Arxiv:1908.06786V2 [Math.PR]
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
BOCHNER’S SUBORDINATION AND FRACTIONAL CALORIC SMOOTHING IN BESOV AND TRIEBEL–LIZORKIN SPACES VICTORIYA KNOPOVA AND RENE´ L. SCHILLING Abstract. We use Bochner’s subordination technique to obtain caloric smooth- ing estimates in Besov- and Triebel–Lizorkin spaces. Our new estimates extend known smoothing results for the Gauß–Weierstraß, Cauchy–Poisson and higher- order generalized Gauß–Weierstraß semigroups. Extensions to other function spaces (homogeneous, hybrid) and more general semigroups are sketched. 1. Introduction f Let (Wt )t≥0 be the f-subordinated Gauß–Weierstraß semigroup; by this we mean the family of operators which is defined through the Fourier transform 2 (1.1) (W f u)(ξ)= e−tf(|ξ| ) u(ξ), u S(Rn), F t F ∈ where the function f : (0, ) (0, ) is a so-called Bernstein function, see Sec- tion 3. Typical examples are∞ f→(x) =∞x (which gives the classical Gauß–Weierstraß semigroup), f(x)= √x (which gives the Cauchy–Poisson semigroup) or f(x)= xα, 0 <α< 1 (which leads to the stable semigroups). In this note we prove the caloric f smoothing of (the extension of) (Wt )t≥0 in Besov and Triebel–Lizorkin spaces, see Section 2. “Caloric smoothing” refers to the smoothing effect of the semigroup which can be quantified through inequalities of the following form (1.2) C (t) W f u As+d u As for all 0 < t 1 and u As , f,d k t | p,q k≤k | p,qk ≤ ∈ p,q where d 0 is arbitrary, Cf,d(t) is a constant depending only on f and d, and ≥ s s Rn s Rn Cf,d(t) 0 as t 0; the symbol Ap,q = Ap,q( ) stands for a Besov space Bp,q( ) → → s Rn or a Triebel–Lizorkin space Fp,q( ). Results of this type are known for the Gauß–Weierstraß semigroup Wt, i.e. for f(x)= x (see Triebel [15, Theorem 3.35]) and for the generalized Gauß–Weierstraß (m) N semigroup Wt where m ; these operators are also given through the relation m ∈ arXiv:1908.06786v2 [math.PR] 16 Jun 2020 (1.1) if we take f(x)= x , cf. [15, Remark 3.37], but note that for m> 1 this is not a Bernstein function, and recent results by Baaske & Schmeißer [1, Theorem 3.5]. We will use Bochner’s subordination technique to prove (1.2) for arbitrary Bern- β stein functions f(x) and arbitrary powers f(x)= x , β > 0. The constant Cf,d(t) is comparable with [f −1(1/t)]−d/2. As an application we generalize the result of Baaske & Schmeißer [1, Theorem 3.5] on the existence and uniqueness of the mild and strong solutions of a nonlinear Cauchy problem with arbitrary (fractional) powers of the Laplacian ( ∆)β, β 1. − ≥ 2010 Mathematics Subject Classification. Primary: 46E36; 60J35. Secondary: 35K25; 35K55; 60G51. Key words and phrases. Function spaces, caloric smoothing, Gauß–Weierstraß semigroup, subordination. 1 2 V.KNOPOVAANDR.L.SCHILLING 2. Function spaces n Let us briefly recall some notation. Lp(R ), resp., ℓq(N0) denote the spaces of pth order integrable functions on Rn, resp., qth order summable sequences indexed n by N0; we admit 0 < p,q . Since we are always working in R , we will usually n≤∞ write Lp instead of Lp(R ). If p,q < 1 these spaces are quasi-Banach spaces, their (quasi-)norms are denoted by L and ℓ , respectively. We write k· | pk k· | qk u(k, x) L ℓ (N ) resp. u(k, x) ℓ (N ) L k | p | q 0 k k | q 0 | pk h i to indicate that we take first the Lp-norm and then the ℓq(N0)-norm [resp. first the ℓq(N0)-norm and then the Lp-norm]. Throughout, we use j, k, m for discrete and x, y, z for continuous variables, so there should be no confusion as to which variable is used for the ℓq(N0)-norm or Lp-norm. We follow Triebel [15, Definition 1.1 and Remark 1.2 (1.14), (1.15)] for the defini- tion of the scales of Besov- and Triebel–Lizorkin spaces. Let u denote the Fourier transform of a function u; the extension to the space of temperedF distributions ′ Rn ∞ 1 1 S ( ) is again denoted by . Fix some φ0 C0 such that B(0,1) φ0 B(0,3/2) F ∈ ∞ ≤ ≤ and set φ (x) := φ (2−kx) φ (2−(k+1)x). Since φ (x) = 1, the sequence k 0 − 0 k=0 k (φk)k≥0 is a dyadic resolution of unity. By P φ (D)u(x) := −1(φ u)(x) k F kF we denote the pseudo-differential operator (Fourier multiplier operator) with −J −J n symbol φk. We will also need the dyadic cubes QJ,M =2 M +2 (0, 1) , where J Z, M Zn and (0, 1)n is the open unit cube in Rn. ∈ ∈ Definition 2.1. Let (φk)k≥0 be any dyadic resolution of unity. R s a) Let p (0, ], q (0, ] and s . The Besov space Bp,q is the family of all u ∈S′(R∞n) such∈ that∞ the following∈ (quasi-)norm is finite: ∈ u Bs := 2ksφ (D)u(x) L ℓ (N ) . k | p,qk k k | p | q 0 k R s b) Let p (0, ), q (0, ] and s . The Triebel–Lizorkin space Fp,q is the family∈ of∞ all f∈ S′(∞Rn) such∈ that the following (quasi-)norm is finite ∈ u F s := 2ksφ (D)u(x) ℓ (N ) L . k | p,qk k k | q 0 | pk R s c) Let p = , q (0, ) and s . The Triebel–Lizorkin space F∞,q is the family of∞ all f∈ S′(∞Rn) such∈ that the following (quasi-)norm is finite ∈ ∞ 1/q s Jn/q ksq q u F∞,q := sup 2 2 φk(D)u(x) dx . N Zn ˆ k | k J∈ 0,M∈ QJ,M | | ! Xk=J R s d) Let p = q = and s . The Triebel–Lizorkin space F∞,∞ is the family of all f S′(∞Rn) such∈ that the following norm is finite ∈ s ks u F∞,∞ := sup sup sup 2 φk(D)u(x) . n k | k J∈N0,M∈Z x∈QJ,M k≥J | | s s R Note that F∞,∞ = B∞,∞ for all s and that the norms appearing in Def- inition 2.1.d) and 2.1.a) coincide if p∈= q = : u F s = u Bs . ∞ k | ∞,∞k k | ∞,∞k Definition 2.1 does not depend on the choice of (φk)k≥0 since different resolutions of unity lead to equivalent (quasi-)norms. Various properties of these spaces as well as SUBORDINATION AND FUNCTION SPACES 3 their relation to other classical function spaces can be found in Triebel [15], see also [13] and [14]. Consider the heat kernel (Gaussian probability density) related to the Laplace operator on Rn 1 2 (2.1) g (x) := e−|x| /(4t), t> 0, x Rn. t (4πt)n/2 ∈ We can use gt(x) to define a convolution operator on the space Bb of bounded Borel functions u : Rn R → (2.2) Wtu(x) := gt u(x)= gt(y x)u(y) dy. ∗ ˆRn − For positive u 0 the above integral always exists in [0, ] and extends Wt to all positive Borel≥ functions. It is not difficult to see that g∞ = g g , i.e. (W ) t+s t ∗ s t t≥0 is a semigroup. The operators are positivity preserving (Wtu 0 if u 0) and −t|ξ|2 ≥ ≥ conservative (Wt1 1). If u S, then (Wtu)(ξ)= e u(ξ). We will need the following simple lemma.≡ We provide∈ theF short proof for theF readers’ convenience. Lemma 2.2. Let (Wt)t≥0 be the Gauß–Weierstraß semigroup. a) W : L L , p [1, ] is a contraction, i.e. t p → p ∈ ∞ W u L u L . k t | pk≤k | pk n b) Let ψk( ) be a sequence of positive measurable functions on R such that (ψ (x)) · ℓ (N ) for some q [1, ] and all x Rn. Then k k≥0 ∈ q 0 ∈ ∞ ∈ W ψ (x) ℓ (N ) W ψ ( ) ℓ (N ) (x). k t k | q 0 k ≤ tk k · | q 0 k Proof. Part a) follows immediately from Jensen’s inequality, see [10, Theorem 13.13], for the probability measure gt(y) dy: p p p Wtu Lp = u(x y)gt(y) dy dx u(x y) gt(y) dy dx k | k ˆRn ˆRn − ≤ ˆRn ˆRn | − | p p = u Lp gt(z) dz = u Lp . k | k ˆRn k | k If 0 <p< 1, the inequality is reversed. ′ In order to prove Part b), we fix x and pick a sequence (ak)k∈N0 from ℓq where ′ q q = 1−q . We have W ψ ( ), a W ψ ( ) , a W ψ ( ) ℓ a ℓ ′ . |h t k · ki| ≤ th| k · | | k|i ≤ tk k · | qk·k k | q k In the estimate we use the fact that Wt is linear and positivity preserving, implying that u W u is monotone. Taking the supremum over all sequences such that 7→ t a ℓ ′ = 1 gives k k | q k Wtψk(x) ℓq = sup Wtψk(x), ak Wt ( ψk( ) ℓq )(x). ′ k | k kak|ℓq k=1 |h i| ≤ k · | k Lemma 2.2 is the key ingredient for our proof that Wt is a contraction in the scales of Besov- and Triebel–Lizorkin spaces. The next theorem is well-known for indices 1 p, q . Our elementary proof also covers 0 <q< 1 in the case of Besov spaces.≤ ≤∞ Theorem 2.3.