DOCSLIB.ORG

Why Salafis Have Anti-Sufi Attitudes

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Why Salafis Have Anti-Sufi Attitudes Why Salafis have Anti-Sufi Attitudes 21/06/2017 | Joas Wagemakers Salafis have doctrinal and political objections to Sufis If one visits a website espousing Salafism, the branch of Sunni Islam whose adherents claim to emulate the first three generations of Muslims (al-salaf al-sālih, “the pious predecessors”) as closely and in as many spheres of life as possible, one is likely to see a long list of firaq (sects) that Salafis oppose. [1] One “sect” sure to be included in such lists is Sufism. A Complicated Relationship Given Salafis’ clear opposition to Sufism, it may seem as if pre-modern scholars appropriated by Salafis must also have been anti-Sufi. This is not entirely the case, however. Some have pointed out, for example, that one of the main sources of inspiration to Salafis today, the Hanbali scholar Ahmad b. Taymiyya (1263-1328), was a Sufi himself. [2] Others have shown that Sufism, at least in as much as it concurred with Ibn Taymiyya’s theological views, was certainly present among his circle of students, including Ibn Qayyim al-Jawziyya (1292-1350), another Salafi favourite. [3] Considering Salafis’ opposition to Sufism, it is not surprising that some of them find this hard to accept and want this issue clarified. [4] Such ambivalent views on Sufis can be explained by pointing to the diverse expressions of Sufism, ranging from asceticism, respect for the texts and adherence to scholarly tradition to rituals and practices rooted less in scriptural sources. It appears that it is only the latter that Salafis really object to in Sufism, which is also how they explain the complicated relationship that men such as Ibn Taymiyya had with Sufism. [5] Doctrinal Objections There are clearly doctrinal aspects about Sufism that Salafis strongly object to, as is evident from the views of perhaps the most prominent Salafi scholar of the twentieth century, the Syrian Muhammad Nāsir al-Dīn al-Albānī (1914-1999). One concept associated with Sufism he criticises is wahdat al-wujūd (the unity of being), an idea developed in detail by the Sufi scholar Ibn al-‘Arabi (1165-1240). It expresses the view that God and his creation are one, since everything that God created must have existed in his knowledge before creation and will, eventually, return to him. Al-Albānī ascribes such ideas to “extremist Sufis” (ghulāt al- Sūfiyya) who “do not differentiate between the Creator and the created”. As such, he rejects it as “an error” (dalal) and as contrary to the unity of God (tawhīd). [6] There are clearly doctrinal aspects about Sufism that Salafis strongly object to Al- Albānī also disavows ‘ilm al-ghayb (knowledge of the unknown) and du‘ā’ al- amwāt (invocations of the deceased). The former refers to what al-Albānī describes as the belief of “some Sufis” that people can have knowledge of things unseen. He rejects this, however, by citing Quran 72:26-27 [7] “(…) He discloses not His Unseen to anyone, save only to such a Messenger as He is well-pleased with (…)”. [8] Du‘ā’ al-amwāt refers to the practice of asking the dead for favours or help “apart from God” (min dūn Allah). Al-Albānī refutes this by citing Quran 35:22 “God makes to hear whomsoever He will; thou canst not make those in their tombs to hear (…)” and labels this a practice of polytheists. [9] For similar reasons, al-Albānī has warned against making requests (tawassul) from the dead and praying in mosques built around graves of so-called saints (awliyā’). [10] Political Objections Apart from doctrinal reasons for rejecting Sufism such as those mentioned above, Salafis also have political objections to Sufis. This is related to the often state-led policies to employ Sufis as a “moderate” antidote to Jihadi-Salafis, [11] who hold radical ideas and often support terrorism. Because of their political quietism and doctrinal “moderation,” Sufis appear risk-free partners for Arab regimes to cooperate with, in order to crack down on radical Islamism. Although these attempts have not always been successful, [12] this practice must have solidified the view among Jihadi-Salafis that Sufi sheikhs and their followers are stooges of Arab regimes. [13] Ironically, the politically quietist Salafis who make up the largest share of Salafism as a whole sometimes have opposite political reasons for disliking Sufis. The Jordanian Salafi scholar ‘Alī al-Halabī not only claims that Salafism – rather than Sufism – has long and established roots in the Hashimite Kingdom, [14] but also states that Sufism is actually a threat because of its alleged links to Shiite Islam. [15] Given the scepticism of Shi’ite Iran in Jordan (and the rest of the Arab world), this should be interpreted as an attempt to smear Sufis. Al-Halabī emphasises this by pointing out that, unlike quietist Salafis, Sufis have done little to combat Jihadi-Salafi ideas and, as such, are rather useless in the fight against terrorism. [16] Thus, while Jihadi-Salafis dislike Sufis for being close to the regime, al-Halabī wants quietist Salafis to take their place as the Jordanian regime’s favoured group of Muslims. [17] Destruction of Sufi Shrines While the destruction of Sufi shrines in countries such as Libya and Mali was likely always done by Jihadi-Salafis – not quietists – the doctrinal arguments used against Sufis are shared by both branches of Salafism. Salafis sometimes apply labels such as “grave worshippers” to Sufis for their alleged polytheism, as expressed in their willingness to visit and worship at the tombs of so-called saints. The fact that such practices touch on the concept of tawhīd, which is hugely important to Salafis, often turns Sufi mosques into doctrinal eyesores for Salafis, yet we must be careful not to ascribe too great a role to religion here. Not only do Salafis have political reasons to be against Sufism as well, attacks against Sufi shrines most often take place in contexts where conflict and violence are quite present anyway, suggesting this may also have something to do with political power and influence in societies in flux.18 As such, we may conclude that while Salafis have long-held and widespread anti-Sufi beliefs based on both doctrinal and political views, it may well be the specific context in which they find themselves that decides which of these prevail – and whether they become violent or not. The opinions expressed in this article are those of the author(s) and do not necessarily reflect the position of the Oasis International Foundation [1] See, for example, www.ilmway.com/site/maqdis/MS_88.html and www.salafipublications.com/sps/sp.cfm?secID=GSC&loadpage=displaysection.cfm. Both were accessed 10 March 2017. [2] See, most explicitly, George Makdisi, “Ibn Taymiya: A Sufi of the Qadiriya Order”, The American Journal of Arabic Studies 1, 1973, pp. 118-129. [3] Arjan Post, “A Glimpse of Sufism from the Circle of Ibn Taymiyya”, Journal of Sufi Studies 5, 2016, pp. 157-163. [4] See, for example, www.ahlalhdeeth.com/vbe/showthread.php?p=32084, accessed 10 March 2017. [5] See, for instance, www.youtube.com/watch?v=Od2rwGwwj3E, accessed 17 March 2017. [6] Abū ‘Abd al-Rahmān Muhammad b. Surūr Sha‘bān, Al-Shaykh al-Albānī wa-Manhajuhu fī Taqrīr Masā’il al-I‘tiqād (Dār al-Kiyān, Riyadh, 2007), p. 726 [7] All Qur’anic verses are from A.J. Arberry’s translation of the Qur’an. [8] Sha‘bān, Al-Shaykh, pp. 728-729. [9] Ibid., p. 735. [10] Muhammad Nāsir al-Dīn al-Albānī, Al-Tawassul: Anwā‘uhu wa-Ahkāmuhu (No publisher, Beirut and Damascus, 1977 [1975]); idem, Tahdhīr al-Sajid min Ittikhādh al-Qubūr Masājid (Al-Maktab al-Islāmī, Beirut and Damascus, 1978 [1957/1958]). [11] For more on the different types of Salafis, see Joas Wagemakers, ‘Revisiting Wiktorowicz: Categorising and Defining the Branches of Salafism’, in Francesco Cavatorta and Fabio Merone (Eds.), Salafism After the Arab Awakening: Contending with People’s Power, (Hurst & Co., London, 2016), pp. 7-24. [12] Mark Sedgwick, ‘Sufis as ‘Good Muslims’: Sufism in the Battle against Jihadi Salafism’, in Lloyd Ridgeon (Ed.), Sufis and Salafis in the Contemporary Age, (Bloomsbury, London, etc., 2015), pp. 105-117. [13] Jihadi-Salafis also share the doctrinal objections to Sufism, however. See, for example, Abū Anas al- Shāmi, Al-Sūfiyya (www.tawhed.ws/dl?i=040309gl, accessed 4 March 2014), n.d. [14] ‘Alī b. Hasan b. ‘Alī b. ‘Abd al-Hamīd al-Halabī al-Atharī, Al-Da‘wa al-Salāfiyya bayna l-Turuq al- Sūfiyya wa-l-Da‘awa al-Sahafiyya wa-Kashf al-Sila bayna l-Tasawwuf wa-l-Afkār al-Shi‘īyya (Al-Dar al- Athariyya, Amman, 2009), pp. 12-24. [15] Ibid., pp. 35-70. [16] Ibid., pp. 71-76. [17] See also Joas Wagemakers, Salafism in Jordan: Political Islam in a Quietist Community (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, etc., 2016), pp. 144-156. [1]8 For an overview of the destruction of Sufi shrines, see http://themuslim500.com/2013-2/issues-of-the- day/destruction-of-sufi-shrines, accessed 17 March 2017. .
Load more

Recommended publications
  • An Introduction to the Salafi Da'wah
    www.ahlulhadeeth.wordpress.com Introduction The Salafi Da’wah is that of the Qur’an and the Sunnah. It is the Religion of Islam - pure and free from any additions, deletions or alterations. It is An Introduction to adhere to the Path of the Messenger (sallal- lahu ‘alaihi wa sallam) and of the True Believers (as- Salaf us-Salih). As-Salaf is a collective term referring to to the Salafi the Pious Pioneers in Islam and all those who follow in their footsteps in belief, actions and morals. Allah said, “Whoever con- tends with and contradicts the Messenger after guidance has been clearly conveyed to him, and follows a path other than that of the Faith- Da’wah ful Believers, We shall leave him in the Path he has chosen and land him in Hell, what an evil destination! [An Nisa 4:115]. Shaikh ul-lslam ibn Taymiyyah (rahimahullah) com- mented on this ayah: “All who contradict and oppose the Messenger (S), after the right path has been clearly shown to them, have followed other than the Path of the Believers. And all who follow other than the Path of the Believers have contradicted and opposed the Messenger (S). If one thinks that he is mistaken in following the Path of the Faithful Believers, he is in the same position as one who thinks that he is mistaken in following the Messenger (S).” Who are the “Salaf ?” As-Salaf us-Salih (or briefly: the Salaf) refers to the first and best three generations of Muslims. They are the Companions (Sahabah) of the Prophet (S), their immediate followers (Tabiun), and the followers of the Tabi’in.
    [Show full text]
  • Indonesia's Salafist Sufis
    Modern Asian Studies 44, 5 (2010) pp. 1029–1051. C Cambridge University Press 2009 doi:10.1017/S0026749X09990278 First published online 23 December 2009 Indonesia’s Salafist Sufis1 JULIA DAY HOWELL Griffith Asia Institute, Griffith University, Nathan, Queensland 4111, Australia Email: j.howell@griffith.edu.au Abstract Islam’s devotional and mystical tradition, Sufism (tasawwuf), is commonly cast as antithetical to Salafi Islam. Self-identified ‘Salafis’, with their ideological roots in anti-liberal strands of twentieth-century modernist Islam, do commonly view Sufis as heretics propagating practices wrongly introduced into Islam centuries after the time of the pious ancestors (the Salaf). Yet reformist zeal that fixes on the singular importance of the Salaf (particularly the Prophet Muhammad and his principal companions) as models for correct piety can also be found amongst Sufis. This paper calls attention to the Salafist colouration of Sufism in two areas of popular culture: television preaching and the popular religious ‘how-to’ books and DVDs that make the preachers’ messages available for purchase. It reprises the teachings of two of the best known Indonesian Muslim televangelists, ‘Hamka’ (b. 1908,d.1981) and M. Arifin Ilham (b. 1969), both of whom also happen to be champions of Sufism, and analyses the different rhetorical uses each has made of references to the ‘Salaf’ and the notion of ‘Salafist’ Islam. Introduction Islam’s devotional and mystical tradition, Sufism (tasawwuf), is commonly cast as antithetical to Salafi Islam. Self-identified ‘Salafis’, with their ideological roots in anti-liberal strands of twentieth- century modernist Islam, commonly view Sufis as heretics propagating practices wrongly introduced into Islam centuries after the time of the 1 The assistance of the Australian Research Council, which supported the research on which this paper is based with a Discovery grant, is acknowledged with appreciation.
    [Show full text]
  • 1 the Role of the Women in Fighting the Enemies [Please Note: Images
    The Role Of The Women In Fighting The Enemies [Please note: Images may have been removed from this document. Page numbers have been added.] By the martyred Shaykh, Al-Hafith Yusuf Bin Salih Al-‘Uyayri (May Allah have Mercy upon him) Introduction In the Name of Allah, the Beneficent, the Most Merciful Verily all praise is due to Allah, and may the Peace and Blessings of Allah be upon the Messenger of Allah, his family and all of his companions. To proceed: My honoured sister, Indeed for you is an important and great role; and you must rise and fulfill your obligatory role in Islam 's confrontation of the new Crusade being waged by all the countries of the world against Islam and the Muslims. I will address you in these papers, and I will prolong this address due only to the importance of the topic; [a topic] that is in need of double these papers. So listen, may Allah protect and preserve you. The Muslim Ummah today is suffering from types of disgrace and humiliation that cannot be enumerated; [disgrace and humiliation] that it was not familiar with in its previous eras, and were never as widespread as they are today. And this disgrace and humiliation is not a result of the smallness of the Islamic Ummah or its poverty - it is counted as the largest Ummah today, just as it is the only Ummah that possesses the riches and elements that its enemies do not possess. And the question that presents itself is: what is the reason for this disgrace and humiliation that the Ummah suffers from today, when it is not in need of money or men? We say that
    [Show full text]
  • Sunni – Shi`A Relations and the Implications for Belgium and Europe
    FEARING A ‘SHIITE OCTOPUS’ SUNNI – SHI`A RELATIONS AND THE IMPLICATIONS FOR BELGIUM AND EUROPE EGMONT PAPER 35 FEARING A ‘SHIITE OCTOPUS’ Sunni – Shi`a relations and the implications for Belgium and Europe JELLE PUELINGS January 2010 The Egmont Papers are published by Academia Press for Egmont – The Royal Institute for International Relations. Founded in 1947 by eminent Belgian political leaders, Egmont is an independent think-tank based in Brussels. Its interdisciplinary research is conducted in a spirit of total academic freedom. A platform of quality information, a forum for debate and analysis, a melting pot of ideas in the field of international politics, Egmont’s ambition – through its publications, seminars and recommendations – is to make a useful contribution to the decision- making process. *** President: Viscount Etienne DAVIGNON Director-General: Marc TRENTESEAU Series Editor: Prof. Dr. Sven BISCOP *** Egmont - The Royal Institute for International Relations Address Naamsestraat / Rue de Namur 69, 1000 Brussels, Belgium Phone 00-32-(0)2.223.41.14 Fax 00-32-(0)2.223.41.16 E-mail [email protected] Website: www.egmontinstitute.be © Academia Press Eekhout 2 9000 Gent Tel. 09/233 80 88 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.academiapress.be J. Story-Scientia NV Wetenschappelijke Boekhandel Sint-Kwintensberg 87 B-9000 Gent Tel. 09/225 57 57 Fax 09/233 14 09 [email protected] www.story.be All authors write in a personal capacity. Lay-out: proxess.be ISBN 978 90 382 1538 9 D/2010/4804/17 U 1384 NUR1 754 All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or otherwise without the permission of the publishers.
    [Show full text]
  • Salafis, Salafism and Modern Salafism: What Lies Behind a Term?
    www.rsis.edu.sg No. 057 – 18 March 2015 RSIS Commentary is a platform to provide timely and, where appropriate, policy-relevant commentary and analysis of topical issues and contemporary developments. The views of the authors are their own and do not represent the official position of the S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies, NTU. These commentaries may be reproduced electronically or in print with prior permission from RSIS and due recognition to the author(s) and RSIS. Please email: [email protected] for feedback to the Editor RSIS Commentaries, Mr Yang Razali Kassim. Salafis, Salafism and Modern Salafism: What Lies Behind a Term? By Mohamed Bin Ali Synopsis The use of the term Salafi and Salafism in the contemporary period is ambiguous and in many ways confusing. The pivotal question of who or what group qualifies as Salafi remains in dispute. What is Salafism and who are the Muslims referred to as Salafis? Commentary IN RECENT years, particularly after the incident of 9/11, the term Salafism has attracted much attention. Salafism has been blamed for being the ideology that underpins terrorist violence. Since then, some Western writers and the media have failed to provide a balanced analysis or even accurate description of Salafism; propagating only a negative and skewed perspective of the term. In actual fact, Salafism is highly misunderstood due to its amorphous nature. It represents a spectrum of thinking that includes violence on one end and a peaceful recourse on the other. As such, efforts to provide a universally-accepted meaning of the term “Salafism”, have been an uphill struggle for scholars.
    [Show full text]
  • Modern Wahhābī Jurisprudence
    CHAPTER FOUR MODERN WAHHĀBĪ JURISPRUDENCE Salafīsm as the Spirit of Wahhābī Legal Thought Wahhābīs believe that genuine Islam is exemplified by the lives of the early Muslims, those Righteous Predecessors (al-Salaf al-Ṣāliḥ) who lived during the first three centuries after the Hijra and set the foun- dations of Islam. Wahhābīs seek a return to this earlier era, its reli- gious thought, practices and teachings, as indicated in their fatwās and contemporary writings.1 For instance, a CRLO fatwā describes the following: Salafiyya refers to the Salaf, who were the Companions of the Prophet, and to the imāms from the first three centuries, who were named in the ḥadīth: ‘The best of the people are those who belong to my century, then those who follow them [the second century], then those who follow them [the third century]’ . Salafīs are those who follow in the footsteps of the Salaf who, in turn, followed the Book [Qurʾān] and the Sunna and called for others to follow them [the Book and the Sunna] and to act according to their directions . .2 For the Wahhābīs, being a Salafī is the only way in which a Mus- lim can assure his membership in the ‘saved sect’ (al-firqa al-nājiya), mentioned in the ḥadīth: “Indeed, before you, the People of the Book split into seventy-two sects. And this community [the Muslims] will split into seventy-three sects, all of them destined for Hellfire except one.” When asked: Who is that one? Muḥammad replied: “That which follows myself and my companions.”3 The Wahhābīs often stress the superiority of the Wahhābiyya as a Salafī movement when comparing 1 Al-Dawīsh, Fatāwā al-lajna, 2:165–166; Bin Qāsim, al-Durar, 7:48; Dekmejian, “Rise,” 635–638.
    [Show full text]
  • “WE PRAY for OUR PRESIDENT”: SAUDI-INSPIRED LOYALIST SALAFISM and the BUSINESS SECTOR in KAZAKHSTAN Aurélie Biard
    BERKLEY CENTER WORKING PAPER for Religion, Peace & World Aairs January 2019 “WE PRAY FOR OUR PRESIDENT”: SAUDI-INSPIRED LOYALIST SALAFISM AND THE BUSINESS SECTOR IN KAZAKHSTAN Aurélie Biard Contents Introduction 2 EXECUTIVE SUMMARY Halal Business: A Vehicle for Dawah Salafiyya 3 This working paper examines the Madkhali Salafism: Ilyas' Loyalty to dissemination strategies of the transnational the Rule Becomes a Religious Duty Salafi movement in post-Soviet Kazakhstan A Discreet Salafi Dawah: "To Be a through the study of its connections with the Crafty Fox" local business sector. This case study seeks to Tawhid: The Very Foundation of Business provide a snapshot of the specific—and A Business Blessed with Baraka significant—ways in which economic entrepreneurs are becoming local drivers of the Quietist Salafi Dawah: Political Loyalty and Social Purification 5 dissemination of Saudi-based loyalist Islam. Political Opposition—and thus Jihadism—is Khariji Societal Reform: Fighting Against Shirk and Bid'a Conclusion 7 Notes 8 About the Author 9 INTRODUCTION In post-Soviet Central Eurasia, the Islam of the “disinherited”—a trend visible among those dispossessed by privatization, shock therapy, and confiscation of wealth by oligarchs during the 1990s—has today morphed into something approaching a prosperity theology. In other words, Islam has conformed—or adapted—to the rules of a globalized market and capitalist economy. After nearly three decades of deep economic transformations in Central Eurasia, we are now witnessing the rise to power of a transnational Islam adapted to the rationale of the market economy. With globalization, Islam has embraced key themes of the world market and become a vehicle for individual autonomy.
    [Show full text]
  • Online Islamic Da'wah Narratives in the UK: the Case of Iera
    Online Islamic Da'wah Narratives in the UK: The Case of iERA by MIRA A. BAZ A thesis submitted to the University of Birmingham for the degree of DOCTOR OF PHILOSOPHY Department of Religion and Theology College of Arts and Law University of Birmingham September 2016 University of Birmingham Research Archive e-theses repository This unpublished thesis/dissertation is copyright of the author and/or third parties. The intellectual property rights of the author or third parties in respect of this work are as defined by The Copyright Designs and Patents Act 1988 or as modified by any successor legislation. Any use made of information contained in this thesis/dissertation must be in accordance with that legislation and must be properly acknowledged. Further distribution or reproduction in any format is prohibited without the permission of the copyright holder. ABSTRACT This thesis is an in-depth study into two of the UK charity iERA's da'wah narratives: the Qura'nic embryology 'miracle' and the Kalam Cosmological Argument. While the embryo verses have received scholarly attention, there is little to no research in the da'wah context for both narratives. Berger and Luckmann's social constructionism was applied to both, which were problematic. It was found that iERA constructed its exegesis of the embryo verses by expanding on classical meanings to show harmony with modern science. Additionally, it developed the Cosmological Argument by adapting it to Salafi Islamic beliefs. The construction processes were found to be influenced by an online dialectic between iERA and its Muslim and atheist detractors, causing it to abandon the scientific miracles and modify the Cosmological Argument.
    [Show full text]
  • Interpretations of Al-Wala' Wa-L-Bara' in Everyday Lives of Salafis in Germany
    religions Article Interpretations of al-wala’ wa-l-bara’ in Everyday Lives of Salafis in Germany Sabine Damir-Geilsdorf, Mira Menzfeld * and Yasmina Hedider Department of Oriental Studies, University of Cologne, 50923 Köln, Germany; [email protected] (S.D.-G.); [email protected] (Y.H.) * Correspondence: [email protected]; Tel.: +49-221-470-3762 Received: 16 January 2019; Accepted: 18 February 2019; Published: 20 February 2019 Abstract: Salafis’ everyday lives, social relations, and attitudes towards both Muslims and non-Muslims are often shaped implicitly or explicitly by the theological concept of al-wala’ wa-l-bara’ (“loyalty and disavowal”). It indicates whom to be loyal to on the one hand, and whom to disavow on the other hand—or from which persons, deeds, and practices one should distance oneself. However, within the highly heterogeneous spectrum of Salafi orientations, beliefs, and religious practices, interpretations of al-wala’ and al-bara’ differ as well as its actual relevance and its implications for concrete life situations. This article explores how Muslims in Germany who identify themselves with non-violent, so-called ‘purist Salafism’ perceive and practice social relations, social closeness, or separation in their everyday lives by drawing implicitly or explicitly on principles of loyalty and disavowal. Based on qualitative interviews and participant observations (data gathered between 2014 and 2018), we shed light on how individuals’ ideas of loyalty and disavowal intersect with issues of identity, belonging, inclusion, and exclusion. The article thus shows how local interpretations and implementations of a Salafi core concept are strongly interwoven with realities of everyday life.
    [Show full text]
  • Women in Islamic State Propaganda
    Contents 1. Key findings ............................................................................................................... 3 2. Introduction .............................................................................................................. 5 3. Methodology ............................................................................................................. 6 4. Islamic State narratives and incentives ..................................................................... 7 4.1. The caliphate: a shield and safe haven for Sunni Muslims ....................................... 7 4.2. Hijra: a religious obligation ....................................................................................... 8 4.3. Finding roots in a jihadi feminism ........................................................................... 11 4.4. A new wave of jihadi torchbearers ......................................................................... 13 5. Life for women in the caliphate .............................................................................. 14 5.1. Well-defined parameters: rules and regulations .................................................... 14 5.2. Islamic State women: mothers first and foremost ................................................. 20 5.3. Patient and steadfast supporters ............................................................................ 21 5.4. Women in combat: the revival of the early Islamic mujahida ................................ 22 5.5. Women and education ...........................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • An Analytical Study of Women-Related Verses of S¯Ura An-Nisa
    Gunawan Adnan Women and The Glorious QurÞÁn: An Analytical Study of Women-RelatedVerses of SÙra An-NisaÞ erschienen in der Reihe der Universitätsdrucke des Universitätsverlages Göttingen 2004 Gunawan Adnan Women and The Glorious QurÞÁn: An Analytical Study of Women- RelatedVerses of SÙra An-NisaÞ Universitätsdrucke Göttingen 2004 Die Deutsche Bibliothek – CIP-Einheitsaufnahme Ein Titelsatz für diese Publikation ist bei der Deutschen Bibliothek erhältlich. © Alle Rechte vorbehalten, Universitätsverlag Göttingen 2004 ISBN 3-930457-50-4 Respectfully dedicated to My honorable parents ...who gave me a wonderful world. To my beloved wife, son and daughter ...who make my world beautiful and meaningful as well. i Acknowledgements All praises be to AllÁh for His blessing and granting me the health, strength, ability and time to finish the Doctoral Program leading to this book on the right time. I am indebted to several persons and institutions that made it possible for this study to be undertaken. My greatest intellectual debt goes to my academic supervisor, Doktorvater, Prof. Tilman Nagel for his invaluable advice, guidance, patience and constructive criticism throughout the various stages in the preparation of this dissertation. My special thanks go to Prof. Brigitta Benzing and Prof. Heide Inhetveen whose interests, comments and guidance were of invaluable assistance. The Seminar for Arabic of Georg-August University of Göttingen with its international reputation has enabled me to enjoy a very favorable environment to expand my insights and experiences especially in the themes of Islamic studies, literature, phylosophy, philology and other oriental studies. My thanks are due to Dr. Abdul RazzÁq Weiss who provided substantial advice and constructive criticism for the perfection of this dissertation.
    [Show full text]
  • The Rise and Impact of Muslim Women Preaching Online
    The Rise and Impact of Muslim Women Preaching Online Richard A. Nielsen.∗ May 12, 2020 Abstract Female Muslim preachers are on the rise online, including in some conservative Islamic traditions such as the Salafi movement. The prevailing wisdom is that religion norms are the key factor explaining the increase and impact of women’s preaching. In this view, religious ideas about gender segregation create a need for female preachers who preach about so-called “women’s issues” to exclusively female audiences. This chapter argues instead for a social movement logic: female preachers help Islamic social movements reach new audiences of both women and men. In this view, religious ideas prohibiting gender mixing are not the cause of women’s preaching, but rather a normative constraint that female preachers circumvent by preaching online. Data from a large Islamic website show that female preachers are reaching mixed gender audiences and eliciting positive reactions, especially from men, supporting the social movement logic. Keywords: Islam, gender, Salafism, social movements, text matching. For the Oxford Handbook of Politics in Muslim Societies, Melani Cammett and Pauline Jones, eds. Word Count: 7,959 ∗Associate Professor, Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Many people have helped commented on this chapter and my related research published elsewhere. Thanks to Melani Cammett, Pauline Jones, Lisa Blaydes, Mark Tessler, Peter Krause, Lindsay Benstead, Sarah Mohamed, Steven Brook, Amaney Jamal, Tarek Masoud, Marc Lynch, Mirjam Kunkler,¨ Ana Weeks, Marsin Alshamary, Rebecca Nielsen, Bruce Rutherford, Zehra Arat, Henri Lauziere,` Aaron Rock-Singer, Ari Schriber, and Malika Zhegal, and audiences at the Oxford Handbook workshop, the NYU Center for Data Science, the University of Connecticut, the Northeast Middle East Politics Working Group, the 2016 AALIMS conference, the 2016 MESA conference, and the Salafiyya Workshop held at Harvard on 11 March 2016.
    [Show full text]