DOCSLIB.ORG

Video at Risk: Strategies for Preserving Commercial Video CollecOns in Research Libraries

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Video at Risk: Strategies for Preserving Commercial Video Collec�Ons in Research Libraries 1/24/13 Video At Risk: Strategies for Preserving Commercial Video Collecons in Research Libraries A partnership between New York University, UC-Berkeley, & Loyola University-New Orleans Funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundaon “Life Span” by Claire Healy & Sean Cordeiro @ 2009 Venice Biennale 195,774 tapes hp://www.nyu.edu/Nsch/preservaon/research/video-risk/ VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 1 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 2 Video At Risk • Video At Risk Project: Background & Overview Video At Risk Project: • Scarcity & Replacement Research IniQal Findings Background & Overview • Intellectual Property & §108(c) Guidelines • ReformaXng: technical issues, RFPs to vendors • Further Issues VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 3 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 4 NYU Mellon Video At Risk Grant: Sample VHS Titles Video replacement issues • “Strawberry Fields: Dolores Huerta & the United Farm Workers” (People’s Video Network, 1997) • Expands on our “Preserving Digital Public Television” grant – NYC-based collective organization’s video interview with labor rights workers • “Live from Europe: the Blind Boys of Mississippi” (Gospel Jubilee Video, 1999) findings that public television distribuNon rights o`en – Long-running Chicago television program (1963-84) release expire aer 6 or 12 years, either reverNng to another • “ISDN, Integrated Services Digital Networks” (1985, Bell Communication) distributor, or rendering the work legally undistributable – AT&T subsidiary technology educational video (the “Eyes on the Prize” problem) • “Coital Alignment Technique: the Key to Simultaneous Orgasm” (2001, Marriage Science) • Sex education researcher’s self-release • Expands on our previous Mellon grant findings that many • “Ice Cream in Glym” (Pyramid for Cinema and Video, 1992) distributed VHS tapes had become both rare and difficult to – Feature-length music video of Egyptian singer Amr Diab replace (Circulang collecNons become preservaon • “Amas de casa [Housewives]” (Colectivo Cine Mujer, 199?) collecNons) – Short by Mexican 1970s women’s filmmaking collective • “Léon-Gontran Damas: ce pays de Guyane à mon coeur accroché” (C.R.D.P Antille-Guyane, 1991) • It’s almost always more efficient to replace than to treat or – Documentary on black French intellectual, writer, and founder of the 1930 Négritude movement reformat • “Fabulous Rio & Carnival” (Rio Productions, 1987) – Independent release from southern Ontario company • Examine rouNne maintenance, preservaon, and © issues in circulang video collecNons- VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 5 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 6 1 1/24/13 NYU Mellon Video At Risk Grant: Examine rouNne maintenance, preservaon, and How to help librarians make © issues in circulang videocollecNons decisions • Research “scarcity” of videos originally purchased by libraries • When to look for a replacement video, and how in commercial market (examine OCLC records) to prioriNze those “at risk” • Research “replaceability” of videos (test several procedures for determining out-of-printness) • Where to go to find a replacement video • Develop checklist procedures for determining whether • How to legally raonalize reformang/digiNzing replacement copy can be legally obtained (Orphan Works type “at risk” videos procedure), and explore legal jusNficaon for digiNzing without prior permission (secNon 108) • What file formats, compression schemes, file size, • Develop a model procedure to follow and idenNfy trade-offs metadata, etc. to use for reformaed video files in preservaon reformang of library videos into digital • How to deal with vendor outsourcing for (quality, file format, CODECs, QA/QC, line 21, …) reformang and technical metadata VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 7 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 8 Partners and Origin of Partnerships Leveraging w/IMLS grant • Don Waters @ Mellon • We already had an IMLS grant to examine job • Laurie Phillips @ Loyolla-NO impediments for managers of academic library media collecNons (primarily aimed at improving • Gary Handman @ Berkeley (& later Barclay training) Ogden) • Leveraged focus groups convened for that grant • OCLC—from top of Research down to Eric in 2010 to engage in discussions of VAR Childress • One interesng discovery—universies were • Academic Librarians w/circulang video rapidly removing video players from classrooms, collecNons (VRT members) and their causing serious problems for viewing anything in Conservators videotape collecNons- VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 9 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 10 ConfronNng a campus wide VHS Deadline [Videolib], Oct 10, 2012 • “...I certainly understand the IT department’s point of view, especially considering our cash-strapped state of late. They are looking for ways to not pay for or maintain “unnecessary” equipment. VHS is a likely target.” Scarcity and Replacement Research • “However, you can imagine the effect this announcement has had IniQal Findings on our faculty when they were suddenly told that that “if you have VHS tapes that you show in your classes, you will need to find replacements by May 6, 2013.” IT also menNoned the coming “analog sunset,” which has evoked memories of the dreaded Y2K of earlier Nmes (remember that apocalypse?). VHS death went from a lingering, gradual one (to which we seem to be slowly adapNng) to a quick bullet to the head. Actually, it’s more like a bomb tossed into a crowd at the moment.” VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 11 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 12 2 1/24/13 Scarcity--iniNal Methodology Scarcity – Duplicate Records With media, duplicate records for the same material are very common. • OCLC delivers cataloging/holding records • We load them into our own system and do further de-duping • We take holdings from each of the 3 partners (NYU, UCB, Loyolla) and match them against the OCLC corpus, looking for our holdings that are only held by few (or no) other libraries • For each video on our 3 collecNons, we can determine how narrowly-held it is VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 13 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 14 Scarcity – Cataloging Display Issues Scarcity – Cataloging Issues Confusing and ambiguous display of format informaGon without delving into the When trying to copy-catalog, some catalogers find it easier to create a actual MARC fields. What are these? Why do these appear as different items? new record rather than correct an exisGng bad record. But if the mulGple records don’t get de-duped, this can cause commonly-held Gtles to appear as ‘scarce.’ OCLC’s data pull told us that the following NYU Gtles were ‘scarce’: • Seven Samourai • Breathless • Last Year at Marienbad • Simon of the Desert •Birth of a NaGon VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 15 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 16 Scarcity – Problems with Scarcity–InsNtuNonal Holding Code Problems Foreign Language Titles WorldCat insGtuGonal codes are imprecise. TranslaGon, transliteraGon, and region-coding differences create mulGple records for the same Gtle. • CUY code includes Ntles held by MRC, but also many Ntles held by Bancro` • ZYU code includes Ntles held by Bobst Library (AFC Ntles and Special Coll. Ntles), as well as Ntles held by consorNum partners like The New School and Fashion InsNtute of Technology VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 17 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 18 3 1/24/13 OCLC’s own indexes vs search criteria for VHS/Beta/Umac/laserdisc OCLC-Generated Data Pull: April 2011 • OCLC--2,201,725 • Indices revealed 1,763,004 total records for video in WorldCat • Normal search criteria--1,157,736 • 69,682 of these records cataloged as Locaon=ZYU, CUY, or LLM • PRIMO FRBR and de-duplicaon algorithms applied to these records • “we think it's likely there's a presence of older- pracNce records, terse/spartan records, and other • AddiNonal filtering for Holdings=1 cases that will either lack a 007 or have $e coded as "n" (it took a while to get $e defined for the • UC-Berkeley: 4,489 Ntles • NYU: 2,122 Ntles various formats) might reasonably account for • Loyola, New Orleans: 31 Ntles this magnitude of difference” VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 19 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 20 InteresNng Replaceability Issues Replacement IniNal Methodology • Step 1 • How to handle replaceability of works that Searching for new, unused replacement copies at a “fair price” via: usually appear only in anthologies/ * Amazon.com (Amazon.co.uk; Amazon.ca; etc.) compliaons (shorts, silents, animaon, …) * Web searches (Google; etc.) • Step 2 • Many works that are unavailable in the US are Direct email & registered mail inquiry to original distributor: available from other countries. How do we * available online contact informaon; * forwarding info from catalog purchaser/company; deal with a variety of issues those raise: * via Secretary of State registry of business address • Legal to import and use? (Costco decision) • Step 3 • O`en not viewable without foreign equipment (PAL) List serv database & community inquiries • How do we tell whether or not they’re bootlegs? * VideoLib • If replacement is DVD, what about region coding? VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 21 VAR--Besser-PAIG, Jan 26, 2013 22 Replacement Methodology— Replacement Methodology— Issues & Problems Issues & Problems • Market availability is ever-shi`ing • As Gary Handman pointed out—in spite of the • Will courts of law approve of merely searching project’s focus on the metric of ‘scarcity’ for Amazon.com? (US only, or other countries?) discovering important material—is a Ntle Should we also check E-Bay for unused copies? necessarily in-need of preservaon if it is What is the “marketplace”? uniquely-held but no one has ever
Load more

Recommended publications
  • ALCF Grant Application Printable PDF Section I: Applicant Information
    ALCF Grant Application printable PDF Please note, this document is intended for those who would like to view or print the application form questions in order to prepare for applying online. The online application link: https://allarvickfund.wufoo.com/forms/alcf-grant-application/ The Guidelines & FAQs: http://www.allarvickfund.org/guidelines/ The online application is 5 pages, a page per section. We suggest reviewing it first and have your answers ready before filling it out. When using the online application, hovering a mouse over certain fields, will prompt additional instruction if further clarification is provided. On this document, further instruction is italicized. Word limits are tracked within the online application. PLEASE NOTE: In order to continue to other pages of the online application, you must: 1). Check the box indicating you agree to the terms about sharing your media. 2). Fill in your first and last name of the "Applicant/Project Manager” section. 3). Choose one applicant category. Incomplete submitted applications will automatically be disqualified. Email [email protected] with any questions. Below are the required information and questions you’ll need to have ready in order to submit an online ALCF grant application. Section I: Applicant Information By checking the box below, you understand that if awarded an ALCF grant, a copy of your transferred media will be uploaded onto the Internet Archive (archive.org), where it will be available for study and enjoyment by the general public. You also agree to work collaboratively with the Fund to screen selected clips from your collection at public events. Since the Fund acts as a digital archive it retains a copy of all grantee media for the purposes of public programming and promotion.
    [Show full text]
  • 4Th Module Video Recording and Play Back
    4th module Video recording and play back Sindhu K S Asst.Professor on Contract, Department of Computer Science L.F College Guruvayoor • Introduction: • Film …….only medium available for recording television pgms • Magnetic tape….used for sound • The greater the quantity of information carried by television signal demanded new studies • 1920 American Engineer ,Philo Taylor Farnsworth devised the television camera , an image dissector ,which converted the image captured in to an electrical signal • The pick-up tube is the main element governing the technical quality of the picture obtained by televisionb camera • The first electronic cameras using iconoscope tubes were characterized by very large lenses ,necessary to ensure enough light reached the pick-up tube • Charles Ginsburg led Ampex research team developing one of the first practical vudeo tape recorder(VTR). • In 1951 the first video tape recorder captured live images from television cameras by converting the camera’s electrical pulses and saving the information on to magnetic video tape • Video technology was first developed for CRT television systems. • VTR is 1st practical video tape recorder • VCR can do same • In 1980 and 1990 VCR removed by DVD players 4.1 basics of analog video tape recording principles • 4.1.1 Relationship of Tape and Bandwidth 4.2 Recording on magnetics tape and Reproduction Several inventions 1) In November 1951: The electronics division of Bing Crosby Enterprises , put on display a videotape recorder which produced black and white images Had 12 fixed recording heads. • In this recorder high speed head switching was employed along with 1”tape and 100 inches per second tape speed.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Tape Storage and Handling: a Guide for Libraries And
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 384 356 IR 055 533 AUTHOR Van Bogart, John W. C. TITLE Magnetic Tape Storage and Handling:-A Guide for Libraries and Archives. INSTITUTION Commission on Preservation and Access, Washington, DC.; National Media Lab., St. Paul, MN. REPORT NO ISBN-1-887334-40-8 PUB DATE Jun 95 NOTE 42p. AVAILABLE FROMCommission on Preservation and Access, 1400 16th St., N.W., Suite 740, Washington, DC 20036-2217 ($10; orders must be prepaid). PUB TYPE Guides Non-Classroom Use (055) EDRS PRICE MF01/PCO2 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Audiotape Cassettes; Costs; Equipment Maintenance; Equipment Standards; Equipment Storage; Guides; Library Facilities; *Magnetic Tapes; *Preservation; Problems; Repair; *Videotape Cassettes IDENTIFIERS *Library Materials Conservation; Restoration ABSTRACT This document provides a guide on how to properly store and care for magnetic media to maximize their life expectancies. An introduction compares magnetic media to paper and film and outlines the scope of the report. The second section discusses things that can go wrong with magnetic media. Binder degradation, magnetic particle instabilities, substrate deformation, magnetic tape recorders; and format issues are highlighted in this section. The third and fourth sections cover preventing information loss with multiple tape copies, costs, and how long magnetic media will last. In the fifth section, care and handling, storage conditions and standards, and refreshing of tapes are described for preventing magnetic tape from degrading prematurely. An appendix provides the Ampex Guide to the Care and Handling of Magnetic Tape, an estimation of life expectancies, sources for furtherreading, resources for transfer and restoration of video and audio tape, and a glossary.
    [Show full text]
  • Winslow, Ken the Adoption and Distribution of Videotape Materials
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 039 716 56 AUT9OR Winslow, Ken TITLE The Adoption and Distribution of VideotapeMaterials for Educational Use. INSTITUTION Academy for Educational Development, Inc., Washington, D.C. SPONS AGENCY Office of Education (DREW) ,Washington, D.C. Bureau of Research. BUREAU NO BR-8-0571 PUB DATE [70] NOTE 95p.; This is one of the support papers for "To Improve Learning; a Report to the President and the Congress of the United States by the Commission on Instructional Technology", ED 034 905 EDRS PRICE EDRS Price MF-$0.50 HC-$4.85 DESCRIPTORS *Educational Change, *Educational Technology, Video Tape Recordings IDENTIFIERS Electrocommunications ABSTRACT With the advent of helical scan videotape technology, we have now arrived at a time in electro-communications when the technological capability to publish has moved into the hands Df the consumer. As a result of this, schools embracing electro-communications capabilities centering on the use of videotape recorded materials should be studied, a greater quantity and diversity of prerecorded materials should be created, and, on a regional basis, joint and cooperative supplier and user agencies should be established to serve the growing needs of education for impartial and systematic information about electro-communications systems. (SP) The Adoption and Distribution of VideotapeMaterials for Educational Use U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION & WELFARE by Ken Winslow* OFFICE OF EDUCATION THIS DOCUMENT HAS BEEN REPRODUCED EXACTLY AS RECEIVED FROM THE PERSON OR ORGANIZATION ORIGINATING IT.POINTS OF VIEW OR OPINIONS STATED DO NOT NECESSARILY REPRESENT OFFICIAL OFFICE OF EDUCATION POSITION OR POLICY. Introduction The present commitment of American Education to theuse of instructional materials of a motion visual-aural nature is undeniable.
    [Show full text]
  • One-Inch Type C Video: the Broadcast Standard
    Young 1 Audrey Young Internship Seminar Professors Ann Harris & Chris Lacinak 8 November 2007 One-Inch Type C Video: The Broadcast Standard The broadcast industry was one of the only segments of the videotape market to have products created by major manufacturers expressly for their use. They were a large and powerful group of corporations, and their budgets were far higher than those of the educational and consumer markets. With the development of two-inch quadruplex video in 1956, the manufacturers were responding to direct complaints by the broadcast networks about their complicated method of kinescoping. In order to broadcast programs on the West Coast at a delay of three hours, employees of the networks would record the broadcast feed from the East Coast, film it onto 35mm film, and rush the film to the developing lab, having it back in the studio to play for broadcast within that three hour time period. With the high cost of film stock, this was enormously expensive for the networks. “American TV operations used more raw film for kines [kinescopes] than all of the Hollywood film studios combined. It was estimated that NBC used more than one million feet of film a month in its New York facility alone to time-shift programs.” They were desperate to lower their operating costs, and the answer came with the introduction of magnetic tape.1 Although two-inch quadruplex tape solved the problem of kinescoping, there was no doubt that it had its own set of disadvantages. Again, the videotape manufacturers were sensitive to the complaints of the broadcasters, and they devised a one-inch video format to meet the demand.
    [Show full text]
  • ED115244.Pdf
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 115 244 95 IR 002 787 AUTHOR Lonsdale, Helen C. TITLE The Development of a Materials Distribution Service for a Satellite-Based Educational Telecommunications Experiment. Satellite Technology Demonstration, Technical Report No. 0501. INSTITUTION Federation of Rocky Mountain States, Inc., Denver, Colo. SPONS AGENCY National Inst. of Education (DREW), Washington, D.C. PUB DATE 75 NOTE 12p.; For related documents see IR 002 769-793 EDRS PRICE MF-$0.76 HC-$1.58 Plus Postage DESCRIPTORS Adult Education; *Communication Satellites; Educational Programs; *Educational Television; Elementary Education; Feasibility Studies; Federal Programs; *Films; Instructional Films; Programing (Broadcast); *Rural Schools; Secondary Education; Telecommunication; *Video Tape Recordings IDENTIFIERS Federation of Rocky Mountain States; Materials Distribution System; *Satellite Technology Demonstration ABSTRACT Because 16mm film programs for classroom use are expensive and distribution is unpredictable, theSatellite Technology Demonstration (STD) established a Materials Distribution Service (MDS) to transmit material via satellite to ruralsites in the Rocky Mountains. The STD leased 300 programs from EncyclopediaBritannica Educational Corporation and 100 programs from GreatPlains National Instructional Television. These films were thenvideotaped and used by STD schools at their convenience during the1974-75 school year. A catalog of titles was made available to classroom teachersfor selection and scheduling of films. Participating schools were required to purchase a video tape recorder (VTR) andmonitor in order to use the service. The MDS was rated positiveregardless of minor inconvenience such as equipment malfunction, copyright restrictions, and budgeting limitation. The project demonstrated that mass distribution of materials on an individualized, personalizedbasis is a viable potential for satellitedelivery systems. A table showing the MDS audience attendance is included.
    [Show full text]
  • Video at Risk: Preserving Commercial Video Collections in Libraries
    “VIDEO AT RISK: STRATEGIES FOR PRESERVING COMMERCIAL VIDEO COLLECTIONS IN LIBRARIES” SECTION 108 GUIDELINES DECEMBER 2012 These guidelines were developed as part of the Video At Risk: Strategies for Preserving Commercial Video Collections in Libraries project, funded by the Andrew W. Mellon Foundation. Drafted with input and analysis from: Howard Besser; M.L.S., PhD (Director, New York University Moving Image Archiving & Preservation Program) Melissa A. Brown; J.D., M.L.I.S. (Scholarly Communications Librarian, New York University Libraries) Robert Clarida; J.D., PhD (Partner, Reitler, Kailas & Rosenblatt, LLC) Walter Forsberg; M.A. (Fellow, New York University Libraries) Mark Righter; J.D. (Associate General Counsel, New York University) Michael Stoller; PhD (Director, Collections & Research Services, New York University Libraries) http://www.nyu.edu/tisch/preservation/research/video-risk/VideoAtRisk_SECTION108_Guidelines_2013.pdf This document is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 United States License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/us/. 1 INTRODUCTION These guidelines seek to clarify exemptions for copying audiovisual works under Section 108(c) of the United States Copyright Act and thereby enhance the ability of librarians to preserve their video collections. They ϐ ͳͲͺȋ Ȍǡ ϐDzǡdzDzǡdzDz ǡdzDzǡdzDz ǡdzDzǡdzDz ǡdzDz ǡdz and others, in a useful eight guideline overview. These guidelines do not purport to present a comprehensive analysis or conclusions as to the scope of copying or otherwise using audiovisual works under Section 107 of the Copyright Act, i.e. fair use, which in some cases may also support reproduction reformatting.1 Ultimately, reproduction reformatting decisions Ǧ ϐ librarians and institutions, but these guidelines seek to better inform these decision-making processes.
    [Show full text]
  • Guide to the Bette Rogge Morse Papers
    University of Dayton eCommons Guides to Archival and Special Collections University Libraries January 2014 Guide to the Bette Rogge Morse papers Follow this and additional works at: https://ecommons.udayton.edu/finding_aid eCommons Citation "Guide to the Bette Rogge Morse papers" (2014). Guides to Archival and Special Collections. 3. https://ecommons.udayton.edu/finding_aid/3 This Finding Aid is brought to you for free and open access by the University Libraries at eCommons. It has been accepted for inclusion in Guides to Archival and Special Collections by an authorized administrator of eCommons. For more information, please contact [email protected], [email protected]. Guide to the Bette Rogge Morse papers, 1940-2011 UASC.016 Finding aid prepared by David Brownell This finding aid was produced using the Archivists' Toolkit October 09, 2012 University Archives and Special Collections University of Dayton 300 College Park Dayton, Ohio, 45469-1360 937-229-4256 [email protected] Guide to the Bette Rogge Morse papers, 1940-2011 UASC.016 Table of Contents Summary Information ............................................................................................................... 3 Biography of Bette Rogge Morse...................................................................................................4 Scope and Contents.........................................................................................................................4 Arrangement...................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Bibliography and References
    Bibliography and References BOOKS Athey, Skipwith W. Magnetic Tape Recording. Washington: NASA SP-5038, U.S. Gov. Printing Office, 1966. Begun, S. J. Magnetic Recording. New York: Rinehart Books, Inc., 1949. Bernstein, Julian. Video Tape Recording. New York: John F. Rider Publications, 1960. Bycer, Bernard. Digital Magnetic Tape Recording. New York: Hayden Book Co., 1965. Carnras, Marvin, (ed). Magnetic Tape Recording. Stroudsburg, Pennsylvania: Van Nostrand Rein- hold Co., 1985. Davies, Gomer. Magnetic Tape Instrumentation. New York: McGraw Hill, 1961. EMI Technology Inc. Modern Instrumentation Tape Recording. EMI Technology Inc. 1978. Eargle, John. Sound Recording. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold Co., 1980. Hoagland, Albert. Digital Magnetic Recording. New York: John Wiley, 1963. Howard, James A. and L. N. Ferguson. Magnetic Recording Handbook. Mountain View, CA: Hewlett Packard Co. AN 89, 1966. Jorgensen, Finn. The Complete Handbook of Magnetic Recording. Blue Ridge Summitt, PA: Tab Books Inc., 1980. Kalil, Ford (editor). Magnetic Tape Recording for the Eighties. NASA Reference Pub!. 1075. Washington: U. S. Gov. Printing Office, 1982. Lowman, Charles E. Magnetic Recording. New York: McGraw Hill, 1972. Mee, C. D. The Physics of Magnetic Recording. New York: John Wiley and Sons, 1964. McKnight, J. G., and Morrison. Level and Frequency Response Standardization in Magnetic Sound Recording. Redwood City CA: Ampex Corp., 1968. McGinty, Gerald P. Videocassette Recorders, Theory and Servicing. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc., 1979. Pear, C. B. Magnetic Recording in Science and Industry. New York: Reinhold Publishing Corp., 1967. Sebastian, L. G. Digital Magnetic Recording for Computer Applications. London: Chapman and Hall, 1973. Snel, D. A. Magnetic Sound Recdrding.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetic Tape Storage and Handling a Guide for Libraries and Archives
    Magnetic Tape Storage and Handling Guide Magnetic Tape Storage and Handling A Guide for Libraries and Archives June 1995 The Commission on Preservation and Access is a private, nonprofit organization acting on behalf of the nation’s libraries, archives, and universities to develop and encourage collaborative strategies for preserving and providing access to the accumulated human record. Additional copies are available for $10.00 from the Commission on Preservation and Access, 1400 16th St., NW, Ste. 740, Washington, DC 20036-2217. Orders must be prepaid, with checks in U.S. funds made payable to “The Commission on Preservation and Access.” This paper has been submitted to the ERIC Clearinghouse on Information Resources. The paper in this publication meets the minimum requirements of the American National Standard for Information Sciences-Permanence of Paper for Printed Library Materials ANSI Z39.48-1992. ISBN 1-887334-40-8 No part of this publication may be reproduced or transcribed in any form without permission of the publisher. Requests for reproduction for noncommercial purposes, including educational advancement, private study, or research will be granted. Full credit must be given to the author, the Commission on Preservation and Access, and the National Media Laboratory. Sale or use for profit of any part of this document is prohibited by law. Page i Magnetic Tape Storage and Handling Guide Magnetic Tape Storage and Handling A Guide for Libraries and Archives by Dr. John W. C. Van Bogart Principal Investigator, Media Stability Studies National Media Laboratory Published by The Commission on Preservation and Access 1400 16th Street, NW, Suite 740 Washington, DC 20036-2217 and National Media Laboratory Building 235-1N-17 St.
    [Show full text]
  • Transmission Device As Preservation Medium
    THE DAWN OF TAPE: TRANSMISSION DEVICE AS PRESERVATION MEDIUM JEFF MARTIN - MARTIN 46 INTRODUCTION In late April 1956, an anonymous columnist in the trade journal Television Digest made a plea especially resonant today. Noting the ephemeral nature of the medium he covered, the writer asked, “Why must a TV masterpiece die after a single performance?” He noted with approval a suggestion by a Philadelphia TV critic to create a “TV Hall of Fame,” an institution that “would be along the lines of N.Y. Museum of Modern Art’s collec- tion of historic movies—with the best TV programs preserved on electronic tape, if possible.”1 The author was writing at a particularly fortuitous moment. Just two weeks ear- lier, the Ampex Corporation had demonstrated the first practical video tape recording sys- tem —the two-inch reel-to-reel format known popularly as “quad” tape—at the National Association of Broadcasters show in Chicago. The new technology promised high-quality recordings of live broadcasts, with fidelity far surpassing that of kinescopes—film recordings made of a broadcast directly from a television screen. Needless to say, that columnist’s proposal did not come to fruition. As early as the first quarter of 1957, the networks were taping dozens of hours of material every week. Yet very few of those early tapes survive—nearly none from the first two years of tape’s use. The reasons for this scarcity lie in the way broadcasters perceived videotape’s purpose—perceptions that are directly at odds with those of archivists today. The archivist’s impulse, of course, is to retain —to keep the masterpieces for posterity and, in an ideal world, to keep everything.
    [Show full text]
  • Guidelines for the Preservation of Video Recordings IASA-TC 06
    Technical Committee Standards, Recommended Practices, and Strategies Guidelines for the Preservation of Video Recordings IASA-TC 06 Part C. Introduction From IASA-TC 06, Edition 1 Version for comment, 2018 C-1 Version for comment, March 2018 Guidelines for the Preservation of Video Recordings Table of Contents C.1 Introduction to carriers: assessment, preparation, and cleaning C-8 C.1.1 Background C-8 C.1.2 Videotape formats, standards, and specifications C-8 C.1.3 Videotape assessment, prep, cleaning, and hydrolysis treatment: general discussion C-10 C.1.3.1 Introduction C-10 C.1.3.2 Inspection and physical assessment C-11 C.1.3.2.1 Case, flange, and enclosure C-11 C.1.3.2.2 Tape and pack C-11 C.1.3.2.3 Hydrolysis/binder degradation C-12 C.1.3.2.4 Loss of lubricant C-12 C.1.3.2.5 Mould C-13 C.1.3.3 Cleaning C-13 C.1.3.3.1 The cleaning environment C-13 C.1.3.3.2 Initial manual cleaning C-13 C.1.3.3.3 Mould removal (safety warning) C-13 C.1.3.3.4 Cassette shell disassembly C-14 C.1.3.3.5 Machine cleaning C-14 C.1.3.4 Baking tapes: treating tape hydrolysis C-15 C.1.3.4.1 Background C-15 C.1.3.4.2 Heat treatment of sticky-shed videotapes C-16 C.2 Quadruplex 2-inch Videotapes C-18 C.2.1 Introduction C-18 C.2.1.1 Format history and featured technology C-18 C.2.1.2 The use of frequency modulation C-18 C.2.1.3 Introduction to recording specifications or modes C-19 C.2.1.4 Initial cost of acquisition C-19 C.2.2 Extent of 2-inch quadruplex holdings and urgency of preservation C-20 C.2.3 Selection of best copy C-21 C.2.4 Cleaning and carrier restoration
    [Show full text]