Transcriptional Control and Protein Specialization Have Roles in the Functional Diversification of Two Dicer-Like Proteins in Ma

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Transcriptional Control and Protein Specialization Have Roles in the Functional Diversification of Two Dicer-Like Proteins in Ma Copyright Ó 2008 by the Genetics Society of America DOI: 10.1534/genetics.108.093922 Note Transcriptional Control and Protein Specialization Have Roles in the Functional Diversification of Two Dicer-Like Proteins in Magnaporthe oryzae Naoki Kadotani, Toshiki Murata, Nguyen Bao Quoc, Yusuke Adachi and Hitoshi Nakayashiki1 Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Kobe University, Kobe 657-8501, Japan Manuscript received July 14, 2008 Accepted for publication August 15, 2008 ABSTRACT Quantitative RT–PCR and overexpression studies of two Dicer-like proteins, MoDcl1 and MoDcl2, in Magnaporthe oryzae indicated that the functional diversification of the MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 proteins in RNA- mediated gene silencing pathways was likely to have arisen from both transcriptional control and protein specialization. ICER is a member of the RNase III superfamily of belongs to the broad category of gene silencing pathways D bidentate nucleases that process long dsRNA exemplified by RNAi, in which a specific mRNA is precursorsintoshorter units (21–30 nt)thatsubsequently targeted for degradation via an siRNA-mediated path- act as specificity determinants in various RNA-mediated way (referred to as ‘‘RNAi pathway’’ hereafter). MSUD gene silencing pathways. Genome sequencing projects silences the expression of such genes that cause un- have revealed that Dicer-like (DCL) proteins are evolu- paired DNA during meiosis in the zygote. Quelling has tionarily conserved in a widerange of eukaryotic genomes been shown to be mediated by qde-1 (RdRP) (Cogoni although the number of DCL proteins in the genome and Macino 1999), qde-2 (Argonaute) (Cogoni and varies among different organisms. Mammals have only Macino 2000), and two redundantly functioning Dicer one DCL protein, which participates in at least two dif- proteins, dcl-1/sms-3 and dcl-2 (Galagan et al. 2003; ferent types of gene silencing pathways, namely, siRNA Catalanotto et al. 2004), with a probable greater and miRNA pathways (Billy et al.2001;Hutvagner contribution of dcl-2 to the pathway (Catalanotto et al. 2001). In contrast, multiple DCL proteins have been et al. 2004; Maiti et al. 2007). Interestingly, MSUD uses found in other organisms such as Drosophila melanogaster paralogous proteins of the quelling components such as and Arabidopsis thaliana. The multiple DCL proteins are sad-1 (RdRP) (Shiu et al. 2001) and sms-2 (Argonaute) shown to mainly function in discrete RNA silencing (Lee et al. 2003). Recently, DCL-1/SMS-3 protein but not pathways with some overlap in specificity (Jaskiewicz DCL-2 protein was shown to be required for MSUD and and Filipowicz 2008). It is of interest to know how the to colocalize with SAD-1 and SMS-2 in the perinuclear functional diversification of paralogous Dicer proteins region (Alexander et al. 2008). has been achieved along with the development of various In the rice blast fungus Magnaporthe oryzae, two DCL RNA silencing pathways during evolution. genes, designated MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 (formerly Mdl1 In the model filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa, and Mdl2, respectively), have been identified (Kadotani two different forms of RNA-mediated gene silencing, et al.2004).MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 are orthologous to namely, quelling (Romano and Macino 1992) and Neurospora dcl-1/sms-3 and dcl-2, respectively. We pre- meiotic silencing by unpaired DNA (MSUD) (Aramayo viously reported that, in Magnaporthe, MoDcl2 was solely and Metzenberg 1996; Shiu et al. 2001), have been responsible for the RNAi pathway in mycelia (Kadotani identified. Quelling operates during the vegetative phase et al. 2004). Therefore, unlike Neurospora, no redun- while MSUD acts during the meiotic phase. Quelling dancy between the two DCL proteins was observed, suggesting a clear functional diversification of the M. oryzae Dicers. Here we show that this functional diversifi- 1Corresponding author: Laboratory of Plant Pathology, Kobe University, 1-1, Rokkodai-cho, Nada-ku, Kobe 657-8501, Japan. cation likely stems from a combination of transcriptional E-mail: [email protected] control and protein specialization. Genetics 180: 1245–1249 (October 2008) 1246 N. Kadotani et al. TABLE 1 Absolute quantitative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) analysis of MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 in the overexpressing trans- formants and wild type of Magnaporthe oryzae mRNA copies (per 25 ng total RNA) Relative fold to wild type Strain MoDcl1 MoDcl2 MoDcl1 MoDcl2 Wild type (Br48) 689.1 6 97.8a 9,267.7 6 935.8 1 1 tMoDcl1-OE11 248,853.2 6 15,017.6 NE 361.2 tMoDcl1-OE12 154,310.5 6 8,766.6 NE 223.9 tMoDcl1-OE13 224,692.2 6 3,004.1 NE 326.1 tMoDcl2-OE21 NE 24,372.4 6 1,662.2 2.6 tMoDcl2-OE22 NE 252,251.5 6 19,721.7 27.2 tMoDcl2-OE23 NE 13,400.5 6 1,140.8 1.4 Quantitative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR) analysis was performed with real-time PCR (Applied Biosystems 7500 or 7300 real-time PCR system) and SYBR Green fluorescence detection (SYBR GreenER two-step qRT–PCR kit for uni- versal; Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA). Total RNA was extracted from fungal mycelia grown in liquid media as described previously (Kadotani et al. 2004), and reverse transcribed into cDNAs using a SuperScript III RT– PCR system (Invitrogen). Sets of specific primers for MoDcl1 (MDL1-Fw: CCCGTGGATACTGTGGTAATGG, MDL1-Rv: GCAATGTCGATTGGAATATCAAGAC) and MoDcl2 (MDL2-Fw: CGCTCTACTTCCAGTCCCTTTC, MDL2-Rv: TGGTCACGTCTGGATCAAAGC) as well as for two internal controls, actin (Mo-actin-F: GCGGTTA CACCTTCTCTACCAC, Mo-actin-R: AGTCTGGATCTCCTGCTCAAAG), and b-tubulin genes (Mo-tub-F: CGA GACCTTCTGCATTGACAAC, Mo-tub-R: GGCCGAAACCAGGTAGTTCA), were used in the analysis. The copy numbers of the MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 transcripts relative to the total RNA were determined by real-time RT– PCR with reference to standard plasmids carrying MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 cDNAs, respectively. NE, not examined. a Standard deviation. First, we examined the expression levels of MoDcl1 (tMoDcl2-OE). Surprisingly, GFP silencing was also ob- and MoDcl2 mRNAs in the vegetative mycelia of the M. served in the MoDcl1-OE lines (tMoDcl1-OE), although oryzae isolate Br48 (a wheat-infecting strain) by quanti- the average level of silencing was significantly lower than tative RT–PCR (qRT–PCR). Three independent qRT– those in the tMoDcl2-OE and wild-type strains (P , 0.01 PCR analyses indicated that 689.1. 6 97.8 copies of by t-test). MoDcl1 and 9267.7 6 935.8 copies of MoDcl2 tran- To address whether MoDcl1 protein is capable of scripts on average were detected in 25 ng of total RNA producing siRNAs, three strongly silenced transform- from mycelia (Table 1). Therefore, the average copy ants (categorized in the 0–20% class in Figure 1) were number of MoDcl2 mRNA was 13.5 times higher than picked up from the tMoDcl1-OE lines as well as from the that of MoDcl1 mRNA in vegetative mycelia of M. oryzae. tMoDcl2-OE lines and subjected to Northern blot To examine whether different levels of transcriptional analysis. Consistent with the phenotypic observations activity could play a role in the functional diversification in Figure 1, lower levels of GFP siRNA accumulation of MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 proteins in RNA silencing path- were, in general, detected in the tMoDcl1-OE lines ways in M. oryzae, we performed overexpression (OE) compared to the tMoDcl2-OE lines (Figure 2). Next we experiments. The full-length MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 cDNAs performed qRT–PCR to examine the transcriptional were introduced into the OE vector, pGT, which carries levels of MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 mRNA in the OE lines. multiple cloning sites between the Aspergillus nidulans The results showed that MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 mRNAs gpdA (glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase) pro- were overexpressed, on average, by 303.7- and 10.4-fold, moter (2kbinlength)andA. nidulans trpC terminator respectively, relative to the wild-type strain (Table 1). (0.5 kb). A GFP-expressing MoDcl2 knockout (KO) The absolute expression levels of the target genes dif- mutant, which was previously constructed by a conven- fered significantly among the OE lines but were at com- tional gene replacement method, was transformed with parable levels in lines strongly expressing either MoDcl1 the MoDcl1 or MoDcl2 OE vectors together with a GFP- or MoDcl2 (e.g., tMoDcl1-OE13 and tMoDcl2-OE22 in silencing plasmid, pEGFP-SA-neo (Kadotani et al. 2004). Table 1). These results indicated the following. First, the As a control, pEGFP-SA-neo was introduced into a GFP- overexpressed MoDcl1 protein was capable of generat- expressing wild-type strain. The resulting transformants ing siRNAs that functioned in the RNAi pathway in M. were classified into five categories on the basis of the oryzae. Second, the MoDcl1 protein appeared to be less relative GFP fluorescence levels to their parent strains efficient in Dicer activity since siRNA accumulation was (Figure 1). The results revealed that the RNAi phenotype lower in the tMoDcl1-OE lines than in the tMoDcl2-OE of the parent strain (MoDcl2 KO mutant) was completely lines, despite the relatively higher gene expression levels restored to the wild-type levels in the MoDcl2-OE lines of the MoDcl1 gene in the transformants. Note 1247 Figure 2.—Northern blot analysis of GFP siRNAs in the MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 overexpressing transformants. Three MoDcl1 and MoDcl2 overexpressing transformants each were subjected to siRNA analysis. Low-molecular-weight RNA was extracted and hybridized with a GFP probe as described pre- viously (Kadotani et al. 2004). DNA oligonucleotides (30 and igure F 1.—Overexpression of MoDcl1 cDNA partially re- 21 mer) were used as molecular size markers. Equal loading of stored hairpin RNA-induced gene silencing in the MoDcl2 total RNA was estimated by ethidium bromide staining of pre- KO mutant. The overexpression (OE) vectors of cMoDcl1 dominant RNAs. M, oligonucleotide markers; C, parent strain and cMoDcl2 were introduced into the GFP-expressing (GFP-expressing MoDcl2 knockout mutant); tMoDcl1-OE11– MoDcl2 knockout mutant by the cotransformation method 13, transformants with the cMoDcl1 OE vector; tMoDcl2- with the GFP silencing construct, pEGFP-SA-neo carrying OE21–23, transformants with the cMoDcl2 OE vector.
Recommended publications
  • The Sirna Suppressor RTL1 Is Redox-Regulated Through Glutathionylation of a Conserved Cysteine in the Double-Stranded-RNA-Bindin
    The siRNA suppressor RTL1 is redox-regulated through glutathionylation of a conserved cysteine in the double-stranded-RNA-binding domain Cyril Charbonnel, Adnan Niazi, Emilie Elvira-Matelot, Elżbieta Nowak, Matthias Zytnicki, Anne De bures, Edouard Jobet, Alisson Opsomer, Nahid Shamandi, Marcin Nowotny, et al. To cite this version: Cyril Charbonnel, Adnan Niazi, Emilie Elvira-Matelot, Elżbieta Nowak, Matthias Zytnicki, et al.. The siRNA suppressor RTL1 is redox-regulated through glutathionylation of a conserved cysteine in the double-stranded-RNA-binding domain. Nucleic Acids Research, Oxford University Press, 2017, 45 (20), pp.11891-11907. 10.1093/nar/gkx820. hal-02116017 HAL Id: hal-02116017 https://hal.archives-ouvertes.fr/hal-02116017 Submitted on 25 May 2020 HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non, lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés. Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution - NonCommercial| 4.0 International License Published online 15 September 2017 Nucleic Acids Research, 2017, Vol. 45, No. 20 11891–11907 doi: 10.1093/nar/gkx820 The siRNA suppressor RTL1 is redox-regulated
    [Show full text]
  • Posttranscriptional Regulation of Microrna Biogenesis in Animals
    Molecular Cell Review Posttranscriptional Regulation of MicroRNA Biogenesis in Animals Haruhiko Siomi1,* and Mikiko C. Siomi1,* 1Department of Molecular Biology, Keio University School of Medicine, 35 Shinanomachi, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo 160-8582, Japan *Correspondence: [email protected] (H.S.), [email protected] (M.C.S.) DOI 10.1016/j.molcel.2010.03.013 MicroRNAs (miRNAs) control gene expression in animals, plants, and unicellular eukaryotes by promoting degradation or repressing translation of target mRNAs. miRNA expression is often tissue specific and devel- opmentally regulated, and regulation occurs both transcriptionally and posttranscriptionally. This regulation is crucial, as alteration of miRNA expression has been linked to human diseases, including several cancers. Here, we discuss recent studies that shed light on how multiple steps in the miRNA biogenesis pathway are regulated to modulate miRNA function in animals. Introduction miRNA turn over, recent findings have uncovered a significant The lin-4 miRNA was identified in C. elegans in 1993 (Lee et al., role for posttranscriptional mechanisms in the regulation of 1993). At the time, lin-4 was thought to be a worm-specific curi- miRNA biogenesis and activity (Carthew and Sontheimer, osity, but with the subsequent identification of the let-7 miRNA, 2009; Davis and Hata, 2009). Here, we review recent progress which is phylogenetically conserved (Pasquinelli et al., 2000; in our understanding of the posttranscriptional mechanisms of Reinhart et al., 2000), researchers took
    [Show full text]
  • Plant 24-Nt Reproductive Phasirnas from Intramolecular Duplex Mrnas in Diverse Monocots
    Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 9, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Plant 24-nt reproductive phasiRNAs from intramolecular duplex mRNAs in diverse monocots Atul Kakrana1,2, Sandra M. Mathioni3, Kun Huang2, Reza Hammond1,2, Lee Vandivier4, Parth Patel1,2, Siwaret Arikit5, Olga Shevchenko2, Alex E. Harkess3, Bruce Kingham2, Brian D. Gregory4, James H. Leebens-Mack6, Blake C. Meyers3,7* 1 Center for Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19714, USA 2 Delaware Biotechnology Institute, University of Delaware, Newark, DE 19714, USA 3 Donald Danforth Plant Science Center, St. Louis, MO 63132, USA 4 Department of Biology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA 5 Department of Agronomy, Kamphaeng Saen and Rice Science Center, Kasetsart University, Nakhon Pathom 73140, Thailand 6 Department of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, GA 30602, USA 7 Division of Plant Sciences, University of Missouri – Columbia, MO 65211, USA *Corresponding author: [email protected]; Keywords: Asparagus, Lilium, daylily, monocots, miRNAs, small RNAs, phasiRNAs, Dicer, Argonaute Downloaded from genome.cshlp.org on October 9, 2021 - Published by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press Abstract In grasses, two pathways generate diverse and numerous 21-nt (pre-meiotic) and 24-nt (meiotic) phased siRNAs highly enriched in anthers, the male reproductive organs. These “phasiRNAs” are analogous to mammalian piRNAs, yet their functions and evolutionary origins remain largely unknown. The 24-nt meiotic phasiRNAs have only been described in grasses, wherein their biogenesis is dependent on a specialized Dicer (DCL5). To assess how evolution gave rise to this pathway, we examined reproductive phasiRNA pathways in non-grass monocots: garden asparagus, daylily and lily.
    [Show full text]
  • Functional Specialization of Monocot DCL3 and DCL5 Proteins Through the Evolution of the PAZ Domain
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.02.454693; this version posted August 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 1 Functional specialization of monocot DCL3 and DCL5 proteins through the 2 evolution of the PAZ domain 3 4 Shirui Chen1,2, Wei Liu1,2, Masahiro Naganuma1,3, Yukihide Tomari1,2,*, Hiro-oki 5 Iwakawa1,* 6 7 1 Institute for Quantitative Biosciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113- 8 0032, Japan 9 2 Department of Computational Biology and Medical Sciences, Graduate School of 10 Frontier Sciences, The University of Tokyo, Bunkyo-ku, Tokyo 113-0032, Japan 11 3 Present address, RIKEN Center for Biosystems Dynamics Research, Yokohama, 12 Kanagawa, 230-0045, Japan 13 *Correspondence: [email protected] (Y.T.), [email protected] (H.-o.I.) 14 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.08.02.454693; this version posted August 2, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. 15 Abstract 16 Monocot DICER-LIKE3 (DCL3) and DCL5 produce distinct 24-nt heterochromatic 17 small interfering RNAs (hc-siRNAs) and phased secondary siRNAs (phasiRNAs).
    [Show full text]
  • First Line of Title
    DEEP SEQUENCING FROM hen1 MUTANTS TO IDENTIFY SMALL RNA 3’ MODIFICATIONS by Jixian Zhai A thesis submitted to the Faculty of the University of Delaware in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Master of Science in Bioinformatics and Computational Biology Spring 2013 © 2013 Jixian Zhai All Rights Reserved DEEP SEQUENCING FROM hen1 MUTANTS TO IDENTIFY SMALL RNA 3’ MODIFICATIONS by Jixian Zhai Approved: __________________________________________________________ Blake C. Meyers, Ph.D. Professor in charge of thesis on behalf of the Advisory Committee Approved: __________________________________________________________ Errol Lloyd, Ph.D. Chair of the Department of Computer and Information Sciences Approved: __________________________________________________________ Babatunde A. Ogunnaike, Ph.D. Interim Dean of College of Engineering Approved: __________________________________________________________ James G. Richards, Ph.D. Vice Provost for Graduate and Professional Education ACKNOWLEDGMENTS I wish to thank my adviser, Dr. Meyers, and my committee members Dr. Liao Li and Dr. Adam Marsh for their continuous advice, guidance, and academic support during my master study. I would also like to thank Dr. Cathy Wu and Katie Lakofsky in the Bioinformatics program for their great work in carrying out this master program. I must also thank my friends Katie Bi, Yuanlong Tian, Jia Ren and Qili Fei who have supported and helped me throughout my master education. This manuscript is dedicated to my parents, Faqing Zhai and Yulan Zhao
    [Show full text]
  • Genetic Insight Into the Domain Structure and Functions of Dicer-Type Ribonucleases
    International Journal of Molecular Sciences Review Genetic Insight into the Domain Structure and Functions of Dicer-Type Ribonucleases Kinga Ciechanowska, Maria Pokornowska and Anna Kurzy ´nska-Kokorniak* Department of Ribonucleoprotein Biochemistry, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry Polish Academy of Sciences, Noskowskiego 12/14, 61-704 Poznan, Poland; [email protected] (K.C.); [email protected] (M.P.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +48-61-852-85-03 (ext. 1264) Abstract: Ribonuclease Dicer belongs to the family of RNase III endoribonucleases, the enzymes that specifically hydrolyze phosphodiester bonds found in double-stranded regions of RNAs. Dicer enzymes are mostly known for their essential role in the biogenesis of small regulatory RNAs. A typical Dicer-type RNase consists of a helicase domain, a domain of unknown function (DUF283), a PAZ (Piwi-Argonaute-Zwille) domain, two RNase III domains, and a double-stranded RNA binding domain; however, the domain composition of Dicers varies among species. Dicer and its homologues developed only in eukaryotes; nevertheless, the two enzymatic domains of Dicer, helicase and RNase III, display high sequence similarity to their prokaryotic orthologs. Evolutionary studies indicate that a combination of the helicase and RNase III domains in a single protein is a eukaryotic signature and is supposed to be one of the critical events that triggered the consolidation of the eukaryotic RNA interference. In this review, we provide the genetic insight into the domain organization and structure of Dicer proteins found in vertebrate and invertebrate animals, plants and fungi. We also discuss, in the context of the individual domains, domain deletion variants and partner proteins, a variety of Dicers’ functions not only related to small RNA biogenesis pathways.
    [Show full text]
  • Cross-Kingdom Small Rnas Among Animals, Plants and Microbes
    cells Review Cross-Kingdom Small RNAs among Animals, Plants and Microbes Jun Zeng 1,2 , Vijai Kumar Gupta 3 , Yueming Jiang 4,5 , Bao Yang 4,5, Liang Gong 4,5,* and Hong Zhu 1,5,* 1 Key Laboratory of South China Agricultural Plant Molecular Analysis and Genetic Improvement, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; [email protected] 2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China 3 Department of Chemistry and Biotechnology, School of Science, Tallinn University of Technology, 12618 Tallinn, Estonia; [email protected] 4 Key Laboratory of Plant Resource Conservation and Sustainable Utilization, Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Applied Botany, South China Botanical Garden, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Guangzhou 510650, China; [email protected] (Y.J.); [email protected] (B.Y.) 5 Key Laboratory of Post-Harvest Handling of fruits, Ministry of Agriculture, Guangzhou 510650, China * Correspondence: [email protected] (L.G.); [email protected] (H.Z.) Received: 22 March 2019; Accepted: 20 April 2019; Published: 23 April 2019 Abstract: Small RNAs (sRNAs), a class of regulatory non-coding RNAs around 20~30-nt long, including small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) and microRNAs (miRNAs), are critical regulators of gene expression. Recently, accumulating evidence indicates that sRNAs can be transferred not only within cells and tissues of individual organisms, but also across different eukaryotic species, serving as a bond connecting the animal, plant, and microbial worlds. In this review, we summarize the results from recent studies on cross-kingdom sRNA communication. We not only review the horizontal transfer of sRNAs among animals, plants and microbes, but also discuss the mechanism of RNA interference (RNAi) signal transmission via cross-kingdom sRNAs.
    [Show full text]
  • Direct Detection of Circulating Microrna-122 Using Dynamic Chemical Labelling with Single Molecule Detection Overcomes Stability
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/777458; this version posted September 20, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 International license. Direct detection of circulating microRNA-122 using dynamic chemical labelling with single molecule detection overcomes stability and isomiR challenges for biomarker qualification Authors: Barbara López-Longarela1*, Emma E. Morrison2*, John D. Tranter2, Lianne Chahman-Vos2, Jean-François Léonard3, Jean-Charles Gautier3, Sébastien Laurent4, AuDe Lartigau3, Eric Boitier3, Lucile Sautier4, PeDro Carmona-Saez5, Jordi Martorell-Marugan5, Richard J. Mellanby6, Salvatore Pernagallo1, Hugh Ilyine1, David M. Rissin7, David C. Duffy7, James W. Dear2♯ & Juan J. Díaz-Mochón1,5♯. * co-first author ♯ co-corresponding author Affiliations: 1. DestiNA Genomics LtD., EDinburgh, UniteD KingDom; DestiNA Genomica S.L. Parque Tecnológico Ciencias de la Salud (PTS), AveniDa De la Innovación 1, EDificio BIC, Armilla, Granada, Spain. 2. Pharmacology, Therapeutics anD Toxicology, Centre for Cardiovascular Science, University of Edinburgh, The Queen's Medical Research Institute, 47 Little France Crescent, Edinburgh, EH16 4TJ, UK. 3. Sanofi R&D, 13 Quai Jules Guesde, 94400 Vitry-sur-Seine, France. 4. Sanofi R&D, 371 Rue du Pr. J. Blayac, 34184 Montpellier, France. 5. Bioinformatics Unit, Centre for Genomics anD Oncological Research: Pfizer/University of GranaDa/AnDalusian Regional Government, PTS, GranaDa, Spain. 6. The Royal (Dick) School of Veterinary Studies and the Roslin Institute, The Hospital for Small Animals, University of EDinburgh, UK.
    [Show full text]
  • A Role for the RNA-Binding Protein MOS2 in Microrna Maturation in Arabidopsis
    Cell Research (2013) 23:645-657. © 2013 IBCB, SIBS, CAS All rights reserved 1001-0602/13 $ 32.00 npg ORIGINAL ARTICLE www.nature.com/cr A role for the RNA-binding protein MOS2 in microRNA maturation in Arabidopsis Xueying Wu1, 2, Yupeng Shi2, 5, Jingrui Li2, 6, Le Xu4, Yuda Fang7, Xin Li8, Yijun Qi3, 4 1College of Life Sciences, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China; 2National Institute of Biological Sciences, Zhong- guancun Life Science Park, Beijing 102206, China; 3Tsinghua-Peking Center for Life Sciences, Beijing 100084, China; 4School of Life Sciences, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China; 5Graduate Program, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing 100730, China; 6College of Biological Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193, China; 7Shanghai Institute of Plant Physiology and Ecology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200032, China; 8Michael Smith Laboratories, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4 microRNAs (miRNAs) play important roles in the regulation of gene expression. In Arabidopsis, mature miRNAs are processed from primary miRNA transcripts (pri-miRNAs) by nuclear HYL1/SE/DCL1 complexes that form Dicing bodies (D-bodies). Here we report that an RNA-binding protein MOS2 binds to pri-miRNAs and is involved in efficient processing of pri-miRNAs. MOS2 does not interact with HYL1, SE, and DCL1 and is not localized in D- bodies. Interestingly, in the absence of MOS2, the recruitment of pri-miRNAs by HYL1 is greatly reduced and the localization of HYL1 in D-bodies is compromised. These data suggest that MOS2 promotes pri-miRNA processing through facilitating the recruitment of pri-miRNAs by the Dicing complexes.
    [Show full text]
  • DCL and Associated Proteins of Arabidopsis Thaliana
    International Letters of Natural Sciences Submitted: 2016-10-30 ISSN: 2300-9675, Vol. 61, pp 85-94 Revised: 2016-12-18 doi:10.18052/www.scipress.com/ILNS.61.85 Accepted: 2016-12-19 CC BY 4.0. Published by SciPress Ltd, Switzerland, 2017 Online: 2017-01-10 DCL and Associated Proteins of Arabidopsis thaliana - An Interaction Study Paushali Roy1* and Abhijit Datta2 1Department of Botany, Vidyasagar College, Kolkata, West Bengal, India 2Department of Botany, Jhargram Raj College, Jhargram, West Bengal, India *E-mail address: [email protected] Keywords: RNA interference, Dicer-like protein, DCL- associated proteins, domain-domain interactions. Abstract. During RNA interference in plants, Dicer-like/DCL proteins process longer double- stranded RNA (dsRNA) precursors into small RNA molecules. In Arabidopsis thaliana there are four DCLs (DCL1, DCL2, DCL3, and DCL4) that interact with various associated proteins to carry out this processing. The lack of complete structural-functional information and characterization of DCLs and their associated proteins leads to this study where we have generated the structures by modelling, analysed the structures and studied the interactions of Arabidopsis thaliana DCLs with their associated proteins with the homology-derived models to screen the interacting residues. Structural analyses indicate existence of significant conserved domains that may play imperative roles during protein-protein interactions. The interaction study shows some key domain-domain (including multi-domains and inter-residue interactions) interfaces and specific residue biases (like arginine and leucine) that may help in augmenting the protein expression level during stress responses. Results point towards plausible stable associations to carry out RNA processing in a synchronised pattern by elucidating the structural properties and protein-protein interactions of DCLs that may hold significance for RNAi researchers.
    [Show full text]
  • In Silico Study Predicts a Key Role of RNA-Binding Domains 3 and 4 in Nucleolin-Mirna Interactions
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.09.447752; this version posted June 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. In silico study predicts a key role of RNA-binding domains 3 and 4 in nucleolin- miRNA interactions. Authors: Avdar San 1,2, Dario Palmieri 3, Anjana Saxena 1,2,4 and Shaneen Singh * 1,2,4 Affiliation: 1Department of Biology, Brooklyn College, The City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York 11210 2The Biochemistry PhD program, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10016; 3Department of Cancer Biology and Genetics, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio, 432104 ; The Biology PhD program, The Graduate Center of the City University of New York, New York, New York 10016 *Correspondence: Corresponding author: Dr. Shaneen Singh, [email protected] http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4003-5756 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.06.09.447752; this version posted June 10, 2021. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder. All rights reserved. No reuse allowed without permission. Abstract RNA binding proteins (RBPs) regulate many important cellular processes through their interactions with RNA molecules. RBPs are critical for post-transcriptional mechanisms keeping gene regulation in a fine equilibrium. Conversely, dysregulation of RBPs and RNA metabolism pathways is an established hallmark of tumorigenesis. Human nucleolin (NCL) is a multifunctional RBP that interacts with different types of RNA molecules, in part through its four RNA binding domains (RBDs).
    [Show full text]
  • Regulation of Mirna Abundance by RNA Binding Protein TOUGH in Arabidopsis
    Regulation of miRNA abundance by RNA binding protein TOUGH in Arabidopsis Guodong Ren, Meng Xie, Yongchao Dou, Shuxin Zhang, Chi Zhang, and Bin Yu1 Center for Plant Science Innovation and School of Biological Sciences, University of Nebraska, Lincoln, NE 68588 Edited by Detlef Weigel, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tübingen, Germany, and approved June 19, 2012 (received for review March 22, 2012) MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are regulators of gene expression in plants Results and animals. The biogenesis of miRNAs is precisely controlled to TGH Is Required for Accumulation of miRNAs and siRNAs in secure normal development of organisms. Here we report that Arabidopsis. Three facts prompted us to test whether TGH acts TOUGH (TGH) is a component of the DCL1–HYL1–SERRATE com- in the miRNA pathway. First, TGH is an evolutionarily con- plex that processes primary transcripts of miRNAs [i.e., primary served protein across plant and animal kingdoms (14), agreeing miRNAs (pri-miRNAs)] into miRNAs in Arabidopsis. Lack of TGH with the fact that many components involved in miRNA bio- impairs multiple DCL activities in vitro and reduces the accumula- genesis are conserved in eukaryotes (1). Second, TGH contains tion of miRNAs and siRNAs in vivo. TGH is an RNA-binding protein, a G-patch and a SWAP domain (Suppressor-of-White-APricot) binds pri-miRNAs and precursor miRNAs in vivo, and contributes to that often exist within RNA metabolism-related proteins (14) – pri-miRNA HYL1 interaction. These results indicate that TGH might (Fig. S1A). Finally, like dcl1, ddl, hyl1, and abh1, which are de- regulate abundance of miRNAs through promoting DCL1 cleavage ficient in the miRNA pathway, the tgh mutants exhibit pleio- fi ef ciency and/or recruitment of pri-miRNAs.
    [Show full text]