Adoption of Retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
World Heritage 39 COM WHC-15/39.COM/8E.Rev Paris, 22 June 2015 Original: English / French UNITED NATIONS EDUCATIONAL, SCIENTIFIC AND CULTURAL ORGANIZATION CONVENTION CONCERNING THE PROTECTION OF THE WORLD CULTURAL AND NATURAL HERITAGE WORLD HERITAGE COMMITTEE Thirty-ninth session Bonn, Germany 28 June – 8 July 2015 Item 8 of the Provisional Agenda: Establishment of the World Heritage List and of the List of World Heritage in Danger 8E: Adoption of Retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value SUMMARY This document presents a draft Decision concerning the adoption of 81 retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value submitted by 27 States Parties for properties which had no Statement of Outstanding Universal Value approved at the time of their inscription on the World Heritage List. The Annex contains the full text of the retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value in the original language submitted to the Secretariat. Draft Decision: 39 COM 8E, see Point II. This document cancels and replaces document WHC-15/39.COM/8E. I. BACKGROUND 1. The Statement of Outstanding Universal Value was introduced in the Operational Guidelines in 2005 as an essential requirement for the inscription of a property on the World Heritage List. All properties inscribed since 2007 present such a Statement. 2. In 2007, the World Heritage Committee, in its Decision 31 COM 11D.1, requested that Statements of Outstanding Universal Value be drafted and approved retrospectively for all World Heritage properties inscribed between 1978 and 2006, prior to the launch of the second cycle of Periodic Reporting in each region. 3. As a consequence, in the framework of the Periodic Reporting exercise, States Parties draft retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value for World Heritage properties located within their territories which are afterwards reviewed by the relevant Advisory Bodies. 4. The 81 draft retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value for which the review process has been finalized since the 38th session of the World Heritage Committee (Doha, 2014) are presented for adoption to the World Heritage Committee in this document. 5. The draft retrospective Statements contained in the draft Decision and in the Annex are presented by region and by State Party in alphabetical order. They are distributed as follows: Africa (3), Arab States (1), Asia and the Pacific (7), Europe and North America (55) and Latin America and the Caribbean (15). The Annex includes a table of contents presenting all sites concerned. 6. Further to Decision 38 COM 8E, the World Heritage Centre continues the harmonisation of all sub-headings in the Statements to “Brief synthesis”, “Criteria”, “Integrity”, “Authenticity” and “Protection and management requirements”. The World Heritage Centre also updates the Statements, further to subsequent decisions taken by the World Heritage Committee concerning changes of names of the World Heritage properties as well as Minor Boundary Modifications. 7. The 81 draft retrospective Statements are presented in the original language of submission. Once adopted, they will be translated into the other official language and uploaded progressively on the World Heritage Centre web site subject to availability of funds. II. DRAFT DECISION Draft Decision: 39 COM 8E The World Heritage Committee, 1. Having examined Document WHC-15/39.COM/8E.Rev, 2. Congratulates the States Parties for the excellent work accomplished in the elaboration of retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value for World Heritage properties located within their territories; Adoption of retrospective Statements WHC-15/39.COM/8E.Rev, p. 1 of Outstanding Universal Value 3. Adopts the retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value, as presented in the Annex of Document WHC-15/39.COM/8E.Rev, for the following World Heritage properties: Africa • Mozambique: Island of Mozambique; • Senegal: Djoudj National Bird Sanctuary; • United Republic of Tanzania: Stone Town of Zanzibar; Arab States • Oman: Land of Frankincense; Asia and the Pacific • India: Humayun’s Tomb, Delhi; Kaziranga National Park; • Iran (Islamic Republic of): Bisotun; Meidan Emam, Esfahan; Persepolis; Soltaniyeh; Tchogha Zanbil; Europe and North America • Belarus: Architectural, Residential and Cultural Complex of the Radziwill Family at Nesvizh; • Belgium: Flemish Béguinages; Historic Centre of Brugge; The Four Lifts on the Canal du Centre and their Environs, La Louvière and Le Roeulx (Hainault); • Canada / United States of America: Waterton Glacier International Peace Park; • Canada: Dinosaur Provincial Park; Gros Morne National Park; Historic District of Old Québec; Miguasha National Park; Old Town Lunenburg; Sgang Gwaay; Wood Buffalo National Park; • France / Spain : Pyrénées – Mont Perdu ; • Greece: Acropolis, Athens; Archaeological Site of Olympia; Archaeological Sites of Mycenae and Tiryns; Delos; Sanctuary of Asklepios at Epidaurus; • Italy: 18th-Century Royal Palace at Caserta with the Park, the Aqueduct of Vanvitelli, and the San Leucio Complex; Archaeological Area of Agrigento; Castel del Monte; Church and Dominican Convent of Santa Maria delle Grazie with “The Last Supper” by Leonardo da Vinci; Cilento and Vallo di Diano National Park with the Archeological sites of Paestum and Velia, and the Certosa di Padula; City of Verona; City of Vicenza and the Palladian Villas of the Veneto; Crespi d’Adda; Early Christian Monuments of Ravenna; Genoa: Le Strade Nuove and the system of the Palazzi dei Rolli; Historic Centre of San Gimignano; Historic Centre of Siena; Historic Centre of the City of Pienza; Late Baroque Towns of the Val di Noto (South- Eastern Sicily); Rock Drawings in Valcamonica; Sacri Monti of Piedmont and Lombardy; Syracuse and the Rocky Necropolis of Pantalica; The Sassi and the Park of the Rupestrian Churches of Matera; • Montenegro: Durmitor National Park; • Russian Federation: Architectural Ensemble of the Trinity Sergius Lavra in Sergiev Posad; Ensemble of the Ferrapontov Monastery; Ensemble of the Novodevichy Convent; Historic Centre of Saint Petersburg and Related Groups of Monuments; Historic Monuments of Novgorod and Surroundings; Kremlin and Red Square, Moscow; • Serbia: Stari Ras and Sopoćani; Studenica Monastery; • Slovakia: Historic Town of Banská Štiavnica and the Technical Monuments in its Vicinity; Adoption of retrospective Statements WHC-15/39.COM/8E.Rev, p. 2 of Outstanding Universal Value • Spain: Aranjuez Cultural Landscape; Archaeological Ensemble of Tárraco; Archaeological site of Atapuerca; Garajonay National Park; Rock Art of the Mediterranean Basin on the Iberian Peninsula; • Sweden: Engelsberg Ironworks; • The Former Yugoslav Republic of Macedonia: Natural and Cultural Heritage of the Ohrid region; • Ukraine: L’viv – the Ensemble of the Historic Centre; • United States of America: Pueblo de Taos; Latin America and the Caribbean • Brazil: Atlantic Forest South-East Reserves; Brazilian Atlantic Islands: Fernando de Noronha and Atol das Rocas Reserves; Central Amazon Conservation Complex; Cerrado Protected Areas: Chapada dos Veadeiros and Emas National Parks; Discovery Coast Atlantic Forest Reserves; Pantanal Conservation Area; • Colombia: Malpelo Fauna and Flora Sanctuary; • Haiti : National History Park – Citadel, Sans Souci, Ramiers ; • Honduras: Río Plátano Biosphere Reserve; • Peru: Historical Centre of the City of Arequipa; Huascarán National Park; Lines and Geoglyphs of Nasca and Pampas de Jumana; Manú National Park; Río Abiseo National Park; • Saint Kitts and Nevis: Brimstone Hill Fortress National Park; 4. Decides that retrospective Statements of Outstanding Universal Value for World Heritage properties in Danger will be reviewed in priority by the Advisory Bodies; 5. Takes note that the World Heritage Centre, further to Decision 38 COM 8E, continues to harmonize all sub-headings in the adopted Statements of Outstanding Universal Value and updates names and sizes or buffer zones, as appropriate, following relevant Decisions of the Committee concerning changes of names and Minor Boundary Modifications; 6. Requests the States Parties to provide support to the World Heritage Centre for translation of the adopted Statements of Outstanding Universal Value into English or French respectively, and further requests the World Heritage Centre to upload the two language versions on its web site. Adoption of retrospective Statements WHC-15/39.COM/8E.Rev, p. 3 of Outstanding Universal Value Annex/ Annexe Table of Contents AFRICA / AFRIQUE 7 Mozambique 7 • Island of Mozambique (C 599) 7 Senegal / Sénégal 9 • Parc national des oiseaux du Djoudj (N 25) 9 United Republic of Tanzania / République-Unie de Tanzanie 9 • Stone Town of Zanzibar (C 173rev) 9 ARAB STATES / ETATS ARABES 12 Oman 12 • Land of Frankincense (C 1010) 12 ASIA AND THE PACIFIC / ASIE ET PACIFIQUE 14 India / Inde 14 • Humayun's Tomb, Delhi (C 232) 14 • Kaziranga National Park (N 337) 15 Iran (Islamic Republic of) / Iran (République islamique d’) 16 • Bisotun (C 1222) 16 • Meidan Emam, Esfahan (C 115) 17 • Persepolis (C 114) 19 • Soltaniyeh (C 1188) 20 • Tchogha Zanbil (C 113) 21 EUROPE AND NORTH AMERICA / EUROPE ET AMERIQUE DU NORD 23 Belarus / Bélarus 23 • Architectural, Residential and Cultural Complex of the Radziwill Family at Nesvizh (C 1196) 23 Belgium / Belgique 24 • Flemish Béguinages (C 855) 24 • Historic Centre of Brugge (C 996) 25 • Les quatre ascenseurs du canal du Centre et leur site, La Louvière et Le Roeulx (Hainaut) (C 856) 27 Canada/United