From Research to Engagement to Translation: Words Are Cheap. Part 2 – a Case Study Timothy G
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
TRANSACTIONS OF THE IMF 2020, VOL. 98, NO. 5, 217–220 https://doi.org/10.1080/00202967.2020.1805187 GUEST EDITORIAL From research to engagement to translation: words are cheap. Part 2 – a case study Timothy G. Leighton Institute of Sound and Vibration Research, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK Introduction larger competitors that wish to bury a However, early in the course of rival technology. Before selecting a developing sensors5–7,12 for these The first of these paired editorials1 intro- funder for SWT, I turned down dozens ocean studies, in the late 1980s I discov- duced ‘the virtuous circle’, where tax- of short term investors whose proposed ered the new acoustic signal13 that led payer funded research, including that model was to form a company (shared directly to the invention described by in the surface finishing field, can 50–50 between us) with a nominal Malakoutikhah et al.3 That signal was produce benefits to society, which in value of £1 M, then (after I had done a at a frequency v +v /2 and was scat- turn not only benefits the health of i p year of advertising) declare that the tered off a bubble when it was driven society as a whole and its individual company had grown in value, and we by two acoustic frequencies, a ‘pump’ members, but also generates tax were looking for an investor to buy frequency v close to the bubble reson- income that can be re-invested into p half of it for £10 M. That sale would ance for its pulsation mode of oscil- the research and development base to reduce my share to 25%, but now of a lation, and an ‘imaging’ signal v continue this onward progress. It i real £10 M. After two rounds of this, having a frequency two or three orders argued that a risk-averse approach hin- the investor and I could sell and be of magnitude higher than v . The dered this, but was what the current p rich, but no jobs or products would ability to stimulate v + v /2 allowed drivers in the system produced, reward- i p have been created. If we rely on short me to deduce that the pump field was ing sponsors and researchers alike for term investors we will be driven by generating cyclostationary scattering avoiding accumulating a record of short term profit. Even in large compa- of the imaging field by exciting surface ‘failed’ high-risk projects. This approach nies, too much emphasis on short-term waves14,15 on the walls of a bubble leads to an underestimation of the cost profit can be detrimental to society – (see Figure 4 of Malakoutikhah et al.3). to society of proper translation of this has led us to the state where there Such waves generate16 local circulatory research across the ‘valley of death’ are hundreds of new cancer drugs in liquid currents, pressure and shear, between academia and society. It will development, but those concerned which act as three ‘agents of change’ also lead to investment in the appear- with antimicrobial resistance still ask that could affect liquids and solids ance of societal benefit (vanity spin- ‘where are the new antibiotics?’, close to the bubble (example changes outs, valueless patents, and the substi- despite the fact that many successful being cleaning and healing the solid). tution of high-impact-factor publications treatments for cancer depend on suc- The clear implication was that, whilst in place of real societal change). The cessful control of infections.2 the basic science relating to these challenges in the journey, from funda- If not by short term investment, what ‘agents of change’ could be published mental research to societal benefitand was the route from fundamental without jeopardising the ability to later contributions to the ‘virtuous circle’,will research to company, that was under- mass produce technology to deliver be illustrated through one case study. taken for the technology in the paper these benefits on a societal scale, what by Malakoutikhah et al.3 It was a long could not be published (until patents journey: I began to wonder about the were secured) were the inventive steps Case study: Sloan Water interaction of sound with bubbles in to deliver these ‘agents’ to the target Technology Limited (SWT) 1984 on hearing a countryside babbling that required changing (i.e. the ‘vectors Just as with publication and public brook4 (Figure 1a), which led to an inter- of change’, that is, the ultrasound and engagement, on the road to translation est in using sound in the oceans to esti- bubbles). The tension between the two there are changelings that should not mate the exchange of atmospheric (publishing and patenting) is at the stand proxy in place of a genuine push gases (particularly CO2)betweenairand heart of my strategy to produce for societal and Treasury benefit. These sea (for applications in climate change societal benefit from the scientific dis- include patent applications that are and ocean acidification),5–7 leading to covery,1 and required publication of never granted, patents granted that sit at-sea measurements 20 years later some elements to be withheld for idle until they expire, and vanity spin- (Figure 1b,c) that revealed substantially many years. outs that will never expand to become higher dissolution of CO2 from atmos- Elements of new knowledge on the genuine employers or producers. Even phere to oceans than is assumed ‘agents of change’ that could be pub- the extravagant sums claimed for the by current climate change models,8 lished from the fundamental research sale of spin-outs can hide zero societal and produced sensors to support its undertaken to underpin this technol- gain: sales can simply be made to mitigation.9–11 ogy, covered: CONTACT Timothy Leighton [email protected] © 2020 Institute of Materials Finishing Published by Taylor & Francis on behalf of the Institute 218 GUEST EDITORIAL ever any sales income came in, because a competitor (who is not pricing to recoup those R&D costs) can reverse-engineer a product and sell for a lower price.1 Premature publication therefore can dissuade any industry from making the necessary investment in R&D. The low cost (under £300) to process the filing of a patent is often touted as an attractive feature, but this is another misleading factor. If a few thou- sand pounds are not also spent on hiring professionals to help draft the patent, it may be too weak to be granted. Depending on the route taken 1 year after filing (UK only filing, or Patent Cooperation Treaty etc. costing up to a few thousand pounds), Figure 1. (a) The author in 1985 holding a hydrophone (the submerged tip at the end of the vertical dark rod ∼12–30 months after the initial filing, a bisecting the white horizontal handle) in a brook running from Kinder Scout in the Peak District (Derbyshire. separate filing must be made in each UK) to detect bubbles (from Leighton and Walton4). (b) A more sophisticated version of substantially the same experiment being launched from the side of RRS Discovery in 2007, in a trial deployment in calm country, which will cost thousands, seas off Scotland, before this equipment was deployed to monitor storms in the Atlantic (panel (c)), a deploy- perhaps tens of thousands, of pounds. ment that discovered a far larger asymmetry in the amount of atmospheric CO2 that dissolves into the ocean The patent application is then examined as opposed to the amount that leaves it and returns to the atmosphere, than had previously been believed (after Leighton et al.8). in each of those countries, and each defence costs the fees of lawyers and patent fees. After this, the application . the conditions required to stimulate extra-terrestrial and oceanic environ- for that country might be rejected or the surface waves on the bubble ments, such as on the topics of: granted, and only if it is granted does 16–18 wall; it have real worth. The criterion for . the shear and microstreaming that . the propagation of sound down a ‘should I file a patent’ should not be ‘is 16,19–22 the surface waves can induce; curved fluid column, and how horns this novel’ but rather ‘do I have a strat- . the use of acoustic radiation forces to and cones could facilitate this (dis- egy to earn tens of thousands of drive the bubbles towards targets, coveries that are used in the pounds from this in a few years, to pay 3 and into cracks and crevices in that device, but published for their the costs to get it granted, and is it target that are normally resistant to tra- ability to allow the sounds of voices likely to be granted?’. A patent that is ditional ways of cleaning (by wipes and and musical instruments on other not granted has little worth, and in 16,22–25 brushes), requiring foundational planets to be simulated, a capability assessing the translation of a technol- research in the propagation of ultra- that has since been distributed to ogy it is vital to distinguish whether a 31–34 sound through porous materials (that planetaria for their Outreach); patent is granted and live, applied for fi in turn led to the rst theory to show . the acoustic losses in water sur- and being examined, or applied for why passing ultrasound through rounded by a pressure-release inter- and dropped (because it was rejected ff 3 di erent directions in the human face (used in the device, but also at examination, or because funds were ankle could monitor bone health, e.g.