DOCSLIB.ORG

[Army Purchase Information Bulletin]

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
[Army Purchase Information Bulletin] FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF DALLAS Dallas, Texas, December 26, 1940 To the Bank Addressed: There is enclosed a copy of Army Purchase Information Bulletin, 1940, which contains a list of the supplies purchased by the Army and furnishes information regarding the procedure of the War Department in connection with purchases. As pointed out in the Bulletin, the War Department de­ centralizes its procurement activities, and the purchase of specialized prod­ ucts is assigned to depots or field purchasing offices listed in Section III. The Navy has a central purchasing bureau, and general purchases, except for local supplies, are handled by the Bureau of Supplies and Accounts, Navy Department, Washington, D. C. This information is furnished for your assistance in connection with inquiries received from any of your customers who may wish to bid on Government contracts. Yours very truly, R. R. GILBERT President This publication was digitized and made available by the Federal Reserve Bank of Dallas' Historical Library ([email protected]) ARMY PURCHASE INFORMATION BULLETIN 1940 WAR DEPARTMENT OFFICE OF THE ASSISTANT SECRETARY (Second Edition - Revised November 1, L94-0) A M Y PURCHASE INFORMATION FOREWORD 1* This bulletin is published as a guide to manufacturers who are interested in placing their facili­ ties at the disposal of the government in connection with the current rearmament program. It is suggested that manu­ facturers who desire to participate in this program follow the routine outlined herein. Communications should be di­ rected to the proper purchasing office or procurement dis­ trict headquarters in the field. 2. So far as practicable, the Weir Department de­ centralizes its procurement activities. Accordingly, in the interest of keeping down overhead costs to American in­ dustry, correspondence with and visits to the offices of the War Department in Washington, D. C., should be minimized. 3. Each War Department procuring agency is in­ terested in specialized products which are assigned to the depots or field purchasing offices listed in Section III, "Purchasing Agencies". For convenient reference, the more important articles being purchased under the current pro­ gram are listed alphabetically in Section X, "General Index of Articles Purchased". The listings in this section refer the manufacturers to the proper field purchasing offices listed in Section III, "Purchasing Agencies". U* The maps inserted between Sections I and II show the locations of the field procurement district head­ quarters and the areas served by each. The addresses of the field planning offices located at these headquarters are given in Section I, "Procurement Planning". ARMY PURCHASE INFORMATION SECTION PAGES I Procurement Planning 1 - 3 Procurement District Maps: Air Corps Chemical Warfare Service Corps of Engineers Medical Department Ordnance Department Quartermaster Corps Signal Corps II Purchase Methods 4 — 5 III Purchasing Agencies & Items Purchased 6-17 IV Construction— Constructing Quartermasters 18-21 V Local Purchase— Principal Army Posts and Purchasing Agencies 22 - 26 VI Horses and Mules—Remount Areas 27 VII Corps of Engineers— Non Military Construc­ tion Projects 28 - 31 VIII Civilian Conservation Corps— Purchasing Agencies 32 - 34 IX Procurement Division, Treasury Department, Navy Department & Reconstruction Finance Corporation 35-37 X General Index of Articles Purchased 38-41 SECTION I PROCUREMENT PLANNING 1. The agencies listed in this section are engaged in planning for the procurement of supplies and equipment which "will be needed by the army during a war or other major National emergency. Military requirements are computed in advance. They are apportioned by the supply arms and services to procurement districts. The pro­ curement planning officers in these districts search the areas to which they are assigned for the productive capacity necessary to meet requirements. Individual plants are surveyed, production stud­ ies are made, and in agreement with the management, plants are al­ located for particular production during an emergency. 2. The management of plants having facilities which are considered suitable for the production of military equipment should communicate directly with the officer in charge of the Procurement District which is nearest the plant for detailed information regard­ ing this activity. PROCUREMENT PLANNING AGENCIES Air Corps Procurement Districts Eastern----------- Room 1216-A, Federal Office Bldg., 90 Church St., New York City Central----------- Wright Field, Dayton, Ohio W estern----------- 506 Santa Monica Blvd., Santa Monica, Calif. Chemical Warfare Procurement Districts Boston ----- - - -Room 2000, Post Office and Courthouse Bldg., Boston, Mass. Chicago--------- Room 1506, 20 North Wacker Drive Bldg., Chicago, Illinois. New Y o r k ---------Room 404, 45 Broadway, New York City Pittsburgh-------1044 New Federal Bldg., Pittsburgh, Pa. San Francisco --- Room 117, Federal Office Bldg., San Francisco, Calif. Engineer Procurement Districts Birmingham-------212 Wilson Bldg., Mobile, Ala. Chicago --------- 1117 United States Post Office Bldg., Chicago, 111. - 1- Engineer Procurement Districts - contfd New Y o r k ---------39 'Whitehall St,, New York City Philadelphia----- 900 U. S. Customhouse, 2d and Chestnut Sts., Philadelphia, Pa. Pittsburgh-------1012 New Federal Bldg., Pittsburgh, Pa. San Francisco --- Room 4-09, Customhouse, San Francisco, Calif. Medical Department Procurement Districts Chicago----------- Room 1203 and 1205 U. S. P. 0. Bldg., Canal and Van Buren Sts., Chicago, 111. New Y o r k -------- First Ave. and 58th St., Brooklyn, N. Y. St. L o u i s --------Second and Arsenal Sts., St. Louis, Mo. San Francisco -----San Francisco Gen. Depot, Ft. Mason, Calif. Ordnance Districts Birmingham ------- 1908 Comer Bldg., Birmingham, Ala. Bost o n ----------- Room 1501, 14.0 Federal St., Boston, Mass. Chicago--------- Room 222, 309 West Jackson Blvd., Chicago, 111. Cincinnati------- 831 The Engineer Bldg., Cincinnati, Ohio Cleveland ------- 14-50 Terminal Tower Bldg., Cleveland, Ohio Detroit----------- 1832 National Bank Bldg., Detroit, Mich. Hartford --------- 95 State Street, Springfield, Mass. New Yo r k --------- Room 1815, So Broadway, New York, N. Y. Philadelphia-----Room 1417, Mitten Bldg., Broad and Locust Sts., Philadelphia, Pa. Pittsburgh ------- 1032 New Federal Bldg., Pittsburgh, Pa. Rochester--------- 1132 Mercantile Bldg., Rochester, N. Y. St. L o u i s ---------Room 935, U.S. Courthouse and Customhouse, St. Louis, Mo. San Francisco -----Room 118, Federal Office Bldg., San Francisco, Calif. Wilmington Ordnance Region - 14-66 Nemours Bldg., Wilmington, Del. Los Angeles Ordnance Region -4-09 Chamber of Commerce Bldg., Los Angeles, California Quartermaster Districts Atlanta---— - -1306 Twenty-two Marietta Bldg., Atlanta, Ga. B o s t o n ----------- Boston Army Base, Boston, Mass. Chicago ----- - - 1819 W. Pershing Rd., Chicago, 111. Detroit----------- Quartermaster Motor Procurement Planning Office, Detroit, 611 Federal Bldg., Detroit, Mich. Jeffersonville --- 10th St. and Meigs Ave., Jeffersonville, Ind. - 2 - Quartermaster Districts - confd New Y o r k ---------First Ave. and 58th St,, Brooklyn, N, Y. Philadelphia-----21st and Johnston Sts., Philadelphia, Pa, St. L o u i s --------- 2d and Arsenal Sts., St. Louis, Mo, San Antonio - ----- San Antonio General Depot, Ft. Sam Houston, Tex. San Francisco-----Ft. Mason, San Francisco, Calif. Remount Areas East Central------- Hq. 434 P. 0. Bldg., Lexington, Ky, Eastern-------------Hq., Front Royal, Va, North Central----- Hq., Room 502, Central P. 0. Bldg., 315 W. Per­ shing Rd., Kansas City, Mo. Northwestern--------Hq,, Fort Douglas, Utah South Central— --- Hq., 3301 El Campo St., Ft. Vforth, Tex. Southwestern------- Hq., Colorado Springs, Colo. Western-------------Hq., San Mateo, Calif. Signal Corps Procurement Districts Chicago------------ 1819 W. Pershing Rd., Chicago, 111. New York---------- First Ave., and 58th St., Brooklyn, N. Y. San Francisco------Presidio of San Francisco, Calif. Signal Corps Development Laboratories Signal Corps Laboratories---------- -- ---- Fort Monmouth, N. J. Aircraft Radio Laboratory------------------ Wright Field, Ohio Signal Corps Photographic Laboratory, Army War College, Washington, D.C. - 3- PIAXNINO BRANCH AUO. 10, 1934. - DRO. No.6 4 0 JULY 11, 1935. 0. A . S. V. PUNNING BRANCH AUO. 10, 1984. - DRO. N o. 6 3 6 PLANNING BRANCH. Data: No t . 2, 1939. Drg. No. 845 O.A.S.J. PUNNING BRANCH, DECEMBER, 1938 DRAWING No. 829a AUO. 10, 1934. - D rg. No. 6 4 f 0 * A« !• i* rLJUMXNQ HUNCH AUBUST 10p 1934. *0. 6 3 9 SCPT. IT, I934-. SECTION II PURCHASING IETHODS 1. After Advertising: All normal purchases of the War De­ partment are made after advertising for bids. Purchasing officers prepare circular proposals and invitations to bid. These papers list the items to be purchased, list the applicable specifications, state delivery points and dates, and fjrnish all the information necessary for a prospective bidder to calculate his costs and submit a bid. Bids are required to be submitted by a stated time in sealed and properly addressed envelopes. Bid bonds are frequently required -with the bids. At the stated time, the Purchasing Officer publicly opens the bids. As a result of this procedure, the purchase contract is awarded to the best advantage of the government. Circular proposals are given -wide distribution in order to secure the maximum competi­ tion. Newspaper advertising is frequently used. Several commercial
Load more

Recommended publications
  • The Story of Fort Snelling and Its State Park Page 4
    RAMSEY COUNTY Colorful, Contentious- St. Paul’s 100-Year-Old Neighborhood Press A Publication of the Ramsey County Historical Society Page 13 Summer, 1993 Volume 28, Number 2 Birth, Death, Reincarnation The Story of Fort Snelling and Its State Park Page 4 Old Fort Snelling in 1844. This water color and gouache painting by John Casper Wild shows the fort a few years before Minnesota became a territory. The many pitfalls in the effort to save, restore and rebuild the fort and create Fort Snelling State Park are de­ scribed by an active participant, in the article beginning on page 4. Minnesota Historical Society photograph of the original paint­ ing, which is in its collection. RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORY Executive Director PrisciUa.Famham Editor Virginia Brainard Kunz RAMSEY COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY BOARD OF DIRECTORS William S. Fallon CONTENTS Chairman o f the Board Joanne Englund President 3 Letters John M. Lindley First Vice President 4 Birth, Death and Reincarnation— James Russell The Story of Fort Snelling and Its State Park Treasurer Samuel H. Morgan Sidney P. Abramson, Arthur Baumeister, Jr., Thomas Boyd, Marshall Hatfield, John 13 Colorful, Sometimes Contentious— Harens, Liz Johnson, Don Larson, Judge Margaret M. Marrinan, Dr. Thomas B. St. Paul’s 100-Year-Old Neighborhood Press Mega, Laurie Murphy, Richard T. Murphy, Sr., Eileen Roberts, Darrell Rooney, Mark Jane McClure Stein, Richard A. Wilhoit and Laurie Zenner. 20 Growing Up in St. Paul Albert Fuller and the Family Business EDITORIAL BOARD Liz Holum Johnson John M. Lindley, chairman; Thomas H. Boyd, Thomas C. Buckley, Charlton Dietz, 25 Books Thomas J.
    [Show full text]
  • PDF of M. Flueger Article
    A map of Fort Snelling by year’s end.⁴ They were built of wood, unlike drawn in the offices of First Lieutenant the more permanent stone dwellings before John Biddle, chief them. Within twenty-five years, nearly all of engineer officer of the these structures passed into memory—mostly Department of Dakota (1885). The lost barracks forgo*en—until recently. (e) are located on the So, who resided in these quickly constructed bluff overlooking the barracks? Initially, the troops of the Seventh Mississippi River. Courtesy of US Infantry, but the Twenty-Fi+h Infantry, National Archives, stationed at Fort Snelling from November 1882 no. 92-225-1054-1061. until May 1888, resided there the longest. Upon arrival, just under two hundred men moved into the barracks. This regiment was one of two segregated infantry regiments of soldiers under the command of white officers in the United States. There also were two segregated cavalry regiments.⁵ These troops became known as America’s legendary “buffalo soldier” regiments, com- prised of African Ameri can men. The Twen- ty-Fi+h was stationed at posts throughout Texas and New Mexico from 1870 to 1880, skirmishing with Native Ameri cans across the region. The regiment transferred to the Department of Dakota in 1880. Headquarters Company, Regimental Band, and Companies B, F, and I were stationed at Fort Randall, Dakota Territory, before their arrival at Fort Snelling. Company C was stationed at Fort Hale, Dakota Territory. The first group arrived at Fort Snelling This upheaval became the impetus for the on November 20, 1882, followed by Company F construction of new brick homes and an ad- on the twenty-first and Company C on the ministration building on Taylor Avenue, which twenty-third.⁶ would eventually be known as the Upper Post.
    [Show full text]
  • 1779 Soldiers, Sailors and Marines Kyllonen
    1779 Soldiers, Sailors and Marines Kyllonen pation, farmer; inducted at Hillsboro on April 29, 1918; sent to Camp Dodge, Iowa; served in Company K, 350th Infantry, to May 16, 1918; Com- pany K, 358th Infantry, to discharge; overseas from June 20, 1918, to June 7, 1919. Engagements: Offensives: St. Mihiel; Meuse-Argonne. De- fensive Sectors: Puvenelle and Villers-en-Haye (Lorraine). Discharged at Camp Dodge, Idwa, on June 14, 1919, as a Private. KYLLONEN, CHARLEY. Army number 4,414,704; registrant, Nelson county; born, Brocket, N. Dak., July 5, 1894, of Finnish parents; occu- pation, farmer; inducted at La,kota on Sept. 3, 1918; sent to Camp Grant, Ill.; served in Machine Gun Training Center, Camp Hancock, Ga., to dis- charge. Discharged at Camp Hancock, Ga., on March 26, 1919, as a Private. KYLMALA, AUGUST. Army number 2,110,746; registrant, Dickey county; born, Oula, Finland, Aug. 9, 1887; naturalized citizen; occupation, laborer; inducted at Ellendale on Sept. 21, 1917; sent. to Camp Dodge, Iowa; served in Company I, 352nd Infantry, to Nov. 28, 1917; Company L, 348th Infantry, to May 18, 1918; 162nd Depot Brigade, to June 17, 1918; 21st Battalion, M. S. Gas Company, to Aug. 2, 1918; 165th Depot Brigade, to discharge. Discharged at Camp Travis, Texas, on Dec. 4, 1918, as a Private. KYNCL, JOHN. Army number 298,290; registrant, Cavalier county; born, Langdon, N. Dak., March 27, 1896, of Bohemian parents; occupation, farmer; inducted at Langdon on Dec. 30, 1917; sent to Fort Stevens, Ore.; served in Battery D, 65th Artillery, Coast Artillery Corps, to discharge; overseas from March 25, 1918, to Jan.
    [Show full text]
  • Department of Defense Office of the Secretary
    Monday, May 16, 2005 Part LXII Department of Defense Office of the Secretary Base Closures and Realignments (BRAC); Notice VerDate jul<14>2003 10:07 May 13, 2005 Jkt 205001 PO 00000 Frm 00001 Fmt 4717 Sfmt 4717 E:\FR\FM\16MYN2.SGM 16MYN2 28030 Federal Register / Vol. 70, No. 93 / Monday, May 16, 2005 / Notices DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE Headquarters U.S. Army Forces Budget/Funding, Contracting, Command (FORSCOM), and the Cataloging, Requisition Processing, Office of the Secretary Headquarters U.S. Army Reserve Customer Services, Item Management, Command (USARC) to Pope Air Force Stock Control, Weapon System Base Closures and Realignments Base, NC. Relocate the Headquarters 3rd Secondary Item Support, Requirements (BRAC) U.S. Army to Shaw Air Force Base, SC. Determination, Integrated Materiel AGENCY: Department of Defense. Relocate the Installation Management Management Technical Support ACTION: Notice of Recommended Base Agency Southeastern Region Inventory Control Point functions for Closures and Realignments. Headquarters and the U.S. Army Consumable Items to Defense Supply Network Enterprise Technology Center Columbus, OH, and reestablish SUMMARY: The Secretary of Defense is Command (NETCOM) Southeastern them as Defense Logistics Agency authorized to recommend military Region Headquarters to Fort Eustis, VA. Inventory Control Point functions; installations inside the United States for Relocate the Army Contracting Agency relocate the procurement management closure and realignment in accordance Southern Region Headquarters to Fort and related support functions for Depot with Section 2914(a) of the Defense Base Sam Houston. Level Reparables to Aberdeen Proving Ground, MD, and designate them as Closure and Realignment Act of 1990, as Operational Army (IGPBS) amended (Pub.
    [Show full text]
  • Historical Air Force Construction Cost Handbook
    DIRECTORATE OF ENGINEERING SUPPORT HISTORICAL AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION COST HANDBOOK AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER SUPPORT AGENCY TYNDALL AIR FORCE BASE FLORIDA 32403-5319 FEBRUARY 2007 HISTORICAL AIR FORCE CONSTRUCTION COST HANDBOOK TABLE OF CONTENTS I. GENERAL INFORMATION AND DEFINITIONS II. HISTORICAL DATA BY FACILITY TYPE III. HISTORICAL DATA BY CATEGORY CODE IV. SIZE ADJUSTMENT V. ESCALATION TABLES VI. LOCATION FACTORS VII. SUPPORTING FACILITY UNIT COSTS VIII. SIOH, CONTINGENCIES, AND ROUNDING SECTION I GENERAL INFORMATION AND DEFINITIONS SECTION ONE GENERAL INFORMATION AND DEFINITIONS GENERAL INFORMATION The Historical Air Force Construction Cost Handbook is prepared by the Directorate of Technical Support, HQ AFCESA/CESC, to provide valid historical costs used in preparing cost estimates and analyses for Air Force construction. Updates are made annually. Prices for OSD Common Facilities, Area Cost Factors, escalation rates, and the size adjustment curve are from UFC 3-701-07, DoD Facility Pricing Guide. Data for AF Unique Facility Costs, Supporting Facility Costs, and Supporting Facility Percentages are from AF Historical data in the Program, ACES system, DD Forms 1391, the Parametric Cost Engineering System (PACES); or from detailed quantity take- off estimates from typical designs. The historical costs are carefully purged to ensure the correct data is listed. Projects with unusual costs often turn out to be additions, alterations, or add/alter projects and are not used in the database. Other reasons include bidding climate, special design features included that are not normally used on an average facility, or unique conditions at a certain location. Facilities with no historical database are listed as "USER" facility types in the category code listing.
    [Show full text]
  • Lincoln's Role in the Gettysburg Campaign
    LINCOLN'S ROLE IN THE GETTYSBURG CAMPAIGN By EDWIN B. CODDINGTON* MOST of you need not be reminded that the battle of Gettys- burg was fought on the first three days of July, 1863, just when Grant's siege of Vicksburg was coming to a successful con- clusion. On July 4. even as Lee's and Meade's men lay panting from their exertions on the slopes of Seminary and Cemetery Ridges, the defenders of the mighty fortress on the Mississippi were laying down their arms. Independence Day, 1863, was, for the Union, truly a Glorious Fourth. But the occurrence of these two great victories at almost the same time raised a question then which has persisted up to the present: If the triumph at Vicksburg was decisive, why was not the one at Gettysburg equally so? Lincoln maintained that it should have been, and this paper is concerned with the soundness of his supposition. The Gettysburg Campaign was the direct outcome of the battle of Chancellorsville, which took place the first week in May. There General Robert E. Lee won a victory which, according to the bookmaker's odds, should have belonged to Major General "Fight- ing Joe" Hooker, if only because Hooker's army outnumbered the Confederates two to one and was better equipped. The story of the Chancel'orsville Campaign is too long and complicated to be told here. It is enough to say that Hooker's initial moves sur- prised his opponent, General Lee, but when Lee refused to react to his strategy in the way he anticipated, Hooker lost his nerve and from then on did everything wrong.
    [Show full text]
  • The Battle of Sailor's Creek
    THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS December 2005 Major Subject: History THE BATTLE OF SAILOR’S CREEK: A STUDY IN LEADERSHIP A Thesis by CLOYD ALLEN SMITH JR. Submitted to the Office of Graduate Studies of Texas A&M University in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF ARTS Approved by: Chair of Committee, Joseph Dawson Committee Members, James Bradford Joseph Cerami Head of Department, Walter L. Buenger December 2005 Major Subject: History iii ABSTRACT The Battle of Sailor’s Creek: A Study in Leadership. (December 2005) Cloyd Allen Smith Jr., B.A., Slippery Rock University Chair: Dr. Joseph Dawson The Battle of Sailor’s Creek, 6 April 1865, has been overshadowed by Lee’s surrender at Appomattox Court House several days later, yet it is an example of the Union military war machine reaching its apex of war making ability during the Civil War. Through Ulysses S. Grant’s leadership and that of his subordinates, the Union armies, specifically that of the Army of the Potomac, had been transformed into a highly motivated, organized and responsive tool of war, led by confident leaders who understood their commander’s intent and were able to execute on that intent with audacious initiative in the absence of further orders. After Robert E. Lee’s Army of Northern Virginia escaped from Petersburg and Richmond on 2 April 1865, Grant’s forces chased after Lee’s forces with the intent of destroying the mighty and once feared iv protector of the Confederate States in the hopes of bringing a swift end to the long war.
    [Show full text]
  • Fort Snelling National Cemetery NRHP Registration Form
    NPS Form 10-900 OMB No. 1024-0018 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service National Register of Historic Places Registration Form This form is for use in nominating or requesting determinations for individual properties and districts. See instructions in National Register Bulletin, How to Complete the National Register of Historic Places Registration Form. If any item does not apply to the property being documented, enter "N/A" for "not applicable." For functions, architectural classification, materials, and areas of significance, enter only categories and subcategories from the instructions. 1. Name of Property Historic name: Fort Snelling National Cemetery Other names/site number: Name of related multiple property listing: Inter-World War National Cemeteries, 1934-1939 (Enter "N/A" if property is not part of a multiple property listing) 2. Location Street & number: 7601 34th Avenue South City or town: Minneapolis State: Minnesota County: Hennepin Not For Publication: Vicinity: 3. State/Federal Agency Certification As the designated authority under the National Historic Preservation Act, as amended, I hereby certify that this nomination request for determination of eligibility meets the documentation standards for registering properties in the National Register of Historic Places and meets the procedural and professional requirements set forth in 36 CFR Part 60. In my opinion, the property meets does not meet the National Register Criteria. I recommend that this property be considered significant at the following level(s) of significance: national statewide local Applicable National Register Criteria: A B C D 1 United States Department of the Interior National Park Service / National Register of Historic Places Registration Form NPS Form 10-900 OMB No.
    [Show full text]
  • Seventy-Second Annual Report of the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York, June
    SEVENTY-SECOND ANNUAL REPORT of the Association of Graduates of the United States Military Academy at West Point, New York June 10, 1941 C-rinted by The Moore Printing Company, Inc. Newburgh, N. Y¥: 0 C; 42 lcc0 0 0 0 P-,.0 r- 'Sc) CD 0 ct e c; *e H, Ir Annual Report, June 10, 1941 3 Report of the 72nd Annual Meeting of the Association of Graduates, U. S. M. A. Held at West Point, N. Y., June 10, 1941 1. The meeting was called to order at 2:02 p. m. by McCoy '97, President of the Association. There were 225 present. 2. Invocation was rendered by the Reverend H. Fairfield Butt, III, Chaplain of the United States Military Academy. 3. The President presented Brigadier General Robert L. Eichel- berger, '09, Superintendent, U. S. Military Academy, who addressed the Association (Appendix B). 4. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the report of the President be dispensed with, since that Report would later be pub- lished in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix A). The motion was passed. 5. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the Report of the Secretary be dispensed with, since that Report would later be pub- lished in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix C.) The motion was passed. 6. It was moved and seconded that the reading of the Report of the Treasurer be dispensed with, since that Report would later be published in its entirety in the 1941 Annual Report (Appendix D).
    [Show full text]
  • List of United States Air Force Aircraft Control and Warning Squadrons from Wikipedia, the Free Encyclopedia
    List of United States Air Force aircraft control and warning squadrons From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia Contents [hide ] • 1 Content • 2 Site codes o 2.1 Sites Within the United States o 2.2 Sites Outside the United States • 3 Squadrons • 4 See also • 5 References • 6 External links Content [edit ] The List of United States Air Force Aircraft Control and Warning Squadrons identifies Squadron Emblem or patch Location, Air Force Station (AFS), or Air Station (AS) North American Air Defense Command (NORAD) code or other identification code for the location Any pertinent notes, including dates active and other designations. Site codes [edit ] Sites Within the United States [edit ] • DC-xx Semi-Automatic Ground Environment (SAGE) Direction Center/Combat Center. • F-xx Alaskan air defense sites. • H-0x Hawaiian air defense sites. • L-xx Original Air Defense Command (ADC) 1946 "Lashup" Radar Network of temporary sites to provide detection at designated important locations using radar sets left over from World War II . • LP-xx "Lashup" site which was incorporated into the first ADC permanent radar network in 1949. • P-xx Original 75 permanent stations established in 1949. • RP-xx Sites that replaced a permanent 1949 station. • M-xx 1952 Phase I Mobile Radar station. • SM-xx 1955 Phase II Mobile Radar Station. • TM-xx 1959 Phase III Mobile station. • TT-x Texas Towers , radar tower rigs off the East Coast of the United States, named because of their resemblance to oil drilling rigs in the Gulf of Mexico. • Z-xx NORAD designation for sites after 31 July 1963. P, M, SM, and TM stations active after that date retained their numbers, but were designated "Z-xx".
    [Show full text]
  • Satin Army Corps System
    THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE ARMY CORPS SYSTEM IN THE UNION ARMY Allan Satin, Cincinnati Civil War Round Table, [email protected] © Allan Satin & Cincinnati Civil War Round Table, 2010, www.cincinnaticwrt.org At the end of the American Civil War, the Union Army was organized into army corps each with its own unique number which remained with it even if the corps was transferred from one army to another. How did this system develop in the Union Army? The United States Regular Army had no field commands larger than a regiment when the Civil War broke out in April 1861. Regiments were assigned to geographical departments with no intervening level of command. With the expansion of the armies resulting from the recruitment of the volunteer forces, command levels between the regimental and departmental levels were clearly required. At first, those departments with large enough field forces organized their new regiments into brigades (e.g. May 28 in the Department of Washington). As the forces became larger, divisions were formed (June 11 in the Department of Pennsylvania). The first major campaign was fought with armies organized into divisions (First Bull Run). Military men in the United States were familiar with the corps d’armée system as it had existed in the armies of Napoleon, but conservative commanders such as George B. McClellan and Don Carlos Buell were reluctant to form army corps in the armies under their command. McClellan wanted to postpone the creation of army corps until he had tested his divisional commanders through active operations to see which of them would be capable of commanding at the army corps level.
    [Show full text]
  • Commanders of the 16Th Infantry Regiment and Its Lineal Ancestors & Descendents 1861 to Present
    Commanders of the 16th Infantry Regiment and its Lineal Ancestors & Descendents 1861 to Present Commanders, 1st Battalion and 11th U. S. Infantry Elements in the Field 1861-1866 NAME DATES REMARKS Lieutenant Colonel Edmund Schriver 3 Jul 61-15 Mar 62 Lieutenant Colonel of the regiment. b: PA s: USMA 1833 Actual commander of Regiment and Highest rank held: Brevet Major General of Volunteers 1st Battalion at Fort Independence and at Perryville until his appointment as Chief of Staff, I Corps 15 Mar 62 Major DeLancey Floyd-Jones 15 Mar 62-1 Oct 62 Commander, 1st Battalion. Leave of b: NY s: USMA 1846 Apr 63–8 Jul 63 absence 1 Oct 62-Feb 63; Commander, Highest rank held: Colonel 2nd Brigade, 2nd Division Feb 63-Apr 63 Transferred to be Commander of Regimental Recruit Depot and Superintendent of Regimental Recruiting Service in Aug 63 Captain Charles S. Russell 1 Oct 62-18 Jan 63 Commander at Fredericksburg b: MA s: Governor of Indiana 1861 8 Jul 63-21 Aug 63 Highest rank held: Brevet Brigadier General 1861 Captain Henry L. Chipman 18 Jan 63-1 Mar 63 Commander during Maj. Floyd- b: NY s: Governor of Michigan 1861 Jones’ leave of absence and while he Highest rank held: Brevet Brigadier General, U.S. Volunteers was commanding 2nd Brigade. Major Jonathan W. Gordon 21 Aug 63-26 Jan 64 Commander, 1st Battalion. Had been b: PA s: Governor of Indiana 1861 Commander of the Regimental Recruit Highest rank held: Major Depot and Superintendent of the Regimental Recruiting Service at Fort Independence Captain Francis M.
    [Show full text]