DOCSLIB.ORG

I. Greek Men and Women

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text

Load more

INDEX I. Greek Men and Women Nysa (Kos), 86 Olympias (wife of Philip 11), \7, 19, 38,42 Agis IV (Sparta), 22 Parmeniskos Aristeos (hieropoios from Kyzi- Akornion Dionysiou (Dionysopolis), 73 kos), 53 Alexander III (the Great), 5, 16-21 Perdiccas, 18, III n. 147 finances, 110-11, n. 135 Perseus, 23, 53, 87-89,102,112 n. 179 hypomnemata, III n. 147 Phi lip 11, 16-18, 38 religious policy of, 17-18 Philip III (Arrhidaios), 16, 18-20, 26, 38, III Alexander IV (son of Alexander the Great), ns. 151 and 157 16, 18,26 Philip V, 23, 38, 60, 89, 113 n. 193 Alexandros (Kephallenia), 86 Philoxenos Philoxenou (hieropoios from Kyzi­ Andriskos, 135 n. 697 kos), 53 Andromachos Demetriou (Samothracian ini- Ptolemy I (Soter), 22, 112 n. 177, 113 n. 184, tiate), 117 n. 278 127 n. 498 Antalkidas (Sparta), 38 Ptolemy 11 (Philadelphos), 22, 24, 38, 81, 112 Antiochos 11 (Theos), 24 n. 177 Antiochos III (the Great), 24 Ptolemy III (Euergetes), 22 Apollonios of Thera, 64-5 Ptolemy IV (Philopator), 65 Aristarche Mikythou (Pergamon), 65 Ptolemy V (Epiphanes), 65 Arrhidaios, see Phi lip III (Arrhidaios) Ptolemy Keraunos, 22 Arsinoe 11, 22, 38,81,82,112 ns. 177 and 179 Pyrrhos of Epiros, 20 Arsinoe Ill, 65 Rhoimetalkes, 99, 137 n. 794 Artemidoros Apolloniou Pergaios, 61-64, 126 Seuthes III (Seuthopolis), 59 n. 496, 127 ns. 498-500, 502, 509; see Skopas, 110 n. 124 frontispiece Sokles (Samothrace), 123 n. 425 Asklepiades Attalou, Samothracian initiate, 45 Theondas (Alexandria), 82 Attalos (Pergamon), 133 n. 657 Theondas (basileus at Samothrace), 39 Diagoras (Melos), 65-66 Tryphera (Ephesos), 86 Dionysios Strouthionos (\stros), 72-73 Epaphrodeitos (Kos), 86 11. Roman Men and Women Epikrates Nikeratou (Olbia), 74 Epimenes (Seuthopolis), 60 Agrippina, 80 Epinikos (Ptolemaic governor of Thrace), 22, Alexandros Babullius F. 1.,96 110 n. 132 Lucius Atilius, 88 Erieus (stone-cutter, Philadelphia), 81 M. Aufidius M. 1.,96 Eubiotos Aristonos (Olbia), 74 Augustus, 91, lOO Eumenes (Pergamon), 88 Babullius Pamphilus M. I. Astymenos, 96-97 Euphrosynos Idymeos (Syme), 85 M. Caecilius Sotas, 66-67 Evander, 88 L. Calpurnius Pi so, 90-91 Helianax Asklepiodoros Athenaios (Delos), 77 C. Cestius, 97 Hestiaios Pempidou (Thasos), 120 n. 356 M. Claudius Marcellus, 87 Hippomedon (Ptolemaic general), 22-23, 38 Cornelius Lentulus, 93 Isodoros Nikostratou (Samothracian initiate), Cn. (Cornelius) Lentulus, 136 n. 738 113 n. 206 L. Cornelius Sulla, 96 Laodike (wife of Antiochos 11), 24 L. Furius L. f. Crassupes (sic), 96 Lysander (Sparta), 38 Germanicus, (J ulius Caesar), 97 Lysimachos, 21, 22, 38, 60, 81,112 ns. 175 and Hadrian, lOO, 102, 137 n. 801 177,113 n. 184 Hilarus Prim[us), 42 Mithridates VI, Eupator Dionysos (the Great), C. Julius Augurinus, 98 77, 93, 95, 132 n. 627, 138 n. 807 C. Julius Caesar, 90, 94 Moschion Thaselitas (Rhodes), 85 L. Julius Caesar, 90 188 INDEX L. or P. lu(v)entius M'. f. Thalna, 134 n. 697 Antioch (on the Maeander), 43, 120 n. 361 L. Licinius Lucullus, 93 Apameia Kibotos, 61, 65, 68,125 ns. 467, 470 Q. Luccius, 93 Argos, 126 n. 475 Lucullus, see L. Licinius Lucullus Arsinoe (see also Patara), 43, 120 n. 362 L. Luuceius M. f., 95 Astypalaia, 49 M. Magulnius M. f., 95, 97 Athens, 26, 32, 39,43, 47, 113 n. 206, 123 n. P. Magulnius, 95 437, 126 n. 475 Marcellus, see M. Claudius Marcellus Anthenian domination of Delos, 77-79 -. Marius Fructus, 47 Attalea, 126 n. 475 C. Marius L. f. Ste. Schinas, 47, 98 Aulai (Rhodian peraia), 84, 125 n. 470, 126 n. Q. Minucius Thermus, 95 475 C. Modius Asclepeades, 135 n. 719 Azoros,43 Nero, 80, 98 Babylon, 18 Octavia (wife of Nero), 80 Bagla, 126 n. 475 C. Octavius Bassus, 99 Beroia, 25, 43, 119 n. 331 T. Ofatulenus Sabinus, 94 Byzantion, 43, 99, 119 n. 330, 120 n. 363, 122 M. Oppius Nepos, 96, 97 n. 403,129 n. 563,131 n. 598 C. Paccius, 94 Bizone, 68, 125 n. 470, 126 n. 475, 129 n. 560 M. Paccius P. f., Fa!. Rufus, 42, 94, 97 Bargylia, 49 Q. Planius Sardus Varius Ambibulus, 92 Bouga, 126 n. 475 Cn. Pompeius (Pompey), 93, 114 n. 223 Brundisium, 97 L. Pomponius Maximus Flavinus Silvanus, 92 Chios, 43, 49, 53, 126 n. 475 T. Pomponius Atticus 93-4, 101 Dardanos, 43, 50-51, 54, 124 n. 451 Rupilia Q. f. Quinta, 47, 98-99 Delos, 3,18,20,61,69-70,75,77-80,82,93, Seleukos (servus), 47, 96 95-97,99,104 n. 11, 123 n. 437,125 n. 470, [M. S]e[rvilius] M. !. Pamp[hilus], 95 126 ns. 475, 479, 133 n. 651, 138 n. 802 M. Servilius M. !. Philo, 95 Delphi, 17-18,20,88, 107 n. 69, 138 n. 802 P. Sextius Lippinus Tarquitianus, 91-92 Didyma, 24, 126 n. 475 Aulos Sikinios Leukiou Romaios Athenion, 96 Dion, 18, 125 n. 470, 126 ns. 475, 485 L. Sicinius M. f. 47, 96 Dionysopolis, 69-71, 73-76,125 n. 470,130 n. Sulla, see L. Cornelius Sulla 586,131 ns. 594, 615 Tertia (Ofatuleni), 94 Dodona, 18, 20 L. Valerius Flaccus, 95 Drus, 12 Q. Visellius L. f., 97 Eleusis, 8, 27, 32, 39, 40, 132 n. 628, 133 n. 651 Voconius, 48, 92 Anaktoron, 106 n. 57 initiates, 113 n. 206 Ill. Index LocurUIII Elis, 43, 50, 55, 58 Ephesos, 18, 24, 43-44, 50-52, 75, 80, 86, 97, Abdera,49 125 ns. 470-73, 126 n. 475, 130 n. 570 Abydos, 43, 120 n. 356 Epidamnos, 43 Aigai (Aeolis), 49, 123 n. 416 Epidauros, 120 n. 335 Aigai (Macedonia), 24, 43, 120 n. 357 Eresos, 50 Ainos, 43, 128 n. 528 Erythrai, 50, 120 n. 335, 126, n. 475 Akragas, 132 n. 628 Fasilar, 61,66, 125 n. 470, 126 n. 479 Aktion, 120 n. 335 Gaugame1a, 17 Alabanda, 49, 51 G6k,e6ren, 61,125 n. 470,126 n. 475,129 n. Ala~ehir, 126 n. 475 560 Alexandria (Egypt), 43, 82, 99, 120 n. 358 . Gortynia, 124 n. 439 Alexandria Troas, 43, 120 ns. 358-59 Gortys, 126 n. 475 Alexandroupolis, 125 n. 470, 126 n. 475 Halikarnassos, 50 Alopekonnesos, 43 Halonnesos, 126 n. 475 Amphipolis, 18,24-25,43,61,66-68, 125 ns. Herakleia apo Strymonos, 43 470, 472, 129 n. 559 1asos, 50, 52, 53 Anapa, 126 n. 475 I1ion, 18,24,44,64-65,68,99, 120 n. 335, 125 Anaphe, 126 n. 475 ns. 470, 472 Andania, 126 n. 475 Imbros, 47,98, 126 n. 475, 133 n. 651 .
Recommended publications
  • Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey

    Seven Churches of Revelation Turkey

    TRAVEL GUIDE SEVEN CHURCHES OF REVELATION TURKEY TURKEY Pergamum Lesbos Thyatira Sardis Izmir Chios Smyrna Philadelphia Samos Ephesus Laodicea Aegean Sea Patmos ASIA Kos 1 Rhodes ARCHEOLOGICAL MAP OF WESTERN TURKEY BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa Neapolis park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Abdera Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA Allante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Dasaki Elimia Pydna Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos
  • Abd-Hadad, Priest-King, Abila, , , , Abydos, , Actium, Battle

    Abd-Hadad, Priest-King, Abila, , , , Abydos, , Actium, Battle

    INDEX Abd-Hadad, priest-king, Akkaron/Ekron, , Abila, , , , Akko, Ake, , , , Abydos, , see also Ptolemaic-Ake Actium, battle, , Alexander III the Great, Macedonian Adaios, ruler of Kypsela, king, –, , , Adakhalamani, Nubian king, and Syria, –, –, , , , Adulis, , –, Aegean Sea, , , , , , –, and Egypt, , , –, , –, – empire of, , , , , , –, legacy of, – –, –, , , death, burial, – Aemilius Paullus, L., cult of, , , Aeropos, Ptolemaic commander, Alexander IV, , , Alexander I Balas, Seleukid king, Afrin, river, , , –, – Agathokleia, mistress of Ptolemy IV, and eastern policy, , and Demetrios II, Agathokles of Syracuse, , –, and Seventh Syrian War, –, , , Agathokles, son of Lysimachos, – death, , , , Alexander II Zabeinas, , , Agathokles, adviser of Ptolemy IV, –, , , –, Alexander Iannai, Judaean king, Aigai, Macedon, , – Ainos, Thrace, , , , Alexander, son of Krateros, , Aitolian League, Aitolians, , , Alexander, satrap of Persis, , , –, , , – Alexandria-by-Egypt, , , , , , , , , , , , , Aitos, son of Apollonios, , , –, , , Akhaian League, , , , , , , –, , , , , , , , , , , , , , Akhaios, son of Seleukos I, , , –, –, , – , , , , , , –, , , , Akhaios, son of Andromachos, , and Sixth Syrian War, –, adviser of Antiochos III, , – Alexandreia Troas, , conquers Asia Minor, – Alexandros, son of Andromachos, king, –, , , –, , , –, , , Alketas, , , Amanus, mountains, , –, index Amathos, Cyprus, and battle of Andros, , , Amathos, transjordan, , Amestris, wife of Lysimachos, , death, Ammonias, Egypt,
  • Τhe Danger of Participating in the Heavy Games of the Ancient Olympics

    Τhe Danger of Participating in the Heavy Games of the Ancient Olympics

    Available online at www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com Scholars Research Library European Journal of Sports & Exercise Science, 2019, 7 (1): 1-6 (http://www.scholarsresearchlibrary.com) ISSN:2278–005X The Danger of Participating in the Heavy Games of the Ancient Olympics Andreas Bourantanis* Department of Sports Science and Physical Education, Democritus University of Thrace, University of Dundee, United Kingdom; E-mail: [email protected] ABSTRACT Through the present, we seek to stimulate the interest of researchers and practitioners at the scientific and non- scientific level as well as the athletes and coaches associated with today's so-called combat sports to turn their concern to the proper adaptation of the ancient Greek Olympic ideal and Olympic Games. Our concern is to motivate the Olympic Committee with a view to reintroducing the sport to the Olympics Sports program. The Olympic Games were the oldest and most remarkable games of the ancient Greek world as a whole, among the events included in the sports program. The Olympics cultivated the body and the mind. Characterizing Pankration the ancient Greek writer Philostratus said it was the best of the Olympic Games. Although the Olympics were reconstituted, Pankration was not included in the sports program of modern Olympics. However this fact has left a gap in the schedule of the Olympics because it is paradoxical that the absence of the event that contributed to the Olympic Games’ prestige is absent. Research is to present some of the techniques that were used by the most famous athletes in antiquity while trying to investigate the dangers as well as the general danger of using these techniques and the damage to the human body.
  • Cleopatra II and III: the Queens of Ptolemy VI and VIII As Guarantors of Kingship and Rivals for Power

    Cleopatra II and III: the Queens of Ptolemy VI and VIII As Guarantors of Kingship and Rivals for Power

    Originalveröffentlichung in: Andrea Jördens, Joachim Friedrich Quack (Hg.), Ägypten zwischen innerem Zwist und äußerem Druck. Die Zeit Ptolemaios’ VI. bis VIII. Internationales Symposion Heidelberg 16.-19.9.2007 (Philippika 45), Wiesbaden 2011, S. 58–76 Cleopatra II and III: The queens of Ptolemy VI and VIII as guarantors of kingship and rivals for power Martina Minas-Nerpel Introduction The second half of the Ptolemaic period was marked by power struggles not only among the male rulers of the dynasty, but also among its female members. Starting with Arsinoe II, the Ptolemaic queens had always been powerful and strong-willed and had been a decisive factor in domestic policy. From the death of Ptolemy V Epiphanes onwards, the queens controlled the political developments in Egypt to a still greater extent. Cleopatra II and especially Cleopatra III became all-dominant, in politics and in the ruler-cult, and they were often depicted in Egyptian temple- reliefs—more often than any of her dynastic predecessors and successors. Mother and/or daughter reigned with Ptolemy VI Philometor to Ptolemy X Alexander I, from 175 to 101 BC, that is, for a quarter of the entire Ptolemaic period. Egyptian queenship was complementary to kingship, both in dynastic and Ptolemaic Egypt: No queen could exist without a king, but at the same time the queen was a necessary component of kingship. According to Lana Troy, the pattern of Egyptian queenship “reflects the interaction of male and female as dualistic elements of the creative dynamics ”.1 The king and the queen functioned as the basic duality through which regeneration of the creative power of the kingship was accomplished.
  • Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In

    Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs the Ptolemaic Family In

    Department of World Cultures University of Helsinki Helsinki Macedonian Kings, Egyptian Pharaohs The Ptolemaic Family in the Encomiastic Poems of Callimachus Iiro Laukola ACADEMIC DISSERTATION To be publicly discussed, by due permission of the Faculty of Arts at the University of Helsinki in auditorium XV, University Main Building, on the 23rd of September, 2016 at 12 o’clock. Helsinki 2016 © Iiro Laukola 2016 ISBN 978-951-51-2383-1 (paperback.) ISBN 978-951-51-2384-8 (PDF) Unigrafia Helsinki 2016 Abstract The interaction between Greek and Egyptian cultural concepts has been an intense yet controversial topic in studies about Ptolemaic Egypt. The present study partakes in this discussion with an analysis of the encomiastic poems of Callimachus of Cyrene (c. 305 – c. 240 BC). The success of the Ptolemaic Dynasty is crystallized in the juxtaposing of the different roles of a Greek ǴdzȅǻǽǷȏȄ and of an Egyptian Pharaoh, and this study gives a glimpse of this political and ideological endeavour through the poetry of Callimachus. The contribution of the present work is to situate Callimachus in the core of the Ptolemaic court. Callimachus was a proponent of the Ptolemaic rule. By reappraising the traditional Greek beliefs, he examined the bicultural rule of the Ptolemies in his encomiastic poems. This work critically examines six Callimachean hymns, namely to Zeus, to Apollo, to Artemis, to Delos, to Athena and to Demeter together with the Victory of Berenice, the Lock of Berenice and the Ektheosis of Arsinoe. Characterized by ambiguous imagery, the hymns inspect the ruptures in Greek thought during the Hellenistic age.
  • Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków*

    Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków*

    ELECTRUM * Vol. 21 (2014): 21–41 doi: 10.4467/20800909EL.14.001.2778 www.ejournals.eu/electrum THE CULT OF THE PTOLEMIES IN THE AEGEAN IN THE 3RD CENTURY BC Tomasz Grabowski Jagiellonian University, Kraków* Abstract: The cult of the Ptolemies spread in various ways. Apart from the Lagids, the initiative came from poleis themselves; private cult was also very important. The ruler cult, both that organ- ised directly by the Ptolemaic authorities and that established by poleis, was tangibly benefi cial for the Ptolemaic foreign policy. The dynastic cult became one of the basic instruments of political activity in the region, alongside acts of euergetism. It seems that Ptolemy II played the biggest role in introducing the ruler cult as a foreign policy measure. He was probably responsible for bringing his father’s nickname Soter to prominence. He also played the decisive role in popularising the cult of Arsinoe II, emphasising her role as protector of sailors and guarantor of the monarchy’s prosperity and linking her to cults accentuating the warrior nature of female deities. Ptolemy II also used dynastic festivals as vehicles of dynastic propaganda and ideology and a means to popu- larise the cult. The ruler cult became one of the means of communication between the subordinate cities and the Ptolemies. It also turned out to be an important platform in contacts with the poleis which were loosely or not at all subjugated by the Lagids. The establishment of divine honours for the Ptolemies by a polis facilitated closer relations and created a friendly atmosphere and a certain emotional bond.
  • Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration

    Separating Fact from Fiction in the Aiolian Migration

    hesperia yy (2008) SEPARATING FACT Pages399-430 FROM FICTION IN THE AIOLIAN MIGRATION ABSTRACT Iron Age settlementsin the northeastAegean are usuallyattributed to Aioliancolonists who journeyed across the Aegean from mainland Greece. This articlereviews the literary accounts of the migration and presentsthe relevantarchaeological evidence, with a focuson newmaterial from Troy. No onearea played a dominantrole in colonizing Aiolis, nor is sucha widespread colonizationsupported by the archaeologicalrecord. But the aggressive promotionof migrationaccounts after the PersianWars provedmutually beneficialto bothsides of theAegean and justified the composition of the Delian League. Scholarlyassessments of habitation in thenortheast Aegean during the EarlyIron Age are remarkably consistent: most settlements are attributed toAiolian colonists who had journeyed across the Aegean from Thessaly, Boiotia,Akhaia, or a combinationof all three.1There is no uniformityin theancient sources that deal with the migration, although Orestes and his descendantsare named as theleaders in mostaccounts, and are credited withfounding colonies over a broadgeographic area, including Lesbos, Tenedos,the western and southerncoasts of theTroad, and theregion betweenthe bays of Adramyttion and Smyrna(Fig. 1). In otherwords, mainlandGreece has repeatedly been viewed as theagent responsible for 1. TroyIV, pp. 147-148,248-249; appendixgradually developed into a Mountjoy,Holt Parker,Gabe Pizzorno, Berard1959; Cook 1962,pp. 25-29; magisterialstudy that is includedhere Allison Sterrett,John Wallrodt, Mal- 1973,pp. 360-363;Vanschoonwinkel as a companionarticle (Parker 2008). colm Wiener, and the anonymous 1991,pp. 405-421; Tenger 1999, It is our hope that readersinterested in reviewersfor Hesperia. Most of trie pp. 121-126;Boardman 1999, pp. 23- the Aiolian migrationwill read both articlewas writtenin the Burnham 33; Fisher2000, pp.
  • Mediterranean Divine Vintage Turkey & Greece

    Mediterranean Divine Vintage Turkey & Greece

    BULGARIA Sinanköy Manya Mt. NORTH EDİRNE KIRKLARELİ Selimiye Fatih Iron Foundry Mosque UNESCO B L A C K S E A MACEDONIA Yeni Saray Kırklareli Höyük İSTANBUL Herakleia Skotoussa (Byzantium) Krenides Linos (Constantinople) Sirra Philippi Beikos Palatianon Berge Karaevlialtı Menekşe Çatağı Prusias Tauriana Filippoi THRACE Bathonea Küçükyalı Ad hypium Morylos Neapolis Dikaia Heraion teikhos Achaeology Edessa park KOCAELİ Tragilos Antisara Perinthos Basilica UNESCO Abdera Maroneia TEKİRDAĞ (İZMİT) DÜZCE Europos Kavala Doriskos Nicomedia Pella Amphipolis Stryme Işıklar Mt. ALBANIA JOINAllante Lete Bormiskos Thessalonica Argilos THE SEA OF MARMARA SAKARYA MACEDONIANaoussa Apollonia Thassos Ainos (ADAPAZARI) UNESCO Thermes Aegae YALOVA Ceramic Furnaces Selectum Chalastra Strepsa Berea Iznik Lake Nicea Methone Cyzicus Vergina Petralona Samothrace Parion Roman theater Acanthos Zeytinli Ada Apamela Aisa Ouranopolis Hisardere Elimia PydnaMEDITERRANEAN Barçın Höyük BTHYNIA Dasaki Galepsos Yenibademli Höyük BURSA UNESCO Antigonia Thyssus Apollonia (Prusa) ÇANAKKALE Manyas Zeytinlik Höyük Arisbe Lake Ulubat Phylace Dion Akrothooi Lake Sane Parthenopolis GÖKCEADA Aktopraklık O.Gazi Külliyesi BİLECİK Asprokampos Kremaste Daskyleion UNESCO Höyük Pythion Neopolis Astyra Sundiken Mts. Herakleum Paşalar Sarhöyük Mount Athos Achmilleion Troy Pessinus Potamia Mt.Olympos Torone Hephaistia Dorylaeum BOZCAADA Sigeion Kenchreai Omphatium Gonnus Skione Limnos MYSIA Uludag ESKİŞEHİR Eritium DIVINE VINTAGE Derecik Basilica Sidari Oxynia Myrina Kaz Mt. Passaron Soufli Troas Kebrene Skepsis UNESCO Meliboea Cassiope Gure bath BALIKESİR Dikilitaş Kanlıtaş Höyük Aiginion Neandra Karacahisar Castle Meteora Antandros Adramyttium Corfu UNESCO Larissa Lamponeia Dodoni Theopetra Gülpinar Pioniai Kulluoba Hamaxitos Seyitömer Höyük Keçi çayırı Syvota KÜTAHYA Grava Polimedion Assos Gerdekkaya Assos Mt.Pelion A E GTURKEY E A N S E A &Pyrrha GREECEMadra Mt. (Cotiaeum) Kumbet Lefkimi Theudoria Pherae Mithymna Midas City Ellina EPIRUS Passandra Perperene Lolkos/Gorytsa Antissa Bahses Mt.
  • Lycus Dergisi Kapak Baskı Converdli

    Lycus Dergisi Kapak Baskı Converdli

    2015 e-ISSN: 2717-8471 PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ ARKEOLOJİ ENSTİTÜSÜ SÜRELİ YAYINI JOURNAL OF PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY DERGİSİ LYCUS JOURNAL ● Sayı/Issue 1 ● Haziran/June 2020 https://dergipark.org.tr/lycus LYCUS DERGİSİ BİLİM KURULU Prof. Dr. Fikri KULAKOĞLU Prof. Dr. Levent ZOROĞLU (Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Batman Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Ord. Prof. Dr. Francesco D’ANDRIA Prof. Dr. Musa KADIOĞLU (Accademia dei Lincei, Italy) (Ankara Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Prof. Dr. Francesco GUIZZI Prof. Dr. Ramazan ÖZGAN (Sapienza Università di Roma, Italy) (Selçuk Üniversitesi (Emekli), Türkiye) Prof. Dr. Grazia SEMERARO Prof. Dr. R. R. Roland SMITH (Università del Salento, Italy) (University of Oxford, England) Prof. Dr. Havva İŞKAN IŞIK Prof. Dr. Thekla SCHULZ-BRIZE (Akdeniz Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Technische Universität Berlin, Germany) LYCUS DERGİSİ YAYIN KURULU Prof. Dr. Celal ŞİMŞEK Dr. Öğr. Ü. Umay OĞUZHANOĞLU-AKAY (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Prof. Dr. Bilal SÖĞÜT Dr. Öğr. Ü. İnci TÜRKOĞLU (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Prof. Dr. Elif ÖZER Dr. Öğr. Ü. Evin CANER-ÖZGEL (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Prof. Dr. Fahriye BAYRAM Dr. Bilge YILMAZ KOLANCI (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Doç. Dr. Bahadır DUMAN Dr. Çağrı Murat TARHAN (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Doç. Dr. Ali OZAN Dr. Murat TAŞKIRAN (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Doç. Dr. Esengül AKINCI-ÖZTÜRK Dr. Barış YENER (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) Dr. Öğr. Ü. Coşkun DAŞBACAK (Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Türkiye) e-ISSN: 2717-8471 LYCUS DERGİSİ ○ LYCUS JOURNAL PAMUKKALE ÜNİVERSİTESİ ARKEOLOJİ ENSTİTÜSÜ SÜRELİ YAYINI JOURNAL OF PAMUKKALE UNIVERSITY INSTITUTE OF ARCHAEOLOGY ● Sayı/Issue 1 ● Haziran/June 2020 Yayın Sahibi Pamukkale Üniversitesi Arkeoloji Enstitüsü adına Müdür Prof.
  • Lucan's Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulf

    Lucan's Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek a Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulf

    Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek A dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy University of Washington 2014 Reading Committee: Catherine Connors, Chair Alain Gowing Stephen Hinds Program Authorized to Offer Degree: Classics © Copyright 2014 Laura Zientek University of Washington Abstract Lucan’s Natural Questions: Landscape and Geography in the Bellum Civile Laura Zientek Chair of the Supervisory Committee: Professor Catherine Connors Department of Classics This dissertation is an analysis of the role of landscape and the natural world in Lucan’s Bellum Civile. I investigate digressions and excurses on mountains, rivers, and certain myths associated aetiologically with the land, and demonstrate how Stoic physics and cosmology – in particular the concepts of cosmic (dis)order, collapse, and conflagration – play a role in the way Lucan writes about the landscape in the context of a civil war poem. Building on previous analyses of the Bellum Civile that provide background on its literary context (Ahl, 1976), on Lucan’s poetic technique (Masters, 1992), and on landscape in Roman literature (Spencer, 2010), I approach Lucan’s depiction of the natural world by focusing on the mutual effect of humanity and landscape on each other. Thus, hardships posed by the land against characters like Caesar and Cato, gloomy and threatening atmospheres, and dangerous or unusual weather phenomena all have places in my study. I also explore how Lucan’s landscapes engage with the tropes of the locus amoenus or horridus (Schiesaro, 2006) and elements of the sublime (Day, 2013).
  • Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult

    Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult

    ΑΡΣΙΝΟΗ ΕΥΠΛΟΙΑ Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult Carlos Francis Robinson Bachelor of Arts (Hons. 1) A thesis submitted for the degree of Master of Philosophy at The University of Queensland in 2019 Historical and Philosophical Inquiry Abstract Queen Arsinoë II, the Maritime Aphrodite and Early Ptolemaic Ruler Cult By the early Hellenistic period a trend was emerging in which royal women were deified as Aphrodite. In a unique innovation, Queen Arsinoë II of Egypt (c. 316 – 270 BC) was deified as the maritime Aphrodite, and was associated with the cult titles Euploia, Akraia, and Galenaië. It was the important study of Robert (1966) which identified that the poets Posidippus and Callimachus were honouring Arsinoë II as the maritime Aphrodite. This thesis examines how this new third-century BC cult of ‘Arsinoë Aphrodite’ adopted aspects of Greek cults of the maritime Aphrodite, creating a new derivative cult. The main historical sources for this cult are the epigrams of Posidippus and Callimachus, including a relatively new epigram (Posidippus AB 39) published in 2001. This thesis demonstrates that the new cult of Arsinoë Aphrodite utilised existing traditions, such as: Aphrodite’s role as patron of fleets, the practice of dedications to Aphrodite by admirals, the use of invocations before sailing, and the practice of marine dedications such as shells. In this way the Ptolemies incorporated existing religious traditions into a new form of ruler cult. This study is the first attempt to trace the direct relationship between Ptolemaic ruler cult and existing traditions of the maritime Aphrodite, and deepens our understanding of the strategies of ruler cult adopted in the early Hellenistic period.
  • Seminars Mt 2018.Pdf

    Seminars Mt 2018.Pdf

    UNIVERSITY OF OXFORD FACULTY OF CLASSICS RESEARCH SEMINARS MT 2018 Antinous: Boy made God Seminars to accompany the Antinous exhibition in the Ashmolean Museum Lecture Theatre, Ioannou Centre, 66 St Giles’ Convenors: Dr Milena Melfi and Prof. Bert Smith Thursday 11 OCT, 4 PM From Egypt to Hadrian’s Villa: the construction of the image of Antinoos Elena Calandra (Istituto Centrale per l’Archeologia, Rome) Thursday 18 OCT, 4 PM Antinous: boy made god Bert Smith (Oxford) Thursday 8 NOV, 4 PM Hadrian's Legacy and the Villa of Herodes Atticus at Loukou Marco Galli (Rome, La Sapienza) and Georgios Spyropoulos (Ephorate of Corinth) Thursday 22 NOV, 4 PM Antinous at Hadrian’s Villa: from antiquity to the Grand Tour Thorsten Opper (British Museum) Classical Archaeology Seminar Mondays 4 pm, Ioannou Centre Lecture Theatre Organisers: Dr Milena Melfi & Dr Maria Stamatopoulou 1. MON 8 OCT ‘The Sanctuary of Athena Polias at Phthiotic Thebes in its Thessalian context’ Maria Stamatopoulou (Oxford) 2. MON 15 OCT ‘The Aeolian Sanctuary of Klopedi on Lesbos from the Late Bronze Age to the early 5th century BC’ Dr. Kokkona Rouggou (Ephorate of Antiquities of Lesbos) 3. MON 22 OCT 'Now you see it now you don't: Greek sanctuaries and their walls’ Prof. Michael Scott (University of Warwick) 4. MON 29 OCT ‘The theatre and the temple of the Sanctuary of Apollo in Gortyna: new research’ Prof. Jacopo Bonetto (University of Padova) 5. MON 5 NOV ‘Shaping and negotiating sacred terrain in the Sanctuary of the Great Gods on Samothrace’ Prof. Bonna Wescoat (Emory University) 6.