DOCSLIB.ORG

2Apparent Competition Between Native and Exotic Plants Mediated

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2Apparent Competition Between Native and Exotic Plants Mediated Lincoln University Digital Thesis Copyright Statement The digital copy of this thesis is protected by the Copyright Act 1994 (New Zealand). This thesis may be consulted by you, provided you comply with the provisions of the Act and the following conditions of use: you will use the copy only for the purposes of research or private study you will recognise the author's right to be identified as the author of the thesis and due acknowledgement will be made to the author where appropriate you will obtain the author's permission before publishing any material from the thesis. ` Apparent Competition Between Native and Exotic Plants Mediated by a Native Insect Herbivore A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy at Lincoln University by Scot Michael Waring Lincoln University 2010 ` Abstract of a thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy. Abstract Apparent Competition Between Native and Exotic Plants Mediated by a Native Insect Herbivore by Scot Michael Waring Invasive species can significantly impact native food webs through indirect effects. Examples of apparent competition typically involve a non-native consumer disproportionately affecting one host population in the presence of another. My research finds evidence for apparent competition between two herbs, one invasive and one endemic, and mediated by an endemic insect herbivore. The European pasture herb Jacobaea vulgaris (formerly Senecio jacobaea), is an invasive weed in several parts of the world, including New Zealand. New Zealand is also home to 19 native species of Senecio – thirteen of which are endemic – that support an endemic insect fauna. Some of these insects have since expanded their host range to include the invasive J. vulgaris. I examined the relationships between one of those herbivores, the New Zealand magpie moth (Nyctemera annulata, Lepidoptera: Arctiidae), J. vulgaris and one endemic (S. wairauensis) and two native host plants (S. minimus and S. quadridentatus). In my laboratory assays, magpie moth larvae found J. vulgaris as attractive as native host plants and larvae fed only J. vulgaris developed at comparable rates to those fed only native hosts. My landscape surveys revealed a strong association between J. vulgaris infestations, magpie moth abundance and increased levels of herbivore damage of the endemic S. wairauensis. Likewise, S. wairauensis was more likely to be present in transects where J. vulgaris was rare. There is convincing anecdotal evidence that the native magpie moth became far more abundant because of an invasive weed and my study suggests that this detrimentally affects native plants through population spillback. Keywords: apparent competition, indirect effects, invasive, enemy release, Jacobaea vulgaris, Senecio, minimus, quadridentatus, wairauensis, rufiglandulosus, dunedinensis, Nyctemera annulata, magpie moth, New Zealand ii ` Acknowledgements While my name alone appears on this thesis, there were many others involved and without whom this project would not have been completed. First and foremost: my family. Thanks to my wife, Anna, who encouraged me to pursue a PhD and helped make it happen. She, along with my children, Sequoya, Anja, Ronin and Rigel, suffered with me through the tough times. I’m sorry and thank you. Many thanks to my parents, Lynn and Jayne, and brother, Shane, who helped support us in so many ways and during every step of this crazy adventure and who, along with my aunt and uncle, Russ & Sue, and Anna’s family, Marty, Stan, Alison and Ron, helped in overcoming some difficult aspects of this journey. I sincerely appreciate their collective and individual sacrifices. I have an enormous amount of gratitude for my PhD advisor, Jon Sullivan. Unfortunately for many graduate students, they will never experience a mentor with a relentless sense of optimism, a wealth of skills and knowledge, and a love of life & science like I have. I consider myself lucky to have had the experience of working and learning with him. Thank you also to my co-advisors, Simon Fowler and Roddy Hale, for their support, particularly at vital points along the journey. Thanks also to the ecology graduate students (too many to list here) all of whom taught me something and most of whom made the complicated process of a doctoral program much more enjoyable. Without the many field assistants that helped with data collection in the final season I would not be writing this now: Ronny Groenteman, Raviv Carasuk, Sam Abercrombie, Tim Forrest, Leyla Cardenas, Gordon Gundlach, Katrina Wisniewski, Sequoya Waring, Mo Correll, John Mulhouse, Fannie Demarque, Virginie Laberge, Heather Rickard, Maren Poitras, Hamish Maule and Myles McKintosh. Much appreciation also to Corbin Jones and Judge Rebecca Knight. I received support from several people at Lincoln University and Landcare Research – particularly Simon Fowler (again), Hugh Gourlay, Lynley Hayes, Lindsay Smith, Stella Belliss and Brad Case. Thanks also to Rob Dunn, Andrea Lucky and the Dunn Lab at NCSU for their edits and support. Great thanks to Landcare Research for funding my PhD programme and for supplying research resources that were unavailable through the university. I appreciate the use of collection data from various national herbaria and the individual custodians of National Vegetation Survey data (listed in Appendix A) for letting me use their data in my analyses. Thank you to Sabrina Leucht, the Department of Conservation and the West Coast and Canterbury Conservancies for facilitating my access to Crown Lands for this research. Thank you also to the people of New Zealand for the experience of a lifetime, your support and hospitality and for such a comprehensive education (sensu lato) in your beautiful country. iii ` Table of Contents Abstract ..................................................................................................................................... ii Acknowledgements .................................................................................................................. iii Table of Contents ..................................................................................................................... iv List of Tables ............................................................................................................................ vi List of Figures ........................................................................................................................ viii Chapter 1 Introduction ............................................................................................................ 1 1.1 Species Invasions .............................................................................................................. 1 1.2 Invasion Facilitation .......................................................................................................... 3 1.3 Apparent Competition ....................................................................................................... 5 1.4 Community Impacts .......................................................................................................... 8 1.5 Indirect Effects of Novel Plant-Herbivore Associations ................................................. 10 1.6 Thesis Structure ............................................................................................................... 14 Chapter 2 Invasion of New Zealand by Jacobaea vulgaris ................................................. 16 2.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 16 2.2 New Zealand Senecio Specialists .................................................................................... 20 2.3 Magpie Moth (Nyctemera annulata) ............................................................................... 20 2.4 Jacobaea vulgaris invasion of New Zealand and the Response by Nyctemera annulata .......................................................................................................................... 23 2.5 Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 26 Chapter 3 Spatial and Temporal Associations Between Native New Zealand Senecio and a Closely-Related Invasive Weed ................................................................................... 30 3.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 30 3.2 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 33 3.3 Results ............................................................................................................................. 39 3.4 Discussion ....................................................................................................................... 44 Chapter 4 Host Expansion in the New Zealand Magpie Moth, Nyctemera annulata ....... 53 4.1 Introduction ..................................................................................................................... 53 4.2 Methods ........................................................................................................................... 56 4.2.1 Magpie Moth ....................................................................................................... 56 4.2.2
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Entomology of the Aucklands and Other Islands South of New Zealand: Lepidoptera, Ex­ Cluding Non-Crambine Pyralidae
    Pacific Insects Monograph 27: 55-172 10 November 1971 ENTOMOLOGY OF THE AUCKLANDS AND OTHER ISLANDS SOUTH OF NEW ZEALAND: LEPIDOPTERA, EX­ CLUDING NON-CRAMBINE PYRALIDAE By J. S. Dugdale1 CONTENTS Introduction 55 Acknowledgements 58 Faunal Composition and Relationships 58 Faunal List 59 Key to Families 68 1. Arctiidae 71 2. Carposinidae 73 Coleophoridae 76 Cosmopterygidae 77 3. Crambinae (pt Pyralidae) 77 4. Elachistidae 79 5. Geometridae 89 Hyponomeutidae 115 6. Nepticulidae 115 7. Noctuidae 117 8. Oecophoridae 131 9. Psychidae 137 10. Pterophoridae 145 11. Tineidae... 148 12. Tortricidae 156 References 169 Note 172 Abstract: This paper deals with all Lepidoptera, excluding the non-crambine Pyralidae, of Auckland, Campbell, Antipodes and Snares Is. The native resident fauna of these islands consists of 42 species of which 21 (50%) are endemic, in 27 genera, of which 3 (11%) are endemic, in 12 families. The endemic fauna is characterised by brachyptery (66%), body size under 10 mm (72%) and concealed, or strictly ground- dwelling larval life. All species can be related to mainland forms; there is a distinctive pre-Pleistocene element as well as some instances of possible Pleistocene introductions, as suggested by the presence of pairs of species, one member of which is endemic but fully winged. A graph and tables are given showing the composition of the fauna, its distribution, habits, and presumed derivations. Host plants or host niches are discussed. An additional 7 species are considered to be non-resident waifs. The taxonomic part includes keys to families (applicable only to the subantarctic fauna), and to genera and species.
    [Show full text]
  • Protection of Pandora Moth (Coloradia Pandora Blake) Eggs from Consumption by Golden-Mantled Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus Lateralis Say)
    AN ABSTRACT OF THE THESIS OF Elizabeth Ann Gerson for the degree of Master of Science in Forest Science presented on 10 January, 1995. Title: Protection of Pandora Moth (Coloradia pandora Blake) Eggs From Consumption by Golden-mantled Ground Squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis Say) Abstract approved: Redacted for Privacy William C. McComb Endemic populations of pandora moths (Coloradia pandora Blake), a defoliator of western pine forests, proliferated to epidemic levels in central Oregon in 1986 and increased dramatically through 1994. Golden-mantled ground squirrels (Spermophilus lateralis Say) consume adult pandora moths, but reject nutritionally valuable eggs from gravid females. Feeding trials with captive S. lateralis were conducted to identify the mode of egg protection. Chemical constituents of fertilized eggs were separated through a polarity gradient of solvent extractions. Consumption of the resulting hexane, dichloromethane, and water egg fractions, and the extracted egg tissue residue, was evaluated by randomized 2-choice feeding tests. Consumption of four physically distinct egg fractions (whole eggs, "whole" egg shells, ground egg shells, and egg contents) also was evaluated. These bioassays indicated that C. pandora eggs are not protected chemically, however, the egg shell does inhibit S. lateralis consumption. Egg protection is one mechanism that enables C. pandora to persist within the forest food web. Spermophilus lateralis, a common and often abundant rodent of central Oregon pine forests, is a natural enemy of C. pandora
    [Show full text]
  • Contribution to the Lepidopterans of Visakhapatnam Region, Andhra Pradesh, India
    ANALYSIS Vol. 21, Issue 68, 2020 ANALYSIS ARTICLE ISSN 2319–5746 EISSN 2319–5754 Species Contribution to the Lepidopterans of Visakhapatnam Region, Andhra Pradesh, India Solomon Raju AJ1, Venkata Ramana K2 1Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India 2Department of Botany, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India Corresponding author: A.J. Solomon Raju, Department of Environmental Sciences, Andhra University, Visakhapatnam 530 003, India Mobile: 91-9866256682, email: [email protected] Article History Received: 28 June 2020 Accepted: 02 August 2020 Published: August 2020 Citation Solomon Raju AJ, Venkata Ramana K. Contribution to the Lepidopterans of Visakhapatnam Region, Andhra Pradesh, India. Species, 2020, 21(68), 275-280 Publication License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. General Note Article is recommended to print as color digital version in recycled paper. ABSTRACT The butterflies Byblia ilithyia (Nymphalidae), Pieris canidia (Pieridae) and Azanus jesous (Lycaenidae) and the day-flying moth, Nyctemera adversata (Erebidae) are oligophagous. Previously, only B. ilithyia has been reported to be occurring in this region while the other three species are being reported for the first time from this region. The larval host plants include Jatropha gossypiifolia and Tragia involucrata for B. ilithyia, Brassica oleracea var. oleracea and B. oleracea var. botrytis for P. canidia, and Acacia auriculiformis for Azanus jesous. The nectar plants include Tragia involucrata, Euphorbia hirta and Jatropha gossypiifolia for B. ilithyia, Premna latifolia and Cleome viscosa for P. canidia, Lagascea mollis, Tridax procumbens and Digera muricata for A. jesous and Bidens pilosa for 275 N. adversata. The study recommends extensive field investigations to find out more larval plants and nectar plants for each Page lepidopteran species now reported.
    [Show full text]
  • Appendix B Natural History and Control of Nonnative Invasive Species
    Appendix B: Natural History and Control of Nonnative Invasive Plants Found in Ten Northern Rocky Mountains National Parks Introduction The Invasive Plant Management Plan was written for the following ten parks (in this document, parks are referred to by the four letter acronyms in bold): the Bear Paw Battlefield-BEPA (MT, also known as Nez Perce National Historical Park); Big Hole National Battlefield-BIHO (MT); City of Rocks National Reserve-CIRO (ID); Craters of the Moon National Monument and Preserve-CRMO (ID); Fossil Butte National Monument-FOBU (WY); Golden Spike National Historic Site-GOSP (UT); Grant-Kohrs Ranch National Historic Site-GRKO (MT); Hagerman Fossil Beds National Monument-HAFO (ID); Little Bighorn Battlefield National Monument-LIBI (MT); and Minidoka National Historic Site-MIIN (ID). The following information is contained for each weed species covered in this document (1) Park presence: based on formal surveys or park representatives’ observations (2) Status: whether the plant is listed as noxious in ID, MT, UT, or WY (3) Identifying characteristics: key characteristics to aid identification, and where possible, unique features to help distinguish the weed from look-a-like species (4) Life cycle: annual, winter-annual, biennial, or perennial and season of flowering and fruit set (5) Spread: the most common method of spread and potential for long distance dispersal (6) Seeds per plant and seed longevity (when available) (7) Habitat (8) Control Options: recommendations on the effectiveness of a. Mechanical Control b. Cultural
    [Show full text]
  • Senecio Campylocarpus (Bulging Fireweed) Senecio Campylocarpus
    Notesheet for Senecio campylocarpus (bulging fireweed) Senecio campylocarpus bulging fireweed T A S M A N I A N T H R E A T E N E D S P E C I E S N O T E S H E E T Image by Mark Wapstra Scientific name: Senecio campylocarpus I.Thomps., Muelleria 20: 139 (2004) Common name: bulging fireweed (Wapstra et al. 2005) Name history: Senecio glandulosus (DC.) Sch.Bip. Group: vascular plant, dicotyledon, family Asteraceae Status: Threatened Species Protection Act 1995: vulnerable Environment Protection and Biodiversity Conservation Act 1999: Not listed Distribution: Endemic status: not endemic to Tasmania Tasmanian NRM regions: North Figure 1. The distribution of Senecio campylocarpus in Plate 1. Inflorescence of Senecio campylocarpus, showing Tasmania, showing Natural Resource Management mature dark achenes with typical curvature regions (image by Mark Wapstra) 1 Threatened Species Section – Department of Primary Industries, Parks, Water and Environment Notesheet for Senecio campylocarpus (bulging fireweed) SUMMARY: Senecio campylocarpus (bulging occurrences that are short-lived and decrease as fireweed) is a semi-aquatic perennial herb, competition with other plants progresses. As known in Tasmania from three extant sites and Senecio campylocarpus occurs on river verges in a site that may now be extinct, all from the flood prone habitats it is likely that seed is also northern Midlands and greater Launceston area. spread by flood waters, with flood-scoured In Tasmania, the species occurs in flood-prone areas providing recruitment niches. It is not lowland grassy habitats associated with major known whether the species germinates from river systems. The data suggest that the total soil-stored seed.
    [Show full text]
  • Koexistence a Rozdělení Niky U Pavouků Rodu Philodromus
    Masarykova univerzita Přírodovědecká fakulta Ústav botaniky a zoologie Koexistence a rozdělení niky u pavouků rodu Philodromus Diplomová práce Autor: Radek Michalko Brno 2012 Vedoucí DP: doc. Mgr. Stano Pekár Ph.D. 1 Souhlasím s uloţením této diplomové práce v knihovně Ústavu botaniky a zoologie PřF MU v Brně, případně v jiné knihovně MU, s jejím veřejným půjčováním a vyuţitím pro vědecké, vzdělávací nebo jiné veřejně prospěšné účely, a to za předpokladu, ţe převzaté informace budou řádně citovány a nebudou vyuţívány komerčně. V Brně 8.1.2012 ………………………………… Podpis 2 PODĚKOVÁNÍ Zejména bych chtěl poděkovat vedoucímu mé diplomové práce panu docentu Stanu Pekárovi, ţe mi umoţnil pracovat na tomto tématu, za trpělivé vedení a uţitečné rady. Dále bych chtěl velice poděkovat mým rodičům, bez jejichţ osobní a finanční podpory by tato práce nevznikla. Rovněţ bych chtěl poděkovat Lence Sentenské, Evě Líznarové, Pavlovi Šebkovi a Stanovi Korenkovi za podporu a cenné rady všeho druhu. 3 ABSTRAKT Koexistence a rozdělení niky pavouků rodu Philodromus V této diplomové práci byl zkoumán mechanismus umoţňující koexistenci mezi Philodromus albidus, P. aureolus a P. cespitum. Studie probíhala na území významného krajinného prvku U Kříţe v Brně Starém Lískovci. Studované území se skládá ze třech typů biotopů: listnatý les, křoviny a monokultura švestek. Pavouci byli získáváni pomocí sklepávání. U zkoumaných druhů byly porovnávány různé dimenze niky. Prostorová nika byla zkoumána na základě mikro- aţ makrobiotopových preferencí. Trofická nika byla zkoumána na základě velikosti a typu přirozené kořisti a pomocí laboratorních experimentů potravních preferencí. Časová nika byla zkoumána na základě fenologie jednotlivých druhů. Studované druhy se lišily v prostorové a trofické nice.
    [Show full text]
  • 197 Section 9 Sunflower (Helianthus
    SECTION 9 SUNFLOWER (HELIANTHUS ANNUUS L.) 1. Taxonomy of the Genus Helianthus, Natural Habitat and Origins of the Cultivated Sunflower A. Taxonomy of the genus Helianthus The sunflower belongs to the genus Helianthus in the Composite family (Asterales order), which includes species with very diverse morphologies (herbs, shrubs, lianas, etc.). The genus Helianthus belongs to the Heliantheae tribe. This includes approximately 50 species originating in North and Central America. The basis for the botanical classification of the genus Helianthus was proposed by Heiser et al. (1969) and refined subsequently using new phenological, cladistic and biosystematic methods, (Robinson, 1979; Anashchenko, 1974, 1979; Schilling and Heiser, 1981) or molecular markers (Sossey-Alaoui et al., 1998). This approach splits Helianthus into four sections: Helianthus, Agrestes, Ciliares and Atrorubens. This classification is set out in Table 1.18. Section Helianthus This section comprises 12 species, including H. annuus, the cultivated sunflower. These species, which are diploid (2n = 34), are interfertile and annual in almost all cases. For the majority, the natural distribution is central and western North America. They are generally well adapted to dry or even arid areas and sandy soils. The widespread H. annuus L. species includes (Heiser et al., 1969) plants cultivated for seed or fodder referred to as H. annuus var. macrocarpus (D.C), or cultivated for ornament (H. annuus subsp. annuus), and uncultivated wild and weedy plants (H. annuus subsp. lenticularis, H. annuus subsp. Texanus, etc.). Leaves of these species are usually alternate, ovoid and with a long petiole. Flower heads, or capitula, consist of tubular and ligulate florets, which may be deep purple, red or yellow.
    [Show full text]
  • NEWSLETTER• of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY
    NEWSLETTER• of the MICHIGAN ENTOMOLOGICAL SOCIETY Volume 38, Numbers 4 December, 1993 Impacts ofBt on Non-Target Lepidoptera John W. Peacock, David L. Wagner, and Dale F. Schweitzer USDA Forest Service, Hamden, CT; University of Connecticut, Storrs, CT; and The Nature Conservancy, Port Norris, NT, respectively Introduction gypsy moth in Oregon. Sample et a1. ing attempts bycertain birds. In another (1 993) have likewise reported a signifi­ study, Bellocq et al. (1992) showed that Bacillus thuringiensis Berliner var. cant reduction inspecies abundance and the use of Btk increased immigration kurstaki (Btk) is one of the pesticides richness in non-target Lepidoptera in rates andcaused d ietary shifts inshrews. most commonly employed against lepi­ field studies in eastern West Virginia. We report here a summary of our dopteran forest pests. In the eastern U.S., James et al. (1993) haveshown thatBtk is studies aimed at determining the effect where millionsofhectares of deciduous toxic to late, but not early, instar larvae of Btko n non-target Lepidoptera inboth forest have been defoliated by the ''Eu­ of the beneficial cinnabar moth, Tyria laboratoryand field studies. Laboratory ropean" gypsy moth, Lymantria dispar jacobaeae (L.). bioassays were conducted on larvae in (L.), Btk has been used extenSively to In addition to its direct effects on seven families of native eastern U.S. slow the spread of this pest and to re­ native Lepidoptera, Btk can indirectly Macrolepidoptera. Field studies were duce defoliation. In 1992 alone, over affect other animals that rely on lepi­ carried out in Rockbridge County, Vir­ 300,000 ha were treated with Btk, in­ dopterous larvae as a primary source of ginia, and were the first to evaluate non­ cluding gypsy moth suppression activi­ food.
    [Show full text]
  • Experiments with Feature Transfer for Fine-Grained Multi-Class and One-Class Image Categorization
    Hidden features: Experiments with feature transfer for fine-grained multi-class and one-class image categorization Varvara Vetrova Sheldon Coup Eibe Frank Michael J. Cree School of Mathematics and Statistics Department of Computer Science School of Engineering University of Canterbury University of Waikato University of Waikato Christchurch, New Zealand Hamilton, New Zealand Hamilton, New Zealand fvarvara.vetrova@,[email protected] [email protected] [email protected] Abstract—Can we apply out-of-the box feature transfer using domain [1]. This is particularly useful in situations where little pre-trained convolutional neural networks in fine-grained multi- labeled data is available in the target domain [2], [3]. class image categorization tasks? What is the effect of (a) domain- In this paper, we tackle the challenge of multi-class and specific fine-tuning and (b) a special-purpose network architec- ture designed and trained specifically for the target domain? one-class classification of fine-grained datasets, where accurate How do these approaches perform in one-class classification? recognition of fine detail is important to discriminate between We investigate these questions by tackling two biological object classes of images and thus achieve good classification perfor- recognition tasks: classification of “cryptic” plants of genus mance [4]. Fine-grained recognition tasks differ from general Coprosma and identification of New Zealand moth species. We image classification tasks because variation between images compare results based on out-of-the-box features extracted using a pre-trained state-of-the-art network to those obtained by fine- pertaining to different classes is much smaller.
    [Show full text]
  • Additions, Deletions and Corrections to An
    Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) ADDITIONS, DELETIONS AND CORRECTIONS TO AN ANNOTATED CHECKLIST OF THE IRISH BUTTERFLIES AND MOTHS (LEPIDOPTERA) WITH A CONCISE CHECKLIST OF IRISH SPECIES AND ELACHISTA BIATOMELLA (STAINTON, 1848) NEW TO IRELAND K. G. M. Bond1 and J. P. O’Connor2 1Department of Zoology and Animal Ecology, School of BEES, University College Cork, Distillery Fields, North Mall, Cork, Ireland. e-mail: <[email protected]> 2Emeritus Entomologist, National Museum of Ireland, Kildare Street, Dublin 2, Ireland. Abstract Additions, deletions and corrections are made to the Irish checklist of butterflies and moths (Lepidoptera). Elachista biatomella (Stainton, 1848) is added to the Irish list. The total number of confirmed Irish species of Lepidoptera now stands at 1480. Key words: Lepidoptera, additions, deletions, corrections, Irish list, Elachista biatomella Introduction Bond, Nash and O’Connor (2006) provided a checklist of the Irish Lepidoptera. Since its publication, many new discoveries have been made and are reported here. In addition, several deletions have been made. A concise and updated checklist is provided. The following abbreviations are used in the text: BM(NH) – The Natural History Museum, London; NMINH – National Museum of Ireland, Natural History, Dublin. The total number of confirmed Irish species now stands at 1480, an addition of 68 since Bond et al. (2006). Taxonomic arrangement As a result of recent systematic research, it has been necessary to replace the arrangement familiar to British and Irish Lepidopterists by the Fauna Europaea [FE] system used by Karsholt 60 Bulletin of the Irish Biogeographical Society No. 36 (2012) and Razowski, which is widely used in continental Europe.
    [Show full text]
  • Microlepidoptera in Nederland, Vooral in 2007-2010 Met Een Terugblik Op 30 Jaar Faunistisch Onderzoek
    entomologische berichten 91 73 (3) 2013 Microlepidoptera in Nederland, vooral in 2007-2010 met een terugblik op 30 jaar faunistisch onderzoek K. J. (Hans) Huisman J. C. (Sjaak) Koster Tymo S.T. Muus Erik J. van Nieukerken TREFWOORDEN Faunistiek, nieuwe waarneming, provincies, areaaluitbreidingen Entomologische Berichten 73 (3): 91-117 In de jaren 2007-2010 werden maar liefst elf soorten kleine vlinders nieuw voor onze fauna gevonden: Infurcitinea teriolella, Bucculatrix ulmifoliae, Caloptilia fidella, Phyllonorycter issikii, Coleophora motacillella, Cochylis molliculana, Cnephasia sedana, Clepsis dumicolana, Lobesia botrana, Pseudococcyx tessulatana en Evergestis aenealis. Daarnaast werden drie soorten al elders gemeld: Caloptilia hemidactylella, Cydalima perspectalis en Bucculatrix ainsliella. Na 30 jaar van jaarlijsten geven we een evaluatie, met onder andere een totaal van 128 nieuw gemelde soorten. Dit zijn er minder dan in Denemarken, maar meer dan op de Britse Eilanden of in Zweden. We verklaren deze verschillen door het verschil in oppervlak van de landen: hoe kleiner het land, hoe meer kans dat er nieuwe soorten gevonden worden. Dit jaaroverzicht is het laatste dat in deze vorm verschijnt. Dit is het negentiende jaaroverzicht van de Nederlandse Micro- die beoordeeld konden worden door specialisten. We hopen dat lepidoptera sedert 1983. Een index van alle overzichten tot 2000 we een goed evenwicht gevonden hebben in het spanningsveld werd gegeven door Koster & Van Nieukerken (2003). tussen volledigheid en betrouwbaarheid. De jaren 2007–2010 waren wederom aan de warme kant met Door de snelle berichtgeving op internet wordt het voor het uitzondering van 2010, dat sinds 1996 het eerste jaar was met samenstellen van een gedrukte ‘jaarlijst’ steeds moeilijker om een temperatuur beneden het langjarige gemiddelde van 9,8°C voldoende actueel te blijven en toch de grens van een bepaald (jaargemiddelden 2007-2010 11,2; 10,6; 10,5; 9,1°C).
    [Show full text]
  • Ecology and Conservation Needs of Nymphalid Butterflies in Disturbed Tropical Forest of Eastern Himalayan Biodiversity Hotspot, Assam, India
    International Journal of Biodiversity and Conservation Vol. 1(7) pp. 231-250, December, 2009 Available online http://www.academicjournals.org/ijbc ©2009 Academic Journals Full Length Research Paper Ecology and conservation needs of nymphalid butterflies in disturbed tropical forest of Eastern Himalayan biodiversity hotspot, Assam, India Malabika Kakati Saikia*, J. Kalita and P. K. Saikia Department of Zoology, Gauhati University, Gopinath Bardoloi Nagar, Jalukbari, Guwahati-781 014, Assam, India. Accepted 21 October, 2009 We examine the hypothesis, whether the diversity of Nymphalid butterflies in primary forest is related to vegetation structure and canopy openness and that this relationship differs between butterfly taxa in relation to phylogenetic differences in light and shade preferences. The study also examines whether the increasing diversity of butterflies in degraded tropical forest is associated with the loss of species with restricted geographical distribution. Present study has considered eight habitat parameters for habitat data collections and the t-test using equal variance, spearman rank correlation and multiple regressions were used for statistical analyses. Species diversity was analyzed using Margalef’s D indices that indicate both the species richness and abundance. Bootstrap method was used to compare the diversity among samples. PCA was carried out to examine the relationship between vegetation structure and species diversity in primary and degraded forest. The relationship between vegetation factor scores and species diversity at each sampling station in primary and degraded forest was analyzed using stepwise multiple regression. Results indicates that the butterflies species sampled in closed canopy forest had more restricted geographical distribution than those being sampled in disturbed forest. The species with greater light preference had significantly wider geographical distribution, whereas, the species with greater shade preferences had significantly narrower geographical distributions.
    [Show full text]