DOCSLIB.ORG

QUANTUM FIELD THEORY? the Charged Particles, Are Ordinary Mechanical Point-Like Objects and Are Thus Not Associated to fields

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
QUANTUM FIELD THEORY? the Charged Particles, Are Ordinary Mechanical Point-Like Objects and Are Thus Not Associated to fields Relativistic Quantum Fields W + ¯b s¯ t¯ t¯ g s s¯ Lecture notes Based on the course given by Riccardo Rattazzi First redaction, Johnny Espin, 2012 Second redaction, Riccardo Rattazzi, 2016 Contents I Foundations and Matter5 1 Introduction 6 1.1 What is quantum field theory?......................................6 1.2 Why quantum field theory?........................................6 1.3 Units of measure..............................................8 1.4 Overview of particle physics........................................9 2 Classical Field Theory 13 2.1 Lagrangian mechanics........................................... 13 2.2 From mechanics to field theory...................................... 15 2.3 Least action principle in field theory................................... 16 2.4 Hamiltonian formalism........................................... 18 3 Symmetries 19 3.1 Group theory................................................ 19 3.1.1 Groups............................................... 19 3.1.2 Schur’s lemma........................................... 23 3.1.3 Lie algebras............................................. 25 3.2 Lorentz and Poincaré groups....................................... 27 3.2.1 Construction............................................ 27 3.2.2 Raising and lowering........................................ 30 3.2.3 Lie algebra............................................. 31 3.2.4 Representations........................................... 32 3.3 Noether’s theorem............................................. 35 3.3.1 Statement.............................................. 35 3.3.2 The stress-energy tensor...................................... 39 1 4 Scalar fields 43 4.1 The Klein-Gordon field........................................... 43 4.2 Quantisation of the Klein-Gordon field.................................. 44 4.2.1 Continuum limit.......................................... 45 4.2.2 Hilbert space............................................ 48 4.3 Properties of the Klein-Gordon field................................... 49 4.3.1 Relativistic normalisation of states and measure........................ 49 4.3.2 States localised in space...................................... 51 4.3.3 Time evolution........................................... 51 4.4 The charged scalar field.......................................... 54 4.4.1 Construction............................................ 54 4.4.2 Internal current and charge.................................... 54 4.4.3 Quantisation............................................ 55 5 Spinor fields 57 5.1 Spinor representations of the Lorentz group............................... 57 5.2 Miscellaneous about spinors........................................ 58 5.2.1 Parity................................................ 58 ↑ 5.2.2 Relation between SL(2, C) and L+ ................................ 61 5.3 Covariant wave equations......................................... 64 5.3.1 Weyl spinors............................................ 64 5.3.2 Majorana spinors.......................................... 66 5.3.3 Dirac spinors............................................ 67 5.3.4 Lagrangians............................................. 68 5.4 Path towards quantisation......................................... 70 5.4.1 Classical solutions......................................... 70 5.4.2 Chirality and helicity....................................... 71 5.5 Quantisation of the Dirac field...................................... 73 5.5.1 How one should not quantise the Dirac field........................... 73 5.5.2 The right quantisation method.................................. 75 5.5.3 Hilbert space............................................ 76 5.6 Properties of the Dirac field........................................ 77 5.6.1 Time evolution........................................... 77 2 5.6.2 Internal charge........................................... 77 6 Causality in quantum field theory 78 II Forces and Interactions 79 7 Vector Fields 80 7.1 Classical Electrodynamics......................................... 80 7.2 Exercise................................................... 82 7.3 A fresh look at Maxwell equations: counting degrees of freedom.................... 83 7.4 A first step towards quantization..................................... 85 7.5 Quantization à la Gupta-Bleuler..................................... 85 7.6 Quantization of massive vector fields................................... 89 7.6.1 Massive Vector Fields....................................... 89 7.6.2 Canonical quantization...................................... 91 7.6.3 Heisenberg Picture Field...................................... 94 7.6.4 Polarization vectors........................................ 94 7.7 Polarisations of the vector field...................................... 96 7.7.1 One-particle states......................................... 97 7.7.2 Operators and fields transformations............................... 99 7.7.3 Polarisations............................................ 101 8 Discrete symmetries 103 8.1 Introduction................................................. 103 8.2 Parity.................................................... 104 8.2.1 Foreword.............................................. 104 8.2.2 Spin 0................................................ 105 8.2.3 Spin 1/2............................................... 107 8.2.4 Spin 1................................................ 109 8.3 Time reversal................................................ 110 8.3.1 Foreword.............................................. 110 8.3.2 Spin 0................................................ 111 8.3.3 Spin 1/2............................................... 112 8.3.4 Spin 1................................................ 113 3 8.4 Charge conjugation............................................. 113 8.4.1 Foreword.............................................. 113 8.4.2 Spin 0................................................ 114 8.4.3 Spin 1/2............................................... 114 8.4.4 Spin 1................................................ 115 9 Interacting Fields 116 9.1 Asymptotic States............................................. 116 9.2 The S-Matrix................................................ 119 9.2.1 Lippmann-Schwinger Equation.................................. 119 9.2.2 Symmetries of the S-Matrix.................................... 122 9.3 Phenomenology............................................... 124 9.3.1 Cross Sections........................................... 124 9.3.2 Decay Rates............................................ 124 9.4 Amplitudes in Perturbation Theory.................................... 126 9.4.1 Perturbative Expansion...................................... 126 9.4.2 Dyson Series Representation of the S-Matrix.......................... 127 9.4.3 Wick’s Theorem.......................................... 131 9.4.4 Feynman Rules and Feynman Diagrams............................. 134 A Proof of Wick’s Theorem 143 4 Part I Foundations and Matter 5 Chapter 1 Introduction Quantum field theory (QFT) is the theoretical “apparatus” that is needed to describe how nature works at its most fundamental level, that is to say at the shortest distances we have explored. In such domain physics is described by elementary particles and by their interactions, and QFT beautifully accounts for that. It also turns out that the notion of Fundamentality is here paired with the notion of Simplicity. As we shall see towards the end of this course, after having digested the necessary set of mathematical and physical concepts (≡formalism), the laws of particle physics can be written in a few lines with absolute precision and greatest empirical adequacy. In a sense particle physics is orthogonal to the sciences that deal with complexity. 1.1 What is quantum field theory? Technically, quantum field theory is the application of quantum mechanics to dynamical systems of fields, very much like basic quantum mechanics concerns the quantisation of dynamical systems of particles. Therefore, while quantum mechanics deals with mechanical systems with a finite number of degrees of freedom, quantum field theory describes the quantisation of systems with infinitely many degrees of freedom. Specifically this course is devoted to relativistic QFT. Relativistic QFTs explain the existence of particles and describe their mutual interactions. The fact that nature at its most basic level consists of particles can thus be viewed merely as a consequence of relativistic QFT. The domains of application of the latter in modern physics are quite broad: from the study of collisions among elementary particles in high energy accelerators, to early Universe cosmology. For instance, the primordial density fluctuations that later gave rise to structures like galaxies, the origin of dark matter or black-hole radiation are all described by relativistic QFT. Nevertheless there are also applications of quantum field theory to non-relativistic systems, in particular in condensed-matter physics: superfluidity, superconductivity, quantum Hall effect, ... 1.2 Why quantum field theory? We just outlined what QFT describes, but why do we need a field theory to describe particles? Is this a necessity? It basically is: relativistic QFT is the only way to reconcile ordinary quantum mechanics with special relativity. We can understand this necessity with several qualitative arguments: • Special relativity postulates the existence of a limiting speed. This implies that instantaneous
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Supergravity and Its Legacy Prelude and the Play
    Supergravity and its Legacy Prelude and the Play Sergio FERRARA (CERN – LNF INFN) Celebrating Supegravity at 40 CERN, June 24 2016 S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 1 Supergravity as carved on the Iconic Wall at the «Simons Center for Geometry and Physics», Stony Brook S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 2 Prelude S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 3 In the early 1970s I was a staff member at the Frascati National Laboratories of CNEN (then the National Nuclear Energy Agency), and with my colleagues Aurelio Grillo and Giorgio Parisi we were investigating, under the leadership of Raoul Gatto (later Professor at the University of Geneva) the consequences of the application of “Conformal Invariance” to Quantum Field Theory (QFT), stimulated by the ongoing Experiments at SLAC where an unexpected Bjorken Scaling was observed in inclusive electron- proton Cross sections, which was suggesting a larger space-time symmetry in processes dominated by short distance physics. In parallel with Alexander Polyakov, at the time in the Soviet Union, we formulated in those days Conformal invariant Operator Product Expansions (OPE) and proposed the “Conformal Bootstrap” as a non-perturbative approach to QFT. S. Ferrara - CERN, 2016 4 Conformal Invariance, OPEs and Conformal Bootstrap has become again a fashionable subject in recent times, because of the introduction of efficient new methods to solve the “Bootstrap Equations” (Riccardo Rattazzi, Slava Rychkov, Erik Tonni, Alessandro Vichi), and mostly because of their role in the AdS/CFT correspondence. The latter, pioneered by Juan Maldacena, Edward Witten, Steve Gubser, Igor Klebanov and Polyakov, can be regarded, to some extent, as one of the great legacies of higher dimensional Supergravity.
    [Show full text]
  • Minkowski Space-Time: a Glorious Non-Entity
    DRAFT: written for Petkov (ed.), The Ontology of Spacetime (in preparation) Minkowski space-time: a glorious non-entity Harvey R Brown∗ and Oliver Pooley† 16 March, 2004 Abstract It is argued that Minkowski space-time cannot serve as the deep struc- ture within a “constructive” version of the special theory of relativity, contrary to widespread opinion in the philosophical community. This paper is dedicated to the memory of Jeeva Anandan. Contents 1 Einsteinandthespace-timeexplanationofinertia 1 2 Thenatureofabsolutespace-time 3 3 The principle vs. constructive theory distinction 4 4 The explanation of length contraction 8 5 Minkowskispace-time: thecartorthehorse? 12 1 Einstein and the space-time explanation of inertia It was a source of satisfaction for Einstein that in developing the general theory of relativity (GR) he was able to eradicate what he saw as an embarrassing defect of his earlier special theory (SR): violation of the action-reaction principle. Leibniz held that a defining attribute of substances was their both acting and being acted upon. It would appear that Einstein shared this view. He wrote in 1924 that each physical object “influences and in general is influenced in turn by others.”1 It is “contrary to the mode of scientific thinking”, he wrote earlier in 1922, “to conceive of a thing. which acts itself, but which cannot be acted upon.”2 But according to Einstein the space-time continuum, in both arXiv:physics/0403088v1 [physics.hist-ph] 17 Mar 2004 Newtonian mechanics and special relativity, is such a thing. In these theories ∗Faculty of Philosophy, University of Oxford, 10 Merton Street, Oxford OX1 4JJ, U.K.; [email protected] †Oriel College, Oxford OX1 4EW, U.K.; [email protected] 1Einstein (1924, 15).
    [Show full text]
  • 1 Introduction 2 Klein Gordon Equation
    Thimo Preis 1 1 Introduction Non-relativistic quantum mechanics refers to the mathematical formulation of quantum mechanics applied in the context of Galilean relativity, more specifically quantizing the equations from the Hamiltonian formalism of non-relativistic Classical Mechanics by replacing dynamical variables by operators through the correspondence principle. Therefore, the physical properties predicted by the Schrödinger theory are invariant in a Galilean change of referential, but they do not have the invariance under a Lorentz change of referential required by the principle of relativity. In particular, all phenomena concerning the interaction between light and matter, such as emission, absorption or scattering of photons, is outside the framework of non-relativistic Quantum Mechanics. One of the main difficulties in elaborating relativistic Quantum Mechanics comes from the fact that the law of conservation of the number of particles ceases in general to be true. Due to the equivalence of mass and energy there can be creation or absorption of particles whenever the interactions give rise to energy transfers equal or superior to the rest massses of these particles. This theory, which i am about to present to you, is not exempt of difficulties, but it accounts for a very large body of experimental facts. We will base our deductions upon the six axioms of the Copenhagen Interpretation of quantum mechanics.Therefore, with the principles of quantum mechanics and of relativistic invariance at our disposal we will try to construct a Lorentz covariant wave equation. For this we need special relativity. 1.1 Special Relativity Special relativity states that the laws of nature are independent of the observer´s frame if it belongs to the class of frames obtained from each other by transformations of the Poincaré group.
    [Show full text]
  • The Dirac-Schwinger Covariance Condition in Classical Field Theory
    Pram~na, Vol. 9, No. 2, August 1977, pp. 103-109, t~) printed in India. The Dirac-Schwinger covariance condition in classical field theory K BABU JOSEPH and M SABIR Department of Physics, Cochin University, Cochin 682 022 MS received 29 January 1977; revised 9 April 1977 Abstract. A straightforward derivation of the Dirac-Schwinger covariance condition is given within the framework of classical field theory. The crucial role of the energy continuity equation in the derivation is pointed out. The origin of higher order deri- vatives of delta function is traced to the presence of higher order derivatives of canoni- cal coordinates and momenta in the energy density functional. Keywords. Lorentz covariance; Poincar6 group; field theory; generalized mechanics. 1. Introduction It has been stated by Dirac (1962) and by Schwinger (1962, 1963a, b, c, 1964) that a sufficient condition for the relativistic covariance of a quantum field theory is the energy density commutator condition [T°°(x), r°°(x')] = (r°k(x) + r°k(x ') c3k3 (x--x') + (bk(x) + bk(x ') c9k8 (x--x') -+- (cktm(x) cktm(x ') OkOtO,3 (X--X') q- ... (1) where bk=O z fl~k and fl~--fl~k = 0mY,,kt and the energy density is that obtained by the Belinfante prescription (Belinfante 1939). For a class of theories that Schwinger calls ' local' the Dirac-Schwinger (DS) condition is satisfied in the simplest form with bk=e~,~r,, = ... = 0. Spin s (s<~l) theories belong to this class. For canonical theories in which simple canonical commutation relations hold Brown (1967) has given two new proofs of the DS condition.
    [Show full text]
  • Hep-Ph/9811291
    CERN-TH/98-354 hep-ph/9811291 Quantum Gravity and Extra Dimensions at High-Energy Colliders Gian F. Giudice, Riccardo Rattazzi, and James D. Wells Theory Division, CERN CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland Abstract Recently it has been pointed out that the characteristic quantum-gravity scale could be as low as the weak scale in theories with gravity propagating in higher dimensions. The observed smallness of Newton’s constant is a consequence of the large compactified volume of the extra dimensions. We investigate the consequences of this supposition for high-energy collider experiments. We do this by first compactifying the higher dimen- sional theory and constructing a 3 + 1-dimensional low-energy effective field theory of the graviton Kaluza-Klein excitations and their interactions with ordinary matter. We then consider graviton production processes, and select γ+ E and jet+ E signatures 6 6 for careful study. We find that both a 1 TeV e+e− collider and the CERN LHC will be able to reliably and perturbatively probe the fundamental gravity scale up to several arXiv:hep-ph/9811291v2 13 Mar 2000 TeV, with the precise value depending on the number of extra dimensions. Similarly, searches at LEP2 and the Tevatron are able to probe this scale up to approximately 1 TeV. We also discuss virtual graviton exchange, which induces local dimension-eight operators associated with the square of the energy-momentum tensor. We estimate the size of such operators and study their effects on ff¯ γγ observables. → CERN-TH/98-354 November 1998 Contents 1 Introduction 1 2 The Kaluza-Klein Excitations of the Graviton 7 3 Feynman Rules 14 4 Graviton Production Processes 18 5 Virtual Graviton Exchange 21 6 Graviton Production and Collider Experiments 24 6.1 e+e− andMuonColliders............................
    [Show full text]
  • Generalized Lorentz Symmetry and Nonlinear Spinor Fields in a Flat Finslerian Space-Time
    Proceedings of Institute of Mathematics of NAS of Ukraine 2004, Vol. 50, Part 2, 637–644 Generalized Lorentz Symmetry and Nonlinear Spinor Fields in a Flat Finslerian Space-Time George BOGOSLOVSKY † and Hubert GOENNER ‡ † Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia E-mail: [email protected] ‡ Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of G¨ottingen, G¨ottingen, Germany E-mail: [email protected] The work is devoted to the generalization of the Dirac equation for a flat locally anisotropic, i.e. Finslerian space-time. At first we reproduce the corresponding metric and a group of the generalized Lorentz transformations, which has the meaning of the relativistic symmetry group of such event space. Next, proceeding from the requirement of the generalized Lorentz invariance we find a generalized Dirac equation in its explicit form. An exact solution of the nonlinear generalized Dirac equation is also presented. 1 Introduction In spite of the impressive successes of the unified gauge theory of strong, weak and electromag- netic interactions, known as the Standard Model, one cannot a priori rule out the possibility that Lorentz symmetry underlying the theory is an approximate symmetry of nature. This implies that at the energies already attainable today empirical evidence may be obtained in favor of violation of Lorentz symmetry. At the same time it is obvious that such effects might manifest themselves only as strongly suppressed effects of Planck-scale physics. Theoretical speculations about a possible violation of Lorentz symmetry continue for more than forty years and they are briefly outlined in [1].
    [Show full text]
  • Baryon Parity Doublets and Chiral Spin Symmetry
    PHYSICAL REVIEW D 98, 014030 (2018) Baryon parity doublets and chiral spin symmetry M. Catillo and L. Ya. Glozman Institute of Physics, University of Graz, 8010 Graz, Austria (Received 24 April 2018; published 25 July 2018) The chirally symmetric baryon parity-doublet model can be used as an effective description of the baryon-like objects in the chirally symmetric phase of QCD. Recently it has been found that above the critical temperature, higher chiral spin symmetries emerge in QCD. It is demonstrated here that the baryon parity-doublet Lagrangian is manifestly chiral spin invariant. We construct nucleon interpolators with fixed chiral spin transformation properties that can be used in lattice studies at high T. DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.98.014030 I. BARYON PARITY DOUBLETS. fermions of opposite parity, parity doublets, that transform INTRODUCTION into each other upon a chiral transformation [1]. Consider a pair of the isodoublet fermion fields A Dirac Lagrangian of a massless fermion field is chirally symmetric since the left- and right-handed com- Ψ ponents of the fermion field are decoupled, Ψ ¼ þ ; ð4Þ Ψ− μ μ μ L iψγ¯ μ∂ ψ iψ¯ Lγμ∂ ψ L iψ¯ Rγμ∂ ψ R; 1 ¼ ¼ þ ð Þ Ψ Ψ where the Dirac bispinors þ and − have positive and negative parity, respectively. The parity doublet above is a where spinor constructed from two Dirac bispinors and contains eight components. Note that there is, in addition, an isospin 1 1 ψ R ¼ ð1 þ γ5Þψ; ψ L ¼ ð1 − γ5Þψ: ð2Þ index which is suppressed. Given that the right- and left- 2 2 handed fields are directly connected
    [Show full text]
  • Lecture 1 – Symmetries & Conservation
    LECTURE 1 – SYMMETRIES & CONSERVATION Contents • Symmetries & Transformations • Transformations in Quantum Mechanics • Generators • Symmetry in Quantum Mechanics • Conservations Laws in Classical Mechanics • Parity Messages • Symmetries give rise to conserved quantities . Symmetries & Conservation Laws Lecture 1, page1 Symmetry & Transformations Systems contain Symmetry if they are unchanged by a Transformation . This symmetry is often due to an absence of an absolute reference and corresponds to the concept of indistinguishability . It will turn out that symmetries are often associated with conserved quantities . Transformations may be: Active: Active • Move object • More physical Passive: • Change “description” Eg. Change Coordinate Frame • More mathematical Passive Symmetries & Conservation Laws Lecture 1, page2 We will consider two classes of Transformation: Space-time : • Translations in (x,t) } Poincaré Transformations • Rotations and Lorentz Boosts } • Parity in (x,t) (Reflections) Internal : associated with quantum numbers Translations: x → 'x = x − ∆ x t → 't = t − ∆ t Rotations (e.g. about z-axis): x → 'x = x cos θz + y sin θz & y → 'y = −x sin θz + y cos θz Lorentz (e.g. along x-axis): x → x' = γ(x − βt) & t → t' = γ(t − βx) Parity: x → x' = −x t → t' = −t For physical laws to be useful, they should exhibit a certain generality, especially under symmetry transformations. In particular, we should expect invariance of the laws to change of the status of the observer – all observers should have the same laws, even if the evaluation of measurables is different. Put differently, the laws of physics applied by different observers should lead to the same observations. It is this principle which led to the formulation of Special Relativity.
    [Show full text]
  • 2 Lecture 1: Spinors, Their Properties and Spinor Prodcuts
    2 Lecture 1: spinors, their properties and spinor prodcuts Consider a theory of a single massless Dirac fermion . The Lagrangian is = ¯ i@ˆ . (2.1) L ⇣ ⌘ The Dirac equation is i@ˆ =0, (2.2) which, in momentum space becomes pUˆ (p)=0, pVˆ (p)=0, (2.3) depending on whether we take positive-energy(particle) or negative-energy (anti-particle) solutions of the Dirac equation. Therefore, in the massless case no di↵erence appears in equations for paprticles and anti-particles. Finding one solution is therefore sufficient. The algebra is simplified if we take γ matrices in Weyl repreentation where µ µ 0 σ γ = µ . (2.4) " σ¯ 0 # and σµ =(1,~σ) andσ ¯µ =(1, ~ ). The Pauli matrices are − 01 0 i 10 σ = ,σ= − ,σ= . (2.5) 1 10 2 i 0 3 0 1 " # " # " − # The matrix γ5 is taken to be 10 γ5 = − . (2.6) " 01# We can use the matrix γ5 to construct projection operators on to upper and lower parts of the four-component spinors U and V . The projection operators are 1 γ 1+γ Pˆ = − 5 , Pˆ = 5 . (2.7) L 2 R 2 Let us write u (p) U(p)= L , (2.8) uR(p) ! where uL(p) and uR(p) are two-component spinors. Since µ 0 pµσ pˆ = µ , (2.9) " pµσ¯ 0(p) # andpU ˆ (p) = 0, the two-component spinors satisfy the following (Weyl) equations µ µ pµσ uR(p)=0,pµσ¯ uL(p)=0. (2.10) –3– Suppose that we have a left handed spinor uL(p) that satisfies the Weyl equation.
    [Show full text]
  • Jhep05(1999)013
    View metadata, citation and similar papers at core.ac.uk brought to you by CORE provided by CERN Document Server Received: March 30, 1999, Accepted: May 11, 1999 HYPER VERSION Sparticle masses from the superconformal anomaly Alex Pomarol∗ Theory Division, CERN CH-1211 Geneva 23, Switzerland JHEP05(1999)013 E-mail: [email protected] Riccardo Rattazzi INFN and Scuola Normale Superiore I-56100 Pisa, Italy E-mail: [email protected] Abstract: We discuss a recently proposed scenario where the sparticle masses are purely mediated by gravity through the superconformal anomaly. This scenario ele- gantly evades the supersymmetric flavor problem since soft masses, like the anomaly, are not directly sensitive to ultraviolet physics. However, its minimal incarnation fails by predicting tachyonic sleptons. We study the conditions for decoupling of heavy threshold effects and how these conditions are evaded. We use these results to build a realistic class of models where the non-decoupling effects of ultra-heavy vectorlike matter fields eliminate the tachyons. These models have a flavor invariant superspectrum similar to that of gauge mediated models. They, however, differ in several aspects: the gaugino masses are not unified, the colored sparticles are not much heavier than the others, the µ problem is less severe and the gravitino mass is well above the weak scale, m3=2 & 10 TeV. We also show that in models where an R-symmetry can be gauged, the associated D-term gives rise to soft terms that are similarly insensitive to the ultraviolet. Keywords: Supersymmetry Breaking, Supergravity Models, Supersymmetric Standard Model. ∗On leave of absence from IFAE, Universitat Aut`onoma de Barcelona, E-08193 Bellaterra, Barcelona.
    [Show full text]
  • The Homology Theory of the Closed Geodesic Problem
    J. DIFFERENTIAL GEOMETRY 11 (1976) 633-644 THE HOMOLOGY THEORY OF THE CLOSED GEODESIC PROBLEM MICHELINE VIGUE-POIRRIER & DENNIS SULLIVAN The problem—does every closed Riemannian manifold of dimension greater than one have infinitely many geometrically distinct periodic geodesies—has received much attention. An affirmative answer is easy to obtain if the funda- mental group of the manifold has infinitely many conjugacy classes, (up to powers). One merely needs to look at the closed curve representations with minimal length. In this paper we consider the opposite case of a finite fundamental group and show by using algebraic calculations and the work of Gromoll-Meyer [2] that the answer is again affirmative if the real cohomology ring of the manifold or any of its covers requires at least two generators. The calculations are based on a method of the second author sketched in [6], and he wishes to acknowledge the motivation provided by conversations with Gromoll in 1967 who pointed out the surprising fact that the available tech- niques of algebraic topology loop spaces, spectral sequences, and so forth seemed inadequate to handle the "rational problem" of calculating the Betti numbers of the space of all closed curves on a manifold. He also acknowledges the help given by John Morgan in understanding what goes on here. The Gromoll-Meyer theorem which uses nongeneric Morse theory asserts the following. Let Λ(M) denote the space of all maps of the circle S1 into M (not based). Then there are infinitely many geometrically distinct periodic geodesies in any metric on M // the Betti numbers of Λ(M) are unbounded.
    [Show full text]
  • 10 Group Theory and Standard Model
    Physics 129b Lecture 18 Caltech, 03/05/20 10 Group Theory and Standard Model Group theory played a big role in the development of the Standard model, which explains the origin of all fundamental particles we see in nature. In order to understand how that works, we need to learn about a new Lie group: SU(3). 10.1 SU(3) and more about Lie groups SU(3) is the group of special (det U = 1) unitary (UU y = I) matrices of dimension three. What are the generators of SU(3)? If we want three dimensional matrices X such that U = eiθX is unitary (eigenvalues of absolute value 1), then X need to be Hermitian (real eigenvalue). Moreover, if U has determinant 1, X has to be traceless. Therefore, the generators of SU(3) are the set of traceless Hermitian matrices of dimension 3. Let's count how many independent parameters we need to characterize this set of matrices (what is the dimension of the Lie algebra). 3 × 3 complex matrices contains 18 real parameters. If it is to be Hermitian, then the number of parameters reduces by a half to 9. If we further impose traceless-ness, then the number of parameter reduces to 8. Therefore, the generator of SU(3) forms an 8 dimensional vector space. We can choose a basis for this eight dimensional vector space as 00 1 01 00 −i 01 01 0 01 00 0 11 λ1 = @1 0 0A ; λ2 = @i 0 0A ; λ3 = @0 −1 0A ; λ4 = @0 0 0A (1) 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 0 00 0 −i1 00 0 01 00 0 0 1 01 0 0 1 1 λ5 = @0 0 0 A ; λ6 = @0 0 1A ; λ7 = @0 0 −iA ; λ8 = p @0 1 0 A (2) i 0 0 0 1 0 0 i 0 3 0 0 −2 They are called the Gell-Mann matrices.
    [Show full text]