<<

Dan Med Bul ϧϩ/Ϫ August ϤϢϣϢ DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN ϣ

Linear correlation between dose and concentration in withdrawal patients

Karen Tangmose1, Mogens Kai Nielsen1, Peter Allerup2 & Jakob Ulrichsen1

ABSTRACT definite conclusions about the relative effectiveness and ORIGINAL ARTICLE INTRODUCTION: are potent drugs for treat- safety of against other alcohol with- 1) Psychiatric Centre ment of alcohol withdrawal symptoms, but they entail a risk drawal drugs [5]. Although barbiturates have never been Gentofte, Copenhagen of over-dosage and respiratory depression. The purpose of tested against placebo in randomized trials, barbital was University Hospital, the present study was to investigate the correlation shown to be more efficient than in the Denmark between phenobarbital dose and phenobarbital blood treatment of delirium tremens [6]. A major concern in 2) The Danish concentration in patients withdrawing from long-term University of relation to the use of barbiturates, including phenobar- Education, Copen- alcohol intoxication. bital, is that these drugs supposedly carry a risk of fatal hagen, Denmark MATERIAL AND METHODS: A total of 497 patients who were intoxication by causing respiratory depression. In hospitalized for treatment of alcohol withdrawal symptoms another retrospective study conducted at our depart- Dan Med Bul during an 18-month period were enrolled in the study. ment, we only detected two cases with respiratory 2010;57(8):A4141 Phenobarbital 200 mg was administered orally every 30 or depression among 73 patients with delirium tremens 60 minutes in response to the observed symptoms. Within who had been treated with phenobarbital during an the first 24 hours after admission, i.e. at 8 AM, blood was 8-year period. No respiratory problems were registered collected for determination of phenobarbital concentration, among 22 patients with pre-delirium in the same study, and the cumulated dose of phenobarbital at the time of the i.e. patients who had physical withdrawal symptoms and blood sampling was registered. RESULTS: The mean cumulated phenobarbital dose at the visual hallucinations, but showed no clouding of con- time of the blood sampling was 877 mg ± 557 mg, while the sciousness [7]. mean plasma phenobarbital concentration was 104 It is a widespread hypothesis among Danish phys- micromol/l ± 62 micromol/l. A statistically significant linear icians and nurses treating alcohol withdrawal patients correlation between phenobarbital dose and concentration that the absorption rate of phenobarbital may decrease was found for both males and females as 83% and 84% of due to slow gastric emptying, leading to a potential risk the variation in drug concentration, respectively, could of over-dosage if large amounts of phenobarbital remain be explained by the phenobarbital dose. We observed in the gastrointestinal system when sedation caused by no serious complications of the phenobarbital treatment the phenobarbital already absorbed sets in. This hypoth- – including respiratory problems or severe sedation. esis is not based on scientific evidence. In fact, the ab- DISCUSSION: The strong linear correlation between sorption rate in non-alcoholic subjects is quite rapid [8] phenobarbital dose and concentration suggests that and there is no reason to assume that alcoholics should absorption of plasma phenobarbital from the gastrointes- differ in this regard. The purpose of the current study tinal system is highly predictable. was to investigate the hypothesis of delayed phenobar- bital absorption by analysing blood samples from pa- tients who were being treated for alcohol withdrawal, Alcohol withdrawal symptoms include tremor, agitation, and by studying the correlation between phenobarbital tachycardia and sweating [1]. Some patients develop dose and its concentration. more severe symptoms such as seizures, visual hallu- cinations or delirium tremens. The latter condition is a MATERIAL AND METHODS true medical emergency which, if left untreated, has a This prospective study comprised patients of either sex mortality rate of 15% [2]. In Denmark, barbiturates have who were admitted to Psychiatric Centre Gentofte, been used for a century in the treatment of alcohol Copenhagen University Hospitals, Denmark, for detoxi- withdrawal symptoms including delirium tremens [3]. fication or treatment for alcohol withdrawal symptoms Worldwide, benzodiazepines are regarded as the drug of in the period from 20 February 2007 to 24 August 2008. choice in alcohol withdrawal [4]. In a recent Cochrane For each patient we registered gender, age and blood review, benzodiazepines were found to be more effi- alcohol concentration upon admittance. Blood samples cient than placebo, whereas it was not possible to draw for measurement of phenobarbital plasma concentra- Ϥ DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN Dan Med Bul ϧϩ/Ϫ August ϤϢϣϢ

tion were collected at 08.00 AM, and the cumulated certified psychiatry specialist who decided whether the phenobarbital doses were registered at the time the patient had Wernicke’s encephalopathy. This syndrome blood samples were taken and upon discharge. The was defined clinically by the presence of any of the phenobarbital concentration in blood was measured by three mentioned symptoms, provided that these could the hospital’s Department of Clinical Chemistry as part not be accounted for by alcohol intoxication or delirium. of their daily routine using Vitros MicroSlide technology Statistical analyses of the relation between pheno- in a fully automated process (Ortho Clinical Diagnostics, barbital concentration (micromol/l) and phenobarbital UK). Since phenobarbital metabolizes slowly with a half- dose (mg) was performed as simple linear regression life of approximately 90 hours [8], patients who had analyses and generalized linear modelling. The latter received phenobarbital 14 days before admission were method was used to compare marginal changes in excluded. Thus, the study did not include those who had plasma phenobarbital (p-phenobarbital) concentration been treated for alcohol withdrawal at the ward within due to differences in the phenobarbital dose between the preceding two weeks of admission. Using the with- males and females. The level of significance was p = 0.05 drawal items tremor, sweating, tachycardia (pulse rate > and all tests were double-sided. Quantitative data are 90), increased psychomotor activity and the patients’ presented as mean ± standard deviation. subjective experience of restlessness, a nurse made a global rating as to whether withdrawal symptoms were RESULTS present or not [9]. In addition, vital signs such as pulse A total of 497 cases, 305 men and 192 women, were rate, blood pressure and temperature were measured admitted for alcohol detoxification or treatment for regularly in patients who were awake. In the sleeping alcohol withdrawal symptoms. The study population patients, a nurse observed if respiration was regular consisted of 241 patients among whom 141 patients without signs of airway obstruction and also recorded were only admitted once while 95 patients were admit- the rate of respiration on an hourly basis. In patients ted twice or more. Two of the 241 patients each de - who were awake, 200 mg phenobarbital was adminis- veloped DT once and were included in the present study tered orally every hour if withdrawal symptoms were as they were not transferred to the closed ward. In present according to the rating of the nurse, i.e. addition, a total of 23 cases (19 patients) who were administration was undertaken if symptoms were either delirious upon admittance or developed DT present. In case of severe symptoms, the same dose of during the withdrawal phase were admitted to a closed phenobarbital was administered every 30 minutes. The ward and not included in the study. The mean age of the need for further phenobarbital was evaluated by the study population was 51.9 ± 9.5 years, the mean physician in charge when 1,200 mg of phenobarbital had duration of hospitalization was 1.34 ± 0.59 day and the been administered and subsequently after administra- mean alcohol concentration at admission was 1.5 ± 1 g/l. tion of each cumulated 600 mg dose, but there was no Some patients did not receive phenobarbital as they did limit to the total cumulated dose of phenobarbital. The not develop withdrawal signs, in some cases blood treatment aimed to terminate the physical withdrawal samples were not collected in the morning on day 2, and symptoms and sleep from which the patient could be some patients were excluded because they had received woken by light or moderate touch. phenobarbital within the previous two weeks. Thus Whereas the present study population was treated correlation between phenobarbital dose and concentra- at the Emergency Ward of the Psychiatric Department, tion was performed on a total of 348 patients (212 men the majority of patients who were admitted with delir- and 136 women). The mean cumulated phenobarbital ium tremens or who developed delirium tremens (DT) dose at the time of blood sampling was 877 mg ± 557 during therapy were transferred to and treated at a and the mean total cumulated phenobarbital dose was closed ward. As blood phenobarbital levels were not sys- 1,005 mg ± 659 mg. The mean p-phenobarbital concen- tematically measured in patients admitted to the closed tration was 104 ± 62 micromol/l. wards, these subjects were not included in the study. Wernicke’s encephalopathy was observed in 49 of The patients were evaluated upon admittance by the 497 cases of the study population and in three of 23 the receiving physician as to the occurrence of signs of DT patients who were admitted to the closed ward. thiamine insufficiency, i.e. cognitive disturbances, ocular No serious complications to the phenobarbital paralysis or gait ataxia. If any of these three symptoms treatment were observed. Thus, we detected no mortal were present, patients were treated with thiamine 400 outcomes, cardiovascular or respiratory insufficiency, mg intravenously three times a day until symptoms and no cases of respiratory depression (defined as rate receded, while patients in whom thiamine insufficiency of respiration below ten per minute), respiratory ob- was not suspected received 200 mg of thiamine intra- struction, apnoea (more than ten seconds between two Phenobarbital. muscularly. On day 2, all patients were evaluated by a subsequent breaths) or pneumonia. In no case did we Dan Med Bul ϧϩ/Ϫ August ϤϢϣϢ DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN ϥ

find it necessary to transfer the patients to a somatic FIGURE 1 department or to the Intensive Care Unit due to pheno- barbital intoxication. Mild side effects such as dizziness, Relation between plasma phenobarbital concentration (micromol/l) and pheno- sedation and cognitive disturbances, which are often barbital dose (mg), including best fitting linear relation and σο% confidence limits encountered in alcoholics treated with phenobarbital at estimated under the linear assumption (μλμ males (A) and λνπ females (B)). our ward, were not systematically monitored in the A present study. Phenobarbital conc. (micromol/l) The relation between phenobarbital concentration 300 (micromol/l) and phenobarbital dose (mg) is shown in Figure 1 for females and males separately as structural gender differences were anticipated. The distinct linear structure can be tested statistic- 200 ally, yielding the following key statistics: R2 = 0.84 (fe- males) and R2 = 0.83 (males). Both associations have sig- nificant slopes (0.092 for females and 0.116 for males). The variation in phenobarbital concentration can there- 100 fore be explained satisfactorily by variation in phenobar- bital dose. Based on the estimated regression models, a simple cross-gender comparison can be undertaken. General- 0 ized linear modelling techniques were used to test the 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 degree of equality of the two slopes, i.e. marginal Phenobarbital dose (mg) changes. The resulting t-value –4.66 indicates that the marginal change of phenobarbital concentration (micro- B mol/l) for each change in the levels of phenobarbital Phenobarbital conc. (micromol/l) dose (mg) is significantly higher for males than for 300 females.

DISCUSSION Among both male and female alcoholics, we found a 200 linear correlation between the cumulated dose and the blood phenobarbital concentration, which explained 83% and 84% of the total variation in phenobarbital concentration, respectively. Thus, the blood phenobar- 100 bital concentration when administered to patients going into alcohol withdrawal is highly predictable for a given dose of the drug [8]. This finding clearly increases the clinical usefulness of phenobarbital, if this drug is 0 chosen, and it allows an aggressive treatment strategy 0 1,000 2,000 3,000 aiming at quickly alleviating the physical withdrawal Phenobarbital dose (mg) symptoms and preventing the development of DT. The strong correlation between the dose and phenobarbital serum concentration fits well with the lack of serious complications during phenobarbital treatment observed seem surprising as the body weight in the general popu- in the current investigation and in previous clinical lation is higher for males than for females, but such studies comprising barbiturates [6, 10, 11]. Altogether, weight differences may not apply to alcoholics. More the current investigation has strongly rejected the importantly, however, the percentage of fatty tissue in hypothesis that phenobarbital may be absorbed slowly relation to total body weight is 30-50% higher in females by alcohol withdrawal patients thereby entailing risk for than in males [12]. As barbiturates are lipid-soluble, the over-dosage and possible respiratory failure. distribution volume in females is likely to be increased Comparison of the slopes of the linear association compared to that of males in an alcoholic population. between phenobarbital dose (mg) and blood phenobar- Approximately 5% (25 out of 522) of the patients bital concentration (micromol/l) of both sexes revealed admitted for alcohol withdrawal treatment in the 1.5- a significantly steeper slope in males. This may at first year study period of the current investigation developed Ϧ DANISH MEDICAL BULLETIN Dan Med Bul ϧϩ/Ϫ August ϤϢϣϢ

DT. Whereas physical alcohol withdrawal symptoms are 3. Møller F. Veronalbehandling af delirium tremens. Ugeskr Læger 1978;71: 1253-9. generally rather easy to treat using benzodiazepines or 4. Mayo-Smith MF. Pharmacological management of alcohol withdrawal. A barbiturates, DT is another and much more serious mat- meta-analysis and evidence-based practice guideline. American Society of Addiction Medicine Working Group on Pharmacological Management of ter. It has been shown that aggressive diazepam treat- Alcohol Withdrawal. JAMA 1997;278:144-51. 5. Ntais C, Pakos E, Kyzas P et al. Benzodiazepines for alcohol withdrawal. ment in DT patients can decrease the frequency of Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2005;(3):CD005063. pneumonia; a serious complication to DT [13]. Further, 6. Kramp P, Rafaelsen OJ. Delirium tremens: a double-blind comparison of diazepam and barbital treatment. Acta Psychiatr Scand 1978;58:174-90. resistance to diazepam treatment is associated with an 7. Lutzen L, Poulsen LM, Ulrichsen J. [Respiratory depression in delirium increased pneumonia rate compared to diazepam-re- tremens patients treated with phenobarbital. A retrospective study]. Ugeskr Læger 2008;170:2018-22. sponders [14]. It seems reasonable to assume that an 8. Viswanathan CT, Booker HE, Welling PG. Bioavailability of oral and intra- aggressive phenobarbital treatment regimen may also muscular phenobarbital. J Clin Pharmacol 1978;18:100-5. 9. Kristensen CB, Rasmussen S, Dahl A et al. The withdrawal syndrome scale decrease the risk of pneumonia. In addition, it is pos- for alcohol and related psychoactive drugs: Total scores as guidelines for sible, at least in theory, to avoid DT in patients in whom treatment with phenobarbital. Nord J Psychiatry 1986;40:139-46. 10. Hasselbalch E, Timm S, Nordentoft M et al. Delirium tremens and physical phenobarbital treatment is started when the patient alcohol withdrawal: A double blind comparison of phenobarbital and barbital treatment. Nord J Psychiatry 1994;48:121-30. only experiences physical withdrawal symptoms. The 11. Flygenring J, Hansen J, Holst B et al. Treatment of alcohol withdrawal present results warrant administration of larger doses symptoms in hospitalized patients. A randomized, double-blind com- parison of (Tegretol) and barbital (Diemal). Acta Psychiatr than those used in the present investigation owing to Scand 1984;69:398-408. the apparently fast absorption. We have therefore 12. Kuk JL, Lee S, Heymsfield SB et al. Waist circumference and abdominal adipose tissue distribution: influence of age and sex. Am J Clin Nutr 2005; changed the treatment protocol at our department so 81:1330-4. that patients with severe withdrawal symptoms now re- 13. Gold JA, Rimal B, Nolan A et al. A strategy of escalating doses of benzo- diazepines and phenobarbital administration reduces the need for ceive 400 mg phenobarbital every half hour as needed mechanical ventilation in delirium tremens. Crit Care Med 2007;35:724- 30. according to the symptoms observed. We have em- 14. Hack JB, Hoffmann RS, Nelson LS. Resistant alcohol withdrawal: does an ployed this new regimen for 12 months, having treated unexpectedly large requirement identify these patients early? J Med Toxicol 2006;2:55-60. more than 300 patients for alcohol withdrawal in this period. The patients are satisfied as their very unpleas- ant withdrawal reactions recede quickly, and we have had no serious complications concerning this treatment regimen. It would be interesting to test under controlled conditions whether our preliminary observations are valid. It should, however, be stressed that the present data from a safe hospital setting cannot be extrapolated to outpatient treatment where intake of alcohol follow- ing phenobarbital administration may have serious con- sequences.

CONCLUSION In conclusion, we found a linear correlation between phenobarbital dose and concentration in patients treated for alcohol withdrawal symptoms. No serious complications were observed. Based on these results, it is justified to increase the aggressiveness of the treat- ment by using higher doses of phenobarbital in the initial treatment phase. This strategy may theoretically reduce the incidence of DT, shorten the delirious reaction in those admitted with DT and reduce the incidence of DT-triggered pneumonia which is a life- threatening condition.

CORRESPONDENCE: Jakob Ulrichsen, Psychiatric Centre Gentofte, Niels Andersens Vej 65, 2900 Hellerup, Denmark. E-mail: [email protected] ACCEPTED: 7 February 2010 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST: None

LITERATURE 1. Guthrie SK. The treatment of alcohol withdrawal. Pharmacotherapy 1989; 9:131-43. 2. Victor M, Adams RD. The effect of alcohol on the nervous system. Res Publ Assoc Res Nerv Ment Dis 1953;32:526-73.