Sivummut II Economic Development Strategy Conference
A SUMMARY REPORT FOR PARTICIPANTS
Rankin Inlet Thursday, March 20 – Sunday, March 23, 2003
Prepared by the Sivummut Economic Development Strategy Steering Committee
Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit:
Though we tend to think of Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit almost exclusively as traditional knowledge, it is more properly defined as, “The Inuit way of doing things: the past, present and future knowledge, experience and values of Inuit Society.”
The First Annual Report of the Inuit Qaujimajatuqanginnut Task Force, August 2002
y e k s u hoto by Kerry McCl P
During his role as a Sivummut II conference panelist, Rankin Inlet Elder Mariano Aupilardjuk displayed tools made by his father. 2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
The Purpose Of This Report ...... 4 Next Steps ...... 5 The Purpose Of The Conference...... 6 Who Was There...... 7 Background ...... 11 The SEDS Working Group...... 12 Welcome And Introduction...... 13 Panels And Breakout Groups...... 14 Summing Up...... 23 Wrap Up ...... 33 How To Get More Information ...... 36
3
THE PURPOSE OF THIS REPORT
This report provides an overview of the Sivummut II Economic Development Conference and summarizes 1. “NAUJAAT CHALLENGE”
“what was said.” CONSULTATIONS
This report is for the use of the delegates who attended the conference, to check that the Sivummut Economic development Conference (SEDS) Steering Committee heard and understood clearly the responses to the Draft 2. PREPARATION OF AN ECONOMIC Framework document that provided the basis for the STRATEGY FRAMEWORK three days of discussion.
This report is not intended to provide a complete record of conference proceedings. Instead, it offers enough 3. SIVUMMUT II CONFERENCE IN information about what was heard at the conference, and RANKIN INLET about how the members of the Steering Committee have interpreted this information, to prompt some reflection by delegates about the principal issues they raised, and whether these issues now will be dealt with adequately in 4. SIVUMMUT II CONFERENCE the forthcoming Sivummut Economic Development SUMMARY REPORT Strategy.
Any delegate with a question or concern about “what was said” at the conference, and its connection to “what was heard” now has the opportunity to read this report, and to 5. DELEGATES’ RESPONSES TO point out to conference organizers where issues appear CONFERENCE REPORT not to have been understood clearly, and where important points were raised in the conference, but may have been omitted in this report.
The diagram on this page illustrates how this Summary 6. SIVUMMUT II WORKING GROUP Report is a fourth step in a series of six leading to the REVIEW publication of the Sivummut Economic Development
Strategy.
The next step (#5) is to gather delegates’ responses to SIVUMMUT ECONOMIC this Report, which will be used by the Steering DEVELOPMENT Committee, and the larger SEDS Working Group, in the STRATEGY preparation of the economic development strategy.
4
NEXT STEPS
MARCH 2003 DRAFT SUMMARY REPORT ON CONFERENCE
APRIL 2003 SUMMARY TO CONFERENCE DELEGATES
MAY 2003 DRAFT STRATEGY TO DELEGATES FOR REVIEW AND COMMENT
MAY 2003 DRAFT STRATEGY TO MEMBERS OF SEDS WORKING GROUP FOR APPROVAL
JUNE 2003 FINAL SIVUMMUT ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY RELEASED FOR PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION
5
THE PURPOSE OF THE CONFERENCE
The Sivummut II Economic Development Conference WORKING TOGETHER was a gathering of people involved in the creation and In addition to providing a review and response to the implementation of economic policy in Nunavut. “Nunavut Sivummut Economic Strategy Draft Framework” The conference brought together representatives from document, the conference brought together economic development organizations across the territory. representatives from all the economic development REVIEWING THE DRAFT organizations in Nunavut for the first time in nearly ten FRAMEWWORK years. The “Sivummut I” conference took place in Rankin Inlet in People at the conference were asked to review the 1994; no similar gathering took place until the Sivummut “Nunavut Sivummut Economic Strategy Draft Framework” II conference in Rankin Inlet in March 2003. document, which is being used to prepare the economic development strategy for Nunavut. The Sivummut Economic Development Strategy Working Group worked together for three months to develop a Panelists were invited to speak about the principal shared understanding on the direction for economic themes from the economic development strategy policy in Nunavut. framework document and to respond to questions from conference delegates. The conference provided an opportunity to extend this collaboration and to include more people from across the Breakout sessions provided conference delegates with an territory in the process. opportunity to discuss the economic development strategy themes in detail and in small groups. The main THE CONFERENCE IN CONTEXT points from these discussions were recorded on flip chart Typically, an economic policy conference takes place as pages, which were used by the speakers from each the final stage of the development of an economic group to report back to all conference delegates. strategy. It is a singular event, not to be repeated in the Following the breakout session group reports, conference process, and provides the last opportunity for people to delegates again had the opportunity to ask questions and have their say about the direction and the content of the to raise issues they believed should be addressed in the economic strategy. economic development strategy, but which, in their view, The Sivummut process is different. This conference was had not received sufficient attention in the framework one step along a continuing journey toward making a document. better life for all Nunavummiut. It has been a report on In this way, the framework for the Sivummut Economic progress on the development of an appropriate economic Development Strategy was reviewed in detail. In this policy for Nunavut. As the collaboration between report, we point out where the conference accepted the Nunavut’s economic development agencies continues, it framework approach and where weaknesses in the is anticipated that the Sivummut conference will be framework documents were identified. reconvened.
6
WHO WAS THERE
Melanie Abbott Stanley Anablak Clare Basler Conference Co-ordination Nunavut Association of Kitikmeot Corporation Iqaluit Municipalities Cambridge Bay Kugluktuk Willie Adams Beth Beattie Senator Caroline Anawak Nunavut Arts & Crafts Association Ottawa Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Iqaluit Iqaluit Joseph Aggark Bea Bernhardt Nunavut Employees Union Jack Anawak Private Business Person Arviat Member of the Legislative Kugluktuk Assembly David Akeeagok Rankin Inlet Gordon Bligh Executive & Intergovernmental Nunavut Economic Developers Affairs Tommy Anguttitauraq Association Iqaluit Translation and Interpretation Cambridge Bay Rankin Inlet Olayuk Akesuk Michael Bloor ivu Minister of Sustainable Malachi Arreak Indian and Northern Affairs Development Qikiqtaaluk Corporation Canada Iqaluit and Cape Dorset Iqaluit Iqaluit
Peter Akkigungak Wilf Atwood George Bohlender Kitikmeot Inuit Association Indian and Northern Affairs Kitikmeot Economic Development Gjoa Haven Canada Commission Iqaluit Cambridge Bay David Akoak Nunavut Housing Corporation Manasie Audlakiak Carey Bonnell Arviat Baffin Fisheries Coalition GN Sustainable Development Qikiqtarjuaq Iqaluit Joanasie Akumalik Conference Facilitation Larry Audlaluk Betty Brewster Arctic Bay Kakivak Association Translation and Interpretation Iqaluit Iqaluit David Alagalak Kivalliq Wildlife Board Jane Aupaluktuq Jason Brown Arviat GN Human Resources Nunavut Arctic College Rankin Inlet Arviat Joavee Alivaktak Nunavut Tourism Mariano Aupilardjuk Doug Brubacher Pangnirtung Elder SEDS Co-ordination Rankin Inlet Ottawa William Amagoalik Technician Dave Baker Louis Bruce Iqaluit Indian and Northern Affairs Private Business Person Canada Coral Harbour Ottawa
7
Page Burt Leonie Duffy Joannie Ikkidluak Conference Co-ordination Private Business Person Qikiqtani Wildlife Board Yellowknife Coral Harbour Kimmirut
Alastair Campbell Okalik Eegeesiak Jim Stevens Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Nunavut Trust GN Community Government & Iqaluit Iqaluit Transportation Rankin Inlet Alex Campbell James Eetoolook GN Sustainable Development Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Nataniel Joanasie Iqaluit Cambridge Bay Nunavut Arctic College Rankin Inlet Andy Campbell Agnes Egotak Nunavut Trust Kitikmeot Hunters and Trappers Brock Junkin Ottawa Association GN Sustainable Development Cambridge Bay Rankin Inlet Nancy Campbell Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Joe Enook Philip Kadlun Iqaluit Nunasi Corporation Kitikmeot Hunters and Trappers Iqaluit Association Graeme Clinton Cambridge Bay SEDS Co-ordination Edwin Evo Yellowknife Kivalliq Partners in Development Paul Kaludjak Baker Lake Vice-president, Nunavut Udloriak Comeau Tunngavik Incorporated Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Darren Flynn Rankin Inlet Iqaluit GN Community Government & Transportation Madeline Kaludjak Robert Connelly Rankin Inlet Kivalliq Inuit Association GN Sustainable Development Rankin Inlet Rankin Inlet Terry Forth Indian and Northern Affairs Louis Kamookak Barry Cornthwaite Canada Nunavut Development GN Public Works & Services Iqaluit Corporation Iqaluit Gjoa Haven John Hickes Glenn Cousins Conference Facilitation Natsiq Kango Chamber of Commerce Rankin Inlet Private Business Person Iqaluit Iqaluit Martha Hickes Tagak Curley Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Joshua Kango Guest Speaker Rankin Inlet Qikiqtani Inuit Association Rankin Inlet Iqaluit Mike Hine Bernadette Dean Nunavut Chamber of Mines Peter Keenainak Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Iqaluit Qikiqtaaluk Corporation Rankin Inlet Iqaluit Ruth Hoddinott Bert Dean Atuqtuarvik Corporation Rosemary Keenainak Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Rankin Inlet GN Sustainable Development Rankin Inlet Iqaluit Hagar Idlout-Sudlovenick Andrea Duffy Indian and Northern Affairs Cheri Kemp-Kinnear Nunavut Arts & Crafts Association Canada Nunavut Economic Developers Rankin Inlet Iqaluit Association Iqaluit
8
Luccasie Kittosuk Pat Lyall Eva Onalik Private Business Person Nunasi Corporation Nunavut Tourism Sanikiluaq Taloyoak Iqaluit
Lisa Komaksiutiksak Gord MacKay Janet Onalik Nunavut Economic Developers GN Sustainable Development Nunavut Literacy Council Association Iqaluit Rankin Inlet Rankin Inlet Shawn Maley Joe Otokiak Laura Kowmuk GN Community Government & Translation and Interpretation Kivalliq Partners in Development Transportation Rankin Inlet Rankin Inlet Rankin Inlet Richard Paton Dan Kreuger Paul Malliki Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Nunavut Tourism Nunavut Arts & Crafts Association Iqaluit Iqaluit Repulse Bay John Patterk David Kritterlik Kerry McCluskey Translation and Interpretation Mayor GN Sustainable Development Rankin Inlet Whale Cove Iqaluit Poasie Peter Kevin Kullualik Ed McKenna Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Technician GN Sustainable Development Iqaluit Iqaluit Iqaluit Catherine Pilakapsi Jean Kusugak Glenn McLean Elder Translation and Interpretation Member of the Legislative Rankin Inlet Rankin Inlet Assembly Baker Lake Joanna Quassa Johnny Kusugak GN Culture, Language, Elders & Kivalliq Inuit Association Brian McLeod Youth Rankin Inlet Kakivak Association Igloolik Iqaluit Jose Kusugak Ian Rose Inuit Tapiriit Kanatami Raymond Mercer GN Education Ottawa Chamber of Commerce Iqaluit Rankin Inlet John Lamb Peter Rose Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Rita Mike Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Iqaluit Kakivak Association Rankin Inlet Iqaluit Greg Logan Tongola Sandy Nunavut Tourism Gordon Miles Kivalliq Inuit Association Iqaluit Kakivak Association Rankin Inlet Iqaluit Bob Long Rick Selleck Chamber of Commerce Dave Monteith Senate Office Iqaluit GN Sustainable Development Ottawa Iqaluit Dennis Lyall Mike Shouldice Kitikmeot Inuit Association Raymond Ningocheak Nunavut Arctic College Taloyoak Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Rankin Inlet Rankin Inlet Charlie Lyall Abraham Tagalik Kitikmeot Corporation Gabriel Nirlungayuk GN Health & Social Services Cambridge Bay Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Iqaluit Rankin Inlet
9
Emily Tagoona Lootie Thomasie Theresie Tungilik GN Justice Nunavut Association of GN Sustainable Development Rankin Inlet Municipalities Rankin Inlet Qikiqtarjuaq Patrick Tagoona Stephen Vail Conference Facilitation Mark Thompson Conference Board of Canada Baker Lake GN Community Government & Ottawa Transportation Peter Taptuna Iqaluit Tracy Wallace Kitikmeot Corporation Youth Representative Kugluktuk Manitok Thompson Rankin Inlet Minister of Community Annie Tattuinee Government & Transportation Jerry Ward Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Iqaluit and Rankin Inlet Baffin Fisheries Coalition Rankin Inlet St. John's Ken Toner Alex Taylor Atuqtuarvik Corporation Doug Workman Nunavut Federal Council Rankin Inlet Nunavut Employees Union Iqaluit Iqaluit David Toolooktook Margaret Taylor Arctic Cooperatives Limited Robin Wyllie GN Community Government & Baker Lake Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Transportation Cambridge Bay Rankin Inlet Victor Tootoo GN Finance Nick Xenos Lorraine Thomas Iqaluit Infrastructure Canada Nunavut Broadband Development Ottawa Corporation Cathy Towtongie Iqaluit President, Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Philip Tagoona Iqaluit Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Iqaluit
ey k s u hoto by Kerry McCl P
Conference delegates mixed business with pleasure while in Rankin Inlet. That’s Senator Willie Adams at the feast with Rick Selleck.
10
BACKGROUND
The necessity for a Sivummut II Economic Development Board, would be to bring together all the players in the Strategy Conference, involving the widest cross section Nunavut economy to join in a collaborative approach to of Nunavut’s economic development agencies, was economic development. obvious for some time. In September of 2001, the Government of Nunavut held a The first Sivummut economic development strategy Cabinet retreat in Repulse Bay (Naujaat) to consider conference took place in Rankin Inlet in October 1994. A Nunavut’s economy and priorities for economic great deal has taken place since that time to improve development. Following the retreat, Premier Paul Okalik economic policy, but until Sivummut II, the opportunity to announced that the government would begin work on an bring together key players had not appeared. economic strategy.
Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated, the Government of A framework document for discussions on the Nunavut, the Regional Inuit Organizations and the development of an economic strategy was prepared and Nunavut Association of Municipalities began working launched formally by the Premier and Minister Akesuk in together on economic policy in 1999, in the context of the April 2002. Called “The Naujaat Challenge: Working newly formed Nunavut Economic Forum. At that time, Together,” the document became the subject for a series most people believed the Government of Canada was of consultation meetings with communities, the private about to announce an Economic Development sector organizations and Inuit Organizations. It also Agreement (EDA) for Nunavut. A number of important formed the basis of two major conferences, the areas for economic development were identified. “Economic Conference for Communities,” June 12-14, 2002, in Rankin Inlet and the “Piliriaksaliuqatigiikniq By February 2000 however, it was clear the federal Conference,” in Gjoa Haven, June 16-19, 2002. government would not fund an EDA for Nunavut at this time. Still, an EDA for Nunavut remains a priority of the In October 2002, NTI proposed to the Government of SEDS group. The Nunavut Economic Forum developed a Nunavut that with the completion of consultations, the broader economic strategy for the territory. preparation of the economic development strategy move forward in a collaborative process with Inuit The first step was to undertake a study of the Nunavut Organizations, communities, the private sector and the economy and its prospects. A contract was awarded to federal government. The GN accepted this proposal and the Conference Board of Canada and in May 2001, they agreed to co-sponsor, with NTI and the federal published The Nunavut Economic Outlook. government, the Sivummut II Economic Development The Outlook provided the first formal description and Strategy Conference. analysis of the economy of the new territory. It included The Sivummut Economic Development Strategy Working an optimistic forecast of Nunavut’s economic prospects in Group began preparations on a final draft strategy before 20 years time if steps are taken today to provide a Christmas 2002. foundation for future economic growth. One of the most important of these steps, according to the Conference
11
THE SIVUMMUT II ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT STRATEGY (SEDS) WORKING GROUP
GOVERNMENT OF NUNAVUT (CO- NUNAVUT TUNNGAVIK INC. (CO- CHAIR)* CHAIR)* INDIAN AND NORTHERN AFFAIRS NUNAVUT RESEARCH INSTITUTE CANADA* QULLIIT NUNAVUT STATUS OF NUNAVUT FEDERAL COUNCIL WOMEN COUNCIL NUNAVUT ARCTIC COLLEGE* REGIONAL INUIT ORGANIZATIONS* NUNAVUT ASSOCIATION OF REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT MUNICIPALITIES* CORPORATIONS NUNAVUT CHAMBERS OF COMMUNITY ECONOMIC COMMERCE* DEVELOPMENT ORGANIZATIONS* NUNAVUT EMPLOYEES UNION ATUQTUARVIK CORPORATION ARCTIC CO-OPERATIVES LIMITED*
* SEDS Steering Committee member
12
WELCOME AND INTRODUCTION
THURSDAY EVENING: The conference began on Thursday evening with a reception at the Siniktarvik Hotel.
Joanasie Akumalik, a conference facilitator, launched the proceedings. Joanasie introduced his fellow-facilitators, John Hickes and Patrick Tagoona.
Laura Kowmuk, representing the Hamlet of Rankin Inlet, welcomed delegates to her community.
Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated Vice-President Paul Kaludjak introduced the Sivummut II process.
Sustainable Development Minister Olayuk Akesuk spoke about the Government of Nunavut’s role in preparing an economic development strategy for Nunavut.
Nunavut Tunngavik President Cathy Towtongie spoke about the barriers that prevent Inuit from participating fully in the territorial economy.
Keynote speaker Tagak Curley, who organized the “Sivummut I” conference, challenged the government and conference delegates to develop a strategy based on Inuit values and way of life.
NTI
of y DSD tes r of y tes r hoto cou P hoto cou P
Nunavut Tunngavik Inc. President Cathy Towtongie and Sustainable Development Minister Olayuk Akesuk hosted the Sivummut II Economic Development Strategy Conference
13
PANELS AND BREAKOUT GROUPS
FRIDAY MORNING: about “What the Strategy Needs To Do.” VALUES AND PRINCIPLES Friday morning’s sessions included a question and answer session with panelists. Conference sessions and breakout groups took place at Maani Ulujuk Ilinniarvik (the high school). Panelists:
Nunavut Tunngavik’s Udloriak Hanson Comeau and Mariano Aupilardjuk, Elder, Rankin Inlet Sustainable Development’s Rosemary Keenainak gave David Kritterlik, Mayor of Whale Cove a presentation on “Nunavut Economy Today.” Tracy Wallace, co-owner, Natsiq Productions, Rankin Nunavut Tunngavik’s John Lamb and Sustainable Inlet Development’s Alex Campbell addressed participants
14
Values and Principles From the panel: Questions and comments to speakers and panelists:
We’re different from the rest of Canada and each of our Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit must be a priority. communities is different and has its own ideas about how Young people have to be a part of our planning process. to grow economically. Too many dollars are leaking to the South. One size fits all doesn’t work any more. There is a demand for workers in many of our communities, Program guidelines must be designed for communities and but people aren’t taking the jobs. respect Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit and local knowledge. Inuit-owned businesses have nowhere to go for support. Risk and entrepreneurship are important, too. We need competition as well as partnership. Tourism was mentioned as having importance to our economy, but there doesn’t seem to be any support. When religion came in, we began to lose our traditions and values – we were empty when we were told not to use our Young people have to be part of our economic plan. customs. Are the values of young people today different from their We know we can benefit from the South, but we need to parents and grandparents? incorporate Inuit values.
We need a foundation for our economic development strategy.
y
McCluske y
Kerr y hoto b P
Interpreter/translator Jeannie Kusugak and her new baby at the conference.
15
FRIDAY MORNING: Panelists: THE LAND James Eetoolook, Nunavut Tunngavik, Cambridge Bay
(See “Draft Framework,” pages 7-9, and Conference David Alagalak, Kivalliq Wildlife Board, Arviat “Workbook,” tab 3) Ed McKenna, Department of Sustainable Development, Iqaluit
Strategic Area One: Land From the panel: Questions and comments to speakers and panelists:
Nunavut has great natural resource development potential. Roads – such as one between Manitoba and the Kivalliq – Inuit selected their lands with this in mind. can help with the development of the mining and tourism industries. Federal policy was designed to assimilate us into Southern society and we have been affected by this policy. I don’t see Inuit working together between the regions. We need to cut those boundaries. The land is an asset that we have in Nunavut, but lack of scientific knowledge prevents us from taking full advantage After the negotiations for the Nunavut Land Claims of it. Agreement were completed, our communities started going down and not going up. Only about 50% of our food now comes from the land. When we negotiate with mining companies to employ Inuit, There is a lack of information about economic development they have to hire from all communities, not just from those – more government support is needed. communities in the region. We are ‘blessed’ with an increase in sealskin process; Inuit-owned businesses need more support. Southerners are ‘blessed’ with million dollar resource development contracts. How do you balance the need for jobs and protection of the environment? Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit can teach us a great deal about how economic development should proceed in Nunavut. Today we have a strong voice in how development will proceed – we can speak up and use the Inuit Impact There are resources for development available all over the Benefit Agreement process. world for people to buy. But here, because of the land and the culture that is based on the land, we have something We must be able to apply Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit, but we that is unique. are struggling with how to do that.
16
FRIDAY AFTERNOON: Panelists: THEME II: PEOPLE Abraham Tagalik, Department of Health and Social Services, Iqaluit (See “Draft Framework,” pages 10-14, and Conference “Workbook,” tabs 4, 5 and 6.) Ian Rose, Department of Education, Iqaluit
Beatrice Bernhardt, Kugluktuk Laura Kowmuk, Kivalliq Partners in Development, Rankin Inlet
People
Topic 1: Education, Training and Employment – principal Topic 2: Physical Infrastructure in Support of Social issues and comments Development and Performance – principal issues and comments
Trades schools in Nunavut – two or three centres. Healthy People=Healthy Communities=Economic Growth.
Long-term stable financial commitment to training by all Housing. levels of government and Inuit organizations (access to Internet access/broadband. Aboriginal funds). Recreational facilities and programs. Remove barriers to access training – accreditation, choice of institutions, funding through Employment Insurance, Inuit cultural facilities. more motivation in college programs. Education and health facilities. Recognize all jobs in communities as important and valued. Establish a technical/trades school in Nunavut. Need for valued and accredited land-based economy Marine infrastructure. training. Inuit cultural school (“folk school”). Include youth in discussions and meetings to expose them to different aspects of Nunavut. Children are losing land- Infrastructure priorities reflect conflicts in the value systems based skills. – local knowledge is not considered sufficiently in policy development. Land claims, business and secretarial courses are needed in high schools.
Training and education for all ages.
Cultural learning/land-based skills – this should be integrated into the school system.
Business, literacy and land-based skills are all needed.
Nunavut needs guidance counselors and mentors.
There needs to be flexibility in certification, including verbal testing, the consideration of equivalencies.
17
FRIDAY EVENING: Glenn McLean explained the role of Standing Committee and concluded with comments on the need to strengthen DINNER, GUEST SPEAKERS AND the role of the private sector in Nunavut’s economy. ENTERTAINMENT Singer, songwriter, and raconteur Charlie Panigoniak of The conference dinner was held at the Siniktarvik Hotel. Rankin Inlet provided the evening’s entertainment. Guest Speaker was Glenn McLean, MLA, Baker Lake, and Chairperson, Standing Committee on Community Empowerment and Sustainable Development.
.
y e k s u hoto by Kerry McCl P
Popular singer and Rankin Inlet resident Charlie Panigoniak (left) and Kitikmeot Corporation President Charlie Lyall entertained the crowd during the Friday evening conference dinner.
18
SATURDAY MORNING: Panelists: THEME III: THE COMMUNITY Andrea Duffy, Nunavut Arts and Crafts Association, ECONOMY Rankin Inlet
(See “Draft Framework,” pages 15-19, and Conference Darryn Flynn, Department of Community Government “Workbook,” tabs 7, 8 and 9.) and Transportation, Rankin Inlet Joannie Ikkidluak, Chair, Qikiqtaaluk Wildlife Board
The Community Economy Topic 1: Linking Community and Sectoral Economies Topic 2: Organizational Development in Communities
Communities must have self-determination and develop Support for small business: insurance, aftercare, services, their own strategies, but these strategies must be linked to training. larger opportunities at the regional and territorial level. Develop regional databases detailing inventories of Establish community priorities and build on community community products and services. strengths. Establish an export development corporation. Implement existing strategies. Establish marketing boards. Communities need more business support and economic More product information on labels: e.g., arts & crafts and development officer training. country foods. Communities face barriers because of their remote Increase access to market information for small businesses location, lack of education, language issues and lack of to use when developing their marketing strategies. access to financing. Support for special event marketing e.g., “2204, Year of the Need more local Inuit involvement in the NNI process and Polar Bear.” make it open and transparent. Increase support for community economic development Identify skill sets in communities. officers – training and enhance community awareness. Government purchases should focus on local business. Packaging for cultural tourism initiatives. Develop advisory boards for support and training. We need to organize our organizations. Recognize and support the land-based economy. Integrate all community plans. There is a problem with government competing with private There is a lack of communication between sectors of the business. economy and communities. Emphasize local arts and crafts. Keep money in communities: credit unions, community Change labour code to make it relevant for Nunavut. development corporations, build consumer awareness of where the dollars are going. Access to capital dollars for businesses to use.
Government support and training for tourism outfitters.
Shipping and transportation subsidies.
19
SATURDAY AFTERNOON: Panelists: THEME IV: THE TERRITORIAL Okalik Eegeesiak, Nunavut Trust, Iqaluit ECONOMY Victor Tootoo, Department of Finance, Iqaluit
(See “Draft Framework,” pages 20-27, and Conference Wilf Attwood, Indian and Northern Affairs Canada, “Workbook,” tabs 10, 11, 12 and 13.) Iqaluit
Ray Mercer, Kivalliq Chamber of Commerce, Rankin Inlet
The Territorial Economy Topic 1: Investment and Infrastructure Topic 2: Allocation of Resources
Community awareness and education about infrastructure Access to infrastructure dollars for local businesses. projects. Elders must participate in the planning of community Give communities the time they need to complete training harvests. before launching infrastructure projects. Put more money into training and education: HTOs for Plan for large projects and related community initiatives, for land-based training; apprenticeships; aftercare for example, the road to Manitoba. business; EDO s; remove red tape; elder participation.
Role of subsidies – must monitor regularly, particularly Where are our youth at this conference? hidden subsidies. Local business needs infrastructure dollars: review policies Where can investment come from? Pension plans, credit (e.g. federal programs are per capita). unions and Aurora fund for Nunavut? Private investors? Devolution: royalties for Nunavut. Address drop out problem, apprenticeships. Lack of focus on vocational training: fisheries, harvesting, Economic Development Agreement with Canada. mining.
Access to transportation. Traditional skills training.
Public/private partnerships needed, but with Inuit majority. Increase focus on literacy issues.
Mining – Nunavut needs its royalties, but going to the Concepts of business and economic development should federal government. be taught earlier in schools (which presently ignore the role of the private sector). Waste management, power generation. How do we employ more Inuit in non-Inuit system of Develop a list of needed infrastructure and prioritize it. government? Poor performance on Article 23 hurts the How do we invest the funds from the NLCA? Nunavummiut economy. should exhaust every opportunity within Nunavut before Public funds should go into facilities for arts & crafts. looking outside. Invest in infrastructure for the fishery; trades training. Set up venture capital. Enhance the NNI strategy “affirmative action with teeth.” Federal transfers – add a cost of living charge – like in transfers fro health care. Invest in tourism marketing and product development.
20
SATURDAY AFTERNOON: SATURDAY NIGHT: MEASURING OUR PROGRESS COMMUNITY FEAST AND SQUARE DANCE (See “Draft Framework,” pages 28-29, and Conference “Workbook,” tab 14.) Singiituq Complex (community hall)
At the end of the working day on Saturday, delegates addressed the question of what information and data is needed to know if the economic development strategy is being effective.
Information gathered in this session is summarized in the next section of this report.
y McCluske y Kerr y hoto b P
CG&T employee Mark Thompson and NTI interpreter/translator Betty Brewster with NTI Vice-President Jamesie Eetoolook at the community feast.
21
y McCluske y Kerr y hoto b P
David Alagalak of the Kivalliq Wildlife Board receives congratulations from Nunasi’s Pat Lyall for winning the airline tickets draw at the community feast. NTI President Cathy Towtongie appears on the left of the stage and NTI Vice-President Paul Kaludjak appears on the right side of the stage.
22
SUMMING UP
SUNDAY AFTERNOON: All regional/territorial economic development agencies must respond to individual community “WHAT’S BEEN HEARD” priorities—that is, one size DOES NOT fit all. On Sunday morning, breakout group facilitators met to Therefore, programs must be designed with a great prepare summaries of each of the themes discussed deal of flexibility to ensure individual communities are during the previous two days: values and principles; the able to take advantage of them in a way that land; people; the community economy; and the territorial addresses their community plan. economy. In conjunction with the importance of community-based What follows is a brief discussion of these themes, programming and decision-making, there was also a highlighting those areas that delegates focused on, and clear message directed toward individual training and ideas that were brought forward in addition to those capacity building. This notion arose from the idea of outlined in the “Nunavut Sivummut Economic Strategy building on personal strengths (similar to building on Draft Framework.” communities’ strengths). For example, if the community is VALUES AND PRINCIPLES rich in artisans, training and education should have some degree of focus on this area. This can happen if we: What Was Heard Recognize and value the knowledge/skill that Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit must play a greater role in individuals already have. shaping Nunavut’s future. It must reach all aspects of our Understand better the aspirations of individuals for Economic Development Strategy. This would include: active pursuits. Stewardship (we are entrusted with the management Give sufficient value to the link between individuals of our land for all generations to come). or families and the land-based (traditional) economy.