DOCSLIB.ORG

PH5011 General Relativity

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
PH5011 General Relativity PH5011 General Relativity Martinmas 2012/2013 Dr HongSheng Zhao shortened/expanded from notes of MD [email protected] 0 General issues 0.1 Summation convention dimension of coordinate space pairwise indices imply sum 0.2 Indices Apart from a few exceptions, upper and lower indices are to be distinguished thoroughly 2 To Exam Or Not To Exam 1. Basis (not examined) intro. tensor and Coordinates transformation (exam). 2. Tensor operations all examinable. 3. Mechanics classical NOT exam. 4. Mechanics in curved space NOT exam. 5. Special Rela. NOT exam. 6. General Rela. (Einstein Eq.) exam. 7. Application of GR Examinable: FRW (p1-6), Schwarzschild (p1-4), Tutorials (1,2,3). Adv. (1p, for intuition) 3 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.1 Basis and coordinates location described by set of coordinates coordinate line given by for all tangent vector at ≡ basis vector related to coordinate ⤿ set of basis vectors spans tangent space at infinitesimal displacement in space on variation of coordinate given by line element in general, the basis vectors depend on 3 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.1 Basis and coordinates Example A: Cartesian coordinates (I) 4 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.1 Basis and coordinates Example B: Constant, non-orthogonal system (I) 5 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.2 Reciprocal basis Kronecker-delta construction: orthogonality for normalization for orthogonal basis for orthonormal basis 6 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.2 Reciprocal basis Special case: 3 dimensions 7 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.2 Reciprocal basis Example A: Cartesian coordinates (II) ⤿ 8 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.2 Reciprocal basis Example B: Constant, non-orthogonal system (II) ⤿ 9 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.3 Metric ⤿ coefficients of metric tensor (→ 1.5) symmetry: as matrix 10 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.3 Metric Examples A+B: Cartesian & non-orthogonal constant basis (III) ⤿ ⤿ 11 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.3 Metric length of curve given by parametric representation of curve 12 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.3 Metric Example: Length of equator in spherical coordinates use parameter along the azimuth ⤿ ⤿ in one only needs to consider : one full turn for and 13 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.3 Metric With the reciprocal basis , one defines reciprocal components of the metric tensor which fulfill , equivalent to the condition for the inverse matrix 14 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.3 Metric metric tensor orthonormality condition ⤿ “lowers index” “raises index” 15 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.4 Vector fields mathematics: vector field physics: vector (field) vector components defined by means of basis vectors contravariant components (→ 1.6) covariant components “raising/lowering indices” 16 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.5 Tensor fields mathematics: tensor field physics: tensor (field) tensor is multi-dimensional generalization of vector product of vector spaces behaves like a vector with respect to each of the vector spaces tensor of rank 0 scalar tensor of rank 1 vector rank of tensor tensor of rank 2 square matrix tensor of rank 3 cube ........ 17 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.5 Tensor fields basis vectors apply to each of the vector spaces ⤿ contravariant components covariant components mixed components 18 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.5 Tensor fields Example: Rank-2 tensor ⤿ Coincidentally, with the matrix product For Cartesian coordinates: 19 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.6 Coordinate transformations consider different set of coordinates (chain rule) different coordinate systems describe same locations ⤿ ⤿ 20 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.6 Coordinate transformations vector fields ⤿ covariant derivatives components transform like coordinate contravariant } {differentials tensor fields ⤿ 21 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.6 Coordinate transformations Proof: are covariant components of a tensor ⤿ 22 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.7 Affine connection in general, basis vectors depend on the coordinates derivative of basis vector written in basis affine connection (Christoffel symbol) derivative of reciprocal basis vector: ⤿ 23 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.7 Affine connection Example C: Spherical coordinates (IV) ⤿ ⤿ 24 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.7 Affine connection Example C: Spherical coordinates (IV) [continued] ⤿ ⤿ ⤿ 25 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.7 Affine connection given that the Christoffel symbols can be expressed by means of the components of the metric tensor and their derivatives 26 1 Curvilinear coordinates 1.7 Affine connection Proof: ⤿ (I) (II) (III) (II) + (III) - (I) : ⤿ 27 2 Tensor analysis 2.1 Covariant derivative vector field both the vector components and the basis vectors depend on the coordinates derivative: define covariant derivative of a contravariant vector component as so that 28 2 Tensor analysis 2.1 Covariant derivative derivatives transform as ⤿ can be considered the covariant components of the vector (gradient) covariant components of a vector form components of a tensor, not 29 2 Tensor analysis 2.1 Covariant derivative contravariant components covariant components covariant derivatives of tensor components upper for each index , add {lower } { where takes place of in or 30 2 Tensor analysis 2.1 Covariant derivative Covariant derivative of 2nd-rank tensor ⤿ 31 2 Tensor analysis 2.2 Riemann tensor order of 2nd covariant derivatives of vector is not commutative, but with the Riemann (curvature) tensor (not intended to be memorized) with and ⤿ 32 2 Tensor analysis 2.2 Riemann tensor Riemann tensor has two pairs of indices and is [ [ antisymmetric in the indices of each pair symmetric in exchanging the pairs Moreover, (1st Bianchi identity) (2nd Bianchi identity) 33 2 Tensor analysis 2.2 Riemann tensor Proof: The scalar product of two vectors is a scalar ⤿ On the other hand ⤿ (Riemann curvature tensor is antisymmetric in first two indices) 34 2 Tensor analysis 2.3 Einstein tensor 2nd-rank curvature tensor fulfilling must relate to Riemann tensor only a single non-vanishing contraction (up to a sign) (Ricci tensor) with next-level contraction (Ricci scalar) ⤿ matches required conditions 35 3 Review: Classical Mechanics 3.1 Principle of stationary action Mechanical system completely described by coordinate (Lagrangian) velocity time action (Hamilton’s) principle of stationary action Fermat’s principle (optics) Feynman’s path integral (QM) ⤿ (Euler-) Lagrange equations kinetic energy for : potential energy 36 3 Classical mechanics 3.1 Principle of stationary action Example: 1D harmonic oscillator (I) ⤿ ⤿ ⤿ 37 4 Intro: Mech. in curved space 4.1 Principle of stationary paths stationary path between two points (e.g. path length is locally shortest) (geodesic equation, assume = s ) Christoffel symbols (affine connection) 47 4 Mechanics in curved space 4.1 Stationary paths Path length ds = G d , stationary path means ⤿ Define ⤿ ⤿ Constant L factored out of derivatives. Write derivative as dot, if we define t = s = 48 4 Mechanics in curved space 4.1 Stationary paths L resembles Lagrangian for a free particle of mass m in curved space (Euler-Lagrange equations) ⤿ ⤿ } ↳ ⤿ with and ⤿ 44 4 Mechanics in curved space 4.1 Stationary paths based on Newton’s law purely space geometry Eq. of motion along geodesics, = s, or in shorthand: 49 4 Mechanics in curved space 4.2 Geodesics as parallel transport = tangent unit vector to a curve is geodesic if unit tangent vector is parallelly transported i.e. • moving along geodesics means to keep the same direction • geodesics form “straight lines” (geodesic equation) 46 4 Mechanics in curved space 4.3 Conserved momentum pk dpk/d=0 if the metric g independent of qk (geodesic equation) if all do not depend on ⤿ 50 5 Review: Special Relativity 5.1 Minkowski space “event” described by time and location “reference frame” defines coordinate origin and motion “inertial system” force-free particles move uniformly all reference frames moving uniformly with respect to an inertial system are inertial system themselves laws of physics assume the same form in all inertial systems 54 5 Special Relativity 5.1 Minkowski space invariance of speed of light ⤿ along light rays: for all reference frames ⤿ homogeneity and isotropy of space and time ⤿ invariance of ⤿ describes distance in four-dimensional space whereas both and depend on reference frame 55 5 Special Relativity 5.1 Minkowski space use 4-dimensional vectors Latin indices Greek indices flat three-dimensional space described by cartesian coordinates ⤿ 56 5 Special Relativity 5.2 Light cone or: “causality and the finite speed of light” defines light cone 45° opening angle in photons trace null geodesics between events inside light cone massive particles move on time-like geodesics outside light cone ‘elsewhere’, no causal connection non-relativistic theories: instantaneous knowledge of interaction : light cone widens, all events get into causal contact invariance of ⤿ categorization holds irrespective of coordinate system and reference frame 57 5 Special Relativity 5.3 Proper time along worldline of clock with attached rest frame ⤿ proper time time shown on clock invariance of ⤿ ⤿ so that (moving clock observed “t” appears big ) 58 5 Special Relativity 5.4 Relativistic mechanics define 4-velocity as ⤿ ⤿ known: free particle moves along geodesic ⤿ [ all ] ⤿ (as anticipated for inertial system) 59 5 Special Relativity 5.4 Relativistic mechanics relativistic action ansatz: (matches invariance of ) let" ⤿ non-relativistic limit ( ) 60 5 Special Relativity 5.4 Relativistic mechanics conjugate momentum energy !" with (sign in spatial part due to in metric) !" (relativistic Hamilton-Jacobi equation) 61 5
Load more

Recommended publications
  • General Relativity
    GENERAL RELATIVITY IAN LIM LAST UPDATED JANUARY 25, 2019 These notes were taken for the General Relativity course taught by Malcolm Perry at the University of Cambridge as part of the Mathematical Tripos Part III in Michaelmas Term 2018. I live-TEXed them using TeXworks, and as such there may be typos; please send questions, comments, complaints, and corrections to [email protected]. Many thanks to Arun Debray for the LATEX template for these lecture notes: as of the time of writing, you can find him at https://web.ma.utexas.edu/users/a.debray/. Contents 1. Friday, October 5, 2018 1 2. Monday, October 8, 2018 4 3. Wednesday, October 10, 20186 4. Friday, October 12, 2018 10 5. Wednesday, October 17, 2018 12 6. Friday, October 19, 2018 15 7. Monday, October 22, 2018 17 8. Wednesday, October 24, 2018 22 9. Friday, October 26, 2018 26 10. Monday, October 29, 2018 28 11. Wednesday, October 31, 2018 32 12. Friday, November 2, 2018 34 13. Monday, November 5, 2018 38 14. Wednesday, November 7, 2018 40 15. Friday, November 9, 2018 44 16. Monday, November 12, 2018 48 17. Wednesday, November 14, 2018 52 18. Friday, November 16, 2018 55 19. Monday, November 19, 2018 57 20. Wednesday, November 21, 2018 62 21. Friday, November 23, 2018 64 22. Monday, November 26, 2018 67 23. Wednesday, November 28, 2018 70 Lecture 1. Friday, October 5, 2018 Unlike in previous years, this course is intended to be a stand-alone course on general relativity, building up the mathematical formalism needed to construct the full theory and explore some examples of interesting spacetime metrics.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Electromagnetic Fields and Charges In
    Electromagnetic fields and charges in ‘3+1’ spacetime derived from symmetry in ‘3+3’ spacetime J.E.Carroll Dept. of Engineering, University of Cambridge, CB2 1PZ E-mail: [email protected] PACS 11.10.Kk Field theories in dimensions other than 4 03.50.De Classical electromagnetism, Maxwell equations 41.20Jb Electromagnetic wave propagation 14.80.Hv Magnetic monopoles 14.70.Bh Photons 11.30.Rd Chiral Symmetries Abstract: Maxwell’s classic equations with fields, potentials, positive and negative charges in ‘3+1’ spacetime are derived solely from the symmetry that is required by the Geometric Algebra of a ‘3+3’ spacetime. The observed direction of time is augmented by two additional orthogonal temporal dimensions forming a complex plane where i is the bi-vector determining this plane. Variations in the ‘transverse’ time determine a zero rest mass. Real fields and sources arise from averaging over a contour in transverse time. Positive and negative charges are linked with poles and zeros generating traditional plane waves with ‘right-handed’ E, B, with a direction of propagation k. Conjugation and space-reversal give ‘left-handed’ plane waves without any net change in the chirality of ‘3+3’ spacetime. Resonant wave-packets of left- and right- handed waves can be formed with eigen frequencies equal to the characteristic frequencies (N+½)fO that are observed for photons. 1 1. Introduction There are many and varied starting points for derivations of Maxwell’s equations. For example Kobe uses the gauge invariance of the Schrödinger equation [1] while Feynman, as reported by Dyson, starts with Newton’s classical laws along with quantum non- commutation rules of position and momentum [2].
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 13 Curvature in Riemannian Manifolds
    Chapter 13 Curvature in Riemannian Manifolds 13.1 The Curvature Tensor If (M, , )isaRiemannianmanifoldand is a connection on M (that is, a connection on TM−), we− saw in Section 11.2 (Proposition 11.8)∇ that the curvature induced by is given by ∇ R(X, Y )= , ∇X ◦∇Y −∇Y ◦∇X −∇[X,Y ] for all X, Y X(M), with R(X, Y ) Γ( om(TM,TM)) = Hom (Γ(TM), Γ(TM)). ∈ ∈ H ∼ C∞(M) Since sections of the tangent bundle are vector fields (Γ(TM)=X(M)), R defines a map R: X(M) X(M) X(M) X(M), × × −→ and, as we observed just after stating Proposition 11.8, R(X, Y )Z is C∞(M)-linear in X, Y, Z and skew-symmetric in X and Y .ItfollowsthatR defines a (1, 3)-tensor, also denoted R, with R : T M T M T M T M. p p × p × p −→ p Experience shows that it is useful to consider the (0, 4)-tensor, also denoted R,givenby R (x, y, z, w)= R (x, y)z,w p p p as well as the expression R(x, y, y, x), which, for an orthonormal pair, of vectors (x, y), is known as the sectional curvature, K(x, y). This last expression brings up a dilemma regarding the choice for the sign of R. With our present choice, the sectional curvature, K(x, y), is given by K(x, y)=R(x, y, y, x)but many authors define K as K(x, y)=R(x, y, x, y). Since R(x, y)isskew-symmetricinx, y, the latter choice corresponds to using R(x, y)insteadofR(x, y), that is, to define R(X, Y ) by − R(X, Y )= + .
    [Show full text]
  • Deformations with Maximal Supersymmetries Part 2: Off-Shell Formulation
    Deformations with maximal supersymmetries part 2: off-shell formulation The MIT Faculty has made this article openly available. Please share how this access benefits you. Your story matters. Citation Chang, Chi-Ming et al. “Deformations with Maximal Supersymmetries Part 2: Off-Shell Formulation.” Journal of High Energy Physics 2016.4 (2016): n. pag. As Published http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/JHEP04(2016)171 Publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg Version Final published version Citable link http://hdl.handle.net/1721.1/103304 Terms of Use Creative Commons Attribution Detailed Terms http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ Published for SISSA by Springer Received: February 26, 2016 Accepted: April 23, 2016 Published: April 28, 2016 Deformations with maximal supersymmetries part 2: JHEP04(2016)171 off-shell formulation Chi-Ming Chang,a Ying-Hsuan Lin,a Yifan Wangb and Xi Yina aJefferson Physical Laboratory, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. bCenter for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: Continuing our exploration of maximally supersymmetric gauge theories (MSYM) deformed by higher dimensional operators, in this paper we consider an off- shell approach based on pure spinor superspace and focus on constructing supersymmetric deformations beyond the first order. In particular, we give a construction of the Batalin- Vilkovisky action of an all-order non-Abelian Born-Infeld deformation of MSYM in the non-minimal pure spinor formalism. We also discuss subtleties in the integration over the pure spinor superspace and the relevance of Berkovits-Nekrasov regularization.
    [Show full text]
  • Eienstein Field Equations and Heisenberg's Principle Of
    International Journal of Scientific and Research Publications, Volume 2, Issue 9, September 2012 1 ISSN 2250-3153 EIENSTEIN FIELD EQUATIONS AND HEISENBERG’S PRINCIPLE OF UNCERTAINLY THE CONSUMMATION OF GTR AND UNCERTAINTY PRINCIPLE 1DR K N PRASANNA KUMAR, 2PROF B S KIRANAGI AND 3PROF C S BAGEWADI ABSTRACT: The Einstein field equations (EFE) or Einstein's equations are a set of 10 equations in Albert Einstein's general theory of relativity which describe the fundamental interaction (e&eb) of gravitation as a result of space time being curved by matter and energy. First published by Einstein in 1915 as a tensor equation, the EFE equate spacetime curvature (expressed by the Einstein tensor) with (=) the energy and momentum tensor within that spacetime (expressed by the stress–energy tensor).Both space time curvature tensor and energy and momentum tensor is classified in to various groups based on which objects they are attributed to. It is to be noted that the total amount of energy and mass in the Universe is zero. But as is said in different context, it is like the Bank Credits and Debits, with the individual debits and Credits being conserved, holistically, the conservation and preservation of Debits and Credits occur, and manifest in the form of General Ledger. Transformations of energy also take place individually in the same form and if all such transformations are classified and written as a Transfer Scroll, it should tally with the total, universalistic transformation. This is a very important factor to be borne in mind. Like accounts are classifiable based on rate of interest, balance standing or the age, we can classify the factors and parameters in the Universe, be it age, interaction ability, mass, energy content.
    [Show full text]
  • Oxford Physics Department Notes on General Relativity Steven Balbus
    Oxford Physics Department Notes on General Relativity Steven Balbus Version: January 25, 2017 1 These notes are intended for classroom use. There is little here that is original, but a few results are. If you would like to quote from these notes and are unable to find an original literature reference, please contact me by email first. Thank you in advance for your cooperation. Steven Balbus 2 Recommended Texts Hobson, M. P., Efstathiou, G., and Lasenby, A. N. 2006, General Relativity: An Introduction for Physicists, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press) Referenced as HEL06. A very clear, very well-blended book, admirably covering the mathematics, physics, and astrophysics of GR. Excellent presentation of black holes and gravitational radiation. The explanation of the geodesic equation and the affine connection is very clear and enlightening. Not so much on cosmology, though a nice introduction to the physics of inflation. Overall, my favourite text on this topic. (The metric has a different sign convention in HEL06 compared with Weinberg 1972 & MTW [see below], as well as these notes. Be careful.) Weinberg, S. 1972, Gravitation and Cosmology. Principles and Applications of the General Theory of Relativity, (New York: John Wiley) Referenced as W72. What is now the classic reference by the great man, but lacking any discussion whatsoever of black holes, and almost nothing on the geometrical interpretation of the equations. The author is explicit in his aversion to anything geometrical: gravity is a field theory with a mere geometrical \analogy" according to Weinberg. But there is no way to make sense of the equations, in any profound sense, without immersing onself in geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • Using Field Equations to Determine the Meaning of Informal Texts
    Using Field Equations To Determine The Meaning Of Informal Texts Philippe Larvet Alcatel-Lucent, Bell Labs France, Centre de Villarceaux, Route de Villejust, 91620 Nozay, France Email: [email protected] Abstract Einstein Field Equations (EFE) are used within the Theory of General Relativity to determine the curvature of space- time resulting from the presence of mass and energy. That is, EFE determine the metric tensor of space-time for a given arrangement of stress-energy in the space-time. An informal text, containing phrases and words, can be seen as a portion of space where words determine a semantic curvature resulting from their presence and their meaning. That is, EFE can be used to determine a sort of semantic tensor or semantic field of text-space for a given arrangement of word-semantics within the area of an informal text. This paper describes an original use of Field Equations in order to compute the meaning of informal texts, leading to the ability to determine and compare the significance of any kind of informal documents (articles, book chapters, mails, technical documentation, etc.), even if written in different languages. Keywords Field equations, semantic tensor, semantic field, informal text, text analysis, natural language processing 1. EINSTEIN FIELD EQUATIONS Einstein field equations (EFE) or Einstein's equations are a set of ten equations in Einstein's Theory of General Relativity in which the fundamental force of gravitation is described as a curved spacetime caused by matter and energy [1] They were first published in 1915 [2]. These dynamic equations describe how matter and energy modify the space-time geometry.
    [Show full text]
  • KIPMU Set 2: Perturbation Theory
    KIPMU Set 2: Perturbation Theory Wayne Hu Covariant Perturbation Theory • Covariant = takes same form in all coordinate systems • Invariant = takes the same value in all coordinate systems • Fundamental equations: Einstein equations, covariant conservation of stress-energy tensor: Gµν = 8πGTµν µν rµT = 0 • Preserve general covariance by keeping all free variables: 10 for each symmetric 4×4 tensor 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Metric Tensor • Useful to think in a 3 + 1 language since there are preferred spatial surfaces where the stress tensor is nearly homogeneous • In general this is an Arnowitt-Deser-Misner (ADM) split • Specialize to the case of a nearly FRW metric 2 2 g00 = −a ; gij = a γij : where the “0” component is conformal time η = dt=a and γij is a 2 spatial metric of constant curvature K = H0 (Ωtot − 1). 6K (3)R = a2 Metric Tensor • First define the slicing (lapse function A, shift function Bi) g00 = −a−2(1 − 2A) ; g0i = −a−2Bi ; A defines the lapse of proper time between 3-surfaces whereas Bi defines the threading or relationship between the 3-coordinates of the surfaces • This absorbs 1+3=4 free variables in the metric, remaining 6 is in the spatial surfaces which we parameterize as ij −2 ij ij ij g = a (γ − 2HLγ − 2HT ) : ij here (1) HL a perturbation to the scale factor; (5) HT a trace-free distortion to spatial metric Curvature Perturbation • Curvature perturbation on the 3D slice 4 2 δ[(3)R] = − r2 + 3K H + r r Hij a2 L a2 i j T • When HT = 0 we will often loosely refer to HL as the “curvature perturbation” • It is easier to work
    [Show full text]
  • GEM: the User Manual Understanding Spacetime Splittings and Their Relationships1
    GEM: the User Manual Understanding Spacetime Splittings and Their Relationships1 Robert T. Jantzen Paolo Carini and Donato Bini June 15, 2021 1This manuscript is preliminary and incomplete and is made available with the understanding that it will not be cited or reproduced without the permission of the authors. Abstract A comprehensive review of the various approaches to splitting spacetime into space-plus-time, establishing a common framework based on test observer families which is best referred to as gravitoelectromagnetism. Contents Preface vi 1 Introduction 1 1.1 Motivation: Local Special Relativity plus Rotating Coordinates . 1 1.2 Why bother? . 4 1.3 Starting vocabulary . 6 1.4 Historical background . 8 1.5 Orthogonalization in the Lorentzian plane . 11 1.6 Notation and conventions . 14 2 The congruence point of view and the measurement process 17 2.1 Algebra . 17 2.1.1 Observer orthogonal decomposition . 18 2.1.2 Observer-adapted frames . 21 2.1.3 Relative kinematics: algebra . 23 2.1.4 Splitting along parametrized spacetime curves and test particle worldlines . 26 2.1.5 Addition of velocities and the aberration map . 28 2.2 Derivatives . 29 2.2.1 Natural derivatives . 29 2.2.2 Covariant derivatives . 30 2.2.3 Kinematical quantities . 31 2.2.4 Splitting the exterior derivative . 33 2.2.5 Splitting the differential form divergence operator . 35 2.2.6 Spatial vector analysis . 35 2.2.7 Ordinary and Co-rotating Fermi-Walker derivatives . 37 2.2.8 Relation between Lie and Fermi-Walker temporal derivatives . 39 2.2.9 Total spatial covariant derivatives .
    [Show full text]
  • The Gravitational Field of the Sds Space-Time
    THE GRAVITATIONAL FIELD OF THE SDS SPACE-TIME PREPRINT OF AN ARTICLE PUBLISHED IN [INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF GEOMETRIC METHODS IN MODERN PHYSICS, 17, 05, 2020, 2050069] [DOI: 10.1142/S0219887820500693] c [COPYRIGHT WORLD SCIENTIFIC PUBLISHING COMPANY][HTTPS://WWW.WORLDSCIENTIFIC.COM/WORLDSCINET/IJGMMP] H. M. Manjunatha∗ and S. K. Narasimhamurthy∗∗ Z. Nekouee Department of PG Studies and Research in Mathematics Department of Mathematics Kuvempu University, Jnana Sahyadri Faculty of Mathematical Sciences Shankaraghatta - 577 451 University of Mazandaran Shivamogga, Karnataka, India P. O. Box 47416-95447, Babolsar, Iran ∗[email protected] [email protected] ∗∗[email protected] ABSTRACT The goal of this paper is to study SdS space-time and its gravitational field with consideration of the canonical form and invariants of the curvature tensor. The characteristic of λ-tensor identifies the type of gravitational field. Gaussian curvature quantities enunciated in terms of curvature invariants. Keywords Gravitational field · SdS space-time · Einstein space · Gaussian curvature. Mathematics Subject Classification 2020 53A45 · 53B50 · 53C25 · 83C15 1 Introduction Albert Einstein proposed the general theory of relativity in the year 1915. Almost one century is over after the discovery of relativity theory, but to date, it continues to yield new results in its mathematical and physical framework. On 10 April 2019, Event Horizon Telescope (EHT) released the first-ever image of a supermassive black hole in the Messier 87 galaxy. It is a milestone of astrophysics and confirms the predictions of Einstein’s relativity theory. Einstein’s general theory of relativity is formulated entirely in terms of differential geometry, in tensor notation, of a four-dimensional manifold combining space and time.
    [Show full text]
  • Navigating Collinear Superspace Arxiv:1810.11032V3 [Hep-Th] 24 Mar 2020
    MIT{CTP 5076 Navigating Collinear Superspace Timothy Cohen,a Gilly Elor,b Andrew J. Larkoski,c and Jesse Thaler d;e aInstitute of Theoretical Science, University of Oregon, Eugene, OR 97403, U.S.A. bDepartment of Physics, Box 1560, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98195, U.S.A. cPhysics Department, Reed College, Portland, OR 97202, U.S.A. dCenter for Theoretical Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139, U.S.A. eDepartment of Physics, Harvard University, 17 Oxford Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, U.S.A. E-mail: [email protected], [email protected], [email protected], [email protected] Abstract: We introduce a new set of effective field theory rules for constructing La- grangians with N = 1 supersymmetry in collinear superspace. In the standard superspace treatment, superfields are functions of the coordinates xµ; θα; θyα_ , and supersymmetry preservation is manifest at the Lagrangian level in part due to the inclusion of auxiliary F - and D-term components. By contrast, collinear superspace depends on a smaller set of coordinates xµ; η; ηy, where η is a complex Grassmann number without a spinor index. This provides a formulation of supersymmetric theories that depends exclusively on propa- gating degrees of freedom, at the expense of obscuring Lorentz invariance and introducing inverse momentum scales. After establishing the general framework, we construct collinear superspace Lagrangians for free chiral matter and non-Abelian gauge fields. For the latter construction, an important ingredient is a superfield representation that is simultaneously chiral, anti-chiral, and real; this novel object encodes residual gauge transformations on the light cone.
    [Show full text]
  • Compendium of Useful Formulas
    Preprint typeset in JHEP style - HYPER VERSION Compendium of useful formulas Matthew Headrick Abstract: Almost everything I know. Contents 1. Miscellaneous math 3 1.1 A matrix identity 3 1.2 Campbell-Baker-Hausdorff 3 1.3 Pauli matrices 3 1.4 Level repulsion 3 1.5 The Legendre transform 3 1.6 Gaussian integrals 5 1.7 Saddle-point approximation 5 1.8 Cauchy principal value 6 1.9 A few Fourier transforms 7 2. Differential geometry 7 2.1 Diffeomorphisms vs. coordinate tranformations 7 2.2 Connection and curvatures 8 2.3 Geodesic deviation equation 9 2.4 Forms 10 2.5 Harmonic forms 11 2.6 Vielbein formalism 12 2.7 Lie derivatives and Killing fields 13 2.8 Weyl transformations 14 2.9 Metric perturbations 14 2.10 Warped products 14 2.11 Flat fibrations 15 2.12 Gauss-Bonnet theorems 16 2.13 Hypersurfaces 17 2.14 General submanifolds 21 2.15 K¨ahlergeometry 21 2.16 Poincar´eduality 23 2.17 Coordinates for S2 24 2.18 The Hopf fibration 25 2.19 Unit sphere 27 3. Classical mechanics 27 3.1 Lagrangian and Hamiltonian formulations 27 3.2 Symmetries 29 3.3 Noether's theorem for higher-order actions 31 3.4 Gauge symmetries 32 3.5 Hamilton-Jacobi theory 34 { 1 { 4. Gauge theories 36 4.1 Generalities 36 4.2 Standard Model 37 5. General relativity 40 5.1 Dimensions 40 5.2 Fundamentals 40 5.3 Spherically symmetric solutions 41 5.4 Cauchy problem 42 5.5 Gravitational waves 44 5.6 Israel junction condition 46 5.7 Boundary term 47 5.8 Dimensional reductions 49 6.
    [Show full text]