DOCSLIB.ORG

OEDIPUS at COLONUS Jon Hesk the Action of Oedipus at Colonus

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
OEDIPUS at COLONUS Jon Hesk the Action of Oedipus at Colonus OEDIPUS AT COLONUS Jon Hesk The action of Oedipus at Colonus begins with the arrival of Oedipus and his daughter Antigone at (what they guess to be) a sacred grove. They sit down to rest on a rock within its boundaries (1–20). This frail, destitute, and blind old man has clearly been relying on the support of his daughter for some time (22). We later learn that he was exiled from Thebes many years ago and has been wandering from place to place ever since. Antigone has never left his side. Initially, father and daughter seem to know only that the city they can see in the distance is Athens (24–27). They (and perhaps the audience) are kept in suspense as to their precise location. Then, a local man arrives on the scene to tell them that they must leave the ground they are treading on (36–37), for the grove is sacred to the Eumenides and the entire area belongs to Poseidon (39–40, 53–55). He gestures to a statue—probably visible on- stage—of the horseman-hero who founded this town and gave it his name. (58–63). The man describes Colonus as the ‘bulwark of Athens’ (58). On hearing all this, Oedipus refuses to move. He declares his status as a suppliant and demands that Attica’s king (Theseus) be sent for (38–80). Theseus will receive a great bene t in return for small assistance (72– 74). While the man goes of to fetch the local elders, Oedipus reveals that the grove has momentous signi cance for him. The same oracle which predicted the ‘evils’ of parricide and incest for him also revealed that it was his destiny to end his ‘long-sufering life’ once he had reached a seat in a sanctuary of the Eumenides (84–110). As he prays to these divinities, Oedipus reveals that his death will bring advantage to those who have received him into their territory but will visit ruin upon those who sent him into exile (93–94). The Chorus of Colonan elders now arrive with their entrance song (par- odos). They insist that he move from sacred ground (117–169). Antigone painstakingly guides Oedipus to sit on another rock just outside the sanc- tuary (170–206). This distinctive combination of dialogue and stage action emphasizes the old man’s heavy reliance upon his daughter for advice and physical support. But it also shows that Oedipus’ appointed end will not 168 jon hesk come about easily or immediately.1 Almost as soon as has he sat down exactly where the oracle dictates, he is forced to move from that hallowed location. The Chorus now learn Oedipus’ identity as he reluctantly yields to their questioning (207–224). They are shocked and horri ed to have this notorious parricide and incest in their midst and they demand that he leave (226–236). Antigone makes a moving lyric appeal: they must show pity and recognize that Oedipus’ actions were unwitting and inescapable (237–254). Oedipus argues for his moral innocence and appeals to Athens’ reputation for compassion (258–291). The Chorus concede that they feel pity and they allow Oedipus to wait for Theseus (292–309). Antigone’s sister Ismene arrives from Thebes. Father and daughters em- brace and exchange tender words (327–334). Oedipus expresses his extreme anger at his two sons (Eteocles and Polyneices) for not supporting him. His contrasting appreciation of the manner in which Antigone and Ismene have put his interests before theirs is marked (337–360). Ismene reports that Oedipus’ sons are no longer content for Creon to rule Thebes and are quarrelling over the throne (361–420). Eteocles has driven his older brother into exile. Polyneices has acquired an alliance with Argos and plans to take control of the Theban throne by force of arms. Furthermore, the Delphic oracle has pronounced that Oedipus will one day be sought by the Theban people ‘in death and in life for their preservation’s sake’ (390). In order to succeed in the coming war, Eteocles and Creon must settle Oedipus close to them and show due care and reverence to his tomb when he dies. Ismene warns that Creon will soon be on his way to persuade Oedipus away from Athens. Creon wants to control Oedipus’ movements and give due oferings to Oedipus’ tomb without incurring the pollution of having this parricide on Theban soil (402, 407). As with Philoctetes and Ajax, the question of who gets to control the protagonist’s physical body is of central importance.2 When he learns that his sons were aware of these new oracles, Oedipus is furious. He curses his sons in the strongest terms and refuses to assist either of them (421–460). They did nothing to prevent his unwanted exile and in preference to their father, they chose ‘thrones and sceptres and to be ruler over the land’ (448–449). He calls upon the Chorus to aid the Eumenides in giving him protection in return for acquiring him as Athens’ saviour (459– 460). On the advice of the Chorus, Oedipus agrees to make ritual atonement to the Eumenides for trespassing upon their sacred ground. These rites 1 See Budelmann (2000b). 2 Hall (2010) 324..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Research Chronicler ISSN-2347-503X International Multidisciplinary Research Journal
    www.rersearch-chronicler.com Research Chronicler ISSN-2347-503X International Multidisciplinary Research journal Oedipus Rex in English and Arabic Drama: An Analogy Fathia S. Al-Ghoreibi Department of European Languages, King Abdul-Aziz University. Jeddah, Saudi Arabia Abstract The present paper deals with the Oedipal theme as was treated by Sophocles in Oedipus Rex and then imitated first in Oedipus written in collaboration by John Dryden and Nathaniel Lee in English literature, and then in Arabic literature by Tawfiq Al-Hakim in his King Oedipus and Ali Ahmed Bakathir in Oedipus' Tragedy. The study investigates changes made by the three writers in the plot and main characters and in some issues and dramatic elements of the tragedy. These changes are introduced by the playwrights to make their versions acceptable to their contemporary audiences. The purposes of the three writers are considered to see how far they have succeeded in fulfilling them. Key Words: Greek myth, Arabic drama, adaptation, social and political criticism Most of the men of letters who treated or suffering greatly. In trying to find the rather wrote on the Oedipus myth were cause of their misery, the citizens come to under the impact, to varying extents, of King Oedipus as suppliants to urge him Sophocles' masterpiece, Oedipus Rex. The deliver their town. The oracle brought present study will shed light on points of from Delphi is essentially the same with congruence and differences in Sophocles' the four playwrights. In Oedipus Rex, tragedy on the one hand, and Dryden' Creon reveals Phoebus' order to wreak Oedipus, Al-Hakim's King Oedipus and vengeance on Laius' murderer so as to put Bakathir's Oedipus' Tragedy on the other.
    [Show full text]
  • Jocasta and the Sin of Thebes Bernadette Waterman Ward
    Jocasta and the Sin of Thebes Bernadette Waterman Ward ABSTRACT: The tragic victim of Oedipus the King is not Oedipus, who after his sufferings shall be raised to divinity; it is his mother Jocasta. She attempted the death by her torture of her own son. When she discovers that he has survived and is her husband, she seeks even to continue her mother-son incest so as to conceal her misdeeds. Cowardly silence among the citizens of doomed Thebes seals their collusion in evil. An examina- tion of the culture of the fatal city can bring the play more vitally into the world that our students actually inhabit, and serve as a warning against the moral collapse that encourages the killing of children. EDIPUS THE KING, the most famous drama of Sophocles, invites many approaches in the classroom. One can delve into such Oquestions as the proper limits of human knowledge, the relation of fate and freewill, responsibility for inadvertent crime, the proper understanding of piety and the power of the gods, and the relation of kingship and self-sacrifice. One can address hubris – pride, overreaching – and hamartia – the mistake or tragic flaw. One can trace dramatic irony in the images of vision and deliberate blindness, or perhaps, with Freud leering in the background, contemplate sexual taboos. Many scholars investigate the guilt of Oedipus, but rarely does the focus shift from the polluted scapegoat to the deep corruption in the scapegoating city of Thebes. The Thebans cast out Oedipus as impure, but in fact they cause their own destruction. By considering the fate of the city, rather than that of Oedipus, our students can make this play vital in the world that we actually inhabit.
    [Show full text]
  • Stravinsky Oedipus
    London Symphony Orchestra LSO Live LSO Live captures exceptional performances from the finest musicians using the latest high-density recording technology. The result? Sensational sound quality and definitive interpretations combined with the energy and emotion that you can only experience live in the concert hall. LSO Live lets everyone, everywhere, feel the excitement in the world’s greatest music. For more information visit lso.co.uk LSO Live témoigne de concerts d’exception, donnés par les musiciens les plus remarquables et restitués grâce aux techniques les plus modernes de Stravinsky l’enregistrement haute-définition. La qualité sonore impressionnante entourant ces interprétations d’anthologie se double de l’énergie et de l’émotion que seuls les concerts en direct peuvent offrit. LSO Live permet à chacun, en toute Oedipus Rex circonstance, de vivre cette passion intense au travers des plus grandes oeuvres du répertoire. Pour plus d’informations, rendez vous sur le site lso.co.uk Apollon musagète LSO Live fängt unter Einsatz der neuesten High-Density Aufnahmetechnik außerordentliche Darbietungen der besten Musiker ein. Das Ergebnis? Sir John Eliot Gardiner Sensationelle Klangqualität und maßgebliche Interpretationen, gepaart mit der Energie und Gefühlstiefe, die man nur live im Konzertsaal erleben kann. LSO Live lässt jedermann an der aufregendsten, herrlichsten Musik dieser Welt teilhaben. Wenn Sie mehr erfahren möchten, schauen Sie bei uns Jennifer Johnston herein: lso.co.uk Stuart Skelton Gidon Saks Fanny Ardant LSO0751 Monteverdi Choir London Symphony Orchestra Igor Stravinsky (1882–1971) Igor Stravinsky (1882–1971) The music is linked by a Speaker, who pretends to explain Oedipus Rex: an opera-oratorio in two acts the plot in the language of the audience, though in fact Oedipus Rex (1927, rev 1948) (1927, rev 1948) Cocteau’s text obscures nearly as much as it clarifies.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Oedipus
    The Story of Oedipus There are many versions of this tragedy, dating from the 5th century BC. This one is ©Jason Buckley 2010, www.thephilosophyman.com The story is set in Ancient Greece Laius & Jocasta were the King and Queen of Thebes Laius & Jocasta, They had a son, which would Thebes normally be a time for great rejoicing. Laius & Jocasta, A son! ...but the king had visited Thebes the Oracle, a priestess who made a terrible prophecy. Laius & Jocasta, A son! The prophecy Thebes of the Oracle “The boy will grow up to kill his father and marry his mother!” “He will kill his father and marry Laius & his mother.” Jocasta, A son! Oracle Thebes So the king had a metal pin hammered through the feet of his own child. He will kill his father and marry Laius & his mother. Jocasta, A son! Oracle Thebes Then he gave the boy to a shepherd. He told the shepherd to A metal pin take him up into the through his mountains and leave him feet to die. He will kill his father and marry Laius & his mother. Jocasta, A son! Oracle Thebes But the shepherd took pity on the boy. He gave him to another shepherd, from A metal pin Corinth on the through his other side of feet the mountains. He will kill his father and marry Laius & his mother. Jocasta, A son! Oracle Thebes Who gave him to the King of Corinth, who was childless. A metal pin through his feet The king named the boy “Oedipus” which means “club foot”.
    [Show full text]
  • The Story of Oedipus: Prequel to Antigone
    The Story of Oedipus: Prequel to Antigone • LAIUS is left an orphaned minor by his father Labdacus • AMPHION AND ZETHUS rule Thebes (Build the Cadmeia) and exile Laius • Laius goes to live in Elis (PISA) with King Pelops (son of Tantalus son of Zeus) • Laius becomes very good friends with young Chrysippus, youngest child of King Pelops • Laius and Chrysippus run away together (or Laius rapes Chrysippus). Pelops curses Laius. • Laius returns to Thebes and becomes King • Laius marries his cousin Jocasta, but they are childless • Laius goes to Delphi and intends to ask Apollo's advice; Apollo announces that Laius will have a child who will kill him • Laius and Jocasta have a baby son (Oedipus) whom they plan to kill. The royal shepherd is ordered to dispose of the child on Mt. Cithaeron. Instead he gives Oedipus to the royal Corinthian shepherd. • The Royal Corinthian Shepherd takes the child back to the childless king and queen of Corinth (Polybus and Merope), who adopt him. • At about the age of 18, at a dinner party, one of Oedipus' friends makes a rude remark about his not being a real Corinthian but only adopted. Oedipus is shocked and shamed, and goes off to Delphi to ask Apollo about the truth. • Apollo tells Oedipus he is doomed to kill his father and sleep with his mother. • Oedipus unknowingly kills his father Laius (within hours, at The Three Ways) • Oedipus kills the SPHINX on the way from the Three Ways to Thebes • Oedipus is received at Thebes as a national hero, and invited to marry the recently widowed queen Jocasta.
    [Show full text]
  • Polis As Player in Aeschylus' Seven Against Thebes This Paper Will
    Polis as Player in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes This paper will focus on the city in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes and argue that the city itself plays a prominent role not just in locating the action, but also in participating in it as a fundamental part of the curse on the house of Laius. Previous scholarship has focused on the absence of Polynices as a speaking character in Aeschylus’ Seven Against Thebes: some have argued that his absence indicates Aeschylus’ sole focus on Eteocles (Kitto 1966, 47), even denying any rightful claim to dike on Polynices’ part (cf. Gagarin 1976, 122 n. 11). The implication of this stance is that Eteocles’ death is predicated solely on Oedipus’ curse on his sons (785-787) and is not caused by any wrongful action on his part. Contrary to this view, I will argue that Eteocles’ death is caused by his mistreatment of the city, and I will suggest that this type of mistreatment is the driving force behind the curse on the family. Aeschylus’ emphasis on intergenerational misfortune is well-known as the basis on which his trilogies are built, and scholarly attention has revolved around human action and interaction as the manifestations of intergenerational conflict. I will argue that, in addition to the human players, the city of Thebes must also be understood as an active participant in and focal point of this intergenerational narrative. This paper will explore the various personifications of the city, first as mother and caretaker in Eteocles’ opening speech (10-15), and later more general ones that speak of the city as one entity (793, 803, 900) comprising its physical structures (795, 901).
    [Show full text]
  • Azamora;Antigone Pwrpt.Key
    Antigone Character Political Views: Differences and Similarities Amy Zamora Battle of Eteocles and Polynices • When Oedipus realizes he fathered his children with his mother, he curses his sons. • Once Oedipus banishes himself, his two sons vow to rule together by taking turns. • After the first year, brother Eteocles rules and then refuses to give up his power and will not share with Polynices. • To gain the throne, Polynices needs to gather an army to fight off his brother. • Polynices gathers an army from Argos because the Theban army was loyal to his brother. • His Argive army attempts to enter the gates to Thebes and fails. • In combat, Eteocles and Polynices kill each other with swords. • Eteocles is given a proper burial. Polynices, however, is not. Creon • The battle positions of each of the son’s determined Creon’s political view. • Polynices’ action where he gathered an army from Argos to fight Eteocles’ Theban army caused him to believe Polynices was a traitor. • This opinion created his decision to give Eteocles a proper burial (he worked for Thebes) and to prevent Polynices from having a proper burial (went against Thebes). • “Polynices, who broke his exile to come back with fire and sword against his native city... whose idea it was to spill the blood of his blood... is to have no burial”. (Sophocles. pg 193) ๏ His political view of Polynices clashed with Antigone’s. Antigone believed Polynices deserved a proper burial because of her promise to her father and the fact that it was her Theban born right while Creon believed Polynices did not deserve one due to his use of the Argive army to fight Eteocles and the Theban army.
    [Show full text]
  • The Riace Bronzes. Recent Research and New Scientific Knowledge
    Искусство Древнего мира 67 УДК: 7.032(38) ББК: 85.13 А43 DOI: 10.18688/aa199-1-6 D. Castrizio The Riace Bronzes. Recent Research and New Scientific Knowledge The two Riace Bronzes, now in the Archaeological Museum of Reggio Calabria (Italy), are almost intact, perfect in their heroic nudity. By comparing their proportions and their pose, we can certainly accept that the two statues resemble each other and that no other statue or painting resembles any one of them. The artist deliberately wanted to make the two heroes resemble each other. The Bronzes form a statuary group of unitary conception [11]. First, I would like to summarize the scientific data concerning the two statues: • the dating: mid-5th century B.C. [1]; • the analysis of the the clay cores, carried out in Rome and in Glasgow, shows that the two statues were made in Argos, in the Peloponnese, in the same period [10]; • the non-Attic style [5; 7]; • the long exposure to the public [8]; • the statues were brought to Rome after a looting of Argos [8]; • they were restored in Rome, during the Augustan period [8]; • after the restoration, the Bronzes appeared glossy black [3]. In Statue A, the Augustan restoration concerned the helmet and the shield. In Statue B, after making a cast, a new right arm and the left forearm were fused and assembled. Similar operations of restoration, with the casting and fusion of new pieces, are known in Rome for two other very important Greek bronze statues: the horse and the bull found in the archaeo- logical excavations of Vicolo delle Terme (now in the Museo dei Conservatori, in Rome) [9].
    [Show full text]
  • Seven Against Thebes [PDF]
    AESCHYLUS SEVEN AGAINST THEBES Translated by Ian Johnston Vancouver Island University, Nanaimo, BC, Canada 2012 [Reformatted 2019] This document may be downloaded for personal use. Teachers may distribute it to their students, in whole or in part, in electronic or printed form, without permission and without charge. Performing artists may use the text for public performances and may edit or adapt it to suit their purposes. However, all commercial publication of any part of this translation is prohibited without the permission of the translator. For information please contact Ian Johnston. TRANSLATOR’S NOTE In the following text, the numbers without brackets refer to the English text, and those in square brackets refer to the Greek text. Indented partial lines in the English text are included with the line above in the reckoning. Stage directions and endnotes have been provided by the translator. In this translation, possessives of names ending in -s are usually indicated in the common way (that is, by adding -’s (e.g. Zeus and Zeus’s). This convention adds a syllable to the spoken word (the sound -iz). Sometimes, for metrical reasons, this English text indicates such possession in an alternate manner, with a simple apostrophe. This form of the possessive does not add an extra syllable to the spoken name (e.g., Hermes and Hermes’ are both two-syllable words). BACKGROUND NOTE Aeschylus (c.525 BC to c.456 BC) was one of the three great Greek tragic dramatists whose works have survived. Of his many plays, seven still remain. Aeschylus may have fought against the Persians at Marathon (490 BC), and he did so again at Salamis (480 BC).
    [Show full text]
  • Alexander Nevile's Translation of Seneca's "Oedipus" Author(S): Evelyn M
    Alexander Nevile's Translation of Seneca's "Oedipus" Author(s): Evelyn M. Spearing Source: The Modern Language Review, Vol. 15, No. 4 (Oct., 1920), pp. 359-363 Published by: Modern Humanities Research Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3714613 Accessed: 14-08-2017 03:51 UTC JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected]. Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at http://about.jstor.org/terms Modern Humanities Research Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Modern Language Review This content downloaded from 149.164.224.49 on Mon, 14 Aug 2017 03:51:14 UTC All use subject to http://about.jstor.org/terms ALEXANDER NEVlLE'S TRANSLATION OF SENECA'S 'OEDIPUS.' THE Elizabethan translations of Seneca's tragedies are generally admitted to be poor productions, though they are worthy of study in view of their influence on the development of the drama. Of the ten plays included in the collected edition of Seneca his Tenne Tragedies, published in 1581, the translation of the Oedipus by Alexander Nevile has received the most praise, on account of the supposed youth of the translator. According to the title and dedicatory epistle the play was ' Englished' in '.the yeare of our Lord MDLX' when Nevile was in his sixteenth year.
    [Show full text]
  • UNIVERSITY of CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE the Motif of Fate In
    UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA RIVERSIDE The Motif of Fate in Homeric Epics and Oedipus Tyrannus A Dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Comparative Literature by Chun Liu August 2010 Dissertation Committee: Dr. Lisa Raphals, Chairperson Dr. Thomas Scanlon Dr. David Glidden The Dissertation of Chun Liu is approved: Committee Chairperson University of California, Riverside Acknowledgements I would like to express my deepest appreciation to my committee chair, Professor Lisa Raphals, whose guidance and support have been crucial to the completion of this dissertation. While the academic help she has offered me during the dissertation writing is invaluable, her excellent expertise in the field and indefatigable enthusiasm for her study set me a lifetime example. I would like to thank my committee members, Professor Thomas Scanlon and Professor David Glidden, who illuminated me not only in the writing and revision of the present work, but also in possible future projects. I benefited greatly from the many course-works and talks with Professor Scanlon. A special thank to Professor Glidden, for his kindness and patience, and for his philosophical perspective that broadened my scope. In addition, a thank you to Professor Wendy Raschke and Professor Benjamin King. For the past years they gave me solid trainings in the languages, read my proposals and gave many useful suggestions. I would also like to thank my parents and my friends in China who have always stood by me and cheered me up during the writing of this dissertation. iii ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION The Motif of Fate in Homeric Epics and Oedipus Tyrannus by Chun Liu Doctor of Philosophy, Graduate Program in Comparative Literature University of California, Riverside, August 2010 Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Apollo and His Purpose in Sophocles' Oedipus Tyrannus
    APOLLO AND HIS PURPOSE IN SOPHOCLES’ OEDIPUS TYRANNUS Stuart Lawrence Abstract Apollo actively intervenes in the fulfilment of Oedipus’ destiny through oracles and immanently in the onstage action. Rather than to punish him for any offence, the god’s purpose appears to be to impress upon Oedipus his existential insignificance. In the context of an ordered but absurd universe, Sophocles emphasises the paradox of the moral greatness of a man whose ‘official’ existential value is less than zero. With the partial exception of Athena in the Ajax, Sophocles’ gods are largely inscruta‐ ble. In no play is this inscrutability more problematical than in the Tyrannus, and the resulting difficulties for the interpreter are well stated by R. Parker (1999), who warns us about drawing inferences where the poet is silent. Sensitive critics have always been struck by these silences of Sophocles’ text, of which the most famous is doubtless the apparent silence in Oedipus Tyrannus about the ulti‐ mate motivation for the destiny prophesied for Laius and Oedipus. In a sense the cen‐ tral problem for any study of Sophocles’ presentation of the divine is that of respond‐ ing to these silences: at all events, it is at this point that the paths of even the best critics diverge. Does Sophocles leave the divine will unexplained because to reason about it would be a distraction from the true human centre of the plays? Or is the point rather the ultimate incomprehensibility to mortals of the divine world? And if so, if the ways of the gods are incomprehensible, is that because those ways are good, but human comprehension weak? Or because mortals seek justice where none is to be found?1 Apollo never appears in person in the Tyrannus, though he declares his condition for the salvation of Thebes in the oracle that requires the discovery of Laius’ killer while he predicts the parricide in the original oracle to Laius and both the parricide and the incest in the later oracle given to Oedipus.
    [Show full text]