DOCSLIB.ORG

CONTEL of SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 D/B/A GTE (South Carolina) Sixth Revised Contents Sheet 1 Canceling Fifth Revised Contents Sheet 1 P.S.C

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
CONTEL of SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 D/B/A GTE (South Carolina) Sixth Revised Contents Sheet 1 Canceling Fifth Revised Contents Sheet 1 P.S.C CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) Sixth Revised Contents Sheet 1 Canceling Fifth Revised Contents Sheet 1 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: August 24, 2001 EFFECTIVE: September 6, 2001 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina CENTRAL OFFICE NON-TRANSPORT SERVICE OFFERING Sheets Centrex Service - (Obsolete - See Section 110) 10.1 CentraNet®/Digital (ISDN) CentraNet® Service 24 10.1.1 General 24 10.1.2 Conditions 24 10.1.3 Features 31 10.1.4 Definition of Features 38 10.1.5 Regulations 59 10.1.6 Telephone Numbers and Facilities Reserved for Future Use 62 10.2 Multi-Account Service 63 10.2.1 General 63 10.2.2 Regulations 63 10.2.3 Definitions 64 10.2.4 Conversion 64 10.3 CentraNet® CustoPAK Service 10.3.1 General 66 (N) 10.3.2 Service Options 66 10.3.3 Conditions 68 10.3.4 Features Description 73 10.3.5 Rates 79 (N) (D) ® - Registered Trademark of Verizon (C) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 1 Canceling Original Sheet 1 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 2 Canceling Original Sheet 2 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 3 Canceling Original Sheet 3 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 4 Canceling Original Sheet 4 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 5 Canceling Original Sheet 5 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 6 Canceling Original Sheet 6 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 7 Canceling Original Sheet 7 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 8 Canceling Original Sheet 8 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 9 Canceling Original Sheet 9 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 10 Canceling Original Sheet 10 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 11 Canceling Original Sheet 11 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 12 Canceling Original Sheet 12 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 13 Canceling Original Sheet 13 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 14 Canceling Original Sheet 14 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 15 Canceling Original Sheet 15 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 16 Canceling Original Sheet 16 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 17 Canceling Original Sheet 17 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 18 Canceling Original Sheet 18 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 19 Canceling Original Sheet 19 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 20 Canceling Original Sheet 20 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 21 Canceling Original Sheet 21 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President Durham, North Carolina (O) │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ │ (O) (O) Material formerly appearing on this page has been moved to Section 110. (N) CONTEL OF SOUTH CAROLINA, INC. Section 10 d/b/a GTE (South Carolina) First Revised Sheet 22 Canceling Original Sheet 22 P.S.C. - S.C. No. 1 ISSUED: February 16, 1996 EFFECTIVE: March 26, 1996 BY: Vice President
Load more

Recommended publications
  • MCI Communications Services, Inc. D/B/A Verizon Business Services Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No
    MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2 (Enterprise Current Services) Effective August 8, 2016 Fourth Revision MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2 (Enterprise Current Services) This Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2 (Enterprise Current Services) sets forth the rates, terms and conditions of certain recent offerings available to enterprise customers (i.e., non-mass markets) of Verizon Business which are not otherwise described in the Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 3 (Enterprise Non-Current Services), or described in the tariff on file with the Public Utilities Commission of Ohio. Where applicable, the retail services described in this document were previously set forth in the Ohio Interexchange Services Tariff No. 2 of MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services. For ease of reference, where applicable the prior section numbers contained in the prior Tariff No. 2 has been retained. Also, the term “tariff” as used in this document, refers to this Catalog Schedule, unless context indicates otherwise. Any questions regarding this Catalog Schedule, please call 1-866-665-7586. ____________________________________ MCI Communications Services, Inc. d/b/a Verizon Business Services Ohio Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2 (Enterprise Current Services) Effective August 8, 2016 CHANGE SHEET This sheet details the most recent revisions made to this Catalog Schedule. Any questions regarding this Catalog Schedule, please call 1-866-665-7586. Revisions to Interexchange Services Catalog Schedule No. 2, Effective 8/8/16 Sections 1, 2, 3, 3.1 and 5 Effective on or after August 8, 2016, MCI Communications Services, Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • THE VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 21 15Th Revised Page 17-1 Cancels 14Th Revised Page 17-1
    THE VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF F.C.C. NO. 21 15th Revised Page 17-1 Cancels 14th Revised Page 17-1 SPECIAL CONSTRUCTION 17. GTE Southwest Incorporated Special Construction Cases 17.1 Charges for the State of Texas (Company Code 2154) 17.1.1 Charges to Provide Permanent Facilities Customer: Cellco Partnership dba VZ Wireless ID#TX0402316 (USOC-93PSC) Description: Special Construction of facilities at 6770 State Hwy. 51, Weatherford, TX to Verizon’s Springtown, TX (SPTWTXXA) central office. NRC $24,028.00 Customer: Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. ID# 2009-489232 Description: Special Construction of facilities at customer’s location at 615 S FM 1138, Nevada, TX to Verizon’s Nevada, TX central office. NRC $34,331.67 Customer: Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. ID# 2010-510146 Description: Special Construction of facilities at customer’s location at 210 Brinkoeter Street, Poth, TX to Verizon’s Poth, TX central office. NRC $20,761.59 Customer: Verizon Business Network Services, Inc. (N) ID# 2011-552086 Description: Special Construction of facilities at customer’s location at 354 W Bradshaw Rd., Springtown, TX to Verizon’s Springtown central office (SPTWTXXA). NRC $23,790.38 Customer: New Cingular Wireless PCS, LLC ID# 2011-557095 Description: Special Construction of facilities at customer’s location at 10515 W State Highway 29, Burnett, TX to Verizon’s Burnett central office (BURNTXXA). NRC $16,772.72 (N) (TR 1140) Issued: April 7, 2011 Effective: April 22, 2011 Vice President, Federal Regulatory 1300 I Street, NW, Washington, D.C. 20005 THE VERIZON TELEPHONE COMPANIES TARIFF F.C.C. NO.
    [Show full text]
  • Oversight and Action Is Required to Protect Verizon New York Telephone Customers and Expand Broadband Services
    It’s All Interconnected: Oversight and Action is Required to Protect Verizon New York Telephone Customers and Expand Broadband Services Public Utility Law Project of New York, Inc. Authors Bruce Kushnick Executive Director, New Networks Assisted by David C. Bergmann Telecom Policy Consulting for Consumers May 13, 2014 It’s All Interconnected. Major Sections § Introduction § Executive Summary § The Future of Telecommunications: Asserting and Regaining the Rights of Customers, Including Low-Income Consumers in New York State § Time to Clean House: Getting New York and America Wired, Opening the Networks to Competition and Protecting the Rights of Customers § A Brief History of Residential, Fiber Optic Broadband in New York State § Implications of the Report’s Findings: Legal and Regulatory Issues § Data and Research — Verizon NY's Financial Relationships with Customers and with Verizon’s Affiliate Companies: Verizon Online, Verizon Business, and Verizon Services, et al. § SPECIAL SECTION: Time Warner and the Social Contract § APPENDIX 1 — About the Authors and Organizations § APPENDIX 2 — Descriptions of Verizon NY and its Affiliate Companies § APPENDIX 3 — Time Line of Verizon NY’s Deregulatory Orders For More Information: § Gerald A. Norlander, [email protected] § Bruce Kushnick, [email protected] § David Bergmann, [email protected] Acknowledgements: PULP analysts include William Yates. New Networks’ experts and advisors include Fred Goldstein, Alexander Goldman, W. Scott McCollough, Esq, Dana Spiegel, Chuck Sherwood, Paul Hartman, Joly MacFie, and Thomas Allibone. 2 It’s All Interconnected. PART I Introduction 1.0 Introduction This report supplies previously unexamined data and new analysis based on primary source information from Verizon New York (VNY) and offers a new alternative path to the future of communications in New York State and the rest of the country.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Telecommunication and Cable
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION AND CABLE __________________________________________ ) Petition of Verizon New England Inc., ) MCImetro Access Transmission Services of ) Massachusetts, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Access ) Transmission Services, MCI Communications ) Services, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Business Services, ) D.T.C. 07-9 Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., d/b/a ) Verizon Long Distance, and Verizon Select ) Services, Inc. for Investigation into the ) Intrastate Access Rates of Competitive Local ) Exchange Carriers ) __________________________________________) VERIZON’S RESPONSE TO XO’s MOTION TO COMPEL DISCOVERY Verizon New England Inc. (―Verizon Massachusetts‖), MCImetro Access Transmission Services of Massachusetts, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Access Transmission Services, MCI Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Business Services, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Long Distance, and Verizon Select Services, Inc. (collectively ―Verizon‖ or ―the Verizon companies‖) hereby respond to the August 11, 2008 Motion of XO Communications Services, Inc. (―XO‖) to Compel Verizon Massachusetts, Inc. to Provide Further Responses to Certain Document Requests (―Motion‖). XO’s Motion seeks an order from the Department compelling production of additional responses to XO-VZ 2-3 and XO-VZ 2-4. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion should be denied. I. The Department Should Sustain Verizon’s Objections to XO-VZ 2-3 In XO-VZ 2-3, XO requests that Verizon confirm that it has ―no internal memos, e-mails, or other documents regarding the reasonableness of Verizon’s switched access rates.‖1 Verizon objected to this request on the grounds that it is overly broad and unduly burdensome, but directed XO to Verizon’s filings in D.T.E.
    [Show full text]
  • Download News Release
    News Release FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE Media contacts: July 21, 2021 Kim Ancin 908.559.3227 [email protected] Eric Wilkens 908.559.3063 [email protected] Verizon reports increased 5G adoption and record 2Q performance Award-winning network performance, customer and wireless service revenue growth lead company to revise guidance upward for the year 2Q 2021 highlights Consolidated: • $1.40 in earnings per share (EPS); adjusted EPS*, excluding special items, of $1.37. • Operating revenue of $33.8 billion, a result of strong sequential wireless revenue growth. • Net income of $5.9 billion and adjusted EBITDA* of $12.2 billion. Total Wireless: • Total wireless service revenue of $16.9 billion, a 5.9 percent increase year over year, and a 4.0 percent increase from second-quarter 2019. • Total retail postpaid churn of 0.94 percent, and retail postpaid phone churn of 0.72 percent. • 528,000 retail postpaid net additions, including 275,000 phone net additions, resulting in 121.3 million total retail connections. Consumer: • Total revenue of $23.5 billion, an increase of 11.2 percent year over year, and an increase of 6.7 percent from second-quarter 2019. • Total retail postpaid churn of 0.83 percent, and retail postpaid phone churn of 0.65 percent, a record- low retail postpaid phone churn outside of second-quarter 2020 and third-quarter 2020, which were heavily impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. • 350,000 retail postpaid net additions, including 197,000 phone net additions, driving 5G-phone adoption to approximately 20 percent of Consumer wireless phone customers and step-ups to premium unlimited plans.
    [Show full text]
  • Verizon up to Speed Live Friday, July 24, 2020 [Music]. >> Hello My Name Is Christallyne Pagulayan I'm Currently an Indire
    Verizon Up To Speed Live Friday, July 24, 2020 _Redefining Communication Access www.acscaptions.com _ [Music]. >> Hello my name is Christallyne Pagulayan I'm currently an indirect account manager based here in viva Las Vegas. I've been with Verizon for ten years now ten years this month I was born and raised in the Philippines. About 40 minutes or an hour from Manila. I've always been that person that's always like a go-getter let's go after it let's go. I traveled with my flipflops with one luggage and $500 in my pocket. All I knew was I was going to San Francisco. I had a map and my American Dream. Until now it still gives me goosies when I think about it I'm like oh, my God what was I thinking I arrived it was freezing cold I used my $500 to get boots I was freezing Verizon said they were hiring for part-time service rep long story short I got the job for me along the way the journey with Verizon my journey in the uses being resilient and patience and compassion helped me in my life where I came from in the Philippines there's places where they don't have electricity. I am so thankful that Verizon has provided me the means of being able to help out. So last month along with my high school classmates we were able to generate almost 300,000 pesos so we could buy basic needs, basic food and basic medical supplies and here in Vegas every weekend I make masks with my mother.
    [Show full text]
  • Affidavit Application No.: SEA 96-L-034-04 Applicant: Cellco Partnership D/B/A Verizon Wireless PC Hearing Date: 4/26/14 BOS Hearing Date: 05/02/17
    County of Fairfax, Virginia MEMORANDUM Office of the County Attorney Suite 549, 12000 Government Center Parkway Fairfax, Virginia 22035-0064 Phone: (703) 324-2421; Fax: (703) 324-2665 www. fair faxcounty. gov DATE: April 13, 2017 TO: KELLY POSUSNEY, Staff Coordinator Zoning Evaluation Division Department of Planning and Zoning FROM: Jo Ellen Groves, Paralegal Office of the County Attorney SUBJECT: Affidavit Application No.: SEA 96-L-034-04 Applicant: Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless PC Hearing Date: 4/26/14 BOS Hearing Date: 05/02/17 REF.: 136710 Attached is an affidavit which has been approved by the Office of the County Attorney for the referenced case. Please include this affidavit dated 04/12/2017, which bears my initials and is numbered 136710 a, when you prepare the staff report. Thank you for your cooperation. Attachment cc: (w/attach) Damaris Martinez, Planning Technician I (Sent via e-mail) Zoning Evaluation Division Department of Planning and Zoning Document in ProLaw SPECIAL EXCEPTION AFFIDAVIT DATE: April 12,2017 (enter date affidavit is notarized) T Frank W. Stearns do hereby state that I am an (enter name of applicant or authorized agent) (check one) [ ] applicant [/] applicant's authorized agent listed in Par. 1(a) below in Application No.(s): SEA 96-L-034-04 (enter County-assigned application number(s), e.g. SE 88-V-001) and that, to the best of my knowledge and belief, the following information is true: 1(a). The following constitutes a listing of the names and addresses of all APPLICANTS, TITLE OWNERS, CONTRACT PURCHASERS, and LESSEES of the land described in the application,* and, if any of the foregoing is a TRUSTEE,** each BENEFICIARY of such trust, and all ATTORNEYS and REAL ESTATE BROKERS, and all AGENTS who have acted on behalf of any of the foregoing with respect to the application: (NOTE: All relationships to the application listed above in BOLD print are to be disclosed.
    [Show full text]
  • Broadband-Final-Report-2005.Pdf
    Southern Maryland Broadband Study CCG Consulting, Inc. Table of Contents Page Overview of the Project.................................................................................................................4 Executive Summary.......................................................................................................................6 Section I – Needs Assessment........................................................................................................9 A. Surveys and Interviews ...........................................................................................9 B. Mapping Broadband Availability..........................................................................16 1. Calvert County Maps ......................................................................................20 2. Charles County Maps......................................................................................25 3. St. Mary’s Maps..............................................................................................30 C. Interviews with Incumbent Providers ..................................................................39 D. Broadband Products and Prices ...........................................................................44 E. Business Market Data...........................................................................................52 Section II – Industry Analysis.....................................................................................................56 A. Overview of the Communications Industry..........................................................56
    [Show full text]
  • Advertisement Report: House Prepared on 2016-02-08 Performance from 2016-01-08 Through 2016-02-08
    Advertisement Report: House Prepared on 2016-02-08 Performance from 2016-01-08 through 2016-02-08 YouTube on Broadstreet Blog ID Name Views Hovers Clicks Click Rate 32928 YouTube on Broadstreet Blog 1,302 115 191 14.67% * * Denotes above average performance. The global average display ad performance is 0.06%, according to benchmarks at Google. Core Events By Day 100 75 50 25 0 8. Jan 10. 12. 14. 16. 18. 20. 22. 24. 26. 28. 30. 1. Feb 3. Feb 5. Feb 7. Feb Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Jan Performance Views Hovers Clicks Breakdown by City Here is a break down of ad events by city. These can be core events like clicks or hovers, or special events that are available only to certain ad formats. 20 15 e g % a 0 t . n % 5 e 10 0 1 . c r 3 e 1 P % 5 0 . 8 % 0 % % . 0 0 0 % % % % 4 . 0 0 0 0 3 3 . d n n e y e k e o r % 2 2 2 2 r o y r it r n F n e 3 o t l o o . f g k C l a e th f o im a B ta R 0 ta lin o t a g n O r r l m n d a S A B a a a e B n B R S a P Extended Event Summary / Counts These are the counts for special or extended events for this ad. The data shown is only for events where user location and detail could be obtained.
    [Show full text]
  • Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-226 Before the Federal
    Federal Communications Commission FCC 07-226 Before the Federal Communications Commission Washington, D.C. 20554 In the Matter of ) ) Applications Filed for the Transfer of Certain ) Spectrum Licenses and Section 214 ) Authorizations in the States of Maine, New ) WC Docket No. 07-22 Hampshire, and Vermont from Verizon ) Communications Inc. and its Subsidiaries to ) FairPoint Communications, Inc. ) MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER Adopted: December 20, 2007 Released: January 9, 2008 By the Commission: Commissioners Copps and Adelstein dissenting and issuing separate statements. TABLE OF CONTENTS Para. I. INTRODUCTION ........................................................................................................................... 1 II. BACKGROUND ............................................................................................................................. 3 A. Description of the Applicants ............................................................................................. 3 1. The Transferor ....................................................................................................... 3 2. The Transferee ....................................................................................................... 6 B. Description of the Transaction............................................................................................ 7 C. Applications and Review Process..................................................................................... 10 III. STANDARD OF REVIEW AND PUBLIC INTEREST
    [Show full text]
  • The History of Verizon Communications
    The history of Verizon Communications Verizon Communications Inc., based in New York City and incorporated in Delaware, was formed on June 30, 2000, with the merger of Bell Atlantic Corp. and GTE Corp. Verizon began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) under the VZ symbol on Monday, July 3, 2000. It also began trading on the NASDAQ exchange under the same symbol on March 10, 2010. The symbol was selected because it uses the two letters of the Verizon logo that graphically portray speed, while also echoing the origin of the company name: veritas, the Latin word connoting certainty and reliability, and horizon, signifying forward-looking and visionary. While Verizon is truly a 21st century company, the mergers that formed Verizon were many years in the making, involving companies with roots that can be traced to the beginnings of the telephone business in the late 19th century. Government regulation largely shaped the evolution of the industry throughout most of the 20th century. Then, with the signing of the Telecommunications Act on February 8, 1996, federal law directed a shift to more market-based policies. This promise of a new competitive marketplace was a driving force behind Verizon’s formation. Verizon’s formation The mergers that formed Verizon were among the largest in U.S. business history, culminating in a definitive merger agreement, dated July 27, 1998, between Bell Atlantic, based in New York City, and GTE, which was in the process of moving its headquarters from Stamford, Conn., to Irving, Texas. GTE and Bell Atlantic had each evolved and grown through years of mergers, acquisitions and divestitures.
    [Show full text]
  • Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Telecommunication and Cable
    COMMONWEALTH OF MASSACHUSETTS DEPARTMENT OF TELECOMMUNICATION AND CABLE __________________________________________ ) Petition of Verizon New England Inc., ) MCImetro Access Transmission Services of ) Massachusetts, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Access ) Transmission Services, MCI Communications ) Services, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Business Services, ) D.T.C. 07-9 Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., d/b/a ) Verizon Long Distance, and Verizon Select ) Services, Inc. for Investigation into the ) Intrastate Access Rates of Competitive Local ) Exchange Carriers ) __________________________________________) MOTION FOR CONFIDENTIAL TREATMENT Verizon New England Inc. (“Verizon Massachusetts”), MCImetro Access Transmission Services of Massachusetts, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Access Transmission Services, MCI Communications Services, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Business Services, Bell Atlantic Communications, Inc., d/b/a Verizon Long Distance, and Verizon Select Services, Inc. (collectively “Verizon” or “the Verizon companies”) hereby request that the Massachusetts Department of Telecommunications and Cable (“Department”) grant this motion for confidential treatment of certain information referenced in the Pre-filed Testimony of Paul B. Vasington (“Vasington Testimony”), which is being filed with the Department along with this Motion. As grounds for this request, Verizon states that the average revenue per minute (“ARPM”) data included in the Vasington Testimony is competitively sensitive information and constitutes a trade secret under Massachusetts law. Specifically, Verizon seeks confidential treatment for (1) the ARPM for Verizon Massachusetts’ usage sensitive switched access rate elements provided by Verizon Massachusetts to other carriers; and (2) the ARPM for the switched access charges paid by the Verizon companies to specifically named carriers. STANDARD OF REVIEW Under Massachusetts General Laws c. 25, § 5D, the Department is empowered to protect from public disclosure trade secrets or other proprietary information that is produced in the course of Department proceedings.
    [Show full text]