Documenting Douglas Huebler: His Early Conceptual Works 1968-1975
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Documenting Douglas Huebler: His Early Conceptual Works 1968-1975 Mary Gunter Haviland Abingdon, Virginia B.M., Queens University of Charlotte, 1970 M.L.S., Emory University, 1974 M.A., Virginia Commonwealth University, 1977 A Dissertation presented to the Graduate Faculty of the University of Virginia in Candidacy for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy McIntire Department of Art University of Virginia May, 2015 2 © Copyright by Mary Gunter Haviland All Rights Reserved May 2015 iii Abstract This dissertation considers the early conceptual work of Douglas Huebler, from 1968 to 1975, focusing on his drawings, mapping, and photographic strategies. It argues for his singular place in the emergence of American conceptual art merited by his inventive linguistic approach to the image, a systematic procedure that extended beyond the conventional tenets of conceptualism and generated a particular openness to his surrounding world. This is the first monographic treatment of Huebler’s early career, examining the critical phases of his work in relation to the art and linguistic currents of the time. The introduction contains biographical information relevant to Huebler’s production—his path from Michigan to his innovative years at Bradford College in Massachusetts where he began his conceptual art in collaboration with New York curator Seth Siegelaub. Each chapter includes detailed analyses of selected works from his categories of location, duration, and variables, those pieces that have particular significance in relation to his carefully devised text. His work is situated in relation to other artists producing in a similar vein during the 1960s and 70s, such as John Baldessari, Lawrence Weiner, and Robert Smithson. Huebler often preferred procedure by chance, presenting the results as snapshot photographs that were shuffled in sequence and often with seemingly disjunctive language. Using the caption, cliché and aphorism, Huebler asks the reader to question conditions of appearance in the photographs, allowing the viewer to go beyond direct visual perception. The dissertation concludes with a look at his Everyone Alive series. 4 Contents An Introduction to Huebler’s Early Work............................................................1 Thesis overview ...............................................................................................1 Thesis structure ...............................................................................................3 Synopsis of chapters....................................................................................... 6 Foundational sources................................................................................... 10 The path to conceptualism: Huebler’s early years from Michigan to Bradford..............................................................................15 Chapter 1. How To Let a Huebler Drawing Speak.........................................25 Chapter 2. Unframing the Grid: Huebler’s Procedural Mapping . 67 Chapter 3. Huebler’s Photoconceptual Strategies.......................................120 Epilogue............................................................................................................................ 206 Bibliography ................................................................................................................... 211 Illustrations.....................................................................................................................221 1 AN INTRODUCTION TO HUEBLER’S EARLY WORK In Huebler’s terms, the text ‘collides’ or ‘dances’ with the image…What looks so familiar, becomes unfamiliar, as it is annoying. We crave familiarity and instead we are made dizzy…It is possible to navigate through Huebler’s multi- layered constructions. It’s just that his is not an easy art.1 —Mike Kelley, “Shall We Kill Daddy?” (1996) Thesis overview Despite his unsettling title “Shall We Kill Daddy?,” Mike Kelley, Huebler’s former student at California Institute of the Arts, fully recognized the reason that his beloved teacher’s work has been overlooked in the mainstream literature—it is not an easy art. It is intellectually playful and purposefully frustrating, requiring a careful navigation through multi-layered constructions of language with image. Douglas Huebler (1924-1997) was a primary figure among the first generation American conceptualists including Lawrence Weiner, Robert Barry, and Joseph Kosuth, those whose group exhibitions in the late 1960s and early 1970s have become hallmarks in conceptual art, and yet scholarly examination of Huebler’s work has been uneven at best. This dissertation argues for Douglas Huebler’s singular place in the emergence of American conceptual art merited by an inventive linguistic approach to the image that generated a particular openness to his surrounding world and extended beyond the conventional tenets of conceptualism. 1 Mike Kelley, “Shall We Kill Daddy?” exhibition catalogue essay in Origin and Destination: Alighiero e Boetti and Douglas Huebler, eds. Marianne Van Leeuw and Anne Pontégnie, Spring 1997 (Brussels: Société des Exposition des Palais de Beaux-Arts de Bruxelles, 1997), 156. Also in C31 Magazine (December 1996 – January 1997), online http://strikingdistance.com/C31nov/kelley.html>. 2 This is the first monographic treatment of Huebler’s early career, examining three critical phases of his work and their relation to the art and linguistic currents of the time. Most art history surveys of the twentieth century give Huebler a cursory glance and a handful of exhibition catalogues have given him substantial consideration. This is why my mentor and thesis advisor Howard Singerman saw the need for further research. The scope of this thesis is limited to Huebler’s conceptual works from 1968-1975, including background information relevant to his production, and an analysis of selected works from this period that best represent my argument. This document is not a catalogue of his works during this period. I examine many of his better known works as well as some less recognized pieces which are exemplary of his approach to an examination of the relationship of image and language. My discussion involves a close reading of Huebler’s language in relation to his drawings, mapping, and photographic strategies. I consider Huebler’s work in relation to the ideas of relevant thinkers on such topics as analysis of a line, twentieth century theories on time and space, and linguistic and social theory. I situate his work in relation to other artists producing in a similar vein during the 1960s and 70s, demonstrating how and why his production is distinctly provocative for analysis. Toward the mid to late 1960s Huebler began to mark locations—on the ground, onto road maps, and in his photographs—as sites for documentation of spatial perception and awareness of one’s surroundings, accompanied by written instructions for the production of the experience. These instructions and the 3 corresponding photographic record of the procedure became his particular signature form of documentation well into the 1970s, revealing his thoughts on the conditions of appearance in both social and physical space. Huebler often preferred procedure by chance, that is, by unpredictable circumstances, presenting the results as snapshot photographs that were shuffled in sequence. He was careful to make the distinction that the photograph, in his work, is a supporting document to explicate the procedural idea as opposed to merely illustrating it. If one characteristic of critical thinking is the ability to think in terms of multiple reasons for an act, certainly Douglas Huebler’s thought process is critical— he thought in terms of variables. Life was a series of variables, waiting for different intervening effects, multiple ways of seeing the same thing. Huebler’s approach was an intense investigation of the three divisions of his interest— Location, Duration, and Variables. These categories were fluid sets within a system that allowed the viewer to go beyond direct visual perception. Thesis structure one might assume that the headings Location, Duration, and Variables would lend a logical arrangement for this dissertation however such an approach would be deceiving. Huebler shifted from one category to another according to whatever temporal or spatial conditions he sought to redefine, whether expanding lines on a map or exposing underlying meanings in language. The works in each of his categories are designated numerically but are often not in chronological sequence, while all three categories overlap topically to varying degrees. For instance, a piece 4 showing a readymade map of New York City streets, despite its obvious geographical focus, does not fall under Location but is instead entitled Site Sculpture Project: Variable Piece #1, New York, 1968, and involves random movement. Huebler purposely creates a complicated net to untangle. When thinking about my own structure for this dissertation, I decided that an arrangement by duration, location, and variables seemed more archival than investigative and might ignore the fact that these are intermingled issues, nuanced in ways that could more logically be considered by medium. For this reason, I have arranged Huebler’s work as drawings, mapping, and photographic strategies. Within these, I have given rigorous attention to certain works that, to my mind, are the most compellingly rich to set Douglas Huebler apart from his contemporaries. These are works that have not been