Faculty of Social and Life Sciences Human Geography

Cecilia Möller

Transforming geographies of tourism and gender

Exploring women's livelihood strategies and practices within tourism in

DISSERTATION Karlstad University Studies 2009:9 Cecilia Möller

Transforming geographies of tourism and gender

Exploring women's livelihood strategies and practices within tourism in Latvia

Karlstad University Studies 2009:9 Cecilia Möller. Transforming geographies of tourism and gender - Exploring women's livelihood strategies and practices within tourism in Latvia

DISSERTATION

Karlstad University Studies 2009:9 ISSN 1403-8099 ISBN 978-91-7063-230-3

© The Author

Distribution: Faculty of Social and Life Sciences Human Geography SE-651 88 Karlstad SWEDEN +46 54 700 10 00 www.kau.se

Printed at: Universitetstryckeriet, Karlstad 2009 Abstract Title: Transforming geographies of tourism and gender. Exploring women’s livelihood strategies and practices within tourism in Latvia Author: CeciliaMöller Language: English Keywords: Latvia, tourism, gender identities, femininities, livelihood, post socialism ISBN: 9789170632303 Thisthesisexploresdifferentgeographiesoftourism,gender,workandliveli hoodinpostsocialistLatvia.Thestudyputsfocusontheoveralltransforma tionprocessandthereshapingofthetourismsector,inhowLatviaisreimag inedbothasanationstateandasatourismdestination.Onecentralaimisto analysethetransformationprocessas genderised ,andhowexistinggenderidenti ties in general and femininities more specifically are being transformed and mirroredwithintourism.Thethesisfirst containan analysis of how Latvian tourismmarketing carries genderised meanings and identities, based on three interrelated‘geographies’aspartofthetransforming‘nationalcommonspace’: geographies of neonationalism, geographies of Europeanisation and geographies of relic communism.Theseholdcertainimaginationsandconceptionsofspaceandplace, and include aims and priorities of the transition process. Secondly, focus is placedonthechangingconditionsforwomen’slivelihoodwithinruraltourism intheCēsisdistrict,andspa/healthtourisminJūrmala.Thethesishasmainlya qualitativeapproach,includingsemistructuredinterviewsandtextanalysis,but thecasestudiesalsocompriseasurvey. The thesis illustrates how tourism becomes an arena for reclaiming a Latvian nationalidentity rooted in apreSovietpast,whilealso manifestinga Western European identity, and negotiating the remains of the controversial Sovietheritage.Thisprocessreveals,forexample,traditionalfeminisedfeatures ofthenationstate,portrayingwomenasthe‘mothers’ofthenation.Twocase studies of female employees and entrepreneurs within rural tourism and spa/health tourism also show how women negotiate different ideals of femininities,including‘traditional’,‘Western’and‘socialist’ideals,throughtheir everyday livelihood practices within both the public and the private sphere. Their negotiations for a more independent livelihood are also affected by structuralfactors,suchaswagesandtaxes,butalsobythelocalsociocultural contextandrelatedgenderidentities,includingclass,familystructure,ageand ethnicity. Contents Acknowledgements…………………………………………………………..9 PartI–Encounteringtransformation ChapteroneIntroduction ...... 13 Thesispurposeandresearchquestions...... 17 Feministgeography ...... 18 Geographiesoftourismandgender ...... 21 Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism...... 25 Casestudiesandmethods...... 28 Structureofthethesis ...... 29 ChaptertwoMethodologicaljourneys...... 31 Whatisfeministmethodology? ...... 31 Textanalysis...... 35 Thecasestudies:JūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrict ...... 38 Thesurvey...... 40 Implementationoftheinterviewstudy...... 45 PartII–Settingthescene Chapterthree–Geographiesofneonationalism...... 57 Therelationsbetweenmusicandplace...... 60 Folkmusicasasourcefornationalawakening ...... 62 Folkmusicasacontemporarynationalmanifestation...... 65 Genderingthenation ...... 68 From‘local’to‘global’heritage...... 78 Conclusion...... 82 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation ...... 85 Tourismintransition...... 88 Towardsregionalism ...... 93 Manifestingthe‘return’toEuropethroughtourismmarketing ...... 98 Rigaasa’sextourismdestination’...... 99 SextourismandtheEast/Westdivide...... 101 Genderedmarketing...... 103 RegulatingsextourisminLatvia...... 108 Conclusion...... 114 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism ...... 117 Thetransitionascontinuitywiththepast...... 120 TourismduringtheSovietregime...... 123 Tourismandthenegotiationofthepast...... 127 ‘Normalising’space ...... 129 CommercialisationoftheSovietheritagethroughtourism...... 133 Makingthepast(in)visiblethroughtourismmarketing...... 139 Conclusion...... 147 PartIIITransformingfemininities Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnational commonspace...... 153 TheSovietgendersystem ...... 153 Workandpostsocialistgenderidentities...... 159 Reclaimingtraditionalidealsoffemininities...... 161 ‘Western’idealsoffemininities ...... 167 Continuityofsocialistidealsoffemininities ...... 176 Conclusion...... 183 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithin tourism...... 187 Exploringworkwithintourism...... 188 Genderidentitiesandwork ...... 192 Livelihoodideologiesandpractices ...... 198 Settingtheframeworkforwomen’slivelihood ...... 203 Conclusion...... 208 PartIVExploringwomen'slivelihoodwithintourismin theCēsisdistrict Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace:rurality,ruraltourismand thelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict...... 213 Whatisruraltourism?...... 215 Threeapproachesto‘rurality’andruraltourism...... 218 Theruralasanationalsymbol ...... 219 Theruralasasiteforconsumption ...... 223 Theruralasa‘problem’...... 228 Conclusion...... 237 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinrural tourismintheCēsisdistrict...... 241 Survey:generaloverviewofruraltourism...... 242 Employmentwithinruraltourism...... 246 Ruralentrepreneurshipwithintourism ...... 252 Women’sentrepreneurshipintheCēsisdistrict...... 254 ‘Survival’strategies...... 255 ‘Lifestyleoriented’strategies ...... 258 Diversifyingwomen’sentrepreneurship ...... 268 Conclusion...... 273 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihood practiceswithinruraltourism...... 275 Privateremainsprivate:traditionallyorientedpractices...... 276 Publicbecomesprivate:‘reliccommunistic’practices...... 285 Privatebecomespublic:commercialisedpractices ...... 291 Paradoxesofwomen’sentrepreneurship...... 297 PartV:Exploringwomen'slivelihoodwithintourismin Jūrmala Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaas ahealthtourismresort...... 305 Jūrmalaasatourismresort–ahistoricalretrospect ...... 305 Encounteringtransformation...... 307 ‘Traditional’geographiesofplace...... 310 Commercialisedgeographiesofplace...... 312 Continuousgeographiesofplace ...... 318 Conclusion...... 326 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourism inJūrmala...... 329 Tourism–a‘refuge’ora‘goldenroad’forwomen’semployment? ...... 329 Exploringlivelihoodstrategieswithintourism...... 333 Employmentwithintourismasaresponseorsolutiontoaproblem ...... 335 Thenatureandcontentoftourismwork...... 338 Tourismasa‘new’positiveandpromisingsector...... 340 Incomefromtourism:safeorrisky?...... 342 Conclusion...... 352 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities:women’slivelihood practiceswithintourisminJūrmala...... 355 Traditionallyfeminisedpractices...... 355 Negotiatingtraditionalidealsoflivelihood ...... 366 ‘Nontraditionalbreadwinningpractices’...... 371 Careerorientedlivelihoodpractices ...... 374 Analysingparadoxesofwomen’slivelihood...... 379 PartVICurtaincall Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismand gender...... 385 (Re)imaginingthe‘nationalcommonspace’throughtourism ...... 385 Exploringgeographiesofgender,workandlivelihood...... 393 Negotiatingwomen’s‘livelihoodactionspace’...... 400 Lookingbeyondthehorizon...... 402 Summary...... 405 References…………………………………………………...413 Appendix1–Interviewthemesfemaleentrepreneurswithinruraltourism....429 Appendix2–Interviewthemesfemaleemployeeswithintourism………….431 Appendix3–Questionnaireforsurveyofemploymentwithintourismin JūrmalaandintheCēsisdistrict…………………………………………….433 Listoffigures Figure1:“Mindmap”figure,illustratingtherelationsandintersectionsamong‘national commonspace’,‘geographiesofplace’andlivelihoodstrategiesandpractices...... 27 Figure2:MapofLatvianregionsanddistricts(theCēsisdistrictandJūrmalahighlighted). ..28 Figure3 :Numberofforeignovernightstaysinhotelsandotheraccommodation establishmentsinLatviaandRiga1993/19992007...... 92 Figure4:Russianovernighttravellersandovernightvisitorsinaccommodation establishments1993/19992007...... 127 Figure5:EconomicactivityfortheLatvianpopulationaged1564bysex19962007...... 164 Figure6:Shareofwomenandmenworkingparttime20022007(%)...... 166 Figure7:Registeredunemployment19922006...... 167 Figure8:Shareofwomenintotalemploymentbysector(%)...... 179 Figure9:Latvianwomen’sshareintotalemploymentwithinservices1992and2007(%). .180 Figure10: Employmentratesbyethnicityandsex20022005(%)...... 182 Figure11:Theinterrelationsamonglivelihoodideologies,practicesandphysicalandmaterial resourcesandrestrictions...... 199 Figure12:Intersectionsbetweengenderedlivelihoodideologies,strategiesandpractices. ..203 Figure13: MapoftheCēsisdistrictandmunicipalities...... 214 Figure14:Shareofwomenofemployed,unemployedandeconomicallyinactivepopulation 2007(aged1564,inpercent)...... 231 Figure15 :Agedistributionofsurveyrespondents...... 243 Figure16:Numberofyearsatcurrentworkwithintourism...... 243 Figure17: Divisionofworkbetweenthemembersofthehousehold...... 278 Figure18:Monthlyincomefromtourism(Lats)...... 292 Figure19: Whoisthemainincomeproviderinyourhousehold? ...... 293 Figure20: NumberoftouristsinregisteredaccommodationestablishmentsinJūrmala1996 2007...... 308 Figure21: NumberofregisteredunemployedpersonsinJūrmalabysex20012008...... 322 Figure22: ShareofunemployedpersonsinJūrmalabylevelofLatvianproficiency, 2005(%)...... 325 Figure23: Agedistributionofsurveyrespondentsbysex...... 333 Figure24:DistributionofRussianandLatvianspeakingfemalerespondentsbasedon“Main workassignment”(numbers)...... 346 Figure25:DistributionofRussianandLatvianspeakingfemalerespondentsbasedongross monthlyincomefromtourism(numbers)...... 346 Figure26: Agedistributionoffemalerespondentsaccordingtotheirnativelanguage...... 350 Figure27: Divisionofhouseholdchores(femalerespondents)...... 359 Figure28: Whoisthemainincomeproviderinyourhousehold?(femalerespondents)...... 365 Listoftables Table1:Overviewofthedifferentpartsofthethesis...... 29 Table2: OverviewofthesurveystudyintheCēsisdistrictandJūrmala...... 41 Table3: Overviewoftheinterviewstudy...... 48 Table4:TheethniccompositionoftheLatvianpopulation(%)...... 140 Table5:CitizenshipandethnicityinLatvia1995and2006...... 142 Table6:LabourforceparticipationinLatvia1989(%)...... 156 Table7:Employedbystatusofemploymentandgender(%oftotalnumberofemployed persons)...... 176 Table8:Femininitiesandnationalcommonspace...... 184 Table9: GeographiesofplaceintheCēsisdistrict...... 238 Table10 :Femaleemployeesincludedintheinterviewstudy...... 246 Table11: Femaleinterviewees,ruraltourismentrepreneurs...... 254 Table12:Paradoxesofwomen’sentrepreneurshipintheCēsisdistrict...... 298 Table13: GeographiesofplaceinJūrmala...... 326 Table14:FemaleintervieweeswithintourisminMajori,Jūrmala...... 335 Table15:Grossmonthlyincomefromtourism(LatvianLats)...... 343 Table16:Paradoxesofwomen’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala...... 379 Table17:Reimaginingnationalcommonspace...... 386 Table18:Interrelationsbetweenidealsoffemininitiesandwomen’slivelihoodstrategiesand practiceswithintourismintheCēsisdistrictandJūrmala...... 395 Acknowledgements Iowethankstomanypeople,whohaveinspiredmetowriteandcompletethis thesis.Firstandforemost,thisstudyhasbeenmadepossiblethroughtheper sonsIhavemetandmadefriendswithinLatvia,especiallythosegivingtheir timeandeffortinparticipatinginmysurveyandinterview study by sharing narratives from their everyday life and showing great hospitality. To you all: thankyouverymuch!liespaldies!большоеспасибо! Myresearchprojectandfieldwork werefinanciallysupportedthroughscholarshipsfromTheSwedishSocietyfor Anthropology and Geography (SSAG) and The Royal Swedish Academy of Sciences(throughtheMargitAlthinFoundation). Special thanks to Alona Rogale for helping out with translations and distributionofthequestionnaires,andArtursSvekrisforbeingafaithfuland committed interpreter during long interview sessions and for being an ambi tiousguidealongthewindingandsometimesinferiorroadsthroughtheLatvian countryside.Ihavefoundagreatdealofideasandinspirationformyworkin my long nocturnal discussions with my friend, Liene Kulakova, and her children,FilipsandJustine.ThanksalsotoAusmaCimdina,forinterestingdis cussionsoffeministresearchinLatvia,andissuesofgenderandrurality.My fieldworkinJūrmalahasalsobeenmadepossiblewiththehelpofthestaffat theJūrmalaTourismInformationCentre,whohelpedoutwithpracticalthings aswellasconstantlykeepingmeuptodatewiththelatestinformationabout thecity’srapidtourismdevelopment. Severalpersons have readandcommented on mytexts along the way, providingmewithinvaluablesuggestionsandcritique.Particularlytwopersons havehadaveryimportantroleinthisprocessasmysupervisors:LarsAronsson and Susanne Johansson. Lars has contributed with many good remarks, especiallyrelatingtotourismresearchfromageographicalperspective.Susanne, you have inspired me to explore the feministgeographical field, and your professionalcommitmentaswellasyourfriendship,positivespiritandsenseof humourhavebeeninvaluableforboththeworkonmythesisandformeasa person.ThanksalsotoGerhardGustafsson,ElisabethBrandinandTomMels for reading and discussing my texts. I am also grateful for feedback from Katarina Schough and Susanne Stenbacka through seminar discussions in differentstagesoftheresearchprocess.Katarinahelpedmefindthedirection andstructureofthethesis,whichintheendresultedinthethree‘geographies’

9 ofthethesis,andSusanneprovidedmewithcrucialreflectionsonmyempirical material.IwouldalsoliketothankSusanCanaliforhelpingme improvemy writtenEnglish. A number of persons at Kalmar University need recognition for their support and social commitment, often through rewarding discussions during our coffee breaks; Christer Foghagen, Sanna Mels, Jennie Almroth, Anneli Andersson,MattiasJunemo,GöranOlsson,PerPeterssonLöfqvistandHans Wessblad.IwouldalsoliketoexpressgratitudetoMonaHedfeldtatÖrebro University,asmygoodfriendandPh.D.student‘companion’, for our great telephone conversations of the everyday joys and worries in the journey towardsourcommonaimofcompletingourdissertations. Last, but not least, I owe many thanks to my family; my parents, my brotherandmyhusband.Thanksforbelievinginme!AndtoStaffanespecially, thanks for making my life complete and for supporting me during my seeminglyendlessworkonmythesis.Youremindmethattherearealsoother importantthingsinlife.NowIlookforwardtostartinganewchapterwithyou! Kalmar,December2008 CeciliaMöller

10 PartI Encounteringtransformation

ViewoveroldRigaandtheDaugavaRiverfromthetopofSt.Peter’sCathedral.Photo: StaffanNolhage Chapterone Introduction TherearenowordsexpressiveenoughtoconveyanauthenticviewofLatvia.Thatiswhyyou shouldcomehereyoushouldsee,hear,tasteandfeelitallyourself(…)Takeamomentto dream about this land and see its colours, hear its sounds and feel its beauty (www.latviatourism.lv,ELatvia,20080526). This dissertation is about different transforming geographies of tourism, gender,workandlivelihoodinLatvia.DuringmyperiodasaPh.D.studentI wasoftenaskedthequestion;“whydidyouchoosetostudytourisminLat via?”, when presenting my research in different academic contexts, or when visiting Latvia for interviews and more empirical work. In some cases, the question automatically assumes that I would have previous personal links to Latvia, for example, as a member of a SwedishLatvian ‘exile community’, whichisnotthecase.MyfirstvisittoLatviawasinthespringof2004,justa fewweeksafterLatviabecameamemberintheEuropeanUnion.Iarrivedas an‘ordinarytourist’atRigaairportjustasthousandsofothervisitors,tooka taxiacrosstheDaugava Rivertooneofthe budget hotels, and a couple of hourslaterwalkedthefirststepsalongthecobblestonedstreetsintheoldtown ofRigawithatouristmapinmyhand.Unlikean‘ordinarytourist’,whose tivesforthejourneymightinvolveanescapefromtheroutinesofeverydaylife, what brought me to Latvia was mainly a personal and academic interest in tourism as a sociocultural and geographical phenomenon. More specifically, myjourneystartedwhenbrowsingthroughanumberofcolourfulLatvian,Es tonianandLithuaniantourismbrochures,withtheaimofanalysinggendered representationswithintourismmarketingforaPh.D.courseinfeministgeog raphy. Images and quotations, such as the above example, of Latvia as an ‘authentic’ and ‘exotic’ tourism destination then became interesting. I already hadthekeywords,‘tourism’,‘gender’,‘work’and‘postsocialism’,forthemain focusofmythesis,butdecidedafterfurtherinquiriestochooseLatviaformy empiricalcasestudies. ThefocusofthethesisistoanalysethedevelopmentoftourisminLatvia as an example and reflection of the transformation process which has taken place since independence. Research about tourism development in the Baltic States in a postsocialist context has been scarce, with a focus mainly on Estonia (see Jaakson 1996; Worthington 2003). Hall (1998; 2001; 2004) and

13 ChapteroneIntroduction

WilliamsandBalaz(2000)claimthattourismbothreflectsandcontributesto the economic transition process in postsocialist countries. From being a centrallycontrolledtoolforsocialistideals,tourismistodayregardedasaway of creating national and regional economic growth and employment possibilities. Thus, the commitment to tourism development has a symbolic significanceintermsofmanifestinganewbornLatviannationalidentityanda more western ‘European’ identity, but also represents a restructuring of the economy,forexample,throughastronglygrowingservicesector. Some studies of the ‘transition’ in the Baltic States in general and of tourism in particular tend to view it as having a predetermined form and directionintheshiftbetweentwoapparentlyknowncircumstances.Thisoften includesanabandonmentofthepast,puttinganendtotheSoviettimes,and insteadembracingthe‘new’westerncapitalisteconomy.Suchreasoninglargely reflectseconomicalandpoliticalaimsofclassicmodernizationtheories(Blom et al. eds. 1996; Blokker 2005). Some actors, for instance, the World Bank, claimthatthetransitionperiodcouldberegardedascompletedforsomeofthe postsocialist countries, especially for those countries who have become membersoftheEuropeanUnion(TheWorldBank2002).Themeaningofthe concept ‘transition’ has been debated. Young and Light (2001) criticize approachesadvocatedbyeconomistsandpoliticalscientists,whodescribethe transitionprocessmainlyasaquestionofestablishingnewinstitutionsandlegal frameworks in order to reach aims of democracy, as well as implementing privatizationandpriceliberalization. (…) postsocialism is more than just a set of technical changes: instead it involves the re definition of almost the entire fabric of everyday life. Thus, postsocialism involves other transformations of culture, identity, traditions, history and symbols – which are not always immediately apparent through an analysis ofmacroprocesses of political and economic re form,butwhichareintimatelyrelatedtosuchprocesses(Young&Light2001:942,references toVerdery1999). Thus,thetransitionhas social and cultural dimensionswhichinteractwithpoliti calandeconomicprocesses.Asaconsequence,theeffectsofthesechangesand transformations might also take longer time to interpret and evaluate, and mightnotbemeasurableinmorequantitativeandtechnicalterms.Moreover, thetransitiondoesnotalways followa linear andlogical developmentphase, butdependsonthecountries’differentsocial,culturalandpoliticalconditions. The process of transition is also affected by external relationships, in which globalprocessesinterrelatewiththelocalcontext(seeGal&Kligman2000a,

14 ChapteroneIntroduction

Pickles&Smith1998;Herrschel2006).Twoalternativeconceptsto‘transition’ which will be used in this study are pathways and transformation , which I find more appropriate because they allow an analysis of a continuation of social patterns,ratherthanmerelyfocusingontheexpectedresultsandaimsofthe transition.IagreewiththestatementmadebyGalandKligman(2000b),who pointout“theimportanceofseeingthepost1989periodnotsimplyasabreak withthepast,butalsoinpartacontinuationofit”(Gal&KligmanIn:Gal& Kligman 2000b:6). I would suggest that tourism research in a postsocialist contextneedstotakeintoconsiderationnotmerelytheeconomicandpolitical aspects of the transition process, but also the social and cultural dimensions, including transforming gender relations and identities. From a relational per spective,tourismispartofanetworkofpowerstructuresandcontrol,which areexpressedindifferenttypesofinequalities,forexample,dependingonclass, ethnicityandgender.Gendermayinthiscontextnotmerelyreflectandexpress thetransformingsocietyintermsofpoliticalandeconomicprocesses,butmay alsoactivelycontributetoandaffecttheoutcomeoftheseprocesses.Thus,this studywilldiscusshowthetransformationprocessis genderised ,andhowexisting genderidentities ingeneraland femininities morespecificallyarebeingtransformed andmirroredwithinthetourismsector,alongsidemoregeneraleconomic,po litical and sociocultural societal changes. Using the term ‘femininities’ illustratestheneedforrecognisingmultiplesetsofgenderidentities,inwhich differentidealsof‘femininity’mayexistparalleltoandintersectwithotherso cial characteristics, such as class and ethnicity. I will return to these central themesofthethesisbelow. Researchontourismasasocietalphenomenonhasbeenconductedona multidisciplinarybasiswithinfluencesfromavarietyofsubjects,rangingfrom geographyandsociologytoeconomics.Theresearchtraditionshavedeveloped frommerelyquantitativemodelsofdestinationmanagementanddevelopment tomoreprofound theoriesandqualitativemethods to illustrate the complex characterandeffectsoftourism,inrelationtomoregeneralsocietalprocesses. Tourismstudieshavetraditionallyhadaweaklinktofeministtheoriesandgen derissues,andwerenotintroducedonalargerscaleuntilthemid1990s(see Kinnaird & Hall 1994; Swain & Momsen 2002). Since then, gender studies withintourismhaveprovidedinsightintohowtourismreflectsandchallenges existentgenderstructures,relationsandinequalitiesbetweenwomenandmen inawiderangeofareas.MorganandPritchard(1998)claimthattheconnection betweengenderandtourismisnecessarysincetourismisaproductofagen derised society. Thereby, the development of tourism reflects and shapes

15 ChapteroneIntroduction existinggenderrelationswhichvaryovertimeandspace(Morgan&Pritchard 1998).Humangeographyhasbeenoneoftheleadingdisciplinesinthedevel opmentoftourismresearch,withthepurposeofhighlightingtourismactivities fromaspatialperspective,butfewstudieshavefullyexploredtheconnections betweenfeministtheoreticalapproacheswithinhumangeographyandtourism studies. Apart from discussing how tourism and gender are part of the transformationprocessinLatviaingeneral,thedissertationcontainsananalysis of employment and entrepreneurship within the emerging tourism sector in Latviamorespecifically,withafocusonwomen’sworkandlivelihoodwithin tourism.InLatvia,aswellasinotherpostsocialistandwesterncountries,the tourismindustrytendstobea‘feminised’sectoroftheeconomy,andreflects an overall gendered division of labour, in which women often constitute a majority of the labour force and tend to be found in lowpaid jobs 1. A dissonance can be identified within tourism research of women’s roles and opportunities within the tourism sector. On the one hand, women are portrayed as ‘victims’ of the tourism industry, expressed in debates of, for instance,sextourismandhowthegrowingmasstourismsectorusestraditional genderrolesandstereotypes.Ontheotherhand,women’soverrepresentation as employees is interpreted as a chance to strengthen their role in society, especiallythroughmoresmallscaleformsoftourism,byofferingindependence and a way of challenging existing gender structures (see Gibson In: Apostopoulosetal.2001). The dissertation takes its departure point in the transforming Latvian labour market since independence, from ‘equal’ malefemale obligations to work during the communist era to the contemporary changing and unequal labour market. The Soviet system involved a high female participation rate withintheworkforce,asaresultofcommunistequalityideologiesandworking ideals. Women should be ‘emancipated’ through their participation in the labour market, and be given the opportunity to access higher education and

1In2007,womenconstituted82percentofthe31200personsemployedwithinhoteland restaurantsinLatvia.Despitetheiroverrepresentation,theyearnedmerely79percentofthe men’s average income (based on number of employed men and women “in the main job (annual average)”, aged 1574 years. The number of women employed within hotels and restaurantshasincreasedmorecomparedtothenumberofmen,fromthemid1990suntil today.In1996,around11000womenwereemployedwithinthehotelandrestaurantsector, comprisingaround2.4percentofthetotalnumberofemployedfemales.In2007,thenumber hadreached25600employedwomen,representingaround4.7percent.However,thenumber ofmenemployedwithinthehotelandrestaurantsectorhasremainedstatic;from4700people in1996,constituting1percentofthetotalnumberofemployedmen,to5600in2007,also representing1percent(LCSBdatabase,www.csb.lv,20080525).

16 ChapteroneIntroduction traditionally‘male’occupations.Still,LaFont(2001)describestheseaimsasan illusory. Women tended to end up in lowpaid jobs, and the vision of full employmentwasmainlyrootedinenforcingtheindustrialdevelopmentinthe SovietUnion.Workasdefinedbythestatebecamemoreorlessimposed,and women had to face multiple burdens, due to the fact that they remained responsibleforworkwithinthehouseholdandfamily,atthesametimeasthey wereencouragedtofulfilthesocialistidealsasfaithfulSovietlabourers(LaFont 2001; Gal & Kligman 2000a). Following independence, many work opportunitieswerelostduetoprivatisationandbudgetcuts,whileatthesame time lowfertility rates, nationalistic ideologies and welfare restructuring have pavedthewayformorestereotypicalandtraditionalgenderidentities(LaFont 2001; True 2003). Concurrently, the transition to market economy and the development of tourism have made new demands on entrepreneurship and individualism, in contrast to the previous collective mentality and largescale production. Thesispurposeandresearchquestions Theoverallaimofthedissertationisto analysethedevelopmentoftourisminLatvia fromagenderperspectiveinordertounderstandhowdifferentgenderedidentitiesingeneral, anddifferent‘femininities’morespecifically,arereflected,transformedandchallengedwithin tourism. This more comprehensive purpose can in turn be divided into two separateandmorespecificaims: Firstly, the aim is to analyse how tourism takes part in the reimagining and constructionoftheLatviannationstate,andhowdifferentspatialtourismrepresentationsin turncarrygenderisedmeaningsandidentities. Inthiscase,Iwillanalysedifferentand contestinggendered‘geographicalimaginations’ofLatvia,inwhatIrefertoas theconstructionof ‘nationalcommonspace’, whichwillbefurtherdiscussed below. The second purpose relates to the transforming Latvian labour market andwomen’sworkandlivelihoodwithintourism.Thepurposeisto analysehow thereshapingoftheLatviantourismsectoraffectswomen’slivelihoodstrategiesandpractices, andhowtheyintheirturnreflectorchallengemoredominatingandgenderisedideologiesof livelihoodandwork. Here,Iwillhighlight livelihood asacentralconceptformycase studies,inordertoanalysebothpaidandunpaidworkwithinboththeprivate andthepublicsphere,anditsspatialandsocioculturalexpressions. Theanalysisofwomen’sworkandlivelihoodwithintourismisbasedon twocasestudies,ruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict,andemploymentwithinthe

17 ChapteroneIntroduction tourismsectorinJūrmala.Inthecasestudies,thefollowingresearchquestions willbehighlighted: • Whatarethemotivesandstrategiesforwomen’semploymentandentre preneurship within tourism? What differences and similarities can be distinguishedbetweenruralandmoreurbanareas? • How do placespecific traditions and conceptions of work and liveli hoodaffectwomen’slivelihoodpossibilities? • What conditions, possibilities and restrictions are implied in women’s everydaylifethroughtheiremploymentandlivelihoodwithintourism? • Dowomen’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourismchallengeormerelyre flecttraditionalgenderrelationsandidentitiesbasedonprevailingnorms aboutlivelihood? BelowIwilldiscusscentralconceptsofthetheoreticalframeworkwhichrelates totheabovedescribedpurposesandaimsofthedissertation. Feministgeography Iwilltakemydeparturepointfromwithinthreeinterrelated theoretical con cepts; feminist geography , gender identities and femininities . There exist multiple overviews of the historical development of feminist geography both interna tionallyandinSweden(seeSchoughed.2002;Little2002).Therefore,Iwillnot goindepthintotheemergenceoffeministtheoryanditsinfluencesonhuman geography. Still, it is importanttoemphasise the diversified character of the feministgeographicalfieldofresearch,whichmeansthattheredoesnotexist one singlefeministtheoryorideology;insteadthefeministgeographyfieldin cludes multiple perspectives. Thus, it is more relevant to speak of feminist geograph ies (McDowell1999). My positioning within feminist geography is related partly to its emancipatory dimensions as part of a feminist research tradition with both theoreticalandpoliticaloriginsandpartly,theaimhasbeentoemphasisethe spatial and geographical dimensions of how gender identities are constructed and reproduced.Inthefirstcase,feministtheorieshavefocusedonhowandwhy inequalities between the sexes are constructed and reproduced, while also criticisingprevailingmasculinecharacterisedmethodsandontoepistemological frameworks within a range of disciplines, including human geography. Concurrently,thefeministcurrentsconstitutepartsofamorecomprehensive politicalproject(mainlyemergingintheWesternworld)withtheaimtochange

18 ChapteroneIntroduction actively the societal inequalities which have been discussed and made visible through research (see McDowell 1999; Johansson 2000). The geographical dimension relates to how feminist geography applies a spatial perspective to feminist theory, in which place and space are not merely given physical attributes, but also genderised meanings. Doreen Massey (1994) emphasises how the place, space and gender are treated as mutuallyinterrelated within feminist geography, which means that (in)equality between the sexes varies betweendifferentspatialcontexts. (…)spaceandplace,spacesandplaces,andoursensesofthem(andsuchrelatedthingsasour degrees of mobility) are gendered through and through. Moreover they are gendered in a myriad different ways, which vary between cultures and over time. And this gendering of spaceandplacebothreflectsand haseffectsback onthewaysinwhichgenderisconstructed andunderstoodinthesocietiesinwhichwelive(Massey1994:186,originalemphasis) Iregardthetheoreticalconcept gender asatoolforanalysisinordertounder stand the societal processes of power which position, but also subordinate, singleindividualsandgroupsbasedonsociallyandculturallycharacterisedper ceptions of masculine and feminine. The concepts sex and gender have been central inthe emergenceof international feminist theoryfromthe1980sand onwards,andareusedparallelindifferentresearchcontexts.Gender,asoppo sitetosexinamorebiologicalsense,isconsideredasasocialconstruction,a productoftheprevailingcultureandideasofwhatisconsideredasmaleand female, which varies in time and space. Recognizing gender as sociallycon structed, opens up the questioning of gender as having a ‘natural’ and biologicallydetermining order, and contributes to opportunities of change. Genderhastraditionallybeenassociatedwith‘women’duetoitscloseparallels tothefeministmovement.However,genderstudiesputfocusonthegender ised relations betweenmenandwomen,theirdifferentactivitiesandexperiences, andtheconstructionofdifferentmasculineandfeminineidentities.Themain purposeistoreveal,understandandexplain,butalsoprovidemeasurestoalter genderiseddifferencesandinequalities(WGSG1997). Ifinditimportanttoemphasisehowgenderisnotsomethingthatexists independentlyoutsidepeople’smindsandexperiences.Rather,genderisboth relational and situated , and gendered conceptions are constantly produced and reproducedthroughsocialinteractions,inthewayweviewandpositionour selvesandothers.Consequently,thewayswethinkofgenderinfluenceshow societyisorganisedandhowwerelatetoandthinkabouttheworldaroundus (McDowell 1999). The spatial dimensions of gender can in this context be

19 ChapteroneIntroduction described as the framework in which more comprehensive political and economic processes interact with and transform conceptions of femininities and masculinities, on different geographical levels. Thus, human geography constitutes a way of illustrating the interaction and interrelatedness between these different scales, in which local studies can be used to illustrate more generalsocietalphenomena(Johansson2000). Genderidentitiesandfemininities Inthisthesis,Ihavechosentousetheconceptof genderidentities rather than genderrelations.Onereasonforthischoiceisthewishtoincludeamorediver sifiedanalysisonwomen’semployment,whichfocusesonthedifferences among women, rather than treating them as one homogenous group. Thus, gender identitiesstresshoweveryindividualmayinhabitamorediversesetofidenti ties,andhowgenderintersectswithotheridentities,suchasethnicityandclass. InLatvia,thesearerelevantcategoriestoinclude,consideringthelargeRussian speaking minority and the social differences within the society following independence. Inmystudy,Ifocusonwomen’s,ratherthanmen’s,workandlivelihood in the more empiricallybased case studies. This is due to women’s over representationwithinthetourismsectorinLatviaaswellasinothercountries. Different work assignments and occupations within tourism also tend to be ascribedas‘femalecoded’work,whichusuallyresultsinthattheworkisgiven a lower status compared to traditionally ‘masculinecoded’ jobs and sectors. Yet,theaimistoseehow different genderidentitiesareconstructed,challenged andreflectedwithintourism.Inthiscase,Iwillusethetermfemininities ,which emphasisesthatthereisnosingleidentitysharedbyallwomen,butthatdiffer entnormsoffemininitiesexistparallelandvaryamongdifferentcontexts.In termsofworkandlivelihoodwithintourism,Iwillanalysehowdifferentideals of femininities are being reproduced, constructed and challenged, and how womenthemselvesactivelytakepartinthisprocess.Here,moretraditionalide alsoffemininitiescanbedistinguished,somewithrootsinLatviancultureand with a focus on women’s role within the family. Other ‘Western’ ideals of femininitiesappearintermsoflifestyleandworkingideals,whilethe‘old’so cialistidealsoffemininitiesandworklingerandarebeingnegotiated,rejected andreproduced. Iwouldsuggestthatthereareseveralexistingandpotentialconnections betweenfeministgeographyandtourismasaresearchfieldduetotheneedfor aspatialperspectiveoftourism,whichisparticularlyinterestinggiventheinter

20 ChapteroneIntroduction nationalspreadoftourismanditsmobilecharacter.However,thetheorisingof space and place within tourism research has for a long time been treated as staticandimmuneagainstgenderedconstructions.Genderperspectiveswithin tourismresearchwereintroducedevenlaterthanwithinhumangeography,and wereinfluencedbyfeministtheorieswithinotherdisciplines,suchassociology. Literature with themes of gender and tourism has been published from the mid1990s and onwards, including for example Kinniard and Hall’s (1994) Tourism, a gender analysis , MorganandPritchard’s (1998) Tourism, promotion and power ,SwainandMomsen(eds)(2002) Tourism/Gender/Fun(?)andPritchardet al.(eds)(2007) Tourismandgender.Embodiment,sensualityandexperience.Amajority oftheearlytextsisbasedonempiricalstudies,butdespitetherootsindisci plines, such as human geography, the theoretical framework has remained rather weak until recent years, when a more ‘cultural turn’ based on post structuralisttheorieshasemerged. In my dissertation I will explore the relations between space, place and genderidentitieswithintourismintwomainways.Firstly, Iwillanalysehow tourismmarketing in Latvia bears gendered and spatial representations. Secondly, the aim is to explore women’s work and livelihood within tourism fromafeministgeographicalperspective.Thesetwoaspectswillbediscussed furtherbelow. Geographiesoftourismandgender WiththeaimtoanalysehowLatviaisreimaginedandreconstructedinthepost socialistperiodbothasanationstateandasatourismdestination,Iwillillus tratethisprocessbyusingtheterm ‘national common space’ 2,whichconsistsof different genderised ‘geographical imaginations’ of Latvia as a ‘new’ nation state. I distinguish three interrelated ‘geographies’ as constituting parts of a transforming national common space: geographies of neonationalism, geographies of Europeanisation and geographies of reliccommunism . The three geographies are my own categorisations, which constitute analytical tools for understanding the spatial dimensions of the Latvian transformation process in terms of gender andtourism.Theyareinturnbasedonexistingpostsocialistresearchanddif ferent theoretical approaches to ‘transition’ and development, as well as my ownempiricalmaterialandobservations.Byusinggeograph ies,ratherthanthe singulargeography,alsoservestoillustratehoweachofthethreegeographies

2 See also what Schough (2001) refers to as “Det gemensamma svenska rummet” (The Swedishcommonspace),whichconsistsofdifferentnationalstatedirectivesofwelfareand work,aswellasdiscoursesofgenderequality,which influence gender relations on both a nationalandalocallevel(Schough2001:86f).

21 ChapteroneIntroduction may take different transforming expressions, and they are not static in their character.Theaimistoillustratethecomplexityanddiversityofthetransfor mation process, in how different postsocialist countries take multiple pathways dependingontheirnationalandlocalcontext.Thus,Iregardthetransitionasa dynamicandconstantlyongoingprocess,ratherthanmerelyacompletedone wayshiftbetweentwoknowneconomicandpoliticalsystems. Theconceptsof space and place constitutecentralpartsofthetheoretical terminologywithin human geography, andtheir meaningsanddefinitionsare persistentlydiscussedanddebatedfromdifferentepistemologicalandontologi cal standpoints. I will use both concepts in order to analyze the spatial transformationprocesseswhichhaveoccurred,andstillaretakingplaceinLat via,withaspecialfocusongenderandtourism.Eachofthethree‘geographies’ willbediscussedashavingdifferentimaginationsandinterpretationsofspace andplace.Withtheconcept‘nationalcommonspace’,Idonotrefertoafixed and static geographicallydelimited area, which would constitute the national territory of ‘Latvia’. It rather denotes how different aims and priorities for Latvia’stransitionalprocessarerevealedandprioritized.Thisincludes,forex ample,whatcommonnationalvaluesarehighlightedwithintourismmarketing, suchascultureandtraditions,whichinvolvequestionsofbelongingandtrans formingnational,ethnicandgenderisedidentities 3.Moreover,Iwillrelatethe threegeographiestodifferent femininities anddominatingideologiesofworkand livelihoodsetonbothanationalandalocallevel,whenestablishingthetheo reticalframeworkforthecasestudies 4. (Re)Imaginingnationalcommonspace Theprocessof(re)imaginingthenationalcommonspacecanbeanalysed as having directional,relational,contested and genderised features.Inthefirstcase,the geographies represent different aims of development, with specific agendas, pointingoutmultiplepathsthroughthetransitionprocess.Thus,theycanbe viewed as constituting diverse ideological projects, for instance, originating withinnationalism,neoliberalcapitalismandmultipleviewsof‘development’, with each holding a certain imagination and conception of space and place 5.

3SeeupcomingChapters24. 4SeeChapter45andthecasestudiesinJūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrict. 5Thedefinitionsof ideology aremultipleandcomplex,aswellastherelationto discourse asa concept,andwillnotbebroughtupindetailhere.Syssner(2006)callsforreclaimingideology as a concept within human geography due to its spatial dimensions, and defines it with referencetovanDijk(2004)as“(…)asetofactionrelatedideasofhowtheworldisandhow itoughttobe.Ideologyis,inotherwords,understoodasasystemsharedbyagroupof peopleandusedtomobilizeotherpeopleforaction”(Syssner2006:21).

22 ChapteroneIntroduction

Eachofthegeographiesalsoreflectdifferenttheoreticalapproachesto‘transi tion’, including, for example, theories of pathdependency evident in the geographies of reliccommunism, and more classic ‘modernisation theories’ illustrated in the geographies of Europeanisation. The transition process also involves a process of ‘looking back in history’, to the first Latvian independence, which will be discussed in terms of geographies of neo nationalism. Secondly,thereimaginingofnationalcommonspaceisnotmerelytaking place within the borders of the Latvian territory. I would suggest that the transition process is relational and takes place through both local and global networksofrelationsship,manifested,forinstance, throughEUmembership, theincreaseofforeigninvestmentsaswithintourism,andthereturnof‘exile ’fromabroad.DoreenMassey(2005)describesspaceas“theproduct of interrelations” (Massey 2005:9), emphasising space as a web of local and globalsocialinteractions.Shecallsforaspatialperspectivewhichacknowledges space(theglobal)andplace(the local)ascloselyinterwovenandinseparable. Recognizing the mutual relations between space and place means that space affects the development of places, but places also actively contribute to the constructionofspace.Inotherwords,placescannotbestrictly‘local’intheir character, but contain global relations. Massey describes place as a ‘meeting place’,inwhichdifferentsocialrelationsandnetworksuniquelyintersectfrom thelocaltotheglobal.Thus,Latvian‘local’places,whichmayrangefromthe householdtotheregion,takepartintheconstructionofthenationalcommon space and in a global context, while also being part of the effects, and vice versa.Consequently,spacedoesnotsimplyaddupasthe“sum”ofanumber ofplaces,butillustratestheinterlinkagesandrelationalcharacterofspaceand place(Massey1994;2005). Therelationalnatureofthetransitionprocessindicatesthatthenational commonspaceisconstantlytransforming,butalsoconstitutesa contested arena. Massey and Jess (1995) emphasise how different actors have different ‘geo graphicalimaginations’(Massey&JessIn:Massey&Jesseds.1995:134)ofhow placeandspaceshouldberepresentedanddeveloped, whichareboundedto thesocial and cultural context.Syssner(2006)alsoarguesthat ideologyas a conceptcontainspowerdimensionsassomeideologiesmightbemorehege monic in relation to others. Still, ideology also has to be anchored in other groupsthanmerelythemoredominating.Thus,differentimaginationsofspace maybeconflictingandcontested,whichmaybeexpressedwithinthedevelop mentoftourism.Iwouldsuggestthatthethreeidentifiedsetsof‘geographies’

23 ChapteroneIntroduction together compete, but also cooperate, in the construction of the national commonspace. Genderedrepresentationswithintourism Different imaginations and representations of space,aswellasplace,arenot genderneutralconceptsbutalsocarry genderised meanings.Thus,thethreedif ferent ‘geographies’ introduced above each represent different gendered ‘imaginations’ofspaceandplace,andreflectaconstantnegotiationofgendered identities.Massey claimsthat place asaconceptwithinhumangeographyhas tendedtorepresenta‘localwayoflife’anda‘female’realm,forexample,inthe studiesofthe‘home’orthe‘private’sphere(Massey1994:9f).Thetendencies to ‘romanticise’ place have been rejected by Massey and other feminist re searchers,emphasisingthat‘home’alsomaycarrymorenegativecharacteristics, forexample,throughfearofdomesticviolence(seeRose1993;Massey1994). Space ,ontheotherhand,hasbeenrepresentedbytheabstractandinfinite,of ten used with parallels to rational and universal scientific progress and development.Inthiscase,spaceasthe‘public’realmhasbeenprivilegedwitha more masculinecoding, inhabiting one single view of space rather than acknowledgingitsdiversity. Myintentionisnottoreproducethedivisionbetweenthefemalecoded images of place and ‘masculine’ space, but to analyse critically how representations of national common space, reproduced through tourism marketing,relatetogenderisedconceptionsofbothspaceandplace.Morgan andPritchard(1998)pointoutthatmediaisaprominentactortakingpartin the construction of gender relations within tourism, in how tourism advertisements use and reproduce female and male stereotypes in their messages,partlythroughcurrentlanguage,andpartlythroughreflectingimages and pictures. The messages within tourismmarketing often try to make a connectionbetweenthetouristandthelandscapetoestablishan imageofa place or a destination, which result in highly genderised representations (Morgan & Pritchard 1998). In the efforts to create a unified image for a tourismdestination,brochuresandothermarketingmaterialareusedinwhich menandwomenaregivendifferentrolesandsymbolism.Womenareusually embodying exotic destinations in more traditional guises, while men are represented through powerful and actionfilled images, often as the tourists themselves.Intheanalysisoftheseimages,differentformsofpowerrelations can be revealed, reflecting conceptions of the feminine ‘Other’, which are

24 ChapteroneIntroduction portrayed in multiple guises, as the foreign and ethnic exotic (Gibson In: Apostopoulosetal.2001) 6. Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism Researchquestionsrelatingtowomen’s livelihood and work withintourismcon stitutecentralpartsofmydissertation.Theabovedescribedgeographieswillbe related to an analysis of work and gender in a postsocialist context, with a focusonwhichdifferentidealsoffemininities,work,andlivelihoodcanbedis tinguished,intermsofhowlabourmarketandwelfarepoliciesareformulated intheperiodfollowingindependence,aswellaswhatpositionswomenhavein the contemporary labour market. In this case, I will discuss how more tradi tional , ‘Western’ and socialist ideals of femininities, work and livelihood are interrelated and negotiated, and represent different spatial organisations of work in relation between the private and the public sphere 7. Apart from discussingtheseidealsaspartoftheformationofthe‘nationalcommonspace’, Iwillalsoanalysehowtheseidealsareexpressed andnegotiatedinwomen’s livelihoodstrategiesandpracticesinthetwocasestudies. Livelihoodcanbedefinedas“ameansofsecuringthenecessitiesinlife” (www.oxfordreference.com20081211).Scholten(2003;In:Fribergetal.2005) undercoresthatlivelihoodhasbothsocialandmaterialdimensions,whichmay includesupportingbothoneselfandothersinaneconomicsense,butalsoasa moresocialresponsibility,andcareforchildrenorotherfamily members.In my theoretical analysis of women’s work and livelihood within the Latvian tourismsectorIwillusetheoreticalapproacheswithin feminist geography in ordertoavoidequatinglivelihoodwithwork,whichtendstomaintainthedi chotomy between the reproductive private sphere and the productive public sphere. Feminist geography has questioned the accepted, traditional spatial divisionbetweenthemalecodedpublicsphereofproduction,andtheprivate sphereofreproductionas‘women’splace’.Bydeconstructingthedualismbe tweenWorkHomeandbetweenPrivatePublic,productionandreproduction

6Thedualismbetweenthe‘Self’andthe‘Other’hasbeenusedbyfeministresearchers,such as Simone de Beauvoir and Gillian Rose, as well as within research of ethnicity and racialisation(seeJohnstonetal.eds2006).Rose(1993)emphasiseshowidentitiesare relational , constantlyconstructedinrelationto‘otherness’,whichtendtopositionpeopleinrelationto each other. Masculinity is, for example, defined in relation to femininity, creating dualisms betweenthemasculinenorm(ortheSame/Self)andthefemale,deviant‘Other’.Thus,these categorisationsareproductsofpowerrelations,andonefocusoffeministresearchhasbeen toproblematise,questionanddeconstructthesedualisms(seeRose1993). 7Theseidealsoffemininitieswillbediscussedinmoredetailinchapter5.Theseareinturn relatedtothethreegeographiespresentedabove.SeealsoTable1below,whichprovidesan overviewofthethesis.

25 ChapteroneIntroduction wereanalysedtogetherastheresultofinterrelatedprocesses.Thisisalsoem phasisedbyGillianRose(1993). Reproductionisnotexplainedwithreferenceonlytopatriarchy,norproductiontocapitalism; norisgenderconfinedtothehomeandclasstotheworkplace,for’theconstructionofgender identity actually occurs in the workplace as well as at home and in the community’ (Rose 1993:120). Rather,theintentionistoanalysethespatialpreconditionsforlivelihood,and toillustratethemutualrelationsbetweenplace,workandhome/family,which together sets the framework for women’s livelihood possibilities. Thus, the choiceofworkwithintourismdoesnothavetobepurelyeconomic,butalso reflects women’s roles and responsibilities at home and in the family (see Schough2001;Friberg1990;Scholten2003). Settingtheframeworkforwomen’slivelihood In order to illustrate the theoretical and empirical framework of the study, Figure 1 demonstrates the relations and intersections among ‘national common space’ , ‘geographies of place’ and women’s livelihood strategies and practices within tourism.ThefigurewillbediscussedinmoredetailinChapterseven,whenthe theoretical framework for the case studies will be discussed. As mentioned above,thenationalcommonspaceincludesthreedifferentcontesting‘geogra phies’,whichholddifferentreimaginationsofLatviaasanationalstateanda tourismdestination,andrelatetogenderisedidealsandideologiesofworkand livelihood. The national common space is closely interrelated to ‘geographies of place’, and the two dimensions should be analysed as mutually intertwined. Geographies of place refer to the two case study areas, which reflect more placespecific ideologies of gender, work and livelihood. The three different geographies illustrated within national common space arealsoevident in the twocasestudies,buttakedifferentexpressionsandlocalvariations.Themore urban environment of Jūrmala offers, for instance, different physical, socio culturalandeconomicpossibilitiesandrestrictionsforlivelihoodcomparedto theruralareasoftheCēsisdistrict.Thetwodifferentareasalsohavedifferent traditions of workand livelihood, which may affectwomen’spossibilitiesfor creatingalivelihoodwithintourism.

26 ChapteroneIntroduction

Figure 1: “Mind map” figure, illustrating the relations and intersections among ‘national commonspace’,‘geographiesofplace’andlivelihoodstrategiesandpractices.

Nationalcommonspace Geograp hiesof Geographiesofneo place nationalism Placespecific Geographiesof traditionsofwork Europeanisation andgender Geographiesofrelic identities communism

Individual Strategiesand Conditions intentionsfor livelihood Abstract Concrete Meansof livelihood Livelihood practices Employment Private/public Entrepreneurship Mixed Livelihood actionspace Negotiation Challenge Adjustment

Author’s own figure, inspired by Stenbacka (2001:191 Figure 6.1), Schough (2001) and Lönnbring(2003). The national common space and geographies of place together set the frameworkofwomen’slivelihoodstrategiesandpracticeswithintourism,asa wayofillustratingthestructuraltransformingprocesses.Itisalsoofimportance to take into consideration women’s personal and individual strategies and intentionsforlivelihood,whichmayreflectmoreplacespecificconditionsand constraints, but may also revealactionswhich challenge genderised normsof work and livelihood. Figure 1 illustrates how the ‘strategies/intentions’ and ‘individual conditions’ refer to the background and motives behind women’s employmentorentrepreneurshipwithintourism.‘Individualconditions’relates tobothconcreteandabstractconditionsforworkwithintourism,whichmay includeplaceattachments,butalsoaccesstohumanandeconomiccapital(see Stenbacka2001).Here,Iwillalsoanalysewomen’sstrategiesinrelationtoother traits,suchasclassandethnicity.Theindividualconsiderations,strategiesand conditions also affect the different forms and ‘means’ of livelihood, for example,entrepreneurshipand/oremployment.Theoutcomesofthestrategies

27 ChapteroneIntroduction maybedifferentfromtheoriginalintentions,andthereforethecasestudiesalso put focus on women’s everyday livelihood practices in relation between the publicandtheprivatesphere.Here,theintentionistoanalysewhat space for women’s more independent livelihood is created in relation to their practice orientations, and whether their livelihood practices involve a negotiation and challenge of, or an adjustment to, prevailing gender identities and norms of livelihoodandwork. Casestudiesandmethods Themethodologicalframeworkforthethesiswillbediscussedinmoredetailin thenextchapter.Thecasestudiesofthedissertationcanbegroupedintotwo mainparts:firstly,asectionwhichfocusesontheLatviantransformingnational commonspace,discussedonthebasisofthethreegendered geographies. In thefirstpart,Iwilldiscusshowtourismparticipatesintheconstructionofthis gendered‘nationalcommonspace’withexamplesofhowLatviaingeneraland Rigamorespecificallyaremarketedandrepresentedwithintourism. Figure2:MapofLatvianregionsanddistricts(theCēsisdistrictandJūrmalahighlighted).

Source: State Regional Development Agency Development of Regions in Latvia 2006 . Modified andpublishedwithpermissionfromtheStateRegionalDevelopmentAgency. Moreover,Iwillalsorelatethegeographiestodifferentidealsoffemininities, workandlivelihoodinbothasocialistandacontemporarycontext. Inboth cases, the empirical material consists of a text analysis of tourism marketing material as well as policyplanning documents published by different state

28 ChapteroneIntroduction institutionsregardingbothtourismdevelopmentandquestionsrelatingtothe labour market. Complementary semistructured interviews have also been conductedwithdifferentpublicactorsresponsiblefortheseissues. Secondly,I haveconductedtwocase studies concerningwomen’s work andlivelihoodwithintourism;oneintheCēsisdistrictinthecentral/eastern part of Latvia which illustrates the development of more smallscale rural tourism, the other in the city of Jūrmala, where largescale health and spa tourismhaveemerged(seeFigure2).ThecasestudiesinboththeCēsisdistrict andinJūrmalahavehadasimilardesignandaim,consistingofasurveyandan interviewstudywithbothfemaleemployeesandentrepreneurswithintourism. Structureofthethesis Thedissertationconsistsofsixdifferentparts,andthemaincontentsofparts IIVareillustratedinTable1.Thethesisisstructuredinrelationtothethree different geographies which have been introduced above, which will be dis cussed separately in part II, including Chapter 3 of geographies of neo nationalism, Chapter 4 of geographies of Europeanisation and Chapter 5 of geographiesofreliccommunism.Here,thepurposeisto‘setthescene’forthe thesisandprovideaninsightintothetransformation process in Latvia since independence, with a focus on tourism and the gendered ‘national common space’.Thedifferentthemesofthechaptersarespecifiedinthefirstsectionof Table1. Table1:Overviewofthedifferentpartsofthethesis. Geographiesof Geographiesof Geographiesof neonationalism Europeanisation reliccommunism PartII Reimaginingthe Reorientation Makingthepast Tourismand‘national Latviannation towardsWestern invisiblevs. commonspace’ throughcultural Europe. commercialisationof heritagewithin Rigaasa‘sex theSovietheritage. tourism. tourismdestination’. PartIII Reclaiming Emergenceof Continuitywith Femininities,workand traditionalidealsof Westernidealsof socialistidealsof ‘nationalcommonspace’ femininities. femininities. femininities. PartIV Theruralasa Theruralasasitefor Theruralasa Geographiesofplacein nationalsymbol. consumption. ‘problem’. theCēsisdistrict PartV Preserving Commercialising Continuityofthe Geographiesofplacein ‘Latvianness’through healthtourism. Sovietheritageof Jūrmala healthtourism. healthtourism.

29 ChapteroneIntroduction

PartIIIconsistsoftwochapters,onerelatingtonationalcommonspaceand differentidealsoffemininities,workandlivelihoodinapostsocialistcontext, andonechapterwhichlaysthetheoreticalframeworkofthecasestudieswitha focusongenderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism. Parts IV and V put focus on the case studies of women’s work and livelihoodwithintourismintheCēsisdistrictandinJūrmala.Eachparthasa similarstructureandconsistsofthreechapters:oneanalysing‘geographiesof place’, providing a local setting and framework for the three geographies of tourismandgenderincludedin‘nationalcommonspace’.IntheCēsisdistrict,I willhighlightissuesof‘rurality’,andinJūrmala,Iwillanalysetheemergenceof healthandspatourism.Thechaptersalsoprovideanoverviewofthelocalla bourmarketinboththeCēsisdistrictandinJūrmala,withaparticularfocuson women’semploymentandunemployment.Chapterninewith the Cēsis study and Chapter twelve with the Jūrmala study contain discussions of women’s livelihood strategies withintourism,basedonasurveyandinterviewstudy,witha focus on the motives for employment and entrepreneurship within tourism. ThelastchaptersofpartsIVandVprovideanoverviewofwomen’slivelihood practices withintourism,relatingtothequestionofhowtheybalancetheirevery day routines and work within tourism, and different paradoxes between their strategiesandpracticesoflivelihood.Ananalysisandcomparisonbetweenthe twocasestudiesandtheirrelationtothethreegeographieswillbemadeinthe concludingchapterofthethesis.

30

Chaptertwo Methodologicaljourneys Ourknowledgeoftheworldcannotimmediatelybetreatedasanobjectivetruth.Realityis onlyavailabletousthroughourcategories–andourknowledgeandourworldviewsarenot reflections of reality “out there” but are products of our ways of categorising the world (WintherJørgensen&Phillips2000:11,Author’stranslationfromSwedish).

Kvale (1997) describes the interviewer as a traveller , based on a postmodern metaphor,inhowtheproductionofknowledgeisa journeythroughstoriesand values, where also the researcher’s own experiences are in focus. In other words,newknowledgeisbeingproducedinthemeetingbetweentheresearcher andthepeopleheorsheconfrontsalongthejourney(Kvale1997:11).Iwould claimthatthismetaphorisrelevantformyownresearchproject,whichinmany wayshasincludeddifferentmethodologicaljourneys,bothasaforeigntourist inLatviaandasaresearcher.Still,myjourneyhasnotbeenpredefinedoral waysmovingfromonepointtoanotherwiththemainaimofreachingagiven destinationor‘objectivetruth’.Rather,thejourneyshavebeenpartofthere searchprocessitself,includingraisingawarenessofmyownroleasaresearcher. Theaimofthepresentchapteristodescribethemethodologicalframeworkof thethesisingeneralandthecasestudiesconductedinLatviamorespecifically. Iwilltakemydeparturepointfromadiscussionoffeministmethodology(ies) inordertohighlightissuessuchasqualitativeresearchandsubjectivity.There after,Iwilldescribetheresearchprocessincludingconductingtextanalysis,as wellasselectingandimplementingthecasestudiesforJūrmalaandtheCēsis district,whichincludebothasurveyandaninterviewstudy. Whatisfeministmethodology? Thechoiceofmethodologyhasaverycloserelationtoone’sownepistemology andontology,whichtogetherformourviewofknowledge,whatitconsistsof, howitcanbegrasped,aswellasourconceptionof reality and its contents. Within my own research, I consider feminist geography(ies) to be a well establishedframeworkforboththedefinitionanddesignofqualitativemethods formythesisandfieldwork.Butwhatthenconstitutesamorefeministmeth odology?Feministcurrentshavehighlightedhowresearchforalongtimehas beencharacterisedbyamasculineviewofscience,whichhasresultedintheuse

31 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys ofmoremasculinedefinedconceptsandhowmen’sexperienceshavebeenput forwardtoagreaterextentthanwomen’s.Therefore,theaimhasbeentobring outandmakevisiblewomenbothintheirrolesasresearchersandassubjects ofinterestsinstudiesofwomen’sexperiencesandlifestories(Widerberg2003; WGSG 1997). Madge et al. (1997) point out how contemporary feminist researchaimsathighlightingarangeofmasculinitiesandfemininities,andthat thefocusnolongerisentirelyon“researchon,byandforwomen”(Madgeet al.1997In:WGSG).Ashasbeendiscussedpreviously,feministgeographyis not a homogenous field of research, which also acknowledges the fact that thereexistmultiplefeministmethodologies.However,thereexistsacommon setoffeatures,whichfocusuponamorecriticalapproachtotheproductionof knowledgeandresearchmethods.Thefeministgeographicalfieldhasbeenone oftheleadingcurrentsinthedevelopmentandpromotionof qualitativeresearch methodswithinhumangeography,partlyasawayofcriticisingtheprevailing masculine character of geographical research, and partly as a way of acknowledging how theresearch process itself can beviewedas subjective and genderised.Thesetwodimensionswillbediscussedseparatelybelow,aspartof myownontoepistemologicalpositioning. Aqualitativeapproach Qualitativemethodsareoftendescribedasawayofgainingmoreanddeeper understandingforsocietalphenomena,andasamethodtogainfurtherinsight into people’s lives and experiences. The qualitative research perspectives are oftenplaced in contrasttoquantitativeresearch, reflecting a repudiation and critiqueofthepositivistresearchtraditionandepistemology,anditssearchfor ‘objective’ truths (see Limb & Dwyer eds. 2001; Silverman 2005). Silverman (2005) criticises the dualistic division between qualitative and quantitative methods, and the assumption that qualitative methods automatically are “better” than quantitative. Rather, qualitative and quantitative methods can togetherbemutuallybeneficial,forexample,inthemixofbothsurveyand/or database material,togetherwithsemistructuredinterviewsand/or participant observation(Silverman2005).Iconsideramixofmethodsasbeingbeneficial for my project for several reasons, which are related to the chosen research questions, but also to the chosen empirical field in terms of language and culturalbarriers.Thethesishasmainlyaqualitativeapproach,includingsemi structuredinterviewsandtextanalysis,butIhavealsousedmorequantitative data, in the form of a survey and Latvian statistical data, for instance, encompassingtouristarrivalsandlabourmarketstatistics.Inthelattercase,the

32 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys main data have been generated from databases distributed by the Latvian Central Statistical Bureau (LCSB) or statistical publications, while some also havebeenorderedseparatelyondemand.IntheCēsisandJūrmalacasestudies, thesurveysbecameafirststeptogainmoreempiricalinsighttoemployment within tourism in two quite different geographical areas, and served as preparatoryworkfortheupcominginterviewstudy.Inotherwords,thesurvey has been essential as a methodological tool to conduct a more qualitative orientedstudy. Methodologicalpositioningandreflectionsareessentialintheambitionto analysehowtoexplainandgainunderstandingofsocietalphenomena.There search process usually consists of a close interaction among three crucially interrelateddimensions:empiricalstudies,theoryandanalysis.Inmystudy,the methodologicalapproachcanbedescribedas abductive ,whichillustratesthein timateconnectionamongthesethreeelements,butinamorenonlinearrather thanonewayorientedmovement.AlvessonandSköldberg(1994)describethe abductiveapproachasinvolvingthesearchforamoreindepthunderstanding comparedtoinductionanddeduction.Abductionhascloseparallelstoamore inductive approach, since it starts from a more empirical context. Still, the empiricalmaterialismorecloselycombinedwiththeoreticalstudieswithinthe abductive approach, which also acknowledges the difficulties of separating “raw”empiricaldata, whichhasnotbeenanalysedandinterpretedinamore theoreticalcontext(Alvesson&Sköldberg1994).Ihavetakenmypointofde partureinageneraloverviewofthefieldofresearch,whichhasincludedearlier empiricalandtheoreticalcasestudiesofgender,tourismandlivelihoodissues. Thereafter,moreempiricalworkwasstartedinordertoprovideaninsightinto theLatviansocietyandthedevelopmentoftourisminapostsocialistcontext. Thiswasdonethroughcontactsandinterviewswithactorswithinthetourism sectoronanationalandaregionallevel,aswellasimplementationofthesurvey and interviewees with employees and entrepreneurs in the Cēsis region and Jūrmala.Thecontinuousworkhasthereafteroscillatedbetweenfurtherdevel opingthetheoreticalframework,andimplementingandanalysingtheresultsof thesurveyandthesemistructuredinterviews. Power,positioningand‘situated’knowledge (…)thinkinganddoingthe’F’wordimpliesasensitivitytopowerrelationswithinthefield, anawarenessoftheethicalroleoftheresearcherandacommitmenttotheprogressivede ploymentofresearchaswellasanunderstandingofhow theresearcher and researched havebeen gendered,sexualised,racedandclassed(Jenkinsetal.2003In: ACME no2(1)p.58,Author’s emphasis).

33 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys

Thecitationpointstoanimportantdimensionoffeministmethodology:how theresearchprocessitselfmaycontaindifferent powerrelations betweenthere searcherandthepeopleinfocusfortheresearchproject.Ifindthisquestionof particularimportancewhenpositioningmyselfasafeministresearcher,which needstobeanalysedfrommyown‘situated’andculturalcontext,asaSwedish, WesternEuropean,welleducated,middleclasswomanconductingresearchin Latvia, as a postsocialist country, representing a completely different socio culturalsetting.Whendoingresearchinacountrywhichforalongtimewas termedasbeingpartof“thesecondworld”,thesepositionsmaybearsubstan tialinfluenceontheresearchprocess.Thisnotonlyimpliespossiblecultureand language problems, but also the risk of being viewed as the privileged “outsider”whocomesmerelytocollectmaterialandknowledgetobringhome, withoutgivingsomethingback. Moreover,Ialsotendtorepresentafeministfieldofresearchwhichhas emergedlargelywithinWesternEurope,boththeoreticallyandpolitically,and whichbearssomedifferencesfromfeministmovementsandresearchdevelop inginpostsocialistcountries.Eventhoughfeministcurrentsinboth‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’ countries share many similarities, one central issue of critique within academia has been that ‘Western’ feminism often has constituted the ‘norm’forhowfeministresearch‘shouldbeconducted’inotherpartsofthe world.Liljeström(2005)emphasiseshow‘Western’and‘Eastern’feministshave tended to constitute two separate groups, each representing a sense of ‘we ness’.Ontheonehand,sheclaimsthat‘Western’feminism’sstudiesof‘Russian women’haveinvolvedtheconstructionof‘EasternOtherness’anddifference, asdeviantfrom‘Westernwomen’,andhow‘Western’feministtheoriesareap plied to an ‘Eastern’ context. On the other hand, researchers in Russia and otherpostsocialistcountriesalsotendtodistancethemselvesfrom‘Western’ feminism,whileunderscoringhowresearchneedstobedoneonthebasisof theirownhistoricalandculturalcontext(LiljeströmIn:AsztalosMorelletal. 2005:41ff). This debateclearly illustrates howthere does not exist one homogenous feminist research field, and the ‘Western’ and ‘Eastern’ versions of feminism should also be regarded as diverse and multiple rather than representing two divided units. The different perspectives provided by the ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ versions of feminism may also be mutually beneficial, rather than drawing boundaries between areas of research which may be conducted by ‘Western’ratherthan‘Eastern’feministsandviceversa.Thedebatealsoraises thequestionofhowcanaresearcherpointto‘difference’ without indirectly

34 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys contributingtoreproducing‘Otherness’.Thisrequiresaninsighttoone’sown positionasaresearcher,takingintoconsiderationhowknowledgeproduction in itself is ‘situated’, rather than making claims for an allencompassing universaltruth,whichDonnaHarawaydescribesasa“thetrick”ofreality. Rather,Harawayemphasisestheneedfor‘localknowledgeclaims’,asawayof gaining insight into which context and under what conditions knowledge is produced(Widerberg2003).Knowledgeis,inotherwords, considered to be both embodied and situated ;itisconstantlyproducedinasocialcontextanddoes notexistindependentofpeoplethemselves.Thefeministcritiquereflectsawill to understand society from within, and thereby turn research objects into subjectsandtakeintoconsiderationthecomplexsocialrelationsinwhichthey exist.Thus,objectivity,whichthepositivisttraditionhaslongstrivedfor,isnot regardedaspossibletoachieveortobedesirable(Widerberg2003; CopeIn: Moss2002).Iwillreturntothediscussionofsituatedknowledgebelow,when discussingtheinterviewstudyintheCēsisdistrictandJūrmala. Textanalysis Ihaveusedtextanalysisasaqualitativemethodinordertoanalyseanddiscuss howLatviaingeneralandRigamorespecificallyaremarketedandrepresented asgenderisedtourismdestinations.Rigawaschosenfortwomainreasons:one, theresultsofthetransformationprocesshavebeenveryfastandstrikinglyevi dentinRigaasthenationalcapitalcity.Insomesense,Rigahastakenthelead intheeconomicandpoliticaltransformationinasymbolic,materialandsocial sense.Theurbanareahasbeenthemain‘growthcentre’andsymbolofthenew Westernoriented market economy, at the same time as it participates in the reconstructionofthepreSovietLatviannationalstate.Moreover,Rigahasalso alargeRussianspeakingminority,andrepresentscontinuinglinkageswiththe East.Two,andrelatedtotheabove,tourismishighlyconcentratedintheRiga region,bothintermsofthenumberofarrivingtouristsandtheexistingtour isminfrastructure;thusRigaisrelevantforcloserfocusandamoreindepth analysis. Text analysis may include a variety of methods and have a more quantitativeorqualitativeapproach,includingananalysisoflanguagestructure, metaphors and rhetoric. In my own study, I have chosen a more qualitative approachwhichanalyseshowthetextsmaybeardifferentgenderisedmeanings, andareconstructedbydifferentactors.Onesource,Ihavechosentofocuson, is the marketing material published by public state actors due to their responsibility ofmarketing Latvia as ‘one’ tourism destination,revealingaims

35 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys andprioritiessetupbythestate.Thestateencouragesnotonlytouristarrivals, but also a particular image of the ‘new’ nation state to be communicated to both domestic citizens and foreign tourists. In this case, I have used text materialfromprintedtourismbrochuresandwebsitespublishedbythe Latvian TourismDevelopmentAgency (LTDA)andthe LatvianInstitute (LI),whichtogether constitutetwoofthemainactorsformarketingLatviainternationally,andalso servethestate’saimsoftourismdevelopmentandpromotion 8. Another source, I have used, is tourism marketingmaterial from the privatesectorinbothprintedandelectronicforms,especiallywhenanalysing Riga’snightlifeandtheuseoftheSovietheritage within tourismmarketing 9. Thematerialcanillustratethepotentialconflictbetweentheaimssetupbythe publicsector,andtheaimsofcommercialisationwhichguidetheprivatesector. Thus, the image of Latvia may have different expressions and outcomes depending on what marketing material is analysed, and thus, different perceptions of place and space may be revealed. The ‘messages’ in tourism marketing have also been analysed in relation to the different ‘geographies’, thus analysing their spatial character as well as how the texts may have ideologicalroots,therebyreflectingtheLatviantransformationprocess. Apart from tourism marketing material, I have also analysed policy documents published on a state level concerning aims of the labour market, concerning aims of future development, economic growth, entrepreneurship andemployment.Theaimhasbeentoseewhataimsandprioritiesaresetup for women’s and men’s positions and possibilities in the labour market, and analysethemfromnational,regionalandlocalcontexts,aswellhowtheyrelate toaimsandpoliciessetupbytheEuropeanUnion.Materialhasbeenselected

8 The Latvian Tourism Development Agency (LTDA) is a state institution responsible for the implementation of tourism policies set up by the Ministry of Economics, which includes supplying and distributing marketing material of Latvia as a tourism destination through channels, such as, the Internet, tourism fairs and international offices (see www.latviatourism.lv, www.em.gov.lv). The Latvian Institute is also a statefunded and governedinstitutionresponsibleforthesupplyofinformationinternationallyaboutLatvia,for example,concerningLatviancultureandhistory(seewww.li.lv).Thetextanalysisincludesin theformercaseprintedbrochures:LTDA(2004) DiscoverLatvia ,LTDA(2007) Thelandthat sings ,andmaterialpublishedelectronicallyatthewebsiteswww.latviatourism.lv.Inthelatter case,materialpublishedelectronicallyatwww.li.lvhasbeenanalysed,includingthemessuchas “MusicinLatvia”,“Society”,“Culture”,“History”,and“Nature”,whichalsoareavailableas printedfactsheetsfromtheLatvianInstitute.Formoredetails,see“Brochuresandreports” and“Internetsources”inthelistofreferences. 9Thetextanalysisincludestourismmarketingmaterialfromtheprivatesector:printedfree tourist magazines such as Riga This Week and Guide for Enjoying and websites containing informationaboutRiga’snightlife,suchaswww.nightliferiga.comandwww.partyinriga.com, as well as private tour operators such as www.rigaoutthere.com. For more details, see “Brochuresandreports”and“Internetsources”inthelistofreferences.

36 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys onthebasisofrelevanceformyresearchquestions,andontheiravailabilityin English and electronic form through official homepages of state institutions andministries 10 . Validityandreliability Inmytextanalysis,Ipositionmyselfinrelationtoamore constructivist approach, which puts emphasis on how language participates inhow we construct and makesenseofoureverydaylives,andinturndeniestheexistenceofhowlan guage can be ‘neutral’ or ‘objective’, as suggested by, for example, positivist scientificresearch.Thus,languageandtextsareabout communication and power, andreflectwhohasthepossibilityandpowertoexpressthemselves,whenand inwhatway.AsBergströmandBoréusemphasise,“texts may reflect, repro duceorquestionfor example power.But theydonot themselves constitute power” (Bergström & Boréus 2000:15, Author’s translation from Swedish). Thus,textsareembeddedinahuman,socioculturalcontext,andbyinterpret ingandanalysingtexts,socialpowerrelationsamongpeopleandactorswithin the society may be revealed. In my interpretation of the tourismmarketing material and other policy planning documents, the main focus has been on analysingdifferentgenderedrepresentations,inhowdifferentfemininitiesand perceptionsofethnicityarereproducedandconstructedbydifferentactors. What then characterises a wellperformed text analysis? Bergström and Boréus(2000)refertotwocentralconcepts: validity and reliability , whichhave their origin in more positivist research traditions and remain controversial withinqualitativeresearch 11 .Issuesofvalidityrefertotheneedtousethe‘right’ tools and adequate methods in order to provide answers for the research questionathand.However,withinsocialscience,itisnotsufficientmerelyto makesurethatthemethodsagreewiththeaimsofthestudy,butalsototake intoconsiderationtheroleoftheresearcherwhoconductsthestudybasedon her/hissituatedknowledge.Thus,questionsofvalidityarecomplexandrequire reflections of the subjective dimensions of the research process rather than

10 Thesepolicydocumentsinclude,forexample, theNationalDevelopmentPlan20072013, The Programme for Promotion of Business Competitiveness and Innovation 20072013, The National Lisbon ProgrammeforLatvia20052008, whichisapolicyplanningdocumentinlinewiththeLisbon strategy, TheProgrammeforImplementationofGenderEquality20072010,TheIntegrationofSocietyin Latvia2001, and ArenewedEUtourismpolicy.TowardsastrongerpartnershipforEuropeanTourism. Foramoredetailedlist,see“Brochuresandreports”inthelistofreferences. 11 Aseparationisoftenmadebetween internal and external validity.Inthefirstcase,theaimis tovalidatetheresultswithinthegivenstudy,whileexternalvalidityaimsatprovingwhetheror nottheresultsmaybegeneralizedintolargercontexts(seeRyen2004).Here,Irefermainlyto internalvalidity.

37 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys merelyfocusingonthestatic‘tools’usedforachievingtheresults.Here,again, parallelscan be madeto knowledgeas ‘situated’;we obtain knowledge about theworldaroundusthroughourlanguage,andasresearchers,weareapartof thisproductionofknowledgewhenreproducingitthroughourowntexts,and whileanalysingthemeaningofotheroralorwrittenformsoflanguage.Thus, theinterpretationoftextsisrootedinasocialandculturalcontextofwhichthe researcherisapart,basedonindividualknowledgeandexperience,aswellas academicperspectivesandtheories.Reliabilityisalsoneededinordertoshow thattheanalysisismadeonanaccurateandtransparentbasis,wheretheinter pretationismadevisiblebyusingcorrectreferencesandcitations(Bergström& Boréus2000:34ff). Thecasestudies:JūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrict In general, a case study puts focus on one or a limited number of units for research,fora moreindepthunderstandingofaphenomenon, with a more holisticapproach,aimedatunderstandingmultiplefeaturesofthechosencase study. Thus, the focus is put on the intensity of the study (Gerring 2007; Denscombe2000).Inmycasestudies,myintentionhasbeentostudywomen’s livelihood within tourism, and based on this, I have chosen two ‘cases’ (two geographicallydelimitedareas)inordertomakeamoreindepthanalysisofmy research questions. Multiple methods (bothqualitativeandquantitative)arealso advocatedwhenusingcasestudiesinordertogetamorecomprehensiveand detailedoverviewofthecase(s)athand(Merriam1994;Denscombe2000).The case studies in the Cēsis district and Jūrmala have included a survey and a qualitativeinterviewstudywithasimilardesignandstructureinbothregions. Themainfocusofthecasestudieshasbeeninterviewswithfemaleemployees andentrepreneurswithintourism,buttheinterviewstudyalsocomprisedrep resentativeswithinthetourismsectoronalocalandregionallevel,aswellas publicactorsinvolvedinquestionsrelatingtolocaldevelopmentandtourismin general and the labour market more specifically. Additionally, an analysis of planningandpolicydocuments,forinstance,relatingtoruralandregionalde velopment, employment and entrepreneurship, tourism development and marketingonalocallevelhavebeenconducted,togetherwithavailablelabour market and tourism statistics, in order to provide further understanding and contextfortheinterviewstudiesandsurveys. Ihavechosentomakeacomparisonofwomen’slivelihoodwithintourismin two different areas. My analysis takes place in relation to placespecific eco

38 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys nomicandsocioculturalcontextsinordertodistinguishbothsimilaritiesand differencesinwomen’slivelihoodpossibilities,strategiesandpractices.Theaim istousetheanalysisofthelocalgeographicalsettingandwomen’snarrativesin ordertounderstandthelargerpostsocialisttransformationprocess,byempha sising the interlinkages with the ‘national common space’ and feminised ‘geographiesofplace’. Selectingthecasestudies The choice of the two case studies came about through a combination of factors.Firstofall,thepurposehasbeentomakeacomparisonoftourismin two different tourism regions, which reflect the growth, development and transformationoftourisminLatvia.IntheCēsisdistrict,ruraltourismiscon sidered to have a large potential, as a tool for regional development. Rural tourism is regarded as a way of creating employment,withtheideaofcon ducting tourism on a more smallscale and sustainable basis. The Latvian countrysidestruggleswithproblemsofunemploymentandmigration toboth Riga and abroad, and a general downturn of the agricultural sector due to reformsandprivatisation.Inotherwords,thereisaneedforalternativeliveli hood possibilities apart from agriculturalwork. In Jūrmala,there hasbeena largecommitmenttothedevelopmentofhealthandspatourism,inanattempt torebuildatourismresortwhichhaditspeakpartlyduringthemiddleofthe 19 th centuryandthebeginningofthe20 th centuryasahealthresort,andpartly duringtheSovietregimewhenJūrmalawasoneofthelargestrecreationresorts within the Soviet Union. Jūrmala illustrates the transformation that Latvia’s tourismsectorisexperiencing,wherethemaingoalistoattractmorewestern touristsandlargescaleinvestments.ThecityisalsoapartoftheRigaregion duetoitsproximitytothecapital,andtakespartintheflowandmobilityof touristsfromtheurbancentre,aswellasbeingpartofalargerurbanlabour marketintermsofworkwithinthetourismsector. The second purpose for conducting the case studies in the above describedregionsistoanalysehowwomen’sworkandlivelihooddifferinmore urban and ruralcharacterised regions. The assumption is that women’s possibilitiesandconditionsinthelabourmarketvarybetweendifferentplaces, as do their means of work and livelihood within tourism as employees or entrepreneurswithintheprivateandthepublicsector.Oneaimisalsotosee how the smallscale or the largescale character of tourism affects women’s possibilitiesandconditionsforlivelihood,andhowdifferentformsoftourism reflectorchallengegenderidentities.InJūrmala,women’sworkandlivelihood

39 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys with more largescale hotels and other tourism establishments are in focus, whilethecasestudyintheCēsisdistrictincludesbothwomenasentrepreneurs andemployeeswithinruraltourism.Entrepreneurshiphasnolongtraditionin Latvia duetotheSovietregime, but todaythe Cēsis district has one of the highestnumberofregisteredentrepreneurswithinruraltourism. Thesurvey Inbothcasestudies,thecollectionofmorequantitativematerialintermsofa surveyquestionnaire has served asa backgroundand selection for the more qualitativeinterviewstudy.Quantitativedataisinthiscaseconsideredascon stituting an important background and context for the study, but is not regardedassufficientforansweringthemainresearchquestionsofthethesis. Latvia, just as many other countries in both Western and Eastern parts of Europe, lacksnational,regional and local statisticswhichcovertheextentof employmentwithintourism.Employmentwithintourismcoversadiversefield ofoccupations,rangingfromdifferentformsoftransportation to restaurants andhotels.Thus,conductingasurveyprovidesbothanopportunitytogeta generaloverviewofemploymentwithintourism,atthesametimeasitoffersa wayofgettingincontactwithrespondentsforamorequalitativestudy. Theaimofthesurveywastoprovideanoverviewof employment and entrepreneurship within both spa/health and rural tourism, as well as issues relating to livelihood. The survey was targeted at both men and women workingasemployeesandasentrepreneurswithintourism,inboththepublic andtheprivatesector.Sincethesurveyshouldcoverworkwithin bothrural andspa/healthtourism,thequestionnairehadtobe designed to cover more general questions relating to employment. The questionnaire consisted of 39 different questions and 26 different statements, divided into the following sections (1) Personal background (2) Employment within tourism (3) Additional work and income (4) Former employment and education (5) A backgroundtotheworkwithintourism.Thequestionnairecoveredarangeof survey data, including more classifying background variables (age, ethnicity, family),workorientedquestions(bothpaidworkwithintourismandhousehold work)andalsodifferentstatementsrelatingtoopinions about people’s work and reasons why they chose to work within tourism (see Appendix 3). The questionnaires were accompanied with an introductionary letter, in which information was given about the project and its aims, and Latvian/Swedish contact details. Those who returned their questionnaires with contact details

40 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys automaticallyparticipatedinalottery.Theideawastooffersomethinginreturn forparticipatinginthesurvey,andincreasetheresponserate 12 . SinceIamunabletospeakthesamelanguageasmystudyparticipants, communicationconstitutedabarrierinseveralphasesoftheresearchprocess. On the one hand, using a survey translated into Latvian/Russian provides a convenientmethodofreachingalargernumberofpeople,andisalsorelatively easytoanalysedependingonitsdesignandextent.Thequestionnairesalsoin cluded mainly “closed” questions with a given set ofalternatives,dueto the limited possibility of translating and interpreting the answers. On the other hand, designing, translating and analysing the questionnaire may also in itself provide difficulties and challenges. The translationofthe questionnairefrom EnglishtoLatvianandRussianwasdonecloselytogetherwithnativeLatvian andRussianspeakers,inordertoavoidthepotentialrisksofmisunderstandings andmisinterpretations.Still,atranslationprocessisneverallneutralandalways includessomedegreeofinterpretation,wheretheinitialmeaningoftheword may go through some transformation. Cultural differences, for example concerning the Latvian educational system and income variables were high lighted and discussed, which resulted in some modifications of the survey during the translation process. In total, 723 questionnaires were distributed, including222intheCēsisdistrictand501inJūrmala,whichtogethergenerated 256replies(seeTable2). Table2:OverviewofthesurveystudyintheCēsisdistrictandJūrmala. TheCēsisdistrict Jūrmala Numberofdistributed 222 501 questionnaires Numberoftourismfacilities 97 20 Numberofreplies 89 167 Responserate(%) 72* 33** *Percentageofthetotalnumberofaddresses. **Percentageofthetotalnumberofquestionnaires. Inbothcasestudyareas,itwasdifficulttoidentifyandestimatethesizeand characteristicsofthepopulation(suchasage,family conditions,employment

12 IntheCēsisdistrict,tworespondentsreceiveddayticketstoLivuAquaparkinJūrmala,and in Jūrmala, one participant was offered a weekend stay in the Cēsis district. In the Cēsis region,thewinnerswerevisitedpersonallyduringthefieldwork,andinJūrmala,thewinner was contacted by the ruraltourism association,LaukoCelotajs,whowasresponsible for the practicalarrangementsoftheweekendstay.

41 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys etc.)forthesurveyduetothelackofstatisticsandpreviousstudies.Thus,the surveybecamemoreexplorativeandservedasawayofgaininganoverviewof employmentandentrepreneurshipwithintourism,whilemakingitdifficultto analyse the responses in relation to the original populations. The response frequenciesinthetwoareaswillbediscussedseparatelybelow. TheCēsisdistrict IntheCēsisdistrict,questionnairesweresentoutbymailtoaddressesacquired fromthetouristinformationcentreinCēsis,whichconsistedoftheirregistered rural accommodation and other tourismrelated activities in the district. It shouldbementionedthatthereexistseveralmoreaddressesofaccommodation andothertourismrelatedservicesnotincludedonthislist,butthesehavenot beenapartofthissurvey.Thesurveycovered97differentaddressesin21dif ferentruralmunicipalities,includingdifferentformsoftourismaccommodation (hotels, guesthouses, holiday homes, country homes, youth hostels, camping andtentsites,holidaycentres),tourismactivitiesandsightseeingpointsofin terest,touristinformationcentresandsuppliersofcrafts,artsandagricultural products. Employment in rural tourism is difficult to estimate since it often comprises both official and unofficial types of work, especially within more familybased businesses. Fourteen different addresses received four questionnaires each, which were estimated to have a larger number of em ployees, for example, hotels and tourist information centres. The other 83 addresses (including smaller guesthouses and other accommodation places) receivedonlytwoquestionnaires,sincetheywereestimatedtoincludemainly familybusinessesorthoseselfemployed. All distributed questionnaires were in Latvian since the Cēsis district constitutes a fairly homogenous population, with around 80 percent ethnic Latvians.ThequestionnairesweredistributedinthelastweekofJune2005,and the last date for returning the questionnaires was set to 1 August 13 . In the beginningofAugust,repliesfrom34addresseshadbeenreceived,comprising 50 different questionnaires. Due to the low response frequency, the initial contactwasfollowedbypersonalvisitstosomeoftheaddressesintheCēsis district.ThesevisitswereconductedinAugustwiththehelpofaninterpreter, whiletravellingaroundthedistrictsandinterviewingwomenemployedwithin rural tourism. A total of 37 addresses were visited, which brought 39 new replies.Someoftheaddressesturnedouttobequiteperipherallocations,and

13 A return envelope together with Latvian postage was enclosed, marked with a Latvian address.ThequestionnaireswerelatercollectedandsenttoSweden.

42 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys theabsenceofroadsignsmadethemsometimesimpossibletofind.Inother cases,badroadconditions,whichincludedeverythingfromloosegravelroads withtheriskofcardamagetooverfloodedforesttracks,madeitimpossibleto reach some of the addresses. Still, the extra time and effort was worthwhile; partlyduetoahigherresponserate,andpartlysincethevisitsgaveanadded valuetothestudybyprovidinganopportunitytomeetpersonallythepeople involved in rural tourism, and to answer their questions about the research project.Thepersonalvisitsalsogavesomeinsightintothelowresponserate. Thosewhohadnotreturnedthequestionnaireclaimedthatitwasduetoalow personalinterestinthetopic,thatthequestionnairewasjustoneofmanyother surveys, a lack of time, the questionnaire was too extensive and time consuming,orthattheyhadjustforgottenaboutit. Jūrmala In Jūrmala, being a more densely clustered environment, 501 questionnaires weredistributedbypersonalvisitsto20different addresses in Majori, which can be described as both the historical and contemporary tourism centre of Jūrmala. Here, a majority of the commercial activities has taken place, and whereanumberofhotels,restaurantsandshopshavebeenlocatedalongthe pedestrian street Jomas iela . The background to why this particular part of JūrmalawaschosenwasalsoduetothatMajorihasexperiencedthemostrapid transformation in terms of large newly renovated and reopened spa hotels, whichhaveasubstantialnumberofemployees.Thedelimitationforthesurvey wasonceagaingeographicalandbasedonofficiallistingsofdifferenttourism services from the local tourism information centres. The addresses included different forms of accommodation (hotels, guest houses, etc), tourist informationcentres,andtourismsites. It was again difficult to estimate the given target population for the survey. The hotels and other accommodation places had between2and 500 employees,andatthelargerhotelsthestaffoftenworkeddifferentshifts.Initial contactsweremadeofeachofthehotels,mainlywiththemanagersordirectors atthehotels,askingiftheywerewillingtoparticipateinthesurvey 14 .Theques tionnaires were then distributed among the different sections of the hotel, rangingfromtherestaurant,healthandspa,andreception.Betweentwoand 223questionnaires weredistributed at the hotelsand collected within4 days, andatthelargerhotelstherepliesthereforecomprisedthosepeopleworking

14 One hotel actively chose not to participate in the study and claimed that the answers requiredconfidentialinformation,forexample,aboutthestaff’ssalaries.

43 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys duringaparticularshift.QuestionnairesinbothLatvianandRussianweredis tributedsincearound50percentofthepopulationinJūrmalaspeakRussianas theirfirstlanguage. Replies were received from 16 out of 20 addresses, constituting 164 questionnaires. This represents a low response frequency of only around 33 percent,whichmayhaveseveralexplanations.Firstofall,itturnedouttobe muchmoredifficulttogetaccessintothedifferenttourismestablishmentsthan whathadatfirstbeenplanned.Comparedtothesurvey in the Cēsis district where the fairly large geographical area and more physical attributes set the limitsforhowmanyquestionnairescouldbecollected,Jūrmalaprovidedmore socialandculturalbarriers.Theinterestforparticipatinginthesurveyturned out tobe low; people showed a fairly skepticalattitude,oftenduetolackof timeorinterest.Thesurveywasnotregardedas‘business’andthereforenot veryrewardingforthehotelortheemployees.Ibecamewellawareofmyrole asan‘outsider’inthissituation,partlyduetomy limited possibility to ‘read’ culturally and foresee the situation, and partly due to the language barriers which sometimes could create misunderstandings, especially in the smaller hotels.Ididnotuseaninterpreterwhendistributingthequestionnaires,which would,whenlookingback,havecreatedabitmorelegitimacyasaresearcher. Secondly,thehierarchicalstructurewithintheorganisationsalsosetlimitsfor thedistributionofthequestionnaires.Itwasdifficulttogetincontactwiththe “right” people, and the managers sometimes did not seem interested in forwardingthequestionnairetopeopleemployedinlowerpositions.However, I would think that the response rate would have been much lower if I had chosentodistributethequestionnaires,forexample,onlyviaregularmail. Analysingtheresultsofthesurvey Amorequantitativeanalysisofthesurveymaterialhasbeenconductedbyusing thestatisticalcomputerprogramSPSS,inordertohandleeffectivelytherela tively large data from the questionnaires 15 . The returned questionnaires were coded, and data variables were created and structured based on the different questionsincludedinthesurvey.Anumberofstatisticaltablesandfigureswere thengeneratedinordertocreateanoverviewoftheresultsofthesurvey.The surveywasusedintwomainways:firstly,thestatisticalmaterialconstitutedan importantbackgroundfortheinterviewstudyintermsofsex,ethnicity,ageand family structure among the respondents. The large overrepresentation of women in the Jūrmala case study made it difficult to compare the statistics

15 SPSSisanabbreviationfor StatisticalPackagefortheSocialSciences.

44 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys basedonsex.Moreover,somequestionshadbeengiventoomanyalternatives foranswers,whichalsomadeitdifficulttogeneratemorereliabledata. Secondly,theresultsofthesurveywerenarroweddownandrelatedtothe main themes of the interview study: for instance, the distribution of employment and entrepreneurship, income levels, and the division of householdrelatedwork.Theanalysisofthesurveymaterialalsofocusedonthe motives for work within tourism, which included partly different statements relatingtowhytherespondentshadchosentoworkwithintourism,andpartly more openended questions. In the latter case, the results were analysed in relation to the interview material, which together provided the basis for analysingdifferentmotivesandstrategiesoflivelihood.Analysingtheresultsof thesurveywasalsomadeincollaborationwithaLatvian/Russianspeaker,who translated the openended questions of the survey as well as additional commentsintoEnglish. Implementationoftheinterviewstudy Thecharacteroftheinterviewsinthecasestudiescanbedescribedasqualita tive and semistructured. Kvale (1997) described this form of interview as something inbetween a structured and unstructured interview; “(…) an interviewwhich aims at receiving descriptions of the interviewee’s life world, withthepurposeofinterpretingthedescribedphenomena’smeaning”(Kvale 1997:13,Author’s translation from Swedish). All interviews are not automati cally qualitative in their form and design, and Svensson and Starrin (1996) describequalitative interviewsasawayof“findingout, discover,understand, figure out the character or quality of a phenomenon” (Svensson & Starrin 1996:53).Theaimisusuallytocreateaconversationordiscussionbetweenthe researcherandtheinformantbylettingpeoplethemselvestellabouttheirex periences and lives. Another advantage with qualitative interviews is that the questionscanbeadjustedduringtheinterview,andtherebycreatebetterpre requisitesforatwowayconversation. Reflexiveinterviewsandfeministresearch Feminist research has emphasised the need for dissolving the traditional dichotomybetweentheresearcherandtheobjectofstudy,andinsteadtriesto makevisibletheresearcher’sroleandsubjectiveexperiencesintheproduction ofknowledge(Widerberg2003;WGSG1997).Ashasbeen discussed above, thisraisesquestionsofexistingpowerrelationsbetweenresearcherandinfor mant,andhowtheresearcherhimself/herselfcannotbetreatedasa‘neutral’

45 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys anddisembodiedagentinthesearchforobjectiveknowledge.Feministresearch hasputhighdemandson reflexivity intheresearchprocess,asawayforthere searcher to create awareness and reflect over how one’s own experience and “culturalbaggage”affecttheinterviewsituation(Widerberg2003).Asawayof achievingamoretransparentandreflexiveapproach,aresearchdiarywaskept throughoutthefieldwork,inwhichreflectionsovermethodologicaldilemmas weremade,aswellasimpressionsofeachoftheinterviews. Falcon AlHindi and Kawabata (2002) claim that the advantage of reflexivity is that differences between the researcher and the informant need not necessarily be regarded as negative and restraining. Instead, what is important is to acknowledge how different identities collaborate in the productionofknowledge(FalconAlHindi&KawabataIn:Moss2002).Thus, the researcher is visible in his or her role as a researcher, and both the researcher and the informant can use different identities in the interview situation,asawayofpositioninghim/herselfinrelationtotheworld.Feminist researchacknowledgeshowtheresearchprocessisapracticewhichexpresses powerrelationsbetweentheresearcherandtheinformant,basedonpersonal traits,suchassex,classandethnicity.Theidentitieswhichareuncoveredduring an interview may be more complex, contradictory and changeable than first predicted. Emerging differences and similarities can also be undermined by misunderstandings and misinterpretations, as a consequence of both parts trying to ‘read’ each other and position themselves (Pini 2003; Valentine In: Moss2002).Inotherwords,acertaindegreeof“performance”takesplacein theresearchprocess,wheredifferentidentitiescollaborateandaffectdifferent contexts. This can, in turn, create possibilities for establishing a ‘common ground’fordiscussionsandinterviews(Pini2003;FalconAlHindi&Kawabata In:Moss2002).Intheinterviewstudy,Itriedtoreflectovermypositionasa researcher,andmyroleasaSwedishand‘Western’ European, welleducated woman in the interview situation, which indirectly may comprise different formsofpowerrelations.Atthesametime,Icouldalso identifymyselfasa ‘tourist’or‘guest’whenvisitingpeople’shomesanddiscussingtourismasboth asocietalphenomenonandeconomicactivity,whichinturncouldconstitutea ‘commonground’fortheinterview.Thismadeiteasiertoestablish aninitial contactasaforeign‘nonLatvianspeaker’,andcreateamore‘open’dialoguein myroleasa‘guest’ratherthanasa‘researcher’.

46 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys

Workingwithaninterpreter Gainingaccessandinsighttopeople’slivesinthisstudyhasbeenpossiblewith thehelpofaninterpreter.Inamajorityoftheinterviews, three parties have been present, which can affect the research process and its results. In other words,itisnotonlynottherelationbetweentheresearcherandtheinformant which calls for attention in how knowledge is produced, but also the inter preter’s own experience, knowledge and performance has to be taken into consideration.Theinterpreterbecomes,ontheonehand,acruciallinktothe respondents, but constitutes, on the other hand, despite his/her excellent knowledgeofthelanguage,afilterofthereceivedinformation.Thereisalack ofliterature,alsowithinfeministresearch,whichdiscussestheeffectsandproc ess of working with an interpreter. Using a fieldwork assistant or interpreter/translator in research is a phenomenon mainly used in anthropological and ethnographic research, where extensive fieldwork is a crucialwayofgainingaccesstoforeignculturesandcountries. Thechoiceofaninterpreterforthefieldworkisanimportantissue,for example, in terms of his/her communication and language skills, and interpretingexperience.Despitetheserightqualifications,itisdifficulttoknow howwellthecooperationbetweentheinterpreterandtheresearcherwillwork. IchoseanativeLatvianspeakerwithgoodlanguageskillsinSwedish,English andRussianfortheinterviewstudy,whohadlivedandworkedinSwedenfora few years. Swedish rather than English was used in the interview situation, whichIwouldclaimbecameanadvantage,sinceitwaseasierformeinmyna tivelanguagetodiscussandexplainlanguagedifferencesandproblemsinthe interpretation process. The presence of a male interpreter for the interviews withfemaleintervieweescanbediscussedashavingbothadvantagesanddisad vantages. Still, a male interpreter has not been experienced as negatively affectingtheoutcomesoftheinterviewstudysinceamajorityoftheinterviews was characterised by outspokenness and ‘openness’ in a dialogue among all threeparties.Asaforeignfemaleresearcher,havingamaleinterpreterseemed tocreatemorelegitimacyfortheresearch,andmyinterpreteralsotookonthe roleandidentityasa‘local’.Ontheotherhand, itisalsodifficultasa ‘non Latvian/Russianspeaker’tofully‘read’andinterprettheinterviewsituationand possibletensionsbetweentheinterpreterandinterviewee. Duringtheinterviews,theaimwastogaincloseatranslationaspossible ofwhathadbeensaidratherthanabriefsummary, inordertoraisefurther questions,avoidpotentialmisunderstandingsandplacetheinformationwithin a larger context. Translating more wordforword has its delimitations, since

47 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys languagedoesnotonlymerelyreflectagivensetofwordsorsymbols;language has a cultural context and meaning, which makes the interpretation process morecomplex.Somewordsorexpressionscannotbetranslatedwordforword andthiscallsforcarefulattention,sincethetranslations have to be analysed anddiscussedtogetherwiththeinterpreter.Therefore,usinganinterpreteralso changesthestructureoftheinterview,whichallpartieshavetogetusedto.On theonehand,theaimwastocreatespacefor theinformant to discuss the questionsandthemesopenlyand inamore narrativeform,butontheother hand,translatingandinterpretingalsorequiredtheintervieweetomakepauses. Thissometimescreatedafragmentationoftheinterviews,whereitwasdifficult to keep a flow of the conversation. At the same time, the need for longer pausesalsocreatedtimeforfurtherreflectionsonwhathadbeensaid,andfor measaninterviewertomakenotes. InterviewswithemployeesandentrepreneursintheCēsisdistrictandJūrmala Qualitativeinterviewswithemployeesandentrepreneursinthetwocasestudy regionshavebeenthemainfocusinmystudyconcerningwomen’slivelihood strategiesandpracticeswithintourism.Intotal,20interviewswereconducted withfemaleemployeesinbothJūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrict,and11interviews withfemaleentrepreneursintheCēsisdistrict(see Table3).Additionally, 12 interviews(sixineachcaseregion)wereimplementedwithrepresentativesfrom the local municipalities and different tourism organisations responsible for tourismdevelopmentandmarketinglocallyorregionally. Table3: Overviewoftheinterviewstudy. TheCēsis Jūrmala district Interviewsfemaleemployees 4 16(+2)*

Interviewsfemaleentrepreneurs 11 0

Interviewswithmunicipalities 6 6 andtourismorganisations Total 20 24 *InJūrmala,interviewswiththreefemalehotelmanagerswereconducted.Oneofthemhad also been selected for the interview study of female employees within the tourism sector. Therefore,onlytwoofthehotelmanagersarepresentedwithinparentheses. TheselectionfortheinterviewsinbothJūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrictwasbased onthereturnedquestionnaires.IntheCēsis district,the interview studywas conductedinAugust2005,andinMajori,Jūrmala,ittookplaceinApril2006.

48 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys

IntheCēsisdistrict,50questionnaireswerereceived,comprisinganswersfrom 30women,ofwhich21hadregisteredtheirinterestforaninterview.Ofthe 132femalerespondentsintheJūrmalasurvey,63hadstatedthattheywould liketoparticipateintheinterviewstudy.Thechoiceofinterview participants was aimed at seeking and highlighting differences, for example, according to age, family, whether they worked as employees/entrepreneurs, work assign ments, ethnicity, and place of residence. In the end, 15 interviews were conducted in the Cēsis district, including both employees and entrepreneurs, and16interviewswithfemaleemployeesweremadeinJūrmala.Theaimwas nottoreachacertainnumberofinterviews,buttoattaina‘saturationdegree’, orapointatwhichtheinterviewshadprovidedenoughrichandvariedcontent (seeKvale1997;Ryen2004).Originally,theintentionhadbeentointerviewa fewfemaleentrepreneurswithintourismalsoinMajori,butthisprovedtobe difficultduetothelownumberofrespondentswhostatedthattheywereactive entrepreneurs. Interviews were also conducted with three hotel managers in Majori,inwhichamajorityofthesurveyrespondentsworked,withthepurpose ofgaininganinsightintotherecruitmentprocesstothehotels,theworkpoli ciesandconditionsforemployment. Allintervieweeswerecontactedbyphoneinordertomakearrangements fortheinterview,butinJūrmala,itprovedtobemoredifficulttofindthose willingtoparticipateintheinterviewstudy.Thiswasrelatedtotheemployees working in shifs, which could create problems in scheduling a time for an interviewaswellasfindingaplacewheretheinterviewcouldbeconducted.In somecases,theinterviewtookplaceattheworkplace,inothercasesatalocal café or restaurant. The latter two cases often represented rather loud and ‘stressful’environments,andsomeofthefemaleintervieweesstatedthatthey onlyhadtimeforashorter(11.5h)interview.Meetingattheirworkplacealso providedthepossibilityofgaininginsightintotheirworkingenvironment,and usuallyamore‘private’placefortheinterviewcouldbearranged.Apartfrom their work hours, the interviewees’ attitudes towards participating in an interview study were also rather skeptical, and reflected a degree of caution. Whenlookingbackafterimplementingthestudy,thismayhavebeenrelatedto theuseofunofficialwageswithinthetourismsector,whichwasconsideredto bearathersensitiveissue.Someoftheintervieweesturneddowntheofferfor an interview even though they had specified their wish to participate on the questionnaire,andtwointervieweesdidnotevenshowupforthemeetingor cancelled at a later time. Others had left their jobsatthehotelsanddidnot workwithintourism,reflectingthehighturnoverofstaff.

49 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys

IntheCēsisdistrict,theintervieweeschosethelocationfortheinterview themselves,whichoftenrepresentedaplaceforbothworkandhome,sincea majority were working as entrepreneurs within rural tourism. Therefore, the interviewscouldtakeplaceindoorsatthekitchentable,oroutdoorsonave randa or in the garden. Compared to Jūrmala, this provided a much more ‘relaxed’atmosphere,andtheintervieweeswereinamajorityofcaseswillingto dedicatealotoftimefortheinterviews.Intwocases,thewomen’shusbands were present during the interview, who also had answered the questionnaire andwereactivelyinvolvedinthefamilyrunbusiness.Itisdifficulttoanalyse whateffectthishadontheinterview,butinbothcases, the women took an activeroleintheinterview.Theinterviewswereoftenfollowedorprecededby aguidedtourofthesurroundingswhere,forexample,accommodationfacilities andotherdimensionsofthetourismactivitieswereshown.Ifpossible,accom modationwasalsoprovidedforatthedifferentlocations.Thiswasawayof gaining more insight into the tourism business, and also a way of showing gratitudefortherespondents’participationinthestudy.However,thiswasnot possible in all cases; sometimes the accommodation was fully booked, and someofthelocationsdidnotofferovernightpossibilities. Theinterviewsincludedopenendedquestionsbasedondifferentthemes relating to the questionnaires, with the aim of gaining a deeper insight and understanding to their answers. The themes included personal background (education, family, work experience), the rural tourism business (structure, visitors,activities),motivesbehindstartingthetourismbusiness,currentwork within tourism, additional work, leisure time, income and livelihood, future plans(seeAppendix1and2).Thequestionswereadjusteddependingonifthe respondent was an employee or an entrepreneur. All interviews in both the CēsisdistrictandinJūrmalaweretapedandlastedbetweenoneandfouranda halfhours.Thelongerinterviewsessions(especiallyintheCēsisdistrict)were aneffectoftheneedforinterpretationfromLatviantoSwedish.Thelonger interviewswerealsorelatedtotheinterviewees’interestinthedifferentsubjects andhowopenlythey wantedtoshare informationand stories of their work within tourism. In general, the respondents tended to respond openly to the questions, and were willing to share information about their everyday and personal lives. A few of the interviewees even expressed how the interviews serveda ‘therapeutic’purpose,givingthemthepossibility of discussing their everydaylivesandconcerns.Someofthethemesoftheinterviewsprovedtobe moresensitive,especiallythoserelatingtoincome,whichoftenincludedissues ofundeclaredwagesorprofits.Questionsrelatingtocitizenshipandlanguage

50 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys lawswerealsoregardedasbeing‘personal’forsomeoftheRussianspeaking respondentsinJūrmala. Interviewswithstaterepresentativesandtourismorganisations Apart from interviews conducted with women working within tourism in JūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrict,theinterviewstudyalsoincludeddifferentstate representativesonthenational,regionalandlocallevels,aswellasrepresenta tivesfromdifferenttourismorganisations.Theinterviewswithdifferentofficial representatives can be categorised as informant interviews , unlike the above describedinterviewswithfemaleemployeesandentrepreneurs,whichmaybe labeledas respondentinterviews. Inthelattercase,theaimistogaininsightintothe interviewees’individual relationship toward a phenomenon inquestion,while informantinterviewsincludeacquiringknowledgeaboutagivenresearchques tionthroughtheobservationsofpeopleas‘witnesses’(Kvale1997:197).Thus, theinformantscanbesaidtorepresentthe‘official’imageandagendaofthe municipalitiesandtourismassociations,whichmayalsoaffecttheoutcomesof theinterviewsinaless‘critical’direction. On the national state level, the interviews have includedrepresentatives fromthe LatvianTourismDevelopmentAgency ,the MinistryofWelfare ,responsible forlabourmarketandgenderpolicy,theMinistryofRegionalDevelopmentandLocal Governance ,governingquestionsofregionaldevelopment,andThe LatvianNa tionalCentreforTraditionalandPerformingArts ,astateinstitutiongovernedbythe MinistryofCultureandresponsiblefortheorganizationandimplementationof thenationalsonganddancefestival 16 .Theinterviewshavehadanopenended and qualitative character, and have been conducted in English. Some of the interviewshavebeensupplementarytothetextanalysis,inordertoprovidean overviewofquestionsrelatingtotourismdevelopmentandmarketinginLatvia in general,accordingtodifferent state aims and policies, but also to discuss morespecificissuesoftourism,suchas,regionaldevelopmentandmorecon troversialquestionsconcerningsextourism.OtherinterviewswiththeMinistry ofWelfarehaveincludedquestionsaboutaimsandstructuresofthecontempo rarylabourmarketandgenderequalitypolicies. In the Cēsis district and in Jūrmala, interviews were conducted with representatives from the local municipalities and different tourism

16 TheorganizationandimplementationoftheLatviansonganddancefestivalisregulatedby lawinthe SongandDanceCelebrationLaw ,whichwasadoptedbytheparliamentin2005.Other lawsincludetheassignmentsandrolesofthe CounciloftheSongandDanceCelebration ,aswellas the TheLatvianNationalCenterforTraditionalandPerformingArts fortheimplementationofthe festival.SeethehomepageoftheMinistryofCulture,www.km.gov.lvformoreinformation.

51 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys organisations.Theaimwastoplacewomen’sworkwithintourisminawider economicandsocioculturalcontext,includingissuesrelatingtowomen’sand men’spossibilitiesinthelabourmarket,issuesrelatingtoregionaldevelopment andthedevelopmentoftourisminthegivenarea.InJūrmala,interviewswere implemented with different representatives from the city council, including three interviewees working within tourismmarketing and development, and twopersonsresponsibleforlabourmarketissues.Additionally, one interview wasalsoconductedwithaconsultantwhohadcompletedastudyofthelabour marketinJūrmala,commissionedbytheJūrmalacitycouncil. IntheCēsisdistrict,interviewswereconductedwithfourrepresentatives from three different rural municipalities, as well as two representatives from regionaltourismassociationsbasedinthetownofCēsis.TheCēsisdistrictis one of 26 administrative districts ( rajons ) in Latvia and is divided into 21 different rural municipalities ( pagasts ). In the rural municipalities, interviews were conducted with the chairmen of the municipalitycouncil(2menand1 woman),aswellasafemalerepresentativefromatouristinformationcentre. Theselectionofthethreeruralmunicipalitieswasbasedpartlyonaninterview withapublictourismorganisationinCēsis,whichhasacoordinativerolefor tourismdevelopmentandmarketinginthewholedistrictandcouldprovidea background for the development of tourism in the different municipalities. Municipality selection was also based on the size of the population, geographical location of the municipalities and the representation of intervieweeswithinthegivenareas. TheinterviewshadasimilarstructureanddesigninboththeCēsisdistrict and in Jūrmala, and included questions about the structure of the labour market,includingemploymentandunemployment,howdifferentmunicipalities workedwithtourismdevelopment,whatproblemsandpossibilitiestheyfaced inthisprocess,whatsupportwasgiventotourismandlocalentrepreneurs,and whatroletourismwasgivenontheiragenda.Theinterviews weretaped and lasted one to two hours, and in the Cēsis district, they were conducted in Latvianwiththehelpofaninterpreter.InJūrmala,amajorityoftheinterviews wereheldinEnglish,achoicemadebytheintervieweesthemselves. Analysingtheinterviewmaterial AllinterviewsweretranscribedandanalysedintheirSwedishversions.Selected quotationsforthethesiswerelatertranslatedfromSwedishtoEnglish.Dueto theratherextensivematerial,Ichosetodothetranscriptionoftheinterviews myself.Ontheonehand,thisallowedmetogothroughtheinterviews ina

52 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys moredetailedmannerwhichalsofacilitatedtheanalysisprocess.Ontheother hand,usinganinterpreterforthisprocessmayhavesecuredthetranslationsof theinterviewsmoreclosely,butthisoptionwasunavailable due to time and budgetconstraints.TranslatingthequotationsfirstlyfromRussian/Latvianto SwedishintheinterviewsituationandlaterintoEnglishhasitsdelimitations, andmayriskthatpartsoftheoriginalstatementsarelost,bothinstructureand culturalmeanings.Inmystudy,Ihaveweighedthesedisadvantagesagainstthe wishtohighlightandmaketheintervieweesvisibleasnarrativesubjectswhen discussingwomen’slivelihoodandstrategieswithintourism,ratherthanmerely summarisingthemainresultsoftheinterviewstudy.Myaimhasbeentotreat theintervieweesasanonymouslyaspossiblewhenpresentingtheresultsofthe casestudies. Therefore,Ihaveusedassumednames,andsometimes replaced otherpersonalspecifications,suchasage. Analysingqualitativedataisaprocesswhichdoesnotmerelystartwhen allthematerialhasbeencollected,butisaconstantlyongoingandinteractive procedure throughout the project. Conducting interviews may generate new questions in need for analysis or new theoretical angles of approach, which illustratestheinterrelationbetweenanalysisandempiricalwork(Grønmo2004; Ryen2004).Thecodingprocessoftheinterviewmaterialcanbedescribedas havingamore interpretative and analytic approach,aimedatdistinguishingdiffer entmeaningsandunderstandingsofthetext,ratherthanmerelydescribingits contents (Grønmo 2004:246). As stated above, I have used an abductive approach,which inthe codingprocessincludedboth conducting an analysis generatedfromtheempiricalmaterialitselfinordertogainnewperspectives,as wellasapplyingthetheoreticalframeworktothefindings.Whenanalysingthe interview material, different central themes were extracted from the material, whichin turn were exploredin more indepth bylooking for additional sub themes,revealingbothcontradictionsandparallelsintheinterviewstatements. Exploring and identifying the themes in the interview material have been conductedbothinrelationtothemaintheoreticalapproachesofthethesisas wellasbeingmoreempiricallygenerated.Inotherwords,theaimhasnotbeen to merely ‘confirm’ theoretical statements and previous research, but to find and reveal alternative interpretations and knowledge based on the empirical material. The three ‘geographies’ which are central to this thesis have slowly emergedintheanalyticphasesoftheresearchprocess,bothwhenmakingthe textanalysisandwhenanalysingtheinterviewmaterial.Inthelattercase,the aim has been to illustrate the complexity and diversity of the geographies as wellastherelationsbetweenthem,bynotmerelytreatingthemasthreestatic

53 Chaptertwo–Methodologicaljourneys categorisations, but as a way of opening up for multiple interpretations of women’severydaylivesandlivelihoodwithintourism.Onewayofhighlighting the variety and density of the interview material has been to put focus on different paradoxes ofwomen’slivelihood,andtherebyrevealingcontradictions betweentheirlivelihoodstrategiesandeverydaypractices.Itshouldbestressed that the analysis of women’s livelihood practices and strategies not merely revealedparadoxes,butalsoshowedexamplesofhowstrategiesandpractices agreed. However, I have chosen to highlight the paradoxes in my analysis in order toemphasise thecomplexityof women’s everyday lives and livelihood, whichwasrevealedintheinterviewstudy. Issues of validity and reliability , as discussed above, are often raised as central issues when analysing texts in general and interview material more specifically.Still,thequestforvalidityremainscomplex,sincemyaimhasnot beentoreachandconfirm‘truths’intheinterviewnarratives,buttotreatthem as multiple, ‘situated’, subjective experiences and statements. Thus, it may be more useful to speak of credibility rather than validity, since it does not presuppose an objective reality, and acknowledges the researcher herself/himselfaspartoftheproductionofknowledge(seeKvale1997:Ryen 2004) 17 .Kvale(1997)claimsthatvalidityincludesmorethanmerelyexamining the‘right’methodsforthestudy,butalsofortheresearchertocontrolcritically andexaminehis/heranalysisinacontinuousmanner,inordertoopenupfor multiple and alternative interpretations and further observations. Moreover, Kvalealsoemphasisestheneedforcontextualisingthevaliditythroughtheory, whichputfocusonhowtheresultscanbesupportedandmadevalidthrougha theoreticalcontext(Kvale1997).Iwouldsuggestthattheaimsofcredibilityin mycasestudiesarereflectedinareflexiveapproach,whichcriticallyexamines myroleasaresearcherasdescribedabove,aswellastheuseofindepthand multiple methods through an abductive approach. In terms of reliability, my aimhasbeentodocumentmyresearchascloselyandtransparentlyaspossible, for example, through taping the interviews and keeping a research diary throughouttheproject,aswellaspresentingrichanddetailedexamplesofthe empiricalmaterialinthethesis.

17 CredibilityisaconceptintroducedbyLincolnandGuba(1985),togetherwith transferability , dependability and confirmability , aimed at replacing thetraditionalcategories ofvalidity (internal andexternal), reliability and neutrality(seeRyen2004).

54

PartII Settingthescene

Fromthetop:(1)SonganddancearenainMezaparks,Riga(2)Nightclubinold townRiga(3)Groupofsoldiers‘Warliberators’,partoftheVictorymonument inRiga.Photosbytheauthor.

55

56

Chapterthree Geographiesofneonationalism Ifyouwalkeastwardfromtheme dieval center of Vecrīga (the old town center of Riga) along KaĜėu iela, you will reach the start of Brīvības bulvāris (Freedom Boule vard) and encounter one of the main tourism sites in Rīga, Brīvības Piemineklis ,theFreedommonument. The monument is 42 meters tall, with a base made of reddish and grey granite, mixed with white tra vertine, while the top of the monument consists of a statue in copper of a woman holding three gilded stars between the palms of her hands over her head. The fe male ‘statue of liberty’ is commonly Thefreedommonument.Photobytheauthor referred to as ‘Milda’. The freedom monument was designed by the Latvian sculptorKārlisZāle,financedbypublicdonationsandcompletedin1934,dur ingLatvia’sfirstperiodofindependence,anddedicatedtothosewholosttheir livesduringthestruggleforindependencefromRussiabetween1918and1920. ThemonumentreplacedastatueofPetertheGreat,whichhadsymbolizedthe previousRussiantsarregime. Today, BrīvībasPiemineklis hasbecomeawellknowntourismsite,aplace visitedandphotographedbyforeigntourists,andisoftenpicturedonpostcards fromRiga,anddescribedandrepresentedinguidebooksandwebpagesglob ally. However, the monument still remains a central public place for the inhabitantsofRigaintheireverydaylife,atthesametimeasitrepresentsan almost‘sacred’placeofhistorical,nationalandsymbolicsignificance.WhenI visitedRigaforthefirsttime,Iwassurprisedbythenumberofpeopleplacing flowersatthefootofthemonument.Themonumentisattendedbytheguard ofHonour,flankedbywatchmen,andthechangeofguardsisanhourlyper formed routine. During the Soviet regime, the monument was more strictly

57 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism controlledanditssupervisiontookotherforms.Placingflowerswasacontro versial and banned political act, and public gatherings were prohibited. The monumentwasascribedadifferentsymbolicmeaning,whichwouldmeetthe communistideologyoftheSovietstateratherthanthequestforLatvianfree dom.PlanstoabolishthemonumentexistedduringtheSovietperiod,butwere neverenforced.Instead,othermeaningswere giventoitssymbolism;forex ample,thefemalestatuewasportrayedasMotherRussiaratherthan‘thestatue offreedom’,andthethreestarswereinterpretedasrepresentingtheSovietBal tic Republics, rather than the traditional Latvian regions Vidzeme, Kurzeme and Latgale. StukulsEglitis (2002) also adds that the story says that tourists duringtheSovietperiodweretoldbytheofficialguidesthatthewomanontop ofthemonumentwasValentinaTereshkova,thefirstfemaleSovietastronaut (StukulsEglitis 2002:186). Thus, the monument came to symbolise the great progress,developmentandsuperiorityofthe Sovietstateandthecommunist system.Themonumentstillservedasareminderofthepastandoftheformer Latvian nation (StukulsEglitis 2002). The monument became a place for resistanceagainsttheSovietoccupationwhichescalatedduringthe1980swhen thefreedommovementand‘thesingingrevolution’began. Themonumentcontains acomplex setofsymbolism,closelyrelated to Latvian history, culture and mythology. The site is also used, both in its symbolicandmorephysicalform,intheconstructionandreimaginationofthe Latviannation,creatingasenseofbelongingandidentificationofitspopulation and a sense of ‘Latvianness’. The process of constructing nationhood is also expressedwithintourismdevelopmentandmarketing.TourisminLatviaandin otherpostsocialistcountrieshasservedasatoolforreclaimingandcommuni catingculturalvalues,whichearlierweremarginalizedduringtheSovietregime. Hall (2004) emphasizes that tourism marketing in postsocialist countries re flectsawishtohighlightanewnationalidentityafterlongperiodsofcultural, politicalandeconomicturbulence.Tourismmaythereforeserveasaplatform forrecreatingand/orreinforcinganationalidentity.Thisoftenincludesare jectionoftheimmediatepast,makingtheSovietperiodinvisiblewhichwillbe discussedinupcomingchapters,andinsteadhighlightingtraditionsandculture with roots in the period before the Soviet occupation. Moreover, these ele mentsareusedinordertocreateacommonimageofLatviaasatourismdesti nationinordertoattractbothtouristsandforeigninvestments(seeHall2004).

58 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism

ThelandthatsingsMusicandtourism Thischapterwilldiscusshowtourismdevelopmentandmarketingcontributein the reimagination, construction and manifestation of the ‘new’ postsocialist Latviannation(aspartoftheLatviancommonspace),asreflecting geographiesof neonationalism .Ihavechosentoillustratethisprocessbyfocusingonhowthe culturalandnaturalheritageofthe‘nation’isusedfortourismpurposes,mainly withexamplesofhowLatvianfolksongsandthetraditionofnationalsongand dancefestivalsarehighlighted,whichoftenaredescribedasconstitutingcentral partsoftheLatviancultureandrepresentingthe‘heartand’ofthenation. The national importance of the cultural musical heritage embodied in the Latvianfolksongs, Dainas ,isalsoreflectedinthecurrentofficialLatviantour ismslogan, Thelandthatsings . Thepurposeofthepresentchapteristoanalysetherelationshipamong tourism , place and music , in how the Latvian musical heritage is used within tourismmarketingtohighlight‘local’,‘genuine’cultureandhistory,inorderto reimagine Latvia as a nation as well as create and communicate an image of Latvia as an international tourism destination 18 . The reimagination of the Latvian common space will be analysed as including two parallel processes, firstly,howtourismmarketingbecomesachannelalsotocreateanimageof Latvia inwardly, in terms with an overall project ofnationalism.In thiscase, identity and nation become two central and interrelated concepts. Tourism becomesatoolforestablishinganewfoundnationaland‘ethnic’identity,inthis caseintermsofacommonmusicalheritageoftheLatviannation.Thisisnota neutral process, and I will discuss how this can be analysed as a gendered process,withafocusofhowdifferentidentitiesoffemininitiesareconstructed in the manifestation of the nation state. Secondly, presenting and communicatingthemusicalheritageraisesthequestionof commodification ofthe musicalandculturalheritage,andhowtourismmayserveasatoolforregional development.ConnellandGibson(2003)describemusicbothasacommercial commodityandaculturalexpression.Themutualrelationshipbetweenculture

18 Thischapterisbasedpartlyontheresultsofatextanalysisstudy,includingprintedtourism brochures(LTDA2004 DiscoverLatvia ,LTDA2007 Thelandthatsings ),andmaterialpublished electronically at the LTDA website (www.latviatourism.lv), and by the Latvian Institute, includingthemessuchas“MusicinLatvia”,“Society”,“Culture”,“History”,and“Nature”, whichalsoareavailableasprintedfactsheets.Thetextanalysishasalsoincludedinformation material about the song and dance festival, such as the Multinational candidature file and The phenomenon of the Latvian Song festival , as well as information published on the official song festivalhomepagewww.dziesmusvetki2003.lv(2003version),andwww.dziesmusvetki2008.lv (2008version).Partly,thechapterisbasedonaninterviewwithafemalerepresentativefrom TheLatvianNationalCenterforTraditionalandPerformingArts .Formoredetails,see“Brochures andreports”,“Internetsources”and“Interviews”inthelistofreferences.

59 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism and economy is illustrated partly in how music is dependent upon financial meansforitsexistenceanddevelopment.Partly,theeconomicdimensionshave a social and cultural context, for example, in the use of symbols and trademarks, such as is evident in the tourism slogan The land that sings . Therefore,acentralquestionishowtheLatviantraditionalmusicalheritageis commodified and commercialized, and how the relation between culture and economyisexpressedandbalanced 19 . Therelationsbetweenmusicandplace The national significanceofthe Latvian musical heritage is manifested at the siteoftheFreedommonument.Thestaircaseleadinguptothemonumentis flankedbytwotravertinereliefs,ontheleftsidetherelief Latvjutautadziedātāja (TheSongfestival march),andtothe right Latvju strēlnieki (Soldiers’ march). Theterracebecameanimportantplaceforbothculturalandpoliticalmarches duringthe1980s,whichincludedsingingandresistanceagainsttheSovietre gime(StukulsEglitis2002:61).Thus,Latvian musichashadapoliticalcharge andsignificanceandservedasanelementofsolidarityduringperiodsofforeign rule. Thesingingrevolution becameawayofmakingapeacefulresistanceagainst theSovietregime,boththroughtraditionalfolkmusicandthroughthedevel opmentofrockmusicwhichwashighlycontestedandopposedbytheregime (seeZvejnieks2001). Connell and Gibson (2003) emphasize how music highly participates in theconstructionofplace,inhowimagesofconceptionsofplacesarecreated. They adopt a relational but also social constructive perspective in the interpretationoftheconceptofplaceandillustratehowplacesareconstantly createdbypeoplethemselves,andtheirconceptionsofplaces.Moreover,the development of music interacts with physical, sociocultural and economic place context, and the relation between music and place can be analysed as mutually interrelated, in how music shapes place and how place form the character of music. Places are not analysed as isolated units, but stand constantlyinrelationtootherplaces,intheconnectionbetweenthelocaland theglobal,forexample,throughdifferentflowsofcapital,peopleorinthiscase in the development and spread of music. How different actors create and

19 ThischapterispartlybasedonthepublicationMöller,Cecilia“Detsjungandefolket.Musik ochturismiLettland”(Thelandthatsings.MusicandtourisminLatvia)In:Aronssonetal. (eds) (2007) Kulturell Ekonomi. Skapandet av värden, platser och identiteter i upplevelsesamhället . (Cultural economy. The making of values, places and identities in the experience society) Poland:Studentlitteratur.Seetheintroductorychaptersofthepublicationforamoreindepth discussionofhowcultureandeconomycanbeanalysedasintertwinedintoday’s‘experience economy’.

60 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism communicate different images of places bears also traces of power and negotiation processes, which often leads to that one actor’s conception of a placebecomesdominating(Connell&Gibson2003). ConnellandGibsonillustratefurtherhowtherelationshipbetweenplace andmusicmaytakeboth‘fluid’and‘fixed’forms.Inamore‘fluid’form,music is characterized by its global flows, reach, and spread, creating partly a more standardizedorhomogenizedmusicsupply,andpartlyanarenaforchangeand culturalhybridity.Musicinamore‘fixed’orstaticsensemaybeanexpression oflocalcultureandidentity,inawishto‘reclaim’one’srootsandheritageand thusdistinguishoneselftoothergroupswithinthesociety(Connell&Gibson 2003).Thelatterform,promotingamore‘fixed’viewoftherelationshipbe tween music and place is a common feature within contemporary Latvian tourism marketing. A recurring ingredient in the Latvian tourism brochures publishedduringthelastfewyearsisthecolorfulportrayalofpeopledressedin folkcostumes,compiledwithtextsportrayingLatviaasacenterforfolkmusic andsongfestivals.Thefolksongsaredescribedasanancienttradition,butstill asavividandnaturalpartoftheLatvianeverydaylife. Latvians seem to be bornsingers and musicians.Almost everyone sings in a choir (LTDA 2004:28). Latvians are highlighted in exotic words as committed to their traditional cultureandcustoms,withahighawarenessandrespectforthehistoricaland culturalheritage,comparedtootherpartsoftheEuropeanpopulation. Liveoutancienttraditions.NobodycelebratesMidsummerNightthewayLatviansdo.Many ancient traditions that have disappeared in Europe are alive and well in Latvia (LTDA 2004:23). Here,thetextrefersto Jāni ,theMidsummerNightcelebration,whichisclosely relatedtotraditionsoflightingbonfiresandsingingtraditional Līgo folksongs. ThecreationofauthenticitywithinLatvianfolkmusic Folkmusicisanexampleofhowauthenticityiscreatedincooperationbetween tourismandmusic,inawishtohighlighta‘genuinely’and‘locally’rootedmusi calheritage,oftenillustratedbyoraltraditionswithcloseparallelstoaplace’s history and culture. Connell and Gibson describe the relationship between musicandconcepts,suchas,authenticityandtradition,asexamplesofmusicin its more ‘fixed’ and placespecific form, in how the distinctive and ‘unique’

61 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism characterofplaceisbroughtintolight.Still,authenticityinthesenseofwhatis perceivedas‘genuine’shouldinthiscontextbeinterpretedasaprocessofso cial construction rather than a fixed objective reality described in scientific terms. In other words, it is mainly about how ‘authenticity’ is created, interpreted and defined by different actors from their specific interests and context(Connell&Gibson2003). Thecollectionoffolksongs, Dainas ,isregardedasacommonsourcefor national pride and cultural abundance, which have survived the centuries of foreign powers and occupation (Female representative, The Latvian National CenterforTraditionalandPerformingArts ,August2005). TotheLatvianthe dainas aremorethanaliterarytradition.Theyaretheveryembodimentof hisculturalheritage,leftbyforefatherswhomhistoryhaddeniedother,moretangibleforms ofexpression.ThesesongsthusformtheverycoreoftheLatvianidentityandsingingbe comes one of the identifying qualities of a Latvian (Vaira VīėeFreiberga, Journal of Baltic studies1975.Quotefromwww.latinst.lv20040913). Theabovequotationemphasizesthemeaningandimportanceoffolkmusicfor Latvian culture andidentity, expressed bythe former Latvian president Vaira VīėeFreiberga. The uniqueness of this literal and musical heritage is further underlined by The Latvian Institute, describing it as having a thousand year history,andincluding1.2milliontextsandmorethan30,000melodies,which togetherformthebaseofthecollectionoffolksongs.Dainasreflectboththe historicalLatvianeverydaylife,andthemoretraditionalcelebrations,butalso containmythologicalandastronomicalelements,inamixofbothpreChristian andChristiantraditions.Still,itisimportanttoemphasizethatthefolksong heritagebynomeans isunique solelyforLatvia;thetraditionis stronginall three Baltic countries, illustrating its common cultural origin, but has during historydevelopedindifferentdirections(www.latinst.lv20040913). Folkmusicasasourcefornationalawakening Thefolksongsbecameanimportanttoolinthenationalawakeningduringthe middleofthe19thcenturywhenLatviaremainedundertheruleofTsaristRus sia,whicheventuallyculminatedwiththefirstindependenceofLatviain1920. TheaimofthenationalawakeningwastodistinguishtheLatvianpeopleand theirculturalheritagefromtherulingGermanandRussianelites.Themanifes tationofanationalLatvianlanguagebecameoneofthemainprioritiesinthis movement, but also included reclaiming the Latvian cultural roots. As else where in Europe, the nationalistic currents involved an ethnographic

62 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism movement, aimedatcollectingandpreserving a traditional heritage, which in Latviawasmanifestedinthecollectionoffolksongs.KrišjānisBarons(1835 1923)becameoneoftheleadingcharacters,commonlyreferredtoas’thefather oftheDainas’,whodevotedhislifetothecollectionofDainas,andhiswork resulted in a publication containing more than 200,000 folk songs. The folk songswerehencegivenaliterarystatus,showingthesignificanceandunique nessoftheLatvianlanguage(Schwartz2006). It was also during the 19th century that the first song festivals were arranged, as a result of the increased number of choirs. The choirs became moreformalmeetingpointsforpracticingfolksongs,whichalsohadparallels tothedevelopmentoftheeducationalsystem.Theveryfirstsongfestivalinthe BalticcountriestookplaceinEstoniain1869,andfouryearslaterwasfollowed byafestivalinRiga,with1003participatingsingers,aphenomenonwhichin 1998 has reached the number of 13,400 singers. Traditional dance has constitutedapartofthesongfestivalsince1948(Multinationalcandidaturefile 2002;LejiĦaetal.2002).ThesongfestivalshavebeendescribedastheBaltic state’sversionoftheOlympicGamesandhaveasarulebeenarrangedevery five years. The preparations and rehearsals before the national festival takes placeallyearroundandhaveacyclicaldesign.Theworkforthefestivalcanbe illustratedbyapyramid,wherethenationalsongcelebrationconstitutesthetop andaimfortheactivitiesinlocalchoirandsonggroups.Thereexistaround400 registeredamateurchoir groupsin Latvia, and around 1000 children’schoirs. Additionally,folkdancinginvolvesaround700adultgroupsand1300dancing groupsforchildren.ThechoirtraditionisincorporatedintheLatvianschool system,eachschoolhasatleastonechoir,andthereisalsoaselectionofchoirs administratedbythelocalmunicipalities.Thechoirsanddancegroupsrehearse beforethenationalsonganddancefestivalfromacommonrepertoireandpro gram,andqualifygraduallyforthefestival.Thegrandactofthefestivalisthe joint acapella performance by all choir groups, dressed in traditional folk costumes, in front of thousands of spectators (Female representative, The LatvianNationalCenterforTraditionalandPerformingArts ,August2005). MusicandcultureinLatviaduringtheSovietoccupation Latvia,togetherwithEstoniaandLithuania,wereincorporatedintotheSoviet UnionbytheendoftheSecondWorldWar.TheSovietoccupationinvolveda conscious‘Sovietisation’oftheLatviansocietybySovieteconomicandadmin istrative control, colonization of Russian speaking immigrants as additional labourforcefortheindustrialdevelopment,and,bythedominationofSoviet

63 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism cultureandpoliticalideologies(StrodsIn:Caune2005).ManyLatviansfledthe country, as the second Soviet occupation began in 1944, and the remaining population was constantly put under surveillance, control and threats of deportation.Thecommunistideologypermeatedthesocietyandleftlittlespace for Latvian influence and cultural expression. Russian culture and language weregiven superiority, whileLatviancultural lifeandits institutions weresu pervisedorclosed.TheLatvianlanguagewasgivenamoresecondaryrolein publiclife,andbecamethemeansforadjustingthecommunistpropagandato morenationalforms(Zvejnieks2001;StrodsIn:Caune2005). Despitetheregimeshift,thesongfestivalscontinuedtobearranged,but inamoremodifiedand‘Sovietised’version.TheSovietregimeforbademany Latvian pieces of music, composers and traditional folk songs, as well as Latvianpoetryandart.Instead,contemporarySovietmusicwasbroughtinto light,whichalsobecameevidentinthedevelopmentofthesongfestival.The program was revised, and the Latvian folk songs were given a much less significant role and were replaced by songs from other Soviet republics or worksofSovietcomposers.FortheSovietregime,thesongfestivalsservedasa politicalinstrument,withthepurposeofcreatingaSovietstateandfellowship. ThesongsweresunginhonorofLeninandthecommunistrule.Largearenas forthesongfestivalswerealsoconstructed,forexample,oneinMežaparksin the outskirts of Riga, to manifest the magnitude of the festivals and the underlyingpoliticalmessages(Femalerepresentative,TheLatvianNationalCenter forTraditionalandPerformingArts ,August2005).FortheLatvianparticipants,the songfestivalcontinuedtohaveanothersymbolicbut‘hidden’significance,and thetraditionofsingingwasperceivedasawayofkeepingandpreservingthe remainsoftheLatvianculture.Thefolksongsalsobecameanimportanttoolin thestruggleandresistanceagainsttheSovietregimeduringthe1980s,which culminated into ‘the singing revolution’ from 1987 and onwards, which involvedmassdemonstrationsandchoirconcertswiththeaimtomanifestthe claimsforfreedom.Themoreliberalclimateduringthisperiod,pavedtheway forapeacefulbuteffectivecritiqueagainsttheSovietauthorities,whenmusic andthe previouslyforbidden songswereusedasaprovocation and weapon against the occupation power (www.dziesmusvetki2003.lv 20041216; female representative, The Latvian National Center for Traditional and Performing Arts , August2005).

64 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism

Folkmusicasacontemporarynationalmanifestation ThecollapseoftheSovietUnionmadeitpossibleforLatvia’saimsofinde pendencetoberealized.Thenewsloganforthenationwasformulatedinthe ‘Western’spiritinthecreationofanationstate,introductionofdemocracyand agradualtransitiontoamarketeconomy(O’Connor2003).Thesongfestivals wereconsideredashavingastrongsocial,symbolicandculturalfunctioninthe manifestationofindependence. Thefolk song tradition isalsodescribed asa wayofincreasingtheawarenessoftheLatvianheritageandreclaimingaLat vianidentity. (…)forLatvianssongfestivalsarenotjustfestivalsforsinging,notjustchoralmusicconcerts withopportunitiestoshowthemselvesandtoviewothers.ForLatviansthesongfestivalsare asymbolofnationalunityandidentity.Theyarenationalthatareawaitedwithlove, preparedforwithrespect,executedwithfullcommitmentandperformedwithhonour.Inthis waytheyareanalogoustotheancientseasonalritualsthatmarkedthemythicalcycleoftime (www.li.lv,20050104). Folk music is in this context used in order to highlight a common history, whichincludesattemptstomaintainarecreationofofbygonetimesand traditions.ConnellandGibson(2003)pointouthowmusicmaycontributeto creating, enhancing and challenging both collective and individual identities, oftenrelatedtoperceptionsofaspecificplace.Theemphasisonfolkmusicis alsoanexampleofhowaspiritofbelongingandfellowshipwithintheborders ofthenationstateiscreated.TheLatvianpresidentValdisZatlersformulated theimportance ofsingingas partof theLatvian ‘soul’ during the Song and Dancecelebrationclosingceremonyin2008,bysaying, (…) The Song Festival awakened Latvian national selfconfidence. The Song and Dance FestivalwritesLatvia'shistory.TheSongandDanceFestivalunitesournationforthefuture. (…) Each and every Latvian keeps three things in the heart: knowledge, courage and love. Latviansalwaysaspiredtobeaneducatednation.Knowledgeincludestheupbringingofchil dren, the wisdom and traditions of the nation. It includes the ability to create one's own future. Couragemeansastrongvoiceagainstabsurdityorinjustice.Couragemeansbelievinginone's ability to change things for better, to fight, to withstand and to win. With knowledge and courageweareabletolove.Toloveourselvesandtheworldaroundus.ToloveourLatvia. Thesongbothhidesandexpressesallthesequalities.Thereisaloveinthesongssinceweare sounitedtonight.Thesongiscourageforeachandeverysingertoopenthesoultotheworld fromthisstage.Thesongisforce(www.dziesmusvetki2008.lv,20080824).

65 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism

Here,the emphasisisonhow thetraditionofsinging constitutes an uniting elementforLatvians,andhowitcontributestotheprocessofmakingLatvia intoonestrongnation,whichalsorequiresdedicationandactiveparticipation oftheLatvianpopulationthroughthemotto“knowledge,courageandlove”. Asdiscussedearlier,folkmusicasanationalmanifestation,wasalreadyevident duringthefirstperiodofLatvianindependence,whichinapostsocialistcon text had been ‘reawakened’ in the establishment of the ‘new’ Latvian nation state.StukulsEglitis(2002)claimsthatideologiesofnationalismreflectawish toestablishasenseof temporalnormality .Here,thefocusisonLatvia’swishto acquire‘aplaceintime’,bylookingbackinhistorytothefirstperiodofinde pendence,assymbolisingaperiodofnormalitywhichcametoendatthetime oftheSovietoccupation.Thus,thisnarrativeisalso concerned with a break with the immediate Soviet past, reflecting a wish to reclaim more traditional valuesfromthepastinordertodevelopLatviaasanationfrom within rather thanwiththeassistanceofoutsideinfluences(StukulsEglitis2002). Reimaginingthe‘ethnic’nation TheaimofreestablishingaLatviannationstatecommunicatedthroughactivi tiessuchasthenationalsonganddancefestival,aswellastourismpromotion, raisesthequestionofhowtheideaofthenationstateanditscharactershould be defined and analysed. Anthony Smith (1999) identifies four different ap proaches to how nations and nationalism have been interpreted in a more historicalandacademiccontext;the primordialist , perennialist , modernist and ethno symbolic approaches 20 .Thefirst,primordalistapproachregardsnationsas ‘ele mentsofnature’,andashavingmore‘organic’forms,andthusconstantlybeing presentthroughouthistoryasawayoforganisingmankind(Smith1999:4).The perennialistapproachbearssimilaritiestotheseideas,butrejectstheemphasis onnationsaspartofnature,andstressestheformationanddevelopmentof nationsthroughtimeinahistoricalandpoliticalperspective.Smithemphasises thatthemodernistapproachhascometorepresentthedominatingviewofna tionsandnationalism,whichdescribesthemas“aproductoftheprocessesof modernisation”(Smith1999:6),startingwiththeeventsoftheFrenchrevolu tion.Thus,thisobjectstotheideathatnationshavepremodernculturalroots, andinsteadregardsthemasbothresultandthebasisforindustrialisation,capi talism,andtheideaofnationalismasservingmorerationalandpoliticalaims.

20 Smith (1999) underlines the diversity of the primordialist, perennialist and modernist paradigms and identifies, for example, three different versions of primordialism and two approachestoperennialism,whichIwillnotgointodetailwithhere.SeeSmith1999:4ffora moredetaileddiscussion.

66 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism

Smithiscriticaltowardsthemodernistapproachasfailingtotakeintoaccount thepremodernrootsofnationsandnationalism,as wellas their culturaldi mensionsandfunctions.Thus,headvocates‘continuity’withthepastthrough the ethnosymbolic approach, in how previous cultural ‘ethnic’ heritages are rediscoveredandusedaspartofthenationalistproject. (…) what gives nationalism its power are the , memories, traditions, and symbols of ethnicheritagesandthewaysinwhichapopular livingpast hasbeen,andcanbe,rediscovered andreinterpretedbymodernnationalistintelligentsias(Smith1999:9,emphasisinoriginal). Theideaofthe‘reborn’and‘normalized’Latviannationstatehascloseparallels tomore‘primordialist’and‘ethnosymbolic’approachestonationalism,which Budryte(2005)claimshaveguidedmanyresearchscholarsstudyingnationalism in theBaltic States sincethe1980s. Smith(1999)recognises nations asbeing formedonan‘ethnicbasis’,havinga‘core’or‘navel’(termed‘ethnie’),thatis, certain uniting cultural values, and ‘a feeling of kinship’ shared by the ethnic community (Smith 1999) 21 . In the case of Latvia, its traditional and ethnic traditions,whichmayinvolvebothsocialandmaterialdimensions,areconsid eredtohaveacommonnatural‘essence’,goingbackmuchlongerthanmerely theperiodof‘nationalisticawakening’duringthe19 th century.Thus,theroots of contemporary nationalism are to be found in historical and premodern mythology and culture. Moreover, the cultural nation is believed to have an ‘eternal’ continuation, present even inthe periodofforeignpowersandrule, untilitwasallowedtoriseagainduringthe1980s(Budryte2005). IwouldclaiminlinewithargumentsputforwardbyBudryte(2005)and StukulsEglitis(2002),thatthereisaneedforamorecriticalsocialconstructiv ist and postmodern approach for the analysis of Latvian nationalist currents evolvingsinceindependence(seeBudryte2005;StukulsEglitis2002).Thisap proachdeniestheexistenceofa‘core’or‘essence’ofthenationorpeopleand focusesonthepoliticalandideologicalexpressionsandmobilizationsmade‘in thename’ofnationalism.ThisdoesnotmeanthatIsupporttheideaofthe nationasamerely‘modernist’project,withouthistoricrootsin‘ethnic’culture. However,itisimportanttoraisethequestionofwhodefinesthehistorical‘es sence’ofthenation,inordertoavoidthatthenationassuchisperceivedas something culturally ‘pure’ or ‘deterministic’. Nationalism may take different

21 Smithdefinesan‘ethnie’as;“anamedhumanpopulationwithmythsofcommonancestry, shared historical memories and one or more common elements of culture, including an associationwithahomeland,andsomedegreeofsolidarity,atleastamongtheélites”(Smith 1999:13).

67 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism anddiverseformsandmayalsoserveinterestsofothergroupsapartfromthe dominating ‘ethnic community’. Maybe the most cited example of this approachisBenedictAnderson’s(1983)conceptofthecommunityandnation as‘imagined’andsociallyconstructed,tocreateasenseofbelongingwithinthe borders of the nation state. By acknowledging nationalism as a sociallycon structiveprocess,describinganddefiningthenationisregardedasaconstantly ongoing process, whichinvolvesa negotiationamongdifferentactors.More over,thisprocessentailspower,andevolves around who are given the right andthetoolstoprovidean‘image’forthenation(seeAnderson1983) 22 .Addi tionally, the approach also emphasizes the economical, social and historical contextinwhichnationalismarises.WithreferencestoGraham(2000),Young and Light (2001) highlight that nationalism includes the redefinition and re negotiationofidentities. (…)nationsandnationalismsareconstructedwithindiscourses,discoursesofbelongingcon structed around place remain important, and these discourses frequently rely on particular constructionsofthepast,ofhistory,cultureandidentity(Young&Light2001:943). Genderingthenation Returning to the site of the Freedom monumentasamarkerandsymbolof thevaluesofLatviancultureandtradi tions, the statue also bears clear genderisedsymbolism, inhowthena tion and its people are imagined. The reliefsandsculpturesofthemonument arearrangedintodifferentgroupsand sections, containing both female and malefigures,butrepresentedashold ingdifferentrolesandfunctionswithin the traditional Latvian community. Menareportrayedastheprotectorsof the nation, as soldiers in battles, evi dentinthe group ‘Guards ofFather land’,orasancientheroes,as Mother Latvia and the inscription ’For fatherland in Lāčplēsis , the national epic of the andfreedom.Photobytheauthor. Bearslayer(seeStukulsEglitis2002).Apartfrombeingasymbolforfreedom,

22 See also Smith’s (1999) critique of Andersen’s description of nationalism as a ‘modern culturalartifact’(Smith1999:8).

68 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism embodiedatthetopofthebronzestatue,thestatue‘Milda’isaccompaniedby twootherfemalefigures.Firstly‘MotherLatvia’,thetrueembodimentofthe Latvian nation, representedby a woman holding a shield andaswordtothe groundinfrontofher,flankedbyasonandadaughterinthebackground.The statuegroupisplacedjustabovetheinscriptionofthemonument Tēvzemeiun Brīvībai (ForFatherlandandFreedom),facingthesamedirectionastheabove located‘statueofliberty’.Secondly,thesectionofsculpturesinreddishgranite belowincludethe‘family’,whichportrayastandingwomanfigureflankedby hertwokneelingsons,emphasisingherchildbearingroleasthesymbolforlife, andhermissiontoraisethefutureheroesandprotectorsofthenation(Stukuls Eglitis2002). Researchofthegenderisednationstateisextensiveandwelldocumented, butwithfewempiricalexamplesfromCentralandEasternEurope,including the Baltic countries (see StukulsEglitis 2002). Within feminist geography, researchhascontributedtochallengingtheconstructionofthenationstateas ‘gender neutral’, as described by Anderson (1983) and other researchers. As McDowellpointsout, (…)thenationstateitselfisoftenrenderedasgendered,embodyingimagesofmasculinityor femininityinitsrepresentationsandsymbols(…)genderedlanguage,imageryandartifactsare drawn on to construct a particular vision of nationalism and national identity (McDowell 1999:194). Sharp(1996)arguesthattheinventionofthenationinvolvesaprocessofcon structingandimaginingitscitizens,whobecomegenderedsubjects(SharpIn: Duncan1996).YuvalDavis(1997)alsoobjectstothetendencytotreatgender andnationastwodifferentcategoriesandemphasizesthattheyaremutually interrelatedandconstructed,consistingof“Nationed Gendersand Gendered Nations”(YuvalDavis1997:20).Sharpconcludesthat“Womenarenotequal tothenationbutsymbolicofit”(SharpIn:Duncan1996:99).Womentendto beinvisibleintheestablishmentandmanifestationofthenationstateinamore ‘public’sense,andaremainlygiventherolesasreproducersofthenation,in termsoftheirbiologicalfunctions,closelyassociatedtonatureandfertility,due totheirroleasmothers,andfamilycaretakers.Thus,thefocusisonwomen’s rolesandsignificanceintheprivatesphere(McDowell1999).Womenarenot ‘soldiersofthenation’,butbelongrathertothegroupinneedofprotection, oftengroupedtogetheras‘womenandchildren’,symbolizingthefamily(Yuval Davis1997:45).Consequently,womenareportrayedbothas‘theSame’andas ‘theOther’,givingwomencomplexbutalsocontradictoryroles.Womenmay,

69 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism ontheonehandberegardedastheverybaseofnationalcultureandtraditions, butmayalsoontheotherhandbeviewedas‘deviant’fromtheimagined(mas culine)community,iftheysomehowbreakagainstculturalcodesandnorms,or too actively engage in the ‘public’ space (YuvalDavis 1997). Below I will highlight the genderised Latvian nation state based on three interrelated dimensionsofthegenderisednationstateaspresentedbyYuvalDavis(1997): (1) Volknation (2) Kulturnation (3) Staatnation 23 .Thisdivisiondoesnotrepresenta ‘fixed’setofcategoriesforanalysingthenationstatefromagenderperspective. Myintentionisthatitwillserveasawayofproblemitisingthenationassuch fromdifferentperspectives,byfocusingonitsdiverseandmultiplegenderised politicalandsocioculturalcharacters. The‘Volknation’ Thefirst concept ‘ Volknation’ raisesthequestionofthenationalpopulation’s origin,andinvolvestheperceptionandconstructionofa‘nation’assharinga common background and history, and thereby sharing the same blood and forefathers.Inthiscase,thecontinuousreproductionofthenationisinfocus, expressedinwhatYuvalDavistermsthediscourseof‘Peopleaspower’.Here, women are given the roles as childbearers, by reclaiming more traditional normsandvaluesofthe family.As reproducersofthe ‘Volknation’, women becomepartsofthenationstatethroughthedebatesoftheirbodies,ofbirth ratesandlawsregulatingabortion.Thus,insomesense,theprivatesphereof reproductionbecomesapublicconcern,togivebirthtomorechildrenforthe sakeofthenation’ssurvival.Thishasbecomeapressingissueinmanypost socialistcountries,includingLatvia,wherelowfertilityratesareconsideredto generateademographic‘crisis’,atrendwhichisusedasanargumenttoreclaim moretraditionalandconservativegenderroles.StukulsEglitis(2002) empha sizesthatthe‘survival’andfurtherexistenceoftheLatviannationstateandits ‘ethnic’populationisconsideredasbeingunderthreat, partly due to the de cliningfertilityratesandpartlyduetodeportationsandanincreaseofRussian speakingimmigrantsduringtheSovietregime.Moreover,contemporarymigra tion abroad for work within the European Union further contributes to a declining ‘ethnic’ Latvian population (see chapter six for a more indepth discussionofthereemergenceofmoretraditionalgenderideals).

23 TheconceptsarederivedaccordingtoYuvalDavisfromthedivisionbetweennationstates (German Kulturnation) and statenations (German Staatnation), discussed by for example AnthonySmith(1971,1986),Neuberger(1986)(seeYuvalDavis1997:20).

70 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism

Iwouldarguethattheideasandconstructionofthe‘Volknation’inaLatvian contextalsocanbeanalysedinrelationtotheimportanceof nature and ‘home land’ ,astwocentralingredientsintheformationandimaginationoftheLatvian nationstate,bothinahistoricalandcontemporarycontext.TheLatvianpopu lationisnotmerely believedtohaveacommonbackgroundandhistory,but alsotoberootedinaparticular(rural)Latvianlandscape,whichalsobecomesa commondefinerofthenation.Schwartz(2006)emphasizeshowtherelations betweentheLatvianpopulationanditsterritoryandlandscapesbecomecrucial throughtheestablishmentoftheideaofthe‘homeland’: Homelandsareconstructedbyinfusingphysicalterrainwithnationalmeaning,transforming landscapeinto“ethnoscape”.Throughawiderangeofpractices–schoolcurricula,thearts, heritagetourism,publicspectacles–historicsitesandmonumentsarenaturalizedandnatural featureshistoricizedbynationalentrepreneursseekingtoinculcateaprofoundidentification withanancestralhomeland(Schwartz2006:3). Schwartz defines ‘ethnoscape’ with reference to Smith (1999) as “a physical landscapeinvestedwithethnicmeanings”(Schwartz2006:3).Schwartzidenti fiestheideologyof‘homeland’ascontaining inwardlooking elements,basedon what she terms ‘an agrarian nationalist discourse’, celebrating the agricultural heritage with a closeness to nature as the main distinguishing feature for the Latvianidentity.Thecreationofanagrariansocietywasrealizedduringthefirst independence,perceived as‘thegoldenage’,whichafter independence in the 1990shasresurfacedasanidealintheestablishmentofthe‘new’nationstate. Theideasof‘Homeland’canbetracedbacktotheconcept Heimat ,whichwas introducedbyGermangeographersduringtheendofthe19 th century,aspart of a conservative movement spreading through Europe and the Russian empire,asareactionagainsttheforcesofindustrialization(Schwartz2006). Among its diverse philosophical underpinnings were environmental determinism and its counterpart, völkisch nationalism:thebeliefthatnatureshapesthecharacterofthenation–das Volk –asmuchaspeopleshapenature(Schwartz2006:33). Heimat representedtheintersectionofboththenaturalandculturallandscape, whichcalledforthepreservation of natureaswell as traditional culture and customs.Homelandstudieswereintroducedandofferedattheuniversitiesin theBalticcountries,andfocusedonalocalandregional geography, with the undertonetogettoknowthetraitsandoriginsofthenativecountry.Theaim was to reawaken the ancient Latvian traditions and customs, as well as the

71 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism closenesstonature,andthefolksongsbecameimportanttoolsfordiscovering andexploringthe‘true’sourcesof‘Latvianness’. When discussing ‘authenticity’ of the Latvian folk song tradition, contemporary tourism marketing tends to portray Latvians as a people living close to their cultural heritage, but also to nature. The Dainas bear close associations to a premodern agricultural Latvian society, with roots in the countrysideandrurallandscapes.ThefolksongsreflectaLatvianmythology,in which the interaction between Latvians and nature plays a central role. The GermangeographerJ.G.Kohldescribedin1841theheritageofthe Dainas as thefollowing, TodayitwouldbetrulydifficulttofindanothernationinEuropethatsorightfullydeservesto becalledthenationofpoets;itwouldbeequallydifficulttofindanothercountrythatdeserves tobecalledthelandofpoetryasmuchasthehomelandoftheLatvians…EveryLatvianisa bornpoet, they all composeverses and songs, and they can all sing these songs(www.li.lv 20080121). Thequotation clearly illustrateshow thefolk songsareconsideredtobenot onlyconnectedtotheLatviansthemselvesasapeoplewithacommonhistory and common blood, but also dependent on the Latvian soil and landscapes whicharebelievedtohavenurturedthetraditionsofpoetryandfolksongs. Thegenderised‘homeland’ ThecelebrationofnatureasanessenceoftheLatviannationstatecanalsobe analysedashavinggenderiseddimensions.Firstly,asstatedinthebeginningof thesection,womentendtobedefinedintheir‘natural’rolesaschildbearers, responsibleforthebiologicalcontinuationoftheethnicLatviannationandits future.Thus,notrealizingtheir‘natural’dutiesmightresultinademographic crisis, and undermine the aims of welfare and economic progress. Secondly, nature isoftengivenfeminineattributesasinrelationtomoremasculinedefini tions of culture .Rose(1993)emphasizeshownaturehasbeenassociated with mysteriousanduncontrollableforcesandtreatedasseparatefromhumansina more‘enlightened’culturalcontext.Dualismsassociatedwiththeseparationof the masculine and feminine have become evident in a historical context, in which the feminine has been represented by the passive, emotional and irra tional(Nature)incontrasttotheactive,calculatingandrationalmale(Culture). The feminine characteristics have been applied to both a bodily and mental framework,inhowwomenhavebeensuitedforworkandactivitiesdifferent frommen’s,butalsohavehadasymbolismrelatedtogenderedperceptionsof

72 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism natureinamorephysicalsense.Rosepointsoutthatnatureinbothahistorical and scientific context has become the object for the male gaze and aims of conquest,forexample, through geographical expeditions searching for‘virgin territory’(Rose1993,seealsoLewanderIn:Schough2002). IwouldsuggestthattheconceptionsoffemininitydiscussedbyRosecan beappliedtoaLatviancontext,intermsofhownatureservesasabaseforthe definitionofthebordersandthecontentsofthenationstate.Here,inthetra ditional conception of nature, humans, culture and nature are perceived as interrelated rather than separated, with parallels to the Latvian folklore and mythology. Nature is considered to include more ‘mysterious’ elements, em bodied in tales, songs, folklore and pagan symbolism, as part of the Latvian culture. The feminine attributes of nature become evident in the potential threattoitsexistence,eitherasademographiccrisis,orasduringtheSoviet regime,thethreatofruiningtheessenceofthe‘homeland’. Schwartz (2006) underlinesthattheSovietoccupationinsomewayswasperceivedasawayof colonizingnotonlytheformerindependentstateofLatvia,butalsoitsnature and‘ethnoscape’.Thiswasevidentintheprocessofnationalizationoflandand property,collectivizationofagricultureandachangeofthe‘traditional’Latvian landscape, including the building of Kolkhozes and destruction of traditional Latvianfarmsteads.Thisprocesswasimplementedinthenameofindustriali zation and modernization, connected to the ideologies of the communist ideologywhichviewednaturemoreasasourceofrawmaterialandexpansion (Schwartz2006). Schwartzdoesnotapplyagenderperspectivetotheanalysisoftheaims andeffectofthecolonizationofthe ‘homeland’,but I would claim that the Sovietoccupationboreclearmasculinesymbolismincontrasttothefeminine conqueredrurallandscapesastheverycoreof‘Latvianness’.TheSovietpower representedinsomesensethe‘modern’rationalsociety,expressedthroughin dustrialization and urbanization, with clear masculine characteristics of dominationandoccupation.However,thedestructionofthecountrysidetrig gered largeprotests amongthe Latvian population, for example, in what was termedthe‘Greattreeliberationmovement’,whichmainlyfocusedontheres cue and protection of large trees from destruction. Caring for trees was considered as an important part of the Latvian mythology, and trees such as andlindenshadasymbolicand‘sacred’meaning.Thetreehastradi tionally had a masculine connotation within Latvian mythology, while linden treesareconsideredtobearafemininesymbolism.

73 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism

(…)thegreattreessymbolizedLatvianvictimsofSovietrepression(…)thecarelessmisuseof treeswas“theoccupationofbeauty”;migrants’townswere“ghettos,concentrationcampsof crippledtrees”.Thegreattree,ontheotherhand,wasa“hoarysoldier”and“guardianofthe homeland,itsbranchesspreadwideasifblessingtheearth”(Schwartz2006:67,quotesfrom EninsKoks–Dabaspiemineklis ,66.Ziedonis, Kopotieraksti, 491982). Thus, the process was described as ‘the occupationof beauty’, which reveals clear genderedrepresentations ofnatureand nation stateasfeminine,fragile andaestheticontheonehand,threatenedbyexternalforces,butalsoasstrong, masculine and protective on the other, symbolized by how the great trees shouldserveas‘soldiers’todefendtheremainingnatureandlandscape. The‘Kulturnation’ Thesecondconcept,‘ Kulturnation’ ,includedinYuvalDavis’analysisofthegen derednationstateisdefinedasfollows; (…)theculturaldimensioninwhichthesymbolicheritageprovidedbylanguageand/orre ligion and/or other customs and traditions is constructed as the ‘essence’ of the nation (YuvalDavis1997:21). Inthiscase,cultureisinterpretedasconstitutingmore‘traditional’elements,in termsofcustomssuchasfolkloreandotherformsofheritagewhicharecon sidered to be uniting a specific nation and people. Thus, the meaning and definitionofcultureisdifferentfromwhathasbeendiscussedabove, inthe dualismbetweennatureandculture,whichreliesonmore‘modern’definitions of culture, emphasizing societal progress, development and enlightment, for example,intermsofscience.The‘Kulturnation’ontheotherhand,isperceived asbeingbasedonculturalpracticesandtraditionsineverydaylife,anditsbor dersmaybesymbolicalratherthanstrictlypolitical.Peoplemaymanifestand participateinthe‘Kulturnation’forexampleinvoluntaryorganizations,church activities,etc.,arrangingfestivalsandotheractivities(HurdIn:AsztalosMorell etal.2005).The‘Kulturnation’highlightswomensymbolsandguardiansofa commonand‘authentic’nationalculture.YuvalDavisclaims,withreferenceto Armstrong(1982),thatwomenbecome“symbolicborderguards”ofthenation andcollectivity(YuvalDavis1997:66).Inthisway,womenmaybothsymbolize andembodytheboundariesofthecollectivity,involvingnormsandbehaviour of what is considered as ‘normal’ and ‘deviant’ in terms of cultural customs, clothingandlooks(YuvalDavis1997:45).

74 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism

TheconstructionoftheLatviannationbearscloseparallelstothe‘Kulturna tion’,especiallyintheemphasisofthe Dainas asthe‘soul’ofLatvianness.As hasbeenmentionedearlier,thefolksongswereverymuchavoiceintheevery daylifeoftheLatvianfarmer.Thesongsweresungthroughoutthecourseof life,forexample,atweddingsandfunerals,festivities, butalsoportrayingthe ‘ordinary’lifewithinthefamilyandtheprivatesphere,whichtraditionallyhas beenafemalecodedsphere. ThesingersandconnoisseursofLatvianfolksongsweremostlywomen,andtheworldde pictedbythefolksongsislargelyawoman'sworld.Latviansalsohavewarsongs,buttheyare not eulogies of bravery and do not contain battlefield depictions or bloody spectacles (www.li.lv,20080121). Itisalsoevidentthatthetraditionofsingingandpreservingtheheritageofthe Dainas has remained a ‘women’s domain’, also within a more contemporary context. While men have historically been regarded as the main actors for protecting and acknowledging the national heritage of the folk songs and therebymakingthemintoa‘public’concern,itiswomenwhohavecontinued topracticetheircontentinamore‘hidden’andprivatecontext; InseveralregionsofLatviaonecanstillencountersingers,mostlywomen,whohaveorally inheritedthistradition.Oftentheysinginfolkloreensemblessidebysidewithotherswho havetakenaninterestinfolksongsasaresultofthefolkloremovement(www.li.lv200801 21). TheorganizersofthenationalSongandDancefestivalstatethattheeventin cludesamajorityofLatvianfemalechoirs,andthattheproblemofgenerating more male choirs is especially evident in the schools, where it is difficult to form boy’s choirs, and thereby raise men’s interestforchoirandfolksongs. Anotherexplanationforwomen’soverrepresentationisdescribedasfollowsby a female representative from the The Latvian National Centre for Traditional and PerformingArts . Onereasonistheeconomicsituationformanyfamilies.Menmustworkmoreandwomen takecareofthefamilyandhavemoretimeforsinginganddancing(Femalerepresentative The LatvianNationalCentreforTraditionalandPerformingArts ,August2005). Here, the publicprivate distinction is made evident; cultural manifestations suchasfolksongsandchoirpracticesarestillassociatedwiththeprivatehome andfamilyenvironment.Womenareresponsibleforraisingthechildrentobe

75 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism come ‘cultural’ citizens, andto pass onand preservethe cultural heritagefor futuregenerationsthroughdaytodaypractices(YuvalDavis1997).Ontheone hand, women tend to take part in much of the ‘invisible’ work for cultural preservationthroughchildcareandparticipationinchoiranddancepractices onaregularbasis.Ontheotherhand,theroleofwomeninthisprocesscan alsobeanalysedasmanifestedandcelebratedinamorepubliccontextthrough theorganizationofsonganddancefestivalsbothnationallyeveryfifthyearand in smallerlocally arranged performances and competitions.Inthe lattercase, womenbecomevisibleactorsondifferentpublicstages by performing more traditional ideals of nationalism and femininity, expressed through songs and dance,aswellasinamorematerialsensebydressingupinwomen’straditional dresses,andplacinggarlandsofflowersintheirhair. TheStaatnation ThethirddimensionofYuvalDavis’analysisofthe genderised nation is the Staatnation .Thepreviousdiscussionhaslargelysuggestedthattheformationof the Kulturnation isastronglyfemalecodedproject,withanemphasisonthena tioninamoresymbolicsense.Still,inthecaseofthe Staatnation ,thefocusis mainlyonthenation state ,anditsfunctionsfromamorepoliticalsense,which has been a malecoded project, for example, in terms of leadership. Here, questions of citizenship are being raised, borders are being drawn, defended andmanifested.Moreover,theestablishmentofthenationstatealsoconcerns men and women’s participation in the public sphere, both politically and as workers(WilfordIn:Miller1998).Hurd(2005)claimsthatmenhavetradition ally held a prominent position within the development of the Staatnation , in their roles as politicians, economic supporters and protectors of both family and nationhood. Women have, on the other hand, by entering the public sphere,beenperceivedasathreattomen’srightsand obligationsandtothe ‘true’missionandrolesofwomen(HurdIn:AsztalosMorelletal.2005).The strife towards establishing a Staatnation has been evident in Latvia since the period of National awakening. Hanovs (2002) emphasizes that the Latvian nationalist movement during the 19 th Century was an urban middle class phenomenon, mainly dominated by men, as in other European countries. In accordancewiththeidealsoftheEnlightment,menrepresented‘culture’and thereby Reason, while women were considered more close to nature, and therefore not having the same functions as men within society. However, Hanovsarguesthatwomenwerenot‘victims’ofthenationalistmovement,but middle class women also actively engaged in the ‘women’s question’ in the

76 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism public debates. Even though women’s contribution to the nationalist movementwasconsideredasassignedtothedomesticarena,theprivatesphere becameasitefordevelopingawarenessofLatviancultureandtradition,andan arenaforresistanceagainstthedominanceoftheGerman elite in the public sphere.Withintheprivaterealm,womenwereportrayedas‘teachers’,guiding thewayinwhichchildrenshouldberaisedina‘Latvian’manner.Thisbecame alsoanargumentfromthestandpointofmiddleclasswomentohavetheright and access to higher education, in order to fulfill their mission (Hanovs In: Goloubeva&Hanovs2002). Hurd (2005) emphasizes that the ‘womanasnation’ reveals both passive and active rolesforwomen(HurdIn:AsztalosMorelletal.2005:45).Ontheone hand,womenserveasthesymbolforthenation,andasasourceforinspiration formenintheirworkanddutytowardsthenation(military and day to day work). In this case, women are given a passive role in the nation building project,as an ‘icon’or evenas an‘object’ of thenation.Ontheotherhand, women are given active roles and assignments, while caring for the private realm and the family and children, and thereby safeguarding the national traditionsandlanguage.Hurdidentifiespotentialtensionbetweentheaimsof the Kulturnation andthe Staatnation .Inshort,womenshouldnotbetooactiveor ‘takeover’toomuchofmen’sobligationsandassignmentsinthepublicsphere, whichmightcreateconflicts(HurdIn:AsztalosMorelletal.2005). Ifwomendonottakecare,inshort,thepubliclyactiveangelofthestrugglingKulturnation risks conversion into the Staatsnation’s whore, the emasculating witch, the woman whose publicpresenceisafundamentalthreattothenationalmalecommunity(HurdIn:Asztalos Morelletal.2005:64). Thus,womenmightbecomeaconvenientgrouptoblameinthepotentialfail ureofthe Staatnation or Volknation .Thissymbolismand‘backlash’forwomenis harsh,buthasparallelstothedevelopmentofthecommunistandpostcom munistperiod.Thecallsforamore‘passive’womanasnationareoftenheard oncethe Staatnation isinplace,andthepoliticalaimsset.Thiswasevidentfor exampleduringtheSovietregimewhentheofficialagendaproclaimedequality between the sexes and high employment rates, but the public presence of womenwasalsocriticized,forbeingconflictingtotheir‘purely’womanlymis sion which also threatened the reproduction of the society, and eventually pavedthe wayfor moreconservativeapproachesduringthe1980s.Theup comingchaptersixwilldiscussthegenderisedpublic/privaterelationsinmore

77 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism detail,withafocusongender,livelihoodandworkinbothacommunistanda postcommunistcontext. From‘local’to‘global’heritage The restoration of nationalistic ideals and values evident in the postsocialist Latviansocietycaninsomerespectbeanalysedasaprocessof‘reterritorialisa tion’.YoungandLight(2001)claimthattheattemptstoestablishandconstruct identitiesbasedontheideaofthenationstatehavecontinuedtohaveasignifi cance alongside the ‘European project’ of borderlessness. Massey (2005) identifiesthecontinuoussuperiorpositionofthenationstateasa“geography ofborderdiscipline”(2005:86),whichdividestheworldintoimagined‘fixed’ and‘enclosed’units,inneedofprotection.Masseycriticizestheoveremphasis oftheboundariesofthenationstate,whichidentifiesthe‘local’orthe‘home’, with reference to culture and place as superior to a more ‘global’ relational context. Here, the ‘local’ is sometimes perceived as becoming the ‘victim’ of globalization and external influences, rather than actively constituting and re producingtheglobal(Massey2005).Iwillherearguethatthelattertendency becomesevidentinthediscussionofthefuturedevelopment of the Latvian culturalheritage,aspartofthe‘Homeland’,whichfacesnewchallengesinthe postsocialist period. Tourism is hereperceived as having an ambivalent and conflictingrole.Ontheonehand,tourismmightserveasatoolforprotecting thenationalculturalheritageandthe Dainas ,whileontheotherhand,tourismis perceivedasathreatintermsofthepossibleexploitationandcommercializa tionofitscoreelements. Commodifyingculture A range of researchers have argued how different forms of cultural heritage havebecomeincreasinglycommodifiedandcommercializedinacontemporary context, in how cultural sites and activities are experienced and consumed through the development of tourism (see Braunerhielm 2006; Urry 1990; Aronssonetal.eds.2007;Meethan2001).Consumptionhasbecomeaninte grated part of the contemporary society and culture. Different authors also underline that this process involves how culture and economy have become gradually more interwoven,in howculture and economyinteractwithin con sumption, production and processes of identitymaking, in collaboration betweenthelocalandglobal(Aronssonetal.eds.2007;DuGay1997;Connell &Gibson2003).Localculturalheritageisingeneralperceivedasasourceof regionaldevelopmentandeconomicgrowthinordertoattracttouristsaswell

78 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism as inhabitants to different places and destinations. Thus, cultural heritage as partofplacemarketinghasbecomecrucialinordertocreateanimageforthe destination which can be used forcompetingfor tourists in an international context (Braunerhielm 2006; Morgan & Pritchard 1998). Cities and regions havestartedtotransformfromhavingtheirrootsintraditionaleconomicsec tors,suchasindustryoragriculture,toadoptingstrategiesorientedtowardsthe development of tourism in general and cultural tourism more specifically. Braunerhielm (2006) underlines the importance of an actor approach in the analysisofhowculturalheritageiscommodified,andemphasizeshowthedefi nition of culture in general and the experience of cultural heritage more specifically vary depending on whose perspective is being acknowledged. Moreover,thedevelopmentoftourismandthecommercializationofthecul tural heritage may also be controversial. How the cultural heritage should be usedandcommodifiedisacomplexissue,andinthiscase,theopinionsofthe localpopulation,tourists,publicactorsandtheprivatesectormighttakediffer entexpressions(seeBraunerhielm2006). The development of cultural tourism in all three Baltic States has been prominentduringthelastfewyears,andhasforexamplebeenconductedin cooperationwithinternationalorganizationssuchasUNESCO.Thepurposes havebeen tobothpreserveanduse thecountries’ cultural heritage for eco nomicpurposesinasustainablemanner,andalsotocreateregionalidentities and images. A report made in collaboration with UNESCO from 2003 emphasisesthepotentialfordevelopingculturaltourismintheBalticStates,but alsoidentifiesanumberofobstacles,forexample,intermsofhowtocommu nicate the cultural heritage due to poor language skills, insufficient infrastructureandalack of previousexperiencewithin this field. The report alsopointsoutorganizationalandpoliticalproblemsinhowthedevelopment ofculturaltourismmayfallbetweentwodepartments,asitisbasedonashared responsibilitybetweentheMinistryofCultureandtheMinistryofEconomics (UNESCO 2003).Thus,questionsrelatingtocultureandeconomyrisktobeing treated as two separate phenomenons in the postsocialist period in Latvia, which relates to the wish to reimagine the nation state and treat culture as associated with preSoviet traditions, customs and the struggle for independence and in need of preservation and protection rather than commercialization. The development of the national song and dance festival has claimed increasedstatusonthestate’spoliticalagendainpacewiththemanifestationof nationalandculturalvaluesaftertheLatvianindependence.Theorganizational

79 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism work with the event is financed by state contributions and supported by a particular national legislation, which for example regulates the organizational framework (see www.km.gov.lv). The financial contributions are distributed partly as economic means for central organization and planning before the festival,andpartlyintermsofstatecontributionsfortheparticipants’expenses inconnectiontothefestival,forexample,accommodationandtransportation toRiga.Thestatehasstartedtoacknowledgethefestivalascontributingtoa localandregionaldevelopment,attractingdomesticandforeignvisitorstoboth Rigaandthecountryside,forboththenationalfestivalandsmallermorelocally arrangedevents(Femalerepresentative,TheLatvianNationalCenterforTraditional andPerformingArts ,August2005). Anothermotiveforthestate’sprioritizationofthesonganddancefestival isthefactthatin2003theLatvianfolkmusicalheritagetogetherwiththeEsto nianandtheLithuanianqualifiedtobeplacesonUNESCO’sinternationallist of ProclamationofMasterpiecesoftheOralandIntangible Heritage of Humanity . The programhighlightstraditional‘intangible’culturalexpressions,suchasdanceor oral heritage, as well as places which become arenas for such manifestation, suchastheLatviannationalsonganddancearena(www.unesco.org,200509 10).OnepurposewiththeBalticapplicationtoUNESCOwastopreservethe oral cultural heritage and its traditions in the song and dance festival, which wereconsideredtobe essentialpartsofthenationalidentitiesandbearersof importantsymbolicvalues.Qualifyingtobeonthelistalsoconstitutedtoward highlightingtheuniquenessoftheculturalheritageinaninternationalcontext, which is an important tool in the development and marketing of tourism (Female representative, The Latvian National Center for Traditional and Performing Arts , August 2005; Multinational candidature file 2002). Moreover, the UNESCOapplicationdescribesthenationalculturalheritageasthreateneddue to extensive economical, political and cultural changes taking place in Latvia sinceindependence. Theeverydaylivesaswellasmentalandculturalspacehavebecomevulnerabletocommer cialization, which has negative effect on the maintenance of local traditions under the overwhelmingglobalization(Multinationalcandidaturefile,2002:15). One ‘risk factor’ identified as contributing to the vulnerability of the cultural heritageisthedecreasedstandardoflivingamongthepopulationandstatefi nancialstraitsasaresultofanegativeeconomicdevelopmentinthebeginning ofthe1990s(Multinationalcandidaturefile2002:15).Thegradualtransitionto amarketeconomyexperiencedaseriesofsetbacksandresulted inincreasing

80 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism socialandeconomicgapswithintheLatviansociety,duetoahighinflationand unemployment (see O’Connor 2003). In the application, the youth and the senior share of the Latvian population are identified as especially vulnerable segments,whileatthesametimeconstituting“thecoregroupsoftraditioncar riers”(Multinationalcandidaturefile2002:15).Anotherissuebroughtintolight istheglobalizationprocess,andnewculturalinfluenceswhichareperceivedas eventuallywateringdownthetraditionalLatviancultureandcontributingtothe lossofsignificantnationalvalues.Inthiscase,theLatviansocietyisconsidered too fragile andvulnerable toresist thenewinfluences.Therefore,oneofthe aimswiththeUNESCOappointmentistoprotecttheseculturalvaluesagainst newinfluencesandprocessesofcommercialization(Multinationalcandidature file2002).TheMultinationalcandidatureapplicationfilestatesthat: (…) this cultural expression has never been and could not ever become a commercial enterprise(Multinationalcandidaturefile,2002:15). Thus,thequestionremainsofwhatstrategieswillbeusedtoreachtheaimsof preservation and protection of the cultural heritage in the future, and how tourism may be a part of this process. In some sense, the song and dance festivalsarealreadybeing‘commercialized’,marketedonaninternationalscale toattractthousandsofpayingvisitorsandtouriststoLatvia,requiringarange of services for its implementation, including private enterprises within the tourismsector.Thestate’sresponsibilityforfinancingthesonganddancefesti valisregulatedinthe SongandDanceCelebrationLaw from2005,including“the preparationandorganizationoftheNationwideLatvianSongandDanceCele bration,aswellasforthecoveringoflodgingandcateringexpensesforFestival participants during the Festival” ( Song and Dance Celebration Law 2005 www.km.gov.lv20080824).Inthe2008versionofthesonganddancefestival, partoftheoverallbudgetgovernedbytheMinistry of Culture also included income from the private sector, partly from the use of the song and dance festival logotype and trademark as well as from selling tickets to different events,andpartlyfromsponsoringfromarangeofprivatecompanies,which aimedat“realizationoftheCelebrationartisticconcept“.Intotal,thefinancial income from private sources was estimated to 1,250 000 Lats (www.dziesmusvetki2008.lv 20080824). The contents and program of the festival are constantly negotiated, as organizers are forced to balance the proportions between the ‘traditional’ oral heritage and new, modern and commercialinfluences.Duringthesonganddancefestivalin2003,thesenew influencesbecameevidentwhenLatvianrockandpopmusicianswereinvited

81 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism tothegalaconcertandmadeaperformancetogetherwithanumberofyouth choirs.Theeventisdescribedassuccessfulbytheorganizers,butthepopular musicwasconsideredtotaketoomuchspace. Whatkindoftraditiondidwekeepwiththeyouthconcert?Thesamefestivalscanbefound inallpartsoftheworld.Therewasnopointofit.Noacapellamusic,thechoirwasnotthe mainperformer,butonlybackgroundsingersforpopmusiciansorsoloists.Thiscouldbea smallpartofthefestival,butnotthewayhowtoperform.Itwasverypopular,butourtaskis to keep a tradition (Female representative, The Latvian National Center for Traditional and PerformingArts ,August2005). Thequoteclearlyillustrateshowfolkmusicandpopularmusicareconsidered tohavetheirownparticularplaceandformofexpression,andarenotpartof the same ‘heritage’. The modern popular music is considered to represent a more homogenized and watereddown type of music, controlled by external, commercialforces.Thechoirmusicontheotherhand,isperceivedasrepre sentingmorea‘professional’and‘advanced’musicalperformance,moreclosely associatedwithaLatvianidentity.Here,atensionbetweenmusicinits‘fluid’ andmore‘fixed’formcanbedistinguished,inhowthestate’sofficialrolehas beentoregulateandprotecttheoralheritageoftheLatvian Dainas ,thuspro motingmore‘fixed’expressionsofmusicaslocallyrootedandasaninstrument forencouragingnationalawakening.Eventhoughthissofarhasbeenthemost prominent discourse, the development of more ‘commercial’elementsof the festival, for example, through sponsorship and the presence of ‘popular culture’,mightalsochallengethe‘static’versionandaimsofthefestival.Music isinevitablyapartofthecontemporarypostsocialisttransformationprocess, which develops, brings in influences and inspiration from different places aroundtheworld,andmeltstogetherwiththe‘traditional’culturalheritageand pavesthewayfornewformsofLatvianmusicalexpressions. Conclusion Theaimofthischapterhasbeentodiscuss‘geographiesofneonationalism’ basedonhowtheLatviannationis(re)imagined,constructedandmanifestedin apostsocialistcontextthroughtourismdevelopmentandmarketing.Thefocus hasbeenonhowpublictourismactorspromoteLatvia as The land that sings , whichrelatestotheculturalheritageofLatvianfolksongs( Dainas ),aswellas thedevelopmentandpromotionofthenationalLatviansonganddancefesti val,arrangedeveryfifthyear.Thepurposeofthechapterhasbeentohighlight therelationbetween music and place ,inthiscasehowtourismdevelopmentpar

82 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism ticipates in reestablishing a national identity by promoting local culture and traditions,whilealsobeingatoolfor commodification andcommercializationof theculturalheritage.Moreover,ithasalsobeendiscussedhowthisprocessis genderised ,inhowdifferentidealsoffemininityarebeingusedintheconstruc tion of the nation state, based on YuvalDavis’ (1997) concepts of the Volknation , Kulturnation and Staatnation . The Latvian tourism marketing can in general be described as a tool for highlighting a local musical heritage where historicaltraditionsandculturebecometwocentralcomponents.Theemphasis onfolkmusicrepresentsanambitiontocreatean‘authentic’nationalidentity andasenseof‘Latvianness’sharedandvaluedbyallinhabitants.Theaimhas beentoidentifya‘core’or‘soul’oftheLatviannation,whichhasclearparallels to more ‘primordialist’ ideals of nationalism, in how the Latvian culture is believed to have survived many years of occupations, and finally reawakened aftertheLatvianindependence.Thus,thefocusisonacontinuationwiththe past,andthepreSovietperiodofnationalawakening,whenamajorityofthe folksongswerecollectedandmadeintoa‘nationalculturalheritage’,aswellas whenthefirstsonganddancefestivalwasinitiated.Moreover,thelongingfor thepreSovietpastalsoincludesthecelebrationofruralLatvianlandscapesas the main setting for the inspiration and performance of the Dainas , which portraysLatviansaslivingclosetonatureandagriculturalactivitiesincontrast tothemodifiedSovietindustriallandscapes. Ihavefocusedonthenationstateassomethingsociallyconstructed,and not‘fixed’inneitheritsbordersnorcontents,butconstantly made inaccordance todifferentactors’specificaimsandvalues.Ihavealsoarguedthattheprocess ofreimaginingthenationstateisnotagenderneutralprocess,butthatwomen andmenhavebeengivendifferentroles in itsmanifestationbothhistorically andtoday.Womentendtobebothvisibleandinvisibleactorsinthisprocess. Ontheonehand,womenhavebecomesymbolsforthenationstate,evidentin howidealsoffemininityarecelebrated,forexample,withinthetraditionofthe Dainas ,andhowwomenareconsideredtoberesponsibleforpassingontradi tional cultural values within the family, and actively engaging in cultural activitiessuchasthesonganddancefestival.Ontheotherhand,femininityis oftenascribedamore‘mystical’meaningwithrootsinnatureratherthancul ture,whichpromoteswomenintheir‘biological’rolesasmothersofthenation inneedofprotectionratherthanvisiblewithinthepublicsphere. The image of Latvia and its population as a ‘nation of singers’ is manifestedonastatelevelbypublictourismactors,aswellasbyotherstate institutionsresponsiblefortheorganizationandimplementationofthenational

83 ChapterthreeGeographiesofneonationalism song and dance festival. I would argue that the main purpose of thefestival eventstilltendtobetocontributetoasenseof‘togetherness’fortheLatvian population within the borders of Latvia, and to make up for the cultural oppression evident during the Soviet regime. This raises two important questions. Firstly, the issue of how to balance aims of preservation of the cultural heritage on the one hand, and the aims of promoting tourism developmentandcommercializationoftheeventontheother.Eventhoughit isa‘local’event,italsoservesasatoolforinternationalrecognitionandimage creation, and may attract thousands of foreign tourists. However, the commercializationofthe event still remains acontroversialquestion,andthe aim of the state actors is still to keep it as ‘pure’ as possible, with little influencesfromexternalmusicalinfluencesandprivateinterests. ThesecondquestionwhichIwouldliketoraiseisrelatedtotheprocess of identitybuilding within the project of the ‘new’ nation state. As has been discussedabove,thisisaclearlygenderisedprocess,providingandusingideals offemininity,whichtendtocelebratewomeninrather‘traditional’rolescom paredtomen.Thisisnotmerelyaninnocentsymbolicprocess,butisreflected withinpoliticsinLatviaaswellasinotherpostsocialistcountries.Theeffects oftheriseoftheseidealswillbefurtherdiscussedinchaptersix.Moreover,the constructionofthenationstatealsoraisesthequestionofwhoshouldbein cludedinthenationalprojectasa‘Latvian’andwhoshouldnot.Insomeways, reimaginingthenationstatetendstodrawlinesbetweenUsandThem,andthe question is who should be included in these two categories. In Latvia, issues relatingtocitizenshipandlanguagepoliciesstillremaincontroversialduetothe largeRussianspeakingminority,buthavebeenpartoftheprocessofhowthe nation state should be built, and by whom. A more indepth discussion of questions relating to theLatvianminorities and their rolesinthe Latvian na tionalprojectwillbediscussedinchapterfive.

84

Chapterfour GeographiesofEuropeanisation IfyoucontinueeastwardfromtheFreedommonumentalongBrīvībasbulvāris, untilitintersectswithElizabetesiela,youwillfindHotel RevalLatvija toyour left.Theglasscoveredfaçadeextends27stories,whichmakesitoneofthetall estbuildingsinthecenterofRiga.Buildingthehotelwasstartedinthe1960s, during the Soviet occupation, and was finished in 1978. After a complete restoration during the beginning of the 21st century, the architecture bears moretracesofWesterncapitalismthanofcommunistideals.

Revalhotel.Photobytheauthor. ThehotelillustratesthefastgrowingtourismsectorinRiga,andhowthecapital isfindingitswayintotheglobaleconomythroughthedevelopmentoftourism, withtheaimsofattractingtouristsaswellasforeigninvestmentcapitaltofur therboostthenationaleconomy. RevalLatvija hasbeenownedbyaNorwegian realestatecompanysince1998,whichhasinvestedinhotels,shoppingcenters and resorts in Eastern Europe, including the Baltic countries and Russia (www.linstow.no20080214).Thecompanyownsthe RevalHotelgroup ,includ ing hotels in the larger cities in the Baltic States and describes itself as “the leadinghotelchainintheBalticcountriesconstantlyexpandinganddevelop ing”. The hotel is being marketed as “Riga’s main landmark and the largest

85 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation businessandconferencehotelintheBaltics”.Othercommontermsusedon theofficialhomepageofthehotelare‘trendyandstylish’,aswellas‘interna tional’, with an emphasis on ‘Scandinavian design’ and ‘modern service (www.revalhotels.com20080214). To a foreign tourist, Riga may appear to have some of the ‘ordinary’ featuresofaEuropeancapitalinhowtheinternationalinfluenceshavebecome strikingpartofthecityscene;globalrestaurantchains,bankofficesreflecting Scandinavian and European investments, large billboards covering housing facades,thatadvertisethelatestmodelsofcellphonesandsubscriptionrates, newly built car sale showrooms and gas stations, and shopping malls and arcadesbothinthecentreandintheoutskirtsofthecity.Rigahasinthissense become a node in a global web of social, cultural, economic and political relations,whichisreflectedintheeverydaylifeoflocalinhabitantsandvisiting tourists. Moreover, Riga is a city reflecting an ‘economy of signs’, containing multiple images, symbols and brands, communicating and reflecting new consumer ‘lifestyles’ and cultural identities. The economy is just as in other European countries becoming more ‘culturalised’, in how different products carrydifferentculturallychargedmeaningsandvalues(seeDuGay1997). The period following the Latvian independence has involved rapid societalchanges.Arangeofresearchershavehighlightedhowthepostsocialist transition process includes a reorientation from a centrallyrun command economyto a more liberal marketeconomy, whichhasalsomeantarefocus towardsWesternandglobalmarketsfortradeandmobility,incontrasttothe previous relatively isolated situation within the borders of the Soviet Union. Thisprocessalsoincludesthetransitionfromlargescaleindustrialproduction tomoreflexibleandserviceorientedsectors,includingtourism.Theeconomic andpoliticaldimensionsofthetransitionprocess arealsodescribedasbeing furtherspurredbythemembershipintheEuropeanUnion,whichhasincluded reducingthebordersandbarriersfortrade,resultinginamoreintensiveflowof capital,investments,goodsandarrivingtourists.Latviaisinthiscontextoften portrayed as one of the most expansive and fastest growing economies in Europe,withreferencetothestabileGNPgrowthsincetheendofthe1990s (seee.g.Smithetal.2002;Pabriksetal.2002). Theaimofthischapteristoanalysehowthedevelopmentandpromotion of tourism, as part of the transforming ‘Latvian common space’, reflects a genderised‘ GeographiesofEuropeanisation’ .Iwilldiscusshowtourismispromoted asanimportantpartofthe‘transition’process,bothasasymbolandaneco nomic activity manifesting the reorientation and reimagination of Latvia as a

86 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation partoftheEuropeanandglobaleconomywithemphasisonthepositiveeffects of globalization andintermsofthe‘new’politicalparadigmof regionalism 24 .Inthe lattercase,thebordersofthenationstatearegivenasecondaryfunction,while providingLatviaamoreactiveroleintheformationofthe‘newEurope’,and embodyingadiversity of Latvian politicaland cultural regions. The questfor ‘Europeanisation’willbeanalysedasrelatedtoclassic‘modernisation’theories, which advocate that postsocialist countries follow the same paradigms and paths of development as Western European countries. This approach also tendstoincludeanadoptionofneoliberalideologiesandstrategiesinorderto reducetheroleofthestateaswellaspotentialbarriersfortradeandmobility,in favouroftheopenandfreemarketwithinthebordersoftheEuropeanUnion. Tourismisoftenanalysedasanexampleofhowpostsocialistcountries adopt to the rules of the Western European market economy through entrepreneurship, privatization, increasing Western tourist arrivals, as well as tourismmarketingandimagepromotionforamoreWesternclientele(seeHall 2004;Young&Light2001).Inthiscase,tourismdevelopmentandmarketingis considered to symbolise a ‘return to Europe’, and the shift from a more ‘Eastern’ identity to a more ‘Western’ belonging, based on the political and economic reforms conducted in the transition process. Still, I would suggest that the Europeanisation of tourism is far more complex than a transitional shiftfromEasttoWest.Inthelatterpartofthechapter,Iwilldiscussexamples of genderised effectsandoutcomesoftheEuropeanisationprocess,basedonan analysis of how Riga struggles with an ‘image’ of being a sex tourism destination.InLatvia,sextourismisdebatedandidentifiedasanegativeeffect of theopenborderstoWesternEurope,which has resulted in an increased inflowofWesterntourists.Iwilldiscusssextourism as alsobeingrelated to howtourismmarketingtendstoreproduceacontinuousgenderisedEast/West divide,aswellashowtheneoliberalideologiescontributetoa‘normalisation’

24 This chapter is based on the results of a text analysis study, including printed tourism brochures(LTDA2004 DiscoverLatvia ,LTDA2007 Thelandthatsings ),andmaterialpublished electronically at the LTDAwebsite (www.latviatourism.lv), and by the tourism organisation Inspiration Riga (www.inspirationriga.com), which includes both public and private actors. Thetextanalysisalsoincludestourismmarketingmaterialfromtheprivatesector:printedfree tourist magazines such as Riga This Week, Welcome! and Guide for Enjoying and websites containing information about Riga’s nightlife, such as www.nightliferiga.com and www.partyinriga.com, as well as private tour operators such as www.rigaoutthere.com. The text analysis has also included national and EUpolicy documents such as the National Development Plan 20072013 and A renewed EU Tourism Policy: towards a stronger partnership for EuropeanTourism, aswellasOnLinenewspaperarticlesfrom TheBalticTimes relatingtoissues of sex tourism and information provided through the campaign “Stop sexterrorism” (www.alfacentrs.lv).Fordetails,see“Brochuresandreports”and“Internetsources”inthelist ofreferences.

87 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation of sex tourism as an integral and natural part of the new Latvian market economy.Myintentionisnottoportraysextourismasthe main outcomeor exampleofprocessesofEuropeanisationortoreinforcethedualisticdivision between the ‘East’ and ‘West’, which should not be regarded as two homogenous units or ideologies. Rather, my objective is to examine critically examplesoftheEuropeanisationoftourismandmakevisiblehowgenderised perceptions of the East and the West interact within tourism marketing, in ordertoquestionthem. Tourismintransition ‘GeographiesofEuropeanisation’ willherebeanalysedasreflectingclassic‘moderni sation theories’ and approaches to development and transition (see Blokker 2005).Fromthisperspective,thetransitionprocessisperceivedasfollowinga logicalandlineardevelopmentphase,whichindicatesthattheaimsofthetran sitionprocessarepredeterminedandthatthemodelsappliedfordevelopment areuniversalintheircharacter,meaningthattheyshouldbeappliedtoallpost socialist countries. The modernization theories advocate an abandonment of thepast,toputanendtotheSoviethistoryanditslegacies,whileembracing moderncapitalistmodelsofchangeanddevelopment.Theeconomicidealsof progressandgrowthtendtoportraymore‘mature’Westerneconomiesasthe rolemodelsforthetransitionprocess,symbolizingthe‘victory’andsuccessof capitalisticideologiesandsocietiesoverthefallandfailuresofthecommunist system. The communist system itself could also be analysed as representing anotherversionofmodernity,whichforalongtimewasregardedasthesingle alternative to capitalism. Thus, from this perspective, transition would imply movingfromonesetofmodernitytoanother(Blokker2005). PicklesandSmith(1998)claimthat‘shocktherapy’orotherpoliticaland economicreformsinpostsocialistcountrieshavebeen regarded as ‘the only possible strategy’ after the collapse of the Soviet Union, due to the distrust againstthepreviouscommunistsystem,andothersocialistmodels.InLatvia, ‘shocktherapy’ was implemented including measuresfor market liberalisation suchasthereleaseofpricesandthenewLatviancurrency,privatisationandthe decreaseofstatesubsidies.Theeconomicaimsofthetransitionhaveinvolved givingfreereigntothemarketandincreasingthedistinctionbetweenthestate andthemarket,whileopeningthebordersforforeigninvestmentsandforin ternationalinvestmentfunds,suchastheIMFandtheWorldBank.Thisre flectsamoreneoliberalapproach,inwhichtheroleofthestateisrenegotiated

88 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation infavourofthefreemarket,privatisationandindividualism(Pickles&Smith 1998). The transition process in Latvia and other postsocialist countries has taken place within overall processes of globalisation , which include increasing flowsandinteractionsamongnationsandregionsonaglobalscale,ofproducts and people as well as symbols and information. Young and Light (2001) illustratethisprocessandarguefortheneedofa geographical approach and analysisofthepostsocialisttransformationprocess. (…)thesecountriesnowfindthemselvesoccupyingparticularspacesintheinternationaldivi sionoflabour,flowsofcapitalandinvestment,andintradingrelationships,whichinvolvean internationalisationorglobalisationoftheireconomicactivities(Young&Light2001:942). The academic discussions of the definition and effects of globalisation have been extensive and diverse. It should be emphasised that the globalisation processtakes multiple forms, including economic,technological, political and culturaldimensions(Taylor&Flint2000:3) 25 .Itsoutcomesmaybebothposi tiveandnegativeandreflectpowerrelationsbetweenamonggroupsofpeople, includingwhichactorsbenefitfromitsdevelopmentandhowglobalisationis used as more political and economic discourse and for what purposes (see Johansson&MolinaIn:Berglundetal.eds2005). Latvia’squestforeconomicreformsaswellasthequestformembership inWesternEuropean political unions, such astheEuropean Union, may be analysed in relation to what Massey (2005) terms the “Geography of borderlessness and mobility” (Massey 2005:86), reflected in the emphasis on globalisation,neoliberalismandfreetrade.Masseyclaimsthatbothhistorical andcontemporarymodernizationprojects,whichtendtoembracethepositive effectsofglobalization,reflectaviewofdifferentsocietiesandplacesasbeing part of a ‘single temporal development’, sharing one history, one universal space and one single temporal phase. Consequently, globalisation becomes ‘evidence’ of how the world is fully integrated, but Massey argues that it involves a world of ‘depthlessness’, presenting it as one closed homogenous system.Moreover,globalizationisportrayedassomethinginevitable,meaning thatallsocietieswilleventuallybepartoftheglobaleconomy,andthereby,of modern Western culture. All societies will thereby eventually reach the same

25 TaylorandFlintclaimthatglobalizationinfacthasalonghistory,andthatitscontemporary forms could be described as plural ‘globalisations’. The authors identify eight different but interrelateddimensionsofglobalization;financial,technological,economic,cultural,political, ecological,geographicalandsociologicalglobalization(seeTaylor&Flint2000:3f).

89 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation standard of living and development, and even though Eastern Europe may seemtobe‘laggingbehind’initsdevelopment,theytoowill‘catchup’when implementingthereformsrequiredandjoiningpoliticalunionssuchastheEU. Fromthisperspective,theaimsofprogressanddevelopment are already set andfixedinbothtimeandspace,andbasedonaWesternmodelofprogress. Thus,Masseyclaimsthatthereisstillaquestfor‘tamingspace’(Massey2005). Theaimsandoutcomesofthetransitionaspromotedbyideologiesbased onaclassicalliberal ‘modernisationparadigm’canbediscussedandcriticized fromarangeofperspectives,includingquestioninghowitdoesnottakeinto account the historicallyrooted structures from both the socialist and pre socialist period. I will not go into a more indepthdiscussion of thecritique againstthemodernisationapproachhere,butreturntotheseissuesinthenext chapter. Promotingeconomicgrowththroughtourism ThetransitionoftheLatvianeconomyisoftendescribedascompletedinre gardtotheprivatizationprocessandthemarketeconomyreformsimplemented (seeTheWorldBank2002;Nordregio2000;Nissinen1999).TheBalticStates have, despite the unstable economy during the 1990s, been regarded as the mostexpansiveeconomiesinEurope.LatviahashadanannualGNPgrowth ofmorethan7percentsincetheendofthe1990s,butthedevelopmentand growthshouldalsobeanalysedastakingplaceinaneconomywhichhadtobe rebuiltfromscratchafterthesecondindependence.TheLatvianGDPislow compared with that of the ‘old’ EUcountries, and the regional differences withinthecountryintermsofeconomicgrowthandstandardoflivingarestill clearly evident (Tiirinen et al. 2000; State Regional Development Agency 2007)26 . The Latvian economy has gone through an extensive structural transformation,whichhasincludedadeclineofthemanufacturingindustryand anupswingfortheservicesector.Thisshiftisespeciallyevidentinthecapital Riga, where services constitute the dominant sector, including trade (21%), transportationandcommunication(19%)andcommercialservices(18%)(Riga CityCouncil2006:15).ThegrowthoftheLatvianeconomyhasbeenspurredby foreigninvestmentsandcompanies,forexample,inassistancewithproduction

26 ThestabileeconomicgrowthinLatviahasbeenchallengedbyincreasedinflationduringthe lastfewyears,creatinganincreaseofconsumerpricelevels,whichhasmadebasicproducts more expensive for the population. See Vanags and Hansen (2007) for a more indepth analysis of the causes andpotential solutions for the inflation in Latvia. The causes of the inflationaredescribedasthefollowing;“weobserveoverheatedlabour,goodsandproperty marketsallofwhichinteracttogenerateacceleratinginflation”(Vanags&Hansen2007:2).

90 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation technology, infrastructure and research and development. The investments have,beenplacedwithinthefood,tourism,finance,energyandcommunication sectors,which havefurthercontributedtoRiga’sdominating position within theLatvianeconomyasa‘growthpole’(seeRigaCityCouncil2006). Hall (2004) andWorthington (2001; 2003) claimthat tourism has both reflected and contributed to the economic transformation processes in many postsocialistcountries.Tourismhasbeenawayofachievingapositivebalance in the national economy through the access to foreign currencies, and has servedasasolutiontothe challengesand problems related to the transition process. Hall (2004) concludes that tourism in postsocialist states can be viewedas“anintegralpartoftheglobalexpansionofcapitalism”,witheffects suchasanincreaseandprivatisationoftheservicesector,promotionofentre preneurshipaswellasforeigninvestments(Hall2004).Tourism’sshareofthe LatvianGDPhasincreasedsinceindependence,butisstillrelativelylowina European comparison 27 . The activities within the hotel and restaurant sector contributedwith1.9percentofthetotalgrossvalueaddedin2007,whichisan increasefrommerely1percentin1995(LCSBdatabasewww.csb.gov.lv2008 0826) 28 .Itisdifficulttoestimatetheeconomiceffectsofthetourismsector due to its diverse character, which includes other activities apart from those within hotelsandrestaurants. The economic effects must also be analysedin relationtothesupplyofnewjobsandbusinessstartups.Intermsofvisitor numberstoLatvia,thenumberofforeigntouristshasshowedasignificantin crease,bothintermsofthenumberofnonresidentbordercrossingsandinthe numberofforeignovernightstays 29 .Fromaround1.5millionbordercrossings

27 TheEuropeanCommissionestimatestourism’scontributiontotheoverallEUGDPtobe around4percentwhenapplyinga‘narrow’definitionofthetourismindustry,and11percent when taking into account relations to other sectors (Commission of the European Communities17.3.2006 A renewed EU Tourism Policy: towards a stronger partnership for European Tourism http://ec.europa.eu20080827). 28 The estimations of the GDP are based on LCSB’s definitions and calculations. From a productionperspective,GDPcanbedescribedas“thesumofgrossvalueaddedofvarious institutionalsectorsorvariousindustriesplustaxesandlesssubsidiesonproducts”(Statistical yearbook of Latvia 2004:9). Tourism’s share of the GDP could also be estimated as larger sincethedefinitionsusedmerelyincludethecategory“hotelsandrestaurants”,andnoother partsofthetourismsector.Itmayalsobedifficulttoseparatetheexpendituresandincome fromdomestictouristsandforeigntourists. 29 Border crossings are measured through a national survey of persons (aged 15 years and over)crossingLatvia’sborders.Thestatisticsincludedeparturesofresidentandnonresident travellers.Oneproblemintheanalysisofthebordercrossingstatisticsisthefactthatthey includebothsamedayandovernightvisitorsandaremerelyestimationsofthenumbersof travellers.DuetothemembershipintheEU,theborderswithotherEUcountrieshavebeen opened up, creating a greater flowofvisitors to and from neighbouring countries, such as EstoniaandLithuania,whomaynotfallwithinthecategorizationofatouristoratraveller.

91 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation in 1995, Latvia had approximately 5.2 million border crossings in 2007, of which32percentwereestimatedtobeforeignovernightvisitors.Intermsof thenumberofovernightstaysinhotelsandotheraccommodation establish ments,thenumbersofforeigntouristshavealsoincreasedsignificantly.From around220000foreignovernightvisitorsin1993,Latviahadjustover844000 foreign tourists staying overnight in 2007. The total expenditure of foreign visitorsisestimatedtohaveincreasedfrom66millionLatsin1999toaround 338 million Lats in 2007, which also includes a rise of the average daily expenditurepertravellerfrom19Latsto47Lats 30 .Asforotherpartsofthe economy,thegrowthoftourisminLatviahasbeenconcentratedintheurban regionofRiga,inthedevelopmentofinfrastructuresuchasaccommodation, services,restaurants,andreflectedinthenumberofvisitors.In2007,thecityof Riga supplied 44 percent of the total number of beds in hotels and other accommodationestablishmentsinLatvia. Figure 3: Number of foreign overnight stays in hotels and other accommodation establishmentsinLatviaandRiga1993/19992007

900000 800000 700000 600000 Total 500000 Latvia 400000 Riga 300000 200000 100000 0

1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Source:LCSBdatabasewww.csb.gov.lv20080825;LCSB TourisminLatviain2007. Whenincludingregisteredbedsintouristaccommodationestablishments alsointhegreaterRigaregion(Pieriga)andJūrmala,Riga’sdominancebecomes

Thestatisticsofovernightstaysinregisteredhotelsandotheraccommodationprovidemore detailedinformationofthenumberofregisteredtouristsstayingovernight,butexcludethose stayingoveratfriendsandfamilies,andrelyonanaccuratesystemforreportingtheincoming touriststothestateauthorities. 30 Theestimationsofthetraveller’sexpenditurearebasedontheLCSBsurveyofnonresident personscrossingLatvia’sborders.1Lat=approximately1.40EUR.

92 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation even more striking, constituting 79 percent of the total number of tourist accommodation facilities. A substantial share ofthe overnightvisitorsstayin RigacomparedtootherpartsofLatvia.Riga’sshareofinternationalovernight staysin2007was74percent(ibid; LCSBTourisminLatviain2007 )(seeFigure 3). When analysing the origin of the foreign tourists in the registered accommodation establishments in 2007, there is an overrepresentation of tourists from Germany (13.2%), and the neighbouring countries, Lithuania (9.8%)andEstonia(9%),aswellasFinland.Comparingthe2007statisticswith numbersfrom1993,therehasbeenanincreaseoftouristsfromcountriesinthe westernpartofEurope,suchastheUK(2.8%in1993comparedto7.4%in 2007)andNorway(notrepresentedinthe1993statistics,butconstituted7%in 2007), which may be related to the development of lowcost airline routes (LCSBdatabasewww.csb.gov.lv20080825;LCSB TourisminLatviain2007 ). Towardsregionalism Theeconomicandpoliticalaimsofthe‘modernisation’paradigmandthequest for‘Europeanisation’asdescribedaboveweremanifestedandfulfilledthrough Latvia’s membership in the European Union in May 2004. Latvia was not merely incorporated into the legislative and institutional framework of the EuropeanUnionasanationstate,butalsoascontainingamultiplicityofre gions. Consequently, the period of independence does not merely include a process of nation building as discussed in the previous chapter, but also in volvesaimsof regionbuilding .Theadministrativebordersbetweenthedifferent nationstatesaretherebyperceivedashavingsecondaryimportance,whilees tablishing stricter borders between the European Union and the rest of the world takes emphasis. This signals an increasing decentralization process in postsocialistcountries,frombeingpartofa centralized command economy, towardsrenegotiatingtheroleofthestate,bothinrelationtothemarket,but alsoinconnectiontodifferentgeographicalscalesofgovernance;therebymore powerisprovidedtothesupranationallevelsaswellasautonomyforthelocal andregionallevels.Theprocessofregionbuildingisalsoimplementedwithin thedevelopmentoftourism.Asdiscussedinthepreviouschapter,thereisan increasing need for marketing different regions in order to attract tourists, which involves a more pronounced commercialization of tourism resources suchasculturalheritage.Thiswillbefurtherdiscussedbelow.

93 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation

‘Old’and‘new’formsofregionalism Thecontemporary‘renaissance’oftheregionsiscommonlyreferredtoasthe development of regionalism (see MacLeod 2001; Johnston et al. 2006; Syssner 2006).JosefinaSyssner(2006)discussestheconceptofregionalismasapolitical and territorial ideology, and distinguishes between ‘new’ and ‘old’ forms of regionalism.The‘older’approachofregionalismwasparticularlyevidentduring the1960sand1970s,reflectingamore‘ethnonationalisticmovement’inmore peripheralregionsinEurope,advocatingalesscentralizedgovernmentandan increasingroleforthecommunities.Fromthisperspective,externalforcesof changeintermsofidealsofmodernizationwereperceivedassomethingnega tive.Thismovementwasalsoareactionagainstamoretraditionalviewofre gions and regional development as a ‘topdown process’, viewing regions as ‘objects’inplanningandpolicymaking(Syssner2006:14f). The‘new’regionalism,ontheotherhand,focusesmoreontheeconomic dimensionsandadvantagesofestablishingregionsasthe‘centers’ofeconomic development.Syssnerclaimsthataimsofeconomicgrowthconstitutethe‘core value’withintheideologyofregionalism,withanemphasisonthepositiveout comesofglobalizationandEuropeanisation.Theideologiesofnewregionalism startedtoemergeduringthe1980swithincreasingcallsforcooperationover thenationalbordersfortheEUstructuralfunds(Syssner2006).Inthiscontext theregionshavebeengivenamoreactiveroleandresponsibility,inestablishing contactsandnetworksondifferentlevels.MacLeod(2001)discusseshowre gionalism reflects how the local level respond to and participates in global processesoftransformationinapostFordistera,whichincludesstrengthening andcollectinglocalassetsintermsofhumancapital,culturalresourcesaswell ascapital(MacLeod2001).Syssnerstateshowtheregionsshouldusetheirlocal strengthsinordertoreachapositiveregionaldevelopment and ‘competitive advantage’,togetherwithestablishedstrategiesofcollaborationwithotherre gions,bothnationallyandwithintheEuropeanUnion(Syssner2006). The emerging ideology of new regionalism is also reflected within the policiessetupnationallyinLatviatoguidetheeconomicdevelopment,through a polycentric rather than monocentric model, requiring more active responsibility of the regions 31 . In Soviet Latvia, a region was considered as merelyapoliticallevelsubordinatedtothecentralgovernmentinMoscow.Lat via as a republic constituted one ‘political unity’, but was also divided into

31 See e. g. The Ministry of Regional development and Local Governance (2006) Latvian NationalDevelopmentPlan20072013. Availableat:www.raplm.gov.lvandwww.nap.lv

94 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation different political administrative regions. Today, new centers and peripheries emerge within Latvia, defined as potential ‘growth regions’, attracting capital, investmentsandtourists,whileestablishingnetworkswithothercoreregions within an enlarged European Union. Despite the emphasis on regional diversity,RigaisstillportrayedashavingaprominentpositionastheLatvian ‘growthcentre’. RigaisthecapitalofLatviaandthecentreofalargeregionwhoseinfluencereachesbeyond itsadministrativeandnationalborders.FacilitationofdevelopmentofRigaasanexcellence centreofbusiness,scienceandcultureintheBalticSearegionisessentialforstrengthening Latvia’scompetitivenessonaglobalscale(TheMinistryofRegionaldevelopmentandLocal Governance2006:33). ForeigninvestmentsareahighpriorityfortheLatvianstate,andtheeconomic guidelines contain directives for creating favorable and competitive business environments for both foreign and domestic companies. The Latvian National Development Plan 32 (LNDP), comprising the period 20072013, describes the aimsofdevelopmentasfollows: LatviahasachievedoneofthehighestratesofeconomicgrowthintheEuropeanUnion.Itis importanttocontinuethisdevelopmentandtorapidlybringtheinhabitants’levelofwelfare andqualityoflifeuptothelevelofthedevelopedcountries.Latviahastocreatesuchcondi tionsfortheeconomythatwouldprovideapossibilitytotakeadvantageofthenewpolitical realityandthefavourablegeographiclocationfortheincreaseofthelevelofwelfareforLatvia itselfaswellasforitspartners,undertakingtheroleofefficientgatesontheroadoftransac tionsbetweenWestandEast(TheMinistryofRegionaldevelopmentandLocalGovernance 2006:12). TheintentionsoftheLNDParebasedona‘ nationalgrowthmodel’ ,whichreflects theaimsofa‘ growthscenario’ .Competitivenessisidentifiedasoneofthemain aims,withthegrowthanddevelopmentoftechnology,innovation,researchand knowledgebeingthemainguidingprinciplesinstridingtowardsa‘knowledge basedeconomy’(TheMinistryofRegionaldevelopmentandLocalGovernance 2006). Tourismand‘newregionalism’ Iwouldclaimthattheemergenceofnewregionalismcanbeanalysedashaving ratherparadoxicalandambivalentcharacteristics.Ontheonehand,theprocess

32 LNDPisanationalplanningdocumentwhichrelatestotheRegionalDevelopmentLawof theRepublicofLatvia(TheMinistryofRegionaldevelopmentandLocalGovernance2006:6).

95 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation of region building could be described as a wish to portray the diversity of Europeintermsofculture,historyandheritage,as wellas a way to provide eachandeveryregionthetoolstoguideandcontrolitsowndevelopment.On theotherhand,theprocessofregionalismtendstofollowaratherhomoge nisedpattern,basedonkeywords,suchaseconomicgrowthandcompetitive ness,whichcouldbeanalysedasreflectingageneralmodernisationideologyset upbyEUdirectivesandadoptedonthelocallevel.Blokker(2005)arguesthat theexpansionoftheEUshouldberegardedasasymbolofdiversityandnot merely as a way of seeing how the Eastern member statesadopttoWestern criteriaandmodelsofdemocracyandpoliticalrulesofthegame. The ostensible reproduction of WestEuropean norms, transition culture and discourses of EuropeanizationbyEastEuropeanelitesshouldbeunderstoodaspotentiallyentailingatwo wayrelationshipbetweentheWesterncentreandtheEasternperiphery,therebyacknowledg ingspacetomanoeuvreforthelatter(Blokker2005:518). Thus,thistwowayrelationshipwouldinvolvecultural,politicalandsocialex changeinbothdirections,notonlyinhowtheenlargementprocesshaseffects onthenewmembershipstates,butalsoinhowtheirparticipationintheoverall EuropeanprojectcontributestothetransformationoftheEUinsuchaway whichmayservealsoEasternEuropeaninterests.Consequently, the division between‘Western’and‘Eastern’Europemayeventuallybechallenged,dueto thisexchangeandcollaboration. In terms of tourism, Syssner points out that the ideology of new regionalismpromotestheuseoflocalresourcesasa‘meansformobilization’, inordertoreachtheaimsofeconomicgrowth(Syssner2006:186).Thismay includeaimsofdevelopingtourismbusinessesandentrepreneurship,aswellas marketingculturalresourcesandregionsasnewdestinations,reflectingamore commercialized approach. Both rural and urban regions are increasingly promotedandbrandedastourismdestinations,aprocesswhichinvolvesboth culturalandeconomicprocessesasdiscussedinthepreviouschapter(Syssner 2006).Iwouldalsoarguethattheprocessesofregionalismmaketheidentities ofdifferentregionsmoreflexibleandless‘fixed’comparedtoidentitiesbased ontheideaofthenationstate.Thisisevidentinthedevelopmentofdifferent tourismprojectsinvolvingcooperationbetweendifferentregionsinLatvia.In someprojects,regionsofLatviaare identifiedasbelongingto‘the BalticSea region’, for promoting rural development and tourism, infrastructure, etc., or are perceived as constituting a different part of the ‘Baltic States’ when

96 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation marketingtourismforforeignmarkets,aswellaswhenestablishingnetworks forruraltourismnetworksinthethreeBalticcountries 33 . Despitetheargumentsthattourismthroughtheideologyofregionalism maybeawayofstrengtheningandmobilizingdifferentregions,itisdifficultto ignorethefactthatthedevelopmenttendstotakeratherhomogenizedforms. DifferentregionaltourismprojectstendtobefinancedbytheEU,following policies which tend to reflect ‘Western’ European models of growth and development,makingtheprioritiesandaimsrathersimilar.Whenanalyzingthe officialEUtourismpolicyfrom2006,theemphasisisonbothdiversification andhomogenization.Tourismisregardedashavingaprominentroleforthe developmentofregionswithintheEU,intermsofincreasingcompetitiveness andasatoolfortransformingregionaleconomiesfromthetraditionalsectors tomoreserviceorientedactivities.Ontheonehand,theuniquenessofregional destinationsinthenewmembershipcountriesisreinforced. TherecentenlargementoftheEuropeanUnionhasincreasedthediversityofEuropeantour istdestinationsandproducts,openingupnumerousnaturalandculturalattractionsoftenun knowntomanyEuropeancitizens(CommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities2006b:3) Ontheotherhand,theEUisportrayedasoneunitandtourismdestination, whichneedstokeepitspositionas“theNo1worldtouristdestination”(ibid:3), andbecomemorecompetitiveinordertocomparewithotherdestinationsona globalscale.Inthiscase,theaimoftourismisalsotoformasenseofacom mon‘Europeanidentity’. Thanks to tourism, those visiting European destinationa are brought into contact with our valuesand our heritage.Tourismcontributestoabetterunderstandingamongstpeopleand helpsintheprocessofshaping theEuropeanidentity (CommissionoftheEuropeanCommuni ties2006b:3,myemphasis). Here,theemphasis is on common ‘European’ values and heritage communi catedthroughtourism, indicating howall regions and membership countries togetherconstitutethebasisforimplementingthe‘Europeanproject’.

33 See e. g. the projects Euroregion Baltic and Seagull (www.euroregionbaltic.eu), EUfunded projectswhichincludetourismactivitiesincollaborationbetweenregionsinSweden,Latvia, Lithuania, Poland, Denmark and Russia (Kaliningrad). See also the Latvian rural tourism association Laukucelotajs andtheircooperationwithruraltourismassociationsinEstoniaand Lithuania(www.celotajs.lv).

97 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation

Manifestingthe‘return’toEuropethroughtourismmarketing Blokker(2005)highlightsthattheincorporationof the ‘Eastern’ membership statesintotheEuropeancommunityhasservedastheultimateproofofsuccess ofthetransitionandbreakingfreefromtheSovietpastandmeetthedemands ofthenewmarketeconomy(Blokker2005).DenisaKostovicova(2004)with examplesfromSerbiaemphasiseshowtheprocesstowardsmembershipinthe EUhashadasymbolicmeaningforthe country’swishtobelongtoa‘new Europe’afterthefallofMilosevic.TheaimofreorientationtowardsEurope means becoming part of the Western world, while challenging the ‘Eastern’ identityandculture.Kostoviconadescribesthisprocessasclaiming Europeas identity,whichrelatesacommonpasthistoryanda‘European’culturalheritage (Kostovicova 2004). The identification with Western rather than Eastern Europe tends to be based on cultural values, for example, by promoting a Western Europeancultural heritage withintourism,buthas increasingly been based on aims of economic and political progress. StukulsEglitis(2002) dis cusses the ideals of Europeanisation as an example of ‘ spatial normality’ . She highlightsthatLatvia’swaytowardstheEuropeanUnionhasreflectedawishto find“ aplaceinspace” (StukulsEglitis2002:17).Thus,thefocushasbeentobe comeaterritorialandspatialpartofthemapoverWesternEurope,basedon ideas of inclusion and adaptation , and finding safety in both political and eco nomical terms, for example through alliances such as the EU and NATO (StukulsEglitis 2002:16). This illustrates attempts to adopt already existing modelsofchange,expressed in idealsof modernisation,ratherthannewand alternativepathwaysfollowingtheLatvianindependence. Parallel to the wish to highlight the ‘authentic’ elements of the reestablishednationstateasdescribedinthepreviouschapter,Latviantourism marketing also reflects a struggle to reestablish Latvia’s Western European identityandbelonging.Withinthiscontext,Rigahasledthewayintheprocess of new regionalism as discussed above, representing a modern Western European metropolis, as the national centre for economic growth. Riga is portrayedasthemeltingpotbetweentheWestandtheEast,intheborderland between‘traditional’Latviancultureandmodern,globalinfluences. Rigaisalivingmuseumwheremodernlifeandcomfortgoeshandinhandwithpicturesque charmoftheMiddleages(DiscoverLatvia2004:10). Rigaisdescribedas“OnthecrossroadsofEurope” (Discover Latvia 2004), reflectingitsformerhistoricalroleasacentrefortradeandeconomicdevelop mentinaNorthEuropeanandNordiccontext.The parallelstootherEuro

98 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation peancitiesarealsoemphasised,intermsofthecultural heritage,architecture andhistory.Thetourismmarketingreflectsawishbothtocompetewithother cities in terms of which city is the ‘oldest’ or has the most ‘wellpreserved’ heritage,butalsotopointouttothesimilaritiesbetweenRigaanditsEuropean neighbouring capitals. Thus, the desire is to accentuate both more homoge nized,commonfeaturesaswellastheRiga’s‘unique’character.Theuniqueness of the city is marked by underscoring the Old town of Riga as being on UNESCO’s world heritage list. However, the medieval heritage is packaged with more ‘Western’ preferences, lifestyles and tastes, which mark a desired reorientation to Western markets. The creative features of the ‘new’ city are further acknowledged as “the city of inspiration”, bearing a comparison with citiessuchasParis,whichhasinspiredmanywritersandartists. IntheOldCityofRigathereisamixtureofthebohemiancosinessofPrague,thecoolele ganceofParisandthecosmopolitanatmosphereofBerlin.Rigaistheuncrownedcapitalof the three Baltic countries (Merian, German travel magazine, September 2003, www.inspirationriga.com20080116). Rigaispromotedasacitywhichhasbeen‘reborn’sincethefallofcommunism, andwhichhasreclaimedamoreEuropeanidentity. RigaistheSleepingBeautyofEurope.Fortunatelyshedidnothavetosleepformorethan50 years.Nowshe–theGrandLadyhaswokenup,shakenoffthedustandrevivedtheradiant coloursanduniquebeautyofheryouth.SheisthecreamanddessertofEuropeancities.Al waysexceedingexpectations(www.inspirationriga.com,20080116). ThetransformationoftheLatviansocietyisembellishedwithpositivecharac teristics,andtheLatviansthemselvesaredepictedasmodern,trendyEuropean citizenswithonefootinthepastandtheotherinthefuture. Constantly connecting with the future. Latvia has the fastest growing economy in Europe (….)Latviansarekeenonpreservingtriedandtruetraditionsastheystepintothefastpaced, hightechworldofglobalizationandinstantcommunication(…)InLatviayou’llfindhigh speedInternetlinksincosywoodenfarmsteadsandgrandparentschattingwiththeirgrand childrenonthelatestmobilephones(DiscoverLatvia2004:3). Rigaasa’sextourismdestination’ TheidentificationofLatviawithWesternEuropethroughtourismpromotion anddevelopmenthasingeneralhadpositiveconnotations.Still,thefastgrowth oftourismfromWesternEurope,forexamplefollowing the introduction of

99 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation lowcostairlines,hassparkedapublicdebateoverthemorenegativeeffectsof ‘mass tourism’. Latvian media, politicians on both the local and the national level, as well as groups among the local population have raised warnings of Riga’s ‘deteriorating image’ as a sex tourism destination, associated with wild nightlife andcheap alcohol(Female representative LTDA,February2007).A representativefromthe LatvianTourismDevelopmentAgency describestheimage asaproblemaffectingtheoverallpromotionoftourisminRiga,sincetourism asaphenomenonislargelyassociatedwithsextourism. Inthesociety,peoplearenotsupportiveoftourism.InRiga,alotofpeoplethinkonlyofsex tourism.Whenyousaytourism,thatmeanssextourism.Ifyoustayhereandwalkaroundin oldRiga,youseethosetourists,andthereisanegativeimagewhichwearefightingwith.Be cause there is a visible number of male tourists from England who only come to Riga for partying(FemalerepresentativeLTDA,February2007).

In2005,theLatvianpresidentVairaVikeFreibergacalledforactionandcon trolof“thespreadandobtrusivenessofprostitution”,aswellastheneedfor presentingalternativeentertainmentandculturalactivitiesfortourists( TheBaltic Times 20050808,www.baltictimes.com20080116).Sextourismisnodoubta verycontroversialanddelicatequestioninLatvia,andraisesquestionsofdesti nationmarketingwithinboththepublicandprivatesectors,aswellastherole ofthestateinregulatingprostitution,andhowimagesofRigaareconstructed andperceivedinthe‘West’. IssuesrelatingtoRigaasa‘sextourismdestination’arecomplexandopen formultipleinterpretations.Withinmyownresearchoftourismdevelopment inLatvia,Ihaveregardedsextourismasoneofthemostdifficulttopicstoap proach, mainly due to the question of methodology, in how to approach a sector which tends to exist in a ‘grey zone’ within society (see Ryan & Hall 2001).Eventhoughsextourismhasnotbeenthemain focus of my project, questionsrelatingtoithaveconstantlybeencallingforattention.Questionsof sextourismhaveemergedindifferentinterviews,aswellasinmoreinformal discussionswithmyLatvianinterpreterandmyLatvianfriends.Asatourist,I have also been approached in the streets of Riga by people handing out informationsheetsaboutstripclubs,orIhavecomeacrossadsandsectionsof ‘adultentertainment’whenbrowsingthrough Riga’s city guides or searching for informationabout Latviaon theInternet. Myaimhere isnottodiscuss whetherornotsextourismexistsinLatvia,ortodescribeitsscopeandextent inmorequantitativeterms.Rather,Iwouldarguethatsextourism doesexist in Latvia,justasinothercountriesinCentralandEasternpartsofEurope,inAsia

100 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation or in other parts of the world, including Western countries. Moreover, sex tourism as a phenomenon cannot merely be explained by the emergence of Western ‘mass tourism’, but has to be analysed in relation to other socio cultural and economic issues, such as human trafficking, poverty, gender inequality,humanrights,etc.Duetoitscomplexcharacter,thereisalsoaneed for delimitation. In the remaining part of the chapter, the aim is to discuss criticallythe genderised and sexualized ‘image’ofRigaasasextourismdestination, which is closely related to the efforts to promote Riga as a ‘modern’ and ‘Westernised’capital.AsRyanandHall(2001)argue, Sextourismisanintegralpartofthecommodificationofthebody,cultureandplaceonwhich thetourismindustryisbased.However,thecommodificationofsexualityiswiderthanjust individuals.Ithasalsotobeseeninrelationtoplaces.Sitesofseductionarecreatedwherethe touristandtheinvestoraretobeseduced(Ryan&Hall2001:148). Thequotationillustrateshowthedevelopmentofsextourismis arelationalproc ess , involving different perceptions of space and place, which in turn are genderisedandsexualizedandcontributetothecommodificationofdifferent destinations.Iwilldiscusssextourismfromtwodifferentinterrelatedperspec tives.Firstly,IwillarguethattheimageofRigaasasextourismdestinationis constructedona relational basis,basedonthevisitors’expectationsandpercep tionofthetourismdestination,aswellasonthemarketingandimagemaking ofRiga.Thisinvolvesgenderisedpowerrelationsbetweenthecountryoforigin andthedestination,betweenthe‘West’andthe‘East’.Secondly,theimageis alsoaffectedbybothlocalandinternationallegalandinstitutionalframeworks, reflectingsociallyandculturallyrootedattitudestowardsprostitution,whichare closelyconnectedtonormsofgenderrelationsandsexuality.Inthiscontext,I will discuss a local campaign introduced in Riga during the summer 2007, in ordertocombattheissueofsextourism. SextourismandtheEast/Westdivide The existing relations between sex and tourism are multiple and complex. There exists no ‘simple’ definition of sex tourism 34 or of the ‘sex tourist’ him/herself.Eventhoughmuchofresearchaboutsextourismhasfocusedon

34 One definition of sex tourism would be “(…) tourism where the main purpose or motivationofatleastpartofthetripistoconsummatesexualrelations”(Ryan&Hall2001:x).

101 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation prostitution 35 ,itincludesotherformsofsexualservicessuchasvisitstostrip clubsortheuseofescortservices.Oppermann(1999)arguesthatsextourism mustbeanalysedina continuum,andthatthestereotypicalsextouristrarely existsin‘reallife’.Rather,he/shemayhaveverydiversifiedfeatures,whichin cludeboththosetravellingwiththeoutspokenaimtobuysexualservicesand thosethatoriginallydidnothavethoseintentions.Fewtouristswouldregard themselves as ‘sex tourists’, as in the more literal meaning of the word. Sex touristsmayincludefemalesexbuyersor‘holidayromance’seekers,orinclude homosexualrelations(Oppermann1999). Moreover, sex tourism cannot be analysed in isolation, as merely originating or having ‘local’ effects at the given tourism destination or as an exchange between two individuals. Sex tourism evolves within a ‘globalised’ society,connectedtoaninternationaldivisionoflabourandinequalitybetween countriesandregions,includingcountries inthe‘West’ and the ‘East’. Kuus (2004)argues thatcountries in CentralandEastern Europe hold ‘dual’ roles following their EUmembership, searching for identification with the ‘West’, butstillbeingidentifiedasthe‘East’.Thus,thedichotomyandorientalistview of the ‘East’ as the ‘Other’ is maintained, even though in a more fluid and contested form (Kuus 1994). As Wolff (1994) stresses; “The iron curtain is gone,andyettheshadowpersists”(Wolff1994:3).Thus,eventhoughthemore formalandphysicalbordersbetweentheEastandtheWesthavedisappeared, the perceptions of the ‘East’ still prevail, even though in a more imaginary form 36 .ThecontemporarydivisionbetweenEastandWesttendstobebased on economic development and modernization, and the new EUaccession countriesareofficiallyapartofEurope,butstillportrayed aslagging behind andinneedofhelpfromthemore‘Western’Europeanmemberstates.Kuus claimsthattheEasternmembershipstateswerebeing‘coachedbytheWest’, adjusting to a degree of ‘Europeanness’ in the enlargement process. In this process,theEUcountrieshaveconstitutedthe‘ideal’ template tofollow and copy in terms of development, which includes maintaining or even ‘re inventing’perceptionsof‘theEast’(Kuus2004:475ff). ThedivisionanddichotomybetweentheEastandtheWestcanalsobe analysedasgenderisedandsexualised.Ineconomicterms,theWestisdescribed

35 Thedefinitionofprostitutionusedhereis“(…)theuseofawoman’sbodyasacommodity to be bought, sold, exchanged not always for money” (Barry 1995:327, cited in Jeffreys 1999:193). 36 Wolff (1994) traces the historical roots of the East/West dualism back to the Enlightenment period, when perceptions of the ‘East’ were reproduced through travel writingsandtheworksofwesternphilosophers,providinganimageofthe‘East’asbarbaric, andtheWestascivilizedandenlightened(Wolff1994).

102 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation as active, progressive and rational, while the Eastisperceivedasdeviantbut reliantontheWesternnorms,stillbeingpassiveandirrationallylaggingbehind (AsztalosMorelletal.2005).Thus,theEastisgivenmorefeminineattributes whiletheWestisgivenmoremasculinecharacteristics.Withintourism,Marttila (2005)describeshowWesternsextouristsseekthe‘Eastern’feminineandeth nic ‘Other’, but also how their actions at the given destination become ‘normalized’whiletheyareinanothertimeandspace,inaforeigncountryand territory.ShearguesthatsincethemembershipsintheEU,theopenborders betweenWesternandEasternEuropehaveincreasedtheflowsofsextourists to the Baltic States, due to its proximity compared to other ‘traditional’ sex tourism destinations such as Asia and due to the stereotypes of ‘Eastern’ womenfabricatedbyWesternmedia.MarttilaclaimsthatsextourisminEsto niaandFinlandworksinatwowayprocess.Ontheonehand,Finnishtourists aretravellingtoEstoniainordertobuysex,andontheotherhand,Estonian prostitutestraveltoFinlandtowork,whichhascontributedtoaboominthe Finnishsexindustrysincethe1990s(Marttila2005). Genderedmarketing MorganandPritchard(1998)pointoutthatdifferentformsofmediaactively takepartintheconstructionofgenderrelationswithintourism,byemphasising aconnectionbetweenthetouristandthelandscapeandtherebyestablishingan appealingimageofaplaceoradestination,whichresultsinhighlygenderised representations (Morgan & Pritchard 1998). Tourism marketing of Riga in volves material which more directly and ‘openly’ promotes Riga as a sex tourism destination, and advertising which more indirectly provides different genderised and sexualized images. Here, I will focus mainly on two different sources: examples of public tourism marketing material provided by official stateinstitutionssuchasthe LatvianTourismDevelopmentAgency ,andexamplesof different ‘city guides’ published several times a year by private companies in bothprintedandonlineversions. A central feature in the attempts to market Riga as a ‘modern’ and European city is the emphasis on nightlife and entertainment within public tourismmarketing.Nightlifeandentertainmentareconsideredtobeimportant parts of the tourism product and services offered especially in the urban environmentofRiga.Inthiscase,Rigaisdescribedasthe‘Hottestcityinthe North’. Hotterthanhottest.Riganeversleepsatnight(…)WhileoutsidetemperaturesinRigacanget quite chilly during the winter months, the climatein Riga’s entertainment establishments is

103 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation sizzling hot all year long (…) What interests you? Want to feel the pulsating rhythms and danceallnightlong?Strutyourstuffwithotherclubbers?Meetanewfriend?Orjusthavea drinkandwatchtheshow?InRiga,theshowisn’tjustonstage–itfillstheclubsandspills intothestreet.Thepossibilitiesareonlylimitedbyyourimagination(LTDA DiscoverLatvia 2004:19). Eventhoughtheimagesandtextsdonotdirectlyrelatetosextourism,theystill contain gendered symbolism and representations. Riga is hot, portrayed as fulfillingeveryneedofentertainmentforthevisitor.Rigaisalsoportrayedas exotic and sensual as ‘ The Dessert of European cities’ (www.inspirationriga.com 20080208). A majority of the marketing made by the private sector includes more ‘open’associationstoRigaasasextourismdestination.Themostoutspoken ‘erotic’tourismrepresentationsarefoundindifferentfree‘Cityguides’suchas RigaThisWeek, Welcome!,RigainYourPocket and GuideforEnjoying .Theguides aredistributedtoseverallocationsinthecity,hotels,restaurants,touristinfor mation centers, and the airport. According to information in Riga This Week , which has been around since 1992, the guide is distributed to 130 different tourism sites. (Riga This Night March/April2006).Theguidesarenotmerely distributedlocally,butRigabecomespartofamuchwiderinternationalnet work comprising the other destinations in Central and Eastern Europe. For example,The Welcome! guideisdistributedinRiga,Kiev,StPetersburg,Tallinn andVilnius(www.welcomeguide.lv20080305).Theguidescontain informa tionmainlyinEnglish,andcontainabroadrangeofbasictouristinformation; lists of accommodation, the main tourist sights, dining, museums, shopping, events, guides and tours, etc. The more ‘nightlifeoriented’ tourism products andservicesareclassifiedintodifferentcategories,forexample‘casinos’,‘music clubs’,‘nightclubs’,‘stripteaseshows’,and‘sexshops’.Here,theadvertisement tends tobe morepronouncedand images ofwomen cover a majorityofthe pages.Adsfordifferent‘escortagencies’,whicharenotactuallypartofthe‘of ficial’contentsoftheguidesanddonot includeanofficialaddress, are also included,offering“Visitinyourhotel”( RigaThisNight 2006:22). Even though public tourism organizations such as the Latvian Tourism DevelopmentAgency (LTDA)themselvesparticipateintheconstructionofRigaas agenderisedtourismdestinationasdescribedabove,theyactivelytakeastand against the more sexualized marketing found in magazines distributed by the privatesector.ActivelobbyingonbehalfoftheLTDAresultedinthenightlife and entertainment sections of some of the magazines being separated from

104 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation otherservicesonatemporarybasisaswith RigabyNight .Arepresentativefrom theLTDAdescribesthedilemmaofthepublicsectorasfollows:

Wecannotforbidtheseadsinthemagazines.Wecantalktothem,agreewiththem,thatthey separate the ads, but cannot forbid it (…) There are many people going around spreading leafletsofnightclubs;wewouldliketoregulatethat.Whatwewanttodoisthateventhough thereisapersoncomingtoRigaforsex,hewillonlyfinditbysearchingforit,butnotthathe comes here andpeople are freely givingittohim.When hewalks the streets, that kindof informationwould not beavailable. Notthat everyone canaccess it, that it isaccessible in everycornerorineverymagazine(FemalerepresentativeLTDA,Februray2007). Thecityguidesrelyonadvertisementfromlocalrestaurants,hotels,etc.,which arealsodescribedintermsofpricerange,standardandtypeofservices.Justas thedininginRigaisreviewedandcommenteduponbythepublishers,soare thenightlifeandentertainmentestablishments.The“JockeyClub”,classifiedas a‘stripteaseshow’hasthefollowingreviewin RigaThisNight . Thissmall,intimatenightclubofferssomeofthehottestgirlsintown.Sitbackinthecom fortable couches and watch these girls swing and sway enticingly before your eyes. After staring at the girls working the pole, a private dance is recommended (Riga This Week March/April2006:25). Thenightclubsandothersitesarealsocontinuouslyreviewedonamore‘free’ basisonthehomepageof RigaThisWeek ,bytouristswhohavevisitedRiga.In thiscase,itispossibletogradethestripteaseshowornightclubsfrom15,and tomakewrittencommentswhichtendtoincludetipsofwheretogotomeet girls,andwhere“themostbeautifulgirls”arefound.Thereviewsonthenight clubsalsoincludecommentsofwheretoavoid,ortofind,“workinggirls”,and underagegirls(www.rigathisweek.lv20080215).ChowWhite(2006)discusses theroleoftheInternetinthedevelopmentofsextourismandclaimsthatthe Internetbecomesaplatformforsextouristswhoactivelyparticipateinrepro ducing and constructing established and newly genderised and racialised perceptionsand‘myths’ofdestinations,culturesandpeople.TheInternetdis cussions contain several themes such as the market for sex, where to buy “cheap”sex,comparingpricesbetweendestinationsaswellaswiththehome country,aswellasperceptionsofgender,raceandsexuality.Throughtheuse and access provided by the Internet, the tourists and consumers themselves increasingly have access to the destination directly, and its products and ser vices, without any physical ‘intermediaries’ such as travel agencies, printed brochures and personal contacts, even though these may be an important

105 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation complement.Thus,theimageofthedestinationisnotmerelyproducedbythe placemarketingagenciesorothermore‘public’actors,butalsobythetourists themselves(ChowWhite2006). Rigabynight Thecityguidesincludea‘nightlifemap’,wheretheservicesaremarkedinboth theoldtownofRigaandtheeasternpartofthecity.Here,ageographicalpat tern of the entertainment industry becomes evident, forming centers and agglomerations in streets such as Brivibas iela. Here, the guides create new tourism‘centers’andattractionsbyseparatingmapsofRiga byday andRiga by night .Inthiscase,Riga’simagebecomesambivalent,havingmultiplefacesand identities.Thecityisdescribedashavingdifferentrhythms,encompassingboth the‘normal’,everydaylifeofworkandroutine,whichtransformsintoamore activenightlife.Oneofthe‘cityguides’describesthetransformationofthecity asthefollowing: Ourcitylives!Itsrhythmisfastandneverending,likeaheartbeat,itdoesnotstopevenat night.Whenthedailyrushandhurryendsandthebrightlanternsarelit,acompletelydiffer ent life may begin.Girls fly out in the darkened streets of Riga followed by men’s excited eyes…Thepubsarefullofpeople,musicfillsthestreetsofthecityandtheairisfilledwith thetasteofsin.Lifeisrunninglikeawildstream.Allyouneedtodoistofollowthepaceor justwatch.Thechoiceisuptoyou…( Guideforenjoying Winter2007:40). Here,thenightbecomesasphereoffeelings,pleasureandbodies, whichare normallyhiddenduringtheday,thustransforminginto‘theOther’,withmore pronouncedfemalecharacteristics.Anotherimageprovidedbythepublictour ismauthorities,givesthecityratherambivalentcharacteristics. Sheisnotonlyanobleandsomewhatoldfashionedlady.Sheisalsoanaughtyandmerry teenager whowalksdownthe street in her modernhighheeled shoes(LTDA The land that sings 2007:4). Thus, the identity of Riga is fluid and hybrid; she becomes both ‘noble’ and ‘naughty’,oldandyoung,traditionalandmodern.The‘traditional’and‘modern’ symbolismmaybothbeinterpretedashavingfeminineattributes,butthelatter embodiesamoresexualizedimage. Ontheonehand,thecity bynight isdescribedastempting,attractiveand sensualforthevisitor.Ontheotherhand,thecityisdescribedaspotentially dangerousforthevisitors,whoneedtobeawareoftherisksofthecityby night.Thetouristher/himselfisportrayedasapotentialtarget,standingoutin

106 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation thecrowd,andmaybe‘outofplace’incertainareasofthecity.Thesafetytips providedintheguidesincludelookingoutforpickpocketing,keepingtrackof drinks,choosingestablishedtaxicompanies,notcarryingtoo much cash, but alsoto“usecondomsifyoudecidetohavesex”( RigaThisNight March/April 2006:27).Theguidealsoincludesa‘minidictionary’,includingthetranslationof phrasessuchas,“Areyoualone?”,“Youarebeautiful”and“Iwanttotakeyou home”intoLatvian(ibidp.4).Eventhoughthegeneralsafetyinformationmay berelevantforbothwomenandmen,theguidesareclearlytargetingaforeign, male, heterosexual tourist, looking for adventure and entertainment and for whomthepotentialrisksofnightlifemaybepartofthetravelexperience. The ‘dangers’ of Riga’s nightlife have been discussed in Latvian media, withreportsoftouristshavingbeenswindledformoneyinnightclubsandstrip clubs.Aspecialtourist24hourphone‘hotline’wasalsoopenedbythe Latvian TourismDevelopmentAgency in2007fortouriststocalliftheyhadbeenvictimsof crime (Female representative LTDA, February 2007). The calls for nightlife safety have also evolved intoa business idea amongdifferenttouroperators, offering guided ‘Nightlife tours’. The tour companies are listed in the city guides, and the homepages of the companies warn the tourists not to get ‘rippedoff’atdifferenttouristbarsandnightclubs,orbypotential‘prostitutes’ on the street (www.rigaoutthere.com; www.partyinriga.com; www.nightliferiga.com20080220). TheBalticGuide describesthecompany Riga OutThere as“expertsinsafetourism”,bystatingthefollowing: Thiscouldhappentoanytouristhere:youwakeuplatemorningandfindyourselfinastrange apartmentontheoutskirtsofRigawithnomoney,nodocuments,andnodignity.Thelast thingyourememberwasyoumetagorgeousgirlataRigabar,andyoutookasipoffreebeer. That scenario is unlikely to develop if you have a trusted guide by your side, if you have someonewhoknowsculturaldifferences,andwhoisabletosiftthroughmanybars,clubsand danceplacestobeabletotellyouwhichonesaregoodandsafeandwhichoneshaveaques tionablereputation(www.balticguide.ee20080220). Nightlife packages, tours and excursion programs are offered alongside spa packages,sportandweekendtrips.InthesecasesaccommodationinRigaand visits to nightclubsarecombinedwith differentactivities such as limousine tours, shooting, bobsleighing etc (www.rigaoutthere.com 20080220). The company RigaOutThere offersthenightlifepackage“Steakandstriptease”,in cludingfood,drinks,VIPvisits,andlivestriptease,withthefollowingslogan. Afeastineverysenseoftheword!Steaks,stripteaseandbeerwhatmorecouldamanwant! (www.rigaoutthere.com20080220).

107 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation

Anothertourcompany, NightlifeinRiga offers‘VIPAdultNightlife’packages, ‘PlayboyLimoparty’aswellas‘TheUltimateBadBoyweekend’,whichinclude “VIPnightclubaccessanddrinks,VodkaDrinkingSchool,adifferentsexygirl eachnight,oneofthedaypackages,lunch,aboxof10differenttypesofbeer,a bottle of vodka and whiskey, security and an Englishspeaking attendant” (www.nightlifeinriga.com20080220).Inthiscase,themoreorganizedforms of‘nightlifetours’canalsobeanalysedasemphasizing‘privacy’andsophistica tion,astheyincreasinglytargetforeigntourists(seeAskola&Okolski2001). RegulatingsextourisminLatvia Zarina(2001)arguesthattheofficiallylegal‘Sexandentertainmentindustry’ 37 , asdescribedinthecityguidesabove,tendstoexistinagreyzoneintheBaltic countries, which has become more of a façade of the development of more organizedformsofprostitution,partsofwhichareforbiddenbylawinLatvia. Street prostitution, usually organized by pimps, is not considered being the mostcommonformofprostitutioninLatvia.Rather,prostitutioninnightclubs, stripclubsandbarsorother‘legal’partsoftheentertainmentindustryisbe lievedtobemorewidespread.Clubswithforeignersarealsoconsideredtobe more‘profitable’forprostitutionactivitiescomparedtootherclubsandbars. Theclubsthemselvesmayalsoprofitfromtheprostitutionactivities,eitherby offeringserviceswithintheirownpremises,orthroughdifferenttypesofescort servicestotheclients’apartmentsorhotels(ZarinaIn:Askola&Okolskietal. 2001). Thedebates of prostitutionand sex tourism, their causes, effects and solutionsaretoocomplextobediscussedindetailinthischapter.However, thenext sectionswill analyseattitudestowardssex tourism and prostitution, which also involve perceptions of gender and sexuality, as well as the legal framework,whichalsoaffectshowRigaasa‘sextourismdestination’isper ceivedandhowtheimagecanorshouldbechanged. ‘Normalisation’ofprostitutionandsextourism The support for a ‘normalisation’ ofprostitutionintheBalticcountriesisdis cussedintheEstonianstudyfrom2003,inwhichamajorityoftherespondents

37 Okolski (2001) defines the Sex and Entertainment Industry (S&EI) as the following; “ServicesrenderedwithinS&EIrangefromrelatively“innocent”telephonesex,performances in night bars, variety shows, discotheques or casinos as bartender, waitress or dancer, and playing a role of hostess, escort or companion, to posing in pornographic acts/films or participating in live sexshows, toservices offered inmassage parlours and brothels. Akey factorintheselectionofimmediateserviceproviderisher(sometimes,his)sexappeal,anda keyprofessionwithinS&EIisprostitution”(OkolskiIn:Askola&Okolski2001:106).

108 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation arguedthatprostitutionhashadalonghistoryand will constitute a ‘natural’ partofboththecontemporaryandfuturesociety 38 .Inthis case,prostitution wasnotconsideredtobea‘real’problem,comparedtoothersocialandeco nomicquestionswhichthestateandsocietyhadtodealwithinthetransition period.Thus,questionsrelatingtoprostitutionweregivenamarginalrole,and theLatvianrespondentsclaimedthattheLatvianstatewasnotyetreadytoin terfere and deal with stricter regulations concerning prostitution. Rather, the state should have a ‘neutral’ approach and not act as a moral intermediary. Fromthisperspective,thelawsandactionsoftheLatvianstatewereconsidered tobesufficient,sincetheysignaledamore‘neutral’approachandgolden‘mid dleway’,whichneithersupportednorbannedprostitutionassuch.Prostitution was recognized as a part of the new market economy, which then could be regulatedbythestatebyfightingthe‘real’problemssuchastheriseofcriminal activities,thespreadofdiseasesandhealthriskissues,andincreaseduseofal coholandnarcotics.Thus,prostitution wasconsideredtobea‘private’con cern, and the state should not interfere in the buying and selling of sexual servicesbetweenpeople.Here,argumentsthatpeoplewerefreetochoosehow tousetheirbodiesbecameevident,whichwasdescribedasanissueofintegrity, of‘choice’andhumanrights(Pajumetsetal.2004). According to Pajumets et al. (2004), the system used to deal with and controlprostitution in Latviasince1998can beclassified as an ‘ neoregulatory system ’,inwhichthestatedoesnotrecognizeprostitutionassuchasacriminal offence, but aims at regulating its activities (Pajumets et al. 2004) 39 . Stukuls Eglitis(2002)arguesthattheLatvianstatehashadaliberalapproachtowards the development of the sex industry, which reflects economic interests and waysofhowmoneyandprofitscanbemadewithinthenewmarketeconomy. Inshort,themoderneconomyhasbecomeanarenaonwhichtradeisopenfor

38 The study was based on qualitative interviews with ‘opinionleaders’ in Latvia, Estonia, Lithuania and Russia, working within media, NGOs, politics, and the private sector (see Pajumetsetal.2004). 39 Accordingtothe“Regulationstolimitprostitution”setbytheLatviangovernmentin2001, allLatvianprostitutesmustobtaina‘healthcard’fromtheauthorities,andgothroughregular obligatorymedicalexaminations.Latvianlawcriminalizesbrothels,pimpingand“compelling engaginginprostitution”,whichinvolves‘forced’or‘involuntary’formsofprostitution.Child prostitution,comprisingminorsundertheageof18,isalsoprohibitedbylaw(Askolaetal. 2001:66ff; Regulationstolimitprostitution 2001).Despitetheregulations,officialstatisticsfrom 2000showthatonly200prostituteshadregisteredforthehealthcards,anumberwhichisnot consideredtocorrespondtotheactualnumberofactiveprostitutes.Theactualnumberof prostitutes may range around 2500, as reported by the local police in Riga; while some researchstudiesindicatethattheremightbeasmanyas35000prostitutesinLatvia,including boththoseworkingfulltimeandparttimeoronaseasonalbasis(Okolski2001:127).

109 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation almost everything, including women’s bodies, which are commodified and objectifiedwithinthisprocess(seeStukulsEglitis2002;Pajumetsetal.2004). Prostitutionisperceivedassomething“voluntary”,asadeliberatechoicefor womentomakealivingjustasanyotherprofessionorbusinessinthemarket economy(Kaseetal.2006).StukulsEglitis(2002) arguesthatthedebatesof prostitution in Latvia mainly have concerned the legalization of prostitution, making itto merelyajuridical question, motivated bythe right of women to express their ’sexual freedom’ (StukulsEglitis 2002:220). Liljeström (1995) stressesthatsexualitywithintheSovietUniongainedwiderexpressionsmainly duringthe1980s,andcanbecomparedtothesexualrevolutionintheWestern worldduringthe1960s.Thiswasaneffectofthemoreliberalpoliticalclimate, andincreasingWesterninfluences.Fromoneperspective,sexualliberationwas regardedasexpressionsofdemocracyandfreedom.Theseviewsalsoreflected a male public discourse, which promoted an increasing focus on women’s bodiesandsexuality(ratherthanmen’s),whichwereincreasinglyexposedand commercializedthroughthespreadofpornography(Liljeström1995). Prostitutionand‘morality’ In the summer of 2007, a monthlong campaign against sex tourism, called STOPsexterrorism, wascarriedoutinRigabytheNGO Re!Action togetherwith the advertising company Alfa Centrs . One of the aims was to “challenge the opinionthatRigaisaplaceforcheapdebauchery”(www.alfacentrs.lv200801 16).Spokesmenofthecampaignemphasisedtheimportanceoferasingtheim ageofRiga asasex tourism destination,sinceitcontributedtotheideathat everythingand everyonecouldbe boughtcheapinLatvia.Thecampaign ini tiatorsclaimedthatwomenwhowerenotinvolvedintheactualsexbusiness were often harassed by foreign tourists, while other women actively sought contactandsexualrelationswithforeigners.Thelattergroupofinitiativeswas describedasacontributingfactortoRiga’simageasa‘sextourismdestination’. OnecouldthinkthatsuchimageofRīgahasbeenestablishedwiththeintroductionofthe cheapairlinesinLatvia,whichincreasedtheflowofforeigntouriststoourcountry.However, thesourceoftheproblemisnottheincreaseinthenumberoftourists,butratherthefreely available sex services that girls in Latvia offer in nightclubs, bars and other venues (www.alfacentrs.lv20080116). TheBalticTimes describedthebackgroundtothecampaignasthefollowing.

110 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation

Numerous local women encourage sex tourism by sleeping with these hedonistic visitors, therebyexacerbatingthenumberofstagpartyersandsoilingthereputationofLatvia.Another worryisthatthispracticewillquicklyleadtoRigagainingthereputationofacityofsin,which wouldonlydamagethecity’sculturalprestige,butcouldleadtoincreasedprostitutionanda host of other problems (The Baltic Times ‘Stopping sex ‘terrorism’ in Riga , 20070801, www.batictimes.com20080114). Thus, the campaign was targeted mainly to young Latvian girls, not merely thoseactivelyinvolvedinthesexbusinessasprostitutesorasother‘sexwork ers’,butthoseindirectlyaffectedandparticipating,tomakethemavoidsexual relations with foreign tourists. The main mission was to spread information amongthepublicthroughadvertisementcampaignsandraidsintheOldtown ofRiga,directedat“youngandsuccessfulgirls”,andmediapublicitythrough channelssuchastelevisionandsupportfromestablishedartists,celebritiesand private businesses. The campaign included around 20 different sponsors, in cluding Riga Airport (www.alfacentrs.lv 20080116; www.baltictimes.com 20070801).Thegoalofthecampaignwastoraisethedebateandawareness aboutsextourismasaproblem. (…)stoppingthenonchalancetowardsthisproblem,aswellasraisingtheselfesteemofthe societyandyoungerwomeninparticular,bymakingonethinkaboutwhetherit'sworthto haveaonenightstandforaglassofcocktail(www.alfacentrs.lv20080116). The STOPsexterrorism campaigncanbe analysed from different perspectives. Ontheonehand,itmayrepresentanefforttoempowerwomentomakea standactivelyagainstthesextourismindustry,andtorejecttheexploitationand commercializationofwomenbyforeigntourists.Inthiscase,womenaregiven amore‘active’role,byencouragingandsupportingwomentosay‘no’toboth unpaidandpaidsex,andnotmerelybecome‘passive’sexualobjectsofthemale gaze.Ontheotherhand,itisdifficulttoignorethefactthatwomenarebeing blamed for Riga’s deteriorated image as a sex tourism destination, since it is localwomen’sbehaviourratherthanthe(male)tourists’actsthatarejudgedas ‘immoral’andnotacceptedbythesociety.Insomeways,thecampaignreflects a wishtosave women’s dignityand morality,andprevent them from being ‘victims’ofabehaviourandsexualitywhichisconsideredasbeingharmful. Therather ambivalent message of thecampaign is alsoreflectedby the imagesusedformarketingonwebsites,postersandinformationfolders.One ofthemainimagesportraysaninflatable(sex)dolldressedinasleevelessshort dressandablondwig,faceanonymous,maskedeyes,andthemouthmerelya hole. The doll holdsa lit dynamite cartridge in herhand,andtheimagealso

111 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation containstheLatviantext:“Sekssturisms?Sekssterrorisms”(Sextourism?Sex terrorism).Thecampaignwascompletedwiththeunveilingofthe“monument of the Fallen Girl”, a large graffiti painting in the Esplanade Park in Riga (www.alfacentrs.lv 20080116). The monument was created by local young artists,andaccordingtothecampaignactivists,themonumentwas“dedicated toasymbolic“FallenGirl”whoengagesinunsafeonenightstands”(TheBal tic Times 20070727, www.baltictimes.com 20080116). One graffiti images published in The Baltic Times shows a row of girls in bikinis, and the Latvian word‘razosana’,meaning‘production’.Anumberofarrowspointoutthedi rection of the girls, aimed towards a number of darker skinned figures, with ‘macho’writtenontheirforeheads.Theimagewasdescribedasthefollowing by The Baltic Times; “a production line of similarlooking beautiful women coming out of Latvia, only to fall off the belt andintothearmsofpawing, demonlikesextourists”(TheBalticTimes ‘Stoppingsex‘terrorism’inRiga ,2007 0801,www.baltictimes.com20080114). Imagesofthe‘fallenwoman’ Boththemarketingimagesandthemonumentofthe‘FallenGirl’furtherrein forcethemessageofthecampaignasillustratingthedelicatebalancebetween ontheonehandLatvianwomenas‘Madonnas’or‘Mothersofthenation’,and on the other hand,theimageofwomenas potential ‘Prostitutes’ or as em bodyingtheroleofthe‘Magdalen’.Thelatterbecamearepresentationof‘the fallenwoman’,whichtraditionallyandhistoricallyhashaddifferentmeanings. Theexpressionmayrefertowomenhavingsexbeforemarriage,actingouta femalesexuality,seducingmenandthereforelivingin‘sin’andshame,andnot gaining much respect from society. The ‘fallen’ woman represents she who breaks against the norm of female, passive and controlled sexuality (Nead 1984).Theidentityofthegirlsportrayedinthecampaignisratherambivalent. Thewomenareperceivedtohavethepowertotemptmen(andsextourists); theyarebeautifulandattractiveas‘ethnic’Latvianwomen,butby‘seducing’or bybeingseduced,womenbecomethe‘fallengirls’,theinflatabledolls. Even though the market economy has called for more liberal views on sexuality as discussed above, including more ‘Western’ gender ideals, it also threatens more traditional norms of society, including ‘rules’ of women’s sexuality. The more ‘conservative’ approaches to sexuality have roots in the Sovietperiod.Liljeström(1995)arguesthatsexualityduringtheSovietperiod, andespeciallywomen’ssexuality,wassomethingthatwashiddenandperceived asapotentialthreatforsocietalorderandcontrolbythestate(Liljeström1995).

112 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation

Between 1987 and 1995, prostitution was illegal and considered as an “administrativeoffence”inLatvia,basedontheregulationsintroducedduring the Soviet regime (StukulsEglitis 2002). However, the approach towards prostitutionchangedsignificantlyduringthelaterpartofthecommunistperiod, andplacedthemoralresponsibilityonthewomenthemselvesratherthanon societal inequalities, making prostitutes sinful and therefore degenerating for the Soviet society (Liljeström 1995). These opinions still linger in the post socialistLatviansociety.Eventhoughwomenareconsideredtobeforcedinto prostitution due to economic hardships, it is still perceived as an ‘immoral choice’ for women, constituting a threat to people’sfundamentalmorals and values. In the Estonian study of prostitution discussed above, some respondents claimed that the existence of prostitution was a symptom of a deteriorating society, as women were viewed as ‘parasites’, living on and infestingthemoralgroundsofsociety(Pajumetsetal.2004). The(in)visiblesextourist The STOPsexterrorism campaignas illustratedabovewas mainlytargetingthe destination(her)self,andnotthesextouristvisitingRiga.Someoftheimages used in thecampaign used headlines, “Wanted sexterrorists”,together witha puzzleofoverlapping(male)facialimages,forminganindistinguishableidentity ofthetourist(wwwreaction.lv20080221).Thus,thetouristwasdepictedas potentially dangerous, but impossible to identify (or to convict), being every man(butnospecificman),withmultiplefacesandfeatures.Theidentityofthe sextouristvisitingLatviaorotherpostsocialistcountriesalsoremainsinvisible in research. Eespere (2005) argues that the main focus of research about prostitutionintheBalticStateshasbeenontheprostitutesthemselvesrather thanontheirclients,inattemptstomapthedevelopmentofprostitution.Few analyseshavebeenmadetoresearchdifferentfeaturesoftheclients’rolewithin the sex industry, including foreign tourists (Eespere 2005). Pajumets et al. (2004)claimthatplacinglittleornofocusonthe sex buyer himself/herself, makesprostitutiona‘women’sproblem’,withfewparallelstoquestionsofgen derinequality,andmen’sandwomen’sdifferentpositionswithinsocietyandon thelabourmarket(Pajumetsetal.2004). Sofar,therearefewcountriesotherthanSwedenwhichhasintroduceda neoabolitionistic system to control and regulate prostitution. The Swedish systemhascriminalizedthepimpsandthesexbuyersratherthantheprostitutes since 1999, making the state largely protecting women as ‘victims’ of prostitution. In the Estonian survey of prostitution, a majority of the

113 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation respondents in all Baltic States and Russia expressed widespread skepticism against the Swedish legislative approach introduced in countries such as Sweden. Some respondents even claimed that it would be a threat to the ‘normal’ order of society to punish the sexbuyers themselves, which would have serious consequences and eventually result in increased malerelated violence since it would deny men’s biological needs. Some respondents even suggested,withreferencestoSweden,thatcriminalizingsexbuyerswouldturn menintoeitherhomosexualsor‘pedophiles’,andtherebythreatenthe‘natural’ heterosexualgenderorder.Estonianrespondentsalsoexpressedconcernthat the neoabolotionistic laws, which have been discussed as an alternative in Finland, would have effects for the development of prostitution and sex tourism in Estonia. The critics claimed that such laws would force men to search for sex elsewhere, and that Tallinn and other ‘Eastern’ tourism destinations would suffer from increasing social problems due to the high numberofsextourists.Thisdevelopmentwasalsoconsideredtobeaproblem asaneffectoftheupcomingmembershipintheEU(thestudywasconducted in2003),whichwasconsideredtofurtheropenupthebordersforsextourism, andforothersexworkerscomingto,forexample,Latviatoworkasa‘transit’ countrytotheWest(Pajumetsetal.2004). Conclusion Theaimofthischapterhasbeentodiscussthedevelopmentandpromotionof tourisminrelationtoatransforminggenderised ‘GeographiesofEuropeanisation’ , in how Latvia is actively manifesting its reorientation from ‘Eastern’ towards ‘Western’ Europe, economically, politically, but also symbolically. Moreover, thepurposehasbeentoanalyseexamplesofhowtheeffectsofthisprocessare genderised, by critically examining the image of Riga as a ‘sex tourism destination’. The transition process is often described as the postsocialist countries’searchforamore‘Western’identity,basedontheimplementationof different economic and political reforms. Thus, by making the necessary ad justmentsrequiredtofulfillcriteriaforbeingtermed‘marketeconomies’,and by accessing organizations and institutions such as the EU, Latvia and other formerCentralandEasterncountrieswillautomaticallybecome‘Westernised’. Still,Iwouldsuggestthatthisprocessisfarmorecomplexthanasimpleshift from East to West, and that debates of Riga as a ‘sex tourism destination’ illustrate how different Western and Eastern ideals become both intertwined andchallenged.TheidentityofRigaasatourismdestinationbecomes‘caught inbetween’EastandWestasemphasizedbyKuus(2004).Rigaisnotyetpart

114 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation oftheWest,andisstillstrugglingwithitsEasternheritage,whichisbothre jectedandhighlighted. ReclaimingamoreWesternidentityinthetransitionprocessisperceived bothasanopportunityandaproblem.Ontheonehand,theidentificationwith theWestisbelievedtohavepositivecharacteristics,andalmostasinevitablein thepostsocialistperiod.Latviawantsto‘return’toEurope,beapartoftheEU asaunitforsecurityandeconomicreasons.Inthiscase,theaimisto‘follow the same tracks’ as other countries in Western Europe in order to reach economicgrowthandmodernlivingstandards.Tourismisperceivedasatool and possibility in this process, in generating jobs and income as well as in contributingtoapositiveidentity,manifestingthisreturnandbelongingtothe European context. Thus, the identification with Europebecomespartofthe Latvian identity, emphasizing the common values. Part of the aims of this Europeanprojectisnotmerelyattemptingtoreconstructthenationstate,but alsotendstodownplaytheroleofthestateinfavourofthemarketaswellas more local forms ofgovernance and reliance of supranational organizations suchastheEU.Thisisillustratedintheprocessofregionalism,whichprovides more power to different regions, for example, for tourism development and promotion. In this case, regionalism may serve as a way of challenging the dualisms between East and West, since the focus is on how Latvia and its regionsmayactivelytakepartindiversifyingEurope,withtheresultthatthe Eastisnowapart oftheWest,whichwouldimplythat East and West no longershouldbetreatedasseparatedorashomogenousunits. Turning towards the West is also perceived as a ‘problem’, which is reflectedintheassumednegativeeffectsoftourismanddebatesofsextourism. JoiningtheEuropeanprojectincludesnotmerelyasymbolicbelongingbutis manifestedthroughagreaterinflowofWesterntourists,whichisconsideredas havingunwantedeffectssuchasariseincrimesandsextourism.Thus,Rigaas atourismdestinationdoesnotonlymerelybecomeapartoftheWest,butis alsoregardedasbeingaffectedbyproblemsoriginatinginWesternEuropean countries,expressedthroughthe behaviour ofmale Westerntourists.Conse quently, Riga’s reborn Western identity may be challenged, revealing power relationsbetweentheEastandtheWest,ashowthedestinationisportrayedas a playground for Western tourists. Despite the efforts to ’westernise’ Riga throughtourismpromotionandmarketeconomicreforms,thecityasatourism destination remains a part of the Eastern feminine ‘Other’, as deviant from WesternEurope.Rigatendstobeconstructedandcommercializedasan‘ex otic’and‘erotic’tourismdestination;dangerous,unexpectedandsinful.Inthis

115 Chapterfour–GeographiesofEuropeanisation case,thefocusisonhowthepricesofnightlifeandentertainmentinLatviaare lower,aswellasonhowthelooksandbehaviourofthegirlsaredifferentfrom thoseintheWest.Thisimageisupheldthroughmarketingactivitieswithinthe publicandprivatesectoraswellasamongtourists,partlybyvisitingRiga,and partlybydiscussingtheirexperiencesonlineontheInternet. Aswasdiscussedinthepreviouschapter,theconstructionofthenation stateincludesapositiveimageofwomenasembodyingthebaseofthenation statethroughtheirrolesasMothersandintheirpracticesforpreservingcultural elements associated with the nation state. In the debates about sex tourism, womenbecomedeviantsymbolsofthenationstate,portrayedassinful,un wantedelements.TheideaofthenationstatehasWesternEuropeanorigins, butinthiscase,womenassymbolsofprostitutionarerelatedtomoremodern Westernidealsofsexuality.Thenewmarketeconomyisperceivedasmaking women‘irrational’and‘immoral’,turningthemintoboth‘victims’and‘oppor tunisticactors’.However,women’sadjustmenttomoreWesternidealsofsexu alityandfemininityalsoremainstobecontroversialduetothecontinuationof more ‘Eastern’ socialist norms of sexuality, which works together with more traditionalandconservativeidealsoffemininityandmotherhood.Thus,women aspotential prostitutes engaging in a too outspoken sexuality are regarded as ‘fallenwomen’,sincetheychallengetheidealsof‘theMothersofthenation’. The responsibility of the state remains unclear in regulating sex tourism and prostitution,inhowthisindustryisconsideredtobea‘natural’partofthenew Western market economy, making sex tourism and prostitution a ‘women’s problem’ratherthandependentonthedemandgeneratedbyWesternandlocal men.

116

Chapterfive Geographiesofreliccommunism Duringthe Soviet regime,the intersection at theformer IntouristHotel Latvija (todayhotel RevalLatvija )becameacentralsiteforthesymbolicmanifestation ofcommunisticideologyinRiga.Here,astatueofLeninwasplaced,facingthe east,andthusturninghisbackontheFreedommonument and ‘Milda’ who facesthewest.Lenin’srightarmwasraisedinthedirectiontowardsMoscow, alongthestreetBrīvībasielawhichatthattimehadbeenrenamed Leninaiela (Leninstreet).UnliketherestrictionsappliedtotheFreedommonument,loyal communist sympathizers among the citizens of Riga were encouraged to lay flowersatthebaseoftheLeninstatue.Shortlyafterindependence,thestatueof Lenin,justasotherphysicalsymbolsandrelicsofthecommunistregime,was removed from Riga’s urban environment (StukulsEglitis 2002; Grava 1999). Consequently,foraforeigntouristtoday,itisdifficulttofindtracesoftheSo vietperiodinRiga,justasinotherpostsocialistcountries. Aplacewhichismarkedonthetouristmapandstillbearstheremnants oftheSovietpast,inbothamaterialandnarrativesense,isthe Museumofthe OccupationofLatvia. ThemuseumislocatedcentrallyintheOldtownofRiga, onthebanksoftheDaugavariver.IfyouwalktowardstheriveralongKalku iela,youwillarriveattheTownHousesquareandfindthemuseumlocatedto the right of the House of the Blackheads. The black, windowless façade consists of squared reliefs and bears resemblance to a large container or a bunker,placedontwolargepillars,makingitpossibleforpedestrianstopass under its body. The museum was opened in 1993, but the building was inaugurated in 1970, an event which also celebrated Lenin’s 100th birthday. Originally,thebuildingconstitutedtheLatvianRedRiflemen’smuseum,built inredcopperanddesignedbythearchitectGunārsLūsisGrīnbergs.Untilthe timeofindependence,theaimofthemuseumwasto manifest communistic values and ideologies, especially through educational activities among the younger part of the population. The Latvian Riflemen was originally a unit withintheCzaristRussianmilitary,formedinthebeginningofthe20 th Century, whichfoughtGermantroopsduringWWI.Still,somesoldiersalsosupported Lenin’s uprising against the Czarist regime and fought together with the Bolsheviks, efforts which were honoured during the Soviet period. A red marble statue of the Latvian Riflemen still stands next to the occupation

117 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism museum at the Latvian riflemen’s square. The statue has been an object for somecontroversy;someclaimthatthestatueupholds communist ideologies, while others interpret the monument as a dedication to those riflemen who servedLatvianinterestsduringWWI(www.occupationmuseum.lv20080223).

Theoccupationmuseum.Photobytheauthor. Whenthemuseumwasopenedinthe1990s,itspurposewastointerpretthe SovietandNazihistoryinLatvia.Thefundingofthemuseumwasbasedon publicdonations,forexamplebyexileLatvians,andhasremainedaprivatein stitution, receiving around 106000 domestic and foreign visitors in 2006 (www.occupationmuseum.lv, 20080223). The aim of the museum according tothehomepageis: (…)toportraylifeduringthethreeoccupationperiodssufferedbyLatviaandLatvians.The itemsoftheexhibitiontellaboutLatviaduringthefifty+yearlongsubjugation:aboutpower politics,aboutSovietandNaziterror,aboutthedestructionofLatvia'seconomy,aboutSoviet andNazitotalitarianideologies,abouttheoppositiontotheregimes,andfinallyhowLatvians regainedtheirfreedomin1991(www.occupationmuseum.lv20080223). Asthenameofthemuseumindicates,thefocusison rewriting and reinter pretingLatvianhistory,totellthestoriesfromaLatvianratherthanRussian point of view, underlining that Latvia was occupied rather than voluntarily an nexedintotheSovietUnionattheendofWWII.Thequestionofwhetheror nottheinvasionofSovietforcesactuallyconstitutedaformalreoccupationof LatviaorliberationofLatviafromNazismisstillaliveanddebatedinLatvia.

118 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

ThelatterversionismainlysupportedbygroupsoftheRussianspeakingmi norities, while the reestablishment and reconstruction of the Latvian nation statehasbeenbasedontheformerscenario,indicatingthatLatviaandLatvians becamevictims ofan occupationimplemented on aninvalidbasis. Thus, the paststillremainscontroversialandisconstantlybeingnegotiatedandcontested. Insomesense,theoccupationmuseumcanbesaidtorepresenttheSovietpast asbeingencapsulatedintoa‘blackbox’orcontainer,isolatedfromthepublic and everyday life, while the space between its walls calls for remembering, mourningandrecognisingthelossofLatvianindependenceandthedeathof ethnicLatviancitizens. Theexample from the occupationmuseum illustrateshow tourism may becomeawayofcommunicating,interpretingandnegotiatingtheSovietpast and its heritage, which has both material and ‘intangible’ social and cultural dimensions. The aim of this chapter is to analyse tourism development in Latviaasreflecting ‘geographiesofreliccommunism’ ,representingacontinuitywith thepast,andasbeinginfluencedbypreviousstructuresandrelationsanchored in the Soviet past. My approach involves questions of how Soviet ‘relics’ or heritage,inbothmaterialandsocioculturalforms,taketheirexpressionswithin tourism, with a focus on tourism marketing and commodification of the communistpast. I willalsodiscuss howtheprocess of highlighting the past maybecomplexandcontroversial,involvingatensionbetweentheeffortsof makingthepast invisible duetothewishto‘normalise’theLatviansociety,and the continuous and inevitable visibility of the Soviet heritage, which takes multipleforms.Asnotedin previous chapters,tourismhasbecomeawayof manifestinganewfoundnationalidentity,withreferencestoa‘unique’Latvian cultural heritage. Thus, the quest for promoting a Latvian identity through tourismraisesquestionsofwhoisgiventherighttodefineandinterpretthe pastaspartofthecontemporary‘nationalcommonspace’,andsharedbyboth ‘ethnic’ Latvians and Russianspeaking minorities. This process may include conflictinginterestsbetweendifferentgroupsofinhabitantsontheonehand, rooted in questionsof citizenship and minorityrights,as well asthe tourists’ demandandfascinationofthe‘East’ontheother. Thechapterwillstartbydiscussingmore‘continuityoriented’approaches tothetransitionprocess,emphasisingtheneedforamorediverseand‘situated’ analysisofthepostsocialistperiodwhichrecognisesthelegaciesoftheSoviet period.Iwillthengiveanoverviewofthehistoricaldevelopmentoftourism duringtheSovietperiod,andillustratehowtheorientationtowards ‘Eastern’ markets and Russia have continued since independence in terms of tourism

119 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism arrivals, trade, capital and investments, alongside with the Europeanisation process.Theremainingpartofthechapterincludesananalysisofhowtourism participatesinnegotiatingthepastSovietheritage;firstly,howtourismhasbeen affectedbyaprocessof‘normalising’theLatvianspaceinamorephysicaland material sense, secondly, how the remaining heritage is commercialised and whateffectsthisprocessinvolves,andthirdly,IwilldiscusshowtheRussian socioculturalheritageismade(in)visiblewithintourismmarketing,andrelateit toissuesofethnicity,languagepoliciesandintegration 40 . Thetransitionascontinuitywiththepast ThemodernizationapproachesandtheoriesoftransitiondiscussedinChapter fourhavebeencriticizedfromdifferentperspectives.Here,alternativetheories advocatinga continuousandhistoricistapproach totheanalysisofthepostsocialist transformationprocesswillbediscussed,constitutingthebasisforhowgeogra phiesofreliccommunismcanbeunderstood 41 .Unlikemodernizationtheories, whichpromoteadiscontinuousapproachandaradicalbreakwiththepastpo litical and economic system, the continuous and historicist approach under scores that the structural legacies of the Soviet past have to be taken into accountwhenanalysingthedevelopmentinpostsocialistcountries.Fromthe latterperspective,thestructureandorganisationoftheSovietinstitutionsare consideredtohaveeffectsfortheoutcomesinthepostsocialistsocietiesde spitenumerouseconomicandpoliticalreforms.DavidStark(1996)emphasizes thatthetransformationprocessincludes (…)rebuildingorganizationsandinstitutionsnotontheruinsbut with theruinsofcommu nism(Stark1996:95In:Williams&Balaz2000,myemphasis). Thecontinuousapproachhighlightshowpostsocialistcountrieschoosemulti pleanddiversepathwaysintheirtransition,andarebothrestrictedandenabled

40 Thischapterisbasedpartlyontheresultsofatextanalysisstudy,includingprintedtourism brochures(LTDA2004 DiscoverLatvia ,LTDA2007 Thelandthatsings ),andmaterialpublished electronically at the LTDA website (www.latviatourism.lv), and by the Latvian Institute, includingthemessuchas“MusicinLatvia”,“Society”,“Culture”,“History”,and“Nature”, which also are available as printed fact sheets. The text analysis has also included national policydocumentsconcerningquestionsofintegration(TheNationalProgramme TheIntegrationof SocietyinLatvia2001),aswellasaswellasInternetbasedinformationandmarketingprovided byprivatetouroperatorssuchaswww.rigaoutthere.comandwww.argonauthotel.com,which offertourswithSovietheritagethemes.NewspaperarticlespublishedintheBalticTimesand Dagens Nyheter regarding the events surrounding the Bronze soldier in Tallinn have also beenanalysed,asexamplesofthe‘normalisationofspace’inapostsocialistcontext. 41 Seee.g.Smith&Pickles1998;Stark&Bruszt1998;Herrscheletal.2006.

120 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism bytheircommunistpast.Thisalsoopensupformorediverselocaloutcomes of the transition, which avoids treating the postsocialist countries as one ho mogenousgrouporregion,aswellasdismissingclaimsthattheywouldfollow the exact same stages in the transition process. The ‘transitional’ ‘Eastern’ countriescompriseinfact27differentstatesandincludeapopulationof270 millionpeople(Pickles&Smith1998:10).GalandKligman(2000a)criticizethe attemptstorankdifferentpostsocialistcountriesdependingontheirdegreeof ‘development’andtransition,whichincludesanalysesofwhichcountrieshave beenthemost“successful”intermsofdemocraticoreconomicreforms(Gal& Kligman2000a).Thus,amorediverseandheterogenous approach would be neededinordertoanalysetheprocessandoutcomesofthetransition,onthe basisofthecountries’multiplesocial,culturalandpoliticalcontexts.Inother words, different countries choose different ‘paths’ or ‘trajectories’ when encounteringtransition.Eachcountryhadadifferentroleandfunctionwithin theSovietUnion, which also affects theperiod following independence. The processoftransition isalsoaffectedby external influences and processes, in which global processes interrelate with the local setting. Therefore, neither socialism nor capitalism can be treated as two homogenized ideologies and structures(seeGal&Kligman2000a,Pickles&Smith1998;Herrscheletal. 2006). Recognisingthestructurallegacyofcommunismalsorejectstheideathat postsocialist countries constitute a tabula rasa for the inscription of western modelsofdevelopment,andhighlightshowthesocialistheritageactivelytakes part in shaping the future society in the postsocialist period (Young In: Herrschel 2006:76). Young (2006) emphasises that each of the postsocialist countries develops its own ‘hybrid’ version of ‘postcommunist capitalism’, whichisamixturebetweenoldsocialistpoliticalandeconomicstructuresand Westernmarketeconomy(YoungIn:Herrschel2006:97). Ifindthisstatement beingofcrucialimportanceforunderstandingthetransformationprocessfrom amoregeographicalperspective,sinceitunderlinesthesignificanceof place and the ‘ situatedness’ of the local context. Here, parallels can be made to Massey’s (2005) discussion of relational space as “the sphere of possibility of the existence of multiplicity” (2005:9), which rejects the existence of a single homogenous space and instead advocates a view of space which recognises multipleandalternativestoriesand‘trajectories’.JustasLatviawasnota ‘tabula rasa’ uponthearrivaloftheRedArmyandNaziforces,nordiddevelopment ‘startover’atthetimeofindependence.Masseystressestheconstantcontinuity

121 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism ofspace,inbothasocialandmaterialsense,inwhichthefutureisopenrather thanconstrained. Loose ends and ongoing stories. ‘Space’, then,cannever be that completedsimultaneity in whichallinterconnectionshavebeenestablished,inwhicheverywhereisalready(andatthat momentunchangingly)linkedtoeverywhereelse(Massey2005:107). Pathdependencyandneoclassicism Thehistoricistapproachcanbedividedintotwodifferentapproaches: pathde pendency andthe neoclassicalapproach 42 .Inthefirstcase,focusisputontherole oftheinstitutionalframeworkandlegacyforthedevelopmentofpostsocialist states,which requiresan acknowledgement of the past in order to encounter thepresentandfuture.Thus,thelegaciesintermsofinstitutionsandprevailing socialrelationsregulateboththeopportunitiesandtherestrictionsforthetran sition process. Here, the focus is on the relationship among different actors, andhowtheytogetherinteractandcontributetothetransitionprocess(Blok ker 2005; Stark & Bruszt 1998). The pathdependency approach has been criticisedforbeingtoo‘deterministic’andlimitingofthefutureoutcomesof thedevelopmentinpostsocialistcountriesduetoitsstrongemphasisonpast structural influences as restricting rather than enabling the transition. Hence, the structural legacies would imply limited action space for people, making themintopassiverespondentstostructuralchange,ratherthanactivesubjects controlling and affecting the outcomes of the transition process (see Joosse 2007). Thediscussionofstructureversusagencyiscomplexbutcentralinorder torecognisethecharacterandoutcomeofthetransformation process.Iwill returntotheseissuesinchapterseven,whendiscussing livelihood and work within tourism from a theoretical perspective. The second version, the neo classicalsociologicalapproach,hasmanysimilaritiestopathdependencysince italsoemphasisesthehistoricalcontextandhowtheresultsoftransitionare diverse and multiple. However, capitalism is viewed as ‘capitalism without capitalists’,whichillustratesthelackofsocialgroupsandclassesresponsiblefor realisingtheaimsofthetransition.Theimportanceofdifferentformsofcapital andagencyisstressed,forexample,thesuperiorityofeconomiccapitalinthe

42 Pathdependencyasaconcepthasbeenusedinarangeofdifferentdisciplines,including economicsandsocialsciencesfromthe1980sonwards.Here,Irefertohowpathdependency hasbeenhighlightedwithinresearchinpostsocialistcountries,whichemphasizestheroleof institutions in the transition process. See e. g. Stark & Bruszt (1998) for a more indepth discussion of pathdependency, and Eyal et al. (1998) for an analysis of the neoclassical approach.

122 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

West, while cultural capital (knowledge, technology) is considered as being moreimportantintheEast(Eyaletal.1998;Ghodsee2005). StukulsEglitis(2002)emphasisesthatthepoliticalnarrativewhichargues forcontinuitywiththepastratherthanaradicalbreakwiththeSovietlegacy and history, has been weak in Latvia since independence. This evolutionary narrativehasbeenmoreprominentwithinquestionsofcitizenship,integration and rights for the Russian minority, but also including questions of welfare. Developmentandchangeareimportantdimensionsofthenarrative,butmay includebothafocusondevelopingtheeasternrelationsaswellasthewestern collaborationsintermsofpoliticsandtrade.StukulsEglitisalsopointsoutthat the evolutionary narrative to some extent carries tendencies of nostalgia ; glorifyingthepastsocialistwelfaresystemincontrasttoacontemporarysystem based on individual rather than collective success (StukulsEglitis 2002:229). She identifies a related political narrative, the reactionary narrative, which she claimshadless significanceintheinitialperiodofLatvia’sindependence,but whichhasbeenmoreevidentinotherpostsocialistcountriessuchasUkraine. In this case, the narrative advocates a return to the Soviet past rather than stressingthecontinuitywiththepast,forexample,byraisingclaimstobein corporated within the Russian state. StukulsEglitis does not dismiss this narrativeasbeingunimportantforthefuturedevelopmentofLatviaduetothe large Russian speaking minority and the proximity to other postsocialist countrieswhichmayalsoadvocateamorereactionarynarrative(StukulsEglitis 2002). TourismduringtheSovietregime Iwouldclaimthatamorecontinuousandhistoricistapproachiscrucialinor dertounderstandthedevelopmentoftourisminLatvia since independence. Thecontemporary‘capitalist’tourismsectordidnot emerge from a vacuum, butwasbuiltwiththe‘ruins’oftheformerSovietrecreationsystem,including infrastructure, social networks and previous tourist flows within the Soviet Union.The‘Eastern’orientationoftourisminLatviaisrootedinthehistorical developmentofmoderntourismsincethe19 th century,whenLatviawasunder theruleofRussia.JustasinEstonia,orotherEuropeancountriessuchasSwe denandGermany,seabathingbecamefashionableinLatviaattheturnofthe century.Thedevelopmentoftourismwasdrivenmainlybytheurbanmiddle andupperclasses,escapingtheindustrialisedcitiesandfindingalternativeenvi

123 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism ronments for leisure in the developing seaside resorts 43 . Travelling was also madepossiblethroughthedevelopmentofinfrastructuresuchasrailways(see Löfgren 1999; Worthington 2003). Riga became a destination for travellers fromtheRussianempireduringthisperiod,attractingbothWesternandRus siantourists.Intheinterwarperiod(19201940),tourismwasrecognisedasan importantsourceofnationalincomebytheindependentLatvianstate,andthe development of tourism was organised and governed as part of the state institutions. During this period, the emphasis was on developing domestic ratherthaninternationaltourism,alsoasaconsequenceofthedecreasednum ber of Russian visitors following the isolation within the Soviet Union. SignificantnumbersoftouristsalsoarrivedfromneighbouringBalticcountries aswellasGermany(Rozite1998). Theorganisationandcharacteroftourismtransformeddrasticallyduring theSovietregime.AfterWWII,LatviawasincorporatedintotheoverallSoviet recreation system, which had several implications. First of all, the aims of tourismchanged,frombeingpartofacapitalisteconomytoconstitutingaway of supporting and promoting socialist ideals and ideologies. Tourism was believed to be a tool for contributing to a positive imageofthe vastSoviet territory,creatingasenseofbelongingbothnationallyandregionally.Parallels canbemadetomorenationalisticidealsemerginginthe19 th centuryinEurope, includingSweden,toinfluencethepopulationtogettoknowthecountry,its natureandculture(seeLöfgren1999;Sandell&Sörlin2000).However,inthe Soviet Union,the state was incontrolofwhatinformation and what image shouldbepromotedtothecitizens,andtourismwasaimedattellingthetaleof Soviet history and patriotism, while manifesting the superiority of the communistsystemcomparedtoWesterncapitalisteconomies.Inotherwords, tourism became a tool for propaganda rather than a means for individual freedomandconsumption(Hall1991;2004). The form in which tourism was developed also served socialist ideals. First and foremost, travel and recreation were regarded to be a social and collective activity aimed at regenerating the labour force. Tourism became a part of the welfare system, in which the workers’ holidays were heavily subsidisedbythestateandarrangedbythetradeunionsandstateenterprises. Thesubsidiesmadetravelandaccommodationinexpensive, andavailablefor mostworkers.ThemainaimwastodevelopdomestictourismwithintheSoviet Union, with destinations being the Black Sea and the Baltic Sea, and Latvia

43 ThedevelopmentofseasideresortsinLatviaduringtheinterwarandSovietperiodwillbe discussedinmoredetailintheupcomingJūrmalacasestudy.

124 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism received an increased flow of visitors from different parts of the Soviet Union 44 .TourismwithintheSovietUnionwashighlycentralised,andinvolved alargebureaucraticapparatus,relyingonthefiveyearplanningsystemrather thanontouristdemand.Alltypesoftourisminfrastructurewereownedbythe state, as part of the overall nationalisation process, including land, private property and former private businesses. A network of destinations for recreationwasestablished,includingstateownedhotels,sanatoriumsandother accommodation places (Hall 1991; 2004). In Latvia, domestic tourism was organisedthroughtheRepublicanTourismandExcursionBoard.Tourismwas amonopolyrunbytheSovietstate,andthetourismorganisationsintheBaltic republics had no economic independence,andthe incomefromtourismwas generatedtothecentralauthoritiesinMoscow.Allinvestmentandplanningfor tourism were governed by the central level, but the service sector was not prioritisedsincetourismwasconsideredasbeingunproductive,andtherefore itsincomewasnotpartofthestatebudget(Rozite1998). Thirdly, and as an effect of the isolation within the Soviet Union, internationaltourismtoandfromLatviaandotherSovietrepublicswasstrictly regulated.InternationaltourismwascontrolledthroughaLatvianbranchofthe state institution “Intourist”, and the international arrivals were very limited, especially in the early period of Soviet rule. Regulating the flow of foreign visitorsbecameawayofavoidingtoomuchWesterninfluenceandcapitalistic ideology.Theinternationalvisitorswereassigneddifferent‘touristguides’,who in reality worked as government officials and supervised the tourists’ movements, commissioned by the state. In Latvia, the foreign visitors were restricted to certain areas, including Riga, Jūrmala and Sigulda, and were accommodated in special “Intourist” hotels, such as the Intourist Hotel Latvija described in previous sections. According to official Soviet statistics, international tourism to Latvia increased especially in the 1980s, reaching around50000visitors(Rozite 1998).Theoutgoing tourism from Latvia was subjecttorestrictionsandcontrolanditwasdifficultforan‘ordinary’citizento obtain a Visa for travelling to Western countries, and international travel remainedan arena for theSovietelite.The lowwagesandstandardofliving also made it hard for the average Soviet Latvian citizen to afford travelling abroad. Travelling to other socialist countries was possible through package tours.AliberalisationoftourismwithintheSovietUnionbecameevidentfrom the 1960s and onwards, following the end of Stalin’s regime. During this

44 Thescopeoftourismarrivalsisdifficulttoestimate,sinceofficialstatisticsfromtheSoviet perioddidnotseparateLatviantouristsfromtouristsfromotherSovietrepublics.

125 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism period,thestandardoflivingalsoincreased,makingindividualisedtravelmore available for the Soviet population. The economic significance of western incomingtourismincreasedduringthe1960s,whichbecamethestartofmore internationalmasstourismtotheSovietUnion,forexample,toBulgaria.Inthis case,tourismwasacknowledgedasawayofgainingwesterncurrencyinorder topaydebtstowesterninstitutionsandmakeinvestmentsintechnologytothe stagnatingSovieteconomy.Theseinitiativescontinuedintothe1980swhenthe Soviet Union further opened up its economy, following reforms such as Perestroika and Glasnost (Hall1991;2004). TourismandtheRussianmarket DespiteLatvia’squestfor‘Europeanisation’andthewishtoredirecttheflows ofcapital,goodsandtouristsinamorewesterndirection,Latvia’seconomyand tourismsectorhascontinueditsrelationswithCentralandEasternEuropean countries in general and Russia in particular, even though they have shown signsofaslowdecline(seeDombrovsky&VanagsIn:Muiznieks2006).The statistics of border crossings of foreign overnight travellers from 2007 show thatRussianresidentsarethesecondlargestgroup,constituting13.3percent, following (16.6%) 45 . The number of Russian overnight travellers alsoshowsasignificantincrease,fromaround102,000in1999to220,000in 2007(seeFigure4). Thebordercrossingscontinuetobeveryregionalintheircharacter,and stillbasedonmobilitybetweenneighbouringcountries.Oneimportantfactor forexplainingthecontinuouslyhighnumberofRussianbordercrossingsisthe presence of the Russianspeaking minorities in Latvia, who have social net worksoffriendsandfamiliesstretching over thenational borders of Latvia. Firstly, this is reflected within the travel patterns of the Latvian population, whereRussiaremainstobeapopulardestination,comprising11percentofall bordercrossings,andconstitutingthethirdmostvisitedcountryforbothsame dayandovernighttripsin2007,afterthetwoneighbouringBalticStates.Sec ondly, this is also evident when analysing statistics for incoming visitors to Latvia. According to surveys of persons crossing Latvia’s borders, visiting friendsandrelativeswasthemostcommonpurposeforRussianresidentsin 2007, constituting 30 percent of the total number of Russian sameday and overnighttravellers(LCSB TourisminLatvia2007 ).

45 Thenumberofbordercrossingsaremeasuredthroughanationalsurveyofpersonsaged15 yearsandovercrossingLatvia’sborders,separatingnonresidentandresidenttravelers,aswell assamedayandovernighttravelers.

126 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

ThenumberofRussianovernightvisitorsinregisteredaccommodationestab lishments shows a slow increase, but experienced a sharp decline from 1993 onwards,fromaround65,000overnightvisitorstomerely22,000in2000.In 2007, the number almost reached previous levels as in the beginning of the 1990s,constituting60,000Russianovernightvisitors.Theslowrecoverycould alsosupportprevioussuggestions ofthata majority of Russian tourists visit friends and families, which may include staying the night in private homes ratherthaninhotels.ThedeclineinthenumberofRussiantouristshasalso beenaresultofdifferentVisaregulationsinthe1990s,aswellasthefactthat RussiajustaswellasLatviaexperiencedeconomichardshipsduringthe1990s, makingpeoplemorereluctanttotravelabroad(ibid). Figure 4: Russian overnight travellers and overnight visitors in accommodation establishments1993/19992007.

225

200 Overnight 175 visitorsin accomm 150 odation establish 125 ments 100 Overnight 75 travellers Number(thousands) 50 25 0

3 99 1 07 199 1995 1997 19 200 2003 2005 20 Year Source:LCSB TourisminLatviain2007;2003;2005 ;andtheLCSBdatabasewww.csb.gov.lv 20080917. Tourismandthenegotiationofthepast Theaimsofthetransitionprocesshavelargelycompriseddifferentattemptsto restoretheLatviansocietyinrelationtoprecommunistidealsand‘European’ values,whichhavebeendiscussedinthetwopreviouschapters.Theseattempts havebeenreflectedwithintourism,inhowtourismhasbeenatoolforcom municating neonationalist ideals as well as a reorientation towards Western Europe.Tourismalsoconstitutesanarenaforthenegotiation of thepast, in howLatviashouldhandleandinterprettheSovietheritage,inbothamaterial

127 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism andimmaterialsense.Ashasbeensuggestedearlier,todayitisdifficulttofind direct traces or ‘relics’ of the previous regime in the streets of Riga, which constitutesitesortouristattractionsforforeignvisitors.Within tourism,it is easier to find remains of the old tourism system, inhow oldsanatoriumsor hotelsarerebuiltandremodelledfrom‘communist’to‘capitalist’,intermsof design,marketingandaccessbyanewWesternclientele.Moreover,thetraces canalsobedistinguishedbythecontinuousimportanceofinflowsofvisitors from‘Eastern’markets,whovisitLatviaduetopersonalcontactsornostalgic memoriesofformerSovietresortsandactivities. ThequestionofhowtohighlightandportraytheSovietpastremainsa controversialissue.Light(2000)statesthatthepostsocialistrenegotiationswith the past within tourism may include “the desire to deny – even to erase – memoriesoftherecentcommunistpast”(Light2000:158).Somephysicalele ments of the Soviet history may be relatively easy to combat, for example, communiststatuesorsymbolsofthepreviousregime,butother,largerbuild ingsandarchitecturemayremaintobepartofthe contemporary city scene. Thememoriesofthepastmaybeevenmoredifficulttocometotermswith, andconflictsmayarisebetweentheeffortstoeliminateasmuchaspossibleof theSovietpast,andtointerprethistorythroughthedevelopmentoftourism. Lightclaimsthattheinterpretationofthepastmayhavediversemeaningsand effectsfordifferentactorsinvolvedintourism.HighlightingSoviet‘relics’may bemorecontroversialforthelocalpopulationaswellasnationalstateauthori ties,whiletheymayserveas‘attractions’forforeigntourists.Thecontroversyis relatedtothefactthatcountriessuchasLatviastillstrugglingwithquestionsof identity and belonging,as a way of coming to termswith the past (see Light 2000). In the next sections I will analyse the visibility and invisibility of the Soviet heritage in Latvia, and its controversy within tourism development, basedonthreeinterrelatedperspectives.Firstly,Iwilldiscussthe ‘normalisationof space’ followingtheLatvianindependence,whichhasinvolvedrestoringapre communistmaterialandsymbolicalurbanlandscapeinRiga.Iwillanalysehow thisprocessmayalsobecontroversialasitstirsupconflictsamongthelocal population, by drawing parallels with recent developments in the Estonian capitalTallinn,wherepartsoftheRussianminorityobjectedtotheremovalofa Soviet monument in the central parts of the city in 2007. Secondly, I will discuss attempts to commercialise theSovietheritage inLatviaand otherpost socialist countries. Thirdly and lastly, I will exmine how Latvian tourism marketingportraystheLatvianpeopleanditsculture,raisingquestionsof ethnic

128 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism diversity and heterogeneity ,inrelationtoquestionsofcitizenshipandlanguagelaws affectingtheRussianspeakingminority. ‘Normalising’space In Latvia, independence became an opportunity to ‘restore’ Latvian features andsymbolsoftheurbanspaceofRiga,recreatingwhatStukulsEglitistermsa “normal”symbolic landscape(StukulsEglitis 2002:130)”.Byredefiningbuild ings,streetsandotherpartsofthephysicalenvironment,Latvianhistorycould be rewritten, and the presence of communistic ideology replaced with tradi tionalLatvianartifactsandsymbolism(StukulsEglitis2002).DuringtheSoviet regime, the totalitarian state did not merely control and manifest its power throughterrorandpoliticalaction,butalsothroughsymbolsandothermani festationsasapartofthecitizens’everydaylife.James(1999)pointsouthow ideologydoesnotmerelyconstituteasetofideasandwaysofthinking,butalso has more material dimensions and expression. The process of redesigning a city,bothinasocialistandpostsocialistcontext,mayhavelargereffectsthan implementingpoliticallawsandguidelines.Thecommunisticonsbecamecom ponentsofanoverallideologicalproject,andservedassymbolsofoppression andcontrol(James1999).InSovietLatvia,theiconsincludedforexamplethe presenceofthe Sovietflag,statuesand memorials,andthe renaming of the streetstoSovietnamesandCyrillicletters,whileothersymbolssuchastheLat vian flag, were banned. These regulations were part of a more standardised systemofurbanpoliticalcontrolandplanningcomprisingallSovietrepublics and satellite states. StukulsEglitis (2002) claims that more than 150 streets, parksandsquaresacquirednewnamesduringtheSovietregime.Forexample, Aspazijasbulvaris ,namedafteraLatvianpoet, waschangedto Padomjubulvaris (Soviet Boulevard), and Brivibas iela was termed Lenina iela (Lenin street) (StukulsEglitis2002:135). ThequestforrestoringtheurbanenvironmentinRigatoitsprewarstate becameanimportantcomponentoftheindependencemovementinthe1980s. Anotherdimensionwastheprocessofrestitution,whichmeantthatlandand property should be returned to its former Latvian prewar owners. Stukuls Eglitisstressesthatthesymbolicimportanceofnamingandrenamingalsobe came a central ingredient in the process of normalising Latvian space after independence,asawayofrestoringsymbolsandhistoryrelatedtoLatviantra ditions rather than totalitarian control and Soviet culture (StukulsEglitis 2002:134).Duringthe1980s,themoreliberalpoliticalclimatepermittedmore active symbolic reforms in this direction, includingrenamingstreets,andthe

129 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism presenceoftheLatvianflag,whichwaslegalisedin1988.ThesymbolsofLenin weresomeofthelasttracestovanishfromRiga’surbanscene,includingthe Lenin street and the statue of Lenin. The removal was believed to be controversial and “could incite outrage and possibly retribution from con servativeforces”(StukulsEglitis2002:140).Theinitiativetorenamethestreets intoLatvianwasraisedbyinhabitantsofRigatogetherwiththeparty Latvia’s PopularFront .EvenbeforeLatvia’sformalindependence,stickerswiththeold prewarLatviannameswereplacedontheRussianstreetsigns.Thisbecamea contestedproject,whichstirredsomeconflictsbetweengroupsofinhabitants advocatingthesymbolicLatvianreformsontheonehand,andthosebelonging totheconservativeRussianspeakinggroupsontheother. IndowntownRiga,wherestreetshadacquiredmorenewnamesthanintheoutskirtsofthe city,somestickerspastedoveroldnamesweretorndown,orpaintwassprayedoverthenew designations. In the outskirts, where there were many signs with obscured Cyrillic letters, painterswithdifferentpointsofviewontheissueerasedtheLatinscriptfromstreetsigns, leavingonlytheRussiannamebelow(StukulsEglitis2002:144). ‘Normalisation’asexclusion 46 TheprocessofnormalisingandreconstructingtheurbanspaceofRigameant thatthedominancebytheRussianlanguagewasreplacedbyaquestforrees tablishingthe meaning and importance ofthe Latvian languageand symbols. However,thesymboliclandscapealsodefinesandidentifiesdifferentgroupsof people,distinguishingthedominatingculturalgroupfromothers,whichmaybe madedeviantoreveninvisible.Thus,the‘normalisationofspace’inthepost socialistperiodmaybeanalysedasalsohavingexclusionaryeffects,intermsof whoisgiventherighttohighlightandinterpretthesymbolicandmaterialSo viet heritage, which may bear different meanings and significance among groupsof‘ethnicLatvians’andRussianspeakingminorities. In the end of May 2007, media reports from Tallinn described ‘ethnic relatedviolence’andtheoutbreakofriotsinthestreetsincentralpartsofthe city,expressedthroughactsofvandalismandviolencebyyouthsbelongingto the Estonian Russian minority, as well as Russian citizens, resulting in mass arrestsofupto1000people,andalsointhedeathofaRussiancitizenlivingin Estonia. The background to the riots was the controversial ‘Bronze soldier’

46 The following section about the riots in Tallinnandcontroversy ofthe Bronzestatueis basedonOnLinearticlesfromtheSwedishnewspaper DagensNyheter (www.dn.se),published between the 1 st of January 2007 and the end of February 2008. The articles were accessed 20080228.

130 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism monument,whichwastoberelocatedtoawarcemeteryintheoutskirtsofTal linn,adecisioninitiatedbytheEstoniangovernment,despiteprotestsamong theRussianminority.ThestatuewasplacedatitsoriginalsiteattheTönismägi hillincentralTallinnin1947,threeyearsaftertheRedArmy’sinvasionofTal linnduringWWII,andduringtheSovietregimeitwasasymbolofthevictory overNaziGermany,andalsoservedasaburialgroundfortwelveSovietsol dierswholosttheirlives.InJanuary2007,theEstoniangovernmentformulated alawwhichwouldinclude‘theremovalofforbiddenstructures’,whichinac cordancewiththeGenevaConventionwouldprohibitunmarkedgraves,aswell asdifferentmonumentsorremainswhichmightserveasmanifestationofthe SovietorNazirule.AccordingtotheEstonianparliament,thelawwasnotspe cificallytargetedtotheremovaloftheBronzestatue,andshouldalsoinclude otherEstonianmonuments.ThecritiquefromRussianspeakingminoritiesas wellasRussianpoliticiansandinhabitantsoftheactionstakenbytheEstonian government was harsh. An official written statement from the Russian governmentconcluded, These admirers of Nazism forget that politicians come and go, while the people in the neighboringcountriesareneighborsforever.Todisassemblethemonumentandviolatethe fallen soldier’s remnants is just one more evidence of the revenge focused on the politics againstRussiaandRussianslivinginEstonia(DN27/42007,mytranslationfromSwedish). Critique was also raised within the Estonian political sphere. The Estonian presidentToomasHendrikIlvesusedhisvetoagainst thelawwhich was ac ceptedbytheparliamentinFebruary,sinceheregardeditasbreakingagainst theEstonianconstitution,whichdelayedbutdidnotstoptheprocessinitiated bytheEstoniangovernment.Despitethecontroversy,themonumentwasre movedtotheGarrisoncemeteryonthe30 th ofApril2007. PoliticiansinbothLatviaandLithuaniaexpressedtheirconcernoverthe escalatingviolenceinTallinn,andthepotentialriskthattheriotswouldspread amongtheRussianspeakingminoritiesintheneighboringcountries,butlargely supported Estonia’s political agenda. Even though violence never spread to LatviaasaresultoftheeventinTallinn,itraisedquestionsoftheSovietrem nantsinRiga.InJanuary2007,claimsfromthenationalistorganisations,such as Latvia’sNationalFront , AllForLatvia andWWIIveteransweremadetopassa similarlawinLatviaasinEstonia,inordertoremovethe‘Victorymonument’ from a park in the outskirts of central Riga, still named ‘Victory park’ (www.baltictimes.com20070621,20070122,20070517,accessed 200802 20).Thevictorymonumentwasestablishedin1985,andjustliketheBronze

131 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism statue, symbolising the Soviet ‘liberation’ of Latviain1945,consistsofa30 metertallstatueflankedbystatuesof‘Motherland’andagroupofsoldiers,the ‘Warliberators’.Whilethequestandmovementfor independencetookplace largelyatthesiteoftheFreedommonument,theVictorymonumentbecamea siteforthegatheringofmoreconservativeandEastorientedgroups.Latvian residentsofRussianoriginstillmeetatthemonumenton‘Victoryday’,the9 th ofMay,tocelebratethevictoryoverNazism(StukulsEglitis2002).Theclaims fortheremovalofthevictorymonumentwererejectedbyrepresentativesof theLatvianparliament.ProtestswerealsomadefromtheRussianembassyin Latvia,suggestingthatthemonumentshouldberestoredtoitsoriginalform, including a list of the names of the Soviet soldiers killed during the battles foughtagainsttheGermanforces.Themonumenthasbeenatargetforvan dalismbyLatviannationalistgroups,andin1996,twopeoplewerekilledinan attempttodestroythemonument(www.baltictimes.com20070621,200701 22,20070517,accessed20080220).

TheVictorymonument:‘Motherland’totheleftandthe‘Warliberators’totheright.Photobytheauthor. TheeventstakingplaceinTallinnandRigaclearlyillustratehowthepastSoviet legacyisstillbeingnegotiatedintheBalticStates.Theperiodfollowinginde pendence has included a continuous confrontation with the past in both a materialandsocialsense.Thecoreissueatstakeis‘ occupation’ versus ‘liberation’ , representing two different ways of interpreting the past. For the Russian mi norities in both Estonia and Latvia, the monument symbolizes freedom and

132 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism liberationfromNazism,andthoseRussianskilledwhentryingtofreetheEsto nians.Theprotestsarealsoanchoredinthewishtogainincreasingrightsand influencefortheRussianminority.For‘ethnic’EstoniansandLatviansonthe otherhand,themonumentsaresymbolsofoppression,buttheeventsalsoil lustratethetenserelationswithRussia,andthestruggletomanifestuniform EstonianandLatviannationstateswithlessRussianinfluence.Thus,theevents inTallinnarealsorootedinquestionsofethnicityandidentity,ofwhobelongs tothe‘ethnic’nationstateandwhodoesnot,ofwhoshouldhavetherightand powertodefinebordersbotharoundandwithinanationstateoracity.As shown above, the negotiations over the ‘national common space’ does not merely take place within Latvia itself, but the situation is also affected by relationsbetweenLatviaandRussia. CommercialisationoftheSovietheritagethroughtourism DespitethedomesticcontroversiesandconflictsoftheBronzestatueinTallinn andtheVictorymonumentinRiga,bothlocationshavebecomepopulartour ismsites,astheyrepresenttwoofthelimitednumberofphysicalrelicsfrom theSovietregime.InEstonia,mediadescribedtheeventsrelatedtotheBronze statueashavingbothnegativeandpositiveeffectsfortourism. Ontheonehand,tourisminEstoniasufferedfromtheriotsinEstonia,givinganimageof ethnicconflictandviolence.Ontheotherhand,intheperiodfollowingtheriots,thestatue alsobecameapopulartourismattractionforforeigntouristsvisitingTallinn(TheBalticTimes 20070506,www.baltictimes.com20080228). InRiga,theVictorymonumenthasbeenincludedaspartofatourist‘cultural daytrip’ofthecity,marketedas‘BackintheUSSR’bytheprivatetouroperator RigaOutThere . NowhereinRigaisthereamorevividreminderoftheSovieterathanatVictoryPark.The placeismobbedbyethnicRussiansonthemostimportantdaysintheoldSovietcalender. 'ŪzvarasParks'isalsofullofRussiansyoungandoldwhenevertheywishtoprotestabout politicalmattersofonekindoranother.Ourtourstopsoffherefor15minutestoletyou immerseyourselfinRiga'smostblatantreminderoftheSovietpast.Latviannationalistshave triedtoblowthisplaceuponoccasion.Butinthecomingyearsitmightwellbethepoliticians whowillfinallysucceedindoingawaywiththeseSovietmonuments(www.rigaoutthere.com 20080901). In this case, the past is described as very much alive, but the future of the monument is illustrated as uncertain and controversial. The description of

133 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

VictoryParkalsoputsfocusonSoviethistoryasseparatefromLatvianhistory, aswellasdescribingthesiteasoneofthefewplacesinwhichtheRussian speakingminorities(incontrasttothe‘ethnicLatvians’)mayclaimtheirpoliti calrightsaswellastheirvisibilityinthecity. AsillustratedbytheaboveexamplefromtheVictorymonument,theSo vietheritageinpostsocialistcountriesisoftenmadevisibleandcommunicated throughtheprivatesectorratherthanpublictourismmarketing.Worthington (2004)pointsoutthatithasmainlybeenexternalandforeignactorswhohave highlightedandcommercialisedtheSovietheritage,forexample,inguidebooks, travelmagazinesandthroughtheInternet(WorthingtonIn:Hall2004).Some countrieshavebecomedestinationsfor‘communistheritage’,oftenasaresult ofanincreasingflowofWesternvisitors,inspiredbyguidebooksandmediato different attractions rather than by active marketing from the destinations themselves.OneexampleistheinflowoftouriststotheformerEastBerlin,to wheretheBerlinWallbecameoneofthemostvisitedtourismplacesafterits fallin1989(seeLight2000).Moreover,thereistheinterestanddemandfrom theforeigntourists,intheirwishtoexperiencethelegaciesandrelicsofcom munism.TheSovietheritagemaybecategorisedasexamplesof‘Darktourism’, definedbyLennonandFoley(2000)as“theattractionofvisitorstotourism sitesassociatedwithrecentandhistoricincidencesofdeathanddisaster”(Len non&Foley2000citedinWight&Lennon2006:520).Thismayincludeboth siteswhicharedirectlyassociatedwithdeath,forexampleconcentrationcamps, butalsomore‘secondary’places,suchas,museumsportrayingeventsofpeo ple’ssufferinganddeath(Wight&Lennon2006). Light (2000) on the other hand, prefers the term ‘communist heritage tourists’,foridentifyingthosetouristswhosemainmotiveistoexperiencethe communistheritageatthegivendestination.Inthiscase,Lightdefinesheritage as “the contemporary uses of the past” (Ashworth & Graham 1997:381, in Light2000:160).Thus,focusisnotputonhowthepastisvalued,forexample, inamorematerialsense,butratherhowtheremainsofcommunismareused andconsumedwithintourism(Light2000:160).Forthetourist,travelmayin volveasearchfor‘otherness’,tofindmoreexoticenvironmentsincontrastto the‘Western’everydaylifeandroutine.Thissearchcaninvolvemoreencoun terswiththe‘East’associatedwithchallengesandpotentialrisks.Thisdoesnot representarecenttrend;thecuriosityfor‘lifebehindtheIroncurtain’wasalso evidentduringtheSovietperiod,buthascontinuedandincreasedintothepre sentduetolessrestrictionsfortravelling(Light2000).

134 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

Makingthepastvisible–examplesfromstatueparks Oneexampleofhowtheremainsofcommunismhavebecomesitesfortour ism isthedevelopmentof differentstatueparks. In Budapest, following the collapseofcommunism,thefutureuseofthecommuniststatueswasdiscussed. Somearguedfortheremovalofallstatuesfromthecitycentre,whileothers wantedthemonumentstoremainasasymbolandmemoryoftheSovietpast. Intheend,thestatueswereremovedtoaparkintheoutskirtsofBudapest,a costwhichamountedtoaround 61 600USdollars(Light 2000). The statue park Szoborpark openedin1993,afteranarchitecturalcompetitionannounced by the Budapest General Assembly. In the park, statuesand busts of Lenin, MarxandEngelsareondisplayaswellasotherSovietmemorials.Accordingto thewinningarchitectArkosEleod,theaimoftheparkwas (…)tocreatesomethingwhichwaspoliticallyandartisticallyneutral,neithercelebratingnor ridiculingthecommunistera,whilstacknowledgingthatthestatueswereapartofHungary’s history(Light2000:167). Thestatueparkhasbecomeapopulartouristsite;someclaimthatithasturned intoa‘themepark’,whileothersviewitasanopenairmuseum,providingin sight into the period of communism. The park is estimated to have around 40000 foreign and domestic visitors every year (Light 2000; www.szoborpark.hu20080224). Anotherexampleofa statue parkis the “ Soviet Garden at Grutas Park ”, unofficiallyknownas‘Stalinworld’, located130kilometres southwest of the Lithuanian capital. The park was opened in 2001, and has been privately fi nanced, displaying statues and monuments which were preserved by the Lithuanian state, and includes a zoo, museum, a children’s park and a café serving“spratporusski”(herring,onionandvodka)(www.grutoparkas.lt2008 0303;Williams2008).TheofficialhomepagedescribesGrutasparkasfollows: The Grūtas Park exposition discloses the negative content of the Soviet ideology and its impact on the value system. The aim of this exposition is to providean opportunity for Lithuanian people, visitorscoming to our country as well as future generations to see the nakedSovietideologywhichsuppressedandhurtthespiritofournationformanydecades (www.grutoparkas.lt20080303). Thus,theaimistobringoutthedarkpastintothedaylight,analysingitwitha newsetofeyes,andtherebyprovideitwithnewmeaning.However,thestatue parks inboth HungaryandLithuania have beenobjects of controversy. For

135 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism example,Grutaspark hasevokedcriticismamong Lithuanians, claiming that theparkdoesnotportraytheseriousnessofthecrimescommittedduringthe Soviet period. A former Lithuanian politician in Parliament, Juozas Galdikas, criticizedtheparkownerasfollows: Malinauskas(Thepark’sowner)doesnotcarethattheseforestswhereGrutasParkwasbuilt onceservedasshelterforLithuanianfreedomfightersagainstSovietoccupants.Hedoesnot careaboutthepainfulhistoryofLithuania.Whatisthepurposeofthispark?Tolaughatour pain?(Williams2008:8,quotefromDapkus2006). InBudapest,thecriticismhasmainlyconcernedthecommercialisationofthe park,andthedifferentpurposesandusesoftheparkbyWesternandlocalin habitants.Light(2000)arguesthatthemainreasonforthegeneralacceptance oftheparkhastodowithitslocation.Beingsituatedintheoutskirtsofthecity mayhavesymbolicsignificance,astheparkrepresents‘neutralground’.Byre movingthestatuesfromtheurbancitycentretoagreenishparksetting,also changestheirsymbolicmeanings.Here,referencescanbemadetotheabove quotefromGrutasPark,intheiraimtoportraythe“nakedSovietideology”, servedinacompletelydifferentsettinginordertodismantleanddeconstruct thepoweroftheSovietsystem.James(1999)arguesthattheHungarian Szobor park maybeanalysedasapostmodernmemorialsitewhichremainsopenfor different and multiple interpretations, while representing conflicting views of thepast.Jamesinterpretsthedecisiontorelocatethestatuesfromthecitycen tre to the outskirts of Budapest as a way of drawing a border between the contemporarypostsocialistHungaryanditscommunistpast. (…)brickwallsandwirefencesdefinethemuseum’sboundaries.Oneistemptedtosaythat these devices ‘imprison’ the collection, but aprison metaphor is just one ofmany possible readings.‘Quarantine’isanalternativeforthosewhoseetherecuperationoftarnishedideals asapossibility.Inanycase,itissafetosaythatthewallsandfencessymbolicallysegregate communismfromtheflowofeverydaylife(James1999:303). Light(2000)describesthestatueparkasa‘memoryscape’,adefinedplacefor rememberingandfortouristconsumption,“apieceofurbanspaceorganized aroundsocialrememberingthroughtheassemblageofkeyicongraphicforms” (Light2000:165).Thus,thepastisnotrejected,butmoreseparatedfromthe cityitselfanditsinhabitantsandeverydaylife,byinitiativesofthestateandlo calgovernments.Still,therelocationalsoraisesthequestionofpower,inwho hasthe‘right’tonarrateandinterpretthehistorybeingtold,whatinterestsand aims the rewriting have, and who benefits. When the statues are ‘displaced’

136 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism fromtheiroriginalsetting,asmarkersofthecity,theurbancontextislost,and themonumentstellanotherstory.Atthesametime,otherpartsoftheurban heritage are highlighted andpreserved inthe city centre.The statue park has alsobecomeaspacefornostalgiaforBudapestinhabitants,toexperiencedif ferentelementsoftheirpasteverydaylife(James1999). CommercialisingandmasculinisingtheSovietheritage The‘normalisation’ofspaceinRigaasdiscussedabovedidnotincludethere moval of different Soviet monuments to new ‘neutral’ places. However, the SovietheritageismarketedandcommodifiedtoWesterntouriststhroughother channelswithintheprivatesectoringeneralandamongtourcompaniesmore specifically.Differenttoursofthecityarepromotedintermstoseethe‘undis covered’SovietRiga,wherefewtouristsgo,andwhicharedifficulttofindby thetourist himself/herself. The Soviet heritageis described as being close to extinction,makingtimeanimportantfactorforattractingtourists.Oneofthe touroperators, RigaOutThere, describesthesituationasfollows: SeventeenyearsonfromthebreakupoftheSovietUnionrelicsfromnearlyfiftyyearsof occupationarefastdisappearing(…)Withtheclocktickingdowntoatimewhenimagesof Sovietoccupationwillnolongerremain,hereatOuttherewewouldliketoofferourclients the opportunity to experience the postSoviet experience in its many guises (www.rigaoutthere.com20080225). Ontheonehand,theSovietheritageispromotedalongsidewithotherheritage tours,suchas‘Sovietleftovers’,‘Russian’,‘Swedish’or‘Jewish’Riga,focusing ondifferenttourismsites,monuments,museums,andarchitecture.The‘Soviet tours’generallyinvolvesitessuchastheOccupationmuseum,theAcademyof ScienceandthecarmuseuminRiga,whicharealsooftenfoundintravelmaga zinesandguidebooksdescribing‘SovietRiga’.Ontheotherhand,toursofthe Soviet heritage are promoted as different from ‘ordinary’ guided tours, with moreparallelstohighlightingthe‘Darkpast’ ofRiga.Inthiscase,theSoviet heritageismadeintoan‘action’adventure.Differenttouroperatorssuchas The Argonaut hostel, offer different ‘Insane tours’, including ‘Shotguns and vodka’, ‘the Soviet prison adventure’ and ‘AK47 adventure’, which can be combined with skydiving, bob sleighing, bungee jumping, or shooting. The ‘AK47 ad venture’isdescribedasthefollowing:

137 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

NeedaHeartStarter?CoffeeoranAK47?StayatArgonautandwewillshowyoutheSoviet bunkernearbyfullofweaponstohaveablastwith.Greatforgroupstochallengeeachother onheadandbodyshotstoseewhobuysthebeers(www.argonauthotel.com,20080225). Riga Out There promotes a tour called ‘Back to the USSR’, which includes themessuchas,“FeellikeJamesBondontopofZakusalaisland’sTVtower”, to“HavelunchwithLeninandPutin”andfinishthetourwith“aRussiandin nerandvodkaparty”.Thetourcompanyalsoprovidesa‘NuclearBunkerTour’ tothesmalltownLigatneinCēsisdistrict,aformertopsecretescapesitefor the Soviet political regime and KGB officials in Latvia in case of a potential Westernnuclearattack.Thesitewasknownas‘ThePension’ andwasmade official in 2003, and resides underground of a public hotel sanatorium (www.rigaoutthere.com20080225).Thetourprovidedby RigaOutThere com binesthetourofthebunkerwiththe“Sovietnuclearbunkerretroparty”. Experiencethistobelieveit!ThecanteenattheLigatnebunkerappearstobesetinatime warpasitremainsvirtuallyuntouchedfromthetimeofSovietoccupationandprovidesafull SovietexperienceincludingretrovinyldiscsandathreecourseSovietlunch.Fortunately,the Russianfoodhasdefinitelyimprovedsincethosedays!(www.rigaoutthere.com20080225). ThepromotionoftheSovietheritagebytheprivatesectorasdescribedabove maybeviewedasasignforamoretolerantattitudeforcommercializingthe SovietpastinLatvia.Iwouldsuggestthatthiscommodificationprocesshasat leasttwoeffects.First,itraises,again,thequestionofwhoisgiventhepowerto define Riga and Latvia as a tourism destination, and how this image is communicated to foreign visitors as well as domestic tourists. The tours presentedabovetendtogiveamorestereotypicalviewoftheRussianandSo vietculture,ratherthanprovidinganinsighttobothpastandcontemporarylife ofRussiansor‘ethnic’Latvians.Russiansbecomeinthiscaseratherequivalent toSovietRussian(s),ratherthantreatedasadiversegroup.Thismayinturn createproblemsanddisparitiesbetweentheofficialtourismaimssetbytourism authorities, and those created by other actors, which may raise questions of howthedestinationsthemselvescancontrolhowtheheritageispresentedand marketed.Tunbridge(1994)identifiedinthiscaseadisparitybetween‘identity versuseconomy’(Tunbridge1994In:Light2000:159),aprocessinwhichmore economic goals and commodification are set in relation to the question of comingtotermswithanddealingwiththepast.

138 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

Secondly,andrelatedtotheprocessofcommodification,Iwouldstatethatthe toursoffered inamore‘Russian’and‘Soviet’manneralsoare‘masculinised’, bothintermsofhowthetraveler(him)selfisportrayedandtheplacesandsites visited.Here,parallelscanbemadetothepreviouschapterwhichhighlighted issuesofsextourismandplacemarketing,andfemininisedexoticimagesofthe ‘East’versusthemale‘Western’tourist.Inthiscase,thedestinationbearsmore ‘masculine’ traits, focusing on war, nationalism, occupation versus victory, whichareinsomesensedifferentstoriesofmen’shistoryandlives,andwhich have remained and ‘materialised’ into physical manifestations such as monu ments,parks,architecturalbuildingsormilitary‘topsecret’bunkersorprisons (seeEdensor&Kathari1994In:Kinnaird&Hall1994).Thus,theemphasison thesetypesofmanifestationsalsotendstoportraytheelitestructuresofthe Sovietsystemratherthantheeverydaylifeofthecitizensthemselves,thestories ofbothmenandwomen,Russian‘immigrants’and‘ethnic’Latvians.Thefocus onthetoursisbasedon‘active’adventures,alsomanifestingmoremasculine characteristics.Someofthesetours,suchas RigaOutThere,combinethe‘action’ adventureswith‘nightlife’toursasdiscussedinchapterfour. Makingthepast(in)visiblethroughtourismmarketing MakingthepastSovietheritagevisibleinpostsocialistcountriesthroughtour ism often includes more material and symbolical manifestations and remains, ratherthanamorediversifiedapproachtohowcultureassuchisdefinedand portrayed.Theattemptsto‘normalise’thepostsocialistLatvianspacealsoin cludepolicieswhichidentifythemembersandnonmembersofthenewnation state,withanemphasisoncommonvaluesandtraditionsratherthandiversity intermsoflanguageandculture.Thedesireto‘returntoEurope’asdiscussed inthepreviouschapteralsomeansdistancingLatviafromimagesofthe‘East’, including the Russian heritage. The following sections will discuss how the contemporaryRussiansocioculturalheritageisportrayedwithinpublictourism marketing,basedoninformationprovidedbythe LatvianInstitute andthe Lat vianTourismDevelopmentAgency .Inthiscase,Iwillrelatepreviousdiscussionsof ‘neonationalism’and‘relicsofcommunism’andtheireffectsregardingques tionsofminoritycultureandrights,firstbyprovidingashortbackgroundto questionsrelatingtoethnicity inLatvia.Theissuesatstakeareverycomplex and would require a more extensive indepth analysis than I have space for

139 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism within the delimitations of my study 47 .I willreturntoquestionsofethnicity relatedtothelabourmarketinchaptersix,aswellasinthecasestudiesofgen der and livelihood within tourism. Here, I will provide a basic setting for questionsrelatingtoethnicity,focusingoncitizenship,languagepoliciesaswell asintegration.Theaimisthatthiswillserveasabackgroundtomyanalysisof tourismmarketingasreflectingperceptionsofethnicityand‘ethnicculture’,as wellasprovidingabasiccontextfortheupcomingchapters. The‘ethnic’question The Russian minority in Latvia is often referred to as a rather homogenous group,andidentifiedonthebasisofbeingRussianspeaking,arrivinginLatvia during the Soviet occupation, and still having roots and sympathies towards Russia(ortheformerSovietUnion),ratherthantowardsthe‘ethnic’Latvian nationstate.However,asBudryte(2005)states,theRussianspeakingminority in Latvia should be analysed as diverse, with multiple sets of identities and backgrounds.Some‘Russians’werebornintheformerSovietUnionandar rivedaslabourimmigrantstoLatvia,whileothershaverootsbacktotheperiod whenLatviabelongedtoCzaristRussia 48 . Table4: TheethniccompositionoftheLatvianpopulation(%). 1935 1989 2005 Latvians 77.0 52.0 58.8 Russians 8.8 34 28.6 Belarussians 1.4 4.5 3.8 Ukrainians 0.1 3.5 2.6 Poles 2.5 2.3 2.5 Others* 10.2 3.7 3.7 *In1935,Jewsconstituted4.9%,andBalticGermans3.3% Source:MuiznieksTable1In:Muiznieks2006:13. Parts of the Russianspeaking minority have been born and raised in contemporary and independent Latvia; some speak Latvianfluentlyandhave acquired Latvian or other citizenship, while others are classified as ‘non

47 SeeforexampleMuiznieks(ed)(2006),Budryte(2005),Jubulis(2001)andDanjoux(2002) foramoreindepthanalysisofquestionsofcitizenshipandethnicityinLatviafrombotha historicalandcontemporaryperspective. 48 DuringLatvia’sfirstindependence,theRussianshareofthepopulationconstitutedaround 10percent.TheRussianelitewasquitelimitedandamajorityoftheRussianpopulationlived intheLatgaleregion,andmanyworkedasfarmers(Muiznieks2006In:Muiznieks(ed)2006). SeeMuiznieks(2006)andBudryte(2005)foranoverviewoftheRussianimmigrationsand influencesinLatvia.

140 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism citizens’. Some might identify themselves as ‘Russians’ or ‘Ukrainians’, while otherswouldclaimaLatvianidentity.Table4aboveprovidesanoverviewof the ethnic composition of the Latvian population, comparing statistics from 1935,1989and2005.Here,theeffectsoftheRussianlabourimmigrationand ‘Russification’ processes during the Soviet regime become evident, making ‘ethnicLatvians’almostaminorityintheirowncountryin1989,representing merely52percentofthetotalpopulation1935.Thisdemographic imbalance togetherwiththewishtoreestablishanationstatebased on Latvian culture, languageandothertraditionshavebeenthesourceofthedebatesofethnicity andcitizenship. Citizenship At the time of independence, the question of citizenship became one of the moreacute,butalsocontroversialpoliticalquestionsinLatvia.Intheimmedi ateperiodfollowingindependence in1991,citizenship was not automatically giventoallcitizensresidingwithinthebordersofLatvia,butonlyto“interwar citizens and their direct descendents (Muiznieks In: Muiznieks 2006:16)”. Consequently, around 740000 people did not acquire an official citizenship status until 1994, when a new law on citizenship was passed (Budryte 2005:108).Thereasonsforthisdecisionwere,forexample,theclaimsfora‘le gal continuity with the past’ including reclaiming prewar institutions and constitutionsforgoverningthecountry,whiletheSovietperiodandtheoccu pation in some sense were declared as invalid. Moreover, regulations of citizenship were also considered to impact the degree of political influence, sincethe‘ethnic’Latvianshareofthepopulationwasbarelyinmajorityatthe time of independence (ibid; Muiznieks 2006 In: Muiznieks 2006). The 1994 LawonCitizenshipgrantedcitizenshipto“ethnicLatvians,spousesofcitizens, those having finished Latvian language school”, while other groups such as former KBG members and Soviet military officials could not apply for citizenship.AllothergroupscouldapplyforLatvian citizenship and became subjects for a neutralization process, implemented through a timetable or “neutralizationwindows”,rangingfrom19962003.Inthiscase,theprocessof citizenshipwasbasedontheideaofan‘individualchoice’(Budryte2005:108). TheapplicationsforcitizenshipstillincludeaLatvianlanguagetest,historytest andanoathofloyaltytotheLatvianstate.In1998,theregulationssetupbythe ‘windowsystem’policieswereabandonedafteranationalreferendum,making itpossibletoapplyforcitizenshipfreelyatany time. Children born by non citizensintheperiodfollowingindependencewerealsoautomaticallygranted

141 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism citizenship(MuiznieksIn:Muiznieks2006:15f;Budryte2005).Thenumberof Latviancitizenshasincreasedsincetheregulationsofthe‘windowpolicy’were changed (see Table 5). Still, the number of noncitizens is still fairly high, comprising418000peopleofdifferentethnicitiesin2006. Table5: CitizenshipandethnicityinLatvia1995and2006. March1995 January2006

Ethnicity Total % % Total % % % Citizens Non Citizens Non Foreign citizens citizens citizens Latvian 1,421,987 98 2 1,351,489 99 0.1 0.08 Russian 764,896 38 62 652,204 54 43 3 Belarussian 109,122 19 81 86,594 34 64 2 Ukrainian 69,334 6 94 58,175 25 68 7 Polish 64,987 61 39 55,684 73 26 1 Lithuanian 35,707 20 80 31,307 57 38 5 Other 49,484 36 64 55,314 57 31 12 Total 2,516,517 1,776,286 740,231 2,290,764 1,834,282 418,440 38,043 Source:MuiznieksTable3,In:Muiznieks2006:17. Alawregulatingtherightsofnoncitizenswasintroducedin1995 49 ,whichgave noncitizenstherighttoresidepermanentlyinLatvia,butthenottherightto voteforeitherthenationalparliament orthelocalelections.Theywere alsorestrictedinbecomingpoliticalcandidates,aswellasoccupyingsomework positionswithinthepublicsector,ormorejuridicalpositionswithintheprivate sector.Restrictionsalsoappliedtolandownership,andtotheLatvianmilitary service.Italsobecamenecessaryfornoncitizenstoobtainspecialtraveldocu mentsandvisasfortravellingabroad,especiallytoWesterncountries,whilethe regulations were less strict for trips to Russia (Muiznieks In: Muiznieks 2006:15f).Theserestrictionsstillapply,eventhoughtherestrictionsforworkin theprivatesectorhavebeenremoved. Languagepolicies Muiznieks(2006)arguesthattheLatviancitizenshiplawshavebeencontrover sialinaninternationalcontext,withpoliciesrelatingtolanguagebeingthemost debated question in Latvia since independence. The main issue concerns the statusoftheRussianlanguage.FrombeingtheofficiallanguageinSovietLat

49 Thelawwasnamed”TheStatusofThosFormerUSSRCitizensWhoDoNotHaveCitizenshipof LatviaorAnyOtherState(Muiznieks2006:16In:Muiznieks(ed)2006)”.

142 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism via, Russian lost much of its status after independence when Latvian was recognized as the official state language, and Russian was termed a minority language.DuringtheSovietregime,LatvianshadtolearnRussianaspartof theireducation,whileRussianswerenotobligedtostudytheLatvianlanguage. Asaresult,acensusfrom1989showedthatonly22 percent of the Russian shareofthepopulationclaimedtohaveknowledgeinLatvian,while69percent of Latvian population had a command in Russian (Muiznieks In: Muiznieks 2006:13). There is still conflicting opinion of whether Russian should be declaredasanofficialstatelanguageornot.Asurveyfrom2005statedthatan overwhelming part ofRussianspeakers(87%)wanted Russian to become an official language, compared to only 19 percent of ‘ethnic’ Latvians (Zepa & SupuleIn:Muiznieks2006:35).Changestothe LawonLanguages weremadein 1992, which made adequate knowledge in Latvian obligatory for people workinginpartsofthepublicaswellasintheprivatesector.Peopleapplying forjobshadtotakelanguagetestsandifneeded,languagecourses.Anewlaw in 1999 stated that language requirements would not apply for work in the privatesector. Integration (…)thepasthasnotdisappearedwithoutatrace.Inreality,theperiodofindependencehas stillbeentooshortforLatviatofreeitselfoftheeffectsoffiftyyearsoftotalitarianismand occupation(…)LatviahasinheritedmorethanhalfamillionSovieteraimmigrantsandtheir descendants, many of whom have not yet become integrated into the Latvian cultural and linguistic environment, and thus do not feel connected to the Latvian state (National Pro gramme TheIntegrationofSocietyinLatvia 2001:7). TheabovecitationistakenfromLatvia’snationalintegrationprogrammefrom 2001,andillustratesthechallengesofdealingwiththepast,notintermsofa materialheritage,butinmakingthesocialandculturalheritagevisible,embod iedinthelivesoftheRussianspeakingminoritiesinLatvia.Here,muchofthe focusisonhowtheminoritygroupsandnoncitizensofLatviashouldadopt andadjusttovaluesofthe‘Latvian’society,intermsoflanguageandculture, whichisverymuchbasedontheideaoftheunitednationstateasdiscussedin chapterone.Theaimsofafutureintegratedsocietyarespecifiedasfollows: An integrated civil society is one where nonLatvianshave a command of the Latvian lan guage,havingovercomealienationfromLatvianculturalvalues,andareinvolvedinrealizing thecommongoalsofLatviansociety;andwherenonLatvianshavetherighttopreservetheir nativelanguageandculture(NationalProgramme TheIntegrationofSocietyinLatvia 2001:8).

143 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

Thus,alotoffocusisputontheimportanceofLatvianastheoneandonly statelanguage,andthedistinctionbetween‘Latvian’and‘nonLatvian’culture. LatviasignedtheEuropean FrameworkConventionontheProtectionofNationalMi norities in2005,whichaimsto“ensureeffectiveandrealequalityforindividuals belonging to national minorities inallareasofeconomic, political,social and culturallife”(www.integracija.gov.lv20080227) 50 .Thiswasdoneafteryearsof refusing the Convention created by the Council of Europe. Budryte (2005) claimsthatthisreflectedunwillingnesstogivemorestatustotheRussianlan guage,whichwouldcreatemoredivisionthanunityintheLatviansociety.Still, only those who have acquired a Latvian citizenship and have a different language,orculturethanLatvianarerecognizedasanationalminority, accordingtoathelaw(Budryte2005).Muiznieks(2006)arguesthatmuchof theethnicquestionhasfocusedoncitizenshipandlanguagepoliciesratherthan onsocialintegrationbetweenLatvianandRussianspeakingcommunities.On theonehand,thereisabeliefthatthereexistclearandunsolvedoppositions between ‘ethnic’ Latvians and Russianspeaking groups, and that the Latvian societycanbedescribedassegregatedintermsofpolitics,mediaandlanguage. On the other hand, there are also opinions that there is not that much outspoken opposition between ethnic groups, and that the everyday life is ratherfrictionfree(Muiznieks;TabunsIn:Muiznieks2006). MarketingtheRussiansocioculturalheritage Whenanalysingpublictourismmarketingmaterialfrominstitutionssuchas The Latvian Tourism Development Agency and The Latvian Institute , it is clear that the majorityofthematerialisbasedonthewishtoconstructanimageofLatviain general and Riga more specifically as having one common background and culture.Thisincludesconstructingofasenseofunityandfellowship,witha focusononeratherhomogenous‘authentic’culturewhichhasbeensuppressed andnowisabletoflourishaftertheLatvianindependence.The‘ethnic’Latvian culture and language was regarded as being under threat during the Soviet period, a ‘crisis’ which was continued due to the Russian immigrants and a generaldecreaseoftheLatvianpopulation.Constructingthenationstatemay alsoinvolvedrawingbordersaroundthoseidentifiedas‘Latvians’andthosenot fulfilling the requirements of ‘Latvianness’ in terms of language and other

50 The convention includes commitment to work against discrimination and for equality amongminorityandmajoritygroupsinthesociety,aswellastherighttopreservecultural traditionsandlanguage,plusfreedomtoengageincivilsocietyactivitiesandmassmedia(see www.integracija.gov.lv20080227).

144 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism culturalvalues.Schwartz(2006)claimsthattheconstructionandreproduction ofthecore‘essence’oftheLatvianidentityremainsgenerallyuncontested. UnlikethesituationinmanypostCommuniststateswithhistoricallyweakorcontestedar ticulationsofnationalidentity(UkraineandBelarusforexample),thedesirabilityofa“Latvian Latvia”isgenerallyaccepted.Agrariansandinternationalistsalikearecommittedtopreserving a Latvian state inwhichthe sole official language and dominant culture areLatvian and in whichLatviansaretheprimarypoliticalshapersoftheirowndestiny(Schwartz2006:13). Asaneffect,theheritageofRussian,Jewishandotherminoritiesremainfairly invisibleinthepromotionoftourism,andintheimage ofRiga asa tourism destination.TourismmarketinginLatviatendstoreproducestheideaofasin gleandhomogenous‘Latvianculture’asacentralpartoftheestablishmentof theLatviannation.Thefocusison differences between‘ethnic’Latvians,inhab iting ‘unique’ features, and other ethnic groups, representing a different language and ethnicity compared to the norm of ‘Latvianness’. The Latvian Institute describestheethnicdifferencesinLatviaasfollows: As in many parts of Eastern Europe, so too in Latvia, ethnic consciousness is very pronounced , sometimesevenpredominatingovernationalorreligiousconsciousness(…)Latvianstendto contrastthemselveswiththelargebodyofethnicRussianimmigrantswhoarrivedduringthe Sovietera(www.li.lv20080225,emphasisinoriginal). ‘Culture’inLatviaisalsodescribedonafairlyuniformbasisontheinstitute’s homepage,includingdescriptionsof‘Latvian’traditions,folkcostumes,Latvian cuisine,literatureandart.Here,thefocusisonhowtraditionaland‘authentic’ culture has survived during the Soviet regime, rather than on the cultural influencesfromothercountries.TheofficialLatviantourismportalalsofocuses onthepreservationoftheLatviancultureratherthanculturalhybridity. Inthebeginningofthe21stcenturyinLatviathereareapproximately664092Russians,88 998Belorussians,59403Ukrainians,56798Polish,31840Lithuanians,9820Jews,8403 Gypsies,3696Germans,2970Tatars,26702530Estoniansand136representa tives of other nations. In spite of the multicultural influence, Latvians have managed to preservetheirnationalidentity,cultureandlanguage(www.latviatourism.lv20080227). The information provided by the Latvian Institute also includes descriptions of ‘The Latvians’ and ‘Latvians’, as opposed to another section named ‘Ethnic minoritiesinLatvia’.Thedifferentsectionsdescribe,forexample,‘WhataLat vian eats’ and ‘A Latvian and His Land’, but also include physical and even ‘racial’descriptionsof‘ThecharacteristicsoftheaverageLatvian’.

145 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

MostLatviansbelongtotwoNorthEuropeanphysicaltypes:WesternBalticandEasternBaltic ,thefirstof whichisdistinguishedbytallerstature,thelatterbeingdistinguishedbyamoreroundedface. ApproximatelytwothirdsofLatvianshavelighthairandgrey,bluishorgreenisheyes,therest being of darker complexion, generally with brownish hair and eyes. (Few Latvians actually haveblackhair.)However,intermsofphysicalfeatures,Latvianswouldbeveryhardtodis tinguishfromEstonians,Lithuanians,Swedes,BelarusiansortheRussianslivinginadjacent areas.Ontheotherhand,Latvianbehaviourandmentality,andthesoundofthelanguage,all permitthemtobedistinguishedquiteclearlyfrompeoplebelongingtootherethnicgroups (www.li.lv20080225,emphasisinoriginal). Thus,thecharacteristicsofLatviansarecloselyexamined,andcontrastedwith differentminoritygroupsinLatvia,whicharedescribedand‘categorized’(Rus sian,Jews,Roman,Ukrainian,etc),mainlybasedontheirethnicorigin,when theyarrivedinLatvia,theirlanguageanddegreeofassimilationintotheLatvian society.TheinformationfromtheLatvianInstitutealsocontainsdetailsofthe processofcitizenshipandintegration. (…) mostofLatvia’sRussianpopulationconsistsofimmigrantswhoarrivedrecentlyasaresultoftheSoviet occupation,andunfortunately,manyofthemtakeadifferent view regardingthecountry’sfutureanddo notwish to recognise Latvian as the country’s sole official language (www.li.lv 20080225, emphasisinoriginal). LittlefocusisputonRussianculturaltraditions,customsorotherinfluences. SomemightarguethatsomeoftheRussianimmigrantswouldnotrepresenta specificculture,duetotheir‘uprootedness’fromtheiroriginalhomecountries, andduetothe‘Russification’processduring theSoviet regime. The Latvian culture(andlanguage)hasalsoinsomesensebeen affectedand modified by ‘Russification’,bothduringtheSovietregime,aswellascontemporaryRussian cultural influences, which would suggest a less homogenous Latvian culture. SeparatingLatvianculturefromother‘Westernised’influencesasdiscussedin thepreviouschapterappearsasdifficult,whichratherwouldsuggestacallfor multiplicity, and Riga as a melting pot for Western European influences, a diversityof‘Eastern’heritagesaswellastraditional‘ethnic’Latviantraditions. Constructingthe‘victimisationethos’ Renegotiatingthepastintermsofquestionsrelatingtoethnicitybecomemore complexduetotheSovietlegaciesandthesomewhatunsolvedpast,aswellas thefragilepoliticalrelationswithRussia.Historyisnotreallyjustyetputbe hind,unsolvedcrimesanddoingsstilltendtosurface.Themainconcernisto rewriteandinterprethistoryintoamoreacceptedLatvianversion,forwhich

146 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism public tourism marketing serves as an example. The actions made by post socialist countries to reinterpret the past also participate in the process of constructinganationalidentity,baseduponthe‘constructionofa victimisation ethos (Young & Kaczmarek 2008:56, the author’s emphasis)’ 51 . This ethos includesthehistoryofmultipleoccupations,andthecollectivesufferingsofthe past shared by ‘ethnic’ Latvians. As James (1999) stresses, postsocialist countries’relationtothepasttendstohavea‘doublenature’:communismis somethingwhichisputinthebackground,atthesametimeasthememories, sufferings and experiences may become uniting elements for the population (James1999).Ifindthesereflectionsascrucialforunderstandingthediversity ofthetransformationprocessinLatviasinceindependence,whichalsopoints toanimportantparadox.AtthesametimeastheSoviet pastisrejectedand ‘snipped out’ from the historic time line due to its portrayal as an ‘invalid’ occupation, the Soviet heritage in terms of past narratives and memories togetherareindirectlymadevisiblesincetheyformabasicingredientforthe riseofideologiesof‘neonationalism’.These‘relics’areinturnusedinorderto charge places, such as the Freedom monument with new meanings and symbolism,justaspastculturaltraditionssuchas theDainas aremanifested.The opening of the Museum of the Occupation of Latvia in Riga, as discussed in the introduction to this chapter, serves as a good example of how tourism participatesintheconstructionandcommunicationofaLatvian‘victimisation ethos’. Conclusion Summingup,thepurposeofthischapterhasbeentodiscusstourismdevelop ment and marketing in Latvia as representing ‘ geographies of reliccommunism’ , in howtheSovietheritageisnegotiated,challengedandmade(in)visiblethrough tourism. Here, the transformation process has been analysed as reflecting a ‘continuityofthepast’,incontrasttothetwopreviouslydiscussedgeographies whichemphasisea‘discontinuity’withtheSovietheritage. Geographiesofneona tionalism representinsomewaysawishtocutoutpiecesoftheSovietperiod fromthetimeline,declaringtheSovietregimeasinvalid, while romanticising thefirstperiodofLatvianindependenceasthebasisforthenewnationstate. GeographiesofEuropeanisation alsopromoteaclearbreakwiththeimmediatepast, butinthiscaseencouragedbynew‘Western’aimsofdevelopmentandmod

51 SeealsoWightandLennon(2006),whoprovideexamplesofhowtheJewishholocaustis interpreted and displayed differently in two Lithuanian museums: the Vilna Gaon Lithuanian StateJewishMuseum andthe MuseumofGenocideVictims (KGBmuseum).

147 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism ernisation,inordertofollowalreadyestablishedpathwaysanddirections.My aimhasbeentoproblematisetheseapproachesfurther,andargueforthatthe outcomesofthetransitionprocessaremuch morecomplexanddiverse,and ratherconstituteanintermixturebetweenEastandWest,traditionalandmod ernideals,oldandnewinfluences,aswellasthefactthatthisprocesshaslocal outcomes,asbeing‘situated’.ThelegacyoftheSovietperiodisconstantlypre sent in the postsocialist Latvia,even thoughthe material remains may have beenremoved or transformed, memories,institutions, ideals and ideasdating back to the Soviet period remain. The legacies are also becoming evident in terms of a heterogeneous and diverse Latvian population and sociocultural heritage.Still,itisimportantnottotreatthelegaciesasstaticordeterministic. Alltogether,theSovietlegaciesmeetandinterrelatewith‘new’idealsofEuro peanisation, as well as ideals dating back to the preSoviet period. Thus, the resultoftheseprocessesmustbeanalysedasconstantlybeingtransformedand negotiated,producingadiverseandsometimesevenconflictingreality. ThechapterhasprovideddifferentexamplesofhowtheSovietlegacies areusedandnegotiatedthroughtourismdevelopmentandmarketing.Ihave shown how the historic relations with more ‘Eastern’ tourism markets have continued since independence,despite the wish tomanifest a more Western Europeanbelonging.Ontheonehand,theSoviettourism heritage could be analysedasa positive assetinthepostsocialistperiod.Theprevioustraditionsof tourismwithintheSovietUnionmeantthattherehas beenanexistinginfra structure in terms of accommodation, tourism destinations, and transport systemsavailable.PartsoftheremainingSovietheritagehavebeenhighlighted andcommercialisedbyboththe privatesectorandby a tourist demand and interest in the Soviet period, reflecting adjustments madewithinthemodern tourismsector,whichincludeadoptingamorecapitalisticratherthansocialist viewoftourism.Ontheotherhand,theuseoftheSovietheritagewithintour ismremainsacontroversialquestion,especiallybylocalinhabitantsandpublic institutions,forwhomitstillcontainsmore negative perceptionsandmemories ofthepastaswellasrepresentscontemporarytensionsandcontroversiesre gardingminorityrights,integrationandcitizenship. Itis evident that tourism has been affected byageneral ‘normalisation’ processof‘thepostsocialistspace’inLatvia.Thispartlyincludestheremoval of the material ‘relics’ of communism and replacing them with symbols manifestinganewlyestablishednationstate.Partly,thenormalisationprocess has meant a focusing on reinterpreting history, and promoting new policies governingcitizenshipandminorityrightswhichhavereconstructednormsof

148 Chapterfive–Geographiesofreliccommunism

‘Latvianness’. When analysing public tourism marketing material, it becomes evidentthattourismtendstobecomeachannelforconstructingmorepositive ideals of a common Latvian culture and language, rather than promoting an imagebasedonethnicdiversity.ThereinterpretationsofLatviancultureand history tend to be selective rather than open and multiple, based on a ‘victimisationethos’,withafocusonpastsufferingsof‘ethnic’Latvians.Thisin turnillustrateshowthepastheritageoftheSovietperiod(intermsofmemories andnarratives)isusedforestablishingacontemporarynationalLatvianidentity, communicatedthroughtourism.Thismaybeanalysedasaprocessof‘ Othering’ , makingadistinctionbetween‘ethnic’Latviansontheonehandand Russian speaking minorities and noncitizens on the other, since selecting the dominatingfeaturesofan‘ethnic’Latviancultureandidentityleaveslittlespace forthepresenceofotherethnicinfluences,whichinturnmaybecomedeviant fromtheLatviannorm.Theabsenceofinterpretationofamorediversesocio cultural ‘Russian’ heritage in the public sphere opens up for more commercialisedandstereotypicalversionsofthepast,whichtendtobebased onthetourists’ownexpectationsandimaginationsofthe ‘East’,andmaybe morecontroversialforlocalinhabitants, including especially ‘ethnic Latvians’. This process tends to reproduce rather than challenge the dualisms between ‘East’ and ‘West’, with the ‘East’ as the exotic ‘Other’. The focus on more ‘masculine’formsofSovietheritagealsoreinforcestheEastasa‘playground’ forthewesternmale,providingadventureactivities which may be combined withmoresexualservices.

149

150

PartIII Transformingfemininities

TheLatvianmotherandhertwosons.Partofthefreedom monumentinRiga.Photobytheauthor.

151

152

Chaptersix Femininities,workand nationalcommonspace Theaimofthepresentchapteristorelatethethreegeographiesdiscussedin thepreviouschapterstoananalysisofworkandgenderinapostsocialistcon text. The main question in focus is how different ideals of femininities and workareformedintheperiodfollowingindependenceinLatvia,andwhatpo sitionswomenoccupyinthecontemporaryLatvianlabourmarket.Theseideals alsorepresent differentspatial organizations of workin relationbetween the privateandthepublicsphere.Thechapterpresentsanoverviewofgenderised idealsofworkduringtheSovietregime,followedbyadiscussionofthreeinter related ideals of femininities: traditional ideals of femininities , with parallels to geographies of neonationalism; the emergence of ‘Western’ ideals of femininities relatedtogeographiesofEuropeanisation;andthecontinuityof socialistidealsof femininities ,reflectinggeographiesofreliccommunism.Theseidealshavebeen distinguished partly based on existing research of postsocialism, gender and work,andpartlyonmyownanalysisofbothnationalandEUlabourmarket policyplanningdocuments, and national labour market statistics 52 . Moreover, thethreeidealsoffemininitiesshouldbeviewedas constitutingpartsofthe ‘nationalcommonspace’ ,inhowlabourmarketandwelfarepoliciesareformulated andgenderisedbythestateintheperiodfollowingindependence,aspartofthe processofconstructingthenewnationstateandactivelyincorporatingLatvia inalarger,Europeancontext. TheSovietgendersystem Thefoundationofthepoliticalideologiesofgenderandsocialismwassetlong before Latvia’s incorporation in the USSR in the 1940s. The ideologies of MarxismLeninismwhichemergedinthelate19 th centuryputclassdifferences

52 Thesepolicydocumentsinclude, theNationalDevelopmentPlan20072013, TheProgrammefor Promotion of Business Competitiveness and Innovation 20072013,The National Lisbon Programmefor Latvia20052008, ReportonprogressinimplementingtheNationalLisbonProgrammeforLatvia2005 2008 ,Puttingsmallbusinessesfirst.EuropeisgoodforSMEs,SMEsaregoodforEurope,TheProgramme forImplementationofGenderEquality20072010,ARoadmapforEqualitybetweenWomenandMen 20062010. Seethelistofreferencesfordetails.

153 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace andtheexistenceofprivatepropertyasthesourceforalltypesofsocialine qualities,includingthosebetweenmenandwomen.Womenwereconsideredto sufferfroma‘dualoppression’,manifestedthrough both ‘bourgeoisie’family relations and through the capitalist economy, due to men’s ownership and access to private property and the means of production. Women’s position withinsocietywasconsideredtochangewiththecollectivization of property (StukulsEglitis 2002; Marx & Engels 2001). By replacing the ‘bourgeoise’ family structure with socialist collective ideals of the working class, a new ‘Soviet family’, or Paterfamilias, was constructed, encompassing the whole communistsociety,andgovernedbytheSovietleader(exemplifiedbyStalin)in the role of the patriarch and the father in both the public and the private sphere.Thestructureofthe‘family’hadclearmasculinedimensions;theleader wasresponsibleforboththecareandupbringingoftheSovietpopulationas hischildren.Thestateshouldbe‘caring’foritscitizensthroughsocialwelfare andservices,atthesametimeasstateexactedcontrolandloyalty,whichgave bothmenandwomenmoresubordinateroles.Womenandmenwerestillgiven different ‘roles’ within the ‘family’; men should take a larger economic responsibilitycomparedtowomenwhowereobligedtoshouldermoresocial andcaringroles(Goven2002). Itisimportanttounderscorethattheredidnotexist one singlehomoge nousorfixedgenderregimeduringtheSovietperiod.Rather,variationsinboth time and space should be acknowledged. The original ideologies of Marxism Leninismadvocatingequalitybetweenthesexesweremodifiedandchallenged duringtheSovietregime,accordingtothestate’spriorities.Theoutcomesof thesocialistpoliciesalsotookdifferentexpressionsindifferentSovietrepub lics,dependingontheiruniquesocioculturalspatial contextand the already existinggender relations,aswellasethnicaldifferences(seeGradskova2007; Ashwin In: Rainnie et al. 2002). Still, the gender ideals produced within the communistsocietyalsosharedsomecommonfeatures,andcanbedescribedas having both contradictory and paradoxical features, especially concerning women’srolesandpositions.Thegenderidealsreflectedofficialaimsofequal ityontheonehand,andamorebiologicaldeterministicapproachontheother. WomenweresimultaneouslyportrayedastheSameandastheOther;required tomeetthedemandsofthehardworkingsocialistlabourer,atthesametimeas theyshouldengageinfamilyresponsibilities(Liljeström1995). BelowIwilldiscusstwodimensionsoftheparadoxicalgenderisedideals; firstly,thegenderrelationswithinthepublicsphere,bothintermsof homogeni zation throughtheidealof HomoSovieticus ,andtheSovietworkideologywhich

154 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace alsowasbasedon differentiating women’sandmen’sprofessions.Secondly,Iwill analysegenderidentitieswithintheprivatesphere,whichwerecharacterisedby differentiation throughwomen’s‘natural’rolesaswivesandmothers. HomoSovieticusandtheSovietlabourideology AccordingtothenewSoviet‘familymodel’,womenshouldbeliberatedbytheir workinthepublicsphereandbyprotectionfromtheSovietstate.Byworking andparticipatingactivelyinthesocialistsociety,womenwouldalsoraisetheir childreninaccordancewith“true”socialistvaluesandideologies.Thus,work becameawayofcontrollingwomeninmultiplearenasofthesociety,andwas notonlyaimedatemancipatingthem(Ashwin2000).Womenshouldadjustto the‘rhythmsofindustriallife’,whichmeantparticipatingintraditionally‘mas culine’workingenvironments,bothintermsofthephysicalindustriallocations, andtheoverrepresentationofmaleworkers(Goven2002).Govenstatesthat the aim was ‘homogenization through masculinization’, which meant that women and men would officially become equals as workers, even though women’sworkparticipationinvolvedanadjustmenttomalenormsandsocialist workingideals(Goven2002:14).Liljeström(1995)emphasisesthatthecreation ofthe‘newsocialistman’,or ‘HomoSovieticus’ ,revealedanimageofaandrogy nouscitizen,withnoidentifiedsex,butamixofbothmaleandfemale,united inonebody.However,womenweretheoneswhoshouldabandontheirfemi ninity and embody the ideals of ‘Homo sovieticus’, while men’s masculine identity remained relatively intact. These ideals also originated in the aims of industrialization and economic development, especially during Stalin’s rule, whichrequiredalargeworkforce(Liljeström1995). Accordingtocommunistideologies,workshouldoffersecurity,comfort and freedom for the Soviet citizens through collective labour, rather than exploitationaswithinthecapitalistsystem.Theidealisedvisionsofworkand labourasauniversalrightwerecontrastedwiththe obligation foreachandevery Sovietcitizentowork.DuringStalin’srule,thiswasharshlyformulatedinthe 1936Constitutionas“hewhodoesnotworkshallnoteat”( KonstitutsiyaSSSR 1982:185,In:Lo2000:20),butreformulatedin1977to“fromeachaccordingto theirability,toeachaccordingtotheirwork”(Ibid:86).EventhoughtheSoviet workersdid not selltheir labour in a more capitalistic sense,they committed themselvestoworkforsocialbenefits.Workandlabourwereregardedaspart ofthewelfaresystem,sinceeverycitizenhadarighttowork,andthestatehad tofindwork foreveryone. It has beendiscussed whether or not the Soviet Unionshouldbelabelledasa‘welfarestate’,whichinitselfisacomplexand

155 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace diverseconcept,relatingtothelivingstandardsofthepopulation,aswellasto therightsandsocialsecuritygrantedbythestateinrelationtothemarketand the family. The characteristics of different welfare states need to be analysed from a gender perspective, since gender relations form within the society in generalandwithinthefamilymoreparticularly;bothaffectandreflecttheout comesofwelfarepolicies 53 .ThetermwelfarestateisusuallygivenaWestern emphasisandmeaning,withfocusonmarketeconomiesintherichernations of the world. On the one hand, the Soviet Union could be described as a welfarestatesincesocialsecurityofficiallywasavailableforeveryoneemployed, for example through paid vacation, pension, health and social care. On the other hand, the lack of more democratic values of the Soviet system, which normallyformthebasisofthewelfarestate,makesthedefinitionmoredifficult (Lo 2000; Aidukaite 2004). Aidukaite (2004) terms the Soviet system an ‘authoritarianwelfarestate’,sincewelfarewastheofficialimage,butincluded low levels of social benefits, and a system based on control rather than democracy(Aidukaite2004).Thestatewasresponsibleforputtingallcitizensto workandtherebymaintainingthevisionoffullemployment.Theofficialimage offullemploymentwasimportantalsoinordertoprovethestrength,success andtheunsurpassablecharacteroftheSovietsystemcomparedwiththeWest (Lo2000).Theaimsoffullemploymentwerenearlyrealizedinofficialstatistics within the Soviet Union in general and in Latvia more specifically, for both womenandmen(seeTable6). Table6: LabourforceparticipationinLatvia1989(%). Total Women Men 1654/59* 87 85 88 1664 83 77 85 *DuringtheSovietregime,theretirementageforwomenwas55and60formen. Source:Populationcensus1989,basedonTable9.2inOxenstierna1991:224. Still,theSovietlabourmarketremainedhorizontallysegregatedintermsofpro fessions,wherewomenweremainlyfoundwithinlowpaidjobsintheservice sectororwithinthelighterindustry(Rainnieetal.In:Rainnieetal.eds2002).

53 My intention is not to go into details about the definition of a ‘welfare state’. See e.g. EspingAndersen(1990)foradiscussionofdifferentwelfaremodelsin‘Westerneconomies’; theScandinavian,Continental/conservative,andliberal,eachrepresentingdifferentrelations between the state, family and market in terms of welfare. See also Johansson (2000) for a feminist critique of the welfare state regimes, and a discussion of both national and local welfaremodels,aswellasAidukaite(2004)forananalysisofthewelfaresystemsintheBaltic countries.

156 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

Despite the ‘genderneutral’ ideals of Homo Sovieticus , the labour market reflectedaimsof differentiation ,makingwomenmoresuitableforcertaintypesof workduetotheirbiologicalcharacteristics,forexample,withinthetextilein dustries. On the one hand, women should have prominent positions within otherwise traditionally masculine professions, but on the other hand, they ended up in professions defined as ‘women’s work’, which did not have the samestatusorwageasmen’swork.Women’sparticipationinthelabourmarket was regulated through laws of security and protection from some types of activities,forexample, withinthe heavy industry,whichcanbeanalysedasa partofthe‘paternalist’careofthestatethatinsomewaysinvolvedbothcon trolandprotectionofwomen’sworkingandreproductivebodies(Marody& GizaPoleszczukIn:Gal&Kligman2000b:160;Liljeström1995). Workandtheprivatesphere Rainnieetal.(2002)emphasisesthatworkduringtheSovietregimeshouldbe analysedas more diverse thanmerely including worktakingplace in thekol khozesoronthefactoryfloors,sinceitalsoincludedpracticeswithinthein formalandprivatesphere(Rainnieetal.2002).Duetothestronginterference ofthestatethroughbothpropagandaandregulationsinthepublicsphere,the private sphere was given a different meaning and function during the Soviet regime.Thehouseholdandfamilyservedasaplaceofrefugeandpoliticalre sistance,whilealsoconstitutingthebaseformoreinformaleconomicactivities. Thus,theprivatesphereemergedasasubstituteforacivilsociety,asawayof avoidingstateinterventionsandasanindependentarenaforsolvingeveryday practicalissues,whichalsoincluded‘illegal’activities.However,thereproduc tivespherealsobecameanobjectforstatecontrolthroughthesupplyofchild care facilities and regulation of divorces and abortions, whichaffectedmen’s andwomen’sparticipationinthelabourforce(Liljeström1995). The private sphere tended to remain a feminised arena, where women were given more traditional roles, partly related to their biological role as mothers and partly due to their work responsibilities in the household and family. Thus, the ideals of homogenization did not apply within the private sphere,whichcontinuedtobeasourcefordifferentiatingthegenderroles(Gal &Kligman2000a).Thefeminisationoftheprivatespherehaditsbackground in the overall organization and economic development of the Soviet society, whichfocusedmainlyoninvestinginheavierindustriesratherthantheservice sector.Thestaterunservicesintermsofchildcareandotherhouseholdduties turned out to be inadequate, and women shouldered double and even triple

157 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace burdens through their roles as workers and mothers (Liljeström 1995). Still, someresearchersemphasisethattheprivatesphereremaineda‘sacred’placeof women’s lives, since it symbolized more feminine values rejected and suppressedinthepublicsphereandthroughtheidealsof HomoSovieticus .Paid workwasconsideredtobeforceduponwomen,whichkeptthemawayfrom activities inthehomeandfamilythattheywouldhavelikedtoprioritise(see Gal&Kligman2000a).Liljeström(1995)claimsthattherehasbeenatendency toviewtheprivatesphereasan‘idyllicplace’forwomen,thoughitinvolveda lotofunpaidwork;andworkinthepublicspherecouldalsobebeneficialasa placeforrecoveryandpeace,andprovidingnecessarysocialcontacts,networks andrelations(Liljeström1995). Thedistinctionanddivisionbetweentheprivateandthepublicspherein creased in the postStalinist period. More evidently, women’s ‘natural’ nurturing,caringandreproductiveroleswithintheprivatespherebecamemore accentuated, as a continuation and reinforcement of the earlier biological de terminism. The more pronounced differentiation had political motives, and especially during the 1980s, was rooted in aims of comingtotermswithde creasing birth rates. Mikhail Gorbachev claimed that earlier visions of full employmentforallandtheoverallaimsofequalityshouldbemodifiedtocom prehend ‘equality through difference’, in order to restore family values and makeitpossibleforwomentoreturntotheir’natural’placeinthehome.Thus, thepoliticalreformsincludedshorterworkinghoursandincreasingbenefitsfor maternityleave,andchildcare(LaFont2001:207). The‘bravevictim’andthe‘bigchild’ The gender relations within the household took also other expressions apart fromatraditionaldivisionofwork.MarodyandGizaPoleszczuk(2000)em phasisehowtheSovietgenderidealscanbeanalysed interms ofthefemale ‘brave victim’ and the male ‘big child’; images which were communicated through state media and reproduced within the private sphere. Women were portrayedas‘thebravevictims’,duetothenumberofmadebothin thepublicandprivatespheres.Womenwere‘brave’inthesensethattheycould manageto balanceboth work and family, which had parallelsto the socialist ideals of the strong woman shouldering more ‘masculine’ ideals (Marody & GizaPoleszczuk2000In:Gal&Kligman2000b).Atthe same time, women became‘victims’,duetotheirsacrificesforthesocialistsystem,forexample,in their obligations of motherhood, and employment in less attractive and low paid jobs inthelabour market (Laceetal.In: Guichonetal.2006).Buholcs

158 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

(2005) and Sprugaine (2005) analyse the construction of gender in women’s magazines during the Soviet period in Latvia, which served to educate and informwomenaboutSovietnormsandhowtobehaveasSovietcitizens.The imagesrevealedautopianviewofwomen,as‘Superwomen’,whowereactive workersandpoliticalrepresentatives,atthesametimeastheyshoulderedthe rolesasdedicatedmothersandwives,eventhoughtheseidealsusuallywerefar from reflecting the everyday life of the average Latvian woman (Buholcs In: Brikse 2005; SprugaineIn: Brikse 2005). Marody andGizaPoleszczuk(2000) emphasisethattheimageofthe‘bravevictim’notonlywasanidealcreatedand reproducedthroughmedia,butalsoenforcedbywomenthemselves. (…) the “brave victim” identity gave women some justification for – and pride in – their situation,they were sacrificingthemselves for the greater good.And this conferred them a sense that they were the real authority in the private sphere, the real head of the family (Marody&GizaPoleszczukInGal&Kligman2000b:163). Theidealsofmasculinitywerenotasclearcutastheimagesoffemininity,es pecially not within the private sphere. Men shouldered the ideal of ‘the big child’ofthefamily,dependentonboththestateandwomen,vulnerableandin need of protection (Gal & Kligman 2000a) 54 . Thus, the dominating gender idealsportrayedastrongimageofthewomanandaratherweakimageofthe man.Formen,thepatriarchalcharacterofthe‘newSovietfamily’meantthat theyinsomewayslosttheirroleswhenmoreauthoritywasreproducedinthe handsofthestate.Despitetheirmoreprivilegedpositioninthelabourmarket, mencouldalsobedescribedas‘victims’duringtheSovietrule(Ashwin2000). Theroleofthebreadwinnerwasdifficulttomaintainduetothelowwagesand duetowomen’sincreasingparticipationinthelabourmarket.Forsomemen, this ‘identitycrisis’ was manifested throughdrinking,which evenfurtherput theresponsibilityoffamilysupportandlivelihoodontheirfemalecounterparts. Forwomen,themissionwastoraiseandeducatenotonlytheirchildrenbut alsotheirmalecounterpartsusingamore‘invisible’orindirectmanner,andto encouragethemtocontributetothefamily’swellbeinginbothamaterialanda socialsense(Marody&GizaPoleszczuk2000InGal&Kligman2000b). Workandpostsocialistgenderidentities Thedebateofhowwomen’sandmen’sparticipationinthelabourmarkethas changed since thecollapse of the Soviet Union, has beenwideand complex. Oneofthemainissuesofdebatehasbeenwhetherornotwomenhave‘suf

54 C.f.feministresearchaboutwomen’sdependenceonmenandthestate,e.g.Walby(1990).

159 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace fered’ more than men from the overall restructuring on the economy, for example,resulting in unemployment,a lack of socialsecurity,andariseofa ‘returntothehome’rhetoricassociatedwithreclaimingtraditionalgenderide als. Theremaining partofthe chapter containsthree different approaches to howworkandgenderidentitieshavetransformedintheLatvianpostsocialist period,whicharerelatedtothedifferentgeographiesdiscussedintheprevious chapters: reclaiming‘traditional’idealsoffemininities ; theemergenceof‘Western’idealsof femininities ;and thecontinuityofsocialistidealsoffemininities. Thesedifferent‘ideals’ offemininitiesshouldnotbetreatedasstaticorhomogenouscategorisations, butascloselyinterrelatedconcepts,taking multiple and diverse forms.Thecatego risations are based on research discussing women’s participation in post socialist labour markets, which tends to be discussed as ‘eitheror scenarios’, arguingforeithertheemergenceofmoreconservativefemininity,orrejecting thesocialistidealswhiletakingonamore‘modern’andWesternlifestyle.Re mainsofthe‘old’gendersystemsfromtheSovietperiodhavealsohadimpact. Idonotregardtheaboveidealsasseparatepossible‘scenarios’oroutcomesof thetransformationprocess,whichwillberealizedintimeandspace,andmark the‘end’ofthepastsocialistgendersysteminfavourforatotallynewpost socialistgenderregime.Rather,Iwouldsuggestthattheseidealsoffemininities coexistandhavecoexistedforsometime,alsoduringtheSovietregime. Thus, my aim is also to point to potential interlinkages between the different ideals, and how they together serve to transform postsocialist femininities,ratherthantotreatthemseparately.Ashwin(2000;2006)describes thepostsocialistgenderrelationsasacomplex‘plurality’,whichcontributesto a “normative uncertainty” of what ideals should be dominating, since traditional,communistandWesterngenderidealsandinfluencesareintermixed and interwoven. During the Soviet regime, official socialist gender ideals governing working and private life were set up by the state, but both more traditional Latvian ideals of femininity and more Western gender influences wereconstantlypresent,andservedbothtosupportandchallengethesocialist gendersystem.Inthepostsocialistperiod,theseidealshaveincreasinglybeen contested and negotiated, and therefore, there is a need for recognizing the multiplicityoftheseidealsandhowtheytogetherproducedifferentidealsof femininities and work. This process will be discussed further in upcoming chapters, with a focus on how different femininities are expressed through women’slivelihoodstrategiesandpracticeswithintourism.

160 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

Reclaimingtraditionalidealsoffemininities AuthorssuchasEinhorn(1993)andFunkandMueller(1993)havearguedthat theobligationsofpaidworkduringtheSovietperiodhavecreatedacounter reaction among women in the postsocialist period, evident in a withdrawal from the labour market into the private sphere. The implementation of the objectivesoffullemploymentwasconductedthroughatopdownprocess,and in the period following independence, the women’s ‘choice’nottoworkhas been regarded as significant, as reflecting a ‘liberation’ from the socialist working ideals. Both men and women in Latvia and in other postsocialist countriesalsostruggledwithdifficultiesoffindingworkintheunstablelabour marketduringthe1990s,duetotheoveralleconomicdecline.Yet,ithasbeen arguedthattheeffectsofunemploymenthavebeenmorestrikingforwomen thanformen,duetothecutbacksinsectorstraditionallyoccupiedbywomen. Moreover, neoliberal political strategies and budget cuts within the welfare system are also considered to have contributed to a decreasing female participationinthelabourmarket(seeFunk1993,Einhorn1993). This process is also regarded as having parallels to a wish to reclaim traditional ideals of femininity, which has links to reemerging nationalistic ideologies, highlighting women in their traditional role as mothers and caretakers;thesewereembodiedintheconstructionofthenewnationstate.In Latvia,theseidealsarerootedintheformationofthefirstindependentLatvian nation state, but were preserved during the Soviet regime, when women still were regarded as having ‘natural’ roles as mothers. StukulsEglitis (2002) emphasiseshowwomencontinuedtobethemainprotectorsandpreserversof theLatvianculture,identityandtraditions,withintherealmofthefamily,asa contrast to the totalitarian Soviet public sphere. Thus, in comparison to the morepaternalisticstatestructures,theprivatesphererepresentedremainsofa traditional ‘ethnic’ Latvian femininity, which could be reclaimed after independence(StukulsEglitis2002). Theriseofneoconservatismandneoliberalism Rainnieetal.(2002)claimthatonecommontrendinmanypostsocialistlabour marketshasbeenariseinunemployment,ahighrelianceonlowstatebenefits forthoseunemployed,aswellastheriseofunofficialjobpractices.Theaimfor the state has been to move towards more neoliberal strategies, involving strategiesofderegulation,inanefforttoabandonthesocialistsystemwhich wasperceivedas‘irrational’,ineffectiveandinvolvingtoomuchstatecontrol. Thus,thelabourmarketsshouldbeguidedbymarketprinciples,inaprocessof

161 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace buyingandsellinglabour,controlledbyotheractorsapartfromthestate(Rain nieetal.In:Rainnieetal.eds2002).Laceetal.(2006)arguethattheriseof neoliberalism in the Baltic countries has gone handinhand with the re emergenceofmoreneoconservativeideologies,whichhaveresultedinarapid dissemblanceofthewelfaresystem,andaffectedwomen’sparticipationinthe labourmarketnegatively,duetoalackofsocialservicessuchaschildcare(Lace etal.In:Guichonetal.2006).Thetendencyhasbeentodiminishtheroleand aimsofsocialsecurity,inthewishtoendeavoreconomicandpoliticaltargets setupinthetransitionprocess.Amoreindividualisticideologyhasemerged,in contrast to the previous collective spirit, portraying the state now as less interfering,makingeachcitizenresponsibleforhis/herownsuccessandwell being. Therefore, problems such as unemployment and poverty tend to be regardedasindividualisticissuesratherthanastateresponsibility(Laceetal.In: Guichonetal.eds2006;Aidukaite2004).Aidukaite(2004)claimsthatthecon temporarywelfaresystemintheBalticcountriescannotbeplacedintothewel faremodelsusedfor‘Western’economies,butthatthesocialpoliciesbeartraits of both previous structures from the Soviet period and the precommunist legacies,aswellasbeinginfluencedpartlybyneoliberalideologiesandexisting welfaremodelsintheScandinaviancountries.Thus,AidukaitepositionsLatvia andotherBalticcountries‘inbetween’theliberalandconservative/corporatist welfareregimesasdefinedbyEspingAndersen,whichrelyonwelfaremeasures related to either the market or the family, rather than on state benefits and security(Aidukaite2004) 55 . A‘return’totheprivatesphere? Someresearchersobjecttothe assumptionthat the postsocialist period has been characterised by women’s ‘return’ to the private sphere or that women have ‘suffered’ more than men in the transition process, and claim that women’sparticipationinthelabourmarketinLatviaandinotherpostsocialist countrieshasincreasedratherthandecreasedsince independence (see Gal & Kligman 2000a, Brunovskis 2001; Motiejanuite 2008). Akvile Motiejunaite (2008) claims that the rise of more conservative ideals of femininity would result in a return to a ‘male breadwinner/female caregiver’ model, evident

55 Aidukaite (2004) makes in this case a comparison between welfare models in the Baltic countriesand‘idealtypes’ofwelfareregimesasintroducedbyEspingAndersen(1990)and KorpiPalme(1998).Thecontinental/conservativewelfaremodelincludesarelianceonthe familyratherthanthestateasbeingresponsibleforwelfarepolicies,withalowlevelofsocial servicesandchildcarefacilities.Theliberalmodelalsoprovidesalessinterferingroleofthe state,butinfavorofthemarket(seeEspingAndersen1990).

162 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace through women’s decreasing participation in the labour market and an emerginghousewifeideal(Motiejunaite2008).Thereturntothehomerhetoric was evident already during the Soviet regime as discussed above, and the question is also whether or not a ‘housewife ideal’ has links to a preSoviet Latvia. StukulsEglitis (2002) emphasises that womenduringthefirstLatvian independence were fairly active as workers. In 1934, Latvia held the second highestrateofpaidfemaleemploymentinEurope,56.2percent 56 .Yet,women were mainly employed within the agricultural sector as unpaid workers, or foundineducationalprofessions.Menwerealsoprioritisedasworkersinthe cities due to problems of unemployment and identified as the head of the family, for example, through a new civil law in 1935, in which men were describedashaving“thedecisivedecisionmakingroleinthefamily”(Stukuls Eglitis 2002:190) 57 . StukulsEglitis describes prewar Latvia as ‘progressive’ in termsofwomen’ssocietalpositions,butnotaslinkedtowomen’sactiveand largescale participation in the labour market, which started in Western Europeancountriesduringthisperiod(StukulsEglitis2002). Based on a comparative study of labour market statistics in the Baltic countries,Motiejanuite(2008)identifiesno‘proof’ofalargescalewithdrawal ofwomenfromthelabourmarketinthepostsocialistperiod.Sheclaimsthat thelargestchangesinemploymentoccurredintheearly1990s,asaneffectof the overall economic decline, characterized by high unemployment rates and decreasing employment rates. In Latvia, employment fellby31.2percentbe tween1990and1996,andbothwomenandmenwereseverelyaffectedbythe restructuringoftheeconomy(Motiejunaite2008:114).Motiejunaitestatesthat thereweresignsofwomenwithdrawingfromthelabourmarketbetween1990 1995,mostprobablytoduetotheshortageofchildcarefacilitiesasaneffectof thereformsinthesocialwelfaresystem.Theindustrialsectorwashitparticu larlyhardinLatvia,inwhichemploymentwasreducedbyaround50percent (ibid:123). Even though the industry was a maledominated sector, many womenworkingintheadministrationalsolosttheirjobs.Thelighterindustries suchasthetextilesectorwerealsoaffectedmorethantheheavierindustryin

56 In1935,84percentofwomenaged2059wereworkingaccordingtoaLatviannational census, but a majority were unpaid workers within farming and agriculture (StukulsEglitis 2002:190). 57 In 1937, the opportunities for urban women entering nonagricultural professions were restricted by a government decree, recommending that “married women, if they had no children,hadtoleavetheirjobs,andsothefamilyhadtoliveonthehusband’swages.The wifewithchildrenhadtostayathomeanywayincityconditions.Inpart,theseregulationshad arisenfromthegrowingrateofunemploymentthat(ledto)…stepstofightunemployment” (VeltaRukeDravinaIn:Eglite1994,quotedinStukulsEglitis2002:191).

163 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace the restructuring of the economy, the former being an important occupation forwomen.Theexpansiveservicesectorabsorbedmanyemployeesduringthis period,especiallywomen,whichisidentifiedasanimportantfactorbehindthe rather stable rates for female employment from 1996 and onwards (ibid). National Latvian labour market statistics, based on annual Labour Force Studies,showasteadyriseofbothwomen’sandmen’semploymentratessince 2001,andaslightlylowernumberofunemployedwomen compared to men (seeFigure5). Figure5: Economicactivity 58 fortheLatvianpopulationaged1564bysex19962007 .

600 Menemployed

500 Men unemployed 400 Men economically 300 inactive Women 200 employed Number(thousand) Women 100 unemployed

Women 0 economically 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 inactive Year

Source:www.csb.gov.lvDatabase20080703.BasedonannualLabourForceSurveydata).

58 Economicactivity :“personsofbothsexeswhointhereferenceperiodofferedtheirworkfor theproductionofgoodsandservices.Economicallyactivepopulationconsistsofemployed persons and nonworking persons actively seeking a job (both those persons who are registered with the State Employment Agency and those who are not).” Employed : “persons aged1574years(priorto2001aged15yearsandover)whoduringthereferenceweekdid anyworkforcashpaymentorcompensationingoodsorservices.” Unemployed: includesboth registeredandnonregisteredunemployedpeopleattheStateEmploymentAgency. “Persons whodonotworkandarenottemporarilyabsentfromwork,areactivelyseekingajoband immediatelyavailableforworkiftheyfindit.Thenumberofjobseekersalsoincludespersons whodidnotseekajobbecausetheyhadalreadyfoundoneandweregoingtostartitwithin thenext3months.” Economicallyinactivepopulation :“Personsofbothsexesirrespectiveoftheir age including persons under working age who can be classified neither as employed nor jobseekers(housewives,nonworkingdisabledpersons,studentsofworkingagewhoneither areinworknorseeking,nonworkingpensioners,etc.)”(www.csb.gov.lvDatabase200807 03.BasedonannualLabourForceSurveydata).

164 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

Figure 5 also shows a decreasing pattern of the number of economically inactivepersonsingeneralandwomenmorespecifically,whichincludepeople officiallyregisteredas‘housewives’.Still,womencomprisedamajority(60%)of the total number of economically inactive persons in 2007 (www.csb.gov.lv Database20080703).Asignificantdifferencecanbedistinguishedintermsof age;thelargestshareofthefemaleinactivepopulation(43%)in2007consisted ofwomenaged1524,whichmayincludealargershareofstudents,whoare classified as economically inactive (www.csb.gov.lv Database 20080703). However,whenanalysingthestatusofthose economicallyinactive,therehas been a slight increase in the women registered as ‘housewives’, which constituted 18 percentof all female economically inactivein 2007, compared with 15 percent in 2002 (LSCB, data ordered upon request “Economically inactivepersonsbystatusandsex”). BasedonaquantitativeattitudestudyofgenderrolesintheBalticcoun tries,WestGermanyandtheformerEastGermany,Motiejunaite arguesthat more‘traditional’attitudestowardswomen’slabourmarketparticipationshow decreasingacceptance.Thestudyincludedstatementsrelatingto‘traditionalism’ suchas“Whenjobsarescarce,menhavemorerighttojobsthanwomen”and “Beingahousewifeisasfulfillingasworkingfor pay”. In Latvia, the results showedadecreaseofmore‘traditional’genderroleattitudesfrom70percentin 1990toaround40percentin1996(Motiejanuite2008:98f) 59 .Motiejunaitecon cludesthatthetraditionalgenderidealstendtoprevail,butclaimsthatthereis littleproofofareturnofthe‘malebreadwinner/femalecaregiver’model,since womenstilltendtoengageactivelyinemploymentinthelabourmarket.Still, Motiejunaitetendstoanalysethetransitionanditstransforminggenderideals asmovingfromonephasetoanother,forexamplefromaSovietgendersystem toapotential‘malebreadwinner/femalecaregivermodel’,ratherthanviewing itasaprocesswithamorecomplexrealityinwhichdifferenttypologiesmay existonaparallelbasis.Thestudieshavebeenconductedonanationalmacro scale,comparingandanalysingdifferentpostsocialistcountriesasseparate,but homogenousunits.Thus,regionalandlocalvariationsareputaside,forexam ple,betweenthecitiesandthecountryside.Potentiallocaldifferencesinhow the traditional ideals of femininities are negotiated will be analysed in more depthinpartIVandVofthethesis.

59 The quantitative study was based on ‘European Values Surveys’, conducted in 1990, 1996/1997 and 1999, measuring attitudes towards gender roles in the family and attitudes concerning female participation in the labour market, ranging from ‘traditional’ to ‘non traditional’(Montiejanuite2008:65f).

165 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

Contemporarypatternsofwomen’semploymentinLatvia The low share of women working parttime in the Baltic countries has also beenputforwardasanargumentforsupportingtheclaimsthatwomenstillare activeinthepostsocialistlabourmarkets(seeMotiejanuite2008).Comparedto otherEuropeancountries,suchasSweden,Latvianwomen’s participation in parttimeworkislow(seeFigure6).Theshareoffemaleparttimeworkersalso shows adecreasingpattern,from13percentin 2004 to merely 8 percent in 2007 60 .Still,theshareofparttimeworkersishigheramongwomencompared tomen,representing61percentin2007.Whenanalysingmotivesforparttime workrelatedtochildcare,eightpercentofwomenspecified“Lookingafterown children”asthemainreasonsfortheirparttimeemployment in 2007, while thisalternativewasnotchosenbymentosuchanextentthatitwasincludedin thestatisticalresults(LCSBDatabase20080715). Figure6: Shareofwomenandmenworkingparttime20022007(%).

14

12

10

8 Women % Men 6

4

2

0 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year

Source:LCSBdatabase20080714.Basedon”employedpopulationinthemainjob”.

Statistics on women’s and men’s registered unemployment, as providedby the Latvian State Employment Agencies, show different results compared to the figurespresentedbythelabourforcesurveysabove.Figure7showshowthe

60 ThedefinitionofparttimeworkersaccordingtoLatvianCSBis“Personswhoareparttime employed (employees) or usually work less than 40 hours per week, excluding those who consider themselves to be employed fulltime irrespective of the number of their working hours”(LatvianCSBDatabase20080715).

166 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace numberofwomenregisteredasunemployedhascontinuedtobehigherthan that for men, even though they have declined since 1998. The gap between men’s and women’s registered unemployment has increased from 1996 on wards, but follows a similar pattern, with a sharp increase of unemployment from1992onwards,andaslowercontinuousdecreasebetween2000and2006. Women’sshareofthetotalnumberofregisteredunemployedpersonshasalso tendedtoincrease.Fromconstitutingaround52percentoftheunemployedin 1994and1995,thestatisticsshowasignificantincrease,especiallyfrom2002 onwards, and in 2006, women comprised 61 percent of thetotal number of registered unemployed (ILO Laborsta Database http://laborsta.ilo.org 2008 0703).Thebackgroundtothesepatternsmaybefoundinthefactthatwomen tendtoregisterasunemployedtoahigherextentthanmeninordertoreceive socialbenefitsandtakepartineducationalprogrammes. This will be further discussedinupcomingchapterswhenpresentingtheresultsofthecasestudies fromtheCēsisdistrictandJūrmala. Figure7:Registeredunemployment19922006.

120

100

80 Total

Men 60 Women 40 Number(thousands)

20

0

2 3 5 6 8 9 1 2 3 4 5 6 99 99 99 99 99 99 000 00 00 00 00 00 00 1 1 1994 1 1 1997 1 1 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 Year Source:ILOLaborstaDatabasehttp://laborsta.ilo.org20080703. ‘Western’idealsoffemininities The transformation process can be analysed as reflecting the emergence of more ‘Western’ ideals of femininities, related to the transition to a capitalist economyandthereorientationtowardsWesternEurope,asdiscussedwithin theGeographiesofEuropeanisation.Butwhatthenactually comprises more

167 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

‘Western’ idealsoffemininities?Iwouldsuggestthatthey,justasmore‘Eastern’ idealsoffemininities,shouldberegardedastaking diverse forms,andmayin mostWesternEuropeancountriesincludebothmoretraditionaland modern ideals, which have national, regional and local variations. Still, the trans formationprocessinLatviaandotherpostsocialistcountrieshas,andis,taking placeinrelationtoeconomic,politicalandsocioculturalinfluencesoriginating inotherpartsofWesternEuropeandtheworld,throughprocessesofglobal isation, neoliberalism and the spread of capitalism as the main economic system for development. These processes carry in turn different culturally formedperceptionsoffemininities,whicharealsomanifestedindifferenteco nomic and political directives, including those relating to work. In the next sections,Iwilldiscusshowthe‘Western’idealsoffemininitiestaketwodirec tions inrelationto work.Firstly,Iwillarguethattheidealsarerootedinin creasing consumption through work, as a way of embracing a Western ‘feminine’lifestyleandatthesametimerejectingthehomogenizedand‘gender neutral’Sovietideals.Secondly,Iwilldiscusshowtheaimsandpoliciesofthe LatvianlabourmarketarebeingaffectedbyEUpolicies in terms ofemploy ment,gendermainstreamingandentrepreneurship,whichupholdandnegotiate differentidealsofgenderandwork. ‘Emancipation’throughconsumption True (2003) claims that processes of globalization together with neoliberal policieshavebroughtnotonlyaboominproductioninpostsocialistecono mies, but also in consumption. Consumption involves embracing a more ‘Westernoriented’lifestyleinbothamaterialandanimmaterialsense,andhas becomeahallmarkofanewfoundfreedom,whichsignalsthechoiceofcreating one’sownindividualidentity,incontrasttotheearliercollectiveidentitywhich oftenwasmanifestedthroughwork.Truestressesthattheincreasedconsump tionof‘new’Westernproductssuchasfashionandbeautyproductshavecome tosymbolizeanew‘emancipation’ofwomen,asawayofexpressingamore liberatedfemininityincontrasttothe‘overemancipated’ andmoremasculine idealswhichexistedduringtheSovietoccupation.Forwomen,andespecially fortheoldergeneration,consumptioncomprisesarejectionofthecommunist ideals, as a way of embracing the new supply and choice to express both a femaleidentityandsexuality(True2003). Butisthepresenceofmore‘Western’idealsoffemininitiesactuallyanew phenomenon in postsocialist countries? Gradskova (2007) points out that thereisatendencytoanalysetheformerSovietsocietyasdeviantanddifferent

168 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace from theWestern world,even thoughSoviet trendsand ideals constituted a part of a more general (Western) development. Discourses of beauty and maternity emerging within the Soviet Union relied on ideals of modernity derivingfromtheEnlightmentperiod,forexample,theemphasisonhealthand hygiene.Thus,ithadcloseparallelstothemodernprojectofthewesternworld, and can be viewed as adopting and implementing ‘Western’ ideas in a more ‘Eastern’ setting. Western ideals of femininity were communicated through differentformsofmediaasaconsumeristideal.However,theWesternbeauty andfashionproductsremainedunavailableforamajorityofwomenduetothe low living standards, revealing social differences among different groups of women despite the socialist ‘classless’ society. The Western trends were not rejected but copied, and the ideals influenced women’s senseoffashion and stylebyrepresentingmodernityas‘natural’andimportanttotheireverydaylife. Still,theofficialSovietidealsincludeda‘discourseofmodesty’,whichmeant thattheclaimforbeautyshouldnotbeexaggerated.Thisdiscoursefitinturn wellintomorelocal,traditionalandconservativeidealsoffemininity,especially inthecountryside(Gradskova2007). Marody and GizaPoleszczuk (2000) argue that the new consumerist idealsinthepostsocialistperiodhavenotmerelyhademancipatoryeffectsfor women,buthavealsoresultedinmorestereotypicalgenderidentities.Women areincreasinglyportrayedaspassive,attractiveandindividualized‘objects’for the male gaze. This has been evident, for example, within marketing and advertising,imagesusedforsellingeverydayproducts,butalsosexualservices asdiscussedinChapterfouraboutsextourism.Masculinity,ontheotherhand, tends to be more active and ‘macho’ compared to the previous communist idealsofthe‘bigchild’.TheWesternidealsoffemininityemerginginthepost socialistperiodarenolongercontrolledormanifestedbythestate,butbythe market,whichinturntendstotransformthegenderidentitiesfromcollective to individualised forms. This includes a mission for women to be successful both in their careers and within the family, while also maintaining the right looksandlifestyles.Here,parallelscanbemadetotheidealofthefemale‘brave victim’,makingsacrificesinordertobalanceworkandfamily,whichnowtakes more consumerist expressions. The supply of ‘Western’ commodities has createdatensionbetweenthewishtopurchasenewproductsandserviceson theonehand,andwomen’sbudgetconstraintsontheotherhand.Marodyand GizaPoleszczukclaimthat,increasinglygaps among groupsofwomentendto emerge,evidentinthefactthatitmaybeeasierforwomenwhoareyounger,

169 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace singleandwelleducatedtoliveup totheidealsof career, consumption and beauty(Marody&GizaPoleszczukIn:Gal&Kligman2000b). New‘Western’policiesofgenderandwork Theaimsandtrendsofwomen’sandmen’semploymentinLatvianeedtobe analysed not merely in a national context, but also from an EUperspective. Latvianpublic institutionsneedtofollowpoliciessetupbyEuropeanUnion bodies,suchastheEuropeanCommission,inorderto reach the ‘European’ targetsofemploymentandeconomiccompetitiveness.Moreover,thepolicies includegeneralaimsofgenderequality,rootedinWesternEuropeanfeminist ideologies and movements, which guide and question principles of women’s andmen’srolesinthelabourmarketaswellinrelationtotheprivatesphere. WhenanalyzingpoliciesandaimssetupbytheEU(forexample,withinthe Lisbonstrategy),itisevidentthatthenewEasternmembershipcountriesare comparedanddiscussedinrelationtoquestionsofemploymentingeneraland genderequalitymorespecifically,inordertoidentifypotential‘problems’and ‘deviances’fromthe‘old’EUcountries.Suchanalysispavesthewayforidenti fyingthemodern(Western)Europeanworkerandhis/hercharacteristics,and howthenewmembershipcountriesintheEastwillhavetocometotermswith their‘problems’,inorderto‘catchup’onthesamepathastheWesternEU countries.Ontheonehand,theEUisportrayedas one strongunit, working togethertoachievecommongoalsofgrowth,butontheotherhand,thediffer encesintermsofeconomicdevelopmentbecomepronounced. The aims of work and employment within the European Union have sincethebeginningofthe21 st centurybeendrawnupinrelationtotheprocess ofcreatinganoveralldevelopmentplanfortheEU,whichhasbeenknownas the Lisbonstrategy 61 .Thestrategycontainsseveralaimsofimprovedeconomic growthandemployment,withthepurposeofcreatingasingleandmoremod ernizedmarketby2010,tobecomecompetitiveinaninternationalcontext.The EUshouldbecome“themostcompetitiveandthemostdynamicknowledge

61 TheLisbonstrategy shouldbeachievedthroughthreedifferentmeasures.Thefirstisto “attractandretainmorepeopleinemployment,increaselaboursupplyandmodernizesocial protection systems.” The second measure is to “improve adaptability of workers and enterprises,” in terms of new technology, as a way of adjusting to “the increasingly global economy.” The third measure involves actions in order to “increase investment in human capital through better education and skills” (The Council of the European Union. Council decisionof12July2005onguidelinesfortheemploymentpoliciesoftheMemberStates). TheLisbonstrategywassimplifiedandupdatedin2005inorderto“renewthebasisofits competitiveness, increase its growth potential and its productivity and strengthen social cohesion, placing the main emphasis on knowledge, innovation and the optimisation of humancapital”(TheCounciloftheEuropeanUnion2005a:2).

170 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace based economy in the world”, with “more and better jobs” (see http://ec.europa.eu).TheCounciloftheEuropeanUnion hasissuedspecific employmentguidelinesforthememberstatesinlinewiththeLisbonstrategy, whichincludebothqualitativeandquantitativeaims,includingthatof fullem ployment (The Council of the European Union 2005b). Thus, theaimoffull employmentisonceagainlaunchedinLatviaasoneofthemainobjectivesfor thelabourmarket,butthistimeformulatedinmarketeconomicaltermsrather than reflecting communist ideologies. According to the guidelines, each memberstateshouldtrytoachievetargetsofemploymentsetupbytheEUby 2010,includingincreasingtheemploymentratesto70percentingeneral,and morespecifically60percentforwomenand50percentforthepopulationaged 5564years. Eachmember state has been responsibleforimplementingtheir ownNationalReformProgramme,andinLatvia, TheNationalLisbonProgramme forLatvia20052008 hasbeendeveloped,whichidentifiedtheEUasakeyto providing economic growth, both in terms of GDP and higher employment rates. The program identifies a number of quantitative goals, including an annualGDPgrowthofbetween68percentandanemploymentratetargeting 67percentingeneral,and62percentforwomenand68percentformenmore specifically (Ministry of Economics et al. 2007a) Some of these targets have alreadybeenachieved;theemploymentrateinLatviawasestimatedtobe66.3 percentin2006,whichisstillfarfromtheEU25targetof70percent,butthe employmentratesforwomen(62percentin2006),exceededtheEU25average target(MinistryofEconomicsetal.(2007b). Promotinggenderequality TheemploymentguidelinesoftheLisbonstrategypayspecificattentiontoin creasingwomen’sparticipationinthelabourmarketandmeasuresto“reduce gender gaps in employment, unemployment and pay” (The Council of the European Union 2005b). The Latvian Lisbon program contains goals of “fosteringemployment”,inwhichlowmaleemploymentratesareidentifiedas aprobleminaEuropeancomparison,whilethehighfemaleemploymentrates aretreatedasagoodexample.Someoftheaimsdescribedintheprogramserve to promote information about gender equality within the society, and the development of childcare facilities and measures which can assist and encouragepeoplepreviouslyonchildcareleavetoreturntothelabourmarket (MinistryofEconomicsetal.2007a)62 .Genderequalityisnotanewconceptin

62 The strategies and prioritiesset upin the program include; firstly to create“an inclusive labourmarket”(p.33),inordertocounteractexclusionfromthelabourmarket,forexample,

171 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

LatviaduetothesocialistideologiesintroducedduringtheSovietregime,but may appear as a controversial topic. An interview conducted with two representatives from the Ministry of Welfare (responsible for gender equality issuesonanationallevel)illustrateshowtheprocessofimplementingofficial guidelinesforgenderequalityinLatviahasbeenslow. Itisdifficult.Wedon’thavealongtraditionofnongovernmentalorganizations.Wedon’t havetheexperienceoffeministicmovements,orsomethingsimilar.Thetopicisfairlynew. There is also a controversy over gender equality and how it was understood in the Soviet times. Sometimes it’s very, very controversial, because people tend to remain out of the discussions or even refuse to accept the discussions, thinking it’s something that we don’t needtohave(Femalerepresentative1,MinistryofWelfare,August2005). TheMinistryofWelfarehasadoptedtheprincipleofgendermainstreamingas oneoftheleadingapproachestogenderequality,whichiswidelyusedinthe EU.Themainaimistointroduceagenderperspectiveasacriticalissueinall aspects of the public planning socioeconomic process 63 . The Latvian policy planning document, The Programme for Implementation of Gender Equality 2007 2010, draws up guidelines for gender and the labour market 64 . It recognizes genderequalityinrelationtogendermainstreamingandhasbeendevelopedin relationtotheaimsoftheEUprogram ARoadmapforEqualitybetweenWomen andMen20062010 65 . Theprogramemphasises,forexample,howbothwomen and men should be able to make a career, and the importance of childcare people with inadequate language skills. Secondly, the intention is to promote work and employmentwithintheformalsector,toreduceunregisteredemploymentandactivitiesinthe informal sector. Thirdly, the aim is to promote business startups and selfemployment, especially in economically weaker regions. Fourthly, the program emphasises the need for educationandtrainingasawayofincreasingtheemploymentrates(MinistryofEconomicset al.2007a). 63 The United Nations Economic and Social Council (ECOSOC) defined the concept of gender mainstreaming in 1997. "Mainstreaming a gender perspective is the process of assessing the implications forwomenandmen ofany planned action, including legislation, policiesorprogrammes,inanyareaandatalllevels.Itisastrategyformakingtheconcerns andexperiencesofwomenaswellasofmenanintegralpartofthedesign,implementation, monitoringandevaluationofpoliciesandprogrammesinallpolitical,economicandsocietal spheres, so that women and men benefit equally, and inequality is not perpetuated. The ultimategoalofmainstreamingistoachievegenderequality”(www.ilo.org20080715). 64 The main Latvian actor responsible for The Programme for Implementationof GenderEquality 20072010 istheMinistryofWelfare.Theprogramwasprecededbyapreviousprogramme coveringtheperiod20052006. 65 Theprogramisbasedonsixcriteria:(1)Achievingequaleconomicindependenceofwomen and men (2) Enhancing reconciliation of work, private and family life (3) Promoting equal decisionmakingofwomenandmen(4)Eradicatinggenderbasedviolenceandtrafficking(5) Eliminating gender stereotypes in society (6) Promoting gender equality outside the EU (CommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities2006).

172 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace facilitiesinordertoraisewomen’semploymentrates.Theprogramconcludes that“theofferofchildcareservicesdoesnotsatisfythedemand”(Ministryof Welfare 2007:29). According to statistics from 2005, 75 percent of children aged36yearsoldhadaccesstochildcare,butonly16percentofchildrenaged 02yearshad.Still,theprogramunderscoresthatthepurposeis not to: (…)achievethatanydifferencesbetweenwomenandmendisappear,butthatanyindividual might fully implement his or her potential regardless of the opinions and prejudices dominatinginsocietyinrelationtoactions,whichareappropriateforawomanandaman,or togenderstereotypes(MinistryofWelfare(2007:54). TheinterviewwiththeMinistryofWelfarealsopointsoutthatthereexistsa tensionbetweenimplementingthe‘Western’policiesofgenderequality,andthe resistanceandrejectionofthesocialistidealsofequality. In one way, on the labour market, the Soviet timeswere quite good, because people were workingthen.Therewasnotaverylargesplitbetweenmenandwomen’soccupations;for example, it was quite OK for a woman to drive a tractor, working in a physically hard profession,sowehavethisgoodlegacyfromtheSoviettimes.Butthereisalsoworktodo (Femalerepresentative1,MinistryofWelfare,August2005). Fromtheotherside,it’salsopartofthebadside,becausewomenthinkweforcethemto drivethetractorsnowalso.Theythinkthatwe’retryingtomakebothgenders,nottohave equalrightsbuttobeequal,ortobethesame(Femalerepresentative2,MinistryofWelfare, August2005). Thus,theSovietheritageis,ontheonehand,perceivedasagoodmeritforuse in the development of more ‘Western’ forms of gender equality, but on the otherhand,theexistingSovietlegacymaymakethepoliciescontroversial.The aimsoftheLatviangenderequalityprogramreflectthisdebateandinclude,for example, no guidelines in how to break the existing horizontally segregated Latvian labour market, as specified in EUprograms such as A Roadmap for EqualitybetweenWomenandMen20062010. Inthelattercase,theprogramdraws upaimsfor‘eliminatinggenderstereotypesinsociety’,inordertomakemore women choose traditionally male professions and vice versa (Commission of theEuropeanCommunities2006a). Promotingentrepreneurshipas‘genderneutral’ Oneofthe mainaimsforeconomicgrowthinEUingeneral and in Latvia more specifically is the promotion of entrepreneurship and development of

173 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace small and mediumsized businesses (SMEs) 66 . National and regional develop ment programs such as The National Development Plan (NDP), emphasise the need for a welleducated work force for economic growth in Latvia, which shouldformthebasisofa‘knowledgebasedeconomy’,withafocusoninno vation and competitiveness 67 . The NDP stresses the importance of entrepreneurship inordertorenewtheLatvianeconomy, anddescribes how Latviastruggleswithlowlevelsofentrepreneurshipwhichisconsideredtobe connectedtoa“lackofinitiativeinsociety,aswellastoadministrativeobsta cleswithinthebusinessenvironment”(MinistryofRegionaldevelopmentand LocalGovernance2006:10).Entrepreneurshipisalsodescribedasa‘solution’ toproblemssuchasregionaleconomicdisparities,lowemploymentratesand unemployment.Acrucialinstrumentinthisprocessisthestructuralfunding, and the EU plans to spend around 27 billion Euros for implementing a ‘cohesionpolicy’,whichaimsatmakingtheregionsmorecompetitivethrough thesupportofbusinessdevelopment(TheEuropeanCommission 2008). The ProgrammeforPromotionofBusinessCompetitivenessandInnovation20072013 includes guidelinesofhowtoimprovetheLatvianbusinessenvironmentandputsfocus onhowtoeducatethefutureentrepreneursasfollows: Developmentofthespiritandskillsofa businessman alreadyfromthelevelofprimaryschool, provisionoftheoptionsforacquisitionofthenecessaryskillsforsuccessfulcommencement ofbusiness(CabinetofMinisters2007:20,myemphasis). Entrepreneurship is rarely defined in the Latvian policy documents and is treatedinalargelygeneralandgenderneutralmanner,whichdoesnotinclude ananalysisofpotentialdifferencesandsimilaritiesbetweenwomen’sandmen’s roles as entrepreneurs. Neither does The Programme for Implementation of Gender Equality 20072010 provide guidelines in how to promote women and men’s entrepreneurship, even though A Roadmap for equality between women and men 20062010 includesdirectionsonincreasing women’s entrepreneurshipwithin theEU.Intheabovequotation,Ihaveitalicisedtheword ‘businessman’ asthe mainidentityofthe‘entrepreneur’,whichtendstoportraythebusinessowner

66 The EU defines a micro business as an enterprise with less than 10 employees. Small enterprisesshouldhave1049employees,amediumsizedbusiness50249employeesanda large enterprise more than 250 employees. The definitions are also made based on the turnoveroftheenterprise.SMEsconstitutemorethan99percentofallregisteredenterprises in Europe, of which 75 percent are classified as ‘microenterprises’, and the SMEs are estimatedtogenerate65millionjobs(http://ec.europa.eu20080715).. 67 SeealsoCabinetofMinisters(2007) TheProgrammeforPromotionofBusinessCompetitivenessand Innovation20072013.

174 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace with masculine rather than feminine characteristics, with keywords such as ‘innovative’, ‘rational’ and ‘creative’. The fact that aims of entrepreneurship often are based on male norms has been widely discussed within feminist studies, and this issue will be further highlighted in Chapter nine, when analyzingentrepreneurshipwithinruraltourism. The emphasis on entrepreneurship as the key to a successful Latvian economy demonstrates how Western European models of economic growth are promoted and applied to a postsocialist context, as discussed in geographies of Europeanisation. As Blokker (2005) underlines, this includes highlighting‘Eastern’modelsofdevelopment(mainlythroughtheexamplesof communism), as failing examples of societal formation, in contrast to the ‘victory’ and success of the Western, capitalistic society as the one and only modelfordevelopment.Blokkerpointsouthowtherapidtransitionprocess oftenisdrivenbyasmallandexclusiveeliteof(male)entrepreneurs,whichare responsibleforthenewsocietalorder.Thusdevelopmentisrootedintherise ofneoliberalideologies,aimedatdecreasingthecontrolofthestateinfavour ofthemarketandtheindividual,toensurefreedomandaction(Blokker2005). AsztalosMorelletal.(2004)emphasisehowtheWesterninfluencesaregiven moremasculinecharacteristics,intermsofadoptingWestern,malenormsof economicmanagementandentrepreneurship(AsztalosMorelletal.2005:14). I find it importanttoacknowledge the diversity ofentrepreneurship,and makebothmenandwomenvisibleasentrepreneurs.However,thereisalack of both research studies and statistics which may provide a more nuanced image of men’s and women’s entrepreneurship in Latvia. Welter and Kolb (2006) estimate that women may constitute around onethird of the total number of Latvian entrepreneurs. A majority of the businesses are micro businesses,andwomentendtobeselfemployedtoahigherextentthanmen, constituting around 69 percent of the total number of femaleowned businesses,whichmayberelatedtothatwomeningeneralneedlowerbarriers for starting their own business (Welter & Kolb 2006). National Latvian statisticsshowadecreaseintheshareofselfemployedwomen,from9percent in 1997 to merely 4.7 percent in 2007 (See Table 7). The share of female employers increased between 1997 and2000, but this share has slowly been declining, reaching merely 1.9 percent 2007 which is close to the 1997 level. Moreover,theshareofmaleemployerscontinuestobealmosttwiceashighas that of female employers, and the share of selfemployed men is also significantlyhigherthanwomen’s.

175 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

Table7: Employedbystatusofemploymentandgender(%oftotalnumberofemployed persons). 1997 2000 2004 2007 Women Men Women Men Women Men Women Men Employees 81.8 79.2 86.6 83.5 88.1 85.9 91.7 87.1 Employers 1.7 4.6 2.5 5.8 2.4 4.3 1.9 4.4 Selfemployed 9 10.7 6.5 7 5.5 6.8 4.7 6.9 Family 7.5 5.3 4.3 3.5 3.8 2.9 1.6 1.5 workers* Total 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 100 Source:Datafrom1997and2000arebasedontheTable,p.47in WomenandMenintheBaltic Countries 2002 , generated from the Labour Force Study. Data from 2004 and 2007 are the author’s own calculations based on statistics from the Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia Database20080703. * Definition according to CSB: Unpaid person who helps another member of family in his/herenterpriseorprivatepractice,craftandfarmwork. Continuityofsocialistidealsoffemininities Thethirdsetoffemininitiesdiscussedinthischapterisrelatedtothediscussion ofwhetherornotthegendersystemduringtheSovietperiodhascontinuedto influencecontemporarygenderidentitiesinpostsocialistcountries,whichhave parallelstothepreviouschapteron‘reliccommunism’.Ashwin(2002)claims that the postcommunist period has involved a continuation of the ‘Soviet heritageofgenderideology’ratherthanareclaimingofmoretraditionalideals offemininity(AshwinIn:Rainnieetal.2002:117).Motiejunaite(2008)alsoar guesthattheBalticpostsocialistlabourmarketstendtoreflectacontinuityof the ‘adult worker/female caregiver’ model, which was evident during the Sovietregime.Thefollowingsectionsofthechapterwilldiscussthe‘relict’of thesocialistidealsoffemininitiesfromthreedifferentperspectives;firstlyhow Latvian women’s relatively high employment rates can be analysed as consti tuting an example of an existing ‘adult worker/female caregiver’ model. Secondly,Iwillanalysehowthecurrentgendersegregatedlabourmarketmay haveparallelstothepreviousSovietdivisionoflabour,forexampleevidentin women’s overrepresentationwithin theservicesector. Thirdly, I will discuss thesegregatedLatvianlabourmarketintermsofethnicity,whichalsoconsti tutes part of the Soviet heritage in terms of employment patterns among ‘ethnic’LatviansandtheRussianminorities. Continuityofthe‘adultworker/femalecaregiver’model Ashwin (2000) argues that women’s high employment rates in postsocialist countriescanbeexplainedbythefactthatthesocialistidealsoffemininityand

176 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace work still continue to have effect, and that women tendtoworkdespitethe difficultiestheyfaceinthelabourmarket.Inherstudiesofwomen’sparticipa tion in the Russian labour market, Ashwin emphasises how women have maintainedtheidealofthe‘Superwoman’,whosuccessfullycombinesandbal ancesherdutiesbothatworkandwithinthefamily.Inasurvey,80percentof thefemalerespondentsstatedthattheywouldcontinuetoworkeventhough theywouldhavethefinancialresourcestostayathome.Accordingtothere spondents,workwasconsideredtobeanimportantpartoftheiridentityand everyday life. ‘The home’, as referring to the private sphere, was not merely givenpositivebutalsonegativeassociations,includingthehomeasa‘prison’. Despite the importance of participating in paid work, the Russian female respondentsstillperceivedthehouseholdasa‘natural’placeforwomen,where theywereexpectedtotakethemainresponsibilityfortheirfamilymembersand related chores. The study also revealed positive attitudes towards the use of public childcare facilities, which were described asimportant interms of the educationalandsocialdevelopmentofchildren(Ashwin2000;2006). Ashwin (2000; 2006) describes the Soviet gender legacy as paradoxical , portrayingwomenas‘active’and‘independent’workers,ontheonehand,and ‘dependent’ on their male counterparts and committed to their obligations withintheprivatesphereontheother.IntheRussianstudy,amajorityofthe femalerespondentsclaimedthatthehusband/manshouldbethemainincome providerforthehousehold,whichalsoreflectedtheactualincomedistribution. Thus,ifamanwasnotabletoprovideforhisfamily,itwasconsideredtobea seriousfailureinhisnormalobligationsandduties, as well as a threat to his male identity, whichnaturallyplaced a lot of responsibility andhigh expecta tionsonmen.Ashwinarguesthatwomen’sexpectationsofmenoriginatein previoussocialistworkingideals,whichemphasisedhowmenshouldsupport thehousehold,notonlyinmaterialterms,butalsobyhelpingoutinthefamily when women were at work (Ashwin In: Ashwin 2000). Nevertheless, even thoughmennoware‘free’toreclaimtheirpositionsintheprivatesphere,they face difficulties to live up to the ideal of the male breadwinner, due to low wagesanddifficultiestofindworkinthelabourmarket.Inaninterviewstudy, theRussianwomenportrayedmenas‘lazy’,duetotheirlackofresponsibility, whichresultedinagreaterneedforwomen’sparticipationinthelabourmarket (Ashwin In: Ashwin 2000:129). Consequently, women still shouldered their responsibilityasthe‘bravevictim’inthepublicandtheprivatesphere,while supplyingtheneedforanadditionalincome.Ashwindescribeswomen’sgender identities as more differentiated and multiple than those of men, and not as

177 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace strongly associated with their achievements in the public sphere (Ashwin In: Ashwin 2006). The definition of masculinity was narrowed after the establishment of the Soviet state, since the socialist project downplayed the relationship between masculinity and private property. The ‘head of the household’wasnolongeranobviousorgivenroleformen,andnoalternative rolesorexpressionsofmasculinitywerepresented.Thus,workandproduction withinthepublicsphere,becameonethefewareasforpractisingmasculinity (Goven 2007). Ashwin claims that women are not potential ‘victims’ of the transition, but rather its “heroic survivors”, which means that women have faced the postsocialist crisis better than men due to their roles within the privatesphere(Ashwin2006:4).InRussia,thepostSovietperiodhascontinued tofosteridealsof‘strong’womenand‘weak’men,whichhaveparallelstothe idealsofthefemale‘bravevictim’andthe‘bigchild’(AshwinIn:Ashwin2000). Continuityofasegregatedlabourmarket Ashwin(2006)claimsthatduetothefactthatwomen’sdoubleburdenstendto continue,womenfinditdifficulttoattainhigherpositionsinthelabourmarket. InaninterviewstudyinRussia,womenconsideredmentohavearighteous advantageinthelabourmarketintermsofwagesandpositions,whiletherewas ageneralacceptanceofwomen’sdominanceintheprivatesphere(AshwinIn: Ashwined2006:50).Women’sandmen’sdifferentpositionsinthecontempo rary, postsocialist labour market can be analysed as a continuity of socialist employmentpatterns,whichdespiteacallfor‘equality’,clearlyrevealedgender segregatedoccupationsandwagedifferences.However,itisalsoimportantto underscorethatasegregatedlabourmarketbasedongenderisnotaphenome nonmerelyfoundinpostsocialistcountries,butapatternevidentinamajority ofbothEasternandWesternEuropeancountries.Motiejunaite(2008)empha siseshowthesegregationofthelabourmarkethas increased rather than de creasedfollowingindependenceintheBalticcountries.Womenhavetendedto leavemaledominated professionsforexamplewithinthe industry, whichhas resultedinahighoverrepresentationofwomenwithinthepublicsectorand withinthegrowingservicesector(seeFigures8and9).Eventhoughmenare startingtofindtheirwayintotheservicesector,asaneffectofthedownturn withinprimarysectorslikeagriculture,employmentwithintheservicesectoris still divided between the sexes. Women tend to be overrepresented within public services compared to the maledominated private service sector, and men have tended to occupy prestigious and betterpaid professions, such as tradeandthefinancialsector(Motiejunaite2008).

178 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

Figure8: Shareofwomenintotalemploymentbysector(%).

70

60 Agriculture, hunting& 50 forestry Industry 40

Percent 30 Construction

20 Services 10

0 1992 1997 2002 2007 Year

Source:Datafrom1992and1997basedonMotiejunaite2008:133Table1,withreferenceto EconomicSurveyofEurope1999,No.1,NY:UnitedNations1999:141.Datafor2002and 2007basedonstatisticsfromLCSBDatabasewww.csb.gov.lv20080703“Employedinthe mainjob(annualaverage)bykindofactivity.”Basedontheauthor’sowncalculations. AsshownbyFigure9below,therehasbeenasignificantincreaseofwomen’s employmentwithinservicesbetween1992and2007,especiallywithinsectors suchas‘hotelandrestaurants’and‘publicadministrationanddefense’.Within hotels and restaurants, education, health and social services, women’s over representation constituted between 82 and 85 percent in 2007. Female employment has decreased in three sectors: within financial intermediation whichshowsadecreasefrom90to74percent,andwithintransportation,stor ageandtelecommunicationsaswellaswithinwholesaleandretailtrade,which supporttheclaimsofmen’sadvancementswithinthesesectors. MotiejunaitearguesthattheoccupationalsegregationintheBalticlabour marketnotmerelybearsnegativeconnotations,butisasignofhowthefemale labour force may have been ‘revalued’ in the period following independence. ‘Femalecoded’ jobs, for example, within the service sector, have gained in creased status following independence compared to traditionally male jobs within the ‘old’ industrial sector. With references to Eyal et al. (1998), Motiejunaitediscusseshowwomenhavehadaccesstothe‘right’humancapital followingindependence,duetotheirhigheducationandpreviousworkingex perience within the service sector during the Soviet regime, which may constituteanadvantageinthepostsocialistperiod. Men, on the other hand,

17 9 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace especiallythosewithalowerlevelofeducation,tendtoremaininlowpaidjobs withinthedecliningagriculturalorindustrialsectors(Motiejunaite2008). Figure9:Latvianwomen’sshareintotalemploymentwithinservices1992and2007(%).

Othercommunity,social 43 andpersonalservices 62

Healthandsocialwork 82 85

78 Education 82

Publicadministrationand 40 defence 53

Realestate,rentingand 49 1992 businessactivities 51 2007

90 Financialintermediation 74

Transportation,storageand 34 telecommunication 31

Hotelsandrestaurants 71 82

65 Wholesaleandretailtrade 62

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 Source:Datafrom1992basedonMotiejunaite2008:133table1,withreferencetoEconomic Survey of Europe 1999, No. 1, NY: United Nations 1999:141. Data for 2007 based on statistics from LCSB Database www.csb.gov.lv 20080703 “Employed in the main job (annualaverage)bykindofactivity”.Basedontheauthor’sowncalculations. Continuityofasegregatedlabourmarket–thecaseofethnicity Thereisalackofqualitativestudieswhichinterweavequestionsofgenderand ethnicityintheanalysisofthecontemporaryLatvianlabourmarket.Amajority oftheavailablestudiesarebasedonlargerstatisticalsurveysprovidedbylarger organizations,whichrelygeneralizationsofsecondarydata,ratherprovidemore indepth analysis (see, for example, studies based on Norbalt surveys by Aasland&Flotten2001;Dobson&Jones1998).Thenationallabourmarket statistics available are also poor and insufficient, which make weak categorizationsofLatviansandnonLatviansbasedonethnicbackground,and donottakelanguageskillsintoconsideration. The occupational segregation of the Latvian labour market in terms of ethnicity was evident already during the Soviet regime and has continued following independence.Aasland(2006)claimsthatitisdifficulttostatethat RussianshadamoreprivilegedpositionintheSovietlabourmarket,justasitis

180 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace complex to conclude that the Russianspeaking minorities have faced more challengesonthecontemporarylabourmarketcomparedwith‘ethnic’Latvians. During the Soviet regime, a majority of the Russian population lived in Riga andotherurbanareas,andwasoverrepresentedasemployeeswithinindustry, transportationandadministration.ManyRussianindustrialworkersmigratedto Latviaduringthisperiod,andasignificantshareoftheRussianimmigrantshad a higher education. From one perspective, Russians hadan advantage in the Soviet labour market due to their Russian language skills, and could easier occupyhigherpoliticalpositions,while‘ethnic’Latvianswerefoundmainlyin theprimaryindustriesandtheculturalsector.Theconditionsforbothethnic Latvians and the Russianspeaking minorities changed at the time of independence.Some havearguedthattheethnicminoritieswouldexperience more difficulties in the labour market since independence duetotheirover representationwithinthestateownedindustry,whichfacedadownturninthe 1990s.Moreover,thelanguagelawsandpoliciesintroducedinthe1990shave alsobeenviewedasobstaclesfortheminorities’employmentandpositionin the labour market. Others argue that Russians have had different types of advantagesinthepostsocialistperiod.Firstly,theRussianspeakingminorities havebeenconcentratedmainlyintheurbancentersingeneralandRigamore specifically,whichhavebeenthecoresforeconomicgrowth.Thus,theyhave beenlessaffectedbythedownturnoftheagriculturalsector,andhavehaddif ferentpossibilitiestoadapttothenewflexibleurbanlabourmarket.Secondly, theRussianspeakingminoritieshavekepttheirrelationsandcontactswiththe Russian market, which could be beneficial in the development of trade and businesses(Aasland2006In:Muznieks2006). The unemployment rates for nonLatvians 68 have been estimated to be higherthanethnicLatviansduringtheinitialyearsofindependence 69 .Here,a differenceintermsofgendercanbedistinguished,astheunemploymentrates werehigherforfemalenonLatvians.Aasland(2006)arguesthatthemainback groundtothispatternisthatfemalenonLatviansdominatedtheadministrative stateprofessionsduringtheSovietperiod,andhadproblemsfindingnewjobs withinthepublicsectorduetothelanguagerequirements.Surveysattheendof the 1990s continued to reveal differences in unemployment rates for non

68 ‘NonLatvians’and‘Latvians’areusedastwoseparatecategoriesinmoststatisticalsurveys, for example, those conducted by the Latvian Central Statistical Bureau. The definitions are basedon ethnicity ,ratherthancitizenshiporlanguageknowledge. 69 BasedonsurveyfromNorbalt1994.

181 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

Latvians and Latvians, with around four percent higher unemployment rate amongnonLatvians(Aasland2006In:Muiznieks2006) 70 . Figure10: Employmentratesbyethnicityandsex20022005(%).

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70

2002 Men(Latvians)

Men(Non Latvians) 2003 Women (Latvians) Women(Non 2004 Latvians)

2005

Source:TheWorldBank(2007) Latvia:sharingtheHighGrowthDividend.ALivingStandardAssessment . Table3.12p.38.BasedonLFSdata(includesemploymentamongpopulation1574yearsold). TheunemploymentrateshavealsobeenhigherforRussianmencomparedto Russianwomen(20%in2000comparedto16%forwomen).Themainexpla nationtothesedifferencesmaybethatwomenwhohad administration jobs initiallyfounditdifficulttofindwork,butthenwereabsorbedbythegrowing service sector, while men have remained within the heavier industries. Still, studies made between 20022005 have shown higher employment rates for Russian women, at the same time as the gaps between Latvians and Non Latviansinemploymenthavedecreased(Aasland2006In:Muiznieks2006).As shown in Figure 10, the employment rates for nonLatvians have increased, both for women and men. The employment rates for nonLatvian women remainlow(49.4%in2005)incomparisontoLatvianwomeningeneral(53.8 percent)andLatvianmen(63.3%)morespecifically(TheWorldBank2007). Occupational segregation in the labour market in terms of ethnicity becomes evident when comparing employment in the public and private sectors.Followingindependence,‘ethnic’Latviansreclaimedtheirpositionsin thepublicsector,forexamplewithinadministration,whileRussianminorities dominatetheprivatesector.Thisisconsideredtoberelatedtotheincreasing

70 BasedonstudiesconductedbyNorbalt1999andWorldBank19972002.

182 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace statusanduseoftheLatvianlanguagewithinthepublicsector,andmanynon Latviansexperienceddifficultiesinqualifyingforjobsinthelabourmarketdue tothelanguagerequirements(Aasland2006In: Muiznieks 2006).). Based on quantitativesurveys,Pabriks(2002)distinguisheslargeethnicdisparitiesinthe public sector, both among employees within local governments and city councils,andwithintheLatvianstateministries,whicharedominatedbyethnic Latvians. The main factor identified as contributing to these patterns was consideredtobethelackoflanguageskills(Pabriks2002).Accordingtoofficial national Labour Force Survey data, the net earnings for ethnic Latvians compared to nonLatvians were around 10 percent higher in 2002. One explanation for this could be the segregation of the labour market, which results in nonLatvians tending to be found in lowerskilled professions. A surveypresentedbytheWorldBankconductedin2005/2006amongLatvian employeesshowsastrongrelationbetweenwagesandLatvianlanguageskills amongnonLatvians.ThosewithlittleknowledgeinLatvianhada13.4percent lower wage than Latvian native speakers, a group which mainly included employeeswithinmanuallabour(TheWorldBank2007:34). Conclusion Theaimofthischapterhasbeentoanalysedifferent femininities inrelationto workinthepostsocialistperiodinLatvia,inordertogainanunderstandingfor the transforming postsocialist labour market both in terms of gender and ethnicity.IllustratedinTable8arethreedifferentbutinterrelatedfemininities whichhavebeenidentifiedinrelationtothepreviouslydiscussedgeographies, as part of the ‘national common space’. These ideals all relate to work and livelihood,aswellasreflectingdifferentspatialorganisationsofwork,between thepublicandtheprivatesphere.Thethreefemininitiesshouldnotbeanalysed asseparated,butasinterwoveninaprocessofbeingnegotiated,rejectedand highlightedindifferent ideological contextsandthrough different practices. I do not regard them as three potential ‘outcomes’ ofthe postsocialist labour market,butratherasvaryinginintensityfrompronouncedtoweakdepending onthecontext.Forexample,claimsthatthepostsocialistperiodhasincluded reclaiming preSoviet traditional ideals of femininities, including women’s ‘returntothehome’ashousewives,maynotbeasclearcutassomeresearchers havesuggested.Theseidealsarestronglyassociatedwiththeideaofwomenas the‘nurturers’oftherebornLatviannation,whichplaceemphasisonwomen’s rolesasmothersandcaregiversintheprivateratherthanthepublicsphere.

183 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace

Table8: Femininitiesandnationalcommonspace. Geographiesof Geographiesof Geographiesofrelic neonationalism Europeanisation communism Idealsof Traditionalidealsof Westernidealsof Continuitywith femininities femininities. femininities. socialistidealsof The(Latvian) femininities. Mother. Homogenisation( Homo Sovieticus )vs. differentiation( The woman/mother ). Feminisedidealsof ‘Returntothehome ‘Emancipation’ Continuityof‘adult workand rhetoric’:housewife throughconsumption. worker/femalecare livelihood ideal.‘Malebread Genderequality. giver’model:balancing winner/femalecare ‘Genderneutral’ideals workandfamily. giver’model. ofentrepreneurship. Continuityof segregatedlabour markets.

Spatial Emphasisof Emphasisonwomen’s Emphasisonwomen’s organizationof women’sworkinthe participationinthe workinboththe work privatesphere. publicsphere. publicandtheprivate sphere. Thechapterhasshownthatthereislittle‘evidence’thatalargescale‘escape’of womenfromthelabourmarketactuallyhasoccurred,basedonLatviannational statistics.Women’semploymentrateshaveremainedhigh,eventhoughade clinecouldbedistinguishedduringthe1990s,aspartoftheoveralleconomic crisis. Still, I would suggest that statistical macrostudies are not sufficient to conclude that more conservative ideals of femininities do not influence women’s choice of employment and their everyday livelihood. I have high lightedtheneedformoreindepthlocalstudieswhichalsorelatetowomen’s everyday practices, which will be discussed in upcoming chapters. Moreover, thetraditionalidealsoffemininitiesalsohaveinterlinkages with the previous socialistworkingideals,inwhichthemainroleforwomenwastobalancebeing both mothers andworkers .Inthiscase,thefocusisonwomen’sdualroles,inboth the private and the public sphere, which rely on ideas of differentiation of women’sworkandidentities,ratherthanmerelyconstitutingan‘escape’from thelabourmarket.Thus,moretraditionalidealsmaybereproducedalsowithin the ‘adult worker/female caregiver’ model, when analysing not merely women’sparticipationwithinthepublicsphere,butalsotakingintoconsidera tion their contribution and obligations within the home and family. Additionally, the contemporary segregated labour market based on both sex

184 Chaptersix–Femininities,workandnationalcommonspace andethnicitycanalsobeanalysedasacontinuityofthepast socialistgender system,includingtheoverrepresentationofwomenwithintheservicesector, and the division in employment between ‘ethnic’ Latvians and the Russian speakingminorities. The official visions of full employment and entrepreneurship as formulatedonanationalandsupranationallevelwithintheEUprovidefurther incentivesforacontinuousactivefemalelabourforce.However,the‘Western’ idealsoffemininitiesarecontradictionaryandcomplex;ontheonehand,they servetoempowerwomenasworkerswithinthepublic,whichhaveparallelsto previoussocialistidealsoffemininitiesandwork,buthavebeenreformulatedin ordertoservetheideologiesofthecapitalistandneoliberalsystem.Onthe otherhand, the increasingsupplyofWesternproductsandculturalinfluences, tends to give rise to an increasing objectification of women, and introduces idealsrelatingtoconsumptionandindividuality;atthesametimethereisless interference of the state in terms of welfare benefits, and more market influences. Implementing ‘Western’ ideals of femininities in terms of gender equality and mainstreaming also appears as controversial due to the Soviet legacyandtherejectionofpreviousofficialideologiesof‘equality’,whichwere consideredtomanipulateratherthanemancipatewomen’s‘natural’femininities. Eventhoughwomen’sactiveemploymentinthelabourmarketishighlighted andalsocherishedasa‘goodexample’incomparisontomen’semploymentor femaleemploymentratesinotherEUcountries,theaimsofentrepreneurship as the key feature for the success of the Latvian economy remain ‘gender neutral’.Consequently,themalenormsofentrepreneurshiplinger,ratherthan makingbothwomen’sandmen’srolesasentrepreneursvisible.

185

186

Chapterseven Genderedworkandlivelihood withintourism Jobsarenotgenderneutral–rathertheyarecreatedasappropriateforeithermen,orwomen, and the sets ofsocialpractices thatconstituteand maintain them, are constructed so asto embody socially sanctioned but variable characteristics of masculinity and femininity (McDowell1999:135) Thischapterwillexploretherelationsbetweengenderandworkwithintourism from different perspectives, and present a theoreticalframeworkfor theup comingcasestudiesofwomen’slivelihoodwithintourism.Thediscussionwill takeitsdeparturepointfromwithinearlierresearchinhumangeographyand feministtheories,whichhavebeensubstantial,aswellasthemorelimitedtheo reticaland empiricalperspectives of work and gender withintourismstudies. Theaimistoanalysecriticallyboth work and gender ,fromadiverseandnuanced perspective.Iwilldiscuss women’s employmentwithintourism,butthefocusis notfromapureoressentialist‘women’sperspective’;insteadthepurposeisto placewomen’slivelihoodpracticesinrelationtodominating genderidentities and femininities as discussed in the previous chapter, which include sociallycon structedperceptionsofworkandlivelihood.Peterson(2003)emphasiseshow accentuatingtraditionally‘female’sectorsmayserveseveralpurposes. Highlightingfemaledominatedservicejobsmaybeviewedasafeministstandpointwiththe purposeofquestioninganalysesofclassandworkinglife,whichtoalargeextenthasbeen basedonnormsof‘themalewageearner’.Ithasalsobeenawayofdiscussingthatcertain groupswithinsocietyhavebeenmadeinvisiblewithinresearch(Peterson2003:21.Author’s owntranslationfromSwedish). Tourismresearchhastendedtoanalyseandportraywomeneitheras‘victims’ ofthetourismindustryintermsofunequalworkingconditions,orpresenting tourismasthe‘solution’forincreasingwomen’semployment.Iwillarguethata more nuanced analysis is needed, which includes addressing aspects such as classandethnicity,inordertoavoidtreatingwomenasahomogenousgroup. ‘Work’ ,asinthemostcommondefinitionoftheword,relatestopaidworkand hastraditionallyhadmasculineconnotations.Inthiscontext,Ihavechosento

187 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism usetheterm livelihood inordertoincludemorespatialdimensionsofwork,as wellastoillustratetheinterrelationsbetweentheprivateandthepublicsphere, whichtogethermayhighlightpatternsofwomen’semploymentwithintourism. Exploringworkwithintourism TheWorldTourismOrganisationestimatedtheinternationaltourismarrivalsto be842millionin2006,andforecastsacontinuedgrowthtomorethan1.5bil lion tourism arrivals(www.worldtourism.org 20070831). Statistics from the WorldTravelandTourism Councilapproximatethatthe global tourism and travelindustrycreatedaround74millionjobsin2005,whichwouldbeequiva lentto2.8percentofthetotalworldemployment(www.wttc.org20070831). Despitethewellciteddescriptionoftourismasthe‘largestandfastestgrowing industryintheworld’,itcontinuestobedifficult to estimate the extent and morepreciseeffectsoftourism,forexample,intermsofemployment.Thishas todowiththeoverallstructureofthetourismindustry, which is difficult to defineanddistinguishfromothereconomicsectors.Concurrently,itisdifficult tomakedistinctionsbetweenjobsgeneratedbytourism,fromthoseproduced by other industries. Work within tourism should be analyzed as diverse and complex,involvingarangeofoccupationsandpositions,bothinthepublicand the private sector, as well as the formal and the informal sector. Tourism relatedworkisusuallyseasonallyconcentratedtothesummermonths,ranging fromemploymentwithinlargescalefivestarhotelfacilitiestomicroorsmall scale, informal accommodation services. Moreover, tourism involves people whoarebothdirectlyandindirectlyemployedwithintourism,andemployment orentrepreneurshipwithintourismissometimescombinedwithotherformsof work,forexample,withinagriculture. Whatthencharacterizesworkwithintourism?Sinclair(1997)emphasises how tourism, on the one hand, is about producing and selling tangible products, such as art, crafts and souvenirs. On the other hand, tourism produces services and intangible experiences, which usually are sold and consumed at the same time and at the same place as they are available. The cultural dimensions of tourismrelated work are evident within tourism and servicerelatedwork,forexampleintheencounterbetweenthetouristandthe hostpopulation.Inotherwords,thetourismindustryisregulatedbynotmerely economicrelationsandtransactions,butalsobytheserviceinteractionaspart of the actual tourism product, which is both consumed and commodified (Sinclair1997).

188 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism

The‘feminisation’oftourismrelatedwork Atavarietyoftourismdestinations,tourismhasdevelopedintoa‘feminised’ sectorintermsofemploymentandwork.Thisisevidentbothinthenumberof women working within tourism, as well as the femalecoded work which is conducted within hotels and restaurants, smaller guest houses, spa facilities, tourism information centers, tourism attractions, etc. Servicerelated jobs and salarieshavenottraditionallyreceivedthesamestatusasothereconomicsec torswithinthenationalandglobaleconomies(Kinnaird&Hall1994;Adkins 1995).Thus,Iwouldsuggestthatitiscrucialtomaketheworkerswithintour ism visible, and analyse the current division of labour, since tourism is no exceptionwhenitcomestoproducingandreproducingexistinggenderpatterns withinsociety,andothersocialinequalities,suchasclassandethnicity. Tourismtendstoreflectanoverallgendersegregatedlabourmarket,both verticallyandhorizontally.Inthelattercase,itincludesadivisionofthelabour marketbasedonsex,wherealargeshareofthefemalelabourforceisfound withinservicejobsingeneralandwithintourismprofessionsmorespecifically. The‘feminisation’ofcertainoccupationshasalsohadthetendencytocontrib utetolowerstatusandpayswithinfemaledominatedjobs.Thelabourmarket canalsobedescribedasverticallysegregated,wherewomenworkinthelower positionswithinacompanyororganization,whilemenoccupythehigherposi tions.Thishasalsobeenevidentwithintourism,despiteitsfemaledominated character (see Adkins 1995: Kinnaird & Hall 1994; Hemmati 1999). Work withintourismhasalsobeenascribeda‘femalecoding’duetothecharacterof theworkinvolved.Tourismworkisoftendescribed as flexible, and includes elementsofhospitality,service,socialinteractionand‘caring’forthecustomers. Thesocialandculturaldimensionsoftheserviceencounterareoftenregarded as demanding a certain awareness of the ‘needs’ of the customers and often involvenormsandregulationsforthestaffintermsofexpectedbehavior,hos pitality,and criteria of howto dress. Thefeminizationoftourismisinsome waystakenforgranted,whichreflectstraditionalgenderrelationsanddualism betweentheTouristandtheHost(ess).Theemploymenthasalsocloseparallels totraditionalhouseholdtasksinthehome,suchascatering,cleaningandcaring forotherfamilymembers(Adkins1995).

Doestourismgenerate‘victimisation’ofwomen? Tourism research and other studies of the tourism industry have tended to analysewomen’semploymentmainlyfromthreedominantperspectives;firstly, tourismhascontinuedtobeviewedasa‘genderneutral’phenomenon,where

189 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism theoverrepresentationofwomenwithintourismmightberecognizedthrough differentformsofstatistics,butnotproblematisedorexplainedinmoredepth. Thus, the high number of women within tourism is regarded as something ‘natural’,andtakenforgranted,withthetendencyforpotentialgenderdiffer encesandinequalitiestobetreatedasnonexistingandinvisible(seee.g.Swain In:Swain & Momsen 2002).Secondly, tourism is regardedas offering positive opportunitiesforwomen,inordertostrengthentheir roles in general within thesociety(seeHemmati1999).Thirdly,womenareportrayedas‘victims’of the tourism industry, evident, for example, in the lowstatus of tourism jobs designatedforwomen(seeKinnaird&Hall1994).Inthefollowingsection,I willdiscussthetwolatterperspectives,andhighlighttheneedoffindingamore nuancedanalysisofwomen’semploymentwithintourism. Inmanycountries,employmentwithintourism,especiallyforwomen,is considered by both inhabitants and investors as a source of income and modernization, especially for developing countries, but also for postsocialist ‘transitional’economies.Alotofhope,effort,andinvestmentareputintothe developmentwithintourism,oftenwiththeaimofturninganegativesituation aroundforareasandregionswhichmightsufferfromdownwardtrendswithin agriculture,andlackotherlargescaleand‘tangible’industries.Tourismiscon sidered to be a ‘clean’ industry, easily accessible for employment and investmentsfornewentrepreneurs,sincemanytourismfacilitiesaremicroor smallscale.Increasingthefemaleemploymentratesinthetransitiontoamore servicebasedeconomytendstobeviewedaspositive,andthefeminisationof the tourism sector or other service jobs is rarely discussed or acknowledged (Apostopoulosetal.In:Apostopoulosetal.2001).Theoverrepresentationof womenwithintourismisoftenviewedasapositiveresourceandanarenafor women’s advancement and opportunity. A report from The United Nations Environment and Development Committee of the United Kingdom (UNEDUK) describeswomen’sroleswithintourismasthefollowing: (…)thetourismindustryseemstobeaparticularlygood“candidate”forengaginginefforts towardstheadvancementofwomen.Duetoitssize,itsrapidgrowthanditsextremelydiverse and dynamic nature, the tourism industry has an enormous flexibility. This can enable the industrytodevelopkeyinitiativesfortheadvancementofwomensothatotherindustriescan benefit from initiatives and strategies inthe tourismsector asmodels foritsown develop ment.Thehighpercentageofwomeninthetourismworkforceinmanycountriesprovidesa necessaryfundamentforthefurtheradvancementofwomen:The“criticalmass”isalready there(Hemmati1999www.earthsummit2002.org).

190 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism

Ontheotherhand,womenaredescribedas‘victims’ofthetourismindustry, especiallyconcerningtheeffectsofmasstourism,whichareperceivedasusing traditionalgenderrolesandstereotypesforemployment,offeringmainlylow paid, lowstatus jobs, and generating other sociocultural effects such as sex tourism (see Chapter twelve). The extent to which tourism is considered to create ‘opportunities’ or ‘exploitation’ of the female workforce is mainly analysedinrelationtothesizeanddevelopmentofthetourismindustry.More smallscale tourism activities, such as rural tourism, are considered to strengthenwomen’srolesinsocietybyofferingempowerment,independence andlivelihood,whilealsobeingawayofchallengingexistinggenderrelations. Mass tourism, on the other hand, has been considered merely to apply and exploitgenderroles(seeGibson;HallIn:Apostopoulosetal.2001). Thediscussionofwomen’s‘victimisation’isalsoevidentwithinfeminist studiesofthetransitionprocessinpostsocialistcountries.True(2003)claims thatmuchoftheresearchhasemphasisedwomenas‘victims’ofthetransition processandthemoreglobalisingandliberalisingforcesinregardtowomen’s limitedpoliticalinfluences,joblosses,lowstatusemployment,andfinally,their plightinemergingsextrafficking.Hall(2001)considerswomen’smarginalisa tioninthepostsocialistlabourmarketingeneraltobereflectedwithintourism, which results in an overrepresentation in low status and lowpaid jobs, and womenareregardedasconstrainedintheirparticipationduetofamilyrespon sibilitiesandchildcare(HallIn:Apostopoulosetal.2001).Truecallsforamore nuanced analysis of how the changing gender relations are expressed, and pointsouthowwomenalsoshouldberegardedas ‘agents’ inthetransformation process,asawayofrecognisingthelocalresponsestomoreglobalprocesses (True2003).Ghodsee(2005)criticisestheassumptionthatwomenwouldnec essarilyfacelargerdifficultiesinthetransitionprocess,becauseanygeneralisa tion about women as a homogenous group should be avoided; instead one mustacknowledgetheexistingdifferencesamongwomenwithregardtoclass andethnicity.ShealsoshowsinastudyoftourisminBulgariahowworkwithin tourism during the communist period offered language skills, education and otherexperiencesforwomenwhichnowserveasimportantculturalcapitalin thepostsocialistperiod(Ghodsee2005) 71 .IagreewithbothTrue’sandGhod see’sarguments.Theneedforamorediverseanalysisofwomen’spositionin thelabourmarketandwithintourismwillbefurtherdiscussedbelow,partlyby exploringgenderidentitieswithintourismandpartlybyusing‘livelihood’asa conceptwhenanalysingwomen’semploymentwithintourism.

71 SeeChaptertwelveforamoredetaileddiscussionofGhodsee’sstudy.

191 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism

Genderidentitiesandwork Swain and Momsen (2002) among others claim that tourism research mainly hasattemptedto describe women’semploymentwithintourism,withoutanyspe cific theoretical framework or problembased approach. Phillimore (2002) pointsouttheabsenceofresearchwhichtriestofindthereasonsbehind why women tend tobefoundin lowpaid,lowstatusjobs within tourism (Philli more I: Swain & Momsen 2002). Then, how should the gendersegregated labourmarketingeneralandthefeminisedtourismsectormorespecificallybe explained?Theexplanationsareoftensoughtwith the assistance of feminist theoriesrelatingto thesegregated and genderised labourmarketin general,a literaturewhichcoversanextensivearea.Theexplanationsforthesegregated labourmarketvary,buthavegenerallybeenfocused,ontheonehand,onthe different‘choices’ofindividualsand,ontheotherhand,emphasisedtheroleof often deterministic, structural processes. Jenkins (2004) stresses that occupa tional segregation traditionally has been explained by labour markettheorists withan analysisofthelabour market itself,while feminist geographers have soughttheexplanationsintheprivateandfamilysphere.Arangeoftheories havebeenintroduced,forexample,the dualsystemtheory ,whichillustrateshow capitalismworkstogetherwithforces,suchaspatriarchy,resultingindifferent forms of genderised exploitation, both in the private and the public sphere (Jenkins2004).Withintourismresearch,Adkins(1995)emphasiseshowtour ism work and labour are ‘sexualised’, positioning women as ‘sexual workers’, due to exploitative patriarchal and capitalist forces which regulate both their paidandunpaidwork(seeAdkins1995). McDowell (1999) emphasises that the wide variety of labour market theoriesdevelopedfromeconomicsandhumangeography,inmanywayshave failed to explain fully the gendersegregated and unequal labour market. The focus on capitalism and work as merely exploitative for women has been criticized, with reference to that work may also be a way for women to strengthen their positions, both in the labour market and within the family (McDowell 1999). Poststructural and postcolonial feminist theories have increasinglyemphasisedgender identities ratherthanmerelygender relations, asa way of illustrating how work is genderised ‘in the making and doing’ of differentoccupations,andhowwomencreate,negotiateandcontestdifferent genderidentitiesatwork.Moreover,focusingongenderidentitiesalsostresses how gender intersects with other traits, such as class and ethnicity, in the processofshapingpeople’s identities. The purposehasbeen to reveal among between women, rather than treating women as a homogenous group, and

192 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism therebyavoidingtheassumptionofthatall womenare subjects to thesame structuraloppression,andinequalities.Tourismresearchingeneralhastended toviewthecategory‘women’asuniversalandencompassingallwomenwithin tourism,ratherthanacknowledginggeographicaldifferencesandthevarietyof professionswithinthetourismsector.Therehasbeenalackofstudiesofwork andtourismwhichalsoincludeamorediversifiedanalysis,includingdifferent genderidentities.AdibandGuerrier(2003)claimthattheheterogeneityofboth the workforce and the clientele within hospitality studies needs to be acknowledged, in order to achieve a more diverse analysis of tourism. The authorsfocusondifferentintersectingidentities,toavoidessentialismandthe tendency to view identity as something set and fixed. Rather, identity is described as relational, fluid and sociallyconstructed, which may vary in differentsituationsandcontexts(AdibandGuerrier2003). Femininities In their book Geographies of new femininities , Dwyer et al. (1999) emphasise the existenceofmultiple femininities and masculinities ,whichvarythroughsocial,po litical,economicandculturalprocessesintimeandspace.Inotherwords,gen der is not considered as something ‘fixed’ or stabile. Different meanings of beingawomanoramanconstitutedifferentnormswithinsociety,whichregu late whatis considered as ‘normal’or ‘deviant’ femininities andmasculinities. Thus, people are socialized into different gender identities. Identities in this contextarenot‘biological’,butsociallyconstructedovertimeandwithindif ferentsocialandculturalcontexts.Consequently,identitiesarenotconsidered ashavingbiologicalroots,anassumptionwhichwouldclaimthatcertaintraits of essentialist ‘femininity’ are biologically etched into women’s behavior and minds(Dwyeretal.1999). Dwyeretal.claimthatthereisnosingle genderidentitysharedbyallmen orbyallwomen;ratherdifferentnotionsandnormsoffemininityexistparallel andvarybetweendifferentcontexts,butsomegenderidentitiesbecomemore dominant and hegemonic than others. Gender identities also intersect with otheridentities,suchasclass,ethnicity,nationalityandsexuality.Still,different identities should notbe viewed as‘added’ to eachother,whichwouldcreate forms of ‘multiple oppression’. Acquiring different gender identities is not merelyadetermining,homogenoustopdownprocess,butsomethingthatthe individualherself/himselftoacertainextenttakespartin.Genderidentityisin thiscase‘performed’,constructedandcontested,indifferentsituations,suchas at work, in the home or within social networks, based on conceptions of

193 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism femininities and masculinities. With reference to Butler (1990), Dwyer et al. claimthatthisperformanceisnotvoluntary,andnotions of femininities and masculinitiescanthereforebechallenged.Fromthisperspective,Dwyeretal. (1999) partly position themselves within poststructuralist studies in feminist geography,whichhavebecomeastudyof‘doing’or‘performing’gender(see Butler 1990). McDowell (1999) emphasises that “gender is constructed and maintained through discourse and everyday action” (McDowell 1999:22). My interpretationoftheDwyeretaldiscussionsisthattheychoosea‘middleway’, in acknowledging the cultural dimensions of how gender identities are constructed,but do not fullyacknowledgeButler’sarguments ofhow gender canbereducedtomerelyitsdiscursiveandculturalmeaning.Dwyeretal.stress theexistenceof genderised structures and‘genderregimes’which govern the livesofindividuals,buttheyarenotcompletelydeterminingorstatic,butrather processes whicharesubjecttochange. Thelivesofindividualsareclearlyconstructedwithineconomic,politicalandsocialstructures throughwhichdominantfemininities(andmasculinities)aredetermined.Individualsarethus positioned,andpositionthemselves,inparticularwaysinrelationtodominantdiscoursesand practicesofgenderidentities.Individually,orcollectively,theymaybecomplicit,subverting and/orcritical.Theymayalsolocatethemselvesorbelocatedinrelationtootherformsof identification,notsimplygenderidentities(Dwyeretal.1999:4). IagreewiththedescriptionofgenderidentitiesaspresentedbyDwyeretal., andfinditusefulinemphasisingthediverserangeoffemininitiesandmascu linities,whichalsoareexpressedindifferentformsofwork.Ialsoconcurwith theDwyeretalcallsfortheneedtomaintainananalysisofstructuralinequali ties,whichisalsoevidentintheworksofLindaMcDowell. She claims that eventhoughthecategories‘women’and‘men’needtobefurtherproblemitised andquestioned,thebasicinequalitiesbetweenmenandwomentendtoexistin mostsocieties,andwomentendtohavelowerwages,lesscontrolandinfluence withinsociety,andaresubjectedtomaledominatedviolence.Tomerelydecon structthecategories‘women’and‘men’mightinvolveproblemsinthefeminist missiontochangethesociety. If there is no longer a stable category ’woman’, how may we make claims on her behalf? (McDowell1999:25). Dwyeretal.emphasisefurthertheemergenceof new femininitiesandmasculin ities. But what is actually new with them? They claim that constructing femininitiescanbeawayofbothreclaiming‘old’femininitiesandexistingones.

194 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism

Thus,‘old’idealsaremixedwith‘new’throughprocessesofchange,forexam ple,throughglobalization,whichmeansthatidealsoffemininitiesspreadand emergeatdifferentplacesaroundtheworld,aprocesswhichcanbedescribed asbothhomogenousanddiverse.Forexample,‘Westernised’ ideals of femi ninityarespreadthroughinternationalmassmediaandothersourcesofinfor mation, at the same time as more placespecific genderised traditions and identities remain. This process was discussed in the previous chapter, when analysinghowdifferentidealsoffemininitiesintheLatvianpostsocialistperiod areshapedandtransformedintheintermixtureof‘old’socialistandtraditional ideals,aswellasWesterninfluences.Dwyeretal.emphasisehowtheprocesses ofglobalizationhavediversifiedandgenderisedoutcomes. Economic,culturalandpoliticalprocessesareworkingindifferentwaysacrosstheglobeand may result in new forms of social relations which work to transform gender identities and open up new spaces for engaging with the construction and contestation of femininities. Ratherthancreatinggreateropportunitiesforwomen,processesofglobalizationmayalsobe associatedwiththeremakingorreworkingofexistinggenderdivisions(Dwyeretal.1999:3). Here,parallelscanbe drawntodiscussions inprevious chapters of how the transition should not be regarded as a ‘universal’ process, but how different postsocialistcountriesmaytakedifferent‘paths’ortrajectoriesintheirtransi tion,andmightchoosealternativewaystoencounterthetransformation.Thus, the question is therefore also how women working within tourism relate to thesechangesandhowthegenderidentitiesarereproduced and negotiated. Still,thereliesalsoadangerintryingtoanalysehowmajorchangesimpact‘on’ women,asasimplified,onewayprocess.Thechangesaremorecomplexthan thataswellasisthecategory‘women’.Dwyeretal.emphasisetheimportance ofstudyingtheprocessesofglobalizationasatwoway process, to see what effects globalization has, but also how it intersects with the local context in termsofgenderandwork,whichmayalsoresultinarejectionandresistance towardsidealsoffemininity.Therefore,womenshouldnotbetreatedasone homogenousgroup,butinsteadfocusshouldbeonthedifferentwaysgender identitiesareshapedandconstructed.Smith(1999)alsounderscoresthatitis importantnottoconstructabinaryoppositionbetweenwomenin the ‘East’ and‘West’,andinsteadacknowledgethediversityoffemininitiesconstructedin the‘East’(SmithIn:Dwyeretal.1999).

195 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism

Merelyperformance? Poststructuraltheoreticalapproacheshaveemphasised how gender identities are performed ,alsowithintourismrelatedwork,withafocusonfrontlineservice jobs,andthemesofhospitalityandemotionallabour.Anumberofstudieshave researchedthegenderisedjobsoftheairlineindustry,andrelatedoccupations suchflightattendants(seePeterson2003;Forseth2005).Tourismliteraturehas also focused on embodiment and aesthetic labour , emphasising how “all work is genderedandallworkisembodied”(Morganetal.2005:2) 72 .Inthiscase,much attentionhasbeengiventohospitalityresearchandemotionallabour,whichdo not merely include feelings and emotions in the service encounter, but also comprisemoreaestheticdimensionsofhowtolookanddress(seeKnightsand ThanemIn:Morganetal.2005; Adkins2002).Thefocus on the genderised ‘service performance’, can be viewed as problematic from different perspectives.Firstly,whenanalyzingtherolespeopletakeonatworkasmerely anexpressionofgenderasaculturalphenomenonanddiscourse,itlegitimizes a stereotypical behaviour as something ‘natural’ within service and tourism occupations.Peterson(2003)approachesthequestionofpowerrelationsinher studyofperformancewithintheairlineindustry. Ifsexisaroleandnotsomethingreal,itdoesnotbecomeasnecessarytochange,sincepeo ple can think that they are not that role for real (Peterson 2003:213, my translation from Swedish). Peterson’sstudyshowsthattheairlinecompaniesuseand‘exploit’genderroles andstereotypesfortheirownpurposes.Eventhoughtheemployeesseparate their‘true’and‘acted’identities,theystillsubmitandperformnormsofgender whicharenotas‘equal’astheymightseem.Eventhoughtheyareconsideredas ‘free’totakeontheirrole,theyareperformingsomethingcontrolledbycom panyregulations.Theemphasisonperformanceandroleplaytendstoturninto a tool for power, and could be described as hidden forms of discipline and control.Secondly,andrelatedtotheabove,isthequestionofwhatpossibilities womenhavetonegotiatetheiridentities,whicharedescribedas‘mobile,fluid andflexible’,andthisabilitymayserveasanargumentagainsttheperceptionof womenas‘victims’ofthetourismindustry.Adkins(2002)claimsthatwomen may use both more feminine and masculine identities at work, for different situations, which reflects an increasing selfconscious and reflexive approach (Adkins 2002). To renegotiate and explore alternative forms of femininities

72 SeealsoPritchardetal.(eds)2007foranoverviewoftourismresearchrelatingtoquestions ofembodiment,sensualityandexperience.

196 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism outsidethe‘traditional’femininitiesmightberestrictedandlieoutofreachdue tostructural(socialandeconomic)restrictions.Thus,itmaybeeasierforsome groupsofwomentobreakthesocietalnorms(seeDwyeretal.1999). Livelihoodandtourism MytheoreticalapproachcanbeviewedaspoststructuralinhowIacknowledge adiversityoffemininities,whicharecreatedandrecreatedwithintourism.Yet, thepurposeofmythesisisnottoexplorethesegenderedidentitiesasmerely performedorembodied,buttoseehowdifferentwomenrelatetoideologiesof femininitiesintheirlivelihoodpracticeswithintourism.Idonotconsiderwork asmerely‘theatre’,butpartofawidercontext,linkedwithaperson’swhole lifeworldandeverydaylife,aswellastomorecomprehensive,but transforming structuralprocesses.Ihavechosentousetheterm‘ livelihood’ ratherthanmerely ‘work’whenanalysingemploymentwithintourism.Livelihoodcanbedefined as“ameansofsecuringthenecessitiesinlife”( TheOxfordDictionaryofEnglish 2005).Scholten(2003;2005)emphasisesthatlivelihoodisacomplexconcept whichincludesbothsocialandmaterialdimensions,andincludesdifferentways ofsupportingbothoneselfandothers.Therefore,livelihoodcancompriseac cesstofinancialandmaterialresources,butalsoincluderesponsibilityandcare forchildrenorotherfamilymembers,orobligationstowardsahomedistrict. Scholtendescribeslivelihoodas“navigatingamongpossibilitiesastheyappear” andhighlightsquestionssuchas;whatpossibilitiesfor livelihoodexist?What resources are available in order to secure adequate standards of livelihood? Howdowomenandmencreatespacefortheirownindependentlivelihoodon theirowntermsandbasedontheirownideasandaims?Scholtenidentifiesa rangeofdifferentsourcesoflivelihood,forexample,differentformsofsocial subsidies,education,thecombinationofformalandinformalincome,parttime work,jackofalltrades,andhowmarriagemaybeawayofsecuringlivelihood (Scholten2003;ScholtenIn:Fribergetal.2005). Iclaimthatafocusonlivelihoodcreatesapossibilitytoexplainandrelate women’s employment in relation to both the public and the private sphere, ratherthanjustfocusingontheforcesofthelabourmarketitself.Hansonand Pratt (1995) were some of the first pioneers within feministgeographical re searchwhostartedtoexploretherelationsbetweenthepublicandtheprivate, asinseparableandcombinedpartsofdailylife,whichonlytogethercouldex plain the occupational segregation on the labour market. Based on a large empiricalandlongitudestudyinEngland,genderrelationsinboththepublic and the private spheres were described as determining the organisation of

197 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism women’s everyday life through mobility, access to work and socialnetworks. Theauthorsalsoshowedhowspaceandgenderinterrelatesandhowwomen’s experiencesofdifferentplacesvarydependingonclass,ethnicityandsexuality (Hanson&Pratt1995). Schough(2001)emphasisesthat“thebaseoflivelihoodiswork,butwhat countsasworkvariesovertimeandspace”(Schough2001:23,author’s own translationfromSwedish).Livelihoodhas,inotherwords,morespatialdimen sions,andisconstructedthroughamutualinterplaybetweenplace,spaceand gender.Differentformsofwork(paid/unpaidwork,organisationalandoccu pational positions, entrepreneurship) are coded as ‘male’ and ‘female’ and reflectplacespecificculturaltraditionsandconceptionsofworkandlivelihood, whichintheirturnhaveconsequencesonmen’sandwomen’schoiceofliveli hoodpractices.Still,thepreferencesofworkandlivelihoodshouldnotmerely beanalysedasreflectingrationaleconomicstrategies,whichprioritisestudiesof women and men’s participation in the public sphere. The background to differences between women and men’s work and employment reflect overall genderrelations,andconceptionsofwomen’sresponsibilityinthehomeand family.Therefore,researchoflivelihoodwithinfeministgeographyactivelytries toavoidtendenciestoequatelivelihoodwithwork,whichautomaticallymain tains the genderised dichotomy between the spheres of production and reproduction,thepublicandtheprivate.Instead,amoreholisticperspectiveis advocated,inhowthemutualrelationshipbetweenworkandhome/familyto getherdeterminetheconditionsforlivelihood(seeScholten2003;ScholtenIn: Fribergetal.2005;Schough2001). Livelihoodideologiesandpractices Inmyanalysisofwomen’slivelihoodwithintourisminLatvia,Iwillfocuson threeinterrelatedconceptsillustratedinthemodelbelow;spatialandgendered livelihood practices, livelihood ideologies, and physical/material resources andrestric tions(seeFigure11).Together,theyrelatetohowthespatialpreconditionsfor women’s livelihood have both material and immaterial dimensions, including physicalresourcesandmoresocialand‘intangible’placespecificconceptionsof gender,workandlivelihood.Thethreeconceptsandtheirinterrelationswillbe discussedseparatelybelow.

198 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism

Figure11: Theinterrelationsamonglivelihoodideologies,practicesandphysicalandmaterial resourcesandrestrictions. Ideologies Physicaland Practices materialresources andrestrictions Livelihoodideologies When analysing women’s livelihood within tourism, the choice of livelihood relates to placespecific socioculturally constructed norms and traditions of livelihood,workandgender.Thesecantogetherbeanalysedasasetof ideologies , relating to previous discussions of the transforming Latvian ‘national common space’ , anddifferent femininities relating towork and livelihood asillustratedin Chaptersix.Here,contemporaryidealsoffemininitiesandlivelihoodarebeing shaped,whichincludeamixofbothprevailing‘traditional’femininities,conti nuitywith‘socialist’idealsand‘Westerninfluenced’genderidentities,aswellas associatedidealsofworkrelatingtoboththeprivateandthepublicsphere.Ido notregardtheideologiesoflivelihoodasexistingindependentlyfromtheactors themselves,buttheyarepartofmorecomprehensiveandtransformingstruc tural processes, and have in their turn implication for how women on an individual level perceive theirworkand livelihoodpossibilities. Thus,women relate to these ideologies in their everyday life and take part in shaping the femininitiesthroughtheirpractices. Livelihoodpractices Livelihoodalsoincludespracticesandactionswhichareconductedthroughthe routinesofeverydaylife.Iregardpracticesasoperatingthroughbothinstitu tionsandindividualactions,butthefocuswillbeputonwomen’sindividual livelihoodpractices.Livelihoodpracticescanbeviewedasactionsthat takeplace in multiple spaces, for example, in the home, at work, at the unemployment agency,ateducationalinstitutions,etc.Thepracticesareconstantlycarriedout inrelationtomoredominatingidealsoffemininitiesandideologiesofworkand livelihood.SusanneStenbacka(2001)hasinherthesisanalysedcounterurbani sationinruralareasinSweden,withafocusonthemotivesformovingtothe

199 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism countryside,andtheeverydayactionsor‘ruralpractices’connectedtofamily’s new life in the local community. The study generates useful perspectives of practice and actions astwointerrelatedconcepts.Shedescribesboththe intentions of why peoplemovetothecountryside,whileillustrating actions andexperiences of how peoplerelatetotheircountrysidelivingintheireverydaylife.Stenbacka hasaqualitativeandphenomenologicalapproachinherstudy,inordertotake thedeparturepointfromtheinformants’ownlifeworld,andhowtheyview theirownandothers’actions.Israel(1999)defines actions withreferencetovon Wrightas, (…)toachieveachangeofagivenconditionoragivensituationdeliberately.Toactcanalso bedirectedatpreventingachangeandpreservingtheexisting.Thechangeorpreservationof aconditionmayinitsturnbeachievedintwoways;eitherthatweactivelyinterveneorthat we achieve change by avoiding to intervene (Isreal 1999:27, author’s own translation from Swedish). Theactionsofindividualpeopleareconsideredtohaveanoveralldimension andconnectiontothesocietallevel,whicharegeneratedinto practices .Inother words,byanalysingpeople’sactions,theanalysiswillalsoincludemoresocietal dimensions.Consequently,thepracticesare intheirturnpartofprocessesof change,whichtransformthecountryside.Iwouldclaimthatthisperspectiveis relevant,sinceitemphasiseshowpeoplearetakingpartinthetransformation processesthemselves,andarenotmerely‘victims’ofchange.InLatvia,tourism servesasanexampleofhowtheeconomyisfindingnewforms,bothinrural andmoreurbanareas.Thus,thepurposeistoseehowwomentakepartinthis processthroughdifferentpractices,andthuscreate spacefortheir individual livelihood. Stenbackaconcludesthatthefocusonactionsandpracticesreflecthow people relate to different private and public spaces in their everyday life. Moreover, spaces are created through actions and practices. Werlen (1992) objectsagainsttheassumptionofspaceasanobject, andcalls for an‘action orientedsocialgeography’(Werlen1992:7).Hestatesthatspaceis“neitheran objectnorapriori,butaframeofreferenceforactions”(Werlen1992:3).Thus, itisimportanttoseehumansasembodiedactorsratherthansubjectsfacingthe impacts of external forces. Stenbacka views the individual as “an acting subject”, and emphasises her purpose is to focus on people’s actions and practices, rather than on the actors themselves, with references to Werlen’s ‘action oriented social geography’. In other words, the focus is put on how people act rather than what people are (Stenbacka 2001:66). Stenbacka

200 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism emphasisesthedifferencesbetweenthisapproachandthe‘structurallifemode analysis’introducedbyHøjrup 73 . (…)actionscanbeviewedasexistingphenomenon,withoutthemneedingtobeusedtocate gorisepeople(Stenbacka2001:147,author’sowntranslationfromSwedish). TheDanishstructurallifemodeanalysishasbeenaunitingthemewithinthe research on livelihood (see Friberg 1990; Lönnbring 2003; Jakobsen 1999). Højrup claims that the society is constituted partly by different structures, whichcanbededucedtoitsmodesofproductions,andpartlybylogicallycon structed life modes. Life modes are described as the sum of people’s daily actionsintherelationbetweenwork,homeandleisuretime,whichareregarded astakenforgranted.Thelifemodeanalysishasbeencriticisedfromdifferent perspectives,forexample,foritsdeficientgenderperspective.Thetheoretical frameworkhasbeendevelopedonthebasisofthehouseholdandfamilyasan economicunit,inwhichthemanbecomesthenormandcarriesthelifeformin his role as breadwinner, while women are described intheirrolesas house wives. Men are considered to live in a ‘pure’ life form, while women are describedaslivingin‘mixed’lifeforms,andusingmultiplelifemodes,which contributestowomenbeingconsideredas deviant 74 . Anothercritique against thelifemodeanalysisishowittendstobe‘static’initsform,duetotheem phasis on life modes merely as theoretical and abstract logical constructions, andnotempiricalphenomenon.Theriskisthatpeopleareviewedonlyaspas siveobjectsinrelationtomoreoverarchingstructures. Consequently, people arecategorisedtofitintothe“topdown”constructedmodelsofthelifemode analysis,whichcreatesahighlevelofabstractionofanindividual’ssubjective experiencesandactionswhichtherebybecomesubordinatetothetheoretical project.Changesinthelifemodesareconsideredpossibleonlythroughstruc tural change, and not through deliberate human action. Actions then merely become ‘outcomes’ and responses to structural change (see Lönnbring 2003; Friberg1990). Stenbacka’sapproachpresentsanalternativewayofdiscussinglivelihood with an ‘action approach’ rather than the static framework of the life mode analysis. However, she declares that her study does not include more overarching processes which might affect the intentions and actions of individuals. Unlike Stenbacka, my intention is totakeadeparturepointfrom thetransformingLatviansociety,strivingtoanalysemoregeneralprocessesand

73 Seee.g.Højrup1995. 74 SeeJakobsen1999foraremodellingofthelifeformsinto‘loveforms’and‘workforms’.

201 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism structureswhichaffectwomen’slivelihoodwithintourism.Still,thefocusison the individual, how women perceive their livelihood possibilities and their livelihood actions and practices as actively taking part in the transforming tourism sector. Livelihood can from this perspective be analysed as an interaction between humans and structures, in how structures to a certain degreesettheframeworkforlivelihoodandwhatspacewomenoccupyintheir livelihoodstrategies.Giddens(1979)hasthroughhis‘structurationtheory’tried toovercomethedualismbetweenhumanactionsandstructure. (Thedualityofstructure)relatestothe fundamentallyrecursivecharacterofsociallife,andexpressesthe mutual dependence of structure and agency. By the duality of structure I mean that the structural propertiesofsocialsystemsareboththemediumandtheoutcomeofthepracticesthatcon stitutethosesystems(Giddens1979:69,emphasisinoriginal). Giddens emphasisesthe interrelation betweenagencyandstructure,andhow structuresnotmerelyaremeansofrestrictions,butmayalsocontributetoand enabledifferenthumanactions. One aimtherefore istoviewpeopleascon scious, acting actors (Giddens 1979). Baerenholdt et al. (1990) emphasise in their analysisof theontological challenges of lifemodetheorythatnostruc tures should be viewed as existing beyond human actions and practice. Moreover,thestudiesofhumaneverydaylifeshouldbedonefromaholistic perspective,includingtherelationsamongwork,home/familyandleisure,with afocusonthemeaningofpeople’sactions.Thissuggestsamorequalitativeand phenomenological and hermeneutic perspective, in order to understand peo ple’slifeworldsfrom“within”,andtointerprettheirexperiences,andnotlet thembepredeterminedbytheoreticalframeworks(Baerenholdtetal.1990). Physicalandmaterialresources The livelihood ideologies and practices are also affected by the provision of morephysicalandmaterialresources,forexample,inaccesstoinfrastructure andservices.Forexample,women’sandmen’saccesstoworkandlivelihood may also be determined by their spatial mobility. Hanson and Pratt’s (1995) study showswomencommute lessandtravel shorter distances compared to men,especiallyamongfemaledominatedprofessions,whichisconditionedby theirresponsibilitiesinthehome(Hanson&Pratt1995).Theyuseatimegeo graphical approach in their study, similar to Tora Friberg’s (1990) study of women’slivelihoodwiththeaimofunderstandingwomen’severydaylifeinthe relationbetweenhome,leisuretimeandwork.Women’smobilitycanbeunder stoodasdifferent‘projects’,whicharelinkedtogetherintimeandspaceonthe

202 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism basisofhiddenandnonlinearstrategiesandaims.Fribergclaimsthatwomen’s mobilityisrestrictedinspace,andthatwomenconstantlyhavetomakediffer entspatialadjustments,partlybasedonmaterialandsocialfactors,andpartlyin relationtotimeconstraintswhichsettheframeworkfortheeverydaylife.The weekdaysbecomemoreorlessatimepuzzle,withthemainaimtofindpracti calsolutionstopracticalproblems(Friberg1990). Settingtheframeworkforwomen’slivelihood Figure 12 below sets the framework of my analysis of women’s livelihood within tourism 75 . The model should be viewed as threedimensional, and the aim is not to apply a ‘topdown perspective’ of how women’s livelihood is affectedbystructuralchange,buttoillustratetheprocessesofchangeinwhich womenactivelytakepart. Figure12: Intersectionsbetweengenderedlivelihoodideologies,strategiesandpractices.

Nationalcommonspace Geographiesof Geographiesofneo place nationalism Placespecific Geographiesof traditionsofwork Europeanisation andgender Geographiesofrelic identities communism

Individual Strategiesand Conditions intentionsof livelihood Abstract Concrete Meansof Livelihood livelihood practices Employment Private/public Entrepreneurship Mixed Livelihood actionspace Negotiation Challenge Adjustment Source:InspiredbyStenbacka(2001:191figure6.1),Schough(2001)andLönnbring(2003). Centraltothefigureisthe ‘nationalcommonspace’ ,withthethreegeographiesand ideals of femininities which have been discussed in previous chapters. These

75 Figure 12 is identical to the mindmap figure presented in the introductionary chapter (Figure1),butwillherebediscussedinmoredepththeoreticalandempiricalapplication.

203 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism togetherwithmoreplacespecificcontexts,illustratedby ‘geographiesofplace’ ,set the political, economical and sociocultural framework of the transformation process. Thus, these dimensions become the ‘setting’ or ‘stage’, on which women’s livelihood practices take place. One aim of the study, relating to central issues within human geography is to illustrate the linkages between national processes and the local and the individual level. Human geography involves a holistic approach to capture the interaction and interrelatedness betweenthesedifferentscales,inwhichlocalstudiescanbeusedtoillustrate moregeneralsocietalphenomena(Johansson2000).Gendercaninthiscontext be described as the framework in which more comprehensive political and economic processes interact with and transform conceptions of femininities andmasculinities,ondifferentgeographicallevels. Geographiesofplace Closely interrelated with the ‘national common space’, are the geographies of place 76 . These two dimensions will be analysed as intertwined and mutually interdependent,eventhough‘geographiesofplace’refertothelocalcontextof thetwocasestudiesIhaveconductedinJūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrict,aslocal outcomesandexpressionsofthetransforming‘nationalcommonspace’.Thus, thechosenplacesandcasestudiesshouldnotbeviewedas‘static’,butastrans forminginpacewiththeoverallsociety,andthroughtheactionsandpractices ofhumanactors(Schough2001;Scholten2005;Lönnbring2003).Whenana lysing ‘geographies of place’, I will focus on more local aims of tourism development, and placespecific sociocultural perceptions and ideologies of work,livelihoodandgender.Thethreegeographiesof neonationalism,Europeani sation and reliccommunism takedifferentformsandexpressionsinthetwocase studyareas,bothrelatingtotourismdevelopmentandthepresenceoffeminin itiesandideologiesofworkandlivelihood.Thishastodowithboththesocio cultural and physical/material context, which influences in turn how women negotiateandperceivetheirlivelihoodwithintourism. Theruralandthemoreurbanlocalsettingmayofferdifferentphysical, sociocultural and economic possibilities and restrictions for livelihood, for example,intermsofspatialreachandpeople’smobility.Immaterialresources intermsofsocialnetworks,humanresources,knowhowetc.alsovaryamong differentplaces.Themorephysicalandmaterialcontexthastodowithaccess

76 The term derivesfrom previous studies of livelihood bySchough (2001) and Lönnbring (2003).Schoughdescribeswhatshereferstoas‘commonspace’aspartofthegeographiesof place,butIhaveherechosentotreatthemseparately,eventhoughtheygreatlyintersect.

204 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism to different forms of services, for example, childcare facilities, commuting distanceandqualityofinfrastructure.Economicfactorswhich may influence livelihoodalsoincludetheoverallstructureofthelocallabourmarket,wages, differentformsofeconomicbenefits,andcostsforliving.Thelocalconditions for livelihood are also affected by more sociocultural factors, such as ideologiesandtraditionsofworkandlivelihood,whichhavebeenformedona historicalbasis.Thesenormscanbedescribedashighlygenderised,andwhatis perceivedas‘male’and‘female’workandprofessionsvaryintimeandspace, andrelatetopeople’sexpectationsanddominatingsocioculturalnorms.Some communitiesmay‘allow’breakingagainstthesegenderisednorms,whileothers might resist change. Women’s and men’s work and livelihood are valued differentlyindifferentcontexts,whichcanberelatedto more overallgender structures(seeStenbacka2001;Friberg1990;Schough2001).Lönnbring(2003) emphasises the social and cultural context from which employment and entrepreneurshipevolve,andhowthebackgroundtodifferentmeansofliveli hood not necessarily have to be strictly economical, or guided by rational actions. Focus is put on the local structural conditions with their possibility for creating alternative actionsinbothamaterialandsocialsense.Thelocalculture–theplace–isviewedasame diumthroughwhichpeopleinterpretandorganisetheiractions.Entrepreneurshipistherefore consideredasaresultofstructuralprerequisites(Lönnbring2003:87,author’sowntranslation fromSwedish). Thus,thestructuresarebelievedtofindexpressionsonlythroughhumanac tions.Lönnbringemphasisesthepossibilityforchangingtheoutcomesofthe structuralprocesses,sincetheyaremediatedthroughsocialandculturalfilters. In other words, more overarching structural processes have local and place specificoutcomes.Ontheonehand,alackofinfrastructureandservicesmay beexperiencedasobstaclesforlivelihoodpractices,butmayontheotherhand beviewedasanadvantage,intermsoftheappealofnatureandattractionfor tourism. Stenbacka (2001)emphasises thatplace isexperienceddifferently by different people, and what may be a restriction for some people may be be lievedtobeapossibilityforothers,dependingontheirintentionsandresources (Stenbacka2001:149f). Strategies,intentionsandconditionsforlivelihood AsillustratedbyFigure12,the‘intentionsandstrategies’and‘conditions’for livelihood practices are affectedbythe intersections between ‘geographies of

205 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism place’andthe‘nationalcommonspace’.Still,itisalsoimportanttotakeinto consideration more personal and individual motives, strategies and catalysts whichaffecttheformsoflivelihoodpractices.Stenbacka(2001)emphasisesthe need of analysing the intentions and reasons for why people move to the countryside.Itoofindthisquestionrelevant,butwiththeaimofanalysingthe backgroundtowhypeopleengageinworkwithintourism.Stenbackaidentifies different intentions and strategies behindthedecisiontomovetothecountryside. These include, for example, ideas of ‘the good life’ for the family in the countryside, and different aims of living a better life and building one’s own home(Stenbacka2001).Theaimisnotmerelytofocusontheeconomicpre conditions for women’s livelihood, but also to illustrate how employment withintourismmaybeawayofrealisingotherpersonalaimsandintentions.It mayalsobeguidedbyfamilyvaluesandresponsibilities,inthewishtocombine workandfamily.Bjerén(1989)emphasisesthatlivelihoodstrategiesnotneces sarily have to involve merely rational, strategic and conscious planning for individual purposes. Instead, livelihood is analysed as closely related to the placespecificcontexts,anddifferentpossibilitiesathand,guidedbyindividual characteristicsandexternalresources. By‘livelihoodstrategy’,Imeaninthiscontextnotaconsciouscareerplanning,butthesumof all choices and considerationswithrespect to ability, cosupporter, labour market, tax and subsidysystems,care,transportationconditions,etc.,whichliebehindeachindividual’sspe cificlivelihoodsituation(Bjerén1989:22,author’sowntranslationfromSwedish). Stenbacka(2001)alsodescribesdifferent catalysts orspecificeventswhichmight havetriggeredthedecisiontomovetothecountryside,duetochangingfamily conditions,divorceorpension(Stenbacka2001).Thesedifferentalteringcir cumstances are also of much importance when analysing the background to livelihoodwithintourism,sincechangesinthecurrentlivelihoodsituationmay createtheneedforneworcomplementarylivelihoodpractices.Thismightin volvejoblosses,bothforoneselfandforotherfamilymembers. The other dimension illustrated in the figure includes ‘individual condi tions’ for livelihood, including both concrete and abstract dimensions. Concrete conditionsmay,forexample,involvehowaccesstoapropertyortoapieceof landmighthavetriggeredthedecisiontostartuparuraltourismbusiness,or economic assets, and the possibilities to take a loan. The abstract conditions involvememoriesandpersonalattachmentstoaplace,forexample,thecoun tryside, or social networks (friends and family) (see Stenbacka 2001). These individualconditionsmayalsoappeardifferentbetweenmenandwomen,and

206 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism maybebasedonthehouseholdorfamilyasaunit.Theyalsorelatetoaccessto human capital (education, working experience), and need to be analysed in relationtotraits,suchasethnicityandclass,toemphasis thedifferencesnot onlybetweenwomen’sandmen’slivelihoods,butalsoamongwomen. Meansoflivelihoodandlivelihoodpractices Theintentions,strategiesanddifferentformsofabstractandconcretecondi tionsdevelopintodifferentmeansoflivelihood.By meansoflivelihood Ireferto thedifferent‘formal’or‘informal’designationsoflivelihood.Theaimishereto illustratetheinterrelationsbetweentheprivateandthepublicsphere.Forex ample, some women may take the step to become ‘entrepreneurs’ within tourism, while others seek employment in hotels or other tourism facilities. Moreover,somewomenmaycombineandmixdifferentformsoflivelihood, whichalsomayincludeinformalincomeandrelianceonotherfamilymembers. Thedifferentmeansoflivelihoodmayalsoincludeexpectationsofshouldering differentgenderised‘roles’,andidealsoffemininities.Forexample,‘theentre preneur’ may carry more masculinecoded attributes, while a job as a receptionistmaybearfeminineideals. Thelivelihoodpractice referstotheactionsandexperiencesofhowpeople relatetotheirenvironmentthroughtheirlivelihood,andwhatprioritiestheyset intheireverydaylife.Stenbacka(2001)emphasisesthatpeopledonotalways actintermsoftheirintentions,andtheoutcomeoftheiractionsdoesnotnec essarilyhavetogivetheresultwhichwasexpected(Stenbacka2001).Schough (2001) also claims that different conflicts can arise between the practice and ideology oflivelihood.Inherstudywomenexpressedawishtocreateawayof living which did not match their own livelihood practice. The conflicts may therefore be expressed both within the women themselves and in relation to normsandideologies withinsociety.Inthelatter case, I will relate women’s livelihoodpracticestothethreeidealsoffemininitiesdiscussedinChaptersix, inordertoseehowtraditional,‘Western’andsocialistidealsoffemininitiesare negotiatedinwomen’severydaylifewithintourism.Stenbacka(2001)makesa distinction between outward and inward orientedpractices,which relateto the publicandtheprivatesphere.Somepracticeswere,forexample,moreoriented towards the local community and its social and physical dimensions, while othersrelatedtotheirresidenceandhomeintheireverydaylife.Inmyanalysis, Iwillnottreatthe‘private’andthe‘public’astwoseparatespheres,butanalyse howthebordersbetweentheprivateandthepublicmaydissolvethroughthe livelihoodpracticeswithintourism,andhowthecentreofgravitymaybedislo

207 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism catedfromonespheretoanother.Thus,publicpaidworkmaybecomeprivate, unpaidwork,andprivatechoresremainprivateunpaidduties.Iwillrelatethe privateandpublicorientedpracticestothethreedifferentidealsoffemininities, whichincludeperceptionsofworkandlivelihood,aswellasthespecificspatial organisationofwork(seeChapterstenandthirteen). Livelihoodactionspace ThelastdimensionofFigure12relatesto Livelihoodactionspace .Here,thefocus is put on the outcome of women’s livelihood practices, and what space for women’sindependentlivelihoodiscreatedinrelationtotheirmeansofliveli hood and practice orientations. This livelihood space is negotiated and contested,andmightinvolve bothchallengesandadjustments to norms and ideologies of work, livelihood and gender, in relation to ‘national common space’and‘geographiesofplace’.Thespaceforwomen’s action space is af fected by the forms of employment, in terms of wage and employment conditions,butalsobytheirownaimsandaspirations.Thequestioniswhether ornotwomen’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourismcontributetoachallenging of existingidealsoffemininitiesinthe privateandthepublicsphere.Not all actionsmightchallengedominatinggenderidentities,butsomespecificactions mightcontributetothischange.Theindividualspaceforlivelihoodmightbe characterised by different paradoxes , inthewishtoactfor more independent forms of livelihood, while meeting the demands of the environment. Friberg (1990)describeswomen’slivelihoodasaparadoxicalsituationinhowwomen donotdecidetheconditionsfortheiradjustmentatthesametimeastheyall strivetowardsindividualaims.Womenhandletheseproblemsinmultipleways, but the common feature is an ‘adjustment strategy’,partlytomorestructural contexts,andpartlytodemandswithinthefamily(Friberg1990). Conclusion Theaimofthechapterhasbeentosettheoveralltheoreticalframeworkforthe upcoming case studies of women’s livelihood practices and strategies within tourismintheCēsisdistrictandJūrmala.Ihavearguedforamorenuancedand diverseanalysisofboth gender and work ,inordertohighlightwomenas ‘agents’ ratherthanpassive‘victims’intheLatvianpostsocialisttransformationproc ess,ofwhichtourismconstitutesapart.Intermsofgender,Ihavechosento use genderidentities ingeneraland femininities morespecificallyformyanalysis,in ordertoillustratethecomplexprocessofhowgenderisconstructed,andhow women themselves constitute parts of this process, in their everyday actions

208 Chapterseven–Genderedworkandlivelihoodwithintourism andwork.Usingtheterm‘femininities’alsoreflectsawishnottotreatwomen asahomogenousgroup,butdiverseintermsofethnicityandclass. Work asa concept within both feminist and tourism research has also been discussed, which has tended to include mainly paid work and activities in the public sphere.Inmycasestudies,Iwillfocuson livelihood ratherthanwork,inorderto illustrate the interrelations between the public and the private sphere, since women’semploymentwithintourismmaybeaffectedby,andreproduce,gen deridentitiesinbothspheres.Idistinguishbetweenlivelihoodas ideology andas practice ,eventhoughtheyarecloselyintertwined,inordertoillustratetherela tionsbetween‘nationalcommonspace’and‘geographiesofplace’ontheone hand, and women’s livelihood strategies and practices within tourism on the other. Livelihood as ideology refers to both more national and placespecific perceptionsofgenderedwork,aspartofmorecomprehensiveandtransform ingstructuralprocesses.Here,threedifferentfemininitiesrelatedtoworkand livelihoodhavebeendiscussedinpreviouschapters,whichrelatestothegeog raphiesconstituting‘nationalcommonspace’. Livelihoodaspractice,ontheotherhand,referstothedaytodayactions of women’s work within tourism, and illustrates a more ‘actionoriented’ approachinhowwomenasactorstakepartinthetransformationprocess.The interlinkages between livelihood as ideology and practice can be analysed as relating agency to structure, in how human actors are both constrained and enabledintheiractionsduetostructuralprocesses.Myintentionistoanalyse the strategies and practices for women’s livelihood withintourism, and what spacefor moreindependentlivelihoodiscreated,inrelationtobothmaterial and physical restrictions, and structural constraints and possibilities. In this process,Iwillalsoexplorehowdifferentidealsoffemininitiesarenegotiated, reproducedandchallenged,inrelationbetweenboththeprivateandthepublic sphere.

209

210

PartIV Exploringwomen’slivelihoodwithintourism intheCēsisdistrict

Fromthetop :(1)ALatvianfarmstead(vinsē ta)(2)Rura ltourism holiday home (3) Former kolkhoz apartment buildings. Photos bytheauthor. 211

212

Chaptereight ‘Geographiesofplace’: Rurality,ruraltourismand thelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict DespitetheurbancharacteroftourisminLatvia,theinterestinruraltourismis expandingthroughouttheBalticcountries,andthesupplyofdifferentformsof ruralaccommodationoptionsisshowingarapidincrease. TheLatvianCountry Tourism Association “Lauku ceĜotājs” increased its members from 38 rural ac commodationestablishmentsin1995to393in2006,whichtogetherprovided around6380bedsfortourists(www.celotajs.lv20080419).Anationalsurvey estimatedthenumberofruralovernightvisitorstobe77280in2006,butthis numberisbasedonstatisticsincludingmerely182differentregisteredruralac commodationestablishmentsandnodoesmakeadistinctionbetweendomestic andforeignvisitors(LCSB TourisminLatviain2007 )77 .However,accordingto statistics provided by “Lauku ceĜotājs”, the interest for rural tourism among foreign tourists seems to be increasing; around 68 percent of the overnight visitorswereforeignersin2007comparedto18percentin1999,ofwhicha majority (30%) were German tourists (www.celotajs.lv 20080419; www.standbynews.info20050204).Apartfromtheincreaseintouristdemand, thedevelopmentandpromotionofruraltourisminLatviaalsoreflectsthepo liticalaimsandprioritiesbothonanationalandasupranationallevelwithinthe EU,asameansandtoolforregionaldevelopment.As in both Western and Eastern Europe, a majority of the Latvian rural regions are characterised by highunemploymentanddemographicalproblems,andthereisaneedfornew andalternativeincomepossibilities,ofwhichthedevelopmentofruraltourism isconsideredtoplayanimportantrole(OECD2003).

77 The first national Latvian survey on rural tourism accommodation establishments was conducted by LSCB in 2007, and included hotels, guest houses, holiday dwellings, rural houses, castles, manors, camp sites and ‘other’ (LSCB Tourism in Latvia in 2007:5, 55). However,theactualnumberofruraltourismaccommodationestablishmentsisestimatedto bemuchhigherandmaybearound1000(www.standbynews.info,DienasBizness 20080522, 20080908).

213 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

The Cēsis district has around 58000 inhabitants of which 66 percent live in ruralareas 78 ( Latvia’sregionsinfigures2004 ). JustasinotherpartsofLatvia,the Cēsis district is experiencing a process of economic restructuring. The agricultural sector is declining, while employment within services, trade and differentindustriesisexperiencinganoverallgrowth.Thus,thedevelopmentof tourismisperceivedasawayofdiversifyingthelocaleconomy. Figure13: MapoftheCēsisdistrictandmunicipalities.

Source: State Regional Development Agency Development of Regions in Latvia 2006 . Modified andpublishedwithpermissionfromtheStateRegionalDevelopmentAgency. TheVidzemeregioningeneralandthe Cēsisdistrict inparticularhasbeena nodefortravelandtradehistorically.ThecityofCēsis,whichdatesbacktothe 13 th century, became a part of the Hanseatic League during the 14 th century. Theareahasalsobeensubjecttoforeignruleandculturalinfluenceswhichto day constitute some of the main cultural tourism attractions in the region, includingcastles,architectureandothermanifestationsinthelandscape.From being occupied by German crusaders, namely, the Livonian order in the 13 th century,theareabecameabattlegroundforanumberofpoliticalpowersfrom the 16 th century onwards, due to its location which was profitable for both trade and defence. The area became a part of the LithuanianPolish union

78 AccordingtotheLatvianStatisticalBureau,”Urbanpopulationreferstothosepersons,who liveincitiesandtowns,i.e.,inpopulatedareaswithnotlessthan2,000residentpopulation. (…)Therestisruralpopulation.”( Latvia’sregionsinfigures 2004:11).

214 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict duringthe16 th century,butwasreplacedbySwedishrulebetween16201721. TheSwedishrulecomprised‘SwedishLivonia’,thepresent parts of Vidzeme andsouthernpartsofEstonia;butSwedenlosttheterritorytoRussiaafterthe NordicWar.Duringthefirstperiodofindependence,theriseofmoderntour ismintheCēsisregionincludedtheestablishmentofhealthresortsandsum merhouses,andistodayconsideredtohavelargepotentialfordevelopingrural tourism.ThemaintourismattractionsintheruralareasaretheGaujariverand nationalpark,anddifferentwintersportfacilities.ThemedievaltownofCēsis constitutesthecentreofthedistrictwithapopulationofaround17000people and is visited by a considerable number of both international and domestic tourists,ofwhichamajorityconstitutesdayvisitorsfromthecapitalRiga(Ruk saneetal.2001;VidzemeDevelopmentAgency2004).ThecityofCēsisisnot partofthisstudy,sincethemainfocusisonmoreruralareas inthedistrict, including21ruralmunicipalitiesandsmallertownsorvillages.Thisfocusalso reflectstheattemptstodiversifytourismintheCēsisdistrict,withtheaimof attractingmorevisitorstotheruralareassurroundingthecityofCēsis. Theoverallpurposeofthischapteristoanalysethelocalframeworkand contextforthecasestudyintheCēsisdistrict,withafocuson Geographiesof place ,whichrelatestomorelocalaimsofdevelopingtourism,andperceptions of livelihood, work and gender. The chapter is based on interviews with representatives from local governments in the Cēsis district as well as with publicactorswithtourismonanational,regionalandlocallevelintheVidzeme region. The main interview questions concerned the incentives and aims of developingruraltourism,aswellassocialandeconomicquestionsrelatingto women and men’s positions in the labour market in the Cēsis district. The chapter is structured around three themes of ‘rurality’ relating to the three geographiesdiscussedinpreviouschapters:ruralityas ‘anationalsymbol’ (relating to geographies of neonationalism), as ‘a site for consumption’ (relating to geographies of Europeanisation) as well as the rural as ‘a problem ’ (relating to geographiesofreliccommunism). Whatisruraltourism? Todefineruraltourismisproblematicinseveralways,andthereisalackofa common and internationallyaccepted definition. This problem has been acknowledgedwithinthebodyoftourismresearchonthesubject,startingfrom the1990sandonwards.Roberts(2001)emphasisesthatitisdifficulttomakea definitionofruraltourism,whichcoversthemultiple and complex forms of tourismactivitieswhichtakeplaceinaruralcontext.Ruraltourismisoftenre

215 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict ferred to as being smallscale in its character, but covers a large selection of activities.Asa consequence, a range of concepts have emerged and areused synonymouslywith“ruraltourism”,suchasagrotourism,farmtourism,ecot ourism, green tourism or adventure tourism (Roberts 2001; Lane 1994). However,Lane(1994)claimsthatthedefinitionof rural tourism should not encompassalltourismactivitiesinruralareas.Moreurbanformsoftourismcan ‘spillout’orbeestablishedinruralareas,suchasdifferenttypesofresortsor themeparks(Lane1994).PettersonLöfqvist(2002)putsfocusontherelation betweentourismandtheruralculturallandscape,which makesruraltourism more distinct from other forms of naturebased tourism, such as wilderness tourism,activitieswhichcommonlytakeplaceinanaturallandscape(Petterson LöfqvistIn:Aronssonetal.2002). Another central dimension in the definition of rural tourism is what shouldbeincludedintheterm‘rurality’.Whatisclassifiedas‘ruralareas’,from amorepoliticalandeconomicalperspective,variesamongnations,butisusu ally based on population density, or traditionally ‘rural’ economies such as agriculture and forestry. The perception of rurality has also more symbolical and sociallyconstructed dimensions, and is often based on the dichotomy betweentheurbanandtherural,inwhichtheruralisperceivedasrepresenting amoretraditionallifestylecomparedtothemodernanddynamicurbanareas (Roberts 2001). The promotion of rural tourism in Latvia could easily be analysed as an expression of the traditional urbanrural dichotomy, with an emphasisontheincreasingsocialandeconomicgapsbetweenthecitiesandthe countryside, and how rural areas tend to be perceived as ‘lagging behind’. Moreover,tourismcansometimesbeviewedasawayofconservingtherural ‘traditional’wayoflife,withregardtobothnaturalandculturalresources.To formalizethedivisionbetweentheurbanandruralareasshouldbemadewith somecaution.Sharpley(2004)statesthat“(…)therural,inthetourismcontext, isaconstructed,negotiatedexperience,thesymbolicsignificanceofwhichmay bear little resemblance to the reality of a dynamic countryside” (Sharpley In: Lewetal.2004:377).Thus,itisimportanttoacknowledgethatruralareas,just likeurbanareas,arenotisolatedfromtheprocessesofchangeasaneffectof globalisation,whichhasresultedinanincreasedmobilityofpeople,products andinformation,diversificationoftheeconomyandnetworkbuildingactivities across national and regional borders. Rural areas could be described as transforming, through increased urbanrural flows, both in terms of more temporalmobilitysuchastourismandleisure,butalsomorepermanentforms of mobility such as migration and secondhome ownership (Roberts 2001).

216 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

Tourism does not necessarily merely ‘preserve’ the rural, but might as well contribute to a change of the rural ‘way of life’ and its economic structure. Rural areas tend to become more and more urban in their character, a phenomenonwhichcloselyrelatestothedevelopmentoftourism.Ruralareas tendnolongertobeplacessolelyforproduction, but also for consumption (Roberts2001;PettersonLöfqvist2002In:Aronssonetal.2002). Gender,ruralityandruraltourism Empiricalstudiesoftourisminvolvingthetransformingruralpostsocialistre gionsingeneralhavebeenscarce,aswellasresearchincludingagenderper spective(seeGranbergIn:Alanen2004;Apostopoulosetal.2001).Little(2002) arguesfortheneedoffeministtheoriesinstudies of rural geography, which havecontributedtomaking‘theruralothers’visible,includingruralwomenand ethnic minorities 79 . Feminist approaches haveexamined andexplored socially andculturallyconstructedperceptionsofruralityinlinewiththe‘culturalturn’ withingeography,ofhowgenderisedidealsofruralityandnatureareproduced, manifested andchallenged in terms ofe. g. genderised landscapesand repre sentations.Moreover,genderstudieshavealsoresearchedhowgenderrelations andidentitiesareproducedinaruralcontext,includingwomenandmen’spo sitions within the rural community, the labour market, and within the family (seeLittle2002).Iwouldsuggestthatboththeseapproachesarerelevantfor theanalysisoftheemergenceofruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict,whichwillbe discussedbelow.Focusingonthelocalsocioculturalandeconomiccontextas genderised‘geographiesofplace’isalsoanattemptto;“understandingtherural communitynotonlyasa‘container’fortheoperationofgenderrolesbutalso asa socioculturalfactor intheevolutionofgenderrelations”(Little2002:71),as suggestedbyJoLittle.Thus,thelocalplacespecificcontextbothaffectsandis beingaffectedbyexistinggenderrelations. In terms of rural tourism, some researchers have suggested that its employment effects in postsocialist countries have large potential for improvingtheeconomicsituationforruralwomen(seeHallIn:Apostopoulos et al. 2001). The successive transition towards market economy and the development of tourism place high demands on entrepreneurship and individualism, in contrast to the earlier collective mentality and largescale production. The emergence of tourism is considered to bring new ways of

79 Little(2002)refersinthiscasetoPhilo’s(1992)critiqueofhowruralstudieshavetendedto ignoreissuesrelatingtomarginalizedgroups(suchasruralwomen),whichtherebybecome treatedasthe‘ruralothers’(Little2002:9).

217 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict livelihood,bothintermsofentrepreneurshipandwagedlabour,andappearsas a chance for rural women to combine work and family. More smallscale tourismactivities,suchasruraltourismareconsideredtostrengthenwomen’s roles in society by offering possibilities for increased empowerment, independence and livelihood, while also being a way of challenging existing genderstructures.However,Hall(2001)considerswomen’smarginalisationin thepostsocialistlabourmarketingeneraltobereflectedwithintourism,which resultsinanoverrepresentationinlowstatusandlowpaidjobs,andwomenare regardedasconstrainedintheirparticipationduetofamilyresponsibilitiesand child care (see Hall In: Apostopoulos et al. 2001). Studies of women’s participationinfarmtourisminSpainhaveshownthatwomentendtobethe main initiative takers for rural tourism, and that a majority of rural tourism businessarerunbywomen.Still,workwithinruraltourismhasbeenviewedas anextensionofhouseholdworkandcaringforthefamily,andthereforenot consideredtobea‘real’professionbutmerelyanextraincometoagriculture (GarciaRamonetal.1995;Caballé1999). Threeapproachesto‘rurality’andruraltourism 80 The next three sections include a discussion of how the emergence of rural tourismcanbeanalysedascloselyrelatedtothethreedifferentgendered‘geog raphies’ discussed in previous chapters. Firstly, I will discuss ‘the rural as a nationalsymbol’,connectedtothe‘geographiesofneonationalism’,inhowru raltourismisperceivedasatoolforpreservingculturalandnaturalresources throughtourism,whichalsoreflectsawishtoreimaginetheruralasacentral ingredientoftheLatviannationalidentity.Secondly,Iwillexaminetheruralas ‘asiteforconsumption’,relatingtoaimsofdiversifyingthetraditionalruralin dustries and emphasising entrepreneurship and investments within tourism, whichinturnreflectsideologiesembodiedwithinthe‘geographiesofEurope anisation’. Thirdly, I will analyse rurality as representing continuity with the past,inhowstructuresrootedintheSovietperiodstillserveasportrayingthe ruralas‘aproblem’,strugglingwithissuessuchaspoorworkethics,lackofin stitutionalframeworks,poorsocialandculturalcapital,andfinances.

80 These three approaches have their roots in existing theoretical and empirical studies exploring questions of rural tourism as well as rurality and geography, and should not be treatedasstaticcategoriesbutasexamplesofhowruralityandruraltourisminLatviacanbe analysed(seee.g.Little2002;Alanenetal.2004;Lönnbring2003;Schwartz2006;Herslund 2007).

218 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

Theruralasanationalsymbol Thedevelopmentofruraltourismcanbeanalysedascloselyrelatedtotheper ceptionofthe‘ruralidyll’,basedonamoreromanticisedandidyllicviewofthe rural.Inthiscontext,theruralisgivenmore‘traditional’characteristicscom paredtotheurban,representingasimplerandmorenaturalwayoflife.This ruralidyllconsistsofstrongnostalgicandromanticelements,constructedon bothanindividualandacollectivelevel,andiscentralinattractingtouriststo thecountryside(SharpleyIn:Lewetal.2004).Thepromotionoftourisminline withmoreromanticisedelementshasbeenevidentinmanyWesternEuropean countries in order to develop more nicheoriented tourism products. These trends have also become evident in Latvia and other postsocialist countries, whereruraltourismhasbecomeawayofreimaginingruralareasbyusinga precommunist heritage, of which the rural idyll and a sense of ‘authenticity’ become important features. In national tourism marketing, the Latvian countrysideisbeingportrayedascontainingtraditional,picturesquecultureand heritage,asajourney‘backintime’. Backtonature.Latviahaskeptalivesmallfarmtraditions(…)Latviahasthousandsofro manticfarmsteadsandcountryhomesthatareopentoguests.Livewithafamily,learntheir traditions,evenjointheminmilkingthecows,feedingthepigsorsearchingforherbsand mushrooms( DiscoverLatvia 2004:22). Moreover, the Latvian tourism marketing also reflects an attempt to portray Latvia’snatureandrurallandscapesasdifferentanduniquecomparedtoother sceneriesandtraditionsfoundelsewhereinWesternEurope.Here,parallelscan bemadebetweenthe romanticisation oftherural landscapes within tourism marketing and the reimagination of the ‘homeland’ and ‘ethnoscape’, as dis cussed in chapter one. In this case, the reconstruction of a Latvian national identity was described as being rooted in an agricultural heritage which cele bratedLatviansclosenesstonature.Schwartz(2006)arguesthatthis‘agrarian romanticism’datesbacktothefirstindependenceofLatvia.Fromthe1920s andonwards,theLatvianeconomywasbasedinagriculture,formedbya‘peas ant’ideologywhichwasatthebaseoftheLatvianidentity,wheretheideaof the‘homeland’,withitsnatureandculturallandscapewerecentral,andprac ticedthroughworkwithinagriculture.Moreover,theheartoftheagricultural societywastheLatvian vinsēta ,theoftenisolatedfamilyfarmstead,datingback tothe12 th century.Schwartzpointsoutthatthefarmsteadsbecamesymbolsof aLatviannationalidentityduringthefirstindependence.Atthattime,alarge shareofLatvianswaslandlessduetothepreviousRussianregime,whichhad

219 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict maintainedtheBalticGermansasthedominatinglandowningclass.Thus,the roleofthe vinsēta wasreestablishedthroughthelandreformsfromthe1920s andonwards,withtheaimofmakingallLatviansfreefarmerswiththeirown landandproperty.Theagriculturaleconomyalsogrewstrongintheinterwar period,andLatviaexportedanumberofagriculturalproductstootherEuro peancountriessuchasSweden(Schwartz2006;StukulsEglitis2002). ‘Normalising’ruralspace The Latvian countryside was largely transformed during the Soviet period, throughnationalisationoflandandpropertyandcollectivisationofagriculture, aprocesswhichwasmoreorlesscompletedbytheendofthe1950s,whenall farmshadbeencollectivised.Around50percentofthetraditionalfarmsteads werealsoabandonedanddestroyedtogivewayforthe collective largescale agriculture (Schwartz 2006:58). However, the rural as a symbol for national identity reemerged in the postsocialist period, and the farmsteads became onceagainassociatedwithasenseof‘Latvianness’,manifestedthroughthere turnofsmallscaleagriculture.Atthetimeofindependence,itwashopedthat thestatusoftheagriculturalsectorwouldberestoredintoitsformergloryand serveastheengineofdevelopmentandeconomicgrowthinthepostsocialist periodasithaddoneduringthefirstindependence.Onesteptowardsreclaim ingtheagriculturalheritagewastoimplementlandreforms,privatisationand restitution,to‘return’landandpropertytoitspreviousprewar(Latvian)own ers 81 . StukulsEglitis (2002) claims that the decollectivisation and restitution processwaspartofthestrategyofregaining‘normality’ofruralspace,justas hadbeendoneinRigabychangingthestreetnamesfromRussianintoLatvian ones. This was symbolic in many ways, for example, by giving power to the ‘ethnic’LatviansratherthantononLatvianswhoautomatically did not have thesamerightstotheagriculturallandsincetheywerenotapartoftheprewar population(StukulsEglitis2002). StukulsEglitisalsoemphasisesthatcriticalvoiceshavebeenraisedagainst theactionstakentoabolishtheruralkolkhozes,sincethisaimhaveincluded

81 StukulsEglitis(2002)makesadistinctionbetween‘ privatisation’ and‘ reprivatisation’ .Acertain degreeofprivatisationoftheagriculturalsectorhadalreadytakenplaceduringthelate1980s, whenitbecamepossibleforindividualfarmerstoacquireland.Reprivatisationontheother handinvolvedrestitutionlaws,throughwhichlandwasofferedtoitspreviousprewarowners andtheirrelatives.Thisprocesswascomplexandgeneratedmayconflictssinceallpeoplewho acquired land had different motives for using the land, which did not always include agricultural activities, especially among urban residentsor exile Latvians(see StukulsEglitis 2002).

220 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict eliminating all traces of the previous Soviet economic system. As a consequence,theformerbaseoftheSovietlargescaleagriculturewaseroded andthewayforratherunproductive,smallscaleunitsofagriculturewaspaved in the attempts to restore the ideals of familybased agriculture. Tisenkopf (1999)statesthatthereformsresultedinasmallscaletypeofagriculture,which mainlyservedthepurposetomaintainbasicsubsistenceforindividualfamilies and households due to a lack of capital, machinery and other agricultural resources. In the 1990s, the number of farms increased from 800 collective units to 200000 individual farms, of which merely 10000 were classified as ‘commercialfarms’andcouldbecomparedtolargerfarmsinwesternpartsof Europe(Tisenkopf1999:412). Thegenderised‘ruralidyll’ ThedevelopmentandpromotionofruraltourisminLatviasinceindependence tend to reflect the ideals of the traditional Latvian family farmstead and its smallscaleagriculture,inwhichtourismisperceivedasawayofcontinuingand sustainingtheagriculturalpractices.Inthiscase,thedifferenceanduniqueness oftheruralincomparisontotheurbanisvaluedandconsideredtobeofsig nificance,asawayofreturningtothe‘roots’ofLatviannessandmanifesting the national identity. Thus, the rural tourism entrepreneurs become in this context important actors for upholding, maintaining and communicating this heritage through their everyday livelihoods. In an interview with the Latvian ruraltourismassociation,thefollowingwasemphasised: (…)ruralpeoplearenotreallyentrepreneurs.Mostofthemtheyarereallynot,andthatmakes ithardforthemandthatiswhyruraltourismissopositive;thisismybelief,theyare…They lovetheirpropertyverymuchbecauseitistheirs,mostly.Wearenotspeakingaboutthebig vacationhousesinthecountryside,withthemarketingmanagersittinginfrontoftheiroffice andselling.Wearespeakingabouttheruralentrepreneurswhorentouttheirownproperty forguests,andthisistheconceptofruraltourisminmyunderstanding,thattheownersofthe housearethefamilymembers,whicharethengivingtheirownpart.Theyaregivingaway partsoftheirownprivatelifeinordertoaccommodateclientsandtopreparetheirbreakfast whichistheirownrecipe,theirowntraditions,theirownstyleandsoon,andthisisthehard estinruraltourism(Femalerepresentative,Latvianruraltourismassociation,August2005). Inthiscase,theuniquenessoftraditionalLatviancultureisstressed,andadif ference is made between ‘family entrepreneurs’ and ‘real commercial entrepreneurs’,ofwhichtheformerisconsideredtobetheveryessenceofru raltourism.The‘familyentrepreneurs’aregivencharacteristicswhichrelateto their traditional ‘rural life’ and practices, rather than to more economically

221 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict orientedmotives.Theirindividualandunique‘wayoflife’isalsodescribedas becomingcommodifiedaspartofthetourismproduct. Butifyougototheseruralhousesitisimportant,andmostlyimportantistheownerofthe house,whomakestheatmosphereofthehouseandthesurroundings,andthentheleisure andthentheactivities,andthensomekindofdetails.ThatiswhatIloveinruraltourism.This individualityiswhatIthinkwilltakeover,andyoucanseeitalreadyinthetourismdemand, thatthereisthisindividualityandnotmasstourismanymore.Tokeepthisindividualityisour maintaskforthefutureyears,tobeintheEuropeanUnion,tostandwiththerulesandrec ommendations and at the same time keep the individual Latvian culture and show the differenceandstandandbeveryhardthatgrandmother’spancakesaretheonesthataredif ferent in Europe. This is why people are coming to Latvia, and this is why travellers are returning to their countries and bringing their memories about these grandma’s pancakes (Femalerepresentative,Latvianruraltourismassociation,August2005). AsLittle(2002)suggests,perceptionsoftheruralcommunityanditswayoflife oftenconstitutetheveryembodimentoftheruralidyll,separatingruralpeople andtheiractivitiesfromthoseinurbanareas,highlightingtheruralinamore authenticand genuine manner (Little2002).Moreover,theabovetwoquota tions emphasise the role and importance of the family as well as the home/farmstead and the private sphere, as some of themostimportantfea turesforruraltourism.Iwouldalsosuggestthattheimportanceofthefamilyas a unit within rural tourism also reveals how it is dependent upon existing gender relations. StukulsEglitis (2002) argues that the nostalgia for the past agriculturallandscapeinthepostsocialistperiodalsoincludesreclaimingsocial relations within the family farmstead, which correspond to more traditional idealsoftheprewar‘peasantfamily’(StukulsEglitis2002:157).Byemphasising andcelebratingtraditionalfamilyidealswithinthe‘ruralidyll’,womentendto becomeboththe‘natural’and‘biological’caretakersofthenation,andofthe family as discussed in chapter one (see also Little 2002). This is also closely relatedtothedemographicdevelopment,andthatthe‘nationalcrisis’wouldbe avoided bystrengtheningthefamily.Byemphasisingtheimportanceofrural tourismasa‘familybusiness’,itindirectlyreferstoagendereddivisionofwork withinthehousehold.Women’sroleswithintheruraltourismbusinesseswere emphasisedasfollows: It'saboutthekindofwarmthoftheirhousewhichisverydifficult,butbiologicallycreatedby women.Thisisaveryindividualappealwhichyoucreatebydecoration.Ofcourseyoucan useaprofessionaldecoratorforyourhouse,butyouhavetohaveanindividualapproach,for examplefreshflowers,sothatthehousegetsapersonaltouch.Ibelievethatmainlywomen cancreatethat,Imightbewrong,butthatismypersonalexperienceandopinion.Wereally

222 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict had problems with single men running these kinds of businesses (Female representative, Latvianruraltourismassociation,August2005). Theruralasasiteforconsumption Schwartz(2006)claimsthatthemoreconservativeapproachof‘rurality’,which hasfocusedonreestablishingagriculturesinceindependencehasbeenaccom panied by a more liberal approach to how the countryside should be reimagined.Inthelattercase,therehasbeenanincreasedfocusontheneedsof diversification oftheeconomicpracticesinthecountrysideapartfromthosepre servedthroughtraditionalagriculturallabour.Thenationalandlocalpriorities ofdevelopingruralareashavechangedfrombeingfocusedsolelyonmaintain ingandencouragingagriculture,tobecomingmorediversified,forexample,by promoting sustainability and creating employment and entrepreneurship also from nonagricultural activities (Zobena et al. 2005). Thus, the idea of the countryside as a site for commercialisation and consumption, rather than merely for production, is starting to evolve in Latvia as in other European countries.Inthiscase,thecountrysideisperceivedas‘open’fortradeandser vices rather than bound to traditional industries, and its cultural and natural landscapesareaccessiblethroughtourismactivities.Thegoalssetuprelatedto regionaldevelopmentinLatviaalsoaimatcounteractingtheunequalrelations amongregions inLatvia, andpromoteabalanced advancement ofthe whole countrybasedonthegivenresourcesofdevelopment.OneaimoftheLatvian regionalpolicy 82 ,asformulatedbytheMinistryofRegionalDevelopmentand LocalGovernments,is ensuringequalliving,workingandenvironmentalconditionsforinhabitantsofthecountryas well as creating equal preconditions for business activity in the entire Latvia ( Development of RegionsinLatvia 2005:7). Herslund’s (2007) study of the diversification of the Latvian and Estonian countrysidestatesthatEUdevelopmentfundsandprogramssuchasSAPARD havebeensignificantintheBalticStatesintheprocessofdiversifyingtheagri cultural economy (Herslund 2007). The calls for diversification of the countrysidehavebeenaneffectoftheEUmembership,andnewwaysofpro motingregionaldevelopmentinLatvia,focusingonideologiesof regionalism as discussedinchapterfour,areaimedatmakingtheruralregionsinLatviamore

82 The regional policy discussed here is based on the Law on Regional Development from 2002 and Basic Principles for Regional Policy signed by the Cabinet of Ministers 2004 (DevelopmentofregionsinLatvia 2005:7).

223 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

‘competitive’inaEuropeancontext.Thisalsoinvolvesadecentralisedplanning process,aimedatgivingmoreresponsibilitytothelocalandregionallevels,at thesametimeasthedevelopmentismonitoredandcontrolledbypoliciesset upbytheEUandinstitutionsonthenationallevel.AccordingtotheMinistry ofRegionalDevelopmentandLocalGovernments,theadjustmenttoregional policiessetbytheEUinvolvesdecreasingthedirectsubsidiestothelocallevel andencouragingamoreactiveapproachtoruraldevelopment. Itismoreaboutachangeofthinking,attheEuropeanlevel,thatyoushouldbegoingfrom purely supporting agriculture, and directly supporting agriculture, tosupporting ruraldevel opment, and supporting rural development also through creating links between urban and rural territories (Female representative Ministry of regional development and Local Governments,February2007). Thus, the regions are given more responsibility for developing themselves, ratherthanexpectingfinancingfromthestateandnationallevel,whichearlier has been the case especially for more economically weaker regions. Conse quently,the regionswillbe responsible forformulating and developing their ownpotentialbasedontheirresources,includingtourism.Inthiscase,devel opment from ‘below’ is encouraged, which puts more focus on how Latvia needstodevelopstrongerregionsandmultiplehighgrowthareasapartfrom Riga being the most prominent and dominating region of the country. However,italsocallsformorecooperationandnetworkingamongurbanand ruralareas,withtheaimofattractinghumanandeconomicresourcestomore remoteregions,fromRigaorinternationally,inordertostrengthentheircom petiveness(FemalerepresentativeMinistryofregionaldevelopmentandLocal Governments, February 2007; Ministry of Regional development and Local Governance2006). Promotingruraltourismandentrepreneurship TheLatvianaimsofdiversificationcorrelatetopoliciessetupbytheEUwithin The RuralDevelopmentStrategicGuidelines ,ofwhichoneofthesixaimsincludes “Improvementofqualityoflifeandencouragingdiversificationinruralareas”, asameasuretocreatenewjobsinruralareas( LatvianRuralDevelopmentNational StrategyPlan20072013 :58). Therural developmentprogrammefor Latvia 20072013 emphasisesdiversificationoftheruraleconomyasoneofthemaintargets. Supporttononagriculturalbusinessstartupsanddevelopmentinmicroenterprises,particu larlywhereagriculturalactivityisreplacedbyotherkindofproduction,primarilysupporting nonagriculturalbusinessinruralareas( TheruraldevelopmentprogrammeforLatvia20072013: 98).

224 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

Here,thefocusisonhowtocreatecompetitivenesswithinruralregionsinLat viaby introducingnew,nontraditionalproductsand activities, of which one prioritizedmeasureisthedevelopmentofbusinesseswithinruraltourism.An exampleisthe‘diversificationofentrepreneurship’,whichopensupforalter nativeincomesapartfromtheagriculturalsector.Theruraldevelopmentprogramme forLatvia20072013 andthe LatvianRuralDevelopmentNationalStrategyPlan2007 2013 bothrefertoaimsofentrepreneurshipandcompetitivenesssetupinthe Lisbonstrategy aswellasthe NationalDevelopmentprogrammeforLatvia (seechapter four)83 . Here, diversification is “(…) targeted at preservation and further development of agricultural and rural cultural heritage” ( Latvian Rural DevelopmentNationalStrategyPlan20072013 :52).Thus,thetraditionalheritageas discussed in the previous section should both be conserved and promoted throughtourism. The national plans provide little information about the tools for implementingtheaimsonalocallevel.Forexample,thecontentsandcharacter of rural tourism are not defined which leaves them open for interpretation, whichmayincludebothlargescaleandsmallscaleformsoftourismactivities, accommodation and other types of products. Moreover, there are few definitions of how entrepreneurship should be promoted as well as what groups of rural inhabitants should constitute the basis as the ‘new’ entrepreneurs,bothwithintourismandother‘nontraditional’sectors.Iwould suggestthatentrepreneurshiptendstobecomearathergeneralterm,whichis oftentakenforgrantedratherthanitsdiversecharacter being acknowledged. Ashasbeendiscussedinchapterfour,theentrepreneuralsotendstobecomea genderneutralterm,whichdoesnottakeintoconsiderationpotentialdifferences in men and women’s possibilities as entrepreneurs. Consequently, I would argue that there is a potential risk for entrepreneurship being interpreted in relationtoamalenorm,andthatwomen’sinvolvementasentrepreneursmay become invisible due to their choice of sector, or as constituting part of a ‘family business’, as discussed in the previous section of rural tourism as a ‘nationalsymbol’.

83 TheruraldevelopmentprogrammeforLatvia20072013 andthe LatvianRuralDevelopmentNational StrategyPlan20072013 .Thelatterisapolicydocumentdrawingupthemainguidelinesfor ruraldevelopment,whiletheformercoverstheimplementationprocess. Bothfallunderthe responsibilityoftheMinistryofAgriculture.Thefundingforimplementingthesepolicieswill be divided between the use of state funds, private funding as well as EU funds (see www.zm.gov.lv).

225 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

DiversificationthroughtourismintheCēsisdistrict TheCēsisdistrictisdescribedasthemostactiveentrepreneurialdistrictwithin thebordersoftheVidzemeplanningregion,basedonthenumberofregistered businesses,whichin2005included4500companies,ofwhich2492werediffer ent farms. The companies are mainly represented within manufacturing, and connectedtotheuseofresourcessuchasforestryproducts.Withinagriculture, milkcattlebreedingisthedominatingbranch,andmanyfarmshaveregistered to become ecological farms (www.cesurajons.lv 20080412). Still, just as in otherregionsanddistrictsofLatvia,ruraltourismispromotedasoneofthe toolsforpromotingeconomicdiversityintheruralareas.Accordingtothe De velopmentstrategyofCesisdistrict20002012 ,oneoftheaimsis“tourismbasedon culturalheritageandnaturalresources” and”promotionofqualitativetourism services” (www.cesurajons.lv 20080412). The Cēsis district is considered to have large potential for developing tourism based on its cultural and natural heritage,andalsoforitsrelativelyproximitytoRiga,around90kilometers.Ac cordingtothe StrategicPlanofTourismDevelopmentforCēsisdistrict workedoutby thetourismcouncilinCēsis,theaimistodevelopsustainabletourismwhichis wellintegratedwiththelocalcommunity,withafocusonsmallscalebutquality tourism,forexample,ruraltourism,whichisconsideredtohave“positiveand wide social influence on local society” (Cēsis Tourism Information Centre 2000:7).ThenumberoftouriststotheCēsisdistricthasincreasedoverthelast fewyears,butthenumberofforeigntouristsisstilllow,around10percent.A challengeraisedbythetourismauthoritiesinCēsisistoincreasethenumberof foreignvisitorsandtoprolongthestaysofbothforeignandLatvianguests. IntheCēsisdistrict,publicactorsonboththedistrictandthemunicipality levelareinvolvedinthepromotionanddevelopmentoftourism.Still,accord ingtothe Lawonselfgovernments, tourismdevelopmentisdefinedasa voluntary rather than a permanent functionforthelocal governments.Accordingtothe subsidiarityprinciple,thelocalgovernmentsshould“performasmanytasksas possiblebecausetheyconstitutethelowestlocalgovernmentlevel”.Thelocal governmentshave17differentpermanentfunctionswhichcanbedividedinto twomainsets;firstly,toprovidesocialandhealthservicestothelocalinhabi tants, and secondly, to engage in more longterm planning and development accordingtospecifiedaimsandpriorities.Thelatterdimensionincludesensur ing and promoting employment and entrepreneurship, for example, to “encouragebusinessactivityintheiradministrativeterritoryandtotakemeas ures to decrease unemployment” (ULRG 2004:11). Thus, the local govern ments may directly and indirectly promote the development of tourism. Still,

226 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict accordingtothe TourismLaw from1998,thelocalgovernmentsareresponsible forpromotingtourisminseveralways,forexample,throughbothphysicaland strategic planning for tourism development, and based on the plans provide resourcesfortourismdevelopment,useandpreservepublictourismattractions, developandfinance“tourismdevelopmentcenters”,andusetourismasaway ofgainingeducationalvaluesand“ahealthylifestyle”(MinistryofEconomics 1998). Based on interviews conducted with public tourism actors in the Cēsis district, including rural municipalities, some of the local and regional municipalitieshighlightedtheimportanceoftourismasa positive sourceandtool forlocalandregionaldevelopment,botheconomicallyandsymbolically.Itwas evidentintheinterviewstudythatthelocalandregionalgovernmentsstressed thattourismaswellasotherpartsofthelocaleconomywasdependenton ex ternal rather than internal resources, for example, EUfunding. Funds from differentEUprojectsweredescribedasthemainconditiontodeveloptourism infrastructure,forexample,includinghikingandbicycleroutes,bothonalocal and a regional level. There were also examples of cross border cooperation between the Vidzeme region and regions in Estonia to develop tourism. Re gional tourism associations have also been established, in order to create networkswithprivateentrepreneursandtoapplyforEUfunds.Thelocalmu nicipalitiesdescribetheirrolealsoas‘collaborating’,toactasanintermediary forcontactsbetweencompanies,publicorganizationsandotheractorswithin thedistrict.Some municipalities alsocollaboratein developing tourisminfor mationcenters,tourisminfrastructureandmarketingfortourism,withaclear nichetowardactive,ecotourismandruraltourism. Someofthe rural municipalities,especiallythose located in thewestern part of the district, with a proximity to Riga and access to paved roads, described a positive development based on an increased inflow of residents throughcounterurbanizationandtourisminvestments. Today,aquiterapiddevelopmentistakingplacehere.JustasinRiga,wholevillagesarebeing built;theaimistobuilduptoonehundrednewhouses,aspartofaprivateinitiative.They wanttosellthepropertiesandtheninvestthemoneyinnewcommunications,forcommut ing.Wearelocatedaround80kmfromRiga,andservicesforwaterandsewagearemuch cheaper here compared to in Riga. More and moreservice businesses are also being estab lished, for example, restaurants and conference establishments (Chairwoman, rural municipality,August2005).

227 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

TheproximitytotheurbanRigaregionmakesitpossibleforpeopletocom mute by car to Riga for work, which also has resulted in fairly low unemploymentrates,andamorebalanceddemographicsituation. Manypeoplebuylandhereandbuildhouses.Ifwelookatthedemographicsituation,itis improving;thenumberofbirthsexceedsthenumberofdeathsandwebelievethatthenum ber of inhabitants will increase. Our municipality will be very attractive in the future (Chairman2,ruralmunicipality,August2005). Thus,thereisanemphasisonexternalresourceswhichalsoincludedtheaccess ofhumancapitalfromurbanregions,networkingandcollaborationwithurban aswellasruralregions,theneedforinvestmentsfromforeignorurbancompa nies and the search for new entrepreneurs. Representatives from the rural municipalities also stressed the need for an increase of the local population throughmigrationtothelocalarea,whichwasalsodescribedascrucialforthe developmentoftourism. Themunicipalitiestrytorecruittourismspecialistsfromuniversitiesandcolleges;theyhave thequalificationsandspecificknowledgeneededfordevelopingtourism.Anewgenerationis needed, who can look at tourism with new eyes (Chairwoman, rural municipality, August 2005). Theruralasa‘problem’ Despitethepositiveoutlookdescribedabove,intheefforttostrengthenthe localandregionallevelthroughdecentralizationand‘new’waysofpromoting regionaldevelopment,theimagesoftheruralasa‘problem’stilltendtoprevail, inhowruralareasareperceivedas‘lagging’behindindevelopmentcompared tothecities.TheseopinionsarenotonlysignificantforLatviaorotherpost socialistcountries,buthavealsobeenfoundandexploredwithinresearchina majorityofWesternEuropeanandScandinaviancountries(seee.g.Lönnbring 2003;Berglundetal.2005).Lönnbring(2003)describes how the countryside from a Swedish perspective has been ascribed with negative connotations, basedonhowtheperipheralruralisdifferentfromtheurbannorm,forexam ple, in terms of economic decline and emigration. Thus, the value of rural regionsas‘assets’(e.g.fortourismandrecreationasdiscussedabove),and/or ‘problems’(e.g.inneedofeconomicandsocialassistance)arerootedinthe commonseparationbetweentheruralandtheurban,butareusuallybasedon urbanactors’perceptionsoftherural(Lönnbring2003:17f). I would suggest that acknowledging how the rural is perceived as a problemdoesnotnecessarily meanignoring existingeconomic, sociocultural

228 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict anddemographicchallengeswhichruralareasinLatviafaceinthepostsocialist period.However,itisimportanttoviewruralareasasrepresentingadiverseset ofapproachesonhowtotacklethesechallengesbasedontheirlocalsocioeco nomiccontext,ratherthanconstitutingahomogenousunitfollowingthesame pathofdevelopment.Moreover,Ialsowanttoavoidmakingananalysisofthe rural as ‘victimised’ due to urbangenerated socioeconomic change, but also discusshowactorsinruralareastakepartinreproducingimagesoftheruralas aproblemandhowtheSovietheritageconstitutesapartinthisprocess,which alsohasgenderiseddimensions. Ruralchallengesinthepostsocialistperiod Inthebeginningof2007,itwasestimatedthataround32percentoftheLat vian population lived in ruralareas.The statisticsshowageneraldecreaseof ruralinhabitantsby2.7percentbetween2000and2005,from698300people to 679400 people (State Regional Development Agency 2006:47). This decrease has affected a majority of the Latvian regions except Riga. In the Vidzeme region, the rural population decreased by 4.2 percent to 245400 peoplebetween2000and2005,constitutingLatvia’slowestpopulationdensity with 16 people per km2 (ibid:24ff). The decrease of the number of rural inhabitantsisrelatedtoanurbanizationprocess,mainlytoRiga,butalsotoa rapidincreaseofpeopleleavingLatviaonatemporarybasistoworkinother EUcountries.In2005,estimationsweremadethataround2percent(50000 people)oftheLatvianpopulationworkedinotherEUcountries(Ministryof Agriculture 2006a). Moreover, the demographic changes are also linked to a general downturn of the agricultural sector and the absence of alternative sourcesforworkandlivelihood.Fromanationalperspective,theGDPfrom agriculture, fishing, hunting and forestry fell from 21 percentin 1990to1.8 percent in 2007 (Schwartz 2006:84; Ministry of Agriculture 2007:8) 84 . The numberofpeopleworkingwithinagriculturehasdeclinedfrom12.3percentin 2001to8.1percentin2006,representing88000peopleaged1574(Ministryof Agriculture2006b).Onanindividuallevel,theaverageincomeforafulltime employee within agriculture was estimated to 129 Lats per month in 2005, which is 27 percent lower than the national average income (Ministry of Agriculture2006a:11). Theunemployment ratesvarybetweendifferentrural municipalities. In 2005, the highest unemployment rate was found in Goliseva pagast (37

84 Figuresfrom2007arebasedon”contributionofvalueaddedofagricultureandhuntingto GDPatcurrentprices,%”(MinistryofAgriculture2007:8).

229 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict percent), and the lowest in Palsmane pagast (1.8 percent) (State Regional Development Agency 2006). The average unemployment rate in rural municipalitiesintheVidzemeplanningregion(includingtheCēsisdistrict)was 6.6percentin2005.IntheCēsisdistrict,theruralmunicipalitiesshowedlarge variationsinunemploymentratesin2006,rangingfrom7.9percentinSkujene pagasttoonly2.8percentinZosenipagastin2006(www.cesurajons.lv2008 0412). The statistics should be treated with some caution since hidden unemploymentiscommonduetosomepeoplenotregisteringasunemployed, forexample,thoseworkingwithinfamilyagriculture.Theeducationallevelis alsoconsiderablylowerinruralareascomparedtothecities.Statisticsshowthat 7.3percentoftheruralpopulationhadauniversitydegreecomparedto16.8 percentinthecities(MinistryofAgriculture2006a:30). Thesocioeconomicchallengesfacingtheruralareaswerealsoreflected in the interview study conducted with public representatives from different localmunicipalities.Onefactoridentifiedasgreatlyaffectingtheconditionsfor local development was the trend of emigration from the rural areas, which meantthatthelocalmunicipalitieslostasignificantsourceofincomethrough the loss of potential tax payers, capital which could be used for local development. Manypeoplegoabroad.Eventhoughitisonly30outof3000inhabitantswholeaveforwork abroad,itmakesabigdifferenceforuswhenthosetaxesdisappear.ThosewhogotoRigaor othercitiestostudydonotreturneither,thatisoursecondlargestproblem.Thesalarieshere arenotveryattractive;itisdifficulttodrawyoungpeopletocomehere(Chairman2,rural municipality,August2005). The ‘negative’ development trends in terms of economic development, employmentanddemographicimbalancewerealsoconsideredtohave internal causes and origin, which provided a rather negative and pessimistic image of thecountryside.Inthiscase,oneofthemainproblemswasconsideredtobe the ‘passivity’ of the local population, including a lack of work ethic and an absenceofentrepreneurship. It affects the economic development severely. Money comes from nonlocals; they are the oneswhoinvest.Itisnotourownpopulationthatisstakingmoney(Chairman1,ruralmu nicipality,August2005). Thus, as discussed above, these trends were consideredtohave solutions by attracting external resourcesintermsofhumanandeconomiccapitalratherthan

230 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict mobilising the community based on local assets. The passivity of the local populationwasdescribedashavingitsrootsintheSovietperiod,asacontinuity of socialist working ideals in the postsocialist period. These ideals were also describedashavinggenderiseddimensions,whichwillbeillustratedbelow. ‘Active’ruralwomen Womenconstituted60percentofthenumberofregisteredunemployedper sonsintheCēsisdistrictintheendof2003,and69percentofthelongterm unemployed,apatternwhichalsoisevidentinotherruralareasinLatvia(LSCB Latvia’s regions in figures 2004 ). However, comparing these statistics with data fromtheLabourforcestudiesconductedinurbanandruralareasaswellasin Vidzeme, a different pattern emerges (see Figure 14). According to statistics from2007,womenmakeupmerelyaround40percentofthetotalnumberof unemployed, a figure which is even lower for the Vidzeme region (35.1%). Womenalsotendtobelessrepresentedamongtheeconomicallyinactiveshare ofthepopulationinruralareascomparedtourbanareas(57.5%),butcomprise alowershareoftheemployedpartofthepopulation(44.2%)(LCSB2008,data ordereduponrequest). Figure14:Shareofwomenofemployed,unemployedandeconomicallyinactivepopulation 2007(aged1564,inpercent).

70 61,7 57,5 60 55,3 50,5 47,2 47,7 50 44,2 Employed 40,6 40 35,1 Unemployed

Percent 30 Economically inactive 20

10

0 Urbanareas Ruralareas Vidzeme Region

Source:BasedondatapreparedonrequestfromtheauthorbytheLSCB,basedontheLFS “Populationbyeconomicactivitystatusandregion”.Calculationsmadebytheauthor.

231 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

The mainreasonbehindthedifferentfigures forwomen’s unemployment is thatwomentendtoregisteratthestate’sunemploymentofficestoahigherex tentcomparedtomen,apatternwhichwasconfirmedintheinterviewstudy. Representatives from the local governments described women and men as havingdifferentrolesandpossibilitiesinthelabourmarket.Ontheonehand, womenwereportrayedasawelleducatedpartofthelocalpopulation,partof theheritagefromtheSovietperiod;theyregisteredfordifferentcourseslocally andwereactiveintheirquestforworkingopportunities.Ontheotherhand, the labour market was described as segregated, providing fewer job op portunitiesforwomenthanformen.Itwasmainlyolderwomen(over40years of age) who were considered to have problems findingworkduetothere structuring of the local economy, including the closure of kolkhozes and a decrease in the more qualified and specialized professions. Consequently, womenweredescribedasbeing‘forced’intoeithertakinglowqualifiedjobsor applyingforjobswithintraditionally maleprofessionswithinthewoodproc essingindustry. Moreover, due to the limited number of (skilled) jobs for women, representativesfromthelocalmunicipalitiesalsoemphasizedhowmorewell educatedyoungerwomentendedtoleavetheruralareas. Inthehigherclassesinthecompulsoryschoolitisalmostonlyboys.Thegirlsstudyinthecity (Cesis).Ifwe arrange discotheques, there will bemore boys than girls. Girls havea higher education and do not return here after their education (Chairwoman, rural municipality, August2005). The labour market was described as having masculine attributes, with refer ences to the cultural and natural landscape, the traditions of largescale agricultureduringtheSovietperiod,andthedevelopmentofwoodprocessing andagriculture(dairyproduction)sinceindependence.Womenweredescribed ashavingtheirplacewithintheservicesector,withinhealthandeducation,and publicadministration,whichalsoconstitutedfairlylowpaidsectorscompared to‘men’swork’. Itismainlywomenwhoareunemployedheresincewoodprocessingisthedominatingin dustry.Forwomenitisabitdifferent,forthemthereistheschool,eldercare,shops,post offices,libraryandinthemunicipalityadministrativedepartment,wherewomencanfindjobs (…)Thosearesotospeakfemalejobs.Thewoodprocessingindustryandmechanicalwork aremoreformen(Chairman1,ruralmunicipality,August2005).

232 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

Thus,theinterviewsrevealedstrongperceptionsofwhatwasconsideredtobe ‘appropriate’ work for men and women. Even though women being ‘active’ participantsinthelabourmarketwasdescribedasapositivefeatureofthede velopment of the local economy, some jobs became ‘marked’ for women, whichinsomewayalsoservedtorestricttheirpotential.Theheritagefromthe Soviet period in terms of the official ideology of full employment and the encouragementofwomen’sparticipationintraditionallymaleprofessionswas rejected,andacontinuityofasegregatedlabourmarketcanbedistinguished. Ithinkequalityisagoodthing,buttherehastobealimit.Ifyouhaveapaintinginaframe,it meansthatthepaintinghassomelimitations,andwithouttheframe,youmighthavepainted thingsoutsideofit.Itisthesamewiththefamily;eachandeveryoneshouldhavetheirown specificrolesandfunctions.Itisgoodifthemancantakecareofthechildrenandhelpout, butIdonotthinkitwouldbegoodifthewomandrovearoundwiththetractoronthefield, andthemanwouldcookfood.Then,thewomanwouldnolongerbeawoman;shewouldget masculinearmsandbecomeamasculinewomanwithdirtyjeansandthickfingers.Then,her femininity would be lost, and she would resemble a man (Chairman 1, rural municipality, August2005). Thus,theaimwasnottobreaktheexistinggenderisedpatternsinthelabour market or in the private sphere, in order to increase women’s employment, whichwouldchallengethe‘natural’genderorder. ‘Passive’ruralmen Whilewomenwereportrayedasactivelysearchingforjobsdespitethedifficul ties intherurallabour market,menweredescribedasmore‘passive’intheir economicactivitiesintheinterviewstudy,despitethefactthatmen’sposition inthelabourmarketwasconsideredtobemuchbrightercomparedtowomen. The‘problem’ofmen’sparticipationinthelabourmarketwasregardedtobe relatedtoanunwillingnesstotakethejobsavailable,ortoregisterthemselves asunemployedorattendingeducationalcoursesprovidedbythemunicipalities. Ifmenareunemployed,theydon’twanttowork.Somedonotwanttoregistereither,they finditunnecessary.Inmaleprofessions,thereisashortageoflabour.Inthemiddleofthe 1990s, we had nineteen wooding industries, now we have eight, but they are quite large (Chairwoman,ruralmunicipality,August2005). Theunwillingnesstoworkwasdescribedasmoreoutspokenamongtheolder generation,agroupwhichalsotendedtohavealowereducation.The‘passivity’

233 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict ofmenwasrevealedtohaveitsrootsinanoverall‘maledepression’,resulting fromthetransitionprocessandlingeringsocialistidealsofworkandgender. Menwaitforbettertimes,asduringsocialism,waitingforsomeonetocomeandsay,dothis, thisandthis.Inthesocialistsystem,everythingbelongedtothepeople,andmendonotfindit attractivetoworkforsomebusinessmen;itisbelowtheirdignityandhonor.Theyarenot open tocapitalism; they stillthink in asocialist way.They have had it drummed into their mindsintheiryouth,theycannotchangetheirwayofthinking,theywilldiewiththeseideas, andcannotacceptalternativewaysofthinking(Chairman1,ruralmunicipality,August2005). Themaledepressionwasdescribedastakingdifferentforms,andapartfrom theloweconomicactivitycouldinvolvedrinkingandothersocialproblemsin thecommunity.Theruralmunicipalitiesdescribedanumberofmeasurestaken tosolvetheseproblems,includingtrainingandeducation,butalsoprofessional help intermsofbothpsychologicalcounsellingandgroupdiscussions.How ever,ithadresultedinamajorityofwomenratherthanmenshowingupforthe meetings.Butwhatthenisthebackgroundtothis“maledepression”?Aswas discussed inchaptersix,thesocialistimagesofmenas‘weak’andwomenas ‘strong’ and active seem to have continued in the postsocialist period (see Ashwin2000;2006).AccordingtoTrue(2003),womenhavehaditeasierto adjusttothenewmarketeconomy,andhavemaintainedtheirroleswithinboth thefamilyandthelabourmarket.Men,ontheotherhand,haveexperienceda largerthreattotheirworkingabilityandtraditionalroleastheheadandeco nomic supporter of the household due to the economic hardships in the transition period.Watson (1995)identifies “a maleidentitycrisis”inpostso cialist countries, which is revealed in, for example, high male suicide and mortalityrates(Watson1995quotedIn:True2003:71).InLatvia,theaverage lifeexpectancyatbirthformeninruralareaswas64.7yearsin2007,compared to75.1 years forwomen(LCSB databasewww.csb.gov.lv 20081210). Even though the interviews described the problems of ‘male depression’ as more outspokenamongoldermen(4050s),theideathatitisthemanwhoshouldbe the head of the household was described as being transferred between the generations. Maybeitissomethingthathastodowithourmentality,themanshouldbetheheadofthe family.Heshouldbetheboss,butwhenherealizesthathenolongercanassumehisfullre sponsibility,hestartsdrinkingandcannotmanagetogetbackontrackagain.Andifhiswife startsearningmorethanhim,Icantellyouthathewillfallintoanevendeeperdepression (Chairman1,ruralmunicipality,August2005).

234 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

Thedevelopmentofruraltourismasa‘problem’ Thedevelopmentoftourismwasnotconsideredtobeapriorityforallthelocal municipalitiesinterviewedinthestudy,andamajorityofthelocalrepresenta tives expressed difficulties and problems relating to the aims of tourism development.Theeconomicandorganizationalstructureforsupportingtour ismdevelopmentprovedtobeweak,withalackofplanningdocumentsforthis purpose.Thisisalsoevidentinotherareasofdevelopment,anditisestimated thatonly45percentofalllocalruralgovernmentshadterritorialdevelopment plans,whichisconsideredtobeaprobleminordertostimulateentrepreneurial activities (Ministry of Agriculture 2006a:33). The organization of tourism consisted mainly of voluntary tourism associations and other public tourism organizations financed in collaboration among different rural municipalities, ratherthanhavingpeopleemployedfortourismmarketingandplanningwithin aspecificlocalgovernment. Themainargumentfornotidentifyingtourismasaprioritywasrelatedto the economic and organisational situation of the local municipalities. As has beendiscussedabove,tourismisavoluntaryfunctionofthelocalgovernments anddonotgenerateaseparatebudgetfromthestate. Ourmunicipalitybudgetis190000Ls(…)37000Lsarestatebenefits,whichprimarilygoto education,sportsandculture,nottourisminparticular.Thatisthemainaimofthestatebene fits(Chairman1,ruralmunicipality,August2005). Thus, money for tourism development and marketing needs to be collected primarilyfromlocaltaxesandVAT,whichhavetobeweightedagainstother socioeconomicneedsandlocalservicessuchasschooling,sportsandculture. Theeconomicbudgetwasalsoconsideredtoberelatedtotheorganisationand designofthelocalmunicipalities.Initscurrentstructure,Latviaisdividedinto 441 different rural municipalities ( pagasts ), a formation which has roots going backtothepoliticalstructureofthefirstindependence 85 .Thesizeandpopula tion of the municipalities vary greatly; in 2006, 73 percent of the local governments had a population of less than 2000 people (State Regional Development Agency 2006:10). In the Cēsis district, the Kaive rural municipalityhadmerely482inhabitantsin2001,equalling4.1inhabitantsper km2 (www.cesurp.apollo.lv 20050610). The high number of pagasts has

85 The Latvian local governments include 63 pilsetas (53 towns and 7 republican cities), 29 novads (amalgamatedlocalmunicipalities),and441 pagasts (ruralmunicipalities).Theregional governmentsconsistof26 rajons (districts,datingbacktotheSovietperiod),and7 republican cities(seeKingetal.2004).

235 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict turnedouttobearatherweakorganisationinthepostsocialistperiod,sincea lownumberofinhabitants(especiallythoseofworkingage)tendtogeneratea lowamountoftaxesforthemunicipalities.Moreover,thepoliticalorganisation ofthemunicipalitiesisalsoconsideredtohaveitslimitationsnotonlydueto their restricted size, but also due to the lack of experience of a more decentralised and ‘bottomup’ planning system compared to the Soviet era. Currently,aterritorialandadministrativereformistakingplaceinLatvia,which mayresultin50differentmunicipalitiescomparedtothecurrent556localand regional governments (Female representative Ministry of Regional DevelopmentandLocalGovernments,February2007). In terms of tourism development, the interview study showed that the localgovernmentsaretakingonaratherparadoxicalrole.Ontheonehand,the responsibilityfortourismdevelopmentandpromotionisbelievedtobeinthe handsofthestateortheprivatesectorduetothelackofcapital,humanre sources and experience on the local level. On the other hand, the local municipalitiesidentifiedtourismasoneoftheirpriorities,butclaimedthatthere wereunspecificregulationsof how thisshouldbedone.Thiswasalsodescribed asaresponsetothestatetourismorganizationsnotactivelypromotingandde velopingtourisminthecountryside. Nothing is done to promote tourism in other parts of Latvia except Riga. We are fighting everytime,togetherwithregionalandlocaltourismassociation,withthetourismdepartment, and for years they are giving more and more money to regions, but it’s nothing. They’re makingregionalinformation,onemapforeachregion;that’sall(Malerepresentative,Cēsis tourismcouncil,August2005). Eventhoughalotofhopewasputintotheroleoftheprivatesector,therepre sentatives from the rural municipalities expressed a concern that the entrepreneurswithinruraltourismwereconsideredto betoosmallscale and not enough investment and businessoriented. The interviewees expressed a needfor investment inlargertourismfacilitiesand other service facilities by ‘real’entrepreneurs,whichcouldaccommodateahighnumberoftouristsand conference attendees. The need for the ‘right’ type of investments was also regarded to be related to the ‘passivity’ of the local population as discussed above,representingatypeofmentalityandattitudewhichcouldberestricting rather than encouraging the development of tourism in the region. This was consideredtoberelatedtothecontinuityofaworkingmentalityfromtheSo vietperiod,whichdidnotmatchtherequirementsofthenewmarketeconomy in terms of skills, education and experience. Thus, as a result, the people in

236 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict volvedinruraltourismweredescribedastooopportunisticandinexperienced intheiractions,contributingtoashorttermanduncontrollabledevelopment oftourism,whichhadtoberegulated. Those who started to work in rural tourism in the beginning, then there were no rules or regulationsat all,orvery lowrequirements. But now the demands are much higher, which demandmoreprofessionalism(…)Thoseworkingwithinruraltourism,thosearenotprofes sionalsbutthosewhowantanadditionalincome.Oftenitispeoplewithpooreducation,but it requires professionalism to make people return (…) Many of therural tourismentrepre neursarenotmembersinanyorganization,thentheyarenotcontrolledbyanybody(Female TICemployee1,ruralmunicipality,August2005). Asaresult,alotofhopewasputin‘external’tourismactorsasthemaindriving forcesforruraltourismintermsofideas,strategiesandcapital,ratherthanmo bilizingthelocalpopulation. Conclusion Theaimofthischapterhasbeentoprovideaninitialframeworkfortheanaly sisofthefirstcasestudyofruraltourismintheCēsisdistrictbydiscussing Ge ographies of place, relating to local aims of tourism development, women and men’s positions in the labour market as well as genderised perceptions of ‘rurality’.Table9providesanoverviewofthechapteraswellasillustratingthe relations between Geographies of place (the Cēsis district) and the three Geographiesofneonationalism,Europeanisationandreliccommunismwhich together constitute what I have chosen to term ‘Latvian common space’. I regard Geographies of place and National common space as closely intertwined and related. Thus, analysing Geographies of place involves an illustration of the localoutcomesofLatvia’stransitionprocess,aswellashowthelocalbecomes acrucialpartofhowLatviaasanationisreimaginedandtransformedinthe postsocialist period. In previous chapters, I have emphasised how the transition process is genderised. I have started to explore how the local expressionsofthesegenderisedprocesses,aswellashowexistinglocalgender relations, affect the outcomes of the transformation process, which will be discussedfurtherinupcomingchapters. Perceptionsoftheruralconstituteanimportantdimensionofhowlocal communities contribute in the process of reimagining the national common space.Here,Idistinguishbetweenthreeinterrelatedapproaches,theruralasa nationalsymbol,theruralasasiteforconsumptionandtheruralasaproblem. Inthefirstcase,theruralisreimaginedinamoretraditionalandromanticised sense,becomingasymbolforalostnationalidentity,rebornintheattemptsto

237 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict

‘normalise’ rural space through decollectivisation and privatisation of the agriculturalsector. Table9:GeographiesofplaceintheCēsisdistrict. Geographiesofneo Geographiesof Geographiesof nationalism Europeanisation reliccommunism Geographiesof Theruralasa Theruralasasitefor Theruralasa place: nationalsymbol. consumption. ‘problem’. ‘Rurality’

Tourism Tourismasthe‘rural Tourismasasource Lackofresourcesand idyll’. ofeconomic experiencefor development. tourismdevelopment. Genderand Traditionalgender Focusontheroleof Menas‘passive’ work/livelihood relations. (genderneutral) womenas‘active’. externalactorsand entrepreneurs. Source: Based partly on literature discussing ‘rurality’, gender and rural tourism (see e. g. Sharpley In: Lew et al. 2004; Roberts 2001; Schwartz2006; Little2002), and partly on the interviewsconductedwithtourismactorswithinthepublicsector. Tourismhasbecomeanimportantchannelforcommunicating imagesofthe ‘ruralidyll’,includingaculturalandnaturalheritagemaintainedthrougharural ‘wayoflife’,whichisillustratedasdifferentfrommodernurbanlivingbothin Latvia and other parts of Europe. Highlighting the rural idyll through the development of rural tourism also tends to be based on traditional social relations both within the rural community and within the family, including idealsoffemininities,whichtendtoportraywomennotmerelyasmothersof thenation,butalsoasthebackbonesoftheruraltourismbusinesses. Ruralityisnotmerelyrecognisedasanationalproject,butisalsorelated to a much broader European context, reflecting policies of regional development,inhowtomoderniseanddiversifythecountryside.Theruralhas become a site for consumption through the development of tourism, apart from itspreviousroleasaproducerofagricultural goods.Thus,the rural is defined,accessedandreimaginedbyinternationalandurbantourists,andEU politicians apart from the ‘local’ inhabitants themselves. In this case, rural tourismtendstobevaluedintermsofits economic ratherthan symbolicsignifi cance,asaresourceforrecreationandlocal,regionalandnationalincome.The interviewstudyrevealedarelianceon external ratherthan internal resourcesfor thedevelopmentoftourismaswellasofothersectorsofthelocaleconomy, includingEUfunding,urbanentrepreneurs,investorsandcapital.Iraisedthe

238 Chaptereight–Geographiesofplace: rurality,ruraltourismandthelabourmarketintheCēsisdistrict questionofwhatgroupsshouldberesponsibleforeconomicdevelopmentand growth.Eventhoughnationaldirectivestendtorelyonofficialgenderneutral descriptions of the entrepreneur, they may be analysed as disguising more traditionalandmasculineperceptionsofthe‘rationalentrepreneur’ratherthan highlighting and encouraging local entrepreneurs and making women visible withinthisprocess. Asdescribedinthethirdapproachtorurality,theruralisstillperceivedas a‘problem’, in needofassistanceandas ‘laggingbehind’thedevelopmentin urban areas due to challenges such as urbanisation, demographic imbalances and economic decline. This is usually an image originating in urban areas, as well as being associated with policies set up by the EU in order to achieve growthanddevelopmentalsoinperipheraland‘depressed’regions.However,I have also pointed out how the perceptions of the rural as a problem are reproduced and rooted in a more local, rural context. I regard these more negative perceptions of the rural asbeing closely relatedtothepresenceand continuity of the Soviet heritage, as discussed in the chapter of relic communism,aswellasintheworkingidealsoriginatingintheSovietperiodas discussedinchaptersix.Inthiscase,theheritageoftheSovietperiodisnot regardedasanassetforthedevelopmentoftourism,butasanobstacleduetoa lackofexperienceandhumanresources.Theinterviewstudyshowedthatthe problems of the rural, represented through an overall passivity of the local population,hadamasculineratherthanfeminineface.Ruralwomenwerede scribedas‘active’inthelabourmarketaswellastakingthemainresponsibility forthefamily,whilethemenweredescribedasbeing‘depressed’and‘passive’ despitethefactthatmenwereperceivedashavingmoreopportunitiesinthe locallabourmarket.

239

240

Chapternine Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithin ruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict Thepresentchapterwilldiscusswomen’slivelihood strategies withinruraltour ism in the Cēsis district, with a focus on the background, intentions and motivesforemploymentandentrepreneurshipwithinruraltourism.Analysing livelihood strategies is a complex process, and one aim is to avoid focusing merelyontheeconomicpreconditionsforlivelihood.Theterm‘strategy’does notmerelyincluderationalandconsciousplanning,butonemustalsoanalyse strategiesinrelationtothelocalcontext,toseehowtheymaybeeithercon strained or encouraged through individual concrete and abstract conditions, suchaseducation,socialnetworksandeconomiccapital. Thecase study isbasedonthe mainresults ofa survey and interview study conducted in the Cēsis district. The survey included both women and menworkingwithinruraltourismasentrepreneursandemployeesinboththe publicandprivatesector,includingdifferentformsoftourismaccommodation, tourism activities and sites and tourism information centers. The interview study included women working as both entrepreneurs and employees within tourism, who were selected based on the interview study. Here, I will focus mainlyonthebackgroundtowomen’s entrepreneurship withinruraltourismand theirlivelihoodstrategies.Thereasonforthisistwofold;firstly,theshareof female entrepreneurs in the survey was larger than the share of female employees. Secondly, based on the rural setting andthe locallabour market, starting up a tourism business may constitute one of the few options for women’slivelihood.Theruraltourismsectoralsotendstobefairlysmallscale, which limits the number of regular jobs offered through larger private businesses. I will give examples of women’s livelihood strategies within rural tourismasemployees,withafocusonworkwithinthepublicsector.Thiswill serveasananalysisofwomen’spossibilitiesintherurallabourmarket,aswell asabackgroundtoupcomingdiscussionsofentrepreneurship.Thechapterwill discuss and highlight research questions such as, whatisthe backgroundfor women’s employment and entrepreneurship within rural tourism? Is

241 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict entrepreneurship within rural tourism a deliberately chosen lifestyle or a survivalstrategyintimesofextensivetransformation? The chapter will start by providing an overview of the results of the surveyconductedintheCēsisdistrict,byhighlightingthemainfeaturesofthe respondentsandthemainmotivesbehindworkwithinruraltourismasrevealed in the outcomes of the survey. Thereafter, I will report on four employees withinruraltourism,whowerepartoftheinterviewstudy,anddescribetheir motivesbehindworkwithintourismanddiscusswhatmeansforlivelihoodthe work within rural tourism provides, with a focus on the public sector. The remaining parts of the chapter are dedicated to women’s entrepreneurship withinruraltourism,basedontheresultsoftheinterviewstudy.Inthelatter sectionsIwillalsodrawparallelsbetweentheresultsandotherresearchstudies ofwomen’sentrepreneurshipfrombothapostsocialistandWesternEuropean context. Survey:generaloverviewofruraltourism The survey in the Cēsis district comprised a total number of 88 replies, of which59werewomen(67%)and29men(33%).TheCēsisdistrictconstitutes afairlyhomogenouspopulation,witharound80%ethnicLatvians,whichwas alsoevidentinthesurvey.AllrespondentsstatedthattheyhadaLatvianciti zenship and 94 percent specified Latvian as their first language. The respondentsalsoprovedtohavea‘local’profile;72percenthadlivedattheir current place of residence for 11 years or more, and around20 percentalso statedthattheywerebornand/orraisedatthegivenplaceofresidence.How ever,nineoftherespondentsspecifiedlargercities,suchasJūrmalaandRigaas theirmainplaceofresidence,indicatingthattheyonlywerelivingintheCēsis districtduringthesummermonths.Around58percent of bothwomen and menhad some sort of higher education (university or collegeeducation), but onlythreeoutof59femalerespondentshadhighereducationfromthetourism field.Theagedistributionwasfairlyhomogenous,where80percentofthere spondentswere36yearsorolder(seeFigure15).Thehigherageisespecially evidentamongthemalerespondents,ofwhicharound70percentwere46years orolder.Thepatternforthefemalerespondents’age interval shows a more even distribution. The age distribution is also reflected within the household andfamilystructure.Eightytwopercentoftherespondentswereeithermar riedorlivingwithapartner,andonlyninepersonsstatedthattheydidnothave anychildren.Amajorityhadtwochildren(46%),butaconsiderable shareof the respondents (36%) had three or more children. A large share of the

242 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict respondentshadchildrenovertheageof18,butin67percentofthecasesat leastonechildwasstilllivingathome. Figure15: Agedistributionofsurveyrespondents.

25 23

20

16 15 Women 13 Men 10 10 9 7 Numberofrespondents

5 4 2 2 0 0 24years 2535years 3645years 4655years 55years Source:Author’ssurveyintheCēsisdistrict2005. Aroundtwothirdsoftherespondentsstatedthattheyhadworkedthreeyears ormoreintheircurrentjobwithintourism(seeFigure 16). The figures also showadifferencebetweenthesexes;52percentofthemalerespondentshad workedsixyearsorlongerwithintourism,comparedto25percentofwomen. Figure16: Numberofyearsatcurrentworkwithintourism.

25 23 21 20

15 15 Women 15

Men 10 8

Numberofrespondents 6 5

0 Lessthan2years 35years 6yearsormore Source:Author’ssurveyintheCēsisdistrict2005.

243 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

Tourismtendstohaveahighseasonality,whichalsowasevidentintheresults ofthesurvey.Eventhougharound60percentofbothwomenandmenstated thattheyworkedallyearround,theyspecifiedthat“Idecidemyownworking hours”, which rarely corresponded to fulltime employment. Those who did notworkwithintourismallyearroundspecifiedahighconcentrationofwork in the summer months between April and September. A majorityofthere spondents(65%)alsohadadditionalpaidworkallyearround.Themainsectors foradditionalworkforwomenwereeducation,agriculture/forestry,trade,and manufacturing.Menwerefoundmainlywithinagriculture/forestry,publicad ministrationandtrade. Themainmotivesbehindworkwithinruraltourism Around fifty percent of the female respondents and 75 percent of the male respondentsspecifiedthattheyhadtheirownbusinessofsomesort(selfem ployed, family business, company owner). The remaining respondents stated that they were permanently, temporarily or seasonally employed. As will be describedlater,themorepreciseshareoffemaleandmaleentrepreneursshould beanalysedwithsomecaution.Theinterviewstudyrevealedthatsomewomen were officially registered as employed within a business owned by their husbands,whileinfacttheywereactivelyrunningandmanagingthebusiness. Inordertogaininsightintodifferentmotivesbehindthedecisiontowork within tourism, the survey contained 15 different statements relating to this topic. Differing motives was also a key theme in the interview study with women working within rural tourism, in order to connect their decision to widerquestionsconcerningthelabourmarket,genderrelations,etc.Thesurvey showsamixofbotheconomicandsocialfactorswhichaffectthedecisionto workwithintourism.Ontheonehand,tourismisconsideredtoofferachance of employmentandadditional income. A majority of the femalerespondents ‘stronglyagreed’or ‘agreedmore orless’tothestatements,“Ihadfewother employmentoptions”(88%),“Ineededadditionalwork”(52%),and“Iwanted tohavemyownindependentincome”(74%).Ontheotherhand,79percent disagreed tothestatement, “I wasunemployedand needed a job”. In other words, the basic foundation for women’s livelihood was already in place, throughanothertypeofjoborincome.Themoreeconomicmotiveswerealso reflectedintheanswerstomoreopenendedquestionsofthesurvey,relatingto themotivesbehindworkwithinruraltourism.

244 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

1)Additionalincomewasneeded.2)Thepropertiesaresituatedinabeautifulplace,onthe shore of a lake, which is one of the main factors for attracting tourists (woman, 44, self employed). Ilikeworkingwithpeople,goodenvironment.Iwanttohaveamaterialbaseforthepension days,tobeabletoearnsomeadditionalmoneyformypension(woman,45,companyowner). These answers also highlight other more social and lifestyleoriented dimen sions of work within tourism apart from pure economic motives, as well as making references to the character of surrounding natural landscapes. Sixty ninepercentexpressedconsenttothestatement,“Iwantedtoworkinapleas antphysicalenvironment”.Referencestotheruralsceneryandlandscapewere alsomadeinthemoreopenendedquestionsofthesurvey, emphasising the willingnesstocommunicatenaturalandculturalexperiencestotourists,andto developthelocalcommunity. Firstofallthereisamissionandunderstandingthatweneedtodevelopoursmallcornerof Latvia.Secondly,thewillingnesstoshowittoothersaswell.Butnowsometimesthereisa willtohideitfromothersaswell(woman,43,unspecifiedworkposition) Intermsofthesocialmotivesforworkwithinruraltourism,53percentofthe femalerespondents‘stronglyagreed’tothestatement,“Iwantedajobinwhich Icouldmeetpeople”.Intheopenendedquestionsofthesurvey,emphasiswas alsoputonthetypeofworkruraltourismincludedintermsofworkinghours, selffulfilmentandflexibility. Iamcompletelyresponsibleformysuccessandfailure.Icanregulatetheworkintensityon myown.IdonotfeelthatIowesomethingtosomeone;itisrathertheotherwayaround (woman,43,companyowner). TwentyyearsagoIwasforcedtochangemyfieldofemployment(…)Ibelievedthattourism wouldbeanindustrywhereIcouldfulfillmyself, influence, many meetings, nonordinary, interestingthings(…).Iamcommunicative;Icandealwithdifferentsituations(woman,54, employee). Morefamilyorientedmotivesforworkwithinruraltourismalsobecameevi dent,and69percentofthewomen‘stronglyagreed’or‘moreorlessagreed’to thestatement,“Iwantedtobeabletocombineworkandfamily”.Theoppor tunity to combine work and family was also expressed in the openended questions.

245 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

Myhusbandstarteditandsomeonehadtocontinue.BecauseIhave3smallkids,currently thisisanidealpossibilitytobetogetherwithkidsandatthesametimeearnabit(woman,29, companyowner). Employmentwithinruraltourism Theinterviewstudyincludedfouremployeeswithinruraltourism,mainlyem ployedwithinthepublicsector(seeTable10).Thissectionwillgiveexamples ofhowwomenhavefoundtheirwayintoruraltourismasemployees,basedon their livelihood strategies,andwhat meansand conditions for livelihood the employmentwithintourismmayoffer,withafocusonworkwithinthepublic sector. Table10: Femaleemployeesincludedintheinterviewstudy. Family Residence Tourism Alona,31 Single Riga Employeeatpublic museum Iveta,47 Divorced,liveswithher Riga Employeeatstateowned daughter fishcultivationfarm Justine,29 Cohabitee,twochildren(3,5) Cēsisdistrict Managerataguesthouse livewithhermother Liga,53 Widow,twogrownup Cēsisdistrict Employeeatpublic children,livestogetherwith hostel herfather Likethesurvey,theinterviewstudyshowsacombinationofeconomicallyand sociallyrelatedmotivesforemploymentwithintourism.Forthefemaleinter vieweeslivingintheCēsisdistrict,workwithintourismwasdescribedasoneof thefewemploymentoptionsofferedtowomeninthelocallabourmarket,at thesametimeastheystatehowtheyactivelyhadchosentoworkwithintour ismduetoitsservicecharacterincludingsocialcontactswithbothforeignand Latvian visitors. However, the motives for working within tourism also bear differences,andthenarrativesofLigaandJustinerepresenttwodifferentgen erationsofworkerswithintourism. Ligaisinherfiftiesandworkedatahotelinthenearbyareaduringthe Sovietregime.Shelostherjobattheendofthe1990s,whenthehotelwhere shehadworkedfor20yearswasclosedandprivatised. ItwasapitythatIhadtoleavethehotel.IthoughtthatIcouldbecomeanentrepreneuror something,butittakesalotofmoneyformaintenance.Youhavetohavealotofcapital,and Iwasnotsurethatitwouldworkout.WhenIlostmyjobIthoughtthatIcouldnotreturnto ajobasateachereither;Ihadnotworkedasateacherfor20years.Theonlyalternativewas thehostel,soIthoughtthatitwasworththerisk(Liga).

246 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

Today,Ligaworksasamanagerinapublicrunhostel,buthasalsoworkedas anentrepreneurwithinruraltourism.Ligaandherhusbandhadasmallerfarm withcowsandpigs,butsinceherhusbandpassedawayafewyearsago,shehas graduallyreducedherworkloadonthefarminfavourofherpaidworkatthe hostel.Shehasconsideredstartingherownbusinessagainwithintourismasan entrepreneur, but claims that she lacks the financial resources. Still, she emphasisesthatshewouldhavetheexperienceneededduetoherpreviousjobs inmanagerialpositionswithintourism,aswellasherpreviousjobasateacher. JustasLigahaddone,Justineactivelysearchedforajobwithintourism. ShestudiedinRigaforacoupleofyears,andcompletedaneducationasatour guideandworkedinthehotelsectorinRigaforafewyears.Justineisoriginally fromtheCēsisdistrict,butmetherboyfriendinRigaandwhentheyhadtheir firstchild,theydecidedtomovebacktoherplaceofbirth,mainlyduetoprac ticalandeconomicreasons.Shefounditdifficulttocombineafulltimejobin Rigawithfamilyresponsibilitiesandthereforedecidedtoreturntoherhome townwherehermothercouldhelpoutwiththechildren.Justinegotajobata guesthouse,andsheandherboyfriendmovedinwithhermother.Today,she combinesherjobwithparttimetourismstudiesatauniversitycollege,andhas completedfouroutoffiveyears. Ichosethisplacebecauseofthesalary;it’sbettercomparedtoCēsis.It’snotasgoodasin Riga,butbettercomparedtoCēsis.Twoyearsagothewagewasthemainissue.Alsothere wasthehotelownerinCēsiswhosaidthatIcan’tstudywhileworkingthere.Thatwasthe secondreason.SoIlookedforwhatIcouldget.Heretheyallowmetostudy,andtheyare gladthatI’mstudying(Justine). Liga’sandJustine’snarrativesoftheir motivesforworkwithintourismboth illustratedifferentlivelihoodstrategiesforhandlingachangingfamilysituation. InLiga’scase,employmentwithintourismwasconsideredtobeamorerational choicethanstartingupherownbusinessfollowingthelossofherhusband.For Justine,hercareerambitionswithinthetourismsectortookanotherturnwhen shestartedafamilytogetherwithherboyfriend.Eventhoughtheirsearchfor livelihoodrepresentsacertainadjustmenttochangingcircumstances,theystill hold crucial tools for a more independent livelihood, in terms of a higher educationandpreviousexperiencefromthetourismsector. Workwithinthepublicsectorasmeansforlivelihood Threeofthefemaleemployeesworkwithinthepublicsector,whichbothdi rectly and indirectly involves tourism activities and has strong roots in the

247 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict traditionsofworkduringtheSovietperiod. Theintervieweesdescribedwork withintourisminthe publicsectorashavingboth advantages and disadvan tages.Ontheonehand,itwasconsideredtoofferarelativelysecurejoband income in a rural labour market which offered limited opportunities for women.Inthiscase,thepublicsectoraswellasservicesandeducationwere described as the main alternatives for employment. On the other hand, the publicsectorwasalsodescribedasofferingpoorandinsufficientwages,aswell asrepresentingmore‘negative’workingSovietideals,which‘laggedbehind’in the development of tourism needed to meet the demands by contemporary tourists. Ivetais47yearsoldandlivesinRiga,butworks at a stateowned fish cultivationstationintheCēsisdistrictandisresponsibleforguidingvisitorsat thefarmespeciallyduringthesummermonths.SheisoriginallyfromRussia, butmovedtoLatviatogetherwithherhusbandaftermarryingandcompleting heruniversitydegreeinKaliningrad.Shehasworkedwithinthestatesectorher wholelife,butdescribesherinvolvementwithintourismasfairlynew.Opening upthefarmfortouristswasencouragedbybothprivateandpublicactorsin thearea,inordertoincludetouristattractionsalong newly developed hiking trails. For Iveta, tourism has indirectly become a partofher jobassignment, whichshehasbecomeinterestedin.However,shefeelsthatshedoesnothave enoughtimeforthetourists,andclaimsthatthefarmisnotadaptedtoreceiv ingsomanyvisitors.Moreover,Ivetaisnotpaidextraforguidingtourists,even thoughitmainlytakesplaceduringherlunchbreakorafterherregularworking hours. Idonotgetpaidextraforguidingthetourists.Theinstitutionwhichreceivestheincomeis relativelynew,andwearetryingtosolvethisproblemwiththeincomefromtourism.Ihope thatitwillbesolved;Idonotknow,maybeithassomethingtodowiththestate’spolicies, buteventhoughweworkextraandworkwithintourismweshouldgetpaid.Tourismisan extraworkloadforusrightnow,ontopofeverythingelse(Iveta). Ivetaemphasisedthatitisdifficultforhertoinfluencehercurrentlivelihood situation.Sheisinneedofanextraincome,butfindsitdifficulttocombineher currentfulltimejobwithanotherjobsinceshecommuteseverydayfromRiga totheCēsisdistrict.Herspecializededucationalsomakesitdifficulttofinda jobinotherfieldsofwork.Ivetaandherhusbandaredivorced,andshelives withherdaughterinanapartmentinRiga.Sinceherdaughterisalsoworking theycantogethermanageontheirincomes.Ivetaclaimsthatifshewouldhave livedonherown,hersalarywouldhavejustbeenenoughforherselftosurvive.

248 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

Alonais31yearsoldandworksasaguideatapublicmuseum.Forher,tourism isatemporarywayofsustaininglivelihood,andtofindadditionalincomeapart fromherprofessionasafreelanceauthorandtranslator.Shehashadseveral temporaryjobswithintheservicesectorinRigainordertosupportherselfas anauthor,andwasofferedthejobatthemuseumthroughafriendandcol leaguewhilelivinginRiga,butdidnotinitiallyhaveanyplansontakingthejob. AtfirstIdidnotfeelthatIwantedtomoveanywhere,totakeallmythingsandleave,and leavemyfriends.ThenalotofbadthingshappenedandIlostmyapartmentandhadno wheretolive.Threeorfourmonthshadpassedsincetheoffer,butthenIrealizedthatthis mightbethesolutiontomyproblems(Alona). ForAlona,thejobatthemuseummeantbothastableincomeandaplaceto live,sinceshewasofferedaplacetoliveonthemuseumpremises.Moreover, shedescribesthatthechoiceofworkalsoreflectsasearchforfreedomand independence, in order tocombine herrelativelyflexible working hours with herinterestinwriting.Still,Alonaclaimsthatshetendstoshouldertheroleasa ‘state employee’ in a more Sovietstyle fashion, which includes doing just as muchasyougetpaidfor.Sheadmitsthatshehasalackofmotivationforher job and takes little initiative, with reference to that it is a public institution dedicated to conservation rather than focusing on developing the tourists’ experienceofthemuseum. Thisisastateownedmuseum;ifitwouldhavebeenaprivatecompanyormyownbusiness,I wouldhaveconsideredtofixasaunaorfeatherpens,orallotherthingsthatwouldhavebeen interestingtodevelop(…)Iamnotmotivatedtodomorethannecessaryhere;Iwillnotgeta highersalary.IdoasmuchasIampaidfor(Alona). Inthiscase,theproblemswerenotconsideredmerelytoberelatedtoalackof moneywithinthepublicsector,butalsotothelackofmotivationamongthe workers.LigaalsoindicateshowthepreviousSovietlegaciesintermsofwork serve as obstacles within both her work and livelihood, and claims that she wouldhaveanotherattitudetowardsherjobatthehostelifithadbeenprivat izedand provided ahighersalary.Liga’smonthly salaryis170Lats,whichis oneofthehighestwagesamongtheworkersatthehostel.Shecomparesher salaryfromtheSovietperiod,whichcorrespondedtoaround100Lats,atime whenalltheemployeesatthehotelweregiventhesamepay.

249 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

IntheSovietperiodyoucouldmakealivingoutof100Lats,butnow,themoneyIreceive now,itishardtomakealivingon.Theinflationistoohigh.Ihavethefarmhere,andhave subsistenceagriculture.Igrowalmostallmyfoodhere;Idonotneedtobuyanything(Liga). Thestaffatthehostelconsistsalmostexclusivelyofwomen intheir40sand 50s.Ligaclaimsthatthemainreasonforthisisthelowsalarywhichdoesnot attractmen,whowouldratherchooseunemploymentthanapplyingforajob withintourism.LigaclaimsthattheSovietworkattitudestillcharacterizesthe publicsector,andthatshehasbeentoldbyhersupervisortofiresomeofher employees, but feels responsible for them since she knows how difficult it wouldbefortheolderwomentofindajobinthelocallabourmarket. Weshouldfiretwoofouremployees,butthereisstillsomesortofSovietthinking,thatyou cannotfireapersonthateasily,beforemakingsuretofindanotherplaceforthemtowork (…)Thereisonewomanwhoisnotinterestedinherwork;,sheonlycomestoworkinorder tositoffherhours,justlikeduringtheSovietperiod(Liga). Caught‘inbetween’differentidealsoflivelihood Liga expresses that the money generated from her job at the hostel is not enoughtosupportherselfandherfatherwholiveswithherandforwhomshe provides.Insomerespects,Liganowconstitutesthe family breadwinner and caregiver,shoulderingbothtraditionalmaleandfemaleroles,partlybyearning asufficientincome,andpartlybycaringforherfatherandtakingresponsibility forhergrandchildrenwholivenearby.Ligawouldliketoworkextrainares taurant at the hostel in order to achieve a higher income, but the new managementofthehosteldoesnotapproveofherextraduties. MyolddirectordidnothaveanyproblemswiththatIworkedthere,butthenewdirectorsays thatI’mfirstandforemostamanager,andthatitisnotappropriateformetoworkthere. “Theguestsshouldseeyouasamanager”,andIinterpretedthatasa“no”(…)Thedirector wantstoraisethestandardofthehostel,andthatmeansthattheymayhavehigherdemands onme,thatIshouldbesmarter,andthatIneedtodressbetter(Liga). Liga becomes in some way ‘caught inbetween’ different ideals of work and livelihood, partly restricted by structures dating back to the Soviet system in termsofthelowstatusandinflexibilityofthepublicsector,andpartlyaffected by new directives set up in the new market economy, advocating a more ra tionalandeconomicapproachtoworkandmanagement.Ligaclaimsthatshe doesnotfeelcomfortableinher‘new’roleasmanager,andexplainsthatshe worksmainlyinordertoprovidethenecessarymeansforherownfamilyrather

250 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict thantomeettherequirementssetupbyherdirector.Atthesametimeshewor riesaboutthefuture,andtheriskoflosingherjobandnotfindinganewonein thelabourmarket. Withherhighereducation,Justinetendstobe‘outofplace’inthelocal community. On the one hand, she is overqualified for some of the jobs offered;butontheotherhand,shestillfindsitdifficulttofindajob,especially onewhichwouldprovideenough incometosupportherself and her family. Justine describes how she tends to be an exception from the younger generation’smigrationpatterns. Theyouthsaregoingtothecities.IfIdidn’thaveafamily,Iwouldgotothecity.Because hereIcoulddonothing(…)Womenhavehighereducationthanmenandthereforetheytend toleavethecountryside.Allthesepeoplewhohaven’teducation;theyonlyhavefourthgrade inschoolfinished.Alsopeoplemyage(Justine). Fromonepointofview,Justinetendstobreakagainstmore traditional gen derisedpatternsofworkandlivelihoodinherquesttomakeacareerwithinthe tourism sector, which she describes is uncommon among women who have remainedinruralareas. It’sveryimportantformetomakeacareer.It’soneofmyissues.Ihaven’tdiscusseditwith myboyfriend;maybehedoesn’tlikethis.Heneedsmoreeducationtomakeacareerhimself.I willdoitdespiteofwhathethinks.Heknowsit’simportantforme.BecauseIamlikethat. Whatisimportantiscareerandeducation.Iliketobeindependentandtohavemyownin come(Justine). Despite her quest for a sufficient and more independent income, Justine describeshersalary as low in comparisontoherprevious jobs in Riga. Her boyfriend works as a carpenter; he gets an official minimum wage, but the monthlyincomeisaroundtwoorthreetimeshigherduetotheuseofunofficial wages. At the moment, she and her boyfriend providearoundequallytothe householdbudget. Myboyfrienddoesnothaveaproblemwiththis,eventhoughinLatviathestereotypeisthat themanshouldsupportthehousehold.Sometimesthemencannotlivewiththethoughtthat thewomanearnsmore.ButIthinkmyboyfriendalsowouldfeelbadifIearnedmorethan him;it’sbecauseofthestereotypesinsideofus(Justine). Fromanotherpointofview,Justinealsodescribesherselfasrequiredtoliveup tomore‘traditional’genderideals.Shehasbeenrequiredtopostponehercareer ambitions temporarily due to her obligations in the family and the need to

251 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict spendtimewithherchildren.Hertimeforstudies,workandthefamilyiscon stantlybeingnegotiated,oftenattheexpenseofherchildren,whichalsocreates aguiltyconscience. Ruralentrepreneurshipwithintourism Amajorityofthefemaleemployeesintheinterviewstudydescribedentrepre neurship within tourism as a ‘positive’ alternative to employment, especially among those working in the public sector. However, starting up one’s own businesswasconsideredtobeasignificantandriskydecision,whichwouldre quirelargeinvestmentswithmoreuncertainoutcomescomparedtocontinuing one’semploymentwithinthepublictourismsector.Thereisalackofresearch withfocusonruralentrepreneurshipinpostsocialistcountriesingeneraland studies which apply a genderperspective more specifically (see Henshall Momsen 2005). Moreover, the limited studies which have been conducted rarelyfocusonmorespecificbrancheswithintheservicesectorsuchasrural tourism.Entrepreneurshipingeneraltendstobebasedoncapitalistnormsof profitmaximisationasdiscussedinpreviouschapters,markingitasoneofthe centralcomponentsinordertocompletethetransitionprocesssuccessfullyin postsocialistcountries. HereIwillarguethatentrepreneurshipwithinruraltourismneedstobe analysedfromamorediversifiedapproach,includinghowentrepreneurshipisa genderisedconcept,revealingperceptionsofmaleandfemalecodedworkand activities.Iwillalsoraisethequestionofwhetherornotruralentrepreneurship inpostsocialistcountriesshouldbeanalysedastaking ‘different’ expressions comparedwithitsdevelopmentinmore‘mature’economiesinWesternparts of Europe and Scandinavia. In this case, I will discuss the results of the interviewstudyinrelationtopreviousresearch,partlyintermsofhowwomen inpostsocialistcountriesare‘pushed’or‘forced’intobecomingentrepreneurs duetoeconomicreasonsratherconsciouslychoosingthisstrategy,andpartly,I will draw parallels to how research especially in Western European countries has emphasised the social and cultural dimensions of women’s entrepreneurship,whichmayincludemore‘lifestyleoriented’motives. Genderedentrepreneurship Nilsson (2004) emphasises how research on entrepreneurship claims to be ‘neutral’initscharacter,butthatlanguage,textsandconceptsoftenbearmas culine attributes and symbolism, which make women invisible both as entrepreneursandresearchers(NilssonIn:Ericsson2004).Getz(2004)empha

252 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict sises that entrepreneurship per definition is often given merely an economic meaning, focusing on individual profitseekingand innovation. Entrepreneur shipisinthiscontextdescribedasamore‘rational’andmasculinewayofdoing business.Womenontheotherhandtendtobecome‘invisible’intheirroleas entrepreneurs,eitherinthecontextofcoownershipwithinfamilybusinesses, orduetotheiroverrepresentationwithinsectors with less economic ‘status’, suchastheserviceorculturalsector,withalargeshareoffemaleemployees (Getz2004). Holmquist and Sundin (1989) claim that women’s entrepreneurship can bedescribedintermsofsubordination,adjustmentanddependence.Women’s entrepreneurshiptendstobeunderestimated,bothinregardtoitsnumbersand economicmeaning.Beingafemaleentrepreneuralsoinvolvesahigherdegree ofadjustmenttofamilyconditionsandresponsibilities,ofwhichworkingonly parttime could be one strategy. Therefore, men’s entrepreneurship and women’sentrepreneurshiphavedifferentconditions,andthemotivesbehind startingupabusinessdifferaccordingly.Inotherwords,profitseekingmight beofsecondaryimportance,whilemorefamilyorientedmotivescouldbemore prominent.Atthesametime,womenactivelyavoidbeingcategorisedasentre preneurs. Entrepreneurshipisanalltoopowerfulandmasculineword,itmightthreatenthewoman’s femaleidentity,thefamilyfocusandalsothehusband’sselfesteem(Homquist&Sundin1989 In:Lönnbring2003:49.Author’sowntranslation). Thisisparticularlyevidentwithinfamilybusinesses,wheretheownershiptends toberegisteredonbehalf ofthehusband,butwhere the husband and wife shareworkandassignments(Lönnbring2003).Butwhythenisitcentraltoput focusonwomen’sentrepreneurship?HolmquistandSundin(2002)arguethatit isnotrelevanttomakewomen’srolesasentrepreneursvisible,sinceitmight result in highlighting women’s entrepreneurship as something deviant com pared to more masculine norms about entrepreneurship. The wish to make womenvisibleintheirrolesasentrepreneursisbecomingevidentwithin re searchofentrepreneurshipinpostsocialistcountries(seee.g.Welteretal.eds 2006;HenshallMomsenetal.2005).Welteretal.(2006)emphasisetheneedto recognise women in transitional economies in their roles as entrepreneurs as significantcontributorsinthetransformationprocess,sincetheygeneratenew economicactivitiesaswellasjobopportunities(Welteretal.2006).Inthiscase, entrepreneurship tends to be portrayed as providing purely positive ‘new’ opportunities for women, including work within tourism. It is crucial to

253 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict emphasis how entrepreneurship as a concept can be analysed as a social construction, thereby revealing its traditionally and predominately masculine character(Holmquist&Sundin2002).Ahl(2002)claimsthatthereisaneedto avoidanalysingwomen’sentrepreneurshipas merelyrelatedtoadiscourseof entrepreneurshipassomethingpurely‘good’,bothforthedevelopmentofthe societyatlargeandasa‘solution’towomen’sadvancementinthelabourmar ket. Entrepreneurship as such may not always challenge existing gender relations,butmayreflectandreproduceunequalpowerstructuresbetweenmen andwomeninboththepublicandprivatespheres(Ahl2002). Women’sentrepreneurshipintheCēsisdistrict Intheremainingpartofthischapter,focuswillbeputonthefemaleentrepre neurs who were part of the interview study, in order to analyse their main motivesandstrategiesforbecomingentrepreneurswithintourism. Table11: Femaleinterviewees,ruraltourismentrepreneurs. Family Residence Tourism Anna,46 Married,three Riga Holidayhomeand Housewife, children(18,22,24) skiing Employee/entrepreneur Brigita,49 Married,oneson Cēsisdistrict Countryhome Entrepreneur (27) Elena,44 Married,three Cēsisdistrict Camping,tour Employee/entrepreneur children(15,20,24) activities Ella,30 Married,two Cēsisdistrict Camping,farm Entrepreneur children(3,6) activities Evija,43 Separated,onechild Cēsis Holidayhome Entrepreneur (22) district/Riga Dace,55 Cohabitee,two Riga Guidedtours Housewife/ children(30,28) unregisteredentrepreneur Helena,35 Married,two Cēsisdistrict Holidayhome Entrepreneur children(3,9) Ilze,39 Married,three Cēsisdistrict Holidayhomes,renting Entrepreneur children(7,14,18) outequipment Kristine,45 Cohabitee,two Cēsisdistrict Holidayhomes,renting Entrepreneur children(8,19) outequipment Liene,46 Divorced,three Cēsisdistrict Countryhome Teacher,selfemployed children(12,15,19) Sandra,29 Married,three Cēsisdistrict Holidayhome Entrepreneur children(5,3,3 months)

254 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

Iwill discussdifferent motivesand strategies of livelihood connected to the questionof why womenhavebecomeentrepreneurswithinruraltourism.Here, economicmotiveswillbeputinrelationtomoresocialand‘lifestyleoriented’ motives.The interviewstudyincludeswomenin microbusinessesandfamily businesses as coowners and owners (including sole proprietors and self employed).However,somewomenwerenotofficiallyregisteredascoowners orownersofthebusinesses,eventhoughtheyshoulderedthemajorityoftheir maintenance,bothinpractical,managerialandadministrativeterms.Moreover, itisimportanttostressthatentrepreneurshipmayalsoincludeunregisteredand unlicensedbusinesses,whichhasbeenacommonfeatureinthedevelopmentof entrepreneurship in postsocialist economies (see HenshallMomsen 2005; Welteretal.In:Welteretal.2006).Thisalsobecameevidentinmycasestudy, eventhoughtheruraltourismbusinessesexisted‘officially’ in tourism maga zinesandinrecordsofruraltourismbusinessesprovidedbythelocaltourist informationcentres. ‘Survival’strategies In the interview study, more economical and livelihoodrelated motives and strategieswereevidentamongmanyofthefemaleentrepreneurs.Someofthe femaleintervieweesdescribedhowtheycametothecountrysidefromRigaor other cities during the Soviet occupation together with their husbands after beingsenttoworkinthelocalkolkhoz.Afterindependencetheyhadlosttheir jobs,andstartingupabusinesswithintourismhadappearedasoneofthefew incomealternatives.Insomecases,itevenbecameanacutelivelihoodstrategy, asaresponsetochangingsocialandeconomicconditions. Liene has been selfemployed for six years, and runs a small Bed and Breakfastbusiness.ShegrewupinRiga,butwassenttoworkinCēsistogether with her husband after finishing art school, where they were given the rare opportunityofbuyingtheirownhouseinthecountryside as newly educated specialists at the local kolkhoz. Liene and her husband divorced a few years aftertheLatvianindependence,andshedecidedtostayinthecountrysideand keepherhousetogetherwithhertwoteenagesons.Atthistime,sheworkedat two different elementary schools, but still did not manage to provide a sufficientincomeforthefamily.Summerwastheperiodinwhichshehadtime off work, and tourism was considered to be one of the few options for additionalandseasonalwork.Lieneexplainshowshedecidedtostartherown businesswithinruraltourism.

255 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

When I got divorced I stopped working within my profession (as a designer). I needed to adjustandfigureoutwhatIcoulddohereandnowinordertoearnmoney.Ruraltourismwas onealternative,butourhousewastoosmalltoreceiveguestssincethesecondfloorofour housewasnotfinished.Asateacher,thespringwagehastobeenoughforthewholesummer, andifyouspendallthemoneyonrenovations,thenyouwouldhavetoeatgrass.SoIapplied toLC(thenationalruraltourismassociation),Ididn’thaveanymoneytopaythemwhenthey camehere,buttheysaidOK,andthenwestartedtoreceiveguestsandliveintent.Itwasabit extreme;assoonastheguestsarrived,wehadtomoveoutfromourhouse.Wechangedthe locationofthetentafterthreeorfourdays,sothatthelawnwouldn’tbecomeyellow.Butmy childrenlikedit(Liene,femaletourismentrepreneur). Liene’sstoryhasparallelstopreviousstudiesinpostsocialistcountrieswhich havetendedtofocusonhowentrepreneurshipingeneralandactivitieswithin rural tourism more specifically have appeared as a ‘survival’ strategy for achievingnewmeansoflivelihoodincome.Nikula(2004)claimsthatamajority oftheentrepreneursinruralareasintheBalticcountriescanbedescribedas ‘accidental entrepreneurs’, representing “a personal endeavour, taken on by coincidence, or compelled by substandard levels of income“ (Nikula In: Alanen2004:136).Inotherwords,startingupabusinesswithinruraltourismor othersectorsisconsideredtobeastrategyforeconomic survivalandmight appearasoneofthefewwaysofsecuringanincome.Thus,theentrepreneur’s ownpersonalinterestinthebusinessisconsideredtobeofsecondaryimpor tance, as well as the expansion of the business, duetoalowturnoveranda needforreinvestments(Nikula2004In:Alanen2004). Themotivesforentrepreneurshipareoftendividedinto ‘ push’ and‘ pull’ factors,ofwhich,forexample,economichardshipsuchasunemploymentmay be considered to be a negative ‘push’ factor, while a wish for a more independent lifestyle and work may be considered as a more positive ‘pull’ factor.The‘push’factorsareoftenconsideredashavingastrongerinfluencein transition economies, which are considered to create a type of ‘reluctant’ entrepreneurship (Smallbone & Welter 2001). The ‘forced’ entrepreneur in postsocialist countries has also been given more feminine characteristics. HenshallMomsenetal.(2005)describemen’smotivesforentrepreneurshipas more related to a wish to make economic profits compared to female entrepreneurswhowereestimatedtoconstitutealargershareofthose‘forced’ into entrepreneurship due to economic reasons and family responsibilities (HenshallMomsenetal.2005:76f).Ifinditimportanttoacknowledgethateven ifthecircumstancessurroundingthedecisiontostartabusinesswithintourism might be analysed as ‘accidental’, the strategies used to put the ideas into

256 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict practicearefar morecomplex, includingovercominganumberofdifficulties andobstaclesalongtheway. Lieneexperiencedseveralchallengesinheraimtostartherownbusiness, duetoherroleasasinglemother.Itwasdifficulttogetbankcreditsandloans, andmanyofherfriendsandfamilydidnotsupportherdecisionsincetheydid not believe that Liene would be able to support herself and her children withoutthehelpofherhusband,andtheytriedtopersuadehertomoveback toRigaagain.Still,Lienewantedtostayinthecountrysidewhereshebelievedit waseasierforhertocombineworkandfamilythanifshewouldgetanewfull time job in Riga. Initially, Liene planned to buildanew guesthouseforthe tourists,andwantedtobuyanoldtimberedhousewhichcouldbetakenapart andtransported toherproperty. The plans were not realized andshehad to comeupwithanotheridea. MyfriendsandfamilydidnotthinkthatIwouldsucceed,“Youcannotevenhitanailwitha hammer,howwouldyoufixthis?”.Thensomekindofextraorganinsideofmestartedto work,“Icandoeverything!”(…)Iwasvery,verystressed.Icouldnotsleepandtheonly thingthathelpedwashardwork.SoIwentuptotheatticandstartedcarryingoutallthesand on thesecond floor.Icontinued every dayfrom twoo’clock in the afternoon until two at night,thenIsleptverygoodatnight(…)ThenIrealizedthatIhadremovedalltheinsulation inthehouseandwestartedtofreeze(Liene). Liene renovated the attic of her house, and made it into the family’s space, whiletheroomsonthefirstfloorbecameguestroomsfortheruraltourism business.Eventhoughherstrategiestobecomeanentrepreneurweremainly economicallyrelated,shehadaclearideaoftheaimsofherproject,whichalso involved creating a livelihood base for her and her children which corre spondedtoanideaofabetterwayoflife. Iknowthatsomemenwouldnotbeabletohandlethiskindofjobstomakesuchalarge renovation,andIhadanideatomoveawholehouse.Therearefamiliesnowinwhichthe womentelltheirhusbands:“Lookat(Liene),shehasrenovatedawholefloorandyoucannot even renovate a room!”. And they reply, “Why are you talking to me, talk with (Liene)!” (Liene). Insomecases,becominganentrepreneurwasdescribedasastrategyforwork related to the difficulties of finding work in the local labour market. The womenintheinterviewstudydescribedtheirruralareaasdecayingduetothe migrationtoRigaorabroad,joblosses,andeconomicandinfrastructuralde cline.Manywomenexpressedaconcernthatitwasmoredifficultforwomen

257 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict tofindworkcomparedtomen,whichreflectsthecurrentlabourmarketsitua tiondescribedinthepreviouschapter. Elena runs an agricultural business together with her husband, and combinesitwithreceivingtouristsduringthesummerseason.Sheworkedasa communicatorduringtheSovietperiod,andclaimsthatherchancestogeta job in the labour market are very limited, due to the small number of companies inthe surrounding areas.Elena has receivedajobofferfromher previousemployer,butturneditdownduetothelowwageitwouldgenerateas anemployeewithinthepublicsector. It’seasierformentofindwork.Mydaughterwasattheunemploymentagencyandtheyonly offeredworkformen,justafewforwomen.Theproblemismen’sattitudes,theyrefuseto workforsuchlowwages.Theythinkit’smuchbettertositathomeanddonothing.Halfof theLatvianpopulationisinIreland.Wholefamiliesareleavingthecountry.Iknowmanywho have left.Many of my daughter’s friends are abroad,but my children are still here (Elena, femaletourismentrepreneur). Despitethefactthatwomenexperiencedlargerdifficultiesinthelabourmarket, womendescribedthemselvesasmore“active”andgoalorientedthanmenin theiradjustmenttothechanginglabourmarket,whilemenwereportrayedas passive“victims”withalackofinitiativetaking.Thewomenemphasisedhow manyruralresidents,andespeciallymen,tendedto“fallintodepression”and alcoholproblemsduetothechangingruraleconomicstructure. The tourism sector was also described as one of the few choices for starting a business, given the physical delimitations of the surrounding landscape. Youcannothavestockraisinghere;youcannotworkasafarmer.Tourismisoneofthefew optionsifyouwanttostartyourownbusiness.Thesoildoesnothaveagoodquality,andthe landscapewiththehillyterrainmakesitdifficulttocultivate.Sheepfarmingcouldbeonepos sibleoption;thatistheonlythingpeoplecoulddohere(Ilze). ‘Lifestyleoriented’strategies Theincomerelatedmotivesbehindthedecisiontostartupabusinesswithin rural tourism were important for a majority of the female interviewees. However, the interview study also revealed social and individual motives for entrepreneurship,whichcouldbedescribedashavingmore‘lifestyleoriented’ characteristics.Inthiscase,startingupone’sownbusinesswithinruraltourism involved different ‘pull’ factors, including how entrepreneurship became ac

258 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict tivelychosenforpersonalfulfilment,reflectingadeliberatelychosen‘lifestyle’ orawishtobeone’sownboss. Intheinterviewstudy,manyofthefemaleentrepreneursemphasisedhow they haddeliberatelychosentostart up a businesswithinruraltourismsince beinganentrepreneurwasconsideredtohavemoreadvantagescompared to workingasanemployeeona‘9to5job’.Inotherwords,beinganentrepreneur was nothing they felt they had been ‘forced into’ due to economic circumstances.Theadvantagesofworkingasanentrepreneurweredescribedas involvingalotoffreedom,autonomy,flexibilityandindependence. Helena, a former family worker in her midthirties, who runs a rural tourismbusinessdescribesthepositivesidesofentrepreneurshipasfollows. HereI’mmyownboss;Idecidewhattodo.It’smuchbettertobeabossthananemployee.I likebeinganentrepreneur,tobeaboss.Wehadaninternherelastsummer,andIwasin somewaysherboss,butevenifwewouldhavehadfiveemployees,Iwouldhavemanaged fine.Havingmyownbusinessinvolvesindependence,youcandowhatyouwant,thereisno onewhogivesordersandpointsatthingstodo.IfIdon’twanttowork,thenIdon’twork (Helena,femaleentrepreneur). Entrepreneurship within rural tourism was often describedasbeingfarfrom the‘original’definitionoftheword,andsomeofthefemaleintervieweeseven considered‘entrepreneurship’tohavenegativeconnotations.Havingabusiness within rural tourism was regarded asbeingbeneficial inmanydifferentways, butnotmerelyinordertomakeagreatdealofmoneyortomakelargeplansor projectshappen. Brigita,whoownsaBedandBreakfastbusinessasacomplementtoan agriculturalbusiness,distancesherselffromtheterm‘entrepreneurship’bythe following. Idon’treallyseemyselfasanentrepreneur.Idon’thaveasetpriceforguestscominghere.If Iseethattheydon’thavesomuchmoney,Ichargethemabitless.Iappreciatethecontact withpeopleinstead.Buttheprofitthinkingisalwaysthere,I’mnotworkingforfree!(Brigita, femaleentrepreneur). The more ‘lifestylerelated’ strategies behind women’s entrepreneurship have beenhighlightedinanumberofcasestudiesconductedinWesternEuropean andScandinaviancountries(seeLönnbring2003;Foghagen&Johansson2004; Scholten 2003). Lönnbring (2003) underscores the importance of the socio culturalcontextforanalysingentrepreneurship,rejectingtheideaofentrepre neurshipasmotivatedbymerelyrationalandeconomicobjectives.Moreover,

259 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict shealsohighlightsthediversifiednatureofwomen’sentrepreneurship,inwhich thedecisiontostartupabusinessisnotmerelyaquestionofadjustingtomore structuralconstraints,butmayalsoserveasatoolandstrategyforfulfillingper sonalandindividualmotivesofindependence(Lönnbring2003). In the following sections, I will give an overview of the more lifestyle oriented motives behind entrepreneurship which became evident in the interviewstudy,byprovidingfourdifferentexamplesofstrategieswithinrural tourism; placerelated strategies , hobbyoriented strategies , businessoriented strategies , and familyoriented strategies . However, this categorisation is merely used as an analytical tool, with the purpose to extract and explore different livelihood strategies,andshouldnotbeviewedasaclearcutorstaticclassification.The categoriesarealsopartlybasedonpreviously discussed research of women’s livelihood strategies and female rural entrepreneurship (see Lönnbring 2003; Johansson & Foghagen 2004) 86 . The aim is not to make any generalisations about the motives and strategies behind women’s entrepreneurship, and it shouldbeacknowledgedthatdifferententrepreneursmightuseamultiplesetof strategiesandmotives. Placerelatedstrategies Thedistinctionsanddifferences betweenthe‘urban’andthe‘rural’wereevi dentinmanyinterviews,andthe‘rural’lifestylewasoftengivenmorepositive connotationsinrelationtothe‘urban’.Thisisaninterestingcontrastorpara doxcomparedtothemorenegativeimageofthecountrysidedescribedearlier, intermsofunemploymentand‘theruraldepression’.Here,oneimportantmo tiveforengaginginruraltourismwastobeabletocontinuetoliveandworkin the countryside in order to secure a ‘better’ way of life. More placerelated motives behind women’s entrepreneurship have also been evident in other studiesinSweden.FoghagenandJohansson(2004)identifyentrepreneurshipas astrategyforcontinuingawayoflifeintheruralareasonÖland,andasaway of contributing to developing the local community (Foghagen & Johansson 2004) 87 .Intheinterviewstudy,theplaceofresidencewasconsideredasimpor tant in many respects, both in relation to the rural natural settings and surroundingsandtoculturalremainsandtraditions.Ruraltourismasasector

86 Based on her empirical material, Lönnbring (2003) identifies four different categories of entrepreneurs; the familyoriented business owners , the genuine business owners , the involuntary business owners and theinnovativeandcreativeentrepreneurs (seeLönnbring2003:266f). 87 The study included an interview survey of 57 femalerun businesses which were active duringÖland’sharvestfestivalin2002.

260 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict wasconsideredtohaveanimportantroleinthiscontext,partlybyprovidinga meansoflivelihoodinordertocontinueanagriculturalbusiness,andpartlyasa wayofpreservingbothculturaltraditionsandnaturalsurroundings.Somefe maleintervieweesemphasisedhowtheyortheirhusbands had inheritedland andpropertythroughtherestitutionprocessatthetimeofindependence,and thatoneaimwastopreserveandcontinueforexample,anagriculturaltradition ortorenovatethefarmsteadwithcarefulmethodsinordertokeepitscultural heritageandvalue. Thewishtocontinuetoliveandworkinthecountrysidewasespecially evidentamongthosewhohadagriculturalactivitiesparalleltotheruraltourism business,sinceruraltourismwasconsideredtobeawayofpreservinga‘rural lifestyle’.Engaginginruraltourismcouldalsobeanecessaryeconomiccom plement to an agricultural business. Some of the interviewees had tried to sustain commercial smallscale agricultural activities together with their hus bands,butmostbusinesseshadbeenreducedtoaselfsufficientbasis,mainly duetoatoolowturnover.OthershavereceivedEUfundsfortherestructuring ofthefarmactivities,ofwhichruraltourismhasemergedasonealternativeto traditionalfarming.Thedecisiontocommitthemselvestoruraltourismcanin thiscasebedescribedasamorelongtermstrategy,includingamoreconscious planningprocessandaim. BrigitaandherhusbandmovedfromCēsistotheirfarmstead 14 years ago, just after the Latvian independence, with the aim of starting their own agriculturalbusiness.Theydidnothavefamilyorfriendsinthearea,butliked thesurroundings,andhadlookedforseveralhousesbeforetheydecidedtobuy theircurrentproperty.Brigitagrewupinthecountrysideinanotherpartofthe region,andmovingtothecountrysidewasalsoinawayareturntoanenvi ronmentwhereshehadlivedasachild.Duringthe1990s,sheandherhusband ranalargerfarmwithanimals,buthaveoverthelastfew years switched to organic farming, mainly for selfsupporting rather than commercial purposes. In order to make a living out of agriculture, a much more largescale farm wouldbeneeded,withmorelandandanimals.Inthisprocess,therewasaneed for diversifying the income from agriculture, and rural tourism became an option. Ifyouworkwithagriculture,itisimpossibletomakealiving;youhavetolookforanother job.Westillhaveagriculture,butthereisnotenoughincomefromit,sowehavetozeroon ouraccounts.Weonlyworktheland,sothatitdoesnotgointodecay(Brigita).

261 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

Brigita, just as some of the other female interviewees described the need to keepthelandscapeopenandthewishtocontinuetheiragriculturedespiteeco nomicdifficulties.Brigitaalsositsinawheelchairsince13yearsago,afteracar accident.Forher,theopportunitiestofindworkarequitelimited,andhersick pensionisnotenoughtomakealiving. Ihavenotlookedforajob,soIdonotknowmypossibilities.Ihavefoundajobmyself.I wouldnotwantaregularpaidjob,notconsideringthepayIwouldget.Itismuchbetterto runyourownbusiness(Brigita). ThebusinessisregisteredinBrigita’snamesincefouryearsago,withtheidea thatshewouldhavemoretimeforadministrationandbookkeepingsinceher husbandhasafulltimejob.Brigitaandherhusbandsoldanotherpropertyand putalltheirfundsintotheirhouse,butdidnotwanttotakeanyloans.Inthis case,theyhadthepossibilitytoreceivefundsfromtheEU,withtheaimtore structure the farm for organic agriculture. The benefits cover smaller investmentsforincreasingthestandardofthehouse.Theyclearedouttheattic oftheirhousetomakespaceforguestrooms. Fromthebeginningwethoughtthatwecouldofferaplacetostayforourfriends,butthen wedecidedtorentoutthespacefortourists.Itwasmyinitiative.Ihadworkedwithpeople before and was now sittingat home in mywheel chair; maybe it was the social contacts I missed(Brigita). Hobbyrelatedstrategies Theinterviewsalsorevealedruraltourismasanopportunitytocombinework and leisure, by developing a personal hobby or interest through the tourism business.Asmentionedabove,runningabusinesswithinruraltourismcouldin itselfbeviewedasleisureorasapersonalhobby.Amongthefemaletourism entrepreneurstherewereexamplesofresidentsfromRigawhohaddeveloped skiingandothersportactivitiesinthecountryside,andhowlocalresidentswith aninterestinstablinghorsesdevelopedtheseactivitiestoincludealsotourists. The hobby interest could be something individual or something they shared withtheirhusband. Kristinehashadherownbusinessforabouttenyears,andhasgradually developed horsebackriding activities related to tourism, since she and her husbandmovedtothecountrysidefromCēsis.Kristinegrewupwithhorsesat thefarmwhereshewasborn,wheretheywereusedwithinagriculture.Sheis educated within agronomy and trained horses also during the Soviet period, when she alsogottheopportunityto go abroad and compete in horseback

262 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict riding.Kristinestartedherbusinessbyrentingoutequipmentsuchasbicycles, tents,boatsandcanoestotouristsandhasdiversifiedherbusinessevenfurther toincludehorses,whichhasremainedhermainpersonalhobby. MyideaforthebusinessisthatIlikehorsesandthatitismyhobby.IhaddecidedthatwhenI havemyownhouse,IalsowantedhorsesandthatIwouldofferhorsebackridingtovisitors. ButIrealizedthatitisnotprofitabletohaveonlyhorses,justasonlyrentingoutboatsisnot profitable.Therefore,Iwantedtooffermoreproducts,whichwouldincreasethechancefor makingitprofitable(Kristine). The hobbyrelated strategies were also found among the‘urbanbased’entre preneurs,whocoulddevelopahobbythroughtourism,andwhoseworkwithin ruraltourismwasalsoapartoftheirleisuretime,andwasinitselfperceivedas a‘hobby’comparedtotheeverydaylifeinthecity. Annaownsabusinesswithinruraltourism,offeringaccommodationand downhill skiing activities for visitors. The interest for downhill skiing comes originallyfromherhusband,whoworkedintheskiingsectorforover20years, andsawthepotentialindevelopingtheskiingfacilitieslocally.Today,Annaand herhusbandshareanactiveinterestinskiing,andtheyarebothinvolvedinthe tourism business. Anna lives and works fulltime in Riga, but travels to the Cēsisdistrictalmosteveryweekendthroughouttheyear.Workingwithinrural tourismisdescribedasawelcomedcontrasttoamore‘urban’lifestyle. Ilikepeople,andIenjoythecontactwiththeguests.(…)IfIwouldhavehadacompanyin Riga,itwouldhavebeenaconsultingcompanyforbookkeepingorformakingbusinessplans, buttoreceiveguestsissomethingtotallydifferent.(…)ItisbetterfinanciallyinRiga.HereI haveonlyanegativebalanceinmyaccounts.Butitisbetterforthebrainandthehearthere. (…)InRigaIsitatmydeskinfrontofthecomputeralldaylong,hereIgetfreshair.Itisa different kind of work; in Riga I have more psychologically demanding work, here more physical.Butsometimesitisquitetiresometohavetwojobs,sincethereisnotimetorest (Anna). In this case, the economic motives are of secondary importance. Still, Anna describesheremploymentandincomefromherworkinRigaasaprerequisite forrunningherruraltourismbusiness,sincetheturnoverisstilllow.Annaand herhusbandhaveusedalltheprofitfromthebusinessforfurtherinvestments intheproperty,buttheyhopethatthebusinesswillexperiencefurthergrowth and make it possible for them to both live and work fulltime in the countryside.

263 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

Businessrelatedstrategies Forsomeofthefemaleentrepreneurs,startingtheirownbusinesseswascon sideredtobe more importantthanthechoice ofsector. However, the rural tourismsectorwasconsideredtobeoneofthefewalternativesforstartinga businessinthecountryside,apartfromanagriculturalbusiness.The motives forbeinganentrepreneurcouldinthiscontexthave more economic dimen sions,inadditiontoinvolvingindependenceandfreedom.Theaimofstarting upthebusinesswithinruraltourismwasforsomeawayofrealisingtheirown plansandprojects,whichincludedinvestments,profitseekingandsomedegree ofrisktaking.Ruraltourismisinthiscontextviewedas‘business’andman agement,andthefemaleintervieweesdescribedthemselvesasconfidentintheir roleasan‘entrepreneur’. Theinterestinruraltourismasa‘business’canbeviewedasrootedina higherlevelofeducation,aswellasbeinganexpressionfora more ‘urban oriented’lifestyle.Someofthefemaleintervieweeshadearlierworkedandlived in Riga, and had decided to return to their place of birth after marrying or getting a divorce. A few also had the experience of entrepreneurship from working inanotherformofbusinessor possessinga leading position in the private or public sector. Others had taken courses in business leadership or bookkeepinginordertodeveloptheirbusinesses.Thedecisiontobecomean entrepreneur was also described as a strategy to avoid more age and gender discriminatingstructuresinthelabourmarket.Inthiscaseitwasconsideredto beeasiertobeafemaleentrepreneurwithinruraltourismcomparedtohavinga leadingpositioninothersectors. Annais45yearsold,hasafulltimejobasabookkeeperintherestaurant sector in Riga and claims that being a ‘middle aged’ woman may have more difficultiesinfindingajob. Agecanbearestriction.Thereareoftenadsforbookkeepers,thattheyshouldnotbeolder than35years,andpleasesendaphoto…Whydoesabookkeeperneedtobeagoodlooking girl?(Anna). Evijaisalsoinhermidfortiesandhashadleadingpositionsinboththepublic andpoliticalsectorinRiga,butdescribestherealityasafemalebusinessleader withthreewords:“Discrimination,discrimination,discrimination”.Sheclaims thatitisdifficulttoachievethesamepositionasmen,forexample,asachair person in different committees, and has now started to limit her political assignmentsinfavourofherworkwithinruraltourism.

264 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

BothAnnaandEvijafindtheirrolesasentrepreneurswithinruraltourismasan alternativewayofrealizingtheirbusinessplansandinterestsandtousetheir experience.Inthiscase,neitheragenorsexisconsideredtobeaproblem,but ratheranadvantagefordevelopingtheirbusinesses.Inthiscase,thecountry side is viewed as a space for opportunities, gaining new possibilities as an ‘urban’entrepreneurandstillmaintainingthesocialandbusinessnetworksto Rigaandotherplaces. Makingacareerisimportantforme.Maybeit’ssomethingIhavefrommydad.Ihavealways hadleadingpositionswithinshops,whereIhaveworkedasadepartmentmanager.Idon’t likewhensomeoneelsecontrolsmywork,andIliketoworkbymyself.Thebestiswhenyou canplanyourself,andnooneiscontrolling.Idon’twanttositatthesameplacebetweennine tosix;Iliketoorganiseandtobeincharge(Anna). Entrepreneurshipwasdescribedasasortofselffulfilment,awishtofindnew challenges and personal projects. The female entrepreneurs had many ideas abouthowtofurtherexpandtheirowntourismbusinesses,andhowtoworkto furtherdeveloptheconditionsforruraltourisminthelocalarea.Atthesame time,runningthebusinesseswasviewedasahobby,reflectingapersonalinter estforbusinessandmanagement.Inamajorityofcasestheentrepreneurship was combined with fulltime or parttime employment, together with other activities, such as volunteer work and political assignments. The income and turnoverfromtheruraltourismbusinesswasnotconsideredtobecrucialfor their economic survival and livelihood. Instead, it was viewed as being some sortof‘bonus’andawayofachievingmore‘qualityoflife’,andtoincreasethe standardofliving,intermsofmorematerialresources. Familyrelatedstrategies Getz(2004)highlightsthefamilybusinessasanimportantpartoftourismin generalandruraltourismspecifically.Thereisalackofacommonlyaccepted definitionofwhatshouldbeincludedintheterm‘familybusiness’.Somedefi nitions stress the succession of the business within the family, while others emphasisetheneedsorgoalsofthefamily, putting their wellbeing in focus overtimeasakindof‘familyfirstvision’.Thefamilyorientedmotivescanalso gohandinhandwithmorelifestyleorautonomyrelatedmotives(Getz2004). Lönnbring(2003)alsoemphasiseshowentrepreneurshipmayservefamilypur poses,andbecomesastrategyforcreatingamoreflexiblewayoflife,guidedby thewishtoachieveagoodbalancebetweenworkandfamily.Shealsopoints out that the ‘family entrepreneurs’ tended to be guided by more traditional

265 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict genderrelationswithinthefamilyandthecommunity(Lönnbring2003).The family business as a concept has mainly been used in a Western European contextandisrelativelynewinpostsocialistcountries.However,theinterview study shows that rural tourism is one sector in which family businesses are common. In a majority of cases, the ownership and/or work was officially sharedbetweenamarriedcoupleorotherfamilymembers.Mostly,itwasthe womenwhohadbeenthemaininitiativetakersforthebusinessandwhowere moreactivelyinvolvedinthetourismbusiness.Themenusuallyhad another businessoractivitiesapartfromtourismonafulltimebasis,whilethewomen tendedtobeworkingmainlywithinthefamilybusiness,orhaveabackground as a housewife. Employment within rural tourism was in some cases also viewedasawayofgaininganindependentincomebythosewomenwhoearlier hadbeenworkingashousewives. Theywereusually highlyeducatedwithina profession,buthadstoppedworkingwhentheyhadmovedtothecountryside andstartedafamily. Beingahousewifewasdescribedasaconsciouschoice,tobeabletohave timeforthechildrenwhiletheywereyoungandavoidhavingtocommuteto workinalargercommunity.Still,tourismwasviewedasawayofcombining thedailychoresandfamilywithone’sownbusinessandactivities. Helenaisaneducatednurse,butstoppedworkingwithinherprofession aftermarryingherhusbandandmovingtothecountryside to her husband’s familyfarm.Herhusbandstartedanagriculturalbusiness,andHelenaworked within agriculture for some time, but became a housewife when the children wereborn.Helena’schildrenarenowthreeandnine years old, and she had decidedearlierthatshewouldbeathomeuntiltheywerefiveandcouldstart preschool.Shebelievedthatherchoiceofemploymentwaslimited,andthatit wasnotpossibletocommutetoalargercitytoworkasanurse.Daycareand schoolforthechildrenarealsolocatedsevenkilometresfromtheirhomeand todrivebackandforthistheonlyalternative. Youhavetothinkifitisworthittohavejob.Youhavetopayfortransportbackandforth, thenyouwillneedababysitter,andhowmuchdoesitcost,andisitworthit?Youmayeven earnmoneybybeingathome(Helena). Theideatostartabusinesswithinruraltourismwasconsideredattractivepartly for thepossibilityofcombining thechoresasahousewife, family and work within tourism, and partly as a way of gaining more economic independence fromherhusband.

266 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict

Thisismyincome,mywork;I’mearningmyownmoney.Notonlythiskindofeconomic maintenance,thisismyworkplace.It’simportantformetohavemyownincome.It’snot alwaysmoneyjustformyself,butIcanbuywhatIwantformeandformychildren,andI don’thavetoaskmyhusbandfor5Latstobuybread.(…)Ienjoymywork.It’smuchbetter beingwithtouriststhanmilkingcows(Helena). Someoftheintervieweesemphasisedthatlifeinthecountrysidewassomething they actively had chosen for themselves and their children, and that work withinruraltourismsuitedtheirlifestyle. Ella lived in Riga until she was 22 years old, and moved to the Cēsis districtwhenshemetherpresenthusbandwhoisoriginallyfromthearea.She hasauniversitydegreeasateacher,andshecontinuedtoworkinRigaasa preschoolteacher,butisnowrunningaruraltourism businesstogetherwith herhusband,providingcampingspacesandfarmactivitiesfortourists.Ellahas two children under the age of six, and she describes what advantages she considersruraltourismtohaveforherfamilyandforherchildren. Iwaswearing‘rosecoloredglasses’,andmyfamilyandfriendswereshockedbythefactthatI movedhere.AndnowIcannotevenimaginemovingback,notforanymoneyintheworld. (…)Thisismylifestyle;it’snotthebusiness,it’salifestyle.Mychildrenhaveeverything;it’s notallchildrenwhohaveallthis.Igivelovetomychildrenthroughtourism,theyhaveall theseanimals,andItrytogivethemknowledgeandthislove.InRiga,childrenhavenofresh air;itdoesnotexist.Childrenarenotallowedtodoanythinginthecity,butheretheycando everythingtheywish(Ella,femaleentrepreneur). Sandrais29yearsoldandhasthreechildren,ofwhichtheyoungestdaughteris onlythreemonthsold.SandraandherhusbandmetinRigawhentheywere studyingatauniversity,andtheymovedtogethertothecountrysideandthe areawherehewasbornandraised.Nowtheyliveinahousetogetherwithhis parents.Sandraclaimsthatitwasmainlyherhusbandwhowantedtomoveto thecountryside. I thought thatIwould live ina bigger city andthat I would work at a bank,or at astate institution.ThatwaswhatIhadimagined.Butthatwasnotwhathappened.Imovedhere (Sandra). Previously,Sandrahadajobatherhusband’scompany in Cēsis, and is cur rently on maternity leave, but runs a rural tourism business providing accommodationfortouristsduringthesummermonths,andhasbeenanactive entrepreneurforfiveyears.Sandradescribeshermotivesforengaginginrural tourismastohavesomethingtodowhensheisonmaternity leave,andshe

267 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict thinksthattourismprovidesrelativelyflexibleworkinghours.Ontheonehand, Sandraemphasisestheimportanceasawomantobeathomewithherchildren untiltheyarethreeyearsold.Ontheotherhand,shealsoregardsentrepreneur shiptobeoneofthefewviableoptionsforworkfor women with younger children.Sandraclaimsthatitisdifficultforwomentofindworklocally,but alsointhecities,especiallyifyouhavechildren. Whenyougotoajobinterviewandmusttellaboutyourself,theyalwaysaskhowmanychil drenyouhaveandhowyouwillhandleworkandfamily.Ifyouhaveafamilyitisdifficult, andyoucanjustforgetaboutthejob(…)Theythinkitiseitherchildrenorwork.Theonly optionistostartyourownbusinessorbecomeamanageryourself(Sandra). ForSandra,workwithinruraltourismisconsideredtobeatemporarysolution, untilherchildrenareolder,andthenshewantstodomorechallengingwork anduseherdegreeinbusinessmanagement.However,shecouldnotimagine onlybeingathomewithherchildrenwithouthavinganotherjob. IdonotknowifIwouldlikesittingathomeforthreeyearsallbymyselfandnotdoanything. Ruraltourismissomething,anactivitytofillmytimewith,tohavesomethingtodo,butitis reallyastepdown.Ifyouwouldbeathomeforsuchalongtime,youmightneverfindyour wayoutonthelabourmarketagain(Sandra). Diversifyingwomen’sentrepreneurship The interview study revealed both economic motives of ‘survival’ as well as morelifestyleorientedmotivesbehindwomen’sdecisionstobecomeentrepre neurs. The results of the interview study have parallels to both previous research of women’s entrepreneurship in postsocialist countries as well as studiesconductedinruralareasinWesternEuropeandScandinavia.Iwould suggestthat highlighting women’s entrepreneurship in postsocialist countries mayserveasawayof diversifying thecharacterofentrepreneurship,whichtends tobebased on malecapitalist normsandmodelsof economic growth. The emergenceofentrepreneurshipinpostsocialistcountries,suchasLatvia,may illustrate how the policies and aims of entrepreneurship may have different local outcomes,and interrelate with the sociocultural and economic context, includingexistinggenderrelations.Moreover,Iwouldalsoarguethatdrawing parallelsbetweentheemergenceofentrepreneurshipinpostsocialistcountries and‘western’capitalisteconomiesavoidstreatingthemotivesandoutcomesof entrepreneurship in countries such as Latvia as ‘deviating’ from established normsofentrepreneurship.BelowIwillhighlightandanalysebothsimilarities

268 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict anddifferencesbetweentheinterviewstudyandpreviousresearchin botha postsocialistandaWesternEuropeancontext. Ruralentrepreneurshipas‘developmentagainstallodds’ AnumberofsimilaritiescanbedrawnbetweenentrepreneurshipinLatviaand Scandinaviancountries.The‘profiles’oftheaveragefemaleentrepreneurshare commonfeatures,forexample,intermsofage(usuallyintheir30s40s),family (marriedwithchildren),companysize(smallercomparedtomen),andusually beingwithinatraditionallyfemalecodedsectorsuchastradeorservices 88 (see Welter et al. In: Welter et al. 2006). The norms of entrepreneurship tend to have ‘urban’ rather than ‘rural’ characteristics, highlighting mainly conditions and motives for entrepreneurship in larger cities and towns both in Scandinavian countries as well as in Latvia. However, entrepreneurship also needstobeanalysedinrelationtoaplacespecific rural contextinwhichitde velops,ashasbeendiscussedinthepreviouschapterof‘geographiesofplace’. Eventhoughtheruralandurbanshouldnotbetreatedastwoseparateunitsor ‘realities’,itisimportanttoemphasisethatrural entrepreneurship might take differentformsandexpressions(seeLönnbring2003). Different researchstudies inSwedenhave highlighted howthe shift of women’srolesfromemployeestoentrepreneurstendstoconstituteanimpor tantlivelihoodstrategyinruralareas,asaresultofageneralrestructuringofthe rural economy which provides a limited number of job opportunities and employmentwithinthetraditionalagriculturalsectors(seeFoghagen&Johans son 2004; Lönnbring 2003; Scholten 2003). Lönnbring (2003) describes how women’s entrepreneurship in rural areas of Sweden tends to increase, even thoughitcanbeanalysedasdeveloping‘againstallodds’.Thisincludesthefact thatfemaleentrepreneursbreakagainsttraditionalmalenormsofentrepreneur ship,aswellasthattheirbusinessesrelyonanexistingpoorruralinfrastructure, lackofsocialandeconomicservices,networks,andweakmarketscomparedto the often welldeveloped business environments found in urban areas (Lönnbring2003). Intheinterviewstudy,theeconomicandsocialdifficultiesinbecomingan entrepreneur was emphasised, both in relation to access to capital and social networksintheruralareas.Amajorityofthefemaleintervieweeswerereluctant totakeloansinordertoinvestanddeveloptheirbusinessduetouncertainties

88 SeealsoHolmquist&Sundin(1989)forananalysisofthe‘average’Swedishfemaleand maleentrepreneurwhichalsoshowssimilaritieswiththecharacteristicsprovidedbyWelteret al.(2006).

269 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict in terms of tourist demand and turnover, which were considered to restrict theirabilitytopaybackontheirloans.Thus,thedevelopment oftheir busi nesseswasdescribedasmovingstepbystep inaccordance to the access to incomeandfinances,andthataslowerandmorecarefuldevelopmentofthe businesswasperceivedtobemorepreferable.Inamajorityofthecases,itwas thehusband’sfinancialcontributionwhichwasdescribedasthemaininvest mentcapitalforthebusiness,eitherbyhisincomefromajobasanemployee oranentrepreneurasthemainsupporterofthehousehold,orthroughother sourcessuchascapitalgeneratedaftersellingpartsofforestorotherproperty. Thiswasoftendescribedasajointfamilyinvestment,butalsoreflectedthelack ofeconomiccapitalamongthefemaleinterviewees.Inmostcases,theydidnot havethesameaccesstopropertyorforestastheir malecounterparts, and if theyhadanadditionaljob,itwasmainlywithinaratherlowpaidsector. Accesstosocialcontactsandnetworkswithotherentrepreneursaswellas organisationsforsocialandeconomicsupportlocallyandregionallyalsoturned outtobeweakamongthefemaleentrepreneurs.Afewofthefemaleentrepre neurshadusedcontactswithindifferenttourismassociationswhenstartingup their own businesses. A majority claimed that they had received little or no supportfromthelocalmunicipalityintermsofservices,cooperationoreduca tion,andclaimedthatruraltourismwasnotconsideredtobeapriorityonthe local municipality level. The problems identified related to poor tourism infrastructure,roadmaintenance,roadsigns,provisionoftourismattractions, hiking trails for tourists and so on. Still, most of the female entrepreneurs consideredthecontactswiththetourisminformationcentresinCēsisorother placestobewellfunctioningintermsofinformationandregularcontacts. Recognisingthesocioculturalcontextforentrepreneurship Thedevelopmentofentrepreneurshipasaresponsetostructuralchangeandas astrategy‘againstallodds’hasparallelstotheinterviewstudyandstrategiesof ‘survival’andentrepreneurshipasmeanstosecureone’seconomiclivelihood. However, thedescriptions of the ‘forced’,‘accidental’and‘reluctant’postso cialistentrepreneurstendtofocusonhowfemaleentrepreneurs in particular differ from norms of the male entrepreneur in more ‘mature’ economies, in termsofaimsofeconomicgrowth.Thus,thereisaneedfordiversifyingthe imageofthefemalepostsocialistentrepreneur,whichdoesnotmerelymakea distinctionbetweenthe‘forced’andthe‘voluntary’entrepreneurasan‘either or’scenario,butrathertriestoregardsocioculturalandeconomicmotivesas interrelated.Moreover,examplesofthe‘reluctant’femaleentrepreneurarealso

270 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict foundinstudiesfromWesternEurope,bothintermsofhowwomenseefew alternatives for work and income in the local rural labour market and how entrepreneurshipmaybetheonlywayofmaintainingandpreservinganartistic orculturalprofession(seeLönnbring2003;Foghagen&Johansson2004). Ateljevic and Doorne (2003) argue that the western norms of entrepreneurship within tourism reflect paradigms of modernisation and development which are considered to be applicable in all social and cultural contexts.WithexamplesfromtourismdevelopmentinCroatia,theyclaimthat the economic focus of entrepreneurship tends to regard entrepreneurs in developing countries and postsocialist countries as deviant from the norm, whilenottaking intoaccounthowthesocial andcultural context influences entrepreneurialactivity. Asolelyeconomicinterpretationofentrepreneurshipintourisminthisregionisclearlyinsuf ficientto fully appreciate the cultural complexitiessurroundingthe place as an economy in transition(Ateljevic&Doorne2003:143). Ateljevic and Doorne’s critique underscores how entrepreneurship may take multiple and diverse forms and outcomes, which is the case in both more ‘mature’ economies and postsocialist countries. In line with their argument, Lönnbring(2003)emphasiseshowstrategiesofentrepreneurshipmaybeaway of preserving a traditional way of life and work. The emergence of women’s entrepreneurshipinSwedenisdescribedasapartofneoculturationprocesses takingplaceinruralareas,inhowitupholdsandmaintainsrurallifemodesand idealsofindependenceintimesofchangewhenthesecannotbeputintoprac ticethroughtraditionalwagedlabour(Lönnbring2003) 89 .Thus,thereisaneed forhighlightingthelocalandregionaldiversity,inwhichentrepreneurshipdoes notnecessarilyneedtobeaquestforsomething‘new’,butcanbeawayofpre serving and continuing existing and culturally anchored traditions, which are closelyrelatedtoplace(Ateljevic&Doorne2003). Basedonmyinterviewstudy,Iwouldsuggestthatthewomen’slivelihood strategiesasentrepreneurswithinruraltourismshouldnotmerelybeanalysed asan‘adaption’or‘adjustment’tothetransforming rural economy, by using entrepreneurshipasa‘new’sourceandstrategyforincome.Ashasbeenshown in the interview material, entrepreneurship is also used to maintain different previous traditional economic strategies, for example, by continuing a small scaleagriculturalbusinessanda‘ruralwayoflife’,whichhasparallelstomore

89 See Højrup(2003) and Jakobsen(1999)for a more indepth discussion of the life mode analysis.

271 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict romantisedidealsof‘rurality’asdiscussedinthepreviouschapter.Thisisre flected in both the ‘place’ and ‘hobbyrelated’ strategies, in which living and working in the countryside is considered to include personal and lifestyle oriented advantages. The familyoriented strategies also involve attempts and decisionstocreateagoodenvironmentforchildren intheruralareas, which were considered to have more advantages compared to the urban environ ments. Yet, this continuity of the livelihood strategies alsoincludestraditions andidealsrootedintheSovietpast.Womenareportrayedasmore‘active’than menintheinterviewstudy,whichalsohasparallelsto theempirical material presented in the previous chapter. Thus, women have a strong tradition of work,andbecominganentrepreneurcanbeanalysedasastrategyofcontinuing thiswishtocarryonworkingandearningone’sownincome. Consequently, the quest for entrepreneurship needs to be analysed in relationtothelocalsocioculturalsetting,andnotasmerelyreflecting‘external’ factors which may ‘push’ women into entrepreneurship in postsocialist countries on an ‘accidental’ basis as suggested by Nikula (2004). Henshall Momsen et al. (2005) describe rural women in Hungary as having different advantages for becoming entrepreneurs due to their previous skills and experiencefromtheSovietperiod,basedbothontherelativelyhigheducational levelaswellasexperiencefromtheservicesector. Manywomenwereemployedbythecollectivesinsmallmanufacturingbranchplants,orin servicessuchaschildcareorretailstoresorbookkeeping.Theseskillscannowbetransferred toselfemploymentintheprivatesector(HenshallMomsen2005:41). SmallboneandWelter(2001)alsohighlightthehigheducationalleveloffemale entrepreneursintransitioneconomies,whichtendstobehighercomparedto thatinwesterncountries,andhasitsbackgroundinthetraditionofhigheredu cationalsoduringtheSovietperiod(Smallbone&Welter2001).Thesepatterns were also reflected in the survey and interview study in the Cēsis district. Thirtyfourofthe59femalerespondentsinthesurveystatedthattheyhada highereducation(universityorcollegedegree),aswellashadamajorityofthe femaleentrepreneursintheinterviewstudy.Someofthemhadaneducation from the Soviet period, which had an orientation towards more agricultural professions.Forothers,workingwithintourismhadbeenachangeofdirection intheirprofessionallife,andworkingintourismandagriculturecouldalsobe described as a more lowqualified type of work compared to their previous skillsandeducation.Thiswasparticularlyevidentamongtheyoungergenera tion of women who had moved to the countryside after finishing their

272 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict universitydegreeandinasense‘adjusted’totheopportunitiesprovidedlocally. Still,someofthe intervieweeshada morebusinessorientededucationwhich they had acquired already before their work within tourism, which was consideredtobeagreatadvantageintheirworkasentrepreneurs.Knowledge injuridicalmattersandbookkeepingwasconsideredtobeadvantageous.Even thoughamajoritylackedexperienceofentrepreneurshipingeneral,someofthe femaleentrepreneursalsohadpreviousexperiencefromotherserviceprofes sions, for example work in restaurants and bars. Others highlighted more ‘peopleoriented’ professions, such as teaching, child care and health related professionswhich wereconsideredtobeimportantfor their communication skillsandserviceorientationwhenreceivingandworkingwithtourists. Conclusion The aim of this chapter has been to discuss women’s livelihood strategies withinruraltourism,withaparticularfocusonthebackgroundandmotivesfor femaleentrepreneurship.BasedontheinterviewstudyconductedintheCēsis district, entrepreneurship constitutes an important livelihood strategy for women,revealingbotheconomicandsocialor‘lifestyleoriented’motivesbe hindthedecisiontostartupabusinesswithintourism.Theeconomicmotives canbedescribedasresponsestowomen’sdifficultiesinfindingjobsintherural labour market, or the need for additional income within the household. The difficulties infindingworkwere emphasisedbyboth employees within rural tourism and the female entrepreneurs. For the employees, the service sector constituted one of the few alternatives for work, and working within rural tourismoftenincludedworkingwithinthepublicsectorwhichwasdescribedas offeringmainlylowpaidjobs,andrepresenting‘negative’Sovietworkingideals. Thus,thealternativeofstartingone’sownbusinesswasdescribedasattractive both among the employees and those who already had taken the step to becomeentrepreneurs.Inthiscase,entrepreneurshipwithintourismwasper ceived as offering possibilities to regulate their own working hours, realising individualaimsandachievingmoreindependentandwellpaidincome. Theinterviewstudyshowedthatthe basiceconomic livelihood for the familyorhouseholdinmostcasesalreadywasinplace,andworkwithinrural tourism wasdescribed moreas ameans for generatingan additional income. Thus, even though the more economic incentives for starting up a business withinruraltourismwereevidentwithintheinterviewstudy,Ihavesuggested thatwomen’sentrepreneurshipshouldnotmerelyberegardedas‘involuntary’ or‘forced’strategiesforsurvival.Emphasisingmainlythe‘push’factorsbehind

273 Chapternine–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict entrepreneurship also tends to portray entrepreneurship in postsocialist countries as ‘deviant’ from norms of the average entrepreneur, and I find it importantalsotopointoutthatstructuralandeconomicconstraintswhichmay guide the decision to become an entrepreneur are also found in Western EuropeanandScandinaviancountries. BasedonmyinterviewstudyIdistinguishamongfourdifferentlifestyle oriented strategies for livelihood: placeoriented strategies , hobbyoriented strategies , businessorientedstrategies and familyorientedstrategies .Iarguefortheneedofadi verse approach to women’s entrepreneurship in rural postsocialist countries, includingtheneedfor analysingentrepreneurshipasagenderisedconcept,as wellasacknowledgingthesocioculturalandruralcontextforentrepreneurship, andrecognisingthediverserangeofmotivesguidingthedecisiontobecomean entrepreneur.Women’slivelihoodstrategiesasentrepreneurscanbeanalysedas representingacontinuityofamore‘traditional’rurallifestyleandSovietideals of work rooted in the local sociocultural context. The female interviewees stressedtheimportanceofbeingabletoliveandworkintheruralarea,aswell ashowsmallscaleagriculturalpracticescouldbemaintainedthroughtourism activities. Theemphasisonthefamilyasthemainunitforthe‘rurallifestyle’also reflectsmoretraditionalvalues,includinggenderiseddimensionsasdiscussedin the previous chapter. However, women’s ‘active’ involvement within rural tourism as entrepreneurs also highlights more socialist ideals of work, distinguishingthemselvesfrom‘passive’men,andunderscoringtheimportance ofworkbothintermsofhavinganindependentincomeaswellasconstituting awelleducatedshareoftheruralpopulation.Atthesametime,thedecisionto becomeanentrepreneurwasalsoputintorelationto‘old’butremainingSoviet ideals of work within the public sector, in which entrepreneurship was consideredtobring‘new’opportunitiesoffreedomandflexibilityaspartofthe newmarketeconomy.

274

Chapterten Balancingeverydaylife: Women’slivelihoodpractices withinruraltourism The present chapter will focus on the female entrepreneurs’ daytoday livelihood practiceswithin rural tourism,in how theyplanand organisetheir lives in time and space, make their daily priorities and take part in different tourismandnontourismactivities.Here,Iwillcomparethelivelihoodstrate gies among the female entrepreneurs described in the previous chapter with their efforts in finding the ‘right’ balance between activities in the private sphere, including household work and family responsibilities, and the public sphere,involvingtheirquestforindependentincome,careeraspirations,leisure time,andsocialcontacts. Workingwithinruraltourismoftenmeansadissolutionoftheprivateand public, since the practices involved within rural tourism may be directed ‘in wards’totheprivatesphereand‘outwards’tothe public sphere at the same time. Within the private sphere, the tourism accommodation is, for example, offeredinpartsoftheentrepreneur’shouse.Oftenthetourists’stayoversin clude a cooked breakfast or another type of meal, which is prepared in the family’sownkitchen,thelaundryisdonetogetherwiththewashingofthechil dren’sclothes,thehomeisturnedintoacallcentreandareception,andatthe sametimefriendsandfamilypayvisits.Tourismisapublicactivity,andmost ofthefemaleentrepreneursintheinterviewstudydescribedtheirdailyroutines as‘goingtowork’,or‘startingtowork’withintourism,planningfortheirac tivitiesandtryingtoseparatework,familyandleisureactivities. The ‘private’ and the ‘public’ should not be analysed as two separate spheres, and the borders between the private and the public may dissolve throughlivelihoodpracticeswithintourism,andthecentreofgravitymaybe dislocatedfromonespheretoanother.Thus,thepublic, paid work may be come private, unpaid work, and private chores remain private unpaid duties. Withinthisprocess,theprivateandthepublicarerelatedtodifferentfeminised idealsofworkandlivelihoodasdiscussedinpreviouschapters,inhowdifferent

275 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism practices reflect or challenge the more ‘traditional’, ‘modern’ and ‘relic communistic’ ideals of work and livelihood. Analysing the balance and dissolutionbetweentheprivateandthepublicalsoreveals different paradoxes between women’s livelihood strategies on the one hand, and their livelihood practices ontheother,whichwillbediscussedinthelatterpartofthechapter. Privateremainsprivate:traditionallyorientedpractices Theoriginalideadescribedbyamajorityofthefemaleentrepreneurswasthat theruraltourismbusinessshouldbea‘commonproject’,involvingallfamily members,andinsomewayscontributetotheideaofa‘betterlife’inthecoun tryside.The‘commonproject’wasalsodescribedinrelationtotheeconomic supportreceivedbytheirmalecounterpartswhenstartingupthebusiness.Still, inamajorityofcases,whathadbeenoriginallyajointproject,becameinthe endmainlyworkforthewomaninthefamily,withthehelpofthechildrenor otherfamilymembersratherthanwithhelpfromtheirhusbands.Amoretra ditionaldivisionofworkwasdescribedbothwithintourismrelatedactivitiesas wellasinthehouseholdwork.Eventhoughsomeofthefemaleinterviewees claimedthattheirhusbandswereactiveinthebusiness,therewasacleardivi sion between ‘women’s’ and ‘men’s’ work. This was often claimed as having naturalandeven‘biological’origins. Maybewomenseethenuancesinwhatpeoplewant,theirneeds.Maybeitissomekindof femaleintuition.Allwomenarelikehousewivesreally,theycanunderstandtheneedsofthe guestsmore,cook,cleanandsoon;theyunderstanditbetterthanmen.Theaccommodation withinruraltourismhasalottodowithcaring;womenhaveitinsidethemselvessomewhere, thattheywanttocareforsomeone(Dace). Themaindutiesforthewomenwere,forexample,toreceiveandhavecontacts withtheguests,cookandcleantheroomsandfacilities,dothelaundryandgo shopping. The men, on the other hand, helped out with more traditionally ‘masculine’chores,suchasconstructionandrepairs,preparingwoodforheat ing,andonlyoccasionallyhavingcontactswiththeguests.Thehusbandoften hadafulltimejobasanemployeeorasanentrepreneur,andhadoftenwork inghourswhichmadeitdifficulttocombinetheirworkwiththeruraltourism businessatleastduringthesummermonths. Ilze’shusbandownsacarworkshopandworksfulltime. Myhusbandworks24hoursaday.Sometimespeopleevencallinthemiddleofthenight.He hasnothadavacationintenyears(Ilze).

276 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Helena’shusbandworksinthewoodprocessingindustry,asectorwhichwas common for some of the female respondents’ male counterparts. She claims thathedoesnothaveregularworkinghours,somedaysheworksmore,and some days less; but since he is a manager, he spends alotof time atwork. Helena’shusbandisofficiallyregisteredastheownerofthecompany,andshe is officially the ‘employee’. Still, Helena regards the business as largely ‘her business’,asacontrasttoherworkasahousewife.Herhusbandhelpsouton some occasions, but during the summer months, Helena hires a student in ordertomanagetheextraworkload. Theonlythingmyhusbanddoesistobringthewooddownhere(totheguesthouse)and chop it. Nothing more(…) He is involved in the business, but hedoesnot come here to sweepthefloor.Imanagefinealone.Inmyfamilyitiswomenwhodothistypeofjob.Butif Iwouldbeillorsomething,hewouldprobablydothechoresalso(Helena). Elladescribesthedivisionofworkbetweenherandherhusbandasfollows. I’mthebossforthe‘inner’partofthebusiness;Itakecareoftheanimalsandthetourists.My husband takes care of the ‘outer’ part; contacts with authorities, marketing and so on. We spendaboutthesameamountoftimeonthebusiness,ifIdon’tcounthouseholdworklike cleaning,washingandputtingthechildrentosleep.IdoallthatandIhavetofindtimefor thataswell.I’mthefirstoneupinthemorningsandthelastoneintobedatnights(Ella, femaleentrepreneur). Ellasaysfurtherthatthedivisionoflabourissomethingthattheybothhave agreedonandhasbecomea‘natural’partoftheireverydaylife. Ireallyliketodothe‘inner’partofthebusiness.Heenjoysgoingaroundtodifferentauthori ties and making contacts. And I think that if we both had been in the inner part of the business,therewouldhavebeenconflicts.Butsinceheisintheouterpart,andIaminthe innerpart,welikeitverymuchandwebothhaveourownfield(…)Everyoneshoulduse theirowntalent(Ella). Householdwork Amajorityofthefemalerespondentsclaimedthattheyspentmoretimethan theirhusbandsonhouseholdwork,whichwasalsoevidentinthesurvey.The surveyshowedthatwomenspentmoretimeonhouseholdworkcomparedto men.Moreover,womenalsotendedtodoamajorityoralloftheworkthem selvesandalsoengageinmanydifferenttypesofhouseholdactivities.Fiftyone percentofthefemalerespondentsclaimedthattheydidalloramajorityofthe work themselves, compared to 10 percent of the men (see Figure 17). A

277 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism majorityofthemalerespondents(11outof27)spentbetween110hourson householdworkperweek,whileasignificantshareofwomendidmorethan20 hoursaweekofhouseholdwork. Figure17: Divisionofworkbetweenthemembersofthehousehold.

35 30 30

24 25 Women 20 15 Men 15 11

Numberofrespondents 10

4 5 3

0 Idoall/amajorityofthe Isharetheworkequally Someoneelsedoesall/a work majorityofthework Source:Theauthor’ssurveyintheCēsisdistrict The survey included a question relating to what kindofhouseholdworkthe respondents engaged in, with the following alternatives: agriculture and hus bandry (for household needs), cleaning, cooking, and child care. Multiple alternativescouldbechosen,and44ofthewomen(79%)chosethreealterna tivesormore,comparedtosixofthemalerespondents(24%).Cleaningand cookingwerethemostcommonactivitiesforbothwomenandmen.Latvian nationaltimeusestudiesalsoshowthatwomenspendmoretimeonhousehold work.Astudyfrom2003whichincludedtimeusediariesfromaround 1400 respondentsinruralareas,concludedthatemployedwomenonaveragespent 12hoursmoreonhouseholdworkperweekthanmen,whichwasequivalentto atotalof25hours.Thesurveyalsoshowedthatemployedmeninruralareas hadmoretimeforleisureactivities,justover27hoursaweekcomparedto20.5 hoursforwomen( TimeuseofthepopulationofLatvia2005 ).Intheinterviewstudy, itwasalsoevidentthatamajorityofthefemaleintervieweesdidamajorityof householdchores.

278 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Cecilia:Howdoyoudividethehouseholdworkbetweenyouandyourhusband? Sandra: It isvery simple; he isnot here.If I askhimto do something, hemightfix a few things.Itismyhusband’ssisterandhismotherwhoalsohelpout.OtherwiseIwouldnot havemanageditonmyown. The female interviewees stressed how their work within tourism was closely interrelatedwiththeirhouseholdchores,andthatitwasdifficulttodrawaline betweenpaidworkandunpaidwork.Here,itbecameevidentthattourismasa ‘public’,paidjobbecameincorporatedintotheprivatearena,andincludedalso toalargeextentunpaidwork.Someofthefemalerespondents also claimed thatstartingaruraltourismbusinessbothhadincreasedthenumberofhouse holdchores,andthetimetheyspentonhouseholdwork.Helena,ontheother hand, claims that the workload has decreased since only working as a housewife,whichisaresultofthefamilyalsohavingreducedtheiragricultural business, and the chores within tourism being prioritised over those of the ‘regular’dutiesasahousewife. IthinkthatIhavelesshouseholdworknow.Earlierwehad50pigsandittookalotoftime tofeedthem,butnowwejusthave5.Nowruraltourismcomesinfirstplace;youcanmake moremoneyonthatthanfeedingpigs(Helena). Helenastillregardsherselfasbeingahousewife,andstilldoesamajorityofthe householdchores,aswellastakingcareofthefarmanimals,andanumberof wildhorses,thefamilydogsandbirds.However,comparedtoearlier,shegetsa monthlyincomethroughherworkwithinruraltourism. Someofthefemaleentrepreneurspointedouthowtheirhouseholdwork was given another meaning and purpose within rural tourism compared to earlier. It’sthecleaningwhichtakesupmostofthetime.Iwouldn’tsaythatIlikecleaning;whatkind ofawomanreallylikesitanyway?Butyoucanearnsomemoney,andinsomewayI’mfortu nate to get paid for cleaning the windows! The payment gives me some motivation, but I don’tfeelthatit’sadutyeither(Liene). Workwithintourismwasnotonlydescribedasbeingdedicatedforthetourists, butforthefamilyasawhole.Ontheonehand,tourismmeantmorework,but ontheotherhand,potentiallyarrivingguestswasconsideredtobeagoodex cusetokeepthegardenandfarmtidy,thelawnmowedandsoon. Brigitaalsostatesthatworkwithintourismoverlappedwithotherchores withinagriculture.

279 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

It is difficulttosay what is workwithin rural tourismand what isworkwithin agriculture. Today I will sort potatoes. When I make marinade and jam, that is also for the tourists (Brigita). Ilzeclaimsthatherhusbandworkstoomuchtohelpoutbothwithintherural tourismbusinessandtodohouseholdchores.Shegetshelpfromher18year old son, but describes herdaily routine especially during the summer asvery stressful,whenshespendsmorethan20hoursonhouseholdworkeveryweek. The family also owns another house next to their property which is Ilze’s responsibilitytocleanforguestsandotherfamilymembers. Igetoutofbedat6inthemorning,gotoworkat11,comebackat17,andthenworkuntil midnight.IfIhaveworkIwillgotowork;otherwiseIcanspendawholedayonhousehold chores.Thenyouhavetogoshoppinganddoerrands.ThereisonlyabankinCēsis,andyou cannotbuyfastfoodaroundhereeither,whichmakesmyworkmoredifficult.Goingtothe storetakesmeonehourbackandforth(Ilze). ‘Bound’intimeandspace Ashasbeendiscussedearlier,manyofthefemaleentrepreneursemphasisedthe positivesidesofentrepreneurship,suchas independence,flexibilityandfree dom,andthewishtocombineworkandfamily,assomeofthemainstrategies and motives behind the decision to start a business within rural tourism. However,therealityasanentrepreneurturnedouttobefarmoreparadoxical. Thefemaleintervieweesdescribedverylongworkingdaysduringthesummer and how they in some cases adjusted their daily routine to their husband’s workinghours,thehouseholddemandsandagriculturalchores,andthetour ists’needs.Consequently,theamountoffreetimewasquitelimited,aswellas thepossibilitytotakeavacation.Thefemaleintervieweesdescribedtheyearas divided into two separate periods of time, summer and winter,eachwith its owntypeofrhythm.Thehighseasonduringthesummermonthsbecomesthe mosthecticperiodwhenthemajorityofthetouristsarrive.Somefemaleinter vieweesexplainedhowtheyworkedtwelvehoursperdayduringthesummer season,andthattheyrarelyhadanyfreetimeontheirown. Mayisaterriblemonth.Thenyoucannotevenhaveacupofcoffee.Sometimeswehave600 visitorsperday.IntheendofMayIdonotevenwanttoseepeopleanymore(Ella). ForHelena,careful,detailedplanningisthekeyformanagingthetimepuzzle inordertohavetimeforbothherworkandherfamily.

280 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

WhenIplanforsparetimeitexists(…)MondaysandTuesdaysIdonothavesomuchwork, butFridaysuntilSundaysIhavemoretodo.WednesdaysandThursdaysInormallycleanthe guesthouseandgoshopping.IworkwiththehorsesonSaturdays(Helena). Despitetheneedforcarefulplanning,Elenaalsoregardsherworkwithinrural tourismasmoreflexibleandinvolvingless‘obligatory’choresthana‘regular’ job. ItisnotlikeastatejobwhereIhavetobefromeighto’clockuntilfive;everythingfloatsto gether, from early morning to late in the evening. The advantage is that you can decide yourselfwhenyouwanttodothings;ifyouhaveplannedtodosomething,youcandoitabit later.Itdoesnotbecomeobligatory,asrightnow,righthere(Elena). Ontheonehand,timewasnotconsideredtobeaproblem,sincethefemale intervieweesclaimedthattheycouldplantheirdailyroutineastheywished.On theotherhand,theyexpressedaneedformoreleisuretimesotheycouldspend moretimeontheirhobbies,orhavetimejustforthemselves.Themainperiod forrestandotheractivitieswasdescribedasthewinterseason,atleastforthose whodidnothaveanadditionaljobapartfromthetourismbusiness. Workwithinruraltourismdidnotonlytakealotoftime,butalsomade someofthewomen‘bound’tothehouseandtheirpropertyinamorephysical senseduringthehighseason.Theywererequiredtobe‘inplace’andavailable fortouristsaroundtheclockduringthesummermonths,inordertoanswerthe phoneandtakecareofarrivingguests. Inthesummer,itisverytiringtowork.Youcannotgoanywhere;youarestuckhereandhave noleisuretime.ItisverystressfulsinceIamalone.Iamnevercompletelyrested,andthenI amofftomysecondwork,andIhavenotsleptenoughandamnotrested(Ilze). Apartfromcombiningworkwithinruraltourismwithhouseholdchores,some ofthewomenlikeIlzehadasecondjob,whichtheyhadtofindtimefor.Ilze worksasacosmetologist,andhasherownpractice,whichisanadvantagesince shecanregulateherworkinghoursatthesalonandadjustthemtoherwork within rural tourism.Ilze has herown car whichshegoes to workwith, and accesstoacarwasconsideredasbeingimportantinordernottogettooiso latedintheireverydayroutines,andtomanageallthenecessaryerrands. Sandraisresponsibleforthemajorityoftheshoppinginthefamilyand describesherrestrictionsasthefollowingwhenshedidnothaveacar.

281 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Youcannotdoanythingwithoutacarhere.WhenIdidnothaveacar,Iwentwithmyhus bandtodotheshopping.Hedidnothavetimetodotheshopping,soIhadtorunbackand forthwithallthebags(Sandra). Liene,ontheotherhand,doesnothaveaccesstoacar,andtakesthebusevery daytogotoCēsisandhertwojobsasateacher.Shestartstoworkatanele mentaryschoolfromeighto’clockinthemorninguntil2pm,andthengoesto workatanartschoolfrom3pmuntil7pm.ShealsostudiespedagogyinRiga, andhastofindtimetostudyonweekdays,andthentravelsbybustoRigaon FridaysandreturnsonSaturdays.Thecoursesinpedagogyareconsideredtobe obligatorybyheremployerinordernottoloseherjobasateacher.Shespends alotoftimeonthebus,butalsoregardsitasgettingsometimeforherself. Ihavesomesparetime.Iborrowbooksfromthelibraryandreadalot;forexample,whenI get to the busstops afewminutes too early, I take out my book and starttoread. Istop readingwhenIgetoffthebusandgointothewoodstomyhouse(…)Youcannotseparate workandleisure.IonlygetsmallmomentsatthebusstoporwhenIeat(Liene). Nothavingacarrequiresmoreplanningandtime,alsoinordertocompletethe choreswithinruraltourism. Iwashanddrythelaundryathome,thenIgotoCēsistohaveitmangled.Ittakesalotof time,Idonothaveacar,andwhenIcanborrowacar,Itakebuildingmaterialandmylaun dryanddriveintotown(Liene). The restrictions in time and space were also considered to create a certain ‘isolation’,withfewcontactswithfriendsandsocialactivitiesinthenearbyarea. Someoftheyoungerwomenwhohadmovedtothecountrysideuponmarry ingalsoclaimedthatitwasdifficulttogetnewfriendsinthearea,intheirage and with common interests, and that they established their contacts mainly throughtheirhusbands.Sandradescribesherlifeasboundtothehouseandthe propertysheownstogetherwithherhusband.TheydonothaveInternet,and have to go to Cēsis to check her email, and also reservations for the rural tourismbusiness. Ihavenotsomanyfriendshere,mainlyacquaintances.Thepersonalnetworksslowlydisap pearwhenyoumove,anditisexpensivetomakephonecalls.Therearenopeopletospend time with here. But I have some contact with my husband’s female colleagues, but notso manyothers.Ourchildrengotothesamedaycarecenterandsoon(Sandra).

282 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Ellaattendsfolkdancinginalocalfolkdancegrouptogettoknowpeople,and describesitasverypositiveforherwellbeingandforherownleisuretime.Ella describesthefolkdancingasstronginthecountryside,andtheaimistopar ticipateinthenationalsonganddancefestival. Iamoneoftheyoungestones,butthereareatleastsomeparentswhoalsohavechildrenand notonlyoldpeople.Ialsolearnwhatisgoingoninthemunicipality.Igetkindofanother perspective,ofwhatishappeningrightthere.Ilivequitefaraway,anddonotfollowwhatis takingplacelocally(Ella). Still, Ella claims that the organizations mainly involve women. In the folk dancing,theorganizationhasproblemsinrecruitingmen.Ellaalsoplanstojoin alocalwomen’sclub,inordertoattendlectures,tripsandotheractivities.On thequestionofwhatmendointheirsparetime,Ellastates; WatchTV,drinkbeerandpickthemselvesintheirbellybuttons.Ithinkwomenaremore social,theyhavetotalkwitheachother.Myhusbandwouldbeabletolivealoneoutinthe woods;hewouldnotneedanyone.Forwomensocialcontactswithothersaremoreimpor tant.MencanjustsitallalonewithacanofbeerinfrontoftheTV(Ella). Combiningworkandchildren Working‘athome’alsoinvolvedtakingalargerresponsibilityforthechildren. Amajorityofthefemaleintervieweeswithyoungerchildrenuseddaynurseries fortheirchildrenlocallyduringthemainpartoftheyear,andwasquitesatisfied withthestandardandservicesoffered.However,thebusyseasonwithinrural tourisminthesummermonthsalsoconstitutedtheperiodwhenthedaynurs erieswereclosedforthesummer,andthechildrenspenttimeathome. Sandraclaimsthatshehasmoretimeforherselfduringthewinterseason whenherchildrengotothedaynursery,comparedtothesummerseason.She hasthreechildrenundertheageofsix,andsincesheisonmaternityleave,she takes the main responsibility of her children during the day. Her husband usually takes the children to the day nursery, which is located around 10 kilometresfromtheirhome,andSandrapicksthemupintheafternoon.She claimsthatitisdifficulttofindababysitterinthelocalruralareacomparedto thecity,butshesometimestakesherchildrentoafriend’shouseforplaytime. Yet,shewouldhavehopedthatherhusbandwouldtakecareofthechildren moreoften,buthecomeshomelateafterworkandhashobbieswhichtakeup alotofhistime.

283 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Whenmyhusbandgoeshuntinghejustleaves,anditismoredifficultformetodoso.Ido notwanttobeawaytoomuchsincemydaughterissosmall.Butitwouldhavebeenniceto beawayforadayortwo.Therearewomenwhoimmediatelyleavetheirchildrentoababy sitter. It is difficult to get my husband to take care of the children. If I would go to the movies,Iwouldhavetogointhemiddleofthenight.Ithinkitwouldbepossibleforhimto takecareofthechildrenmore,buthethinksitisimpossible.Sowequarreloverit(Sandra). Sandradescribesherselfasbeingtornbetweentheresponsibilityofherchildren andthewishtohaveherownbusinessandleisuretime,just as her husband has,andsheactivelyraisesthetopicfordiscussion.However,foramajorityof thewomenwithyoungerchildren,therewasconsideredtobealmosta‘natural’ divisionofworkbetweenmenandwomenwithnotonlyhouseholdwork,but also with the raising and taking care of the children. The husbands were de scribedasprimarily‘lookingafterthechildren’,whilethewomenactivelytook theroleas‘caretakers’and‘nurturers’. Themanjustlooksatthechildreninordertoseeiftheyarefullorhungry.Butwomenkeep wonderingallthetimeandaskiftheyhaveeatenornot(Ella). Mostwomenintheinterviewstudydidnotseeaproblemincombiningtheir workwithintourismandfamily,andemphasisedhowthechildrenhelpedout withdifferenttourismrelatedchoresandhowtherewasalwayssomethingfor themtodoonthefarm,andtohelpoutsomehowinrelationtothetourism activities.Thechildrenweredescribedassocialandenjoyedthecontactswith the guests. Some women expressed difficulties in balancing two roles at the same time, and they sometimes used time for the tourists which could have beenspenttogetherwiththechildren.Thelackoftimefortheirchildrenmade themfeel‘guilty’,andthedailyroutinewasaconstantnegotiationoftime,to havetimeforthechildren,forthemselvesandforthetourists. Helenaemphasisesthattheneedtohavetimeforherselfalsointerfered withthewishtospendtimewithherchildren. Ireadalot.Iclosethedoorandtellthechildrennottocomeintotheroom.Thechildrencan manageontheirown,andthenIalsogetsometimeformyself.However,itisdifficulttotell myyoungestdaughterwhoisonlythreethatIwanttositinpeace,andthatsheshouldnot comein(Helena). Still,Helenapointsoutthatthechildrenalwayscomefirst.

284 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

I’mamotherfirstofall,thenanentrepreneur.IguessI’mquiteflexible.WhenI’mcooking I’mthemothertomychildrenandthewifeofmyhusband;butwhenaguestcalls,I’mentre preneur.Iswitchbetweentheseroles(Helena). Publicbecomesprivate:‘reliccommunistic’practices Ashasbeendiscussedabove,theinterviewstudyclearlyshowedthatmanyday today practices of the female entrepreneurs was closely connected to the private sphere of the home and family. In this process, the ‘public’ tourism workwasturnedintoamatterofthe‘privatesphere’,notonlythroughmore ‘traditional’ practices, such as household chores and responsibilities for the family, but also through the way businesses were conducted ‘officially’ and ‘unofficially’.Inthiscase,thefamilyasaunitwasdescribedashavinganother function,astheonly‘reliable’institution,bothinrelationtootheractorslocally, butalso incomparisontostateauthorities.Itreflectedawishtodobusiness accordingtorulesandwishessetupbythefamiliesthemselvesratherthanby ‘outsiders’,whocouldnotbetrustedforavarietyofreasons. Smith(2002)discussestheculturaldimensionsofeconomicpracticesin postsocialistcountries,andrejectstheassumptionthatthefocuson‘survival strategies’ in most types of research often includes merely the responses to wards thedeteriorated economic situation withintheframeworkofthe‘new’ capitaliststructures.Heclaimsthattheeconomyofpostsocialiststatesneeds tobeanalysedasmuchmorediverseandmultiple,includingnotonlycapitalis ticprocesseswhichoftenaredescribedas‘hegemonic’,butalsononcapitalistic practicesoriginatingfromthecommunistsystem,togetherwithanagricultural heritage.Inotherwords,itisnotnecessarilymerely‘external’structuresthatthe local inhabitants respond to, but the practices must be analysed in the local socioculturalcontext.Inthiscase,thestrategiesusedintimesoftransforma tion might actually have a long historical and cultural tradition.Thus,people mayusebothmore‘formal’capitalistpracticeswhile still holding onto more ‘informal’practices.SmithquotesByrneetal.(1998); tostepoutsidetheconfinesofeconomicmonoism,wherecapitalismiseverywhere…This entails…revisioningtheeconomiclandscapeasalandscapeofdifferenceratherthansame ness, identifying both capitalist and noncapitalist… activities and the interactions between them(Byrneetal.1998:2In:Smith2002:235). Smith argues that practices such as subsistence agricultural practices and the exchange of labour between households could be relatedtoaSovietorpre Sovietcontextratherthanmerelyasaresponsetothedifficultiesexperienced duringthe‘new’capitalisteconomy.Thus,thepracticesnotonlyhave economic ,

285 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism butalso cultural dimensions.Duetostatecontroloflabourandpoliticsinthe publicsphere,theprivatespherereceivedaprominentroleduringtheSoviet period,askindofaplaceof‘refuge’. IwouldsuggestthatSmith’sanalysisisusefulalsoinordertounderstand women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourisminLatvia,andwhatroleand functionsthe‘private’spherearegiveninthetransforming countryside. The more‘informal’practicesdistinguishedintheinterviewstudycanbeanalysedas havingthreemainexpressions.Firstly,differentpracticesareorientedtowards keepingthetourismbusinessasa‘private’matter,intermsofunofficialpay ment transactions. Secondly, and related to the latter, is how the female interviewees tended to emphasise how their business development was con strainedbutalsodependenton‘problems’andattitudestowardsworkinthe community,whichwereconsideredtodatebacktotheSovietsystem.Thirdly,I willdiscusshowtheruraltourismbusinessesweresupportedbytheuseofsub sistenceagriculture,whichnotmerelywasdescribedashavingeconomicalbut alsoculturalandtraditionalmeanings. Ruraltourismas‘informal’business The female interviewees expressed a wish to control and regulate their own businessesaccordingtotheirownaimsandprioritiesratherthanbyrulesand regulationssetupbyauthoritiesandother‘external’actors.Thus,amajorityof thefemaleintervieweesclaimedthattheydidnotpaytaxesforacertainshare oftheirincomefromtourism. Kristinerentsoutequipment,suchasboats,bikesandtentstotourists, and has to pay 18 percent in taxes, compared to 5 percent for businesses involvedinaccommodation.Justasamajorityofthefemaleinterviewees,sheis responsibleforthebookkeepingwithinthefamilybusiness,andclaimsthathalf of her income from tourism would disappear through taxes if she would presentallherincomefromtourism. Twothirdsofourprofitisnotshownforthestateauthorities.NaturallyImakesomeadjust ments. If I am developing a larger project I present a larger share of my profits and what investmentsI havemade,and pay more taxes (…) Otherwise the questionwillbewhereI havegotthemoneyfrom(Kristine). Ontheonehand,Kristineclaimsthatthedecisionnottopresentalltheprofits inherbookkeepingisawayforthefamilyto‘survive’economicallyduetothe rules and regulations set up by the central authorities. On the other hand, Kristine,justasotherfemaleinterviewees,alsorefersto“howthingsaredone”

286 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism inthecountryside,andthatherpracticesareapartofageneraland‘traditional’ wayofdoingbusiness,aspartoftherural‘shadoweconomy’.Thematerialand productssheusedfordevelopingandinvestinginherbusinesswerealsobe lieved to be a part of the shadow economy, which also made it difficult to presenttheexpensesappropriately. The interviews revealed a pronounced distrust towards the public authoritiesintermsofhowmuchtaxestheypaidfortheirbusinesses,andhow muchtheyactuallygotbackthroughsocialservicesandotherbenefits. Thestateauthoritiesdonotcareabouthowpeoplesurvive;forexample,“areyouasingle motherwiththreechildren?Howareyoudoing?Howareyourfinances?”.Instead,youcan haverealproblemsifyoudonotpresenteverythingright.Buttakingmygirlstoschoolcosts 25Lats,andthereisnoonewhothinksthatIamnotdoingitforfree,thatcoststoo.IfIhad had four children, I would have had to pay 50 Lats per month, and who cares? No one (Liene). Otherincomesuchaschildbenefits,wasconsideredtobetoosmallevento countasanincomeforthehousehold.ForElenaandherhusband,thechild benefitisaround9Latseachmonth,whichdoesnotevencovertheexpenses todrivetheirchildrentoschool,includingchangingthespringsonthecarevery yearduetothepoorroadconditions. Wedriveourchildrentoschooleachday;itisaround10kilometerstotheschool.Wego theretwiceaday,sothatis40kilometersintotal.Wethoughtitwasaproblem,andweasked themunicipalityifabuscouldbearranged,sinceIhavethreechildrenandtheneighborshave children,sotogetheritwouldhavebeen1015children.Oneofourneighborsdidnothavea careither,soIdon’tknowhowtheymanagedtogettheirchildrentoschool.Iguessthey weredelayed.Butthemunicipalitysawthatwehadacar,andsaidthatwehadtodriveour selves,andthatwealsocouldbringtheneighbor’schildrenaswell(Elena). Inthiscase,the imageandpracticesoftheentrepreneurs were described as beingdifferentfromthoseofthe‘capitalist’modelofentrepreneurship.Instead localtraditionsofhowtorunbusinesseswerenotonlyameanstosurvivefi nancially,butalsoreflectedmoreculturaldimensions. Iguessentrepreneursshouldbeabletocalculatehowmuchhelosesandhowmuchhewins, totaketimeanddoyourbookkeeping,butIamnotgoodatthat.ItisOKthatyoucancon trolyourowntime,butattheendoftheyearwhenIneedtogatherallthereceipts,thenit mightbebettertodie(Liene).

287 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Within the context of developing rural tourism business as part of the ‘informal’economy, italso hasthe effectthatwomen toalarger extent than men in some ways became ‘invisible’ as entrepreneurs in the ‘public’ sphere, sincetheyofficiallywereregisteredas‘employees’ofthebusinesses,oftenfor taxreasons,andthemenremainedtheofficialownersofthetourismbusiness. In Elena’s case, she is registered neither as an employee nor as a housewifeandhasinsomesensefallen‘inbetween’theprivateandthepublic sphere. Iamnotregisteredasanemployee.Ijustcannotunderstandcertainthings;wehavehada large discussion with the tax authorities, and now my husband should be registered as the owner,andIshouldofficiallybehisemployee,eventhoughwedoeverythingtogether.Ijust cannotunderstandit.Welivehere,wehaveeverythingtogether,andthebusinessisnotthat big.Iwriteallthedocumentsandbookkeeping,butmyhusbandsignsthem.Hedoesnotlike paperwork(Elena). Onewayofregulatingtourismandadjustingittothefamily’sneedsandaims wastocontrolthetourism‘carryingcapacity’,inhowmanyvisitorsthefamilies receivedandwhatimpacttheywouldhave.Someofthe female interviewees expressedawishfornotattracting“toomanyvisitors”.Thishadnotsomuch todowiththeeconomicneedsofthefamily,butwithsocialaspects,ofhow muchthefamilywasconsideredtobeabletohandle.Therefore,someofthe businesseshadactivelychosennottodosomuchmarketingactivitiesandpar ticipateintourismassociations,butrathertrustthemouthtomouthmarketing. Thegeneralopinionwasthat“touristsshowupanyway”,andthatitwasim portanttobeabletosay“no”totouristsiftherewasnotenoughspace. Thelocalasaconstraint Ashasbeendiscussedearlier,thefemaleintervieweesstressedtheimportance offamilylabourwithinthetourismbusiness,eventhoughtheworkwasclearly dividedbetween‘women’s’and‘men’s’work.Theworkchorescouldalsoin volveanumberofrelativesandfriends.Ontheonehand,thebusinesseswere consideredtobetoosmalltohavepaid‘official’employeesallyearround.On theotherhand,apartfrommore‘economic’motives,therewasalsotheopin ionthatitwasdifficulttofind‘reliable’fulltimeortemporaryemployeeswho couldbetrustedwithinthesphereofthefamilybusiness.Thiswasrelatedto theviewoftheruralasa‘problem’discussedinpreviouschapters,whererural peopleingeneralandmenmorespecificallywerenotconsideredtobeinter estedinworking.Someofthebusinesseshad‘unofficial’employeesfortheir

288 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism businesses, especially during the summer, but they were rarely permanent employees. Ellahasengagedsixunofficialemployeesonatemporarybasisduringthe summer months. She claims that the main problem is that some employees, oftenmen,justdonotreturnafterbeingpaid,andusethemoneytobuyalco hol.Ellafindsitdifficulttotrusttheemployeesandtheirworkassignmentsget fairlylimitedtoagriculturalchoresratherthanreceivingtourists. Wefiredtwoofouremployees.Thelargestproblemonthecountrysideisnottheunemploy ment, but that people don’t want to work. If people don’t have any other interest than to drink,thenIdon’tneedthemhere.It’simpossibletofindreliablepeoplewhowanttowork (Ella). In some ways, Ella and other female entrepreneurs made a clear separation between‘Us’and‘Them’,whichwasreproducedintheirdailyactivities.Inthis case,thefamilybusinessandtheprivatespherebecametheonlyreliableunit fortheirownworkandemployment,whichwascontrastedtoothermembers ofthecommunitywhowerenotconsideredtobereliable.‘Theirmindset’was consideredtobedifferent,representingamore‘Sovietmentality’ofwork,with alackofinitiativeandgoalorientation,incomparisontothefamily’sownroles asentrepreneurs.Inthiscase,womenportrayedthemselvesas ‘active’,taking ontheirresponsibilityforengaginginboththeprivateandthepublicsphere, whichhasparallelstomoreSovietidealsofworkintermsofthe‘bravevictim’ asdiscussedpreviously.Actingthisway,theytookontheroleasentrepreneurs ‘againstallodds’,bothconstrainedandenabledbythelocalculture. Onlycrazypeoplebecomeentrepreneurs(…)Someentrepreneurshavecomeup,thenthey havebeenpusheddown,thencomeback,andthentheyarepusheddownagain(Ella). Elenaandherhusbandarecurrentlyworkingonrenovatinganoldtraditional farmstead into aholiday home fortouristsandfor their children when they cometovisit. Whatisdifficultistofindpeoplewhocanwork,qualifiedworkerswithahighmotivationfor working.Myhusbanddoeseverythingsocarefullyandwell.Wedonotlikewhenpeoplework toofastandunprofessional.Theideawastohireacompanyorqualifiedworkers,butitistoo expensive,andtheyaretoobusy(…)Whenmyhusbandworksonthehouse,hetriestoput hisheartandhissoulintohiswork.Whenworkerscometheyonlythinkofmoney(Elena).

289 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Additionalinformallivelihoodpractices Apart from the abovedescribed ‘informal’ practices,suchasunregisteredin come and the use of family members as workers within rural tourism rather than official employees, women also used family substance agriculture as an additional source of livelihood. In a case study from Slovakia, Smith (2002) arguesthattheuseofsubsistenceagricultureisnotmerelyaneconomicsurvival strategyinthepostsocialistcontext,butthatthetraditionofhavingplotsfor growingvegetablesandotheragriculturalproductsforfamilyusewascommon alsoduringtheSovietperiod,bothinthecountrysideandintheoutskirtsofthe cities.Smithclaimsthatsubsistenceagricultureismainlyusedasasupplement tofoodboughtintheshops,andthatitisalsoconsideredtobeahobby,rather anaimtogrowallproductsforhouseholdneeds.Anargumentwasalsothat thisfoodwas‘cleaner’thanfoodboughtintheshops,andthereforemorepref erable.Smithalsostatesthattheworkwithagriculturalproducts,forexample, preservingvegetables,wasmainly‘women’swork’(Smith2002). Schwartz(2006)alsopointsoutthattheSovietagricultureinLatviahada ‘dual structure’, and consisted both of largescale collective farms as well as smallplotsfor householdneeds,andinsomecasesalsoalimitednumberof animals.The individualplotsweresometimesevenmoreproductivethanthe kolkhozes. Official tolerance ofthis individual sector allowedamuch larger proportion of Latvians to continue farming– and tofinditrelativelylucrative –than would have been possible in a marketeconomy.The vinsēta wasbulldozed,inotherwords,butavestigeofownerlaborer’s intimate relationship with the land survived in the form of the household plot (Schwartz 2006:82). Thus,theuseofsubsistenceagriculturecouldbeanalysed asan intermixture betweenmore‘traditional’Latvianagriculturalidealsandaneconomicpractice rooted in the Soviet period. In the interview study, work within subsistence agriculture was described as an important part of some of the female interviewees’dailyroutine.Itwasespeciallyevident among those who earlier hadhada more commercialagriculturalfarm andnow haddecreasedits size andpurposemainlytomerelyincludeproductsforthehouseholdandforvis itingtourists.Inthesurvey,46percent(27persons)ofthefemalerespondents stated that they engaged in some sort of agricultural activity for household needs.Ontheonehand,intheinterviewstudy,theproductsgeneratedfrom agriculturewereconsideredtobeanimportantsupplementtothe‘cash’gener atedthroughtourism,butontheotherhand,workinginthegardenandwithin

290 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism agriculturewereconsideredtobeahobbyandawayoflivinginthecountry side.Theintervieweesalsostressedthevalueofbeingabletoofferproductsto touristswhichwereorganicallygrownlocally.Thefoodfromthefarmorthe gardenwasconsideredtobe‘better’,thanproductsimportedfromotherre gions or countries. It was also considered important to preserve ‘traditional’ ruralpractices,madepossiblethroughtourism,whichthusaddedavaluetothe ‘informal’typesoflivelihoodpractices. Elenacooperateswithalocalhotelandreceivesguestsforguidedtours andlunchesatthefarm. Whenagroupofpeoplecomestheyusuallystayfortwohours.Theyareboundtoapro gramme,andhereweshowthemaroundandprovideameal.Theytakealookaroundthe farm,toseewhattechniquesweuseandweshowthemourhouseinterior.Theyarefondof thewaywecook,andhowwepreparethefood,even60yearoldpeoplecannotremember thesemethods.Oneguidesaidthatifyoudestroythisoven,thenwewon’tcomeback!People want toknow howwelive in the countryside, our history. Inthe beginningIwas worried abouthowtheywouldperceiveus,thateverythinghadtobeperfect,butthenIrealisedthatit wasexactlywhattheyneededtosee,theflaws.Still,itneedstobeniceandneat(Elena). Shetriesfirstandforemosttousetheproductsfromthefarm,andtriestobuy herfoodlocally,tobenefitthelocalproducers. Iusuallycooksoup,potatowedges,meatfilletandchops.Thenanicelydecoratedsalad.And forthemeatdishesIonlyusemyownmeat.IusuallyonlyuseLatviantomatoes.Inthespring itmightbemoreexpensivetobuyLatvianones,butIstillbelieveinit(…)Themeatyoucan buyinthestoreistasteless;itdoesnotmatterwhatyouserveitwith.Themeatproducedhere onthefarmismuchbetter;ithasmuchmoretaste(Elena). Privatebecomespublic:commercialisedpractices Eventhoughthepracticeswithinruraltourismweredirected mainly towards theprivatesphereandthefamilyasthe‘safe’unitduringtimesoftransforma tion, it was also evident that the practices were oriented towards the public sphere,andbecamepartofalargercontext,forexample,aspartofthe‘regular’ marketeconomy,andaspartofthedevelopmentoftheruralcommunity.As hasbeenmentionedaboveinthediscussionoftherelationbetweenruraltour ism and household work, some of the women described an increased satisfactionwiththeirhouseholdworkwhichhadgainedanotherstatussince engaginginruraltourism.Bymakingtheir‘normal’chores,suchascleaningand cooking also directed to tourists, their practices became a part of the public sphere,andcouldbedescribedashavingasetprice in the money transfers.

291 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Thus,insomesense,theeverydaypracticesarecommodifiedandcommercial isedonthemarket. Despitethefactthatthefemaleentrepreneurs’daytodaychoreswithin ruraltourismreceivedaneconomicsignificance,theincomefromtourismwas in most cases regarded as merely an additional income for the household. In some cases, the interviewees emphasised that the household would manage withouttheextraincomefromtourism.Thiswasalsoevidentinthesurvey,in whichamajorityoftherespondents(63%)statedthattourismwasnotthemain sourceofincome.Mostoftheruraltourismbusinesseswhichwereincludedin theinterviewstudyweresmallscalebusinesseswithlessthan30bedsandcan bedescribedas havingalow economic turnover.Seventytwo percentofthe femalerespondentsand62percentofthemenstatedthattheyearned250LVL amonthorlessfromtheirworkwithintourism(seeFigure18). Figure18: Grossmonthlyincomefromtourism(Lats).

30

25 25

20 19 Women

15 Men 11 11 10

Numberofrespondents 7 7

5 4 2

0 Lessthan100 100250 251500 Morethan500 Source:Author’ssurveyintheCēsisdistrict Theinterviewstudyshowedthatitwasthemenwhoremainedthemainsup portersofthehousehold.Thiswasalsoevidentinthesurvey,where45percent ofthefemalerespondentsstatedthattheirhusbandorpartnerwasthemain income provider in the household. Only three out of 28 male respondents claimedthattheirwivesorpartnerswerethemainsupporters(seeFigure19).

292 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Figure19: Whoisthemainincomeproviderinyourhousehold?

30

25 25

20 17 Women 15 14 15 Men 10 10 Numberofrespondents

5 3

0 Iam Someoneelseinthe Equalcontribution householdis Source:Author’ssurveyintheCēsisdistrict Intheinterviewstudy,women’sworkwithin tourism provided additional in comeforthehousehold,butitwasusuallynotenoughforlargerinvestments. Theinvestmentswereinsteadmadeonthebasisofothersourcesofincome, forexample,throughtheman’sownofficialorunofficialbusiness. Theruraltourismbusinesscannotsurvivewithoutanadditionalactivity;it’softentheman who has his own business and can support this. The man himself does not want to work withintourismsinceyoucannotearnsomuchmoney.Butwomencantakecareofthebusi ness.OntheLatviancountrysideit’snormallythewomanwhosupportsthefamily,butthere arealsoexceptionswhenthemansupportsthefamily.Allmendrinkvodka,andwomentake alargerresponsibilityforthefamily.I’mnottalkingaboutmyownhusband;butifmendrink therewillbenoruraltourismbusiness(Ilze). However,despitetherelatively‘low’financialcontributionofwomen,everyLat whichtheycouldcontributewithwasregardedasimportant, sinceit also in creasedtheireconomicindependenceandgavethemmoreinfluenceoverhow themoneyofthehouseholdshouldbespent,andenabledthemtousemoney fortheirownpersonalneedsandinterests. Daceisahousewifeandlives inRiga, butrunsanunregisteredtourism businessduringthesummer,andhasarathersmallincomefromtourismwhich sheisplanningtoexpandwhenshedevelopsherownbusiness. Itisveryimportantformetogetmyownincomefromtourism,sothatIalsodosomething. To not be dependent, but to have money for my own needs. I cannot get what I want; I cannotbuywhatIwant;Ihavetoaskmyhusbandformoney.Itisnotalwayseasy;hekeeps

293 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism asking“again?”.Wehavedifferentprioritiessometimes,andwanttospendmoneyondiffer entthings(Dace). Moreover,eventhoughthefemaleentrepreneursnormallydidnotcontributeas much to the household income as their male counterparts and even though theywereofficiallyregisteredasemployees,theyoftentookresponsibilityfor financialandadministrationaltasksbothwithinthehouseholdandfortherural tourism business. This included, forexample, bookkeeping, making a budget for the tourism business, setting prices and adjusting to the tourism supply, paying bills and loans and so on. The female interviewees emphasised the importanceofcarefulfinancialplanningduetotheseasonalcharacteroftour ism.Moneyneededtobesavedforthewinterseason,aswellasbeputawayfor renovationandinvestmentsforthebusiness. In some cases, having ‘too high’ financial aspirations, for example, in relation to wishing to make an ‘individual’ career, was not considered to be appropriate,andthatthemainaimshouldbetohavetimefortheirfamilyand themenshouldkeeptheirroleasthefamilybreadwinner.Still,thiswasnotthe case for allfemale interviewees.Someofthembroke against the ‘norms’ of genderrelationswiththeireconomicgainfromruraltourism. Kristineworksfulltimewithinruraltourismasanentrepreneurandearns more,atleastduringthesummermonths,thanherhusband. OnaFridayandSaturdayIcanmakemoremoneythanmyhusbanddoesforawholemonth (Kristine). Moreover,fortheurbanbasedentrepreneurs,theincomeandturnoverfrom theruraltourismbusinesswasnotconsideredtobecrucialfortheireconomic survivalandlivelihood.Instead,itwasviewedasbeingsomesortof‘bonus’and awayofachievinganextra‘qualityoflife’,toincreasetheirstandardofliving, intermsofmorematerialresources. AsforLiene,asasinglemotherofthreechildren, she also breaks the normofthefamilybreadwinner.Sheclaimsthatthe additional income from ruraltourismapartfromhertwojobsasateacherisjustenoughforherfamily tohaveaminimumincomeeachmonth.Shehastopayforhereducationin pedagogy as well, which is a significant cost. She also gets income from her craftsand artisticwork;butfollowingherdivorce, the financial contribution fromherhusbandhasbeeninfrequent.

294 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Ihavenotreceivedchildcaremaintenancefrommyhusbandforsixyears,andheisalmost forcedtopaythemaintenancenow,butearlierhejustsaidthathedidnothaveanymoney (Liene). Openinguptheprivatespherefortourists Thecommercialisationofthe‘rural’wayoflifeanditspracticesalsotakesother expressions. On the Internet or in brochures, the private and familyowned houses and farmsteads are also made accessible in a more ‘public’ sense. Throughlinkstodifferentassociations,suchas LaukoCelotajs, itispossibleto lookatphotosofrooms,interiorsandgardens,whichevenmightincludepic turesofthefamilymembers.Theaccommodationalternativesaremarketedas awayofexperiencingnotonly‘genuine’Latvianculture,butalsoinsomecases ‘familylife’,ortraditionalagriculturalpracticesonafamilyfarm. Intheinterviewstudy,invitingtouriststothefamilyhousesorfarmsteads wasdescribedashavingpositiveeffectsintermsofnewsocialcontacts.Most of the female interviewees claimed that they liked the social dimensions of running a tourism business, which involved communicating and talking with arrivingtourists,andthatitofferedcontactsoutsidetheimmediatefamily. Liene receives both domestic and foreign tourists all yearround, and pointsoutthatitistherepeatedvisitorsthatsheappreciatesthemost. IfI had travelled a lot,Imight havemetMexicansorAfricans;butsinceI have not been abroad,theycancometomeinstead.Therightpeoplecometome.Peopleoftenstayfora longerperiodoftimeandafriendshipgrows,justaswithyou;youtalkabitmore,exchange opinions.Sometimestheycallearlyinthespring;thesnowisstillleftandsaythattheywantto comeandhelp;“Wecanworkhard”(Liene). Someoftheentrepreneurswereevenpreparedtomove outoftheir houses temporarilyifalargegroupoftouristswerearriving,andmoveinwithother familymembers.Itwasemphasizedthat“wehavetobeabletotrustthetour ists”,andthatgivingthetouristsfreeaccesstothefacilitiesalsowouldresult that they would take more responsibility for their actions. The female intervieweesalsoemphasisedthattheconstantpresenceoftouristswithintheir homeorinthenearbyareaoftheirhomealsocouldbechallengingfortheir personal integrity. This was especially evident among those who offered accommodationintheirownhouse. Onedisadvantageisthatthey(thetourists)turnyourhouseupsidedown.Somemakealotof noise. There is a dining room in the basement, and our bedroom is placed just above it.

295 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Sometimesitislikesleepinginadiscotheque.FridaysandSaturdaysaretheworstdays,but sometimeswedonotevennoticethatwehaveguests(Brigite). Insomecases,thetouristsweredescribedasmerelyinterestedindrinkingand partying, rather than visiting the surrounding tourism attractions and nature, and that it created an extra workload for the entrepreneurs, for example through cleaning. In this case, it was underlined that “the tourists have to followourrules”,andadjustingtothefamily’sneedsandregulations. Adjustingtoqualitystandards Anotherexampleofhowtheprivatewasmadepublicwithinruraltourismwas howworkwithin thebusinesses, includingtraditional household and agricul turalchores,constantlyhadtobeadjustedtomodernqualitystandards,which wasdescribedtobeaneffectoftheEUmembership.Inthiscase,aparadox couldbedistinguishedbetweenthedemandforthesmallscaleandtraditional rural tourism farmstead or holiday home on the one hand, which included homemadefoodandproducts,andtheneedformodernequipmentandsanita tionregulationsontheother.Someofthefemaleentrepreneurs expressed a concernthattherulesandregulationshadincreasedinthelastfewyears,in cluding both those membership criteria set up by tourism associations and thosesetupbytheEUinordertoreceivebenefits,suchasdiversifyingtheir agriculturalbusiness. Elena and her husband have not applied for EUfunding yet, partly becauseofthelackofstartingcapitalandtheadministrativeworkloadneeded for completing all the documents required, and partly due to the demands within rural tourism, such as increasing the standard of accommodation, becauseofthetouriststhemselvesandtheauthorities. Thedemandshaveslowlybeenraised.Inthebeginningtheruraltourismassociationdidnot havethesedemands.Maybethelifestyleanddemandhavechangedtoo.They(thetourists) haveotherdemands;maybetheydon’twanttoliveintentsanymore,andtheymightwantto havecookedfood(…)Themainproblemindevelopingourbusinessisthetaxlegislation,and otherrulesforexampleconcerningsanitation.Thesedemandsarecomparablewiththosefor aluxuryrestaurant(…)IfIweretohireachef,hemusthavehisownbathroomandchanging room,andthenwehavetorebuildeverything(Elena). Forsomeofthefemaleentrepreneurs,membershipin different regional and nationaltourismassociationswasconsideredtobeimportantinordertoattract foreign tourists. However, the memberships also required different forms of qualitystandards,andintheruraltourismassociation, LaukoCelotajs ,thebusi

296 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism nesses are ranked into different categories depending on their standard. The rankingissetupinrelationtosurveysconducted amongtouristsabouttheir ownexpectations,aswellasinrelationtootherqualitycriteriausedbyother European countries. The quality label system of ‘butterflies’ range from “minimumfacilities”to“verygood”facilities(www.celotajs.lv20080418). Helenaandherhusbandhavedoneactivemarketingfortheircompanyin Riga,andarealsomembersofaruraltourismassociation.Theyhaverecently beenapprovedaccordingtodifferentqualitycriteria,andHelenaconsidersthe classificationandqualityasimportantfordevelopingtheirtourismbusiness. (…)Iwantedthree,butwegotonlytwo“butterflies”.Thesystemranksfromonetofour (butterflies);oneisalmostnoamenitiesatall,onlyatoiletandashower.ForLatviansitmay notmakeanydifference,butthestandardisveryimportantforforeigners.Thentheyknow whattheyget(Helena). Some of the female entrepreneurs also stressed that a future expansion and modernisationoftheirbusinesswouldalmostbenecessary,partlyinrelationto thequalitydemandssetupbytourismassociationsandtourists,andpartlydue to an increased competition among entrepreneurs offering rural tourism accommodation.Thus,thedevelopmentofmorelargescalefacilitieswascon sideredtoberequired,especiallyamongthoseentrepreneurshavingtourismas theirmainsourceofincome,inordertoattractmoretouristsandtooperateon anallyearroundbasis,forexample,throughbusinessandconferencetourism. Afewoftheintervieweesexpressedaconcernformakingadditionallongterm investments in both time and money, due to the uncertain prognosis for actuallymakingasustainableprofit. Paradoxesofwomen’sentrepreneurship Analysingandsumminguptheaboveaccountofwomen’sentrepreneurshipin termsoftheir strategies and practices .Table12illustratesanumberof paradoxes whichcanbeidentified.Here,parallelscanbemadetoLönnbring(2003),who emphasises the paradoxical nature of the rural female entrepreneur, between the external image of entrepreneurship as a consciously chosen independent ‘lifestyle’ontheonehand,andtherestrictionsoftheirindependenceintheir everydaylifeduetomorestructuralconstraints(seeLönnbring2003).

297 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism

Table12: Paradoxesofwomen’sentrepreneurshipintheCēsisdistrict. Strategy Practice Flexiblework Inflexibleworkintimeandspace Stridingforfreedomandindependence Adaptingandadjusting ‘Familybusiness’ Traditionaldivisionofpaidandunpaid work Womenas‘active’entrepreneurs Womenasemployeesandmothers Questforindependentlivelihood Menremaineconomicbreadwinners Ruraltourismas‘visible’business Ruraltourismaspartoftheprivate sphereandtheinformalsector Thefirstparadoxwhichcanbeidentifiedintheinterviewstudyisbetweenthe idea of tourism as providing ‘flexible work’ , and the common outcome of the daytoday work within tourism which often includes ‘inflexible work’ in both timeandspace.Ashasbeendiscussedintheinterviewstudyabove,theinten tionsandstrategiesforworkingasanentrepreneurwithinruraltourismwere partlychosen duetotheflexibilityandpossibilitiesofcombining family and work, or other forms of employment with entrepreneurship within tourism. Manyofthefemaleintervieweesexpressedanegativeattitudetowardsgettinga ‘9 to 5 job’, which would require them to remain fixed at their work place throughoutthedaynomatterhowmuchworkwasneededtobedone.Here,a rejectionoftheoldsocialistidealsmaybedistinguished,andinsteadthereisthe goaltofindandkeepajobwhichservesone’sownmotivesratherthanothers. Theintervieweesalsounderscoredthepossibilitiesandadvantagesofplanning theirowntime,doingthechoreswithinruraltourismwhentheyhadtheenergy andmotivation,ratherthanwhensomeonetoldthemtodoso.Here,astrong emphasiswasputonhowworkwithintourismwasa‘lifestyle’ratherthana ‘normaljob’,whichalsowasconsideredtobemoremotivating.Whenitcomes toanalysingwomen’slivelihoodpractices,adiscrepancycanbefoundbetween themotivesbehindentrepreneurshipineverydaypractice,andtheactualresults oftheirworkontheother.Thepracticesrevealeda‘boundness’inbothtime andspace,withlimitedsparetimeforleisureactivitiesandhobbies,especially duringthesummermonths.Therequirementsof being available for tourists during the summer months also included spatial restrictions, especially for thosefemaleintervieweeswhodidnothaveaccesstoacar. Closely related to the discrepancy between ‘flexibility’ and ‘inflexibility’, thesecondpairofparadoxeswhichcanbeidentifiedis ‘stridingforfreedomand independence’ and ‘adaptingandadjusting’ .Themotivesforbecominganentrepre neurwithinruraltourismweresometimesrelatedtoawishtohaveone’sown

298 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism job and income, and finding alternatives to being a housewife. Yet, the interviewstudyalsoshowedthatthedaytodaypracticeswithinruraltourism meantadegreeofadjustment,totheneedsofthefamily, including the chil dren’sneedsandthehusband’sworkinghours.Moreover,the ‘boundness in timeandspace’,alsoincludedan‘adjustment’intimeandspace,totheneeds andrequirementsmadebythetourists. The female interviewees also stated that their participation within rural tourismasentrepreneurwasacommon ‘familyproject’ ,whichnotonlyincluded themselvesasindividualentrepreneursbutalsotheirhusband,childrenandin some cases other relatives. This was described in positive terms, as a way of realisingfamilyideals,continuingafamilyagriculturalbusinessandbeingable to work and live in the countryside. In some cases, the idea for the rural tourism business had been the husband’s or some other family member’s, ratherthan the women’s themselves.Still, thework within the rural tourism businesshadslowlybeentakenoverbywomen,orincludedarathertraditional divisionofwork,inwhichwomentookthemainresponsibilityforthecontacts withtheguests,cleaningandotherchores,whilethehusband’sroleremained somewhat‘passive’inthetourismbusiness.Moreover,theworkwithintourism tendedtohavecloseparallelstotheeverydayunpaidworkinthehousehold, whichstillremained‘women’swork’andresponsibility,aswellasdidthecare forthechildren.Thus,womenwereboth ‘activeentrepreneurs’ atthesametimeas they gained other ‘official’ status within the household. Some of the female entrepreneursemphasisedthattheywerefirst mothers ,andthenentrepreneurs, prioritisingtheirtimewiththeirchildrenandfamilybeforetheserviceforthe tourists.Therolewasactivelytaken,andhadapositivemeaning,involvinga sense of freedom toembracetraditional idealsoffemininities. However, the womenalso stressedthedifficultiesinbalancingworkandfamily,duetothe commitment to the rural tourism business and the ‘boundness in time and space’. Even though the female interviewees stated thatthey switched rather freely betweentheirroles as‘entrepreneur’ and ‘mother’, they alsorevealeda frustrationduetothefactthattheysometimeswereofficiallyunpaid‘helpers’ or ‘employees’, and not ‘real’ entrepreneurs as in the ‘true’ meaning of the word. Onecentralquestionofthestudywaswhetherworkwithinruraltourism couldcontributetoamoreindividualincomeandlivelihoodforwomen.Inthe motives behind working within tourism, there was a large emphasis on the valuetoearnone’sownincomeinordertoavoidtoo much dependency on theirmalepartner.Thishadbothamoresymbolicalsignificance,aswellasa

299 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism materialmeaning.Theindependentincomemarkedavaluedsenseoffreedom and independence, at the same time as the female interviewees claimed that they could spend money on what they wanted without their husband’s commentsandcritique.Itwasalsoacknowledgedasimportant to beable to contribute to the household, with money which could be spent on their childrenandeverydayproducts.Inmanycases,theincomefromtourismonly constituted a smaller part of the household budget, and was more symbolic thancrucialforthefamily’slivelihood.Ofcourse,therewereexceptionsfrom this,especiallyregardingthesinglemothers,orthosehouseholdswhichrelied moreontourismastheirmainincome.Inmanycases,additionalincomewas consideredascrucial,andthiswasinamajorityofcasesprovidedbytheman rather than the woman. The main exceptions here were those living and workinginRiga,whocontributedtothehouseholdtothesameextent. ThelastparadoxillustratedinTable12isthatbetweentourismas ‘visible business’ andtourismaspartofthe privatesphereandinformalsector .Entrepreneur ship within rural tourism was considered to be a way of gaining one’s own income,andinsomesensethenparticipatinginthelabourmarketandthepub lic sphere. In this case, tourism also involved more ‘public activities’, for example,contactswithlocalauthorities, beinga memberindifferenttourism organisations,participatingindifferentcoursesandconferencesandmarketing. Inthissense,theprivateintermsofthefamilyfarmortheguesthouseinthe garden became public. There are also examples of how the private remained privatethroughtraditionallyorientedpracticesandhowthepublicbecamepri vatethroughmore‘reliccommunistoriented’practices.Intheformercase,the everydaypracticeswithinruraltourismupholdtheidealsoftheprivateasthe traditionally‘femalesphere’,incontrasttothe‘public’malesphere.Someofthe female interviewees remained in the household for a majority of their work withintourism,whiletheirmalecounterpartshadamuchlarger‘reach’interms ofadditionalemploymentandotheractivities.Withinruraltourisminthepri vatesphere,traditionalidealsoffemininitieswerereproducedthroughthedaily practiceswithintourism, such ascleaning, cookingand caring for theguests. Someofthefemaleintervieweesalsoemphasisedthattheworkwasdifferent from‘ordinary’householdchoressincetheypaidmoney,andthereforehada morepositiveconnotation. For others, the householdrelated chores within tourism were leisure rather than work, which was especially evident among the ‘urban’ female entrepreneurs,whousuallydidlittleornohouseholdworkonadailybasis.The practices within rural tourism also illustrated how ‘old’ reliccommunistic

300 Chapterten–Balancingeverydaylife:women’slivelihoodpracticeswithinruraltourism practiceswerereproducedthroughtourism.Oneexampleisthepracticeofdis tinguishingbetweenthe‘official’andthe‘unofficial’incomefromtourismand the unwillingness to pay taxes. This also reflects a problem and discrepancy between the possibility of making women visible as entrepreneurs in a more ‘public’context,notonlyascopartnerswiththeirhusbands,butasindepend entandindividualentrepreneurs,andthetendencynottotreatwomenintheir rolesasentrepreneursascontributingtotheoveralllocal,regionalandnational development.Eventhoughtheystillmightbuytheirproductslocallyandcon tributetothelocaldevelopment,their‘visibility’asentrepreneurswillnotbeas highandasseriouslyrecognisedasotherentrepreneursinothergeographical contexts.Thismightalsoberelatedtotourismasaservicephenomenon,which does not generate as much ‘visible’ products as other sectors in the Latvian economy.

301

302

PartV Exploringwomen’slivelihoodwithintourisminJūrmala

From the top: (1) Abandoned hotel building from the turn of the century at the beach in Majori (2) Renovated summer house with fencesandsurveillancecameras,Jūrasiela,MajoriChaptereleven(3)FormerSoviet sanatoriuminruinswithgraffitionthebeachinMajori.Photosbythe author.

303

304

Chaptereleven ‘Geographiesofplace’: transformingJūrmalaasa healthtourismresort The aim of the present chapter is to analyse the emergence of tourism in Jūrmalaandprovideanoverviewofthelocallabourmarketonthebasisofthe differentgenderised‘geographies’whichwereintroducedinthefirstchaptersof thethesis.Thiswillinturnserveasabackgroundtothenexttwo chapters which will focus on women’s livelihood and employment within Jūrmala’s tourismsector.Iwillstartbyprovidingahistoricalcontexttothedevelopment oftourisminJūrmala,anddescribethetransforming character of the city in both a physical and socioeconomic sense, with examples from the tourism sectorandthelabourmarket.Iwillputfocusonthreedimensionsofthetrans forming‘geographiesofplace’;firstlyIwillanalysehowtourismbecomesaway of preservingtraditionalelementsof‘Latvianness’ throughafocusonlocalnaturaland cultural resources within tourism, which has parallels to geographies of neo nationalism.Secondly,IwilldiscusshowtourisminJūrmalais‘ commercialised’ ,in theprocessofpositioningthecityasa‘new’andmodernhealthresortonan international basis, which relates to geographies of Europeanisation. Thirdly, trendswithintourismdevelopmentandthelabourmarketwillbediscussedas representing‘ continuitywiththepast ’,reflectinggeographiesofreliccommunism. Jūrmalaasatourismresort–ahistoricalretrospect Jūrmalahasaround55000inhabitantsandislocatedonapeninsulabetween theGulfofRigaandtheRiver,around20kmfromthecapitalRiga. JūrmalawasoneofthelargesthealthresortsintheBalticStatesduringtheSo viet period and attracted visitors from all over the Soviet Union, but the traditionofhealthandrecreationhasamuchlongerhistory.JūrmalainLatvian means‘seaside’,andhasbeenasearesortforhealthandrecreationsincethe middleofthe19 th century.Thenamederiveshistoricallyfromasettlementof fishingvillages,whichwerescatteredalongthecoast.Jūrmalainitiallybecame knownasahealthresortwhenitssulphurrichmineralwatersinKemeriwere discovered,andbecameincorporatedasahealthresortwithinTsaristRussiain 1838. As in other parts of Europe and Scandinavia, sea bathing became

305 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort fashionableinthemiddleofthe19 th century,whichbroughtamixofLatvian, GermanandRussianvisitors,mainlyfromtheupperandmiddleclasses,who escapedtheurbanlifeduringthesummermonths.Thesummerguestsarrived withcoachesandlaterbytrainsorsteamboats,andwereatfirstlodgedinthe existing fishing villages, but later bought their own pieces of land and built woodensummerhouses.Thelifeatthehealthresortalsobecamemoreorgan izedandsophisticated,withtheestablishmentofsanatoriumsandhotels.The urbanizationofJūrmalawaslargelyaneffectoftourismdevelopment,andparts of Jūrmala, known as Rigas Jūrmala , gained administrative autonomy during Latvia’sfirstindependence(19181940),inordertorebuildthecityasatourist resortafterthedamagefromWW1.DuringtheSovietregime,Jūrmalawasnot establishedasacityuntil1959,butwasratherearlyincorporatedintotheSoviet networkofrecreationandhealthresorts.Thereby,allinfrastructurefortravel ling and recreation was nationalized (Pētersone In: Slava 2004; Henningsen 1994). Tourism during theSovietoccupation reflected the overall centralised andisolatedsociety,andwasmerelyawayofhighlightingsocialistidealsand creatingemploymentopportunities.TraveltoandwithintheSovietUnionwas strictlycontrolledbythestateandcollectivelyarrangedthroughlabourunions forthepurposeofrehabilitationforthenation’sworkers(seeHallIn:William &Shaw1998;HallIn:Harrison2001;Hall2004;Williams&Balaz2000). Tourismasaconceptwasnotusedasinthewesternmeaningoftheword intheSovietUnion.Themainfocuswasonrecreation,somethingoppositeof work,fortheworkerstoregainstrengthandhealthbothphysicallyandmen tally and thereby achieve new productivity. The state supported the worker’s holidaysthroughorganizedvacationsandspecial‘holidaypasses’weresubmit tedtotheworkersbytradeunions,stateownedcompaniesandministries;the passeswereneededtoobtainastayinsanatoriumsandotherlargeraccommo dation facilities.The sanatoriums were importantbackbones ofthe organised travel within the Soviet Union, with a focus on different forms of medical treatmentsandspecialisations,suchasphysiotherapy.Peoplecouldalsospend their holidays as “unorganized holidaymakers”, and visit resorts on an individualbasis.Thisbecameaverypopularwayofrecreation,sincetheholiday also could be spent together with other holidaymakers in Dachas or other accommodationestablishments(Moskoff1984) 90 .InJūrmala,amajorityofthe traditional wooden summer houses became stateowned property as Dachas ,

90 Dachas canbedefinedassecondhomesorsummerhouseswhichwereofferedtovisitors within the Soviet Union and Jurmala, which had to meet the state requirements and restrictionsofaccommodation.

306 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort whichconstitutedamajorityoftheaccommodationfacilitiesinJūrmalaafter theSecondWorldWar,witharound2224000beds(Henningsen1994).Due toaconstantshortageofaccommodationandotherhealthestablishments,new largescaleandmorestandardizedsanatoriumsandotherfacilitieswerebuiltin the1960sandonwards(PētersoneIn:Slava2004;Henningsen 1994). In the endofthe1980s,Jūrmalahadacapacityofaround95000bedplacesduring summerand20000allyearround.Statisticsfromthesameperiodshowthat theresorthadaround500000visitorsperyear(Henningsen 1994). Statistics fromJūrmalaCityCouncilfromthelatterpartofthe1980sshowthatJūrmala duringanaveragesummerdaycouldhaveupto260000visitors,whichcanbe compared to the city’s own population during that time of 70000 people (JūrmalaCityCouncil2007b:29). Encounteringtransformation WhenLatviaregaineditsindependencein1991,thetourismsectorinJūrmala faced an extensive crisis.The number of visitorsfell dramatically, for several reasons. Firstly, the Latvian economy experienced a general downturn in the 1990s, due to high inflation and bank crises, which meant that the Latvian populationdidnothave thefinancial means toinvestintheir holidays.Sec ondly, the border towards Russia was strengthened and a visa regime was introduced,whichmadeitmoredifficultforRussiantouriststovisitJūrmala, who earlier had been the most important visitors. Thirdly, and as a conse quence, the privatization and restitution processes within the tourism sector turnedouttobeslowanddifficult.Thelargersanatoriumsandaccommodation facilitiesinJūrmalaweredifficulttoprivatizeduetotheneedoflargeinvest mentsforrenovationandtheuncertaindemandfortourism.Jūrmalasuddenly suffered an overcapacity in its accommodation, and as a consequence, many largescalesanatoriumswereleftemptyandabandoned,aswellasmanyofthe woodensummerhouses(MalerepresentativeJūrmalaCityCouncil,May2004, Henningsen1994). Today, Jūrmala is slowly recovering from the downturn of the tourism sectorinthe1990s,andsincetheyear2000,theincreaseoftouristsaswellas bothlocalandforeigninvestmentshavebeensignificant.In2007,thenumber of tourists in accommodation establishments in Jūrmala was estimated to be 128,184 (see Figure 20). The average length of stay in 2007 was 3.2 nights, whichishigherthanthenationalaverage.Themainreasonforthisdifferenceis thefocusonhealthtreatmentsandstaysinsanatoriumswhichoftenincludea longerperiodofstay.TouristsfromBelarusstayed,forexample,inaverageof

30 7 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort

15 nights in Jūrmala in different resort accommodations, which can be comparedtovisitorsfromtheUnitedKingdomwhospentmerely2.7nightsin Jūrmalain2007. Figure20:NumberoftouristsinregisteredaccommodationestablishmentsinJūrmala1996 2007.

140000

120000

100000 Total numberof 80000 tourists

Foreign

Number 60000 tourists 40000

20000

0 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 Year Source: Jūrmala City Council (2004a) presentation material; Jūrmala City Council (2007b) JūrmalainFigures 2006.DatageneratedfromLSCB. Sixtyninepercentofthetouristswereofforeignorigin,includingamajorityof Estonians(19%),followedbyRussians(14%),Lithuanians(16%),andFinnish tourists (8%). During the last few years, the tourists from Scandinavian countries and Northern Europe have shown a rapid increase. Between 2006 and2007,thetouristsfromNorwayincreasedwith47percent(3311visitors), andtouristsfromSwedenshowedagrowthwith27percent(1305visitors).The backgroundtothisincreaseisconsideredtoberelatedtothedevelopmentof lowcostairlinesfromdestinationsinScandinavianandEuropeancountries,as wellasactivetourismmarketingtargetingthesemarkets(www.jurmala.lv2008 0929). The transformation process has left visible physical traces in Jūrmala’s tourism and everyday environment, in several ways. Whathasbeenthemost lastingimpressionduringallmyvisitstoJūrmalaisthecontrastingfeaturesof thecity;betweenoldandnew,betweenthe‘sleepy’characterofthetownand its intensive tourist invasions during the summer months, between rich and poor, between the town as teeming with activities related to renovation and ‘landscapesofabandonment’.Inthelattercase,theseincludeprevioustourism

308 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort accommodationbuildingswhichdatebacktotheearlyperiodoftourismduring thebeginningofthe20 th century,aswellaslargescaleconcretebuildingsfrom the Soviet period, which have been left to their own fate, and now more resemblingruins,withcrackedfacades,brokenwindows,andcolourfulgraffiti paintings.

HotelJūrmala,Majori,in2004(totheleft)andafterrenovationin2005(totheright).Photosbytheauthor. Theruinsincludeolderwoodensummerhouseswhichhavenotyetbeenreno vatedalongstreetssuchas Jomas or Jurasiela ,thetwomainstreetsinJūrmala running parallel with the beach. Some of them are forsaleorrent;someof them are objects for active renovation according to luxurious modern ideals anddesignaswellasthedemandssetupduetotheirclassificationasculturally protected objects. Moreover, largescale restaurant and accommodation buildingsdatingbacktotheexpansionoftourismduringthe1960sand1970s arefoundalongthebeachesofMajoriandDubulti,somealmostcoveredby thedensepineforest.InotherpartsofJūrmala,someoftheseSovietbuildings still function as more medicallydesigned, largescale sanatoriums for visitors, preserving the previous traditions. In Majori, the tourism centre of Jūrmala, somehavebeenrenovatedtomeetthedemandsofmore‘modern’spafacilities, withanemphasisonhealthandbeautytreatments,includingaccesstoamod erngym,poolandsportfacilities.ThefastdevelopmentofJūrmalaintermsof housingandtourismaccommodationhasalsocreatedadivisionbetweenmore exclusiveareasofJūrmalaandmoreperipheralareasforliving.InMajori,the

309 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort prices for land and property are among the highest in Jūrmala, and walking along streets such as Juras iela gives an impression of a ‘gated community’ ratherthanatouristresort.Highfences,videosurveillancecameras,guarddogs, andgatesforaccessingpropertiesarecommonfeaturesamongthemoreexclu sivevillasalongthebeach 91 .Still,onlyaround7percentofJūrmala’spopulation isestimatedtoliveinMajori;amajorityliveinKauguri(41%),Parēije(13%) andSloka(10%),whichincludemorelargescaleapartmentcomplexesdating backtotheSovietperiod(Jūrmala2004a). ‘Traditional’geographiesofplace Withintourismmarketing,Jūrmalaisoften described as being ‘inbetween’ a ruralandurbansetting.Ontheonehand,tourismmarketingfocusesonnature asthebasisforbothspa/healthtourismandothernaturebasedactivities,such as hiking along the nature trails in Kemeri National Parkintheoutskirts of Jūrmala. Traditionally, Jūrmala has throughout history constituted ‘Riga’s seaside’, a playground for tourists escaping urban and industrialised settings. Today,Jūrmalaismarketedas‘Riga’sownseasideresort’,withamorerelaxed atmosphere. SpendingtimeinJūrmalagivesnotonlyapositiveeffecttothehumanorganism,butalsoa spiritual wellbeing, resulting from the change of the usual environment, a big quantity of sunlight, stayaway from the big city hustle, good sleep, peace and quietness, sports and ,longwalksalongthebeachandgoodfood(JūrmalaCityCouncil2007c Jūrmala Cityonthewave2007 ). Ontheotherhand,JūrmalaisactivelybeingpromotedaspartoftheurbanRiga region,tiedtoitsnetworksoftransportationandcommunication,constitutinga modernresortbasedonurbanratherthanruralvaluesandcharacteristics.As hasbeendiscussedabove,Jūrmalahasinsomesensebeen‘urbanised’through thedevelopmentandpromotionoftourism,bothinitshistoricalandcontem poraryforms.Apartfromtheblurredboundariesbetweentheurbanandrural environment,Jūrmala ispromotedinrelation toits‘unique’localsettings,by emphasisingthecity’slocalnaturalandculturalresourcesaswellasitshistorical heritageasahealthresort. Naturalelements,suchasmineralwaterand‘healingmud’fromthearea are highlighted, as well as the cultural and medical traditions rooted in the periodwhenLatviabelongedtotheRussianempireandduringthefirstLatvian independence from the 1920s onwards. Within tourism marketing, different

91 SeepicturesforPartV.

310 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort naturalelementsaredescribedasbeing‘therapeutic’forthevisitors,including theJūrmala’s‘freshair,pineforests,andbeaches’. Itislikenoothersmell–itradiateshealthandrejuvenation.Thestrengthofthelandandthe sea has been collected for centuries and millennia, and in just a few hours’ time, you will recoveryourenergyandyourjoiedevivre(LTDA2007 LatviaThelandthatsings p.6). Thefocuson‘local’resourcesintourismmarketingcan be analysedas high lighting a traditional ‘Latvian’ heritage in terms of both nature and cultural practices. In this case, parallels can be made with ‘geographies of neo nationalism’ as discussed in Chapter three, and how the rural is highlighted throughruraltourisminCēsisasdescribedinpreviouschapters.Thereisaten dencytoportraythehealthtraditionsinJūrmalaas‘Latvian’ratherthanrelying onRussiantraditionashasbeenthecasebothinthe19 th centuryandduring theSovietperiod.Thefocusonbeautyandwellnessisalsoconsideredtoorigi natefromLatviantraditionsandtheLatviansthemselves. Indulgeyourbody.Latviansknowhowtokeeptheirbodiesbeautiful.Everyoneseeksbeauty. Beautifulplacesandbeautifulpeople.Latvianstakeprideinboth.Anditshows.Whatistheir secret? You’ll get many answers in Latvia (...) Latvians spend a lot of time and money on cosmetics,massages,manicuresandpedicures.Fromtheirheadtotheirtoesandeverythingin between.Atsurprisinglyreasonableprices.It’samustforgroupsofwomentakingaweekend triptoRiga.Menaremostwelcometoo!(LTDA2004DiscoverLatvia p.20). ThemedicalandlargescalecharacteroftheresortasaheritageoftheSoviet modelofrecreationisoftenmutedinfavourofthepreSoviettraditionsand the ancient Latvian landscape. Parallels are also made with other European healthresorts,forexample,inGermany. Natureasfeminisedand‘healing’ Highlighting nature as the source for wellbeing and beauty also has more genderiseddimensions.Thetourismbrochuresarefilledwithimagesofwomen receivingdifferentkindsofhealthtreatments:awomanonherstomach,eyes closedduringaspatreatment,herbackcoveredwithmudorhotlavastones,or awomaninabathtubwithafacialmask,herhairwrappedinatowelandsur roundedbylitcandles.Here,thefocusisonthefemaletouristandthewell beingofthefemalebody,inthesearchforbothrelaxationandbeauty,whichis described as originating from nature itself through water, mud or stone massage. The spa products and services can be analysed as having clear feminisedcharacteristics,withfocusonmanicure,pedicureandmakeup.The

311 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort spa procedures ‘for men’ are also usually separated from thebasicsupplyof healthtreatments,meetingtheneedsofmenratherthanwomen.Thepromo tion of spa and health treatments can be analysed as having a ‘double feminisation’.Ontheonehand,natureitselfisportrayedas‘healing’and‘nur turing’forboththemaleandthefemalebodywithclearfeminisedcharacteris tics.Thetouristbrochuresdescribeinadetailedmannerhowthetouristsmay benefitfromsunbathingandswimminginthesea,inordertogainasmuchas possiblefromtheirstay.Oneofthedistributedbrochuresfrom2004statesthat “thebestdoctorisnature”(JūrmalaCityCouncil2004b JūrmalaCityonthewave ). Climate in Jūrmala is temperate and soft, that’s why even on hot days swimming and sunbathing in Jūrmala is not exhaustive. There are several kinds of climate therapies in Jūrmala: sunbathing, swimming in the sea, sand bathing (psammotherapy), and air therapy (JūrmalaCityCouncil2007c JūrmalaCityonthewave ). Here,parallelscanbemadebetweenthecontemporarytouristandthehistorical developmentoftheEuropeanhealthresortasaplaceforrecovery,whichin cluded the doctor’srecommendations oftakinglong healthy walks along the beachandbreathingthefreshsaltyairasawayofregainingone’shealth(see Löfgren1999).Moreover,todayimagesofthesea,beachandnaturenotmerely serveasthesettingorsceneforthespaproductsandservicesofferedbydiffer enthotelsandotheraccommodationestablishments,butalsoconstituteapart oftheirowninteriordesigninamorephysicalsense. Hotel facilities provide awide range of recreational opportunities includingspa andbeauty treatments,gymservices,saunasandpools.Thehotelhasbeendecoratedusingonlynatural materials–woodandstonetocreatearestfulandrelaxingatmosphere(HotelJūrmalaSPA www.hoteljurmala.com20081005). Ontheotherhand,theprocessinwhichnatureisgivenmorefeminineattrib utesisfurtherreinforcedbythefactthatwomenoftenconstituteamajorityof theemployeesinspaestablishmentsaswillbediscussedinupcomingchapters. Thus,workitself,asembodiedinthefemalehandsprovidingmassageorother spatreatments,becomespartofthenatural‘healing’process. Commercialisedgeographiesofplace Jūrmalaisthecityonthewave–onthewaveofchangeandsuccess,onthewaveofloveand hope(MayorofJūrmalaJurisHlevickisIn:JūrmalaCityCouncil2005JūrmalaCityonthewave ).

312 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort

Tourismhasbeenidentifiedasoneofthemainprioritiesonthelocalpolitical agendainJūrmalaaswellasforlocalentrepreneurs,andisregardedasatool for economic growthand development. Accordingto The TourismDevelopment Strategy for Jūrmala 20072018 (hereafter referred to as TDS), initiated by the JūrmalaCityCouncil,oneofthevisionsoftourismdevelopmentistopromote Jūrmalaas“aninternationallyknownresort”,withanemphasison“qualitative productswithhighaddedvalue”(JūrmalaCityCouncil2007a:6) 92 .Thestrategic objectivesrefermainlytoeconomicgrowthanddevelopmentoftourism,witha focusonaimsofincreasingthenumberoftourists,theirspendingaswellas attracting tourists during other periods than the high season. The aim is to reacharound140000touristsin2020,ofwhich90000foreigners(ibidp.7). Jūrmalacityisaratherwealthymunicipalitycomparedtoothertownsand municipalitiesinLatvia,includingtheruralmunicipalitiesinCēsisdescribedin previouschapters.In2006,themunicipalityrevenuesofthebudgetwere35.4 million Lats,ofwhich morethanhalf(56%)wasgeneratedfromresidentin cometaxesandfrompropertytaxes(9.5%)(JūrmalaCityCouncil2007b:22) 93 . Themunicipalityhasalsobeenactiveininvestingininfrastructurefortourism, forexample,byestablishingapublictourisminformationcentreinJūrmalaand settingapartfundsforactiveinternationaltourismmarketing.Arepresentative fromthelocaltourisminformationcentredescribeshowthefundsfortourism promotionhaveincreasedoverthelastfewyears. Oneoftheprioritiesishealthtourism,spatourism.Butwehavealsootherpriorities,wehave many inhabitants,so the priorities are also education and social security.We don’t haveso strongentrepreneursinotherfieldsexcepttourism.Tourismisthebaseintheeconomicfield. Whenwearetalkingtothecitycouncil,theyunderstandthatitisapriority.Eachyearweare askingformoremoneyforourbudget,andeveryyeartheyaregivingusmore.Ithinkthatis oneoftheimprovements(Femalerepresentative1,Jūrmalatourisminformationcentre,April 2006).

92 TheTourismDevelopmentStrategyforJurmala20072018 wasinitiatedbyJūrmalaCityCouncil and developed in cooperation between Jūrmala City Council, ”DEA Baltika Ltd”, entrepreneursinJurmalaandNGOsandstateinstitutionsactivewithintourismdevelopment.. The strategy highlights four different programs for implementing its aims and objectives: ResortDevelopmentProgram,TourismMarketingProgram,TourismInfrastructureProgram, and Program of Hospitality and Education Promotion. These will be implemented over a period of five years and include a number of tourism projects. Jūrmala City Council is responsible for the “implementation, supervision, evaluation and revision” of the strategy document(JūrmalaCityCouncil2007a:3f). 93 The largest spending was within the educational field (34%), followed by “Leisure time, culture,sportsandreligion”,whichaccountedfor13.6percentofthebudgetspendingin2006 (JūrmalaCityCouncil JūrmalainFigures2006 :22).

313 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort

Moreover,thebudgetfortourismdevelopmentandmarketingisalsogenerated throughaspecificpublicresorttax,partlybyafeefortouristsenteringthecity bycar,andpartlybyafeeapplyingtoalltouristsstayingovernight(Malerepre sentativeJūrmalaCityCouncil,May2004). Analysing the Tourism Development Strategy for Jūrmala reveals a clear reorientationtowardsWesternEuropeanmarketsintermsofthedevelopment oftourismproductssuchashealthandspatourism.Inthiscase,thetourism marketing program of the TDS references are made to the demands of “European” tourists, as well as to the aims of creating and improving “Jūrmala’scityimage intheWest”,andpromotingJūrmalaasahealthresort witha“modernbrandnameintheinternationalmarket”.TheEUmembership isalsodescribedashavingpositiveeffectsfortourismdevelopmentinLatviain generalandforJūrmalainparticular,asprovidinganincreaseoftouristarrivals since 2004. The Latvian Tourism Development Program 20062008 connects this growthalsotothedevelopmentoflowcostairlines,aswellasthedemandfor shorterweekendandholidaytripsespeciallytocitieswithinEurope.Jūrmalais consideredtobenefitfromthesetrends,andidentifiesaimsofincreasingthe numberofforeigntouristarrivalsby15percentperyear,aswellasincreasing theirspendingwithacorrespondingamount(JūrmalaCityCouncil2007a:12ff). The need for promoting Jūrmala as a modern and highquality health resortwasalsoemphasisedintheinterviewstudy.Thiswasalsodescribedas beingrelatedtoachangingdemandfromtourists,especiallyfromScandinavian countries,whotendtoaskformorequalitativeproductsandservices. Thetrendisthatpeople,thereisquitealotofdemandforexpensiveproducts.Peopleknow andagreetopaymoreinordertogetmoreservice.It’snotlikeallofthemareseekingsome thingcheaper,cheaperandcheaper(…)Forthem(Norwegians),it’smuchreducedprices.Of coursetheycanchoosesomethingataverygoodlevelhere,becausethisvery,verygoodlevel willbecheaperthantheyhavethere(inNorway).Iftheyhaveamassagefor100Euro,here theycangetthismassagefor30Euro(Femalerepresentative2,Jūrmalatourisminformation centre,February2007). Anotheraspectconcerningtheneedfordevelopinghealthtourismwastoavoid the seasonality of tourism. Normally, the trend is that all accommodation facilitiesarefullybookedduringafewsummermonths,whenthereisalmosta shortageofbedsforarrivingtourists,whiletheoccupancyismuchlowerduring thewinterseason.Oneoftheproblemsidentifiedinthiscontextisthatprivate entrepreneursintheprivatisationprocesstendedtodevelophotelsratherthan includespafacilitiesandotheractivitieswhichcouldattracttouriststhroughout

314 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort theyear,andthishascontributedtoarelianceonsummertourismactivities. However,thistrendisshowingsignsofchange,sinceanumberoflargerspa hotels have opened in Jūrmala, which also include conference facilities that could contribute to extending the tourist season (Female representative 2, Jūrmalatourisminformationcentre,February2007). TheeconomicaimsofdevelopingJūrmalaasatourismresortwithinthe TourismDevelopmentStrategy isalsomadewithclearparallelsof‘Europeanisation’ and‘Regionalism’asdiscussedinpreviouschaptersinPartIofthethesis.One exampleistheemphasisonhowJūrmalashouldbecomecompetitiveinbotha Europeanandaninternationalcontext.TheEUstructuralfundsareconsidered to be an important asset in the aims of realising tourism development in Jūrmala,aswellascollaboratingwithhealthresorts in neighbouring Balticor European countries, for example through establishing INTERREG projects (Jūrmala City Council 2007a). The aims of competitiveness within the local economy in Jūrmala in general and within tourism more specifically, are also formulatedwithreferencestonationalandregionalplanningdocuments,such asthe NationalDevelopmentPlan20072013 ,and TheDevelopmentProgramofRiga Region 20052011 , which emphasise economic growth and development 94 . According to the latter program, the vision for the Riga region includes becoming: ThedrivingforceofdevelopmentofLatvia,competitive,Europeanlevelregionofmetropolis, withevenlyhighlifestandardinthewholeterritorywithattractiveconditionsforbusinessand investmentswithbalancedandpolycentricspatialstructure(RigaPlanningRegionDevelop mentCouncil&RigaRegionDevelopmentAgency2005:6). Inthiscase,JūrmalaisidentifiedasconstitutingapartofthewiderurbanRiga region,withitsgeographicallocationandproximitytoRigadescribedasoneof Jūrmala’smainstrengthsintheTDS,providinggoodinfrastructurefortourism development. Tourism is also identified as one of the strategies for regional developmentaccordingtothedevelopmentprogramfortheRigaregion,inline with aims of “competitive national economy, varied andactiveentrepreneur ship” (Jūrmala City Council 2007a:34). The aims of tourism development as specifiedintheprogrammainlyrelatetodevelopinginfrastructureandmarket ing for tourism in the region, as a way of increasing the number of foreign

94 TheDevelopmentProgramofRigaRegion20052011 hasbeendevelopedbytheRigaPlanning Region Development Council and the Riga Region Development Agency. The program consistsofthreeparts:currentsituation,program,itsimplementationandmonitoring.Five targetsofregionaldevelopmentareidentifiedaswellasrelateddirectionsofactions(seeRiga PlanningRegionDevelopmentCouncil&RigaRegionDevelopmentAgency2004;2005).

315 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort touristsaswellastheturnoveroftourism.Inlinewiththeseobjectives,aswell asaimsrelatingtodeveloping“highqualityhumanresources”(ibidp.6),the TDSstressestheneedforextendinghumanresources and hospitality within tourism and hospitality as a way of raising the quality level of tourism in Jūrmala, by developing the tourism products and servicesofferedto tourists. This involves strategies relating to the local labour market, including a com mitmenttofosteringeducationalandtraineepossibilitieswithinbothhospitality andmedicalfieldsinordertodevelop‘professionalspecialists’withinthetour ismfield.ThiswouldcompriseestablishingaTourismCollegeinJūrmalaina longtermperspective.‘TheResortprogram’includedintheTDSidentifiesthe potential for developing a ‘resort cluster’ in Jūrmala, with a focus on resort tourism as both economic activities and the development of educational and researchactivities.DevelopingJūrmalaasa‘resort’ismadeinthewidermean ingoftheword,asusedforinternationalpromotionandbrandinginorderto attractbothtouristsandinvestmentsfromtheprivatesector.Inthis process, cooperationbetweenpublicandprivateinstitutionsisencouraged,whichalso reflects aims set up by the NDP and EU directives. These plans aim at strengthening the ‘scientific’ dimensions of the health resort, for example, withinbalneology,withafocusonthecuringeffectsofdifferentformsofbath andwatertreatments,withrootsinthe19 th centuryinLatvia(ibid). Marketing‘Westernised’healthtourism Theemphasison‘local’healthandspaproductsfor promoting Jūrmala as a healthresortdoesnotmerelyinvolvehighlightingnatureandcultureinatradi tional manner, but also commercialising theircontentsandmeaningsinawider sense, and thus making them available on an international basis. Thus, the emphasison‘traditions’withinspaandhealthproductswithintourismpromo tion is combined with keywords such as ‘modern’, ‘quality’, ‘European standardsandhospitality’aswellasscientifically‘medical’knowledge,including doctors’anddieticians’consultations.

GuestsoftheSpaareinvitedtoembarkonapersonaljourneyofwellbeing.Atrulyunique array of spa services and products combine the innovations of science, the renewing propertiesoftheseaandthebenefitsofbotanicalextracts.Throughextensiveresearch,we havecreatedacollectionofexclusivesensorytherapiestonurtureallofyoursenses(Baltic Beachhotelwww.balticbeach.lv20081005). Moreover,localspatraditionsalsomeetinternationaltrends;today,aspamenu in Jūrmala can include everything from Thai, Chinese, Russian, Swedish and

316 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort

Indian massages, revealing how the services and products offered have been adjustedtomeetthedemandsofforeigninternationalvisitors. O’Dell(2007)discussesthedevelopmentofSwedishspasandclaimsthat spas increasingly have become “commercial institutions”, including commercialisationofhospitalityandservices.O’Dellemphasisesthatthespas have moved from being “arenas for social interaction” as during the 19 th century,toincreasinglyfocusingon“individuallyorientedexperiences”,putting theindividual in focusbasedonthe ideathat wellness should develop from within each person, but also be guided by the spa environment and its employees.Thishasinturnparallelstogeneraltrendsofhowemphasisisput onconsumptionandexperienceswithintourismatlarge(O’Dell108fIn:Molz &Gibson2007).InJūrmala,theshifttowardsmoreindividualexperiencesis alsobecomingevident,butinthiscase,themainfactorofchangehasbeenthe privatisation of the previous sanatoriums, which are the basis of the development and establishment of more modern spa hotels. Thus, from representing more collective forms of tourism during the Soviet regime, maintainedthroughthestate’sidealsofwelfareforthesocialistpopulationand the organisation of trade unions, spa tourism today serves more individual forms, offering tailormade services and products for their visitors. From a situationinwhichthestatewasconsideredtocontributetotherehabilitation andhealthofitscitizens,theemergenceofspasnowreflectsmoreneoliberal currentsinbothLatviaandotherpartsofEurope,whichincludetheneedfor people to find alternative means for relaxation and escapefromthestressful everydaylife(seeO’DellIn:Molz&Gibson2007). Thecommercialisationofhealthtourismalsohasgenderedattributes.The promotion of spa and health tourism, may be analysed as marketing a ‘feminised’environment,reflectinggenderisedidealsofhowwomenandmen shouldlook,whichmeanshowtheirbodiesandfiguresaretransformed and ‘made’inthespa,throughdifferentprogramsoffitnessanddiets,orhairre movals,makeup,andanticellulitetreatments.Inthisprocess,achievingideals of femininities also comes with a price tag, guided by massproduced and commercialisedservices.Here,parallelscanbemadetopreviousdiscussionsin Chaptersix,inhowTrue(2003)claimsthatthetransformationprocessinpost socialist countries has included changing patterns of ‘Western’ lifestyle orientedconsumption,representingnewfoundwaysforwomentoexpresstheir femininity. The development of spa and health products and services rests uponthesemore‘Westernised’andindividualisedidealsoffemininityasacon trasttotheprevious socialist genderneutral ideals of collective rehabilitation

317 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort andrecreation.Still,livinguptotheseidealsisnotpossibleforeachandevery womanduetotherather‘highend’character,attractingthosewiththeright capitalandtimeforconsumption,whichalsodrawsboundariesbetweengroups of women, for example, between those being served at the spa facilities and thoseworkingandservingthetourists,aswillbediscussedinthenextchapters. Continuousgeographiesofplace DespitethereorientationtowardsWesternEuropeanmarketsthroughthede velopmentofspaand healthtourism,touristsfromRussiaandformerUSSR republicsstillconstituteanimportantmarketforthedevelopmentoftourismin Jūrmala.Intheinterviewstudy,aswellasinthetourismdevelopmentstrategy, the continuous presence of tourists from ‘Eastern’ markets is described as havingbothpositiveandnegativeconnotations.IntheTourismDevelopment Strategy,Jūrmalaisconsideredashavinga“recognizibleimageofaresortcity inEasternEurope,RussiaandCIS”,which isidentifiedasastrengthinthe SWOTanalysisoftourisminJūrmala(JūrmalaCityCouncil2007a:24).Repre sentatives from Jūrmala’s tourist information centre also emphasised the potential for increasing the share of tourists from different postsocialist countries,bymarketingJūrmalabasedonits‘old’andwellpreservedreputation asapopulartourismdestinationduringtheSovietregime. TheothermarketsareformerrepublicsoftheUSSR;theseareprospectivemarkets.Theyare developing;peoplestarttoearnmoneyandspendingvacationabroad.WehadaJūrmalastand in Uzbekistan;itwasverypopular. People rememberJūrmala from that time, and they are very happy that there are renovated houses and so on. Everyone remembers that during Soviettimestheywerehere,butalreadyalmost20yearshavepast,andtheyhaven’tbeenhere, but they would like to come here (Female representative 2, Jūrmala Tourism information centreFebruary2007). Moreover,theRussianspeakingpopulationinWesternpartsofEuropeandthe USwasdescribedasanewpotentialtourismsegment. (…) there are many Russians in Germany. Usually you think only of native people there. PeoplewereaskingforbrochuresinRussianandtherearespecialtouroperatorswhoarerun byRussianspeakingpeople,whoareorganisingtripsforformerRussiancitizenswhohave emigratedthere.Forthem,again,Jūrmalaissomethingtheyremember(Femalerepresentative 2,JūrmalaTourisminformationcentre,February2007). AmericantouristswithRussianoriginwereconsideredtocomposeanimpor tantpotentialmarketsincetheyusuallystayforalongerperiodoftime,butin

318 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort this case, the resources for marketing were considered to be too limited to attracttouriststoJūrmala,andhadtobeconductedonanationallevel. Still,theTDSalsostatesthata“largeamountofRussianspeakingevents may “threaten away” tourists from western countries” (Jūrmala City Council 2007a:26).Thus,thepresenceoflargeRussianorientedeventsisplacedunder the headline “Threats” in the SWOT analysis of the development of cultural tourism in Jūrmala. One example of the continuous inflow of tourists from RussiaandotherformerUSSRrepublicsto“Russianspeaking events” is the organisationoftheannual NewWave musicfestivalinJūrmala.Thefestivalhas beenarrangedsince2002,andcontinuesinsomewaysthetraditionofmusic festivalsinJūrmalawhichstartedduringthe1980s95 .Theintentionhasbeento findandpromotenewartistsfromRussiaandformerUSSRrepublics,aswell asothercountriesinWesternEuropeandinternationally.However,thepopu larity of the event has been more widespread within postsocialist countries, attractingmillionsofTVviewersandmanyvisitorsandpopstarsfromRussia and former USSR republics to Jūrmala each year (Female representative 2, Jūrmala tourism information center, February 2007; www.newwavestars.com 20081002). Interviews with representatives from the municipality and the tourism information center emphasised that the Russian influences in Jūrmala have continuedboththroughtourismandtheoveralleconomicdevelopmentofthe city.DuringtheSovietregime,JūrmalawasapopularresortfortheSovietelite, andtheimageofJūrmalawasaresortforthe‘wealthier’partsofthepopulation from Russia and the Soviet Union, a trend which seems to continue. Many Russianshaveboughtlandandsummerhousesinmoreprestigiousdistrictsin JūrmalafollowingLatvia’sindependenceandtheprivatisationprocess.Insome cases,theintervieweesdescribedthisashavinga‘negative’effectforJūrmala’s economic and political development, by being controlled and influenced by external interests rather than by the Latvian population itself (Female repre sentative Jūrmala City Council, April 2006; female representative 2, Jūrmala tourisminformationcenter,February2007). Continuityoflabourmarkettrends Theinterviewstudyrevealeda‘continuity’ofthelabourmarketstructuresfrom theSovietperiod,includingalargedependenceonemploymentwithinservices andtourism.

95 PopmusicfestivalJūrmala wasarrangedinJūrmalabetween1986and1993andbroadcasted throughouttheSovietUnion(seewww.newwavestars.com).

319 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort

Therearenoradicalchangessincethattime(duringtheSovietperiod),becauseJūrmalahas alwaysbeenaresortcity,andtheeconomyhastendedtobeconnectedtotourismandtothe developmentoftheresort.Therewasaperiodwhenthesanatoriumswerealmostgoingbank rupt, but now they are starting again to develop (Female representative State Employment Agency,Jūrmalabranch,August2005). Tourismwasdescribedasthe‘mostimportant’partofthelocaleconomy,as the main source of income among both employees and entrepreneurs in Jūrmala.ThemanufacturingsectorinJūrmalaisrelativelysmallandthecityhas continueditsemphasisonservices,ofwhichamajoritydirectlyandindirectly arerelatedtotourism,asaheritagefromtheSovietperiod.Themanufacturing industryisalsomainlyconcentratedtotheSlokadistrictinJūrmala,whiletour ismandservicestendtodominatethecentralpartsofthecity.In2006,around 86 percent of all employees had their main employment within services in general, and 7 percent worked within hotels and restaurants. Compared to previousyears,thelatterfigureofemploymentwithin hotels and restaurants has increased, from constituting around 2.9 percent in 1996 (Jūrmala City Council2004a,basedonLSCBstatistics). Thedependenceupontourismandserviceswasnotmerelydescribedas havingpositiveconnotationsintheinterviewstudy.Thejobalternativesforthe localpopulationwereconsideredtobelimited,makingtourismoneofthefew optionsforwork.Asaresult,alargeshareofthepopulation isestimated to workinRiga,ortohavefoundjobsabroad.Thejobswithintheservicesector inJūrmalawerealsodescribedasgeneratinglowerwagesthanjobsinRigaor abroad,whichalsomotivatedpeopletosearchforemploymentelsewhere. ThereasonwhypeoplearenotworkinginJūrmalaisthesalaries;it’sthemainreason.The economy is not functioning. People are going to Riga or Europe for work, and Jūrmala is becomingasleepingcity,andasuburbtoRigacity.Startupsandentrepreneurshiparevery low.Itisconnectedtothepriceofland,andit’sasmalllocalmarket,thatpeoplearespending moneyinRiga(Malelabourmarketconsultant,April2006). Ontheone hand,Jūrmala wasdescribedashavingadvantagesinitsworking environmentandnotbeingasstressfulasRiga,butontheotherhand,Jūrmala wasconsideredtobetooexpensiveforbothinvestingandliving,duetothe highpricesofproperty,landtaxesanddifficultiesinbuying land. Moreover, employment within tourism in Jūrmala also tends to be very seasonal in its characterandmainlyconcentratedtothesummermonths(Femalerepresenta tiveStateEmploymentAgency,Jūrmalabranch,August2005).Consequently,it hasbeenestimatedthataround15,000ofJūrmala’sresidentscommutetoRiga

320 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort onadailybasisforwork 96 .ThelabourmarketinJūrmalawasdescribedaspro vidingmorelowskilledjobpossibilitiescomparedtoRiga,andemployerswere consideredtohavedifficultiesinfindingamoreskilledworkforcewhichcould generate a better business environment. Paradoxically, the highskilled work forceislivinginJūrmala,butworkinginRiga.Thus,themunicipalitytendsto benefitfromtheincometaxesofpeoplelivinginJūrmalaandworkinginRiga, butfromawiderperspective,thelownumberofbusinessstartupsandem ploymentpossibilitiesalsogenerateaslowereconomicgrowth.Withintourism, Jūrmala’s tourism development strategy emphasises the need for attracting a welleducatedworkforcetothetourismsectorinJūrmala.Thecurrentweak nessesaredescribedasincludingthefollowing: (…) insufficient quality of hospitality services and shortage of hospitable employees, weak possibilitiesoflocalemployerstocompetewithemployersfromRigaonattractionofcorre spondingandhighlyqualifiedworkforce(JūrmalaCityCouncil2007a:24). The solution to the dependence on lowskilled jobs and low productivity in Jūrmala was described as creating new work places, especially by attracting more ‘creative’ businesses by initiating technology and business parks, which couldaffordtochooseJūrmalaasalocationfortheirinvestmentsandwhich wouldattractamorehighskilledlabourforce(Malelabourmarketconsultant, April2006;FemalerepresentativeJūrmalaCityCouncil,April2006). Genderedandethnicdimensionsofthelabourmarket Thereisalackoflabourmarketstatisticsillustratingthelocallabourmarketin Jūrmalabasedonsexandethnicity.However,basedontheresultsoftheinter viewstudy,thelabourmarketwasdescribedas‘feminised’,bothintermsofthe jobsofferedandcurrentunemploymentpatterns.Thestrongpresenceofser vicerelatedjobsbothduringtheSovietperiodandinthecontemporarylabour market was described as employing many women on the one hand. On the otherhand,thedownturnofthetourismsectorinthe1990stogetherwiththe closureoflargerfactoriesinJūrmalaweredescribedasresultinginunemploy mentformanywomeninJūrmala.

96 ThisfigureisbasedonalabourmarketsurveyconductedinJurmalain2005,basedona project funded by the European Social Fund. The aim of the survey was to provide an overviewofJurmala’slabourmarket,andincluded607respondents(employees),inthelocal labourmarketwithinallsectors,ofwhich60percentwerewomen.Sincethesurveywasonly available in Latvian, an interview with a labour market consultant responsible for its implementationandresultswasconductedinordertogainthemainresultsofthesurvey.

321 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort

Thefactories,thepaperandfishingfactoriesalsocloseddownandsomanypeoplebecame unemployed.DuringtheSoviettimesthereweremoreworkingplacesandlesspeoplewho wereunemployed.Nowadaystherearelessjobopportunitiesandmorepeopleintheunem ploymentoffice(FemalerepresentativeJūrmalaCityCouncil,April2006). Manufacturingindustries,suchaspaperandfishingfactories,usedtoemploy manywomeninJūrmala;“themencaughtthefishandthewomenworkedwith thecleaningofthefish”(Ibid).Eventhoughtheunemploymentratesforboth women and men have shown signs of a decrease during the last few years, womenstillconstituteamajorityofthoseregisteredatthelocalunemployment officeinJūrmala(seeFigure21). Figure21:NumberofregisteredunemployedpersonsinJūrmalabysex20012008.

2500

2000

Total 1500 Women

Men Number 1000

500

0 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Year Source: Foryears20012004 :statisticalmaterialderivedfromJūrmalaCityCouncilbasedon datafromtheStateEmploymentAgency,showingnumberofregisteredunemployedinthe beginningoftheyear. Foryear2005 ;statisticalmaterialfromtheStateEmploymentAgency Jūrmalabranch,showingnumberofregisteredunemployedon10August. Foryears20062008: data from the State Employment Agency homepage www.nva.gov.lv 20081003, showing numberofregisteredunemployedby31January. Moreover, the number of registered unemployed tends to be higher in the winter months, due to the seasonal character of tourism in Jūrmala. For example,attheendofJanuary2006,thetotalregisteredunemploymentratein Jūrmalawas6.4percent,comparedwith5.7percentattheendofJulythesame year.Women’sshareofthenumberofunemployedtendstofollowasimilar

322 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort pattern, in which they constitute around 66 percent of the total number of registeredunemployedinJūrmala(www.nva.gov.lv20081003). A female representative from the local branch office of the State Employment Agency in Jūrmala describes the background to the high unemploymentratesforwomenasfollows. Womenaremoreencouragedtocomeheretoregister;theyhavemoremotivationtogoto differentcoursesandsoon.Theotherthingisprobablythatmendonotregister,sincethey mayhaveillegalwork.Theywouldlosesomeoftheirhonourtocomehereandregisteras unemployed.Therearemorewomenwhoregister.Becausemaybeyouhadababy,youhave oneyearwhenyouhavesocialbenefits,andafterthatyoucancomeandregister,andifyou havesomewhereyoucanhaveyourbaby,youcangotocourses.Theyareusingallpossibili tiesthattheycan(FemalerepresentativeStateEmploymentAgency,Jūrmalabranch,August 2005). Thus,asimilarpatternofunemploymentasinCēsiscanbefoundinJūrmala: thatwomentendtoregisterasunemployed to ahigher extent compared to men.Justasinruralareas,womenweredescribedasmore‘active’inthelabour market,despitedifficultiesinfindingmorewellpaidjobs.Alabourmarketcon sultantdescribeditas“womenarethebestworkers,becausetheywork”.Men on theother hand weredescribed as more passive,with parallels toprevious discussionsofacontinuingnegative‘Sovietworking mentality’,which results partlyinthefactthatmenarenotpreparedtotakemorelowpaidjobsoffered, andpartlybytheportrayalofmenasthereal‘losers’oftransition,asaneffect ofa‘crisisofmasculinity’inthepostsocialistperiod. (…) it’s an individual choice; women are prepared to work for lower salaries than men. It doesn’tmean lowqualifiedjobs. They (women) havechildren andthey calculate in a long termperspectiveratherthanshorttimeperspective.Menaremoreopportunistsandtheyare not ready to work for less money. From the employers’ side,suchkind of reaction makes women more reliable as employees. Historically we are used to work here. But men won’t workforthatkindofmoney.It’snotdiscrimination,butalevelofacceptanceofthesalaries. Men are managers or in the construction business where they can make more money (…) Otherwisetheyliveonsocialbenefits,andhavesocialproblems,suchasalcoholism.Menare losing their role of being the only breadwinner. The losers end their lives (Interview male labourmarketconsultant,April2006). However,moretraditionalgenderrelationswithinthefamilyinwhichmenac tively were reclaiming their roles as the main family breadwinner, were also consideredtohaveeffectsforwomen’spossibilitiestoparticipateinthelabour market,intermsofeducationandworkexperience.

323 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort

We also have these tragic situations in some families where the men are earning a lot of money,andhedoesn’tallowhiswifetoearnherownincomeorlearnsomethingnew,and somethinghappenstohim,andshe’sbyherselfandshehasnoeducation,workingexperi ence.Therearemanywomenwhoarestayingathomewiththeirchildrenuntiltheyareeight or nine, and notregisteredhere(Femalerepresentative StateEmploymentAgency, Jūrmala branch,August2005). Thequestionofwomen’sandmen’spossibilitiesinJūrmala’slocallabourmar ketalsoneedstobeanalysedinrelationtoethnicityandLatvianlanguageskills. Today, the Russianspeaking groups constitute a fairly large part of the population of Jūrmala. ‘Ethnic’ Latvians constitute barely a majority of the populationwith50.4percentin2006,followedbyethnicRussians(35.9%)and Byelorussians (4.1%) (Jūrmala City Council 2007b). When comparing the RussianshareofthecontemporarypopulationwiththatduringtheSovietpe riod, statistics show a decrease of Russianspeakers from 1989 and onwards. The ‘ethnic’ Latvian population merely constituted around 45 percent of Jūrmala’sresidentsin1989,comparedwithabout87percentin1935(Jūrmala City Council presentation material 2004, based on data from LCSB) 97 . The share of Latvian citizens and noncitizens reflect about the national average; 24.2 percent of the population in Jūrmala were classified as ‘noncitizens’ in 2006, compared to 73.1 percent ‘citizens’ and 2.7 percent ‘foreign citizens’ (JūrmalaCityCouncil2007b). Unfortunately, the scarce statistics of employment or unemployment reported by sex does not include figures of ‘ethnic’ Latvians’ and Russian speakers’ participation in the labour market divided by sex. In terms of registeredunemployment,around60percentofthetotalnumberofregistered unemployed inJūrmalain2005did not have Latvian astheir mothertongue (seeFigure22).Thestatisticsmakeadivisionaccordingtotheresultsofthe Latvianlanguagetest,rangingfromthehighestlevelofLatvian,whichmeans thattheyaremoreorlessfluentinLatvian,tothelowestlevel,whichcorrelates toonlyabasicLatvianvocabulary.Thestatisticsalsoincludethosewhohave nottakenalanguagetestandreceivedacertificationoftheirlevelofLatvian.

97 In1935,Jurmala’spopulationwasaround13,600peoplecomparedto60,600peoplein1989 (JūrmalaCityCouncilpresentationmaterial2004.DatafromLCSB).

324 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort

Figure22: ShareofunemployedpersonsinJūrmalabylevelofLatvianproficiency,2005(%).

40 38 35 30 25 23 20 17 15 Percent 15 10 7 5 0 Mothertongue Highestlevel Averagelevel Lowestlevel Nocertification ofLatvian LevelofLatvianproficiency knowledge

Source: Based on the number of unemployed registered at the State Employment Agency, JūrmalabranchinAugust2005. Intheinterviewstudy,thepossibilitiesforRussianspeakersinthelocallabour market were described as somewhat contradictionary. On the one hand, the Russian speaking minority was described as having fewer job opportunities comparedtoethnicLatviansiftheyhadlimitedLatvianlanguageskills. IfyouareworkinginLatviathereisanobligationtoknowtheLatvianlanguage,andifyouare a foreignlanguage speaker you have to take this examination, to prove that you know the Latvianlanguage.Ifyouarelearningthelanguageandyouhavenotthiscertificate,youcan only work in more lowqualified jobs until you get the certificate (Female representative JūrmalaCityCouncil,April2006). On the other hand, the labour market in Jūrmala was described as being affectedbythepresenceof‘Russian’businesses,whichhadcontactswithcom paniesinRussiaorwhichservedalargenumberofRussianspeakingclientele, for example, within the tourism or trade sector. Moreover, the Russian speaking share of the population was portrayed as taking advantage of the employment opportunities provided and as more eagertostartuptheirown businesses, as well as searching for alternative workingopportunities both in otherpartsofLatviaandabroad,comparedwith‘ethnic’Latvians. Russianpeoplearemoreentrepreneurial,intermsofhowtheydobusiness.It’smorecultural training.IfyoudobusinessinLatviathatwillbewithRussianpeople,butifyouwanttohave skilledpeople,thenyouwillhireLatvians.Thatisthetendency.Butthepotentialrisktolose

325 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort yourjobwashigheramongRussians,53percent,and14percentamongLatvians.Meaning thatifyoudon’tspeakLatvian,thelabourmarketopportunitiesaremorelimited(Malelabour marketconsultant,April2006). Conclusion Theaim ofthischapterhasbeentoanalyse thedevelopment of tourism in Jūrmalabasedon‘geographiesofplace’,asrelatedtothepreviouslydiscussed geographies of ‘neonationalism’, ‘Europeanisation’ and ‘reliccommunism’. Table13providesanoverviewoftheinterrelationsbetweenthedifferentgeog raphies,withafocusontheirgenderedand‘ethnic’ dimensions. Jūrmala has been described as a city with contrasting features which illustrates the inter mixtureandcomplexrelationshipamongthethreedifferentgeographies.More ‘traditional’ geographies of place with parallels to neonationalism have been discussedintermsofhowtourismmarketinghighlightsJūrmalainrelationto ‘unique’localculturalandnaturalresources.Theemphasisonnaturereflectsa wishtopreserveasenseof‘Latvianness’,bothintermsofhighlightingthesea side landscapes, and by stressing the heritage of health tourism as ‘Latvian’ rather than Russian. Moreover, the ‘Latvian’ elements of nature and cultural traditionsalsoincluderepresentationsofthefemalecoded‘Nature’ashealing andnurturingforthetourists’needsandwellbeing,alsoasembodiedinthe caringhandsofthe(female)spatherapist. Table13:GeographiesofplaceinJūrmala. Geographiesof Geographiesof Geographiesof neonationalism Europeanisation reliccommunism

Geographiesofplace Preserving Commercialisation. Continuitywiththe ‘Latvianness’. past.

Gendered geographies of Focuson‘Latvian’ Commercialising Continuousreliance tourismandwork traditionsofhealth healthtourism:the on‘Easternmarkets’. tourism.Natureas spaasfeminine Feminisationofthe ‘healing’and environment. labourmarket. feminised. Striding towards becoming a ‘modern’ health tourism resort is strongly ex pressedinplanningdocumentsaswellasintheinterviewstudy.Thishasstrong parallelswithpreviouslydiscussedideologiesof‘Europeanisation’,ofreorienta tion towards western European markets and following directives of regional ‘competitiveness’ in terms of attracting both investments and tourists to Jūrmala.Thisprocessalsoinvolveselementsofcommercialisation,inhowlocal

326 Chaptereleven–Geographiesofplace:transformingJūrmalaasahealthresort naturalandculturalresources,suchasnature,labour and hospitality,increas ingly are commodified and marketed on an international scale. Moreover, I have also shown that this development bears genderised dimensions, in how thehealthandspaestablishmentsbecome‘feminised’environments,designed toattractfemalevisitors, andreflectingmore ‘Western’idealsoffemininities, beautyandconsumption. Even though the spa products and services offered are marketed as originatinginarather‘traditional’Latvianlandscape,theemergenceofhealth andspatourismcontinuestohaverootsinstructures established during the Soviet period. The old sanatoriums from the 1960s and 1970s are today renovated and modified to fit modern standards, and the emphasis on the ‘medical’and‘scientific’elementsofhealthtourismalsohavetheirorigininthe previousidealsofcollectiverecreation.Moreover,eventhoughtheemphasisis on‘individuality’andpersonalservice,themassproducedformsofhospitality and service also seem to continue into the present version of how health tourism is organised. The continuity with the past is also manifested and maintainedthroughthecontinuousinflow of visitorsfrom‘Eastern’ markets, which was described in the interview study as having both positive and ‘nostalgic’ elements, at the same time as it was regarded as a ‘threat’ for attractingWesternEuropeantouriststoJūrmala.Intermsofthelabourmarket, connectionswiththepastSovietstructuresshowsignsofcontinuing,bothin termsofthedominanceoftheservicesectorandintheworkingmentalityand ideals, from which women are described as more ‘active’ despite them being overrepresentedintheunemploymentstatistics,andmenasfacinga‘crisisof masculinity’andnotinterestedinmorelowpaidjobswhicharethedominant featureofJūrmala’slabourmarket.Thus,a‘feminisation’ofthelabourmarket canbedistinguished, inhowwomenadjusttotheconditionsofemployment andunemploymentwhilementendtoseekalternativepathwaysfortheirliveli hood.Moreover,thepossibilitiesinthelocallabourmarketarealsogoverned by ethnicity, in terms of language skills. The interview study revealed how Russianspeakerswereconsideredtohavebothadvantagesanddisadvantages intheirsearchforemployment,partlydependingontheirlanguageabilityand partlydependingontheincreasingimportanceof‘Russianoriented’businesses, includingtradeandservices.

327

328

Chaptertwelve Women’slivelihoodstrategies withintourisminJūrmala Thischaptercontainsananalysisofwomen’slivelihoodstrategieswithintour ismintheLatvianseasideresort,Jūrmala.Justasinthepreviouschapterabout employmentandentrepreneurshipintheCēsisdistrict,themainfocuswillbe putonthebackground,motivesandintentionsforemploymentwithintourism. Thecasestudywillhighlightmainlywomenas employees withintourismanddis cuss research questions such as: what is the background for women’s employment within tourism in Jūrmala? What livelihood opportunities does workwithinmorelargescaleformsoftourismprovide?Iwillalsoanalyse differ ences in women’s livelihood strategies and opportunities in terms of ethnicity andage.Thechapterwillstartwithadiscussionofwhetherornotthetourism sector constitutes a ‘refuge’ for ‘victims’ of the transition, based on previous studiesoftourisminpostsocialistcountries.Iwillthenprovideageneralover viewoftheresultsofthesurveyinJūrmalaanddiscussthemainmotivesand strategiesforworkandlivelihoodwithintourisminJūrmalabasedonboththe surveyandinterviewstudyresults. Tourism–a‘refuge’ora‘goldenroad’forwomen’semployment? SzivasandRiley(2002)claimthatinterindustrylabourmobilityfromoldand declining economic sectors into the new emerging service sector has been a common outcome of structural changes in postsocialist economies, such as, Hungary.Aquantitativestudywasconductedinordertoillustratethemotives andeffectsoflabourmobilityintotourismfromothersectorsoftheHungarian economy,basedonthehypothesisthattourismwas“arefugeforthevictimsof the transition”, constituting the “least worst” option in the labour market 98 . Duringthetransitionprocessinthe1990s,tourismwasoneofthelowestpaid sectorswithintheHungarianeconomy.Thelowwageswithintourismwerenot

98 The study was based on macro economic data, including the distribution of 600 questionnaires in four Hungarian regions, to a wide variety of tourism workers, including thoseworkingintransportation,hotelsandrestaurants.Ofthetotalamountofresponses,58 percentwerewomenand42percentmen.

329 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala consideredtoattractmanypeoplefromotheroccupations,butSzivasandRiley claimed that people might choose tourism for other reasons than pure eco nomicalones,andthattourismworkmustbecomparedtoothersectorsofthe Hungarian economy. The results showed that tourism labour was recruited fromawiderangeofindustries,ofwhichthetradesectorconstitutedamajor ity, including retailing and foreign trade companies. The second largest generating category was “Other”, which included those who had been on maternity leave or had been housewives. The mobility into tourism was assumedtoincludesomekindofdisadvantage,forexample,concerningalower social status or wage. Still, the employment situation for the respondents seemedtohavechangedlittleornotatall,andthemajoritywassatisfiedwith their jobwithintourism,comparedtotheirprevious employment. The main motivesbehindworkingwithintourismwerecapturedinstatements,suchas,“I wantedtohaveaninterestingjob”and“IwantedtohaveajobinwhichIcould dealwithpeople”(Szivas&Riley2002In:Hall&Williams2002). SzivasandRileydidnotapplyagenderperspectiveintheiranalysisofthe data,eventhoughwomenwereoverrepresentedasrespondentsinthesurvey.I wouldsuggestthatagenderperspective,aswellasananalysisofethnicityand class,iscrucialinunderstandingthetransformingpostsocialistlabourmarket andthebackgroundandmotivesforwomen’semploymentwithintourismin Jūrmala.Theassumptionthattourismwouldconstituteasectorforthe‘victims ofthetransition’isrejectedbyGhodsee(2003;2005),whoclaimsthattourism inBulgariahasservedasa‘goldenroad’througheconomichardships,especially forwomen,andthattourismhashadalonghistoryofofferingrelativelyattrac tive employment possibilities for women with regard to both wages and workingconditions.Workwithintourismduringthecommunistperiodoffered languageskills,educationandotherexperienceswhichserveasimportantcul turalcapitalinthepostsocialistperiod.Tourismhasalsobeenshowntobeone ofthesectorswhichhaveabsorbedwomenwholosttheirjobswithinthepub licsectorafterthecommunistregime(Ghodsee2003;2005).

Women’semploymentwithintourisminJūrmalaintransition Parallels can be made between Ghodsee’s study in Bulgaria and the develop mentoftourisminJūrmala,eventhoughthereisalackofstudiesandstatistics whichmayillustrateemploymentwithintourismduringtheSovietoccupation. Interviewswithemployeesandotherswithinthetourismsectorrevealedthat workinsanatoriumsandotherrecreationfacilitieswasfemaledominatedalso duringtheSovietperiod,particularlyconsideringthehealthandmedicalorien

330 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala tation. The major differences between tourism development in Bulgaria and LatviaarethatresortssuchasGoldenSandsbecamemajorinternationaltour ism destinations during the 1960s, while health resorts such as Jūrmala remainedfairlyisolatedwithintheUSSRwithonlyalimitednumberofforeign tourists.Intheinterviewstudy,Imerelycameincontactwithonlyonefemale employeewhohadworkedwithintourisminJūrmaladuringtheSovietperiod. Sabine startedtowork asa varietyshowdancerin 1972 at one of the largerhotelsinJūrmala.Shehadbeendancingsinceshewasseven. Mymotherbroughtmetotheschool’stheatreanddanceactivitieswhenIwasseven,andI sawdanceforthefirsttimeandfellinlovedirectly,andunderstoodthatitwaswhatIwanted todo.Mymothersaid,“Withdanceyouwon’tearnmoney;youhavetogetaneducation”.So Ididexactlywhatshesaid;Igraduatedwithinatechnicalcollege,andbecameaneducated radiomechanic.Soaftermygraduation,Ishowedmydiplomaformymotherandwentoffto dancevariety(Sabine). Shehadearlierbeenanactivefolkdancer,butwasofferedthejobatthehotel through a friend. The hotel was one of the few hotels in Latvia during the SovietregimeopenedforaWesternaudience,aswellasforvisitorsfromother partsoftheSovietUnion.Thus,thehotelhadaratherexclusivestatus. Ithinkamajoritycamefromsocialistcountries;butasyoumightknow,weweren’tallowedto talkwiththeforeigntourists;itwasstrictlyforbidden.Weweren’tevenallowedtocomenear them.Weknewthattheywereforeigners,butwedidn’tknowwherefrom.Buttherewere peoplefromFinlandandotherwesterncountries(Sabine). Sabine worked in the variety show sixeveningsper week, and describes the shows as becoming very popular, including live music and famous Russian actorsandsingers.Thehotelshowwasdevelopedthroughaninfluentialmem berofthetradeunion,whohadtravelledabroadand got inspiration for the nightlife.Otherworkersalsobroughtwesterninfluences. Inthosedayswehadareallypopularbartender;hehadtravelledalot,workedondifferent boatsandferriesandlearnedhowtofixdrinks.ThenweheardofGinFizzforthefirsttime, chipsandhamburgers.Hedecidedtoservehamburgersherealsoandthebarbecamevery popular(Sabine). Still,the‘Russian’and‘Soviet’influencesweredominating. Youcouldonlysingoneforeignsongperperformance,notmore,thenyouhadtochoose RussianorLatvianmusicinstead.ButactuallytheRussianmusicwasplayedmorethanthe Latvian(Sabine).

331 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Sabine was employed by the trade union, and got contacts with prominent figureswithinthestateorganization.Sheemphasisesthatinordertogetajob withinthehotelorrecreationsectorduringtheSovietperiod,goodconnections withthe‘right’peoplewererequired.Forexample,Sabineandherformerhus band got the possibility to buy an apartment in Riga through their contacts withinthetradeunion.Sabinewasalsowellpaidcomparedtootherworkersin SovietLatvia,andcouldearnaround500rubelspermonth,whichwasmore thanherhusbandwhoworkedasanengineerandearned200rubels,andher motherwhoworkedatafactoryandearnedmerely90rubels.Asaworkerata moreWesternorientedhotel,Sabinehadaccesstootherproductsontheblack marketwhichhadbeenboughtfromWesterntourists. Ofcourse,wewereinthecentreamongpeoplewhohadaccesstoalltypesofproducts;for example,Icouldbuyabathingsuitfor90rubels,andsomepeopleearned80rubels,sothose kindsofthingswerenotforordinarypeople(…)Waitresseswereallowedtocomecloseto theforeigntourists,sotheyweretheoneswiththerightcontacts(Sabine). WhenSabineturned31,shedecidedtoabandonwhatshetermsher‘bohemian’ lifeandwentintothe‘normal’civillife.ShegotajobatasanatoriuminJūrmala asasecretary,butfounditdifficulttoadjusttothenewlifestyle. Therewassuchadifferencebetweenusandthem.Wehadourownlanguage;wehadprac ticestogether,thenwehadtosleepbeforewehadourperformances;weweretogetherallthe time.Whenwewenttothebeachwetalkedaboutdanceandfashionandhowwewouldper form,aboutourprogramandnews,andwhenIcametothesanatoriumIdidn’tknowwhatto talkabout(…)Icouldn’tsleepforayearwhenIquitmyjobasadancer;Iclosedmyeyes,but Ineverfellasleep;ittookhalfayear.ThenIopenedmyeyesandwenttowork.Themost difficult was the working hours from eight until five.I felt terrible,IthoughtIwas dying (Sabine). Whenthesanatoriumsclosedattheendofthe1980s,Sabineandaround500 otheremployeeslosttheirjobsintheprivatizationprocessandwiththegeneral decline of the tourism sector in Jūrmala. Sabine found other administrative jobs,butfinallyendedupworkingasareceptionistatthesamehotelinwhich shehadworkedasadancerinthe1970s. For Sabine and others who worked within tourism during the Soviet period, the economic and human capital for employees within tourism followingindependenceasdescribedinGhodsee’sstudywasverylimited.Since Russian was the official language, and the contact with foreign guests was restricted and highly supervised by the authorities, Sabine’s knowledge in

332 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Englishisstilllow,andshenowtakesalanguagecourseatthehotel.Moreover, themoreluxuriouslifestylethatsheandhercolleagueshadduringtheirtimeas variety dancersended before thetime of independence,and she faced a new labourmarketwithnewconditionsandrequirements.

Exploringlivelihoodstrategieswithintourism Thequestionofwhetherornottourismshouldberegardedasa‘refuge’forthe ‘victims’oftransitioniscomplex,butneitherSzivasandRiley’snorGhodsee’s study supportsthis assumption. However,I wouldsuggest that the question remainsof for whom and why tourismisconsideredasattractive,andhastobe analysedinrelationtogender,classandethnicity. Thefollowingsectionswill provideanoverviewofthebasicresultsofthesurveyandanalysethedifferent motivesandstrategiesforemploymentwithintourism,basedontheresultsof boththesurveyandtheinterviewstudy. The Jūrmala survey comprised a total number of 167 respondents, of which 132 were women (79%) and 35 were men (21%). The respondents proved to have a fairly ‘local’ profile; a majority of the respondents lived in Jūrmala(46%)andRiga (35%).Around30percent of both the Jūrmala and Rigaresidentsstatedthattheywerebornand/orraisedattheircurrentplaceof residence. The agedistributionofthe respondents shows an interesting gen derised pattern. The boxandwhiskers plot diagram below clearly illustrates howtheagerangeforwomenismuchwiderthanthatformen(seeFigure23).

Figure23: Agedistributionofsurveyrespondentsbysex.

70 167

82

60

50 84

159 40 Age 57

30

20

10

Women Men

333 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Amajorityofmenare intheirearlytwenties, whileamajorityofwomenare betweentwentyandfortyyearsold.Theminimumageisaboutthesamefor womenasformen,17yearsand16years,respectively,buttheagespanfor womenshowsamoreevenpatternthanthatformen,stretchingfromaround 40to62,whilethefigureformenshowsmore‘extreme’values,withonlyafew respondentsolderthan25.Theagerangewasalsoreflectedinthefamilysitua tion.Around50percentofboththefemaleandthe male respondents were either married or living in cohabitation, but the share of women who have childrenwassignificantlyhigherthanthatofmen,57percentcomparedto24 percent. Arelativelysignificantshareoftherespondentsinthesurveystatedthat theyhadsomesortofhighereducation(universityorcollege);53percentofthe female respondents,compared to 25percent ofthe malerespondents, which alsoreflectthegeneralpatternthatLatvianwomentendtohaveahigheredu cationthanmen.Only9percentofthefemalerespondents(11persons)and15 percent of the male respondents (5persons) specified thatthey had a higher educationwithinthetourismfield.Alargemajorityofboththefemaleandthe malerespondentshadworkedattheircurrenttourismjoblessthanoneyear, whichmaybeexplainedbythefactthatmanyofthehotelsinMajoriincluded inthestudywerefairlynewlyopened.Workwithin tourism was also mainly offered on a fulltime and allyearround basis, for80percentof thefemale respondents,despitethecommonseasonalityoftourism.Consequently,around thesamesharestatedthattheirworktourismwasthemainsourceofincome, and only 16 percent of the female respondents specified that they had an additionalincome. AsinthecasestudyfromtheCēsisdistrict,thesurveyinJūrmalaincluded 15different statementsrelatingtothemain motivesforengaging intourism work.JustasintheCēsisdistrict,thesurveyshowsamixof social or lifestyle oriented motivesand economical factorswhichareinterrelatedinthebackground to work within tourism. These were also evident in the interview study, as differentlivelihoodstrategies.Intheanalysisofthemorequantitativematerial, afocusisputonthefemalerespondents’replies,inordertodrawparallelsto the focus on women’s rather than men’s livelihood strategies. Based on the quantitative and more qualitative statements of thesurveyandthe more in depth interview study, three main categories of livelihood strategies can be distinguished.Firstly,therearemotivesrelatingtomore‘economicmotives’for employment within tourism, which constitute a response and solution to a particular problem or situation. Here, more ‘survival strategies’ can be

334 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala distinguished. Secondly, the background to work within tourism was also relevant to the nature and content of tourism related work, which will be exemplifiedthroughmore ‘lifestyleorientedstrategies’ .Thirdly,thetourismsector wasperceivedasa‘new’positiveandpromisingsector,whichwillbediscussed alsoinrelationtomore ‘careerorientedstrategies’ .Table14providesanoverview ofthefemaleinterviewees,whowerepartoftheinterviewstudy,inrelationto theirfamilystructure,residenceandemploymentwithintourism. Table14: FemaleintervieweeswithintourisminMajori,Jūrmala. Family Residence Employment Aleksandra , Boyfriend,liveswithhermother Riga Hoteladministrator 22 Emma,26 Divorced,butnowcohabitee Riga Hoteladministrator Erika,23 Single,liveswithherparents Jūrmala Employeeatpublic tourismattraction Irina,29 Cohabitee Jūrmala TICemployee Klara,52 Husband,twochildren(22,5) Riga Hotelcleaner Matilde,36 Husband,twochildren(16,17) Jūrmala Hotelmanager Nina,59 Husband,twochildren(35,20) Jūrmala Hotelcleaner Regīna,23 Cohabitee Riga Hotelreceptionist Sabīne,53 Divorced,onechild(33),lives Jūrmala Hotelreceptionist withhergrandson(15) Sofīja,33 Cohabitee Riga Hotelmanager Vaira,36 Divorced,twochildren(13,12) Jūrmala SPAemployee Valentina,49 Cohabitee,twochildren(23,27) Jūrmala Formerhotelemployee Vera,35 Divorced,onechild(14) Riga Fitnessinstructor Viktoriya,38 Husband,twochildren(19,15) Jūrmala Hotelreceptionist Zaiga,37 Husband,twochildren(17,10,5) Jūrmala SPAemployee Zoya,25 Husband,onechild(7) Jūrmala Hotelcleaner Employmentwithintourismasaresponseorsolutiontoaproblem Thefirstsetofmotivesbehindemploymentwithintourism identified in the surveyandinterviewstudycanbedescribedasmoreeconomicallyoriented,as aresponseorsolutiontoaproblem,forexample,unemployment.Thus,work ingwithinthetourismsectorcanberegardedasapossibilitytogetajobinthe labourmarketforthosewhomayhaveexperienceddifficultiesinfindingajob for different reasons, for example, due to a lack of education and language skills,age,lackofworkingexperience.Tourismcaninthiscontextberegarded asatemporaryorseasonalemployment,asa‘steppingstone’,inordertoget moneyandexperienceinthelabourmarket.Eventhoughalargeshareofthe

335 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala femalerespondents(49%)disagreedinthestatement,“Iwasunemployedand neededajob”,40percent‘agreedmoreorless’or‘stronglyagreed’thatthey had been in need of a job. Moreover, 64 percent ‘agreed more or less’ or ‘stronglyagreed’inthestatement,“Ihadfewotheremploymentoptions”.Only asmallershareofthefemalerespondents(31%)agreedstronglyormoreorless in the statement that they “needed additional work”. The more openended questionsofthesurveyrelatingtothebackgroundandmotivesforemployment withintourismprovidedthefollowinganswersrelating to the needto get an incomeandemployment. Myreasonwastheneedtoearnmoneyformyself.AndwithmyeducationIwouldnotbe acceptedtoanyhigherpositions(Woman,21,cleaner). Iwasunemployedandreceivedthisoffer(Woman,53,cleaner). IneededajobandIappliedforthisvacancy(Woman,21,receptionist). TherearelittleotheremploymentopportunitiesinJūrmala(Woman,45,cleaner). Ineededseasonalemploymentandbychancecametoahotel.Iworkintourismnotbecause itinterestsme,buttoearnadditionalmoney(Woman,21,cleaner). Toensurethefamily’smaterialstate(Woman,38,SPAemployee). It does not seem to be a difficult job for me, and it does not necessarily require previous working experience, whichis important inother places. Therefore for young people it is a goodpossibilitytostartworking(Woman,25,administrator). Survivalstrategies Basedontheabovesurveyreplies,workwithintourismwasconsideredtooffer ratherlowskilledjobs,whichwasperceivedasbeingatemporarysolutionfor employmentandlivelihood.Thesemore‘economicallyorientedmotives’were also evident in the interview study, which here will be discussed as ‘survival strategies’. Amajorityofthefemaleintervieweesdescribedthelabourmarketin Jūrmalaasofferingrathergoodopportunitiestofindajobforbothwomenand men,especiallyonaseasonalbasisduetothepresenceofthetourismsector. I’vealwaysbeenabletofindajobfast.Thosewhoseekwillfind…Somesaythatit’sdifficult tofindajob,butIdon’tbelievethat.Idon’tknowifit’seasiertofindajobinJūrmalathanin Riga.Hereit’seasiertofindajobduringthesummer,sinceallhotelsneedextrastaffthen, andmanyshopsopentheirbusiness(Sofija). However,oneofthemainproblemswasconsideredtobefindingawellpaid andmorequalifiedjob.Thejobsofferedwerealsodescribedaslowskilledand lowpaid,whichwasconsideredtobeaprobleminthewishtocreateasuffi cientlivelihoodbase.

336 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Youcanalwaysfindworkifyouwantto.Youcanfindjobswhereyou’llgetverylittlepaid, but eventually you’ll be able to increase your income. It depends on your own needs and priorities,whatdemandsyouhave(Zaiga). Thus,theimageofJūrmalaasa‘tourismtown’wasdescribedashavingboth positiveandnegativedimensionsintermsofthestructureofthelabourmarket, andtheneedfor ‘cheaplabour’.Forsomeofthefemale interviewees, work withintourismwasconsideredtobeoneofthefewoptionsofemployment, duetotheirage,educationorethnicity,whichwillbefurtherdiscussedbelow. For Vaira, tourism appeared as one of the few options for additional work,inanacutesituationinherlife.Sheisoriginallyfromthewesternpartof Latvia, but has lived in Jūrmala for seven years, and has both her upper secondaryeducationandworkexperiencewithinthehealth sector. Currently, shehasthreejobs,oneataSPAdepartmentatahotel,oneatahospitalinRiga, and one job on an unofficial basis within gardening. The need for an extra incomeapartfromherworkatthehospitalcamewhensheseparatedfromher husband, a relationship which had been characterized by both physical and psychologicalviolenceformanyyears.Vairadescribesthedecisiontoleaveher husbandasnecessaryforbothherandherchildren,buttheconsequenceswere much more difficult than she had imagined. She stresses that protection for womenwhohavebeensubjectsofabuseisnonexistentinLatvia,andthereisa lackofsheltersopenforwomen’sneeds.Shewasforcedtolivetogetherwith herhusbandforsixmonthsuntilshecouldfindanapartment. Therentsareveryhigh,andit’sverydifficultto support yourself and your children. It’s a mysterythatIfoundsomewheretolive.It’salongstory.Iaskedforhelpeverywhere.Idis tributed leaflets; I sought help at the church; I went to the social authorities, the social ministry,friends…Butalltheseeffortsgavenothing(…)InallplacesIgottheanswerthat “wecannothelpyou”.Therewererulesandroutines,butIwasn’tincludedinthem.Iwasn’t registeredinJūrmalaatthattime,andIwasn’tanalcoholicorsomethinglikethat,andmy childrendidn’tliveinthestreets.Ididn’tfitintoanyoftheircategories.Ionlyhadonechoice andthatwastoleavehim,butIhadnoplacetogo(Vaira). Vaira’shusbandwasneverchargedorprosecutedfortheabuse,andshefelt thatitwasdifficulttobetakenseriouslyinheraccusations.WhenVairaman agedtosecureaplacetolive,shealsoneededafulltimejobinordertosupport herchildrenfinancially.Sheappliedforthejobatthehotelsinceitrepresented a rather safe and wellpaid job compared to other service and healthrelated workshehadexperiencewithearlier.

337 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Thenatureandcontentoftourismwork Thesecondcategoryofmotivesisrelatedtothecharacterandcontentoftour ismrelatedworkanditsworkingenvironments,for example,communication withtheguests,experienceofdifferentculturesandlanguages,socialcontacts, variation and diversity of work, and working within a larger team of people. Theimportanceofthesocialdimensionwithintourismworkwasevidentinthe survey,inwhich68percentofthefemalerespondents‘stronglyagreed’withthe statement“IwantedajobinwhichIcouldmeetpeople,”and77percentalso ‘strongly’supportedthestatement“Iwantedaninterestingjob”.Moreover,a largeshareofthefemalerespondents(73%)stronglyagreed inthe statement that“workwithintourismprovidesmewithnewchallengesandexperiences”, and78percentalsostronglyagreedthatthey“wantedtowork inapleasant physical environment.” Sixtyone percent of the female respondents also stronglyormoreorlessagreedwiththestatement“Myworkwithintourismis a reflection of my personal lifestyle and identity.” The statements were also complementedwiththefollowinganswers. Communicationwithdifferentpeople,usingvariouslanguages(Woman,34,SPAemployee). Ilikeverymuchtocommunicatewithpeopleandtodomybest.Willingnesstocommunicate inEnglish,withagreatpleasureItellourvisitorswhattheycanseeandwhatplacestheycan visit(Woman,38,receptionist). Iliketoworkinateam;workwithpeople(Woman,49,cleaner). Tourismisabroadeningofhorizons,newknowledgeandacquaintanceswithotherpeople andculturesandsimplyapleasantrelaxation(Woman,55,cleaner). Veryinterestingandresponsiblejob.Alotofcommunication,alotofactivity.Thereisa feelingthatyouareintherhythmoflifeandnothingescapesyou(Woman,45,cleaner). Lifestyleorientedstrategies Fromtheinterviewstudy,itbecameevidentthatemploymentwithintourism could be a way of combining paid work with a personal interest or sports hobby, health, beauty etc. Work within tourism could be a precondition for practicing a hobby, or could be a direct expressionofthehobby.Workwas more described in terms of a lifestyle and could in this respect offer flexible working hours and freedom to decide one’s own work schedule, which was moreevidentforwomeninmanagementpositionsandthosewhohadsports related activities. Work within tourism could be described as having a more entrepreneurialoriented, independent character, which involved multiple jobs and activities. Thus, it was not economic profit which was considered as central,butthefreedomtopracticeahobby.

338 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Vera is35 years oldandhas lived in Riga all her life,andworksasafitness instructoratahotelin Jūrmala, startingayearago.Shewasencouragedbya colleaguewhohadworkedatthehoteltoapplyforthejob.Sheiscombining herworkatthehotelwithajobatagyminRiga,andisalsocurrentlytaking healthrelated courses in higher education parttime. She went to a technical collegeandworkedforsometimeinthetextileindustry,butsoonrealizedthat shewantedtocommitherselftoherinterestinsportsandfitnesswhenthose startedtogetmorepopularinLatvia. IwasactivewithinsportsduringmystudiesanddiscoveredthatitwaswhatIlikedthebest.If it’sahobbyyoucanmakemoneyfrom,thenit’sthebestoption.It’sveryimportantforme thatmyworkmakesmehappyandprovidesmoney(…)Ilikemyjobverymuch,andit’s moreofalifestyletohaveajoblikethis(Vera). ForVera,workwithinthefitnessandtourismsectoralsobecameaquestfor independence,reflectingastrategytohaveherown income and develop her owninterestsandhobbies.Vera,justassomeoftheotherfemaleinterviewees hadearlierbeenathomeasahousewife.Thewomendescribeditasboththeir ownwishtobehome withtheirchildrenforalongerperiodoftime,andas theirhusband’swish,sincethemenwantedtotaketheroleasthemainbread winner. Verawasahousewifeforsixyears,butsheandherhusbanddivorceda fewyearsback.Duringtheirmarriage,shestarted to work within the fitness sector,butherhusbanddidnotapproveofherdecisiontorealiseherhobby throughpaidwork. Vera:Myworkwasmyhusband.Myhusbandworkedandhethoughtthatitwasenoughfor usfinancially,sowhyshouldIwork?ThenIrealizedthatIcouldn’tlivelikethatanymore,so thatwaswhenIgotajob.Wedidnotagreeonthat;myhusbandstillwantedmetobeat home. Cecilia:Whydidn’thewantyoutowork? Vera:I don’tknowwhy; maybe it wasmore convenient for him; you’llhaveto ask him.I think that mostwomenstrive to do something by themselves, andprove that they can do something.ThepositivethingwasthatIneverhadtothinkaboutmoney,butIrealizedthatit gotboring,andjustnotinterestinganymore(Vera). Verachosetowork,butalsounderscoresthatthedivorcemadeiteconomically difficult.Sheneededmorethanonejobinordertosupportherself,andthejob withintourismturnedouttobeagoodoption,sincetheflexibleworkinghours fitwellwithherotherjob.

339 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

WhenIbecamesingleIthoughtthatnowIneedtostartmakingmoney.We(women)will havetolearnnewprofessions.Menforceustodothesekindsofheroicthings.Iknowmany womenwhoendedupinthesamesituation.Weareaboutthesameageandgotmarriedatthe sametime,andnowwedivorceatthesametime(Vera). Klarawasalsoahousewifebeforestartingtoworkwithintourism.Shestudied threeyearsatatechnicalcollege,andisaneducatedpastrychef.Still,shenever started to work within her profession since she got married and had her daughterwhohasbeendisabledsincebirth.Klarawasbornandraisedinthe easternpartofLatviainasmalltowninthecountryside,butwhenherdaughter gotolderandwantedtoapplytotheuniversityinRiga,shedecidedtofollow herdaughterandliveandworkinRiga. It was my own idea and initiative, I said to my husband that “I’m going to Riga with my daughterorwe’regettingadivorce.”Hehadeverythingthere,hunting,theapartment,friends, work,everything.(…)IwenttoRigabymyselftoreconnoiterthecity.Igotajob,arrangeda jobformyhusband,andfoundanapartment(…).Everyonefounditstrangethatweleft;we had everything there; why would we leave it? We wouldn’t have managed to send off our daughterbyherself,nowshe’sgotherownroomwhereshecanliveandthat’smuchbetter. His(herhusband’s)parentsareveryconservativeanddidn’tthinkwewouldleave,everything wouldbefine,andtheymorelikethesaying“whereyouarebornyoushouldlive”(Klara). Klaradecidedtoapplyforajobasacleanerwithintourism,partlyduetoher lack of education and working experience, and partly due to her previous experienceasahousewife. WhenIsatathomeIthoughtaboutwhatIwantedtoworkwith,whatIwouldlike.Ihadmy professionasapastrychef,butIdidn’twanttoworkwithinmyprofession.I’vebeenathome forsomanyyears;mymotherwasalsoillandhadtolieinbedmostofthetimeduringalong period,soItookcareofheralso.Thisjobisnotdifficultforme.Totakecareoftheguests andtheroomsisexactlywhatIhavebeendoingforsomanyyears.Ihavemanyfriendswho just cannot understand that I could look for a job here. They think this job is below my dignity. They’ve alwaysbelieved that youshouldn’twork at all or have an easy job. It may soundstrange,butIwouldn’tliketositatadesk;Iliketakingcareoftherooms(Klara). Tourismasa‘new’positiveandpromisingsector Thestatementsinthesurveyrelatingtothemotivesbehindengagingintour ismrelated work revealed answers which highlighted tourism as a ‘strong’ sector within both the national economy and in Jūrmala, providing future possibilities both for development in general, and for career and personal development.Jūrmalawasportrayedasapromisingtourismtown,withalotof potential,andthetourismsectorwasalsoinsomecasesconsideredtobefairly

340 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala wellpaidincomparisontootherjobsinthelabourmarket.Seventytwoper centofthefemalerespondents‘stronglyagreed’or‘agreedmoreorless’with thestatement“IsawafutureinthedevelopmentoftourisminLatvia,”and nearlyasimilarshareofthefemalerespondents(73%)statedthatthey‘strongly agreed’or‘agreedmoreorless’withthestatement“Iseegoodopportunitiesto makeafuturecareerintourism.”Moreover,70percentofthefemalerespon dents‘stronglyagreed’or‘agreedmoreorless’that“workingwithintourism has a positive image”. There was less consensus concerning whether or not tourismwasawellpaidsector;49percentofthefemalerespondentsagreedto thestatementthattourismwaswellpaidcomparedtoothersectorsinLatvia. Tourismisoneofthemostdevelopingareas(Woman,23,receptionist). IliveinJūrmala–acitywithadevelopingtourismsphere(…)Iseefuturepossibilitiesfor employmentinthisarea(Woman,49,administrator). (…) tourism and hotel businesses are developing fast, good perspectives (Woman, 29, receptionist). (…) career possibilities determined this choice to stay in the tourism area after graduation (Woman,36,manager). (…)toworkinaprestigiousplacewith“aname”,possibilitytoearn–intheperspectiveto earnwell(Woman,22,SPAemployee). Atthe momenttourism isa strongly developing industry, where many new and interesting opportunitiescanbefoundforyourselfandothers(Woman,23,receptionist). Careerorientedstrategies Intheinterviewstudy,idealsofcareeralsobecameevident,especiallyamong thosewomenwhohadhigherpositionsintourism,andwhopossessedtheright ‘humancapital’intermsofhighereducation,workingexperienceandlanguage skills. Tourism was considered as an attractive sector to make a career in, in termsofsocialcontacts,travelopportunitiesandinternationalcharacter.This also included a positive view of Jūrmala as a growing tourism centre, which providedgoodchancestomakeacareerwithinlargerhotelsandothertourism companies.Havingacareerwasdescribedpartlyinmorelifestyleandidentity oriented terms such as selffulfilment and wishing to find and conquer new personal challenges, and having a career was considered partly as ‘business’, attractiveduetobettersalariesandadvancementintermsofposition,andwas connectedtothewishtobeeconomicallyindependent. Matildestartedtostudyattheuniversityafterfinishinguppersecondary school,andattendedthesportsacademy.Shelaterfoundherwayintotourism throughamoreadministrativepath,afterworkinginthetourismsectorinthe US for a few months; shealso worked asan administrator at a hotelparallel

341 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala withherstudiesattheuniversity.Shehasworkedatthecurrenthotelforfour years, and just a few months after her employment, she was offered the positionasadirectorofthehotel.Matildehastwoteenagechildrenandhas prioritizedher education andcareer whenthe children gotolder, and is now studyingatauniversity. FourteenyearsagoinLatviaitwasmoreimportanttogetmarriedwhenyouwereyoung,21 orsomething.It’snotcommonanymore.ThatwaswhatIdidtoo.Afterthateverythingwas changed,andIhadtohaveeducationandIkeepgoing.Noweveryonethinksaboutmoney andtheircareer(Matilde). Matildedescribesherpersonalaimsofacareerasthefollowing: IthinkandplanhowIcanclimbupthecareerladder.(…)Iwouldn’tchooseapositiononly inordertomakemoremoney.Careerisimportantformetochallengemyself;Idon’tthink theroadinlifeshouldgohorizontally.Ithinkitisimportanttogrowanddevelop,andto alwaysfindnewchallenges.Formeit’snotaboutappearingsuccessfulforothers,butthatI enjoymywork(Matilde,director). IrinaisbornandraisedinRiga.ShehasauniversityMaster’sdegree,startedher studiesdirectlyfollowinguppersecondaryschool,andstudiedandworkedpar allelfor sevenyears. Irinaworkedatthestate levelforacoupleofyearsbut decidedtoquither job,even though she wasoffered positions abroad. She wantedtostayinLatvia,andwasofferedajobwithintourisminJūrmala.Irina describesLatvianwomenasinneedofhighereducationinordertogetajobin thelabourmarket,anddescribedwomenas‘strong’and‘independent’. Ithinkitismoreimportantforawomantohavehighereducation.InthelabourmarketI thinkitisimportantforbothsexes;butifyoulookatthestatistics,womenhavehigheredu cation than men. Men work more within construction and don’t need higher education. Women are very independent in our country, sometimes women have higher salaries than men;it’smyopinion.Womenwanttobeindependent,andtheywanttohavechildren.They trytodoitall,justtogetagoodjob,buttodothatyouneedagoodeducation(Irina).

Incomefromtourism:safeorrisky? Latviannationalstatisticsfrom2007showthataround31,200peoplewereem ployedwithinhotelsandrestaurants,ofwhichwomenrepresented82percent. However,despitetheiroverrepresentationwithintourism,womenearnedonly 79percentofmen’saveragemonthlywage(CSBdatabase,www.csb.lv200805 25). The Survey on occupations in Latvia in October 2005 also shows that tourism includes lowpaid jobs compared to other sectors in Latvia. The

342 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala averagefemalegrossmonthlywageinthecategory‘Hotelandrestaurants’was 137Ls,whichcanbecomparedtothetotalfemaleaveragegrossmonthlywage of215Ls(LCSB2005 ResultsofthesurveyonoccupationsinLatviainOctober2005 ). LocalstatisticsforemploymentwithintourisminJūrmala,showingeachsexare scarce.Thesurveyandinterviewstudyshowedthatworkwithintourismwas relativelylowpaid(seeTable15). Table15: Grossmonthlyincomefromtourism(LatvianLats 99 ). Lessthan 100250 Morethan Total 100LVL LVL 250LVL Women 34(27%) 79(63%) 13(10%) 126 Men 8(23%) 18(51%) 9(26%) 35 Total 42(26%) 97(60%) 22(14%) 161 Source:Author’ssurvey,Majori2005. Theincomefiguresshouldbeanalysedwithsomecaution,sinceofficialmini mumwagesand‘envelopepractices’appearedtobewidespreadintheprivate hotelsector.Usuallytheemployeeswerepaidtheminimumwageofaround90 LVLeachmonth,andtherestwaspaidcashinhand.Asaresult,theemployees werenotobligedtopayincometaxesandthecompaniesavoidedtopaysocial insurances.Intheinterviewstudy,thiswasalsoconsideredtoincludesomerisk taking,andmanyofthefemaleintervieweesdescribedtheirincomefromtour ism as unreliable, due to the low salaries and unofficial wages. This was especiallyevidentforolderwomen,sinceitaffectedtheirfuturesocialbenefits andpensions. Zoyaisinhermidtwentiesandearns150Latspermonthathercurrent jobasacleaneratahotel.Sheclaimsthatsheearnedmorewhensheworkedat abeautysalon,butprefersherjobwithintourismanddoesnotobjecttothe ‘envelope practices’. This was a common attitude among the younger female interviewees.Shedescribestheprocedurewithunofficialandofficialpayment asfollows: So that the owner will not have to pay social benefits, we get a part of our payment in envelopes(…)Wearemanyemployees,sothereisalotoftalkaboutit.Therearemanywho quittheirjobsduetotheunofficialpay.Especiallythosewhoareolderandaresoonretiring, forthemitwouldnotbemuchtolivefrom.Ihaven’tthoughtsomuchaboutit,butIthink thattheyeventuallywillpayofficialwages(Zoya).

99 1LVL=around1.40EUR

343 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Viktoriyaworksasareceptionistatahotel,andarguesthatthepracticeofun officialwagesisareflectionofthedistrusttowardsthenationalpoliticalsystem andaimsofwelfare. I’mnotagainstunofficialwages.Thestatedoesn’ttakecareofus.Whyshouldwepaytaxes?I thinktheyneedtodosomething;theyhavetotakecareofpeople,andraisethestandardof living.Medicine,healthcare,everythingneedstobeimproved(Viktoriya). AleksandraworksasanadministratorataSPAdepartmentatoneofthehotels, and is partly responsible for paying the employees their monthly wages. She claimsthatthewagesstartataround90Latsamonthandthatpartofthewages asa‘companyrule’arepaidonanunofficialbasis.Thereisahighrotationof staffatthehotelduetotheunofficialwages,whichmakesitdifficulttoplan andcreatedistinctiveroutinesforherownjob.Aleksandrastatesthatitisdiffi culttofindagoodandwellpaidjobwithintourism,andsheisnowlookingfor anewjob. IthinkwhenIfindabetterjob,Iwillquitthisjob.I’vealreadystartedtolookforajobin Riga.Forme,itdoesn’tmatterifit’sinJūrmalaorRiga.Ithinkitwillbemyfirstquestionto themiftheypayofficialwages.Manyemployerstrytoavoidthatquestion(Aleksandra). Manyofthefemaleintervieweesdidnotmerelydescribetheirpossibilitiesand strategies in the local labour market, but also compared the wages, working conditionsandthepossibilitiestofindajobinJūrmalaorRigawiththechances of findingemploymentabroad. Thewellpaid jobs within tourism and other sectorsweredescribedasbeingfoundinRigaorabroadratherinJūrmala.A majority of the female interviewees knew at least one friend or relative who lived in a western European Union country, such as England or Ireland, in ordertoworkandearnhighersalaries.Acoupleoftheintervieweeshadalready worked abroad for a shorter period of time, while others planned to work abroadwithinthenextfewyears.Thestoriesandperceptionsofopportunities ofworkandlifeabroadvaried,fromamore‘utopian’imageofthebetterlifeto amorenuancedandevencriticalapproach. Sofijaworksasahotelmanagerandemphasisesthelargewagedifferences betweenotherEuropeanUnioncountriesandLatvia. FriendsofminehavegoneabroadtoIrelandtowork(…)Theyleftfamilyandchildrenin ordertomakemoremoney.Theyearnaround10Latsperhour,andtheywork10hoursa day,soyoucanimaginehowmuchtheyearn…Theyearn100Latsperdayandheretheyearn 150Latspermonth(…)I’mOKnow,butifthesituationwouldchange,thenI’llleavetoo. Thenwe’llsee!(Sofija).

344 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

The impression was that both the unskilled and the skilled work force left Latviaforworkabroad,buttheexpectationsofabetterlifewerenotnecessarily consideredtoberealized.Someofthefemaleintervieweeswerereluctanttogo abroad,partlyduetotheworkingconditionswhichincludedlongworkingdays withinunqualifiedjobs,andpartlyduetothefactthatworkingabroadmight involvebeingawayfromthefamilyforlongperiodsoftime. Viktoriyawouldliketoworkabroad,butconsidersitdifficulttofindajob which would be more qualified and equivalent to her current job within tourism. Iknowalotofpeoplewhohavegoneabroad,manyofmyfriends.SometimesIthinkthat they aren’tvery happy; they move away from their families. The children grow up without theirparents,andit’smaybeonlythegrandmothersandgrandfatherswhotakecareofthem. Theparentstheyonlygettoseetwiceayear,andthat’snotnormal.Everyonewantstolive beautifully,butatthesametimetheylosesomething.Idon’tthinkit’smerelymoneythatcan makeyouhappy(Viktoriya). Thequestionofethnicity Ethnicityintermsofnativelanguageandoriginisalsoanimportantfactorin analyzingwomen’semploymentwithintourisminJūrmala,sincethecityhasa fairlyheterogeneouspopulationintermsofthenumberof‘ethnic’Latviansand Russians as discussed in the previous chapter. The survey showed a similar pattern;amajorityofthefemalerespondentsstatedthattheirnativelanguage wasRussian;52percentcomparedto45percentofthemalerespondents.The shareofrespondentswhohadaLatviancitizenshipwasfairlyhigh,including79 percentofthefemalerespondentsand86percentofthemalerespondents.The resultsofthesurvey illustratedhowthework assignments and wages within tourismdifferedbetweenfemaleRussianspeakingrespondentsandthosewho had Latvian as a native language (see Figure 24). A majority of the Russian speaking respondents (29 women) were found within “Housekeeping”, followedby“Spa”(17women),and“Administration” (9 women).Thework assignments show a different pattern for the female native Latvianspeaking respondents,whoweremainlyworkingin“frontoffice”and“housekeeping”, constituting13respondentseach.TheoverrepresentationofLatvianspeaking respondentsatthefrontofficemayberelatedtothelackoflanguageskills.It shouldbenotedthatthesurveyshowsahighernumber of Latvian speaking managers,8respondentscomparedto2femaleRussianspeakingrespondents.

345 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Figure24: DistributionofRussianandLatvianspeakingfemalerespondentsbasedon“Main workassignment”(numbers).

0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35

13 Frontoffice 6

13 Housekeeping 29

11 spa 17

8 Latvian Management 2 Russian 1 Restaurant 2

5 Administration 9

5 Other 2

“spa”includeshealth/spaandbeautytreatments,sports&fitnessactivities. “Administration”includesITwork,marketingandbookkeeping. “Other”includestourguidesandthosewhospecifiedmorethanonealternative. Source:Author’ssurveyMajori2005.

The survey also illustrated differences in gross monthly income between the femaleRussianspeakingandnativeLatvianrespondents(seeFigure25). Figure25: DistributionofRussianandLatvianspeakingfemalerespondentsbasedongross monthlyincomefromtourism(numbers).

45 39 40 35 35

30

25 22 Latvian 20 Russian

15 11 10 8

5 2

0 Lessthan100LVL 100250LVL Morethan250LVL Source:Author’ssurvey,Majori2005.

346 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Forexample,33percentoftheRussianspeakingrespondentsearnedlessthan 100 LVL per month compared to 20 percent of the Latvianspeaking respondents. This may also be related to the overrepresentation of Russian speaking respondents within less qualified work assignments such as “housekeeping”. LanguageskillsinLatvianandRussianwerevalueddifferentlyindifferent hotels depending on ownership and management, but also the guest target groups. Russian constitutes an important language for business and travel related workinLatvia, especially inJūrmalawherethe Russian influencesare stronginthenumberofRussianspeakingvisitorsandinvestments.However, insomeofthemore‘Latvian’hotels,knowledgeinLatvianwasvaluedhigher, andethnicLatvianswerethereforemainlyhiredforhigherpositions.Asare sult,manyRussianspeakingwomenwerefoundinthelowerpositions,suchas housekeeping.Matilde,oneofthe‘ethnic’Latvianhoteldirectorsdescribedthe requirementsforemploymentintermsoflanguageasfollows: ThosewhohavecontactwithguestsshouldknowLatvian,andhaveitastheirfirstlanguage. Russiansusuallydon’thavegoodskillsinLatvian.ItrytohireLatviansonly,buttheyshould havegoodRussianandEnglishskills,too(Matilde,hotelmanager). SomeoftheRussianspeakingfemaleintervieweesclaimedthattheyfeltcon strainedintheirsearchforajobduetoalackofLatvianlanguageskills.These difficultieswereespeciallyemphasisedamongtheolderRussianspeakinginter viewees.LearningLatvianfluentlywasconsideredtobedifficultfordifferent reasons. Some of the Russianspeaking employees experienced difficulties to learnandusetheLatvianlanguageonadaytodaybasissinceRussianwasthe mainlanguagespokenwithinthefamily,andcouldeasilybeaccessedthrough different media. A majority of their friends were also Russianspeaking, and theyhadearlierstudiedataRussianratherthanaLatvianschool. KlarahashadLatviancitizenshipsinceshewasborn,sincebothofher parentswereLatviancitizens,butRussianhasremainedtobeherfirstlanguage. HerfatherwasLatvianandhermotherRussian,andafterherparentsdivorced shelivedwithhermother.KlarastillstrugglestolearnLatvian.Shewenttoa Russianschool,andRussianwasspokenathomewhenshegrewup,whichalso contributedtoRussianbecomingherfirstlanguage.Sheholdsthesecondde greeoftheLatvianlanguagetest,whichmeansthatshecanspeakLatvianonan almostfluentbasis,butstillfindsitdifficulttospeakitonaeverydaybasis.She claimsthatabetterknowledgeinLatvianwouldberequiredinordertogeta morequalifiedjob.

347 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Actually,Ithinkthatthelanguageisinsidemesomewhere,butIthinkthereissomekindof psychologicalbarrier,whichrestrainsmefromspeakingLatvian.IspeakLatvianonamore basiclevel,butonadeeperlevelit’smoredifficult.Mydaughtersuggestedthatweshouldtalk Latvianwithinourfamily,butitwouldbeverydifficult.Isometimesthinkthatthelanguageis a problem. If Ihad betterknowledge inLatvian,Iwould be able to step up inmy career. Careerornocareer,theproblemstillexists.IwouldliketostudymoreLatvian,butthenI wouldbeforcedtoquitthisjob.Consideringthatwehavechildren,Ineedtotrytospendall mysparetimewithmyson(Klara). SomeoftheRussianspeakingintervieweeshadalsogottheirjobsthroughper sonal contacts with other Russianspeakers, and some of the hotels were described as being more ‘Russianoriented’ in termsoftheworkingenviron ment,makingtheofficialworkinglanguageRussian.Itwasalsodescribedhow ‘ethnic’ Latvians adjusted and started to speak Russian in the presence of Russianspeakers,ratherthanhavingtheconversationinLatvian. KlaraworksinhousekeepingandhasbothRussianandLatvianspeaking colleagues. She feels that she would like to learn and practice more of her Latvian,butalsostressesthatit’ssometimesdifficulttoconvinceherLatvian speakingcolleaguestotalktoherinLatvianratherthaninRussian. It’saround50percentoftheemployeeswhohaveRussianastheirfirstlanguage,butIspeak mainlyRussian.IfthereareLatviansspeakingLatvianandaRussiancomesalong,theywill automaticallystartspeakingRussian.IaskthemtospeakLatvian,buttheythinkit’seasierto speakRussian(Klara). ThefemaleRussianspeakingintervieweesdescribedhowtheirlackoflanguage skillsconstitutedalargerobstaclefortheiremploymentandeverydaylifecom paredtoissuesrelatingtocitizenship.NottoapplyforaLatviancitizenshipwas almost described as a political act, in order to manifest and show resistance againstthelawsregulatingcitizenshipandlanguagepolicies.Othersemphasised howthelackofpoliticalrightsandinfluenceswerenotconsideredtobeapo tential problem, which in some ways reflected a general distrust against the politicalregimeonbothanationalandalocallevel. Sabine’smotherisfromRussiaandherfatherfromBelorussia,andthey immigrated together to Latvia during the Soviet period. Thus, neither Sabine nor her parents were automatically granted Latvian citizenship following independence.Sabinehasnotyetappliedforcitizenship,buthaslevelthreeon herLatvianlanguagetest,whichisthehighestlevel,andsheisfluentinLatvian. It’ssomekindofcontradiction;I’mbornhere,havelivedhereallmylife,mydaughterisa citizen,thenwhyshouldIapplyforcitizenship?Maybeit’swrongbutIcannotdoanything

348 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala about it. I cannot vote (…) but I don’t worry that I cannot vote. If you look at what’s happeningwithinpolitics,youunderstandthatyoucannotdoanythingaboutit(Sabine). Whilesomeofthefemaleintervieweesdescribeddifficultiesintheirattemptsor evenresistancetotheneedtolearnLatvian,otherrespondentsemphasisedthe individual‘choice’tolearnLatvian,andthatitwasuptoeachandeveryoneto wanttospeakLatvian,andtoadjusttothecultureandcountryofwhichone wasapartof. ViktoriyawasbornandraisedinBelorussiaandcametoJūrmalain1985, whenshewas17yearsold,andmarriedherhusbandwhowasfromLatvia.She hadjustfinishedherstudiesatatechnicalcollege,andshewasconvincedby herfatherthatshewouldworkatthetrainstation,butshesoondiscoveredthat itwasnotaprofessionshehadanyinterestin.InJūrmala,Viktoriyasoonhad herfirstchildandprioritisedfirstherfamilybeforebothworkandeducation. Afterafewyearsofbeingathomewithherchildren,shestartedtoworkasa waitressandsearchedforotherjobsinthehotelsector,andgothercurrentjob throughafriend.ShedescribeshowshewasverydeterminedtolearnLatvian andEnglishinordertogetajob. Theideawastogetajob,butPerestroikawasstarting,andIhadtolearnLatvian;thatwasthe mainrequirementtogetajob.Ididn’twanttoworkasacleanerorsomething,Iwanteda betterjob.Butatthetimeofindependence,myhusbandunderstoodthatitwasn’tonlyneces sarytolearnLatvian,butalsoEnglish,soheforcedmetolearnit.Myhusbandsaidthat“you willlearnEnglish,”andIsaidthatIdidn’twantto,andhesaid,“I’llpayateacherwhowill teachyou.”HeunderstoodthatifIwantedtoworkasanadministrator,itwasimportantto learnEnglish.NowI’mgratefulthatIlearnedEnglish.MyEnglishisn’tfluent,butIcantalk andlistenandIwouldliketolearnmore(Viktoriya). ViktoriyaappliedforLatviancitizenshipinthe1990s,andsawitas anatural partoflivinginLatvia. Itwasn’tdifficulttoapplyforcitizenship.IknewLatvian,andtheonlythingthatIhadto studywashistory.Ifyoureallywantyourcitizenshipit’snoproblem.Ithinkthataperson wholivesinacountryshouldbeabletolearnthelanguage.Somejustdon’twantcitizenship. They’realsofreetoapplyforothercitizenships,buttheydon’t.IfIhadwantedtogetaBelo russian citizenship, I could have got one. But since I’ve got a Latvian citizenship, I’ve got betterpossibilities(…)Idon’tseethecitizenshipquestionasaproblem;thosewhowantwill getcitizenship.Butthereisnoonewhowillserveittoyouonasilverplatter(Viktoriya).

349 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala

Thequestionofage Employmentwithintourismwasconsideredtobeoneofthefewoptionsof work,especiallyforsomeoftheolderfemaleinterviewees,whoclaimedthatit wasdifficulttofindworkduetotheirlackofeducationorlanguageskills,and thereforetheyhadtochoosemorelowqualifiedjobs. Figure 26 below illus tratestheagedistributionofthefemalerespondentsaccordingtotheirnative language,revealingahighershareofolderRussianspeakingrespondents.This pattern was also reflected when analysing their main work assignments. Thirteenoutof29Russianspeakingrespondentswhoworkedwithin“house keeping”,and7outof15respondentswithin“Spa”were36yearsorolder.The oppositewastrueforfrontofficework,ofwhich10outof13Latvianspeaking respondentsand4outofthe6Russianspeakingrespondentswere24yearsor younger. Figure26: Agedistributionoffemalerespondentsaccordingtotheirnativelanguage.

70

51 60

50 132

40 Age

30

131 20

10

Latvian Russian Other Intheinterviewstudy,someoftheolderfemaleintervieweesemphasisedhow they felt that they were not able to meet the demands of the contemporary labourmarket, duetothehighrequirements onage, looks, higher education andlanguageskills.TheirpreviousworkingexperiencefromtheSovietperiod in general and within tourism more specifically was not considered to be a qualification when applying for a job. Thus, employment within tourism was

350 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala describedasarelativelysafeandreliableincomebysomeoftheolderfemale interviewees,sinceitusuallyofferedfulltimeemploymentallyearround. Sabineis53yearsoldandhasexperiencedagediscriminationwithinother serviceprofessions,andwasreluctanttoapplyforhercurrentjobatthehotel. It’sevenbeenthecasethatwhenI’vecalledinordertoapplyforajobI’vegotthequestion: “howoldareyou?”Theydon’tevenwanttolookatmypreviousexperience,whatI’vedone orhowIlook;theyonlyseemyage(Sabine). Today,sheis oneofthe fewolder women working inthereceptionandad ministration,andshefeltabitoutofplacewhenshestartedherjob. Therearemanyyounggirlsworkinginthereception,andmyfirstthoughtwas,“HowwillI be able toworkwith them?”But they havehad a very positive approachtowardsme. No problemsatall(Sabine). Forotherfemaleinterviewees,thequestionofagewenthandinhandwiththe lackofLatvianlanguageskills,andsomefounditreallydifficultto‘startover’ andlearnLatvianfluentlyinordertogainamorequalifiedprofession.Instead, itwasconsideredtobemoreimportanttohavea‘safe’andpermanentjob,and they chose their employment within tourism carefully, in order to find a job whichgaveanofficialwagethatwouldsecuretheirfuturepensionandsocial benefitsiftheyforsomereasonlosttheirjob. Ninaonlyhasthreeyearsleftuntilsheisfreetoretire,andclaimsthatitis veryimportantforhertokeephercurrentjob.Sheisconcernedforherfuture pension,andiseagertohaveajobinwhichstate taxes are paid in order to increasehersocialsecurity.Ninaestimatesherfuturepensiontobearound100 Latspermonth.Shelooksforwardtoherpension,butfeelsthatsheisrequired toworkafewmoreyearsinordertosecureahigherincome. I’manoptimistbynature,andIcanworkanddoeverything.I’mveryenergeticandhavea strongback.I’mthinkingthatwhenIretireI’llgoabroadandworktoearnmoneyinorderto helpmychildrenbuyanapartment.Iwouldn’thavebeenabletobeunemployedortositat home;thenIwouldn’thavebeenabletolive,andbuyfoodorpaymyrent;it’sjustnotpossi blewhenthereisonlyonepersonworkinginthehousehold(Nina). Akindof‘nostalgia’forthepastcouldalsobefoundamongtheolder,Russian speakingfemale interviewees.ItreflectedawishtolookbackintotheSoviet past,andcomparethepresentlabourmarketandwelfaresystemwiththoseof thecommunistsystem.Thisreflectedfeelingsofvulnerabilityandofbeing‘out

351 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala of place’ in a more competitive capitalist market, which did not provide the samekindofsecurityasearlier. Ninaemphasisestheprevious‘collective’fellowshipatwork,andanother typeofsecuritywhichmeantthatyouwereguaranteedajob,anddidnotrisk unemployment. Itwaseasierduringthatperiod,that’swhatIthinkanyway.Allpeoplefeltagreaterfellowship witheachotherandworkedforacommonaim.Nowit’smoreaboutpeoplehavingtolivefor theirownaims,andIthinkthat’sabigdifference.HereatthehotelImaylosemyjob,butin thosedaysworkmeantmorestability,andyoucouldn’tgetfiredjustlikethat.NowIcanget firedevenifIdoagoodjob(…)Inthosedaysitwaseasiertolive.Wehadplentyofmoney, andyoucouldpaythebillsfortheapartmentandeverythingelse,andyoustillhadmoneyleft. Today it’s very difficult. Iit takes two incomes within the family in order to have enough money(Nina). Valentina is 49 years old and worked in the tourism sector also during the Sovietperiod,butquitherjobatahotelafewmonthsback.Sheclaimsthatthe changesintheworkingenvironmentweretoostrikingforhertocontinueher work.The organization andownership of thehotelshifted during the 1990s, andcalledforrenovationandnewstaff.Thepreviousemployeeswereoffered newjobs,butamajoritychosetoquit.Valentinacontinuedtoworkasanad ministrator,butgotnewworkassignmentsbeyondherpreviousexperienceand competence.Unofficialwageswereintroduced,andValentinaemphasiseshow her working conditions changed compared with the Soviet period when her social security was guaranteed by strong trade unions. If she would have be comeunemployedaftertheprivatisationofthehotel,shewouldhavehadan incomeof66Latspermonth. Iquitmyjob.IrealizedthatI’mratherold;newandyounggirlswillcomeinmyplace.Icould havechangedworkassignments,buttheattitudeofthemanagerswasterrible.Allpeoplewho get power look down at others (…) The younger girls have language skills and education; that’simportantnow(Valentina). Conclusion Summingup,thepurposeofthechapterhasbeentoanalysethemotives,back ground and intentions for women’s employment and livelihood strategies withinthetourismsectorinJūrmala,basedonasurvey and interview study conductedinMajori.Thechaptercontainedadiscussionofwhetherornotthe tourismsectorconstitutesa‘refuge’forthe‘victims’ofthetransitionorifithas served as the ‘golden road’ for women especially, which has been debated

352 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala withinpreviousresearchofemploymentwithintourisminpostsocialistcoun tries.Theresultsofthecasestudydonotindicatethatwomenwouldconstitute the‘losers’ of thetransitionthrough their employmentwithintourism.Work within tourism was described as offering relatively ‘secure’ employment throughouttheyear,andtourismworkwasdescribedashavingpositivecon notations in terms of work assignments and future prospects for the developmentoftourisminJūrmala. ComparedtootherpostsocialistcountriessuchasBulgaria,wherefemale employees within tourism have been portrayed as possessing crucial human capital due to their experience from work within tourism during the Soviet period,womenfacenewrequirementswithintourisminJūrmala.Manywomen losttheirjobsduringtheprivatisationoftourismduringthe1990s,andsince international tourism to Jūrmala was very restricted, knowledge in foreign languages remained low. Thus, I have argued that the analysis of the back groundandmotivestowomen’semploymentwithintourismneedstobemore diversethanmerelyincludingthequestionofwhetherornottourismconsti tutesa‘refuge’forthosehavingproblemsoffindingworkinthelocallabour market. I have analysed women’s livelihood strategies in relationto ethnicity, class and age, and emphasised both social/lifestyleoriented motives as well as economical factorswhichguidethedecisiontoworkwithintourism.Basedonthe surveyandinterviewstudy,threemainstrategiescanbedistinguished; survival strategies , lifestyleorientedstrategies and careerorientedstrategies .Themoreeconomi callyorientedstrategiescanbeanalysedasmoreprominentamongforexample single mothers, particularly for those with a lower education, and for older Russianspeaking women who lacked both the sufficient language skills and educationtofindmorehighskilledworkinthelabourmarket.Thelattergroup also tended to be found within more lowskilled work assignments, for example, within cleaning and housekeeping. Thus, work within tourism was consideredtoprovidearelatively‘safe’butlowerincome,whilesomewomen emphasisedtherisk of unofficialpay which leftthem little social security in termsofunemploymentbenefitsorfuturepensions. The lifestyle and careeroriented strategies were more common among womenwithahighereducationandpreviousexperiencefrommanagementand higherpositionsinthelabourmarket,whosawthepotentialofmakingacareer within tourism and for whom tourism constituted a relatively wellpaid job. However,morelifestylerelatedstrategieswereemphasisedamongwomenwho previouslyhadbeenhousewives,revealingthewishtofindtheirownjoband incomeandnotbeeconomicallysupportedbytheirmale counterparts, while

353 Chaptertwelve–Women’slivelihoodstrategieswithintourisminJūrmala also realising a hobby or being motivated by the social dimensions of work withintourism.Thewomenintheinterviewstudyalsoemphasisedhowtheir alternativesforworknotmerelyincludedthelocallabourmarket,butthewages andpossibilitiestofindworkwerealsocomparedwithpotentialjobsabroad, which on the one hand were described as better paid compared to jobs in Latvia, but on the other hand also would include a number of sacrifices, includingbeingawayfromfamilyandfriends.

354

Chapterthirteen Negotiatingfemininities:women’s everydaylivelihoodpractices withintourisminJūrmala Theaimofthepresentchapteristoanalysehowwomenasemployeeswithin tourisminJūrmalarespond,relateandadjusttochanginggenderisedidealsof livelihood,intheirworkwithintourismandintheireverydaylivelihoodprac tices. In the interview study, the female interviewees related differently to prevailing idealsof livelihoodand work, which were expressed both in their conceptionofpotentiallivelihoodstrategiesandtheiractualmeansandliveli hoodpractices.Livelihoodisinthiscontextnotmerelyanalysedinrelationto itseconomicmeaningoftheconcept,butalsoasguidedbyfamilyresponsibili ties and genderised ideals and normsof livelihoodandworkwithin boththe private and the public sphere. The chapter will focus on how different femininities and ideals of livelihood are reproduced, rejected and challenged throughwomen’slivelihoodpractices.Asdiscussedinthepreviouscasestudy of entrepreneurship in the Cēsis district, I will relate the practices to more ‘traditional’, ‘modern’ and ‘reliccommunistic’ genderised ideals of work and livelihood,andhowtheyrelatetothepublicandtheprivatesphere.Attheend ofthechapter,Iwillalsoillustratedifferent paradoxes betweenwomen’sliveli hoodstrategiesontheonehandandtheirlivelihoodpracticesontheother,and thequestionofwhetheremploymentwithinmorelargescaleformsoftourism can be a way of increasing and negotiating the spaceforwomen’s individual andindependentlivelihood. Traditionallyfeminisedpractices Ashasbeenhighlightedinpreviouschapters,workwithintourismtendstobe ‘feminised’indifferentways,whichalsobecameevidentintheinterviewstudy when analyzing both the structure of the tourism sector in Jūrmala and the femaleinterviewees’daytodaypractices.Thesurveyrevealedahighoverrepre sentationofwomenindifferentformsofaccommodationestablishmentsand othertourismfacilitieswhichwereincludedinthestudy.Womenandmenwere

355 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala alsofound indifferentsectionsanddepartmentsof the hotels; women were overrepresentedmainlyin“housekeeping”(31percentoffemalerespondents), “Spa”(19%),“frontdesk”(13%),and“administration”(9%).Menwerefound mainlyintherestaurant(21percentofmalerespondents)andatthefrontdesk (21%).Interviewswithhotelmanagersfurtherconfirmedtheresultsofthesur vey,statingthatalargemajorityoftheemployeeswithinthehotelsectorwere women, especially in departments such as housekeeping, where the share of womencouldbeuptoninetyorahundredpercent. Ghodsee(2005)emphasiseshowfemaleemployeesinBulgariantourism resorts described themselves as being more suitablefor workwithintourism due to their responsibilities in household work, but also because of more ‘biological’advantagestobeingawoman,andthereforebeingabletodealwith guestsina“better”way.Justaswomenwereconsideredtohavea‘natural’role inthefamilyasmothersandwives,women’soverrepresentationwithintourism was also described as having the same ‘natural’ order(Ghodsee 2005). Work within tourism was also described as ‘feminised’ by both the employers and employeesintheinterviewstudyinJūrmala.BelowIwilldiscusshowwomen’s daily practices within tourism can be analysed as reflecting more traditional ‘feminised’ ideals of work and livelihood: firstly in relation to men’s and women’sbiologicalrolefunctions,secondlyrelatingtowomen’sresponsibilities within the family and private sphere, and thirdly with reference to more traditionalbreadwinnermodels. Biological‘feminine’advantages Interviewswithbothemployeesandhotelmanagersillustratedhowadistinc tion was made between which jobs and positions were considered to be ‘women’s’ and ‘men’s’ work with reference to more biological and physical advantagesanddelimitations.Someofthefemaleintervieweespointedoutthat womenhadbetter‘instincts’forworkingwithintourism,includingamorecar ing approach as well as better communication skillsthanmen,andthatthey therefore better understood the needs of the guests, especially considering healthandspaprocedures. Ithinkthebackgroundtowhytherearemanywomenworkingwithintourismisthatthey haveclosertiestothattypeofenvironment,theyliketalkingtopeople;they’reabitmore openforcommunication(…)Theclientsaremainlymenandtheywanttomeetawoman, theyexpectto.Butifthereisafemaleguest,sheismoreopenandcommunicative,andasks wheretheycangetamanicureandpedicure.Womenknowtheirneedsandwhat’sthebest place.Menwouldn’tbeabletoexplainthatfortheguests(Viktoriya).

356 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

Eventhoughwomendominatedtheworkforceinthehotelsinnumbers,some jobswereclearlycodedas‘men’sjobs’,forexample,positionsatthefrontdesk. The managers claimed that they actively searched formeninthesepositions sincetheyalsoincludednightshiftsandsecurityissues,whichmenwerecon sidered as more capable of handling. Moreover, work in the restaurant was described as more physically demanding, in terms of work load, tasks and workinghours,andthereforemoresuitableformen. Matilde is the director of a hotel where a majority of the bar and restaurantstaffaremen.Shehasactivelyhiredmenforworkintherestaurant, basedmainlyontheperceptionthatitisademandingphysicaljob,butalsodue tothefactthatamajorityoftheeducatedstaffwithintherestaurantbusiness aremen. WhenIhirewomenfortherestauranttheyshouldbestrongwomen,sothatIgettheright contactwiththem.Theworkisveryintensiveanddemanding,andIworkalotmyself,andif therearemenworkingIcandemandmuchmorefromthem(…)Womenmightnotmanage certainthings.Sometimeswhentherearemanyguestsinthebar,youhavetobeabletoclear thetablesveryquickly,andcarrythingsbackandforth.Ifwomencanhandleit,thenfine“go ahead,starttowork”(Matilde). Paradoxically,eventhoughwomenwereportrayedasmoresuitedfor‘lighter’ and social work within tourism compared to men, the interview study also revealed women’s work assignments as very physically demanding. This was especiallyprominentforthoseworkinginthehousekeepingorspasectionsof thehotelonadailybasis,wheretheyhadheavyliftingandinconvenientwork ingpositions,whichinturngeneratedsoremusclesandworkrelatedinjuries, suchasbackproblems. Vaira provides water massage, which means that she works with the guestsinabathtub.Shedescribesthemonotonousandstandardizedroutines ofherwork,whicharephysicallydemanding. It’stheproceduresthattakeupmostofthetime.Thehydromassageisthemostphysically demanding;mybackhurtsfromit;it’sstrainingforyourhandsandveryboringinthelong run…It’sjustbodiesbeingexchanged,it’sarathermonotonousjobreally.Therearenoartis ticdimensionstoit(…)It’susuallyafactthatifyouhaveproblemswithyourhealth,theywill show you the door (…) It’s very, very difficult to prove that the injury is workrelated. Everyonehaspainintheirbacksorarmsandsoon,butItrytodosomeexerciseandmove whenIhavetimeoff(Vaira).

357 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

Makinghouseholdchores‘public’ Women’s household work and their hotel work also tended to be closely related,intheirchoresandroutines,suchascleaningandhousekeeping,allde scribed as ‘women’s work’ in comparison with other work assignments and positionswithinthehotels.Someofthefemaleintervieweesrelatedtheirprevi ous experience of household work, for example, as housewives, to their decision to work within tourism, as was discussed in the previous chapter. Thus, women were considered to have positive ‘advantages’ in searching for jobs, forexample, ascleaners in thehotels,with theargument that thework was‘easy’sincetheyalreadyweredoingthemajorityofthehouseholdrelated work at home. Here, parallelscanbe made to thepreviouscase study in the Cēsisdistrict,wherehouseholdworkontheonehandwasmade‘public’and commercialised through the female entrepreneurs’ everyday practices within ruraltourism.Ontheotherhand,theboundariesbetweenthepublicandthe privatespheretendedtobeblurred,andtheprivateremainedprivateduetoa moretraditionaldivisionoflabourwithinthehousehold.Theinterviewstudyin Jūrmalaalsoillustratedhowthehouseholdworkintheprivatesphereandthe choresatthehoteltendedto‘melttogether’. ZoyaworksasacleaneratoneofthehotelsinJūrmala,andemphasises howshetriestoseparateherhouseholdchoresfromherworkatthehotel. EventhoughIsaythatIforgetaboutmyworkwhenIcomehome,Idosomethingsbyforce of habit. I usuallyplacethe remotecontrol on the TV, and myhusband always complains aboutit;“what’sthenthepointofusingit?”.(…)WhenIchangethebedlinen,Itrynottodo itthesamewayasatwork,todoitasfastasIcan.Instead,Iwanttodoitslowly,morere laxed.Iwantittobecomeanothertypeofwork,andmorerelaxing.(…)SometimesI’mmore likeamachine.It’snotthatIlikeordislikemyworkathome;it’smorelikethatifIchange linenathome,Irealizethat,well,I’vedonethisalready!(Zoya) Zoyaismarriedandhasasixyearoldson.Herhusbandworkswithinthemetal industryinLiepajaandcommutesbackandforthfortwohoursonewayalmost everyday,whichresultsinlongworkingdays.Justasamajorityofthemarried womenintheinterviewstudy,Zoyaregardshouseholdworkasthe‘woman’s responsibility’andtakesalargerresponsibilityforbothchildcareandhouse holdchores. Idoeverythingathome.Cleaning,cooking,doingthedishes,washing,nootherthanmyself doesthattypeofwork(…)I’mthebossathome,andIthinkthatawomanshouldbethe bossathome.Sometimesmyhusbandhelpsoutwhenhe’sgotthetimeandfeelslikeit,then hewilldosomething(Zoya).

358 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

Inthesurvey,60percentofthefemalerespondentsstatedthattheydidallora majorityoftheworkinthehousehold.Theseresultsalsoneedtobeanalysedin relationtothehouseholdstructure,whichisillustrated in Figure 27. Here, a distinctionismadeamongmarried,singleandwomenlivingincohabitation,in relationtothedivisionofhouseholdchores.Duetothehighnumberofsingle womenhouseholds,theassumptionwouldbethatthey did a larger share of householdwork,butsomeofthemalsostatedthattheysharedtheworkwith anotherhouseholdmember.Thismayberelatedtothefactthatmanyofthe youngerfemalerespondentsstilllivedwiththeirparentsandthereforeshared thehouseholdworkwithotherfamilymembers.Thefigurealsoshowsthata highernumberofmarriedwomentendedtodoalloramajorityofthehouse hold work (23 respondents), compared to those living in cohabitation (11 respondents). Figure27: Divisionofhouseholdchores(femalerespondents).

40 38

35

30 Married 25 23 Cohabitee 20 Single 15 11 12 12

Numberofrespondents 10 8 8 4 5 5

0 Idoall/amajorityofthe Isharetheworkequally Someoneelsedoesall/a work majorityofthework

Source:Author’ssurveyinMajori,Jūrmala.

(In)visiblefeminisedpractices Despitetheoverrepresentationofwomenwithinthehotelsectorandthepro motion and commodification of traditionally ‘women’s work’, work within tourismalsotendstobecharacterizedbycertaindegrees of invisibility . In the interviewstudy,thehotelwasdescribedasalmosthavinga‘private’character,a spacemeantfortheguestfirstandforemost,towhichtheemployeeshadto adjusttoratherthantocontrolthemselves.Thefemaleinterviewees,especially those working in the cleaning and spa sections of the hotels, described their daily routines at work ascharacterized by some degreeof ‘invisibility’, which

359 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala included keeping a low profile and adjusting to the rules and regulations of hospitalityandservice.Someofthehotelshadhandbooksfortheemployees, whichincludeddirectivesonhowtodressandlookappropriately,howtowear theuniform,andhowtobehaveina‘correct’mannertowardstheguests.A majority of the female interviewees described the rules and regulations as ‘normal’and‘obvious’partsoftheireverydayroutinesinthehotels. Klaraworksasahotelcleaner,andemphasiseshowtheemployeesneed topayattentionandrespectthehotelasthespaceoftheguests. I think it’s important to have some communication with the guests when I work, but it shouldn’tbetoomuch.Werarelyseetheguests;it’smoretheirspace;weshouldbehappy, and greet them, or carry or get something for them. Neither I nor my colleague speaks English,butwehavemanyguestsfromEnglandorScandinavia,sothenyouhavetosmilea lot,andmaybelearnafewphrases(…)We’renotsupposedtotalkwiththeguests;weshould justsay‘hello’andaskwhenwecancleantheirroom.Butthereareguestswhowanttotalk, andthenwehavetoreply(Klara). Beingacleanerinvolvesalotofwork‘behindthescenes’;cleaningtherooms takesplacewhentheclientshavelefttheirroomsbothtemporarilyandperma nently,andtheworkinghoursofthecleanersareadjustedtotheroutinesofthe guests.Still,thecontactwiththeguestsoftentookplaceinthecorridors,and theywerealsosometimesgivennewrolesasguideswhentheguestsaskedfor directions or information about tourism activities, restaurants and shopping. Notallfemaleemployeesfullyacceptedandadjustedtotheroleofthe‘invisible maid’,butprioritisedtheireffortstomakesocialcontacts,bothwithotherem ployeesandtheguests. Zoyaworksasahotelcleaneranddoesnotagreewiththehotel’srulesof notspeakingwiththeguests,butvaluesthesporadiccontactswiththeguestsas important elements of her job. However, Zoya also describes how breaking againsttherulesandnormsisnotpermitted. TherewasamanfromRussiawhostayedatthehoteltogetherwithhistwosonsduringmid summer. Then he asked me what traditions we have, how we celebrate Ligo, and how we jumpoverthefire…WhenItalkedtohim,mybosscamebyandnoticedthatIwasspeaking toaguest,andscoldedmeforspeakingwithhim.ButIcouldn’thavetoldhimthat“Idon’t wanttotalkwithyou”,orsomethinglikethat.Idon’tthinkshewasright(Zoya). The need for ‘invisibility’wasalso evident inthe spa sections of thehotels. Vairadescribesherselfasbeingapartofthespaenvironment,whichischarac terizedbyscentsandmassageoils,softmusicandaquietwayofmovingand

360 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala beingattheworkplace.Vairastatesthattheworkingenvironmentcanbetire someandstaticintheeverydayroutine. You’renotallowedtohaveshoeswithhighheels;theywouldmaketoomuchnoise,andifthe guestsareinthebath,theyshouldn’thavetolistentothesoundofheelsagainstthefloorin thecorridors.It’saspa(…)Theyplayspamusichereallthetime.Ifyouhearthesamemusic somewhereelse,youimmediatelythinkofthespa;it’sjustinyourhead.It’sabitpeculiar. Oneoftheguestaskedwhatkindoffuneralmusicweplayed.It’saveryboringmusic;ifyou hearittoomuch,yougetabitdepressed(Vaira). Apartfromthe‘invisible’feminisedpractices,more‘visible’practicescouldbe distinguished in the interview study, where femininity in terms of looks and aesthetics had a more prominent role. In this case, tourism work does not includemerelythework‘behindthescenes’,butalsoworkrelatingtodemands of modern hospitality. The hotel managers put emphasis on education and foreignlanguageskillsasrequirementsforworkwithintourism,especiallyfor workinthereceptionandforhigherpositions.Onemustalsohaveaservice attitudeandhospitalityqualities,wheresocial,personalandaestheticskillsare valued morethan basic technical knowledgeand experience (seeLucas2004; Adkins 1995). These skills were considered to be more common among youngerwomenduetotheirhigherlevelofeducation. Inthereception,theabilitytocommunicateisthemostimportantquality.Theyaretheface ofthehotelforthearrivingguests,andtheyshouldknowdirectlytheneedsofthecustomers. So language and communication are highly valued, as well as some diplomacy. (…) They shouldbehappyandfriendly,anddoeverythinginordertomaketheguestreturn(Yelena, hotelmanager). I would suggest that this more ‘aesthetic’ femininity has parallels to more ‘Western’ ideals of femininity, in how to dress and behave within tourism related work. Thus, work within tourism became a way of expressing ‘femininity’,andbydoingso,womenbecomeactivesubjects,butalsoinsome ways‘objects’forthemalegaze. Vera’sjobasanaerobicsinstructorinvolvesbodilyperformance,andshe isconstantlyworkingwithherbody,atthesametimeassheisthesubjectof different forms of ‘gaze’, and becomes in some sense a role model for the guests. Myworkmotivatesmetokeepmyselfingoodshape.Peoplelookatmeallthetime,andthen youjusthavetostayfit.Butthat’snotaproblem,I’mawoman!Womenalwaystrytolook good;that’snormal.Whenpeoplelookatyou,theyshouldthink,“Iwannalooklikeher!”,

361 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala andnotbeoffendedbyyourlooks.(…)Womenhavetolookgoodinalltypesofsituations, nomatterifyou’rehappyorsad.Everyonecanhaveabadday,butwhenyou’reatwork,you havetogetridofyoursadfaceandmeetthepeoplethereandputyourproblemsbehind.A smilealwayshelpstogetridoftheproblems,andyourmoodwillimprovetoo(Vera). Themore‘visible’feminizedpracticeswithintourismalsohadclearparallelsto idealsofnewformsandpatternsofconsumption.AsTrue(2003)emphasises, thenew‘emancipation’ofwomeninpostsocialistcountriestendstobemani fested through an increased consumption, which involves embracing a more ‘Westernlifestyle’inbothamaterialandanimmaterialsense,andhasbecomea hallmarkofthenewfoundfreedom.Formanyofthefemaleinterviewees,con sumption in terms of a manicure, pedicure and other beauty products were consideredaspartofeverydaylife,andanexpressionof‘femininity’whichalso agreedwiththeirworkwithintourism. Ibuycosmetics,domynails,anddomyface.Ithinkitisimportant.Inthereceptionyou need it. If you have bad nails, it’s not good. People are always looking at you, especially women; they go, “Oh, so beautiful ring, so beautiful nails”. Even some guys say, “So nice bracelet, where did you get it?” That iswhy it isimportant.Ifeel nicewhenthey sayit; it provesthatthemoneyforthemanicureisnotwasted.Idon’tknowwhybeautyisimportant forLatvians,butpeoplelookandtellwhoyouarefromyourshoes,nails,hairandwhatever. Theythink“Nice,you’rearichgirl;okyouarearichlady,hmmm”.Thisiswhatpeoplevalue mostofall.Theyarenotlookingatyourinsides;theyonlyseeyourappearance.Maybeit’s bad,butthat’sthewayitis(Regina). Apart from being ‘role models’ (mainly for other women), the female intervieweesalsodescribedthemselvesas‘exposed’intheirfemininityindiffer entworkrelatedsituations.Someofthefemaleintervieweesclaimedthatthey hadbeensubjectsofdifferentformsofharassmentfrommaleguests. Zoya describes one incident when she was harassed by the male hotel guestsasfollows. OnetimeIwasattackedatthehotel.Therewereacoupleofguestswholockedmeintoa roomsoIcouldn’tgetout.Theykeptmeimprisonedthereforawholehour.Theguardsdid notseeanything.Theydidn’ttouchmeorsomethinglikethat,buttheycalledmeuglynames. Theywereverydrunk.ThenextmorningIwroteareport,whichItoreapartlater(Zoya). Manyofthehotelshadregulationswhichrequiredatleastonemaleemployee in the reception during the night shifts, which was part of a safety routine. Moreover, some of the hotels had installed surveillance cameras for security measures,problemsoftheftandpeoplebreakingintothehotelrooms.

362 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

Reginaworksinthereceptionandclaimsthatthepresenceofmaleemployees providesahighersenseofsecuritythanthesecuritycameras. Duringthedaywehaveoneguywithmeinthereception,butofcourseamanlikesitwhena womangreetshim,talkstohim.Buteveryoneisnice…LatviansandRussiansmightberude. Wehavethreemeninthereception.Atnightweneedmeninthereception,becauseduring thelatehoursitisnotsosafetoworkinthereception,andwedon’thavesecurity.Wehave camerasnow,butcamerascandonothing…(Regina). Thefemale interviewees also statedthatthe surveillance cameraswhich were meanttoincreaseasenseofsecurityforthe(female)employees,alsocreateda senseofbeingwatched,andthattheywerenotonlyusedfortheprotectionof theemployees,butalsoasawayofcontrollingthestaffandpreventingstealing andunwantedbehaviour. Wehavesurveillancecameraseverywhere;thereisalsoabuggingsystem.Theylistentoeve rything,thephones,inthestaffrooms.Youdon’tseethemicrophones(…)Wehavealready gottenusedtoit;wedon’tlookatthecamerasanymore;wedon’tnoticethem.Buttheysee everything and hear everything (…) We have certain places where they can’t hear us, for example,goingtotherestroomsorsomethingifwewanttotalkinprivate.Thenwemeetin otherplacesoutsidethehotelwhenwedon’twork,incafésandsoon(Zoya). Reproducingthetraditionalbreadwinnermodel Thefeminisationofthetourismsectorcanalsobeanalysedasrelatedtothe lowincomegeneratedwithinthetourismsector,whichwasnotconsideredas ‘appropriate’formenaccordingtotheidealofthemanasthemainbreadwin ner. Menweredescribedasbeingguidedbyamore‘rationalthinking’intheir searchforwork,bothinrelationtojobstatusandsalaries.Workingasachefor abartenderwasdescribedashavingmorestatusthanotherjobsatthehotels likethespaorhousekeeping. Manymenworkascooksandbarmen;ourheadwaiterisalsoaman.HereIcanseethatitis veryimportanttobeabarman;it’skindofthistopposition.Ifyouworkintherestaurantyou areabletoworkwherever,andthere’salsothepsychologicalpart,“I’mfreeasabirdandIcan dowhatIwant”,whichclicksintotheideaofworkthat“Idomykindoftemporarywork, andIcanbecomesomethingbetterinthefuture.”Thisisverymuchthemen’sideology.(…) Youngmenthinkaboutfast,bigmoney,andtheyconstantlymovetoanotherplacewhere theyagaincangetfastmoney.Theycomeherewithoutknowledge,getthebasictrainingand thentheyleave,forexample,toRiga,maybetosomediscos(Laura,hotelmanager). Menworkingwithintourismwerealsodescribedasyounger,andthemanagers described a shortage of older men with experience interested in working in

363 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala tourism.This was alsoillustratedin theresultsof the survey, where the age patternsformenandwomendifferedsignificantly,andshowedthatamajority ofthemalerespondentswerebetween21and25yearsold,whilethefemale respondentstendedtobeofmixedages(seeFigure23inthepreviouschapter). Thehotelmanagersdescribedtheyoungermenasbeinginterestedin‘fastand bigmoney’,whilewomenwereregardedassearchingformorelongtermand stableemployment,andmorewillingtoinvestinhighereducation. Theservicesectorisnotthemostwellpaidsector.InLatviawehavetheimagethattheman shouldsupportthefamily,sothisisnottherightplaceforaman.Itisactuallyarathertradi tionalimagethatwehave,thatthewomanshouldsitathomeandtakecareofthechildren andcook.Maybeit’ssomethingwithahistoricalandculturalorigin(Matilde,hotelmanager). Moreover,themanagersclaimedthattheystruggledwithproblemsofalarge turnoverofstaff,ofwhichamajorityweremen.Menwhohadtheobjectiveto earnbettersomeplaceelse,werenotperceivedasbeing‘loyal’totheirworkat thehotel. Thetravelbusinessisconsideredafemalebusiness.It’snotgoodforyourimagetobework ing in the travel industry. Men don’t find it too serious, and that they actually can achieve somethingintheirpositions.It’slikeentertainment;it’snotaseriousbusinesslikeothersec tors.Menwanttodoseriousbusiness.IthinkinRigathereare1001waysofmakingserious businessapartfromthetravelindustry(Laura,hotelmanager). The interview study showed how the twoperson household constituted a strong norm for women’s livelihood among the female employees, partly in relationto traditional family ideals, and partlyduetothefactwomenusually occupiedlowerpaidpositionsinthelabourmarketingeneralandwithintour ismspecifically.Eventhoughsomeofthefemaleintervieweesexpressedawish ofbecomingmoreeconomicallyindependentfromtheirmalepartners,onlya fewofthemclaimedthattheywouldbeabletosupportthemselves,letalonea family, on their salary from tourismrelated work. Therefore, men tended to remainthe‘natural’breadwinnersofthefamily,whilewomenwereconsidered toliveuptotheidealsandrolesasthe‘familysupporter’,whichputemphasis ontheirsocialandcaringdimensionsintheprivateanddomesticsphererather thantheireconomicalcontributioninthepublicsphere. Theinterviewstudyshowedthatafewofthefemale respondents who wereeithermarriedorlivingincohabitationwerethemainincomeproviderin thehousehold.Thiswasparticularlyevidentamongthemarriedfemalerespon dents,ofwhichamajoritystatedthatanotherhouseholdmemberwasthemain

364 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala incomeprovider,andonlysixstatedthattheywerethemainincomeprovider. AsillustratedbyFigure28,thedifferentcategoriesamongthefemalecohabit eesshowamoreequalpattern. Figure28: Whoisthemainincomeproviderinyourhousehold?(femalerespondents).

50 47 45 40 35

30 Married 25 22 Cohabitee 20 Single 15

Numberofrespondents 11 9 10 8 8 6 5 5 0 0 Iam Someoneelseinthe Equalcontribution householdis

Source:Theauthor’ssurveyinMajori,Jūrmala. Thenormofthemanasthemainbreadwinnerinthefamilyturnedouttobe stronglyrootedamongsomeofthefemaleintervieweeswhowereeithermar riedorlivingincohabitationandoccupyinglowerpositionswithintourism.Ina majority of cases, the married interviewees had a significantly lower income thantheirmalecounterparts,whichalsocontributedtoamoretraditionalview oflivelihood. Viktorijaismarriedandhasalsoarathertraditionalviewofwhoshould bethemainincomeproviderinthefamily. Ithinkit’srightthatthemanearnsmore.Ifthemanwouldearnless,hewouldn’tbeableto callhimselfaman.Amanshouldearnmoreinordertospendmoneyonhiswife(Viktoriya). Zoya clearly acknowledges her husband in the role as the main breadwinner, whichmeansthatsheisalsodependentonhisincome.Sheclaimsthatitisvery expensive to live in Jūrmala,the rentforthe apartment is high, and that her ownsalarywouldonlybeenoughtopaytherentandthebasicbills. (…)Idon’tknowtheincomeofmyfamily,andhowmuchmyhusbandearns.Mymoneyis mymoney,buthismoneyisthefamily’smoney(…)Thehusbandshouldearnmore,andthe

365 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala womanshouldbethebossathome;maybeit’stradition.It’sthesamewayamonganimals. Themaleshuntandthefemalestakecareoftheyoung.WequarrelwhenIspendtoomuch, but what are you supposed to do? I wouldn’t have managed to live on my own salary. I wouldn’tevenhavebeenabletoliveonmyown(Zoya). Negotiatingtraditionalidealsoflivelihood Differencesrelatingtoclassandfamilystructurebecameevidentintheinter viewstudywhenanalyzingvariationsofwomen’sworkandlivelihoodwithin tourism. The women had different possibilities to affect their livelihood de pendingontheirsocialpositions,accesstohumancapitalintermsofeducation, previousworkingexperienceandincome.Inthiscase,threegroupsofwomen can be identified. Firstly,there is a group of marriedand cohabiting women, whoconstitutethe‘norm’ofthetwopersonhouseholdandfamilystructureas discussed above through more ‘traditionallyoriented livelihood practices’ . Secondly, therearesinglewomenrepresenting ‘nontraditionalbreadwinningpractices’ ,includ ing either younger women who lacked a sufficient working experience or education,orsinglemotherswhohadtofindadditionalincomeinordertose cure their livelihood. Thirdly, there is a group of women with more ‘ career oriented livelihood practices’ who possessed the adequate education for a higher positionwithintourism,andwhowouldbeabletosupportthemselvesontheir ownincomeregardlessoftheirhouseholdstructure.BelowIwilldiscusshow the female interviewees in the three abovedescribed groups negotiated and challengedmoretraditionalidealsoflivelihood. Negotiatingthe‘housewifeideal’ Theidealsofthetraditionalbreadwinnermodelalsobecameevidentinterms oftheidealofthe‘modernhousewife’.Intheinterview study, some women claimedthattheywouldconsiderit‘normal’nottowork,partlyasaneffectof thelowwageswithintourism,andpartlyduetothemoretraditionalfamilyval ues and beliefs of the man remaining the main supporter of the household. Some of the female interviewees had also previously been housewives for a shorterorlongerperiodoftime,foravarietyofreasons.Ontheonehand,and especially among some of the younger female interviewees, the ideals of ‘the housewife’ somewhat included a wish to be economically supported by their husbands,whichalsorepresentedfreedomandstatusandamoremoderncon sumptionoriented lifestyle. On the other hand, the female interviewees expressedaneedandinteresttowork,bothasawayofearninganincomeand thereby becoming more independent from their husbands, and to get more socialand challenging work ratherthan ‘just sittingathome’. However,even

366 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala though the ideals of the‘housewife’ wererejectedby a majorityof theinter viewees, it became evident that some of the women’s employment also was questionedandnegotiated. Regina has a college education from the tourism field and works as a receptionist,butexplainsthatherboyfriendisstillthemainincomeproviderin the household. She put emphasis on the norm of the male breadwinner as something‘natural’. Heworkswithinthefinancialsector.It’sagoodsectortoworkinforaguy.Menhavetoearn alot,alot,forthewholefamily.Womencanearnmorethantheirmen,butusuallytheydon’t likeitwhenthewomanearnsmore.Myhusbandwantstosupportme,becauseheisaguy whowantstobethemaninthefamily.IlikeitwhenIcanrelyonsomebody;Icanrelaxand domyownthings(Regina). EventhoughReginarecognizesherboyfriendasthemainincomeprovider,she stillwantstocontributewithincometothehousehold.Yet,herboyfriendalso questionsthevalueofhersalaryandherjob. Wemanagewell.I’mearningtenpercentofmyboyfriend’ssalary.Yes,it’strue.That’swhy he’ssometimeslaughingaboutmeandmysalary;“whatcanyoubuyforyourmoney?You’re workingformonthsandyouearnonlythatlittle”.Ifeelbad;that’swhyIwanttostepupin my job, earn more money, so that I can show my boyfriend. “You’re coming home every night,sosickandtiredafteryourwork,youearnnothing”(Regina). For her boyfriend, being a housewife is considered to be an option, which Reginaactivelyrejectsduetothefactthatshewantstomakeuseofherhigher educationwithinthetourismfield,aswellasgettingsocialcontactthroughher work. Even though Regina’s income from tourism constituted only a small shareofthehousehold’stotalbudget,andthatsherecognisedherboyfriendas themainbreadwinner,she,justasamajorityofthefemaleinterviewees,em phasisedthatherincomehadbothaneconomicandsymbolicimportance.This wasalsoevidentamongthosewomenwhoearlierhadbeenhousewivesbefore startingtoworkwithintourism. Vera is a single mother and values her economic freedom highly comparedtowhenshewasmarried. Menspendalotofmoneyonbuyingalcohol,butdon’tspendasmuchmoneyontheirwives. Somuchmoneyforgettingdrunk…WhenIwasahousewifeIhadtoaskmyhusbandbefore IboughtclothesandprovewhatIshouldusethemfor.Hethoughtthatyoucoulduseone pairofjeansallyearround.Hesaid,“You’renotgoinganywhereanyway,whydoyouneed anythingmore?”(Vera)

367 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

Klara’s income asacleaneris much lower than herhusband’s monthlywage fromhisworkwithintheconstructionbusiness.However,Klaraunderlinesthat the salary represents much more in terms of a social security which was not guaranteedduringherperiodasahousewife; Myhusbanddoesn’treallywantmetowork;thingswouldhavebeeneasierforhimifIdid nothaveajob.Hesays“I’llpayyou100Latsforbeingathome,”butthenthingswouldbe come as before and I don’t want it that way. It’s very important for me to have my own income,alsoformyfuturepension.I’vealsotakencareofmyfamilyforsomanyyears,andI havebeenmoreorlessforcedtodoso.Nowthereisnosuchneed,butIstilltakealotof responsibilityformyfamily(…)WhenIwasathomewekeptthemoneyinthekitchencabi net,andwecouldgothereandtakemoney.Butforsomeofmyfriendsitwasdifficult,since theyhadtoaskformoneyfromtheirhusbands.ButnowIcantakeoutmoneymyselfand buyapresentformyhusband.Earlieritwasnotpossibletotakehismoneyandthenbuyhim apresent!(Klara) Due to the fact that some of the female interviewees’ salaries merely representedafractionofthehousehold’sincome,theyalsostressedthatitwas difficult to influence what the income should be used for. Their partner’s moneywasdescribedashis‘personalincome’,andmanyadmittedthattheydid notevenknowwhattheirpartnersearned.Themoneywasusedforcommon household needs and for the children, while the women’s income was consideredtobe for their own personal needs, including for example money forclothesandmakeup. Balancingworkintheprivateandthepublicsphere Foramajorityofthefemaleemployeeswithinthehotelsector,workinvolved irregularworkinghoursduetoshift schedules,which made it challenging to combineworkandfamily.Someoftheinterviewees,especiallythoseworkingat aspa,describedtheirroutinesasverystressfulanddemanding,bothmentally andphysically.Thus,theimageofthespaasasanctuaryforrelaxationforboth thebodyandsoulcanbeputincontrasttotheeverydayroutineoftheemploy ees‘behindthescenes’,whichoftenisfarfromtheidealizedimageofthespa. AsTomO’Dell(2005)concludes,theemployeesatthespaarepartofcreating the‘magic’ofthespafortheclientsas‘magicians’,assymbolsforcreatingre laxation and escape from the stressful everyday life. Even though they may appearasbeingindividualizedandtailormadefortheclients,theactivitiesare boundtoatighttimeschedulefortreatments,mealsandsportsessions,which requirepunctualityfromboththeemployeesandthevisitorsthemselves.The sparesortstendtoreflectbothFordistandPostFordistproductionandcon

368 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala sumptionpatterns,includingmassproductionofservicesandemployees,atthe sametimeastheresortsneedtobeflexible,inordertorespondtodifferent client needs and to regulate the employees according to the tourist demand (O’DellIn:Löfgren&Willim2005). Vairaworksinshiftswithprovidingdifferentformsofmassage,andcan workforuptoelevenortwelvehoursfortwodaysbeforeshegetsoneortwo days off. The schedule may change depending on how many guests have booked procedures, and sometimes the employees change shifts with each other.Theroutinesvaryandsheexplainsthatworkinginaspaisfarfroma regularofficejob;shedoesnotnormallyhavethe weekends off or normally haveworkinghoursbetween8inthemorningand5intheafternoon. TodayIworkbetweeneightinthemorninguntilnineintheevening.Earlierweworkedone dayandhadtwodaysoff,butthat’snotthecaseanymore.That’swhywelookthistired…I don’tknowwhat’shappening,butifI’moffworkatnineintheeveningandcomehomeat ten,andthendosomethingbeforeIgotobed,I’mtiredwhenIwakeup.It’sdifficulttosay why,buteveryoneistiredandthinksthatsheworksalot.Youhavenevertimetorestand gathernewenergy(Vaira). Thus,Vairaandhercolleagueshavetobeflexibleintheirworkandadjustto theseasonaldemandswithinspatourism,aswellastothetimeschedulesset up regulating different treatments. The work load varies, but the hotels also haverulesregulatingtheuseofovertime.Vairaworksfulltimethemajorityof theyear,buttriestoavoidworkingovertimesinceshewillnotbecompensated inmoney,butmerelythroughtimeoffwork,andregardsitmorebeneficialjust toworkasmuchassheisrequiredto.Hermonthlyincomefromherworkat thehotelisaround200Latsbeforetaxes,whichisaboutequivalenttotheprice for a spa weekend in Jūrmala including accommodation, meals and a spa treatment. Zaiga works at the spa section and has more administrative chores combined with contacts with the guests. She offers the guests different proceduresandhasalsoamoremedicalresponsibilityasanursetoadminister first aid or respond to other healthrelated problems. Zaiga works irregular workinghours,whichalsovaryovertheyeardependingontheseason. Wework40hoursperweek,butwedon’tworkeverydayandwemayworkonweekends,but wearenotallowedtoworkmorethan40hoursperweek.Itdiffershowmanyhourswework everymonth,sometimesit’spublicholidays,butyoucannotworklessthan144hours.Some timesImightworktwoorthreedaysinarowfor12hoursperday,andsometimeslikeright nowIworkonlyeighthoursperday(Zaiga).

369 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

However, there were also examples of how work within tourism and the irregularworkinghourshadcontributedto arenegotiation of the household workwithinthefamily,especiallyamongthosefemaleintervieweeswhoprevi ouslyhadbeenhousewives. Klarastartedtoworkwithintourismacoupleofyearsago,whensheand herhusbandmovedtoRigafromtheeasternpartofLatviatogetherwiththeir children.Shehadearlierbeenahousewife,butthendecidedtogetherownjob andincome,whichmeantthatherhusbandalsohadtoadjusttoherirregular workinghours.Currentlysheworksfortwodaysandhastwodaysoff. Iworkverylate.WhenIcomehomelate,it’shisresponsibilitytocook.Duringthesummer weworkfourdaysandhavetwodaysoff.It’sabitdifficultforhimwhenhewantstogo fishingandhunting.HegoeswhenI’moffwork(Klara). Klaradescribesfurtherhowthedailyroutineshavechangedaftergetting her jobwithintourism. My husband is at home in the evening, and he spends a lot oftime withthe children. He understandsthatIneedthisjobinordernottobecomeanoutsiderinthesociety.Formany yearsIdidn’thaveanysocialguarantees.Icouldn’tgetunemploymentbenefitssinceIhadn’t worked. I don’t work a hundred percent here; I work my hours and then I go home, and there’snoproblem.Hereit’smoreofaroutine.Ihavehadmanydifferentroutinesinmylife andhadverylittletimeformyself.I’vehadlittletimeforentertainmentandpleasure.WhenI camehomeearlier,beforehewouldletmegoanddomysportpractice.Nowit’stheother wayaround;Iworkandhe’sathomewiththechildren.Ithinkitmightbemoredifficultfor him.Hewantstoearnmoney,butalsohastospendtimewiththechildren(Klara). Klaraclaimsthatshedoesn’thavemuchsparetimeduetoherwork,andthat herhobbies,suchassportactivities,havefadedawaysincethefamilymovedto Riga. She also emphasises that even though her husband takes more responsibilityathome,herefusestodochores,suchascleaningtheapartment. Findingandusingchildcarewasnotconsideredtobeaproblemforthe female interviewees who had children, but they stressed that the irregular workinghourswithintourismsometimesmadeitdifficulttosolvetheeveryday routines of work and family. Some of the women in the interview study describedhowtheyreliedontheirparents,grandparentsornanniesforhelping outwithchildcarewhentheyandtheirhusbandswereworkinglate. Zaiga has three children, including one daughter aged five who attends day care on the weekdays, usually between 7 in the morning and 5 in the afternoon.Herhusbandworksfulltimewithintheconstructionbusinessand

370 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala has irregular working hours, which may include 12hour shifts. The family’s solutionhasbeentohireananny. I haven’t had so many problems to combine work and family. I’ve always managed a job whereyoucantaketimeoff.I’vecomeupwithasolutiontoo.Ourchildrenhaveababysitter. She’saretiredteacherandshepicksupthechildrenatthenurseryifIworkabitlater.But another thing that gives me a badconscience is ifI use time for myself or otherswhichI couldhavespentwiththem,thenwewouldhavebeenabletoseeeachothermore(Zaiga). ‘Nontraditionalbreadwinningpractices’ Intheinterviewstudy,onegroupofwomendeviatedclearlyfromthenormsof the twoperson household and traditional ideals of the male breadwinner, including single women who took on the main livelihood responsibilities for eithertheirchildrenorotherfamilymembers,botheconomicallyandsocially. Moreover, these more ‘nontraditional breadwinning practices’ also illustrated thedifficultiesof supportingoneselfandafamilybasedontheincomefrom tourism,whichbecameevidentintheinterviewswiththesinglemothersand theyounger,singlefemaleinterviewees,whosawnootheroptionthantolive withtheirparents. Erikaisinhertwentiesandworksatoneofthetourism attractions in Jūrmala,andlivestogetherwithherparents.Hermotherhasnotworkedfora fewyearsduetobadhealth,whichisconsideredtobeworkrelatedafter26 yearsofindustrywork.Herfatherisstillworkingintheconstructionbusiness, butErikaistheonemainlycaringforhermotherathomeandtakingcareof mosthouseholdwork,whichhermotherusedtodoamajorityofearlier. WhenIcomehomeIstarttocook,thenIironclothesandthenIusuallydiscoverthatit’slate intheevening.Butwhenmymotherfeelsabitbetter,thenwecandosomethingtogether.If thereisfoodreadywhenIcomehome,IknowthatIwillhavetwohoursformyselfinthe evening(…)Myfatherdoesn’tdoanyhouseholdworkathome.Heisjustresponsiblefor repairs,andhepaintstheceiling.Hecannotevenfryeggs;he’sarealman.Orrather,maybe hecouldfryeggs,buthedoesn’twantto(Erika). Erikaworksinthepublicsectorandhasnegotiatedabouthersalarysinceshe started,whichhasresultedinincreasedpay.Shestillthinksthatthesalaryistoo low,sinceamajorityofitgoestothefamilyhousehold. Ialsogivemoneytomyparents.Frommysalarymoneygoestopaytherent,gasforthecar andthefoodwhichwehavetobuy.InthatwayIspendalmostmyentiresalary.Idon’tknow whatIlivefrom,butIalwaysmanagetofixmoney.Forexample,Idon’tneedtobuyanynew clothes;Ihaveboughtenough(Erika).

371 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

Still,Erikawouldnotbeabletosupportherselfonherownsalary.Sheworks regular office hours on a fulltime basis, but does not get paid for working overtime,andisthereforereluctanttoworkmorethansheisboundto.Erika wantstohaveahigherincomeinordertocontributemoretothefamilyhouse holdandinthelongrunaffordtobuyherownapartment,andforsometime has been looking for an extra job in the evenings. However, her current employerhasfoundoutaboutherplansandforbiddenhertotakeanotherjob withtheexplanationthatitmayjeopardiseherworkingability. For the divorced or widowed single mothers, their more independent livelihood became more of a ‘war and battleground’, in efforts to support themselves and their children. They usually worked fulltime within tourism, butwerestillforcedtogetasecondorevenathirdjob. VairaisdivorcedandlivesinJūrmalatogetherwithhertwoteenagesons. Sheworksinshiftsatahotelandusuallystartsmornings at8 andends her workeveningsat9.Apartfromherfulltimejobatthehotel,Vairahastwo additionaljobs;sheworksparttimeatahospitalinRigasinceafewyearsback, usually 3 24hour shifts per month. She has also an unofficial job doing occasionalgardeningworkataneighbouringfarm.Still,shehascutdownon herjobatthehospitalandprioritisesthejobatthehotel. Idon’twanttoworktoomuchandsavemyenergyandbodyinstead.I’vealwayshadmultiple jobs(…)Thatjob(atthehospital)ismainlyforstabilityandsafety.Ifsomethingwouldhap penwithmyjobhere(atthehotel)whichwouldmeanthatIwouldn’tbeabletocontinueto workhere,I’vegottheotherjob(Vaira). Despite her multiplejobs, hermonthly income isaround300Lats,ofwhich 120 Lats is required to pay the rent. Vaira’s daily routine is more or less a puzzle,tohaveenoughtimeforherworkandchildren. Mychildrenmanageprettywellontheirown;theyareindependent.Orrather,theyhavetobe independent.Ihavenooneelsewhocanlookafterthem.It’slikethismorning,whenmy childrenaskedmeifIwouldworkhereoratthehospital,andItoldthemthatIwouldcome here. They haven’t had a choice. I would need five additional hours eachday. When I get homethereissomuchtodo.Iwanttopreparethefoodformychildrenmyself.Idon’tallow them to cook since they might use toomuch food, and we don’t have unlimited supplies. ThenIspendtimewiththem,helpthemwiththeirhomeworkandthatkindofthing(Vaira). Veraisalsoasinglemotherandhastwojobswithinthefitnesssectorandalso studiesparttimeatacollegeinRiga.Anormalworkdayduringthesummer monthsinvolvesonetrainingsessionatthehotel,and oneatthe gym inthe

372 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala afternoon,followedbystudiesatthecollegeintheevening.Vera’swishisto widenherknowledge,notonlytobeafitnessinstructor,butalsotogainamore formaleducation,whichmayintheendresultinamorewellpaidprofessionas aphysiotherapist. It’sverysimple,Iplanaheadverymuch.TodayIhaveameetingwithyou;thenwehaveaTV broadcast at two o’clock; then I go to a training session. It’s common to have many jobs withinfitness,butIdon’tknowhowit’swithinotherprofessions.Itmayalsohappenthata fitnessclubwillclosedown,soit’sabituncertain,youneverknow.Youdon’tearnenough moneyatoneplaceeither;that’swhyyouhavetohaveatleasttwojobs(Vera).

Verahasalsotheresponsibilityofher14yearolddaughterwhohasbeendis abledsincebirth,andisnotabletotalk,walkorsitbyherselfandlivesavery isolatedlife. TheonlyhelpIgetisagovernmentsubsidy,andmymotherhelpstakingcareofher.The subsidy isverylimited,just as other state subsidies. Nothing isadjusted todisabled people here.It’simpossibletogetaccesstotransportation,andit’sverydifficulttohandle.Maybeit’s a heritage from the Soviet period, and I think people just don’t accept people who look different(Vera). Takingcareofherdaughter,havingtwojobsandhercollegestudiesdoesnot leavemuchtimeforleisure.Veraclaimsthattimeisnotenough,notevenfor herownstudies.Despitehertwojobs,andthetimeinvestedinthedifferent activities,herincomeisbarelyenoughtocoverthebasicexpensesintermsof rentandafewbills.NeitherVairanorVeraownsacar,whichisconsideredas too expensive. Vera lives in Riga and commutes with theminibus whenshe goestoworkinJūrmala.ShedoesnotwanttoliveinJūrmala,partlyduetothe expensive housing, and partly due to Jūrmala being considered as a ‘summer town’,whichflourishesduringthesummermonths,butdoesnothavemany activitiesduringthewinter. IgowiththeminibustoJūrmala,andsometimesyoucanevenfindaseat…Butit’sdifficult to reach Jūrmala if you don’t have a car. Women’s position within the fitness business are ratherlimited.Wedon’tearnenoughmoneysowecanbuyourowncar.That’swhyyouhave togowiththeminibus(Vera). However,bothVeraandVairastressthatthemainproblemsintheireveryday routinehaveamoreeconomicnatureandconcerntimeratherthanthemobility inspace.Accesstobothpublicandprivatetransportationiswidespreadinboth RigaandJūrmalaandisrathercheapincomparisontoothermodesoftravel

373 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala ling. Rather, Vaira’s main concerns are managing her household with her incomeandfindingtimeforherself. It’sdifficulttogetleisuretime,thenIgoshopping,Igotothelibrary,anddoothererrands. Youhavetowritealistofeverythingthatneedstobedone.I’veonlygotonehourbeforeI gotosleepwhenthechildrenarenotallowedtodisturbme;that’smytimewhenIread.Itry togetthattimeeveryday.Iwouldneedtimetosleepandread.Yes,sleepingandreading... (Vaira). Careerorientedlivelihoodpractices Attheotherendofthespectrum,anothergroupof female intervieweesalso challengedthenormsofthetwopersonhouseholdinadifferentway,through more‘careerorientedlivelihoodpractices’.Amajorityofthefemaleinterview eesdescribedtheirpossibilitiesformakingacareeraslimitedduetoeducation, age,languageskillsorresponsibilitiesinthefamily.Still,therewasalsoagroup ofyoungerwomenwithmorepronouncedcareeraspirations,whoalsoheldthe right‘humancapital’, in termsof highereducation, language skills and work experience,andwhoalreadyhadstrongpositionsinthenewLatviancapitalist economythelabourmarket. Incontrasttothemoretraditionally‘feminised’practicesoftourismwork discussedabove,somewomenintheinterviewstudyrelatedtoidealswhichput the changing conditions of the public sphere in focus in terms of work, livelihood and individual career. The transformationof theLatvian economy includes changing conceptions of work and livelihood inthe transitionfrom socialistworkingideals,toamorediversified,competitiveandhierarchallabour market within the new capitalist economy. While the domestic and private spherecanbeanalysedas‘feminised’,GalandKligman(2000)emphasisehow thepublicsphereingeneralandtheprivatesectormorespecificallyinpostso cialistcountriesoftenaregivenmore‘masculine’characteristics. (…)itismenmorethanwomenwhoareincreasinglyassociatedwiththeidealizedandeven romanticizedprivate,thedynamic,capitalistsectoroftheeconomy.Indeed,theaggressivity, initiative,andcompetitionthatareidentifiedwiththemarketarebecomingnewrepresentative formsofmasculinity(Gal&Kligman2000:59). As discussed above, the tourism sector in Jūrmala has remained clearly ‘feminised’,buttheidealsandnormswhichinfluencework,employmentand livelihoodwithintourismaswellasinothersectorsoftheneweconomystill carrysomemoremasculineattributes.Tourismas‘business’andasthemeans

374 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala ofmakingasuccessful careerbecameevidentintheinterview study,through more‘careeroriented’practices. Someofthefemaleintervieweesregardedtourismasasuitablesectorfor business and future career aspirations. Being a woman in a more leading positionwithinprivatetourismbusinesseswasusuallyconsideredascommon and ‘normal’. The female interviewees also emphasised that higher positions withintourismdidnothavethesamestatusasthoseinothersectorsduetothe lowwages,andthefactthattourismwasconsideredtobea‘female’sector. Matilde works as a manager and describes how the tourism sector is differentcomparedtoothersectorsoftheeconomy interms of income and career. Tourismisnotaswellpaidasotherjobswithinbusiness,eventhoughyouhaveahigherpo sitionasamanager.Amanagerintourismdoesn’tequalbeingamanagerinothertypesof businesses.Tourismdoesn’tgeneratebigmoney(Matilde). The more careeroriented women often portrayed themselves as ‘strong’ and independent,withahighmotivationandcommitmentintheirwork,andthere fore capable of shouldering the demands of more ‘masculine’ characteristics androleswhichwereregardedasnecessarytotheorganization. Iprefertoworkwithmen;it’seasierforme.Idon’tneedsomuchconnectionwithwomen; it’snothingnewforme.Menhavedifferentviews,waysofdoingthings.Formeit’smuch moreinterestingtoknowmoreaboutmen,howtheyworkandthink.ThatismaybewhatI’m lookingfor,tomakemyselfequaltomen(Matilde). In this case, the wish to participate in the same ‘division’ as men could be analysedasastridingtoachieveprominentpositionswithintheemergingcapi talist market, where climbing hierarchies and shouldering more ‘masculine’ businesscharacteristicsmaybecrucialinordertomakeacareer.Thewishto makewomen‘equal’withmeninthepublicspherealsoinsomewaysindicates a continuity with past socialist gender ideals, which value women’s active participationinthelabourmarket,whilealsoshoulderingtheirresponsibilities intheprivatesphere.Intheinterviewstudy,somewomenregardedthemselves asactiveworkersbasedonrathergenderneutralterms,atthesametimeasthey believed themselves to have some sort of advantage in their ‘biological’ and ‘feminine’roleaswomen. Idon’tthinkIhavebeentreateddifferentlyasafemalemanager.Therearesomanywomen workingwithintourism,andwomenoftenhavethesekindsofpositions.Iratherthinkthatit

375 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala isanadvantagetobeawomaninthiskindofpositioninrelationtothemen.Womencanuse theirfemininityinanotherway(Matilde). Womenandmenweredescribedashavingthesameopportunitiesingeneralin tourism,butwhencareerwasdiscussed,menwereconsideredtohaveiteasier tomakeacareerwithregardtocontactsandrecognitionoftheirwork,while womenhadtoworkhardertoachievethesamepositions. Irinaworksasamanager,anddescribeshowsheexperienceddifficulties toachieverecognitionforherworkinthebeginningofhercareer. It’seasierformentomakeacareer.(…)Itiseasier for them to be approved as a good worker,andgoodintheirposition.Youneedtoworkharderandmoreforthisapprovalasa woman.Icouldnoticethisduringmyfirstyearshere.Icouldnoticeitinmyfirstyearsof work(…)OfcourseIhadtoshowthatIcouldbeheadofadepartment,toworkhard,but right now it’s not that hard, because people know me now very well after four years, and knowthatIworkveryhardandhaveseenmyresults.Butatthebeginning,Ithinkit’seasier formenthanforfemalesinLatvia(Irina). Questformoreindependentlivelihoodpractices Mostofthecareerorientedfemaleintervieweesalreadyhadahigherposition withintourismandbelongedtothefewwhocouldsupportthemselvesontheir ownsalaries.Theyalsomoreclearlymadeadistinctionbetweentheirownin come and the earnings made by their male counterparts, for example, by separating their expenses within the household from their own personal investmentsandcosts.Thiswasinturndescribedtoberelatedtoaquestfora moreindependentlivelihood,whichdidnotincludearelianceontheincome fromtheirhusbandsorboyfriends. Matildeandherhusbandcontributeeconomicallyaboutthesameamount tothehousehold,buttheyhavechosentohaveaseparateeconomy. Idon’twanthismoney,butifhewantstogivemesomeIwillacceptit(…)Ithinkit’sabout afeelingofindependence.Idon’tthinkit’srightthatyouputthemoneytogetherandthen seeswhohasspentitandforwhat.It’sbetterthatyou’reresponsibleforyourownmoneyand ifyouwantsomethingextra,youhelpeachother(Matilde). Sofijaworksasahotelmanagerandearnsabitmorethanherhusband,and theyhaveacommonhouseholdbudgetfortheirexpenses.Halfofherincome comesfromtourismandhalffromherworkasaswimminginstructor,whichis conductedonanunofficialbasis.Sofijarelatesherquestforindependenceto herpreviouscareerasanathlete.

376 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

Insomefamiliesthewomenmightwanttobesupportedbytheirhusbands,butIdon’twant itthatway.I’veworkedsinceIwastwelve.AllathletesintheSovietUnionreceivedasalary, soyoucansaythatI’vegotworkexperiencesinceIwastwelve(…)SosinceIwastwelveI’ve supportedmyselffinancially.Andthat’smaybewhyit’sstillimportantformetobeeconomi callyindependentsinceI’vebeenthatsinceIwasyounger(Sofija). Themore‘traditional’divisionofworkinthehouseholdwasalsonegotiatedto a larger degree among the more ‘careeroriented’ female interviewees. In this case, they made a clear separation between their paid work and household work. Moreover, their husbands or partners were also described as taking a largerresponsibilityinthehomeandwiththechildren.Thus,householdwork wasconductedonamore‘equal’basis,partlyduetothelargetimeinvestments thewomenmadeintheirjobs,whichleftlittletimeforhouseholdchores,and partlyduetoamoreideologicalconvictionthathouseholdworkwasnotmerely ‘women’swork’andshouldbedividedamongthemembersofthehousehold. Irinahasahigherpositionwithintourismandworksalotofovertime. Overtime?(Irinabringsouthercalculator.)Theworkweekisusually40hours,butIsome timeswork70hoursperweek.I’mlikeaDuracellbattery!(Laughs.)Wehavetoworkandwe needtodothiswork.Idon’tknow,Ithinkit’snormal.Ifyouwouldliketodoqualitativeand successfulwork,youneedtoputalotofenergyintoit(Irina). Herboyfriendisalsoworkingfulltimeandismakingacareer,andtheytryto sharesomeofthehouseholdchoresduetotheirlongworkinghours.However, eventhoughIrinaandherboyfriendtrytosharethechoresbetweenthem,she describeshowacertaindegreeof‘traditionalthinking’stillprevails. Sometimes he helps and sometimesI tell himwhat he can do. For some, traditionallyand historically,it’sconsideredtobefemalework.Inourcaseit’snotverydifferent.Myboyfriend isthinkinginthatway,too;butsinceI’mawayalot,heneedstomakebreakfastanddinner. ButwhenI’mathome,heexpectsmetodohouseholdthings.ThenIsaythathecanmakeit himself.SometimesIliketomakesomethingforhim,butsometimesIsay,“Sorry,I’mso tired;youcanmakeityourself”(Irina). JustasIrina,Emmadoesnotautomaticallytakeonthemainresponsibilityfor householdwork.Shelivestogetherwithherboyfriend,butdoesnotprioritise hertimeonhouseholdchorescomparedtothetimespentathermarketingjob atoneofthehotels. Inevercook,butifmyboyfriendcookshecleansupafterhimself.Icleantheapartmenton theweekends.Ieatbothlunchandbreakfasthereatwork,andtherestofthedayIeatalotof

377 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala candy.AthomeIjustfixsomethingquickly,orwegotothepizzeria(…).I’veexplainedto myboyfriendthatI’mnotamaid.IthinkI’vealwayslivedlikethis,andIdon’tthinkthatyou shouldteachpeopletobelazy(Emma). Neither Emma nor Irina have children and have prioritised their education, careerand personal ambitions before entering family life.Yet, Irinahopes to soonhavetheeconomicstabilityandtimeneededforstartingafamily. IneedtoplanforwhenIshouldhaveachild,becauseIneedtoplanformorefreetimewith child.Myworkistakingsomuchtime,Idon’thavetimetoseemyparents,orjustrelax.For childrenIneedalotoftime,soIneedtoplanmytime.SothatifIgetachildnextyear,I needtoplanwithmystaffthatIcanputmoreenergyintomychild.Fromonesidewecan work,work,work,butfromtheotherside,ifyoudon’thaveafamily,intheendyou’llbean emptyperson.Youwillbenoone.Everyoneneedsafamily.RightnowI’mmakingmycareer andworking,butatsometimeIwillneedafamily,too.Myboyfriendisalsoplanningafam ily…Buthe’salsobusy,andwehavemanyideasofwhattodo,manyprojects,butwedon’t havesomuchtimetoimplementitall.I’maverybusyperson(Irina). Justasinthedivisionofworkwithinthehousehold,Irinaalsohopesthatthe family responsibilitiesandparentalleavewill be shared between her and her boyfriendonan‘untraditional’basis. Matildehastwochildrenanddespiteherlongworkinghoursasahotel manager,shedoesnotseeaproblemincombiningheraspirationsforacareer with her family responsibilities. Matilde often cooksforthefamilywhenshe comes home from work, but she and her husband also try to divide the householdchoresbetweenthem.Sheclaimsthatshehastimeforherself,but emphasisesthatherfamilycomesbeforespendingtimewithherfriends.The children are active within sports, and a lot of time is required to drive the childrentotheiractivities,bothduringtheweeks and on theweekends. She saysthatthemainobstaclesmaybeofeconomiccharacter,ratherthanmaking theendsmeetinthefamily’severydaylife.Herchildrenarenowteenagers,and their interestsforsportsandleisureactivities createalotofexpensesforthe household. I don’t see any problems in combining work and family. It’s not a problem. It’s a way of living.It’salifewhichconsistsofdifferentdifficultiesandsuccesses.Nowthechildrenare older, and it’s easier now. I don’t think the problem is time, but to have money for your children(Matilde).

378 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala

Analysingparadoxesofwomen’slivelihood Summingupandanalyzingwomen’slivelihood strategies and practices discussedin thetwopreviouschapters, Table16provides anoverview of differentpara doxesthatcanbeidentifiedinwomen’sworkwithintourism. Table16: Paradoxesofwomen’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala. Strategy Practice ‘Feminised’tourismworkasincluding Workandlivelihoodwithintourism astrategicadvantageforwomen as‘invisible’practices Livelihoodwithintourismasreliable Livelihood within tourism as part of and‘safe’ theshadoweconomy Tourismasprovidingnew Tourismasrevealingdifferencesand opportunitiesforwomen inequalities among women Strategiesforindependentlivelihood Dependenceandtraditionallivelihood practices Questforcareerwithintourism Deviantcareerandlivelihood practices The first paradox illustrated in the Table concerns the overrepresentation of womenwithintourism,versusworkandlivelihoodas‘invisible’practices.As hasbeendiscussedinpreviouschapters,tourismrepresentsa‘feminised’sector, bothintermsofhowwomentendtoconstituteamajorityoftheemployees, and how the work and chores within tourism are considered to be ‘female coded’.ThesurveyandinterviewstudyinJūrmalatendedtoreflectthesepat terns,especiallyconcerningworkwithinhotelhousekeepingandthespa.Some of the female interviewees also expressed a wish to work within tourism in relationtothetypeofworkitinvolved,withreferencestoworkintheprivate sphere.However,despitethe‘visibility’ofwomeninthehotelsectorandthe publicsphere,women’spracticesweredescribedmoreintermsof‘invisibility’ andadjustmentstomoreorlessoutspokennormsandregulations.Inthiscase, women’s work within tourism bore more resemblance to work within the privatesphere,withtheaimsofcaringandnurturingforothers,andthusup holdingmoretraditionalgenderisedidealsofwork.Therewerealsoexceptions, revealinghowthefemaleintervieweesusedtheir ‘femininity’in more‘visible’ ways,withafocusonlooksandbeauty,andthusbecomingmorerolemodels for the female guests. Here, more ‘modern’ and ‘Westernized’ ideals of femininitybecameevident. The second paradox relates to the question of whether income from tourism constitutes a safe and reliable income. For some of the female interviewees,tourismrepresentedoneofthefewalternativesforemployment

379 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala inthelocallabourmarketinJūrmala,andsomeofthenewhotelsofferedfull time employment all yearround which sometimes is uncommon due to the seasonalcharacteroftourism.Thepracticesofhowthewageswerepaidvaried among different hotels and other tourism activities. Some hotels paid their employeesmerelyaminimumwageandtherestcashinhand,makingtourism partoftheshadoweconomyratherthanreflectingtheimageoftourismasan importantpartofthenationaleconomy.Thus,forsomewomen,especiallythe oldergeneration,onestrategyintheirsearchforemploymentwastofindajob whichofferedonlyofficialwages,inordertosecuretheirfuturesocialsecurity. Forothers,whoregardedworkwithintourismonlyas a temporary step, the unofficialwagewasconsideredtobea‘normal’wayofmakingtheirlivelihood inthelabourmarket.Theacceptedpracticesofinformalpaywithinthetourism sectoralsotendtomakeitan‘invisible’sector,attractingmainlywomen,dueto the low wages and ‘unsafe’ social conditions. Men, on the other hand, were described as interested mainly in morehighstatusjobs, whichalso generated higherincome. Relatedtothis,thethirdparadoxillustratedabovedescribeshowtourism ontheonehand,maybringnewopportunitiesforwomeninthelabourmarket, but on the other hand also reveals differences among women in terms of ethnicityandclass.Asdiscussedintheinterviewstudy,tourismwasperceived bysomewomenasasuitablesectorforworkwhichdidnotrequirehigheredu cation for certain positions, and provided space for more ‘lifestyleoriented’ interestsinhealthorsports,basedonpracticalratherthantheoreticalknowl edge.Duetothelowqualifiedpositionswithintourism,thesectoralsoreveals a certain imbalance in the labour market. Firstly, as stated in the previous section, men are absent within lower skilled professions, and mainly found withinrestaurantandbarwork.Secondly,especiallyolderwomenwithalackof knowledge in the Latvian language tend to be found in the lowest positions withintourism,eventhoughtheymayhaveamoreformaleducationfromthe Soviet period. For some, work within tourism appears as one of the few optionsinthelabourmarket,anddoesnotfulfillthecriteriaofworkingwithin more‘visible’work,suchasthefrontdesk.However, for those women who hadtheadequatelanguageskillsandtherightage,includingbothnativeRussian and Latvianspeakers, tourism offers different types of positions and possibilitiesforacareer. The fourth set of paradoxes includes ‘strategies for independent livelihood’ versus ‘dependence and traditional livelihood practices’. As discussed above, tourism was considered to provide new opportunities for

380 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala workinthepublicsphere,especiallyforthosefemaleintervieweeswhoearlier hadbeenworkingashousewives.Thus,tourismbecameawayofbreakingfree from more traditional genderised ideals of work, which had both a more symbolicandeconomicimportanceintermsofcontributingtothehousehold and becoming more independent from their male counterparts. Some of the female interviewees also described a changing pattern of their everyday routines,inhowtheirhusbandsneededtoadjusttotheirnewworkinghours andtotakemoreresponsibilityforchildrenandhouseholdwork.Forothers, householdwork,justasworkwithintourism,wasconsideredtobewomen’s work and responsibility, and the chores in the public and the private sphere tendedtobecomemoredissolvedratherthanseparated.Themoretraditionally oriented practices within the private sphere were more common among the married and cohabiting female interviewees who were occupying lower positions within tourism, and who prioritized the family and the household. Still, the interview study also revealed that the women’s more independent livelihoodsometimeswasnegotiatedandquestionedbytheirmalecounterparts, through the ideal of the ‘housewife’. Most female interviewees rejected this more‘consumerorientedlifestyle’,andstressedtheneedandwishtobeactive in their work rather than ‘just sit at home’. Despite their quest for independence,itwasclearthatitwasverydifficulttosupportoneselfandthe householdon anaverage salaryfromtourism,which also contributed to the norm of the man as the main family provider. Even though the women’s salarieshadsymbolicimportance,theywererarelyenoughformorethanthe women’sbasicneeds.Jūrmalawasalsodescribedasanexclusiveandexpensive placetolive,whichillustratesdifferent‘gaps’withinthecity:partlybetweenthe more welloff western and eastern tourists and the employees, and partly betweenthemorewelloffsegmentofJūrmala’spopulationwhoworksinRiga andlivesinmoreexclusiveareasinJūrmala. Onegroupofwomenwhichdifferedfromthesepatternsof‘dependence’, isthemore‘careeroriented’employees,whohadahigherincomeandposition within tourism, and sometimes even earned more than their male partners. Theirquestforindependencewasclearlyoutspoken,andtheyinvestedalotof time and effort into their work. The interview study also showed that even though their practices can be described as having more ‘masculine’ char acteristics,inreflectingamoreindividualquestforcareerandincome,theyalso stated that the tourism sector was considered to be ‘different’ from other sectorsoftheeconomyintermsofmakingacareer.Thiswasconsideredtobe partlyduetotheoverrepresentationofwomenwithintourism,andpartlydue

381 Chapterthirteen–Negotiatingfemininities: women’slivelihoodpracticeswithintourisminJūrmala to the low wages which did not exist similarly in other ‘maledominated’ sectors.Ontheone hand,the more‘careeroriented’practicescanbesaidto represent‘Western’idealsofthe‘modernwoman’,eagertomakeacareeron thesametermsastheirmalecolleagues.Ontheotherhand,thepracticescanbe analysedasreflecting‘socialist’ideals,ofhowwomenandmenshouldequally participateinpaidworkandthepublicsector.Eventhoughawomaninthe roleasof‘careerperson’couldbedescribedasmore‘individualised’thanrepre senting the socialist ‘collective’, in some ways, the man continues to be the norm of the successful businessman, just as the man remained the ideal for ‘HomoSovieticus’.Themorecareerorientedwomencanbesaidtobeactively breakingmoretraditionalnormsoflivelihood,duetotheirmoreindependent incomeandalso,insomecases,therejectionofthe‘natural’roleofwomenas the homemaker and ‘mother’. The interview study illustrated that they more activelytriedtobreakthetraditionaldivisionofworkinthehousehold,partly duetotheirlackoftimeforhouseholdchores,andpartlyduetomoreideologi calconvictionsofamore‘equal’relationship.

382

PartVI Curtaincall

ArtNoveauarchitectureinRiga.Photobytheautho r .

383

384

Chapterfourteen Transforminggeographies oftourismandgender Thepresentchapterwillhighlightthemainconclusionsofthethesis,andmake aclosercomparisonbetweenthetwocasestudiesofwomen’slivelihoodwithin tourismandtheoveralltheoreticalframework.Thecentralaimofthethesishas beentoanalysehowtourismtakespartinandreflectsthepostsocialistLatvian transformationprocessfromagenderperspective.Thishasincludedananalysis ofhowLatviaisreimaginedandreconstructedasbothanationstateandasa tourism destination, and how the reshaping of the tourism sector affects women’slivelihoodstrategiesandpracticeswithintourism. Takingmydepar ture point from feminist geographical theories, I have shown how different gender identities in general and femininities more specifically participate in the general economic, political and sociocultural societal changes, by reflecting, transformingandaffectingtheiroutcomes,withinthedevelopmentoftourism. Fromaspatialperspective,Ihavehighlightedthediversity and complexity ofthe transformation process, in how the broader societal processes interact with moreplacespecificconditions,whichtogetherformtheoutcomesofthepost socialistLatvian society,ratherthantreatthe‘transition’asasimpleshiftbe tween two known circumstances, from the ‘old’ Soviet system, to a ‘new’ capitalistsociety. (Re)imaginingthe‘nationalcommonspace’throughtourism ThereimaginationandreconstructionofLatviaasanationstatethroughtour ismhasbeenanalysedthroughtheuseoftheconcept ‘national common space’, including gendered ‘geographies’; geographies of neonationalism , geographies of Europeanisation and geographiesofreliccommunism (seeTable17).Thegeographies aremyowncategorisations,basedonmyownempiricalmaterialandexisting postsocialistresearch,andshouldnotbeviewedas ‘static’ categories, but as togetherconstitutingananalyticframeworkforunderstandingthepostsocialist ‘transition’processanditsmultipleoutcomesandpathways.Thegeographies, thosereferringto‘nationalcommonspace’andthoserelatingto ‘Geographiesof place’ ,havebeenappliedasabaseforanalysingwomen’slivelihood strategies and practices within tourism in relation to more comprehensive structural

385 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender processes.Theyeachincludedifferentperceptionsofspaceandplace,inhow Latviaisreimaginedasanationstatebasedondifferentideologicalapproaches and aims of the transition, including nationalism, neoliberalism, modernism, regionalismandmorepathdependentapproacheshighlightingcontinuitywith thepast.Thus,thenationalcommonspacecanbedescribedashaving directional features, pointing out different paths through the transition process. The re imaginationofspacealsoraisesquestionsofidentityand belonging: how the borders are drawn around the ‘new’ nation state, thereby defining the values and characteristics of its population, culture and traditions. In more relational terms,thereimaginationsofspacealsoreflecthowLatviapositionsitselfinre lation to ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ Europe, as well as how the interactions betweenthelocalandtheglobalformtheoutcomesofthetransitionprocess. Apartfromitsdirectionalandrelationalnature,thenationalcommonspacecan alsobeanalysedas contested and genderised ,whichwillbefurtherdiscussedbelow. Table17: Reimaginingnationalcommonspace. Geographiesof Geographiesof Geographiesof Neonationalism Europeanisation Reliccommunism Preservationof Reorientation Makingthepast Tourismand nationalandcultural towardsWestern invisiblevs. ‘nationalcommon heritagethrough Europeand commercialisationof space’ tourism. commercialisation. theSovietheritage. ‘Legalcontinuity’ Modernisation Continuitywiththe ‘Transitionalapproaches withthepreSoviet theories. Sovietpast. past. ‘Geographyof ‘Geographyof ‘Geographyofspatial Imaginationsofspace 100 borderdiscipline’. borderlessness’. legacies’. Womanas‘The Womanasnation Femininities Other’:exoticand Masculineheritage. and‘nature’. sexualised. Defining‘Latvi.an Manifestinga Multiculturalismvs. Ethnicidentities ness’. Europeanidentity. UsandThem. The‘geographiesofneonationalism’,canbeanalysedasreflectinga‘geography ofborderdiscipline’,inwhichthebordersarerestoredandredrawninorderto serveaimsofdefiningthe‘new’Latviannationstate,anditspopulation,culture, andtraditions.Inmyanalysis,Ihavefoundthatthisincludesrestoringandre claiming the ideals of the first Latvian independence, making the Soviet

100 SeeMassey(2005)foradiscussionof’Geographyofborderdiscipline’and’Geographyof borderlessness’.

386 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender occupationan‘illegal’timeperiod,andthusadvocatinga‘legalcontinuity’with thepreSovietpast.Withintourismmarketinganddevelopment,geographiesof neonationalismareexpressedthroughhighlightingthepastpreSovietcultural andmusicalheritage,whichIhaveexemplifiedthroughafocusontheLatvian folksongs, Dainas, andthenationalsonganddancecelebrationheldeveryfifth year.Thus,tourismbecomesawayofmanifestingthe interrelations between music and place, byhighlightingalocalmusicalheritagefosteredbyuniquean cienttraditions,andasconstitutingthe‘core’or‘soul’ofthenationstateandits inhabitants, rooted in perceptions of the ‘homeland’ comprising a traditional agriculturallandscape. Whilethegeographiesofneonationalismlargelyreflectawishtorebuild thefoundationsforthenationstateinthepostsocialistperiodbylookingback intothepastandmakingparallelstoaprevious‘goldenage’inLatvianhistory, theindependencehasalsoincludedasearchfornewandalternativemodelsof development. This search has been illustrated and discussedthrough geogra phiesofEuropeanisation,whichlargelyhaveincludedawishforidentification withWesternEuropeanditseconomicandpoliticalstructuresaswellassocio culturalbelonging.ThereimaginationofLatviafrom‘East’to‘West’tendsto reflectaquestfordevelopmentthroughmodernisationandmoreliberaleco nomicstrategiesinthepostsocialistperiod,openinguptheLatvianbordersfor increasingtradewithWesternEurope,aswellaspromotingtourismasaninte gral part of how the economy should be reformed and grow into already existingcapitalistmodelsofdevelopmentandfinditsbaseinserviceoriented sectorsratherthan‘old’Sovietstructuresoftheeconomy. The growth of the tourism sector has also been evident, for example, throughtheriseoftouristarrivalsfromWesternEuropeancountries,especially sincemembershipintheEUin2004.Tourismmarketingalsoreflectsawishto manifest the reoriententation towards Western Europe, with a focus on common features between Latvia and other European countries in terms of culture, architectural heritage and Riga as a modern capital. The increasing focusontourismmarketingandimagebuildingcanbesaidtoreflectaneedfor Latvianotonlytorecreateitsbordersasanationstate,butalsototakepartin activeregionbuildingandprocessesof regionalism withintheEU,throughmore decentralised strategies and an active cooperation among regions and with supranational institutions. Thus, tourism destinations, such as, Riga, further needtomobiliseinordertoattractbothinvestmentsandtourists,inorderto achieve‘competitiveadvantages’,andtopositionitselfastheLatviancentrefor continuouseconomicgrowth.

387 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender

Withintourism,thethreegeographiesillustratehowthereisaconstantnego tiation among the rejection , preservation and commercialisation of the ‘Latvian’ culturalheritage.Somedimensionsof‘Latvia’and‘Latvianness’arehighlighted andputintofocuswhileothersareleftontheperiphery.Moreover,somecul turalelementsareconsideredtobeprotectedthroughtourism,whileothersare commercialised and commodified, which also may be considered to be controversialfordifferentreasons.Here,atensionbetweenthegeographiesof neonationalismandthegeographiesofEuropeanisationcanbedistinguished in terms of tourism development. On the one hand, tourism is portrayed as mainlyaninstrumentforpreservingthenationaltraditionalvalues,suchas,the songanddancefestivaland Dainas ;butontheotherhand,promotingtheimage ofLatviaas theLandthatsings hasalsoincreasinglybeenturnedintoaninterna tionaleventthroughthesonganddancefestival,attractingbothforeignvisitors andprivate sponsors,reflectingthe desire to makethe event more profitable andmeetthecriteriasetupbythemarket. Issuesofcommercialisingtheculturalheritagealsoappearascontroversial whendiscussingtheSovietheritageinLatvia.TheSovietperiodisstillembed dedinnegativeperceptionsandmemories,expressedthrougha‘victimisation ethos’,whichtendstofocusonthecollectivesufferingofethnicLatviansdur ing the Soviet and Nazi regimes. Thus, the commercialisation of the Soviet periodremainscontroversial,andconstantlyputincontrasttothegeographies ofneonationalism,withtheaimsofrestoringLatviantraditions,languageand values,whilealsoconductinga‘normalisationofspace’,byreplacingthephysi calremainsfromtheSovietperiodwithinsymbolspromotingLatvianunityand independence. Paradoxically, tourism sites, such as, the Freedom monument, would not embody the same meaning and symbolism without their occupa tionalnarratives,somethingdemandedbytouristsandsomethingthatattracts them. Thus, here lies a tension between making the past invisible and the demandsforvisibilityandaccessibility,onbehalfofboththelocalpopulation andforeignvisitors. ThegeographiesofEuropeanisationhaveparallelstowhatMassey(2005) termsthe‘geographyofborderlessness’,wheretheaimsofdevelopmentalready have been set for the world’s developing and transition countries, based on Western,capitaliststandardsandconductedthroughthe‘inevitable’ forces of globalisation. In this case, borders are regarded as having a more ‘negative’ meaning,whichmayhinderthefreeflowsoftradeandtourism.Thus,aswithin theEU,thefocusisputonborderstoothernonEuropean countries rather thanthebordersbetweenEUnationstates.BoththeEuropeanisationandthe

388 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender neonationalism approaches tend to disregard the remains from the Soviet period, focusing on a discontinuity with the past. Intermsoftheneoliberal strategies,reforms(suchas‘shocktherapy’)advocatedacleanbreakwiththe SovietpastandreplaceitwithWesternEuropeanmodelsofdevelopment.The neonationalistic approach, however, puts focus on restoring the older pre Sovietsocietalframework,forinstance,throughdifferentpoliticalconstitutions, aswellaslegislationsrelatingtocitizenshipandlanguagelaws.Still,theanalysis of national common space in terms of geographies of reliccommunism has shownthatitisnotpossibletorejectordisregardfullytheremainingstructures fromtheSovietperiod,neitherintheirphysicalnortheirsocioculturalforms. Here,the‘geographyofborderlessness’canbeputintorelationtoa‘geography ofspatiallegacies’,whichcanbesaidtocarveoutboundariesandbarriers within theLatviannationstateitself,basedonexistingsocialistrelics.Thesebounda ries may take expression through language regulations and citizenship issues, whichtendtoidentifygroupsofpeopleas‘nonLatvians’duetotheirpositions asimmigrantsduringtheSovietregime.Thus,thesetypesofpoliciestogether withotheraimsof‘normalisingspace’becomewaysof‘dealingwiththepast’, but also indirectly involve reimagining the Latvian nation state as ‘divided’ between‘ethnic’LatviansandRussianspeakingminorities. Throughout the thesis, I have advocated a more nuanced and diverse approachtothetransformationprocessinLatvia,whichrecognisesthatpost socialistcountriesmaytakedifferentpathwaysintheirtransitionprocesses,and thateachjourneyisgeographically‘situated’,whichmeansrecognisingthelocal placespecificcontextfordevelopment.EventhoughIrecognisetheneedfor recognising past Soviet structures, I find it importantnotto getcaught ina more deterministic way of interpreting the postsocialist period, but to find waysofanalysinghowthesemaybechallengedandrejected. My main point hereistounderscorehowthethreegeographiesinterrelateandcreatea‘unique’ mix,whichbringsthetransformationprocessforward,bybothhavingcommon andconflicting,aimsandintentions.Thus,thepostsocialistperiodincludesan intermixture of the ‘new’ Western ideologies of Europeanisation, ‘old’ pre Soviet traditional ideals, as well as ‘relics’ of communism, as traces from the Sovietperiod.Ideally,thiswouldopenupforwhatMasseytermsthe‘geogra phy of multiplicity and possibility’, a postsocialist national common space whichdoesnotconstituteatabularasa,but isopen for hybrid and multiple trajectoriesofdevelopment,andrecognisescontemporarydiversityratherthan merelyclingsontopastSovietorpreSovietstructures,orchoosesalreadyset modelsofdevelopment.

389 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender

Femininitiesandethnicity Thethesishasillustratedhowthedifferent‘reimaginations’ofLatvia,reflected within tourism, carry genderised meanings and identities, with a focus on femininities andquestionsof ethnicity .Concepts,suchasspaceandplace,arenot genderneutral,whichhasbeenacrucialpointofdiscussionforfeministgeog raphers. The wish to draw boundaries or to promote development by advocating one homogenousviewofspacetendstobearmoremasculinechar acteristics,reflecting,forexample,thetendencytoviewthetransitionprocess asasimpleshiftfromonestateofdevelopmenttoanother. Theaimsofthe transition process tend mainly to concern activities inthe public sphere, the needforeconomicalandpoliticalreforms,forexampleconcerningthe‘right’ levelofGDPgrowth,whileissuesrelatingtotherelationsbetweentheprivate andthepublic,forinstance,intermsofwelfareandsocialquestionstendtolag behind.Questionsofgenderandequalitytendtobeputasideduetotheheri tagefromtheSovietperiod,whenaimsofgenderequalityofficiallywereonthe politicalagenda,buthaveverymuchbeenregardedasa‘failed’project.Thus, opinionsthat“womenshouldbeallowedtobewomen,andmenremainmen” haveemerged,indicatingarestorationofmoretraditionalidealsoffemininity. In my analysis of the three geographies, I have shown how tourism marketing constructs and reflects different gender identities in general and femininities more specifically. By using the latter concept, theaimhasbeento recognise multiple sets of gender identities, in which different ideals of femininitiesmayexistparallelandintersectwithothersocialcategories,suchas, ethnicity.Here,themutualinterrelationbetween space/placeand gender becomes crucial, when marketing a tourism destination with different symbolism and marketing language, thereby creating a relation between the tourist and the destination(includingboththephysicallandscapeandthehostpopulation)on theonehand,butalsobetweenthehostpopulationandthedestinationonthe other. The three geographies all reveal different ways of how the relations between space/place and gender are expressed through tourismmarketing. Within the ‘geographies of neonationalism’, I used examples of how the culturaland musical heritagewasused intourismmarketing,withparallelsto genderisedimaginationsof place .Firstandforemost,thereimaginationsofthe Latviannationstatehavecleargenderisedsymbolism,reproducingfemininities intermsof‘womanasnation’,celebratedandsymbolicforthenewnationstate in line with more traditional ideals of femininity. The nation state has been discussedfromdifferentperspectives,butIhavefocusedonitsmoresocially constructeddimensions,whichtendtoportraythenation state as constantly

390 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender beingmade,involvingborderandcontentnegotiations.Ontheonehand,my analysis has revealed that representing ‘woman as nation’ includes a more positive celebration of femininity, in which women are made visible in the publicsphereofthenationstate,forexample,throughtheirparticipationand overrepresentation in thenational song and dance celebration.Onthe other hand, the relations between place and gender are mainly connected to the privatesphere.Womenareportrayedasthereproducersofthenationintimes of a ‘demographic crisis’ and lowbirth rate, but this function refers to their placeintheprivatesphere.Thus,womenarecelebratedintheirbiologicaland ‘natural’roles,as mothersandcaretakers,positioning women closer to nature ratherthanculture.Inthelattercase,womenareportrayedasbeinginneedof protection, in their roles as ‘mothers’ within the private sphere, but also in relation to femininised images of the rural agricultural landscape and ‘homeland’,threatenedbyexternalforces.Moreover,apartfromtheirbiological functions,womenalsobecomeprotectorsofculturalvaluesandtraditions,and areentrustedwithraisingthefuturegenerationsofLatvians,adutyperformed withinthehomeandfamily. Thefeminisedidealof‘womanasnation’canbeplacedincontrasttothe femininitiesdiscussedwithinthegeographiesofEuropeanisation,whichtendto highlight more provocative feminised representations within tourism marketing.Rigaasatourismdestinationtendstobeconstructedbasedonmore exoticandsexualisedimages,wherethecityisdescribedasbothsinfulanddan gerous. These representations are reproduced through marketing activities in boththeprivateandthepublicsector,butalsoamongthetouristsvisitingRiga, who also discuss their travel experience on different Internet forums. The ‘image’ofRigaasasextourismdestinationishighlycomplexandcontroversial, andneedstobeanalysedinrelationtoothersocietal issues, such as, gender equality,economicdifficulties,legislation,etc.Thepotentially‘innocent’adver tisements of Riga’s rich nightlife also tend to have connections to more organised prostitution and even trafficking. Furthermore, existing studies of prostitutionintheBalticcountrieshaveshownthatitisnotalwaysregardedas a‘problem’,butasa‘natural’effectofthetransitionprocessandthenewmar keteconomy.Consequently,bothrepresentationsoffemalebodiesandactual sexualservicestendtobeboughtandsoldasanyothercommodityonthe‘free’ market. The tendency has been to ‘normalise’ prostitution, leaving it to the market forces rather than incorporating it as a state responsibility through stricter legislation, or making the male sex buyers (and sex tourists) visible ratherthanmerelythe femaleprostitutes.Despitethequestformore‘liberal’

391 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender attitudestowardsprostitution,theperceptionsofwomen’sbodiesandsexuality remaincontroversial.Women’smore‘liberal’sexualityinamore‘public’con textisperceivedasathreattotheidealsof‘woman as nation’. Taking on a more‘Western’andopensexuality,whichwasnotthenormduringtheSoviet occupationanddoesnotcorrespondtothetraditionalidealsoffemininity,also includemakingwomendeviantandsinful,andevenresponsibleforswindling ‘innocent’ foreign tourists with onenight stands, thereby contributing to the imageofRigaasasextourismdestination.Thus,eventhoughwomenfollow thenew‘rules’ofthe marketeconomy,they are turned into ‘fallen women’, havinglosttheirmoralandjudgement,positionedfarfromthecherishedideals ofthe‘mothersofthenation’. In the debates of sex tourism, the wish to restore Latvia’s ‘Western’ affiliation isnotmerelydescribedashavingpositivecharacteristics.Analysing Riga as a ‘sex tourism destination’ also questions two central assumptions; firstlyitrejectstheideathatthetransitionmerelyincludesasimpleshiftfrom an‘Eastern’toamore‘Western’association.Secondly,itpointstothefactthat thedualismsbetweenthe‘East’andthe‘West’needtobedeconstructedand diversified from being treated as two separate, homogenous units. Paradoxically,theimageofRigaasasextourismdestinationtendstoportray thecityaspartofthe‘East’,despiteitseffortsofbecomingapartofthe‘new’ Europe through active tourismmarketing, and economical and political networking.Thus,Rigastillremainstosomeextentpartoftheexotic‘Other’. Thisparadoxisalsoevidentinthegeographiesofreliccommunism,wherethe wishtoputtheSovietpastbehindischallengedbythetourists’fascinationfor theSovietrelics,whichareincreasinglyusedfortourismmarketingand‘sold’ throughtourismactivitieswithintheprivatetourismsector.Thisheritagebears more masculine characteristics, highlighting remains associated with war, victoryandoccupation. Consequently, Latvia in general and Riga more specifically asatourism destination can be described as being ‘caught inbetween’ the East and the West, revealing how ‘Eastern’ and ‘Western’ sociocultural, economic and politicalinfluencesareintertwinedandmixed.PortrayingRigaasasextourism destinationusesexoticidealsofthe‘Eastern’Other,butalsoincludes‘Western’ idealsoffemininityandsexuality.Thus,thetransitionprocesshasnotresulted in Latvia automatically becoming part of the ‘West’, whichwouldimplythat Latviamerelyadoptsandadjuststogiven‘Western’idealsandmodels.Rather, Latviastillbearstracesofits‘Eastern’heritage,whichisvariedanddiverse,and insomewaysincludeanuniqueintermixofethnicLatviantraditions,Russian

392 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender cultureaswellasWesternEuropean,capitalistinfluences;thesealltosomede greealsoshapedthesocietyduringtheSovietperiod.Moreover,byjoiningthe European Union and searching for a more ‘Western’ belonging, Latvia also contributes to highlighting and challenging the ideas and perceptions of the ‘West’ashavinga‘core’or‘essence’. Thus,thetransitionprocessnotmerely involvesatransformationoftheLatviansociety,butalsocomprisesachangein theWesternEuropeansociety,affectedbyEasternandCentralEuropeaninflu ences,socioculturally,politicallyandeconomically.Thismayinturnbreakup thetraditionaldivisionanddualismbetweentheEastandtheWest. Tensionsamongthedifferentgeographiescanalsobedistinguishedwhen analysingmore‘ethnic’representationswithintourismmarketing,whichreflect imaginationsoftheEast/Westandthe‘reborn’Latviannationstate.Asstated earlier, the reimagining of the nation state within geographies of neo nationalism and reliccommunism include drawing boundaries around and withinitspopulation,alsoidentifyingwhoisLatvianandwhoisnotLatvian, basedonethnicity,languageandculturalcustoms.Latviantourismmarketingin generalreflectsawishtomanifestanethnic‘Latvian’identityanddefinitionof ‘Latvianness’,basedonrestoringthetraditionalpreSovietvaluesandtraditions whichwere suppressed during the Soviet regime. Littlefocus is put on high lighting the diverse minority cultures, including Russianspeaking groups’ traditionsandculture.TheLatvianpopulationtendstobeportrayedasarather homogenouspeopleintermsoflanguageandtraditions,eventhoughthecus tomshavebeencolouredbyRussianinfluences.Thisleaveslimitedpossibilities forrecognisingtheSovietpastthroughmultipleinterpretationsratherthan one dominating narrative. Even though past occupational sufferings need to be takenintoaccount,theabsenceofmoreopeninterpretationsofthehistorymay also result in more controversial usage of the past, merely focusing on the Sovietperiodandevenglamourifyingit,ratherthananalysingthecontemporary situation.Withintourism,thisisevidentbymakingthe‘East’exoticbyusing stereotypicalinterpretationsofthepast,whichtendtoreproducethedivision betweentheEastandtheWest. Exploringgeographiesofgender,workandlivelihood The thesis has analysed the transforming gendered geographies in relation to women’sworkand livelihoodwithintourism, basedon two case studies: the emergenceofruraltourismintheCēsisdistrictandthedevelopmentofhealth and spa tourism in Jūrmala. The aim has been to put women’s livelihood strategies and practices inrelationtothelargerstructuraltransformationprocess,

393 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender anddiscusshowworkwithintourismreflectsorchallengesexistinggenderised idealsofworkandlivelihood.Basedonthethreegeographies,Ihaveanalysed different‘ideals’offemininitiesandwork; traditional,‘Western’ ,andthecontinu ity of socialist ideals, which together also affect the spatial organisation of women’s livelihood, including paid and unpaid work within both the private andthepublicsphere.Justaswiththethreegeographies,thedifferentidealsof femininitiesconstitutetoolsforanalysisandshouldnotbeviewedasclearcut andseparatecategories,butinterrelated,diverseandmultiple.Moreover,they shouldalsobeanalysedas‘situated’andtakingdifferentexpressionsindifferent geographical,socioculturalandeconomiccontexts,whichhavebeenillustrated inthetwocasestudies,whenplacingtheminrelationto ‘geographiesofplace’ .The tensionsamongthedifferentidealsoffemininitiesalsobecomeevidentindif ferent ‘paradoxes’ of women’s livelihood, when comparing their everyday strategiesandpracticeswithintourism(seeTable18). Traditionalidealsoffemininities The ‘traditional’ideals offemininitiesrelatetothegeographiesofneonationalism anddebatesofwhetherwomeninthepostsocialist period increasingly have reclaimed more conservative gender roles and identities, as a reaction to the previoussocialistsystem,itsgenderneutralityandthe‘double’burdenswithin the public and the private sphere. Moreover, the existence of the ideals has further been spurred by a ‘returntothehome’ rhetoric on a more political level,asawayofcomingtotermswithlowbirthrates,the‘demographiccrisis’. Thus,thereisamovementtoreclaimwomen’s‘natural’femininity,asmothers andcaretakerswithinthefamilyandhousehold,ratherthanpromotethemas activeworkersinthelabourmarket,atthesameasrestoringmen’spositionsas themainfamilybreadwinners. An analysis of national statistics in Latvia does not support the assumption that women have increasingly left the labour market since independence. Rather, they show a decrease of female economically inactive persons,andthenumberofparttimeworkersisalsolowercomparedtoother European countries. Unemployment among women and men also tends to showsimilarpatterns,eventhoughwomentendtoregisterasunemployedtoa greaterextentthanmen.Withthisbackground,isitevenrelevanttospeakof the existence of more ‘traditional ideals of femininities’ in the postsocialist periodinLatvia?Basedontheresultsoftheinterviewstudy,Iwouldsuggest that these ideals still linger and are expressed differently in various local

394 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender contexts,eventhoughthemoreextreme‘returntothehome’rhetoricseemsto havehadlittleeffect. Table18: Interrelationsbetweenidealsoffemininitiesandwomen’slivelihoodstrategiesand practiceswithintourismintheCēsisdistrictandJūrmala. Geographiesofneo Geographiesof Geographiesof nationalism Europeanisation reliccommunism Femininities, Traditionalidealsof ‘Western’idealsof Continuitywith livelihoodand femininities. femininities. socialistidealsof work The(Latvian)Mother. ‘Emancipation’through femininities. Malebreadwinner consumption. Homogenisationvs. /femalecaregiver ‘Genderneutral’ideals differentiation. model. ofentrepreneurship. TheCēsis Traditionalgender Relatingtotheidealof Womenas‘active’, district relationsthroughthe the‘entrepreneur’. the‘bravevictim’. Geographiesof ‘ruralidyll’. place Strategies Familyandplacerelated Businessoriented Questfor strategies. strategies. independentincome. Practices Workwithintheprivate Workwithintheprivate Workwithinthe sphereremainsprivate. sphereismadepublic. publicsphereis madeprivate. Jūrmala Thefemalehostess. Commercialisedideals Continuous Geographiesof Natureandcontentsof offemininities. feminisationof place tourismworkas serviceworkthrough ‘feminised’. differentiation. Strategies From‘housewife’to Careeroriented Workwithintourism ‘hotelmaid’. strategies. asa‘safer’optionfor ethnicminorities. Practices Blurringboundaries ‘Visible’feminised Balancingworkand betweentheprivateand practices. family. thepublicsphere. Makingcareerbefore Makingcareeron ‘Invisible’feminised family. ‘equal’terms. practices. Source:Basedontheresultsofthecasestudies,withafocusonthe‘geographiesofplace’and theparadoxesillustratedintheconcludingsectionsofthecasestudychapters. In the Cēsis district, women expressed that it was more difficult for women thanformentofindwork,andthatengaginginruraltourismasentrepreneurs became one of the few income alternatives apart from lowpaid jobs in the publicsector.Themoretraditionalgenderrelationstendtoprevailbasedonthe perceptionsofthe‘ruralidyll’,whichinsomesenseromanticisestheruralway of life, for example, through activities such as rural tourism. Even though

395 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender womenactivelyengageintheruraltourismbusinessasentrepreneurs,themo tivesforentrepreneurshiptendtobefocusedaroundthefamily,andbecomea strategyofmaintainingtheirpaidworkparallelwithtakingthemainresponsi bility for household work. Chores are often divided between ‘women’s’ and ‘men’s’ work, at the same time as work within the private sphere tends to remaina‘private’concern,duetothecloseassociationbetweenchoreswithin rural tourism and ‘regular’ household work, which do not achieve the same statusasan ordinaryjobinthepublicsphere. Moreover, investments in the ruraltourismbusinessestendtobefinancedmainlybymen,whonormallyhad an additional job and income, while women’s income from work within the family businesses tended to be treated merely as an ‘extra bonus’ on top of men’ssalariesasthemainbreadwinnersinthefamily. InJūrmala,asimilar idealofthe‘femalehostess’withintourismcanbe distinguished,butinthiscaseintermsoftheemployeewithinthehotelandspa sector. In this case, more traditional ideals of femininities were largely con nectedtothenatureandcontentsoftourismrelatedwork,whichalsotendedto blurtheboundariesbetweenhouseholdchoresandpaidworksuchascleaning inthehotels.Someoftheintervieweesalsodescribedtheirmotivesforworking withintourismasrelatingtotheirpreviousrolesashousewives,andthatchores within tourism therefore were familiar and ‘easy’ to handle. Here a similar paradoxcanbefoundintermsofhowworkwithintourisminsomewaysmade ‘feminised’workactivities‘public’withasetprice,ratherthanmerelyanunpaid activity conducted in the private sphere, and how thedaytodaydutiestoa certain degree involved ‘invisible’ feminised practices, in how the maids and cleaners had to follow certain regulations in order not to speak or even be noticedbythehotelguests.Moreover,thelowwageswithinthetourismsector inJūrmalaalsomadeitdifficultforwomentocontributetothehouseholdtoa greaterextent,andthementhereforetendedtoremainthemainbreadwinners inthefamily. ‘Western’idealsoffemininities The‘ Western’ idealsoffemininitiesputfocus onwomen’sparticipationinthe public sphere. However,notinterms of socialist ideals,butaseffectsofthe financialreformsinthepostsocialistperiod,whichfocusonpromotingeco nomic growth, competitiveness and entrepreneurship. This is related to geographies of Europeanisation, and EUdirectives of howtheEuropean la bourmarketshoulddevelop,andhowthe‘Eastern’newmembershipcountries should‘catchup’withthe‘old’EUcountriesintermsofemploymentandun

396 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender employmentstatistics. Thesestrategiestendtoappearas‘genderneutral’,but revealrathermasculinecharacteristics,forexample,inthepoliciesforpromot ing the new ideals of the competitive, rational and successful ‘entrepreneur’. Moreover,theincreasinginflowsof‘Western’consumptionproductshavealso pavedthewayformore‘Western’idealsoffemininities;theseincludeareaction against the old genderneutral communist ideals, and making each and every woman free to express her femininity through consumption, which further illustratetheimportanceofmakingmoneyinthenewlabourmarket. IntheCēsisdistrict,theintervieweesrelatedindifferentwaystotheideal oftheentrepreneur,butmainlythroughrejection,astheydescribedthemselves as‘deviant’fromtheirperceptionsofentrepreneurship.Thiswasmainlybased onthefactthatonlyafewoftheruraltourismbusinessesweredrivenbyaims of profitmaximation and reinvesting their capital inthe businessesor taking loansforextendingtheiractivitiesonamorelargescale.Rather,amajorityof the female entrepreneurs referred to other motives for starting up their businesses, for example more ‘lifestyleoriented’ motives, such as, sustaining livelihoodandworkinthecountrysideormorefamilyorientedmotives.Thus, the rural entrepreneurs positioned themselves far from the ‘genderneutral’, rationalidealsofentrepreneurship.Still,Ifinditimportantinthiscontextnot totreattheseformsofentrepreneurshipas‘deviant’fromthedominatingideals ofentrepreneurship,buttoanalysethemascloselyrelatedtotheruralsocio culturalcontext,asawayofusingexistingtraditionsofworkandrelatedgender relationsasawayof‘preserving’theidealsof moretraditionalidealsofrural life.Therewerealsoexceptionstohowfemaleentrepreneurs,oftenthoseonly temporarilyresidinginthecountrysideduringthesummerseasons,hadmore businessrelated strategies in their motives for work within rural tourism, includingshoulderingmore‘masculine’idealsofdoingbusinessandmakinga career.Moreover,women’sworkwithinruraltourismindirectlyalsohadtobe adjusted to more ‘modern’ and ‘Western European’ quality standards by fol lowing rules and regulations as well as the tourists’ requirements when organisingandrunningtheirbusinesses. In Jūrmala, the more ‘Westernised’ ideals of femininities were more evident in terms of how the tourism sector has developed into more commercialisedformsduringthelastfewyears,instridingtowardsbecominga ‘modern’internationalspaandhealthtourismresort.Inthiscase,bothnatural andculturalresources,includinglabourandhospitalityarecommodified, and actively marketed on an international scale. The hotel and spa environment itselfhasalsotendedtoconstitutearather‘feminised’environment,partlyin

397 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender relationtotheproductsandservicesoffered,mainlytargetingfemaletourists, andpartlythroughtheoverrepresentationofwomenasemployeeswithinthe spahotels.However,thefeminisationoftourismwasnotonlyreferredtoas reflectingmoretraditionalideals,butalsoasanarenaforexpressingfemininity based more on commercialised ideals, making femininity visible in terms of looksandaesthetics.Thisalsoturnedouttohavemorenegativeeffects,since theemployeesexpressedaconcernthattheyalsohadratherexposedpositions, and also became ‘objects’ for the male gaze and harassments. The more ‘Westernised’ ideals of femininities werealsoexpressedthroughmorecareer orientedstrategies,especiallyamongthoseintervieweeswhohadahigheredu cation,andhadactivelychosentomaketheirindividualcareerbeforestarting theirownfamily. Continuitywithsocialistidealsoffemininities Thethirdidealsoffemininitiesrelatestothegeographiesofreliccommunism and highlights how previous socialist ideals of femininities andworkhavelin geredinthepostsocialistperiod;partlyinhowoneofthemainchallengesfor womenhasbeenhowtobalanceworkandfamily,indicatingthatwomenstill face‘doubleburdens’whichwereevidentinthepostsocialistperiod.Partly,the labourmarketinLatviaandotherpostsocialistcountriesisstillcharacterised bystructureswhichdatebacktotheSovietperiod,intermsofoccupational segregation,ofwhichtourismisoneexampleandpatternthathasremainedand wherewomenstillconstitutethemajorityoftheemployees. The continuity of a segregated labour market was evident in both the JūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrictcasestudy.Inthelatterregion,thelabourmarket wasdescribedasclearlydividedbetween‘men’s’and‘women’sjobs’,portraying men as more suitable for physical work within agriculture and the timber industry, while women’s place had remained in the more administrative jobs and service sector since the Soviet period. In Jūrmala, the serviceoriented structure of the labour market remains a heritage from the Soviet period, in whichwomenstillconstituteamajorityoftheemployees within thetourism sector. The interview studies also revealed a continuation of old Soviet genderedworkingidealsinbothJūrmalaandintheCēsisdistrict,wherewomen were described as more ‘active’ compared to men in their search for employment or in taking up educational activities as an alternative for unemploymentorbeinghousewives.Womenstilltendedtotakeontherolesof ‘thebravevictim’,bothcaringforthefamilyandmaintainingtheirworkinthe public sphereforeconomicandtraditionalreasons.Women’sparticipationin

398 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender thepublicspherewasregardedassomething‘natural’inamajorityofcases,but alsoasaconsequenceofmennotalwaystakingtheirresponsibilityasthemain family breadwinner. Thus, women were considered to bemoreeagertotake morelowpaidjobs,whilemenstruggledwitha‘maledepression’,rootedina loss of their breadwinning roles, even though men, especially in rural areas, weredescribedashavinganadvantageinthelocallabourmarket.InJūrmala, the quest for a career among some of the female interviewees may also be analysed as a continuation of socialist working ideals portraying women as men’s ‘equals’ in the public sphere, who should also have the same opportunitiesinmakingacareer.Inthiscase,theeffortsalsoinvolvedadjusting tomore‘masculine’norms,intermsofleadershipandmanagement,whilestill maintainingtheir‘femininity’intheprivatesphere. IntheCēsisdistrict,women’slivelihoodpracticestendedtorelatetomore socialistidealsofhowpublicworkwasmadea‘private’concern,portrayingthe privatesphereastheonlyreliableplaceforeconomicactivities.Thiswasde scribed as connected to how the rural areas constituted means of restraint ratherthanopportunitiesindevelopingtheirruraltourismbusinesses,portray ingthepopulationas‘unreliable’and‘passive’whenitcametoemploymentor otherjobs.Thus,amajorityoftheworkwithintheruraltourismbusinesseswas conducted within the family sphere. Moreover, the female interviewees also describedhowtheirbusinessestendedtooperateon theborder betweenthe officialandunofficialbusinesssphere,duetoalackoftrustintheeconomic andlegalsystemgoverningthebusinessenvironment.Theuseofprivateplots for family subsistence agriculture can also be analysed as a continuation of practices introduced during the Soviet period and as a preservation of more ‘traditional’ agricultural practices, rather than merely a strategy for economic ‘survival’. In Jūrmala, the interview study also raised questions of ethnicity, as anotherdimensionofacontinuityofstructuresofthelabourmarketrootedin the Soviet period. For some of the Russianspeaking interviewees, tourism constituted one of the few alternatives of employment due to insufficient Latvianlanguageskills,andtourismwasalsoperceivedasa‘safe’optionfor work due to all yearround employment. Questions of ethnic minority possibilities on the Latvian labour market remain rather unexplored and also rather controversial since they touch issues of citizenship and language laws. Still,inthesurveyandinterviewstudy,itbecameevidentthatRussianspeaking women were overrepresented within more lowerpaid and lowerskilled professionswithinthehotelsector,suchascleaningorspaactivities.Onthe

399 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender other hand, some of the Russianspeaking interviewees also described themselvesasnothavingproblemsinfindingjobs,andthatthesegregationalso couldhavemorepositivedimensions,includingworkinginafamiliarRussian speakingenvironment,andthattheyhadusefortheirRussianlanguageskillsin thecontactwithforeignguests. Negotiatingwomen’s‘livelihoodactionspace’ The thesis has analysed the relation between ideologies and ideals of livelihood (throughthethreedifferentgeographies)ontheonehand,andwomen’sliveli hood practices and strategies ontheother,exemplifiedthroughdifferentmeansof livelihood (as entrepreneurs, employees or combining different forms of livelihood)intwoseparateregionalcontexts.Onecentralquestioninthiscon text has been to analyse how women’s individual ‘livelihood action space’ is negotiatedandaffectedbytheirengagementinthetourismsectorasemployees or entrepreneurs. Does work within tourism provide a basis for more inde pendentlivelihood,andwhatidealsoffemininitiesarechallenged,rejectedor adjustedtoinrelationbetweenthepublicandtheprivatesphere? Ashasbeendiscussedabove,theinterviewstudyhasshownhowwomen relatetodifferentidealsoffemininitiesintheireverydayliveswithintourism. Analysingtherelationbetweenwomen’slivelihoodstrategiesandpracticeshas alsorevealedanumberof paradoxes ,betweenthequestformoreindependent livelihood while facing the restrictions of livelihood. Thesemay berelated to morestructuralconstraintsintermsofwagesandemploymentconditions,but alsotothelocalsocioculturalandeconomiccontext,aswellastofamilyneeds intermsofgenderedidealsofwork.Moreover,Ihavealsoshownthatthepos sibilityforwomentonegotiatetheirlivelihoodactionspaceisrelatedtoother characteristics,suchasclass,familystructure,ageandethnicity. In the Cēsis district, women’s possibilities to negotiate their livelihood actionspaceweremainlyrelatedtohowtheyinfluencedtheirpositionswithin theprivatesphere,sincebeinganentrepreneurwithinruraltourismtendedto blurtheboundariesbetweentheprivateandthepublic,andbebasedonamore traditionaldivisionoflabourbetweenwomenandmenwithinthefamily.Even thoughthefemaleentrepreneurs’livelihoodstrategiesinvolvedaclearquestfor freedom and economic independence, the daytoday practices tended to involvecertaindegreesofadjustmentinbothspaceandtime,constantlybeing tied to the home environment and continuing to take the majority of the responsibilityforthehouseholdandchildren,firstandforemostintheirroles as‘mothers’.Here,aparadoxcanbedistinguishedbetweenentrepreneurshipas

400 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender aconsciouslychosen‘lifestyle’incomparisontoanordinaryofficejob,anda rather inflexible everyday life routine. However, there were also examples of howthemoretraditionaldivisionofworkwaschallenged,andhowentrepre neurship within rural tourism also provided more independent forms of livelihood. The more ‘urbanbased’ and ‘businessoriented’ entrepreneurs tended to make a clearer division between work within tourism and their householdroutines,inwhichtourismrelatedworkbecamemoreofa‘hobby’ as well as a way of realising individual plans and projects. Moreover, even though the economic contributions women made to the household through their entrepreneurship were described as limited, the income had a symbolic importanceaswell,andgavethemincreasedpossibilitiestoinvestintheirown activitiesandhaveasayabouthowthehouseholdmoneyshouldbeused. Thelimitedspaceformoreindependentlivelihoodactionspaceisrooted inthetraditionalgenderedidealsof workandlivelihood as discussed above, whichtendtobepronouncedintheruralareas,wheretheprivatesphereand family have remained to be an ‘escape’ and ‘sanctuary’ from an all too dominatingstate,suchasduringtheSovietperiod.Thus,inthiscase,thequest for reclaiming more ‘traditionally Latvian’ values in a more agrarian ideal fits wellintosocialistremainswhichvaluedtheprivateoverthepublic.Thereisstill notaissueaboutafullreturnofconservativegenderideals,sincetheidealof theactivewomanstilllingersandguideswomenactivelytofindworkandliveli hoodopportunities.Still,the‘invisibility’ofwomenasentrepreneurstendsto beevident,whichismainlyrelatedtooverallweakstructuresintheruralcom munity asawhole,which do not fullyrecognise the localpotentials, butstill hope to attract external resources for development instead of creating supportivefunctionsforbothlocalfemaleandmaleentrepreneurs. InJūrmala,thedifferences among womenbecameevenmoreevidentthan inthecasestudyfromtheCēsisdistrict,intermsofage,class,familystructure and ethnicity, which largely guided their possibilities to create more independentmeansoflivelihood.IntheCēsisdistrict,amajorityofthefemale respondents were ‘ethnic’ Latvians, usually in their thirties and married with largerfamilies.ThesurveyinJūrmalashowedmorediversepatterns,inwhich theagespanofthefemaleemployeeswasmuchwider, as well asthefamily structureandwithanalmostequalshareofboth‘ethnic’LatviansandRussian speaking respondents. Thus, the ways in which women negotiated their livelihoods were much more complex. On the one hand, the structural constraintsforwomen’slivelihoodcanbedescribedasmoreevidentinJūrmala comparedwiththeCēsisdistrict,sincetourismofferedrelativelylowpaidand

401 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender lowskilled jobs, which automatically made it difficult for women to support themselvesandtheirfamiliesbasedontheirmonthlywages.Ontheotherhand, justasintheCēsisdistrict,themeasurestoaffectthesystemwerealsoevident through the use of unofficial payments, which for some of the interviewees provided opportunities for higher salaries without having to pay taxes. For others,thissysteminvolvedacertain‘risk’,sinceitalsocouldjeopardisetheir futurepensionsandunemploymentbenefits.Thosewhostruggled mostwith theirlivelihoodpracticesweremainlyolderandRussianspeakinginterviewees whoinasensegot‘caught’inmorelowpaidjobs,duetoalackofeducationor language skills. Moreover, for the single women with children, a job within tourism was not enoughtosupportthe household,buttheyhadtotakeon multiplejobs.Attheotherendofthespectrum,therewerefemaleinterviewees whosaw possibilitiestomakeacareerwithintourismandwhohadtheright educationalandlanguageskillstosucceedandwhoalsoearnedahigherincome withintourism. The interview study also showed that women had difficulties in negotiating their livelihood action space as employees in relation to the persistenceofmoretraditionalgenderedidealsoflivelihood.Amajorityofthe marriedorcohabitingfemaleemployeestendedtoberesponsibleforamajority ofthehouseholdchores,andreliedonidealsofthe‘malebreadwinner’.Itwas considered‘natural’thatmenwouldearnmorethanwomen,buttheidealof the‘housewife’wasbeingnegotiatedandrejected,sinceitwouldcontributetoa greater degree of dependence on their male counterparts. Thus, there was a delicatebalancebetweenthewishtobesupportedandtheneedforeconomic independence.Thetraditionalidealsoffemininityweremainlychallengedand rejected by younger and careeroriented women, partly due to their higher incomefromtourismandpartlyduetothefactthattheyinvestedmoretimein theirworkcomparedtotheirunpaidworkwithintheprivatesphere. Lookingbeyondthehorizon Summingup,whathavebeenmymaincontributions,intermsoftheresultsof mystudy?Theoreticallyandempirically,Iwouldclaimthatthestudydemon stratestheneedforapplyingafeministgeographicalperspectiveonresearchof the postsocialist transformation, in Latvia and in other countries. This also includes tourism research of gender and work, which has mainly focused on WesternEuropeancountriesanddevelopingcountries.Throughtheuseofthe concept‘nationalcommonspace’,includingthethreegeographies,Ihavealso opened up for a more nuanced approach for analysing the transition by

402 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender illustratinghowdifferenteconomic,politicalandsocioculturalprocessesinter relate and have spatial and genderised expressions, while also pointing out tensions among multiple ideological agendas, which are expressed and made visible within tourism development and marketing. By connecting the three geographies to different ideals of femininities and work and livelihood, the studyhasalsocontributedtotheneedtodiversifyboth gender and work astheo reticalcategories. Inbothcases,Iwouldsaythatmystudyhasmadewomen visibleasindividualsratherthanasagroupinthepostsocialisttransformation process,byfocusingontheirowndaytodaypractices,ratherthanmerelyon thechangestakingplaceonanabstractandinstitutionallevel.Ashasbeenun derscoredthroughoutthethesis,Ifinditcentralnottotreatwomenas victims of thetransition,butasactive subjects and‘ agents’ ,whothroughtheiractionspar ticipateinaffectingtheoutcomesofthetransformationprocess. Thewomen donotmerely respond tothestructuralchangestakingplaceinthelabourmarket and within tourism, for example, through economic ‘survival strategies’, but also use situated socioculturally embedded measures to face the new condi tionsinboththeprivateandthepublicsphere. Thenegotiationofwomen’slivelihoodactionspaceclearlyillustrateshow theyactivelyparticipateinbothadjustingtoandchallengingdifferentidealsof femininities in the postsocialist period. Through the feministgeographical approach, I have illustrated the need for recognising the mutual interrelationshipbetween gender and place, withafocusonthespatialvariations ofhowwomennegotiatetheirlivelihoodanddifferentfemininitiesinvarious formsintheruralCēsisdistrictandinJūrmala.Thus,thefemininitiesarealso placespecific, rooted in a sociocultural context, and take diverse forms, for instance, reflecting genderisedperceptionsof ruralityandwork,inrelationto thepublicandtheprivatesphere.Thestudyhasalsohighlightedquestionsof ethnicity and the labour market, which remain rather unexplored in terms of morequalitativelyorientedstudies.Therefore,issuesofhowdifferentRussian speakingminorities,bothwomenandmen,navigateinthelabourmarketand whatconditionsforlivelihoodtheyfindanduse,wouldneedtoberesearched inmoredepth. Thetourismsector,neitherinitsmoresmallscalenor largescaleform, shouldnotbeanalysedasa‘refuge’ofthe‘victims’ofthetransitionprocess, butinsteadprovidesdifferentmeansoflivelihoodbasedonindividualactions inrelationtostructuralconstraintsandopportunities. In theinterviewstudy, discussions with local labour market representatives, as well as the female employeesandentrepreneursthemselves,havestressedtheroleofwomenas

403 Chapterfourteen–Transforminggeographiesoftourismandgender

‘activesurvivors’,whohavehaditeasiertofindnewwaysoflivelihoodinthe new market economy compared to their male counterparts. Consequently, it hasbeenmenwhohavebeendescribedasthepotential‘losers’ofthetransi tion,andwhohavenotfullyfoundtheirroleseitherinthecontemporarylabour market, or in the family. This ‘crisis of masculinity’hasnotbeenoneofmy focal points, but would need further analysis and research of how different masculinities arereproducedandconstructedinthepostsocialistperiodwithin tourismandothersectors.

404

Summary Thisthesisexploresdifferentgeographiesoftourism,gender,workandliveli hood in postsocialist Latvia. The study takes its departure point from the overalltransformationprocesswhichhastakenplacesinceindependence,with afocusonthereshapingofthetourismsectorandwomen’schangingcondi tionsforemploymentinthelabourmarketingeneralandwithintourismmore specifically. The case studies illustrate how tourism both reflects and contributestosociocultural,economicandpoliticalchange,includingmirror ing and transforming different gender identities and femininities. The thesis containsananalysisofwomen’semploymentandlivelihoodwithinthetourism sector based on its ‘feminised’ character, in terms of women’s over representation as employees, and how work within tourism often is given a ‘femalecoding’. Purposeandresearchquestions Thegeneralaimofthedissertationisto analysethedevelopmentoftourisminLatvia fromagenderperspectiveinordertounderstandhowdifferentgenderedidentitiesingeneral, anddifferent‘femininities’morespecifically,arereflected,transformedandchallengedwithin tourism. This more comprehensive purpose can in turn be divided into two separateandmorespecificaims;firstly,theaimisto analysehowtourismtakespart in the reimagining and construction of the Latvian nation state, and how different spatial tourismrepresentationsinturncarrygenderisedmeaningsandidentities. Thesecondpur poserelatestothetransformingLatvianlabourmarketandwomen’sworkand livelihoodwithintourism.Thepurposeisto analysehowthereshapingoftheLatvian tourismsectoraffectswomen’slivelihoodstrategiesandpractices,andhowtheyintheirturn reflectorchallengemoredominatingandgenderisedideologiesoflivelihoodandwork. Theanalysisofwomen’sworkandlivelihoodwithintourismisbasedon twocasestudies:entrepreneurshipwithinruraltourismintheCēsisdistrict,and employmentwithinthetourismsectorinJūrmala.Inthecasestudies,thefol lowingresearchquestionsarehighlighted: • What are the motives and strategies for women’s employment and entrepreneurshipwithintourism?Whatdifferencesandsimilaritiescan bedistinguishedbetweentheruralandthemoreurbanareas? • How do placespecific traditions and conceptions of work and liveli hoodaffectwomen’slivelihoodpossibilities?

405 Summary

• What conditions, possibilities and restrictions are implied in women’s everydaylifebytheiremploymentandlivelihoodwithintourism? • Do women’s livelihood practices within tourism challenge or merely reflect traditional gender relations and identities based on prevailing normsaboutlivelihood? Theoreticalframework Thethesisincorporatestheorieswithin feministgeography ,withafocusonthree interrelated concepts; gender identities , femininities and livelihood . Feminist geogra phyappliesaspatialperspectivetofeministtheory,inwhichplaceandspaceare not merely given physical attributes, but also genderised meanings, which means that (in)equality between the sexes varies across different spatial contexts .Genderidentities areusedinordertomakeamorediversifiedanalysisof women’semployment,whichfocusesonthedifferencesamongwomen,rather than treating them as one homogenous group. Thus, every individual may inhabitamorediversesetofidentities,andgender also intersectswith other identities,suchasethnicityandclass. Thegenderidentitiesareillustratedasdif ferent femininities ,whichunderscoresthatthereisnosingleidentitysharedbyall women,butthatdifferentnormsoffemininitiesexistparallelandvaryacross different contexts. The thesis explores a diverse set of femininities, including more‘traditional’idealsoffemininities,somewithrootsinLatviancultureand with a focus on women’s roles within the family. Other ‘Western’ ideals of femininitiesalsoappearintermsofnewlifestyleandworkingideals,whilethe ‘old’ socialist ideals of femininities and work linger and are being negotiated, rejectedandreproduced. Livelihood isacentralconceptforthethesis,inordertoanalysebothpaid andunpaidworkwithinboththeprivateandthepublicsphere,anditsspatial dimensionsinthemutualinterrelationsbetweenworkandhome/family,which togethersettheframeworkforwomen’slivelihoodpossibilities.Livelihoodhas bothsocialandmaterialdimensions,whichmayincludesupportingbothone selfandothersinaneconomic sense,butalsoasamoresocialresponsibility andcareforchildrenorotherfamilymembers. Methodsandcasestudies The thesis has mainly a qualitative approach, includingsemistructuredinter viewsandtextanalysis,butisalsobasedonmorequantitativedata,intheform of a survey and Latvian statistical data, for example, encompassing tourist arrivals,andlabourmarketstatistics.Thequalitativeapproachisrootedwithin

406 Summary feminist methodology, as a way of acknowledging how the research process itselfissubjective,situatedandgenderised.Thecasestudiesofthedissertation canbegrouped intotwomainparts:firstlyasectionwhichfocuses on how LatviaasanationstateandtourismdestinationingeneralandRigamorespe cificallyaremarketedandrepresentedwithintourism.Inthiscase,theempirical materialconsistsofaqualitativetextanalysisoftourismmarketingmaterialas wellaspolicyplanningdocumentspublishedbydifferentstateinstitutionsre gardingbothtourismdevelopmentandquestionsrelatingtothelabourmarket. Complementarysemistructuredinterviewshavealsobeenconductedwithdif ferentpublicactorsresponsibleforthese issues.Secondly,thethesisincludes twocasestudiesofwomen’sworkandlivelihoodwithintourism;oneinthe Cēsisdistrictinthecentral/easternpartofLatviawhich illustratesthe devel opmentofmoresmallscaleruraltourism,andtheotherinthecityofJūrmala, where largescale health and spa tourism have emerged. The case studies in boththeCēsisdistrictandinJūrmalahavehadasimilardesignandaim,con sisting of a survey and an interview study with both female employees and entrepreneurs within tourism, as well as representatives from local tourism organisationsandmunicipalities. (Re)imaginingthenationalcommonspacethroughtourism How Latvia is reimagined and reconstructed both as a nation state and as a tourismdestinationismadethroughaframeworkbasedontheconcept ‘national commonspace’ ,whichconsistsofthreedifferentgenderised‘geographicalimagi nations’ of the Latvian nation state; geographies of neonationalism, geographies of Europeanisation and geographies of reliccommunism . The three geographies are my owncategorisations,constitutinganalyticaltoolsforunderstandingthespatial dimensionsoftheLatviantransformationprocess,andarealsobasedonexist ingpostsocialistresearch,aswellasmyownempiricalmaterial.Theydenote howdifferentaimsandprioritiesforLatvia’stransitionalprocessarerevealed andprioritized,includingwhatcommonnationalvaluesarehighlightedwithin tourismmarketing,suchascultureandtraditions,whichinvolvequestionsof belongingandtransformingnational,ethnicandgenderisedidentities.Eachof thethreegeographiescanbeviewedasconstitutingdiverseideologicalprojects, forexample,originatingwithinnationalism,neoliberalcapitalismandmultiple viewsof‘development’,whereeachholdsacertainimaginationandconception ofspaceandplace.Theaimistoillustratethecomplexityanddiversityofthe transformation process, in how different postsocialist countries take multiple pathways dependingontheirnationalandlocalcontext.Thus,thetransitionis

407 Summary illustratedasadynamicandconstantlyongoingprocess,ratherthanmerelya completedonewayshiftbetweentwoknowneconomicandpoliticalsystems. The ‘geographiesofneonationalism’ areanalysedasreflectingawishtodefine thecoreelementsofthe‘new’Latviannationstate,itspopulation,culture,and traditions, by reclaiming ideals from the first Latvian independence. Within tourismmarketing and development, geographies of neonationalism are expressedthroughhighlightingthepastpreSovietculturalandmusicalheritage, whichisexemplifiedinthethesisthroughtheLatvianfolksongs, Dainas, and the national song and dance festival held every fifth year. Thus, tourism be comes a way of manifesting the interrelations between music and place by highlightingalocalmusicalheritageasbeingfosteredbyuniqueancienttradi tions, and as constituting the ‘core’ or ‘soul’ of the nation state and its inhabitants.ThereimaginationsoftheLatviannationstatehavecleargender ised symbolism, reproducing femininities in terms of ‘woman as nation’, celebratedandsymbolicforthenewnationstateinlinewithmoretraditional idealsoffemininity,highlightingtheirbiologicaland‘natural’rolesasmothers andcaretakers,positioningwomencloserto nature ratherthanculture. The ‘ geographies of Europeanisation’ include a wish for identification with Western Europe and its economic and political structures as well as socio culturalbelonging.Thisisevidentthroughaquestformodernisationandneo liberaleconomicstrategiesinthepostsocialistperiod,aswellasinpromoting tourismasanintegralpartofhowtheeconomyshouldbereformedandgrow into alreadyexisting capitalist models of development. Tourismmarketing reflectsawishtomanifestthereoriententationtowardsWesternEurope,witha focus oncommonfeatures betweenLatvia andotherEuropean countries in termsofculture,architecturalheritageandRigaasamoderncapital.Still,Riga as a tourism destination tends to be constructed based on more exotic and sexualisedimages,wherethecityisdescribedasbothsinfulanddangerous.The thesis highlights how Riga struggles with an image of being a ‘sex tourism destination’, and how representations of female bodies and actual sexual services tend to be bought and sold as any other commodity on the new capitalist market. The tendency has been to ‘normalise’ prostitution, while condemning women’s more ‘Western’ and open sexuality which was not the normduringtheSovietoccupationanddoesnotcorrespondtothetraditional idealsoffemininity,whichtendtomakewomendeviantandevenresponsible forswindling‘innocent’foreigntouristswithonenightstands. Within the geographies of reliccommunism , the transformation process is analysedasreflectinga‘continuityofthepast’,inhowdifferentlegaciesofthe

408 Summary

SovietpastarestillevidentinpostsocialistLatvia.Tourismhasbeenaffected by a general ‘normalisation’ process of ‘the postsocialist space’ in Latvia, includingaremovalofmaterial‘relics’ofcommunismandreplacingthemwith symbols manifesting a newly established nation state. The remaining Soviet legaciesareusedandnegotiatedthroughtourismdevelopmentandmarketing, includingprocessesofcommercialisationwithintheprivatesector.Still,theuse of the Soviet heritage within tourism remains a controversial question, especiallybylocalinhabitantsandpublicinstitutions,forwhomitstillcontains more negative perceptionsandmemoriesofthepast.Thereinterpretationsof Latviancultureandhistorywithintourismtendtobeselectiveratherthanopen andmultiple,basedona‘victimisationethos’,withafocusonpastsufferingsof ‘ethnic’Latvians.Thus,theabsenceofinterpretationofamorediversesocio cultural ‘Russian’ heritage in the public sphere opens up for more commercialisedandstereotypicalversionsofthepast.Thesemore‘masculine’ formsofSovietheritagealsoreinforcethe‘East’asa‘playground’forWestern (male) tourists, providing adventure activities which may be combined with moresexualservices. Exploringgeographiesofgender,workandlivelihood Thethreegeographiesarealsorelatedtodifferentidealsoffemininities,work and livelihood in both a socialist and a contemporary Latvian context. The thesis relates the transforming gendered geographies to women’s livelihood strategies and practices ,andthequestionofhowtheirworkwithintourismreflects orchallengesexistinggenderisedidealsofworkandlivelihood.Thelivelihood strategies refertothebackgroundandmotivesbehindwomen’semploymentor entrepreneurship within tourism, which do not necessarily have to involve merely rational, strategic and conscious planning, but may be guided by the placespecificcontexts,anddifferentpossibilitiesathand.Theoutcomesofthe strategiesmaydifferfromtheoriginalintentions,andthereforethecasestudies alsoputfocusonwomen’severydaylivelihood practices inrelationbetweenthe publicandtheprivatesphere.Here,thethesisincludesananalysisofwhat space forwomen’smoreindependentlivelihoodiscreatedinrelationtotheirpractice orientationswithintourism. Basedonthethreegeographies,threedifferent‘ideals’offemininitiesand workaredistinguishedaspartofnationalcommonspace: traditional,‘Western’ , andthecontinuityof socialist ideals,whichtogetherareexpressedthroughthe spatial organisation of women’s livelihood, including paid and unpaid work withinboththeprivateandthepublicsphere.Togetherwith ‘geographiesofplace’ ,

409 Summary whichconstitutethelocalphysicalandsocioculturalcontextforlivelihood,the femininities are analysed as constituting the ideological and structural frameworkforwomen’slivelihood.Womenrelatetotheseideologiesintheir everyday life, but also take part in shaping the femininities through their practices. The ‘traditional’ ideals of femininities have parallels to geographies of neo nationalismandfocusonreclaimingwomen’s‘natural’femininity,asmothers andcaretakerswithinthefamilyandhouseholdratherthanpromotingthemas activeworkersinthelabourmarket,whilerestoringmen’spositionsasthemain familybreadwinners.IntheCēsisdistrict,thetraditionalgenderrelationstend toprevailbasedontheperceptionsofthe‘ruralidyll’,whichinsomesensero manticisestheruralwayoflife.Here,themotivesforentrepreneurshiptendto befocusedaroundthefamily,andbecomeastrategyformaintainingtheirpaid workparalleltotakingthemainresponsibilityforhouseholdwork.InJūrmala, moretraditionalidealsoffemininitywerelargelyconnectedtothenatureand contents of tourismrelated work, which also tended to blur the boundaries betweenhouseholdchoresandpaidworksuchascleaninginthehotels. The ‘ Western’ ideals of femininities are related to geographies of Europeanisation,andEUpoliciesofemploymentandentrepreneurship,which tendtoappearas‘genderneutral’withaimsofincreasingwomen’sparticipation inthelabourmarket,butrevealrathermasculinecharacteristicsintermsofthe competitive, rational and successful ‘entrepreneur’. Moreover, the increasing inflowsof‘Western’consumptionproductshavealsopavedthewayformore ‘Western’idealsoffemininitieswhichincludeareactionagainsttheoldgender neutral communist ideals. In the Cēsis district, the interviewees related in differentwaystotheidealoftheentrepreneur,butmainlythroughrejection,as they described themselves as ‘deviant’ from their perceptions of entrepreneurship.Still,therewerealsoexceptionstohowfemaleentrepreneurs tookonmorebusinessrelatedstrategiesintheirmotivesforworkwithinrural tourism, including shouldering more ‘masculine’ idealsofdoingbusinessand making a career. In Jūrmala, the more commercialised ideals of femininities, wereevidentthroughmakingfemininity visible intermsoflooksandaesthetics. Theintervieweesalsoexpressedmorecareerorientedstrategiesandpractices, especially those interviewees who had a higher education, and had actively chosentomaketheirindividualcareerbeforestartingtheirownfamily. The socialist ideals of femininities relate to the geographies of relic communism andhighlight how ideals of femininities andworkrootedinthe Sovietperiodhavelingeredinthepostsocialistperiod.Thesewereevident,for

410 Summary example,throughthecontinuityofasegregatedlabourmarketbasedonsex,in which women have remained within ‘female professions’ such as service and tourism, even though the official Soviet ideology advocated a challenge of traditionallymaleandfemaleprofessions.Theinterviewstudiesalsorevealeda continuationofoldSovietgenderedworkingidealsinbothJūrmalaandinthe Cēsisdistrict,wherewomenweredescribedasmore‘active’comparedtomen intheirsearchforemploymentorforeducationalactivitiesasanalternativeto unemployment or being housewives. Women’s participation in the public spherewasregardedassomething‘natural’inamajorityofcases,butalsoasa consequenceofmen not alwaystaking their responsibility asthe main family breadwinner. Negotiatingwomen’s‘livelihoodactionspace’ Theanalysisoftherelationbetweenwomen’slivelihoodstrategiesandpractices revealsanumberof paradoxes ,betweenthequestforamoreindependentliveli hoodwhilefacingtherestrictionsoflivelihood.Thesemayberelatedtomore structuralconstraintsintermsofwagesandemploymentconditions,butalso linkedtotheplacespecific,socioculturalandeconomiccontext. The mutual interrelationship between gender and place became evident in the case studies, showingspatialvariationsofhowwomennegotiatedtheirlivelihoodanddiffer ent femininities between the rural Cēsis district and Jūrmala. Gender also intersectedwithothertraits,suchasclass,familystructure,ageandethnicity.In theCēsisdistrict,women’spossibilitiestonegotiatetheirlivelihoodactionspace were,forexample,mainlyrelatedtohowtheyinfluencedtheirpositionswithin theprivatesphere,sincebeinganentrepreneurwithinruraltourismtendedto blurtheboundariesbetweentheprivateandthepublicandbebasedonamore traditionaldivisionoflabourbetweenwomenandmenwithinthefamily.Even thoughthefemaleentrepreneurs’livelihoodstrategiesinvolvedaclearquestfor freedom and economic independence, the daytoday practices tended to involvecertaindegreesofadjustmentinbothspaceandtime,constantlybeing tiedtothehomeenvironmentandcontinuingtotakethe majority of there sponsibility for the household and children. In Jūrmala, tourism offered relativelylowpaidandlowskilledjobs,whichautomaticallymadeitdifficultfor womentosupportthemselvesandtheirfamiliesbasedontheirmonthlywages. Thecustomofunofficialpaymentswithinthetourismsector,wasforsomeof theintervieweesregardedasadvantageoussincetheydidnotpaytaxes;butfor others,itinvolvedacertain‘risk’sinceitalsocouldjeopardisetheirfuturepen sions and unemployment benefits. Those who struggled most with their

411 Summary livelihoodpracticesweremainlyolderRussianspeakingintervieweeswhoina sensegot‘caught’inmorelowpaidjobs,duetoalackofeducationorlanguage skills.Moreover,forthesinglewomenwithchildren,ajobwithintourismwas notenoughtosupportthehousehold,buttheyhadtotakemultiplejobs.Even though the economic contributions which women made to thehousehold in boththeCēsisdistrictandinJūrmalawaslimited,theincomehadasymbolic importanceaswell,andgivingwomenincreasedpossibilitiestoinvestintheir ownactivitiesandhaveasayinhowthemoneyforthehouseholdshouldbe used.Inamajorityofcases,theidealofthemanasthemainbreadwinnerwas maintained,butmoreconservativeidealsoffemininities,suchasthe‘housewife ideal’,werenegotiatedandrejected,sincetheywereconsideredtocontributeto alargerdegreeofdependenceontheirmalecounterparts.

412

References Aasland, Aadne & Fløtten, Tone (2001) “Ethnicity and Social Exclusion in EstoniaandLatvia”. EuropeAsiaStudies, Vol.53,No.7. Adib, Amel & Guerrier, Yvonne (2003) “The interlocking of gender with nationality, race, ethnicity and class: the narratives of women in hotel work”. Gender,workandorganization, Vol.10,No.4. Adkins, Lisa (1995) Gendered work: sexuality, family and the labour market. Buckingham:OpenUniversityPress. Adkins, Lisa (2002) Revisions: gender and sexuality in late modernity . Buckingham: OpenUniv.Press. Ahl, Helene J (2002) The making of the female entrepreneur: a discourse analysis of researchtextsonwomen’sentrepreneurship. Jönköping:JönköpingInternational BusinessSchool. Aidukaite,Jolanta(2004) Theemergenceofthepostsocialistwelfarestate:thecaseofthe Baltic states: Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. Södertörns högskola, Diss. Stockholm:StockholmUniversity. Alanen, Ilkka (ed.) (2004) Mapping the Rural Problem in the Baltic Countryside. PerspectivesonRuralPolicyandPlanning. Gateshead:Ashgate. Alvesson,Mats&Sköldberg,Kaj(1994) Tolkningochreflektion.Vetenskapsfilosofi ochkvalitativmetod .Lund:Studentlitteratur. Anderson,Benedict(1983) Imaginedcommunities:reflectionsontheoriginandspreadof nationalism .London:Verso. Apostopoulos,Y,Sönmez,S&TimothyDJ(eds.)(2001) Womenasproducersand consumersoftourismindevelopingregions. USA:PraegerPublishers. Aronsson Lars, Foghagen Christer, PettersonLöfqvist Per, & Svensson Åsa (2002) Rutter med Öländska rötter. Studier av världsarv och landsbygdsturism . Kalmar:KalmarUniversity,BalticBusinessSchool. Aronsson Lars, Bjälesjö Jonas & Johansson, Susanne (eds.) (2007) Kulturell ekonomi: skapandetav värden, platseroch identiteter i upplevelsesamhället . 1st ed. Lund:Studentlitteratur. Ashwin, Sarah (ed.) (2006) Adapting to Russia's new labour market: gender and employmentbehaviour .NewYork:Routledge. Ashwin,Sarah.(ed.)(2000) Gender,state,andsocietyinSovietandpostSovietRussia. London:Routledge. Askola,Heli&Okolski,Marek(eds.)(2001) TraffickinginWomenandProstitution in the Baltic States: Social and Legal Aspects. International Organization for Migration(IOM):Helsinki.AvaliableinPDFat:www.refocusbaltic.net

413

Asztalos Morell Ildikó, Carlbäck Helene, Hurd Madeleine & Rastbäck Sara (eds.) (2005) Gendertransitions: in Russia and Eastern Europe . 1 st ed. Eslöv: Gondolin. Ateljevic&Doorne(2003)“Unpackingthelocal:aculturalanalysisoftourism entrepreneurshipinMurter,Croatia”. TourismGeographies, Vol.5,No.2. Baerenholdt Jørgen Ole, Simsonsen Kirsten, Sørensen Ole Beier & Peter Vogelius(1990)”LifemodesandSocialPractice”. NordiskSamhällsgeografisk Tidskrift, No.11,May1990. Berglund, AnnaKarin Johansson,Susanne& Molina, Irene (eds.) (2005) Med periferienisentrum:enstudieavlokalvelferd,arbeidsmarkedogkjønnsrelasjoneriden nordiskeperiferien .Alta:NorutNIBRFinnmark. Bergström,Göran&Boréus,Kristina(2000) Textensmeningochmakt:metodboki samhällsvetenskapligtextanalys .Lund:Studentlitteratur. Bjerén, Gunilla (1989) Kvinnor i Värmlands glesbygd: försörjningsstrategier för skogsbygdens kvinnfolk . Stockholm: Glesbygdsdelegationen på uppdrag av RegionalekonomiskaenhetenvidLänsstyrelseniVärmlandslän. Blokker,Paul(2005)“PostCommunistModernization,TransitionStudies,and DiversityinEurope”. EuropeanJournalofSocialTheory, 8;503. BlomRaimo,MelinHarri&Nikula,Jouko(eds.)(1996) Betweenplanandmarket: socialchangeintheBalticstatesandRussia .Berlin:deGruyter. Braunerhielm,Lotta(2006) Platsförkulturarvochturism:Grythyttan:enfallstudieav upplevelser,värderingarochintressen .Diss.Karlstad:KarlstadsUniversity. Brikse, Inta (ed.) (2005) Communication. Discourse of Culture and History . Acta UniversitatisLatviensis,Vol.683.Riga:TheUniversityofLatviaPress. Brunovskis, Anette (2001) ”Kvinner og det latviske arbeidsmarkedet tendenserisistehalvdelav1990tallet”. Nordiskøstforum ,2001(15):1. Budryte,Dovile(2005) Tamingnationalism?:politicalcommunitybuildinginthepost SovietBalticStates .Aldershot:Ashgate. Butler, Judith (1990) Gender trouble: feminism and the subversion of identity . New York:Routledge. Caballé,Alba(1999)“FarmtourisminSpain:agenderperspective”. GeoJournal, Vol.48. Caune,Andris(ed.)(2005) ThehiddenandforbiddenhistoryofLatviaunderSovietand Nazi occupations 19401991 . Symposium of the commission of the historiansofLatvia.Volume14.Riga:InstituteoftheHistoryofLatvia. ChowWhite, Peter A. (2006) “Race, gender and sex on the net: semantic networksofsellingandstorytellingsextourism”.Media,CultureandSociety, 28;883.

414

Connell,John&Gibson, Chris(2003) Sound Tracks. Popular music, identity and place .Suffolk:Routledge. Danjoux, Olivier (2002) L'etat, c'est pas moi: reframing citizenship(s) in the Baltic republics .Diss.Lund:Univ.2002. Denscombe,Martyn(2000) Forskningshandboken–försmåskaligaforskningsprojekt inomsamhällsvetenskaperna. Lund:Studentlitteratur. Dobson,John&JonesGraham(1998)“Ethnicdiscrimination: public policy andtheLatvianlabourmarket”. InternationalJournalofManpower ,Vol.19, No.1. DuGay,Paul(ed.)(1997) Productionofculture,culturesofproduction .London:Sage. Duncan,Nancy(ed.)(1996) Bodyspace:destabilizinggeographiesofgenderandsexuality . London:Routledge. Dwyer Claire, Holloway Sarah, Laurie Nina, Smith Fiona (eds.) (1999) Geographiesofnewfemininities .Harlow:Longman. Eespere,Katri(2005)Clientsofprostitution:motivesandattitudesIn: Sexsäljer. Kön och makt inom prostitution och pornografi. Om mediebevakningen och hur genusforskningenkanbidraga. ReportfromNordicjournalistseminar,2125 Nov.2005,Tallinn,Estonia.Avaliableat: http://www.nikk.uio.no Einhorn, Barbara (1993) Cinderella goes to market: citizenship, gender and women's movementsinEastCentralEurope .London:Verso. Ericsson,Daniel(ed.)(2004) Detoavseddaentreprenörskapet .Karlshamn:Academia Adacta. EspingAndersen,Gøsta(1990) Thethree worldsofwelfarecapitalism . Cambridge: Polity. Eyal,Gil,Szelényi,Iván&Townsley,EleanorR.(1998) Makingcapitalismwithout capitalists:classformationandelitestrugglesinpostcommunistCentralEurope:the newrulingelitesinEasternEurope .London:Verso. Foghagen, Christer & Johansson, Susanne (2004) Att gå mellan ladugården och köket är inget för mig! En kartläggning av kvinnor som driver företag på Öland. Kalmar:KalmarUniversityBalticBusinessSchool. Forseth,Ulla(2005)“Gendermatters?:exploringhowgenderisnegotiatedin serviceencounters”. Gender,workandorganization, Vol.12No.5. Friberg,Tora(1990) Kvinnorsvardag–omkvinnorsarbeteochliv.Anpassningsstrategier itidochrum. Lund:LundUniversityPress. FribergTora,ListbornCarina,AnderssonBirgitta&Scholten,Christina(eds.) (2005) Speglingaravrum.Omkönskodadeplatserochsammanhang. Stockholm: BrutusÖstlingsBokförlagSymposium.

415

Funk,Nanette&Mueller,Magda(eds.)(1993) Genderpoliticsandpostcommunism: reflections from Eastern Europe and the former Soviet Union . New York: Routledge. Gal, Susan & Kligman, Gail (2000a) The politics of gender after socialism. USA: PrincetonUniversityPress. Gal,Susan&Kligman,Gail(eds.)(2000b) Reproducinggender:politics,publics,and everydaylifeaftersocialism .Princeton,N.J.:PrincetonUniv.Press. GarciaRamon,Canoves&Valdovinos(1995)“Farmtourism,genderandthe environmentinSpain. AnnalsofTourismResearch, Vol.22,No.2. Gerring, John (2007) Case study research: principles and practices . New York: CambridgeUniversityPress. Getz,Donald(2004) FamilyBusinessinTourismandHospitality .Cambridge:CABI Publishing. Ghodsee,Kristen(2003)“StateSupportintheMarket:WomenandTourism Employment in PostSocialist Bulgaria”. International Journal of Politics, CultureandSociety, Vol.16.No3. Ghodsee,Kristen(2005) TheRed Riviera.Gender,tourism,andpostsocialismonthe Blacksea .USA:DukeUniversityPress. Giddens, Anthony (1979) Central problems in social theory: action, structure and contradictioninsocialanalysis .London:Macmillan. Goloubeva,Maria&Hanovs,Deniss(eds.)(2002) WomeninBalticsocieties:past andpresent .Riga:N.I.M.S.publishinghouse. Goven, Joanna (2002) “Gender and modernism in a Stalinist state”. Social politics ,Vol.9No.1. Gradskova, Yulia (2007) Soviet people with female bodies: performing beauty and maternityinSovietRussiainthemid19301960s .Diss.Stockholm:Stockholm University. Grava,Sigurd(1993)“TheurbanheritageoftheSovietregime”. Journalofthe AmericanPlanningAssociation1993 .Vol.59,No.1. Guichon, Audrey, Anker, Christien van den & Novikova, Irina (eds.) (2006) Women'ssocialrightsandentitlements .NewYork,N.Y.:PalgraveMacmillan Grønmo,Sigmund(2004) Metoderisamhällsvetenskap .Slovenia:Liber. Hall,Derek(1991) TourismandeconomicdevelopmentinEasternEuropeandtheSoviet Union .London:Belhaven. HallCM&WilliamsAM(eds.)(2002) TourismandMigration:NewRelationships betweenProductionandConsumption. Dordrecht:Kluwer. Hall, Derek (ed.) (2004) Tourism and transition. Governance, transformation and development .Trowbridge:CABIPublishing.

416

Hanson, Susan & Pratt, Geraldine (1995) Gender, work and space . London: Routledge. Harrison(ed.)(2001) Tourismandthelessdevelopedworld:issuesandcasestudies .UK: CABIpublishing. Hemmati, Minu (ed.) (1999) Gender and Tourism: Women’s Employment and Participation in tourism. Summary of UNEDUK’s Project Report, 1999. United Nations Environment and Development UK Committee. Availableatwww.earthsummit2002.org Henningsen, Monika (1994) Der freizeit und Fremdenverkehr in der (ehemaligen) Sowjeunion unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Baltischen Raums . Germany: PeterLang. HenshallKukorelli,MomsenJanet,SzörényiIrén&TimarJudit(2005) Gender attheborder:entrepreneurshipinruralpostsocialistHungary .Aldershot:Ashgate. Herrschel, Tassilo (ed.) (2006) Global geographies of postsocialist transition: geographies,societies,policies .NewYork,NY:Routledge. Herslund,Lise(2007) RuraldiversificationandchangeintheBalticcountryside.Rural inhabitantsandbusinessesinLatviaandEstonia.Alocalperspective .Dissertation UniversityofCopenhagen,InstituteofGeography:Copenhagen. Holmquist, Carin & Sundin, Elisabeth (2002) Företagerskan. Om kvinnor och entreprenörskap .Angered:SNSFörlag. Højrup, Thomas (1995) Omkring livsformsanalysens udvikling . København: MuseumTusculanumsForl. Højrup, Thomas (2003) State, culture and lifemodes: the foundations of lifemode analysis .Aldershot:Ashgate. Israel,Joachim(1999) Handlingochsamspel:ettsocialpsykologisktperspektiv .Lund: Studentlitteratur. Jaakson,Reiner(1996)”TourismintransitioninPostSovietEstonia”. Annalsof TourismResearch ,Vol.23,No.3. Jakobsen, Liselott (1999) Livsform, kön och risk, en utveckling och tillämpning av realistisklivsformsanalys. Diss.Karlstad:KarlstadUniversityPress. James, Beverly (1999) “Fencing the past: Budapest’s statue park museum”. Media,Culture&Society, Vol.21,No.3. Jenkins,Jones&Dixon(2003)“Thinking/Doingthe‘F’ word: On power in feministmethodologies”. ACME No.2(1). Jenkins, Sarah (2004) Gender, place, and the labour market . Burlington, VT: Ashgate. Jeffreys, Sheila (1999) “Globalizing sexual exploitation: sex tourism and the trafficinwomen”. LeisureStudies, No.18.

417

Johansson, Susanne (2000) Genusstrukturer och lokala välfärdsmodeller. Fyra kommunermöteromvandlingenavdenoffentligasektorn .Diss.Uppsala:Uppsala University. Johnston, Ronald John (ed.) (2006) The dictionary of human geography . 4. ed. Oxford:Blackwell. Joosse, Sofie (2007) “Talking about cooperation: continuity and change in a ruralcommunityinSlovakia”. Sociology–SlovakSociologicalReview ,No.3. Jubulis,MarkA(2001) Nationalismanddemocratictransition:thepoliticsofcitizenship andlanguageinpostSovietLatvia .Lanham,Md.:UniversityPressofAmerica. KaseHelve,PettaiIris&ProosIvi(2006) Prostitution in Estonia: a Suvey of the Situation of Women Involved in Prostitution. Results of a sociological study. EQUAL,EestiAvatudÜhiskonnaInstituut:Tallinn. King, GundarJ.Vanags,Edvins,VilkaInga, McNabbDavidE.(2004)Local Government reforms in Latvia, 19902003: transition to a democratic society. EuropeanForum, Vol.82,No.4. Kinnaird,Vivian&Hall,Derek(eds.)(1994), Tourism:AGenderAnalysis.Great Britain:JohnWiley&Sons. Kostovicova,Denisa(2004)“Postsocialistidentity,territorialityandEuropean integration:Serbia’sreturntoEuropéafterMilosevic”. GeoJournal, No.61. Kuus, Merje (2004) “Europe’s eastern expansion and the reinscription of othernessinEastCentralEurope”. ProgressinHumanGeography, 28;472. Kvale,Steinar(1997) Denkvalitativaforskningsintervjun. Lund:Studentlitteratur. LaFont, Suzanne (2001) “One step forward, two steps back: women in the postcommuniststates”. CommunistandPostCommunistStudies, No.34. Lane, Bernard (1994)“Whatis RuralTourism?”. Journalof Sustainable Tourism, Vol.2,No.1&2. Lew, Alan A., Hall, Michael, Williams, Allan M. (eds.) (2004) A Companion to Tourism .Cornwall:BlackwellPublishing. Light, Duncan (2000) “Gazing on communism: heritage tourism and post Communist identities in Germany, Hungary and Romania”. Tourism Geographies, 2(2). Liljeström, Marianne (1995) Emanciperade till underordning: det sovjetiska könssystemetsuppkomstochdiskursivareproduktion .Diss.Åbo:ÅboAcademy. Limb & Dwyer (red) (2001) Qualitative methodologies for geographers: issues and debates. London:Arnold. Little, Jo (2002): Gender and rural geography: identity, sexuality and power in the countryside. Harlow:PrenticeHall.

418

Lo, Bobo (2000) Soviet labour ideology and the collapse of the state . Basingstoke: Macmillan. Lucas, Rosemary (2004) Employment Relations in the Hospitality and Tourism Industries .Cornwall:Routledge. Löfgren, Orvar (1999) On Holiday. A history of vacationing. USA: University of CaliforniaPress. Löfgren,Orvar&Willim,Robert(eds.)(2005) Magic,cultureandtheneweconomy . NewYork,NY:Berg. Lönnbring,Gunilla(2003) Självständighetensformer.Kvinnoföretagandepåvärmländsk landsbygd .Diss.Karlstad:KarlstadUniversityStudies. MacLeod,Gordon(2001)“NewRegionalismReconsidered:Globalizationand theRemakingofPoliticalEconomicSpace”. InternationalJournalofUrban andRegionalResearch, Vol.25,No.4. Marttila,AnneMaria(2005)”FinnishMenBuyingSexinFinlandandEstonia” In: Sexsäljer.Könochmaktinomprostitutionochpornografi. Ommediebevakningen ochhurgenusforskningenkanbidraga. ReportfromNordicjournalistseminar, 2125Nov.2005,Tallinn,Estonia.Avaliableat:http://www.nikk.uio.no/ Marx, Karl & Engels, Frederick (2001) The Communist manifesto [Elektronisk resurs] .London:ElectricBookCo. Massey,Doreen(1994) Space,placeandgender .Oxford:PolityPress. Massey, Doreen & Jess, Pat (eds.) (1995) The shape of the world: explorations in humangeography.Vol.4,Aplaceintheworld?:places,culturesandglobalization . Massey,Doreen(2005) Forspace .London:SAGE. McDowell,Linda(1999) Gender,identityandplace:understandingfeministgeographies . Cambridge:Polity. Meethan, Kevin (2001) Tourism in global society: place, culture, consumption . Basingstoke:Palgrave. Merriam,SharanB.(1994) Fallstudiensomforskningsmetod .Lund:Studentlitteratur. Miller,RobertL.(1998) Women,EthnicityandNationalism:ThePoliticsofTransition . Florence,KY,USA:Routledge. Molz,JennieGermann&Gibson,Sarah(eds.)(2007) Mobilizing hospitality: the ethicsofsocialrelationsinamobileworld .Aldershot,England:Ashgate. Morgan,Nigel&Pritchard,Annette(1998) TourismPromotionandPower.Creating Images,CreatingIdentities. Chichester:Wiley. MorganD.H.J.,BrandthBerit&KvandeElin(eds.)(2005) Gender,bodiesand work .Burlington,VT:Ashgate. Moskoff,William(1984) LabourandleisureintheSovietUnion:theconflictbetween publicandprivatedecisionmakinginaplannedeconomy .London:Macmillan.

419

Moss, Pamela (ed.) (2002) Feminist geography in practice. Research and methods. Cornwall:Blackwell. Motiejunaite,Akvile (2008)Femaleemployment,genderroles,andattitudes:theBaltic countriesinabroadercontext .Diss.Stockholm:StockholmUniversity. Muiznieks, Nils (ed.) (2006) LatvianRussian relations: domestic and international dimensions .Riga:LUAkademiskaisapgads. Nead, Lynn (1984) “The Magdalen in modern times: the mythology of the fallenwomaninpreraphaelitepainting”. TheOxfordartjournal ,Vol.7No. 1. Nilsson,PerÅke(2002)“Stayingonfarms.Anideologicalbackground”. Annals ofTourismResearch ,Vol.29,No.1. O’Connor,Kevin(2003). ThehistoryoftheBalticStates .USA:Greenwoodpress. Oppermann,Martin(1999)“SexTourism”. AnnalsofTourismResearch ,Vol.26, No.2. Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) (2003) AgriculturalandruraldevelopmentpoliciesintheBalticcountries. OECDseminar on Agriculture and Rural Incomes, Labour Mobility and Rural DevelopmentPoliciesinEstonia,LatviaandLithuania.Tallinn. Oxenstierna, Susanne (1991) Labour market policies in the Baltic republics . Stockholm:Stockholmsuniv.,SwedishInstituteforSocialResearch. Pabriks, Artis (2002) Occupational representation and ethnic discrimination in Latvia . Latvia:SorosFoundation.Avaliableat:www.politika.lv PabriksArtis,PursAldis&LaneThomas(eds.)(2002). TheBalticStates:Estonia, LatviaandLithuania .London:Routledge. Padgett, Deborah K. (ed.) (2004) The Qualitative Research Experience . Belmont: Thomson. Pajumets, Marion (2004) Prostitution – a social problem? The views on prostitution’s nature, causes and effects in the Baltic States and northwestern Russia. Tallinn: NordicCouncilofMinisters. Petersson, Magdalena (2003) Identitetsföreställningar: performance, normativitet och maktombordpåSASochAirHoliday .Diss.GöteborgUniversity. Pickles, John & Smith, Adrian (eds.) (1998) Theorising transition : the political economyofpostcommunisttransformations .London:Routledge. Pini (2003) “On being a nice country girl and an academic feminist: using reflexivityinruralsocialresearch”. JournalofRuralStudies, No.20. Pritchard, Annette (ed.) (2007) Tourism and gender: embodiment, sensuality, and experience .Wallingford,Oxfordshire,UK:CABInternational

420

Rainnie,Al,Smith,Adrian&Swain,Adam(eds.)(2002) Work,employment,and transition:restructuringlivelihoodsinpostcommunism .London:Routledge. Roberts, Lesley (2001) Rural tourism and recreation: principles and practice . Cambridge:CABI. Rose, Gillian (1993) Feminism and Geography. The limits of geographical knowledge . Exeter:PolityPress. Rozite,Maija(1998) TourisminRigaanddevelopmentofurbantourism .Conference paper 5 th NordicBaltic conference in regional science. Globallocal interplayintheBalticSeaRegion.PärnuOctober141998.Availableat: http://www.geo.ut.ee/nbc/paper/rozite.htm Ruksane, Guna (ed.) (2001) Learn about Cesis district! A guide to tourism in Cesis district .Cēsis:Cēsisdistrictcouncil. Ryan, Chris & Hall, Colin Michael (2001) Sex tourism: marginal people and liminalities .London:Routledge. Ryen, Anne (2004) Kvalitativ intervju: från vetenskapsteori till fältstudier . 1. uppl. Malmö:Liberekonomi. Scholten, Christina (2003) Kvinnors försörjningsrum. Hegemonins försvarare och murbräckor. Diss.Lund:LundUniversity. Schough, Katarina (2001) Försörjningens geografier och paradoxala rum . Diss. Karlstad:KarlstadUniversityStudies. Schough,Katarina(ed.)(2002) Svenskkulturgeografiochfeminism.Rötterochrörelseri enrumsligdisciplin .Karlstad:KarlstadUniversityStudies. Schwartz, Katrina Z. S (2006) Nature and national identity after communism: globalizingtheethnoscape .Pittsburgh,Pa.:UniversityofPittsburghPress. Silverman(2005) Doingqualitativeresearch:apracticalhandbook .2dned.London: SAGE. Sinclair,Thea(ed.)(1997) Gender,Work&Tourism .Wiltshire:Routledge. Slava,(ed.)(2004) Jūrmala.Natureandcultureheritage .Riga:Neptuns. Smallbone, David & Welter, Friedrike (2001) “The Distinctiveness of Entrepreneurship in Transition Economies”. Small Business Economics 16: 249262. Smith, Adrian (2002) “Culture/economy and spaces of economic practice: positioninghouseholdsinpostcommunism”. TransactionsoftheInstituteof BritishGeographers ,Vol.27,No.2. Smith, Anthony D. (1999) Myths and memories of the nation . Oxford: Oxford UniversityPress. Stark,David&Bruszt,László(1998) Postsocialistpathways:transformingpoliticsand propertyinEastCentralEurope .Cambridge:CambridgeUniversityPress.

421

Stenbacka, Susanne (2001) Landsbygdsboende i inflyttarnas perspektiv: intention och handlingilokalsamhället .Diss.Uppsala:UppsalaUniversity. StukulsEglitis,(2002) Imaginingthenation:history,modernity,andrevolutionin Latvia .UniversityPark,Pa.:PennsylvaniaStateUniversityPress. Svensson,PerGunnar&Starrin,Bengt(eds.)(1996) Kvalitativastudieriteorioch praktik .Lund:Studentlitteratur. Swain, Margaret & Momsen, Janet (eds.) (2002) Gender/Tourism/Fun(? ). USA: CognizantCommunicationCorporation. Syssner,Josefina(2006) Whatkindofregionalism?:regionalismandregionbuildingin northernEuropeanperipheries .Diss.Linköping:LinköpingsUniversity. Sörlin, Sverker & Sandell, Klas (eds.) (2000) Friluftshistoria: från "härdande friluftslif"tillekoturismochmiljöpedagogik:temanidetsvenskafriluftslivetshistoria . Taylor,PeterJ.&Flint,Colin(2000) Politicalgeography:worldeconomy,nationstate andlocality .4.ed.Harlow:PrenticeHall. Tiirinen,Markoetal.(2000) RegionsoftheBalticStates.NordregioReport2000:2. Tisenkopf, Talis (1999) “Rurality as a Created Field: Towards an Integrated RuralDevelopmentinLatvia?” EuropeanSocietyforRuralSociology, Vol.39, No.3. True,Jacqui(2003) Gender,globalization,andpostsocialism.TheCzechRepublicafter socialism .NewYork:ColombiaUniversityPress. UnionofLocalandRegionalGovernments(2004) LocalandRegionalGovernments inLatvia2004. Thirdedition,Riga. Urry,John(1990) Thetouristgaze:leisureandtravelincontemporarysocieties .London: Sage. Vanags, Alf & Hansen, Morten (2007) Inflation in Latvia: causes, prospects and consequences. Baltic International Centre for Economic Policy Studies, occasionalpaperNo.2. Walby,Sylvia(1990) Theorizingpatriarchy .Oxford:BasilBlackwell. WelterFriederike,SmallboneDavid&IsakovaNinaB.(eds.)(2006) Enterprising womenintransitioneconomies .Aldershot:Ashgate. Welter,Friedrike&Kolb,Susanne(2006) Womenand entrepreneurshipin Latvia. TeliaSoneraInstituteDiscussionPaperNo.4.Riga:StockholmSchoolof Economics. Werlen, Benno (1992) Society, action and space: an alternative human geography . London:Routledge. Widerberg,Karin(2003) Kunskapenskön .Stockholm:Nordstedt. Wight,CraigA.&Lennon,JohnL.(2006)“Selectiveinterpretationandeclectic humanheritageinLithuania”. TourismManagement ,No.28.

422

Williams, Allan & Shaw, Gareth (eds.) (1998) Tourism and economic development: Europeanexperiences .3 rd edition.Guildford:JohnWiley&Sons. Williams,Allan&Balaz,Vladimir(2000) Tourismintransition.Economicchangein CentralEurope. Bodmin:I.B.Tauris&Co.Ltd. Williams, Paul (2008) “The afterlife of communist statuary: Hungary’s Szoborpark and Lithuania’s Grutas Park”. Forum for Modern Language Studies . WintherJørgensen,Marianne&Phillips,Louise(2000) Diskursanalyssomteorioch metod .Lund:Studentlitteratur. Wolff,Larry(1994). InventingEasternEurope:themapofcivilizationonthemindofthe Enlightenment .Stanford,Calif.:StanfordUniv.Press. Women and Geography Study Group (WGSG) (1997) Feminist geographies: Explorationsindiversityanddifference. Harlow:Longman. Worthington, Barry (2001) “Riding the ‘J’ Curve Tourism and Successful TransitioninEstonia?” PostCommunistEconomics ,Vol.13,No.3. Worthington, Barry (2003) “Change in an Estonian resort. Contrasting DevelopmentContexts”. AnnalsofTourismResearch, Vol.30,No.2. Young,Craig&Kaczmarek,Sylvia(2008)“Thesocialistpastandpostsocialist urbanidentityinCentralandEasternEurope.ThecaseofLodz,Poland”. EuropeanUrbanandRegionalStudies ,Vol.15,No.1. Young, Craig & Light, Duncan (2001) “Place, national identity and post socialisttransformations:anintroduction”. PoliticalGeography, Vol.20. YuvalDavis,Nira(1997). Genderandnation .London:Sage. Zobena Aija, Sumane Sandra & Kalnina Anita (2005) Rural Tourism in Latvia: Rauna Tourism Association. Case Study Analysis for WP3. Department of SociologyUniversityofLatvia. Zvejnieks,Anneli(2001) Nilever–nisläppsbaraintefria.Rockmusikochpolitiki Lettland från 1960 till 2000. Påbyggnadsuppsats Musikvetenskapliga institutionenStockholmsuniversitet. Reportsandbrochures CabinetofMinisters(2001) NationalProgramme TheIntegrationofSocietyinLatvia 2001. Riga . Cabinet of Ministers (2007) Program for Promotion of Business Competitiveness and Innovation20072013 .No.406.Riga. CēsisTourismInformationCentre(2000) TheStrategicPlanofTourismDevelopment forCēsisdistrict.

423

Commission of the European Communities (2006a) A Roadmap for Equality betweenWomenandMen20062010. CommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities(2006b) ArenewedEUtourismpolicy. TowardsastrongerpartnershipforEuropeanTourism. TheCounciloftheEuropeanUnion(2005a) Presidencyconclusions.March22and 23 . TheCounciloftheEuropeanUnion(2005b) Councildecisionof12July2005on guidelinesfortheemploymentpoliciesoftheMemberStates .2005/600/EC. Official JournaloftheEuropeanUnion . TheEuropeanCommission(2008) Puttingsmallbusinessesfirst.Europeisgoodfor SMEs,SMEsaregoodforEurope. Guideforenjoying Winter2007. Jūrmala City Council (2004a) presentation material Socially – economical environmentinJūrmala .BasedonLSCBstatistics. JūrmalaCityCouncil(2004b) JūrmalaCityonthewave2004. JūrmalaCityCouncil(2005) JūrmalaCityonthewave2005 . JūrmalaCityCouncil(2007a) TourismdevelopmentstrategyforJūrmala20072018. JūrmalaCityCouncil(2007c) JūrmalaCityonthewave2007 . LatvianTourismDevelopmentAgency(2004) DiscoverLatvia LatvianTourismDevelopmentAgency(2007) Thelandthatsings LejiĦa,Dagmāra(ed)(2002) ThephenomenonoftheLatvianSongfestival. Riga:Valsts tautasmākslascentrs . Ministry of Agriculture (2006a) Latvian Rural Development National Strategy Plan 20072013.Availableat:www.zm.gov.lv MinistryofAgriculture(2006b) RuraldevelopmentprogrammeforLatvia 20072013. Availableat:www.zm.gov.lv MinistryofAgriculture(2007) AgricultureandRuralAreaofLatvia2008 .Available at:www.zm.gov.lv MinistryofEconomics(1998) Tourismlaw1998. MinistryofEconomicsetal.(2007a) NationalLisbonProgrammeofLatviafor2005 2008. MinistryofEconomicsetal.(2007b) ReportonprogressinimplementingtheNational LisbonProgrammeforLatvia20052008 .Riga. Ministry of Regional development and Local Governance (2006) Latvian NationalDevelopmentPlan20072013. Availableat:www.nap.lv Mutinationalcandidaturefile. ProclamationofMasterpeicesoftheOralandIntangible HeritageofHumanity.TraditionandSymbolismoftheSongandDanceCelebration

424

Process in Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania. UNESCO application 2002. Avaliableatwww.laulupidu.ee. RigaCityCouncil(2006) TheRigaMunicipalityAnnualReport2005. Riga Planning Region Development Council & Riga Region Development Agency(2004) DevelopmentProgramofRigaRegion20052011.PartI. Current situation. Riga Planning Region Development Council & Riga Region Development Agency(2005) DevelopmentProgramofRigaRegion20052011.PartII&III. Program,itsimplementationandmonitoring. RigaThisNight march/april2006. RigaThisWeek march/april2006. StateRegionalDevelopmentAgency(2006) DevelopmentofRegionsinLatvia2005 . Riga.Avaliableatwww.vraa.gov.lv. StateRegionalDevelopmentAgency(2007) DevelopmentofRegionsinLatvia2006 . Riga.Avaliableatwww.vraa.gov.lv. UNESCO (2003) Baltic Cultural Tourism Policy Paper 2003. Avaliable at www.unesco.org...... Vidzeme Development Agency (2004) Development of settlement structure in Vidzeme. Avaliableat:www.vidzemesregions.lv. Ministry of Welfare (2007) The Programme for Implementation of Gender Equality 20072010. CabinetorderNo.648. The World Bank (2002) Transition. The First Ten Years. Analysis and Lessons for EasternEuropeandtheFormerSovietUnion. WashingtonD.C. TheWorldBank(2007) Latvia:sharingtheHighGrowthDividend.ALivingStandard Assessment .ReportNo.38437LV. Statisticalmaterial Department of Statistics to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania (2002) WomenandmenintheBalticCountries2002. Vilnius. ILOLaborstaDatabase:http://laborsta.ilo.org.Accessed20080703. JūrmalaCityCouncil(2007b) JūrmalainFigures 2006 .PDFfile. LatvianCentralStatisticalBureau(2004) TourisminLatviain2003. Riga. LatvianCentralStatisticalBureau(2005) Latvia’sregionsinfigures2004. Riga. LatvianCentralStatisticalBureau(2005) StatisticalyearbookofLatvia2004. Riga. LatvianCentralStatisticalBureau(2006) ResultsofthesurveyonoccupationsinLatvia inOctober2005. Riga. LatvianCentralStatisticalBureau(2006) TourisminLatviain2005. Riga .

425

LatvianCentralStatisticalBureau(2006) TimeuseofthepopulationofLatvia2005 . Riga. LatvianCentralStatisticalBureau(2007) TourisminLatviain2006. Riga. LatvianCentralStatisticalBureau(2008) TourisminLatviain2007. Riga. Latvian Central Statistical Bureau (2008) Data ordered upon request: “Economically inactive persons by status and sex”, “Employed, unemployed and economically inactive population 2007 by region and sex”. Latvian Central Statistical Bureau Database: www.csb.lv. Labour market, population and tourism statistics etc. Accessed 20050525; 20080703; 20080714; 20080715; 20080825; 20080826; 20080917; 200812 10. State Employment Agency www.nva.gov.lv. Statistics of unregistered unemployment.Accessed20081003. StateEmploymentAgency(2005)Jūrmalabranch,registeredunemploymentin August2005(statisticalsheet). Internetsources Alfacentrs:www.alfacentrs.lv(20080116). TheArgonauthostelRiga:www.argonauthotel.com(20080225). BalticBeachhotel:www.balticbeach.lv(20081005). TheBalticGuide:www.balticguide.ee(20080220). BalticStandBy:www.standbynews.info(20040614;20070109;20050204; 20080522;20080908). TheBalticTimes:www.baltictimes.com. President calls upon Latvians to prevent damage to country’s image 20050808 (20080116). Stoppingsex‘terrorism’inRiga, 20070801(20080114). Sextourismcampaigncloses ,20070727(20080116). Bronzesoldierbecomestouristmagnet 20070506(20080228). Budapeststatuepark Szoborpark: www.szoborpark.hu(20080224). Cēsis regional portal: www.cesurajons.lv (20080412); www.cesurp.apollo.lv (20050610). CommissionoftheEuropeanCommunities:http://ec.europa.eu(20080827). Dagensnyheter:www.dn.se(20080228)ArticlesofTallinn events published between1 st ofJanuary2007andtheendofFebruary2008. DödshotmotEstlandspremiärminister 20070427(20080228). HotelJūrmala:www.hoteljurmala.com(20081005). ILO:www.ilo.org(20080715).

426

InspirationRiga:www.inspirationriga.com(20080116;20080208). Jūrmalatourismportal:www.jurmala.lv(20080929). TheLatvianCountryTourismAssociation LaukuceĜotājs: www.celotajs.lv(2008 0419;20080418). TheLatvianInstitute:www.latinst.lv(20040913);www.li.lv(20050104; 2008 0121;20080225). TheLatvianoccupationmuseum:www.occupationmuseum.lv(20080223). Latviantourismportal:www.latviatourism.lv(20080526;20080227). MinistryofCulture:www.km.gov.lv(20080824) TheNewWavefestival:www.newwavestars.com(20081002). NightlifeRiga:www.nightliferiga.com(20080220). PartyinRiga:www.partyinriga.com(20080220). ReAction!campaignhomepage:wwwreaction.lv(20080221). RevalHotels:www.linstow.no;www.revalhotels.com(20080412). RigaOutThere:www.rigaoutthere.com(20080220;20080225;20080901). RigathisWeekcityguide:www.rigathisweek.lv(20080215). Secretariat for the special assignment minister for social integration: www.integracija.gov.lv(20080227). Thesonganddancefestival2003homepage:www.dziesmusvetki2003.lv(2004 1216). Thesonganddancefestival2008homepage:www.dziesmusvetki2008.lv(2008 0824. SovietGardenatGrutasPark,Lithuania:www.grutoparkas.lt(20080303) UNESCO:www.unesco.org(20050910). Welcome!Cityguide:www.welcomeguide.lv(20080305). WorldTourismOrganization:www.worldtourism.org(20070831). WorldTravel&TourismCouncil:www.wttc.org(20070831). OxfordReferenceOnline:www.oxfordreference.com(20081211).

Interviews 101 Female representative, The Latvian National Center for Traditional and Performing Arts ,August2005. Femalerepresentative,Latvianruraltourismassociation,August2005. Femalerepresentative,LatvianTourismDevelopmentAgency,February2007. Femalerepresentative1,MinistryofWelfare,August2005. Femalerepresentative2,MinistryofWelfare,August2005.

101 Seechapter2foranoverviewoftheinterviewstudy,andchapters9and12detailedlistsof intervieweesintheJūrmalaandtheCēsisdistrictcasestudies.

427

Female representative, Ministry of Regional Development and Local Governments,February2007. TheCēsisdistrict: Chairman1,ruralmunicipality,August2005. Chairman2,ruralmunicipality,August2005. Chairwoman,ruralmunicipality,August2005. FemaleTouristInformationCentreemployee,ruralmunicipality,August2005. Malerepresentative,Cēsistourismcouncil,August2005. Jūrmala Femalerepresentative1,Jūrmalatourisminformationcentre,April2006. Femalerepresentative2,Jūrmalatourisminformationcentre,February2007. Femalerepresentative,JūrmalaCityCouncil,April2006. Female representative State Employment Agency, Jūrmala branch, August 2005. Malelabourmarketconsultant,April2006. Malerepresentative,JūrmalaCityCouncil2004.

428

Appendix1:Interviewthemesfemaleentrepreneurswithinrural tourism Background Education (Field/subjects,occupational/academic education,coursesetc.). Previousworking (Employmentandunemployment. experience Experienceofentrepreneurship? Occupationalbackgroundofparents?) Family (Householdstructure,children,childcare, husband’soccupationandworkinghours). Ruralresidence (Backgroundtoruralresidence,“local”/”in mover”.Allyearroundresidence?Former placeofresidence,motivestomovingto thecountryside.Connection/attachmentto placeofresidence). Theruraltourismbusiness Companystructure (Typeofbusiness,ownership,location). Ruraltourismactivities (Services,products,seasonality). Visitors (Yearlydistribution,domestic/international visitors,marketing). Employees (Recruitmentprocess,typeofemployment Fulltime?Unofficial,officialbasis? Women/men,workassignments). Financing/investments (Backgroundtoownershipand acquirementsofproperty/house.Accessto EUfunds,problems/possibilitieswhen startingupthebusiness,risktaking). Contactsandnetworks (Supportandbusinesscontactswith municipality,localorganizations,support fromfamily/friends/neighbours). Motivesforstartingthebusiness Themainideasbehindthe (Maininitiativetaker.Howhasformer business workingexperienceand/orcontacts influencedthedecision?). Mainmotives (Themaindrivingforces?Whyisit attractivetohaveone’sownbusiness?) Entrepreneurship (Selfimage:beinganentrepreneur? Restrictionsandpossibilitiesofbeinga femaleentrepreneurinthecountryside?). Ruraltourism (Whyisruraltourismimportantand attractiveasabusinessopportunity? Potentialsandproblems).

429

Thelocallabourmarket (Restrictionsandpossibilitiesforworking andlivinginthecountryside.Womenand men’spositionsandpossibilitiesonthe locallabourmarket.“Traditional” employment?). Currentworkwithinruraltourism Mainworkassignments (Thedailyroutines,an“ordinarydayat work”,contactswithguests,positiveand negativeexperiences). Workingconditions (Workinghours,seasonality,stress, flexibility.Tourismas‘women’swork’? Combiningentrepreneurshipandfamily, accesstochildcareandservices). Divisionofwork (Howistheworkwithinthefamilybusiness dividedbetweenthefamilymembers?). Leisuretime (Extent,activities,restrictionsand possibilities). Additionalwork Additionalemployment (Background,mainworkassignments, workinghours.Problems/possibilitiesin combiningentrepreneurshipwithother employment?) Householdwork (Timespentonhouseholdwork,daily routines,divisionofworkbetweenfamily members.Statusofhouseholdwork). (Housewife) (Backgroundtobecomingahousewife, workchores,advantages/disadvantages). Incomeandlivelihood Incomefromruraltourism (Distributionthroughouttheyear,effectsof seasonality,expansion,risktaking?). Livelihood (Directandindirectdependenceofincome fromtourism,unofficial/officialincome, distributionofindividual/household income,sufficientintermsofexpenses?). Additionalincome (Incomefromemployment,pension,social benefits,mainincomeprovider?). Thefuture Individualgoals (Personalaimsandscenarios,challenges andopportunities). Businessgoals (Plansofexpansion,newprojects,career, potentialsandproblems).

430

Appendix2:Interviewthemesfemaleemployeeswithintourism Background Education (Field/subjects,occupational/academic education,coursesetc.). Previousworking (Employmentandunemployment. experience Occupationalbackgroundofparents?) Family (Householdstructure,children,childcare, husband’s/boyfriend’seducation, occupationandworkinghours). Placeofresidence (Backgroundtoplaceandtypeofresidence, “local”/”inmover”.Formerplacesof residence.Connection/attachmenttoplace ofresidence). Currentworkwithintourism Mainworkassignments (Thedailyroutines,an“ordinarydayat work”,contactswithguests,positiveand negativeexperiences). Workingconditions (Workinghours,seasonality,stress, flexibility.Rules,demandsandregulations. Social/physicalworkingenvironment. Tourismas‘women’swork’?Combining paidworkandfamily,accesstochildcare andservices,commuting). Leisuretime (Extent,activities,restrictionsand possibilities). Motivesbehindworkwithintourism Mainmotives (Whytourism/services?Choiceofsector,is tourismattractive,why/whynot?What qualificationsareneeded?). Thelocallabourmarket (Restrictionsandpossibilitiesoffinding employmentonthelocallabourmarket. Womenandmen’spositionsand possibilitiesonthelabourmarket. Discrimination?Positiveandnegative experiences). (Ethnicityandcitizenship) (How/whenacquiredcitizenship,motives why/whynotapplied,languageknowledge, networkswithRussianandLatvian speakers,restrictionsandpossibilitiesfor employment).

431

Additionalwork Additionalemployment (Background,mainworkassignments, workinghours.Problems/possibilitiesin combiningdifferentformsofemployment?) Householdwork (Timespentonhouseholdwork,daily routines,divisionofworkbetweenfamily members.Statusofhouseholdwork). (Studies) (Background,subject/program,timeand costs,routines). (Housewife) (Backgroundtobecomingahousewife, workchores,advantages/disadvantages). Incomeandlivelihood Incomefromruraltourism (Distributionthroughouttheyear,effectsof seasonality?). Livelihood (Directandindirectdependenceofincome fromtourism,unofficial/officialwages, distributionofindividual/household income,sufficientintermsofexpenses?). Additionalincome (Incomefromemployment,pension,social benefits,mainincomeprovider?). Thefuture Individualgoals (Personalaimsandscenarios,challenges andopportunities). Workrelatedgoals (Plansofnewemployment,education, career,potentialsandproblems).

432 Appendix3:Questionnaireforsurveyofemploymentwithintourismin JūrmalaandintheCēsisdistrict.

1. PERSONAL BACKGROUND As an introduction to this survey, please tell us a bit about your personal background, including information about your family and household.

1.1 Sex  Woman  Man

1.2 How old are you? Age:______

1.3 What is your native language?  Latvian  Russian  Lithuanian Other______

1.3 What other languages do you  Latvian speak fluently?  Russian  English  German Other______

1.4 Do you have a Latvian  Yes citizenship?  No

If your answer is No: What is your citizenship? ______

1.5 What is your current place of Name of city/town/village: ______residence? Postal code ______

1.6 How long have you lived at Number of year(s): ______your current place of residence?

1.7 Were you born and/or raised at  Yes your current place of residence?  No

If your answer is No: What is your place of birth? Name of City/town______Postal code: ______

433

1.8 What is your marital status?  Never married  Married  Divorced/widowed  Cohabitation 1

1.9 Do you have children?  Yes  No (please go to question 2.1)

If your answer if Yes, please specify: Number of children ______Age ______

1.10 Does any of your children  Yes still live in the household?  No

1.11 If you have pre-school  Public childcare children, how do you solve  Private childcare daytime childcare?  A nanny takes care of the children  I take care of the children myself  My husband/wife takes care of the children  A f riend/relative takes care of the children Other ______

1IntheLatvianversionofthequestionnaire,thisquestionincludedtwooptionsforcohabitation:(1)Ir civilsieva/civilvīrs(2)Kopdzīvearkādu.

434

2. EMPLOYMENT WITHIN TOURISM The following section is aimed at gaining insight to your current work within tourism, your field of work, working hours, wage etc.

2.1 What is your current  I am permanently employed employment situation within  I am temporarily employed (as a substitute or tourism? within a project)  I am seasonally employed  I am a company owner (with 1 employee or more)  I am an owner of a family business (shared ownership between husband and wife or other family members)  I am self-employed (no employees) Other: ______

2.2 In what sector do you work?  In the public sector  In the private sector

2.3 In what field of tourism do you (More than one option may be marked) work?  Accommodation (Hotel, guest house, holiday home, Your field of work can include both camping etc.) tourist related products and services.  Sightseeing (Incoming tour operator, guiding, rental etc.)  Conference and event  Tourism attraction (Museum, amusement park etc.)  Tourist information centre  Public planning department  Handicraft/art (Wood carving, painting etc.)  Agricultural products (Mushroom picking, vegetables) Other: ______

Please describe your field of work in more detail: ______

435

2.4 What is your main work (Please choose only one alternative!) assignment?  Guest booking (over the phone or the Internet etc.) Your main work assignment is what  Cleaning takes up the most of your time when  Restaurant or kitchen work (cooking, waitressing etc.) working within tourism  Bar  Construction work/technical repair  Health treatment/SPA  IT/computer work (website etc.)  Front office (reception work etc.)  Administrative work (accounting, book keeping etc.)  Marketing  Management (supervision, recruitment etc.)  Guiding Other: ______

Please describe your work assignments in more detail: ______

2.5 For how long time have you  Less than 1 year worked at your current place of  1-2 years work?  3-5 years  6-10 years  More than 10 years

If you have a family business , who took the main initiative for starting your business?

 I did  My wife/husband did  Someone else did (friend, relative etc)

2.6 How many employees does your  0 employees current place of work have?  1-9 employees  10-20 employees Please specify the number of employees  21-50 employees in high season  More than 50 employees

436

2.7 Where is your current place of Name of city/town/village______work located? ______Postal code ______

2.8 Do you work within tourism all  Yes (please go to question 2.9) year around?  No

If your answer is No : What month(s) do you generally work within tourism? (More than one option may be marked)

 January  July  February  August  March  September  April  October  May  November  June  December

2.9 When working within tourism,  On a full-time basis (40 hours/week) how are you working hours  On a half-time or part-time basis officially regulated?  On an hourly basis  I decide my own working hours as self-employed The officially regulated working hours or as a company owner are those set up by your employer or company If you are not full-time employed : How many hours per week in average do you work? ______(hours/week)

2.10 How much overtime do you  I do not work overtime (40 hours or less a week) work in average each week?  I work less than 10 hours overtime a week  I work more than 10 hours overtime a week Overtime is here referred to as tourism related work exceeding more than 40 hours a week, which can be both paid and unpaid.

2.11 What is your average  Less than 100 LVL/month monthly income from work  100-250 LVL/month within tourism?  250-500 LVL/month  500-700 LVL/month Please estimate your monthly income  More than 700 LVL/month (before taxes) during high season

437

3. ADDITIONAL WORK AND INCOME

Work within tourism is often seasonal in its character, and other income sources may therefore be necessary. This section investigates whether or not you have additional work and income besides your work within tourism. Some questions are also related to unpaid, household work.

3.1 Is work within tourism your  Yes main source of income ?  No

The main source of income is here referred to as 50 percent or more of your total annual income

3.2 Do you have additional paid  Yes work besides your work within  No (please go to question 3.6) tourism? If your answer is Yes : What is your employment Additional paid work is here referred to situation at your additional job? as work within a non-tourism sector  I am p ermanently employed  I am t emporarily employed (as a substitute or within a project)  I am seasonally employed  I am self-employed  I am a company owner  I am an owner of a family business Other______

From which sector is your additional income generated? (more than one option may be marked)

 Agriculture, hunting and fishing  Forestry  Manufacturing  Health  Social work and child care  Education  Public administration  Transport, storage and communication  Construction  Real estate, renting and business activities  Trade (retail and wholesale, repairing)  Domestic services  Artistic work or handicraft Other: ______

438

3.3 Do you have additional paid  Yes (please go to question 3.4) work all year around ?  No

If your answer is No: What month(s) do you generally have additional paid work? (More than one option may be marked)

 January  July  February  August  March  September  April  October  May  November  June  December

´ 3.4 How are your working hours  On a full-time basis (40 hours/week) officially regulated at your  On a half-time or part-time basis additional paid work?  On an hourly basis  I decide my own working hours as self-employed The officially regulated working hours or as a company owner are those set up by your employer or company If you are not full-time employed : How many hours per week in average do you work? ______(hours/week)

3.5 What is your average monthly  Less than 100 LVL/month income from additional paid  100-250 LVL/month work?  250-500 LVL/month  500-700 LVL/month Please estimate your monthly income  More than 700 LVL/month (before taxes)

3.6 Do you receive any  Yes governmental subsidies ?  No

Government subsidies are here referred If your answer is Yes: What type of subsidies do you to as social and economic benefits from receive? the state on a national, regional or local level  Unemployment subsidy  Pension  Sick leave subsidy  Student grant  Agricultural subsidy  Company related subsidy Other: ______

439

3.7 Who is the main income provider  I am the main income provider (please go to question in your household? 3.8)  My husband/wife/partner is the main income The main income provider is here provider referred to as the person whose wage  My husband/wife/partner and I contribute constitute the majority (50% or more) of an equal amount of income to the household the household’s total income (please go to question 3.8)

If your husband/wife/partner provides the main income, within what sector does she/he work? (more than one option may be marked)

 Agriculture, hunting and fishing  Forestry  Manufacturing  Health  Social work and child care  Education  Public administration

 Transport, storage and communication  Construction  Real estate, renting and business activities  Trade (retail and wholesale, repairing)  Domestic services  Artistic work or handicraft  Tourism  Student  Pensioner Other: ______

3.8 Do you engage in any additional  Yes unpaid housework ?  No (please go to question 3.10)

Unpaid housework is here referred to as If your answer is Yes: What does the unpaid household unpaid, domestic chores such as work include? cleaning, cooking or agricultural work (More than one option may be marked) for household needs  Agriculture (for household needs)  Husbandry (for household needs)  Cleaning  Cooking  Child care Other: ______

440

3.9 How many hours per week in  1-5 hours/week average do you spend on unpaid  6-10 hours/week housework ?  11-15 hours/week  16-20 hours/week Unpaid housework is here referred to as  More than 20 hours/week unpaid, domestic chores such as cleaning, cooking or agricultural work for household needs

3.10 How are the domestic chores  I do all the work myself divided between the members of  I do the majority of the work the household?  I share the work equally with my husband/wife/partner/other member of the Domestic chores are here referred to work family such as cleaning, cooking or agricultural  My husband/wife/partner/other family member work for household needs does a majority of the work  My husband/wife/partner does all the work  A housekeeper does the majority or all of the work Other: ______

441

4. FORMER EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION

As a background of your employment within tourism, the following question will relate to your former employment situation and educational background .

4.1 Level of education  Compulsory school (grade 1-9)  Upper secondary school 2  Higher education (university, college, etc)

4.2 Do you have a higher education  Yes from the tourism field?  No (please go to question 4.3)

Higher education is here referred to as a If your answer is Yes: college or university degree Please specify the college/university and year of your degree: University/College ______Year ______

How quickly did you find a job within tourism after your degree?

 After 0-6 months  After 7-12 months  After 1-2 years  After more than 2 years

4.3 Before you got your current  Permanently employed job within tourism, what was  Temporarily employed (as a substitute or within a your employment situation? project)  Seasonally employed  Self-employed  Company owner  Owner of a family business  Family worker (house wife etc.)  Student (please go to question 4.6)  Unemployed (please go to question 4.6)  Pensioner (please go to question 4.6) Other______

2IntheLatvianversionofthequestionnaire,thisquestionincludedtwoseparateoptionsforupper secondaryschool:special/technicalcollege(Speciālāizglītība)andregularuppersecondaryschool(Vidējā izglītība).

442

4.4 Within what sector did you  Public work?  Private

Please specify:  Agriculture, hunting and fishing  Forestry  Manufacturing  Health  Social work and child care  Education  Public administration  Transport, storage and communication  Construction  Real estate, renting and business activities  Trade (retail and wholesale, repairing)  Domestic services  Artistic work or handicraft  Tourism Other ______

4.5 Where did you work or study? City/town/village: ______Postal code (If possible): ______

4.6 Where did you live while  At my current place of residence working or studying? Other (Name of city/town/village) :______

443

5. A BACKGROUND TO YOUR WORK WITHIN TOURISM The motives behind the decision to work within the tourism sector vary, and might be related to a personal interest. Tourism might also appear as one of the few options for economic livelihood. This section contains questions and statements relating to possible motives and reasons that might have affected your decision to work within tourism. Some questions also relates to your opinions about your current work within tourism.

5.1 What were the reasons behind your decision to work within tourism? Please comment each of the following statements I strongly I agree more I only I disagree agree or less partly agree 1. I was unemployed and needed a job    

2. I saw a future in the development of the     tourism industry in Latvia

3. I had few employment options except     within the tourism sector

4. I wanted a job in which I could meet     people

5. I wanted to work in a pleasant     physical environment

6. I needed additional work    

7. I wanted to both work and live in     the countryside

8. I wanted to start my own business    

9. I wanted to make my own career    

10. I wanted to have my own independent     income

11 . I wanted to be able to combine work     and family by working at home

12. I wanted a work alternative or     complement to traditional agriculture

13. I wanted an interesting job    

14. I wanted to have a safe and reliable     income

15. I wanted to continue a family business    

444

Please describe your motives for working within tourism in more detail: ______

5.2 What is your opinion about your current work within tourism? Please comment the following statements

I strongly I agree more I only I disagree agree or less partly agree 1. I enjoy working within the tourism sector    

2. Work within tourism is relatively well     paid compared to other jobs in Latvia

3. I see good opportunities to make a future     career in tourism

4. My work within tourism is only     temporary

5. Working within tourism includes taking     some economic risks

6. Work within tourism is traditionally     associated with “women’s work”

7. I have use of my skills or education in     my work

8. My work provides me with new     challenges and experiences

9. Work within tourism involves freedom     and flexibility

10. My work within tourism is a reflection     of my personal lifestyle and identity

11. Working within tourism has a positive     image

445

5.3 How would you describe your current work within tourism? Please choose 5 of the following statements

 Stressful  Modern  Flexible  Independent  Time consuming  Personal  Social  Rational  Secure  Creative  Traditional  Varied  Challenging  Hierarchal  Profitable

Other comments: ______

Thank you for your assistance!

If you have comments about the questionnaire or your work within tourism, please specify them here: ______

May we contact you later for an interview?  Yes  No

Contact details: Telephone number: ______E-mail: ______

446 Transforming geographies of tourism and gender

Latvia has experienced extensive political, economic and social transformation in the period following independence. From being a centrally-controlled tool for socialist ideals, tourism today is often viewed as a means for creating national and regional economic growth and employment possibilities. This thesis explores how tourism takes part in the transformation process, in how Latvia is reimagined both as a nation state and as a tourism destination, by analysing its genderised and spatial dimensions. Using a feminist-geographical theoretical approach, the study analyses how gender identities in general and femininities more specifically are reflected and negotiated within tourismmarketing and women’s employment and livelihood practices within tourism. Based on three interrelated ‘geographies’, the thesis illustrates how tourism becomes an arena for reclaiming a Latvian national identity rooted in a pre-Soviet past, while also manifesting a Western European identity, and negotiating the remains of the controversial Soviet heritage. This process reveals, for example, traditional feminised characteristics of the nation state. Two case studies of female employees and entrepreneurs within rural tourism and spa/health tourism also show how women negotiate different ideals of femininities, including ‘traditional’, ‘Western’ and ‘socialist’ ideals, through their everyday livelihood strategies and practices within both the public and the private sphere.

Karlstad University Studies ISSN 1403-8099 ISBN 978-91-7063-230-3