DOCSLIB.ORG

Scattering and Decay of Particles

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Scattering and Decay of Particles All human things are subject to decay, and when fate summons, monarchs must obey. John Dryden (1631-1700) 9 Scattering and Decay of Particles So far we have discussed only free particles. If we want to detect the presence and detailed properties of any of them, it is necessary to perform scattering experiments or to observe their decay products. In this chapter, we shall develop an appropriate quantum mechanical description of such processes. 9.1 Quantum-Mechanical Description We begin by developing the appropriate quantum-mechanical tools for describing the scattering process. 9.1.1 Schr¨odinger Picture Consider a quantum mechanical system whose Schr¨odinger equation Hˆ ψ (t) = i∂ ψ (t) (9.1) | S i t| S i cannot be solved analytically (here we use natural units withh ¯=1). The standard method of deriving information on such a system comes from perturbation the- ory: The Hamilton operator is separated into a time-independent part Hˆ0, whose Schr¨odinger equation Hˆ ψ (t) = i∂ ψ (t) (9.2) 0| S i t| S i is solvable, plus a remainder Vˆ , to be called interaction. The operator Hˆ0 is also called the unperturbed Hamiltonian, and the interaction Vˆ is often called the per- turbation. For the sake of a simple notation we have omitted the hats on top of all operators without danger of confusion. The time-dependent state ψS(t) carries a subscript S to indicate the fact that we are dealing with the Schr¨odinger| i picture. Observables are operators OˆS (p, x, t) whose matrix elements between states yield transition amplitudes. The interaction will be assumed to be of finite range. This excludes, for the moment, the most important interaction potential, the Coulomb 660 9.1 Quantum-Mechanical Description 661 potential. As an example, we may assume the unperturbed Hamiltonian to describe a particle in a Rosen-Morse potential well: const x Vˆ x = V (x)= . (9.3) h | | i cosh2 x | | If the constant is sufficiently negative, the system has one or more discrete bound states. The important Coulomb potential does not fall directly into the class of potentials under consideration. It must first be modified by multiplying it with a very small exponential screening factor. The consequences of an infinite range that would be present in the absence of screening will have to be discussed separately. The interaction Vˆ may in general depend explicitly on time. The results will later be applied to quantum field theory. Then Hˆ0 will be a sum of the second-quantized Hamilton operator of all particles involved, and Vˆ will be some as yet unspecified short-range interaction between them. If the particles are all massive, all forces are of short range. Moreover, the vacuum state is a discrete state which is well separated from all other states by an energy gap. The lowest excited state contains a single particle with the smallest mass at rest. This mass is the energy gap. 9.1.2 Heisenberg Picture The other, equivalent, description of the system is due to Heisenberg. It is based on time-independent states which are equal to the Schr¨odinger states ψ (t) at a | S i certain fixed time t = t0: ψ ψ (0) = Uˆ(t, t )−1 ψ (t) . (9.4) | H i≡| S i 0 | S i For simplicity, we choose t0 = 0. When using these states, the time dependence of the system is carried by time-dependent Heisenberg operators −1 OˆH (t)= Uˆ(t, 0) OˆSUˆ(t, 0). (9.5) Here Uˆ(t, 0) is the unitary time evolution operator introduced in Section 1.6 which governs the motion of the Schr¨odinger state. It has the explicit form [recall (1.269)] t −i dt′ Hˆ (t′) Uˆ(t, 0) = Tˆ e 0 . (9.6) R If Hˆ has no explicit time dependence, which we shall assume from now on, then Uˆ(t, 0) has the explicit form Uˆ(t, 0) = e−iHt/ˆ ¯h and satisfies the unitarity relations Uˆ −1(t, 0) = Uˆ †(t, 0) = Uˆ(0, t). (9.7) Then the relation (9.5) becomes iHt/ˆ ¯h −iHt/ˆ ¯h OˆH (t)= e OˆSe . (9.8) 662 9 Scattering and Decay of Particles 9.1.3 Interaction Picture As far as perturbation theory is concerned it is useful to introduce yet a third description called the Dirac or interaction picture. Its states are related to the previous ones by ˆ ˆ ψ (t) = eiH0t ψ (t) = eiH0tUˆ(t, 0) ψ . (9.9) | I i | S i | H i In the absence of interactions, they become time independent and coincide with the Heisenberg states (9.4). The interactions, however, drive ψI (t) away from ψH (t). When using such states, the observables in the interaction picture are iHˆ0t −iHˆ0t iHˆ0t −iHtˆ iHtˆ −iHˆ0t OˆI (t)= e OˆSe = e e OˆH e e . (9.10) These operators coincide, of course, with those of the Heisenberg picture in the ab- sence of interactions. By definition, the unperturbed Schr¨odinger equation Hˆ ψ(t) 0| i can be solved explicitly implying that the time dependence of the operators OˆI (t), d Oˆ (t) = [Hˆ , Oˆ (t)], (9.11) dt I 0 I is completely known. If the Schr¨odinger operator OˆS is explicitly time-dependent, this becomes d ˙ Oˆ (t) = [Hˆ , Oˆ (t)] + [Oˆ (t)] , (9.12) dt I 0 I S I where ˙ ˆ ˙ ˆ [Oˆ (t)] eiH0tOˆ (t)e−iH0t. (9.13) S I ≡ S 9.1.4 Neumann-Liouville Expansion A state vector in the interaction picture moves according to the following equation of motion: iHˆ0t i∂t ψI (t) = i∂te ψS(t) | i | i ˆ ˆ = Hˆ ψ (t) + eiH0tHeˆ −iH0t ψ (t) − 0| I i | I i = Vˆ (t) ψ (t) , (9.14) I | I i where ˆ ˆ Vˆ (t) eiH0tVˆ e−iH0t (9.15) I ≡ S is the interaction picture of the potential VˆS. It is useful to introduce a unitary time evolution operator also for the interaction picture. It determines the evolution of the states by ψ (t) = Uˆ (t, t ) ψ (t ) . (9.16) | I i I 0 | I 0 i 9.1 Quantum-Mechanical Description 663 Obviously, UˆI (t, t0) satisfies the same composition law as the previously introduced time translation operator Uˆ(t, t0) in the Schr¨odinger picture: ′ ′ UˆI (t, t0)= UˆI (t, t )UˆI (t , t0). (9.17) Using the differential equation (9.14) for the states we see that the operator UˆI (t, t0) satisfies the equation of motion i∂tUˆI (t, t0)= VˆI (t)UˆI (t, t0). (9.18) The equation of motion (9.18) can be integrated, resulting in the Neumann- Liouville expansion [recall (1.200), (1.201)]: t ( i)2 t UˆI (t, t0) = 1 i dt1VˆI (t1)+ − Tˆ dt1dt2VˆI (t1)VˆI (t2)+ ... − Zt0 2! Zt0 t ′ ′ Tˆ exp i dt VˆI (t ) . (9.19) ≡ − Zt0 The expansion holds for t > t0 and respects the initial condition UˆI (t0, t0) = 1. Note that the differential equation (9.18) for UˆI (t, t0) implies that UˆI (t, t0) sat- isfies an integral equation: t ′ ′ ′ UˆI (t, t0)=1 i dt VˆI(t )UˆI (t , t0). (9.20) − Zt0 ′ Indeed, we may solve this equation by iteration, starting with UˆI (t , t0) = 1 which yields the lowest approximation: t UˆI (t, t0) = 1 i dt1VˆI(t1). (9.21) − Zt0 Reinserting this into (9.2), we obtain the second approximation t ( i)2 t UˆI (t, t0) = 1 i dt1VˆI (t1)+ − Tˆ dt1dt2VˆI (t1)VˆI(t2). (9.22) − Zt0 2! Zt0 Continuing this iteration we recover the full Neumann-Liouville expansion (9.19). For t < t0, we may use the relation (9.7) according to which Uˆ(t, t0) is simply the −1 inverse Uˆ (t0, t), and an expansion is again applicable. The time-ordering operator T makes sure that the operators VˆI(ti) in the expansion appear in chronological order, with all later VˆI (ti) standing to the left of earlier ones. If Vˆ and therefore Hˆ has no explicit time dependence, the Schr¨odinger state is governed by the simple exponential time evolution operator: ˆ ψ (t) = Uˆ(t, t ) ψ (t ) = e−iH(t−t0) ψ (t ) . (9.23) | S i 0 | S 0 i | S 0 i Combining this with (9.9), we see that iHˆ0t −iHˆ (t−t0) −iHˆ0t0 UˆI (t, t0)= e e e . (9.24) 664 9 Scattering and Decay of Particles If the potential Vˆ depends explicitly on time, this has to be replaced by [recall (9.6)] t ˆ −i dt′ Hˆ (t′) ˆ iH0t t −iH0t0 UˆI (t, t0) = e Tˆ e 0 e R iHˆ0t −iHˆ0t0 = e Uˆ(t, t0)e . (9.25) For a time-independent Hˆ , this relation shows that UˆI (t, t0) satisfies the same uni- tarity relations (9.7) as Uˆ(t, t0): ˆ −1 ˆ † ˆ UI (t, 0) = UI (t, 0) = UI (0, t). (9.26) The Heisenberg representation (9.5) of an arbitrary operator is obtained from the interaction representation (9.10) via ˆ ˆ ˆ ˆ −1 −iH0t ˆ iH0t ˆ OHˆ (t) = U (t, 0)e OI(t)e U(t, 0) ˆ −1 ˆ ˆ = UI (t, 0)OI(t)UI (t, 0). (9.27) We have observed above that the operator in the interaction picture OˆI(t) has a particularly simple time dependence. Its movement is determined by the unper- turbed equation of motion (9.11). Thus (9.27) establishes a relation between the complicated time dependence of the Heisenberg operator OˆH (t) in the presence of interaction and the simple time dependence of OˆI(t) which reduces to the Heisenberg operator in the absence of an interaction.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • M1b. Scattering Theory 1 A
    Scattering Theory 1 (last revised: July 8, 2013) M1b–1 M1b. Scattering Theory 1 a. To be covered in Scattering Theory 2 (T1b) This is a non-exhaustive list of what will be covered in T1b. Electromagnetic part of the NN interaction • Bound states and NN scattering • – basic deuteron properties (but not mixing) – absence of other two-body bound states Phenomenology of NN phase shifts (e.g., `ala Machleidt) • – Both S-waves and large scattering lengths. E↵ective range e↵ects. Sign changes – what parts of forces contribute to di↵erent phases – low vs. high L partial waves How high in energy and partial wave and how accurately do phase shifts need to be reproduced • for various nuclear applications? b. Reminder of basic quantum mechanical scattering Our first and dominant source of information about the two-body force between nucleons (protons and neutrons) is nucleon-nucleon scattering. All of you are familiar with the basic quantum me- chanical formulation of non-relativistic scattering. We will review and build on that knowledge in this lecture and the exercises. Nucleon-nucleon scattering means n–n, n–p, and p–p. While all involve electromagnetic inter- actions as well as the strong interaction, p–p has to be treated specially because of the Coulomb interaction (what other electromagnetic interactions contribute to the other scattering processes?). We’ll start here with neglecting the electromagnetic potential Vem and the di↵erence between the proton and neutron masses (this is a good approximation, because (m m )/m 10 3 with n − p ⇡ − m (m + m )/2).
    [Show full text]
  • Scattering and S-Matrix 1/42 J
    SCATTERING AND S-MATRIX 1/42 J. Rosner – Reaction Theory Summer Workshop Indiana University – June 2015 Lecture 1: Review of Lecture 2: S-matrix and Lecture 3: Some simple scattering theory related physics applications S, T , and K matrices 1-,2-channel examples Optical analogs Wave packet scattering Transmission resonances Eikonal approximation Scattering amplitude Bound states Diffractive scattering Partial wave expansion S wave properties Adding resonances Phase shifts Resonances Dalitz plot applications R-matrix Absorption Historical notes Unitarity circle Inelastic cross section Example from electronics For simplicity some of the formalism will be nonrelativistic “In” state i : Free particle in remote past | iin “Out” state j : Free particle in remote future outh | S-matrix takes “in” states to “out” (with wave packets: Goldberger and Watson, Scattering Theory, 1964.) UNITARITY; T AND K MATRICES 2/42 Sji out j i in is unitary: completeness and orthonormality of “in”≡ andh | i “out” states S†S = SS† = ½ Just an expression of probability conservation S has a piece corresponding to no scattering Can write S = ½ +2iT Notation of S. Spanier, BaBar Analysis Document #303, based on S. U. Chung et al. Ann. d. Phys. 4, 404 (1995). Unitarity of S-matrix T T † =2iT †T =2iT T †. ⇒ − 1 1 1 1 (T †)− T − =2i½ or (T − + i½)† = (T − + i½). − 1 1 1 Thus K [T − + i½]− is hermitian; T = K(½ iK)− ≡ − WAVE PACKETS 3/42 i~q ~r 3/2 Normalized plane wave states: χ~q = e · /(2π) 3 3 i(~q q~′) ~r 3 (χ , χ )=(2π)− d ~re − · = δ (~q q~ ) . q~′ ~q − ′ R Expansion of wave packet: ψ (~r, t =0)= d3q χ φ(~q ~p) ~p ~q − where φ is a weight function peaked aroundR 0 3 i~k ~r Fourier transform of φ: G(~r)= d k e · φ(~k) 3 R ψ~p(~r, t =0)= d q χ~q ~p+~p φ(~q ~p)= χ~p G(~r) .
    [Show full text]
  • 21 Scattering and Partial Wave Analysis
    C. Amsler, Nuclear and Particle Physics 21 Scattering and partial wave analysis In this chapter we deal with elastic two-body scattering between two particles with masses m1 and m2. We shall first assume that the two particles are spinless and that particle 1 scatters in the potential V (r) of particle 2 (figure 21.1). At distances of separation larger than the range R of the potential the projectile can be described by a plane wave moving along the z-axis, which is then scattered in the spherically symmetrical potential V (r). 1 dF dV k Q 1 b z 2 R Figure 21.1: Elastic scattering 1+2 1+2by a potential of range R. ! At large distances (r>R) from the scattering center the scattered particle 1 is represented by a spherical wave emitted from the origin at r = 0. The wave function is given by eikr (r, ✓)=eikz + f(✓) , (21.1) r up to an overall normalization constant, and where k is the momentum of both incident and scattered particles, that is the momentum expressed in the center-of-mass system. The function f(✓) is the scattering amplitude. Using (8.13) one obtains from the total energy E1 and momentum p1 in the laboratory k = βγE γp = βγm , (21.2) 1 − 1 2 hence the velocity of the center of mass, p β = 1 . (21.3) E1 + m2 The relativistic γ-factor is 1 E + m γ = = 1 2 , (21.4) p2 2 2 1 m + m +2E1m2 1 2 1 2 − (E1+m2) q p and therefore from (21.2) m2p1 m2p1 k = = µβ1 (21.5) 2 2 m1 + m2 +2E1m2 ' m1 + m2 21.0 p Nuclear and Particle Physics in the non-relativistic limit E1 m1, where β1 is the incident velocity in the laboratory m1m2 ' and µ = the reduced mass.
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 9 SCATTERING THEORY
    Chapter 9 SCATTERING THEORY 9.1 General Considerations In this chapter we consider a situation of considerable experimental and theoretical inter- est, namely, the scattering of particles o¤ of a medium containing some type of scattering centers, such as atoms, molecules, or nuclei. The basic experimental situation of interest is indicated in the …gure below. An incident beam of particles impinges upon a target, which maybe a cell con- taining atoms or molecules in a gas, a thin metallic foil, or a beam of particles moving at right angles to the incident beam. As a result of interactions between the particles in the initial beam and those in the target, some of the particles in the beam are de‡ected and emerge from the target traveling along a direction (µ; Á) with respect to the original beam direction, while some are left unscattered and emerge out the other side having undergone no de‡ection (or undergo “forward scattering”). The number of particles de‡ected along a given direction are then counted in a detector of some sort. The kinds of interactions and the analyis of general scattering situations of this type can be quite complicated. We will focus in the following discussion on the scattering of incident particles by scattering centers in the target uner the following conditions: 1. The incident beam is composed of idealized spinless, structureless, point particles. 2. The interaction of the particles with the scattering centers is assumed to be elastic so that the energy of the scattered particle is …xed, the internal structure of the scatterer (if any) and, thus, the potential seen by the scattered particle does not change during the scattering event.
    [Show full text]
  • Scattering Theory: Born Series
    Scattering Theory: Born Series Stefan Blügel This document has been published in Manuel Angst, Thomas Brückel, Dieter Richter, Reiner Zorn (Eds.): Scattering Methods for Condensed Matter Research: Towards Novel Applications at Future Sources Lecture Notes of the 43rd IFF Spring School 2012 Schriften des Forschungszentrums Jülich / Reihe Schlüsseltechnologien / Key Tech- nologies, Vol. 33 JCNS, PGI, ICS, IAS Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, JCNS, PGI, ICS, IAS, 2012 ISBN: 978-3-89336-759-7 All rights reserved. A 2 Scattering Theory: Born Series 1 Stefan Blugel¨ Peter Grunberg¨ Institut and Institute for Advanced Simulation Forschungszentrum Julich¨ GmbH Contents 1 Introduction 2 2 The Scattering Problem 2 2.1 The Experimental Situation . .3 2.2 Description of Scattering Experiment . .4 2.3 Coherence . .7 2.4 The Cross Section . .8 3 Lippmann Schwinger Equation 9 4 Born Approximation 11 4.1 Example of Born Approximation: Central Potential . 12 4.2 Example of Born Approximation: Square Well Potential . 13 4.3 Validity of first Born Approximation . 14 4.4 Distorted-Wave Born Approximation (DWBA) . 15 5 Method of Partial Wave Expansion 17 5.1 The Born Approximation for Partial Waves . 20 5.2 Low Energy Scattering: Scattering Phases and Scattering Length . 21 5.3 S-Wave Scattering at Square Well Potential . 22 5.4 Nuclear Scattering Length . 25 6 Scattering from a Collection of Scatterers 25 1Lecture Notes of the 43rd IFF Spring School “Scattering Methods for Condensed Matter Research: Towards Novel Applications at Future Sources” (Forschungszentrum Julich,¨ 2012). All rights reserved. A2.2 Stefan Blugel¨ 1 Introduction Since Rutherford’s surprise at finding that atoms have their mass and positive charge concen- trated in almost point-like nuclei, scattering methods are of extreme importance for studying the properties of condensed matter at the atomic scale.
    [Show full text]
  • A Practical Introduction to Quantum Scattering Theory, and Beyond
    A practical introduction to quantum scattering theory, and beyond Calvin W. Johnson June 29, 2017 2 Contents Introduction iv I The basics of quantum scattering 1 1 Cross-sections 2 1.1 The scattering amplitude . 4 1.2 Other matters, maybe . 6 1.3 Project 1 . 6 2 Phase shifts 7 2.1 What is a phase shift? . 7 2.2 Scattering off a finite square well potential . 9 2.3 Formal derivation . 14 2.4 Scattering lengths . 17 2.5 The δ-shell potential . 19 2.6 Resonances: a first look . 21 2.7 Project 2: A first look at data . 22 3 Introducing the S-matrix 24 3.1 Green's functions and the Lippmann-Schwinger equation . 24 3.2 Derivation of Green's functions . 26 3.3 Free-particle Green's function . 29 3.4 Mathematical interlude: Sturm-Liouville problems . 30 3.5 Radial Green's functions . 30 3.6 Jost functions . 30 3.7 The S-matrix in the complex momentum plane . 31 3.8 S-matrix poles and resonances . 33 3.9 Application to the square well potential . 33 3.10 Application to the δ-shell potential . 33 3.11 Project 3 . 34 i ii CONTENTS II Numerical calculations 35 4 The continuum in coordinate space 36 4.1 The mathematics of continuum states . 36 4.2 Boxing up the continuum . 38 4.3 The δ-shell potential . 42 4.3.1 A note on numerical eigensolvers . 43 4.4 Beyond the square well . 43 4.4.1 Finding the scattering length . 44 5 The continuum in Hilbert spaces 46 5.1 Phase shifts in a discrete Fourier space .
    [Show full text]
  • Chapter 8 Scattering Theory
    Chapter 8 Scattering Theory I ask you to look both ways. For the road to a knowledge of the stars leads through the atom; and important knowledge of the atom has been reached through the stars. -Sir Arthur Eddington (1882 - 1944) Most of our knowledge about microscopic physics originates from scattering experiments. In these experiments the interactions between atomic or sub-atomic particles can be measured. This is done by letting them collide with a fixed target or with each other. In this chapter we present the basic concepts for the analysis of scattering experiments. We will first analyze the asymptotic behavior of scattering solutions to the Schr¨odinger equa- tion and define the differential cross section. With the method of partial waves the scattering amplitudes are then obtained from the phase shifts for spherically symmetric potentials. The Lippmann–Schwinger equation and its formal solution, the Born series, provides a perturbative approximation technique which we apply to the Coulomb potential. Eventually we define the scattering matrix and the transition matrix and relate them to the scattering amplitude. 8.1 The central potential The physical situation that we have in mind is an incident beam of particles that scatters at some localized potential V (~x) which can represent a nucleus in some solid target or a particle in a colliding beam. For fixed targets we can usually focus on the interaction with a single nucleus. In beam-beam collisions it is more difficult to produce sufficient luminosity, but this has to be dealt with in the ultrarelativistic scattering experiments of particle physics for kinematic 135 CHAPTER 8.
    [Show full text]