Direct Cinema: America 1960-75 Order of Discussion

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Direct Cinema: America 1960-75 Order of Discussion Direct Cinema: America 1960-75 Order of Discussion • French “Cinema verité” and Jean Rouch • Direct Cinema • Contributing conditions • Filmmakers • Robert Drew & Drew Associates • Richard Leacock • D.A. Pennebaker • David Maysles • Frederick Wiseman • Symbiopsychotaxiplasm (William Graves, 1968) • Significance of direct cinema • Screenings of A Happy Mother’s Day and Titicut Follies “Cinema verité” Jean Rouch (1917-2004) Chronicle of a Summer (Edgar Morin & Jean Rouch, 1961) Chronicle of a Summer (Edgar Morin & Jean Rouch, 1961) Direct Cinema “The new documentary sought to study individuals, to reveal the moment-by-moment development of a situation, to search for instants of drama or psychological revelation.” Drew and Associates Robert Drew LIFE Photojournalist Twenty TV documentaries produced by Time.Inc 1960-63 Primary (1960), Jane (1962), The Chair (1962)… Drew Associates’ Filmmakers: Richard Leacock D.A Pennebaker David and Albert Maysles Primary (Robert Drew, 1960) The “Crisis Structure” “In each of the stories there is a time when man comes against moments of tension and pressure, and revelation, and decision. It’s these moments that interest us the most.” (Robert Drew) “A politician/professional/ordinary person is put on the spot, put through unusual demands and emotions, and there is a suspense to the outcome.” (Charles Warren, 59) The Chair (Robert Drew, 1962) Richard Leacock and D.A. Pennebaker Form a production company together. Leacock: “uncontrolled cinema.” Leacock’s A Happy Mother’s Day (1963) Monterey Pop! (Leacock & Pennebaker, 1968) Don’t Look Back (D.A. Pennebaker, 1967) Don’t Look Back (D.A. Pennebaker, 1967) Albert and David Maysles Albert and David Maysles Salesman (1969) Gimme Shelter (1970) Grey Gardens (1976) Gimme Shelter (Maysles, 1970) Gimme Shelter (Maysles, 1970) Gimme Shelter (Maysles, 1970) Symbiopsychotaxiplasm: Take One (William Greaves, 1968) A Happy Mother’s Day (Richard Leacock & Joyce Chopra, 1963) Titicut Follies (Frederick Wiseman, 1967) • Frederick Wiseman (former Boston lawyer) made Titicut Follies to expose the conditions of Bridgewater State Hospital for the Criminally Insane. • Continued to make films that visited institutions: schools, hospitals, army bases…etc..
Recommended publications
  • Copyright by Leah Michelle Ross 2012
    Copyright by Leah Michelle Ross 2012 The Dissertation Committee for Leah Michelle Ross Certifies that this is the approved version of the following dissertation: A Rhetoric of Instrumentality: Documentary Film in the Landscape of Public Memory Committee: Katherine Arens, Supervisor Barry Brummett, Co-Supervisor Richard Cherwitz Dana Cloud Andrew Garrison A Rhetoric of Instrumentality: Documentary Film in the Landscape of Public Memory by Leah Michelle Ross, B.A.; M.A. Dissertation Presented to the Faculty of the Graduate School of The University of Texas at Austin in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Texas at Austin December, 2012 Dedication For Chaim Silberstrom, who taught me to choose life. Acknowledgements This dissertation was conceived with insurmountable help from Dr. Katherine Arens, who has been my champion in both my academic work as well as in my personal growth and development for the last ten years. This kind of support and mentorship is rare and I can only hope to embody the same generosity when I am in the position to do so. I am forever indebted. Also to William Russell Hart, who taught me about strength in the process of recovery. I would also like to thank my dissertation committee members: Dr Barry Brummett for his patience through the years and maintaining a discipline of cool; Dr Dana Cloud for her inspiring and invaluable and tireless work on social justice issues, as well as her invaluable academic support in the early years of my graduate studies; Dr. Rick Cherwitz whose mentorship program provides practical skills and support to otherwise marginalized students is an invaluable contribution to the life of our university and world as a whole; Andrew Garrison for teaching me the craft I continue to practice and continuing to support me when I reach out with questions of my professional and creative goals; an inspiration in his ability to juggle filmmaking, teaching, and family and continued dedication to community based filmmaking programs.
    [Show full text]
  • Film Screening and Discussion CRISIS: Behind a Presidential
    The College of Communication & Information Sciences Diversity Forum Presents Film Screening and Discussion CRISIS: Behind a Presidential Commitment Wednesday, March 13, 2013 7 p.m. Gorgas Library Room 205 TV: Too Many Cameras: Documentary on the Segregation Crisis Termed Just a Peep Show By JACK GOULD New York Times (1923-Current file); Oct 22, 1963; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The New York Times (1851-2009) pg. 75 Film on Kennedys In Alabama Crisis Set for TV Oct. 28: Murrow on A.B.C. New York Times (1923-Current file); Jul 30, 1963; ProQuest Historical Newspapers: The New York Times (1851-2009) pg. 55 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. WELCOME Caryl Cooper Coordinator, Discerning Diverse Voices Symposium AN AUDIO FLASHBACK George Daniels Department of Journalism “Media and the Moment: A Panel Discussion in June 2003” Featuring Robert Drew, Producer of CRISIS; Jim Lipscomb, Alabama-based film crew, CRISIS; Mary Ann Watson, media historian THE SCREENING CRISIS: Behind A Presidential Commitment THE DISCUSSION Mike Letcher Production Manager Center for Public Television Kari Frederickson Professor and Department Chair UA Department of History CLOSING REMARKS In 1960, when Robert Drew produced “Primary”, it was recognized as a breakthrough, the be- ginning of what came to be called “Cinema Verite,” in America. “Primary” was the first film in which the sync sound camera moved freely with characters throughout a breaking story. Drew, a former LIFE magazine correspondent and editor, wanted to expand LIFE’s candid still photography into sound and motion pictures.
    [Show full text]
  • Hildegard on Rubble Mountain
    HILDEGARD ON RUBBLE MOUNTAIN Michael Bryan Mullins, B.S., M.S. Thesis Prepared for the Degree of MASTER OF SCIENCE UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS December 2002 APPROVED: C.Melinda Levin, Major Professor Ben Levin, Committee Member, Director of Graduate Studies, Department of RTVF Alan Albarran, Committee Member, Chair, Department of RTVF Jean Schaake, Associate Dean, College of Arts and Sciences C. Neal Tate, Dean, Robert B. Toulouse School of Graduate Studies 1 Mullins, Michael Bryan, Hildegard On Rubble Mountain. Master of Science (Radio, Television and Film), December 2002. Documentary Videotape shot on Mini DV tape, VHS release, 55 minutes; production book, 74 pp., references, 32 titles. Hildegard On Rubble Mountain is a cinema verité documentary about Hildegard Modinger’s childhood. She grew up in Stuttgart, Germany during World War II and immigrated to the United States at the age of nineteen. This video follows her back to her childhood neighborhood as she recalls memories of that time in her life. The accompanying production book explains the production process: preproduction, production, postproduction, theoretical approaches, style used and a self-evaluation. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION ......................................1 Subject Matter Research Production Research Funding Distribution Possibilities Self Distribution Goals of the Documentary 2. PRODUCTION .......................................20 Schedule Crew Style Integration of Theory and Production 3. INTEGRATION OF THEORY AND PRODUCTION .............22
    [Show full text]
  • COM 321, Documentary Form in Film & Television
    1 COM 321, Documentary Form in Film, Television, & Interactive Media Notes from and about Barnouw’s Documentary: A history of the non-fiction film 11. Documentarist as. Observer Definition(s): [British] Free Cinema—A series of showings at London’s National Film Theater, 1956-58 with films by such filmmakers as Lindsay Anderson (primarily known for his narrative films If. ., O Lucky Man), Karel Reisz & Tony Richardson (primarily known for his narrative films The Entertainer, Tom Jones), and Georges Franju (see below); characterized by filmmakers acting as observers, rejecting the role of promoter; made possible by new, light film equipment that allowed an intimacy of observation new to documentary (including both sound and image). [American] Direct Cinema—A term coined by filmmaker Albert Maysles, this is another type of “observer” documentary that attempts to limit the apparent involvement of the filmmaker, using little or no voiceover narration, no script, and no “setting up” subjects (stagings) or reenactments. As David Maysles has indicated, “direct” means “there’s nothing between us and the subject.” Following the British Free Cinema, the American Direct Cinema took advantage of the new, maneuverable 16mm film equipment; after a series of experiments, a wireless synchronizing sound system for this equipment was developed by the Drew Unit at Time, Inc. The main Documentarists: Robert Drew, Ricky Leacock, D. A. Pennebaker, David & Albert Maysles (and associates), Frederick Wiseman. The influence of Direct Cinema has been felt around the world (e.g., prominent films from Holland, Japan, India, Sweden, Canada). [French] Cinema Verite—According to Barnouw, this term is reserved for films following Jean Rouch’s notions of filmmaker as avowed participant, as provocateur (as what Barnouw calls catalyst), rather than the cool detachment of the Direct Cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • Download Date 27/09/2021 09:14:37
    Out of sight: the mediation of the music festival Item Type Book chapter Authors Goodall, Mark D. Citation Goodall MD (2015) Out of sight: the mediation of the music festival. In: McKay G (Ed.) The Pop Festival: History, Music, Media, Culture. London: Bloomsbury. Rights (c) 2015 Bloomsbury. Full-text reproduced with publisher permission. Download date 27/09/2021 09:14:37 Link to Item http://hdl.handle.net/10454/10323 The University of Bradford Institutional Repository http://bradscholars.brad.ac.uk This work is made available online in accordance with publisher policies. Please refer to the repository record for this item and our Policy Document available from the repository home page for further information. To see the final version of this work please visit the publisher’s website. Access to the published online version may require a subscription. Citation: Goodall MD (2015) Out of sight: the mediation of the music festival. In: McKay G (Ed.) The Pop Festival: History, Music, Media, Culture. London: Bloomsbury. Copyright statement: © 2015 Bloomsbury. Full-text reproduced with publisher permission. Chapter 4. Out of sight: the mediation of the music festival The children danced night and day. Eric Burdon, Monterey1 The pop festival grows from nothing; it rises up from an empty space into an audio- visual spectacle, captivating the thousands of individuals who have made the pilgrimage to witness it. Over the years these musical staged events, with a strong visual dimension, have attracted media producers, especially film-makers. This chapter explores how the pop festival has been mediated over time, from the early pioneering films of music festivals through to the modern festival.
    [Show full text]
  • Big Brother: Reality TV in the Twenty-First Century
    Big brother: reality TV in the twenty-first century Book Accepted Version Bignell, J. (2005) Big brother: reality TV in the twenty-first century. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp256. ISBN 9781403916846 Available at http://centaur.reading.ac.uk/23194/ It is advisable to refer to the publisher’s version if you intend to cite from the work. See Guidance on citing . Publisher: Palgrave Macmillan All outputs in CentAUR are protected by Intellectual Property Rights law, including copyright law. Copyright and IPR is retained by the creators or other copyright holders. Terms and conditions for use of this material are defined in the End User Agreement . www.reading.ac.uk/centaur CentAUR Central Archive at the University of Reading Reading’s research outputs online NOTE: This is Chapter 1 of my book, Bignell, J., Big Brother: Reality TV in the Twenty- first Century (Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005), pp. 8-32. The book is available to buy from http://www.palgrave.com/gb/book/9781403916846. A list of my work with downloadable full-text PDFs is at http://www.reading.ac.uk/ftt/about/staff/j-bignell.aspx. Chapter 1: Genesis Introduction This chapter discusses the ways that Reality TV represents both a development of television documentary forms, and also a departure from their conventions. The argument that can be made in these terms is based on a model of development that addresses changes in technologies, television institutions, the cultural role of the medium, and the relationships between television and its audiences. From this perspective, Reality TV is a recent form of factual programming emerging from the established mode of television documentary.
    [Show full text]
  • 11. Documentarist As. . . Observer
    1 COM 321, Documentary Form in Film & Television Notes from and about Barnouw’s Documentary: A history of the non-fiction film 11. Documentarist as. Observer Definition(s): Free Cinema—A series of showings at London’s National Film Theater, 1956-58 with films by such filmmakers as Lindsay Anderson (If. ., O Lucky Man), Karel Reisz & Tony Richardson (The Entertainer, Tom Jones), and Georges Franju (see below); characterized by filmmakers acting as observers, rejecting the role of promoter; made possible by new, light film equipment that allowed an intimacy of observation new to documentary (including both sound and image). Direct Cinema—A term coined by filmmaker Albert Maysles, this is another type of “observer” documentary that attempts to limit the apparent involvement of the filmmaker, using little or no voiceover narration, no script, and no “setting up” subjects (stagings) or reenactments. As David Maysles has indicated, “direct” means “there’s nothing between us and the subject.” Following the British Free Cinema, the American Direct Cinema took advantage of the new, maneuverable 16mm film equipment; after a series of experiments, a wireless synchronizing sound system for this equipment was developed by the Drew Unit at Time, Inc. The main Documentarists: Robert Drew, Ricky Leacock, D. A. Pennebaker, David & Albert Maysles (and associates), Frederick Wiseman. The influence of Direct Cinema has been felt around the world (e.g., prominent films from Holland, Japan, India, Sweden, Canada). Cinema Verite—According to Barnouw, this term is reserved for films following Jean Rouch’s notions of filmmaker as avowed participant, as provocateur (as what Barnouw calls catalyst), rather than the cool detachment of the Direct Cinema.
    [Show full text]
  • New Journalism and Direct Cinema
    W&M ScholarWorks Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects 2004 Re-shaping documentary expectations: New Journalism and Direct Cinema Sharon Lynne Zuber College of William & Mary - Arts & Sciences Follow this and additional works at: https://scholarworks.wm.edu/etd Part of the American Studies Commons, Film and Media Studies Commons, and the Journalism Studies Commons Recommended Citation Zuber, Sharon Lynne, "Re-shaping documentary expectations: New Journalism and Direct Cinema" (2004). Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects. Paper 1539623442. https://dx.doi.org/doi:10.21220/s2-kj3p-jb60 This Dissertation is brought to you for free and open access by the Theses, Dissertations, & Master Projects at W&M ScholarWorks. It has been accepted for inclusion in Dissertations, Theses, and Masters Projects by an authorized administrator of W&M ScholarWorks. For more information, please contact [email protected]. RE-SHAPING DOCUMENTARY EXPECTATIONS New Journalism and Direct Cinema A Dissertation Presented to The Faculty of the American Studies Program The College of William and Mary in Virginia In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy by Sharon Lynne Zuber 2004 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. APPROVAL SHEET This dissertation is submitted in partial felfiilment of the requiretiaeirts for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy Sharon Lynoe ZJwr Approved by 004 Knight, Chair Colleen S. Kennedy ... V''"' c Richard S. Low ]^ GeotlxeyB. Pingree Oberlin College ii Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner. Further reproduction prohibited without permission. To my sons Russell Gordon Zuber Yates and Phillip Wallace Zuber Yates and In Memory of Jonathan Mednick 111 Reproduced with permission of the copyright owner.
    [Show full text]
  • Cinema of the Civil Rights Movement, Aug 13—28
    BAMcinématek presents A Time for Burning: Cinema of the Civil Rights Movement, Aug 13—28 Opens with the New York premiere of a new 35mm restoration of King: A Filmed Record…Montgomery to Memphis and culminates on the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington Special guests include D.A. Pennebaker, Madeline Anderson, Jack Willis, William Jersey, and more The Wall Street Journal is the title sponsor for BAMcinématek and BAM Rose Cinemas. Brooklyn, NY/Jul 24, 2013—From Tuesday, August 13 through Wednesday, August 28, BAMcinématek presents A Time for Burning: Cinema of the Civil Rights Movement, a 40-film series commemorating the 50th anniversary of the March on Washington. The series covers the civil rights movement from the end of World War II to the historic 1963 march and the waves of legislation that passed in the years after. Culled from 28 private film and television archives, collectors, studios, and the New York Public Library, these films create a picture of what is often called the heroic era of the movement, with rarely screened documentaries and archival footage alongside Hollywood classics, revolutionary independent films, agitprop, and incendiary exploitation movies from Roger Corman and Herschell Gordon Lewis. Opening the series on Tuesday, August 13 is the New York premiere of a new 35mm restoration of King: A Filmed Record...Montgomery to Memphis (1970), a chronicle of the life of Martin Luther King, Jr., from the early days of his civil rights activism to his untimely assassination. Originally released in theaters as a one-night-only event, this documentary, which was produced and compiled by Ely Landau, was subsequently nominated for an Academy Award for Best Documentary Feature and deemed “culturally significant” by the Library of Congress, thus being inducted into the National Film Registry.
    [Show full text]
  • DA Pennebaker's Don't Look Back
    January 15, 2007 Terri C Smith D.A. Pennebaker’s Don’t Look Back: Direct Cinema’s Early Portrait of a Cultural Icon Final Paper for Projective Artwork in the Age of Digital Reproduction: Professor, Chrissie Iles In 1965 filmmaker Donn Alan Pennebaker made a black and white documentary film about a young “folk” singer’s tour of England. The singer was Bob Dylan, and Dylan’s manager Albert Grossman commissioned Pennebaker to make the movie. Titled Don’t Look Back after Satchel Page’s saying, “Don’t look back, it might be gaining on you,” i the feature length film utilized the latest portable, synchronous sound equipment to follow the three-week tour as it unfolded. Using the documentary style called “cinema verité” (truth film) in France and “direct cinema” in the United States, Pennebaker and his small crew gathered footage of concert performances, hotel room bantering and the tour’s repeated interstitial spaces of dressing rooms, trains, cars and back stage catacombs. During the process, Pennebaker parlayed the cinema verité style he learned making television documentaries with Drew Associates into the feature film format. The film gave Pennebaker the creative latitude television did not, he elaborates on this when discussing a scene where the theater manager opens the hall’s doors for a waiting crowd, saying, “I like the long length of this. Now if we’d been doing this for Time-Life, I would have had to cut this shot before we even got it open really. And I left it just going on and on. I couldn’t cut it.”ii His approach, however, was still formed by the lessons of television.
    [Show full text]
  • 1960S History and Culture
    1960s History and Culture Books - Articles - Videos - Collections - Oral Histories - YouTube - Websites - Lesson Plans Visit our Library Catalog for complete list of books, magazines, and videos. Books Anderson, Walt. The Age of Protest. Pacific Palisades, CA: Goodyear Pub. Co. 1969. Berkley Art Center. The Whole World's Watching: Peace and Social Justice Movements of the 1960s and 1970s. Berkley, CA: Berkley Art Center Association, 2001. Brokaw, Tom. Boom!: Voices of the Sixties: Personal Reflections on the '60s and Today. New York: Random House, 2007. Connikie, Yvonne. Fashions of a Decade: The 1960s. New York: Facts on File, 1990. Farmer, John Alan. The New Frontier: Art and Television 1960-65. Austin, TX: Austin Museum of Art, 2000. Fischer, Fritz. Making Them like Us: Peace Corps Volunteers in the 1960s. Washington: Smithsonian Institution Press, 1998. Flamm, Michael W. Debating the 1960s: Liberal, Conservative, and Radical Perspectives. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield, 2008. French, Francis. Into that Silent Sea: Trailblazers of the Space Era 1961-1965. Lincoln, NE: University of Nebraska Press, 2007. Goodlad, Lauren, et.al. Mad Men, Mad World: Sex, Politics Style and the 1960s. North Carolina: Duke University Press, 2013. Hoberman, J. The Dream Life: Movies, Media and the Mythology of the Sixties. New York: New Press by W.W. Norton & Co, 2003. Nachman, Gerald. Seriously Funny: The Rebel Comedians of the 1950s and 1960s. New York: Pantheon Books, 2003. New York Times, The Times of the Sixties: the Culture, Politics, and Personalities that Shaped the Decade. New York: Black Dog, 2014. Rielly, Edward J. The 1960s. Connecticut: Greenwood Press, 2003.
    [Show full text]
  • DIRECT CINEMA: OBSERVING AMERICA in the 1960S Frederick Wiseman’S Law and Order (1969)
    DIRECT CINEMA: OBSERVING AMERICA IN THE 1960s Frederick Wiseman’s Law and Order (1969) DIRECT CINEMA: OBSERVING AMERICA IN THE 1960s Frederick Wiseman’s Law and Order (1969) I think when my films work, they work because they place the viewer in the middle of the event and ask the spectator to think through their own relationship to see what they’re seeing and hearing. – Frederick Wiseman Independent Online, 20021 Law and Order - The movie The words “Law and Order” on a black background. Then, several grainy mug shots of men with hard expressions on their faces flash shakily across the screen. Abruptly, we hear a voice ask, “Do you know what you’re charged with?” as we now see a close up of an obviously uncomfortable man as he denies the charges that he “beat this boy, hittin’ him with a gun, and committing From Law and Order (1969) Directed by Frederick Wiseman sexual assault on him.” The scene lasts Zipporah Films for several minutes. Next, another man sits and asks a different detective for help, “or he’ll take matters in his own hands.” Then we listen and watch as a woman talks on the phone and spills out her anger at the police for arresting her. Later, a young, angry white couple with a baby argues with their landlady. A young black man resists arrest, and police throw him up against their patrol car as neighbors watch. For the next 80 minutes or so, we continue to watch these short scenes unfold – domestic arguments, lost children, two policemen sitting in their patrol cars next to each other and talking, more interviews at the police station.
    [Show full text]