Palaeoecology and Palaeoenvironments of the Late Permian Zechstein Sea and Its Hinterlands

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Palaeoecology and Palaeoenvironments of the Late Permian Zechstein Sea and Its Hinterlands Palaeoecology and Palaeoenvironments of the Late Permian Zechstein Sea and its Hinterlands Martha Elizabeth Gibson A thesis submitted in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy The University of Sheffield Faculty of Science Department of Animal and Plant Sciences 22/09/2020 1 Declaration I, the author, confirm that the Thesis is my own work. I am aware of the University’s Guidance on the Use of Unfair Means (www.sheffield.ac.uk/ssid/unfair-means). This work has not been previously been presented for an award at this, or any other, university. The following chapters are intended for publication or have already been published at the time of thesis submission. Asher Haynes and David Warburton of Anglo American Plc have approved all manuscripts for publication which have used York Potash Ltd boreholes SM4 Gough, SM7 Mortar Hall, SM11 Dove’s Nest and SM14b Woodsmith Mine North Shaft. Gibson, M.E., Taylor, W.A., Wellman, C.H. 2020. Wall ultrastructure of the Permian pollen grain Lueckisporites virkkiae Potonié et Klaus 1954 emend. Clarke 1965: evidence for botanical affinity. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology, 104169. Gibson, M.E., Wellman, C.H. 2020. The Use of Spore-Pollen Assemblages to Reconstruct Vegetation Changes in the Permian (Lopingian) Zechstein Deposits of Northeast England. Review of Palaeobotany and Palynology. Accepted subject to minor revision. Gibson, M.E., Bodman, D.B. 2020. Evaporite Palynology: a case study on the Permian (Lopingian) Zechstein Sea. Journal of the Geological Society. In review. Gibson, M.E., Wellman, C.H. 2020. Zechstein forests thrived up to the Permian-Triassic mass extinction event. In prep. Gibson, M.E. 2020. Exceptional preservation of possible endobiotic fungus inside late Permian pollen grains from the British Zechstein Group. In prep. 2 Table of Contents Acknowledgements .......................................................................................................................................... 8 Abstract ............................................................................................................................................................ 9 Chapter 1. Introduction & Literature Review ............................................................................................ 10 1.1 The Permian Timescale ................................................................................................................. 10 1.1.1 Overview and History .................................................................................................................... 10 1.1.2 Permian Biostratigraphy ............................................................................................................... 11 1.1.3 Terrestrial Biostratigraphy ............................................................................................................ 12 1.1.4 Zechstein Timescales ..................................................................................................................... 13 1.1.5 Zechstein Biozonation ................................................................................................................... 17 1.2 Palaeocontinental Reconstruction: Pangaea ............................................................................... 18 1.3 The Permian Atmosphere ............................................................................................................. 19 1.3.1 Atmospheric O2 .............................................................................................................................. 19 1.3.2 Atmospheric CO2 ........................................................................................................................... 20 1.4 Sea Level ......................................................................................................................................... 21 1.4.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 21 1.4.3 The Zechstein Water Column ....................................................................................................... 22 1.5 Permian Climate ............................................................................................................................ 25 1.5.1 Icehouse-Hothouse transition ....................................................................................................... 25 1.5.2 Regional Climates .......................................................................................................................... 25 1.5.3 Zechstein Climate .......................................................................................................................... 27 1.6 Palaeophytogeography .................................................................................................................. 29 1.6.1 Macroflora Provincialism ............................................................................................................. 29 1.6.2 Permian Palynology....................................................................................................................... 30 1.6.3 Euramerican Palynology Highlight .............................................................................................. 32 1.7 Review of the Zechstein Fossil Record......................................................................................... 33 1.7.1 Marine Biota .................................................................................................................................. 33 1.7.2 Terrestrial Biota ............................................................................................................................. 36 1.7.3 Review of Zechstein Palaeobotany ................................................................................................ 37 1.7.4 A Review of Zechstein Palynology ................................................................................................ 38 1.7.5 Early Research on the Zechstein Palynology ............................................................................... 40 1.7.6 British Zechstein Palaeobotany and Palynology .......................................................................... 41 Thesis outline ............................................................................................................................................. 43 Chapter 2. Geological Setting ....................................................................................................................... 44 2.1 Permian Rocks in the U.K. ................................................................................................................. 44 2.1.1 Marine Permian Rocks .................................................................................................................. 44 2.1.2 Non-Zechstein Marine Permian ................................................................................................... 44 3 2.2 The Zechstein Sea ................................................................................................................................ 46 2.2.1 Overview ......................................................................................................................................... 46 2.2.2 Pre-Zechstein/Rotliegend .............................................................................................................. 49 2.2.3 Cycle 1 (EZ1) ................................................................................................................................. 49 2.2.4 Cycle 2 (EZ2) ................................................................................................................................. 57 2.2.5 Cycle 3 (EZ3) ................................................................................................................................. 60 2.2.6 Cycle 4 (EZ4) ................................................................................................................................. 62 2.2.7 Cycle 5 (EZ5) ................................................................................................................................. 64 2.3 Sequence Stratigraphy ........................................................................................................................ 64 2.3.1 ZS1 (Marl Slate, Wetherby Member/Raisby Formation) ............................................................. 66 2.3.2 ZS2 (Ford Formation/Sprotbrough Member) .............................................................................. 66 2.3.3 ZS3 (Hartlepool/Hayton Anhydrite, Edlington Fm/Roker Dolomite) ......................................... 67 2.3.4 ZS4 (Fordon Evaporite Fm, Illitic Shale/Grauer Salzton, Brotherton/Seaham Fm) ................. 68 2.3.5 ZS 5,6 and 7 ................................................................................................................................... 69 Chapter 3. Materials and Methods .............................................................................................................. 71 3.1 Brief description of Fieldwork Sites and Sampling .......................................................................... 71 3.2 Lithology ............................................................................................................................................... 72 3.3 Sample Preparation ............................................................................................................................
Recommended publications
  • De Heterocera Van Sumatra — Iv —
    00 ZOOLOG1SCHE MEDEDEELINGEN — DEEL X. VIII. — DE HETEROCERA VAN SUMATRA — IV —. DOOR R. VAN EECKE. (MET 14 TEXTFIGUREN EN 1 GEKLEURDE PLAAT). Gen. Thumata Walk. Thumata, Walk., List. Lep. Ins. Br. Mus. XXXV, p. 1900, (1866). Hamps., Cat. Lep. Phal. II, p. 420, (1900). Seitz, Grossschm. d. Erde X, p. 159, (1914). Type: Th. fuscescens Walk. Geogr. verspr.: W. Afrika, Madagascar, Br. Indie, Assam, Ceylon, Borneo, Java, Australie. Zuiger gereduceerd, klein; palpen vooruitstekend, doch niet over het voorhoofd reikend; dat met haar begroeid is; antennen van het cT kort dubbel gekamd en wat verdikt aan de toppen; tibien middelmatig ge- spoord; abdomen wollig. Voorvleugel kort en breed; ader 2 vanaf het midden der eel; 3 vanaf voor den celhoek; 4 en 5 vanaf dien hoek; 6 vanaf onder den bovenhoek; 7, 8 en 9 gesteeld; 10 vrij; 11 met 12 samensmeltend. Aehtervleugelader 2 vanaf over het midden der eel; 3 en 4 gesteeld; 5 vanaf ongeveer het midden der discocellularis; 6 en 7 lang gesteeld; 8 vanaf bij het celeinde. Thumata fuscescens Walk. Thumata fuscescens, Walk., List. Lep. Ins. Br. Mus. XXXV, p. 1901, (1866). Hamps., 111. Typ. Sp. Br. Mus. IX, p. 86; pi. 158, f. 18, (1893). Cat. Lep. Phal. II, p. 421, f. 332, (1900). Seitz, Grossschm. d. Erde X, p. 159; pi. 17c, (1914). Deze soort werd tot nog toe niet op Sumatra gevonden, doch zal daar ongetwijfeld wel voorkomen. Grijs-bruin; kop, thorax, voorvleugelbasis en eenige vlekken langs de costa donker bruin; sporen van een gezaagde, buitenwaarts gebogen mediale; een duidelijke vlek op de discocellularis; sporen van een postmediale lijn, gevolgd door eene serie zwarte stippen.
    [Show full text]
  • Gymnosperm Foliage from the Upper Triassic of Lunz, Lower Austria: an Annotated Check List and Identification Key
    Geo.Alp, Vol. 7, S. 19–38, 2010 GYMNOSPERM FOLIAGE FROM THE UPPER TRIASSIC OF LUNZ, LOWER AUSTRIA: AN ANNOTATED CHECK LIST AND IDENTIFICATION KEY Christian Pott1 & Michael Krings2 With 7 figures and 1 table 1 Naturhistoriska riksmuseet, Sektionen för paleobotanik, Box 50007, SE-104 05 Stockholm, Sweden; [email protected] 2 Department für Geo- und Umweltwissenschaften, Paläontologie und Geobiologie, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität, and Bayerische Staatssammlung für Paläontologie und Geologie, Richard-Wagner-Straße 10, 80333 München, Germany; [email protected] Abstract The famous Lunz flora from Lower Austria is one of the richest and most diverse Late Triassic floras of the Northern He- misphere. The historical outcrops (mainly coal mines) are no longer accessible, but showy fossils can still be collected from natural exposures around the town of Lunz-am-See and from several of the old spoil tips. This paper presents an annotated check list with characterisations of all currently recognised gymnosperm foliage taxa in the Lunz flora. The descriptions are exemplified by illustrations of typical specimens and diagnostic features of the leaf morphology and epidermal anatomy. Moreover, a simple identification key for the taxa based on macromorphological features is provided that facilitates identification of newly collected specimens. 1. Introduction The Carnian (Late Triassic) flora from Lunz in Lo- ments (i.e. reproductive structures) among the fossils wer Austria is one of only a few well-preserved flo- (see e.g., Krasser, 1917, 1919; Kräusel, 1948, 1949, ras from the Alpine Triassic (Cleal, 1993; Dobruskina, 1953; Pott et al., 2010), the most striking feature of 1998).
    [Show full text]
  • La Flora Triásica Del Grupo El Tranquilo, Provincia De Santa Cruz, Patagonia
    Asociación Paleontológica Argentina. Publicación Especial 6 ISSN0002-7014 X Simposio Argentino de Paleobotánica y Palinología: 27-32. Buenos Aires, 30-08-99 La flora triásica del Grupo El Tranquilo, provincia de Santa Cruz, Patagonia. Parte VII: Cycadophyta Silvia GNAEDINGER' Abstract. THE TRIASSICFLORAOF THE EL TRANQUILOGROUP, SANTA CRUZ PROVINCE,PATAGONIA.PART VII. CYCADOPHYTA.Plants impressions of the Cycadopsida (sensu lato) from the Upper Triassic El Tranquilo Group are described. This plant group is limited to the genus Pseudocienis and PterophyIlum and comprí- ses: Pseudoctenis fissa Du Toit, Pseudoctenis spaiulata Du Toit and PterophyIlum muliilineaium Shirley from the Cañadon Largo Formation and Pseudoctenis sp. from the Laguna Colorada Formation. They are very scarcely represented in the flora, slightly more abundant in the Cañadón Largo Formation. Key words. Cycadophyta, Impressions, Systematics, Upper Triassic, Santa Cruz, Argentina. Palabras clave. Cycadophyta, Impresiones, Sistemática, Triásico Superior, Santa Cruz, Argentina. Introducción tados como Cycadales en tanto que Pterophyllum Brongniart por datos cuticulares de algunas de sus La presente contribución es parte de una serie de- especies se ubica en las Bennettitales. En este caso las dicada al estudio sistemático de la tafoflora del Gru- formas descriptas carecen de materia orgánica pre- po El Tranquilo, e involucra la descripción de las Cy- servada y como no hay evidencia de caracteres cutí- cadophyta. culares en este trabajo son tratadas como Cycadopsí- En la primera parte de esta serie, [alfin y Herbst da en un sentido amplio. (1995), brindan datos estratigráficos y sedimen- tológicos de las unidades portadoras de las plantas que integran el Grupo El Tranquilo (Triásico Supe- Materiales y métodos rior), provincia de Santa Cruz.
    [Show full text]
  • Fossil Mosses: What Do They Tell Us About Moss Evolution?
    Bry. Div. Evo. 043 (1): 072–097 ISSN 2381-9677 (print edition) DIVERSITY & https://www.mapress.com/j/bde BRYOPHYTEEVOLUTION Copyright © 2021 Magnolia Press Article ISSN 2381-9685 (online edition) https://doi.org/10.11646/bde.43.1.7 Fossil mosses: What do they tell us about moss evolution? MicHAEL S. IGNATOV1,2 & ELENA V. MASLOVA3 1 Tsitsin Main Botanical Garden of the Russian Academy of Sciences, Moscow, Russia 2 Faculty of Biology, Lomonosov Moscow State University, Moscow, Russia 3 Belgorod State University, Pobedy Square, 85, Belgorod, 308015 Russia �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-042X * author for correspondence: �[email protected], https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6096-6315 Abstract The moss fossil records from the Paleozoic age to the Eocene epoch are reviewed and their putative relationships to extant moss groups discussed. The incomplete preservation and lack of key characters that could define the position of an ancient moss in modern classification remain the problem. Carboniferous records are still impossible to refer to any of the modern moss taxa. Numerous Permian protosphagnalean mosses possess traits that are absent in any extant group and they are therefore treated here as an extinct lineage, whose descendants, if any remain, cannot be recognized among contemporary taxa. Non-protosphagnalean Permian mosses were also fairly diverse, representing morphotypes comparable with Dicranidae and acrocarpous Bryidae, although unequivocal representatives of these subclasses are known only since Cretaceous and Jurassic. Even though Sphagnales is one of two oldest lineages separated from the main trunk of moss phylogenetic tree, it appears in fossil state regularly only since Late Cretaceous, ca.
    [Show full text]
  • A Late Permian Ichthyofauna from the Zechstein Basin, Lithuania-Latvia Region
    bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/554998; this version posted February 20, 2019. The copyright holder for this preprint (which was not certified by peer review) is the author/funder, who has granted bioRxiv a license to display the preprint in perpetuity. It is made available under aCC-BY 4.0 International license. 1 A late Permian ichthyofauna from the Zechstein Basin, Lithuania-Latvia Region 2 3 Darja Dankina-Beyer1*, Andrej Spiridonov1,4, Ģirts Stinkulis2, Esther Manzanares3, 4 Sigitas Radzevičius1 5 6 1 Department of Geology and Mineralogy, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania 7 2 Chairman of Bedrock Geology, Faculty of Geography and Earth Sciences, University 8 of Latvia, Riga, Latvia 9 3 Department of Botany and Geology, University of Valencia, Valencia, Spain 10 4 Laboratory of Bedrock Geology, Nature Research Centre, Vilnius, Lithuania 11 12 *[email protected] (DD-B) 13 14 Abstract 15 The late Permian is a transformative time, which ended in one of the most 16 significant extinction events in Earth’s history. Fish assemblages are a major 17 component of marine foods webs. The macroevolution and biogeographic patterns of 18 late Permian fish are currently insufficiently known. In this contribution, the late Permian 19 fish fauna from Kūmas quarry (southern Latvia) is described for the first time. As a 20 result, the studied late Permian Latvian assemblage consisted of isolated 21 chondrichthyan teeth of Helodus sp., ?Acrodus sp., ?Omanoselache sp. and 22 euselachian type dermal denticles as well as many osteichthyan scales of the 23 Haplolepidae and Elonichthydae; numerous teeth of Palaeoniscus, rare teeth findings of 1 bioRxiv preprint doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/554998; this version posted February 20, 2019.
    [Show full text]
  • Triassic) in Barreal Depocenter, San Juan Province, Argentina
    Andean Geology ISSN: 0718-7092 ISSN: 0718-7106 [email protected] Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería Chile Stratigraphical, sedimentological and palaeofloristic characterization of the Sorocayense Group (Triassic) in Barreal depocenter, San Juan Province, Argentina Bodnar, Josefina; Iglesias, Ari; Colombi, Carina E.; Drovandi, Juan Martín Stratigraphical, sedimentological and palaeofloristic characterization of the Sorocayense Group (Triassic) in Barreal depocenter, San Juan Province, Argentina Andean Geology, vol. 46, no. 3, 2019 Servicio Nacional de Geología y Minería, Chile Available in: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=173961656006 This work is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 International. PDF generated from XML JATS4R by Redalyc Project academic non-profit, developed under the open access initiative Josefina Bodnar, et al. Stratigraphical, sedimentological and palaeofloristic characterization of ... Research article Stratigraphical, sedimentological and palaeofloristic characterization of the Sorocayense Group (Triassic) in Barreal depocenter, San Juan Province, Argentina Caracterización estratigráfica, sedimentológica y paleoflorística del Grupo Sorocayense (Triásico) en el área de Barreal, provincia de San Juan, Argentina Josefina Bodnar *12 Redalyc: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa? Universidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina id=173961656006 [email protected] Ari Iglesias 23 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina [email protected] Carina E. Colombi 24 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina [email protected] Juan Martín Drovandi 24 Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas, Argentina [email protected] Received: 30 November 2017 Accepted: 30 October 2018 Published: 04 February 2019 Abstract: e northern area of Cuyo Basin (west-central Argentina) corresponds to the Rincón Blanco half-graben, whose filling is arranged into the Rincón Blanco and Sorocayense groups.
    [Show full text]
  • Reappraisal of the Genus Dicroidium Gothan from the Triassic Sediments of India
    The Palaeobotanist 63(2014): 137–155 0031–0174/2014 Reappraisal of the genus Dicroidium Gothan from the Triassic sediments of India PANKAJ K. PAL1*, AMIT K. GHOSH2, RATAN KAR2, R.S. SINGH2, MANOBIKA SARKAR1 AND RESHMI CHATTERJEE2 1Department of Botany, UGC Centre of Advanced Study, University of Burdwan, Burdwan–713 104, West Bengal, India. 2Birbal Sahni Institute of Palaeobotany, 53 University Road, Lucknow 226 007, India. *Corresponding author: [email protected] (Received 28 August, 2014; revised version accepted 25 September, 2014) ABSTRACT Pal PK, Ghosh AK, Kar R, Singh RS, Sarkar M & Chatterjee R 2014. Reappraisal of the genus Dicroidium Gothan from the Triassic sediments of India. The Palaeobotanist 63(2): 137–155. The genus Dicroidium Gothan, belonging to Corystospermaceae, is characterised by pinnately compound leaves with proximally forked primary rachis. The genus was earlier included under the genus Thinnfeldia Ettingshausen. Dicroidium is the most consistent macrofloral element in the Triassic strata of Southern Hemisphere. The present reassessment deals with the morphotaxonomy and stratigraphic significance of the species of Dicroidium in India. A critical review of the literature reveals that the specimens of Dicroidium described so far from India require reassessment, because same morphotypes have often been placed under different species names and sometimes dissimilar elements have been assigned to the same species. In view of this, a thorough analysis of Indian Dicroidium was undertaken based on fresh collections along with the species described earlier by previous workers. The present reappraisal reveals that the genus in the Triassic of Peninsular India is represented by eight species. These are D. hughesii (Feistmantel) Lele, D.
    [Show full text]
  • Gondwana Vertebrate Faunas of India: Their Diversity and Intercontinental Relationships
    438 Article 438 by Saswati Bandyopadhyay1* and Sanghamitra Ray2 Gondwana Vertebrate Faunas of India: Their Diversity and Intercontinental Relationships 1Geological Studies Unit, Indian Statistical Institute, 203 B. T. Road, Kolkata 700108, India; email: [email protected] 2Department of Geology and Geophysics, Indian Institute of Technology, Kharagpur 721302, India; email: [email protected] *Corresponding author (Received : 23/12/2018; Revised accepted : 11/09/2019) https://doi.org/10.18814/epiiugs/2020/020028 The twelve Gondwanan stratigraphic horizons of many extant lineages, producing highly diverse terrestrial vertebrates India have yielded varied vertebrate fossils. The oldest in the vacant niches created throughout the world due to the end- Permian extinction event. Diapsids diversified rapidly by the Middle fossil record is the Endothiodon-dominated multitaxic Triassic in to many communities of continental tetrapods, whereas Kundaram fauna, which correlates the Kundaram the non-mammalian synapsids became a minor components for the Formation with several other coeval Late Permian remainder of the Mesozoic Era. The Gondwana basins of peninsular horizons of South Africa, Zambia, Tanzania, India (Fig. 1A) aptly exemplify the diverse vertebrate faunas found Mozambique, Malawi, Madagascar and Brazil. The from the Late Palaeozoic and Mesozoic. During the last few decades much emphasis was given on explorations and excavations of Permian-Triassic transition in India is marked by vertebrate fossils in these basins which have yielded many new fossil distinct taxonomic shift and faunal characteristics and vertebrates, significant both in numbers and diversity of genera, and represented by small-sized holdover fauna of the providing information on their taphonomy, taxonomy, phylogeny, Early Triassic Panchet and Kamthi fauna.
    [Show full text]
  • JUDD W.S. Et. Al. (2002) Plant Systematics: a Phylogenetic Approach. Chapter 7. an Overview of Green
    UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS An Overview of Green Plant Phylogeny he word plant is commonly used to refer to any auto- trophic eukaryotic organism capable of converting light energy into chemical energy via the process of photosynthe- sis. More specifically, these organisms produce carbohydrates from carbon dioxide and water in the presence of chlorophyll inside of organelles called chloroplasts. Sometimes the term plant is extended to include autotrophic prokaryotic forms, especially the (eu)bacterial lineage known as the cyanobacteria (or blue- green algae). Many traditional botany textbooks even include the fungi, which differ dramatically in being heterotrophic eukaryotic organisms that enzymatically break down living or dead organic material and then absorb the simpler products. Fungi appear to be more closely related to animals, another lineage of heterotrophs characterized by eating other organisms and digesting them inter- nally. In this chapter we first briefly discuss the origin and evolution of several separately evolved plant lineages, both to acquaint you with these important branches of the tree of life and to help put the green plant lineage in broad phylogenetic perspective. We then focus attention on the evolution of green plants, emphasizing sev- eral critical transitions. Specifically, we concentrate on the origins of land plants (embryophytes), of vascular plants (tracheophytes), of 1 UNCORRECTED PAGE PROOFS 2 CHAPTER SEVEN seed plants (spermatophytes), and of flowering plants dons.” In some cases it is possible to abandon such (angiosperms). names entirely, but in others it is tempting to retain Although knowledge of fossil plants is critical to a them, either as common names for certain forms of orga- deep understanding of each of these shifts and some key nization (e.g., the “bryophytic” life cycle), or to refer to a fossils are mentioned, much of our discussion focuses on clade (e.g., applying “gymnosperms” to a hypothesized extant groups.
    [Show full text]
  • The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028
    The Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy 2014- 2028 Creating a Greener, Healthier & more Attractive Borough Adoption Version April 2014 Doncaster Council Service Improvement & Policy (Regeneration & Environment) 0 1 the potential of the Limestone Valley, which runs through the west of the borough. Did you know that Doncaster has 65 different woodlands which cover an area in excess of 521 hectares? That’s about the equivalent to over 1,000 football pitches. There are 88 different formal open spaces across the borough, which include football, rugby and cricket pitches, greens, courts and athletics tracks. Doncaster is also home to 12 golf courses. The Trans-Pennine Trail passes through Doncaster and is integral to the extensive footpath and cycle network that link the borough’s communities with the countryside, jobs and recreation opportunities. There are so Foreword from the many more features across Doncaster and these are covered within this Strategy document. Portfolio Holder… Despite this enviable position that communities in Doncaster enjoy, there is always so much more that can be done to make the borough’s GI even greater. The Strategy sets out a framework As Portfolio Holder for Environment & Waste at for ensuring maximum investment and funding Doncaster Council, I am delighted to introduce is being channelled, both by the Council and the the Doncaster Green Infrastructure Strategy vast array of important partners who invest so 2014-2028: Creating a Greener, Healthier & much time and resources, often voluntarily, into more Attractive Borough. making our GI as good as it can be. As the largest metropolitan Borough in the This Strategy will help deliver a better country, covering over 220 square miles, connected network of multi-purpose spaces and Doncaster has an extensive green infrastructure provide the opportunity for the coordination (GI) network which includes numerous assets and delivery of environmental improvements and large areas that are rural in character.
    [Show full text]
  • Subclase Equisetidae ¿Tienes Alguna Duda, Sugerencia O Corrección Acerca De Este Taxón? Envíanosla Y Con Gusto La Atenderemos
    subclase Equisetidae ¿Tienes alguna duda, sugerencia o corrección acerca de este taxón? Envíanosla y con gusto la atenderemos. Ver todas las fotos etiquetadas con Equisetidae en Banco de Imagénes » Descripción de WIKIPEDIAES Ver en Wikipedia (español) → Ver Pteridophyta para una introducción a las plantas Equisetos vasculares sin semilla Rango temporal: Devónico-Holoceno PreЄ Є O S D C P T J K Pg N Los equisetos , llamados Equisetidae en la moderna clasificación de Christenhusz et al. 2011,[1] [2] [3] o también Equisetopsida o Equisetophyta, y en paleobotánica es más común Sphenopsida, son plantas vasculares afines a los helechos que aparecieron en el Devónico, pero que actualmente sobrevive únicamente el género Equisetum, si bien hay representantes de órdenes extintos que se verán en este artículo. Este grupo es monofilético, aun con sus representantes extintos, debido a su morfología distintiva. Son plantas pequeñas, aunque en el pasado una variedad de calamitácea alcanzó los 15 metros durante el pérmico.[4] Índice 1 Filogenia 1.1 Ecología y evolución 2 Taxonomía 2.1 Sinonimia Variedades de Equisetum 2.2 Sistema de Christenhusz et al. 2011 Taxonomía 2.3 Clasificación sensu Smith et al. 2006 2.4 Otras clasificaciones Reino: Plantae 3 Caracteres Viridiplantae 4 Véase también Streptophyta 5 Referencias Streptophytina 6 Bibliografía Embryophyta (sin rango) 7 Enlaces externos Tracheophyta Euphyllophyta Monilophyta Filogenia[editar] Equisetopsida o Sphenopsida Introducción teórica en Filogenia Clase: C.Agardh 1825 / Engler 1924 Equisetidae Los análisis moleculares y genéticos de filogenia solo Subclase: se pueden hacer sobre representantes vivientes, Warm. 1883 como circunscripto según Smith et al. (2006) (ver la Órdenes ficha), al menos Equisetales es monofilético (Pryer et Equisetales (DC.
    [Show full text]
  • Volume 2 Number 3 February 2013
    The Doncaster Naturalist Volume 2 Number 3 February 2013 Don Gorge Special Edition Doncaster Naturalists’ Society The Doncaster Naturalist Volume 2 Number 3 February 2013 Contents p77 Ice age mammals in the Don Gorge, Doncaster: A tribute to Edward Bennett Jenkinson FGS (1838-1878) Colin A. Howes and Andrea Marshall p84 Notes on the ‘threshold faunas’ of caves and tunnels within the Magnesian Limestone of the Don Gorge, Doncaster Colin A. Howes p89 Bat studies in the Don Gorge 1990-2012: The first twenty-three years Tony Lane, Colin A. Howes, Pip Secombe, Louise Hill and Derek Allen p105 Cave spiders of the Don Gorge Colin A. Howes p107 Notes on the Lepidoptera of subterranean sites in the Don Gorge, Doncaster Colin A.Howes, Tony Lane and Louise Hill p109 Victorian botanical eco-tourists in the Don Gorge Colin A. Howes p111 A walk from Hexthorpe to Conisbrough Derek Allen and Hugh Parkin p113 The Wild Tulip Tulipa sylvestris in The Don Gorge Colin A. Howes p116 The Flamingo Moss Tortula cernua on kiln-dried Magnesian Limestone fines in the quarries and kiln sites of the Don Gorge, Doncaster: a centenary review Colin A. Howes, Colin Wall, Tim Kohler and Louise Hill p128 Common Cottongrass in the Don Gorge at Cadeby Quarry Ian McDonald and Colin A. Howes p129 Dane’s blood on Cadeby Viaduct! Colin A. Howes p130 Doncaster Naturalists Society Presidential Reports 2012 and 2013 Louise Hill Cover photo: A view from the Conisbrough Viaduct, showing Cadeby Quarry at the left and the Levitt Hagg landfill site at top right.
    [Show full text]