James Randi (1928–2020)

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

Load more

Obituary James Randi (1928–2020) Illusionist who exposed fraud to showcase the perils of credulity. he illusionist James Randi devoted This alleged “memory of water”, published in much of his career to debunking Nature in 1988, seemed to offer support for frauds. Seen as a lodestar by the homeopathy. ‘sceptical movement’ that confronts Randi, Maddox and US National Institutes superstition and magical thinking with of Health biologist Walter Stewart, a specialist Tscience and rationality, he famously collabo- in scientific misconduct, went to Benveniste’s rated with an editor of this journal, yet would laboratory near Paris to witness a repeat of also have found a receptive audience in medi- the experiments. Randi created an element eval courts and Victorian theatres. That such of theatre by taping the code identifying individuals are needed now more than ever the samples for blind testing to the ceiling — is a reminder that advances in science don’t not so much to prevent tampering, he later banish credulity, but create new stages for it. explained, but to see if anyone would make the A precociously gifted child, Randi (born attempt. The episode added to the notoriety Randall James Zwinge in Toronto, Canada, of the original claim: one correspondent said it in 1928) developed an enthusiasm for stage confirmed his suspicion that “Papers for pub- magic. In his teens he literally ran away to join lication in Nature are refereed by the Editor, a the circus, becoming a ‘mind reader’ and an magician and his rabbit.” Benveniste’s findings escape artist. In the 1970s, his taste for spec- were largely dismissed after he (and others) tacle found him touring with theatrical rock proved unable to replicate them. star Alice Cooper, whom he ‘executed’ at the Randi courted that kind of controversy all end of each show. his life. Some felt that the sage-like beard and FILM FESTIVAL TRIBECA THE 2014 FOR IMAGES BUSACCA/GETTY LARRY Like many who investigated spiritualism Elizabethan Reginald Scot’s assertion in The wizard-style hats detracted from his debunking and seances before him, Randi was keen to Discoverie of Witchcraft (1584) that honest mission. But Randi was mindful of the lessons be seen as a sceptic rather than as someone jugglers and prestidigitators “always acknowl- of history: spectacle need not compromise on a mission to disprove. He challenged edge wherein the art consisteth”. rationality, but can be enlisted in its service. faith-healers, psychics and believers in One of Randi’s most enduring adversaries Since the 1960s, he had offered substantial UFOs, and in 1976 he joined with mathemati- was the British Israeli illusionist and self-styled sums to anyone who could demonstrate para- cian Martin Gardner, planetary scientist Carl psychic Uri Geller. A regular on 1970s TV, Geller normal or psychic powers — a stunt Maskelyne Sagan and science-fiction author Isaac Asimov would demonstrate his skills memorably in instigated. From 1996 until the prize was ter- to found the Committee for Skeptical Inquiry. minated in 2015, the James Randi Educational The organization still publishes Skeptical “The descendants of Foundation raised the stakes to US$1 million. Inquirer, a magazine devoted to the scientific Although quacks and psychics are still in investigation of paranormal or otherwise medieval mountebanks business (and probably always will be), today extraordinary claims. ply their wares online.” the biggest danger of deception comes in The idea that stage magic can be used to a form that can threaten lives, nations and debunk superstition and psychic fraud was international structures: disinformation. familiar in the nineteenth century. Illusion- ‘psychokinetic’ spoon-bending. The two men From conspiracy theories to deep-fake videos, ist shows by the likes of John Henry Pepper developed a strangely symbiotic relationship. the descendants of medieval mountebanks at London’s Egyptian Hall were also popular Randi exposed Geller’s deceptions in his 1975 ply their wares online, sometimes packaged demonstrations of the wonders made possible book The Magic of Uri Geller; undaunted, Geller in ways that mislead even astute audiences. by optics and electromagnetism. In the early regarded their sparring as good publicity. Randi surely saw the ‘infodemic’ coming, but it twentieth century, John Nevil Maskelyne, a Geller’s feats looked underwhelming to has proved an infinitely more insidious oppo- founder of the UK Magic Circle, took on deceiv- anyone who had witnessed Randi in action. nent than the con artists of stage and screen. ers such as the spiritualists Ira and William I recall an impromptu demonstration at Randi died aged 92. His central message Davenport and theosophists such as Helena Nature’s office in the late 1980s, when he pro- is as important for scientists as for everyone Blavatsky. He also showed how the Indian rope duced a very plausible sketch of a word plucked else: “Don’t be too sure of yourself. No matter trick, which turns a rope into a rigid pole, can by an editor at random from past volumes of how smart or well educated you are, you can be done without recourse to occult powers. the journal. (It happened to be ‘position’.) be deceived.” Following the tradition of the Magic Circle, Randi’s involvement with Nature began whose members disavow any claim to mystic when then-editor John Maddox enlisted him Philip Ball was a physics editor of Nature powers (although they do not reveal their to investigate a claim by French immunol- during the Benveniste saga. His books methods), Randi dubbed himself an “honest ogist Jacques Benveniste, who had found include H2O: A Biography of Water and liar”, the title of a 2014 documentary on his recurrent biological activity in a solution The Devil’s Doctor: Paracelsus and the life and work. Frankness about the nature of of antibodies diluted well past the point at World of Renaissance Magic and Science. magical stagecraft goes back at least to the which any active ingredient should remain. e-mail: [email protected] 34 | Nature | Vol 587 | 5 November 2020 ©2020 Spri nger Nature Li mited. All rights reserved. .
Recommended publications
  • John Nevil Maskelyne's Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee

    John Nevil Maskelyne's Queen Victoria's Diamond Jubilee

    JOHN NEVIL MASKELYNE’S QUEEN VICTORIA’S DIAMOND JUBILEE SPECULATION Courtesy The Magic Circle By Edwin A Dawes © Edwin A Dawes 2020 Dr Dawes first published this in the May, June and August 1992 issues of The Magic Circular, as part of his A Rich Cabinet of Magical Curiosities series. It is published here, with a few additions, on The Davenport Collection website www.davenportcollection.co.uk with the permission of The Magic Circle. 1 JOHN NEVIL MASKELYNE’S QUEEN VICTORIA’S DIAMOND JUBILEE SPECULATION John Nevil Maskelyne was well-known for his readiness, even eagerness, to embark upon litigation. There has always been the tacit assumption that, irrespective of the outcome, the ensuing publicity was considered good for business at the Egyptian Hall, and in later years at St. George’s Hall. In December 1897, however, Maskelyne was openly cited as an example of exploitation of the law of libel when a leader writer in The Times thundered “It was high time that some check should be put upon the recent developments of the law of libel as applied to public comment in the Press”. The paper’s criticism arose from three cases heard in the Queen’s Bench Division of the High Court of Justice on 16th December. One of these appeared under the heading of “MASKELYNE v. DIBBLEE AND OTHERS when Maskelyne sought to recover damages from the publisher and proprietors of the Manchester Guardian for alleged libel contained in an article which had appeared in their issue of 6th April, 1897. It is an interesting story, for which Queen Victoria’s long reign must be held responsible! The year 1897 marked the 60th anniversary of Queen Victoria’s accession, an occasion to be celebrated with full pomp and circumstance on 22nd June with a service of thanksgiving at St.
  • Citation Perspective on Jacques Benveniste-Dew Process at Last?

    Citation Perspective on Jacques Benveniste-Dew Process at Last?

    current Comments” EUGENE GARFIELD INSTITUTE FOR SCIENTIFIC lNFORMATION@ 3501 MAR KETST PHILADELPHIA PA 19104 Citation Perspective on Jacques Benveniste-Dew Process at Last? Number 13 March 27, 1989 Introduction The [Press] digest [ED: September 26, 1988, issue f139, pp. 9-10, is heavify tilted It is now more than six months since in favor of the Nature report. What is un- Jacques Benveniste, INSERM, Clamart, believable and discredited is the latter. France, presented his controversial data. 1 You are at risk, in taking this position, that He and others claim that the effect of a pro- our data are true. Atxf, unfortunately, they are. It is enough to look calmly at our ong- tein can be observed at dilutions that pre- inat paper, and the Nature report itself, clude the existence of a single molecule of to scc that they are und~putable. Should the protein in solution. It is not surprising the ligand be at normal concentration, no- that we classified this controversy as a “Hot tmdy would have discussed them a minute. Topic” in the L’W Press Digest section for These ‘‘irreproducible” resufts have been reproduced in six laboratories afl over the September 26, 1988.2 THE SCIENTISP, world. The “able” opinion of Mefzger too,recognized the significance of the paper [ED: ref. 14] is deadly to science. Why and published articles and letters on the not “digest” my answer presented in Sci- Benveniste affair s-g ence 241, 1028 [August 26, 1988] [ED: ref. 15]. It would add some fairness to the The Press Digest headline chosen was two CurrentContermpagesthat wift even- “Can publishing unbelievable results serve tually prove devastating to all authoritative science?”2 Three articles were digested: but unsubstantiated opinions that Currem “A debate over discredited data, ” art arti- Clmrents reflected so eagerly.
  • The Seance Free Download

    The Seance Free Download

    THE SEANCE FREE DOWNLOAD John Harwood | 304 pages | 02 Apr 2009 | Vintage Publishing | 9780099516422 | English | London, United Kingdom The Seance The third point of view character is Eleanor Unwin, a young woman much like Constance with psychic powers that seem to want to destroy her. Sign In. By the end, it all made sense though. And The Seance Constance Langton has inherited this dark place as well The Seance the mysteries surrounding it. Get A Copy. Lucille Ball is actually a Leo. Sign In. External Sites. View Map View Map. Enter the The Seance as shown below:. Oh, how I worshipped at the alter of writers like Lowery Nixon Other editions. Lists with This Book. He came to our rescue many times. John Bosley : Angels. Meet your host, Anthony Host on Airbnb since See the full gallery. Clear your history. Sort order. In addition to communicating with the spirits of people who have a personal relationship to congregants, some Spiritual Churches also deal with spirits who may have a specific relationship to the medium or a historic relationship to the body of the church. The Seance entire novel reads like a prologue better off being cut: "I had hoped that Mama would The Seance content with regular messages from Alma but as the autumn advanced and the days grew shorter, the old haunted look crept back into her eyes The lawyer for the The Seance, John Montague, comes to find Constance and to tell her about the troubled history surrounding the Hall, and begs The Seance to The Seance the home once and for all.
  • United States District Court District of Minnesota

    United States District Court District of Minnesota

    CASE 0:07-cv-01296-JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 02/23/07 Page 1 of 4 United States District Court District of Minnesota Christopher Roller (Plaintiff) vs. The James Randi Educational Civil Action No. Foundation, Inc. (JREF) c/o Magician James Randi (Defendant) Complaint I'm thoroughly confused about James Randi. James educates people. I would like James to educate me. James is a magician. The "Amazing Randi". I truly believe Randi is amazing. I believe James Randi has godly powers. I could be wrong. I've been wrong before, but I had a hunch about David Copperfield, and it turned out I was right. Now James doesn't perform many magic shows anymore, but I think he's making money via products made from godly powers. Again, I could be wrong. You see, I now have a patent on godly powers - Pat#20070035812. http://www. objectforce.com/php/MyTrumanShow__/Legal/Patent/Patent.html. The patent gives me exclusive right to the ethical use and financial gain in the use of godly powers on planet Earth. I believe James has been infringing on that patent effective 29July2005 in accordance with U.S.C 35 § 271. Not just for financial gain, but also because I believe he has knowledge of immoral behavior through the use of godly powers. CASE 0:07-cv-01296-JRT-FLN Document 1 Filed 02/23/07 Page 2 of 4 Again I could be wrong. If I'm wrong I will drop the suit immediately. But it's seems like a stubborn game played by lawyers to dismiss the case before I get a chance to ask any questions.
  • United States Court of Appeals for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA

    United States Court of Appeals for the DISTRICT of COLUMBIA

    <<The pagination in this PDF may not match the actual pagination in the printed slip opinion>> USCA Case #93-7140 Document #89561 Filed: 12/09/1994 Page 1 of 8 UnitedÿStatesÿCourtÿofÿAppeals FORÿTHEÿDISTRICTÿOFÿCOLUMBIAÿCIRCUIT ArguedÿOctoberÿ6,ÿ1994ÿÿÿÿÿDecidedÿDecemberÿ9,ÿ1994 No.ÿ93-7140 URIÿGELLER, APPELLANT v. JAMESÿRANDI, A/K/AÿADAMÿJERSIN, A/K/AÿDONALD, A/K/AÿTRUTH'SÿBODYGUARD, A/K/AÿTHEÿAMAZINGÿRANDI, A/K/AÿRANDALLÿJAMESÿZWINGE; ÿCOMMITTEEÿFORÿTHE SCIENTIFICÿINVESTIGATIONÿOFÿCLAIMSÿOFÿTHEÿPARANORMAL, APPELLEES AppealÿfromÿtheÿUnitedÿStatesÿDistrictÿCourt forÿtheÿDistrictÿofÿColumbia 91cv01014 RichardÿW.ÿWinelander arguedÿtheÿcauseÿandÿfiledÿtheÿbriefÿforÿappellant. LeeÿLevine argued the cause for appellees. Withÿhimÿo nÿt heÿbriefÿwasÿ James E. Grossberg.ÿÿR. Darryl Cooper enteredÿanÿappearanceÿforÿappelleeÿCommitteeÿforÿtheÿScientificÿInvestigationÿof ClaimsÿofÿtheÿParanormal.ÿÿMichaelÿJ.ÿKennedy enteredÿanÿappearanceÿforÿappelleeÿJamesÿRandi. BeforeÿWALD,ÿSENTELLE,ÿandÿROGERS,ÿCircuitÿJudges. OpinionÿforÿtheÿCourtÿfiledÿbyÿCircuitÿJudge SENTELLE. SENTELLE,ÿCircuit Judge: AppellantÿUriÿGellerÿchallengesÿtheÿdistrictÿcourt'sÿawardÿof monetary sanctions under Rule 11 of the FederalÿRulesÿofÿCivilÿProcedureÿ("Ruleÿ11")ÿinÿfavorÿof appellee Committee for the Scientific Investigation ofClaims ofthe Paranormal. Gellerÿcontendsÿthat the district courtÿerredÿwhenÿitÿtreatedÿaÿmotionÿforÿRuleÿ11ÿsanctionsÿasÿconcededÿbyÿGeller under localÿrulesÿandÿthusÿawardedÿsanctions.ÿÿBecauseÿweÿholdÿthatÿtheÿdistrictÿcourtÿdidÿnotÿabuseÿit s discretionÿinÿsanctioningÿappellantÿunderÿRuleÿ11,ÿweÿaffirm.
  • The Chronicle Review

    The Chronicle Review

    The Chronicle Review January 11, 2008 The Truth Is Out There After a formative encounter with the paranormal, one philosopher embraced the study of it By Scott Carlson The pivotal moment of Stephen E. Braude's academic career happened when he was in graduate school, on a dull afternoon in Northampton, Mass., in 1969. Or, at least, what follows is what he says happened. Readers — skeptics and believers both — will have to make up their own minds. Braude and two friends had seen the only movie in town and were looking for something to do. His friends suggested going to Braude's house and playing a game called "table up." In other words, they wanted to perform a séance. They sat at a folding table, with their fingers lightly touching the tabletop, silently urging it to levitate. Suddenly it shuddered and rose several inches off the ground, then came back down. Then it rose a second time. And again and again. Braude and his friends worked out a code with the table, and it answered questions and spelled out names. Braude says he had not given much thought to the paranormal before that afternoon, but the experience shook him to his core, he says, sitting in an easy chair in his immaculate home in suburban Baltimore. He insists there was no way his friends could have manipulated the table, adding, "I should tell you, we were not stoned." Today Braude, 62, is one of the few mainstream academics applying his intellectual training to questions that many would regard at best as impossible to answer, and at worst absolutely ridiculous: Do psychic phenomena exist? Are mediums and ghosts real? Can people move objects with their minds or predict the future? A professor of philosophy at the University of Maryland- Baltimore County, Braude is a past president of the Parapsychological Association, an organization that gathers academics and others interested in phenomena like ESP and psychokinesis, and he has published a series of books with well- known academic presses on such topics.
  • Benveniste on the Benveniste Affair

    Benveniste on the Benveniste Affair

    759 _N_AT_u_R_E_v_oL_._33_5 _21_o_cr_o_s_E_R_19_~8-----NEWS AND VI EWS--------------_ Benveniste on the Benveniste affair Dr Jacques Benveniste replies to some of the points raised in recent correspondence in a text which is printed ( as on a previous occasion) unchanged except for grammatical reasons. Paris that remain unchallenged. I am supposed rial standards" for extraordinary data from WHAT a deluge! Certainly appropriate not to have ever seen anything such as Fig. H . Metzger. J. Randi believes that it takes about a paper on water but a lot of it could 2 before, when the same is in Table 1 and special data to tell a unicorn from a goat. have been deleted using Nature's criteria Fig. lb of our paper. The two plots in Fig. In the experimental process, data must be for publication. Our publication of our 6 are declared discordant, exactly what is collected and interpreted independently paper was a cry for help to explain these printed in our article. of the weight and implication of the hypo­ puzzling results. Instead we got a fraud The following correspondence for weeks thesis. A goat is a unicorn when a statis­ squad, an unsound (a fraud implicating occupied precious Nature space to show tically significant number of experiments five laboratories?) insult to respected both that these data do not exist and how have shown a unique horn, obviously after scientists, who from the start and there­ to explain them. I am more concerned at Randi has checked that it was not glued after were treated as criminals. All scien­ Gaylarde's claim that they are synthetic with Araldite.
  • Homeopathy Kernel Beyond Nanomedicine

    Homeopathy Kernel Beyond Nanomedicine

    Homeopathy Kernel Beyond Nanomedicine Drs. M.V.Ramanamurthy Dr. Shiv Dua 68-1-3/1, Netaji Street, Ashok Nagar, Kakinada- 533 00 2617, sector 16, Faridabad – 121 002 Ph: 0884 -2346644, e-mail: [email protected] Ph: 9871408050 e-mail: [email protected] Prologue The Cardinal twin objective of this write-up stems out to take stock of the evidences, in tune with the latest modern technological state of advances that have been generated, so far in favor of Homeopathy to establish it as a “Perfect Medical Scientific System”. This note also encompasses how Homeopathic Infinitesimals Drugs Dilution Doctrine embodies the inherent built-in character to impress in perceiving that Homeopathy kernel is much more beyond Nano-Medicine concepts in allopathy with respect to the up-coming modern knowledge frontiers. Today, Homeopathy being an Excellent Medical System is an Alternative or Complimentary Medicine, especially for Common, Chronic, Terminal, Supposed to be incurable and Non-surgical diseases. Concept of nanopharmacology is in itself a holistic reflection of homeopathy kernel. Nanopharmacological doses deeply penetrate into cells and are hypersensitive to the specific medicinal substance. Normal doses of Atropine blocks parasympathetic nerves mucous membranes to dry up, while exceedingly small dose-administration increase secretions. Repeated small doses only influence biological systems. Smaller homeopathic doses with longer lasting effects do not require repetition of dosages. With Water Memory Messenger elucidated, homeopathy R&D should take advantage by revisiting, being notably, after Hahnemann‟s contribution, almost it reminded static. Hence, all genuinely concerned should ponder over as to how best this envisaged cardinal canons endeavor of homeopathy treatise vs modern knowledge frontiers of this millennium could be accomplished affectively in effect.
  • GROUP Bonus Assignments: Total 12 Points 2. JAMES RANDI WEEKLY

    GROUP Bonus Assignments: Total 12 Points 2. JAMES RANDI WEEKLY

    GROUP Bonus Assignments: Total 12 points These are not required assignments and are ONLY to be completed by the GROUPS. To take advantage of these bonus assignments your GROUP must first meet with your instructor to discuss the due date for completion and other details of the assignment. Only a brief explanation is provided below. Additional details necessary for completion of these assignments will be provided during your meeting with your instructor. There is a matching Grading Form that must be completed for these assignments. 1 A. ASSESSING A CLAIM USING FIVE (5) CRITICAL QUESTIONS (6 points) Using all five (5) “Critical Questions” put one claim (ordinary or extraordinary) to the test. Ordinary claims can include pharmaceutical, vitamin, homeopathy, and health/medical claims, and extraordinary claims include magic, psychics, mediums, conspiracy theories, ESP, and remote viewing to name a few. If you have a claim to test and it appear under one of the categories here, please consult your instructor. After you have met with your instructor regarding completion of the assignment, you will have two (2) class meetings within which to submit your answers. Submissions will not be accepted after that deadline. The five (5) “Critical Questions” can be found at the end of the Critical Thinking PowerPoint slides that were provided with your syllabus and that are available on your instructor’s ACC webpage. At the end of your response you must explicitly state whether you supported or refuted the claim. ------------------------------------------------- OR -------------------------------------------------------- 1 B. ASSESSING A CLAIM USING THE “CRITIC” ACRONYM (6 Points) Using the “CRITIC” acronym put one claim (ordinary or extraordinary) to the test.
  • La “Memoria Del Agua” Y Su Origen Homeopático

    La “Memoria Del Agua” Y Su Origen Homeopático

    La “Memoria del Agua” y su Origen Homeopático www.latindex.unam.mx periodica.unam.mx lilacs.bvsalud.org/es/ www.imbiomed.com Ensayo La “Memoria del Agua” y su Origen Homeopático **Bernard Poitevin PALABRAS CLAVE: Resumen La memoria del agua, Historia de la memoria del agua, Homeopatía y memoria del agua, Jacques Benveniste, A tres décadas de la publicación del artículo científico que divulgó internacionalmente las Bernard Poitevin, revista investigaciones dirigidas por el doctor Jacques Benveniste en torno a la degranulación de Nature, Degranulación de basófilos disparada por anticuerpos altamente diluidos (fenómeno conocido de manera co- basófilos, Altas diluciones, loquial como “la memoria del agua”), el doctor Bernard Poitevin, quien fue colaborador en Soluciones dinamizadas, dichos estudios científicos, expone en este artículo su versión de la historia y sus puntos de Homeopatía e Investigación, vista sobre este episodio de especial trascendencia para la Homeopatía. Homeopatía y ciencia. En ese sentido, el presente documento nos contextualiza en el panorama que se vivía en torno a la medicina hahnemanniana en Francia desde finales de la década de 1970 y nos muestra ciertos detalles poco recordados sobre el trabajo de Benveniste: cómo se definió la metodología de la investigación, la forma en que se constituyó el equipo de trabajo y el papel que desempeñaron la industria farmacéutica homeopática, el sistema de salud francés y un lobby o grupo de presión contrario a la Homeopatía. Más aún, el artículo nos presenta al doctor Benveniste sin idealizaciones y nos sugiere que ciertos rasgos de su personalidad pudieron influir en el desarrollo de sus investigaciones y en la presentación de los resultados ante la comunidad científica, lo que a su vez pudo repercutir en las discusiones mediáticas que sucedieron en los siguientes años y cuyas consecuencias persisten hasta nuestros días.
  • An Honest Liar Premieres on Independent Lens Monday, March 28, 2016 on PBS

    An Honest Liar Premieres on Independent Lens Monday, March 28, 2016 on PBS

    FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE CONTACT Lisa Tawil, ITVS 415-356-8383 [email protected] Mary Lugo 770-623-8190 [email protected] Cara White 843-881-1480 [email protected] For downloadable images, visit pbs.org/pressroom/ An Honest Liar Premieres on Independent Lens Monday, March 28, 2016 on PBS Portrait of James “The Amazing” Randi, the Extraordinary Magician Who Dedicated His Life to Exposing Hucksters and Frauds “Magicians are the most honest people in the world. They tell you they’re gonna fool you, and then they do it.” – James Randi (San Francisco, CA) — For the last half-century, James “The Amazing” Randi has entertained millions of people around the world with his remarkable feats of magic, escape, and trickery. But when he saw faith healers, fortunetellers, and psychics using his beloved magician’s tricks to steal money from innocent people and destroy lives, he dedicated his life to exposing frauds, using the wit and style of the great showman that he is. Part detective story, part biography, and a bit of a magic act itself, the award- James "The Amazing" Randi. winning An Honest Liar, directed and produced by Credit: Justin Weinstein, Tyler Measom Justin Weinstein and Tyler Measom, premieres on Independent Lens Monday, March 28, 2016, 10:00-11:30 p.m. ET (check local listings) on PBS. A self-described liar, cheat, and charlatan, Randi embarked on a mission for truth by perpetrating a series of unparalleled investigations and elaborate hoaxes. These grand schemes fooled scientists, the media, and a gullible public, but always with a deeper goal of demonstrating the importance of evidence and the dangers of magical thinking.
  • Evolution of Homoeopathic Posology Sengupta Dishari*1, Ghosh Shubhamoy2

    Evolution of Homoeopathic Posology Sengupta Dishari*1, Ghosh Shubhamoy2

    Vol 1, Issue 1 , 2013 Review Article EVOLUTION OF HOMOEOPATHIC POSOLOGY SENGUPTA DISHARI*1, GHOSH SHUBHAMOY2 1MD (Hom.)(PGT) National Institute of Homoeopathy (Gov. of India) ; Ex- House Physician (Mahesh Bhattacharyya Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital,Govt. of West Bengal) ; B.H.M.S ; Residence : 57/1/3 Kasundia Ist Bye Lane; P.O- Santragachi, Howrah – 711104; 2Head of the Department of Pathology & Microbiology of Mahesh Bhattacharyya Homoeopathic Medical College & Hospital, Govt. of West Bengal; BHMS, MSc, MD (Hom), PhD (Scholar), Email: [email protected] Received: 9 May 2013, Revised and Accepted: 9 May 2013 ABSTRACT Homoeopathy is based on the use of potentised remedies following the law of similia. It is the science of determining and understanding of dosage, as based on research into a huge number of factors. This article shows our sincere and humble attempts to focus on the historical development of posology and unfolding of dose and potency. Keywords: Dose, potency, repetition, Scientificity of potentisation INTRODUCTION memory that results in the homoeopathic effect. In 1988 Dr. Benveniste published a study in the journal Nature in support of his The term Posology originates from Greek words ‘posos’ meaning water-memory theory. He claimed his experiments showed that an ‘how much’ and ‘logos’ meaning ‘study’. In homeopathy, Posology ultra-dilute solution exerted a biological effect. The main evidence means the doctrine of dose of medicine. A homeopathic dose means against water having a memory is that of the very short lifetime of the potency, quantity and form of medicine as well as repetition. hydrogen bonds between the water molecules.