The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Meet the Dean Nicholas W
BLSLawNotesThe Magazine of Brooklyn Law School | fall 2012 Meet the Dean Nicholas W. Allard becomes the Eighth Dean of Brooklyn Law School www.brooklaw.edu • 1 BLSLawNotes Vol. 17, No. 2 Editor-in-Chief Graphic Design Linda S. Harvey Ron Hester Design & Photography Assistant Dean for External Affairs Photographers Managing Editor Damion Edwards Andrea Strong ’94 Matilda Garrido Ron Hester Contributors Alan Perlman Diana Barnes-Brown Joe Vericker Bethany Blankley Tina Herrera Printer Alice Loeb Allied Printing Services, Inc. Andrea Polci Debra Sapp ’04 BLS LawNotes is published Andrea Strong ’94 semi-annually by Brooklyn Law School ClassNotes Editor for alumni, students, Caitlin Monck-Marcellino ’02 faculty and friends. Director of Alumni Relations Letters and Comments Faculty Highlights Editor We welcome letters and comments Bethany Blankley about articles in BLS LawNotes from Associate Director of Communications our graduates and friends. We will consider reprinting brief submissions Photo Editor in LawNotes and on our website. Matilda Garrido mailing address: Managing Editor BLS LawNotes 250 Joralemon Street Brooklyn, New York 11201 fax: 718-625-5242 email: [email protected] web: www.brooklaw.edu on the cover: Dean Nicholas W. Allard, with Brooklyn as his backdrop, photographed on the 22nd floor balcony of Feil Hall’s Forchelli Conference Center. 2 • BLSLawNotes | Fall 2012 CONTENTS FEATURES IN EVERY ISSUE 20 Meet the Dean: 3 Briefs From “Bedford Falls” to the Beltway Convocation; A Tech Revolution Grows in Brooklyn; to Brooklyn, Nicholas W. Allard Spotlight on OUTLaws; New Courses Bring Practice of Law into the Classroom; Janet Sinder Appointed Becomes the Eighth Dean of Library Director; Spring Events Roundup. -
Promoting Accuracy and Fairness in the Use of Government Watch Lists
STATEMENT ON PRESIDENTIAL SIGNING STATEMENTS BY THE COALITION TO DEFEND CHECKS AND BALANCES AN INITIATIVE OF THE CONSTITUTION PROJECT The Constitution Project 1025 Vermont Avenue, NW Third Floor Washington, DC 20005 202-580-6920 (phone) 202-580-6929 (fax) [email protected] www.constitutionproject.org STATEMENT ON PRESIDENTIAL SIGNING STATEMENTS BY THE COALITION TO DEFEND CHECKS AND BALANCES We are members of the Constitution Project’s Coalition to Defend Checks and Balances. We are former government officials and judges, scholars, and other Americans who are deeply concerned about the risk of permanent and unchecked presidential power, and the accompanying failure of Congress to exercise its responsibility as a separate and independent branch of government. We write to express our concerns about certain uses of presidential signing statements that we believe greatly increase this risk. We applaud Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Arlen Specter for calling a hearing to focus attention on an issue that goes to the very heart of our system of government. Presidential signing statements – formal expressions of the views of a President regarding legislation that he has just signed into law – are nearly as old as the Republic. There is nothing inherently troubling about them. The question is how they are used. Throughout history, signing statements have been used to thank supporters, provide reasons for signing a bill, and express satisfaction or, on occasion, displeasure with legislation passed by Congress. More recently, Presidents Ronald Reagan, George H.W. Bush, and Bill Clinton have used signing statements as a tool to express constitutional and other objections to legislation, influence judicial interpretation, and otherwise advance policy goals. -
The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America 2017 Churches & Ministries Edition
The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America Kelly Shackelford Executive Editor 2017 CHURCHES & MINISTRIES EDITION UNDENIABLE The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America 2017 Churches & Ministries Edition Editorial Team Kelly Shackelford Executive Editor Justin Butterfield Editor-in-chief Contributors Abigail Doty Mary Katherine McNabb Stephanie Taub Past Contributors Michael Andrews Bryan Clegg Julie Hennighausen Candice Lundquist UNDENIABLE The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America 2017 Churches & Ministries Edition Kelly Shackelford, executive editor Justin Butterfield, editor-in-chief Copyright © 2013–2017 First Liberty Institute. All rights reserved. This publication is not to be used for legal advice. Because the law is constantly changing and each factual situation is unique, First Liberty Institute and its attorneys do not warrant, either expressly or impliedly, that the law, cases, statutes, and rules discussed or cited in this publication have not been subject to change, amendment, reversal, or revision. If you have a legal question or need legal advice, please contact an attorney. First Liberty Institute’s attorneys may be contacted by going to www.firstliberty.org, selecting the “Contact” menu option at the top of the page, and then selecting “Request Legal Assistance.” First Liberty Institute 2001 W. Plano Parkway, Suite 1600 Plano, Texas 75075 (972) 941–4444 WHAT IS FIRST LIBERTY INSTITUTE? First Liberty Institute is the largest legal organization in the nation dedicated exclusively to defending religious liberty for all Americans. A non-profit law firm, First Liberty handles hundreds of legal matters each year at no cost to its clients and educates Americans regarding the first liberty in the Bill of Rights: religious liberty. -
UNDENIABLE the Survey of Hostility to Religion in America
UNDENIABLE The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America 2014 Edition Editorial Team Kelly Shackelford Chairman Jeffrey Mateer Executive Editor Justin Butterfield Editor-in-chief Michael Andrews Assistant Editor Past Contributors Bryan Clegg An Open Letter to the American PEople UNDENIABLE To our fellow citizens: The Survey of Hostility to Religion in America Hostility to religion and religious freedom in America—institutional, pervasive, damaging hostility—can no longer reasonably be denied. And 2014 Edition yet there remain deniers. Because denial of these attacks is a mortal threat to the survival and health of Kelly Shackelford, chairman our republic, Liberty Institute and Family Research Council collaborated in 2012 to publish a survey documenting the frequency and severity of incidents Jeffrey Mateer, executive editor of hostility. In the 2013 survey entitled Undeniable, the research team led by Justin Butterfield, editor-in-chief a Harvard-trained constitutional attorney found almost twice the number of incidents in the previous twelve months than all the incidents found from Michael Andrews, assistant editor several years’ past. The rate of hostility was increasing at an alarming rate. This year in Undeniable: The Survey of Hostility to Religion 2014, the team Copyright © 2013–2014 Liberty Institute. of researchers again documented an alarming increase in the number of All rights reserved. hostile incidents toward religion from the year before. The rate of hostility is continuing to climb. We offer Undeniable 2014 to you, the American people, as an alarm bell This publication is not to be used for legal advice. Because the law is ringing in the night. We believe the many public opinion surveys showing constantly changing and each factual situation is unique, Liberty Institute that you, the people, are still a religious people. -
No. 17-249 John W. Whitehead Counsel
No. 17-249 IN THE ___________ AMY YOUNG and JOHN SCOTT, as Co-Personal Representatives of the Estate of Andrew Lee Scott, deceased, and MIRANDA MAUCK, individually, Petitioners, v. GARY S. BORDERS, in his official capacity as Sheriff of Lake County Florida, and RICHARD SYLVESTER, in his individual capacity, Respondents. ___________ ON PETITION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT __________ MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE AND BRIEF OF THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS __________ John W. Whitehead Counsel of Record Douglas R. McKusick THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE 923 Gardens Boulevard Charlottesville, VA 22901 (434) 978-3888 [email protected] [email protected] Lantagne Legal Printing 801 East Main Street Suite 100 Richmond VA 23219 (800) 847-0477 1 MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE BRIEF AS AMICUS CURIAE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS Pursuant to Supreme Court Rule 37.2(b), The Rutherford Institute respectfully moves for leave to file the attached brief as amicus curiae supporting the Petitioners. All parties were provided with time- ly notice of amicus’ intent to file as required by Rule 37.2(a). Counsel of record for the Petitioners grant- ed consent to the filing of this amicus curiae brief. Counsel of record for the Respondents denied con- sent to the filing of this amicus curiae brief. The interest of amicus arises from its com- mitment to protecting the civil rights and liberties of all persons and defending advancing the laws and Constitution of the United States as a bulwark against abuses of government power. -
1 the Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign
The Association for Diplomatic Studies and Training Foreign Assistance Series HAROLD M. JONES Interviewed by: Self Initial interview date: n/a Copyright 2002 ADST Dedicated with love and affection to my family, especially to Loretta, my lovable supporting and charming wife ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The inaccuracies in this book might have been enormous without the response of a great number of people I contacted by phone to help with the recall of events, places, and people written about. To all of them I am indebted. Since we did not keep a diary of anything that resembled organized notes of the many happenings, many of our friends responded with vivid memories. I have written about people who have come into our lives and stayed for years or simply for a single visit. More specifically, Carol, our third oldest daughter and now a resident of Boulder, Colorado contributed greatly to the effort with her newly acquired editing skills. The other girls showed varying degrees of interest, and generally endorsed the effort as a good idea but could hardly find time to respond to my request for a statement about their feelings or impressions when they returned to the USA to attend college, seek employment and to live. There is no one I am so indebted to as Karen St. Rossi, a friend of the daughters and whose family we met in Kenya. Thanks to Estrellita, one of our twins, for suggesting that I link up with Karen. “Do you use your computer spelling capacity? And do you know the rule of i before e except after c?” Karen asked after completing the first lot given her for editing. -
14-720 Reply Brief
NO. 14-720 In the Supreme Court of the United States JOHN DARIANO; DIANNA DARIANO, on behalf of their minor child, M.D.; KURT FAGERSTROM; JULIE ANN FAGERSTROM, on behalf of their minor child, D.M.; KENDALL JONES; JOY JONES, on behalf of their minor child, D.G., Petitioners, v. MORGAN HILL UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT; NICK BODEN, in his official capacity as Principal, Live Oak High School; MIGUEL RODRIGUEZ, in his individual and official capacity as Assistant Principal, Live Oak High School, Respondents. On Petition for Writ of Certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit REPLY BRIEF FOR PETITIONERS ROBERT JOSEPH MUISE WILLIAM JOSEPH Counsel of Record BECKER, JR. American Freedom Law Center Freedom X P.O. Box 131098 11500 Olympic Blvd. Ann Arbor, MI 48113 Suite 400 (734) 635-3756 Los Angeles, CA 90064 [email protected] (310) 636-1018 ERIN MERSINO Affiliated Counsel with Thomas More Law Center The Rutherford Institute 24 Frank Lloyd Wright Drive Counsel for Petitioners P.O. Box 393 Ann Arbor, MI 48106 (734) 827-2001 Becker Gallagher · Cincinnati, OH · Washington, D.C. · 800.890.5001 i TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF AUTHORITIES................... ii INTRODUCTION........................... 1 REVIEW OF RELEVANT FACTS .............. 3 ARGUMENT IN REPLY...................... 7 I. The Ninth Circuit Misapplied Tinker and Allowed a Heckler’s Veto to Silence Protected Student Speech .......................... 7 II. This Case Is the Ideal Vehicle for Deciding the Question Presented...................... 11 CONCLUSION ............................ 13 ii TABLE OF AUTHORITIES CASES Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc., 477 U.S. 242 (1986) ....................... 3 Bernhardt v. Cnty. of L.A., 279 F.3d 862 (9th Cir. -
Lopez Group Lalong Tatatag Sa Susunod Na 5 Taon
January 2006 Lopez execs bag Excel awards ...p. 6 Lopez Group lalong tatatag sa susunod na 5 taon By Carla Paras-Sison Upang makamit ang katatagan at Media and communications paglago na inaasahan ni OML sa Para sa ABS-CBN Broadcasting “Though there are still daunting envi- susunod na limang taon, idinulog ng Corp., kailangang patatagin ang organ- ronmental imponderables and also ma- Benpres Holdings Corporation sa isasyon, mabawi ang pangunguna sa jor business problems in some of our bawa’t kumpanya ng mga kailangang Mega Manila TV ratings at ipagpatuloy companies, I am optimistic that we are mangyari sa taong 2006. ang paglago ng ABS-CBN Global. making definite progress toward group stability, growth and increased prof- Turn to page 2 Meralco Phase 4 itability in the next five years,” pa- hayag ni LopezGroup chairman Oscar refund ongoing...p. 2 M. Lopez(OML) sa nakaraang Strate- gic Planning Conference. Abangan ang ‘Pinoy Big Brother’ Season 2! ...p. 5 2 LOPEZLINK January 2006 Lopez Group lalong tatatag ... from page 1 Bagama’t nakapaglunsad ng mga mga bagong proyekto para sa strategic ings sa 2006 kung maaprubahan ang Para sa Manila North Tollways Property development bagong programa ang ABS-CBN growth. rate hike na hinihiling ng Meralco. Corp. (MNTC), nakatuon ang pansin Inaasahang mabebenta ng Rockwell noong 2005, hindi pa nito nababawi Sa Sky Cable, inaasahang magawa Walumpu’t dalawang porsiyento sa pagpapadami ng motoristang du- Land Corporation ang 100% ng Joya ang leadership sa Mega Manila TV ang pilot encryption ng Sky Cable ng kita ng First Holdings ay mangga- madaan sa North Luzon Expressway condominium sa taong ito. -
The Indian War of Independence 1857
PUBLISHER’S NOTE Most historians, British as well as Indian, have described and dismissed the rising of 1857 as a ‘Sepoy Munity’ or at best ‘The Indian Mutiny’. Indian revolution is on the other hand, and national minded leaders thinkers have regarded it as a planned and organised olitical and military rising aimed at destroying the British power in India. Mr. Sawarkar’s is an attempt to look at the incidents of 1857 from the Indian point of view. A leading revolutionary himself, was attracted and inspired by the burning zeal, the heroism, bravery, suffering and tragic fate of the leaders of 1857, and he decided to re-interpret the story and to relate it in full with the help of all the material available to him at the time. He spent days and months at the India Office Library studying the period. Finally, his work was published in 1909, under the title “The Indian War of Independence –1857”. The full story of its publication and eventual fate is related, at length, elsewhere in this volume. We shall only mention here that its entry into India was banned by the Government even before it was published. This ban was finally lifted by the Congress Government of Bombay in May 1946, and this is the first authorised edition of the book to be published in India. As the publishers of this edition we take here the opportunity of recording our sense of gratitute to Mr.G.M.Joshi, editor of the Marathi weekly journal Agrani, for making this work available to us, and for his continued interest in it while it was going through the press. -
BETTER TIMES AHEAD About the Cover
BETTER TIMES AHEAD About the cover The year 2009 could have been a diffi cult year were it not for the Filipinos’ indominable spirit. Amidst the many challenges, GMA Network, Inc. capitalized on its strength and moved forward decisively, unwavering in its faith that together, Filipinos will rise above all these and look forward to better times ahead. rhick_COVER-BACK.indd 1 5/8/2010 1:45:09 PM CONTENTS 2 Corporate Purpose, Vision and Core Values 6 Better Times Ahead Chairman’s Message 14 On Target Report on Operations 20 Profi le of the Business 34 Corporate Social Responsibility 40 Advocating Good Governance 44 Awards 46 Corporate Governance 50 Executive Profi le 60 Financial Statements 120 Contact Information INSIDE FRONT.indd 1 4/27/2010 4:56:11 PM CORPORATE PURPOSE We enrich the lives of Filipinos everywhere with superior Entertainment and the responsible delivery of News and Informati on. CORPORATE VISION We are the most respected, undisputed leader in the Philippine broadcast industry and the recognized media innovator and pacesett er in Asia. We are the Filipinos’ favorite network. We are the adverti sers’ preferred partner. We are the employer of choice in our industry. We provide the best returns to our shareholders. We are a key partner in promoti ng the best in the Filipino. CORE VALUES We place God above all. We believe that the viewer is Boss. We value our People as our best assets. We uphold Integrity and Transparency. We are driven by our Passion for Excellence. We strive for Effi ciency in everything we do. -
The Sikh Prayer)
Acknowledgements My sincere thanks to: Professor Emeritus Dr. Darshan Singh and Prof Parkash Kaur (Chandigarh), S. Gurvinder Singh Shampura (member S.G.P.C.), Mrs Panninder Kaur Sandhu (nee Pammy Sidhu), Dr Gurnam Singh (p.U. Patiala), S. Bhag Singh Ankhi (Chief Khalsa Diwan, Amritsar), Dr. Gurbachan Singh Bachan, Jathedar Principal Dalbir Singh Sattowal (Ghuman), S. Dilbir Singh and S. Awtar Singh (Sikh Forum, Kolkata), S. Ravinder Singh Khalsa Mohali, Jathedar Jasbinder Singh Dubai (Bhai Lalo Foundation), S. Hardarshan Singh Mejie (H.S.Mejie), S. Jaswant Singh Mann (Former President AISSF), S. Gurinderpal Singh Dhanaula (Miri-Piri Da! & Amritsar Akali Dal), S. Satnam Singh Paonta Sahib and Sarbjit Singh Ghuman (Dal Khalsa), S. Amllljit Singh Dhawan, Dr Kulwinder Singh Bajwa (p.U. Patiala), Khoji Kafir (Canada), Jathedar Amllljit Singh Chandi (Uttrancbal), Jathedar Kamaljit Singh Kundal (Sikh missionary), Jathedar Pritam Singh Matwani (Sikh missionary), Dr Amllljit Kaur Ibben Kalan, Ms Jagmohan Kaur Bassi Pathanan, Ms Gurdeep Kaur Deepi, Ms. Sarbjit Kaur. S. Surjeet Singh Chhadauri (Belgium), S Kulwinder Singh (Spain), S, Nachhatar Singh Bains (Norway), S Bhupinder Singh (Holland), S. Jageer Singh Hamdard (Birmingham), Mrs Balwinder Kaur Chahal (Sourball), S. Gurinder Singh Sacha, S.Arvinder Singh Khalsa and S. Inder Singh Jammu Mayor (ali from south-east London), S.Tejinder Singh Hounslow, S Ravinder Singh Kundra (BBC), S Jameet Singh, S Jawinder Singh, Satchit Singh, Jasbir Singh Ikkolaha and Mohinder Singh (all from Bristol), Pritam Singh 'Lala' Hounslow (all from England). Dr Awatar Singh Sekhon, S. Joginder Singh (Winnipeg, Canada), S. Balkaran Singh, S. Raghbir Singh Samagh, S. Manjit Singh Mangat, S. -
Brief for Amnesty International USA, the Center for Constitutional Rights
No. 15-118 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- --------------------------------- JESUS C. HERNANDEZ, et al., Petitioners, v. JESUS MESA, JR., Respondent. --------------------------------- --------------------------------- On Writ Of Certiorari To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Fifth Circuit --------------------------------- --------------------------------- BRIEF OF AMICI CURIAE AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL USA, THE CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, HUMAN RIGHTS FIRST, AND THE RUTHERFORD INSTITUTE IN SUPPORT OF PETITIONERS --------------------------------- --------------------------------- HOPE METCALF BRENT M. ROSENTHAL Counsel of Record ROSENTHAL WEINER LLP 127 Wall Street 12221 Merit Drive, Suite 1640 New Haven, CT 06511 Dallas, TX 75251 (203) 432-9404 (214) 871-6600 [email protected] [email protected] DIALA SHAMAS 559 Nathan Abbott Way Stanford, CA 94305 (650) 725-1797 [email protected] Counsel for Amici Curiae ================================================================ COCKLE LEGAL BRIEFS (800) 225-6964 WWW.COCKLELEGALBRIEFS.COM i TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Table of Authorities ............................................. ii Interest of Amici Curiae ...................................... 1 Summary of Argument ........................................ 2 Argument ............................................................. 5 Conclusion ............................................................ 15