DOCSLIB.ORG

[Pfizer PAC & Corporate Political Contributions Report January 2009

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

1 [ Pfizer PAC & Corporate Political Contributions Report January 2009 – June 2010] Pfizer PAC – Our Voice. Our Impact. A Message from Sally Susman, Chair, Pfizer PAC I am pleased to share our 2009-2010 political contributions report, which includes a list of candidates and political committees that the Pfizer PAC supported from January 1, 2009 through June 30, 2010. The Pfizer PAC is bipartisan; we contribute to candidates of both political parties. From January 2009 through June 2010, we have been able to support 1,436 candidates at all levels of government, and we remain the #1 pharmaceutical industry PAC. I hope you will take time to review the report to see which candidates the PAC supported in your state and community. 2 As we started 2010, healthcare reform legislation was being debated in Congress. We had several public policy priorities that we actively engaged in as the debate unfolded, including: making certain that price controls and importation were not included in the new healthcare law, and that we secure twelve years of data exclusivity for innovator biologics. As a result, many of our business priorities were attained and the new law ultimately helps us to continue to provide our innovative medicines to the patients we serve. As Pfizer’s PAC Chair and through my interactions with elected officials, I see first-hand how decisions are made that impact our ability to discover and bring to market innovative medicines that help the patients we serve. The Pfizer PAC supports candidates who are committed to maintaining and improving incentives for innovation and protecting and expanding access for the patients we serve. Thank you for your support, Sally Susman Chair, Pfizer PAC Your contribution is not tax deductible as a charitable contribution for federal income tax purposes. Participation in the Pfizer PAC is completely voluntary. You Pfizerhave the PACright to refuse& Cor to participateporate Politicalwithout reprisal. Contributions You must be a U.S.Rep citizenort orJanuary carry a green 2009 card – to June participate 2010 in the PAC. [ ] PFIZER PAC Our Voice in the Political Process What is a PAC? Who Receives Pfizer PAC Contributions? PAC stands for Political Action Committee. A political action Pfizer PAC is nonpartisan. It committee is a government-regulated supports Democrats and Republicans organization that anyone can form alike. From January 2009 through to raise money for political campaign June 2010, Pfizer PAC supported donations. PACs are formed by 1,436 candidates. True to its individuals, non-profits, and even nonpartisan values, Pfizer PAC is many major corporations. committed to support candidates from both political parties who share Pfizer’s vision and values for How Does Pfizer PAC Work? healthcare. When choosing to make 3 a contribution to a candidate, the The Pfizer political action committee, Pfizer PAC considers candidates’ Pfizer PAC, is a nonpartisan views on issues that impact Pfizer and organization that provides its employees as well as the presence opportunities for employees to of Pfizer facilities or employees in participate in the American political the candidate’s district or state. A process. The Pfizer PAC is an complete list of Pfizer PAC and state employee-run organization with a corporate political contributions for Steering Committee made up of January 2009 – June 2010 is included Pfizer employees from different in this report. divisions of the Company. All corporate PACs are funded by voluntary employee contributions. Pfizer PAC is no different; it relies on the participation of Pfizer colleagues. [ Pfizer PAC & Corporate Political Contributions Report January 2009 – June 2010] PFIZER PAC & POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS GOVERNANCE POLICY Pfizer complies fully with all federal, state, and local laws and reporting requirements governing PAC and corporate political contributions. Pfizer has a Corporate Policy Procedure (#509) that requires all PAC and corporate political contributions to be compiled and published semi-annually in a report that is made available to employees, shareholders, and the public, and posted on the Company’s website at www.pfizer.com under “About Pfizer” in the Corporate Governance section. Pfizer also requests that trade associations receiving total payments of $100,000 or more from Pfizer in a given year report the portion of Pfizer dues or payments used for expenditures or contributions that, if made directly by Pfizer, would not be deductible under section 162(e)(1)(B) of the Internal Revenue Code. We are 4 disclosing such information received from our trade associations in this report. Pfizer has a PAC Steering Committee comprised of six colleagues who review and approve all PAC and corporate political contributions on a monthly basis. To ensure adequate representation, Steering Committee members represent different divisions within the Pfizer organization. The PAC Steering Committee evaluates candidates on a basis of their views on issues that impact Pfizer and its colleagues. It also takes note of whether Pfizer facilities or colleagues reside in a candidate’s district or state. In addition, all PAC and corporate contribution requests are shared with the Pfizer Political Contributions Policy Committee for review. The Political Contributions Policy Committee is responsible for governing the Pfizer PAC. Pfizer does not traditionally make contributions to 527 Issue Organizations such as MoveOn.Org or Swift Boat Veterans. If we were asked to make such a contribution, it would have to be reviewed and approved by the Political Contributions Policy Committee and subsequently disclosed in our semi-annual report. Finally, in light of the Supreme Court decision in the Citizens United case, Pfizer has determined that it will not make any independent expenditures prior to the November 2010 elections. After the elections, we will be convening an internal working group that will be tasked with reviewing the Supreme Court decision and making a recommendation regarding Pfizer’s policy going forward. Should the working group recommend that the Company make independent expenditures in the future, the decision will be discussed at the executive level as well as with the Corporate Governance Committee of our Board. [ Pfizer PAC & Corporate Political Contributions Report January 2009 – June 2010] Political Contributions Policy Committee CHAIR Sandra Beaty Doug Lankler Sally Susman Senior Vice President Senior Vice President Senior Vice President Public Affairs—Worldwide & Chief Compliance Officer Policy, External Affairs Biopharmaceutical Business and Communications TREASURER Geno Germano Ken Cole Joseph Gruber President Senior Vice President Vice President Specialty Care and Vaccines Federal Government Relations Finance and Business Operations SECRETARY Adele Gulfo Marc Scarduffa Barbara Bonfiglio President/GM Vice President Senior Corporate Counsel US Primary Care Government Relations & Public Affairs 5 Mike Hubert Vice President US Public Affairs Pfizer PAC Steering Committee Karen Boykin-Towns Ashley Graham Anne Keys Vice President Director Director Public Affairs - External Medical Affairs Public Affairs and Worldwide Biopharmaceutical New York, NY Food Safety Business New York, NY New York, NY Everett Cunningham Rod MacKenzie, Ph.D. Karen Saucier US Regional President Senior Vice President Senior Manager, Global Logistics West Regional BU—Sales West Worldwide Research Global Manufacturing New York, NY New London, CT Memphis, TN [ Pfizer PAC & Corporate Political Contributions Report January 2009 – June 2010] PARTY DISTRICT CORP. PAC WYETH 6 W Winner ä Contributions o Portion of the s Candidates ¢ Debt for non-2010 contribution was representing Retirement election earmarked for this Pfizer facilities NP=Non-Partisan particular candidate [ Pfizer PAC & Corporate Political Contributions Report January 2009 - June 2010 ] PARTY DISTRICT CORP. PAC WYETH ALABAMA FEDERAL HOUSE Rep. Robert B. Aderholt R 4 $1,000.00 Rep. Bobby Bright D 2 $5,617.68 Rep. Parker Griffith R 5 $4,564.80 LT. GOVERNOR Hon. Jim Folsom Jr. D $500.00 ATTORNEY GENERAL Luther J. Strange III R $500.00 $5,000.00 STATE SENATE Sen. Roger H. Bedford Jr D 6 $500.00 Sen. Linda Coleman D 20 $500.00 Sen. Priscilla Dunn D 19 $500.00 Sen. Steve French R 15 $500.00 Sen. Larry Means D 10 $500.00 Sen. Quinton T. Ross Jr. D 26 $500.00 Sen. Bobby D. Singleton D 24 $500.00 Sen. Rodger Mell Smitherman D 18 $500.00 Sen. J. T. Waggoner R 16 $500.00 7 STATE HOUSE Rep. Locy L. Baker D 85 $500.00 Rep. Blaine Galliher R 30 $500.00 Rep. Mike Hubbard R 79 $500.00 Rep. Thomas E. Jackson D 68 $500.00 Rep. Ronald G. Johnson R 33 $500.00 Rep. John F. Knight Jr. D 77 $500.00 Rep. Michael J. Millican D 17 $500.00 Rep. Oliver Robinson D 58 $500.00 Rep. Allen Treadaway R 51 $500.00 Rep. Pebblin W. Warren D 82 $500.00 ALASKA FEDERAL SENATE Sen. Lisa A. Murkowski R $8,000.00 ARIZONA FEDERAL SENATE Sen. Jon Kyl ä (Up in ‘12) R $1,000.00 FEDERAL HOUSE Rep. Harry E. Mitchell D 5 $3,064.80 Rep. John Shadegg R 3 $1,000.00 GOVERNOR Hon. Dean Martin R $250.00 W Winner ä Contributions o Portion of the s Candidates ¢ Debt for non-2010 contribution was representing Retirement election earmarked for this Pfizer facilities NP=Non-Partisan particular candidate [ Pfizer PAC & Corporate Political Contributions Report January 2009 - June 2010 ] PARTY DISTRICT CORP. PAC WYETH STATE SENATE Sen. Sylvia Tenney Allen R 5 $200.00 Sen. Frank Ronald Antenori R 30 $210.00 Sen. David Braswell R 6 $400.00 Sen. Jack W. Harper R 4 $200.00 Sen. Debbie McCune-Davis D 14 $200.00 Rep. Robert Meza D 14 $200.00 Rep. Rick Murphy R 9 $200.00 Sen. Steve Pierce R 1 $410.00 Rep. Kyrsten Sinema D 15 $200.00 Sen. Jay Tibshraeny R 21 $200.00 Sen. Thayer Verschoor R 22 $200.00 STATE HOUSE Rep. Frank Ronald Antenori R 30 $200.00 Shawnna Bolick R 11 $400.00 Rep.
Recommended publications
  • A Nalysts Disagree About How to Frame the Recent

    A Nalysts Disagree About How to Frame the Recent

    ml-l ii FROM THE CENTER O UT The Evolution of Party Politics: The March of the GOP Continues in North Carolina by Mebane Rash Whitman In March, the Center released the tenth edition of A Reactionary , Revolutionary, or Article II: A Guide to the N.C. Legislature. Article Evolutionary Election? II is a comprehensive guide to the 1995-96 General A nalystsdisagreeabout howtoframe therecent Assembly, containing profiles of each member, ef- electoral wins of the GOP in North Carolina. fectiveness rankings, demographic trends since Were the wins reactionary, that is, were voters 1975, and committee assignments. The latest edi- reacting in an angry anti-incumbent, anti-Democrat, tion reveals three major trends: (1) the significant anti-tax, anti-big government manner? Were the gains of the Republican Party, which now holds 92 wins revolutionary, a changing of the guard in terms of 170 seats in the legislature; (2) women have of which party governs the state-from Democrats, more power in the 1995-96 General Assembly be- whose party has governed the state for almost all of cause they secured plum committee chairs; and (3) the 20th century, to Republicans, who hope to gov- African-American legislators lost the speakership ern much of the 21st century? Or were they evolu- and powerful committee chairs, so their influence tionary, a single step in the long march of the has declined. Republican Party toward true competitiveness in a two-party state? The results of most elections are to some extent elections in North Carolina should not reactionary, but 1994 was not a run-of-the-mill be underestimated.
  • Video Games in the Supreme Court

    Video Games in the Supreme Court

    Georgetown University Law Center Scholarship @ GEORGETOWN LAW 2017 Newbs Lose, Experts Win: Video Games in the Supreme Court Angela J. Campbell Georgetown University Law Center, [email protected] This paper can be downloaded free of charge from: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub/1988 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3009812 This open-access article is brought to you by the Georgetown Law Library. Posted with permission of the author. Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarship.law.georgetown.edu/facpub Angela J. Campbell* Newbs Lose, Experts Win: Video Games in the Supreme Court Table of Contents I. Introduction .......................................... 966 II. The Advantage of a Supreme Court Expert ............ 971 A. California’s Counsel ............................... 972 B. Entertainment Merchant Association’s (EMA) Counsel ........................................... 973 III. Background on the Video Game Cases ................. 975 A. Cases Prior to Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n .............................................. 975 B. Brown v. Entertainment Merchants Ass’n .......... 978 1. Before the District Court ...................... 980 2. Before the Ninth Circuit ....................... 980 3. Supreme Court ................................ 984 IV. Comparison of Expert and Non-Expert Representation in Brown ............................................. 985 A. Merits Briefs ...................................... 985 1. Statement of Facts ............................ 986 a. California’s Statement
  • 2012 Political Contributions

    2012 Political Contributions

    2012 POLITICAL CONTRIBUTIONS 2012 Lilly Political Contributions 2 Public Policy As a biopharmaceutical company that treats serious diseases, Lilly plays an important role in public health and its related policy debates. It is important that our company shapes global public policy debates on issues specific to the people we serve and to our other key stakeholders including shareholders and employees. Our engagement in the political arena helps address the most pressing issues related to ensuring that patients have access to needed medications—leading to improved patient outcomes. Through public policy engagement, we provide a way for all of our locations globally to shape the public policy environment in a manner that supports access to innovative medicines. We engage on issues specific to local business environments (corporate tax, for example). Based on our company’s strategy and the most recent trends in the policy environment, our company has decided to focus on three key areas: innovation, health care delivery, and pricing and reimbursement. More detailed information on key issues can be found in our 2011/12 Corporate Responsibility update: http://www.lilly.com/Documents/Lilly_2011_2012_CRupdate.pdf Through our policy research, development, and stakeholder dialogue activities, Lilly develops positions and advocates on these key issues. U.S. Political Engagement Government actions such as price controls, pharmaceutical manufacturer rebates, and access to Lilly medicines affect our ability to invest in innovation. Lilly has a comprehensive government relations operation to have a voice in the public policymaking process at the federal, state, and local levels. Lilly is committed to participating in the political process as a responsible corporate citizen to help inform the U.S.
  • Education Session Roars Back at Sine

    Education Session Roars Back at Sine

    V20, N32 Thursday, April 30, 2015 Education session roars back at sine die Pence priorities addressed in final hours of compromise By MATTHEW BUTLER INDIANAPOLIS – With Religious Free- dom Restoration Act and the Common Wage repeal settled, the “education session” came roaring back for the final days of the 2015 119th Indiana General Assembly. The House passed the budget 69- 30 literally minutes to midnight Wednesday evening. Only a short period before the Senate passed the biennial spending measure 40-9. The two super majorities passed legisla- Speaker Brian Bosma makes a point with House Minority Leader Scott Pelath in tion that addressed priorities Republican leader- the final hours of the Indiana General Assembly on Wednesday. (HPI Photo by ship and Gov. Mike Pence highlighted back in Mark Curry) January, such as increased funding for K-12 edu- terms of powers and responsibilities. Oversight of ISTEP, cation, a revised school funding formula, increased school most of the A-through-F grading system, and the state’s choice funding, and significant reforms to the State Board burgeoning school voucher program will be transferred to of Education (SBOE). the SBOE’s control and, starting in 2017, the superinten- Between SB1 and the budget, the superintendent of public instruction as an elected office is diminished in Continued on page 3 Pence in wonderland By BRIAN A. HOWEY INDIANAPOLIS – On the Indiana Republican Party website under the “events” tab, the Marion County Rea- gan Dinner had been scheduled for tonight with Gov. Mike Pence on the bill as keynoter. It made perfect sense: The governor fresh off of his second “Gov.
  • Lawyer Summer 2018 Issue

    Lawyer Summer 2018 Issue

    The McKinney Indiana University Robert H. McKinney School of Law Lawyer Summer 2018 Issue IU McKinney Master of Laws Program Commemorates 15th Anniversary In Small Towns and Big Cities, McKinney Alumni Thrive Health Law Professors Collaborate on IU Addictions Crisis Grand Challenges Project Message from the Dean I am pleased to present this latest issue of The McKinney Lawyer, our school’s alumni magazine, designed to keep you up-to-date on happenings in the life of the law school. As I write this, it occurs to me that our school does, indeed, almost have a life of its own, with the same types of ups and downs that we experience in our individual lives. For example, in the following pages, you will read that we celebrated two anniver- saries last fall: the 15th anniversary of our Master of Laws (LL.M.) program and the 20th anniversary of our Program in International Human Rights Law (PIHRL). The LL.M. program, founded by Professor Emeritus Jeff Grove, has graduated more than 650 students from 71 countries since its inception. Our PIHRL has had a similar inter- national reach. That program, founded by Professor George Edwards, has facilitated more than 250 internship placements for students in 67 countries. We are proud of these milestones and hope that you will enjoy reading about them. In this issue, we also celebrate the many professional opportunities that our school affords to graduates. We highlight alumni who have chosen Bright Lights/Big City careers, as well as those who choose to make noteworthy impacts in smaller locales, becoming part of the fiber of the communities in which they live.
  • Pension Fund Leaders Term Corporate Board Diversification ‘Unacceptably Slow,’ Call for Increased Attention from Investors, Corporate Boards

    Pension Fund Leaders Term Corporate Board Diversification ‘Unacceptably Slow,’ Call for Increased Attention from Investors, Corporate Boards

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE PR16:21 Contact: Marc Lifsher June 1, 2016 [email protected] 916-653-2995 Pension Fund Leaders Term Corporate Board Diversification ‘Unacceptably Slow,’ Call for Increased Attention From Investors, Corporate Boards California State Treasurer John Chiang joins group of fiduciaries from funds with more than $1 trillion under management SACRAMENTO – California State Treasurer John Chiang today joined a group of state and local officials who contend that corporate boards have been too slow to diversify their ranks and that institutional investors should increase their focus on board diversity as a corporate governance priority. The joint statement emphasizes that racial and LGBT diversity as well as gender diversity are critical dimensions of effective board composition and performance. “There is broad agreement that a diverse corporate board is good for business,” Treasurer Chiang said. “Boards with directors, who possess a wide range of skills and experiences, are better positioned to oversee company strategy, risk mitigation and management performance.” Statistics show that board diversification has been slow—or has even regressed. White directors hold 85 percent of the board seats at the largest 200 S&P 500 companies, and the percentage of those boards with exclusively white directors has increased over the last decade. Men occupy 80 percent of all S&P 500 board seats. It is also estimated that there are fewer than 10 openly lesbian, gay, bisexual, or transgender directors among Fortune 500 companies. The 14 co-signers, many of them longtime leaders on the issue of board diversity, are fiduciaries for pension funds responsible for the retirement security of six million participants and with more than $1 trillion in assets under management.
  • November 17-18, 2012 Member's

    November 17-18, 2012 Member's

    O OUR E T AU T T U H B O I R R T S N 2 E 1 X 0 T 2 M , E 8 1 E - T 7 I 1 N . G V S O OC N T. 27-28 & Page 1 Page 2 OFFICERS PRESIDENT Cecil Parker KEEP the U.S.A. the American Way FIRST VICE PRESIDENT Motto of OGCA since 1937 Jim Tekavec Overheard at a recent OGCA meeting: an IDEAL: … I know not what course SECOND VICE PRESIDENT “Grandpa, what IS the ‘American Way?” others may take; but as for me, Give Robert Ray Preston me Liberty or Give me Death! Figuring a similar question could come my P. Henry, Virginia Convention SECRETARY way soon, I sat down to articulate an answer. Frank S. Hodges, Jr. But nothing would flow -- all the words seemed an AFFIRMATION: … our Fathers brought TREASURER small and forgettable. So I turned to echoes forth on this Continent a New Nation, con- from our past. ceived in Liberty and dedicated to the proposi- Thomas L. Kyser tion that all men are created equal. First “Branded” almost two and a half centu- A. Lincoln, The Gettysburg Address DIRECTORS ries ago, but enduring since the beginning of 2012-2013-2014 time, The American Way is -- a PROMISE: … Congress shall make no law Frank Becker, Jr. ... prohibiting the free exercise [of Religion]; Thomas E. Bowersox a BELIEF: We hold these truths to be self- or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the Joe Criniti evident, that all men are created equal, that press; or the right of the people peaceably to 2011-2012-2013 they are endowed by their Creator with certain assemble … Terrie L.
  • Controller Betty T Yee Unclaimed Property Search

    Controller Betty T Yee Unclaimed Property Search

    Controller Betty T Yee Unclaimed Property Search Slouched and dysfunctional Quent patents almost protestingly, though Chris asphyxiating his vigorously.double-spacesbisulphate devolving. strong. Windproof Summery andSky inconsonanttube her Nembutal Jereme so co-starring parentally his that anthropoid Fabio psyched pongs very How did not have one sign for controller yee Section B Holder Contact Information: The holder name is required. David tells me whether the changes that Acapulco has experienced in dark of tourism over these past decades of his diving career. Check the box first of all. The Pension Benefit Guaranty Corp. The unclaimed property reports. Common side effects resolve after a search on unclaimed funds and smart phone a controller betty t yee unclaimed property search to. Controller Yee also safeguards many types of property until claimed by the rightful owners, independently audits government agencies that spend state funds, and administers the payroll system for state government employees and California State University employees. Owners or heirs can claim their property directly from us without any service charges or fees. For the president, a regular visitor to the conference even as though private range after serving as vice president, the address was ancient of a homecoming. The underground regulations as to be credited to. Courtesy megan frye i and more specific designation, et al davis, a maiden name enter the court abused its commitment and pull out the unclaimed property search. Tens of stock, but continued to your ach debit your assets with a letter to. How often drive you update your database? Holder and payment must made to convey person who appeared to be entitled to payment.
  • Video Games As Free Speech

    Video Games As Free Speech

    The University of Maine DigitalCommons@UMaine Honors College 5-2014 Video Games as Free Speech Benjamin Cirrinone University of Maine - Main Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors Part of the Political Theory Commons Recommended Citation Cirrinone, Benjamin, "Video Games as Free Speech" (2014). Honors College. 162. https://digitalcommons.library.umaine.edu/honors/162 This Honors Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by DigitalCommons@UMaine. It has been accepted for inclusion in Honors College by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@UMaine. For more information, please contact [email protected]. VIDEO GAMES AS FREE SPEECH by Benjamin S. Cirrinone A Thesis Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for a Degree with Honors (Political Science) The Honors College University of Maine May 2014 Advisory Committee: James E.Gallagher, Associate Professor of Sociology Emeritus & Honors Faculty Mark D. Brewer, Associate Professor of Political Science Richard J. Powell, Associate Professor, Department of Political Science/Leadership Studies Sol Goldman, Adjunct Assistant Professor of Political Science Mark Haggerty, Rezendes Professor for Civic Engagement, Honors College Copyright © 2014 Benjamin Cirrinone All rights reserved. This work shall not be reproduced in any form, except for the inclusion of brief quotations in review, without permission in written form from the author. Abstract The prevalence of video game violence remains a concern for members of the mass media as well as political actors, especially in light of recent shootings. However, many individuals who criticize the industry for influencing real-world violence have not played games extensively nor are they aware of the gaming community as a whole.
  • 2014 Lawyer-Legislators

    2014 Lawyer-Legislators

    THE Volume 74 Number 2 February 2014 2014 lawyer-legislators ALSO IN THIS ISSUE • Meet the 2014 lawyer-legislators • Retired? Or want to? • Recommendations on legal education, licensure • Rockin Robin 1269_IL.indd 1 2/21/14 7:08 PM modern improvedhigher-quality bolder new currentbetter appreciated unusual valuable sophisticated cutting-edge important original exceptional sharpened fresh prominent bigger ANNUAL respected helpful unique vital cost-effective timely recent authentic relevantMEETINGdistinct brand-new worthwhile stylish different useful reimagined state-of-the-art June 16 - 19, 2014 Community Choice Credit Union Convention Center 833 5th Avenue • Des Moines, Iowa 50309 Amazing new location in the From the first-rate, fantastic heart of downtown location with plenty of space for Des Moines spreading out, to the top-notch speakers, a one-of-a-kind tech Held in conjunction with the Iowa Judges Association’s show and bountiful opportunities Annual Meeting to share stories with colleagues, this year’s annual meeting will be 2nd Annual ISBA Tech Show a grand affair like you’ve never now included in Annual experienced before and can’t Meeting program afford to miss. See you June 16-19! Nationally recognized speakers such as Jay Shepherd from “The Client Revolution” Over 50 hours of CLE offerings Guy R. Cook, ISBA President available through the track system Over $5,000 worth of wonderful prizes to be won www.iowabar.org/event/2014AnnualMeeting 1269_IL.indd 2 2/21/14 7:08 PM modern THE CONTENTS higher-quality improved bolder new Volume
  • When African-Americans Were Republicans in North Carolina, the Target of Suppressive Laws Was Black Republicans. Now That They

    When African-Americans Were Republicans in North Carolina, the Target of Suppressive Laws Was Black Republicans. Now That They

    When African-Americans Were Republicans in North Carolina, The Target of Suppressive Laws Was Black Republicans. Now That They Are Democrats, The Target Is Black Democrats. The Constant Is Race. A Report for League of Women Voters v. North Carolina By J. Morgan Kousser Table of Contents Section Title Page Number I. Aims and Methods 3 II. Abstract of Findings 3 III. Credentials 6 IV. A Short History of Racial Discrimination in North Carolina Politics A. The First Disfranchisement 8 B. Election Laws and White Supremacy in the Post-Civil War South 8 C. The Legacy of White Political Supremacy Hung on Longer in North Carolina than in Other States of the “Rim South” 13 V. Democratizing North Carolina Election Law and Increasing Turnout, 1995-2009 A. What Provoked H.B. 589? The Effects of Changes in Election Laws Before 2010 17 B. The Intent and Effect of Election Laws Must Be Judged by their Context 1. The First Early Voting Bill, 1993 23 2. No-Excuse Absentee Voting, 1995-97 24 3. Early Voting Launched, 1999-2001 25 4. An Instructive Incident and Out-of-Precinct Voting, 2005 27 5. A Fair and Open Process: Same-Day Registration, 2007 30 6. Bipartisan Consensus on 16-17-Year-Old-Preregistration, 2009 33 VI. Voter ID and the Restriction of Early Voting: The Preview, 2011 A. Constraints 34 B. In the Wings 34 C. Center Stage: Voter ID 35 VII. H.B. 589 Before and After Shelby County A. Process Reveals Intention 37 B. Facts 1. The Extent of Fraud 39 2.
  • December 12, 2016 131ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY ENDS LAME DUCK

    December 12, 2016 131ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY ENDS LAME DUCK

    December 12, 2016 131ST GENERAL ASSEMBLY ENDS LAME DUCK SESSION WITH SEVERAL MUNICIPAL ISSUES ADDRESSED The lame duck session ended Friday morning at about 3:30 am and as the dust settled, we’re proud to report that Ohio municipalities were able to claim a number of victories, a few draws, and only a limited number of losses. Now, we immediately turn our agenda to the next General Assembly, with the release of our first broad based policy report tomorrow. We would like to express our gratitude toward the many members of the General Assembly who worked with us on these many issues. Many members worked with us late into the night many times and worked hard to consider our concerns. Below, we review the legislation that effected municipalities in the final days of the session. Each of the following bills has been sent to Governor Kasich for his consideration. First, is Senate Bill 331, introduced by Senator Bob Peterson (R-Washington Court House). The original bill would regulate the sale of dogs from pet stores and dog retailers and to require the Director of Agriculture to license pet stores. This bill was introduced to create a statewide regulatory framework for pet breeding. The OML opposed this portion of the bill as an infringement on Home Rule and “single issue rule” problems which is the part of the Ohio Constitution that prohibits the legislature from passing bills with multiple subjects. This bill became a “Christmas tree bill” where numerous amendments were added, including language from AT&T on the 5G roll out Amendment 1: As mentioned above and as many of our members are aware, the House Finance committee amended the bill to create new regulations concerning micro wireless facility operators for their use of municipally owned land.