DOCSLIB.ORG

Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan CAMDEN COUNTY HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN Prepared By: Camden County Emergency Management 12 VFW Road Camdenton, Missouri 65020 And Lake of the Ozarks Council of Local Governments 34 Roofener St. Camdenton, MO 65020 2015 Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Table of Contents Executive Summary i Prerequisites ii Section 1: Introduction and Plan Development 1.1 Purpose 1- 1 1.2 Background 1- 1 1.3 History of Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan 1- 2 1.4 Multi-Jurisdictional Plan Participation 1- 2 1.5 Planning Process 1- 3 Planning Meetings 1- 4 Planning Participation 1- 6 Public Participation 1- 8 Structural Changes In Updated Plan 2013 1- 8 Source Materials 1- 10 Section 2: Planning Area Community Profile 2.1 Geography and Geology 2- 1 2.2 History 2- 2 2.3 Climate 2- 5 2.4 Natural Hazards History 2- 6 2.5 Demographics 2- 7 2.6 Education 2- 10 2.7 Employment and Income 2- 11 2.8 Transportation and Commuting Patterns 2- 16 2.9 Planning Area Capacity 2- 20 Local Government 2- 21 Land Use 2- 22 Policy and Programs 2- 22 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 2- 26 Communications 2- 27 Media 2- 28 NOAA Weather Radio 2- 30 Special Districts 2- 31 Law Enforcement 2- 34 Public Water Supply Districts 2- 35 Road and Bridge Districts 2- 36 Critical Facilities 2- 36 Non-Governmental and Volunteer Organizations 2- 39 Historical Sites 2- 40 Public Land 2- 42 Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Section 2: Planning Area Community Profile, Cont. Countywide Development Trends 2- 44 Community Partnerships 2- 45 Community Participation 2- 45 2.10 Participating Jurisdictions-History, Profile and Assets 2- 45 City of Camdenton 2- 45 Village of Climax Springs 2- 47 City of Lake Ozark 2- 49 City of Linn Creek 2- 51 City of Osage Beach 2- 52 City of Richland 2- 54 City of Stoutland 2- 56 Village of Sunrise Beach 2- 58 Village of Four Seasons, Village of 2- 59 School Districts 2- 62 Camdenton R-III 2- 64 Macks Creek R-V 2- 66 Climax Springs R-IV 2- 68 Stoutland R-II 2- 70 Section 3: Risk Assessment 3.1 Introduction and Methodology 3- 1 Identification of Hazards 3- 1 Analysis of Hazards 3- 2 Measure of Probability 3- 2 Measure of Severity 3- 3 Evaluation of Vulnerability 3- 3 Comparison to Previous Mitigation Plan 3- 5 Impact of Hazards 3- 6 3.2 Hazard Summary and Susceptibility 3- 6 Tornado, Thunderstorm Wind, and Hailstorm 3- 6 Tornado 3- 7 Thunderstorms/Windstorms 3- 10 Hailstorms 3- 15 Flood 3- 18 National Flood Insurance Program (NFIP) 3- 33 (NFIP) Repetitive Loss 3- 34 Severe Winter Weather 3- 37 Extreme Heat 3- 41 Drought 3- 44 Wildfire 3- 49 Dam Failure 3- 55 Earthquake 3- 63 Land Subsidence/Sinkholes 3- 68 Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Section 3: Risk Assessment Levee Failure 3- 71 Section 4: Mitigation Strategy 4.1 Hazard Mitigation Goals and Objectives 4- 1 4.2 Developing the Hazard Mitigation Goals and Action Items 4- 2 4.3 Hazard Mitigation Strategies with Goals and Action Items 4- 6 Mitigation Strategies in the Camden County Hazard Mitigatoin Plan 4- 6 4.4 Prioritization, Implementation, and Administration 4- 8 Prioritization of Action Items- Modified-STAPLEE Review 4- 8 Implementation and Administration 4- 13 Integration of Hazard Mitigation Actions into Current Planning Processes 4- 13 Section 5: Plan Maintenance 5.1 Plan Evaluation and Update 5- 1 5.2 Public Participation in the Plan Maintenance 5- 1 Appendices Apendix A: Adoption Resolutions A- Apendix B: Agendas, Press Releases, Meeting Summaries, B- Meeting Sign-In Sheets, and Press Coverage, Meeting Materials, and Worksheets Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Executive Summary Camden County has taken on the responsibility of updating their Hazard Mitigation plan, as their current plan expires in 2015. County officials understand the need and importance of updating this plan and implementing the goals to protect the communities within Camden County. The Camden County Natural Hazard Mitigation Plan is a multi‐jurisdictional plan that has been developed and prepared with the coordination of the Camden County government and the following Camden County local jurisdictions: City of Camdenton, Village of Climax Springs, City of Lake Ozark, City of Linn Creek, City of Osage Beach, City of Richland, City of Stoutland, Village of Sunrise Beach, and Village of Four Seasons. All of the local school districts were notified of the planning process and encouraged to participate. Several of the schools were fully engaged in the planning process and have adopted the plan, including, Camdenton R‐III School District, Mack’s Creek R‐V School District, Climax Springs R‐IV School District, and Stoutland R‐II School District. Representatives of private businesses and community volunteers also contributed in the planning process. The two Special Road Districts within Camden County were notified of the planning process, and engagement was encouraged. The districts were notified of the potential benefits of participation and of how to contact LOCLG staff. The Camden County plan profiles eleven natural hazards (Dam Failure, Drought, Earthquake, Extreme/Excessive Heat, Sinkholes, Flood, Hailstorm, Severe Winter Weather, Tornado, Thunderstorm Wind, and Wildfire). In the previous plan, there were a total of nine natural hazards; FEMA requires separation of tornadoes and thunderstorm and also the addition of hailstorms. All hazards were evaluated in regard to previous occurrences, probability and severity of future occurrences, existing mitigation strategies and potential impact on each jurisdiction. An overall mitigation strategy has been developed through the evaluation of potential threats and available resources with careful consideration to the long‐term effectiveness of the mitigation strategy. The planning team reviewed the goals established in the 2010 Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan and felt that the goals needed to be updated. The goals defined for the 2015 plan were refined in order for us toe creat relevant action items associated with each of the goals. We maintained the number of goals and the intent of the original goals but updated them so everyone could better understand the objectives behind each goal, planning, i Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 programs, procedures, and public awareness. A complete list of the original goals and action items can be found in Appendix B, page xx Goal 1: Mitigation Planning – Mitigate the effects of potential natural hazards in Camden County. Goal 2: Mitigation Programs – Protect Camden County’s assets and populace through cost‐effective and tangible mitigation projects whenever financially feasible. Goal 3: Mitigation Procedures – Encourage continuity of operations of government and emergency services in a disaster. Goal 4: Mitigation Public Awareness – Increase Public awareness of natural hazards that have the potential to impact Camden County. Mitigation action items have been developed to enhance the established goals and further the implementation of mitigation strategies throughout our region. The Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan will be formally adopted by each of the participating jurisdictions after a final draft is approved by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). Participation in and formal adoption of the plan qualifies a jurisdiction to apply for FEMA pre‐disaster mitigation grants and the mitigation portion of post‐disaster mitigation grants. FEMA requires the plan to be completely updated every five years. To effectively and efficiently be able to follow this directive, Camden County will evaluate and maintain the Hazard Mitigation Plan on an annual basis prior to the five year update. Prerequisites Multi‐Jurisdictional Plan Adoption For multi‐jurisdictional plans, each jurisdiction requesting Requirement approval of the plan must document that it has been §201.6(c)(5): formally adopted. Adoption resolutions for the participating jurisdictions are included in the Appendix A. ii Camden County Hazard Mitigation Plan 2015 Section 1: Introduction and Plan Development 1.1 Purpose The Camden County Hazard Mitigation plan was developed to be a resource for local governments, residents, developers, organizations and anyone interested in controlling the potentially devastating effects of natural hazards within Camden County. Missouri has felt the intensity and the damage from numerous disasters, and is susceptible to many natural hazards, including, Droughts, Extreme Heat, Floods, Hail, Tornadoes, Severe Winter Weather, Thunderstorms/Windstorms, and Wildfires. With each of these disasters, there are frequently physical and emotional consequences. Often times these are coupled with economic fatigue as recovery takes time and money. Hazard mitigation is a fundamentally important part of community development and planning. Therefore, developing a strategy and mitigation process is important to protecting lives and property within Camden County. With the participation of our local community leaders, concerned citizens and public officials, we identified each natural hazard and the potential impact of each hazard, while discussing probable mitigation actions that could be effectively implemented. Understanding that extreme devastation, and often excessive financial costs that are associated with a natural hazard, has increased our need to take action before a natural hazard event happens. This multi‐jurisdictional plan was developed in accordance with FEMA’s Mitigation Planning guidelines and in compliance with federal regulations. With the contribution of numerous jurisdictions within Camden County,
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Cuba. Mo "Route 66 Mural City" a Year Round Destination Where Art Meets History
    DENBY POTT 'RY Same Location ;~ .....,.- for 50 Years! HisTORic ROUTe 66 STRetches acrOSS the U.S. froM Chicago TO LoS ANgeLes. ALONg The waY, in LebaNOn, MissoURi iS a gROWing POPULar LaNdMarK STOP fOR aNY hisTORY enthUSiast, TOURist, OR LOcaL OZark resideNt. Shepherd HiLLS FacTORY OUtleTS STaRTed iN the OUTLeT business iN 1972 as aN Outlet fORLOcaLLY Made WaLNUT BOWLS. Ida and Rea Reid, fOunderS, begaN theiR entrepreNeURShiP operating a MoteL in the 1960's caLLed the CaPRi MoTeL Which was LOcaTed righT aLONg ROUTe 66,KNOWNTOdaY as InteRSTaTe 44. ' TheY SOld the Capri MoteL iN 1966 and aLONg With their SONs, ROd and RandY, staRTed a New busiNess in 1972 caLLed the Shepherd HillS Gift ShOP Which was leased as a PaRT Of the Shepherd HillS MoTeL aNd haPpeNed TO be LOcaTed iN viRTUaLLY the same SPOT as the Capri MoTeL. LateR, aS they begaN exPanding, they bOUght a POrtiON of the MOTeL as weLL aS the gift ShOP and begaN cONStruction Of their cuRReNT building iN 1999. In the meaNTime, Shepherd Hills added additiONaLLOcatiONS including those in Osage Beach, MO, BraNSOn, MO, and EddYviLLe, KY, and bROUght in Other QUalitY PROducts TO the lineUP including Chicago CUTLerY, DenbY POTTerY, and of cOUrse Case XX POcketknives--MakiNg the latter aLSO aVailabLe through caTaLOg Mail ORder and eveNTUaLLYON the web at WWW.CaseXX.cOM. Leach Service Serving the motoring public since 1949 9720 Manchester Road Rock Hill, MO 63119 • (314J 962·5550 www.Leachservice.com Open 6AM-Midnight We now have fountain soda and lottery! Missouri Safety & Emissions Inspections Auto Repairs, Towing, Tires-new & repairs Diesel, bp Gasoline, Kerosene Propane Tank Refills or Exchanges 7fJe~~iu~~~, Ask about our Buy 5 Oil Changes Get One FREE! Special Full Service Customers, ask about a FREE Oil Change punch card.
    [Show full text]
  • LUE RD the Voice of ASM Since 1934 June2009 Volume 76, Ho
    LUE RD The voice of ASM since 1934 June2009 Volume 76, Ho . 2 The Audubon Society of Missouri Missouri's Ornithological Society Since 1901 THE AUDUBON SOCIETY OF MISSOURI Officers Regional Directors Jim Zellmer*+, President (2010) Lisa Berger+ (2011) 2001 NE 4th St., Blue Springs, MO Springfield (417) 881-8393 64014, (816) 228-3955 JoAnn Eldridge+ (2011) [email protected] Kearny (816) 628-4840 Bruce Beck*+, Vice-President (2010) Larry Lade+ (2009) 230 CR 466; Poplar Bluff, MO 63901 St. Joseph (816) 232-6125 (573) 785-3871 [email protected] Terry McNeely+ (2010) Jameson, MO (660) 828-4215 Pat Lueders*+, Treasurer (2010) 4 79 Sherwood Drive June Newman+ (2009) St. Louis, MO 63119; (314) 779-1372 Carrollton (660) 542-0873 plleuders4 [email protected] Bill Reeves+ (2010) Laura Gilchrist*+, Secretary (2010) Farmington 7606 NW 73rd Ct Ruth Simmons+ (2011) Kansas City MO 64152-2385 Kansas City (816) 746-8973 lagi. [email protected] Mike Thelen+ (2009) University City, (314) 862-6642 Honorary Directors Clare Wheeler+ (2010) Richard A. Anderson, St. Louis** Lake Ozark & Canton (573) 365-2951 Nathan Fay, Ozark** Leo Galloway, St. Joseph Chairs Jim Jackson, Marthasville Josh Uffman, Rare Bird Alert Lisle Jeffrey, Columbia** Ferguson, MO Floyd Lawhon, St. Joseph** (314).387 .8037 Patrick Mahnkey, Forsyth** [email protected] Rebecca Matthews, Springfield Sydney Wade, Jefferson City** Bill Clark, Historian Dave Witten, Columbia** 3906 Grace Ellen Dr. John Wylie, Jefferson City** Columbia, MO 65202 (573) 474-4510 Dr. David Easterla, 2006 Recipient June Newman, Membership of the Rudolph Bennitt Award Carrollton, MO 64633 Paul E. Bauer, 2004 Recipient ofthe (660)542-0873 Rudolph Bennitt Award + Board Position * Executive Committee Member **Deceased Page i THE BLUEBIRD THE BLUEBIRD The Bluebird Editor: Bill Eddleman*+, 1831 Ricardo Drive, Cape Girardeau, MO 63701, (573) 335-1507, eddlemanw@s be global.
    [Show full text]
  • Caves of Missouri
    CAVES OF MISSOURI J HARLEN BRETZ Vol. XXXIX, Second Series E P LU M R I U BU N S U 1956 STATE OF MISSOURI Department of Business and Administration Division of GEOLOGICAL SURVEY AND WATER RESOURCES T. R. B, State Geologist Rolla, Missouri vii CONTENT Page Abstract 1 Introduction 1 Acknowledgments 5 Origin of Missouri's caves 6 Cave patterns 13 Solutional features 14 Phreatic solutional features 15 Vadose solutional features 17 Topographic relations of caves 23 Cave "formations" 28 Deposits made in air 30 Deposits made at air-water contact 34 Deposits made under water 36 Rate of growth of cave formations 37 Missouri caves with provision for visitors 39 Alley Spring and Cave 40 Big Spring and Cave 41 Bluff Dwellers' Cave 44 Bridal Cave 49 Cameron Cave 55 Cathedral Cave 62 Cave Spring Onyx Caverns 72 Cherokee Cave 74 Crystal Cave 81 Crystal Caverns 89 Doling City Park Cave 94 Fairy Cave 96 Fantastic Caverns 104 Fisher Cave 111 Hahatonka, caves in the vicinity of 123 River Cave 124 Counterfeiters' Cave 128 Robbers' Cave 128 Island Cave 130 Honey Branch Cave 133 Inca Cave 135 Jacob's Cave 139 Keener Cave 147 Mark Twain Cave 151 Marvel Cave 157 Meramec Caverns 166 Mount Shira Cave 185 Mushroom Cave 189 Old Spanish Cave 191 Onondaga Cave 197 Ozark Caverns 212 Ozark Wonder Cave 217 Pike's Peak Cave 222 Roaring River Spring and Cave 229 Round Spring Cavern 232 Sequiota Spring and Cave 248 viii Table of Contents Smittle Cave 250 Stark Caverns 256 Truitt's Cave 261 Wonder Cave 270 Undeveloped and wild caves of Missouri 275 Barry County 275 Ash Cave
    [Show full text]
  • Of the Niangua River Basin, Missouri
    Freshwater Mollusk Biology and Conservation 21:19–27, 2018 Ó Freshwater Mollusk Conservation Society 2018 REGULAR ARTICLE A SURVEY OF THE FRESHWATER MUSSELS (MOLLUSCA: BIVALVIA: UNIONIDA) OF THE NIANGUA RIVER BASIN, MISSOURI Stephen E. McMurray*, Joshua T. Hundley1, and J. Scott Faiman Missouri Department of Conservation, Central Regional Office and Conservation Research Center, Columbia, MO 65201 USA ABSTRACT During 2007 and 2008, we surveyed freshwater mussels with timed searches at 35 sites in the Niangua River basin, an Osage River tributary in west-central Missouri. Our objective was to determine the distribution, species richness, and abundance of freshwater mussels in the basin. We observed a total of 714 live individuals from 20 species, including the Missouri endemic and species of conservation concern Lampsilis brittsi. The mean catch per unit effort (live mussels/person-hour) was 12 with values ranging from 0 to 144. Eurynia dilatata was the most abundant species (387 individuals observed, relative abundance ¼ 54.2%), but all other species were present at much lower numbers. Eurynia dilatata and Venustaconcha ellipsiformis were the most commonly encountered species, both occurring at 24 sites. Our observation of 20 species is lower than historical richness in the basin (32 species), and nearly all species were formerly more widely distributed in the basin based on the occurrence of weathered and subfossil shells. Together with low catch per unit effort at most sites, these data suggest a sharp decline in mussel populations throughout the basin over the last few decades. This decline is cause for concern, but the causes are unknown. KEY WORDS: freshwater mussel, Unionida, survey, Missouri INTRODUCTION endangered species (Epioblasma triquetra), are reported The freshwater mussel fauna of Missouri is diverse but historically from the Niangua River basin (Table 1).
    [Show full text]
  • Having Completed Seven Other GWB Contracts, AB Is Experienced With
    Having completed seven other GWB contracts, AB is experienced with the bridge’s distinguishing condition and this knowledge has proved to be quite an advantage over the years. GEORGE WASHINGTON BRIDGE 5PAGE ConnectionsSUMMER 2012 New KS City and VA District Projects/Current Contracts/Flashbacks/AB Published/Safety Timeline. Built original east and west span 1935 2014 Replaced east span San Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge American Bridge Company has been a leader in the 1998), the 2nd longest cable stay bridge in the world (Forth construction of complex bridges and other structures for Replacement Crossing, Scotland, 2016), the tallest building over 112 years. Our credits include the longest mainspan in in the Americas (Willis Tower, 1973), the world’s largest the Americas (Verrazano, 1964), the longest suspended span observation wheel (Vegas High Roller, Nevada, 2013), the in the Americas (Mackinac, 1957), the longest Arch Bridge in longest back to back suspension bridge in the Americas (San the Americas (New River Gorge, 1973), the longest concrete Francisco/Oakland Bay Bridge West span, 1936, pictured segmental cable stay bridge in the Americas (Sunshine above, left), the world’s longest self-anchored-suspension Skyway, 1986), the longest mainspan in South America bridge (San Francisco Oakland Bay Bridge, East Span, 2014, (Angostura, Venezuela, 1967), the largest bascule bridge pictured above, right), and on and on and on … We can do it! in the world (Woodrow Wilson, 2008), the only stiffening truss replacement under live traf c (Lions
    [Show full text]
  • Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007
    Everything you need to know about more than 90 of the best camps in the region Including more than 60 High Adventure opportunities Images courtesy of: http://signal.baldwincity.com/news/2011/oct/20/local-boy-scouts-troop-remained-busy-during-summer/ http://i4.ytimg.com/vi/obn8RVY_szM/mgdefault.jpg http://www/sccovington.com/philmont/trek_info/equipment/tents.htm This is a publication of Tamegonit Lodge, the Order of the Arrow lodge affiliated with the Heart of America Council, BSA. Updated: December 2012 Additional copies of this publication are available through the Program Services Department at the Heart of America Council Scout Service Center 10210 Holmes Road Kansas City, Missouri 64131 Phone: (816) 942-9333 Toll Free: (800) 776-1110 Fax: (816) 942-8086 Online: www.hoac-bsa.org Camps: Revised December 2012; Rivers: Revised November 2008; Caves: Revised July 2007; Trails: Revised March 2010; High Adventure: Revised September 2007 HOAC – Order of the Arrow – ON THE LOOSE RIVERS – Page 1 Welcome to the adventures which the scenic rivers in southern Missouri offer. In the next pages many rivers are described, both in general and by specific sections. You will also find within this section a compilation of many public outfitters, which regularly provide all necessary equipment for a canoe trip. The river sections that are profiled are probably not the exact sections of river that you will float if you rent your canoes and equipment form an outfitter. Each outfitter has “normal” floats that you may choose from, and few, if any, of these floats will match with the sections profiled in On The Loose, or with the sections any other outfitter would float! After spending some time with the River Section of On The Loose, I feel that you will agree there are many more rivers, which can be floated than the ones commonly mentioned (i.e.
    [Show full text]
  • Stream Stewardship Trust Fund
    Stream Stewardship Trust Fund Old and New Programs Annual Report January 1 through December 31, 2017 Dedicated to Improving Missouri Stream Conservation TABLE OF CONTENTS Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................... 3 Missouri Conservation Heritage Foundation’s Stream Stewardship Trust Fund ............................. 4 U.S. Army Corps of Engineers District Map ................................................................................... 5 MDC Unit Map ............................................................................................................................... 6 MDC Regions Map .......................................................................................................................... 7 SSTF Service Area Map ................................................................................................................... 8 2017 Old Program Accomplishments .............................................................................................. 9 Fees Collected and Impacted Resources ......................................................................................... Table 1. Overview of old program fee collection and allocation timeline ...................................... 2017 New Program Accomplishments .......................................................................................... 10 SSTF Program Receipts .................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Multi-Scale Resource Selection Of
    MULTI-SCALE RESOURCE SELECTION OF NIANGUA DARTERS IN THE OSAGE RIVER BASIN, MISSOURI _______________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Faculty of the Graduate School University of Missouri-Columbia _______________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment Of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science _____________________________________________________ by JACOB D. A. FAULKNER Dr. Craig P. Paukert, Thesis Supervisor MAY 2015 The undersigned, appointed by the dean of the Graduate School, have examined the thesis entitled Multi-scale resource selection of Niangua darters in the Osage River basin, Missouri Presented by Jacob D. A. Faulkner, a candidate for the degree of Master of Science, and hereby certify that, in their opinion, it is worthy of acceptance. ______________________________________ Dr. Craig P. Paukert ______________________________________ Dr. Joshua J. Millspaugh ______________________________________ Dr. Michael A. Urban ______________________________________ Dr. Douglas C. Novinger ACKNOWLEDGMENTS First and foremost I would like to thank my advisor Dr. Craig P. Paukert for this opportunity as well as his guidance and patience throughout this project. I would like to thank my committee members: Drs. Douglas C. Novinger, Joshua J. Millspaugh, and Michael A. Urban for their insight that undoubtedly improved the resulting product. I would like to thank my field technicians Travis Schepker and Scott Childers for their unwavering effort throughout field data collection. I would like to thank the graduate students and faculty within the Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, specifically: Jonathan Spurgeon, Landon Pierce, and Emily Pherigo for occasional field assistance and intellectual input that helped to improve this research. I would like to thank Thomas Bonnot for statistical guidance and advice. I would like to thank Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • Osage Beach Police Department Accident Reports
    Osage Beach Police Department Accident Reports Amalgamative Noel chunks his broad-mindedness went disagreeably. Witty and simulatory Neel discomposed while shrieval Shlomo blast-off her Lamaist temporarily and bings industriously. Cadgy or dichotomous, Roderich never shivers any opsimaths! The ground combat units poses unique challenges victims as osage beach: teen killed a traffic accident, but once we currently only Saturday January 9 2021 at Lake Regional Health did in Osage Beach Missouri. Officials in Osage Beach Missouri said in a pick release that another plane crashed. Officials in Osage Beach Missouri said in review news update that specific plane crashed. We usually offer rental service and financing near the areas of Osage Beach. The chord of Justice also found that the Ferguson Police children and. Six arrested in massive meth bust in 2019 at the Los Angeles-Long Beach seaport. The Patrol's Kansas state troopers Capitol Police officers motor carrier inspectors and civilian workers are devoted to improving the easy of gift for citizens. Police identify 2 killed in plane to near board of the KMBC. Scott and Amy Lowe killed in a crash in Grand Glaize Airport in Osage Beach Missouri. Created in 155 within the Osage Reserve the people white settlers began arriving in 157. To fatal two-car crash north of Hillsboro Teen shot by Arnold Police officer. The Osage Beach Police reported eight arrests for holy week ending July. OSAGE BEACH A plane crashed in the patron of Sleepy Hollow brick in Osage. Monthly Catalog of United States Government Publications. CLALLAM COUNTY Wash with Port Angeles police officers reporting that.
    [Show full text]
  • 2014 Fiery Fork Conservation Area Management Plan  Page 3
    2014 Fiery Fork Conservation Area Management Plan Page 3 OVERVIEW • Official Area Name: Fiery Fork Conservation Area, # 8103 • Year of Initial Acquisition: 1981 • Acreage: 1609 acres • County: Camden • Division with Administrative Responsibility: Forestry • Division with Maintenance Responsibility: Forestry • Statement of Purpose: Fiery Fork Conservation Area was purchased in 1981 as a multiuse area for the public to experience nature and unique natural features, observe forest management, and have access to public fishing and hunting opportunities. Fiery Fork CA will emphasize sustainable management of Missouri’s forest, fish, and wildlife resources and provide opportunity for all citizens to use, enjoy and learn about these resources. Fiery Fork’s forest will be actively managed utilizing appropriate silvicultural techniques. Natural communities such as glades, woodlands, springs and fens will be managed to preserve biodiversity and create wildlife habitat. Furthermore aquatic and visual resources will not be compromised. Finally the enjoyment and use of the area by the public will remain a high priority. Fiery Fork Conservation Area will serve as a benchmark example of how a publicly owned forest can be highly productive for timber production, wildlife and the surrounding community. A. Strategic Direction 1) Restore natural communities, namely woodlands, glades, savannas and fens. 2) Manage the forest and natural community resource, utilizing sustainable forest management practices and Best Management Practices (BMP’s) to prevent erosion. 3) Correct fish and sediment passage issues on area streams to promote recovery efforts for the federally threatened Niangua Darter. 4) Maintain adequate public access for fishing, hunting, wildlife viewing and general recreation. B. Desired Future Condition The desired future condition of Fiery Fork Conservation Area (CA) is a diverse woodland/forest landscape with glades, springs and fens.
    [Show full text]
  • CHAPTER III Affected Environment
    III-1 CHAPTER III Affected Environment This chapter describes the existing social, economic and environmental settings of the project area that may be affected by the reasonable strategies described in chapter II. The project area is 199 miles (320.3 km) long and approximately 10 miles (16.1 km) wide. Environmentally sensitive features discussed in this chapter, such as cemeteries, schools, rivers and wetlands are shown on Exhibit III-1 to Exhibit III-9. A. Social and Economic Characteristics 1. EXISTING LAND USE For the first tier environmental document, existing land use was divided into two categories: developed land and undeveloped land, which mainly consists of agricultural land. Developed land represents primarily the municipal limits of a community within the study corridor. Although areas within each city, town or village may be currently undeveloped, it is the implied intention of the community to develop within its boundaries. Although land development does occur outside of city limits, development characteristics are usually more dispersed outside municipal limits. The lack of densely located populations identifies greater opportunity for avoidance by an alternative with improvements outside of the existing I-70 right-of-way. Exhibit III-10 to Exhibit III-12 represents the developed areas within the study corridor. Within a community’s limits, general development patterns throughout the study area are such that commercial and industrial uses are primarily centered around nodes located at the I-70 interchanges and corridors associated with primary north/south routes. Residential development primarily occurs outside of these boundaries in clusters of development. Public spaces are dispersed throughout each community in a generally random manner.
    [Show full text]
  • LOCLG Regional Transportation Plan 2019 DRAFT
    2019 Lake of the Ozarks Regional Transportation Plan 1 Chapter 1 Introduction Study Organization The staff of Lake of the Ozarks Council of Local Governments (LOCLG) has produced this study with the advice and approval of the LOCLG Board of Directors and the LOCLG Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC). In 1969, an Executive Order of Missouri Governor Warren E. Hearnes led to the formation of the Lake of the Ozarks Council of Local Governments (LOCLG). Lake of the Ozarks Council of Local Governments serves a four-county region of Camden, Laclede, Miller, and Morgan Counties. In transportation- related matters, LOCLG has appointed the Transportation Advisory Committee (TAC), a committee of members appointed by the commissioners of each county from around the region who have particular expertise and interest in local transportation issues. Appendix A lists the LOCLG Board of Directors and TAC members. Study Area As noted above, the Lake of the Ozarks region includes the counties of Camden, Laclede, Miller, and Morgan. The region is composed of 2,691 square miles and had a 2017 population of 125,387. Camden County is comprised of 709 square miles and has seven functioning municipalities1 (Camdenton, Climax Springs, Lake Ozark, Osage Beach, Sunrise Beach, and Village of Four Seasons). Camden County’s population in the 2010 Census was 44,002 and was 44,855 in the 2017 American Community Survey. The county had an assessed valuation in 2016 of $1,672,515,421. The county seat is Camdenton. Laclede County covers 768 square miles and has three functioning municipalities (Conway, Lebanon and Phillipsburg).
    [Show full text]