DOCSLIB.ORG

A5 2 Paraburdoo Closure Plan (Rio Tinto 2019D)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
A5 2 Paraburdoo Closure Plan (Rio Tinto 2019D) Hamersley Iron Pty. Limited ABN: 49 004 558 276 Paraburdoo Closure Plan 2019 Mineral Field 47 – West Pilbara FDMS No RTIO-HSE-0071355 Version 2.0 Contact details: Tammy Savage Rio Tinto Level 12, Central Park 152 – 158 St Georges Terrace, Perth, WA 6837 T: 0432 840 201 E: [email protected] W: http://www.riotinto.com Executive Summary Overview The Paraburdoo mine is located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia, approximately 5 km south- west of the Paraburdoo town in the Shire of Ashburton. The mine is located within the traditional lands of the Yinhawangka People. The Paraburdoo mine, in combination with Eastern Range mine and the Western Range deposits, are known as the Greater Paraburdoo Iron Ore Hub. The Paraburdoo mine is operated by Rio Tinto and is 100% owned by Hamersley Iron Pty Limited. Paraburdoo uses traditional open cut, conventional drill-and-blast and load-and-haul mining methods to mine iron ore deposits positioned above and below the groundwater table. Ore is processed on-site before being transported via rail to either Dampier or Cape Lambert ports for shipping. Completion of mining at Paraburdoo is currently scheduled for 2039, although additional deposits may be proposed in the future, and subject to relevant approvals, may extend mining post this date. Purpose This closure plan has been developed to support the Greater Paraburdoo Iron Ore Hub Proposal (The Proposal) referred to the Environmental Protection Authority (EPA) under the Section 38 (s38) of the Environmental Protection Act 1986 (EP Act) and the Department of Agriculture, Water and the Environment (DAWE) (Cwth) under the Environmental Protection and Biodiversity Act 1999 (EPBC Act). Within the Paraburdoo mine, pits and deposits included in The Proposal comprise 27 West, 20 West, 14 West -16 West and 4 East Extension (4EE); the deposition of tailings into the 4 West pit is also included. The remainder of the operating areas at the Paraburdoo mine are excluded from The Proposal. The development of the Western Range and 4 East Extension deposits is presently under pre-feasibility study (PFS) by Rio Tinto. Existing and project baseline information have been used to develop closure strategies, and these will be refined as further information becomes available. The purpose of this closure plan is to also address closure of the existing Paraburdoo operations. This closure plan has been developed to meet the requirements of the joint Department of Mines and Petroleum and Environmental Protection Authority Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans (2015). Scope This document, titled ‘Paraburdoo Closure Plan September 2019’, represents the updated closure plan for the Paraburdoo operations and supersedes the previous 2018 Paraburdoo Closure Plan. It is applicable to existing operations and addresses the proposed development of Paraburdoo deposits and associated infrastructure. This closure plan does not include the nearby Channar and Eastern Range mine sites or development of the proposed Western Range deposits. The Paraburdoo town is outside the scope of this closure plan. Post-mining land use Post-mining land use options in the Pilbara are generally limited due to the remote location. As a result of the nature of the mining activity undertaken, the final landform will include large voids and waste dumps, and will therefore be unlikely to support pastoral activities in the immediate disturbed areas. However, it is recognised that surrounding areas are likely to return to pastoral activity. The proposed post-mining land use assumes that the site will be rehabilitated to create a safe, stable and non-polluting landscape vegetated with native vegetation of local provenance, to maximise environmental and cultural heritage outcomes and ensure the site minimises adverse impacts on the current surrounding land use. The post-mining land use will be confirmed prior to closure, during final planning phases and in consultation with relevant stakeholders. Closure objectives The following closure objectives have been developed for Paraburdoo: • cultural heritage values have been preserved where possible; • public health and safety hazards have been appropriately managed; • contamination risks have been appropriately managed; • the final landform is stable and considers hydrological factors; ii • vegetation on rehabilitated land is self-sustaining and compatible with the post-mining land use; • surface water flows of the Seven Mile and Pirraburdu Creeks have been maintained; • pit lakes do not result in a significant ecological impact, and • infrastructure has been appropriately managed. Indicative completion criteria have been proposed for each of these objectives; ongoing consultation is planned with stakeholders to ensure these criteria remain suitable. Anticipated closure outcome The Seven Mile and Pirraburdu Creek lines will continue to flow through the area. One pit lake is predicted to form as groundwater levels recover; preliminary modelling suggests the pit lake will act as a groundwater sink, remain circum-neutral with increasing Total Dissolved Solids (TDS) over time. Groundwater is not predicted to recover to pre-mining levels in all areas. Potentially acid forming (PAF) mineral waste within waste landforms will be encapsulated. Waste landforms will be reshaped to be stable based on their material characteristics. It is assumed that all infrastructure will be removed, but this will be subject to negotiation with the Western Australian State Government as per State Agreement Act obligations. All accessible disturbed areas outside of the pit voids will be rehabilitated. Rehabilitation practices include application of topsoil or an alternative growth medium where available, and spreading native seed of local provenance with the aim of creating self- sustaining ecosystems. The area around pit voids may be unstable as pit walls are expected to collapse over time, and inadvertent public access will be restricted by the use of physical barriers (e.g. abandonment bunds). Strategies for managing safety risks will be developed as the site approaches closure, but will need to consider the potential for ongoing public access resulting from a portion of the mining area being underlain by pastoral stations and the access requirements of the local Traditional Owner groups. iii Closure Plan Checklist The following table provides cross reference to the requirements of the Department of Mines and Petroleum / Environmental Protection Authority Guidelines for Preparing Mine Closure Plans (2015). Change from Mine closure plan (MCP) Y/N/ Page Page Comments previous Comments checklist NA No. No. version (Y/N) 1 Has the Checklist been Y viii endorsed by a senior representative within the operating company? Public Availability 2 Are you aware that from 2015 Y NA all MCPs will be made publically available? 3 Is there any information in N NA this MCP that should not be publicly available? 4 If “Yes” to Q3, has NA Appendix confidential information been C submitted in a separate document / section? Cover page, table of contents 5 Does the MCP cover page Y include: Project Title, Company Name, Contact Details (including telephone numbers and email address) Document ID and version number, Date of submission (needs to match the date of this checklist) Scope and purpose 6 State why the MCP is Y 1 To support the Y Inclusion of submitted (e.g. as part of a GPdo Hub 4EE pit, 4W Mining Proposal, a reviewed environmental TSF and MCP or to fulfil other legal approval general requirement) updates Project overview 7 Does the project summary Y 5-69 Y Inclusion of include land ownership 4EE pit, 4W details, location of the project, TSF and comprehensive site plans and general background information on updates the history and status of the project? iv Change from Mine closure plan (MCP) Y/N/ Page Page Comments previous Comments checklist NA No. No. version (Y/N) Legal obligations and commitments 8 Does the MCP include a Y Appendix N No new consolidated summary or A obligations register of closure obligations and commitments been included? Stakeholder engagement 9 Have all stakeholders Y 14 N No new involved in closure been stakeholders identified? 10 Does the MCP included a Y Appendix Y New entries summary or register of B historic stakeholder engagement been provided, with details on who has been consulted and the outcomes? 11 Does the MCP include a Y 14 N No change to stakeholder consultation strategy or strategy to be implemented in process the future? Post mining land use(s) and closure objectives 12 Does the MCP include Y 16, 17; Y Updated mine agreed post-mining land use, 96; plan, new closure objectives and Appendix objective (pit conceptual landform design F lakes) diagram? 13 Does the MCP identify all Y 63 N No new potential (or pre-existing) contaminated environmental legacies which sites may restrict the post mining land use (including contaminated sites)? 14 Has any soil or groundwater Y 63 N No new contamination that occurred, contaminated or is suspected to have sites occurred, during the operation of the mine, been reported to DER as required under the Contaminated Sites Act 2003? Development of completion criteria 15 Does the MCP include an Y 18 Y New objective appropriate set of specific (pit lakes) completion criteria and closure performance indicators? v Change from Mine closure plan (MCP) Y/N/ Page Page Comments previous Comments checklist NA No. No. version (Y/N) Collection and analysis of closure data 16 Does the MCP include Y 22 - 74 Y Inclusion of baseline
Load more

Recommended publications
  • September Shire of Roebourne Local Planning Strategy Evidential Analysis Paper: (Major Industry Projects)
    September Shire of Roebourne Local Planning Strategy Evidential Analysis Paper: (Major Industry Projects) Shire of Roebourne – Economic Development Strategy Preliminary Paper Version Control Document History and Status Status Issued To Qty Date Reviewed Approved Draft MP 1 23/4/13 Report Details Name: Author: Client: Name of doc: Doc version: Project number: P85029 SM Shire of Shire of Roebourne Electronic Draft 85029 MPD Roebourne – Local Planning P1263 SM Strategy 3103 PS Disclaimer: If you are a party other than the Shire of Roebourne, MacroPlan Dimasi: owes you no duty (whether in contract or in tort or under statute or otherwise) with respect to or in connection with the attached report or any part thereof; and will have no liability to you for any loss or damage suffered or costs incurred by you or any other person arising out of or in connection with the provision to you of the attached report or any part thereof, however the loss or damage is caused, including, but not limited to, as a result of negligence. If you are a party other than the Shire of Roebourne and you choose to rely upon the attached report or any part thereof, you do so entirely at your own risk. The responsibility for determining the adequacy or otherwise of our terms of reference is that of the Shire of Roebourne. The findings and recommendations in this report are given in good faith but, in the preparation of this report, we have relied upon and assumed, without independent verification, the accuracy, reliability and completeness of the information made available to us in the course of our work, and have not sought to establish the reliability of the information by reference to other evidence.
    [Show full text]
  • Quarterly Activities and Cashflow Report for Period Ending 30 June 2008
    4 July 2008 The Company Announcements Office ASX Limited Via E Lodgement QUARTERLY ACTIVITIES AND CASHFLOW REPORT FOR PERIOD ENDING 30 JUNE 2008 Yours faithfully CAPE LAMBERT IRON ORE LIMITED Ian Burston Executive Chairman Cape Lambert Iron Ore Limited 4 July 2008 June 2008 Quarterly Report Page 2 of 9 REPORT FOR THE QUARTER ENDING 30 JUNE 2008 COMPANY HIGHLIGHTS Corporate • A General Meeting of Shareholders to consider the sale of the Cape Lambert Iron Ore project is scheduled for 28 July 2008, • A Notice of Meeting has been mailed to Shareholders and can be downloaded from the Company’s website at www.capelam.com.au, • Subject to Shareholders approving the sale of the Project and the receipt of Chinese government approvals, the first tranche of AUD$240 million is to be paid by MCC on 31 July 2008 with payment of the second tranche of AUD$80 million due on 15 September 2008, • At the end of the quarter, the Company had cash of AUD$16.2 million, • During the quarter, 3.3 million options exercisable at AUD$0.90 each on or before 30 June 2008 lapsed without being exercised, • On 28 April 2008, the Company appointed Grant Thornton UK LLP as Nominated Adviser pursuant to its admission to London’s AIM market. Cape Lambert South Project • The 3km long, untested magnetic anomaly located on ELA 47/1493, which is excluded from the MCC sale, has been named the Cape Lambert South Project, • Preliminary enquiries have been issued to drilling contractors to secure a multi- purpose drill rig to enable drilling to commence at Cape Lambert South in September/October 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • China's Steel Plan Puts Challenge to Australian Iron Ore Miners 2021-01
    China’s Steel Plan Puts Challenge to Australian Iron Ore Miners 2021-01-04 08:15:20.74 GMT By Krystal Chia and Martin Ritchie (Bloomberg) -- China pledged to slash its reliance on third parties for iron ore in a five-year plan for the steel industry, amid soaring prices of the raw material and a burgeoning trade dispute with top supplier Australia. By 2025, the world’s biggest steel sector should get at least 45% of its iron inputs from sources that China controls, the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology said in a draft policy document. The proposal foresees an expanded role for China-owned mines overseas, cooperation with non-dominant suppliers, as well as greater consumption of steel scrap that’s an alternative to mined iron ore. The proposal follows a series of comments from China’s top steel officials about over-reliance on external sources of iron ore, especially as spot prices surged to more than nine-year highs in December. China produces well over half the world’s steel, and around 70% of its iron ore imports come from just two countries, Australia and Brazil. That could be of particular concern for Australia, which counts iron ore as its top commodity export earner and China as its biggest market. While Beijing has imposed curbs on a string of imports from Australia, iron ore has so far been unaffected, which analysts have attributed to the Asian country’s heavy reliance on Australian supply. China has already been moving steadily to secure iron ore resources. Some of its overseas mines include Sinosteel Corp.’s Channar mine joint venture in Australia and Shougang Group Co.’s Marcona project in Peru.
    [Show full text]
  • J a N H O P E & Partners
    J A N H O P E & PARTNERS PUBLIC RELATIONS CORPORATE COMMUNICATIONS ABN 55 042 486 807 Business Iron ore alliance aims to pressure miners for infrastructure access JOHN PHACEAS, PERTH 477 words 19 February 2007 The Age First 1 English © 2007 Copyright John Fairfax Holdings Limited. www.theage.com.au Not available for re- distribution. FOURTEEN prospective Pilbara iron ore miners have formed a fledgling alliance to fight for access to critical transport infrastructure in the region, including the massive port and rail networks of mining giants BHP Billiton and Rio Tinto. The so-called Pilbara Iron Ore Alliance will aim to present a united front to lobby for infrastructure access and investment to unlock hundreds of millions of tonnes of "stranded" iron ore resources in the region. The group is expected to adopt a similar approach to that of the Geraldton Iron Ore Alliance, which was launched last year to present a united voice in representing start-up iron ore miners in the state's mid-west, especially in relation to co-ordinating their conflicting infrastructure requirements. At a meeting at the West Perth headquarters of the Association of Mining and Exploration Companies last week, representatives from the 14 iron ore juniors met to formulate the agenda and core objectives of the alliance. Last week's meeting was initiated by Atlas Iron chief executive David Flanagan, whose company is racing with Fortescue Metals to become the first new iron ore miner in the Pilbara in more than two decades. Atlas hopes to commission its boutique 1-million-tonnes-a-year Pardoo hematite mine near Port Hedland early in 2008.
    [Show full text]
  • Shire of Ashburton Ordinary Council Meeting Agenda
    AGENDA – ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL 1 16 October 2007 SHIRE OF ASHBURTON ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING AGENDA Council Chambers, TOM PRICE 16 October 2007 AGENDA – ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL 2 16 October 2007 SHIRE OF ASHBURTON ORDINARY COUNCIL MEETING Dear Councillor, Notice is hereby given that an Ordinary Meeting of the Council of the Shire of Ashburton will be held on Tuesday 16 October, 2007 at Council Chambers, Tom Price commencing at 9.00am. The business to be transacted is shown in the Agenda. Keith Pearson CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER 10 October 2007 DISCLAIMER The recommendations contained in the Agenda are subject to confirmation by Council. The Shire of Ashburton warns that anyone who has any application lodged with Council must obtain and should only rely on written confirmation of the outcomes of the application following the Council meeting, and any conditions attaching to the decision made by the Council in respect of the application. No responsibility whatsoever is implied or accepted by the Shire of Ashburton for any act, omission or statement or intimation occurring during a Council meeting. AGENDA – ORDINARY MEETING OF COUNCIL 3 16 October 2007 1.10.0 DECLARATION OF OPENING .....................................................................................................................5 2.10.0 ANNOUNCEMENT OF VISITORS.................................................................................................................5 3.10.0 ATTENDANCE..............................................................................................................................................5
    [Show full text]
  • Rio Tinto Iron Ore Legend Greater Paraburdoo
    563000 564000 565000 566000 567000 568000 569000 570000 571000 572000 573000 574000 !!!((( ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") ") 7430000 ") 7429000 7428000 !( ") ") !( ") ") ") ") ") ") 7427000 ") ") 7426000 ") *# !( ") !( """"""")))))))!( ") 7425000 Legend 7424000 Proposed Development Envelope Other fauna detected Proposed Conceptual Pits 20181214 !( Stygofauna Paraburdoo Approved PITS 141218 ") Troglofauna Rio Tinto Iron Ore Habitat modelling confidence boundary (300m) WCS AWT Habitat (High/Med) Greater Paraburdoo Subterranean Fauna Survey Status, Morphospecies, Risk Habitat thickness High : 286m Fig. 7.2b: WCS (modelled) extent of AWT habitat *# Symphyella `WAM-SYMPH002`, Low for troglofauna known only from Eastern Range 1:30,000 Low : 1m Coordinate System: GDA 1994 MGA Zone 50 0 0.4 0.8 1.6 Projection: Transverse Mercator ¯ km Datum: GDA 1994 Size A3. Created 01/05/2019 Greater Paraburdoo Subterranean Fauna Survey 7.3 Types of impacts to stygofauna Direct impacts to stygofauna assemblages and habitats comprise the removal of porous/ fractured hydrogeological strata from BWT mining, and depletion of groundwater by abstraction for mine dewatering and operational uses. The propagation of groundwater drawdown throughout all suitable, connected hydrogeological habitats is considered to be a direct impact, regardless of distance from the mine or whether the drawdown propagates through strata with different porosities. Nevertheless, the direct impact from groundwater drawdown is more complex to measure and assess than removal of porous hydrogeological
    [Show full text]
  • Case Study: Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) Centralized Monitoring Solution
    Case Study: Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) Centralized Monitoring Solution of 2007, seven mines all linked by the world’s largest privately owned rail network. CHALLENGES To meet the growing demand for their iron ore, particularly from the ever-growing Chinese market, Pilbara Iron were faced with the challenge of increasing production from their mining operations, or more importantly preventing stoppages in production, while maintaining quality. It was recognized that the process control systems at their processing plants were critical assets required to be available and reliable while keeping the plant within the optimal production limits. At the same time the mining industry, like most industries, was and is facing a worldwide shortage of skilled labor to operate and maintain their plants. Rio Tinto Iron Ore Figure 1. Pilbara Iron’s operations has the added burden of very remote mining operations, making it even harder to attract and retain experienced and skilled labor, PROFILE particularly control and process engineers. The mining operations of Rio Tinto Iron Ore (Pilbara Iron) in Australia are located in the Pilbara Region, In order to offer the benefits of living in a a remote outback area in northwest Western modern thriving city, a group of process control Australia, some 1200 kilometers from Perth. Pilbara professionals was established in Perth. Iron has three export port facilities and, by the end The members of this team came from Rio Tinto A WEB-BASED SOLUTION Asset Utilization, a corporate support group To meet this need a centralized monitoring solution established within Rio Tinto at the time to address was established, with data collection performed at performance improvement across all operations the sites and analysis and diagnosis undertaken worldwide, and Pilbara Iron itself.
    [Show full text]
  • Cape Lambert to Emu Siding Rail Duplication
    Cape Lambert to Emu Siding Rail Duplication Assessment on Proponent Information DRAFT Prepared for Rio Tinto by Strategen April 2011 Cape Lambert to Emu Siding Rail Duplication Assessment on Proponent Information DRAFT Strategen is a trading name of Strategen Environmental Consultants Pty Ltd Level 2, 322 Hay Street Subiaco WA ACN: 056 190 419 April 2011 Disclaimer and Limitation This report has been prepared for the exclusive use of the Client, in accordance with the agreement between the Client and Strategen (“Agreement”). Strategen accepts no liability or responsibility whatsoever for it in respect of any use of or reliance upon this report by any person who is not a party to the Agreement. In particular, it should be noted that this report is a qualitative assessment only, based on the scope of services defined by the Client, budgetary and time constraints imposed by the Client, the information supplied by the Client (and its agents), and the method consistent with the preceding. Strategen has not attempted to verify the accuracy or completeness of the information supplied by the Client. Copyright and any other Intellectual Property arising from the report and the provision of the services in accordance with the Agreement belongs exclusively to Strategen unless otherwise agreed. This document may not be reproduced or disclosed to any person other than the Client without the express written authority of Strategen unless the document has been released for referral and assessment of proposals. Client: Rio Tinto Report Version Prepared
    [Show full text]
  • The Mineral Industry of Australia in 2007
    2007 Minerals Yearbook AUSTRALIA U.S. Department of the Interior December 2009 U.S. Geological Survey THE MINERAL INDUS T RY OF AUS T RALIA By Pui-Kwan Tse Australia was one of the world’s leading mineral producing Constitution belong to the States and Territories. All powers that countries and ranked among the top 10 countries in the world in relate to mineral resources and their production belong to the the production of bauxite, coal, cobalt, copper, gem and near- States and Territories. Except for the Australian Capital Territory gem diamond, gold, iron ore, lithium, manganese ore, tantalum, (that is, the capital city Canberra and its environs), all Australian and uranium. Reflecting an increase in world demand for States and Territories have identified mineral resources and mineral commodities, the Australian economy grew at a rate of established mineral industries. 3.9% during 2007. Owing to anticipated higher prices of mineral The Mineral Council of Australia (MCA) urged the Federal commodities in the world markets, the Australian economy Government to establish a nationwide project approval process continued expanding and, as a result, surplus productive that would be consistent across all jurisdictions to reduce capacity was expected in the future. Owing to an increase in regulatory burdens that were affecting the mineral sector. In domestic demand and a tightening in the labor market, the addition, 10 principal statutes govern occupational health and consumer price index increased by 4.2% in 2007. safety in Australia, and, according to the MCA, this multilayer Australia’s total mineral exploration spending, excluding regulatory regime imposes a significant administrative burden petroleum, was $1,751.9 million (A$2,061.1 million) in 2007.
    [Show full text]
  • Magnetite Makes a Comeback Under Magnate
    Australian 10/03/2008 Page: 33 Business News Region: National Circulation: 133000 Type: National Size: 219.06 sq.cms MTWTF Magnetite makesacomeback under magnate Nigel Wilson Hematite is usually associated amount of en-below 65 per cent. Just as impor- Energy writer with alumina. ergy they use fortant is the capability of producing This means that a lot of energy both cost and en-magnetite pellets with less than 5 IAN Burston is a West Australian needs to be employed by steel vironmental rea-per cent silica content. legend, a man synonymous with mills in the sintering process that sons. There are a number of magne- the development of the iron oreremoves impurities such as alu- This makes tite hopefuls in WA, particularly industry in WA. mina. pelletising in in the Murchison region east of Now executive chairman of Magnetite host rocks do not Australia for nat- Geraldton, but Burston argues Cape Lambert Iron Ore, he has containalumina,butcontain Burston ural gas that the Cape Lambert project held many executive manage- silica. rather than thelocated 5km from the Pilbara ment posts in the mining sector Because it has a lower iron oil fuel used in the 1970s and 80s coast, 10km from Rio Tinto's since being Hamersley Iron's content than hematite, magnetite a far more viable proposition. Cape Lambert iron ore port with managing director in the 1970s. has been regardedasaless "`What we are doing is takingdirect connection to nearby infra- There he oversaw the develop- attractive proposition. the energycostof removingstructure and the townships of ment of the mining of hematite In the 1980s, the iron ore alumina from hematite from the Karratha, Roebourne and Wick- first as lump ore then as fines, industry was characterised by steel producers and giving them a ham, make it a shoo-in.
    [Show full text]
  • Wool Statistical Area's
    Wool Statistical Area's Monday, 24 May, 2010 A ALBURY WEST 2640 N28 ANAMA 5464 S15 ARDEN VALE 5433 S05 ABBETON PARK 5417 S15 ALDAVILLA 2440 N42 ANCONA 3715 V14 ARDGLEN 2338 N20 ABBEY 6280 W18 ALDERSGATE 5070 S18 ANDAMOOKA OPALFIELDS5722 S04 ARDING 2358 N03 ABBOTSFORD 2046 N21 ALDERSYDE 6306 W11 ANDAMOOKA STATION 5720 S04 ARDINGLY 6630 W06 ABBOTSFORD 3067 V30 ALDGATE 5154 S18 ANDAS PARK 5353 S19 ARDJORIE STATION 6728 W01 ABBOTSFORD POINT 2046 N21 ALDGATE NORTH 5154 S18 ANDERSON 3995 V31 ARDLETHAN 2665 N29 ABBOTSHAM 7315 T02 ALDGATE PARK 5154 S18 ANDO 2631 N24 ARDMONA 3629 V09 ABERCROMBIE 2795 N19 ALDINGA 5173 S18 ANDOVER 7120 T05 ARDNO 3312 V20 ABERCROMBIE CAVES 2795 N19 ALDINGA BEACH 5173 S18 ANDREWS 5454 S09 ARDONACHIE 3286 V24 ABERDEEN 5417 S15 ALECTOWN 2870 N15 ANEMBO 2621 N24 ARDROSS 6153 W15 ABERDEEN 7310 T02 ALEXANDER PARK 5039 S18 ANGAS PLAINS 5255 S20 ARDROSSAN 5571 S17 ABERFELDY 3825 V33 ALEXANDRA 3714 V14 ANGAS VALLEY 5238 S25 AREEGRA 3480 V02 ABERFOYLE 2350 N03 ALEXANDRA BRIDGE 6288 W18 ANGASTON 5353 S19 ARGALONG 2720 N27 ABERFOYLE PARK 5159 S18 ALEXANDRA HILLS 4161 Q30 ANGEPENA 5732 S05 ARGENTON 2284 N20 ABINGA 5710 18 ALFORD 5554 S16 ANGIP 3393 V02 ARGENTS HILL 2449 N01 ABROLHOS ISLANDS 6532 W06 ALFORDS POINT 2234 N21 ANGLE PARK 5010 S18 ARGYLE 2852 N17 ABYDOS 6721 W02 ALFRED COVE 6154 W15 ANGLE VALE 5117 S18 ARGYLE 3523 V15 ACACIA CREEK 2476 N02 ALFRED TOWN 2650 N29 ANGLEDALE 2550 N43 ARGYLE 6239 W17 ACACIA PLATEAU 2476 N02 ALFREDTON 3350 V26 ANGLEDOOL 2832 N12 ARGYLE DOWNS STATION6743 W01 ACACIA RIDGE 4110 Q30 ALGEBUCKINA
    [Show full text]
  • COMMISSION DECISION of 30 October 2001 Declaring A
    L 92/50 EN Official Journal of the European Union 30.3.2004 COMMISSION DECISION of 30 October 2001 declaring a concentration to be compatible with the common market and the functioning of the EEA Agreement (Case COMP/M.2420 — Mitsui/CVRD/Caemi) (notified under document number C(2001) 3363) (Only the English text is authentic) (Text with EEA relevance) (2004/270/EC) THE COMMISSION OF THE EUROPEAN COMMUNITIES, (2) After examination of the notification, the Commission concluded on 3 July 2001 that the notified operation fell within the scope of Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 and that it raised serious doubts as to its compatibility Having regard to the Treaty establishing the European with the common market and the EEA Agreement. On Community, 29 August 2001, the Commission issued a statement of objections, which was followed by an oral hearing of the parties on 24 September 2001. Having regard to the Agreement on the European Economic Area, and in particular Article 57(2)(a) thereof, Having regard to Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between I. THE PARTIES undertakings (1), as last amended by Regulation (EC) No 1310/97 (2), and in particular Article 8(2) thereof, Having regard to the Commission's decision of 26 May 2000 (3) Mitsui is a Japanese company conducting worldwide to initiate proceedings in this case, trading in various commodities and other products, including iron ore, and having minority and controlling stakes in a number of Australian and Indian iron ore mining companies, including a significant minority stake Having regard to the opinion of the Advisory Committee on in the world's second largest iron ore mine, Robe River.
    [Show full text]