DOCSLIB.ORG

Mexican American War Classroom Resources

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Mexican American War Classroom Resources Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Background: Mexican American War In the early 19th century, Mexico and America were very different countries, the result of their very different colonial histories. Mexico admired the republican spirit of its stronger neighbor, but worried about its territorial ambitions. When Texas seceded from Mexico in 1836, Mexicans suspected that America was behind it. Nine years later, responding to pressure from the South to bring another slave state into the Union, America annexed Texas outright. Mexico did not object, but the United States dispatched an army to Corpus Christi, led by General Zachary Taylor. Young Ulysses S. Grant was among his forces. President James K. Polk argued that slavery was not the issue in the Mexican War, but anti-slavery forces saw things very differently. Polk had run for president on a platform that included annexing Texas to enlarge the slave-holding area of the United States. Thanks to slave states’ greater power in the U.S. Senate, the Wilmot Proviso, which would have prohibited the spread of slavery into territory won from Mexico, failed in 1846 and many times thereafter. The growing political power of slave states in Washington led to fears that slavery would be introduced in newly acquired Western territories, further adding to the power of pro- slavery forces. The delicate balance that the country had sought to maintain between slave and free states was profoundly at risk. In the spring of 1846, General Taylor provoked the Mexican army to cross the Rio Grande, which the Americans had declared the border between the countries. Mexico believed the border to be the Nueces River, several miles to the north. So the land between the rivers was contested. When 11 of Taylor’s soldiers were killed, President Polk told Congress that “American blood had been shed on American soil,” and war was declared on May 13, 1846. Hostilities ended 16 months later, when General Winfield Scott’s army won the final battle at Chapultepec and took the capital, Mexico City, which had been deserted by the Mexican military. The war that began over Texas ended with an America that stretched from the Atlantic to the Pacific coast. For a generation of West Point graduates, it provided an introduction to combat and an opportunity to know nearly all the officers then in the Regular Army—the men they would serve with and against in the Civil War. And it presented the nation with unresolved questions about the expansion of slavery into the West, which the Compromise of 1850 would try in vain to resolve. Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Resource 1: James K. Polk’s Message on War with Mexico Ex. Doc. No. 60 Hostilities by Mexico. Message from the President of the United States, relative to the invasion and commencement of hostilities by Mexico. May 11, 1846. Read, and referred to the Committee of the Whole House on the state of the Union. To the Senate and House of Representatives: The existing state of the relations between the United States and Mexico renders it proper that I should bring the subject to the consideration of Congress. … The grievous wrongs perpetrated by Mexico upon our citizens throughout a long period of years remain unredressed; and solemn treaties, pledging her public faith for this redress, have been disregarded. A government either unable or unwilling to enforce the execution of such treaties, fails to perform one of its plainest duties. … The cup of forbearance had been exhausted, even before the recent information from the frontier of the Del Norte; but now after reiterated menaces, Mexico has passed the boundary of the United States, has invaded our territory and shed American blood upon American soil. She has proclaimed that hostilities have commenced, and that the two nations are now at war. As war exists, and, not withstanding all our efforts to avoid it, exists by the act of Mexico herself, we are called upon by every consideration of duty and patriotism to vindicate with decision the honor, the rights, and the interest of our country. … In further vindication of our rights, and defence of our territory, I invoke the prompt action of Congress to recognize the existence of the war, and to place at the disposition of the Executive the means of prosecuting the war with vigor, and thus hastening the restoration of peace. … James K. Polk, Executive Document Number 6. Library of Congress. Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Resource 1: James K. Polk was elected president in 1844 because he appealed to voters’ hunger for national expansion. On this subject, he had enormous ambitions that were largely fulfilled during his one term in office. He wanted Texas to be an American state, and Congress passed a resolution annexing Texas even before he took office. He claimed the Oregon territory, which was in British hands. He offered Mexico $20 million for California and the New Mexico country – neither area had the state boundaries they have today. When the Mexican government declined the purchase offer, Polk sent the U.S. Army to intimidate Mexico with a show of force. The two sides did not agree on where the border lay between Texas and Mexico. Mexico believed it was the Nueces River; the United States claimed it was further south, at the Rio Grande. When the U.S. Army entered the disputed territory between the rivers, Mexico attacked and killed 11 American soldiers. In this address to Congress, President Polk roused war fever by claiming that American blood had been shed on American soil. Knowing that this land could also be considered Mexican soil, his opponents in the Whig party passed a resolution declaring that the war had been “unnecessarily and unconstitutionally begun by the President.” Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Resource 2: “Eight Dollars a Day” J. J. Hutchinson, “Eight Dollars a Day” (Boston: Oliver Ditson, 1848). Library of Congress. Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Resource 2: The Hutchinson Family was a popular singing group of four siblings: Abby, Asa, John, and Judson, with their brother Jesse writing the lyrics. They performed in the 1840s, singing songs about country life and politics. They supported abolition and temperance, and opposed the war with Mexico as little more than a strategy for spreading slavery. “Eight dollars a day” was then the pay of Congressmen, and a good deal more money than was made by most Americans or, as the song points out, by the soldiers fighting in the war. Here are the first and ninth verses: At Washington, full once a year do politicians throng Contriving there by various arts to make their sessions long And many a reason do they give why they’re obliged to stay, But the clearest reason yet adduced is Eight dollars a day. Then the cry of war runs through the land for Volunteers to go And fight in the war for slavery on the plains of Mexico Seven dollars a month and to be shot at that is the common soldier’s pay While those who send the poor fellows there get Eight dollars a day. Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Resource 3: Mapa de los Estados Unidos de Méjico John Disturnell, “Mapa de los Estados Unidos de Méjico,” 1847. Library of Congress. Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Resource 3: The language of this map is almost entirely Spanish, but it was created by an American map- maker and published in New York, probably around the time fighting ended in September of 1847. The map shows Texas within the area labeled “Estados Unidos,” or United States, with the Rio Grande as its southern border. The states of Mexico are shown in pastels. Seven issues of this map were created in 1847, one of which was used as the official map during negotiations of the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, Article V: The boundary line between the two Republics shall commence in the Gulf of Mexico, three leagues [about 9 miles] from land, opposite the mouth of the Rio Grande… from thence up the middle of that river… to the point where it strikes the southern boundary of New Mexico; thence, westwardly, along the whole southern boundary of New Mexico (which runs north of the town called Paso) to its western termination; thence, northward, along the western line of New Mexico, until it intersects the first branch of the river Gila…thence down the middle of the said branch and of the said river, until it empties into the Rio Colorado; thence across the Rio Colorado, following the division line between Upper and Lower California, to the Pacific Ocean. The southern and western limits of New Mexico, mentioned in the article, are those laid down in the map entitled “Map of the United Mexican States, as organized and defined by various acts of the Congress of said republic, and constructed according to the best authorities. Revised edition. Published at New York, in 1847, by J. Disturnell,” of which map a copy is added to this treaty, bearing the signatures and seals of the undersigned Plenipotentiaries. Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Resource 4: Drawing of a Mexican Man Abner Doubleday, Sketchbook and Scrapbook: Mexican War, 1846-47. New-York Historical Society. Gift of Mrs. Thomas H. Eddy. Unit 2: The Mexican American War Classroom Resources Resource 4: There is considerable doubt that Abner Doubleday really invented the game of baseball, but none about his role as a military man. Born near Cooperstown, New York, he was a year ahead of Ulysses S.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • John Fulton Reynolds
    John Fulton Reynolds By COL. JOHN FULTON REYNOLDS SCOTT ( U. S. Army, retired ) Grand-nephew of General Reynolds I CAME here to give a talk on John Fulton Reynolds, and as I have sat here this evening I really feel superfluous. The stu- dents of this school have certainly outdone themselves in their essays on that subject, and I feel that what I may add is more or less duplication. For the sake of the record I will do my best to make a brief talk, and to try to fill in some of the gaps in Reynolds' life which have been left out because some of them have not yet been published. As you have heard, John Reynolds was the second son of the nine children of John Reynolds and Lydia Moore. Lydia Moore's ancestry was entirely Irish. Her father came from Rathmelton, Ireland, served as a captain at Brandywine with the 3rd Penn- sylvania. Infantry of the Continental Line, where he was wounded; also served at Germantown and at Valley Forge, and was then retired. Her mother was Irish on both sides of her family, and the Reynolds family itself was Irish, but, of course, the Huguenot strain came in through John Reynolds' own mother, who was a LeFever and a great-granddaughter of Madam Ferree of Paradise. Our subject was born on September 21, 1820, at 42 West King Street, Lancaster, and subsequently went to the celebrated school at Lititz, conducted by the grandfather of the presiding officer of this meeting, Dr. Herbert H. Beck. I have a letter written by John F.
    [Show full text]
  • 89.1963.1 Iron Brigade Commander Wayne County Marker Text Review Report 2/16/2015
    89.1963.1 Iron Brigade Commander Wayne County Marker Text Review Report 2/16/2015 Marker Text One-quarter mile south of this marker is the home of General Solomon A. Meredith, Iron Brigade Commander at Gettysburg. Born in North Carolina, Meredith was an Indiana political leader and post-war Surveyor-General of Montana Territory. Report The Bureau placed this marker under review because its file lacked both primary and secondary documentation. IHB researchers were able to locate primary sources to support the claims made by the marker. The following report expands upon the marker points and addresses various omissions, including specifics about Meredith’s political service before and after the war. Solomon Meredith was born in Guilford County, North Carolina on May 29, 1810.1 By 1830, his family had relocated to Center Township, Wayne County, Indiana.2 Meredith soon turned to farming and raising stock; in the 1850s, he purchased property near Cambridge City, which became known as Oakland Farm, where he grew crops and raised award-winning cattle.3 Meredith also embarked on a varied political career. He served as a member of the Wayne County Whig convention in 1839.4 During this period, Meredith became concerned with state internal improvements: in the early 1840s, he supported the development of the Whitewater Canal, which terminated in Cambridge City.5 Voters next chose Meredith as their representative to the Indiana House of Representatives in 1846 and they reelected him to that position in 1847 and 1848.6 From 1849-1853, Meredith served
    [Show full text]
  • Missouri Compromise (1820) • Compromise Sponsored by Henry Clay
    Congressional Compromises and the Road to War The Great Triumvirate Henry Clay Daniel Webster John C. Calhoun representing the representing representing West the North the South John C. Calhoun •From South Carolina •Called “Cast-Iron Man” for his stubbornness and determination. •Owned slaves •Believed states were sovereign and could nullify or reject federal laws they believed were unconstitutional. Daniel Webster •From Massachusetts •Called “The Great Orator” •Did not own slaves Henry Clay •From Kentucky •Called “The Great Compromiser” •Owned slaves •Calmed sectional conflict through balanced legislation and compromises. Missouri Compromise (1820) • Compromise sponsored by Henry Clay. It allowed Missouri to enter the Union as a Slave State and Maine to enter as a Free State. The southern border of Missouri would determine if a territory could allow slavery or not. • Slavery was allowed in some new states while other states allowed freedom for African Americans. • Balanced political power between slave states and free states. Nullification Crisis (1832-1833) • South Carolina, led by Senator John C. Calhoun declared a high federal tariff to be null and avoid within its borders. • John C. Calhoun and others believed in Nullification, the idea that state governments have the right to reject federal laws they see as Unconstitutional. • The state of South Carolina threatened to secede or break off from the United States if the federal government, under President Andrew Jackson, tried to enforce the tariff in South Carolina. Andrew Jackson on Nullification “The laws of the United States, its Constitution…are the supreme law of the land.” “Look, for a moment, to the consequence.
    [Show full text]
  • Compromise of 1850 Earlier You Read About the Missouri Compromise and the Wilmot Proviso
    Compromise of 1850 Earlier you read about the Missouri Compromise and the Wilmot Proviso. Keep them in mind as you read here What is a compromise? A compromise is a resolution of a problem in which each side gives up demands or makes concession. Earlier you read about the Missouri Compromise. What conflict did it resolve? It kept the number of slave and free states equal by admitting Maine as free and Missouri as slave and it provided for a policy with respect to slavery in the Louisiana Territory. Other than in Missouri, the Compromise prohibited slavery north of 36°30' N latitude in the land acquired in the Louisiana Purchase. Look at the 1850 map. Notice how the "Missouri Compromise Line" ends at the border to Mexican Territory. In 1850 the United States controls the 36°30' N latitude to the Pacific Ocean. Will the United States allow slavery in its new territory? Slavery's Expansion Look again at this map and watch for the 36°30' N latitude Missouri Compromise line as well as the proportion of free and slave states up to the Civil War, which begins in 1861. WSBCTC 1 This map was created by User: Kenmayer and is licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported license (CC-BY 3.0) [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:US_Slave_Free_1789-1861.gif]. Here's a chart that compares the Missouri Compromise with the Compromise of 1850. WSBCTC 2 Wilmot Proviso During the Mexican-American War in 1846, David Wilmot, a Democratic congressman from Pennsylvania, proposed in an amendment to a military appropriations bill that slavery be banned in all the territories acquired from Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Battle of Gettysburg Day 1 Reading Comprehension Name: ______
    Battle of Gettysburg Day 1 Reading Comprehension Name: _________________________ Read the passage and answer the questions. The Ridges of Gettysburg Anticipating a Confederate assault, Union Brigadier General John Buford and his soldiers would produce the first line of defense. Buford positioned his defenses along three ridges west of the town. Buford's goal was simply to delay the Confederate advance with his small cavalry unit until greater Union forces could assemble their defenses on the three storied ridges south of town known as Cemetery Ridge, Cemetery Hill, and Culp's Hill's. These ridges were crucial to control of Gettysburg. Whichever army could successfully occupy these heights would have superior position and would be difficult to dislodge. The Death of Major General Reynolds The first of the Confederate forces to engage at Gettysburg, under the Command of Major General Henry Heth, succeeded in advancing forward despite Buford's defenses. Soon, battles erupted in several locations, and Union forces would suffer severe casualties. Union Major General John Reynolds would be killed in battle while positioning his troops. Major General Abner Doubleday, the man eventually credited with inventing the formal game of baseball, would assume command. Fighting would intensify on a road known as the Chambersburg Pike, as Confederate forces continued to advance. Jubal Early's Successful Assault Meanwhile, Union defenses positioned north and northwest of town would soon be outflanked by Confederates under the command of Jubal Early and Robert Rodes. Despite suffering severe casualties, Early's soldiers would break through the line under the command of Union General Francis Barlow, attacking them from multiple sides and completely overwhelming them.
    [Show full text]
  • American Presidents and the Civil War Teacher Guide
    the union dissolved american presidents and the civil war teacher guide © Mort Kunstler, Candlelight and Roses, oil on canvas, 1998, 32 x 46” interdisciplinary classroom activities a nd student field trip program Updated Summer 2017 Bartow County Educator Externs Stephanie Diamond, JoAnn Jenkins, Shannon Hensley Booth Western Art Museum Education Department Go For the Blue and Gray How much do you know about the Civil War? See how many questions you can answer. Record answers on a separate page. Score ten points for each correct answer. Score 1. Who risked her life to care for the wounded and later founded the American Red Cross. _____ 2. Which Civil War battle is considered the greatest battle fought in the Western Hemisphere? _____ 3. What did Southerners call the Battle of Bull Run? _____ 4. What Civil War general later died in a standoff with the Sioux and Cheyenne Indians in Montana? _____ 5. What was William T. Sherman’s destructive campaign through the South called? _____ 6. What Union general fought heroically at the Battle of Gettysburg and is also credited with inventing baseball? _____ 7. Why was the Battle of Vicksburg so important? _____ 8. How many Americans were killed during the Civil War? _____ 9. What was the importance of Appomattox Court House in the Civil War? _____ 10. What was Ulysses S. Grant’s full name? _____ 11. What was the “Emancipation Proclamation”? _____ 12. Who was the journalist who did wide research on the Civil War and wrote the book called The Red Badge of Courage? _____ Pre-Visit Activity Total _____ Standard: SS4H5/ SS8H5 Go for the Blue and Gray Answer Key 1.
    [Show full text]
  • No Open Book!
    Test on Tuesday 12/10 Study, study, study What did Nat Turner do? • Leader of a Slave Rebellion in VA • Caused changes in treatment of slaves in some states What was the result (or significance) of Nat Turner’s rebellion • Placing stricter slave “codes” or laws on slaves To balance the slave and free states and create a rule of entrance for new states of the Louisiana Territory. (1820) • The Missouri Compromise What two states entered in the agreement from #3 (and which way? Free/slave) • Missouri- Slave • Maine- Free (kept the balance to 12 each) What was it called when the Tariffs were opposed by the South and they wrote about how it was unconstitutional? • Nullification Crisis What is the name of the paper that stated that the federal government was unconstitutional in their actions of this “Tariff of abominations”? • Doctrine of Nullification How was South Carolina involved in the Nullification Crisis? • It was the state had issue with the actions of the Government in the Nullification Crisis (Calhoun was from here) What did John C. Calhoun have to do with the Nullification Crisis? • He wrote the Doctrine of Nullification What is Loyalty to the interests of one's own region or section of the country, rather than to the country as a whole? • Sectionalism In what ways were the North and South different in the period of 1800-1860? • North had: No slavery, industry, urbanization, and small farms. • South had; plantation slavery, agricultural base, and poor subsistence farmers. Webster Ashburton was a treaty that settled the dispute of what territory? • The shared Oregon territory between Britain and the U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • The Mexican General Officer Corps in the US
    University of New Mexico UNM Digital Repository Latin American Studies ETDs Electronic Theses and Dissertations 12-1-2011 Valor Wrought Asunder: The exM ican General Officer Corps in the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847. Javier Ernesto Sanchez Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ltam_etds Recommended Citation Sanchez, Javier Ernesto. "Valor Wrought Asunder: The exM ican General Officer Corps in the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847.." (2011). https://digitalrepository.unm.edu/ltam_etds/3 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Electronic Theses and Dissertations at UNM Digital Repository. It has been accepted for inclusion in Latin American Studies ETDs by an authorized administrator of UNM Digital Repository. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Javier E. Sánchez Candidate Latin-American Studies Department This thesis is approved, and it is acceptable in quality and form for publication: Approved by the Thesis Committee: L.M. García y Griego, Chairperson Teresa Córdova Barbara Reyes i VALOR WROUGHT ASUNDER: THE MEXICAN GENERAL OFFICER CORPS IN THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR, 1846 -1847 by JAVIER E. SANCHEZ B.B.A., BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICO 2009 THESIS Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree of MASTER OF ARTS LATIN AMERICAN STUDIES The University of New Mexico Albuquerque, New Mexico December 2011 ii VALOR WROUGHT ASUNDER: THE MEXICAN GENERAL OFFICER CORPS IN THE U.S.-MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1847 By Javier E. Sánchez B.A., Business Administration, University of New Mexico, 2008 ABSTRACT This thesis presents a reappraisal of the performance of the Mexican general officer corps during the U.S.-Mexican War, 1846-1847.
    [Show full text]
  • Proceedings First Annual Palo Alto Conference
    PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST ANNUAL PALO ALTO CONFERENCE An International Conference on the Mexican-American War and its Causes and Consequences with Participants from Mexico and the United States. Brownsville, Texas, May 6-9, 1993 Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site Southwest Region National Park Service I Cover Illustration: "Plan of the Country to the North East of the City of Matamoros, 1846" in Albert I C. Ramsey, trans., The Other Side: Or, Notes for the History of the War Between Mexico and the I United States (New York: John Wiley, 1850). 1i L9 37 PROCEEDINGS OF THE FIRST ANNUAL PALO ALTO CONFERENCE Edited by Aaron P. Mahr Yafiez National Park Service Palo Alto Battlefield National Historic Site P.O. Box 1832 Brownsville, Texas 78522 United States Department of the Interior 1994 In order to meet the challenges of the future, human understanding, cooperation, and respect must transcend aggression. We cannot learn from the future, we can only learn from the past and the present. I feel the proceedings of this conference illustrate that a step has been taken in the right direction. John E. Cook Regional Director Southwest Region National Park Service TABLE OF CONTENTS Introduction. A.N. Zavaleta vii General Mariano Arista at the Battle of Palo Alto, Texas, 1846: Military Realist or Failure? Joseph P. Sanchez 1 A Fanatical Patriot With Good Intentions: Reflections on the Activities of Valentin GOmez Farfas During the Mexican-American War. Pedro Santoni 19 El contexto mexicano: angulo desconocido de la guerra. Josefina Zoraida Vazquez 29 Could the Mexican-American War Have Been Avoided? Miguel Soto 35 Confederate Imperial Designs on Northwestern Mexico.
    [Show full text]
  • Section 17-1: Manifest Destiny and Expansion
    Name: Date: Chapter 17 Study Guide Section 17-1: Manifest Destiny and Expansion Fill in the blank: 1. Manifest Destiny was the idea that it was America’s God-given fate to expand westward all the way to the Pacific Ocean. 2. John O’Sullivan coined the above term. 3. American Exceptionalism is the idea or belief that America is “special” in terms of its society, economy, and government. 4. John Tyler became President of the United States after William Henry Harrison died in office. 5. The addition of Texas became one of the primary goals of the administration of the above Presidential administration. 6. Henry Clay was the primary Whig Party nominee in the election of 1844. 7. James Polk was the Democratic Party nominee, and eventual winner, in the election of 1844. 8. One of the main goals of the above administration was to see Oregon, jointly occupied by the US and Britain, added to the growing territory of the United States. 9. Americans wanted the northern border of the above territory fixed at a latitude of 54°, 54’ N. 10. The slogan of supporters of this fixed border was “Fifty-Four Forty or Fight” to indicate their willingness to go to war with Britain if necessary. 11. The border was finally fixed at a latitude of 49°N. 12. In 1845, Texas became the 28th state. 13. General Zachary Taylor was sent to Texas to protect American interests. 14. John Slidell was sent to Mexico to negotiate a deal settling the border of Texas, and purchase California and New Mexico if possible.
    [Show full text]
  • The Wilmot Proviso the Wilmot Proviso Was a Rider (Or Provision) Attached to an Appropriations Bill During the Mexican War
    The Wilmot Proviso The Wilmot Proviso was a rider (or provision) attached to an appropriations bill during the Mexican War. It stated that slavery would be banned in any territory won from Mexico as a result of the war. While it was approved by the U.S. House of Representatives (where northern states had an advantage due to population), it failed to be considered by the U.S. Senate (where slave and free states were evenly divided). Though never enacted, the Wilmot Proviso signaled significant challenges regarding what to do with the extension of slavery into the territories. The controversy over slavery’s extension polarized public opinion and resulted in dramatically increased sectional tension during the 1850s. The Wilmot Proviso was introduced by David Wilmot from Pennsylvania and mirrored the wording of the Northwest Ordinance on slavery. The proviso stated “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory” that might be gained from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War. The issue of the extension of slavery was not new. As northern states abolished the institution of slavery, they pushed to keep the practice from extending into new territory. The push for abolition began before the ratification of the Constitution with the enactment of the Northwest Ordinance which outlawed slavery in the Northwest Territory. The Louisiana Purchase in 1803 brought a large amount of new land into the U.S. that, over time, would qualify for territorial status and eventually statehood. The proviso stated “neither slavery nor involuntary servitude shall ever exist in any part of said territory” that might be gained from Mexico as a result of the Mexican-American War.
    [Show full text]
  • The Texas Rangers in the Mexican War, 1846-1848
    MIXED BLESSING: THE ROLE OF THE TEXAS RANGERS IN THE MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1848 A thesis presented to the Faculty of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE Military History by IAN B. LYLES, MAJ, USA M.A., University of Texas at Austin, Austin, Texas, 2001 Fort Leavenworth, Kansas 2003 Approved for public release; distribution is unlimited. i MASTER OF MILITARY ART AND SCIENCE THESIS APPROVAL PAGE Name of Candidate: MAJ Ian B. Lyles Thesis Title: Mixed Blessing: The Role of the Texas Rangers in the Mexican War, 1846- 1848 Approved by: , Thesis Committee Chair COL Lawyn C. Edwards, M.S., M.M.A.S. , Member LTC Steven E. Clay, M.A. , Member William S. Reeder, Ph.D. Accepted this 6th day of June 2003 by: , Director, Graduate Degree Programs Philip J. Brookes, Ph.D. The opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the student author and do not necessarily represent the views of the U.S. Army Command and General Staff College or any other governmental agency. (References to this study should include the foregoing statement.) ii ABSTRACT MIXED BLESSING: THE ROLE OF THE TEXAS RANGERS IN THE MEXICAN WAR, 1846-1848, by MAJ Ian B. Lyles, 110 pages. The Texas Rangers assumed many roles during the Mexican War (1846-1848), fighting in both the northern and central theaters. Along with frontier knowledge and combat experience, they also brought prejudices and they earned a reputation for ill-discipline. Thus, the central research question is whether the Texas Rangers contributed to the success of conventional army forces or did they materially hinder Generals Taylor and Scott more than they helped? Analysis begins by discussing the Mexican War, the Texas Rangers, and the concept of Compound Warfare (CW) (conventional and unconventional forces employed simultaneously to gain a synergistic advantage).
    [Show full text]