Technical and Managerial Development for Raising Efficiency in Dr
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Thermal Efficiency of Combined Cycle Power Plant
www.ijemr.net ISSN (ONLINE): 2250-0758, ISSN (PRINT): 2394-6962 Volume-8, Issue-3, June 2018 International Journal of Engineering and Management Research Page Number: 229-234 DOI: doi.org/10.31033/ijemr.8.3.30 Thermal Efficiency of Combined Cycle Power Plant R. Rajesh1 and Dr. P.S. Kishore2 1M.Tech student, Thermal Engineering., Department of Mechanical Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA 2Professor, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, INDIA 1Corresponding Author: [email protected] ABSTRACT Keywords-- Brayton Cycle, Rankine Cycle, Heat Supplied Now a day’s power generation is most important for Work Output and Efficiency every country. This power is generated by some thermal cycles. But single cycle cannot be attain complete power requirements and its efficiency also very low so that to fulfill this requirements to combine two or more cycles in a single I. INTRODUCTION power plant then we can increase the efficiency of the power plant. Its increased efficiency is more than that of if the plant Combined cycle power plants used for generate operated on single cycle. In which we are using two different electricity and also cogeneration. Generally combined cycles and these two cycles are operated by means of different cycles are made up of two cycles. One is gas turbine cycle working mediums. These type of power plants we can called and another one is Rankine cycle. This gas turbine cycle them like combined cycle power plants. In combined cycle may be simple gas turbine or inter cooling or reheating or power plants above cycle is known as topping cycle and below regeneration gas turbine cycle and Rankine cycle maybe cycle is known as bottoming cycle. -
Thermal Efficiency of Natural Gas-Fired Generation in California: 2019 Update Michael Nyberg Data Integration and Policy Office Energy Assessments Division
DOCKETED Docket Number: 20-IEPR-03 Project Title: Electricity and Natural Gas TN #: 233380 Staff Paper - Thermal Efficiency of Natural Gas-Fired Document Title: Generation in California 2019 Update Description: N/A Filer: Courtney Wagner Organization: California Energy Commission Submitter Role: Commission Staff Submission Date: 6/9/2020 1:14:49 PM Docketed Date: 6/9/2020 California Energy Commission STAFF PAPER Thermal Efficiency of Natural Gas-Fired Generation in California: 2019 Update Michael Nyberg Data Integration and Policy Office Energy Assessments Division Gavin Newsom, Governor June 2020|CEC-200-2020-03 DISCLAIMER Staff members of the California Energy Commission prepared this report. As such, it does not necessarily represent the views of the Energy Commission, its employees, or the State of California. The Energy Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this report; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This report has not been approved or disapproved by the Energy Commission nor has the Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this report. ABSTRACT The Thermal Efficiency of Natural Gas-Fired Generation: 2019 Update staff paper provides a brief overview of the general trends in power generation in California from 2001 through 2018. The paper details the changes in the type of power plants used over the past 18 years to meet load and documents the total annual natural gas usage for thermal power generation. -
Efficiency in Electricity Generation July 2003
EFFICIENCY IN ELECTRICITY GENERATION Report drafted by: EURELECTRIC “Preservation of Resources” Working Group’s “Upstream” Sub-Group in collaboration with VGB July 2003 Efficiency in Electricity Generation July 2003 This report has been drafted by: EURELECTRIC “Preservation of Resources” Working Group’s “Upstream” Sub-Group in collaboration with VGB Members of the Drafting Team: EURELECTRIC Upstream Sub-Group: Livio HONORIO, Chairman (PT) Jean-Guy BARTAIRE (FR), Rolf BAUERSCHMIDT (DE), Tapio OHMAN (FIN), Zoltan TIHANYI (HU), Hans ZEINHOFER (AT), John F. SCOWCROFT (EURELECTRIC), Vasco DE JANEIRO (EURELECTRIC) VGB: Hartmut KRUGER (DE), Hans-Joachim MEIER (DE), Daniel OFFERMANN (DE), Ulrich LANGNICKEL (DE) The Union of the Electricity Industry - EURELECTRIC, formed as a result of a merger in December 1999 of the twin electricity industry associations, UNIPEDE and EURELECTRIC, is the sector association representing the common interests of the European electricity industry and its worldwide affiliates and associates. Its mission is to contribute to the development and competitiveness of the electricity industry and to promote the role of electricity in the advancement of society. Union of the Electricity Industry - EURELECTRIC Boulevard de l’Impératrice, 66 – B-1000 Brussels Tel: +32 2 515 1000 - Fax: +32 2 515 1010 E-mail: [email protected] Website: www.eurelectric.org VGB PowerTech was founded in Leuna (East Germany) in 1920. It is a voluntary association of power as well as heat generating utilities. Its main objective is joint support and improvement of operational safety, availability, efficiency and environmental compatibility of power plants (fossil-fired, nuclear, renewables) both in operation or under construction. Further, VGB is involved in standardization as well as in elaboration of technical guidelines and regulations in the field of thermal power plants. -
Energy Efficiency and Energy Security Benefits of District Energy
Energy Efficiency and Energy Security Benefits of District Energy Report to Congress July 2019 United States Department of Energy Washington, DC 20585 Department of Energy | July 2019 Message from the Secretary The following report, Energy Efficiency and Energy Security Benefits of District Energy, discusses the energy efficiency benefits of district energy, an overview of how district energy increases energy security, the current status of the district energy market, challenges to district energy implementation, and future research and development opportunities. This report is being provided to the following Members of Congress: The Honorable Richard Shelby Chairman, Senate Committee on Appropriations The Honorable Patrick Leahy Vice Chairman, Senate Committee on Appropriations The Honorable Nita Lowey Chairwoman, House Committee on Appropriations The Honorable Kay Granger Ranking Member, House Committee on Appropriations The Honorable Lamar Alexander Chairman, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Senate Committee on Appropriations The Honorable Dianne Feinstein Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development Senate Committee on Appropriations The Honorable Marcy Kaptur Chairwoman, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development House Committee on Appropriations The Honorable Mike Simpson Ranking Member, Subcommittee on Energy and Water Development House Committee on Appropriations Energy Efficiency and Energy Security Benefits of District Energy | Page ii Department of Energy | July 2019 If you have any questions or -
Electric Generating Units
Office of Air and Radiation October 2010 AVAILABLE AND EMERGING TECHNOLOGIES FOR REDUCING GREENHOUSE GAS EMISSIONS FROM COAL-FIRED ELECTRIC GENERATING UNITS Available and Emerging Technologies for Reducing Greenhouse Gas Emissions from Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units Prepared by the Sector Policies and Programs Division Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711 October 2010 Table of Contents 1. Introduction .......................................................................................................................... 5 1.1 Electric Power Generation Using Coal ...................................................................... 5 2. Coal-Fired Electric Generating Units .................................................................................. 7 2.1 Coals Burned in U.S. EGUs ....................................................................................... 7 2.2 Coal Utilization in U.S. EGUs ................................................................................... 8 2.2.1 Stoker-Fired Coal Combustion ......................................................................... 9 2.2.2 Pulverized-Coal Combustion ............................................................................ 9 2.2.3 Cyclone Coal Combustion .............................................................................. 13 2.2.4 Fluidized-Bed Combustion ............................................................................. 13 2.2.5 Coal -
Review of the Reference Values for High-Efficiency Cogeneration | I
[Keywords] Review of the Reference Values for High- Efficiency Cogeneration Final Report ___________________________________________________ Report for EC DG Energy ENER/C3/2013-424/SI2.682977 ED59519 | Final report | Date 07/04/2015 Ricardo-AEA Review of the Reference Values for High-Efficiency Cogeneration | i Customer: Contact: EC DG Energy Mahmoud Abu-Ebid Ricardo-AEA Ltd Customer reference: Gemini Building, Harwell, Didcot, OX11 0QR, United Kingdom ENER/C3/2013-424/SI2.682977 t: +44 (0) 1235 75 3193 Confidentiality, copyright & reproduction: e: [email protected] This report is the Copyright of European Ricardo-AEA is certificated to ISO9001 and ISO14001 Commission – DG Energy and has been prepared by Ricardo-AEA Ltd under contract Author: to DG ENER dated 01/07/2014. The contents of this report may not be Naser Odeh, Robert Harmsen, Simon Minett, Pete reproduced in whole or in part, nor passed to Edwards, Alicia Perez-Lopez, Jing Hu any organisation or person without the specific prior written permission of EC DG Approved By: Energy. Ricardo-AEA Ltd accepts no liability Mahmoud Abu-Ebid whatsoever to any third party for any loss or damage arising from any interpretation or Date: use of the information contained in this report, or reliance on any views expressed 07 April 2015 therein. Ricardo-AEA reference: Ref: ED59519 - Final report Ricardo-AEA Ref: Ricardo-AEA/ED59519/Final report Review of the Reference Values for High-Efficiency Cogeneration | ii Executive summary This report is prepared as part of a project led by Ricardo-AEA on reviewing the cogeneration reference efficiencies as required by Article 14(10) of the Energy Efficiency Directive (EED). -
Thermal Efficiency of Gas‐Fired Generation in California: 2014 Update
STAFF PAPER Thermal Efficiency of Gas‐Fired Generation in California: 2014 Update Michael Nyberg Supply Analysis Office Energy Assessments Division California Energy Commission DISCLAIMER This paper was prepared by a member of the staff of the California Energy Commission. As such, it does not necessarily represent the SEPTEMBER 2014 views of the Energy Commission or the State of California. The Energy CEC‐200‐2014‐005 Commission, the State of California, its employees, contractors, and subcontractors make no warrant, express or implied, and assume no legal liability for the information in this paper; nor does any party represent that the uses of this information will not infringe upon privately owned rights. This paper has not been approved or disapproved by the California Energy Commission nor has the Commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of the information in this paper. This paper has not been approved or disapproved by the full Commission. ABSTRACT This staff paper describes general trends in natural gas‐fired generation in California from 2001 through 2013. Over this 13‐year period, California’s gas‐fired generation has seen thermal efficiency improvements of more than 17 percent. The successful development of new combined‐cycle plants continues to be the primary reason for the improvement in California’s systemwide heat rate. The thermal efficiency of the state’s current portfolio of natural gas power plants has resulted in 12 percent more energy being generated while using 7 percent less natural gas compared to 13 years ago. Keywords: Combined‐cycle, heat rate, gas‐fired generation, thermal efficiency Please use the following citation for this report: Nyberg, Michael.