DOCSLIB.ORG

Environmental Assessment

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Environmental Assessment Environmental Assessment for issuance of an Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit for incidental take of Fender’s blue butterfly, Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly, Willamette daisy, Kincaid’s lupine, Bradshaw’s lomatium, Nelson’s checkermallow, and peacock larkspur in Benton County. Benton County Corvallis, Oregon U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon December 2010 Title for Proposed Action: Environmental Assessment for issuance of an Endangered Species Act Section 10(a)(1)(B) Permit for incidental take of Fender’s blue butterfly, Taylor’s checkerspot butterfly, Willamette daisy, Kincaid’s lupine, Bradshaw’s lomatium, Nelson’s checkermallow, and peacock larkspur in Benton County. Unit of Fish and Wildlife Service Proposing Action: US Fish and Wildlife Service, Portland, Oregon. Legal Mandate for Proposed Action: Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended, Section 10(a)(1)(B), as implemented by 50 CFR 17.22 for endangered species; National Environmental Policy Act of 1969, as implemented by 40 CFR 1500, et. seq. Applicant: Benton County, Oregon. Date: December 2010. This document was prepared for U.S. Fish and Wildlife by staff at the Institute for Applied Ecology: Michelle Michaud, Habitat Conservation Planner (Primary Author) Tom Kaye, Executive Director Carolyn Menke, Conservation Biologist Rachel Schwindt, Conservation Biologist The Institute for Applied Ecology is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to conserve native ecosystems through restoration, research, and education. P.O. Box 2855 Corvallis, OR 97339-2855 (541)753-3099 www.appliedeco.org Benton County Prairie Species EA Contents List of Tables ................................................................................................................................. iii List of Figures ................................................................................................................................ iii Appendices ..................................................................................................................................... iii 1 Purpose and Need for Action ....................................................................................................... 1 1.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 1 1.2 Purpose ............................................................................................................................ 1 1.3 Need ................................................................................................................................ 2 1.4 Location and Scope ......................................................................................................... 3 1.5 Decisions to be made by USFWS ................................................................................... 4 2 Alternatives .................................................................................................................................. 5 2.1 Alternative 1: Proposed Action Alternative .................................................................... 5 2.1.0 Activities and Impacts of the HCP.......................................................................... 5 2.1.1 Rationale of the Proposed Alternative .................................................................... 9 2.2 No Action Alternative ................................................................................................... 10 2.3 Alternatives Considered and Rejected .......................................................................... 11 2.3.0 Benton County Coverage Only/Animal Species Only.......................................... 11 2.3.1 All Lands in Benton County/ Eight Species ......................................................... 11 2.3.2 All Lands in Benton County/Fender’s Blue Butterfly Only ................................. 12 2.3.3 Coverage of Private Development Activities on Lots Generated through Partitions in Fender’s Blue Zone ........................................................................................................... 12 2.3.4 Private Landowners Share Mitigation Costs for Impacts on their Lands ............. 13 3 Description of the Affected Environment .................................................................................. 14 3.1 Physiographic Setting ................................................................................................... 14 3.1.0 Overview ............................................................................................................... 14 3.1.1 Willamette Valley Ecoregion ................................................................................ 15 3.2 Climate .......................................................................................................................... 15 3.3 Topography/Soils .......................................................................................................... 15 3.4 Prairie Habitat Vegetation............................................................................................. 16 3.4.0 Wet Prairies ........................................................................................................... 16 3.4.1 Upland Prairies...................................................................................................... 16 3.5 Wildlife and Fish........................................................................................................... 16 3.5.0 Mammals............................................................................................................... 16 3.5.1 Amphibians ........................................................................................................... 17 3.5.2 Reptiles ................................................................................................................. 17 3.5.3 Birds ...................................................................................................................... 17 3.5.4 Invertebrates .......................................................................................................... 17 3.5.5 Fish ........................................................................................................................ 18 3.6 Listed, Proposed and Candidate Species ...................................................................... 18 3.6.0 Listed Species ....................................................................................................... 18 3.6.1 Proposed and Candidate Species .......................................................................... 22 3.7 Water Resources (Quantity and Quality) ...................................................................... 24 3.7.0 Water Quality Limited Streams ............................................................................ 25 3.7.1 Groundwater ......................................................................................................... 26 3.8 Wetlands ....................................................................................................................... 26 3.9 Air Quality .................................................................................................................... 26 i Benton County Prairie Species EA 3.10 Cultural and Historical Resources ................................................................................ 27 3.11 Land Use/Socio-Economic ........................................................................................... 27 3.12 Transportation ............................................................................................................... 29 4 Environmental Consequences .................................................................................................... 30 4.1 Proposed Action Alternative ......................................................................................... 30 4.1.0 Climate .................................................................................................................. 31 4.1.1 Topography/Soils .................................................................................................. 36 4.1.2 Prairie Habitat Vegetation..................................................................................... 38 4.1.3 Wildlife and Fish................................................................................................... 42 4.1.4 Threatened and Endangered Species .................................................................... 45 4.1.5 Critical Habitat ...................................................................................................... 58 4.1.6 Water Resources ................................................................................................... 63 4.1.7 Land Use/Socio-Economic/Environmental Justice ............................................... 67 4.1.8 Cultural and Archaeological Resources ................................................................ 68 4.1.9 Air Quality ............................................................................................................ 70 4.1.10 Transportation ....................................................................................................... 73 4.2 No-Action Alternative .................................................................................................. 75 4.2.0 Climate .................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Lomatium Bradshawii -‐ Plant Propagation Protocol ESRM
    Lomatium bradshawii - Plant Propagation Protocol ESRM 412 – Native Plant Production View Native Status Present Absent/Unreported USA (OR, WA) (3) Photos by Melissa Carr. (8) TAXONOMY Plant Family Scientific Name: Apiaceae Common Name: Carrot family Species Scientific Name Scientific Name: Lomatium bradshawii Varieties: Common Name(s): Bradshaw’s Lomatium, Bradshaw’s Desert Parsley Species Code: LOBR GENERAL INFORMATION Geographical range: Southwestern Washington, Puget Trough, Clark County (only 2 occurrences) Oregon: Central and Southern Willamette Valley: Benton, Lane, Linn, and Marion counties (47 occurrences) (1,7) Ecological distribution: moist meadows, wetlands, seasonally wet prairies (1) Climate and elevation range: Deep valleys, low elevations only (2) Local habitat and abundance: Grows in wet prairies that are inundated until late spring or early summer, within 500 feet of river or stream beds, in deep pluvial clay, shallow, and poorly drained soils, sometimes over basalt layer. (2) Commonly associated with the following species: Deschampsia cespitosa, Hordeum brachyantherum, Poapratensis, Eryngium petiolatum, Perideridia spp., Juncus spp., Grindelia integrifolia, Microseris laciniata, and Galium cymosum (1) Plant strategy type / successional stage: grows best in seasonally flooded areas, between wetland and upland Plant characteristics: perennial forb with long, slender taproot, linear segmented leaves 4- 12 inches long, small, light yellow flowers on umbels (2); flowers have spatial and temporal separation of sexual phases to insure outcrossing (not self-pollinating) (6), fruit is oblong, ¼-1/2 inch w/ thickened, corky wings (7). Blooms late April-June, fruits mid- May-early July (8). PROPAGATION DETAILS Ecotype: n/a Propagation Goal: Seedlings (2). Propagation Method: Seed only, plant germinated seeds in pots, or direct seed at site (LOBR does not reproduce vegetatively) (7).
    [Show full text]
  • Redacted for Privacy W
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Aaron D. Drew for the degree of Master of Science in Wildlife Science presented on December 19. 2000. Title: Effects of Livestock Grazing and Small Mammal Populations on Endangered Bradshaw's Desert Parsley (Lomatium bradshawii) at Oak Creek. Willamette Valley. Oregon. Abstract approved: Redacted for privacy W. Daniel I evaluated the response of the federally listed endangered plant species Bradshaw's desert parsley (Lomatium bradshawii) to livestock grazing and small mammal depredation at Oak Creek, Linn County, Oregon, 1997-1998. I established six study blocks (three each in wooded and herbaceous pastures) with plots in each block randomly assigned to one of four intensities of livestock grazing based on biomass remaining after grazing (no grazing [1,746 kg/ha], high biomass [969 kg/ha], moderate biomass [670 kg/ha], and light biomass [318 kg/ha]). Small mammals were live-trapped in each of the study blocks pre and post application of the livestock grazing treatments. I mapped and measured 2,807 Bradshaw's desert parsley plants (n1,366 in the wooded and n = 1,441 in the herbaceous pastures) over the two year period to determine changes in schizocarp production, morphological structure (conical surface area and height), population composition (plant stage), survival, emergence of new plants, and effects of small mammal herbivory pre and post application of livestock grazing. Grazing reductions in standing crop biomass appeared to have a positive effect on emergence of new Bradshaw's desert parsley plants, while having no detectible effect on total plant density or survival. Differences in total plant density, survival, schizocarp production, morphological structure, and population composition were related to pasture type.
    [Show full text]
  • Fern Ridge Research Natural Area
    FERN RIDGE RESEARCH NATURAL AREA Fern Ridge RNA 2014 Abstract Public land provides benefits including species conservation, ecological function, and scientific knowledge. Authorized by Congress in 1939, the Corps of Engineers’ Fern Ridge Project (Oregon, Wes Messinger, Corps of Engineers Willamette Valley Project Lane County) includes nearly 5500 acres of marsh, wet and upland prairie, and deciduous forest: a significant quantity of publicly held habitat on the heavily utilized Willamette Valley floor. Following Heritage Program surveys in the 1980s, the Corps designated 250 acres of wet prairie as the Fern Ridge Research Natural Area. These sites comprise the only Corps of Engineers RNA, and one of two on the floor of the Willamette Valley. Other land use designations on these parcels include the Oregon Department of Fish and Wildlife Fern Ridge Wildlife Area and Critical Habitat for Erigeron decumbens and Fender’s blue butterfly. The RNA supports 10 plant species of conservation concern including Lupinus oreganus, Sericocarpus rigidus, Horkelia congesta, the largest remnant population of Erigeron decumbens, and large numbers of Lomatium bradshawii. It is the type locality of The Fern Ridge Research Natural Area was dedicated in 1988 by the Amanita pruittii, described in 2014. It supports nesting territories of Western Meadowlarks and Grasshopper Sparrows. Corps management is intended to sustain ecological processes including fire Commander of the Portland District, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. It Microtopography and sheet and to reduce the influence of eXotic species. Two dozen studies on the RNA include seminal work flow, Royal Amazon unit on prescribed fire and Lomatium bradshawii demography. Current studies address prairie fungi serves the natural area system as a high quality eXample of remnant communities, plant demographics, and eXotic grass control against a background of prescribed fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Benton County Natural Areas and Parks
    Benton County Natural Areas and Parks Prairie Baseline Inventory Report October 2011 Institute for Applied Ecology www.appliedeco.org 541.753.3099 This document was prepared for Benton County by staff at the Institute for Applied Ecology: Carolyn Menke [email protected] 541.753.3099 ext. 121 The Institute for Applied Ecology is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to conserve native ecosystems through restoration, research, and education. P.O. Box 2855 Corvallis, OR 97339-2855 (541) 753-3099 www.appliedeco.org We wish to thank the ESRI Conservation Program for a generous GIS software grant that allowed us to create the maps for this project. Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................................................. 1 Methods ........................................................................................................................................................ 2 HCP Species and Habitat Abundance .................................................................................................... 2 Noxious Weeds ..................................................................................................................................... 3 Vegetation Sampling ............................................................................................................................. 4 Prairie Perimeter Mapping...................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Copyright Statement
    University of Plymouth PEARL https://pearl.plymouth.ac.uk 04 University of Plymouth Research Theses 01 Research Theses Main Collection 2014 Comparative Demography and Life history Evolution of Plants Mbeau ache, Cyril http://hdl.handle.net/10026.1/3201 Plymouth University All content in PEARL is protected by copyright law. Author manuscripts are made available in accordance with publisher policies. Please cite only the published version using the details provided on the item record or document. In the absence of an open licence (e.g. Creative Commons), permissions for further reuse of content should be sought from the publisher or author. Copyright Statement This copy of the thesis has been supplied on the condition that anyone who consults it is understood to recognise that its copyright rests with its author and that no quotation from the thesis and no information derived from it may be published without the author’s prior consent. Title page Comparative Demography and Life history Evolution of Plants By Cyril Mbeau ache (10030310) A thesis submitted to Plymouth University in partial fulfillment for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY School of Biological Sciences Plymouth University, UK August 2014 ii Comparative demography and life history evolution of plants Cyril Mbeau ache Abstract Explaining the origin and maintenance of biodiversity is a central goal in ecology and evolutionary biology. Some of the most important, theoretical explanations for this diversity centre on the evolution of life histories. Comparative studies on life history evolution, have received significant attention in the zoological literature, but have lagged in plants. Recent developments, however, have emphasised the value of comparative analysis of data for many species to test existing theories of life history evolution, as well as to provide the basis for developing additional or alternative theories.
    [Show full text]
  • AN ABSTRACT of the DISSERTATION of Paul M
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE DISSERTATION OF Paul M. Severns for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Botany and Plant Pathology, presented on May 4, 2009. Title: Conservation Genetics of Kincaid’s Lupine: A Threatened Plant of Western Oregon and Southwest Washington Grasslands Abstract approved: Aaron Liston Mark V. Wilson Kincaid’s lupine (Lupinus oreganus Heller) is a federally listed threatened species native to remnant grassland of western Oregon and southwestern Washington, and is the primary larval host plant of a once thought extinct butterfly, Plebejus icarioides fenderi Macy. Past studies concerning Kincaid’s lupine reproduction suggested that populations may suffer reductions in fitness and progeny vigor due to inbreeding depression, but no direct investigation into range-wide patterns of genetic variation has been undertaken. I used nuclear DNA and chloroplast DNA simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers to determine genet size and patterns of non-adventitious rhizomatous lupine spread, to estimate the number of genets within Kincaid’s lupine populations, and to assess whether seed transfer for the purpose of genetic rescue is an appropriate genetics management strategy for Kincaid’s lupine. Patterns of allelic diversity at nDNA SSR loci within study patches revealed that non-adventitious spread of rhizomes can extend to at least 27 m and may dominate a portion of a lupine patch or small population. However, genet spread and arrangement in study patches were sufficiently integrated such that interplantlet Bombus foraging flights exceeding 2 m had > 90% probability of occurring between different genets. Within-lupine patch genetic diversity was well-undersampled, refuting the supposition that Kincaid’s lupine populations suffer from inbreeding depression due to small effective population sizes.
    [Show full text]
  • Bradshaw's Desert Parsley
    Species Fact Sheet Bradshaw's lomatium Lomatium bradshawii STATUS: ENDANGERED This species potentially occurs in Clark County, Washington CRITICAL HABITAT: NONE (Map may reflect historical as well as recent sightings) Bradshaw's lomatium, Lomatium bradshawii, was federally listed as endangered in 1988. A recovery plan was published in 1993. Current and Historical Status Bradshaw's lomatium currently extends from Clark County, Washington, to the southern end of the Willamette Valley, Oregon. Historically, Lomatium bradshawii was poorly documented. No known collections occurred between 1941 and 1969, which led to the assumption that the taxon might be extinct. By 1980, following a study of the species, six populations had been located. Since 1980, over 40 new sites have been discovered. For many years Lomatium bradshawii was considered an Oregon endemic, however, in 1994, two populations were discovered in Clark County, Washington. The Washington populations are located on private land and contain the largest number of plants, with one site estimated to have over 800,000 individuals. Description and Life History Bradshaw's lomatium is perennial herb in the parsley family (Apiaceae) and can reach 8-20 inches in height. Mature plants have 2-6 leaves that are chiefly basal and divided into very fine, almost threadlike, linear segments. The yellow flowers are small and grouped into asymmetrical umbels. Each umbel is composed of 5-14 umbellets, which are subtended by green bracts divided into sets of three. This bract arrangement differentiates Bradshaw's from other lomatiums. Bradshaw's lomatium blooms during April and early May, with fruits appearing in late May and June.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Bradshaw's Lomatium, a Federally-Listed Endangered
    TECHNICAL NOTES U. S. DEPT. OF AGRICULTURE NATURAL RESOURCES CONSERVATION SERVICE Portland, Oregon September 2010 PLANT MATERIALS No. 40 – Supplement B Introduction to Bradshaw’s lomatium, a Federally-listed Endangered Species, and a Key and Photo Guide to the Lomatium Species that Occur within its Range * Use of line drawing illustrations for all species courtesy of the University of Washington Press per C.L. Hitchcock and A. Cronquist. 1961. Vascular Plants of the Pacific Northwest. Part 3; Saxifragaceae to Ericaceae. * Most species descriptions and maps of Washington plant distributions provided by the Washington University Herbarium, Burke Museum: http://biology.burke.washington.edu/herbarium/imagecollection.php * Maps of Oregon plant distributions courtesy of the Oregon Flora Project: http://oregonflora.org/atlas.php *Prepared by Kathy Pendergrass; Plant Conservation Specialist with the Natural Resources Conservation Service, Portland, Oregon The purpose of this technical note is to provide information about Bradshaw’s lomatium, a federal and state-listed Endangered plant, and to provide information on how to identify the species from other co-occurring lomatium species within its range. A special thanks to all who contributed use of photographs for this publication including: G.D. Carr, Steve Gisler, Jean Jancaitus, Ben Legler, Carolyn Menke, and Paul Slichter. We welcome your comments for improving any of the content of this publication for future editions. Please contact [email protected]. The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in its programs on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, religion, age, disability, political beliefs and marital or familial status. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact the USDA Office of Communications (202) 720-2791.
    [Show full text]
  • Climate Change Vulnerability Index Report Lomatium Bradshawii
    Climate Change Vulnerability Index Report Lomatium bradshawii (Bradshaw’s desert-parsley) Date: October 2019 Assessor: Walter Fertig, WA Natural Heritage Program (update from Gamon 2014) Geographic Area: Washington Heritage Rank: G2/S1 Index Result: Moderately Vulnerable Confidence: Very High Climate Change Vulnerability Index Scores Section A Severity Scope (% of range) 1. Temperature Severity >6.0° F (3.3°C) warmer 0 5.6-6.0° F (3.2-3.3°C) warmer 0 5.0-5.5° F (2.8-3.1°C) warmer 0 4.5-5.0° F (2.5-2.7°C) warmer 0 3.9-4.4° F (2.2-2.4°C) warmer 0 <3.9° F (2.2°C) warmer 100 2. Hamon AET:PET moisture < -0.119 0 -0.097 to -0.119 0 -0.074 to - 0.096 100 -0.051 to - 0.073 0 -0.028 to -0.050 0 >-0.028 0 Section B Effect on Vulnerability 1. Sea level rise Neutral 2a. Distribution relative to natural barriers Neutral 2b. Distribution relative to anthropogenic barriers Somewhat Increase 3. Impacts from climate change mitigation Neutral Section C 1. Dispersal and movements Somewhat Increase 2ai Change in historical thermal niche Increase 2aii. Change in physiological thermal niche Neutral 2bi. Changes in historical hydrological niche Neutral 2bii. Changes in physiological hydrological niche Increase 2c. Dependence on specific disturbance regime Somewhat Increase 2d. Dependence on ice or snow-covered habitats Neutral 3. Restricted to uncommon landscape/geological features Neutral 4a. Dependence on others species to generate required habitat Neutral 4b. Dietary versatility Not Applicable 4c.
    [Show full text]
  • Benton County, Oregon Prairie Conservation Strategy
    BENTON COUNTY, OREGON PRAIRIE CONSERVATION STRATEGY DECEMBER 2010 Benton County Prairie Conservation Strategy This document was prepared for Benton County by staff at the Institute for Applied Ecology The Institute for Applied Ecology is a non-profit 501(c)(3) organization whose mission is to conserve native ecosystems through restoration, research, and education. P.O. Box 2855 Corvallis, OR 97339-2855 (541) 753-3099 www.appliedeco.org We wish to thank the ESRI Conservation Program for a generous GIS software grant that allowed us to create the maps for this project Cover photos: Photos top left to right: Fender’s blue butterfly: Tom Kaye Kincaid’s lupine: Lori Wisehart American Kestrel: Rod Gilbert Wren upland prairie tour: Rachel Schwindt Western gray squirrel: Rod Gilbert Willamette daisy: Lori Wisehart Photo bottom: Jackson-Frazier and Owens Farm: Rachel Schwindt Benton County Prairie Conservation Strategy Preamble The Benton County Prairie Conservation Strategy has been developed to educate citizens and land managers about at-risk habitat and species in Benton County, and to provide voluntary long-term strategies for conservation on both public and private lands. The Strategy is the result of input from local citizens and land managers who participated in meetings, workshops, and a web based survey. The Benton County Habitat Conservation Plan Stakeholder Advisory and Technical Advisory Committees guided the goals and objectives of the Strategy, as well as provided technical information on species and habitats (Benton County 2010). The information in this Strategy provides a reference for landowners and land managers to recognize at-risk habitat and species, and understand where these species occur in Benton County.
    [Show full text]
  • Species Status Assessment Report for Bradshaw's Lomatium (Lomatium
    Species Status Assessment Report for Bradshaw’s lomatium (Lomatium bradshawii (Rose ex. Math.) Mathias & Constance) Version 1.0 (Photo by Jeff Dillon, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service) January 2018 Pacific Region (Region 1) U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service Portland, Oregon Species Status Assessment Report for Bradshaw’s lomatium ● Version 1.0 This document was prepared by Tom Brumbelow. Kim Garner and Paul LaFemina contributed to earlier versions of this report. Additionally we would like to thank Ed Alverson (Lane County Parks), Wes Messinger (Army Corps of Engineers), and Kathy Pendergrass (Natural Resources Conservation Service) for providing peer review of a prior draft of this report. Throughout this document, words that appear in bold type are defined in the Glossary. Suggested reference: U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. 2018. Species status assessment report for Bradshaw’s lomatium (Lomatium bradshawii). Version 1.0. Oregon Fish and Wildlife Office, Portland, Oregon. 64 pp. i Species Status Assessment Report for Bradshaw’s lomatium ● Version 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY This Species Status Assessment Report is a comprehensive review of the biology and status of Bradshaw’s lomatium (Lomatium bradshawii), a perennial herb that was listed as endangered under the Endangered Species Act of 1973, as amended (Act), in 1988 (53 Federal Register 38448-38451). The purpose of this report is to evaluate the viability of Bradshaw’s lomatium as indicated by measures of population resiliency, redundancy, and representation. This report was prepared for the purposes of conducting a 5-year review of the status of the species, as required by section 4(c)(2)(A) of the Act.
    [Show full text]
  • Consequences of Dispersal Limitation and Strategies for Reintroduction Steven James Kroiss Washington University in St
    Washington University in St. Louis Washington University Open Scholarship All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 9-4-2012 Regional Rarity: Consequences of Dispersal Limitation and Strategies for Reintroduction Steven James Kroiss Washington University in St. Louis Follow this and additional works at: https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd Recommended Citation Kroiss, Steven James, "Regional Rarity: Consequences of Dispersal Limitation and Strategies for Reintroduction" (2012). All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs). 965. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/etd/965 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by Washington University Open Scholarship. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) by an authorized administrator of Washington University Open Scholarship. For more information, please contact [email protected]. WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY IN ST. LOUIS Division of Biology and Biomedical Sciences Evolution, Ecology, and Population Biology Dissertation Examination Committee: Tiffany Knight, Chair Ken Olsen Eleanor Pardini Barbara Schaal Kevin Smith Peter Wyse Jackson Regional Rarity: Consequences of Dispersal Limitation and Strategies for Reintroduction by Steven James Kroiss A dissertation presented to the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences of Washington University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy August 2012 Saint Louis, Missouri Abstract of the Dissertation Regional rarity: consequences of dispersal limitation and strategies for reintroduction by Steven James Kroiss Doctor of Philosophy in Evolution, Ecology and Population Biology Washington University in St. Louis, 2012 Professor Barbara Schaal, Chair Understanding factors that limit species distributions within restored habitats has been a longstanding goal of restoration ecology, particularly with respect to differences between rare and widespread species.
    [Show full text]