DOCSLIB.ORG

The Case of the Japanese Anti-Nuclear Movement After Fukushima

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Case of the Japanese Anti-Nuclear Movement After Fukushima Anna Wiemann Networks and Mobilization Processes: The Case of the Japanese Anti-Nuclear Movement after Fukushima Monographien aus dem Deutschen Institut für Japanstudien Band 61 2018 Monographien Band 61 Herausgegeben vom Deutschen Institut für Japanstudien der Max Weber Stiftung – Deutsche Geisteswissenschaftliche Institute im Ausland Direktor: Prof. Dr. Franz Waldenberger Anschrift: Jochi Kioizaka Bldg. 2F 7-1, Kioicho Chiyoda-ku Tokyo 102-0094, Japan Tel.: (03) 3222-5077 Fax: (03) 3222-5420 E-Mail: [email protected] Homepage: http://www.dijtokyo.org Umschlagbild: e-shift network centrality © Anna Wiemann Bibliografische Information der Deutschen Nationalbibliothek Die Deutsche Nationalbibliothek verzeichnet diese Publikation in der Deutschen Nationalbibliografie; detaillierte bibliografische Daten sind im Internet über http://dnb.d-nb.de abrufbar. Dissertation der Universität Hamburg, 2017 ISBN 978-3-86205-049-9 © IUDICIUM Verlag GmbH München 2018 Alle Rechte vorbehalten Druck: Totem, Inowrocław ISBN 978-3-86205-049-9 www.iudicium.de Table of Contents TABLE OF CONTENTS LIST OF TABLES . 9 LIST OF FIGURES . 10 ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS . 11 PRELIMINARY REMARKS . 13 LIST OF JAPANESE EXPRESSIONS . 14 1INTRODUCTION . 22 1.1 Mobilization Processes through Networks: Towards a Refined Analytical Model . 24 1.2 The Case of the Japanese Anti-Nuclear Movement since 3.11 . 29 1.2.1 Infrastructure of Japanese Social Movements and Civil Society . 30 1.2.2 The Japanese Anti-Nuclear Movement Waves before 3.11 . 37 1.2.3 The Heterogeneity of the Anti-Nuclear Movement since 3.11: The Hitotsubashi Survey. 42 1.2.4 Insights into the Dynamics of Visible Protest Action since 3.11. 47 1.2.5 Insights into the Dynamics of Less Visible Collective Action since 3.11 . 50 1.3 The Sample: Two Coalitional Networks, e-shift and SHSK . 56 1.4 Research Objectives and Course of the Study . 57 2SOCIAL MOVEMENTS, MOBILIZATION, AND NETWORKS: A RELATIONAL PERSPECTIVE . 60 2.1 Movements in Context: Tarrow’s Model of Movement Cycles and Mechanisms of Contention. 63 2.2 The Role of the Meso Level in Social Movement Mobilization . 65 2.2.1 From Mobilizing Structures to Movement Communities . 67 2.2.2 Key Mobilizing Agents: Social Movement Organizations . 69 5 Table of Contents 2.2.3 The Question of How to Get Along: Cooperation or Competition? . 70 2.2.4 Coalition-Building: A Key Mobilizing Mechanism . 71 2.3 At the Height of Mobilization: Forms of Collective Action in Social Movements . 73 2.4 Before and After Mobilization: Latent Movements or Civic Networks? . 75 2.5 Structural Implications of the Broader Movement Environment . 77 2.6 Network Analysis and Movement Mobilization . 78 2.6.1 The Network Metaphor . 79 2.6.2 Networks of Individuals and Movement Mobilization. 83 2.6.3 Interorganizational Networks and Movement Mobilization. 84 2.7 Cultural-Constructivist Network Perspectives on Mobilization: The New York School of Relational Sociology . 88 2.7.1 Mobilization Reflected in Discourse: Building a ‘Civic Arena’ . 89 2.8 Towards a Synthesis: The Network Mobilization Model . 90 3APPLYING EMPIRICAL METHODS TO THE NETWORK MOBILIZATION MODEL . 93 3.1 Research Design Settings. 96 3.1.1 Sampling Strategy. 96 3.1.2 Network Boundaries. 99 3.1.3 Field Site . 99 3.1.4 Sampling Process . 100 3.1.5 Relations of the Researcher to the Field. 103 3.2 Data Material. 104 3.2.1 Participant Observation . 105 3.2.1.1 Public Movement Events . 106 3.2.1.2 Coalitional Network Meetings . 108 3.2.2 Qualitative Semi-Structured Interviews . 109 3.2.3 Documentary Data . 112 3.3 Data Analysis . 112 3.3.1 Structural Network Analysis and Visualization. 113 3.3.1.1 Affiliation Networks and Network Centrality . 113 3.3.1.2 UCINET and NETDRAW . 116 3.3.2 Qualitative Content Analysis . 117 3.3.2.1 MAXQDA . 119 6 Table of Contents 4 E-SHIFT: NETWORKING FOR NUCLEAR PHASE-OUT AND RENEWABLE ENERGY . 121 4.1 Action Profile . 121 4.1.1 Common Project . 121 4.1.2 Joint Action Repertoire. 126 4.2 Relational Patterns . 129 4.2.1 Network Composition . 131 4.2.2 Relations in Action . 135 4.2.3 Internal Relations . 141 4.2.3.1 Network-Coalitional Structures . 141 4.2.3.2 Core Members . 148 4.2.3.3 Cooperation and Conflict . 153 4.2.4 Relations to the Broader Movement. 157 4.2.4.1 e-shift’s Role in the Movement . 157 4.2.4.2 Multiplexity . 160 4.2.4.3 Cooperation and Conflict . 161 4.2.5 Relations to the Outside . 165 4.2.5.1 Relations to the Political Arena. 166 4.2.5.2 Relations to Society. 172 4.3 Network Emergence . 176 4.3.1 Civil Networking . 176 4.3.2 The Emergence of e-shift . 179 4.4 Latent Relational Patterns . 182 4.4.1 Relational Patterns from Previous Movement Waves . 182 4.4.2 National Networking . 189 4.4.3 Relations to Political Actors. 196 4.5 Case Summary: e-shift’s Network and Mobilization Process . 198 5SHIENHŌ SHIMIN KAIGI (SHSK): NETWORKING FOR NUCLEAR VICTIMS’ RIGHTS . 200 5.1 Action Profile . 200 5.1.1 Common Project . 201 5.1.2 Joint Action Repertoire. 208 5.2 Relational Patterns . 210 5.2.1 Network Composition . 210 5.2.2 Relations in Action . 215 5.2.3 Internal Relations . 220 5.2.3.1 Coalitional Structures. 220 5.2.3.2 Core Members . 225 5.2.3.3 Cooperation and Conflict . 226 7 Table of Contents 5.2.4 Relations to the Broader Movement. 227 5.2.4.1 SHSK’s Role in the Movement . 227 5.2.4.2 Multiplexity . 227 5.2.4.3 Cooperation and Conflict in the Movement Field . 229 5.2.5 Relations to the Outside . 230 5.2.5.1 Relations to the Political Arena. 231 5.2.5.2 Relations to the Society . 234 5.3 Network Emergence . ..
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Beyond Peace: Pluralizing Japan's Nuclear History 平和を越え て−−日本の核の歴史を非単純化する
    Volume 10 | Issue 11 | Number 6 | Article ID 3716 | Mar 05, 2012 The Asia-Pacific Journal | Japan Focus Beyond Peace: Pluralizing Japan's Nuclear History 平和を越え て−−日本の核の歴史を非単純化する Shi-Lin Loh Beyond Peace: Pluralizing Japan's the world… Nuclear History - Koizumi Junichirō, August 6, 1 Shi-Lin Loh 2005 Abstract: This paper examines the On the 60th anniversary of the bombing of construction of Hiroshima and Nagasaki as Hiroshima, at the annual Peace Memorial signifiers of "peace" in postwar Japan. It offers Ceremony held in the city, former Japanese alternate ways of understanding the impact and Prime Minister Koizumi Junichirō made a significance of "Hiroshima and Nagasaki" in speech highlighting the "tragedy" of the world's historical context and argues that national only two atomic-bombed cities as the main readings of the history of the cities obscure reason for the present-day linkage of Hiroshima nuances in the local narratives of the atomic and Nagasaki to "world peace." His narrative of bombs in each place. atomic bombs-as-peace implicitly links the Keywords: Hiroshima, Nagasaki, nuclear local, the national and the international. The weapons, postwar Japan, atomic bombings, atomic bombs, a "tragedy" for the cities of culture, commemoration, history, science, Hiroshima and Nagasaki, are also claimed for Atoms for Peace the entirety of Japan, the "only nation in human history to be bombed with atomic weapons." Finally, this national victimization is then …As the only nation in human transposed into the universal, moral goal of history to be bombed with atomic "world peace." weapons, Japan will continue to comply with its Peace Constitution and firmly maintain the Three Non- Nuclear Principles, with its strong commitment not to repeat the tragedy of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
    [Show full text]
  • Electricity Review Japan
    The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan Keidanren-kaikan, 1-3-2, Otemachi, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo 100-8118, Japan E L E C TRIC I T Y http://www.fepc.or.jp/english/index.html R E VIE W J A PA N The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan 2019 The Ten Electric Power Companies by Main Service Area National Trunk Line History of Japan’s Electric Utility Industry (North latitude) Connections 45゜ (As of September 30, 2019) Transmission Line（500kV） Electricity was rst used in Japan on March 25, 1878 at demand for electricity remained very tight in Japan. A HOKKAIDO Electric Power Co. Transmission Line（154kV～275kV） the Institute of Technology in Toranomon, Tokyo when series of intense discussions were held on restructuring DC Transmission Line an arc lamp was switched on in commemoration of the the electric utility industry as one of the measures for HOKURIKU Electric Power Co. Switching Station or Substation opening of the Central Telegraph Oce. In those days, democratizing the economy. As a result, nine regional 40゜ Frequency Converter Facility（F.C.） TOHOKU Electric Power Co. AC-DC Converter Facility electricity was still unfamiliar and uncommon not only in privately owned and managed General Electricity CHUBU Electric Power Co. The CHUGOKU Japan but also in Europe and the United States. In 1886, Utilities— Hokkaido, Tohoku, Tokyo, Chubu, Hokuriku, Electric Power Co. TOKYO Electric Power Company Holdings Tokyo Electric Lighting, a private company, commenced Kansai, Chugoku, Shikoku and Kyushu Electric Power The OKINAWA Electric Power Co. operations as the nation’s rst electric power company, Companies — were established in 1951 and assumed the 35゜ and began supplying electricity to the public in the responsibility of supplying electricity to each region.
    [Show full text]
  • Betrayed by Nuclear Power Transforming the Community and Collective Memory of Fukushima’S Evacuees
    Leiden University, Faculty of Humanities Asian Studies 120EC: Japanese Studies MA Thesis Betrayed by Nuclear Power Transforming the Community and Collective Memory of Fukushima’s Evacuees Author: Nick Sint Nicolaas Student Number: 1059998 Supervisor: Dr. A.E. Ezawa Second Reader: Dr. M. Winkel Date: December 15, 2015 Word count: 14,043 Table of Contents I: Introduction…………………………………………………………………………….……… 3 Disaster Background ..….….….………………………………………………….……… 5 II: Theoretical Framework ...…………………………………………………………………….. 8 Communities …………………………………………………………………………….. 8 Community Attachment …………………………………………………………………. 9 Collective Memory …………………………………………………………………….. 10 Disasters ...……………………………………………………………….….….………. 12 III: Japan’s Nuclear History ...………………………………………………………………….. 16 Postwar Nuclear Allergy.……………………………………………………………..… 16 Localized Pro-Nuclear Strategies ……………………………………………………… 18 Post-Disaster Nuclear Discourse …...……………………………..….………………… 20 IV: Analysis ……………………………………………….…………………...………………. 23 Futaba ………………………….……………………………………………………….. 25 Mayor Idogawa: Representing the Collective ………………………………………….. 27 Decontamination Waste Storage: Taint vs Absolute Loss ...…………………………… 30 The Elderly: Futility ……………………………………………………………………. 33 Temporary and Core Communities ……………………………….……………………. 34 Nakai Family: In the Face of Absolute Loss ……………………..…………….……… 35 Suzuki Family: Salvaging Treasures and Moving On ……………………………….… 36 Widow Umeda: Holding On to What Remains …………….………………………….. 38 Saito Family: Forsaking a Legacy ……………………………………………………... 39 Farmer
    [Show full text]
  • Japan's Gas and Electricity Market Reform: the Third Revolution
    JAPAN'S GAS AND ELECTRICITY MARKET REFORM: THE THIRD REVOLUTION Hiroshi Hashimoto Institute of Energy Economics, Japan - IEEJ Disclaimer: This paper is prepared for general informational purposes only and is not intended to influence any specific actions. Views expressed this paper are the author's ones but do not represent the organisation's ones. Japan's city gas and electric power industries are undergoing unprecedented but somewhat anticipated structural changes brought about by the recent regulatory restructuring. The process in fact dates back as far as 1995, when gas sales to the largest industrial customers were opened for competition. The ensuing regulatory measures have been considered and implemented extremely carefully so as not to jeopardise security of supply at affordable prices to end consumers in a country who does not have a lot of energy production within its territory. During the period the country's LNG market has successfully grown to be the largest and the most diversified in the world in terms of volumes, as well as numbers of both supply sources, importers and their receiving facilities, incorporating great flexibility in procurement with around 30% of the total volumes coming from short-term contracts and spot cargo purchases supplementing the main-stream long-term purchase contracts. In the latest stage of the industry restructuring, as the retail markets are opened for competition, city gas and electric power companies are entering into each other's home grounds by taking advantage of their own muscles and expertise, leading to the most unique, realistic and useful competition in the energy consuming market in the world.
    [Show full text]
  • Learning from Fukushima: Nuclear Power in East Asia
    LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER IN EAST ASIA LEARNING FROM FUKUSHIMA NUCLEAR POWER IN EAST ASIA EDITED BY PETER VAN NESS AND MEL GURTOV WITH CONTRIBUTIONS FROM ANDREW BLAKERS, MELY CABALLERO-ANTHONY, GLORIA KUANG-JUNG HSU, AMY KING, DOUG KOPLOW, ANDERS P. MØLLER, TIMOTHY A. MOUSSEAU, M. V. RAMANA, LAUREN RICHARDSON, KALMAN A. ROBERTSON, TILMAN A. RUFF, CHRISTINA STUART, TATSUJIRO SUZUKI, AND JULIUS CESAR I. TRAJANO Published by ANU Press The Australian National University Acton ACT 2601, Australia Email: [email protected] This title is also available online at press.anu.edu.au National Library of Australia Cataloguing-in-Publication entry Title: Learning from Fukushima : nuclear power in East Asia / Peter Van Ness, Mel Gurtov, editors. ISBN: 9781760461393 (paperback) 9781760461409 (ebook) Subjects: Nuclear power plants--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--Risk assessment--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--Health aspects--East Asia. Nuclear power plants--East Asia--Evaluation. Other Creators/Contributors: Van Ness, Peter, editor. Gurtov, Melvin, editor. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying or otherwise, without the prior permission of the publisher. Cover design and layout by ANU Press. Cover image: ‘Fukushima apple tree’ by Kristian Laemmle-Ruff. Near Fukushima City, 60 km from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant, February 2014. The number in the artwork is the radioactivity level measured in the orchard—2.166 microsieverts per hour, around 20 times normal background radiation. This edition © 2017 ANU Press Contents Figures . vii Tables . ix Acronyms and abbreviations .
    [Show full text]
  • Study on Japan's Nuclear Materials
    Study on Japan's Nuclear Materials China Arms Control and Disarmament Association China Institute of Nuclear Information and Economics September 2015 Foreword The nuclear accident in March 2011 in Fukushima, Japan brought a disaster to the safety of local residents and to the environment of surrounding regions. However, the Japanese government failed to inform the international community of the accident in a timely, accurate, and comprehensive manner. The accident's consequential impacts still linger on today, and the international community is still highly concerned about the safety of Japan’s nuclear facilities. In early 2014, media reports held that around 331 kilograms of weapon-grade plutonium had been stored by Japan for years. And in fact, Japan has stored a lot of sensitive nuclear materials for a long time, which far exceeds its actual need. The imbalance between supply and demand of nuclear materials in Japan has given rise to the concern of and questions raised by the international community. Why does Japan store nuclear materials in such a large amount? How to ensure their safety? How to effectively prevent disasters similar to the Fukushima nuclear accident from happening again? How to ensure that these materials will be used exclusively for peaceful purposes? What measures should be taken to solve this serious imbalance of supply and demand of nuclear materials in Japan? These are questions that are often raised. Regretably, the Japanese government has yet to answer these questions. In September 2015, the Japanese Diet ratified the new bills. In recent years, right-wings forces in Japan have kept denying the history of aggression of Japan and advocated the revision of Japan's "Peace Constitution", Which have aroused vigilance among all peace-loving people.
    [Show full text]
  • On the Appointment of a FEPC Chairman]
    Summary of Press Conference Comments Made by Satoru Katsuno, FEPC Chairman, on October 18, 2019 [On the Appointment of a FEPC Chairman] I am FEPC Vice Chairman Susumu Tsukiyama. I would like to announce the appointment of a new FEPC Chairman. Please refer to Document 1 at hand. President Iwane of the Kansai Electric Power Company has resigned as FEPC Chairman. Given this development, the FEPC General Policy Committee has elected in today’s session from among its members President Satoru Katsuno of Chubu Electric Power Company as the next Chairman of FEPC. The previous Chairman, President Iwane, will be absent from this press conference today. I ask for your kind understanding. Now, Chairman Katsuno will make his remarks. [Remarks from Chairman Katsuno] I am Satoru Katsuno of Chubu Electric Power Company. As just announced by Vice President Tsukiyama, I will be serving as FEPC Chairman again. This is my first press conference of FEPC Chairman since the press conference in June. I would like to ask for the continued support of the Energy Press Club and the media at large. Japan has been plagued by typhoons in the past month—Typhoon Faxai (15th typhoon of the season) hit the Kanto region in early September and Typhoon Hagibis (19th typhoon of the season) wreaked severe damage in eastern Japan last weekend, causing rivers to overflow. I offer my heartfelt condolences for those who lost their lives in the typhoons and express my deepest sympathies to the bereaved families and those who were affected. -1- The typhoons have caused wide-ranging outages in various parts of Japan, concentrating in the Kanto region.
    [Show full text]
  • Plans for the Utilization of Plutonium to Be Recovered at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant
    Reference Plans for the Utilization of Plutonium To Be Recovered at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant March 15, 2010 Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan Japan Nuclear Fuel Ltd. (JNFL) has been performing active tests at the Rokkasho Reprocessing Plant (RRP) since March 2006 using spent fuel. These tests result in the separation of plutonium as a product of reprocessing. The Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan (FEPC) is announcing the Japanese electric utilities’ plans to utilize plutonium in FY2010 as per the details attached, in the interests of transparency. According to the paper entitled “Concerning the Basic Position on Japan’s Use of Plutonium,” decided by the Atomic Energy Commission of Japan (AEC) on August 5, 2003, each utility shall announce a “Plutonium Utilization Plan” for its share of the plutonium to be recovered at RRP. In addition, in the “Framework for Nuclear Energy Policy,” decided by the AEC on October 11, 2005, and resolved by the Cabinet on October 14, 2005, the utilities are expected to announce their plans for the utilization of plutonium in an appropriate manner. Seeking to realize pluthermal generation as soon as possible, electric utilities are working to introduce pluthermal generation to 16-18 reactors across the country by FY2015 at the latest. FY2015 is the year for the projected commencement of operation of the Rokkasho MOX fuel fabrication plant. In the early stage of the program, the utilities are planning to use MOX fuel, manufactured overseas, using plutonium retained overseas (see separate supplementary explanation). Once the Rokkasho MOX fuel fabrication plant commences operation, plutonium recovered at RRP will also be used in due course.
    [Show full text]
  • The Failed Nuclear Risk Governance: Reflections on the Boundary Between Misfortune and Injustice in the Case of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster Hiroyuki Tosa
    The Failed Nuclear Risk Governance: Reflections on the Boundary between Misfortune and Injustice in the case of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Disaster Hiroyuki Tosa Abstract Although technological progress has greatly created the possibilities for the expanded reach of risk management, its newly manufactured uncertainty may bring about a big scale of catastrophe. In order to control risk of the nature, the human ironically may create a hybrid monster that the human cannot control. Te Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster also can be described as a hybrid monster, in which natural and technological elements combine to produce uncontrollable risks that may have disastrous consequences. Tis article scrutinizes the politics of the boundary between calculable risks and unpredictable uncertainty as well as the politics of the boundary between misfortune and injustice by focusing upon the lineage of a hybrid monster such as the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster. Following the check of implications of a hybrid monster, we will interrogate historical lineage. Tird we will examine the way in which technocratic politics of <risk/uncertainty> would infuence the boundary between misfortune and injustice. Fourth we will scrutinize problems with the probabilist way of thinking, which tends to suppress the risk of nuclear technology. Finally we shed a light on technocratic governance forcing the people to become resilient. As recent Science and Technology Studies (STS) literature suggests that sci- entifc and technical knowledge needs to be seen as situated in social and material spaces(Simondo 2010, 204, O’Malley 2004), political interests would shape the presentation of scientifc facts and predictions in areas of high uncertainty(Heazle 2010, Jasanof 1990, 6) and the confguration of political actors in each country may bring about the diferent perceptions of risk and its related diferent regulatory policy(Jasanof 2005, Brickman, Jasanof, and Ilgen 1985, Vogel 2012, Jasanof 2012, 23–58).
    [Show full text]
  • SAMPLE REPORT: JAPAN April 2020– (The Data in the Sample Report May Not Be the Latest Data Available in the Service)
    COUNTRY ENERGY REPORT- SAMPLE Sample Report SAMPLE REPORT: JAPAN April 2020– (The data in the sample report may not be the latest data available in the service). World Energy Research → Table of contents Table of contents ______________________________ 1 List of graphs & tables __________________________ 2 Overview ____________________________________ 4 Institutions and energy policy ____________________ 6 Energy companies ____________________________ 12 Energy supply ________________________________ 15 Energy prices ________________________________ 19 Energy consumptionSample __________________________ 21 Issues and prospects __________________________ 27 Graphs & data files ___________________________ 33 Abbreviations ________________________________ 37 ReportGlossary ________________________________ ____ 39 Energy Report Sample — Japan Energy Report April 2020 — Copyright © Enerdata — All rights reserved 1 *Reproduction in whole or in part prohibited without written permission. World Energy Research → List of graphs & tables List of graphs GRAPH 1: CO2-energy emissions (MtCO2) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10 GRAPH 2: Installed electric capacity by source (2019, %) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16 GRAPH 3: Gross power production by source (TWh) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 17 GRAPH 4: Power generation by source (2019) -----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    [Show full text]
  • Japan Energy Newsletter Japan Electric Power
    Vol 4. Issue 3, June 2021 Japan Energy Newsletter Japan Electric Power Information Center, U.S.A. Japan Energy Weekly News Table of Contents 1 Volume 4 Issue 3, June 2021 ............................................................................................ 3 Current Development and Deployment Trends for Renewable Energy Aggregation Services ..3 1.1.1 Background ............................................................................................................................................... 3 1.1.2 Utilities’ Involvement in Renewable Energy Aggregation Demonstration Projects ................................. 3 1.1.3 The Current Trends for the Development and Introduction of VPP and Renewable Energy Aggregation Services.................................................................................................................................................................. 5 Utilities’ Involvement and Investment in Smart Agriculture ...................................................6 1.2.1 Energia’s Establishment of an Indoor Vertical Farm ................................................................................. 6 1.2.2 Utilities’ Active Investment in Smart Agriculture ..................................................................................... 6 2 Volume 4 Issue 2, May 2021 ............................................................................................ 8 Japan is Advancing the Development of Ammonia Fuel Technologies ....................................8 2.1.1 Background ..............................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Regulating Japanese Nuclear Power in the Wake of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident
    FAS Issue Brief May 2013 Regulating Japanese Nuclear Power in the Wake of the Fukushima Daiichi Accident Charles D. Ferguson Mark Jansson Federation of American Scientists FAS ISSUE BRIEF Authors Charles D. Ferguson, Ph.D., President, Federation of American Scientists Mark Jansson, Special Projects Director, Federation of American Scientists About FAS Issue Briefs FAS Issue Briefs provide nonpartisan research and analysis for policymakers, government officials, academics, and the general public. Individual authors who may be FAS staff or acknowledged experts from outside the institution write these Issue Briefs. All statements of fact and expressions of opinion contained in this and other FAS Issue Briefs are the sole responsibility of the author or authors. This report does not necessarily represent the views of the Federation of American Scientists. About FAS Founded in 1945 by many of the scientists who built the first atomic bombs, the Federation of American Scientists (FAS) is devoted to the belief that scientists, engineers, and other technically trained people have the ethical obliga- tion to ensure that the technological fruits of their intellect and labor are applied to the benefit of humankind. The founding mission was to prevent nuclear war. While nuclear security remains a major objective of FAS today, the organization has expanded its critical work to address urgent issues at the intersection of science and security. FAS publications are produced to increase the understanding of policymakers, the public, and the press about ur- gent issues in science and security policy. Individual authors who may be FAS staff or acknowledged experts from outside the institution write these reports.
    [Show full text]