DOCSLIB.ORG

Mary River Project

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mary River Project Post-Hearing Question Responses Phase 2 Proposal – Mary River Project Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation Mary River Project NIRB File No. 08MN053 Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal TABLE OF CONTENTS Nunavut Impact Review Board ............................................................................................................................................ 3 The Qikiqtani Inuit Association .......................................................................................................................................... 18 Hamlet of Pond Inlet ......................................................................................................................................................... 30 Mittimatalik Hunters and Trappers Organization .............................................................................................................. 31 Sanirajak ............................................................................................................................................................................ 62 Clyde River ........................................................................................................................................................................ 64 Government of Nunavut .................................................................................................................................................... 67 Government of Canada ...................................................................................................................................................... 69 Oceans North..................................................................................................................................................................... 76 Nunavut Independent Television Network ........................................................................................................................ 82 Question Form Responses ................................................................................................................................................. 83 LIST OF ATTACHMENTS Appendix 1 Nunavut Impact Review Board IR Attachments NIRB-1 Attachment 1: Mary River Ore Content Analysis NIRB-10 Attachment 1: Full Response NIRB-75 Attachment 1: Icebreaking Impacts on Ringed Seal NIRB-79 Attachment 1: A summary of key monitoring-related feedback/suggestions provided to Baffinland by the Working Groups since 2018 NIRB-79 Attachment 2: Overview of what Baffinland has proposed with respect to the roles of the Inuit Committee and the Environmental Working Groups will have in the monitoring and adaptive management oversight framework for Phase Appendix 2 The Qikiqtani Inuit Association IR Attachments QIA-1 Attachment 1: Figure QIA-8 Attachment 1: Reference List QIA-9 Attachment 1: Ringed Seal Moulting QIA 26 Attachment 1: North Railway – Rail Car Covers Appendix 3 Hamlet of Pond Inlet IR Attachments HPI-5 Attachment 1: Full Response Appendix 4 Mittimatalik Hunters and Trappers Organization IR Attachments MHTO-2 Attachment 1: Rail Presentation MHTO-5 Attachment 1: Rail Car Covering MHTO-8 Attachment 1: Full Response MHTO-12 Attachment 1: Memo on Snow Sampling March 2021 1 Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal MHTO-18 Attachment 1: List of References MHTO-18 Attachment 2: Pond Inlet Engagement Summary MHTO-18 Attachment 3: IQ Considered in Ringed Seal Assessment MHTO-18 Attachment 4: Summary of IQ Considered in the Ringed Seal Assessment MHTO-21 Attachment 1: Description of the Initial OITRs Proposed by Baffinland MHTO-26 Attachment 1: A List of a Scientific Studies for which the Findings are Consistent with the Impact Predictions Made for Narwhal MHTO-26 Attachment 2: additional information MHTO-28 Attachment 1: Response to Question 4 Appendix 5 Sanirajak IR Attachments There are no attachments identified for this group of responses, at this time Appendix 6 Clyde River IR Attachments CR-5 Attachment 1: Golder Review of Paper on Cortisol Levels in Narwhal Appendix 7 Government of Nunavut IR Attachments There are no attachments identified for this group of responses, at this time Appendix 8 Government of Canada IR Attachments GoC-4 Attachment 1: AIS Response Protocol GOC-6 Attachment 1: Store Hellefiskebank Anchoring Appendix 9 Oceans North IR Attachments There are no attachments identified for this group of responses, at this time Appendix 10 NIVT IR Attachments There are no attachments identified for this group of responses, at this time Appendix 11 Questions IR Attachments Appendix 12 TARPs and Toolkits, AMP March 2021 2 Mary River Project Phase 2 Proposal Nunavut Impact Review Board NUNAVUT IMPACT REVIEW BOARD ID # Question Response Attachment NIRB-1 Through the Board’s assessment process parties and community members have raised Yes, a sample of ore will be brought to the April Hearings in Iqaluit. The sample will be accompanied by a colour printed pie chart NIRB-1 Attachment 1: Mary concerns regarding heavy metals concentrations in the ore. Is it possible to bring samples (Appendix 1). River Ore Content Analysis and an analysis of their content for participants to view? Attachment 1 provides detail of the chemistry components of the ore from Deposit 1 at Mary River Mine, based on analysis of over 9,500 ore samples. Iron, silicon, magnesium and aluminum are the major components of the ore, and there are also a number of minor salts and elements, as well as some trace contaminants, which include some metals such as arsenic, cadmium, chromium and lead. These trace contaminants are present at very low concentrations and include some of the metals that the community has expressed concerns about. The presence of these trace contaminants in dustfall from operations was assessed in the country foods risk assessment, which concluded that Project-related risks related to consumption of country foods were negligible. NIRB-2 What is the pool of eligible Inuit available for hire, what kind of accreditation does 1. Pool of Eligible Inuit for Hire Baffinland require, and how long would it take to get the required accreditation(s)? There were approximately 10,500 Inuit living in the Local Study Area (LSA) communities of Arctic Bay, Clyde River, Sanirajak, Igloolik, Pond Inlet, and Iqaluit in 2017 at the time Baffinland completed its Phase 2 labour market analysis. However, not all of these people would be considered “available for hire”. Subtracting those aged 18 and under and those 60 and over reduces the number to approximately 5,700. Taking into account key factors such as ability, accreditation required, current employment status and the desire of individuals to seek work at a mine, Baffinland’s estimate is that the pool of available, ready and able Inuit labour in the LSA communities is approximately 2,200. Moving forward, Baffinland looked at how this pool of Inuit labour might change over the course of the next 20 years. Considering annual increases as a result of new graduates that could be boosted by an improving graduation rate, Baffinland estimated the pool of ready, able, and willing Inuit labour supply could grow to approximately 3,000 over this time frame. This growth in the number of potential new hires gives Baffinland confidence that it will increase the number of Inuit working at the Project, and importantly, the number of Inuit working at the Project in jobs that are classified as Level C or higher. Baffinland’s commitments in the Mary River Project Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement (IIBA) and the Inuit Certainty Agreement will aim to attract more Inuit into Project employment over time. Further, Baffinland’s commitments in the Mary River Project Inuit Impact and Benefit Agreement (IIBA) and the Inuit Certainty Agreement will aim to attract more Inuit into Project employment over time. More information can be found in Technical Supporting Document (TSD) 26 Labour Market Analysis, NIRB 320570, describes the Phase 2 Proposal’s labour demands and future labour supply conditions of the North Baffin communities. 2. Accreditation Required and Time Required to Obtain Accreditation Qualifications are related to the work to be performed. Skills acquired on the job at each level can help contribute to accreditation required for promotion, if individuals have interest and ability. Jobs classified as Level D do not necessarily require any accreditation. The skills needed to perform the required tasks will be taught on-the-job, with an emphasis on safety. Level C occupations usually require secondary school and/or occupation-specific training. This level includes jobs such as heavy equipment operators, administrative support, scheduling jobs, and occupations in food and beverage services. Some of the training takes place at site, but successful applicants will have typically completed a technical training course, often delivered through a college or other post-secondary institution. Training timeframes vary, but qualifications for many Level C jobs can be obtained from courses that span a few months up to 1 or 2 years. After that, on-the-job training and experience can result in promotion into higher paying jobs within this job classification, often within the field already chosen. Examples include promotions to bigger or more complex machinery, or more responsibilities and/or a higher status within the kitchen staff. Level B and higher occupations are jobs that usually require apprenticeship training or college/university education. This level includes industrial trades, supervisors, technical occupations, managers,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Anvil Boulders and Lithic Reduction on Southern Victoria Island, Northwest Territories JACK BRINK’
    ARCTIC VOL. 45, NO. 2 (JUNE 1992) P. 138-144 Anvil Boulders and Lithic Reduction on Southern Victoria Island, Northwest Territories JACK BRINK’ (Received II December 1990; accepted in revised form I5 August 1991) ABSTRACT. This paper reports on an unusual archaeological feature discovered at the Cadfael site (NiNg-17) on southeastern Victoria Island. TWO large boulders apparently served as anvil stones on which quartzite cobbleswere fractured. Lithic debris remained in situ on and around the boulders, preserving the materials and spatial arrangements as abandoned by the last flintknappers. Analysis ofone boulder and the associated artifacts demon- strates that a bipolar technology was employed to split cobbles, presumably to obtain large flakes for use as, or for making into, tools. As far as is known, no similar features have been reported in the literature on the Canadian Arctic, although potential candidates exist on Baffin Island and at Great Bear Lake. The age and cultural affiliation of the Cadfael site anvil boulders are undetermined; however an association with the Late Dorset culture, dating to about lo00 years ago, seemsmost likely. Key words: arctic archaeology, lithic technology, Dorsetculture, Victoria Island RÉSUMÉ. Cette communication concerne la d6couverte d’un aménagement archéologique plutôt inhabituel trouvé au site Cadfael (NiNg-17), situé au sud de l’île Victoria. Deux grosses pierres y auraient apparemment servies d’enclumes où l’on aurait cassé des galets de quartzite. Les débris lithiques étaient restés in situ sur et autour des grosses roches, préservant ainsi le materiel et les arrangements spatiaux tels qu’abandonnés par les derniers artisans de la pierre.
    [Show full text]
  • RECLAMATION PILOT STUDY Mary River Mine Project
    RECLAMATION PILOT STUDY Mary River Mine Project Revegetaon Survey & Preliminary Reclamaon Trial REV.1 Prepared For Baffinland Iron Mines Corporaon 300 - 2275 Upper Middle Road East Oakville, ON L6H 0C3 Prepared By EDI Environmental Dynamics Inc. 220 - 736, 8 Ave. Southwest Calgary, AB T2P 1H4 EDI Contact Patrick Audet, PhD, RPBio Mike Seerington, MSc, RPBio EDI Project 19Y0005:2008 March 2020 Down to Earth Biology This page is intentionally blank. RECLAMATION PILOT STUDY Mary River Mine Project | Revegetation Survey & Preliminary Reclamation Trial TABLE OF CONTENTS 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................................................... 1 2 POST-DISTURBANCE REVEGETATION SURVEY............................................................................................ 2 2.1 SURVEY DESIGN ........................................................................................................................................................................... 2 2.2 METHODS & ANALYSES ............................................................................................................................................................ 4 2.3 RESULTS SUMMARY ..................................................................................................................................................................... 6 2.3.1 KM52 — 1-Year Post-Disturbance ........................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Caribou Rangifer Tarandus
    COSEWIC Assessment and Status Report on the Caribou Rangifer tarandus Dolphin and Union population in Canada ENDANGERED 2017 COSEWIC status reports are working documents used in assigning the status of wildlife species suspected of being at risk. This report may be cited as follows: COSEWIC. 2017. COSEWIC assessment and status report on the Caribou, Dolphin and Union population, Rangifer tarandus, in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. xii + 51 pp. (http://www.registrelep-sararegistry.gc.ca/default.asp?lang=en&n=24F7211B-1). Previous report(s): COSEWIC 2004. COSEWIC assessment and update status report on the Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi and the barren-ground caribou Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus (Dolphin and Union population) in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. x + 91 pp. (www.sararegistry.gc.ca/status/status_e.cfm). Gunn, A., F.L. Miller and D.C. Thomas. 1979. COSEWIC status report on the Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 40 pp. Miller, F.L. 1991. Update COSEWIC status report on the Peary caribou Rangifer tarandus pearyi in Canada. Committee on the Status of Endangered Wildlife in Canada. Ottawa. 124 pp. Production note: COSEWIC would like to acknowledge Lee Harding (SciWrite Environmental Sciences Ltd.) for writing the draft status report on the Caribou (Rangifer tarandus), Dolphin and Union population in Canada, and Justina Ray for writing the revised provisional report. This report was prepared under contract with Environment and Climate Change Canada and overseen by Graham Forbes, Co-chair of the COSEWIC Terrestrial Mammals Species Specialist Subcommittee.
    [Show full text]
  • Dolphin and Union Caribou Herd Status and Trend
    Population Estimate of the Dolphin and Union Caribou herd (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus x pearyi) Coastal Survey, October 2018 and Demographic Indicators Lisa-Marie Leclerc1 John Boulanger2 1Wildlife Biologist Kitikmeot Region, Department of Environment Wildlife Research Section, Government of Nunavut, P.O. Box 377 Kugluktuk, NU X0B 0E0 2Integrated Ecological Research, Nelson, BC NUNAVUT DEPARTMENT OF ENVIRONMENT WILDLIFE RESEARCH SECTION KUGLUKTUK, NU Executive Summary Dolphin and Union (DU) Caribou (Rangifer tarandus groenlandicus x pearyi) have a large distribution covering Victoria Island (Nunavut and Northwest Territory) and the northern region of the Canadian mainland in Nunavut. The DU Caribou calve and summer on Victoria Island, resulting in the sharing of the northwestern extents of their seasonal ranges with Peary Caribou (Rangifer tarandus pearyi). While Peary Caribou winter on Victoria Island, the DU Caribou generally display migratory behavior by crossing the sea-ice of the Coronation Gulf to winter on the Canadian mainland. Once on the mainland, DU caribou over-winter with other tundra- wintering caribou in the eastern part of their winter range. In addition to this specific movement and seasonal range, the DU Caribou can also be distinguished, with certainty, genetically from other caribou herds (Peary Caribou and Barren-ground Caribou), highlighting the conservation importance of this herd. A coastal survey methodology, originally developed by Nishi (2004), has been used to estimate the DU caribou since 1997 as they physically separate from the Peary caribou in the fall. This methodology is based on hunter observations and Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit of Dolphin and Union Caribou gathering during rut into a narrow band on the southern coastline of Victoria Island.
    [Show full text]
  • Grade 5 Module 3B, Unit 3, Lesson 3
    Grade 5: Module 3B: Unit 3: Lesson 3 Conducting Research: Analyzing Expert Texts about the Mary River Project This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 3.0 Unported License. Exempt third-party content is indicated by the footer: © (name of copyright holder). Used by permission and not subject to Creative Commons license. GRADE 5: MODULE 3B: UNIT 3: LESSON 3 Conducting Research: Analyzing Expert Texts about the Mary River Project Long-Term Targets Addressed (Based on NYSP12 ELA CCLS) I can analyze multiple accounts of the same topic, noting important similarities and differences in the point of view they represent. (RI.5.6) I can explain how the author uses reasons and evidence to support particular points in a text. (RI.5.8) I can draw evidence from informational texts to support analysis, reflection, and research. (W.5.9b) I can determine the meaning of unknown words and phrases, choosing flexibly from a range of strategies. (L.5.4) Supporting Learning Targets Ongoing Assessment • I can analyze the meaning of key words and phrases, using a variety of strategies. • Vocabulary terms defined on index cards and Frayer • I can support my research, analysis, and reflection on the Mary River project by drawing upon evidence Models from expert texts. • Point of View Graphic Organizer: Expert Texts • I can explain the reasons and evidence given to support two different points of view about the Mary River project on Baffin Island. Copyright © 2013 by Expeditionary Learning, New York, NY. All Rights Reserved. NYS Common Core ELA Curriculum • G5:M3B:U3:L3 • June 2014 • 1 GRADE 5: MODULE 3B: UNIT 3: LESSON 3 Conducting Research: Analyzing Expert Texts about the Mary River Project Agenda Teaching Notes 1.
    [Show full text]
  • Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Contents
    Overview 2020 Nunavut Mining, Mineral Exploration and Geoscience Contents 3 Land Tenure in Nunavut 30 Base Metals 6 Government of Canada 31 Diamonds 10 Government of Nunavut 3 2 Gold 16 Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated 4 4 Iron 2 0 Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office 4 6 Inactive projects 2 4 Kitikmeot Region 4 9 Glossary 2 6 Kivalliq Region 50 Guide to Abbreviations 2 8 Qikiqtani Region 51 Index About Nunavut: Mining, Mineral Exploration and by the Canadian Securities Administrators (CSA), the regulatory Geoscience Overview 2020 body which oversees stock market and investment practices, and is intended to ensure that misleading, erroneous, or This publication is a combined effort of four partners: fraudulent information relating to mineral properties is not Crown‑Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada published and promoted to investors on the stock exchanges (CIRNAC), Government of Nunavut (GN), Nunavut Tunngavik Incorporated (NTI), and Canada‑Nunavut Geoscience Office overseen by the CSA. Resource estimates reported by mineral (CNGO). The intent is to capture information on exploration and exploration companies that are listed on Canadian stock mining activities in 2020 and to make this information available exchanges must be NI 43‑101 compliant. to the public and industry stakeholders. We thank the many contributors who submitted data and Acknowledgements photos for this edition. Prospectors and mining companies are This publication was written by the Mineral Resources Division welcome to submit information on their programs and photos at CIRNAC’s Nunavut Regional Office (Matthew Senkow, for inclusion in next year’s publication. Feedback and comments Alia Bigio, Samuel de Beer, Yann Bureau, Cedric Mayer, and are always appreciated.
    [Show full text]
  • Cambridge Bay Arctic
    NWRT 03-17-11 Harris NWRT Final Progress Report Submitted September 30, 2018 1. NWRT Project Number: 3-17-11 2. Project Title: Cambridge Bay Arctic Char Research: Intra-System Assessment of Genetic Population Structure, Migration and Habitat Use Among Spawning Arctic Char (Salvelinus alpinus) from the Cambridge Bay Region, NU: Year 2 3. Project Leaders: Les N. Harris Fisheries and Oceans Canada Freshwater Institute 501 University Cres., Winnipeg, MB, R3T 2N6 Ph: (204) 983-5143 Fax: (204) 984-2403 E-mail: [email protected] 4. Summary The culturally important Arctic char is the most harvested species of wildlife in Nunavut and is used by Inuit across the territory for both subsistence and commercial purposes. The Cambridge Bay region of the territory is home to the most important commercial fishery for sea run Arctic char, with annual available quotas totaling 68,000 kg. Effective management of this fishery, however, requires a full understanding of the biological independence of these populations and the degree to which they mix, especially when being targeted in the commercial fisheries. Unfortunately, there are many knowledge gaps with respect to these aspects char biology in the region. Given these questions that still remain, in 2016 we aimed to acoustically tag spawning Arctic char in the Cambridge Bay region while also collecting genetic samples in order to better resolve stock structure (independence of populations) and stock mixing in the region. In 2016 we were successful in finding and tagging Arctic char at three discrete
    [Show full text]
  • Aqhaliat-2018-EN-Full-Report.Pdf
    POLAR KNOWLEDGE Aqhaliat Table of Contents ECOSYSTEM SCIENCE .....................................................................................................1 Lichens in High Arctic ecosystems: Recommended research directions for assessing diversity and function near the Canadian High Arctic Research Station, Cambridge Bay, Nunavut ........................................................................................................................................ 1 Vascular synphenology of plant communities around Cambridge Bay, Victoria Island, Nunavut, during the growing season of 2015 .............................................................................. 9 The distribution and abundance of parasites in harvested wildlife from the Canadian North: A review .......................................................................................................................... 20 Fire in the Arctic: The effect of wildfire across diverse aquatic ecosystems of the Northwest Territories ................................................................................................................. 31 Arctic marine ecology benchmarking program: Monitoring biodiversity using scuba ............... 39 For more information about Polar Knowledge Canada, or for additional copies of this report, contact: Stratification in the Canadian Arctic Archipelago’s Kitikmeot Sea: Biological and geochemical consequences ........................................................................................................ 46 Polar Knowledge
    [Show full text]
  • Problems with the Environmental Working Groups for the Mary River
    Problems with the environmental working groups for the Mary River mine Report to the Hamlet of Clyde River and Nangmautaq Hunters and Trappers Association January 5, 2021 Dr. Warren Bernauer (Department of Environment and Geography, University of Manitoba) Dr. Glen Hostetler (Natural Resources Institute, University of Manitoba) Rowan Harris (BSc, University of British Columbia) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Baffinland’s Mary River mine uses a flexible approach to mitigating environmental effects. The mitigation measures are not set in stone in the NIRB project certificate. Instead, Baffinland is required to regularly update its management plans, based on advice from working groups. The members of these working groups include Baffinland, government authorities, Inuit organizations, and the Miitimatalik HTO. In some cases, non-government organizations participate as observers. For example, the Marine Environment Working Group (MEWG) includes Baffinland, the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, Parks Canada, the Qikiqtani Inuit Association, and the Mittimatalik HTO. World Wildlife Fund and Oceans North are observers to the MEWG. The Terrestrial Environment Working Group (TEWG) includes the Government of Nunavut, QIA, and Mittimatalik HTO. When these groups were proposed, they were presented as a way to minimize the negative effects of the Mary River mine. Communities were told they could use the working groups to impose stricter mitigation measures if the mine ended up having more serious environmental impacts than expected. In other words, these working groups were supposed to provide the opportunity for adaptive management. Adaptive management is useful in situations where there is uncertainty about a project’s environmental impacts and the effectiveness of mitigation measures. It requires careful monitoring so participants can learn about the environmental impacts that are actually happening and if environmental management plans are successful in avoiding significant effects.
    [Show full text]
  • Canadian Data Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2262
    Scientific Excellence • Resource Protection & Conservation • Benefits for Canadians Excellence scientifique • Protection et conservation des ressources • Bénéfices aux Canadiens DFO Lib ary MPO B bhotheque Ill 11 11 11 12022686 11 A Review of the Status and Harvests of Fish, Invertebrate, and Marine Mammal Stocks in the Nunavut Settlement Area D.B. Stewart Central and Arctic Region Department of Fisheries and Oceans Winnipeg, Manitoba R3T 2N6 1994 Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 2262 . 51( P_ .3 AS-5 -- I__2,7 Fisheries Pêches 1+1 1+1and Oceans et Océans CanaclUi ILIIM Canadian Manuscript Report of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences Manuscript reports contain scientific and technical information that contributes to existing knowledge but which deals with national or regional problems. Distribu- tion is restricted to institutions or individuals located in particular regions of Canada. However, no restriction is placed on subject matter, and the series reflects the broad interests and policies of the Department of Fisheries and Oceans, namely, fisheries and aquatic sciences. Manuscript reports may be cited as full-publications. The correct citation appears above the abstract of each report. Each report is abstracted in Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts and,indexed in the Department's annual index to scientific and technical publications. Numbers 1-900 in this series were issued as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Biological Board of Canada, and subsequent to 1937 when the name of the Board was changed by Act of Parliament, as Manuscript Reports (Biological Series) of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada. Numbers 901-1425 were issued as Manuscript Reports of the Fisheries Research Board of Canada.
    [Show full text]
  • Technical Report
    Project N Report NI 43-101 Technical Baffin Island-Mary River, Mary RiverIron OreTrucking o . 165926 Mary River, Baffin Island, Canada Mary River Iron Ore Trucking NI 43-101 Technical Report Prepared by: AMEC Americas Ltd. Prepared for: Baffinland George H. Wahl, P. Geo Iron Mines Corporation Rene Gharapetian, P. Eng. February 2010 James E. Jackson, P. Eng Project No. 165926 Vikram Khera, P. Eng VOLUME 1 Gregory G. Wortman, P. Eng REPORT Effective Date, January 13, 2011 IMPORTANT NOTICE This report was prepared as a National Instrument 43-101 Technical Re- port for Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation (BIM) by AMEC Americas Lim- ited (AMEC). The quality of information, conclusions, and estimates con- tained herein is consistent with the level of effort involved in AMEC’s ser- vices, based on: i) information available at the time of preparation, ii) data supplied by outside sources, and iii) the assumptions, conditions, and qualifications set forth in this report. This report is intended for use by (BIM) subject to the terms and conditions of its contract with AMEC. This contract permits (BIM) to file this report as a Technical Report with Cana- dian Securities Regulatory Authorities pursuant to National Instrument 43- 101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects. Except for the purposes legislated under provincial securities law, any other uses of this report by any third party is at that party’s sole risk. Baffinland Iron Mines Corporation Mary River Baffin Island Mary River Iron Ore Trucking NI 43-101 Technical Report TABLE OF CONTENTS 1.0 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................. 1-1 1.1 Introduction and Scope of Work ......................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • La Classification Écologique Des Terres, 2017
    No 12-607-X au catalogue ISBN 978-0-660-24502-7 La Classification écologique des terres, 2017 Date de diffusion : le 1e mars 2018 Comment obtenir d’autres renseignements Pour toute demande de renseignements au sujet de ce produit ou sur l’ensemble des données et des services de Statistique Canada, visiter notre site Web à www.statcan.gc.ca. Vous pouvez également communiquer avec nous par : Courriel à [email protected] Téléphone entre 8 h 30 et 16 h 30 du lundi au vendredi aux numéros suivants : • Service de renseignements statistiques 1-800-263-1136 • Service national d’appareils de télécommunications pour les malentendants 1-800-363-7629 • Télécopieur 1-514-283-9350 Programme des services de dépôt • Service de renseignements 1-800-635-7943 • Télécopieur 1-800-565-7757 Normes de service à la clientèle Note de reconnaissance Statistique Canada s’engage à fournir à ses clients des services Le succès du système statistique du Canada repose sur un rapides, fiables et courtois. À cet égard, notre organisme s’est partenariat bien établi entre Statistique Canada et la population doté de normes de service à la clientèle que les employés du Canada, les entreprises, les administrations et les autres observent. Pour obtenir une copie de ces normes de service, organismes. Sans cette collaboration et cette bonne volonté, veuillez communiquer avec Statistique Canada au numéro il serait impossible de produire des statistiques exactes et sans frais 1-800-263-1136. Les normes de service sont aussi actuelles. publiées sur le site www.statcan.gc.ca sous « Contactez-nous » > « Normes de service à la clientèle ».
    [Show full text]