Coleoptera: Lycidae: Metrior- Odontocerus Stephens, 1829 (Trichoptera))

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Coleoptera: Lycidae: Metrior- Odontocerus Stephens, 1829 (Trichoptera)) Eur. J. Entorno!. 99: 315-351, 2002 ISSN 1210-5759 Generic revision and phylogenetic analysis of the Metriorrhynchinae (Coleóptera: Lycidae) Ladislav BOCAK Faculty of Science, Palacký University, tř. Svobody 26, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Key words.Coleóptera, Metriorrhynchmae, generic revision, phylogeny, taxonomy, key, World Abstract. The subfamily Metriorrhynchinae is the most species-rich clade of Lycidae (Coleoptera). A recent proposal suggests that the Erotinae is a sister group of the Metriorrhynchinae. Within the Metriorrhynchinae, evidence is presented for the monophyly of the Conderini and Metriorrhynchini and their sister group position. The Trichalina, Hemiconderina and Metriorrhynchina form the tribe Metriorrhynchini. The relationships between the basal lineages of this group are poorly understood. Several clades are distin­ guished within the Metriorrhynchina, but there is only weak evidence supporting a relationships between them. The distribution of individual clades is discussed. Carathrix Kleine, 1926 (=Pseudodontocerus Pic, 1921), Dilolycus Kleine, 1926 (= Metriorrhynchus Gemminger et Harold, 1869),Flabelloporrostoma Pic, 1923 (= Metriorrhynchus Gemminger et Harold, 1869),Rossioptera Kasant- sev, 1988 (=Xylobanellus Kleine, 1930), Samanga Pic, 1921 (= Broxylus C.O. Waterhouse, 1879),Strophicus C. O. Waterhouse, 1879 (=Enylus C.O. Waterhouse, 1879), andTapromenoeus Bocak et Bocakova, 1989 (=Prometanoeus Kleine, 1925) are proposed as junior synonyms. Pseudosynchonnus Pic, 1922 is transferred to the Erotinae (Taphini) and Pseudosynchonnus Pic, 1922, Prota- phes Kleine, 1926, andParapyropterus Kleine, 1926 are proposed to be junior subjective synonyms ofLycoprogenthes Pic, 1915. Redescriptions of Metriorrhynchinae genera and a key to genera are provided. INTRODUCTION first to introduce the genera of Metriorrhynchinae to lycid classification: Cladophorus Guerin-Meneville, 1830, The Metriorrhynchinae is the largest subfamily of Lyci­ Metriorhynchus Guerin-Meneville, 1838, andPorrostoma dae, both in the number of genera and number of species. Castelnau, 1838. Various authors disagreed with the Kleine (1933) listed in the last World Catalogue about dating of their descriptions, and the validity of these taxa 1200 species in 41 genera now classified in this was clarified much later by Bocak (1998c). Numerous subfamily. That is, in terms species this subfamily make authors added further species to various genera (e. g. up over 40 percent of the Lycidae. Most Metrior­ Erichson, Blanchard, Thomson, Walker, Motschulsky, rhynchinae are from Southeast Asia, the Indonesian Redtenbacher, Kiesenwetter, and Kirsch). C.O. Water­ Archipelago, New Guinea and Northern Australia. Fur­ house (1877, 1879) alone proposed thirteen new genera ther species occur in Africa, Madagascar, temperate Asia, which still form the backbone of Metriorrhynchinae clas­ Ceylon, and India. Only one species occurs in Eastern sification. He described also numerous new species from Europe and in Siberia. Within Lycidae, Metrior­ different parts of the Metriorrhynchinae range of distribu­ rhynchinae are defined by their circular phallobase (Figs tion. Further species were proposed in the last decades of 91-132), flat, conspicuous, unpaired vaginal gland in the XIXth century (Blackburn, Bourgeois, Fairmaire, most representatives (Figs 143-160), and a pronotum Gorham, Harold, Kirsch, Kiesenwetter, Lea, W. M. Leay, with lanceolate median areola, usually with lateral and and Schaufuss). Only two authors, R. Kleine and M. Pic, frontolateral pronotal carinae (Figs 57-86). Metrior­ contributed substantially to the knowledge of Lycidae rhynchinae appear to be close to the Erotinae as they have before World War II. They described hundreds of new very similar pronotal carinae in some forms, structurally species and several new genera. Kleine and Pic defined similar elytral costae, male and female genitalia similar in genera mostly on the basis of the presence or absence of some features, and generally similar larvae (Bocak and secondary costae, flabellate antennae or the number of Matsuda, in press). pronotal carinae. Congruence of these criteria with other Fabricius (1775) described the first species that is now characters needs to be established. Unlike Pic, Kleine dis­ placed in Metriorrhynchinae (Pyrochroa serraticornis sected genitalia, but preferred other characters for classi­ now classified in Trichalus) and later proposed several fication. Consequently, Kleine (1926a) classified additional species (Fabricius, 1801). Numerous entomolo­ Metriorrhynchus parallelus in Cladophorus on the basis gists working on the material collected by scientific expe­ of its flabellate antennae, although it is the type species of ditions in the first half of the XIXth century (Dalman, Metriorrhynchus, which he recognised. Fahraeus, Macleay, Hope, Klug, and Boisduval) fol­ Only a few species were described after World War II. lowed Fabricius. They described few species and classi­ Nakane (1968, 1969a, b, 1971, 1980) studied the fauna of fied them in then genera Lycus F., 1787, Calopteron Japan and Taiwan, Kasantsev (1988) described the genus Castelnau, 1838, orDictyoptera Latreille, 1829. Guerin- Rossioptera (= Xylobanellus Kleine) from Russia, but he Meneville (1830, 1838) and Castelnau (1838), were thedid not classify it in the Metriorrhynchinae. Bocak & 315 Bocakova (1987b, 1989, 1990b, 1991, 1999), Bocakobserved in early morning and shortly before sunset. (1998a, b, d, e, 1999a, b, 2000a, b, c, d, 2001a, b), andSome species are attracted to light but the proportion of Bocak & Matsuda (1998) published several geographi­ Lycidae collected at lights is generally low. Unlike Lyci­ cally limited revisions and descriptions of new species nae, the Metriorrhynchinae are rarely attracted to flowers. from the Oriental Region and New Guinea. Bocak Leptotrichalus are the only Metriorrhynchinae regularly (1998c) solved the long lasting uncertainty about the collected on flowers in South East Asia. Flowers in Aus­ status of the genera described by Guérin-Méneville. tralia attract at least some species of Porrostoma and Tri- Calder (1998) compiled a catalogue of Australian Lycidae chalus. Larvae were collected in decaying wood. Lycidae and proposed 85 new combinations within the Porros- generally seek moist conditions and inhabit rotten trunks toma. These new combinations were not based on the or branches in shaded places, often laying on the ground study of type specimens, and therefore the generic classi­ and in close contact with moist soil. Several larvae of fication of Australian Lycidae remains obscure. Metriorrhynchinae have been described. Burakowski At present, the entire classification of the Metrior- (1988) described the larva and pupa Xylobanellusof rhynchinae at the species and generic levels is chaotic. A erythropterus; Hayashi (1954), Fukuda & Hayashi large part of this confusion results from the inadequate (1981), and Hayashi (1986) described several Japanese nature of Pic’s descriptions and unclear reasons for his species of Cautires. Potozkaja (1981) described the larva proposals. He thought that as his descriptions were long of Xylobanus angusticollis (Motschulsky). Other larvae they would be useful (W. Wittmer, pers. comm.). As of Metriorrhynchinae were reported recently by Bocak & Kleine usually ignored Pic’s descriptions, revisions of Matsuda (in press). Metriorrhynchinae are often involved most genera are urgently needed. in Mullerian mimicry complexes, Lawrence & Britton The subfamily Metriorrhynchinae was proposed by (1991) mentioned those from Australia. Moore & Brown Kleine (1926a), along with the subfamily Dilolycinae (1981) studied the antifeedants in the bodyof Porrostoma (=Haplothoracinae, nomen nudum). Later he described rhippidium (W. M. Leay, 1827). the subfamilies Trichalinae and Cladophorinae (Kleine, MATERIAL AND METHODS 1928). Kleine (1933) designated all these taxa as tribes of Lycinae. Bocak & Bocakova (1990a) proposed the tribe Taxa Conderini and subtribe Hemiconderina, synonymised Altogether 45 genera were classified in the Metriorrhynchinae Cladophorinae and Dilolycinae with Metriorrhynchinae and Bocakova (in press) transferred Broxylus to the Metrior­ and downgraded Trichalinae to the subtribal level. Metri­ rhynchinae: for a list of genera see Appendix 1. The phyloge­ orrhynchinae was made up of two tribes, Conderini and netic analysis deals with 34 genera of Metriorrhynchinae. One Metriorrhynchini, the later being divided to the subtribes of Metriorrhynchinae genera was found to be a member of the Erotinae (Pseudosynchonnus). Four genera were synonymised Trichalina, Metriorrhynchina and Hemiconderina. Bocak prior the analysis, because they did not differ from genera (1998b) revised the generic classification of the Tri- included in the analysis: Dilolycus (= Metriorrhynchus), Flabel- chalina. loporrostoma (= Metriorrhynchus), Samanga (= Broxylus), and The species richness and high endemism in the transi­ Strophicus (= Synchonnus). One genus was not found in Pic’s tional Austro-Oriental zone, as well as the restriction of collection and its identity is unknown (Falsolucidota). The Lycidae to moist forests and usually to mountainous habi­ genera Mimoxylobanus, Oriomum, Cladophorinus, Xylobano- tats, suggest that Metriorrhynchinae could be a valuable morphus, Xylobanomimus, and Malacolycus are available only model group for evolutionary and zoogeographical stud­ as single specimens of one sex, and therefore
Recommended publications
  • Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E
    Beetle Appreciation Diversity and Classification of Common Beetle Families Christopher E. Carlton Louisiana State Arthropod Museum Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist) Suborder Adephaga Suborder Polyphaga, cont. •Carabidae Superfamily Scarabaeoidea •Dytiscidae •Lucanidae •Gyrinidae •Passalidae Suborder Polyphaga •Scarabaeidae Superfamily Staphylinoidea Superfamily Buprestoidea •Ptiliidae •Buprestidae •Silphidae Superfamily Byrroidea •Staphylinidae •Heteroceridae Superfamily Hydrophiloidea •Dryopidae •Hydrophilidae •Elmidae •Histeridae Superfamily Elateroidea •Elateridae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Cantharoidea Superfamily Cucujoidea •Lycidae •Nitidulidae •Cantharidae •Silvanidae •Lampyridae •Cucujidae Superfamily Bostrichoidea •Erotylidae •Dermestidae •Coccinellidae Bostrichidae Superfamily Tenebrionoidea •Anobiidae •Tenebrionidae Superfamily Cleroidea •Mordellidae •Cleridae •Meloidae •Anthicidae Coleoptera Families Everyone Should Know (Checklist, cont.) Suborder Polyphaga, cont. Superfamily Chrysomeloidea •Chrysomelidae •Cerambycidae Superfamily Curculionoidea •Brentidae •Curculionidae Total: 35 families of 131 in the U.S. Suborder Adephaga Family Carabidae “Ground and Tiger Beetles” Terrestrial predators or herbivores (few). 2600 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Dytiscidae “Predacious diving beetles” Adults and larvae aquatic predators. 500 N. A. spp. Suborder Adephaga Family Gyrindae “Whirligig beetles” Aquatic, on water
    [Show full text]
  • Green-Tree Retention and Controlled Burning in Restoration and Conservation of Beetle Diversity in Boreal Forests
    Dissertationes Forestales 21 Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Esko Hyvärinen Faculty of Forestry University of Joensuu Academic dissertation To be presented, with the permission of the Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu, for public criticism in auditorium C2 of the University of Joensuu, Yliopistonkatu 4, Joensuu, on 9th June 2006, at 12 o’clock noon. 2 Title: Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests Author: Esko Hyvärinen Dissertationes Forestales 21 Supervisors: Prof. Jari Kouki, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Docent Petri Martikainen, Faculty of Forestry, University of Joensuu, Finland Pre-examiners: Docent Jyrki Muona, Finnish Museum of Natural History, Zoological Museum, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Docent Tomas Roslin, Department of Biological and Environmental Sciences, Division of Population Biology, University of Helsinki, Helsinki, Finland Opponent: Prof. Bengt Gunnar Jonsson, Department of Natural Sciences, Mid Sweden University, Sundsvall, Sweden ISSN 1795-7389 ISBN-13: 978-951-651-130-9 (PDF) ISBN-10: 951-651-130-9 (PDF) Paper copy printed: Joensuun yliopistopaino, 2006 Publishers: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Finnish Forest Research Institute Faculty of Agriculture and Forestry of the University of Helsinki Faculty of Forestry of the University of Joensuu Editorial Office: The Finnish Society of Forest Science Unioninkatu 40A, 00170 Helsinki, Finland http://www.metla.fi/dissertationes 3 Hyvärinen, Esko 2006. Green-tree retention and controlled burning in restoration and conservation of beetle diversity in boreal forests. University of Joensuu, Faculty of Forestry. ABSTRACT The main aim of this thesis was to demonstrate the effects of green-tree retention and controlled burning on beetles (Coleoptera) in order to provide information applicable to the restoration and conservation of beetle species diversity in boreal forests.
    [Show full text]
  • The Evolution and Genomic Basis of Beetle Diversity
    The evolution and genomic basis of beetle diversity Duane D. McKennaa,b,1,2, Seunggwan Shina,b,2, Dirk Ahrensc, Michael Balked, Cristian Beza-Bezaa,b, Dave J. Clarkea,b, Alexander Donathe, Hermes E. Escalonae,f,g, Frank Friedrichh, Harald Letschi, Shanlin Liuj, David Maddisonk, Christoph Mayere, Bernhard Misofe, Peyton J. Murina, Oliver Niehuisg, Ralph S. Petersc, Lars Podsiadlowskie, l m l,n o f l Hans Pohl , Erin D. Scully , Evgeny V. Yan , Xin Zhou , Adam Slipinski , and Rolf G. Beutel aDepartment of Biological Sciences, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; bCenter for Biodiversity Research, University of Memphis, Memphis, TN 38152; cCenter for Taxonomy and Evolutionary Research, Arthropoda Department, Zoologisches Forschungsmuseum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; dBavarian State Collection of Zoology, Bavarian Natural History Collections, 81247 Munich, Germany; eCenter for Molecular Biodiversity Research, Zoological Research Museum Alexander Koenig, 53113 Bonn, Germany; fAustralian National Insect Collection, Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia; gDepartment of Evolutionary Biology and Ecology, Institute for Biology I (Zoology), University of Freiburg, 79104 Freiburg, Germany; hInstitute of Zoology, University of Hamburg, D-20146 Hamburg, Germany; iDepartment of Botany and Biodiversity Research, University of Wien, Wien 1030, Austria; jChina National GeneBank, BGI-Shenzhen, 518083 Guangdong, People’s Republic of China; kDepartment of Integrative Biology, Oregon State
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogenetic Structure of Metriorrhynchini Fauna of Sulawesi
    Zoological Studies 50(5): 645-656 (2011) The Phylogenetic Structure of Metriorrhynchini Fauna of Sulawesi (Coleoptera: Lycidae) with Descriptions of a New Genus, Mangkutanus, and Three New Species of Xylobanus Vaclav Kubecek, Milan Dvorak, and Ladislav Bocak* Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, Tr. Svobody 26, 771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic (Accepted May 20, 2011) Vaclav Kubecek, Milan Dvorak, and Ladislav Bocak (2011) The phylogenetic structure of Metriorrhynchini fauna of Sulawesi (Coleoptera: Lycidae) with descriptions of a new genus, Mangkutanus, and three new species of Xylobanus. Zoological Studies 50(5): 645-656. The phylogenetic structure of the Metriorrhynchini fauna from Sulawesi was investigated. We obtained DNA sequences for 3 fragments of the mitochondrial genome: cytochrome oxidase I, tRNA-Leu, and cytochrome oxidase subunit 2; NADH dehydrogenase subunit 5, tRNA- Ser, tRNA-Glu, and tRNA-Phe; and rrnl, tRNA-Leu, and NADH dehydrogenase subunit 1 for a total of 3070 aligned nucleotide positions, and performed a phylogenetic analysis of 12 genera of the Metriorrhynchini from Sulawesi and adjacent regions. Metriorrhynchini formed a monophylum that was split into 2 clades: an Afro- Oriental clade consisting of Cautires Waterhouse, 1879 and Xylobanus Waterhouse, 1879, and an Austral- Oriental clade formed by 10 genera distributed either only in the Australian Region, or with hundreds of species in Australia and New Guinea and a few in the Oriental region. Altogether, 11 genera are known from Sulawesi, four of them endemic to the island, only 2 genera, Xylobanus and Cautires, with a presumed Oriental origin, and 9 belonging to the Australian clade. All 87 metriorrhynchine species except 1 are endemic to Sulawesi, and 79 (91%) of them belong to the Australian lineage.
    [Show full text]
  • A New Species of Synchonnus (Coleoptera: Lycidae) from New Guinea, with an Identifi Cation Key to the Papuan Species
    ACTA ENTOMOLOGICA MUSEI NATIONALIS PRAGAE Published 30.vi.2017 Volume 57(1), pp. 153–160 ISSN 0374-1036 http://zoobank.org/urn:lsid:zoobank.org:C47634CE-13B8-4011-9CEB-A1F0A7E02CF9 doi: 10.1515/aemnp-2017-0064 A new species of Synchonnus (Coleoptera: Lycidae) from New Guinea, with an identifi cation key to the Papuan species Dominik KUSY Department of Zoology, Faculty of Science, Palacky University, 17. listopadu 50, CZ-771 46 Olomouc, Czech Republic; e-mail: [email protected] Abstract. The Papuan fauna of Synchonnus Waterhouse, 1879 contains only four species distributed in Mysool, Japen, and New Guinea and is less diversifi ed than those of the continental Australia where 16 species have been recorded. Synchon- nus occurs in lowlands and in lower mountain forests. A new species, Synchonnus etheringtoni sp. nov., is described from New Guinea, and S. testaceithorax Pic, 1923 is redescribed. All Papuan species are keyed. Key words. Coleoptera, Lycidae, Synchonnus, taxonomy, new species, morpho- logy, key, New Guinea Introduction Papuan net-winged beetles are represented mostly by the subtribe Metriorrhynchina (Ly- cidae: Metriorrhynchini), and only a few other net-winged beetle tribes and subfamilies have been recorded in New Guinea and the adjacent islands (BOCAK & BOCAKOVA 2008; SKLENAROVA et al. 2013). Although the fi rst Papuan species were described already at the beginning of the 19th century by GUÉRIN-MÉNEVILLE (1830–1838) and further about two hundred species before the second world war (KLEINE 1926), the diversity of the Papuan net-winged beetle fauna has not been systematically studied except for a few genus restricted reviews (e.g., BOCAKOVA 1992, BOCEK & BOCAK 2016).
    [Show full text]
  • Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve
    Arthropods of Elm Fork Preserve Arthropods are characterized by having jointed limbs and exoskeletons. They include a diverse assortment of creatures: Insects, spiders, crustaceans (crayfish, crabs, pill bugs), centipedes and millipedes among others. Column Headings Scientific Name: The phenomenal diversity of arthropods, creates numerous difficulties in the determination of species. Positive identification is often achieved only by specialists using obscure monographs to ‘key out’ a species by examining microscopic differences in anatomy. For our purposes in this survey of the fauna, classification at a lower level of resolution still yields valuable information. For instance, knowing that ant lions belong to the Family, Myrmeleontidae, allows us to quickly look them up on the Internet and be confident we are not being fooled by a common name that may also apply to some other, unrelated something. With the Family name firmly in hand, we may explore the natural history of ant lions without needing to know exactly which species we are viewing. In some instances identification is only readily available at an even higher ranking such as Class. Millipedes are in the Class Diplopoda. There are many Orders (O) of millipedes and they are not easily differentiated so this entry is best left at the rank of Class. A great deal of taxonomic reorganization has been occurring lately with advances in DNA analysis pointing out underlying connections and differences that were previously unrealized. For this reason, all other rankings aside from Family, Genus and Species have been omitted from the interior of the tables since many of these ranks are in a state of flux.
    [Show full text]
  • A Baseline Invertebrate Survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015
    A baseline invertebrate survey of the Knepp Estate - 2015 Graeme Lyons May 2016 1 Contents Page Summary...................................................................................... 3 Introduction.................................................................................. 5 Methodologies............................................................................... 15 Results....................................................................................... 17 Conclusions................................................................................... 44 Management recommendations........................................................... 51 References & bibliography................................................................. 53 Acknowledgements.......................................................................... 55 Appendices.................................................................................... 55 Front cover: One of the southern fields showing dominance by Common Fleabane. 2 0 – Summary The Knepp Wildlands Project is a large rewilding project where natural processes predominate. Large grazing herbivores drive the ecology of the site and can have a profound impact on invertebrates, both positive and negative. This survey was commissioned in order to assess the site’s invertebrate assemblage in a standardised and repeatable way both internally between fields and sections and temporally between years. Eight fields were selected across the estate with two in the north, two in the central block
    [Show full text]
  • The Phylogeny of Termites
    Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 48 (2008) 615–627 Contents lists available at ScienceDirect Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution journal homepage: www.elsevier.com/locate/ympev The phylogeny of termites (Dictyoptera: Isoptera) based on mitochondrial and nuclear markers: Implications for the evolution of the worker and pseudergate castes, and foraging behaviors Frédéric Legendre a,*, Michael F. Whiting b, Christian Bordereau c, Eliana M. Cancello d, Theodore A. Evans e, Philippe Grandcolas a a Muséum national d’Histoire naturelle, Département Systématique et Évolution, UMR 5202, CNRS, CP 50 (Entomologie), 45 rue Buffon, 75005 Paris, France b Department of Integrative Biology, 693 Widtsoe Building, Brigham Young University, Provo, UT 84602, USA c UMR 5548, Développement—Communication chimique, Université de Bourgogne, 6, Bd Gabriel 21000 Dijon, France d Muzeu de Zoologia da Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Nazaré 481, 04263-000 São Paulo, SP, Brazil e CSIRO Entomology, Ecosystem Management: Functional Biodiversity, Canberra, Australia article info abstract Article history: A phylogenetic hypothesis of termite relationships was inferred from DNA sequence data. Seven gene Received 31 October 2007 fragments (12S rDNA, 16S rDNA, 18S rDNA, 28S rDNA, cytochrome oxidase I, cytochrome oxidase II Revised 25 March 2008 and cytochrome b) were sequenced for 40 termite exemplars, representing all termite families and 14 Accepted 9 April 2008 outgroups. Termites were found to be monophyletic with Mastotermes darwiniensis (Mastotermitidae) Available online 27 May 2008 as sister group to the remainder of the termites. In this remainder, the family Kalotermitidae was sister group to other families. The families Kalotermitidae, Hodotermitidae and Termitidae were retrieved as Keywords: monophyletic whereas the Termopsidae and Rhinotermitidae appeared paraphyletic.
    [Show full text]
  • Insect Classification Standards 2020
    RECOMMENDED INSECT CLASSIFICATION FOR UGA ENTOMOLOGY CLASSES (2020) In an effort to standardize the hexapod classification systems being taught to our students by our faculty in multiple courses across three UGA campuses, I recommend that the Entomology Department adopts the basic system presented in the following textbook: Triplehorn, C.A. and N.F. Johnson. 2005. Borror and DeLong’s Introduction to the Study of Insects. 7th ed. Thomson Brooks/Cole, Belmont CA, 864 pp. This book was chosen for a variety of reasons. It is widely used in the U.S. as the textbook for Insect Taxonomy classes, including our class at UGA. It focuses on North American taxa. The authors were cautious, presenting changes only after they have been widely accepted by the taxonomic community. Below is an annotated summary of the T&J (2005) classification. Some of the more familiar taxa above the ordinal level are given in caps. Some of the more important and familiar suborders and families are indented and listed beneath each order. Note that this is neither an exhaustive nor representative list of suborders and families. It was provided simply to clarify which taxa are impacted by some of more important classification changes. Please consult T&J (2005) for information about taxa that are not listed below. Unfortunately, T&J (2005) is now badly outdated with respect to some significant classification changes. Therefore, in the classification standard provided below, some well corroborated and broadly accepted updates have been made to their classification scheme. Feel free to contact me if you have any questions about this classification.
    [Show full text]
  • Conspicuousness, Phylogenetic Structure, and Origins of Müllerian
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Conspicuousness, phylogenetic structure, and origins of Müllerian mimicry in 4000 lycid beetles from all zoogeographic regions Michal Motyka1, Dominik Kusy1, Michal Masek1, Matej Bocek1, Yun Li1, R. Bilkova1, Josef Kapitán2, Takashi Yagi3 & Ladislav Bocak1* Biologists have reported on the chemical defences and the phenetic similarity of net-winged beetles (Coleoptera: Lycidae) and their co-mimics. Nevertheless, our knowledge has remained fragmental, and the evolution of mimetic patterns has not been studied in the phylogenetic context. We illustrate the general appearance of ~ 600 lycid species and ~ 200 co-mimics and their distribution. Further, we assemble the phylogeny using the transcriptomic backbone and ~ 570 species. Using phylogenetic information, we closely scrutinise the relationships among aposematically coloured species, the worldwide diversity, and the distribution of aposematic patterns. The emitted visual signals difer in conspicuousness. The uniform coloured dorsum is ancestral and was followed by the evolution of bicoloured forms. The mottled patterns, i.e. fasciate, striate, punctate, and reticulate, originated later in the course of evolution. The highest number of sympatrically occurring patterns was recovered in New Guinea and the Andean mountain ecosystems (the areas of the highest abundance), and in continental South East Asia (an area of moderate abundance but high in phylogenetic diversity). Consequently, a large number of co-existing aposematic patterns in a single region and/or locality is the rule, in contrast with the theoretical prediction, and predators do not face a simple model-like choice but cope with complex mimetic communities. Lycids display an ancestral aposematic signal even though they sympatrically occur with diferently coloured unproftable relatives.
    [Show full text]
  • Diversity and Abundance of Pest Insects Associated with Solanum Tuberosum L
    American Journal of Entomology 2021; 5(3): 51-69 http://www.sciencepublishinggroup.com/j/aje doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20210503.13 ISSN: 2640-0529 (Print); ISSN: 2640-0537 (Online) Diversity and Abundance of Pest Insects Associated with Solanum tuberosum L. 1753 (Solanaceae) in Balessing (West-Cameroon) Babell Ngamaleu-Siewe, Boris Fouelifack-Nintidem, Jeanne Agrippine Yetchom-Fondjo, Basile Moumite Mohamed, Junior Tsekane Sedick, Edith Laure Kenne, Biawa-Miric Kagmegni, * Patrick Steve Tuekam Kowa, Romaine Magloire Fantio, Abdel Kayoum Yomon, Martin Kenne Department of the Biology and Physiology of Animal Organisms, University of Douala, Douala, Cameroon Email address: *Corresponding author To cite this article: Babell Ngamaleu-Siewe, Boris Fouelifack-Nintidem, Jeanne Agrippine Yetchom-Fondjo, Basile Moumite Mohamed, Junior Tsekane Sedick, Edith Laure Kenne, Biawa-Miric Kagmegni, Patrick Steve Tuekam Kowa, Romaine Magloire Fantio, Abdel Kayoum Yomon, Martin Kenne. Diversity and Abundance of Pest Insects Associated with Solanum tuberosum L. 1753 (Solanaceae) in Balessing (West-Cameroon). American Journal of Entomology . Vol. 5, No. 3, 2021, pp. 51-69. doi: 10.11648/j.aje.20210503.13 Received : July 14, 2021; Accepted : August 3, 2021; Published : August 11, 2021 Abstract: Solanum tuberosum L. 1753 (Solanaceae) is widely cultivated for its therapeutic and nutritional qualities. In Cameroon, the production is insufficient to meet the demand in the cities and there is no published data on the diversity of associated pest insects. Ecological surveys were conducted from July to September 2020 in 16 plots of five development stages in Balessing (West- Cameroon). Insects active on the plants were captured and identified and the community structure was characterized.
    [Show full text]
  • Atlas of Yorkshire Coleoptera (Vcs 61-65)
    Atlas of Yorkshire Coleoptera (VCs 61-65) Part 8 - Elateroidea - Families Eucnemidae to Cantharidae Introduction This is Part 8 of the Atlas and covers the Families Eucnemidae, Throscidae, Elateridae, Drilidae, Lycidae, Lampyridae and Cantharidae Each species in the database is considered and in each case a distribution map representing records on the database (at 1/10/2017) is presented. The number of records on the database for each species is given in the account in the form (a,b,c,d,e) where 'a' to 'e' are the number of records from VC61 to VC65 respectively. These figures include undated records (see comment on undated records in the paragraph below on mapping). As a recorder, I shall continue to use the vice-county recording system, as the county is thereby divided up into manageable, roughly equal, areas for recording purposes. For an explanation of the vice-county recording system, under a system devised in Watson (1883) and subsequently documented by Dandy (1969), Britain was divided into convenient recording areas ("vice-counties"). Thus Yorkshire was divided into vice-counties numbered 61 to 65 inclusive, and notwithstanding fairly recent county boundary reorganisations and changes, the vice-county system remains a constant and convenient one for recording purposes; in the text, reference to “Yorkshire” implies VC61 to VC65 ignoring modern boundary changes. For some species there are many records, and for others only one or two. In cases where there are five species or less full details of the known records are given. Many common species have quite a high proportion of recent records.
    [Show full text]