Initial Advice Statement

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Initial Advice Statement Six Mile Creek Dam (Lake Macdonald) Safety Upgrade Project Initial Advice Statement September 2017 TABLE OF CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Background ................................................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Purpose and scope of the IAS ................................................................................................... 1 1.3 Coordinated Project Declaration ............................................................................................... 2 2. THE PROPONENT .................................................................................................... 4 3. NATURE OF THE PROPOSAL ................................................................................. 5 3.1 Scope of the Project ................................................................................................................... 5 3.2 Land use....................................................................................................................................... 6 3.3 Project need, justification and alternatives considered ......................................................... 9 3.3.1 Alternatives to Project – Risk Reduction Options ........................................................... 10 3.4 Key Project components to be declared ................................................................................ 11 3.5 External infrastructure requirements ...................................................................................... 11 3.6 Project timeframes .................................................................................................................... 11 3.7 Construction and operational processes ............................................................................... 12 3.8 Workforce requirements during construction and operation .............................................. 12 3.9 Economic indicators ................................................................................................................. 12 3.10 Financing requirements and implications ............................................................................. 13 4. LOCATION OF KEY PROJECT ELEMENTS .......................................................... 13 4.1 Location ..................................................................................................................................... 13 4.2 Tenure ........................................................................................................................................ 13 5. DESCRIPTION OF THE EXISTING ENVIRONMENT .............................................. 14 5.1 Natural environment ................................................................................................................. 14 5.1.1 Land ................................................................................................................................ 14 5.1.2 Water ............................................................................................................................... 17 5.1.3 Air .................................................................................................................................... 20 5.1.4 Ecosystems ..................................................................................................................... 20 5.1.5 Flora and fauna ............................................................................................................... 21 5.1.6 Amenity ........................................................................................................................... 25 5.2 Social and economic environment .......................................................................................... 25 5.2.1 Accommodation and housing .......................................................................................... 26 5.2.2 Cultural heritage (Indigenous and non-Indigenous) ........................................................ 26 5.3 Built environment ...................................................................................................................... 27 5.4 Traffic and transport ................................................................................................................. 27 5.5 Land use and tenures ............................................................................................................... 30 5.5.1 Key local and regional land uses .................................................................................... 30 5.5.2 Key local and regional land tenures ................................................................................ 30 5.5.3 Native title ....................................................................................................................... 30 5.6 Planning instruments, government policies .......................................................................... 34 5.6.1 Commonwealth ............................................................................................................... 34 5.6.2 State ................................................................................................................................ 35 6. POTENTIAL PROJECT IMPACTS .......................................................................... 39 6.1 Justification for IAR Process – Potential Impacts ................................................................. 39 6.2 Natural environment ................................................................................................................. 39 6.2.1 Land ................................................................................................................................ 39 6.2.2 Water ............................................................................................................................... 40 6.2.3 Air .................................................................................................................................... 41 6.2.4 Ecosystems ..................................................................................................................... 41 6.2.5 Flora and fauna ............................................................................................................... 42 6.2.6 Amenity ........................................................................................................................... 43 6.3 Social and economic impact .................................................................................................... 44 6.3.1 Accommodation and housing .......................................................................................... 44 6.3.2 Social and recreational services ..................................................................................... 44 6.4 Cultural Heritage ....................................................................................................................... 45 i 6.4.1 Indigenous ....................................................................................................................... 45 6.4.2 Non-indigenous ............................................................................................................... 45 6.5 Built environment ...................................................................................................................... 45 6.6 MNES under EPBC Act ............................................................................................................. 46 7. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT AND MITIGATION MEASURES ................... 47 7.1 Justification for IAR Process – Key Concerns and Mitigations ........................................... 47 7.2 Natural environment ................................................................................................................. 49 7.2.1 Land ................................................................................................................................ 49 7.2.2 Water ............................................................................................................................... 49 7.2.3 Air .................................................................................................................................... 50 7.2.4 Flora and fauna ............................................................................................................... 50 7.3 Built environment ...................................................................................................................... 52 7.4 Cultural heritage management plan (Indigenous) ................................................................. 52 7.5 Non-indigenous cultural heritage management .................................................................... 52 7.6 Greenhouse gas management plan ........................................................................................ 52 7.7 Waste management .................................................................................................................. 52 7.8 Hazard and risk, and health and safety .................................................................................. 52 7.9 Environmental management .................................................................................................... 53 8. APPROVALS PROCESS........................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • Seqwater Recreation Guide WAPPA
    Wappa Dam RECREATION GUIDE seqwater.com.au About OUR VISION Wappa Dam To manage access to recreation Wappa Dam is located west of Yandina in the Sunshine Coast opportunities while protecting hinterland. The dam was constructed in 1963 on the South Maroochy natural resources and water quality. River and supplies drinking water to the interconnected supply network. The lake has a catchment area of approximately 69.7km2 and holds 4694 megalitres of water at full supply. Spillway Lookout The lookout at Jack Harrison Park located at Wappa Park Road, Kiamba, is a great place to view the dam when it is spilling. RECREATION REVIEW UPDATE Seqwater is committed to providing quality recreation facilities that everyone can enjoy. We wanted to know what the community thought of current facilities and what suggestions you had for the future, so in 2013 we started a full Recreation Review across our assets. We appreciate the efforts of everyone who took the time to participate in our workshops and online surveys. While we want to implement as many ideas as possible, Seqwater must remain committed to protecting our natural environment and minimising the risks to water quality. Some of the changes will be implemented at a later date, once further funding has been secured and all environmental impact analysis has been completed. Progress updates, along with details of the feedback received is available at seqwater.com.au/recreview. We value the unique status of the Jinibara People as the original owners and custodians of the land and water around Wappa Dam. 2 Wappa Dam RECREATION GUIDE Wappa Dam RECREATION GUIDE 3 Protecting our waterways & the environment We all need to do our part to ensure we keep our • cleaning and drying anything that came into waterways healthy.
    [Show full text]
  • Water for Life
    SQWQ.001.002.0382 • se a er WATER FOR LIFE • Strategic Plan 2010-11 to 2014-15 Queensland Bulk Water Supply Authority (QBWSA) trading as Seqwater 1 SQWQ.001.002.0383 2010-11 to 2014-15 Strategic Plan Contents Foreword ........................................................................................................................................................... 3 Regional Water Grid ......................................................................................................................................... 4 . Seqwater's vision and mission ......................................................................................................................... 5 Our strategic planning framework ................................................................................................................... 5 Emerging strategic issues ................................................................................................................................ 7 Seqwater's goals and strategy for 2010-11 to 2014-15 ................................................................................... 8 • Budget outlook............................................................................................................................................... 10 Strategic performance management ................................................................................................................. 11 Key Performance Indicators ..........................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Schedule a - Urban Utilities High Level Water Restrictions
    Schedule A - Urban Utilities High Level Water Restrictions This schedule details the way in which potable water from the Seqwater bulk water supply is permitted to be used after commencement of High Level Water Restrictions. For assistance with interpretation of this document please refer to the definition section at the end of this document. Category High Level Water Restrictions 1.1 Residential and non- Total ban on sprinklers. Hand-held hoses with a twist or trigger nozzle can be used for watering established residential premises gardens and lawns: a. Odd numbered properties Watering established gardens and lawns - 4am-8am and 4pm-8pm - Tuesday and Saturday (Note this does not include b. Even or un-numbered properties production and sale area - 4am-8am and 4pm-8pm irrigation for non-residential - Wednesday and Sunday consumers) Bucket or watering can may be used at any time. Only one hose at a time can be used at the property. The following are not permitted: ‐ Hoses without a twist or trigger nozzle ‐ Hoses which are not hand- held (e.g. left to run hooked in a tree). Category High Level Water Restrictions 1.2 Residential premises As per restriction item 1.1 Watering of gardens only for residents eligible for concession 1.3 Residential and non- Wasting water by way of leaking taps and plumbing fittings and overflowing containers or structures (including residential premises but not limited to pools, spas and rainwater tanks) and allowing water to flow onto roads, pathways and driveways during is prohibited. Water wastage 1.4 Residential and non- Sprinklers with a timer and hand- held hoses with a twist or trigger nozzle can be used for watering newly residential properties established gardens and lawns: Watering newly established a.
    [Show full text]
  • Lower Lockyer Valley Water Supply Scheme Annual Network Service Plan
    Lower Lockyer Valley Water Supply Scheme Annual Network Service Plan December 2013 Contents 1. Introduction ............................................................................................................................ 3 2. Scheme Details ...................................................................................................................... 3 2.1 Scheme background and context ............................................................................................ 3 2.2 Infrastructure details ................................................................................................................ 3 2.3 Customers and water entitlements serviced ........................................................................... 4 2.4 Water availability and use ........................................................................................................ 4 2.5 Water trading ........................................................................................................................... 5 2.6 Irrigation Customer Consultation ............................................................................................. 5 2.7 Customer service standards .................................................................................................... 6 3. Financial Performance .......................................................................................................... 6 3.1 Tariffs ......................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UNESCO Noosa Biosphere Reserve 10 Year Periodic Review Report
    NOOSA BIOSPHERE RESERVE PERIODIC REVIEW 2018 Document Set ID: 20620708 Version: 7, Version Date: 01/08/2018 Noosa Biosphere Reserve - Periodic Review 2018 Copyright 2018 Noosa Shire Council 9 Pelican Street, Tewantin, Queensland 4565 and Noosa Biosphere Reserve Foundation Ltd. 52 Doonella Street, Tewantin Queensland 4565 The words noosa biosphere® and the logo noosa biosphere depicted on the cover are registered trademarks of Noosa Shire Council. Acknowledgements Thank you to the following people for their generous assistance with background research and preparation of this report: • NBRF Periodic Review Advisory Group (PRAG) • NBRF Board and Members • NBRF contract staff • Professor Peter Bridgewater, University of Canberra • Noosa Shire Councillors • Noosa Shire Council staff • The Noosa Shire community Cover photo: Noosa Council Page 2 Document Set ID: 20620708 Version: 7, Version Date: 01/08/2018 Noosa Biosphere Reserve - Periodic Review 2018 CONTENTS PAGE LIST OF MAPS, TABLES AND FIGURES ................................................................................................... 5 LIST OF ACRONYMS ................................................................................................................................... 5 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................... 7 PART ONE: SUMMARY ............................................................................................................................ 10 PART
    [Show full text]
  • Water for South East Queensland: Planning for Our Future ANNUAL REPORT 2020 This Report Is a Collaborative Effort by the Following Partners
    Water for South East Queensland: Planning for our future ANNUAL REPORT 2020 This report is a collaborative effort by the following partners: CITY OF LOGAN Logo guidelines Logo formats 2.1 LOGO FORMATS 2.1.1 Primary logo Horizontal version The full colour, horizontal version of our logo is the preferred option across all Urban Utilities communications where a white background is used. The horizontal version is the preferred format, however due to design, space and layout restrictions, the vertical version can be used. Our logo needs to be produced from electronic files and should never be altered, redrawn or modified in any way. Clear space guidelines are to be followed at all times. In all cases, our logo needs to appear clearly and consistently. Minimum size 2.1.2 Primary logo minimum size Minimum size specifications ensure the Urban Utilities logo is reproduced effectively at a small size. The minimum size for the logo in a horizontal format is 50mm. Minimum size is defined by the width of our logo and size specifications need to be adhered to at all times. 50mm Urban Utilities Brand Guidelines 5 The SEQ Water Service Provider Partners work together to provide essential water and sewerage services now and into the future. 2 SEQ WATER SERVICE PROVIDERS PARTNERSHIP FOREWORD Water for SEQ – a simple In 2018, the SEQ Water Service Providers made a strategic and ambitious statement that represents decision to set out on a five-year journey to prepare a holistic and integrated a major milestone for the plan for water cycle management in South East Queensland (SEQ) titled “Water region.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Classic Lines
    CLASSIC LINES May 2018 Doonan Shed Tour President’s Remarks Hi to all Members Welcome to the May edition of Classic Lines. The April events were very strongly supported, thanks to all The website is an ongoing work of art. We hope to shortly those who attended. appoint a Webmaster to look after the day-to-day changes and additions required to the website. Our thanks to Paul Bookings are also open for the at AIS for his very generous & ongoing help with the site. 30th Birthday Celebrations on 22 September at Noosa Springs. We welcome any and all feedback from members to make this site as useful as possible to members. Bookings will soon be available for the Pre-Hill Climb Event at Sea and Land Brewery, Noosaville, $29 pp. It is also important that information on the site is relevant to all members and we will try to achieve that. ENTRY is now open for the Winter HILL CLIMB on the CAMS entry portal. Check our website for details. So please phone or email one of the team with your comments/ideas. Management Meetings Sponsors required urgently The Management Committee, May monthly meeting will be at the Reef Hotel, on Wednesday 16 May at 5.30 pm. As some of you will be aware The Hill Climb has lost the 2 major sponsors from the 2017 Winter Hill. We will wherever possible hold Management meetings on the 3rd Wednesday of each month, this may not always be Autobarn franchisees have sold their business back to the possible. Venues will vary to enable us to support those corporate owners.
    [Show full text]
  • L Z012 Oalt Aegavcd
    t 6 JUL Z012 OAlt AEGavcD Queensland Competition Authority. file ref:444089 Level19, 12 Creek Street, BRISBANE. QLD 4001 For the Attention of Angus MacDonald Dear Sir, Subject-Irrigation Prices for Seqwater Central Brisbane WSS: 2013-17 We are stakeholders in the Central Brisbane WSS and hold a current license to draw water from the Brisbane River between Wivenhoe Dam and Mount Crosby. We would be extremely concerned should the QCA come to the conclusion that the documentation provided by Seqwater provides a justification for any charge to be made for water taken direct from the Brisbane River under the capped 7000MI agreement. We note that the Fernvale Consultation meeting of 22"d June was attended by a very small proportion of the 130 license Holders. We consider that the views expressed about the level of charging per Ml were not representative of our views or the views of the majority of license holders in the Central Brisbane WSS who attended a meeting of 10th July 2012. We support the views expressed in the attached submission and request the QCA accept this submission on our behalf. Yours faithfully, Signature r/lrz-1'151§/1 rr-; L-~,P Print Name of l icense Holder... ............... :.................. .............................................. .. Date 16 ~: ~.... / 'j-l- ~~ MID a&Ua&JII£ A l 'f'EI. 1 &1.1&4..-e&l ~ Pt•omotin8 Effective Sustainable Catchment Manag=ent Submission to Queensland Competition Authority In relation to Seqwater Rural Water Supply Network Service Plan For the Central Brisbane River supply scheme On Behalf of The Members of Mid Brisbane River Irrigators Inc This submission is prepared under 3 main headings 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Wyaralong Dam: Issues and Alternatives
    Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives Issues associated with the proposed construction of a dam on the Teviot Brook, South East Queensland 2nd edition October 2006 Report prepared by Dr G Bradd Witt and Katherine Witt The proposed Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives 2nd edition October 2006 Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives Issues associated with the proposed construction of a dam on the Teviot Brook, South East Queensland 2nd Edition October 2006 Report prepared by Dr G Bradd Witt and Katherine Witt - 1 - The proposed Wyaralong Dam: issues and alternatives 2nd edition October 2006 Table of contents Table of contents ................................................................................. i 1.0 Executive summary ................................................................... 1 1.1 Purpose ............................................................................. 1 1.2 Key issues identified in this report ........................................ 2 1.3 Alternative proposition ........................................................ 3 2.0 Introduction and context............................................................ 5 2.1 The Wyaralong District ........................................................ 5 2.2 The Teviot Catchment ......................................................... 5 3.0 Key issues of concern ................................................................ 7 3.1 Catchment yield and dam yield ............................................ 7 3.2 Water quality...................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Darling Downs - DD1
    Priority Agricultural Areas - Darling Downs - DD1 Legend Railway Regional Plans boundary Parcel boundary C o g o Lake and dam o n R i Priority Agricultural Area ver DD4 DD7 DD1 DD5 DD8 M a r a n o a DD2 DD3 DD6 DD9 R iv e r r ive e R onn Bal 02.25 4.5 9 13.5 18 Ej Beardmore Dam kilometres B a l o n To the extent permitted by law, The Department of State Development, n e Infrastructure and Planning gives no warranty in relation to the material or R i information contained in this data (including accuracy, reliability, v e r completeness or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) relating to any use of the material or information contained in this Data; and responsibility or liability for any loss or damage arising from its use. Priority Agricultural Areas - Darling Downs - DD2 Legend Bollon St George Railway Regional Plans boundary Parcel boundary Lake and dam Priority Agricultural Area DD4 DD7 Ba DD1 DD5 DD8 lo n n e R i v DD2 DD3 DD6 DD9 e r r e iv R n a rr Na Dirranbandi ive r lgo a R Cu r e v i R a 02.25 4.5 9 13.5 18 ar k h kilometres Bo To the extent permitted by law, The Department of State Development, Infrastructure and Planning gives no warranty in relation to the material or information contained in this data (including accuracy, reliability, Lake Bokhara completeness or suitability) and accepts no liability (including without limitation, Hebel liability in negligence) for any loss, damage or costs (including indirect or consequential damage) relating to any use of the material or information contained in this Data; and responsibility or liability for any loss or damage New South Wales arising from its use.
    [Show full text]
  • Dare Lawrence
    Dare Lawrence Project Environmental Scientist Dare’s field of expertise includes aquatic ecology, water/sediment quality and environmental impact assessments and as a result has experience in collecting baseline data on a broad range of environmental components. Dare is experienced in assessing habitat condition and ecological health. His substantial field experience includes much of Australia, south East Asia and South America. Dare has been involved in a broad range of ecological assessments, ranging from urbanised systems, engineered mining landscapes to pristine coasts. For these projects, Dare has gained a working understanding of potential impacts to ecosystems and the legislation that supports them. SKILLSETS Environmental Impact Assessment QUALIFICATIONS 2016 James Cook University / Bachelor of Science (Honors) Groundwater 2013 SKEMA (France) / Bachelor of Oceanography Ecology MAJOR PROJECTS Environmental/Social Impact Assessment, BHP, MG/ES/BA Brazil Receiving Environment Monitoring Program, Glencore Coal Water / Sediment Quality Assets, Emerald QLD Environmental Impact Assessment, QGC Shell, Surat Basin QLD Ecotoxicology Receiving Environment Monitoring Program, RIO Tinto, Weipa QLD EIS, EA, EPBC, PRCP, Multicom, QLD MARKET SECTORS AFFILIATIONS Environmental Institute of Australia New Zealand Queensland Environmental Law Association Institute of Environmental Sciences and Technology CONTACT Email [email protected] Phone 1800 779 363 Dare Lawrence – Project Environmental Scientist EXPERIENCE WATER QUALITY / AQUATIC ECOLOGY Aquatic Ecology Assessment, Stockland, North Lakes (2020). Assessing the potential for a waterway running through the project area to support aquatic life with the ability to magnify contaminants. Ecology Assessment, McIlwain, Brisbane (2020). Conducted flora and fauna (terrestrial and aquatic) surveys determining potential impacts from the upgrade of Teese Bridge. Ecology Assessment, Wasco-IOR, Brisbane (2020).
    [Show full text]
  • Leslie Harrison Dam Emergency Action Plan
    LESLIE HARRISON DAM EMERGENCY ACTION PLAN Expires: 1 August 2023 September 2020 Leslie Harrison Dam Emergency Action Plan QUICK REFERENCE GUIDE Emergency Condition Level Dam Hazard Alert Lean Forward Stand Up Stand Down Flood Event (Section Reservoir level equal to or Flood of Record: Reservoir Extreme Flood Level: Reservoir Level below Full 7.1) greater than 15.24m AHD and level equal to or greater than Reservoir level equal to or Supply Level of 15.24m AHD BoM expected to issue Flood 18.62m AHD greater than 21.00m AHD Warnings across SEQ. Significant Increase in Earthquake of Magnitude 3 or Seepage is increasing or earth Dam failure is considered Seepage through the Dam is Seepage or New Area of higher detected in the vicinity material evident in the possible via an identified controlled and; Seepage (Section 7.2) of the Dam or; seepage is increasing and; failure mechanism. No indicators of potential Dam Significant new or increased The increases cannot be failure are present. seepage areas identified at the controlled. Dam or; Seepage areas containing earth material identified at the Dam. Structural Damage to Earthquake of Magnitude 3 or A Terrorist Threat or Incident is New structural damage or Dam embankment is stable Dam (Section 7.3) higher detected in the vicinity reported at the Dam Site or; movement areas indicate and; of the Dam or; some potential for a structural New structural damage or No potential indicators of failure of the Dam. New structural damage or movement areas have not potential Dam failure are movement areas identified at stabilised and are present.
    [Show full text]