Team Players
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Ohio ACTT Promoting Safety and Access Cleveland's Innerbelt Freeway
March 19, 2007 ADDENDUM TO Promoting Safety and Access Cleveland Innerbelt Freeway Publication Number FHWA-IF-06-038-OHIO The following is part of the Structures I (Major Bridges) skill set’s final recommendations and should be included in Section 3.4 at the bottom of page 12. Please add to your copy of the report accordingly. Demolition of Existing Bridge ♦ Demolish the existing single-span bridge, and construct two new shorter-span structures. This will eliminate a significant maintenance liability for ODOT. Utilize the pier in the west embankment of the river (as noted above) to construct a less costly, shorter-span structure. Decrease deck width; two-way traffic may not need to be maintained on the southbound bridge.Archival Utilize savings from the repetition of two similar structures to balance the cost of building two shorter versus one long bridge. May no longer reflect current or accepted regulation, policy, guidance or practice. PROMOTING SAFETY OHIO AND ACCESS cleveland’S innerbelT FREEWAY ACTT WORKSHOP Archival U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Highway Administration May no longer reflect current or accepted regulation, policy, guidance or practice. ACTT ACCELERATED CONSTRUCTION TECHNOLOGY TRANSFER www.fhwa.dot.gov/construction/accelerated • ACTT provides a fresh outlook by bringing national experts to your planning table. • ACTT introduces innovations that have been tested elsewhere. • ACTT saves time: according to FHWA’s ACTT II report, published WHY ACTT? in March 2005, “most agencies have found ways to slice construc- tion time by 30 percent or more.” • ACTT saves money: ACTT suggestions enabled New Jersey to reduce its budget for the Route 46 bridge project from $10 million to $7.2 million. -
Congestion Pricing Evaluation
NOACA Technical Memorandum Congestion Pricing Evaluation August 2012 The Northeast Ohio Areawide Coordinating Agency (NOACA) is a public organization serving the counties of and municipalities and townships within Cuyahoga, Geauga, Lake, Lorain and Medina (covering an area with 2.1 million people). NOACA is the agency designated or recognized to perform the following functions: • Serve as the Metropolitan Planning Organization (MPO), with responsibility for comprehensive, cooperative and continuous planning for highways, public transit, and bikeways, as defined in the current transportation law. • Perform continuous water quality, transportation-related air quality and other environmental planning functions. • Administer the area clearinghouse function, which includes providing local government with the opportunity to review a wide variety of local or state applications for federal funds. • Conduct transportation and environmental planning and related demographic, economic and land use research. • Serve as an information center for transportation and environmental and related planning. • At NOACA Governing Board direction, provide transportation and environmental planning assistance to the 172 units of local, general purpose government. MADISON TWP. NORTH PERRY The NOACA Governing Board is composed of 44 local public officials. LAKE MADISON GRAND RIVER VILLAGE TWP. PAINESVILLE PERRY The Board convenes monthly to provide a forum for members to present, FAIRPORT HARBOR VILLAGE. PAINESVILLE PERRY TWP. TWP. 90 MENTOR ON PAINESVILLE discuss and develop solutions to local and areawide issues and make THE LAKE TWP. LEROY MENTOR PAINESVILLE TWP. THOMPSON recommendations regarding implementation strategies. As the area CONCORD TWP. TWP. TIMBERLAKE 2 LAKELINE 90 EASTLAKE clearinghouse for the region, the Board makes comments and LAKE KIRTLAND WILLOWICK GEAUGA HILLS GEAUGA WILLOUGHBY WICKLIFFE MONTVILLE WAITE CHARDON HAMBDEN recommendations on applications for state and federal grants, HILL TWP. -
Odot District 12 2017 Construction Program
` ODOT DISTRICT 12 2017 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM SERVING CUYAHOGA, GEAUGA AND LAKE COUNTIES JOHN R. KASICH, OHIO GOVERNOR | JERRY WRAY, ODOT DIRECTOR | MYRON S. PAKUSH, DISTRICT DEPUTY DIRECTOR ODOT DISTRICT 12 2017 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM Table of Contents Overview............................................................................... Page 2 Cuyahoga County…………………………………………………. Page 3 Geauga County……………………………………………………. Page 28 Lake County…………………………….................................... Page 33 Regional Projects…………………………………………………. Page 39 Local-Let Projects…………………………………………………. Page 41 OVERVIEW 1 ODOT DISTRICT 12 2017 CONSTRUCTION PROGRAM The Ohio Department of Transportation, District 12 is responsible for the maintenance and construction of all interstates, U.S. and State Routes in unincorporated municipalities in Cuyahoga, Geauga and Lake counties. Every spring, we shift our focus from snow and ice removal to the construction and repair of our roadways. The 2017 Construction Guide includes information about major construction projects in the District 12, tri- county area. Projects to which ODOT has contributed money but are administered by local agencies are listed at the back of the book. Tentative start and completion dates are included to provide you with a project timeline. For the latest on ODOT’s three major Cleveland Urban Core Projects and to sign-up to receive project related e-mails, motorists are encouraged to log-on to the following websites: Cleveland “Innerbelt” Corridor: www.Innerbelt.org. Opportunity Corridor: www.OpportunityCorridor.transportaton.ohio.gov Lakefront West: www.LakefrontWest.transportation.ohio.gov As with every construction season, we ask motorists to use caution when traveling through work zones. By obeying posted speed limits and exercising caution, motorists can do their part to keep both our construction employees and fellow motorists safe. -
Tiger Iv – Innerbelt Bridge Replacement
TIGER IV – INNERBELT BRIDGE REPLACEMENT This Project is the second project in the Cleveland Innerbelt Project series as identified in the Record of Decision approved September 18, 2009. This Project will replace the existing Innerbelt non-redundant steel cantilevered deck truss with a new five lane delta girder structure, reconstruct one entrance ramp, three exit ramps and reconstruct several local streets and intersections, improving access into and out of the Central Business District of Cleveland, Ohio Contact Information: Dale Schiavoni Ohio Department of Transportation District 12 5500 Transportation Blvd. Garfield Heights, OH 44125 [email protected] 216.584.2080 [Type text] March 13, 2012 I. PROJECT DESCRIPTION Project Purpose: The purpose of the Construction Contract Group 2 (CCG2) EB Innerbelt Bridge Project is to improve travel efficiency and safety on Interstate (I-90) across the Cuyahoga River and the industrial “Flats” area by demolishing the existing non-redundant steel cantilevered deck truss rated in “Serious Condition”, construct a new five lane delta frame girder structure carrying eastbound traffic only (westbound traffic will be carried on the new westbound structure currently being constructed under CCG1), modifying interchange ramp configurations along with improving the city street grid. The Innerbelt Corridor, including the Innerbelt Bridges, collects and distributes traffic between the radial freeway and interstate freeway system and the local downtown street system. This Project developed from the need to address the deteriorating bridges and pavements, which have met their useful lives. As part of the comprehensive planning study conducted to address the physical conditions of the Innerbelt Freeway, the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) also identified issues with the operational performance, safety, freeway access and design deficiencies that need addressed. -
L New Innerbelt Bridge Brings Modern, Innovative Design to Cleveland's
New Innerbelt Bridge Brings Modern, Innovative Design to Cleveland’s Skyline ike many of the nation’s cities that are served by an aging interstate L system, Cleveland has been faced with rising congestion and funding chal- lenges for the maintenance or replacement of vital transportation infrastructure. The city is taking a big step forward with the new Innerbelt Bridge, the first phase of the Innerbelt Corridor Plan, a multi-billion dollar effort to modernize the Innerbelt Freeway system. In 2009, when the Ohio Department of Transportation (ODOT) received over $900 million in stimulus funds from the American Recovery and Investment Act, it The new Westbound Innerbelt Bridge, courtesy Walsh/HNTB Innerbelt Project Team invested over a fifth of the allocation in the High Steel Structures LLC (HSS) was single largest transportation infrastructure awarded a contract to fabricate some project in the state’s history – the replace- 22,000 tons of structural steel for the ment of the Cleveland Innerbelt Bridge. 16-span bridge. The Cleveland Innerbelt Bridge project A Design for the Future includes two new bridges, carrying that Honors the Past Interstate 90 across the Cuyahoga River, Walsh and HNTB won the contract with several existing roads and “The Flats,” an a steel delta frame design. According to Double Helix Bridge industrial area. The scope of the projects Thomas Flask, Transportation Engineer, includes replacing the 1959 Pratt Deck Truss HNTB, the team was influenced by other Singapore bridge with two, nearly identical spans. nearby bridges over the Flats and the The project sequence began with the Cuyahoga River, such as the Hope Memorial The Ying and Yang of Asian culture inspired construction of a new $293 Million west- Bridge and Veterans Memorial Bridge, when the Double Helix Bridge in Singapore. -
Cib Feis 7-21-09
CUY-90-Innerbelt ODOT PID No 77510 Table of Contents Executive Summary ...................................................................................................................................................................... ii 1.0 Introduction ........................................................................................................................................................................ 1 2.0 Comments on the DEIS ...................................................................................................................................................... 1 List of Tables 2.1 Notice of Availability ................................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 1a: Summary of Public Comments – Written 2.2 Public Hearing ............................................................................................................................................................ 1 Table 1b: Summary of Public Comments – Verbal 2.3 Summary of Public Comments ................................................................................................................................... 1 Table 1c: Summary of Public Comments received after close of comment period 2.4 Agency Coordination .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Table 2: Summary of Agency Comments on DEIS 2.5 Issues and Resolutions ...........................................................................................................................................