Hydrocarbons from the Direct Liquefaction of Solid Fuels

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

2.4 Hydrocarbons from the direct liquefaction of solid fuels 2.4.1 Introduction 1985 once again prevented this technology from becoming established on a commercial scale, and led Coal has always been used prevalently to generate to spending cuts affecting most research activities in power and in the metallurgical industry. At times, the sector. At the beginning of the third millennium, however, the potential for using coal to manufacture interest was reawakened by the construction of various liquid hydrocarbons for vehicle transportation has also new industrial plants for coal liquefaction in Asia been considered. (especially in China), that is economically emerging The production of liquid hydrocarbons from coal areas which possess enormous reserves of this raw (syncrude) can be carried out following two different material. Further refinements of the technology and technological routes: indirect liquefaction, in other the resulting decline in production costs, alongside words, gasification to synthesis gas followed by strategic considerations, could render industrial Fischer-Tropsch synthesis; direct liquefaction, that is, initiatives in this sector attractive, at least on a local the transformation of coal into liquid hydrocarbons in level. a single stage using a hydrocracking process. These technologies were both developed in The role of coal in the international energy Germany before the Second World War to counter scenario the oil embargo to which the country was subject at Coal is the most abundant fossil fuel on our planet. the time, and to produce liquid hydrocarbons using Proven reserves are estimated at about 1012 t, raw materials widely available in its territory. representing two-thirds of all existing fossil fuels. At Starting from the post-war period, however, the current levels of consumption, this source could last availability of large amounts of crude oil made these for over 200 years. Worldwide coal production technologies largely obsolete, except in South Africa (5.4 109иt/y in 2003) meets one-fourth of the world’s (Sasol I and II processes), due to the country’s primary energy supply (10.6 Gtoe/y in 2003). isolation from the international community caused by Furthermore, unlike oil and natural gas, coal reserves its apartheid regime (now overcome). From 1967, the are evenly distributed geographically, with almost half year of the first oil shock, these technologies were being located in OECD (Organization for Economic again taken into consideration, and for at least 20 Cooperation and Development) countries. Specifically, years intense R&D (Research and Development) 26.2% of proven reserves are found in North America, work was carried out to identify new solutions able to 12.4% in Europe, 23.5% in ex-USSR countries and as render the production of syncrude from coal much as 29.7% in the Asia-Pacific region, in other competitive with petroleum. In the case of direct words countries such as China and India, with fast liquefaction, for example, important results were growing populations (Fig. 1). obtained, making it possible to significantly improve These factors have contributed to keeping the performance levels to the extent that processes able market price of this fuel sufficiently stable over time, to produce up to 5 bbl of oil per tonne of coal treated even in situations of considerable international became feasible. tension, such as oil shocks, or more recently the Gulf Although various processes were also developed at War and the Iraq War (Fig. 2). Coal is thus the energy the demonstration plant level, falling oil prices from source which is least exposed to risk from the VOLUME III / NEW DEVELOPMENTS: ENERGY, TRANSPORT, SUSTAINABILITY 113 HYDROCARBONS FROM NON-CONVENTIONAL AND ALTERNATIVE FOSSIL RESOURCES Fig. 1. Distribution 258 122 233 of world coal reserves 292 as of 2002 in billions of t. 57 22 standpoint of the vulnerability of supply, and the least the use of these technologies over the coming decades, subject to market disruptions, to the extent that the although, at least on a local level, conditions already long-term scenarios developed by the International seem ripe for their establishment. Energy Agency (IEA, 2001) predict a relatively constant price in real terms. Coal mining and pretreatment technologies As far as consumption is concerned, a mean The technical term used to describe coal mining is growth in demand of 1.4% per year is predicted over exploitation. This may take place at the surface (open the next 20 years, with the most significant growth pit mines) or at depth if the seam is more than 70 m rates in the countries of the Asia-Pacific region. The below ground level. increase in coal consumption is mainly linked to its Open pit exploitation begins with earth moving, potential use for electricity generation in developing and proceeds with the recovery of the coal using countries, especially India and China, but also to mechanical systems that differ depending on the type establishing technologies – such as gasification with of mine. Open pit exploitation is rapid, relatively the sequestration of the carbon dioxide produced – cheap since the need for manpower is reduced without able to improve the social acceptability of coal in presenting excessive risks, and makes it possible to terms of local pollution and its potential impact on extract up to 95% of the coal present in the seam. It is climate change. mainly used in lignite seams – or in any case for low As far as liquefaction is concerned (i.e. the rank coals (brown coal), and is thus preferred when transformation of coal into liquid hydrocarbon blends these are extremely large. for the production of fuels), it is not yet clear whether High rank coal seams, however, are located at the world energy market will be able to benefit from great depth (sometimes above 1,000 m) and are exploited underground by digging shafts until the mineral seam is reached; this may be from a few cm oil to several tens of metres thick. The seam is then 3.0 liquefied natural gas exploited using more or less sophisticated coal 2.5 techniques, which range from conventional mining, that is the direct intervention of man inside the 2.0 mine, to various mechanical techniques including, specifically, so-called room and pillar mining and 1.5 longwall mining. In the first case, special machines known as continuous miners are used; these are able 1.0 to create a series of cavities inside the mine itself. The longwall mining technique, by contrast, price (US cents/1,000 kcal) 0.5 involves digging two parallel tunnels up to 200 m 0 apart; they are then linked by a third tunnel, inside 19651977 1985 1990 1995 2000 which special machines with rotating blades extract year the coal and create a mine face advancing Fig. 2. Mean market prices of major fossil fuels. progressively through the seam. Using these 114 ENCYCLOPAEDIA OF HYDROCARBONS HYDROCARBONS FROM THE DIRECT LIQUEFACTION OF SOLID FUELS techniques, over 50% of the coal present in the Properties and chemical characteristics of coal formation can be recovered (Franklin, 1997). Fossil coal is a sedimentary rock originated by Once extracted, the coal can be sold as it is, or organic substances accompanied by mineral pretreated to remove the mineral component; this also substances and water. The organic component is reduces its contaminant content (for example, present in numerous different varieties, depending on inorganic sulphur). The term pretreatment, or coal the degree of coalification which determines its beneficiation (Mishra and Klimpel, 1987), refers to classification (or rank) according to the parameters operations which are generally carried out in the mine established by the American Society for Testing and area to prepare the coal for final use – treatment to Materials (ASTM D388-99e1). Since coal contains turn it into coke, combustion in thermo-electric power moisture and ash (or more accurately a mineral stations, conversion – to reduce the costs of component), the data deriving from analysis and the transportation and the processing of ashes, in addition conversion yields of direct liquefaction processes must to providing a substrate that is easier to treat in specify which fraction of the sample they refer to downstream plants. (reference basis): ar (as received), in other words on Coal beneficiation operations range from simple the sample as it is; dry, that is on the dry fraction; daf grinding to free the organic component in a crude way or maf (dry-ash-free or mixture-ash-free) or more from some inorganic pollutants (generally accurately dmmf (dry-mineral-matter-free), that is with non-combustible) to sophisticated and expensive respect to the organic component alone. treatments able to significantly reduce the Coals with a calorific value above 14,000 Btu/lb concentration of the mineral component. The extent to (dmmf basis) are classified on the basis of their fixed which the inorganic component can be removed carbon content, whereas below this value they are depends on how it is distributed within the classified on the basis of heating value (Tab. 1). combustible organic component; the higher the degree Coals are usually characterized using two analysis of dispersion, the more severe the grinding must be, protocols – proximate analysis and ultimate analysis – and thus the more expensive the whole beneficiation which are also standardized by the ASTM. The former process. defines properties of applicational type, such as The most common inorganic components are clays, moisture, volatile matter content, fixed carbon, ash carbonates and pyrites, which have a significantly (ASTM D3172-89); the latter defines the chemical higher density (as much as double or triple) than the properties, such as elemental composition (ASTM organic component. By far the most widespread coal D3176-89). beneficiation processes are thus of gravimetric type, in Low rank coals – lignites and sub-bituminous coals – other words processes which exploit precisely these have a very high moisture content and an organic differences in density.
Recommended publications
  • Recent Advances in Direct Coal Liquefaction

    Recent Advances in Direct Coal Liquefaction

    Energies 2010, 3, 155-170; doi:10.3390/en3020155 OPEN ACCESS energies ISSN 1996-1073 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies Review Recent Advances in Direct Coal Liquefaction Hengfu Shui 1, Zhenyi Cai 1 and Chunbao (Charles) Xu 2,* 1 School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Anhui University of Technology, Maanshan 243002, Anhui, China; E-Mails: [email protected] (H.S.); [email protected] (Z.C.) 2 Department of Chemical Engineering, Lakehead University, Thunder Bay, Ontario P7B 5E1, Canada * Author to whom correspondence should be addressed; E-Mail: [email protected]; Tel.: +1-807-343-8761; Fax: +1-807-343-8928. Received: 16 November 2009 / Accepted: 19 January 2010 / Published: 27 January 2010 Abstract: The growing demand for petroleum, accompanied by the declining petroleum reserves and the concerns over energy security, has intensified the interest in direct coal liquefaction (DCL), particularly in countries such as China which is rich in coal resources, but short of petroleum. In addition to a general introduction on the mechanisms and processes of DCL, this paper overviews some recent advances in DCL technology with respect to the influencing factors for DCL reactions (temperature, solvent, pressure, atmospheres, etc.), the effects of coal pre-treatments for DCL (swelling, thermal treatment, hydrothermal treatment, etc.), as well as recent development in multi-staged DCL processes, DCL catalysts and co-liquefaction of coal with biomass. Keywords: direct coal liquefaction (DCL); processes; influencing factors; coal pre-treatment; catalysts; co-liquefaction; biomass 1. Introduction Due to the rapid increase in demand for petroleum and its declining reserves, the concern over energy security has intensified the interest in coal liquefaction, especially for those countries which are short of oil resources but have abundant coal reserves, such as the United States and China, etc.
  • Liquid Coal As a Green Energy: a Review

    Liquid Coal As a Green Energy: a Review

    International Journal of Engineering and Technical Research (IJETR) ISSN: 2321-0869, Volume-2, Issue-3, March 2014 LIQUID COAL AS A GREEN ENERGY: A REVIEW Saurabh Prakash, Ghanshyam Paswan & Kumar Nikhil offers significant reductions in vehicle emissions such as Abstract— Fuel market is growing more rapidly than the oxides of nitrogen, volatile organic compounds and carbon fuel production of the world. Simultaneously coal to liquid fuel mono- oxide. technology is growing and covers some of the fuel demand of the world. A cost effective technology uses the coal with low carbon value, which is not much useful in its natural form and II. METHODOLOGY the manipulated form leads to the development of liquid coal. Most of process have not been industrialized. The raw gas is The process of liquid coal production is coal to liquid or converted into liquid is an idea along with removal of sulphur, gas to liquid conversion. There are mainly two methods of phosphorous impurities which does not pollutes air so, liquid coal production. ultimately environmentally safe. A. Direct coal liquefaction process. Index terms—Bergius process, fischer- tropsch reactor, B. Indirect coal liquefaction process. liquefaction, liquefied coal, syngas. A. Direct coal liquefaction process: I. INTRODUCTION The direct coal liquefaction processes are hydrogenation Liquid coal is a manipulated component used as a fuel by and carbonisation[3]. the process of liquefaction of coal. Liquid coal is used as an alternative to oil. Coal liquefaction is particularly suited to countries that rely heavily on oil imports and have large a) Hydrogenation: domestic reserve of coal [1]. The basic method of producing Bergius process developed by Friedrich bergius in 1913 , liquid coal is gasification of coal with little oxygen and water is a method for direct conversion of coal to liquid by vapour [2].
  • Industrial Hydrocarbon Processes

    Industrial Hydrocarbon Processes

    Handbook of INDUSTRIAL HYDROCARBON PROCESSES JAMES G. SPEIGHT PhD, DSc AMSTERDAM • BOSTON • HEIDELBERG • LONDON NEW YORK • OXFORD • PARIS • SAN DIEGO SAN FRANCISCO • SINGAPORE • SYDNEY • TOKYO Gulf Professional Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier Gulf Professional Publishing is an imprint of Elsevier The Boulevard, Langford Lane, Kidlington, Oxford OX5 1GB, UK 30 Corporate Drive, Suite 400, Burlington, MA 01803, USA First edition 2011 Copyright Ó 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system or transmitted in any form or by any means electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the prior written permission of the publisher Permissions may be sought directly from Elsevier’s Science & Technology Rights Department in Oxford, UK: phone (+44) (0) 1865 843830; fax (+44) (0) 1865 853333; email: [email protected]. Alternatively you can submit your request online by visiting the Elsevier web site at http://elsevier.com/locate/ permissions, and selecting Obtaining permission to use Elsevier material Notice No responsibility is assumed by the publisher for any injury and/or damage to persons or property as a matter of products liability, negligence or otherwise, or from any use or operation of any methods, products, instructions or ideas contained in the material herein. Because of rapid advances in the medical sciences, in particular, independent verification of diagnoses and drug dosages should be made British Library Cataloguing in Publication Data
  • Coal Liquefaction

    Coal Liquefaction

    http://uu.diva-portal.org This is an author produced version of a paper published in International journal of energy research. This paper has been peer-reviewed but does not include the final publisher proof-corrections or journal pagination. Citation for the published paper: Höök, M. & Aleklett, K. ”A review on coal-to-liquid fuels and its coal consumption” International journal of energy research, 2010, Vol. 34, Issue 10: 848-864 URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.1596 Access to the published version may require subscription. Published in International Journal of Energy Research Volume 34, Issue 10, October 2010, Pages 848-864 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/er.1596 A review on coal to liquid fuels and its coal consumption Mikael Höök*, Kjell Aleklett* Corresponding author: [email protected], phone: +46 18-471 7643, fax: +46 18-4713513 * Uppsala University, Global Energy Systems, Department of physics and astronomy, Box 535, SE-751 21, Lägerhyddsvägen 1, Sweden, http://www.fysast.uu.se/ges Abstract Continued reliance on oil is unsustainable and this has resulted in interest in alternative fuels. Coal-to-Liquids (CTL) can supply liquid fuels and have been successfully used in several cases, particularly in South Africa. This article reviews CTL theory and technology. Understanding the fundamental aspects of coal liquefaction technologies are vital for planning and policy-making, as future CTL systems will be integrated in a much larger global energy and fuel utilization system. Conversion ratios for CTL are generally estimated to be between 1-2 barrels/ton coal. This puts a strict limitation on future CTL capacity imposed by future coal production volumes, regardless of other factors such as economics, emissions or environmental concern.
  • Principles of Selectivity in Fischer-Tropsch SYNTHESIS Hans Schulz Engler-Bunte-Institute, University of Karlsruhe Kaiserstrasse 12, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany

    Principles of Selectivity in Fischer-Tropsch SYNTHESIS Hans Schulz Engler-Bunte-Institute, University of Karlsruhe Kaiserstrasse 12, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany

    DGMK/SCI-Conference „Synthesis Gas Chemistry", October 4-6, 2006, Dresden, Germany Principles of Selectivity in Fischer-Tropsch SYNTHESIS Hans Schulz Engler-Bunte-Institute, University of Karlsruhe Kaiserstrasse 12, 76128 Karlsruhe, Germany Abstract The detailed selectivity of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis with iron and cobalt as catalysts with high temporal resolution has been determined and used to derive the values of probability of chain growth, chain branching and olefin/paraffin molar ratio as a function of carbon number and time. Catalyst reassembling and self-organization of the Fischer-Tropsch regime are i nvestigated. The basic principle of Fischer-Tropsch synthesis, suppression of desorption of growing chains is disclosed. This frustration governs FT-synthesis of the otherwise different systems with iron and cobalt. The advanced characterization of sites and elementary reactions (specifically with cobalt) is thought to be a more realistic basis for future theoretical calculations. Diesel fuel through Fischer-Tropsch synthesis The present interest in Fischer-Tropsch synthesis focuses on the production of Diesel fuel. Competing in coal liquefaction with hydrogenation [1], the FT-route now is superior because the fuel is very clean and exhibits excellent performance in the combustion engine (TABLE 1). However, the maximum selectivity is only ~ 40% C, as shown in Fig. 1 on the basis of calculating the theoretical product composition, assuming ideal polymerization kinetics with carbon number independent growth probability [2]. The overall Diesel selectivity can be increased to ~ 60% by running the FT-synthesis at high paraffin-wax selectivity (high growth probability pg) and mildly converting the paraffin wax through ideal hydrocracking. TABLE 1 Gas oils from direct coal liquefaction and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis Gas oil from coal hydrogenation*): Highly aromatic, Atomic H/C-ratio: 1.3 Phenols: 16 wt-% Oxygen = 3 wt.-%.
  • Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Coal, Natural Gas, and Biomass: Background and Policy

    Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Coal, Natural Gas, and Biomass: Background and Policy

    Order Code RL34133 Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Coal, Natural Gas, and Biomass: Background and Policy Updated March 27, 2008 Anthony Andrews Specialist in Energy and Energy Infrastructure Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Jeffrey Logan Specialist in Energy Policy Resources, Science, and Industry Division Fischer-Tropsch Fuels from Coal, Natural Gas, and Biomass: Background and Policy Summary As the price of crude oil sets a record high, liquid transportation fuels synthesized from coal, natural gas, and biomass are proposed as one solution to reducing dependency on imported petroleum and strained refinery capacity. The technology to do so developed from processes that directly and indirectly convert coal into liquid fuel. Congress now faces decisions on whether, and to what extent, it should support such a solution. Lacking domestic petroleum resources, but abundant in coal, Germany built synthetic fuel plants during World War II that employed the Bergius coal hydrogenation process (direct liquefaction), and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (indirect). The United States attempted to capitalize on the German experience after World War II. Despite considerable investment in synthetic fuel research and development, the United States cut support for commercialization when crude oil prices dropped and supplies stabilized in the mid-1980s. Since then, several synthetic fuels plants have been constructed around the world that convert coal, natural gas, or biomass to liquid fuels using the Fischer-Tropsch process. Several private ventures in the United States are now studying the feasibility of constructing Fischer-Tropsch synthetic fuel plants based on coal, natural gas, and biomass. Proposals to expand the use of coal to synthesize transportation fuels have generated much opposition, particularly because the carbon dioxide (CO2) produced in the Fischer-Tropsch process is a greenhouse gas associated with global warming.
  • Kinetic Modelling for Coal Liquefaction Process

    Kinetic Modelling for Coal Liquefaction Process

    International Journal of Engineering Research & Technology (IJERT) ISSN: 2278-0181 Vol. 3 Issue 5, May - 2014 Kinetic Modelling for Coal Liquefaction Process Rohitbabu .G. Nalwala[1]; Pravat Kumar Rana[2]; Deepak H. Shukla[3] Chemical Engineering Department, Gharda Institute of Technology, At/Po-Lavel, Tal-Khed, Dist.-Ratnagiri, Maharashtra (India) Abstract- In 1913 Bergius developed the coal hydro the principal products can be high molecular mass fuels, liquefaction. In 1917 there were clear indication of decline in distillate fuel Oils, gasoline, or chemical feedstocks. domestic oil production and possibility of international shortage The products of both indirect and direct liquefaction have was realized. Around to be 1970 the chevron started coal higher energy content than coal. Coal typically contains 60 liquefaction process. He had designed and executed the wt% of the heating value of the liquefied products. The production of synthetic fuel, but had not given any kinetic model for monitoring the reaction. Our main focus is on to development liquids produced by the two methods are very different in a kinetic model of reaction taking place and estimating the chemical composition. Synthesis gas conversion processes kinetic parameter like rate constant, order of the reaction using give saturated hydrocarbon liquids, whereas the products of optimization technique like regression, PSO (Particle Swamp direct liquefaction are highly aromatic. These chemical Optimization) validating it with experimental values. The differences affect the end use. Indirect liquefaction provides validating incorporate kinetic rate constant, conversion to cross high-quality diesel fuel and intermediates for olefin verify the result obtained through optimization. production; direct liquefaction yields high-octane gasoline and Scope of this work is to get a better insight of coal excellent feedstocks for aromatic chemicals.
  • Friedrich Bergius and the Rise of the German Synthetic Fuel Industry

    Friedrich Bergius and the Rise of the German Synthetic Fuel Industry

    Friedrich Bergius and the Rise of the German Synthetic Fue nI ustry By Anthony N. Stranges* G ERMANY HAS VIRTUALLY NO petroleumdeposits. Prior to the twen- tieth century that lack of a liquid fuel was not a serious problem, because Germany possessed abundantcoal reserves. Coal provided for commercial and home heating; it also fulfilled the needs of industryand the military,particularly the navy. In the first decade of the twentieth century, Germany's energy requirements began to change. Two reasons were especially important. First, Germany be- came increasinglydependent on gasoline and diesel oil engines. The appearance of automobiles, trucks, and then airplanes made a plentiful supply of gasoline absolutely essential; moreover, ocean-going ships increasingly used diesel oil rather than coal as their energy source. Second, Germany's continuing indus- trialization and urbanizationmagnified the shortcomings of coal as an energy source. German scientists and engineers began to replace coal with smokeless liquid fuels, which not only were cleaner burningand more convenient to handle but also had a higher energy content. Petroleumwas clearly the fuel of the future, and to insure that Germanywould never be without it, her scientists and engineers created a domestic source of that fuel. From a plentiful natural substance, coal, they synthesized petroleum. Of the several processes the Germansused to convert coal into petroleum, high- pressure coal hydrogenationwas the most highly advanced. Its history falls into two broad periods: 1910-1925, duringwhich time its inventor, FriedrichBergius (1884-1949) developed the process through the first stages of industrialization, and 1925-1945, the period of its further commercial development by German industrialists.
  • Aug. 4, 1964 E. Gorln 3,143,489 PROCESS for MAKING LIQUID FUELS from COAL Filed NOV

    Aug. 4, 1964 E. Gorln 3,143,489 PROCESS for MAKING LIQUID FUELS from COAL Filed NOV

    Aug. 4, 1964 E. GoRlN 3,143,489 PROCESS FOR MAKING LIQUID FUELS FROM COAL Filed NOV. 24, 1961 Immun I.. 3,143,489 United States Patent C) ice Patented Aug. d, i‘àfîlâ 1 2 For example, in the Pott-Broche Process as close to 100 3,143,489 weight percent of the coal as possible is converted to coal PRÜCESS FÜR MAKING ‘LIQUID FUELS extract. It was believed the resulting coal extract would FROM CGAL Everett Gerin, Pittsburgh, Pa., assigner to Consolidation be more amenable to subsequent catalytic hydrogenation Coal Company, Pittsburgh, Pa., a corporation of 5 than the original coal. Unfortunately, when substantial Pennsylvania ly all of the coal is converted to extract, the resulting ex Filed Nov. 24, 1961, Ser. No. 154,451 tract is as diflicult to hydrogenate as the coal. More 9 Claims. (Cl. 208-8) over, the expense of extracting substantially all of the coal is economically prohibitive, as fully discussed in my This invention relates lto a process for making liquid copending application, Serial No. 61,518, filed October fuels from coal. More particularly, this invention relates l0, 1960, now Patent No. 3,018,242 which is assigned to to a process for making gasoline from coal at a cost the assignee of the kpresent application. which is equal to or less than the cost per gallon of simi I have found that liquid fuels such as gasoline can be lar gasoline made from petroleum (based on present economically obtained from coal if the coal is subjected coal and petroleum prices). to a “partial conversion process.” By this I mean a proc For many years investigators have been trying to de ess wherein the coal and the intermediate coal-derived velop commercially feasible processes for the production products are sequentially and incrementally upgraded in of hydrogen-enriched liquid fuels such as gasoline from a series of process steps, each of which is designed to par materials other than petroleum.
  • Hydrocarbon Liquefaction: Viability As a Peak Oil Mitigation Strategy

    Hydrocarbon Liquefaction: Viability As a Peak Oil Mitigation Strategy

    Munich Personal RePEc Archive Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy Höök, Mikael and Fantazzini, Dean and Angelantoni, André and Snowden, Simon Global Energy Systems, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University (Sweden), Moscow School of Economics, Moscow State University, Moscow (Russia), Post Peak Living, San Francisco, USA„ Management School, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom 2013 Online at https://mpra.ub.uni-muenchen.de/46957/ MPRA Paper No. 46957, posted 13 May 2013 21:03 UTC Accepted by Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society: A Hydrocarbon liquefaction: viability as a peak oil mitigation strategy Mikael Höök1, Dean Fantazzini234, André Angelantoni5, Simon Snowden6 Contact e-mail: [email protected] 1 Global Energy Systems, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Villavägen 16, 752 36 Uppsala, Sweden, Telephone: +46 18-4713777, Fax: +46 184713513, web: http://www.geo.uu.se 2 Moscow School of Economics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia, www.mse-msu.ru 3 Faculty of Economics, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia 4 The International College of Economics and Finance, Higher School of Economics, Moscow, Russia 5 Post Peak Living, San Francisco, USA, http://www.PostPeakLiving.com 6 Management School, University of Liverpool, United Kingdom Abstract Current world capacity of hydrocarbon liquefaction is around 400,000 barrels per day (kb/d), providing a marginal share of the global liquid fuel supply. This study performs a broad review of technical, economic, environmental, and supply chains issues related to coal-to- liquids (CTL) and gas-to-liquids (GTL). We find three issues predominate. First, significant amounts of coal and gas would be required to obtain anything more than a marginal production of liquids.
  • Presentation 80A Stranges Germany

    GERMANY’S SYNTHETIC FUEL INDUSTRIES Anthony Stranges Texas A&M University Department of History Abstract Germany’s Synthetic Fuel Industry 1930-1945 Abstract Petroleum was clearly the fuel of the future, and to insure that Germany would never lack a plentiful supply, German scientists and engineers synthesized petroleum from their country’s abundant coal supplies and thereby established the world’s first technologically successful synthetic fuels industry. Of the several conversion processes the Germans developed, high-pressure coal hydrogenation or liquefaction and the Fischer-Tropsch synthesis (F-T) were the most advanced. Friedrich Bergius (1884- 1949) launched the German program for energy independence with the invention of high-pressure coal hydrogenation in the years 1910-25. Franz Fischer (1877-1947) and Hans Tropsch broadened it with the gaseous synthesis of liquid fuels in the mid-1920s. IG Farben, Ruhrchemie, and others industrialized the German energy program with their development of the Bergius process and Fischer-Tropsch synthesis from the 1920s to the end of World War II. This paper examines Germany’s industrialization of the two synthetic fuel processes, analyzing their growth over several decades of social, political, and economic unrest. Overview SYNTHETIC FUELS IN GERMANY OVERVIEW 1911-1945 For the Fischer-Tropsch process the research and development falls into two divisions PERIOD ACTIVITY 1922-1935 Laboratory research and pilot plant development 1936-1945 Industrial-size development, with most of the development occurring
  • Aviation Gasoline Technology Transfer During the Second World War: Japan, Germany and the U.S.A

    Aviation Gasoline Technology Transfer During the Second World War: Japan, Germany and the U.S.A

    Aviation Gasoline Technology Transfer during the Second World War: Japan, Germany and the U.S.A. Munehiro Miwa INTRODUCTION As an example of the reception of knowledge, let us consider the aviation gasoline production technologies, which were transferred over the boundaries of Allies vs. Axis Powers during the World War II. It is worthwhile to trace how Japan acquired the overseas methods from a web of newest and complicated technological information then available and developed its own technology. Detailed consideration reveals prejudiced assumptions, misleading reception of knowledge, technology transfer from enemy country, and other complex aspects. Why did Japan, specifically the Imperial Navy, believe that Germany succeeded in coal liquefaction by Bergius Process to produce aviation gasoline, and did not consider using low- temperature coal tar as the raw material? It is necessary to discuss the background and the reasons how the Naval Fuel Depot, which employed the most advanced technical staff in Japan at the time, led this move on the wrong assumption. The Navy doggedly insisted on the liquefaction process, spent enormous resources, and solicited the South Manchuria Railway Co., Ltd. (Fushun) and Nippon Chisso (Hungnam) to prepare for manufacture. The Navy showed interest in the information regarding the isooctane process, which came from the Universal Oil Products Company (“UOP”), and was actually able to show some results in production. However, it paid no heed to the similar, more efficient alkylation process, which played an important role in increased production of high-octane aviation spirit in the U.S. , in the Trinidad, in Abadan and in Germany during the war.