DOCSLIB.ORG

New Member Handbook

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
New Member Handbook New Member Handbook Your Guide to Becoming an Accredited Member of The National Certified Public Manager® Consortium Unofficial version, revised August 2015 This page intentionally left blank Thank you for your interest in the National Certified Public Manager® (CPM) Consortium. The New Member Handbook has been prepared to assist potential new members of the CPM Consortium in moving forward from interested party to associate member status and ultimately to accredited member status within the organization. The CPM Handbook will provide you with the information needed to achieve accreditation as a full member of the Consortium. The Handbook includes a copy of the Constitution and bylaws as well a representative sample of accreditation information and the core competencies required in each program. Also included are checklists and sample letters that will be useful to you as you seek a better understanding of the organization. All of the members of the CPM Consortium are eager to assist you as you go through the accreditation process. You are encouraged to work closely with your mentor and any of the other Consortium members. Each will be eager to assist you. We are here to help in any way we can. Respectfully yours, Mary Hamilton 2014-2015 Chair, Board of Directors National Certified Public Manager® Consortium Table of Contents Introduction .................................................................................................................... 2 The Mentor Program ................................................................................................... 4 The Accreditation Questionnaire ............................................................................ 5 Sample Program Accreditation Review Checklist ............................................ 8 Sample CPM Program Plan for Becoming an Accredited Program ...... 13 Template for Plan for Becoming an Accredited Program ............................ 28 Core Competencies of the National CPM Consortium .................................. 34 Bylaws of the National Certified Public Manager® Consortium ................ 35 Attachments - Sample Letters: Associate Membership 46 Active Membership 47 Initial Accreditation Review Request Letter 49 Continuing Accreditation Review Request Letter 50 Letter to Mentor Program 51 NOTE: In addition to this handbook, additional information about Consortium membership is available in the Standard Operating Procedures manual posted on the website or available from the administrator. Introduction This handbook is intended to provide you with a step-by-step guide to becoming an accredited member of the National Certified Public Manager® Consortium. Here is a general overview of that process: 1. Indicate your interest in conducting a CPM Program by submitting a request for Associate Membership (see sample p. 46). Only one organization may operate a CPM Program within a state or government jurisdiction. 2. Once Associate Membership has been granted by a vote of the Executive Council of the Consortium, you will receive a letter from the Consortium Chair welcoming you to our organization. That letter will identify an accredited member assigned as your “mentor program” to guide you through the development of your CPM program. 3. Associate memberships are for two-year periods and may be renewed on written request. The Consortium ‘membership year’ is July 1 – June 30; annual membership dues are $1000. Dues for those joining mid-year are pro-rated on a quarterly basis. 3. Develop your program, using the guidance provided in this handbook. You are encouraged to contact any and all members of the Consortium for copies of existing class materials they use. The current list of members can be found at: http://www.cpmconsortium.org *. Click on link for Board of Directors. An email can be sent to all program directors on your behalf via the Consortium Administrator, Peggy Stewart [email protected] . * NOTE: Our website is currently hosted by Texas State University and that will show when the web site opens. 4. Once development of your program is in progress, you may request in writing Active Membership (see sample p.47). The application must include a letter from the governor/university president or other appropriate governmental/university officials who demonstrate both organizational and financial support for the National CPM Consortium New Member Handbook August 2015 1 proposed program. Active membership is granted by a vote of the full Consortium Board of Directors. 5. Once you have a complete program in operation that meets all standards listed in the Bylaws of the Consortium (Accreditation Assessment Questionnaire on pp. 6-8; bylaws on pp. 36-44), you may request an Initial Accreditation Review (see sample letter p. 50) NOTE: The program does not have to graduate a class before requesting an initial accreditation review, only have students enrolled and in the process of completing requirements. But, you cannot give the “certified public manager®” designation until your program is accredited. Please note that the term “certified public manager” is a registered service mark by the US Patent and Trademark Office and may only be used by the National Certified Public Manager® Consortium and it’s associate, active and accredited programs. When using the registered service mark it must always include the ® mark following “manager”. CPM, as all letter combinations not part of a logo, is not registered and is not restricted in use National CPM Consortium New Member Handbook August 2015 2 The Mentor Program The accredited CPM Program that has been assigned as your mentor is a valuable resource as you begin to develop your program. Below is a list of the responsibilities of the mentor program. You may expect all the support described here. Purpose: . To orient and familiarize the new associate member with CPM. To actively provide advice and support to the new associate member through the process of accreditation. Mentor Role and Responsibilities . Make initial contact to talk with the new associate member. Encourage and support the associate member in the process of program design and development. Have regular contact with the associate member. Know what resources are available and/or how to access information regarding resources. Mentee Role and Responsibilities . Follow-up if initial contact has not been made. Use mentor as first resource. Be prepared for mentor meetings: Where are you in the process, What is working and what is not working, Next steps. Keep mentor informed on progress: Share materials; ask for specific guidance, Accept responsibility for your accreditation. The Mentor-Mentee Relationship Assess how well the relationship is working. Either party can discuss with the Consortium Administrator how well the relationship is working and request a change if appropriate. Do not be afraid to say I don’t know or to contact Peggy Stewart, Consortium Administrator with questions, [email protected] . or 858-231-0048. National CPM Consortium New Member Handbook August 2015 3 Mentor – Mentee Best Practice Guide Phase I Phase II Phase III Associate to Active Active Initial Accreditation . Contacting Program Models . How to government/ Criteria for request an university leaders selecting and accreditation orienting review . Letters of Support instructors . Preparing for . Sharing actual accreditation Initial Contact competency- Binder . Establish based Visit relationship curriculum . Arrange materials reimburse- . Talk about program . Testing ment experience options procedure for . Capstone site visit . Share start up options travel costs materials . Program policies and . Identify when to procedures refer to the CPM . CPM applicant Administrator selection Sample policies process Sample . Marketing curriculum strategies and Questions to approaches Consortium . Graduation members criteria and process . Database development Assess Mentor- Mentee relationship . Is it working? Resources available on the website: Ohio Survey Past accreditation reports Resources available from the administrator: Examples of accreditation binders National CPM Consortium New Member Handbook August 2015 4 The Accreditation Assessment Questionnaire The accreditation questionnaire is an excellent guide for those developing a new CPM program. It addresses all the critical components necessary to meet the standards for accreditation by the National Certified Public Manager® Consortium. In the eventual Initial Accreditation Review, the program is required to provide evidence that each of these standards have been met. The following checklist is used by the accreditation review committee in their assessment of the program. NATIONAL CERTIFIED PUBLIC MANAGER® CONSORTIUM ACCREDITATION ASSESSMENT QUESTIONNAIRE Adopted 3.18.06 Revised 10.17.10 Member being accredited: ___________________ Date: _______ Assessment: ________ “I” Initial; “C” Continuing Committee Member: ________________________ State: ___ Role: _________________ Chair/Instructor/CPM Grad. Directions: Please review the documents you have received and respond either YES or NO to the statements below. If your answer is NO to any question or a series or questions, the committee chair should obtain clarifying data. YES NO TAB 1 – PROGRAM OVERVIEW (There is adequate summary description of the CPM ___ ___ program delivered by this member to understand the basics of how it operates, basic expectations, time frames, projects and examinations required, eligibility/application process,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cerrfied Public Manager Program
    Cer$fied Public Manager Program Does The Original Vision S$ll Ring True? Doug Wilson, B.S., M.Ed., MPA, CPM 9 By 9 Soluons 9by9soluons.com 404-432-9043 THE CERTIFIED PUBLIC MANAGER PROGRAM Has the Vision Been Realized? Time of Leadership Evolu$on • Started in Georgia State Government in 1972 – Vietnam was ending • Movement from autocrac to “par$cipave” leadership – Civil Rights Act of 1964 amended in 1972 and impac$ng organizaons – Leaders becoming aware of personal liability for ac$on • Cases hit Supreme Court • Being scared helped build interest • Leaders – Needed prac$cal direc$on • Management training efforts were mediocre overall Copyright 9 By 9 Solu$ons, LLC 2018 3 All Rights Reserved Exis$ng Management Training in Georgia • Agencies had limited management training course of own • University of Georgia offered 1 course for higher level managers – Several professional level courses • State Merit System offered 1 core management course Copyright 9 By 9 Solu$ons, LLC 2018 4 All Rights Reserved Quality of Training • SMS Training Division was bureaupathological • Staff: • 5 management instructors • 1 course offering per month (rest of $me for “research”)! Quality was very poor • Good topics • Bad topics • 1 class per month • More entertainers than trainers • High evaluaons due to fun, jokes & geng out early • Within 6 months everybody above me in SMS lei, I became Assistant Division Director – Would never happen today, somebody would have been brought in Copyright 9 By 9 Solu$ons, LLC 2018 5 All Rights Reserved Star$ng The Road To Change
    [Show full text]
  • The National CPM Program
    Why Do Change Efforts Fail? The Public Manager The Quarterly for Practitioners FALL 2008 ! Volume 37, Number 3 WWW.THEPUBLICMANAGER.ORG Novel Solutions oue37,NumberVolume 3 A New Generation of Change Solutions for Public Bureaucracies Fall 2008 Creating a “Super” Agency in San Diego County Transforming the Military Health System The National CPM Program by Howard R. Balanoff and Marilyn K. Balanoff Expansion of a model certification he Certified Public Manager (CPM) program in the United program in Texas States is a nationally recognized professional development pro- T gram. It is designed for federal,state,and local government man- and across the United agers, but the skills, knowledge, and competencies taught are also relevant for managers and supervisors in the nonprofit sector. States holds promise The CPM program’s primary goal is to improve the performance of for public-sector public-sector managers and the organizational performance of federal, state, and local government employees. It is a comprehensive course of workforces around study through which public managers can acquire and apply the best prac- tices and theory to their management behaviors and strategies using pre- the world. scribed sets of professional standards, often referred to as “competencies.” The curriculum uses theory as the foundation and applies it to prac- tical problems facing the participants,their agencies and departments,and the citizens.Those who complete the program earn a nationally trade- marked designation of CPM. The CPM program has been operating in the United States since 1979. It began in Georgia as a certification program for public managers in Georgia’s state government.
    [Show full text]
  • Certified Public Manager Program
    C ertified P ublic M anager Participant Handbook NVCPM 2 Rev_July 2011 Proprietary & Confidential - State of Nevada Participant HB Table of Contents ADMINISTRATION.................................................................................................. 4 Contact Information ................................................................................................ 4 INTRODUCTION...................................................................................................... 5 Overview and Background........................................................................................... 5 Program Benefits & Goals ........................................................................................... 5 Eligibility....................................................................................................................... 7 Program Sites.............................................................................................................. 7 PROGRAM POLICIES ........................................................................................... 7 Participant Policies ...................................................................................................... 7 Program Attendance Expectations........................................................................... 7 Certification Requirements .......................................................................................... 8 Coursework.............................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • MPA and CPM Curriculum: an Analysis of the Views of Public Administrators. SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA
    DOCUMENT RESUME ED 423 725 HE 030 816 AUTHOR Rose, Bruce J. TITLE MPA and CPM Curriculum: An Analysis of the Views of Public Administrators. SPONS AGENCY National Science Foundation, Arlington, VA. PUB DATE 1996-04-12 NOTE 15p.; Working paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the Indiana Political Science Association (Terre Haute, IN, April 12, 1996). PUB TYPE Reports Research (143) Speeches/Meeting Papers (150) EDRS PRICE MF01/PC01 Plus Postage. DESCRIPTORS *Administrator Attitudes; Administrator Education; Course Content; Educational Needs; Government Employees; Higher Education; *Management Development; *Masters Programs; National Surveys; *Professional Training; Program Effectiveness; *Public Administration; Skill Development; *State Officials; Training Objectives; Workshops ABSTRACT Views of state public administrators about management education and training needs were investigated, as were administrator views concerning short-term management development workshops. Data was drawn from responses to questionnaires mailed to 5,980 state administrators who were selected from a national survey and from random samples using lists provided by states, state-supported programs, and universities; respondent profile data are included. Results suggest that respondents regard as important the topics addressed by both Masters of Public Administration (MPA) programs and by Certified Public Manager (CPM) programs, which are government-supported management training programs. The MPA respondents cited as most important learning about organizational behavior, budget operations, and political institutions. CPM respondents cited problem-solving techniques, strategic planning, and performance management as most important. Responses of the MPA and CPM respondents were not compared because the two groups had not been given a dissimilar set of items. The majority of the CPM respondents reported finding their training only somewhat valuable in increasing their effectiveness.
    [Show full text]
  • American Academy of Certified Public Managers®
    Henning Award The Henning Award, named for the CPM program founder, Kenneth K. Henning, is presented annually to an active Academy Fellow whose contributions to their profes- sion, community, society, and Academy have been superlative. Each society may nominate one candidate for this prestigious award. The Henning Award Committee administers the ap- plication, selection, and presentation process. The recipient is recognized at the awards banquet held at the conclusion of the annual professional development conference. Askew Award American Academy The Askew Award is named for George C. Askew, who received his CPM in Georgia in 1976 at the first-ever graduation ceremony of and who is personally recognized as a CPM leader at both the state and national levels. Certified Public CPM projects are a vital component of each ® program participant’s training and those ® Managers program individuals or teams who completed projects considered exemplary by the program administrators are selected to receive the Askew Award. Fran W. Wilkinson Scholarship The Academy awards an annual memorial scholarship to a deserving student who plans a career in public service. The scholarship is named in honor of Fran W. Wilkinson, a leader in the CPM program at the state and national An association of www.cpmacademy.org level who died at a young age. Applicants Academy of Certified Public Managers American management professionals dedicated must meet specific criteria. Recipients are de- to excellence in government termined by an empowered committee of the Academy’s Executive Board. Application infor- www.cpmacademy.org mation, nomination criteria, and other details are available on the Academy website.
    [Show full text]
  • The Texas Certified Public Manager (Cpm) Program
    The National Certified Public Manager® (CPM) Program : A Model for Public and Nonprofit Leaders and Managers around the World By: Dr. Howard R. Balanoff, Professor & Director The William P. Hobby Center for Public Service Texas State University San Marcos, Texas 78666 512/245-3453 [email protected] and Ms. Marilyn K. Balanoff, Program Faculty Office of Distance & Extended Learning (ODEL) Texas State University San Marcos, Texas 78666 512/245-2507 [email protected] ABSTRACT PREPARED FOR THE 2015 CONFERENCE OF THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF SCHOOLS AND INSTITUTES OF ADMINISTRATION (IASIA) WORKING GROUP 1: EDUCATION AND TRAINING PROGRAMME: PARIS, FRANCE JULY 6 – 10, 2015 This abstract builds on a series of papers about the Certified Public Manager® (CPM) Program that were delivered at previous IASIA Conferences in Lake Como Italy, Warsaw Poland & Rome Italy. These papers generated significant interest in how public management certification programs could provide a vehicle for the professional development and education of the public sector and nonprofit sector workforces around the world. Now that the American Society for Public Administration (ASPA) has created a new Section called the American Academy of Certified Public Manager s® (CPM) Program (AACPM) and that Section has begun a collaboration with ASPA’s International Chapter and ASPA’s Section for Public Management Practice (SPMP) the mechanisms are in place for Cer t ified Public Manager® (CPM) Program s to be established in a number of countries around the world. One of the goals of the authors of this paper is to review the potential of the National Certified Public Manager® (CPM) Consortium and ASPA’s AACPM & SPMP Sections and ASPA’s International Chapter to link together to provide high quality professional development and educational services (using CPM Programs) for ASPA’s international practitioner and academic members.
    [Show full text]
  • School of Public Affairs Newsletter Newsletter
    Arizona State University College of Public Programs School of Public Affairs Spring 2000 Newsletter DIRECT OR’S MES SAGE MESSAGE FROM THE DIRECTOR The first semester of changing of some deeply held convictions. the college and school a good deal of posi- this year was out- Glacial is probably the word to describe the tive feedback. APEP graduated a class of standing. The School speed at which these will be processed. 60 CPM students, and is in the midst of of Public Affairs saw Fortunately, Dean Schneider is very suppor- starting a very exciting "best-practices" pro- the continuation of tive of these attempts. ject with five jurisdictions. They have also several promising applied for grants ranging from training war- activities and initiated The School has started a cohort program dens to acting as NASPAA evaluation sub- action in some differ- with the City of Mesa. Mesa has guaran- contractors. ent arenas. The re- teed a class of 30 MPA students and we sults of these can be will be providing on-site classes at their Finally, Lou Weschler has announced that seen in our spring civic center. We anticipate that this will be he will be retiring after this Spring Semester. enrollments, which may be as much as 15 a model for other cities in the area. Our Lou's scholarship, dedication, service, hu- percent higher this year compared to last BIS Certificate program is wending its way mor, energy, and philosophy has made the year. The entire staff is to be congratulated through the University, with two under- School one of the best in the United States-it for the superb work that they have done graduate classes offered this spring both is rare that any one individual can make that has resulted in this success.
    [Show full text]
  • A Program Evaluation of the State of Nevada's Certified Public Manager Program
    UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones 8-1-2017 A Program Evaluation of The State of Nevada's Certified Public Manager Program Carolyn Faircloth University of Nevada, Las Vegas Pat La Putt University of Nevada, Las Vegas Diana Ritter University of Nevada, Las Vegas Shawntay Tyler University of Nevada, Las Vegas Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalscholarship.unlv.edu/thesesdissertations Part of the Public Administration Commons, Public Affairs Commons, and the Public Policy Commons Repository Citation Faircloth, Carolyn; La Putt, Pat; Ritter, Diana; and Tyler, Shawntay, "A Program Evaluation of The State of Nevada's Certified Public Manager Program" (2017). UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones. 3110. http://dx.doi.org/10.34917/11201556 This Capstone is protected by copyright and/or related rights. It has been brought to you by Digital Scholarship@UNLV with permission from the rights-holder(s). You are free to use this Capstone in any way that is permitted by the copyright and related rights legislation that applies to your use. For other uses you need to obtain permission from the rights-holder(s) directly, unless additional rights are indicated by a Creative Commons license in the record and/or on the work itself. This Capstone has been accepted for inclusion in UNLV Theses, Dissertations, Professional Papers, and Capstones by an authorized administrator of Digital Scholarship@UNLV. For more information, please contact [email protected]. University of Nevada, Las Vegas School of Public Policy and Leadership 4505 South Maryland Parkway Las Vegas, NV 89154-4030 A Program Evaluation of The State of Nevada’s Certified Public Manager Program PUA 729 Capstone Program Evaluation Summer 2017 Professor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • 2013 CPM Handbook 11-07-13
    UTAHUTAH CERTIFIEDCERTIFIED PUBLICPUBLIC ®® MANAGERMANAGER HANDBOOKHANDBOOK Sponsored by the Utah Department of Human Resource Management in partnership with the Utah System of Higher Education www.cpm.utah.gov Room 2120 State Office Bldg PO Box 141531 SLC, UT 84114-1531 801-538-4222 e-mail: [email protected] Welcome to the Utah Certified Public Manager® Handbook. This handbook was designed as an introduction to the Utah Certified Public Manager® (UCPM) program and a reference guide to UCPM policies and procedures. You will also find a list of course descriptions and program highlights. Table of Contents Contents Page # Welcome ..............................................................................................3 Introduction to CPM .............................................................................. 4 FAQ’s Regarding the Utah CPM Program .................................................. 5 Certified Public Manager® Associations and Organizations ........................ 7 Certified Public Manager® Competency Cluster Descriptions ...................... 8 Utah Certified Public Manager® Courses .................................................. 9 UCPM Policies and Procedure ............................................................... 12 What People are Saying About UCPM .................................................... 18 Notes ................................................................................................. 19 UCPM Handbook 2 11/13/2013 elcome to the Utah Certified Public Manager® Program. As a W participant,
    [Show full text]