A Comparative Analysis of the Court Structures in Nigeria and South Africa

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

A Comparative Analysis of the Court Structures in Nigeria and South Africa A Comparative Analysis of the Court Structures in Nigeria and South Africa By Rebecca Emiene Badejogbin Submitted in fulfillment for the requirements for the degree LL.M. (Research) In the Faculty of Law, University of Pretoria June, 2012 Supervisor: Professor Christo J Botha i © University of Pretoria Research Summary This research is centered on carrying out a comparison between the current court systems (with particular reference to structures) in Nigeria and South Africa. A pertinent question that comes to bear in relation to court systems, is whether the current court structure in South Africa should be adopted by Nigeria? The response to this question is vital for the avoidance of the adoption of a court structure by Nigeria basically for the reason of its seeming successful implementation in South Africa without giving credence to other factors like the salient distinctiveness of their experiences and the legal systems that operate in both countries which I addressed in the dissertation. In this dissertation, I specifically concentrated on the various courts currently adopted by each country. In chapters three and four, I indentified and examined all the courts in the current court structure of each country, their composition, role, jurisdictions, operations, and other related means of adjudication vis a vis tribunals, arbitrations and even the Truth and Reconciliation Commission. I carried out a comparative analysis in chapter five between the Nigerian and South African court systems with particular reference to the structures of the courts to indentify the strengths and weaknesses of each structure and the indirect and direct threatened reorganizations i.e the proposed reforms in the two countries and their likely effects and repercussions in the enhancement of justice delivery. Prior to looking at the structures of the courts, I generally looked at the role of the judiciary in both countries and their application of judicial concepts like independence of the judiciary, doctrine of judicial precedents and principles of natural justice. I briefly looked at the history of both legal systems and the evolution of their court structures, the current make up of each legal system, which includes their form of government, democratic set ups and the interrelatedness of each organ of government with the judiciary. The relevance of looking at these legal conceptions is merely to create a background understanding and the appreciation of the makeup ii and contents of the courts in both countries on which the research is centered. In carrying out a comparative analysis of the courts of these two countries I identified their similarities and differences and concluded by making findings and proposals towards a more effective court system for Nigeria. In my conclusion in chapter six, I made observations, suggestions and proffered solutions for the way forward towards achieving a more viable court structure for Nigeria by adopting some strong points from South African court structure. iii Acknowledgments I express gratitude to the following: My supervisor Professor Christo J. Botha for his academic guidance on this study, and the Faculty and library staff for their assistance. The Management of the Nigeria Law School (my employer) for its encouragement to embark on this study. My colleagues and friends for moral and spiritual support during my studies. Specifically I mention M. E. Onoriode, A. O. Ordor, Y. Y. D. Dadem, A. O. Adegoke, S. Osamolu, Rev. & Mrs. S. O. Ojo, V. Lawal and Mr. & Mrs. S. Kputu. Udobong, Getrude & Miriam Idemetor for their support, encouragement, prayers and for providing a home away from home for me in Pretoria without which the success of my studies would have been hindered. My parents and siblings Mr. & Mrs. N. O. Omuh, Oowo, Oche, Onyeche, Oja, Owoicho and Olekwu for their love and support. My husband Toyin (for his immense encouragement) and our little ones T’Oluwanimi and AnretiOluwa without whom the success of this research programme would be dimmed. I embarked on this study during the busiest time of my life - a full time employment with an institution undergoing major overhauls and making twice as much demands on me, and the birth of two babies who were exposed to international travels from tender ages of two months and three months respectively on account of my studies. Ultimately, my profound gratitude goes to my Lord and Savior Jesus Christ. Rebecca Emiene Badejogbin June, 2012. iv Table of Contents Title Page i Research Summary ii Acknowledgements iv Table of Content vi List of Cases x Abbreviations xii Chapter One 1.1 Background to the Research 1 1.2 Literature Review 9 1.3 General Statement of Court Structures 11 1.4 Problem Statement 12 1.5 Thesis Statement and Research Questions 12 1.6 Definition of Terms 12 1.7 Scope of Research 14 1.8 Aims and Justification for Study 15 1.9 Significance of Study 17 1.10 Methodology 17 1.11 Outline of the Dissertation 19 1.12 Conclusion 20 Chapter Two 2.1 The Role of the Judiciary in Nigeria and South Africa 21 2.1.1 Judicial Independence in Nigeria and South Africa: A Brief Overview 23 2.1.2 Compliance with Requirements of Judicial v Independence by the Nigeria and South African Constitutions and Statutes 26 2.2. The Application of the Doctrine of Judicial Precedent by Courts in Nigeria and South Africa 55 2.3. The Rule of Law and the Judiciary in Nigeria and South Africa 58 2.4. Conclusion 64 Chapter Three 3.1 Brief History of South African Legal System 65 3.2 History and Evolution of some Courts in South Africa 68 3.3 Applicable Law for the Creation of Courts and Regulations of proceedings in Courts in South Africa. 71 3.4 The Current Court Structures in South Africa 73 3.4.1 Courts Established by the Constitution 76 3.4.1.1 Courts of High Jurisdiction 76 3.4.1.1.1 The Constitutional Court 76 3.4.1.1.2 Supreme Court of Appeal 77 3.4.1.1.3 High Court 78 3.4.1.2 Courts of Lower Jurisdiction 80 3.4.1.2.1 Magistrate Courts 80 3.4.2 Courts Established by Statutes 81 3.4.2.1 Courts of Superior Jurisdiction 81 3.4.2.1.1 Labour Court and Labour Appeal Court 81 3.4.2.1.2 Special Income Tax Court 83 3.4.2.1.3 Land Claims Court 83 3.4.2.1.4 Commercial Court 84 3.4.2.1.5 Special Consumer Court 84 vi 3.4.2.1.6 Electoral Court 85 3.4.2.1.7 Competition Appeal Court 85 3.4.2.2 Courts of lower Jurisdiction 85 3.4,2.2.1 Divorce Court 85 3.4,2.2.2 Maintenance Court 86 3.4,2.2.3 Children’s Court 86 3.4,2.2.4 Family Court 87 3.4,2.2.5 Short Process Court 87 3.4,2.2.6 Equality Court 87 3.4,2.2.7 Small Claims Court 88 3.4,2.2.8 Courts of Chiefs and Headsmen 89 3.4,2.2.9 Community Court 89 3.4,2.2.10 Child Justice Court 89 3.4,2.2.11 Sexual Offences Court 90 3.4,2.2.12 Special Criminal Court 90 3.4.3 Tribunals 90 3.4.4 Other Methods of Resolution of Disputes outside the Court Structures 92 3.4.4.1 Truth and Reconciliation Commission 92 3.4.4.2 Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods 93 3.5 Conclusion 94 3.6 Chart for South African Court Structure 96 Chapter Four 4.1 Brief Narration of Nigerian Legal System 97 4.2 History and Evolution of Court Structure in Nigeria 101 4.3 Applicable Law for the Creation of Courts and Regulations of proceedings in Courts in Nigeria 105 4.4 The Current Court Structures in Nigeria 108 4.4.1 Courts of High Jurisdiction 110 vii 4.4.1.1 Federal Courts 110 4.4.1.1.1 The Supreme Court 110 4.4.1.1.2 The Court of Appeal 113 4.4.1.1.3 Federal High Court 115 4.4.1.1.4 High Court of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja 118 4.4.1.1.5 The Customary Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja 119 4.4.1.1.6 Sharia Court of Appeal of the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja 120 4.4.1.2 State Courts 122 4.4.1.2.1 State High Courts 122 4.4.1.2.2 Customary Court of Appeal of the States 123 4.4.1.2.3 Sharia Court of Appeal of the States 124 4.4.2 Courts of Lower Jurisdiction 125 4.4.2.1 Magistrate Courts 125 4.4.2.2 District Courts 128 4.4.2.3 Upper Area Courts 128 4.4.2.4 Area Courts 129 4.4.2.5 Customary Courts 130 4.4.2.6 Sharia Courts 130 4.4.3. Specialized Courts 131 4.4.3.1 National Industrial Court 131 4.4.3.2 Coroner’s Court 133 4.4.3.3 Juvenile Court 133 4.4.3.4 Military Court 134 4.4.4 Tribunals 135 4.4.5 Other Methods of Resolution of Disputes outside the Court Structures 137 viii 4.4.5.1 Truth and Reconciliation Commission 137 4.4.5.2 Alternative Dispute Resolution Methods 138 4.5 Conclusion 140 4.6 Chart for Nigerian Court Structure 141 Chapter Five 5.1 Comparative Analysis of the Current Court Structures in Nigeria and South Africa 142 5.1.1 Arrangement of Federal and State Courts 143 5.1.2 Responsibility for allocation of Jurisdictional Limits 145 5.1.3 Jurisdiction over Constitutional Questions 146 5.1.4 Appeals 147 5.1.4 Qualification of Judicial Officers 152 5.1.5 Jurisdiction 154 5.1.6 Geographical Spread of Courts 156 5.1.7 Specialised Courts 158 5.1.8 Customary Court of Appeal and Sharia Court of Appeal 160 5.1.9 Tribunals 161 5.1.10 The Truth and Reconciliation Commission 162 5.1.11 Alternative Dispute Resolution 162 5.1.13 Court Performance 162 5.2 Analysis of the Changes Proposed in Nigeria and South Africa to Enhance Justice Delivery 167 5.3 Conclusion 178 Chapter Six 6.1 Observations, Proposals and the way Forward 180 6.2 Conclusion 191 ix Bibliography 192 List of cases 1 Cranch 137 (1803) A.
Recommended publications
  • Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria: the Role of Traditional Institutions
    Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria Past, Present, and Future Edited by Abdalla Uba Adamu ii Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria Past, Present, and Future Proceedings of the National Conference on Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria. Organized by the Kano State Emirate Council to commemorate the 40th anniversary of His Royal Highness, the Emir of Kano, Alhaji Ado Bayero, CFR, LLD, as the Emir of Kano (October 1963-October 2003) H.R.H. Alhaji (Dr.) Ado Bayero, CFR, LLD 40th Anniversary (1383-1424 A.H., 1963-2003) Allah Ya Kara Jan Zamanin Sarki, Amin. iii Copyright Pages © ISBN © All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted, in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise, without the prior permission of the editors. iv Contents A Brief Biography of the Emir of Kano..............................................................vi Editorial Note........................................................................................................i Preface...................................................................................................................i Opening Lead Papers Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria: The Role of Traditional Institutions...........1 Lt. General Aliyu Mohammed (rtd), GCON Chieftaincy and Security in Nigeria: A Case Study of Sarkin Kano Alhaji Ado Bayero and the Kano Emirate Council...............................................................14 Dr. Ibrahim Tahir, M.A. (Cantab) PhD (Cantab)
    [Show full text]
  • In the Panel of the National Judicial Council Holden at Abuja
    IN THE PANEL OF THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL HOLDEN AT ABUJA IN THE PETITIONS OF ALLEGED FINANCIAL IMPROPRIETY, INFIDELITY TO THE CONSTITUION AND OTHER ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES RELATED LAWS BY THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION AGAINST HON. JUSTICE WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN, GCON WRITTEN ADDRESS SUBMITTED BY THE COUNSEL TO THE RESPONDENT Respondent’s Counsel R.A. Lawal-Rabana, SAN Okon Nkanu Efut, SAN J.U.K. Igwe, SAN George Ibrahim,Esq Victoria Agi, Esq Orji Ude Ekumankama, Esq Opeyemi Origunloye, Esq Temitayo Fiki, Esq For Service On Counsel For the Petitioner Economic and Financial Crimes Commission Rotimi Oyedepo, Esq [email protected] 1 IN THE PANEL OF THE NATIONAL JUDICIAL COUNCIL HOLDEN AT ABUJA IN THE PETITIONS OF ALLEGED FINANCIAL IMPROPRIETY, INFIDELITY TO THE CONSTITUION AND OTHER ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES RELATED LAWS BY THE ECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL CRIMES COMMISSION AGAINST HON. JUSTICE WALTER SAMUEL NKANU ONNOGHEN, GCON 1.0 Introduction 1.1 The Economic and Financial Crimes Commission sent two (2) petitions to the Chairman, National Judicial Council through the office of the Chief Justice of Nigeria against The Hon. Justice Walter Samuel Nkanu Onnoghen, GCON, Chief Justice of Nigeria. 1.2 The first petition is dated 4th February, 2019 vide reference EFCC/EC/GC/31/2253 while the second petition is dated 5th March 2019 vide reference EFCC/EC/CJN/05/59. 1.3 The petition was forwarded to the Hon. Chief Justice of Nigeria by the National Judicial Council vide a memo dated 11th February 2019 reference NJC/F1/SC.3/1/570 following the 17th Emergency meeting of the Council held the same 11th February 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Chief Samuel Adebisi Falomo V. 1. Obaomoniyibanigbe 2. The
    CHIEF SAMUEL ADEBISI FALOMO V. 1. OBAOMONIYIBANIGBE 2. THE ATTORNEY-GENERAL KWARA STATE 3. IFELODUNIIREPODUNIEKITI TRADITIONALCOUNCIL 4. IREPODUN LOCAL GOVERNMENT SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA SC. 127/1995 SALIIHU MODIBBO ALFA BELGORE, J.S.C. (Presided) IDRIS LEGBO KUTIGI. J.S.C. MICHAEL EKUNDA YO OGUNDARE, J.S.C. SYVESTER UMARU ONU. I.S.C. ANTHONY IKECHUKWU IGUH. J.S.C. (Read the Leading Judgment) FRIDA Y 5TH JUNE, 1998. APPEAL - Entering of appeal - Effect of on jurisdiction of the appellate court. COURT - Court determining interlocutory application - Duty on to refrain from prejudicing the substantive matter. OURT - Court entertaining application for interlocutory injunction ~Power of to restrain both parties -When exercisable COURT - Court of Appeal- Power of under section 16 of the Court of Appeal Act and Order 3 rule 23 of the Court of Appeal Rules in determination of an appeal. INJUNCTION -Interlocutory injunction -Application for -Court entertaining - power of to restrain both parties - When exercisable. INJUNCTION - Interlocutory injunction - Application for. Principles guiding grant of LEGAL PRACTITIONER - Counsel announcing appearance ]Of {[ TJCl. Implication on his competence to conduct the case. PRACTICEAND PROCEDURE- Court of Appeal- Power of leader section I6 of the CourtofAppealActandOrder3 rule23 of the court o f Appeal Rules determination of an appeal. PRACTICEAND PROCEDURE-Interlocutory application –Determination of trial court - Duty on court not to delve into issues prejudicial to the substantial cases. PRACTICE AND PROCEDURE
    [Show full text]
  • 2021 Phd Onafuwa.Pdf
    SOCIO-LEGAL BARRIERS TO THE EXPANSION OF LEGAL AID IN NIGERIA: INITIATING LEGAL REFORM THROUGH THE CUSTOMARY COURT SYSTEM OLÚBÙNMI EUNICE ỌNÀFUWÀ Doctor of Philosophy School of Business and Law UNIVERSITY OF EAST LONDON July 2020 i Abstract The core of this study is directed towards an analysis of the laws, rules and guidelines that embody legal aid provision in present day Nigeria. This study will employ a socio-legal approach to investigate the root causes of Nigeria’s limited legal aid scheme. It will also focus on the relationship between law and society and will employ appropriate empirical research methods for an in-depth understanding of significant causal factors that influence legal aid provision in Nigeria. These factors will include an examination of Nigerian legal institutions, legal processes, and legal behaviour,1 particularly how legal institutions and legal processes affect individuals and how they are perceived by ordinary citizens and potential recipients of legal aid. This research considers the potential for other sources of law, and other legal institutions, such as customary legal systems, to be used as an additional, credible way to access, develop and expand legal aid provision in Nigeria. This study adopts two qualitative techniques: semi-structured telephone interviews and self- administered questionnaires, which were completed and returned via email. The request for respondents was launched on social media. In total, fifteen respondents partook in the study: twelve via self-administered questionnaires and three via telephone interviews. The inquiry was focused on a people’s perspective, the respondents were a variety of ages above 18, and evenly distributed by gender.
    [Show full text]
  • THE ORIGIN of the NAME NIGERIA Nigeria As Country
    THE ORIGIN OF THE NAME NIGERIA Help our youth the truth to know Nigeria as country is located in West In love and Honesty to grow Africa between latitude 40 – 140 North of the And living just and true equator and longitude 30 – 140 East of the Greenwich meridian. Great lofty heights attain The name Nigeria was given by the Miss To build a nation where peace Flora Shaw in 1898 who later married Fredrick Lord Lugard who amalgamated the Northern And justice shall reign and Southern Protectorates of Nigeria in the NYSC ANTHEM year 1914 and died in 1945. Youth obey the Clarion call The official language is English and the Nation’s motto is UNITY AND FAITH, PEACE AND Let us lift our Nation high PROGRESS. Under the sun or in the rain NATIONAL ANTHEM With dedication, and selflessness Arise, O Compatriots, Nigeria’s call obey Nigeria is ours, Nigeria we serve. To serve our fatherland NIGERIA COAT OF ARMS With love and strength and faith Representation of Components The labour of our hero’s past - The Black Shield represents the good Shall never be in vain soil of Nigeria - The Eagle represents the Strength of To serve with heart and Might Nigeria One nation bound in freedom, - The Two Horses stands for dignity and pride Peace and unity. - The Y represent River Niger and River Benue. THE PLEDGE THE NIGERIAN FLAG I Pledge to Nigeria my Country The Nigeria flag has two colours To be faithful loyal and honest (Green and White) To serve Nigeria with all my strength - The Green part represents Agriculture To defend her unity - The White represents Unity and Peace.
    [Show full text]
  • Nigeria Page 1 of 52
    Nigeria Page 1 of 52 September 1996 Vol. 8, No. 3 (A) NIGERIA "PERMANENT TRANSITION" Current Violations of Human Rights in Nigeria SUMMARY Despite its stated commitment to return Nigeria to elected civilian rule by October 1, 1998, the military government continues to violate the rights of Nigerians to free political activity, including freedom of expression, assembly and association, freedom of movement, and freedom from arbitrary detention and trial. Its security forces in Ogoniland and elsewhere persist in a longstanding pattern of human rights abuses. Head of state General Sani Abacha continues to hold in arbitrary detention the presumed winner of the June 12, 1993 elections, Chief M.K.O. Abiola. Nigerians are deeply skeptical that this military government, after setting aside the fairest elections ever held in their country, will hand over power to a civilian government when it has promised to do so. Nigeria appears to be in a state of permanent transition, still governed by the armed forces a decade after a program to restore democracy was first announced by General Ibrahim Babangida. Recent reforms announced by the government-including the restoration of a right to appeal to a higher court in some cases where it had been denied, the repeal of a decree preventing the courts from granting writs of habeas corpus in favor of detainees without charge, and the creation of a human rights commission-have had no effect in practice, and do not begin to address the need for fundamental reform and renewal. The transition program announced on October 1, 1995, is already slipping behind schedule, while the conditions that have been set for political participation seem designed to exclude the great majority of credible and committed pro-democracy activists.
    [Show full text]
  • 2015 Brocheur Cover Pages
    ICI JUD AL I L N A S T N I O T I U T T A E N M ABUJA ce ot n to lle : K xce Nationalnowledge for E Judicial Institute Mohammed Bello Centre, Abuja. 2015 BROCHURE OF CONTINUING JUDICIAL EDUCATION Theme: PROMOTING JUDICIAL ETHICS IN NIGERIA Hon. Justice Mahmud Mohammed, GCON Chief Justice of Nigeria and Chairman Board of Governors of the National Judicial Institute 1 2 Mallam Abubakar Umar Maidama Institute Secretary 3 Outer & Inside View of the Andrews Otutu Obaseki Auditorium of the Institute used for Continuing Judicial Education Programmes such as All Nigeria Judges’ Conferences, Seminars, summits Etc. 4 Participants at a Continuing Judicial Education Programme. 5 Outer and Inner view of the Seminar and Study Rooms used for Case Studies, Simulations and group Exercises during Continuing Judicial Education Programmes 6 A Case Study and Simulation Session at a Workshop in one of the Institute’s Seminar and Workshop Halls 7 Outer view of the Banquet Hall Used for Tea / Coffee Breaks and Refreshments During Continuing Judicial Education Programmes of the Institute. 8 TABLE OF CONTENTS Pages 1. 2015 Calendar of Judicial Education Programmes---- 7 2. Foreword------------------------------------------------------11-12 3. Purpose of the Brochure----------------------------------- 8 Who can use the Brochure--------------------------------- 8 4. How to use the Brochure----------------------------------- 8-9 5. Introduction-------------------------------------------------- 10 6. Establishment of the National Judicial Institute-------10-13 7. Mission Statement------------------------------------------ 14 8. Role of the Institute in the Administration of Justice- 14-15 9. Checklist for Developing our Programmes---------------15-18 10. Development of Judicial education Programmes-------18-22 11.
    [Show full text]
  • Past Justices of Supreme Court of Nigeria 1956-2011 S/No Names 1
    PAST JUSTICES OF SUPREME COURT OF NIGERIA 1956-2011 S/NO NAMES 1. Justice Stafford Foster Sutton (Past CIF) 2. Justice Olumuyiwa Jibowu 3. Justice Nageon Delestang 4. Justice John Abbott 5. Justice John Verity 6. Justice Percival Cyril Hubbard 7. Justice Adetokunbo Ademola (Past CJN) 8. Justice Lionel Brett 9. Justice Lious Nwachukwu Mbanefo 10. Justice James Henley Coussey 11. Justice Robert Yorke Hedges 12. Justice George Frederick Dove-Edwin 13. Justice Thomas Algernon Brown 14. Justice Samuel Okai Qyashie-Idun 15. Justice Wilfred Hugh Hurley 16. Justice Alfred John Ainley 17. Justice Alexander William Bellamy 18. Justice William Aigernon Howell Duffus 19. Justice Edgar Ignatus Godfrey Unsworth 20. Justice John Idowu Conrad Taylor 21. Justice Vahe Robert Bairmian 22. Justice Charles Dadi Onyeama 23. Justice Eugene Olufemi Adeyinka Morgan © Supreme Court of Nigeria – Past Justices of the Supreme Court. 24. Justice Micheal Oguejiojo Adegbo 25. Justice George Baptist Ayodola Coker 26. Justice Chukweike Idigbe 27. Justice Ian Lewis 28. Justice Charles Olusoji Madarikan 29. Justice Sir Udo Udoma 30. Justice Atanda Fatayi Williams (Past CJN) 31. Justice George Sodeinde Sowemimo (Past CJN) 32. Justice Talim Olawale Elias (Past CJN) 33. Justice Dan Ibekwe 34. Justice Ayo Gabriel Irikefe (Past CJN) 35. Justice Darnley Arthur Raymond Alexander (Past CJN) 36. Justice Mohammed Bello (Past CJN) 37. Justice Mamman Nasir 38. Justice Andrews Otutu Obaseki 39. Justice Kayode Eso 40. Justice Anthony Nnemezie Aniagolu 41. Justice Buba Ardo 42. Justice Augustine Nnamani 43. Justice Boonyamin Oladiran Kazeem 44. Justice Dahunsi Olugbemi Coker 45. Justice A.G. Karibi-Whyte 46. Justice Saidu Kawu 47.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 10 Part 2
    NIGERIAN BANKING LAW REPORTS [2000 – 2001] VOLUME 10 (PART II) To be cited as: [2000 – 2001] 10 N.B.L.R. (PART II) Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation Plot 447/448 Airport Road Central Business District P.M.B. 284, Garki Abuja, Federal Capital Territory [FCT] Nigeria Tel: +23495237715-6, +523696740-44 Members of the LexisNexis Group worldwide South Africa LexisNexis Durban 215 Peter Mokaba Road (North Ridge Road), Morningside, 4001 Johannesburg First Floor, 25 Fredman Drive, Sandton, 2196 Cape Town Office Floor 2, North Lobby, Boulevard Place, Heron Close, Century City, 7114 www.lexisnexis.co.za Australia LexisNexis, CHATSWOOD, New South Wales Austria LexisNexis Verlag ARD Orac GmbH & Co KG, VIENNA Benelux LexisNexis Benelux, AMSTERDAM China LexisNexis, BEIJING Canada LexisNexis Butterworths, MARKHAM, Ontario France LexisNexis SA, PARIS Germany LexisNexis Germany, MÜNSTER Hong Kong LexisNexis, HONG KONG Hungary HVG-Orac, BUDAPEST India LexisNexis Butterworths Wadhwa Nagpur, NEW DELHI Ireland Butterworths (Ireland) Ltd, DUBLIN Italy Giuffrè Editore, MILAN Japan LexisNexis, TOKYO Korea LexisNexis, SEOUL Malaysia LexisNexis, KUALA LUMPUR New Zealand LexisNexis, WELLINGTON Poland LexisNexis Poland, WARSAW Singapore LexisNexis, SINGAPORE United Kingdom LexisNexis Butterworths, LONDON USA LexisNexis, DAYTON, Ohio © 2009 Nigeria Deposit Insurance Corporation, published by LexisNexis (Pty) Ltd under licence ISSN 1595-1030 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, including electronic, mechanical, photocopying and recording, without the written permission of the copyright holder, application for which should be addressed to the publisher. Such written permission must also be obtained before any part of this publication is stored in a retrieval system of any nature.
    [Show full text]
  • 2017 Annual Report
    NATIONAL PENSION COMMISSION (PenCom) 2017 ANNUAL REPORT CORPORATE VISION AND MISSION STATEMENT Corporate Vision “By 2019, to be a pension industry with 20 million contributors delivering measurable impact on the Economy” Mission Statement “PenCom exists for the effective regulation and supervision of the Nigerian Pension Industry to ensure that retirement benefits are paid as and when due” i EXECUTIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS Mrs. Aisha Dahir-Umar Acting Director General ii MANAGEMENT CONSULTATIVE COMMITTEE MEMBERS Mrs. Aisha Dahir- Umar Acting Director General Mr. Mohammed Bello Umar Head (Compliance & Enforcement Department) Mrs. Grace Usoro Head (National Databank Management Department) Mr. Mohammed Yola Datti Head (Surveillance Department) Mr. Moses O. Loyinmi Head (Contributions & Bond Redemption Department) Mrs. Ekanem B. Aikhomu Head (Benefits & Insurance Department) Dr. Dan Ndackson Head (State Operations Department) Dr. Umar F. Aminu Head (Research & Strategy Management Department) Mr. Ehimeme Ohioma Head (Investment Supervision Department) Mr. Aliyu A. Tijjani Head (Corporate Responsibility & SERVICOM Department) Mr. Tijjani A. Saleh Head (Management Services Department) Mr. Peter Nwabuike Ekwealor Head (Internal Audit Department) Mr. Polycarp Nzeadibe C. Head (Information & Communication Technology Anyanwu Department) Mr. Adamu S. Kollere Head (Director General’s Office Department) Mr. Muhammad S. Muhammad Commission Secretariat/Legal Advisory Services Department Mr. Peter Agahowa Head (Corporate Communications Department) Mr. Bala
    [Show full text]
  • The Quality of Justice Is Strained: the Death Penalty in Nigeria
    THE QUALITY OF JUSTICE IS STRAINED: THE DEATH PENALTY IN NIGERIA. + CHINWE CHINEMEREM ONUOHA Table of Contents Introduction....................................................................................................................3 I. The Death Penalty in the Nigerian Legal System…………..……….…………………4 A. The Nigerian Legal System............................................................................................4 1. Sources of Law...............................................................................................................5 2. The Criminal Law...........................................................................................................6 3. The Court System...........................................................................................................7 4. Nigerian Demographics……………………………………….………..……………...9 5. History of the Legal System…………………………………….…….…..................10 6. Shari’a Law…………………………………………………….……....…………….10 B. History of the Death Penalty in Nigeria......................................................................12 C. Legal Framework of the Death Penalty.......................................................................13 1. Crimes for which the Death Penalty Can Be Imposed...............................................13 2. The Death Penalty and the Nigerian Constitution......................................................14 D. Application of the Death Penalty………………………………….……...................17 1. Drug-Related Crimes..................................................................................................19
    [Show full text]
  • Job Satisfaction Among Librarians in Academic Libraries in Niger State, Nigeria by Nnakaihe Prisca Oluchi Pg/Mls/08/49382 a Proj
    i JOB SATISFACTION AMONG LIBRARIANS IN ACADEMIC LIBRARIES IN NIGER STATE, NIGERIA BY NNAKAIHE PRISCA OLUCHI PG/MLS/08/49382 A PROJECT SUBMITTED IN PARTIAL FULFILMENT OF THE REQUIREMENTS FOR THE AWARD OF MASTER OF LIBRARY SCIENCE (MLS) DEPARTMENT OF LIBRARY AND INFORMATION SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NIGERIA, NSUKKA SUPERVISOR: DR. R. E. OZIOKO MAY, 2012 ii APPROVAL PAGE This work by Nnakaihe Prisca Oluchi PG/MLS/ 08/49382 has been approved for the Department of Library and Information Science, By _______________ ________________ Dr. R. E. Ozioko Prof. V. W. Dike Supervisor Head of Department _______________ ________________ Internal Examiner External Examiner _______________ Prof. S. A. Ezeudu Dean of Faculty iii CERTIFICATION PAGE NNAKAIHE PRISCA OLUCHI, a post graduate student in the Department of Library and Information Science with Registration Number PG/MLS/08/49382, has satisfactorily completed research requirements for the award of Masters in Library and Information Science. The work embodied in this thesis is original and has not been submitted in part or in full for another degree of this or any other university. ______________________________ ______________________________ Nnakaihe Prisca Oluchi Dr. R. E. Ozioko Student (Name and Signature) Supervisor (Name and Signature) iv DEDICATION This work is dedicated to the Almighty God for His immeasurable mercies that saw me through, and to the memory of my late father, Mr. R. E. Nnakaihe. v AKNOWLEDGEMENTS With deep sense of appreciation, the researcher sincerely appreciates the efforts of her ever dependable supervisor, Dr. R. E. Ozioko who despite his busy schedules showed an undivided attention to this work until completion. She also want to appreciate in a special way, Dr.
    [Show full text]