DOCSLIB.ORG

2021-2022 Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
2021-2022 Handbook PEARLAND INDEPENDENT SCHOOL DISTRICT 2021-2022 HANDBOOK 1 TABLE OF CONTENTS TABLE OF CONTENTS .......................................................................................................... 2 Preface ............................................................................................................................................... 11 Accessibility ...................................................................................................................................... 12 Section I: Parental Rights .................................................................................................................. 13 Parental Involvement ......................................................................................................................... 13 Working Together ............................................................................................................................. 13 Parent Involvement Coordinator ....................................................................................................... 14 Consent, Opt-Out, And Refusal Rights ............................................................................................. 14 Consent to Human Sexuality Instruction ........................................................................................... 14 Consent to Conduct a Psychological Evaluation ............................................................................... 14 Consent to Display a Student’s Original Works and Personal Information ...................................... 15 Consent to Receive Parenting and Paternity Awareness Instruction if Student is Under Age 14 ..... 15 Consent to Video or Audio Record a Student When Not Already Permitted by Law ...................... 15 Limiting Electronic Communications between Students and District Employees ............................ 16 Objecting to the Release of Directory Information ........................................................................... 16 Objecting to the Release of Student Information to Military Recruiters and Institutions ................. 17 of Higher Education (Secondary Grade Levels Only) ...................................................................... 17 Participation in Third-Party Surveys ................................................................................................. 17 Consent Required Before Student Participation in a Federally Funded Survey, Analysis,............... 17 or Evaluation ..................................................................................................................................... 17 “Opting Out” of Participation in Other Types of Surveys or Screenings and the ............................. 17 Disclosure of Personal Information ................................................................................................... 17 Removing a Student From Instruction or Excusing a Student From a Required .............................. 18 Component of Instruction .................................................................................................................. 18 Reciting a Portion of the Declaration of Independence in Grades 3-12 ............................................ 18 Reciting the Pledges to the U.S. and Texas Flags ............................................................................. 18 Religious or Moral Beliefs ................................................................................................................ 18 Tutoring or Test Preparation ............................................................................................................. 19 Right of Access to Student Records, Curriculum Materials, and District Records/Policies ............. 19 Instructional Materials ....................................................................................................................... 19 Notices of Certain Student Misconduct to Noncustodial Parent ....................................................... 19 2 Participation in Federally Required, State Mandated, and District Assessments .............................. 19 Student Records ................................................................................................................................. 19 Accessing Student Records ............................................................................................................... 19 Authorized Inspection and Use of Student Records .......................................................................... 20 Teacher and Staff Professional Qualifications .................................................................................. 23 Students With Exceptionalities or Special Circumstances ................................................................ 23 Children of Military Families ............................................................................................................ 23 Parental Role in Certain Classroom and School Assignments .......................................................... 24 Multiple Birth Siblings ...................................................................................................................... 24 Safety Transfers/Assignments ........................................................................................................... 24 Service/Assistance Animal ................................................................................................................ 24 Students in the Conservatorship of the State (Foster Care) ............................................................... 24 A Student Who Is Homeless .............................................................................................................. 25 A Student Who Has Learning Difficulties or Needs Special Education Services or ........................ 26 Section 504 Services .......................................................................................................................... 26 Special Education Referrals .............................................................................................................. 26 Contact Person for Special Education Referrals ............................................................................... 27 Section 504 Referrals ........................................................................................................................ 27 Contact Person for Section 504 Referrals ......................................................................................... 27 Notification to Parent of Intervention Strategies for Learning Difficulties Provided to Student in General Education ............................................................................................................ 28 Students Who Receive Special Education Services With Other School-Aged Children .................. 28 In the Home ....................................................................................................................................... 28 Students Who Speak a Primary Language Other than English ......................................................... 28 Students With Physical or Mental Impairments Protected Under Section 504 ................................. 28 Section II: Other Information for Students And Parents ................................................................... 28 Absences/Attendance ........................................................................................................................ 29 Compulsory Attendance .................................................................................................................... 29 Pre-Kindergarten and Kindergarten .................................................................................................. 29 Between Ages 6 -18 ........................................................................................................................... 29 Age 19 and Older ............................................................................................................................... 29 Exemptions to Compulsory Attendance (All Grade Levels) ............................................................. 29 Secondary Grade Levels .................................................................................................................... 30 Failure to Comply With Compulsory Attendance ............................................................................. 30 3 All Grade Levels ................................................................................................................................ 30 Students with Disabilities .................................................................................................................. 31 Truancy Prevention Measures ........................................................................................................... 31 Attendance for Credit or Final Grade (Kindergarten Through Grade 12) ........................................ 31 Official Attendance-Taking Time (All Grade Levels) ...................................................................... 32 Documentation After An Absence: (All Grade Levels) .................................................................... 33 Doctor’s Note After An Absence for Illness (All Grade Levels) ...................................................... 33 Driver License Attendance Verification (Secondary Grade Levels Only) ........................................ 33 Academic Programs
Load more

Recommended publications
  • TEA Releases 2017 Accountability Ratings
    TEA News Releases Online Aug. 15, 2017 TEA releases 2017 accountability ratings AUSTIN – The Texas Education Agency (TEA) today released the 2017 state accountability ratings for more than 1,200 school districts and charters, as well as more than 8,700 campuses statewide. The ratings reveal that approximately 95 percent of school districts and charters across Texas have achieved the rating of Met Standard. In addition, the number of individual campuses achieving a rating of Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard increased again this year, while the number of campuses receiving a rating of Improvement Required continued to decline. Districts, campuses, and charters receive one of three ratings under the accountability system: Met Standard, Met Alternative Standard, or Improvement Required. School district ratings (including charter operators) by category in 2017 are as follows: DISTRICT LEVEL 2017 RATING DISTRICT CHARTER TOTAL PERCENT Met Standard/Alternative 993 153 1,146 95.3% Met Standard 993 126 1,119 93.0% Met Alternative Standard N/A 27 27 2.2% Improvement Required 28 16 44 3.7% Not Rated 2 11 13 1.1% TOTAL 1,023 180 1,203 100.0% The 2017 ratings are based on a system that uses a performance index framework that includes four areas: Index 1 – Student Achievement (which provides a snapshot of performance across all subjects); Index 2 – Student Progress (which measures year-to-year student progress by student group); Index 3 – Closing Performance Gaps (which emphasizes the academic achievement of economically disadvantaged students and the lowest performing racial/ethnic student groups); and Index 4 – Postsecondary Readiness (which emphasizes the importance of earning a high school diploma that provides students with the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs or the military).
    [Show full text]
  • 1718 SB All Starselections
    Texas Girls Coaches Association 2017-18 Softball Legacy Team 1-2-3-4A All-Star SchoolCoach Conf Callista Camacho MARTINS MILL HIGH SCHOOL Don Tarrant 2A Makayla Deleon EARLY HIGH SCHOOL Alfonso Chavez 3A Taylor Franco MONAHANS HIGH SCHOOL Corey Aven 4A Mercy Garcia HARPER HIGH SCHOOL Jeffery Vasquez 2A Elaina Garcia SPRINGTOWN HIGH SCHOOL Scott Mann 4A Kirstin Hansen SWEENY HIGH SCHOOL Melissa Hansen 4A Nicole King GRAHAM HIGH SCHOOL Adam Arrington 4A Kyndal Kutac SCHULENBURG HIGH SCHOOL Gilbert Price 3A Carissa McMillan CLYDE HIGH SCHOOL Reagan Sewell 3A Bethany Nevlud SHINER HIGH SCHOOL Steven Cerny 2A Brycelen Richards ITALY HIGH SCHOOL Christina Richards 2A Aaliyah Ruiz JONES HIGH SCHOOL Alan Burkett 4A Darrian Smith WEIMAR HIGH SCHOOL Roger Maupin 2A Jarynn Sprinkle CENTRAL HIGH SCHOOL Kurtis Acosta 3A Maddie Stewart SWEENY HIGH SCHOOL Melissa Hansen 4A Ashlyn Taylor CADDO MILLS HIGH SCHOOL Gary Qualls 4A Mattye Tyler BROCK HIGH SCHOOL Mark Starnes 3A Rachel Williams LORENA HIGH SCHOOL Steve Dolezel 4A Kailey Williams SHINER HIGH SCHOOL Steven Cerny 2A Callie Yellin FARMERSVILLE HIGH SCHOOL Paula Wilfong 3A Texas Girls Coaches Association 2017-18 Softball Legacy Team 5-6A All-Star SchoolCoach Conf Briana Arredondo WARREN HIGH SCHOOL Melanie Morales 6A Celia Bigger AUSTIN HIGH SCHOOL Kristen Lozano 5A Kaylee Buck PEARLAND HIGH SCHOOL Laneigh Clark 6A Everly Carey GRANBURY HIGH SCHOOL Ashley Benson 5A Alyssa DiFiore LOVEJOY HIGH SCHOOL Jeffrey Roberts 5A Alexis Farris KLEIN COLLINS HIGH SCHOOL Audra Troutman 6A Sydney Greeson AMARILLO
    [Show full text]
  • NGPF's 2021 State of Financial Education Report
    11 ++ 2020-2021 $$ xx %% NGPF’s 2021 State of Financial == Education Report ¢¢ Who Has Access to Financial Education in America Today? In the 2020-2021 school year, nearly 7 out of 10 students across U.S. high schools had access to a standalone Personal Finance course. 2.4M (1 in 5 U.S. high school students) were guaranteed to take the course prior to graduation. GOLD STANDARD GOLD STANDARD (NATIONWIDE) (OUTSIDE GUARANTEE STATES)* In public U.S. high schools, In public U.S. high schools, 1 IN 5 1 IN 9 $$ students were guaranteed to take a students were guaranteed to take a W-4 standalone Personal Finance course standalone Personal Finance course W-4 prior to graduation. prior to graduation. STATE POLICY IMPACTS NATIONWIDE ACCESS (GOLD + SILVER STANDARD) Currently, In public U.S. high schools, = 7 IN = 7 10 states have or are implementing statewide guarantees for a standalone students have access to or are ¢ guaranteed to take a standalone ¢ Personal Finance course for all high school students. North Carolina and Mississippi Personal Finance course prior are currently implementing. to graduation. How states are guaranteeing Personal Finance for their students: In 2018, the Mississippi Department of Education Signed in 2018, North Carolina’s legislation echoes created a 1-year College & Career Readiness (CCR) neighboring state Virginia’s, by which all students take Course for the entering freshman class of the one semester of Economics and one semester of 2018-2019 school year. The course combines Personal Finance. All North Carolina high school one semester of career exploration and college students, beginning with the graduating class of 2024, transition preparation with one semester of will take a 1-year Economics and Personal Finance Personal Finance.
    [Show full text]
  • Web Stats Report: November
    WEB STATS REPORT: NOVEMBER Texas 1 Temple High School 259,274 31 Elgin High School 6,029 2 Calhoun High School 108,778 32 Santa Fe High School 5,973 3 Belton High School 66,064 33 Copperas Cove High School 5,964 4 North Dallas High School 59,756 34 San Marcos High School 5,961 5 Roscoe High School 34,210 35 North Forney High School 5,952 6 Klein Collins High School 31,303 36 Stephen F Austin High School 5,554 7 Huntsville High School 28,851 37 Sherman High School 5,211 8 Lovejoy High School 20,601 38 William J Brennan High School 5,036 9 Forney High School 17,597 39 Westfield High School 4,909 10 Tomball High School 16,986 40 Early High School 4,822 11 Byron P Steele I I High School 16,448 41 Kempner High School 4,809 12 Spring Hill High School 13,028 42 C E Ellison High School 4,697 13 Ennis High School 12,474 43 Midland Lee High School 4,490 14 Tomball Memorial High School 11,773 44 Odem High School 4,470 15 San Antonio Christian High School 10,783 45 Gregory-Portland High School 4,299 16 Palacios High School 10,731 46 Hays High School 4,235 17 Gainesville High School 10,288 47 Clements High School 4,066 18 Waxahachie High School 9,609 48 Pasadena Memorial High School 4,009 19 Life School Waxahachie 9,332 49 Channelview High School 3,890 20 East Central High School 9,150 50 Burleson High School 3,615 21 Lockhart High School 9,111 51 North Crowley High School 3,485 22 Foster High School 8,972 52 Life School Oak Cliff High School 3,401 23 Brownwood High School 8,803 53 L C Anderson High School 3,400 24 Pleasanton High School 8,605 54 Samuel
    [Show full text]
  • Web Stats Report: March
    WEB STATS REPORT: MARCH Texas 1 Temple High School 163983 31 Life School Waxahachie 7969 2 Belton High School 62888 32 L C Anderson High School 7852 3 Calhoun High School 52546 33 Gregory-Portland High School 7835 4 Tomball High School 44880 34 Pleasanton High School 7619 5 North Dallas High School 38704 35 Foster High School 7420 6 Lovejoy High School 27189 36 Stephen F Austin High School 7366 7 Tomball Memorial High School 26493 37 Denton High School 7295 8 Midway High School 23237 38 Denton Guyer High School 7067 9 Huntsville High School 18605 39 Early High School 6881 10 Ennis High School 18184 40 C E Ellison High School 6698 11 Southlake Carroll High School 17784 41 Midland Lee High School 6567 12 Forney High School 17767 42 Klein Collins High School 6407 13 Highland Park High School 16130 43 Kyle Lehman High School 5995 14 Spring Hill High School 15982 44 Burleson High School 5917 15 Braswell High School 15941 45 Cypress Springs High School 5912 16 San Marcos High School 12928 46 Elgin High School 5634 17 Waxahachie High School 12656 47 Roscoe High School 5598 18 Kempner High School 12036 48 Sherman High School 5564 19 Brownwood High School 11281 49 Trimble Tech High School 5122 20 Magnolia High School 11256 50 San Antonio Christian High School 5104 21 North Forney High School 10647 51 Frisco Heritage High School 5046 22 Gainesville High School 10302 52 Lanier High School 4987 23 East Central High School 10232 53 Andy Dekaney High School 4712 24 Billy Ryan High School 10144 54 Channelview High School 4602 25 Magnolia West High School
    [Show full text]
  • Puc Cals Charter Middle and Early College High School
    LAUSD BOARD APPROVED 11/19/19 (BR 168-19/20) TERM: 2020-2025 PUC CALS CHARTER MIDDLE AND EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL A School Within Partnerships to Uplift Communities Los Angeles Allison Vann, MS Principal Jason Marin, HS Principal Concepcion Rivas, Superintendent Partnerships to Uplift Communities, Los Angeles ADDRESS: 7350 N. Figueroa Street Los Angeles, CA 90041-2547 Submitted: September 24, 2019 PUC CALS CHARTER MIDDLE AND EARLY COLLEGE HIGH SCHOOL Table of Contents ASSURANCES, AFFIRMATIONS, AND DECLARATIONS ...........................................................................3 ELEMENT 1 – THE EDUCATIONAL PROGRAM .......................................................................................5 ELEMENT 2 – MEASURABLE STUDENT OUTCOMES AND .................................................................. 166 ELEMENT 3- METHOD BY WHICH PUPIL PROGRESS TOWARD OUTCOMES WILL BE MEASURED......... 166 ELEMENT 4 – GOVERNANCE ........................................................................................................... 178 ELEMENT 5 – EMPLOYEE QUALIFICATIONS ...................................................................................... 191 ELEMENT 6 – HEALTH AND SAFETY PROCEDURES ............................................................................ 221 ELEMENT 7 – MEANS TO ACHIEVE RACIAL AND ETHNIC BALANCE .................................................... 229 ELEMENT 8 - ADMISSION REQUIREMENTS ...................................................................................... 231 ELEMENT 9 – ANNUAL
    [Show full text]
  • Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) Agenda Monday
    DRAFT_For Discussion September 26–27, 2016 Accountability Technical Advisory Committee (ATAC) WBT Room 1-104 Agenda Monday, September 26, 2016 10:00 a.m. to 5:00 p.m. I. Welcome ........................................................................................................................................... 10:00–10:15 New ATAC Member Introductions II. 2016 Accountability Rating System ............................................................................................... 10:15–11:00 Overview of Accountability Results Remaining Accountability Reports and Data III. Review Changes to Assessment Program for 2016–17 ............................................................... 11:00–12:00 ATAC Member Comments IV. State Assessments in 2017 Performance Indices ........................................................................ 12:00–12:30 State Assessments Evaluated in Performance Index Framework Policies for Inclusion of ELL Students Required Improvement 2017 Accountability Development Calendar Lunch ................. ……………………………………………………………………………………………………12:30–1:00 V. Distinction Designations in 2017 Accountability .............................................................................. 1:00–1:30 VI. Preliminary Recommendations on Options to Determine 2017 Targets......................................... 1:30–2:00 Introduction and Overview Small Group Discussion VII. 2017–18 Accountability (A–F) ............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Met Standard
    TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2016 Accountability Summary SOUTH TEXAS ISD (031916) Accountability Rating Met Standard Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on - Student Achievement - NONE - Student Progress - Closing Performance Gaps - Postsecondary Readiness In 2016, to receive a Met Standard or Met Alternative Standard rating, districts and campuses must meet targets on three indexes: Index 1 or Index 2 and Index 3 and Index 4. Performance Index Report Distinction Designation 100 Postsecondary Readiness 75 Percent of Eligible Measures in Top Quartile 33 out of 38 = 87% 50 DISTINCTION EARNED 25 93 40 65 93 0 Index 1 Index 2 Index 3 Index 4 Student Student Closing Postsecondary Achievement Progress Performance Gaps Readiness (Target Score=60) (Target Score=22) (Target Score=28) (Target Score=60) Performance Index Summary System Safeguards Points Maximum Index Number and Percentage of Indicators Met Index Earned Points Score 1 - Student Achievement 5,332 5,717 93 Performance Rates 30 out of 32 = 94% 2 - Student Progress 483 1,200 40 Participation Rates 15 out of 15 = 100% 3 - Closing Performance Gaps 1,935 3,000 65 4 - Postsecondary Readiness Graduation Rates 5 out of 5 = 100% STAAR Score 19.0 Met Federal Limits on Graduation Rate Score 24.8 Alternative Assessments 1 out of 1 = 100% Graduation Plan Score 24.2 Postsecondary Component Score 25.0 93 Total 51 out of 53 = 96% For further information about this report, please see the Performance Reporting Division website at https://rptsvr1.tea.texas.gov/perfreport/account/2016/index.html TEA Division
    [Show full text]
  • Planning Your Future
    KLEIN ISD Planning Your Future Junior/Senior Handbook 2014-2015 Planning Your Future KLEIN ISD Junior/Senior Handbook Prepared by The Klein ISD High School Counselors TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE Foreword & Klein ISD Philosophy ................................................................................................ 1 Klein ISD Mission Statement & Strategies .................................................................................... 2 Klein ISD School Calendar ........................................................................................................... 3 High Schools, Names, and Addresses & Counselors .................................................................... 4 Planning Your Future - Introduction .............................................................................................. 5 Junior Dates to Remember ............................................................................................................. 7 Senior Dates to Remember ............................................................................................................. 9 Who Am I? ................................................................................................................................... 11 Self-Assessment Worksheet ......................................................................................................... 12 Personal Activity Sheet ................................................................................................................ 15 Analyze Your Options .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 153 Campuses Earn All Seven Distinctions in 2015 Accountability Ratings
    Aug. 7, 2015 153 campuses earn all seven distinctions in 2015 accountability ratings AUSTIN – The Texas Education Agency today released the 2015 state accountability ratings for more than 8,600 campuses. The ratings reveal that 86.4 percent of campuses across Texas achieved the rating of Met Standard. Campuses that receive an accountability rating of Met Standard are also eligible for distinction designations. Distinction designations are awarded to campuses based on achievement in performance indicators relative to a group of 40 campuses of similar type, size and student demographics. Distinction designations can be earned by campuses for: Academic Achievement in Reading/English Language Arts; Academic Achievement in Mathematics; Academic Achievement in Science; Academic Achievement in Social Studies; Top 25 Percent: Student Progress; Top 25 Percent: Closing Performance Gaps; and Postsecondary Readiness. In 2015, 4,388 campuses achieved the Met Standard rating and earned some type of distinction designation. However, only 153 high schools, middle schools and junior high schools earned all seven distinction designations. “Earning any type of distinction under the state accountability system is commendable and should be a source of pride in a community,” said Commissioner of Education Michael Williams. “Achieving all seven distinctions reflects extraordinary work taking place on a campus while affirming a strong commitment to students.” Campuses (listed alphabetically by school district or charter) that earned all seven distinctions
    [Show full text]
  • High School Top Ten Finalist National TSA Conference 2021
    National TSA Conference 2021 High School Top Ten Finalist Architectural Design Harts Bluff 5 Architectural Design George Ranch High School 6 BioTech Design Flower Mound High School 4 Board Game Design George Ranch High School 3 CAD Architecture Keller Center for Advanced Learnig 1 CAD Architecture Keller Center for Advanced Learnig 3 CAD Engineering Seven Lakes High School 5 CAD Engineering Coppell High School 7 Children's Stories Tompkins High School 2 Coding Hebron High School 4 Theordore Roosevelt High School Cybersecurity Engineering & Technologies Academy 9 Data Science and Analytics Coppell High School Team #1 1 Data Science and Analytics STISD Science Academy Team #1 4 Debating Technological Issues STISD World Scholars 3 Digital Video Production Bowie High School 8 Engineering Design George Ranch High School 4 Engineering Design Captain John L Chapin High School 5 Engineering Design George Ranch High School 6 Fashion Design and Technology STISD Academy 2 Fashion Design and Technology STISD Academy 6 Forensic Science Coppell High School 2 Forensic Science STISD Science Academy 7 Future Technology & EngineeringIndependence Teacher High School 9 IT Fundamentals Foster High School 8 On Demand Video Cleburne High School 3 On Demand Video Coppell High School 7 Prepared Presentation West High School 8 Prepared Presentation STISD Science Academy 10 Promotional Design Hanna Early High School 9 SCIVIZ Waxahachie High School 5 Software Development STISD Science Academy 7 Transportation Modeling McKinney High School 1 VEX Robotics Challenge Klein Cain High School 4 Video Game Design Flower Mound High School 3 Webmaster Flower Mound High School 7 Webmaster Coppell High School 8 Webmaster Seven Lakes High School 9 Middle School Top Ten Finalists Biotechnology Design South Texas Preparatory Academy 3 Biotechnology Design Parkland Middle School 6 Challenging Technology Issues Parkland Middle School 6 Children's Stories Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • State Acct 2017 Report Board Memo
    To: Dr. Marla M. Guerra, Superintendent South Texas ISD Board of Directors From: Jeff Hembree, Deputy Superintendent Date: August 17, 2017 RE: 2017 State Accountability Report The Texas Education Agency released the 2017 State Accountability Reports, with the Distinctions, on August 15, 2017. The state accountability system is based upon the State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness (STAAR) examinations and the complex rating system developed by the state. This is the fifth and last year of this version of the state accountability system. The district and campus reports are on the following pages. South Texas ISD and every campus received the highest accountability rating available, “Met Standard”. The district received the only “Distinction Designation” available at the district level; Post-Secondary Readiness. STISD earned this distinction for the fourth consecutive year, which is every year it has been part of the state accountability system. All six STISD campuses received the maximum number of distinction designations available. We are proud of our students, parents, teachers, and all faculty members. The high level of student performance reflected in these reports demonstrates their hard work while focusing on the life goals of each student. Thank you. TEXAS EDUCATION AGENCY 2017 Accountability Summary SOUTH TEXAS ISD (031916) Accountability Rating Met Standard Met Standards on Did Not Meet Standards on - Student Achievement - NONE - Student Progress - Closing Performance Gaps - Postsecondary Readiness In 2017, to receive
    [Show full text]