DOCSLIB.ORG

Aviation Weather Services, Advisory Circular 00-45F, Change 2 (March 2009)

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Aviation Weather Services, Advisory Circular 00-45F, Change 2 (March 2009) AVIATION U.S. DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE WEATHER U.S. DEPARTMENT OF TRANSPORTATION SERVICES FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION Advisory Circular, AC 00-45F, Change 2 Photo courtesy of Aaron A. Gilstad Published March 12, 2009 Aviation Weather Services, Advisory Circular 00-45F, Change 2 (March 2009) SUMMARY OF CHANGES SECTION CHANGE(S) Cover Specified that this is AC 00-45F, Change 2. The previous version of this document used the word “Revision” instead of “Change.” Did this to maintain consistency with other FAA Advisory Circulars. Also, changed NWS FAA Academy email address to: [email protected] Table of Contents Updated due to changes listed below. 1.3.7 Inserted ADS-B and FIS-B information. 3.1.4 Changed section title from “Examples of METAR Reports, Explanations, and Phraseology” to “METAR/SPECI Examples.” Replaced METAR/SPECI examples. 7.1 Updated FA product descriptions and replaced CONUS examples. 7.1.2 Inserted a note to define the terms “CSTL WTRS” and “CSTL SXNS” 7.1 Deleted “AND CSTL WTRS” from Figure 7-6 and Table 7-3. 7.2 Deleted TAF location maps. 7.2 Updated to 30-hour TAF format. 7.2.2 “Section 7.2.2.5 Valid period of Amended TAFs” was deleted and pertinent information was moved to section 7.2.2.4. 7.2.3 Sections 7.2.3.1 – 7.2.3.4 were updated to follow NWS Directive 10- 813 (dated 11/19/2007). 10, Appendix A Replaced “ASOS/AWOS Location Maps” with “Definitions of Common Terms used in En Route Forecasts and Advisories.” 15, Appendix F Updated Figure F-1. AWC Advisory Plotting Chart – Contiguous US and accompanying table. AC 00-45F, CHG 2 Summary of Changes Aviation Weather Services, Advisory Circular 00-45F, Change 2 (March 2009) FOREWORD Aviation Weather Services, Advisory Circular 00-45F, is published jointly by the National Weather Service (NWS) and the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA). This publication supplements its companion manual Aviation Weather, Advisory Circular 00-6A, which documents weather theory and its application to the aviation community. This advisory circular, AC 00-45F, explains U.S. aviation weather products and services. It details the interpretation and application of advisories, coded weather reports, forecasts, observed and prognostic weather charts, and radar and satellite imagery. Product examples and explanations are taken primarily from the Aviation Weather Center’s Aviation Digital Data Service website (http://adds.aviationweather.noaa.gov/). The AC 00-45F was written by Robert A. Prentice with assistance from Douglas D. Streu, and edited by Cynthia Abelman and Tom Dulong. Stan Roberts (AFS-600) was the reviewer for the FAA. Additional contributors include Raymond Tanabe, Larry Burch, Duane Carpenter, Lisa Glikbarg, Celia Miner, Ronald Olson, Richard Akers, Bill Carle, and Christa Jacobs. An online version of this document can be found at: http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory_and_Guidance_Library/rgAdvisoryCircular.nsf/MainFram e?OpenFrameSet or http://www.srh.noaa.gov/faa/pubs.html Comments and suggestions for improving this publication are encouraged and should be directed to: E-mail [email protected] US Postal Mail NATIONAL WEATHER SERVICE, W/SR64 BLDG 30, RM 107 6500 S MACARTHUR BLVD OKLAHOMA CITY OK 73169-6901 Aviation Weather Services, Advisory Circular, AC 00-45F, Change 2, supersedes AC 00-45F, revision 1, published July 31, 2008. This AC document will be cancelled when the AC 00-45G is published on February 11, 2010. AC 00-45F, CHG 2 Foreword Aviation Weather Services, Advisory Circular 00-45F, Change 2 (March 2009) NOTE: CLICK ON ANY ENTRY IN THE OF THE TABLE OF CONTENTS TO JUMP DIRECTLY TO THAT SECTION. ............................................................................................. XVI 1 AVIATION WEATHER SERVICE PROGRAM ................................................................... 1-1 1.1 NATIONAL OCEANIC AND ATMOSPHERIC ADMINISTRATION (NOAA) ................................................. 1-1 1.1.1 National Environmental Satellite Data and Information Service (NESDIS) ....................................... 1-1 1.1.1.1 Satellite Analysis Branch (SAB) .................................................................................................................. 1-1 1.1.2 National Weather Service (NWS) ........................................................................................................ 1-1 1.1.2.1 National Centers for Environmental Prediction (NCEP) .............................................................................. 1-1 1.1.2.1.1 NCEP Central Operations (NCO) ........................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.2.1.2 Aviation Weather Center (AWC) ............................................................................................................ 1-2 1.1.2.1.3 Hydrometeorological Prediction Center (HPC) ...................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.2.1.4 Storm Prediction Center (SPC) ............................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.2.1.5 Tropical Prediction Center (TPC) ........................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.2.2 Alaskan Aviation Weather Unit (AAWU) ................................................................................................... 1-2 1.1.2.3 Center Weather Service Unit (CWSU) ........................................................................................................ 1-3 1.1.2.4 Weather Forecast Office (WFO) .................................................................................................................. 1-3 1.1.2.5 NWS Office at the FAA Academy ............................................................................................................... 1-3 1.2 FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION (FAA) ...................................................................................... 1-4 1.2.1 Air Traffic Control System Command Center (ATCSCC) .................................................................. 1-4 1.2.2 Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC) ........................................................................................ 1-4 1.2.3 Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) and Terminal Radar Approach Control (TRACON) ................... 1-4 1.2.4 Flight Service Station (FSS) / Automated Flight Service Station (AFSS) ........................................... 1-5 1.3 DISSEMINATION OF AVIATION WEATHER PRODUCTS ........................................................................... 1-6 1.3.1 Weather Briefings ................................................................................................................................ 1-6 1.3.1.1 Standard Briefing ......................................................................................................................................... 1-6 1.3.1.2 Abbreviated Briefing .................................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.3.1.3 Outlook Briefing .......................................................................................................................................... 1-7 1.3.2 Direct Use Access Terminal Service (DUATS/DUAT) ...................................................................... 1-7 1.3.3 Aviation Digital Data Service (ADDS) ............................................................................................... 1-8 1.3.4 Telephone Information Briefing Service (TIBS) ................................................................................. 1-8 1.3.5 Hazardous Inflight Weather Advisory Service (HIWAS).................................................................... 1-9 1.3.6 En Route Flight Advisory Service (EFAS) ........................................................................................ 1-10 1.3.7 Automatic Dependent Surveillance – Broadcast (ADS-B) ................................................................ 1-11 1.3.7.1 Flight Information Service – Broadcast (FIS-B) ........................................................................................ 1-11 1.3.7.1.1 FIS-B Products ...................................................................................................................................... 1-11 1.3.7.1.2 Operational Use of FIS-B Products ....................................................................................................... 1-12 2 AVIATION WEATHER PRODUCT CLASSIFICATION AND POLICY .............................. 2-1 2.1 CLASSIFICATION OF AVIATION WEATHER PRODUCTS .......................................................................... 2-1 2.1.1 Primary Weather Product Classification .............................................................................................. 2-1 2.1.2 Supplementary Weather Product Classification .................................................................................. 2-1 2.2 TYPES OF AVIATION WEATHER INFORMATION ..................................................................................... 2-2 2.2.1 Observations ........................................................................................................................................ 2-2 2.2.2 Analysis ..............................................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • A Real-Time System to Estimate Weather Conditions at High Resolution
    12.1 A Real-Time System to Estimate Weather Conditions at High Resolution Peter P. Neilley1 Weather Services International, Inc. Andover, MA 01810 And Bruce L. Rose The Weather Channel Atlanta, GA the earth’s surface (the so-called current 1. Introduction1 conditions). b) We do not necessarily produce weather The purpose of this paper is to describe an observations on a regular grid, but at an operational system used to estimate current irregular set of arbitrary locations or points weather conditions at arbitrary places in real- that are relevant to the consumers of the time. The system, known as High Resolution information. Assimilation of Data (or HiRAD), is designed to generate synthetic weather observations in a c) In addition to producing quantitative manner equivalent in scope, timeliness and observational elements (e.g. temperature, quality to a arbitrarily dense physical observing pressure and wind speed) our system network. Our approach is, first, to collect produces common, descriptive terminology information from a variety of relevant sources of the sensible weather such as including gridded analyses, traditional surface “Thundershowers”, “Patchy Fog”, and weather reports, radar, satellite and lightning “Snow Flurries”. observations. Then we continuously synthesize these data into weather condition estimates at d) We do not strive to produce a state of the prescribed locations. An operational system atmosphere optimized for fidelity with based on this approach has been built and is Numerical Weather Prediction (NWP) commercially deployed in the United States. models. Instead, the system is optimized to produce the most accurate estimate of the In most regards, our approach is analogous to observed state at the surface that can be modern data assimilation techniques.
    [Show full text]
  • Geometric Characteristics of Clouds from Ceilometer Measurements and Radiosounding Methods
    GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CLOUDS FROM CEILOMETER MEASUREMENTS AND RADIOSOUNDING METHODS Montserrat Costa Surós Dipòsit legal: Gi. 1888-2014 http://hdl.handle.net/10803/284084 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ca Aquesta obra està subjecta a una llicència Creative Commons Reconeixement Esta obra está bajo una licencia Creative Commons Reconocimiento This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution licence GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CLOUDS FROM CEILOMETER MEASUREMENTS AND RADIOSOUNDING METHODS DOCTORAL THESIS Montserrat Costa Surós 2014 DOCTORAL THESIS GEOMETRIC CHARACTERISTICS OF CLOUDS FROM CEILOMETER MEASUREMENTS AND RADIOSOUNDING METHODS Montserrat Costa Surós 2014 Doctoral Programme in Experimental Sciences and Sustainability Supervisors: Josep Calbó Angrill José Abel González Gutiérrez Thesis submitted for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy by the University of Girona El Dr. Josep Calbó Angrill i el Dr. José Abel González Gutiérrez, professors titulars del Departament de Física de la Universitat de Girona, CERTIFIQUEN: Que aquest treball, titulat “Geometric characteristics of clouds from ceilometer measurements and radiosounding methods”, que presenta la Montserrat Costa Surós per a l’obtenció del títol de doctora, ha estat realitzat sota la seva direcció. I, perquè així consti i tingui els efectes oportuns, signen aquest document. Dr. Josep Calbó Angrill Dr. José Abel González Gutiérrez Girona, 29 de juliol de 2014. Un esforç total és una victòria completa M. Ghandi Acknowledgments First and the most important I would like to thank my supervisors Dr. Josep Calbó and Dr. Josep- Abel González for giving me the opportunity to begin my research career with them, which has led to this doctoral thesis, and for their guidance and support during these years.
    [Show full text]
  • AMOFSG/10-Sod 19/6/13
    AMOFSG/10-SoD 19/6/13 AERODROME METEOROLOGICAL OBSERVATION AND FORECAST STUDY GROUP (AMOFSG) TENTH MEETING Montréal, 17 to 19 June 2013 SUMMARY OF DISCUSSIONS 1. HISTORICAL 1.1 The tenth meeting of the Aerodrome Meteorological Observation and Forecast Study Group (AMOFSG) was held at the Headquarters of the International Civil Aviation Organization (ICAO) in Montréal, Canada, 17 to 19 June 2013. 1.2 The meeting was opened by Mr. Greg Brock, Chief of the Meteorology Section of the Air Navigation Bureau of ICAO, who extended a warm welcome to all the participants. Mr. Brock emphasized that this tenth meeting of the AMOFSG was likely to be the last of the group prior to the convening of an ICAO Meteorology (MET) Divisional Meeting in July 2014, to be held in part conjointly with the Fifteenth Session of the World Meteorological Organization (WMO) Commission for Aeronautical Meteorology (CAeM-XV). For this reason, Mr. Brock underlined the need for the group to work efficiently during its three days of deliberations, with a strong emphasis placed on determining whether proposals arising from each of the topics to be addressed were of sufficient maturity so as to reduce or eliminate entirely the need for significant further work and/or a meeting ahead of the MET Divisional Meeting. 1.3 The names and contact details of the participants are listed in Appendix A . Mr. Bill Maynard was elected Chairman of the meeting. The meeting was served by the Acting Secretary of the AMOFSG, Mr. Greg Brock, Chief, Meteorology Section. 1.4 The meeting considered the following agenda items: Agenda Item 1: Opening of the meeting; Agenda Item 2: Election of Chairman; Agenda Item 3: Adoption of working arrangements; Agenda Item 4: Adoption of the agenda; (41 pages) AMOFSG.10.SoD.en.docx AMOFSG/10-SoD - 2 - Agenda Item 5: Aerodrome observations; Agenda Item 6: Forecasting at the aerodrome and in the terminal area and ATIS requirements; Agenda Item 7: Deliverables; Agenda Item 8: Any other business; and Agenda Item 9: Closure of the meeting.
    [Show full text]
  • Fire W Eather
    Fire Weather Fire Weather Fire weather depends on a combination of wildland fuels and surface weather conditions. Dead and live fuels are assessed weekly from a satellite that determines the greenness of the landscape. Surface weather conditions are monitored every 5-minutes from the Oklahoma Mesonet. This fire weather help page highlights the surface weather ingredients to monitor before wildfires and also includes several products to monitor once wildfires are underway. Fire Weather Ingredients: WRAP While the presence of wildland fuels is one necessary component for wildfires, weather conditions ultimately dictate whether or not a day is primed for wildfires to occur. There are four key fire weather ingredients and they include: high Winds, low Relative humidity, high Air temperature, and no/minimal recent Precipitation (WRAP). High Winds are the second most critical weather ingredient for wildfires. In general, winds of 20 mph or greater 20+ mph winds increase spot fires and make for most of the containment considerably more difficult. state Low Relative humidity is the most 30-40+ critical weather ingredient for wildfires mph winds and is most common in the afternoon when the air temperature is at its warmest. When relative humidity is at or below 20% extreme fire behavior can result and spot fires become freQuent. Watch out for areas of 20% or below relative humidity and 20 mph or higher winds à 20/20 rule! Extremely low relative humidity Warm Air temperatures are another values key weather ingredient for wildfires as warming can lower the relative humidity, reduce moisture for smaller dead fuels, and bring fuels closer to their ignition point.
    [Show full text]
  • Clouds, Precipitation and Their Remote Sensing Intergovernmental
    25.09.12 Clouds, Precipitation and their Remote Sensing Prof. Susanne Crewell AG Integrated Remote Sensing Institute for Geophysics and Meteorology University of Cologne Susanne Crewell, Kompaktkurs, Jülich24. 25 September September 2012 2012 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) www.ipcc.ch Nobel price 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report (FAR), 2007: "Warming of the climate system is unequivocal", and "Most of the observed increase in global average temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic greenhouse gas concentrations". Aerosols, clouds and their interaction with climate is still the most uncertain area of climate change and require multidisciplinary coordinated research efforts. SusanneSusS sanna ne Crewell,Crewewellelll,K, Kompaktkurs,Kompakta kurs, JülichJülJüü ichchc 252 SeptemberSSeeptetetembembber 201220121 1 25.09.12 Why are clouds so complex? Cloud microphysical processes occur on small spatial scales and need to be parametrized in atmospheric models Cloud microphysics is strongly connected to other sub-grid scale processes (turbulence, radiation) Cloud droplets 0.01 mm diameter 100-1000 per cm3 Condensation nuclei Drizzle droplets 0.001 mm diameter 0.1 mm diameter 1000 per cm3 1 per cm3 Rain drops ca. 1 mm diameter, 1 drops per liter Susannesa Crewell, Kompaktkurs, Jülich 25 September 2012 Why are clouds so complex? From hydrometeors to single clouds to Einzelwolken to the global and cloud fields system Susanne Crewell, Kompaktkurs, Jülich 25 September
    [Show full text]
  • The Error Is the Feature: How to Forecast Lightning Using a Model Prediction Error [Applied Data Science Track, Category Evidential]
    The Error is the Feature: How to Forecast Lightning using a Model Prediction Error [Applied Data Science Track, Category Evidential] Christian Schön Jens Dittrich Richard Müller Saarland Informatics Campus Saarland Informatics Campus German Meteorological Service Big Data Analytics Group Big Data Analytics Group Offenbach, Germany ABSTRACT ACM Reference Format: Despite the progress within the last decades, weather forecasting Christian Schön, Jens Dittrich, and Richard Müller. 2019. The Error is the is still a challenging and computationally expensive task. Current Feature: How to Forecast Lightning using a Model Prediction Error: [Ap- plied Data Science Track, Category Evidential]. In Proceedings of 25th ACM satellite-based approaches to predict thunderstorms are usually SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (KDD ’19). based on the analysis of the observed brightness temperatures in ACM, New York, NY, USA, 10 pages. different spectral channels and emit a warning if a critical threshold is reached. Recent progress in data science however demonstrates 1 INTRODUCTION that machine learning can be successfully applied to many research fields in science, especially in areas dealing with large datasets. Weather forecasting is a very complex and challenging task requir- We therefore present a new approach to the problem of predicting ing extremely complex models running on large supercomputers. thunderstorms based on machine learning. The core idea of our Besides delivering forecasts for variables such as the temperature, work is to use the error of two-dimensional optical flow algorithms one key task for meteorological services is the detection and pre- applied to images of meteorological satellites as a feature for ma- diction of severe weather conditions.
    [Show full text]
  • Touching the Clouds Activity Guide
    Touching the Clouds Activity Guide Purpose Provide a mental representation of each cloud type Create a tactile cloud identification chart Overview Individuals will construct and touch a tactile model of common types of clouds to learn how to describe the clouds based on their shape and texture. They will compare their descriptions with the standard classifications using the cloud types identified in the GLOBE Clouds Protocol. Time: 45 minutes to 1 ½ hours, depending on individual’s age Level: All Materials (per person) One large sheet of cardstock (18” x 12”) Tape One set of Braille labels for each cloud type and/or markers One small feather A layered piece of blanket or soft fabric (eight 1’ X 1” pieces) Cotton balls of varied sizes One tissue Organza or a similar material, cut into pieces, one layered 1” x 1” piece Pillow stuffing, one 1” x 1” piece A tsp of sand Three paper clips Liquid glue Scissors Baby Wipes Preparation Use tape to divide the large cardstock sheet in four sections: one for the cloud title at the top and three for the altitudes: using a portrait layout, place three pieces of tape horizontally, from side to side of the sheet. 1. 1” off the upper edge of the sheet 2. 8” off the upper edge of the sheet 1 Steps What to do and how to do it: Making A Tactile Cloud Identification Chart 1. Discuss that clouds come in three basic shapes: cirrus, stratus and cumulus. a. Feel of the 4” feather and describe it; discuss that these wispy clouds are high in the sky and are named cirrus.
    [Show full text]
  • 6.4 the Warning Time for Cloud-To-Ground Lightning in Isolated, Ordinary Thunderstorms Over Houston, Texas
    6.4 THE WARNING TIME FOR CLOUD-TO-GROUND LIGHTNING IN ISOLATED, ORDINARY THUNDERSTORMS OVER HOUSTON, TEXAS Nathan C. Clements and Richard E. Orville Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 1. INTRODUCTION shear and buoyancy, with small magnitudes of vertical wind shear likely to produce ordinary, convective Lightning is a natural but destructive phenomenon storms. Weisman and Klemp (1986) describe the short- that affects various locations on the earth’s surface lived single cell storm as the most basic convective every year. Uman (1968) defines lightning as a self- storm. Therefore, this ordinary convective storm type will propagating atmospheric electrical discharge that results be the focus of this study. from the accumulation of positive and negative space charge, typically occurring within convective clouds. This 1.2 THUNDERSTORM CHARGE STRUCTURE electrical discharge can occur in two basic ways: cloud flashes and ground flashes (MacGorman and Rust The primary source of lightning is electric charge 1998, p. 83). The latter affects human activity, property separated in a cloud type known as a cumulonimbus and life. Curran et al. (2000) find that lightning is ranked (Cb) (Uman 1987). Interactions between different types second behind flash and river flooding as causing the of hydrometeors within a cloud are thought to carry or most deaths from any weather-related event in the transfer charges, thus creating net charge regions United States. From 1959 to 1994, there was an throughout a thunderstorm. Charge separation can average of 87 deaths per year from lightning. Curran et either come about by inductive mechanisms (i.e. al. also rank the state of Texas as third in the number of requires an electric field to induce charge on the surface fatalities from 1959 to 1994, behind Florida at number of the hydrometeor) or non-inductive mechanisms (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Rightsizing Project Nextgen IOC Sensor Assessment Summary AJP
    RightSizing Project NextGen IOC Sensor Assessment Summary AJP-6830 1 of 64 December 1, 2009 RightSizing Project NextGen IOC Sensor Assessment Summary TABLE OF CONTENTS EXECUTIVE SUMMARY ............................................................................................................ 3 1 INTRODUCTION ................................................................................................................ 4 1.1 Context and Motivation .....................................................................................................4 1.1.1 NextGen ......................................................................................................................4 1.1.2 4D weather cube ........................................................................................................4 1.1.3 Weather observation and forecast requirements to meet NextGen goals .................5 1.2 RightSizing Project Goals ....................................................................................................6 1.2.1 Assessment of Sensor Network ..................................................................................7 1.2.2 Identification of gaps based on functional and performance requirements ..............8 1.2.3 Development of master plan to meet NextGen weather observation requirements .8 1.3 Scope of this Report (FY 2009) ...........................................................................................8 2 PROGRAM MANAGEMENT AND SCHEDULE ......................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • January 2, 2020 Notices to Airmen
    U.S. Department of Transportation Federal Aviation Administration NOTICES TO AIRMEN Domestic/International January 2, 2020 Next Issue January 30, 2020 Notices to Airmen included in this publication are NOT given during pilot briefings unless specifically requested by the pilot. An electronic version of this publication is on the internet at http://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/notices Air Traffic Products and Publications Team NOTICES TO AIRMEN - January 2, 2020 Part 2. INTERNATIONAL NOTICES TO AIRMEN Notices to Airmen International GENERAL This part features significant international notices to airmen (NOTAM) information and special notices. The information contained in the International Notices to Airmen section is derived from international notices and other official sources. International notices are of two types: Class One International Notices are those NOTAMs issued via telecommunications. They are made available to the U.S. flying public by the International NOTAM Office (Washington, DC) through the local Flight Service Station (FSS). Class Two International Notices are NOTAMs issued via postal services and are not readily available to the U.S. flying public. The International Notices to Airmen draws from both these sources and also includes information about temporary hazardous conditions which are not otherwise readily available to the flyer. Before any international flight, always update the International Notices to Airmen with a review of Class One International Notices available at your closest FSS. Foreign notices carried in this publication are carried as issued to the maximum extent possible. Most abbreviations used in this publication are listed in ICAO Document DOC 8400. Wherever possible, the source of the information is included at the end of an entry.
    [Show full text]
  • Datasheet: Thunderstorm Local Lightning Sensor TSS928
    Thunderstorm Local Lightning Sensor ™ TSS928 lightning Vaisala TSS928™ is a local-area lightning detection sensor that can be integrated with automated surface weather observations. Superior Performance in Local- area TSS928 detects: Lightning Tracking • Optical, magnetic, and electrostatic Lightning-sensitive operations rely on pulses from lightning events with zero Vaisala TSS928 sensors to provide critical false alarms local lightning information, both for • Cloud and cloud-to-ground lightning meteorological applications as well as within 30 nautical miles (56 km) threat data, to facilitate advance • Cloud-to-ground lightning classified warnings, initiate safety procedures, and into three range intervals: isolate equipment with full confidence. • 0 … 5 nmi (0 … 9 km) The patented lightning algorithms of TSS928 provide the most precise ranging • 5 … 10 nmi (9 … 19 km) of any stand-alone lightning sensor • 10 … 30 nmi (19 … 56 km) available in the world today. • Cloud-to-ground lightning classified The optical coincident requirement into directions: N, NE, E, SE, S, SW, W, Vaisala TSS928™ accurately reports the eliminates reporting of non-lightning and NW range and direction of cloud-to-ground events. The Vaisala Automated lightning and provides cloud lightning TSS928 can be used to integrate counts. Lightning Alert and Risk Management lightning reports with automated (ALARM) system software is used to weather observation programs such as visualize TSS928 sensor data. METAR. Technical Data Measurement Performance Support Services Detection range 30 nmi (56 km) radius from sensor Vaisala TSS928™ is fully supported by our Customer location Support Center, Technical Service Group, and Field Range resolution Three range groups: Service Engineering Team. Maintain optimal 0 … 5 nmi (0 … 9 km) performance by purchasing a service agreement 5 … 10 nmi (9 … 19 km) customized to your unique system requirements.
    [Show full text]
  • Aerodrome Actual Weather – METAR Decode
    Aerodrome Actual Weather – METAR decode Code element Example Decode Notes 1 Identification METAR — Meteorological Airfield Report, SPECI — selected special (not from UK civil METAR or SPECI METAR METAR aerodromes) Location indicator EGLL London Heathrow Station four-letter indicator 'ten twenty Zulu on the Date/Time 291020Z 29th' AUTO Metars will only be disseminated when an aerodrome is closed or at H24 aerodromes, A fully automated where the accredited met. observer is on duty break overnight. Users are reminded that reports AUTO report with no human of visibility, present weather and cloud from automated systems should be treated with caution intervention due to the limitations of the sensors themselves and the spatial area sampled by the sensors. 2 Wind 'three one zero Wind degrees, fifteen knots, Max only given if >= 10KT greater than the mean. VRB = variable. 00000KT = calm. 31015G27KT direction/speed max twenty seven Wind direction is given in degrees true. knots' 'varying between two Extreme direction 280V350 eight zero and three Variation given in clockwise direction, but only when mean speed is greater than 3 KT. variance five zero degrees' 3 Visibility 'three thousand two Prevailing visibility 3200 0000 = 'less than 50 metres' 9999 = 'ten kilometres or more'. No direction is required. hundred metres' Minimum visibility 'Twelve hundred The minimum visibility is also included alongside the prevailing visibility when the visibility in one (in addition to the 1200SW metres to the south- direction, which is not the prevailing visibility, is less than 1500 metres or less than 50% of the prevailing visibility west' prevailing visibility. A direction is also added as one of the eight points of the compass.
    [Show full text]