Starship Fleming Terraform

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Starship Fleming Terraform “Original Non-Fiction” finalist for the Canopus Award for Excellence in Interstellar Writing, http://canopus.100yss.org/?p=402... Terraforming Planets, Geoengineering Earth James Rodger Fleming Science, Technology and Society Program Colby College, Maine 04901 USA Can humanity survive on Earth into the indefinite future without taking control of the climate system and biosphere, or perhaps one day engaging in solar engineering? If we seek to colonize other planets, will we need to live sequestered from harsh environments in little residential capsules and venture out only in spacesuits, or should we practice terraformation to make the environment of other planets more Earthlike? In either case, we will need to master bio-geo-chemical engineering to generate fresh air, water, and food. Would it be better then to engineer planets for humans or to engineer humans and perhaps cyborgs to withstand harsh environments? Since prediction of new technological developments or inventions has proven to be notoriously inaccurate, what insights can we derive from the history of planetary manipulation proposals and fantasies? In 2248, according to science fiction writer Kim Stanley Robinson’s novel Icehenge,1 heroine Emma Weil’s “five-hundred-year project is the terraforming of Mars,” while starship captain Eric Swann’s “is the colonization of a planet in another system.” “What’s the big difference?” asked Swann; “About ten or twenty light years,” replied Emma (22). One of the biggest challenges facing the starship was generating fresh air, fresh water, and food for the crew while recycling wastes with near 100 percent efficiency. The starship is a traveling biosphere, and engineers have to balance the photosynthetic coefficient for algae and the respiratory coefficient for the humans and animals to prevent too much build-up in either CO2 or oxygen: “Light feeds algae. Algae feed plants and fish. Plants feed animals and humans and create oxygen and water. Animals feed humans, and humans and animals create wastes, which sustain microorganisms that mineralize the wastes (to an extent), making it possible to plow them back into the soil” (adapted from p. 29). Eighty percent efficiency in this system was good enough for a three-year voyage; 99 percent perhaps for 100-years, but perfect 2 closure in any system, even a planet, is not technically possible. Major problems include mineral deficiencies, the incomplete recycling of wastes, and minute losses of water that would coat the interior of the ship and pool in cracks and crevices. The starship would have to recharge its systems somehow. Even by 2610, or some 600 fictional years from today, Mars remains a hostile environment for humans, and author Robinson envisions humans safely venturing only as far as Pluto, while the fate of the starship, which had left the solar system remains unknown. The pace is much quicker, unrealistically so, in Robinson’s later more popular writings, Red, Green, and Blue Mars, where it takes less than two generations, beginning in 2026, for the granddaughter of the first Martian colonist to depart from a fully terraformed solar system in an interstellar vessel headed to another star system twenty light-years away. Such is science fiction, but what about its more proximate cousin science fantasy? Fantasy often informs reality (and vice versa). NASA managers know this well, as do Trekkies. The best science fiction authors typically build from the current state of a field to construct futuristic scenarios that reveal and explore the human condition. Scientists as well often venture into flights of fancy. Although not widely documented, the fantasy–reality axis is a prominent aspect of the history of science and technology. The chief distinction is that the fiction writers provide a moral core and compass. Science fiction and science fantasy meet in such classic works as Olaf Stapledon’s Last and First Men (1930), a two-billion year “history” of the future in which the human species and its many successors escape the dying Earth and colonize other worlds, until the remnants of humanity are extinguished when the Sun becomes a supernova. Near the end the last men, living on Neptune, design an artificial human dust, “capable of being carried forward on the sun's radiation, hardy enough to endure the conditions of a trans- galactic voyage of many millions of years, and yet intricate enough to bear the potentiality of life and of spiritual development.” This, for Stapledon, is humanity’s final legacy. Robert Heinlein’s Farmer in the Sky (1950), concerns the terraformation of Jupiter’s moon Ganymede by frontier homesteaders who depart an Earth that is 3 overcrowded and near ecological exhaustion. The colonizing farmers face a super harsh environment of thin air and biting cold. Not only do the hardscrabble space pioneers have to nurture their crops in such conditions, they have to create their own soil from crushed rock. The Greening of Mars (1984) by James Lovelock and Michael Allaby brings contemporary environmental and social issues into story telling about planetary transformation.2 Writing before the Montreal Protocol was enacted or the Cold War ended, the authors anticipated using banned chlorofluorocarbon gases to warm the Martian climate, transporting them there with surplus US and Soviet missiles, and paying for the whole operation with funds from the “peace dividend.” The colony was populated by “homeless” people who had sold all their Earthly assets in exchange for Martian real estate futures, valuable only in proportion to the progress of terraformation. Two ersatz starship missions have already been launched on Planet Earth, but not by NASA or any other space-faring nation. Some twenty years ago a crew of eight attempted a shakedown cruise of some 16 months, but the life support systems failed miserably and the mission had to be aborted prematurely. Oxygen levels in the craft, which began at a robust 21 percent, systematically decreased to about 14 percent causing members of the crew to suffer from high-altitude sickness, sleep apnea, and extreme fatigue. Other life support systems also went erratic. CO2 levels fluctuated on a daily basis by as much as 600 parts per million (ppm), with much greater seasonal variation. 3 Wintertime CO2 levels soared as high as 4,500 ppm, or close to a lethal concentration. Although the ship was huge, enclosing 3.5 acres, it was not huge enough, and fluctuating plant photosynthesis alternating with system respiration threatened to overwhelm the carbon dioxide scrubbers. With the human crew suffering mightily, most of the mammals and birds brought on board dead, and insect pests such as ants and cockroaches flourishing, the mission came to a screeching halt. After scrubbing and tuning the life-support systems, a second mission was launched a year later with a crew of seven, but it too crashed, this time within six months, due to a severe management dispute, a munity which involved monkey-wrenching the craft, and the early departure of two crew members. By now it should be clear that we are discussing the foibles of Biosphere 2 in the Arizona desert, not an actual starship. 4 There was no propulsion system and the craft was surrounded by the friendly biosphere of Earth, not the vacuum of outer space. The closed-system research days of Biosphere 2 ended under the management of Columbia University (1995-2003). For several years the facility was the site of a planned residential development with tours being offered to the public. Now it is managed by the University of Arizona, which uses its the soaring glass vivarium for experiments on dryland grass species. The interesting technical, human, and managerial lessons of Biosphere 2 are legion, and are fully worthy of study.4 For our purposes the lessons of the two missions launched in the 1990s indicate that we need to learn how to run a small artificial biosphere successfully before we can ever hope to terraform a planet or geoengineer our own. We have a lot to learn in the next 100 years. In his book Terraforming: Engineering Planetary Environments (1995) Martyn J. Fogg reviewed the history and some of the technical aspects of “orchestrated planetary change.” He defined “planetary engineering” as the application of technology for the purpose of influencing the global properties of a planet and “terraforming” as the process of enhancing the capacity of a planetary environment to support life. The ultimate in terraforming would be to create an uncontained planetary biosphere emulating all the functions of the biosphere of the Earth—one that would be fully habitable for human beings. “Astroengineering,” or modifying the properties of the Sun or a star, by intervening in its opacity, nuclear reactions, mass loss, chemical mixing, or other properties, is admittedly hyper speculative now, but who can say in the future? Fogg described how ecological-engineering techniques might be used someday to implant life on other planets and how geoengineering might be used to ameliorate (or perhaps exacerbate) the currently “corrosive process” of global change on the Earth. He presented order-of-magnitude calculations and the results of some simple computer modeling to assess the plausibility of various planetary-engineering scenarios. He deemed it “rash to proclaim” impossible any scheme that does not “obviously violate the laws of physics.” Yet Fogg focused only on possibilities, not on unintended consequences, and left unaddressed questions of whether the schemes are desirable, or even ethical.
Recommended publications
  • A Brief Discussion from the Epistemological, Religious and Societal Dimension
    International Journal of Astrobioethics: a brief discussion from Astrobiology the epistemological, religious and cambridge.org/ija societal dimension Octavio A. Chon-Torres1 Research Article Programa de Estudios Generales, Universidad de Lima, Lima, Peru Cite this article: Chon-Torres OA (2019). Astrobioethics: a brief discussion from Abstract the epistemological, religious and As astrobiology progresses in its quest to discover life on other planets or to put ourselves in societal dimension. International Journal of another one, so does its moral problematic. Astrobiology is not only part of natural sciences, Astrobiology 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1017/ S147355041900017X but also deals with direct aspects of humanities. For this reason, this paper aims to briefly examine astrobioethics from the epistemological, religious and societal dimension. It also Received: 31 January 2019 deals with different researches in this regard, in order to better understand the state of the Revised: 24 June 2019 art on this topic and that astrobioethics can help us not only on how we should relate with Accepted: 25 June 2019 extraterrestrial lifeforms, but even with terrestrials. Key words: Astrobiocentrism; astrobioethics; astrobiology; transdisciplinarity Astrobioethics is the discipline inside astrobiology that studies not only the morality of all activities related to the presence of life on other worlds, but also studies our attitude towards Author for correspondence: the expansion of terrestrial life in the Universe. The discipline that focuses on moral problems Octavio A. Chon-Torres, E-mail: ochon@ulima. edu.pe is ethics; however, as ethics is not an exact science but rather a branch of philosophy, its prob- lematic nature makes its content always updated according to the social context in which it operates.
    [Show full text]
  • Perceptions of Female High School Students on Engineering
    Journal of Education and Practice www.iiste.org ISSN 2222-1735 (Paper) ISSN 2222-288X (Online) Vol.7, No.25, 2016 Perceptions of Female High School Students on Engineering Diana Starovoytova Madara* Sitati Namango School of Engineering, Moi University P. O .Box 3900, Eldoret, Kenya Abstract There is overwhelming evidence that females are underrepresented in engineering worldwide, and Kenya is not an exception. Recent study at School of Engineering (SOE), Moi University (MU) established that engineering parity ration was found to be 1.68 %, meaning that for every 59 students admitted to MU there was only one student admitted to SOE. Engineering female parity index was found to be 0.0038, meaning that, on average, for 260 female students admitted to MU, only 1(one) female student was admitted to SOE. Humankind depends on engineers to create new technologies, to find solutions to practical problems and to shape the world that people live in and the future they rely on. Yet young people have little or no perception of engineering and the understanding they do have is all too often confused with other careers, such as science. The perception of engineering as “masculine” and “too hard” is a contributing factor for the female minority in engineering. On the other hand there are very few studies on what high school students think about engineering. In view of the above, this paper will try to fill this gap of information, by exploring teenage girls’ perceptions of engineering as a subject for study and as a potential career choice. Furthermore, it will attempt to raise awareness about and improve the image of engineering, by providing fused notion of engineering to the potential broad audience of this paper.
    [Show full text]
  • Long Futures and Type Iv Civilizations
    PERIODICA POLYTECHNICA SER. SOC. MAN. SCI. VOL. 12, NO. 1, PP. 83–89 (2004) LONG FUTURES AND TYPE IV CIVILIZATIONS Zoltán GALÁNTAI Department of Innovation Studies and History of Technology Budapest University of Technology and Economics H–1111 Hungary, Budapest, Stoczek u. 2., bg. St., gfloor 7. Tel: (+36) 1 463–2141, Fax: (+36) 1 463–1412 e-mail: [email protected] Received: September 7, 2003 Abstract The emergence of the physical eschatology in the last decades led to an opportunity to ask questions about the fate of our Universe from a cosmologist’s point of view and to study mankind’s possible future on a cosmological scale, while we can define some theoretical limits of a civilization’s possible developments. Keywords: physical eschatology, Kardashev civilizations, Type IV civilization, criticism of Anthropic Cosmological Principle, artificial and natural signs. “Whether the details of my calculations turn out to be correct or not, I think I have shown that there are good scientific reasons for taking seriously the possibility that life and intelligence can succeed in mold- ing this universe of ours to their own purposes.” (Freeman Dyson: Time Without End: Physics and Biology in an Open Universe) 1. Introduction We could imagine a physicist floating in his laboratory in the outer space, far from any celestial body. That physicist would never discover the gravitational force without the closeness of big masses like our planet, wrote Astronomer Royal Sir Martin Rees, and similarly, the existence of some unknown forces is also imaginable, whose effects are not detectable on the scale of our Planetary System – but they would play an important role either in the centers of galaxies or in cosmology [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Moon-Miners-Manifesto-Mars.Pdf
    http://www.moonsociety.org/mars/ Let’s make the right choice - Mars and the Moon! Advantages of a low profile for shielding Mars looks like Arizona but feels like Antarctica Rover Opportunity at edge of Endeavor Crater Designing railroads and trains for Mars Designing planes that can fly in Mars’ thin air Breeding plants to be “Mars-hardy” Outposts between dunes, pulling sand over them These are just a few of the Mars-related topics covered in the past 25+ years. Read on for much more! Why Mars? The lunar and Martian frontiers will thrive much better as trading partners than either could on it own. Mars has little to trade to Earth, but a lot it can trade with the Moon. Both can/will thrive together! CHRONOLOGICAL INDEX MMM THEMES: MARS MMM #6 - "M" is for Missing Volatiles: Methane and 'Mmonia; Mars, PHOBOS, Deimos; Mars as I see it; MMM #16 Frontiers Have Rough Edges MMM #18 Importance of the M.U.S.-c.l.e.Plan for the Opening of Mars; Pavonis Mons MMM #19 Seizing the Reins of the Mars Bandwagon; Mars: Option to Stay; Mars Calendar MMM #30 NIMF: Nuclear rocket using Indigenous Martian Fuel; Wanted: Split personality types for Mars Expedition; Mars Calendar Postscript; Are there Meteor Showers on Mars? MMM #41 Imagineering Mars Rovers; Rethink Mars Sample Return; Lunar Development & Mars; Temptations to Eco-carelessness; The Romantic Touch of Old Barsoom MMM #42 Igloos: Atmosphere-derived shielding for lo-rem Martian Shelters MMM #54 Mars of Lore vs. Mars of Yore; vendors wanted for wheeled and walking Mars Rovers; Transforming Mars; Xities
    [Show full text]
  • V Isysphere Mars: Terraforming Meets Eng Ineered Life Adaptation MSS
    Visysphere mars: Terraforming meets engineered life adaptation MSS/MSM 2005 Visysphere Mars Terraforming Meets Engineered Life Adaptation International Space University Masters Program 2005 © International Space University. All Rights Reserved. Front Cover Artwork: “From Earth to Mars via technology and life”. Connecting the two planets through engineering of technology and life itself to reach the final goal of a terraformed Mars. The Executive Summary, ordering information and order forms may be found on the ISU web site at http://www.isunet.edu/Services/library/isu_publications.htm. Copies of the Executive Summary and the Final Report can also be ordered from: International Space University Strasbourg Central Campus Parc d’Innovation 1 rue Jean-Dominique Cassini 67400 Illkirch-Graffenstaden France Tel. +33 (0)3 88 65 54 32 Fax. +33 (0)3 88 65 54 47 e-mail. [email protected] ii International Space University, Masters 2005 Visysphere Mars Acknowledgements ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS The International Space University and the students of the Masters Program 2005 would like to thank the following people for their generous support and guidance: Achilleas, Philippe Hill, Hugh Part-Time Faculty Faculty, Space Science International Space University International Space University IDEST, Université Paris Sud, France Lapierre, Bernard Arnould, Jacques Coordinator “Ethics Applied to Special Advisor to the President Engineering” course. CNES Ecole Polytechnique of Montreal Averner, Mel Marinova, Margarita Program Manager, Fundamental Planetary
    [Show full text]
  • Planetary Protection
    OPEN ACCESS Freelyavailableonline Journal of Astrobiology &Outreach Editorial Terraforming of Mars Environment * Pekka Janhunen Department of Astrobiology, Finnish Meteorological Institute, Space Research, Helsinki, Finland ABSTRACT Mars also features a history of being wet and plush. It has been theorized that when it had been first formed 4.2 billion years ago it had an environment and high amounts of water. Since Mars is far smaller than Earth, its internal core gradually hardened, which caused Mars to lose its magnetic flux? Without a protective magnetic flux, the solar radiation was ready to strip away most of the Martian atmosphere. The end result's that over subsequent 500 million years, Mars gradually transformed from a warm, wet planet to a chilly, dry planet. Around 3.7 billion years ago, Mars eventually became almost like the barren planet we all know of today. Despite this, there's evidence that water still exists on Mars. Water in the form of ice has been found at the poles and underground in the Utopia Plantain region of Mars. There is up to five million cubic kilometers of ice on Mars, and if this were to be spread evenly over everything of the surface of Mars it would submerge the planet under 35 meters of water. Keywords: Mars, Utopia plantain region, Martian atmosphere INTRODUCTION or her visual or olfactory qualities. This, unfortunately, pales in comparison to the 1.36 billion cubic If we are to urge an accurate picture of the potential wealth to be kilometers of water found on Earth, but it is a start. We are gained from the system, we must recognize the successive waves of currently on the hunt for life on Mars, but this has not been economic energy through which our civilization is passing.
    [Show full text]
  • Spa Ce Resources Round Tableii
    _4 73_b.-,J ,/.J/_ (1 + ._'/ SPA CE RESOURCES ROUND TABLEII November 8-10, 2000 Colorado School of Mines Golden, Colorado LPI Contribution No. 1070 LPI Contributtotl No 1070 ill / • .... :., j, / 7 / /....? ,;_ Preface This volume contains abstracts that have been accepted for presentation at the Space Resources Roundtable II, November 8-10, 2000. The Steering Committee consisted of Joe Burris (WorldTradeNetwork.net), David Criswell (University of Houston), Michael B. Duke (Lunar and Planetary Institute), Mike O'Neal (NASA Kennedy Space Center), Sanders Rosenberg (InSpace Propulsion, Inc.), Kevin Reed (Marconi, Inc.), Jerry Sanders (NASA Johnson Space Center), Frank Schowengerdt (Colorado School of Mines), and Bill Sharp (Colorado School of Mines). Logistical, administrative, and publications support were provided by the Publications and Program Services Department of the Lunar and Planetary Institute. SPACE RESOURCES ROUNDTABLE II November 8-10, 2000 Golden, Colorado Sponsored by Colorado School of Mines Lunar and Planetary Institute National Aeronautics and Space Administration Steering Committee Joe Bums, WorldTradeNetwork.net David Criswell, University of Houston Michael B. Duke, Lunar and Planetary Institute Mike O'Neal, NASA Kennedy Space Center Sanders Rosenberg, InSpace Propulsion, Inc. Kevin Reed, Marconi, Inc. Jerry Sanders, NASA Johnson Space Center Frank Schowengerdt, Colorado School of Mines Bill Sharp, Colorado School of Mines LPI Contribution No. 1070 Compiled in 2000 by LUNAR AND PLANETARY INSTITUTE The Institute is operated by the Universities Space Research Association under Contract No. NASW-4574 with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Material in this volume may be copied without restraint for library, abstract service, education, or personal research purposes; however, republication of any paper or portion thereof requires the written permission of the authors as well as the appropriate acknowledgment of this publication.
    [Show full text]
  • The Thermodynamics of Planetary Engineering on the Planet Mars
    University of Central Florida STARS HIM 1990-2015 2014 The Thermodynamics of Planetary Engineering on the Planet Mars Christopher Barsoum University of Central Florida Part of the Aerospace Engineering Commons Find similar works at: https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015 University of Central Florida Libraries http://library.ucf.edu This Open Access is brought to you for free and open access by STARS. It has been accepted for inclusion in HIM 1990-2015 by an authorized administrator of STARS. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Recommended Citation Barsoum, Christopher, "The Thermodynamics of Planetary Engineering on the Planet Mars" (2014). HIM 1990-2015. 1552. https://stars.library.ucf.edu/honorstheses1990-2015/1552 THE THERMODYNAMICS OF PLANETARY ENGINEERING ON THE PLANET MARS by CHRISTOPHER BARSOUM A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the Honors in the Major Program in Aerospace Engineering in the College of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering and in The Burnett Honors College at the University of Central Florida Orlando, Florida Spring Term 2014 Thesis Chair: Dr. Kuo-Chi Lin © 2014 Christopher Barsoum ii ABSTRACT Mars is a potentially habitable planet given the appropriate planetary engineering efforts. In order to create a habitable environment, the planet must be terraformed, creating quasi-Earth conditions. Benchmarks for minimum acceptable survivable human conditions were set by observing atmospheric pressures and temperatures here on Earth that humans are known to exist in. By observing a positive feedback reaction, it is shown how the sublimation of the volatile southern polar ice cap on Mars can increase global temperatures and pressures to the benchmarks set for minimum acceptable survivable human conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Ethics of Climate Engineering: Solar Radiation Management and Non-Ideal Justice (Routledge, 2017)
    This is a pre-print version of Toby Svoboda, The Ethics of Climate Engineering: Solar Radiation Management and Non-Ideal Justice (Routledge, 2017). If citing, please consult the published version, which contains minor changes. The Ethics of Climate Engineering: Solar Radiation Management and Non-Ideal Justice Toby Svoboda Table of Contents • Introduction • Chapter 1: Benefits • Chapter 2: Distributions • Chapter 3: Decisions • Chapter 4: Virtues • Chapter 5: Dilemmas • Chapter 6: Comparisons Acknowledgements Many individuals provided helpful feedback on draft chapters of this book. For that I thank Daniel Callies, Frank Jankunis, David Morrow, Christian Uhle, and two anonymous reviewers. I acknowledge permission from the White Horse Press and the Center for Environmental Philosophy to reuse some material from two articles previously published in Environmental Values and Environmental Ethics, respectively. Finally, I acknowledge a Summer Research Stipend from Fairfield University, which supported work on this project during the summer of 2016. Dedication To Kate and Arizona 1 Introduction This is a book about justice, anthropogenic climate change, and the prospect of climate engineering. More specifically, it is a book about the justice (or injustice) of using solar radiation management (SRM) in response to climate change. SRM is a category of climate engineering, which we may define as the large-scale, intentional, technological modification of the global environment in order to address climate change.1 A technique counts as SRM if it would seek to engineer the climate by increasing planetary albedo, such as by injecting sulfate aerosols into the stratosphere, thereby reducing the quantity of solar radiation absorbed by the planet. If they worked, SRM techniques could offset (to some degree) the planetary warming driven by the increasing concentration of atmospheric greenhouse gases due to anthropogenic emissions.
    [Show full text]
  • Evaluating Future Nanotechnology: the Net Societal Impacts of Atomically Precise Manufacturing
    Evaluating Future Nanotechnology: The Net Societal Impacts of Atomically Precise Manufacturing Steven Umbrelloa,∗, Seth D. Baumb a Global Catastrophic Risk Institute b Global Catastrophic Risk Institute Abstract Atomically precise manufacturing (APM) is the assembly of materials with atomic precision. APM does not currently exist, and may not be feasible, but if it is feasible, then the societal impacts could be dramatic. This paper assesses the net societal impacts of APM across the full range of important APM sectors: general material wealth, environmental issues, military affairs, surveillance, artificial intelligence, and space travel. Positive effects were found for material wealth, the environment, military affairs (specifically nuclear disarmament), and space travel. Negative effects were found for military affairs (specifically rogue actor violence and AI. The net effect for surveillance was ambiguous. The effects for the environment, military affairs, and AI appear to be the largest, with the environment perhaps being the largest of these, suggesting that APM would be net beneficial to society. However, these factors are not well quantified and no definitive conclusion can be made. One conclusion that can be reached is that if APM R&D is pursued, it should go hand-in-hand with effective governance strategies to increase the benefits and reduce the harms. Keywords: atomically precise manufacturing, nanotechnology, ethics, research policy 1. Introduction Atomically precise manufacturing (APM) is the assembly of materials with atomic pre- cision. APM is also known as molecular assembly or molecular manufacturing, and is a form of molecular nanotechnology. APM does not currently exist, and some nanotechnology researchers doubt that it is feasible (e.g., Smalley, 2001), but those who believe it is feasible anticipate a wide range of transformative societal impacts (e.g., Drexler, 2013a).
    [Show full text]
  • Earth Systems: Engineering and Management† Stephen H
    CHAPTER 20 Earth Systems: Engineering and Management† Stephen H. Schneider Imagine that we could let the world’s economy continue to grow, bring the dis- advantaged classes up from poverty, and not threaten the atmosphere or global ecosystems with unprecedented buildup of greenhouse gases (GHGs) and the climatic risks of such growth. Earth system engineering and management may just be such a panacea, some have suggested. But can we anticipate the costs or ever truly predict the consequences? Few people would ask us to accept that a growing world economy based on greatly expanded per capita energy consumption would be free of environmen- tal side effects. But many have claimed that the anticipated severalfold increase in GHGs—and associated sea level rises, intensified hurricanes, and drought and flood stresses—can be largely overcome by human ingenuity. Their opti- mistic vision depends greatly on what had been called geoengineering and has more recently been called earth system engineering, the deliberate manipulation of earth systems to manage the climatic consequences of human population and economic expansion.1 To others, the notion of geoengineering—injecting dust into the strato- sphere, for example, to reflect some sunlight back to space and counteract global warming—is an irresponsible palliative. It evades the need for a real cure, such as curbing consumption by the rich and population growth by the poor and charging polluters for their use of the atmosphere as a free sewer. In response, defenders of geoengineering retort that two-thirds of the world’s people use a small fraction of the energy per capita of the rich.
    [Show full text]
  • Afterword: Why Space Advocates and Environmentalists Should Work Together
    Afterword: Why Space Advocates and Environmentalists Should Work Together Aerospace is not usually considered verdant. Jet aircraft emit tons of carbon dioxide into the atmosphere; some of the companies that make them are defense contrac- tors, and nobody considers weapons of war, necessary or not, to be green. These companies are in business to make money for their shareholders and will only be green if it somehow benefits their bottom line or if law or mandate requires them to be so. This reality, and there are exceptions, also taints those involved in space exploration and development. But painting the entire canvas with the same brush is not only grossly unfair, it is also incorrect. Many people who devote their lives and careers to the exploration of space are not in it for the money. Sure, they need to earn a living like everyone else. But that is not why the authors of this book chose their careers. Greg Matloff is an astronomer and astronomy professor. He lives, breathes, studies, and teaches about the heavens. He does this, in part, because studying the universe tells us something about ourselves. As we have explored the universe around us, we have learned how precious our planet Earth truly is. C Bangs explores archetypes of Earth and depicts cosmological elements from an ecological and feminist perspective. One premise of her work is that we are part of Earth and all the elements of our bodies at one time were within a star. We contain both systems within us. Her art in a wide variety of media is informed by mythology and the hope for human evolution.
    [Show full text]