DOCSLIB.ORG

Language and Communication (PDF)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Language and Communication (PDF) 0≥π£®Ø¨Øßπ ¶Ø≤ )!3 ,°Æßµ°ß• °Æ§ #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ 1 •≤ØÆ≥©Æ ,°Æßµ°ß• °Æ§ #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ (µ≠°Æ ¨°Æßµ°ß• # 0≤Ø∞•≤¥©•≥+ ≥¥≤µ£¥µ≤• °Æ§ ¨©Æßµ©≥¥©£ ®©•≤°≤£®π+ ,°Æßµ°ß• °£±µ©≥©¥©ØÆ# ∞≤•§©≥∞Ø≥©¥©ØÆ+ £≤©¥©£°¨ ∞•≤©Ø§ ®π∞Ø¥®•≥©≥- 4®•Ø≤©•≥ ض ¨°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ # 3´©ÆÆ•≤ °Æ§ #®Ø≠≥´π- 0≤Ø£•≥≥ °Æ§ ¥π∞•≥ ض £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ # •¶¶•£¥©∂• £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ ¥≤°©Æ©Æß ∑∑∑Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥©Æ ∑∑∑Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥©Æ #Ø≠∞©¨•§ ¢π !≠©¥ 3®•´®°≤ %≠°©¨ Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥ß≠°©¨£Ø≠ #ØÆ¥°£¥ !"#!$%&'(()($ 0≥π£®Ø¨Øßπ ¶Ø≤ )!3 ,°Æßµ°ß• °Æ§ #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ 2 4Ø∞©£ 0°ß• .µ≠¢•≤ ,°Æßµ°ß• $•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ 0≤Ø∞•≤¥©•≥ °Æ§ 3¥≤µ£¥µ≤• ,°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ' ,©Æßµ©≥¥©£≥ 0 ,°Æßµ°ß• °£±µ©≥©¥©ØÆ "0 3Ø£©°¨ ©Æ¥•≤°£¥©ØÆ©≥¥ ¥®•Ø≤π "! 2•¨°¥©ØÆ°¨ ¶≤°≠• ¥®•Ø≤π )" •≤ØÆ≥©Æ 3´©ÆÆ•≤!≥ 4®•Ø≤π ض ,°Æßµ°ß• $•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ %& 6•≤¢°¨ "•®°∂©Ø≤ )% -°Æ§ )5 4°£¥ '" !µ¥Ø£¨©¥©£≥ '% 2•¨°¥©ØÆ°¨ ¶≤°≠• ¥®•Ø≤π (& #®Ø≠≥´π!≥ 4®•Ø≤π ض ,°Æßµ°ß• $•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ' 5Æ©∂•≤≥°¨ ß≤°≠≠°≤ (' ,°Æßµ°ß• °£±µ©≥©¥©ØÆ §•∂©£• (5 '•Æ•≤°¥©∂• ß≤°≠≠°≤ (! #®Ø≠≥´π ®©•≤°≤£®π $& 8#¢°≤ ¥®•Ø≤π $' 0≤©Æ£©∞¨•≥ °Æ§ ∞°≤°≠•¥•≤≥ $0 -©Æ©≠°¨©≥¥ ∞≤Øß≤°≠ $5 ∑∑∑Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥©Æ #≤©¥©£°¨ ∞•≤©Ø§ ®π∞Ø¥®•≥©≥ &% 0≤Ø£•≥≥ ض #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ ( #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ 0' #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ ¥®•Ø≤π 5' 4Ø≤ØÆ¥Ø 3£®Øب ض £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ ¥®•Ø≤π !) -•§©µ≠ ¥®•Ø≤π !$ 4π∞•≥ ض #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ )& )Æ¥•≤∞•≤≥ØÆ°¨ £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ !% )Æ¥≤°∞•≤≥ØÆ°¨ £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ "&! "µ≥©Æ•≥≥ £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ ""& #Ø≤∞Ø≤°¥• £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ "") -°≥≥ £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ ""0 0µ¢¨©£ ≥∞•°´©Æß ""! 4≤°©Æ©Æß ¶Ø≤ %¶¶•£¥©∂• ∑#Ø≠∑≠µÆ∑©£°¥©ÆØÆ µ ≠• ≤Ø Æ≥ ©Æ %% #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ≥ ¥≤°©Æ©Æß ")) #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ ≥´©¨¨≥ ¥≤°©Æ©Æß ")( Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking 128 #Ø≠∞©¨•§ ¢π !≠©¥ 3®•´®°≤ %≠°©¨ Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥ß≠°©¨£Ø≠ #ØÆ¥°£¥ !"#!$%&'(()($ 0≥π£®Ø¨Øßπ ¶Ø≤ )!3 ,°Æßµ°ß• °Æ§ #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ 3 ,°Æßµ°ß• $•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ 0≤Ø∞•≤¥©•≥ °Æ§ 3¥≤µ£¥µ≤• ,°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ,°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ©≥ ° ∞≤Ø£•≥≥ ≥¥°≤¥©Æß •°≤¨π ©Æ ®µ≠°Æ ¨©¶•+ ∑®•Æ ° ∞•≤≥ØÆ ¢•ß©Æ≥ ¥Ø °£±µ©≤• ¨°Æßµ°ß• ¢π ¨•°≤Æ©Æß ©¥ °≥ ©¥ ©≥ ≥∞Ø´•Æ °Æ§ ¢π ≠©≠©£≤π #®©¨§≤•Æ:≥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ≠Ø∂•≥ ¶≤Ø≠ ≥©≠∞¨• ¥Ø £Ø≠∞¨•∏ )ƶ°Æ¥≥ ≥¥°≤¥ ∑©¥®Øµ¥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• 9•¥ ¢π ¶Øµ≤ ≠ØÆ¥®≥ ض °ß•+ ¢°¢©•≥ •≤ØÆ≥©Æ£°Æ ≤•°§ ¨©∞≥ °Æ§ §©≥£≤©≠©Æ°¥• ≥∞••£® ≥صƧ≥ 4®• ¨°Æßµ°ß• ¥®°¥ ©Æ¶°Æ¥≥ ≥∞•°´ ©≥ £°¨¨•§ ¢°¢¢¨©Æß 5≥µ°¨¨π+ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ≥¥°≤¥≥ ض¶ °≥ ≤•£°¨¨ ض ≥©≠∞¨• ∑Ø≤§≥ ∑©¥®Øµ¥ °≥≥Ø£©°¥•§ ≠•°Æ©Æß+ ¢µ¥ °≥ £®©¨§≤•Æ ß≤Ø∑+ ∑Ø≤§≥ °£±µ©≤• ≠•°Æ©Æß+ ∑©¥® £ØÆÆ•£¥©ØÆ≥ ¢•¥∑••Æ ∑Ø≤§≥ ¢•©Æß ¶Ø≤≠•§ !≥ ° ∞•≤≥ØÆ ß•¥≥ ب§•≤+ Æ•∑ ≠•°Æ©Æß≥ °Æ§ Æ•∑ °≥≥Ø£©°¥©ØÆ≥ °≤• £≤•°¥•§ °Æ§ ∂Ø£°¢µ¨°≤π ©Æ£≤•°≥•≥ °≥ ≠Ø≤• ∑Ø≤§≥ °≤• ¨•°≤Æ•§ )ƶ°Æ¥≥ µ≥• ¥®•©≤ ¢Ø§©•≥+ ∂Ø£°¨ £≤©•≥ °Æ§ Ø¥®•≤ ∞≤•∂•≤¢°¨ ∂Ø£°¨©∫°¥©ØÆ≥ ¥Ø £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥• ¥®•©≤ ∑°Æ¥≥+ Æ••§≥ °Æ§ §©≥∞Ø≥©¥©ØÆ≥ %∂•Æ ¥®Øµß® ≠Ø≥¥ £®©¨§≤•Æ ¢•ß©Æ ¥Ø ∂Ø£°¨©∫• °Æ§ •∂•Æ¥µ°¨¨π ∂•≤¢°¨©∫• °¥ ∂°≤©Øµ≥ °ß•≥ °Æ§ °¥ §©¶¶•≤•Æ¥ ≤°¥•≥+ ¥®•π ¨•°≤Æ ¥®•©≤ ¶©≤≥¥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ∑©¥®Øµ¥ £ØÆ≥£©Øµ≥ ©Æ≥¥≤µ£¥©ØÆ ¶≤Ø≠ ∞°≤•Æ¥≥ Ø≤ £°≤•¥°´•≤≥ )Æ ¶°£¥ ≤•≥•°≤£® ®°≥ ≥®Ø∑Æ ¥®°¥ ¥®• •°≤¨©•≥¥ ¨•°≤Æ©Æß ¢•ß©Æ≥ ©Æ µ¥•≤µ≥ ∑®•Æ ¥®• ¶•¥µ≥ £°Æ ≤•£ØßÆ©∫• ¥®• ≥صƧ≥ °Æ§ ≥∞••£® ∞°¥¥•≤Æ≥ ض ©¥≥ ≠Ø¥®•≤:≥ ∂Ø©£• 4®•Ø≤•¥©£°¨ ¶≤°≠•∑Ø≤´≥ ض ¨°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ∑∑∑Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥©Æ 4®•≤• °≤• ¶Øµ≤ ≠°™Ø≤ ¥®•Ø≤©•≥ ض ¨°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ 4®• ¢•®°∂©Ø≤©≥¥ ¥®•Ø≤π + ∞≤Ø∞Ø≥•§ ¢π " & 3´©ÆÆ•≤ ≥µßß•≥¥≥ ¥®°¥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ©≥ ¨•°≤Æ•§ ¥®≤ص߮ Ø∞•≤°Æ¥ £ØƧ©¥©ØÆ©Æß ?≤•©Æ¶Ø≤£•≠•Æ¥ °Æ§ ©≠©¥°¥©ØÆ@ 4®©≥ ∞•≤≥∞•£¥©∂• ≥©§•≥ ∑©¥® ¥®• Ƶ≤¥µ≤• ≥©§• ض ¥®• Æ°¥µ≤•#Ƶ≤¥µ≤• §•¢°¥• 4®©≥ ∞•≤≥∞•£¥©∂• ®°≥ ÆØ¥ ¢••Æ ∑©§•¨π °££•∞¥•§ ©Æ •©¥®•≤ ∞≥π£®Ø¨Øßπ Ø≤ ¨©Æßµ©≥¥©£≥ ¶Ø≤ ≥Ø≠• ¥©≠•+ ¢µ¥ ¢π ≠°Æπ °££ØµÆ¥≥+ ©≥ •∏∞•≤©•Æ£©Æß ° ≤•≥µ≤ß•Æ£• 3Ø≠• •≠∞©≤©£©≥¥ ¥®•Ø≤π °££ØµÆ¥≥ ¥Ø§°π µ≥• ¢•®°∂©Ø≤©≥¥ ≠ا•¨≥ 4®• Æ°¥©∂©≥¥ ¥®•Ø≤π + ∞≤Ø∞Ø≥•§ ¢π .Ø°≠ #®Ø≠≥´π+ °≤ßµ•≥ ¥®°¥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ©≥ ° µÆ©±µ• ®µ≠°Æ °££Ø≠∞¨©≥®≠•Æ¥ #®Ø≠≥´π ≥°π≥ ¥®°¥ °¨¨ £®©¨§≤•Æ ®°∂• ∑®°¥ ©≥ £°¨¨•§ °Æ ,!$+ °Æ ©ÆÆ°¥• ¨°Æßµ°ß• °£±µ©≥©¥©ØÆ §•∂©£• ¥®°¥ °¨¨Ø∑≥ £®©¨§≤•Æ ¥Ø ∞≤اµ£• £ØÆ≥©≥¥•Æ¥ ≥•Æ¥•Æ£•≥ ØÆ£• ∂Ø£°¢µ¨°≤π ©≥ ¨•°≤Æ•§ (©≥ £¨°©≠ ©≥ ¢°≥•§ µ∞ØÆ ¥®• ∂©•∑ ¥®°¥ ∑®°¥ £®©¨§≤•Æ ®•°≤ # ¥®•©≤ ¨©Æßµ©≥¥©£ ©Æ∞µ¥ # ©≥ ©Æ≥µ¶¶©£©•Æ¥ ¥Ø •∏∞¨°©Æ ®Ø∑ ¥®•π £Ø≠• ¥Ø ¨•°≤Æ ¨°Æßµ°ß• 7®©¨• ¥®©≥ ∂©•∑ ®°≥ §Ø≠©Æ°¥•§ ¨©Æßµ©≥¥©£ ¥®•Ø≤π ¶Ø≤ Ø∂•≤ ¶©¶¥π π•°≤ ≥+ ©¥ ®°≥ ≤•£•Æ¥¨π ¶°¨¨•Æ ©Æ¥Ø §©≥≤•∞µ¥• 4®• •≠∞©≤©£©≥¥ ¥®•Ø≤π ≥µßß•≥¥≥+ £ØÆ¥≤° #®Ø≠≥´π+ ¥®°¥ ¥®•≤• ©≥ •Æص߮ ©Æ¶Ø≤≠°¥©ØÆ ©Æ ¥®• ¨©Æßµ©≥¥©£ ©Æ∞µ¥ ¥®°¥ £®©¨§≤•Æ∑∑∑Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥©Æ ≤•£•©∂•+ °Æ§ ¥®•≤•¶Ø≤• ¥®•≤• ©≥ ÆØ Æ••§ ¥Ø °≥≥µ≠• °Æ ©ÆÆ°¥• ¨°Æßµ°ß• °£±µ©≥©¥©ØÆ §•∂©£• ?≥•• °¢Ø∂•@ 4®©≥ °∞∞≤Ø°£® ©≥ £®°≤°£¥•≤©∫•§ ¢π ¥®• £ØÆ≥¥≤µ£¥©ØÆ Ø¶ £Ø≠∞µ¥°¥©ØÆ°¨ ≠ا•¨≥ ¥®°¥ ¨•°≤Æ °≥∞•£¥≥ ض ¨°Æßµ°ß• °Æ§DØ≤ ¥®°¥ ≥©≠µ¨°¥• ¥®• ¥π∞• ض ¨©Æßµ©≥¥©£ ص¥∞µ¥ ∞≤اµ£•§ ¢π £®©¨§≤•Æ 4®• ≠Ø≥¥ ©Æ¶¨µ•Æ¥©°¨ ≠ا•¨≥ ∑©¥®©Æ ¥®©≥ °∞∞≤Ø°£® °≤• ≥¥°¥©≥¥©£°¨ ¨•°≤Æ©Æß ¥®•Ø≤©•≥ ≥µ£® °≥ £ØÆÆ•£¥©ØÆ©≥¥ ≠ا•¨≥ °Æ§ £®µÆ´©Æß ¥®•Ø≤©•≥ #Ø≠∞©¨•§ ¢π !≠©¥ 3®•´®°≤ %≠°©¨ Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥ß≠°©¨£Ø≠ #ØÆ¥°£¥ !"#!$%&'(()($ 0≥π£®Ø¨Øßπ ¶Ø≤ )!3 ,°Æßµ°ß• °Æ§ #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ 4 4®• ¨°≥¥ ¥®•Ø≤π+ ¥®• ©Æ¥•≤°£¥©ØÆ©≥¥ ∞•≤≥∞•£¥©∂• + £ØÆ≥©≥¥≥ ض ¥∑Ø £Ø≠∞ØÆ•Æ¥≥ 4®©≥ ∞•≤≥∞•£¥©∂• ©≥ ° £Ø≠¢©Æ°¥©ØÆ Ø¶ ¢Ø¥® ¥®• Æ°¥©∂©≥¥ °Æ§ ¢•®°∂©Ø≤©≥¥ ¥®•Ø≤©•≥ 4®• ¶©≤≥¥ ∞°≤¥+ ¥®• ©Æ¶Ø≤≠°¥©ØÆ#∞≤Ø£•≥≥©Æß ¥®•Ø≤©•≥+ ¥•≥¥≥ ¥®≤ص߮ ¥®• £ØÆÆ•£¥©ØÆ©≥¥ ≠ا•¨+ µ≥©Æß ≥¥°¥©≥¥©£≥ &≤Ø≠ ¥®•≥• ¥®•Ø≤©•≥+ ∑• ≥•• ¥®°¥ ¥®• ¢≤°©Æ ©≥ •∏£•¨¨•Æ¥ °¥ §•¥•£¥©Æß ∞°¥¥•≤Æ≥ 4®• ≥•£ØƧ ∞°≤¥ ض ¥®• ©Æ¥•≤°£¥©ØÆ©≥¥ ∞•≤≥∞•£¥©∂•+ ©≥ ¥®• ≥Ø£©°¨#©Æ¥•≤°£¥©ØÆ©≥¥ ¥®•Ø≤©•≥ 4®•≥• ¥®•Ø≤©•≥ ≥µßß•≥¥ ¥®°¥ ¥®•≤• ©≥ ° Æ°¥©∂• §•≥©≤• ¥Ø µÆ§•≤≥¥°Æ§ Ø¥®•≤≥ °≥ ∑•¨¨ °≥ ¢•©Æß µÆ§•≤≥¥Øا ¢π Ø¥®•≤≥ •≤ØÆ≥©Æ "©Ø¨Øß©£°¨ ∞≤•£ØƧ©¥©ØÆ≥ ,©Æßµ©≥¥≥ §Ø ÆØ¥ °ß≤•• ØÆ ¥®• ¢©Ø¨Øß©£°¨ ¶°£¥Ø≤≥ £ØÆ¥≤©¢µ¥©Æß ¥Ø ¨°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥+ ®Ø∑•∂•≤ ≠Ø≥¥ §Ø °ß≤•• ¥®°¥ ¥®• °¢©¨©¥π ¥Ø °£±µ©≤• ≥µ£® ° £Ø≠∞¨©£°¥•§ ≥π≥¥•≠ ©≥ µÆ©±µ• ¥Ø ¥®• ®µ≠°Æ ≥∞•£©•≥ &µ≤¥®•≤≠Ø≤•+ ≠°Æπ ¢•¨©•∂• ¥®°¥ ص≤ °¢©¨©¥π ¥Ø ¨•°≤Æ ≥∞Ø´•Æ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ≠°π ®°∂• ¢••Æ §•∂•¨Ø∞•§ ¥®≤ص߮ ¥®• •∂بµ¥©ØÆ°≤π ∞≤Ø£•≥≥ °Æ§ ¥®°¥ ¥®• ¶ØµÆ§°¥©ØÆ ¶Ø≤ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ≠°π ¢• ∞°≥≥•§ §Ø∑Æ ß•Æ•¥©£°¨¨π 4®• °¢©¨©¥π ¥Ø ≥∞•°´ °Æ§ µÆ§•≤≥¥°Æ§ ®µ≠°Æ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ≤•±µ©≤•≥ ° ≥∞•£©¶©£ ∂Ø£°¨ °∞∞°≤°¥µ≥ °≥ ∑•¨¨ °≥ ° Æ•≤∂ص≥ ≥π≥¥•≠ ∑©¥® £•≤¥°©Æ £°∞°¢©¨©¥©•≥ /Æ• ®Ø¥¨π §•¢°¥•§ ©≥≥µ• ©≥ ∑®•¥®•≤ ¥®• ¢©Ø¨Øß©£°¨ £ØÆ¥≤©¢µ¥©ØÆ ©Æ£¨µ§•≥ £°∞°£©¥©•≥ ≥∞•£©¶©£ ¥Ø ¨°Æßµ°ß• °£±µ©≥©¥©ØÆ+ ض¥•Æ ≤•¶•≤≤•§ ¥Ø °≥ µÆ©∂•≤≥°¨ ß≤°≠≠°≤ &Ø≤ ¶©¶¥π π•°≤≥+ ¨©Æßµ©≥¥ .Ø°≠ #®Ø≠≥´π ®°≥ °≤ßµ•§ ¶Ø≤ ¥®• ®π∞Ø¥®•≥©≥ ¥®°¥ £®©¨§≤•Æ ®°∂• ©ÆÆ°¥•+ ¨°Æßµ°ß•#≥∞•£©¶©£ °¢©¨©¥©•≥ ¥®°¥ ¶°£©¨©¥°¥• °Æ§ £ØÆ≥¥≤°©Æ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ¨•°≤Æ©Æß )Æ ∞°≤¥©£µ¨°≤+ ®• ®°≥ ∞≤Ø∞Ø≥•§ ¥®°¥ ®µ≠°Æ≥ °≤• ¢©Ø¨Øß©£°¨¨π ∞≤•∑©≤•§ ¥Ø ¨•°≤Æ ¨°Æßµ°ß• °¥ ° £•≤¥°©Æ ¥©≠• °Æ§ ©Æ ° £•≤¥°©Æ ∑°π+ °≤ßµ©Æß ¥®°¥ £®©¨§≤•Æ °≤•∑∑∑Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥©Æ ¢Ø≤Æ ∑©¥® ° ,°Æßµ°ß• !£±µ©≥©¥©ØÆ $•∂©£• ?,!$@ /¥®•≤ ≤•≥•°≤£®•≤≥+ ∑®Ø ¢•¨©•∂• ¥®°¥ ∑Ø≤§≥ °Æ§ ß≤°≠≠°≤≥ °≤• ¨•°≤Æ•§ ?≤°¥®•≤ ¥®°Æ ©ÆÆ°¥•@+ ®°∂• ®π∞Ø¥®•≥©∫•§ ¥®°¥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ¨•°≤Æ©Æß ≤•≥µ¨¥≥ ¶≤Ø≠ ß•Æ•≤°¨ £ØßÆ©¥©∂• °¢©¨©¥©•≥ °Æ§ ¥®• ©Æ¥•≤°£¥©ØÆ ¢•¥∑••Æ ¨•°≤Æ•≤≥ °Æ§ ¥®•©≤ ≥µ≤≤صƧ©Æß £Ø≠≠µÆ©¥©•≥ )¥ ®°≥ °¨≥Ø ≤•£•Æ¥¨π ¢••Æ ≥µßß•≥¥•§ ¥®°¥ ¥®• ≤•¨°¥©∂•¨π ≥¨Ø∑ §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ض ¥®• ∞≤•¶≤ØÆ¥°¨ £Ø≤¥•∏ ©Æ ®µ≠°Æ≥ ≠°π ¢• ØÆ• ≤•°≥ØÆ ¥®°¥ ®µ≠°Æ≥ °≤• °¢¨• ¥Ø ¨•°≤Æ ¨°Æßµ°ß•+ ∑®•≤•°≥ Ø¥®•≤ ≥∞•£©•≥ °≤• ÆØ¥ %Æ∂©≤ØÆ≠•Æ¥°¨ )ƶ¨µ•Æ£•≥ ! ∞µ≤•¨π ¢•®°∂©Ø≤©≥¥ ∂©•∑ ض ¨°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ©≥ ÆØ ¨ØÆß•≤ £ØÆ≥©§•≤•§ ° ∂©°¢¨• •∏∞¨°Æ°¥©ØÆ Ø¶ ®Ø∑ £®©¨§≤•Æ °£±µ©≤• ¨°Æßµ°ß•+ π•¥ ° ß≤•°¥ §•°¨ ض ≤•≥•°≤£® §•≥£≤©¢•≥ ∑°π≥ ©Æ ∑®©£® ° £®©¨§≤•Æ:≥ •Æ∂©≤ØÆ≠•Æ¥°¨ •∏∞•≤©•Æ£•≥ ©Æ¶¨µ•Æ£• ¥®•©≤ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ≥´©¨¨≥ -©£®°•¨ 4Ø≠°≥•¨¨Ø ≥¥≤•≥≥•≥ ¥®°¥ πصÆß £®©¨§≤•Æ °≤• ©Æ¥•Æ≥•¨π ©Æ¥•≤•≥¥•§ ©Æ ¥®•©≤ ≥Ø£©°¨ ∑Ø≤¨§ °Æ§ ¥®°¥ •°≤¨π ©Æ ¥®•©≤ §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ ¥®•π £°Æ µÆ§•≤≥¥°Æ§ ¥®• ©Æ¥•Æ¥©ØÆ≥ ض Ø¥®•≤ ∞•Ø∞¨•F /Æ• £Ø≠∞ØÆ•Æ¥ ض ¥®• πصÆß £®©¨§:≥ ¨©Æßµ©≥¥©£ •Æ∂©≤ØÆ≠•Æ¥ ©≥ ?£®©¨§#§©≤•£¥•§ ≥∞••£®@ °¨≥Ø ´ÆØ∑Æ °≥ ¢°¢π ¥°¨´ Ø≤ ≠Ø¥®•≤•≥•+∑∑∑Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥©Æ ∑®©£® ©≥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ≥∞Ø´•Æ ©Æ ° ®©ß®•≤ ∞©¥£® ¥®°Æ ÆØ≤≠°¨ ∑©¥® ≥©≠∞¨• ∑Ø≤§≥ °Æ§ ≥•Æ¥•Æ£•≥ !¨¥®Øµß® ¥®• ©≠∞Ø≤¥°Æ£• ض ©¥≥ ≤ب• ©Æ §•∂•¨Ø∞©Æß ¨°Æßµ°ß• ®°≥ ¢••Æ §•¢°¥•§+ ≠°Æ𠨩Æßµ©≥¥≥ ¥®©Æ´ ¥®°¥ ©¥ ≠°π °©§ ©Æ £°∞¥µ≤©Æß ¥®• ©Æ¶°Æ¥:≥ °¥¥•Æ¥©ØÆ °Æ§ ≠°©Æ¥°©Æ©Æß £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ !§µ¨¥≥ µ≥• ≥¥≤°¥•ß©•≥ Ø¥®•≤ ¥®°Æ £®©¨§#§©≤•£¥•§ ≥∞••£® ¨©´• ≤•£°≥¥©Æß+ •∏∞°Æ§©Æß+ °Æ§ ¨°¢•¨©ÆßF 2•£°≥¥©Æß ©≥ ≤•∞®≤°≥©Æß ≥Ø≠•¥®©Æß ¥®• £®©¨§ #Ø≠∞©¨•§ ¢π !≠©¥ 3®•´®°≤ %≠°©¨ Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥ß≠°©¨£Ø≠ #ØÆ¥°£¥ !"#!$%&'(()($ 0≥π£®Ø¨Øßπ ¶Ø≤ )!3 ,°Æßµ°ß• °Æ§ #Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ 5 ®°≥ ≥°©§+ ∞•≤®°∞≥ ¥µ≤Æ©Æß ©¥ ©Æ¥Ø ° ±µ•≥¥©ØÆ Ø≤ ≤•≥¥°¥©Æß ¥®• £®©¨§:≥ ©≠≠°¥µ≤• µ¥¥•≤°Æ£• ©Æ ¥®• ¶Ø≤≠ ض ° ¶µ¨¨π ß≤°≠≠°¥©£°¨ ≥•Æ¥•Æ£• %∏∞°Æ§©Æß ©≥ ≤•≥¥°¥©Æß+ ©Æ ° ¨©Æßµ©≥¥©£°¨¨π ≥Ø∞®©≥¥©£°¥•§ ¶Ø≤≠+ ∑®°¥ ° £®©¨§ ®°≥ ≥°©§ ,°¢•¨©Æß ©≥ ©§•Æ¥©¶π©Æß ¥®• Æ°≠•≥ ض Ø¢™•£¥≥ 3Ø£©°¨ ∞≤•£ØƧ©¥©ØÆ≥ )¥ ©≥ £≤µ£©°¨ ¥®°¥ £®©¨§≤•Æ °≤• °¨¨Ø∑•§ ¥Ø ≥Ø£©°¨¨π ©Æ¥•≤°£¥ ∑©¥® Ø¥®•≤ ∞•Ø∞¨• ∑®Ø £°Æ ∂Ø£°¨©∫• °Æ§ ≤•≥∞ØƧ ¥Ø ±µ•≥¥©ØÆ≥ &Ø≤ ¨°Æßµ°ß• °£±µ©≥©¥©ØÆ ¥Ø §•∂•¨Ø∞ ≥µ££•≥≥¶µ¨¨π+ £®©¨§≤•Æ ≠µ≥¥ ¢• ©Æ °Æ •Æ∂©≤ØÆ≠•Æ¥ ¥®°¥•≤ØÆ≥©Æ °¨¨Ø∑≥ ¥®•≠ ¥Ø £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥• ≥Ø£©°¨¨π ©Æ ¥®°¥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• 4®•≤• °≤• ° ¶•∑ §©¶¶•≤•Æ¥ ¥®•Ø≤©•≥ °≥ ¥Ø ∑®π °Æ§ ®Ø∑ £®©¨§≤•Æ §•∂•¨Ø∞ ¨°Æßµ°ß• 4®• ≠Ø≥¥ ∞Ø∞µ¨°≤ ## °Æ§ π•¥ ®•°∂©¨π §•¢°¥•§## •∏∞¨°Æ°¥©ØÆ ©≥ ¥®°¥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• ©≥ °£±µ©≤•§ ¥®≤ص߮ ©≠©¥°¥©ØÆ 4®• ¥∑Ø ≠Ø≥¥ °££•∞¥•§ ¥®•Ø≤©•≥ ©Æ ¨°Æßµ°ß• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥ °≤• ∞≥π£®Ø¨Øß©£°¨ °Æ§ ¶µÆ£¥©ØÆ°¨ 0≥π£®Ø¨Øß©£°¨ •∏∞¨°Æ°¥©ØÆ≥ ¶Ø£µ≥ ØÆ ¥®• ≠•Æ¥°¨ ∞≤Ø£•≥≥•≥ ©Æ∂ب∂•§ ©Æ £®©¨§®Øا ¨°Æßµ°ß• ¨•°≤Æ©Æß &µÆ£¥©ØÆ°¨ •∏∞¨°Æ°¥©ØÆ≥ ¨ØØ´ °¥ ¥®• ≥Ø£©°¨ ∞≤Ø£•≥≥•≥ ©Æ∂ب∂•§ ©Æ ¨•°≤Æ©Æß ¥®• ¶©≤≥¥ ¨°Æßµ°ß• 4®•≤• °≤• ¶Øµ≤ ≠°©Æ £Ø≠∞ØÆ•Æ¥≥ ض ¨°Æßµ°ß• ° 0®ØÆبØßπ ©Æ∂ب∂•≥ ¥®• ≤µ¨•≥ °¢Øµ¥ ¥®• ≥¥≤µ£¥µ≤• °Æ§ ≥•±µ•Æ£• ض ≥∞••£® ≥صƧ≥ ° 3•≠°Æ¥©£≥ £ØÆ≥©≥¥≥ ض ∂Ø£°¢µ¨°≤π °Æ§ ®Ø∑ £ØÆ£•∞¥≥ °≤• •∏∞≤•≥≥•§ ¥®≤ص߮ ∑Ø≤§≥ ° '≤°≠≠°≤ ©Æ∂ب∂•≥ ¥∑Ø ∞°≤¥≥ 4®• ¶©≤≥¥+ ≥πÆ¥°∏+ ©≥ ¥®• ≤µ¨•≥ ©Æ ∑®©£® ∑Ø≤§≥ °≤• °≤≤°Æß•§ ©Æ¥Ø ≥•Æ¥•Æ£•≥ 4®• ≥•£ØƧ+ ≠Ø≤∞®Ø¨Øßπ+ ©≥ ¥®• µ≥• ض ß≤°≠≠°¥©£°¨ ≠°≤´•≤≥ ?©Æ§©£°¥©Æß ¥•Æ≥•+ °£¥©∂• Ø≤ ∞°≥≥©∂• ∂Ø©£• •¥£@ ° 0≤°ß≠°¥©£≥ ©Æ∂ب∂•≥∑∑∑Ƶ≠•≤ØÆ≥©Æ ¥®• ≤µ¨•≥ ¶Ø≤ °∞∞≤Ø∞≤©°¥• °Æ§ •¶¶•£¥©∂• £Ø≠≠µÆ©£°¥©ØÆ 0≤°ß≠°¥©£≥ ©Æ∂ب∂•≥ ¥®≤•• ≥´©¨¨≥ ° µ≥©Æß ¨°Æßµ°ß• ¶Ø≤ ß≤••¥©Æß+ §•≠°Æ§©Æß •¥£ ° £®°Æß©Æß ¨°Æßµ°ß• ¶Ø≤ ¥°¨´©Æß §©¶¶•≤•Æ¥¨π §•∞•Æ§©Æß ØÆ ∑®Ø ©¥ ©≥ πص °≤• ¥°¨´©Æß ¥Ø ° ¶Ø¨¨Ø∑©Æß ≤µ¨•≥ ≥µ£® °≥ ¥µ≤Æ ¥°´©Æß+ ≥¥°π©Æß ØÆ ¥Ø∞©£ %°£® £Ø≠∞ØÆ•Æ¥ ®°≥ ©¥≥ Ø∑Æ °∞∞≤Ø∞≤©°¥• §•∂•¨Ø∞≠•Æ¥°¨ ∞•≤©Ø§≥
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Instructional Communication 8 the Emergence of a Field
    Instructional Communication 8 The Emergence of a Field Scott A. Myers ince its inception, the field of instructional communication has Senjoyed a healthy existence. Unlike its related subareas of communi- cation education and developmental communication (Friedrich, 1989), instructional communication is considered to be a unique area of study rooted in the tripartite field of research conducted among educational psychology, pedagogy, and communication studies scholars (Mottet & Beebe, 2006). This tripartite field focuses on the learner (i.e., how students learn affectively, behaviorally, and cognitively), the instructor (i.e., the skills and strategies necessary for effective instruction), and the meaning exchanged in the verbal, nonverbal, and mediated messages between and among instructors and students. As such, the study of instructional com- munication centers on the study of the communicative factors in the teaching-learning process that occur across grade levels (e.g., K–12, post- secondary), instructional settings (e.g., the classroom, the organization), and subject matter (Friedrich, 1989; Staton, 1989). Although some debate exists as to the events that precipitated the emer- gence of instructional communication as a field of study (Rubin & Feezel, 1986; Sprague, 1992), McCroskey and McCroskey (2006) posited that the establishment of instructional communication as a legitimate area of scholarship originated in 1972, when the governing board of the Inter- national Communication Association created the Instructional Communi- cation Division. The purpose of the Division was to “focus attention on the role of communication in all teaching and training contexts, not just the teaching of communication” (p. 35), and provided instructional communication researchers with the opportunity to showcase their scholarship at the Association’s annual convention and to publish their research in Communication Yearbook, a yearly periodical sponsored by the Association.
    [Show full text]
  • Social Scientific Theories for Media and Communication JMC:6210:0001/ 019:231:001 Spring 2014
    Social Scientific Theories for Media and Communication JMC:6210:0001/ 019:231:001 Spring 2014 Professor: Sujatha Sosale Room: E254 AJB Office: W331 AJB Time: M 11:30-2:15 Phone: 319-335-0663 Office hours: Wed. 11:30 – 2:30 E-mail: [email protected] and by appointment Course description and objectives This course explores the ways in which media impact society and how individuals relate to the media by examining social scientific-based theories that relate to media effects, learning, and public opinion. Discussion includes the elements necessary for theory development from a social science perspective, plus historical and current contexts for understanding the major theories of the field. The objectives of this course are: • To learn and critique a variety of social science-based theories • To review mass communication literature in terms of its theoretical relevance • To study the process of theory building Textbook: Bryant, J. & Oliver M.B. (2009). Media Effects: Advances in Theory and Research. 3rd Ed. New York: Routledge. [Available at the University Bookstore] Additional readings will be posted on the course ICON. Teaching Policies & Resources — CLAS Syllabus Insert (instructor additions in this font) Administrative Home The College of Liberal Arts and Sciences is the administrative home of this course and governs matters such as the add/drop deadlines, the second-grade-only option, and other related issues. Different colleges may have different policies. Questions may be addressed to 120 Schaeffer Hall, or see the CLAS Academic Policies Handbook at http://clas.uiowa.edu/students/handbook. Electronic Communication University policy specifies that students are responsible for all official correspondences sent to their University of Iowa e-mail address (@uiowa.edu).
    [Show full text]
  • COMMUNICATION STUDIES 20223: Communication Theory TR 11:00-12:20 AM, Moudy South 320, Class #70959
    This copy of Andrew Ledbetter’s syllabus for Communication Theory is posted on www.afirstlook.com, the resource website for A First Look at Communication Theory, for which he is one of the co-authors. COMMUNICATION STUDIES 20223: Communication Theory TR 11:00-12:20 AM, Moudy South 320, Class #70959 Syllabus Addendum, Fall Semester 2014 Instructor: Dr. Andrew Ledbetter Office: Moudy South 355 Office Phone: 817-257-4524 (terrible way to reach me) E-mail: [email protected] (best way to reach me) Twitter: @dr_ledbetter (also a good way to reach me more publicly) IM screen name (GoogleTalk): DrAndrewLedbetter (this works too) Office Hours: TR 10:00-10:50 AM & 12:30 PM-2:00 PM; W 11:00 AM-12:00 PM (but check with me first); other times by appointment. When possible, please e-mail me in advance of your desired meeting time. Course Text: Em Griffin, Andrew Ledbetter, & Glenn Sparks (2015), A First Look at Communication Theory (9th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill. Course Description From TCU’s course catalog: Applies communication theory and practice to a broad range of communication phenomena in intrapersonal, interpersonal and public communication settings. You are about to embark on an exciting adventure through the world of communication theory. In some sense, you already inhabit this “world”—you communicate every day, and you may even be very good at it. But, if you’re like me, sometimes you might find yourself wondering: Why did she say that? Why did I say that in response? What there something that I could have said that would have been better? How could I communicate better with my friends? My parents? At school? At work? If you’ve ever asked any of these questions—and it would be hard for me to believe that there is anyone who hasn’t!—then this course is for you! By the end of our time together, I hope you will come to a deeper, fuller understanding of the power and mystery of human communication.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction to Communication Theory ❖ ❖ ❖
    01-Dainton.qxd 9/16/2004 12:26 PM Page 1 1 Introduction to Communication Theory ❖ ❖ ❖ recent advertisement for the AT&T cellular service has a bold A headline that asserts, “If only communication plans were as simple as communicating.” We respectfully disagree with their assess- ment. Cellular communication plans may indeed be intricate, but the process of communicating is infinitely more so. Unfortunately, much of popular culture tends to minimize the challenges associated with the communication process. We all do it, all of the time. Yet one need only peruse the content of talk shows, classified ads, advice columns, and organizational performance reviews to recognize that communication skill can make or break an individual’s personal and professional lives. Companies want to hire and promote people with excellent communi- cation skills. Divorces occur because spouses believe that they “no longer communicate.” Communication is perceived as a magical elixir, one that can ensure a happy long-term relationship and can guarantee organizational success. Clearly, popular culture holds paradoxical views about communication: It is easy to do yet powerful in its effects, simultaneously simple and magical. 1 01-Dainton.qxd 9/16/2004 12:26 PM Page 2 2 APPLYING COMMUNICATION THEORY FOR PROFESSIONAL LIFE The reality is even more complex. “Good” communication means different things to different people in different situations. Accordingly, simply adopting a set of particular skills is not going to guarantee success. Those who are genuinely good communicators are those who under- stand the underlying principles behind communication and are able to enact, appropriately and effectively, particular communication skills as the situation warrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicology and Culturology: Semiotic Phenomenological Method in Applied Small Group Research
    The Public Journal of Semiotics IV(2), February 2013 71 Communicology and Culturology: Semiotic Phenomenological Method in Applied Small Group Research Richard L. Lanigan1, International Communicology Institute, Washington, D.C., USA Southern Illinois University at Carbondale, Carbondale, Illinois, USA Abstract Communicology is the science of human communication where consciousness is constituted as a medium of communication at four interconnected levels of interaction experience: intrapersonal (embodied), interpersonal (dyadic), group (social), and inter-group (cultural). The focus of the paper is the group level of communication across generations, thus constituting inter-group communication that stabilizes norms (forms a culture). I propose to explicate the way in which the method of semiotic phenomenology informs the pioneering work at the University of Toronto by Tom McFeat, a Harvard trained cultural anthropologist, on small group cultures as an experimental research methodology. Rather than the cognitive- analytic (Husserl‘s transcendental eidetic) techniques suggest by Don Ihde as a pseudo ―experimental phenomenology‖, McFeat provides an applied method for the empirical experimental constitution of culture in conscious experience. Group cultures are constructed in the communicological practices of group formation and transformation by means of a self- generating group narrative (myth) design. McFeat‘s method consists of three steps of culture formation by communication that are: (1) Content-Ordering, (2) Task-Ordering, and (3) Group-Ordering, i.e., what Ernst Cassirer and Karl Jaspers call the logic of culture or Culturology. These steps are compared to the descriptive phenomenology research procedures suggested by Amedeo Giorgi following Husserl‘s approach: (1) Find a sense of the whole, (2) Determine meaning units, (3) Transform the natural attitude expressions into phenomenologically, psychologically sensitive expressions.
    [Show full text]
  • Media Influence: Communication Theories
    MEDIA INFLUENCE: COMMUNICATION THEORIES Hypodermic Needle Agenda Setting Reinforcement Theory Uses & Gratification Encoding/Decoding Theory Function Theory Theory YEAR 1920 - 1940 1972 1960 1974 1980 THEORIST Various Maxwell McCombs Joseph Klapper Jay Blumler Stuart Hall Donald Shaw Elihu Katz OVERVIEW A linear communication theory This theory suggests that the Klapper argued that the The Uses and Gratification Stuart Hall’s which suggests that the media media can’t tell you what to media has little power to Theory looks at how people Encoding/Decoding Theory has a direct and powerful think but it can tell you what influence people and it just use the media to gratify a suggests that audience influence on audiences, like being to think about. Through a reinforces our pre-existing range of needs – including derive their own meaning injected with a hypodermic process of selection, omission attitudes and beliefs, which the need for information, from media texts. These needle. and framing, the media have been developed by personal identity, meanings can be focuses public discussion on more powerful social integration, social dominant, negotiated or particular issues. institutions like families, interaction and oppositional. schools and religion entertainment. organisations. AUDIENCE Audiences are passive and Audiences are active but, Audiences are active and Audiences are active and Audiences are active in homogenous, this theory does not when it comes to making exist in a society where they can have power over the decoding media account for individual differences. important decisions like who are influenced by important media. If people don’t messages. They can to vote for, they draw on social institutions.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Theory and the Disciplines JEFFERSON D
    Communication Theory and the Disciplines JEFFERSON D. POOLEY Muhlenberg College, USA Communication theory, like the communication discipline itself, has a long history but a short past. “Communication” as an organized, self-conscious discipline dates to the 1950s in its earliest, US-based incarnation (though cognate fields like the German Zeitungswissenschaft (newspaper science) began decades earlier). The US field’s first readers and textbooks make frequent and weighty reference to “communication theory”—intellectual putty for a would-be discipline that was, at the time, a collage of media-related work from the existing social sciences. Soon the “communication theory” phrase was claimed by US speech and rhetoric scholars too, who in the 1960s started using the same disciplinary label (“communication”) as the social scientists across campus. “Communication theory” was already, in the organized field’s infancy, an unruly subject. By the time Wilbur Schramm (1954) mapped out the theory domain of the new dis- cipline he was trying to forge, however, other traditions had long grappled with the same fundamental questions—notably the entwined, millennia-old “fields” of philos- ophy, religion, and rhetoric (Peters, 1999). Even if mid-century US communication scholars imagined themselves as breaking with the past—and even if “communica- tion theory” is an anachronistic label for, say, Plato’s Phaedrus—no account of thinking about communication could honor the postwar discipline’s borders. Even those half- forgotten fields dismembered in the Western university’s late 19th-century discipline- building project (Philology, for example, or Political Economy)haddevelopedtheir own bodies of thought on the key communication questions. The same is true for the mainline disciplines—the ones we take as unquestionably legitimate,thoughmostwereformedjustafewdecadesbeforeSchramm’smarch through US journalism schools.
    [Show full text]
  • Information Theory and Communication - Tibor Nemetz
    PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS – Vol. II - Information Theory and Communication - Tibor Nemetz INFORMATION THEORY AND COMMUNICATION Tibor Nemetz Rényi Mathematical Institute, Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Budapest, Hungary Keywords: Shannon theory, alphabet, capacity, (transmission) channel, channel coding, cryptology, data processing, data compression, digital signature, discrete memoryless source, entropy, error-correcting codes, error-detecting codes, fidelity criterion, hashing, Internet, measures of information, memoryless channel, modulation, multi-user communication, multi-port systems, networks, noise, public key cryptography, quantization, rate-distortion theory, redundancy, reliable communication, (information) source, source coding, (information) transmission, white Gaussian noise. Contents 1. Introduction 1.1. The Origins 1.2. Shannon Theory 1.3. Future in Present 2. Information source 3. Source coding 3.1. Uniquely Decodable Codes 3.2. Entropy 3.3. Source Coding with Small Decoding Error Probability 3.4. Universal Codes 3.5. Facsimile Coding 3.6. Electronic Correspondence 4. Measures of information 5. Transmission channel 5.1. Classification of Channels 5.2. The Noisy Channel Coding Problem 5.3. Error Detecting and Correcting Codes 6. The practice of classical telecommunication 6.1. Analog-to-Digital Conversion 6.2. Quantization 6.3 ModulationUNESCO – EOLSS 6.4. Multiplexing 6.5. Multiple Access 7. Mobile communicationSAMPLE CHAPTERS 8. Cryptology 8.1. Classical Cryptography 8.1.1 Simple Substitution 8.1.2. Transposition 8.1.3. Polyalphabetic Methods 8.1.4. One Time Pad 8.1.5. DES: Data Encryption Standard. AES: Advanced Encryption Standard 8.1.6. Vocoders 8.2. Public Key Cryptography ©Encyclopedia of Life Support Systems (EOLSS) PROBABILITY AND STATISTICS – Vol. II - Information Theory and Communication - Tibor Nemetz 8.2.1.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication Studies 1
    Communication Studies 1 • Must participate in the online graduate student development program COMMUNICATION STUDIES run through the graduate school. (Note: this training must be completed while the student is still an undergraduate student.) Undergraduate Program Information Eligible courses for the MAP Program in Communication Studies Communication Studies focuses on the complex role that human communication plays in everyday life. • Students may take any COMM course numbered 500 or higher. If students want to enroll in COMM 505 Research Methods, COMM 506 The undergraduate program in Communication Studies is designed to Qualitative Research Methods in Communication, or COMM 583 enhance students’ interpersonal skills, presentation skills, and critical Seminar in Theories of Communication, then they must receive thinking skills. Thus the successful graduate should be able to work permission from the Department Head. effectively with people, assimilate, organize and analyze information, • Students may elect to take all 12 credits numbered 500 or higher. solve problems, make effective presentations and show potential • Students have the option to take the following: for leadership. The program prepares students for careers in several professions, such as training and development, public relations, law, • Any two courses (6 credits) numbered 450 or above in the advertising and sales, government service, mediation, customer relations, Department of Communication Studies. human resources, international service, fundraising, and the ministry. • Students will not be allowed to use more than two courses (6 credits) for credit toward a graduate degree in Communication Studies. If a student Graduate Program Information uses courses numbered 450 or greater in the MAP program (up to 6 credits), then that student will not be able to use any other course below The Master of Arts in Communication Studies provides students with 500 to count toward the M.A.
    [Show full text]
  • Communication History and Its Research Subject1
    COMMUNICATION HISTORY AND ITS RESEARCH SUBJECT1 Emanuel KULCZYCKI 2 Abstract: The article proposes a way of defining the research subject of the history of communication. It concentrates on the use of philosophical tools in the study of the collective views of communication practices. The study distinguishes three aspects in the research subject: the means and forms of communication, the collective views of communication practices and communication practices as such. On the theoretical level, these aspects are reflected in various studies undertaken in the fields of media history, the history of the idea of communication and the history of communication practices. The analysis is conducted from a meta-theoretical point of view which places the argument within two orders: that of the research subject and that of the discipline. To give an outline of the current state of research, a distinction is introduced between an implicit and an explicit history of communication. The effect of these considerations is presented in a diagram that specifies the aspects of the research subject as well as the relationships between them. Keywords: communicology, communication practices, reflexive historicizing, communication theory, media. 1. Introduction Scientific research on communication has been undertaken since the first half of the 20th century. Naturally, communication itself, as well as reflection on it, has a much longer history. However, in the pre-scientific studies on what we now call communication, neither the term itself, nor even the notion of communication appears most of the time.3 1 Acknowledgments: I would like to thank Michał Wendland, Mikołaj Domaradzki, Paweł Gałkowski and Stanisław Kandulski for their valuable observations.
    [Show full text]
  • Communicology, Apparatus, and Post-History: Vilém Flusser's Concepts Applied to Video Games and Gamification
    Repositorium für die Medienwissenschaft Fabrizio Poltronieri Communicology, Apparatus, and Post-history: Vilém Flusser’s Concepts Applied to Video Games and Gamification 2014 https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/619 Veröffentlichungsversion / published version Sammelbandbeitrag / collection article Empfohlene Zitierung / Suggested Citation: Poltronieri, Fabrizio: Communicology, Apparatus, and Post-history: Vilém Flusser’s Concepts Applied to Video Games and Gamification. In: Mathias Fuchs, Sonia Fizek, Paolo Ruffino u.a. (Hg.): Rethinking Gamification. Lüneburg: meson press 2014, S. 165–186. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25969/mediarep/619. Nutzungsbedingungen: Terms of use: Dieser Text wird unter einer Creative Commons - This document is made available under a creative commons - Namensnennung - Weitergabe unter gleichen Bedingungen 4.0 Attribution - Share Alike 4.0 License. For more information see: Lizenz zur Verfügung gestellt. Nähere Auskünfte zu dieser Lizenz https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 finden Sie hier: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0 COMMUNICOLOGY, AppARATUS, AND POST-HISTORY: VILÉM FLUssER’S CONCEPTS AppLIED TO VIDEO GAMES AND GAMIFICATION by Fabrizio Poltronieri Among the philosophers who undertook the task of thinking about the status of culture and the key advents of the twentieth century, the Czech- Brazilian Vilém Flusser deserves prominent recognition. A multifaceted thinker, Flusser produced sophisticated theories about a reality in which man advances towards the game, endorsed by the emer- gence of a kind of technical device that is dedicated, mainly, to the calcula- tion of possibilities and to the projection of these possibilities on reality, gen- erating a veil that conceals the natural reality and creates layers of cultural and artificial realities.
    [Show full text]
  • Introduction
    FLUSSER STUDIES 06 1 Introduction The sixth issue of Flusser Studies is the first in a series dedicated to theoretical convergences and divergences between Vilém Flusser’s work and that of other communication theorists and philo- sophers, among them Gilles Deleuze and Jean Baudrillard. We begin with a dialogue between Vilém Flusser and Marshall McLuhan, two of the major, if not the most significant, media and communication theorists of the second half of the 20th century. The issue is also the result of a collaboration between the editors of Flusser Studies and several members of the Visible City Project (www.visiblecity.ca) at York University in Toronto. The VC project, very much inspired by a McLuhanesque framework (i.e., an aesthetic approach to social spaces), investigates how art practices function in specific contemporary urban contexts to educate about and transform the experience of urban dwelling in light of the changing technological, economic and cultural expe- riences of globalization. What is particularly exciting about engaging with theoretical and metho- dological problems in communication and culture through the writings of Flusser and McLuhan is that they were working in very different contexts -- at polar ends, in fact, of the Americas. Consequently, their views of technology, communication, media, and aesthetics are very much a product of these places and of the post-war period. Both Flusser and McLuhan share a distinctive interdisciplinary style of writing that aligns them with a post-war generation of cultural theorists like Raymond Williams, Roland Barthes and Umberto Eco. Their theories exceed academically defined norms of writing and disciplinary boundaries that have contributed to the richness and complexity of humanistic studies (which is not to say that science was beyond their purview).
    [Show full text]