DOCSLIB.ORG

The Borderpolitics of Whiteness

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
The Borderpolitics of Whiteness ACRAWSA e-journal, Vol.3 , No.1 , 2007 EDITORIAL: THE BORDERPOLITICS OF WHITENESS LARA PALOMBO AND MARIA GIANNACOPOULOS We begin this edition by acknowledging to use Irene Watson’s term, “unsettled”.1 the sovereignty of the Cadigal people, We adopt this term and call the space upon whose land we live in Sydney, and of the Conference “unsettled” because upon whose land this ACRAWSA e- this was a space constituted by diverse journal has been produced. However, it intents to challenge the ‘borderpolitics is against the background of the of whiteness’ as a form of power, but it ongoing denial of Indigenous was also a space invested in whiteness sovereignties as well as the unrelenting or constructed through these same ‘War on Terror’, both on and off shore, borders. In other words, complex that we introduce an edition of the racialised relations of power persist even ACRAWSA e-journal on the Borderpolitics in spaces that have been set up to of Whiteness . This edition contains a critique and dismantle them. Discussions selection of papers, first presented at the at the Conference and at the Borderpolitics of Whiteness Conference Community Forum “The Borderpolitics of in Sydney 2006, that contribute to Communities: Marking Cronulla” discussions of the multiple ways in which indicated that much work still needs to borders and their attendant politics are be done in order to develop strategies continually transforming but still across community and academic operational as white colonial power. spaces to continue to contest colonial The essays and literary work that relations of power. We read the comprise this edition bring to attention controversial discussions that took place the historical formations and at the Community Forum as testimony to transformations of the borders of the different modes of questioning whiteness and the targeted violence ‘whiteness’, but also as marking the that these processes produce through differential effects that colonialism their concatenation with a politics of continues to exact upon the bodies of ‘race’. The Borderpolitics of Whiteness people from various communities. The has become a renewed politics of intricate web of racialised relations that vengeance by processes that re- were laid bare at the Forum should be constitute their alignments via the placed and understood within the regulation of the body, across local and broader context of the complex national spaces, and across diasporic operations of colonialism which embeds and transnational formations. divisions and then thrives in these very climates. In saying this we are not The Borderpolitics of Whiteness advocating a politics of sameness or Conference, as the first official easy unities as the way forward; instead ACRAWSA Conference, brought we think that insisting on mapping the together academics, performers and various manifestations of colonial power community activists to engage in a upon different communities and their dialogue around issues pertaining to a interconnectedness is one way to move field that we believe cannot but be towards racial justice in the Australian controversial. The very terrain that the colonial landscape. We believe this to conference played out upon was and is, be a difficult and painful dialogue that ISSN 1832-3898 © Australian Critical Race and Whiteness Studies Association 2007 PALOMBO AND GIANNACOPOULOS: EDITORIAL needs to continue as a way of Forum in December. Perera’s essay negotiating, understanding, intervening meticulously maps the ways in which in and contesting colonial power in the citizenship is deployed as a form of multiple forms that it takes. Discussions internal border control and policing around the ways in which non- “across” a series of “discontinuous sites indigenous communities can engage and contexts”. She pinpoints “a hidden with the politics of racism in the context but nonetheless inexorable logic of of denied Indigenous sovereignties are territorialisation” that binds the racialised particularly urgent and need to be space of Redfern to the space of continued. Cronulla and asks that the events of Cronulla be understood in terms of this We are very privileged in this issue to relation. Without this there is an reproduce extracts of some highly obfuscation of the “sociospatial linkages poignant daily entries documenting life that sustain Sydney as a city constituted in immigration detention by Mina from by racialised and ethnicised borders Mina’s Diary and a collection of poems within a neoliberal regime that both powerfully crafted by esteemed writers recodes and reinscribes colonial Nor Faridah Abdul Manaf The Veil My demarcations, scales and categories”. Body, Tony Birch Not Our Jo b and Within this framework Perera engages Another 113 , Anita Heiss White and Black with the heterogenous effects of the Poetry Readings: Distinct Differences “watershed” of Cronulla to expose the and Ouyang Yu The Last Barrier . These “racist hierarchies and demarcations great works were selected by Dr Helen that are…constitutive of Australia as a Koukoutsis who negotiated with each nation-state”. Her detailed analysis of writer or their publishers, highlighting the the Tamworth council’s decision to purpose of this journal and of ACRAWSA. refuse resettlement to Sudanese families, These works participate in current the decision to ban the Australian flag at polemics of war, race, sovereignty, the Big Day Out, the circulation of the refugee rights and detention centres, Cronulla 2230 Board game, and the border control, religion, white Australia name changes of Governmental and its policies. Their use of literary and classificatory institutions, expose the poetic discourses extends, encourages, “new emphasis on citizenship” as “a inspires and builds up links that work to technology that aims to search out the interrupt dominant narratives on these enemy within”. This is a project that, in issues. Meanwhile, they undo colonial making and remaking the borders ‘imaginations’ that affect in multiple between Indigenous and other ways all readers of this edition. It is with racial/ethnic bodies, “extends at an their gritty critical incisiveness that official level the project of national whiteness studies must connect. purification undertaken at Cronulla Beach”. In distinct ways, the essays in this edition maintain a focus on the operations of In an essay where the intellectual labour borders and whiteness through analyses and analytical rigour of painstakingly of law, geopolitics, history, racial dissecting elaborate documents of the violence and citizenship. The edition U.S. state are palpable, Joseph opens with the articulate and critical Pugliese’s Geocorpographies of Torture essay by Suvendrini Perera, ‘Aussie Luck’: shifts the focus of the edition to the The Border Politics of Citizenship Post global business of empire and war. This Cronulla Beach , a paper first presented paper, which was originally presented as at the Borderpolitics of Communities a keynote address at the Borderpolitics 2 PALOMBO AND GIANNACOPOULOS: EDITORIAL of Whiteness Conference, unravels and global colonial project. This paper lays bare the logic that informs, enables specifically engages with the way in and effectively legalises, the torture of which the bordering of these camps Iraqi prisoners at Abu Ghraib. Pugliese controlled the local shifts from the invalidates the official claim that position of non-white and white ‘object practices of torture “have a unique of labour’ to ‘political subjects’ or nature” by establishing crucial points of citizens of the nation. The essay connection between the practices of foregrounds how these Camps within torture at Abu Ghraib and the U.S.’s their specificities continued the colonial racially supremacist history, a violent techniques used against Indigenous history that continues to shape and Australians to create “white sovereignty” inform the contemporary U.S. nation. but also, as Palombo argues, “these Pugliese argues, through his incisive biopolitical and necropolitical processes analysis of the deployment of legal have been enacted to suit the ‘global’ rationales for defending torture, that aims of a certain transnational form of “torture is officially sanctioned along a sovereignty”. continuum of carefully managed intensities, punctuated by levels of pain In Nomos Basileus: The Reign of Law in a that, the reflexively disciplined torturer ‘World of Violence’, Maria ‘knows’ must not go beyond that Giannacopoulos tracks the points of defined level of intensity that will place connection between three distinct but his or her victim within the domain of legally enabled enactments of white possible death”. Therefore, officially, sovereign power. Specifically, she draws “torture really only comes into being, on excerpts from the High Court Mabo paradoxically, in the death of the judgement, Howard’s celebration of victim”. And it is precisely because of Greeks being “fully integrated” and her this violent logic, through which “Arab own experience of racial violence on a prisoners become metonymic adjuncts Sydney train, in order to contextualise of the external terrain of Iraq”, that these events in relation to the process Pugliese insists that bodies become “the that enables them, that is, ongoing ground upon which the military Indigenous dispossession. She questions operations are performed and through the claim made by scholars of whiteness which control of the colonised country is studies that Southern Europeans secured”. become “fully complicit” with Indigenous dispossession
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Off with Their Heads: Terrorism and Electoral Support for Capital Punishment in Australia*
    27 May 2004 Off with their heads: Terrorism and electoral support for capital punishment in Australia* Sinclair Davidsona, Lisa Farrellb, Clare Felvusa and Tim R. L. Frya a School of Economics and Finance Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology GPO Box 2476V Melbourne, Victoria 3001 b Department of Economics The University of Melbourne Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia Abstract: Terrorist attacks such as the attacks on the World Trade Centre in September 2001 have generated new interest in the debate on capital punishment. It has been suggested that support for the death penalty could be higher in the wake of terrorist activity. Using data from the Australian Election Study we investigate voters’ attitudes towards capital punishment. Paradoxically, overall support for the death penalty at the 2001 Federal election was lower than at previous elections. In this paper we utilise a treatment effects models to model the determinants of those attitudes and to investigate the impact of terrorism on support for the death penalty at the 2001 Federal election. In particular, we address the question of whether voters who felt terrorism was an important issue had higher levels of support for the death penalty than voters who did not feel that terrorism was important. J.E.L. Classification: D72, C35 __________ * The research in this paper was supported by Australian Research Council grant DP0449846: “Economic reform and Australian electoral decision making”. The data used is from the Australian Election Study. We wish to state that those who carried out the original analysis and collection of the data bear no responsibility for our analysis or interpretation of the data.
    [Show full text]
  • Amy Mcmunn SLSP2690 Racism, Ethnicity, Migration and Decolonial Studies Module Convenor: Dr Ipek Demir
    Amy McMunn SLSP2690 Racism, Ethnicity, Migration and Decolonial Studies Module Convenor: Dr Ipek Demir If you would like to cite this work, please use: McMunn, Amy (2020) ‘On Brexit’ SLSP2690 Student Paper, University of Leeds. Introduction On June 23rd, 2016, Britain voted to withdraw from the European Union with a narrow majority of 52% (Antonucci et al., 2017). Dominant rhetoric attributes the Leave vote to the left-behind Britons disseminating the idea of Brexit as an expression of the predominantly white angry working class (Antonucci et al., 2017). Disguising Brexit as the economic anxieties of the white economically marginalised is methodological whiteness, disregarding the role of race (Bhambra, 2017a). The lack of recognition of those left-behind voting Remain, crucially ethnic minorities, highlights the necessity to understand Brexit in racial and cultural terms. This essay proceeds to identify the majority of Leave voters as middle-class southerners provoking cross-class analysis considering individual values, looking beyond simply the left-behinds (Antonucci et al., 2017). The overarching drivers behind Brexit stem from society’s transition to progressive cultural views which has fostered multicultural resentment and anti- immigration sentiment amongst those in declining economic positions and nostalgic towards Britain’s imperial past (Antonucci et al., 2017; Namusoke, 2016). Caution should be taken when approaching the adopted mantra that the left-behinds caused Brexit as evidence reveals the vote was a “cross-class allegiance to whiteness,” (Virdee & McGeever, 2018. p.1810) fuelled by misplaced nostalgia and desire for the resurgence of white privilege (Namusoke, 2016). Exploration of why the left-behind view has so much purchase reveals the long-term political reproduction of the colourisation of the globalisation losers as white which must not be so readily accepted.
    [Show full text]
  • Border Controls and Preventative Counter-Terrorism
    Notes Introduction: Value Trouble 1. Joppke suggests that what has been described as the essential values of Britishness are in fact the ‘nationally anonymous’ values of applied political liberalism (2008: 538). 2. A dispositif is according to Nikolas Rose, ‘a family way of thinking and act- ing, involving calculations about probable futures in the present followed by interventions into the present in order to control that potential future’ (in Aradau and van Munster 2008: 25) 3. That is shared in terms of them being the set of what Parekh calls the ‘ operative social values’ (see Chapter 5) that are established through a wide- ranging and national debate in the process of developing a Statement of Values. It should be noted that the only purpose this author considers that this process should be undertaken is when it is for the purposes of underwrit- ing what the Joint Commission on Human Rights calls the UK Bill of Rights and Freedoms (see Chapter 5). 1 Pre-Emptive Securities – Border Controls and Preventative Counter-Terrorism 1. Please see McGhee (2008a and 2008b) for a more direct exploration of the UK’s recent counter-terrorism legislation. 2. According to the House of Lords European Union Committee (2008: 25), Frontex has six statutory tasks to: (1) co-ordinate operational cooperation between member states in the field of management of external borders; (2) assist member states on the training of national border guards, including the establishment of common training standards; (3) carry out risk analyses; (4) follow-up on the development of research relevant for the control and surveillance of external borders; (5) assist member states in circumstances requiring increased technical and operational assistance at external borders; (6) provide member states with the necessary support in organizing joint return operations.
    [Show full text]
  • Ethnic Relations: a Perspective from Critical Rationalism
    Ethnic Relations: A Perspective from Critical Rationalism Preliminary memorandum for the stream plenary debate at the BSA annual conference, April 2012 Michael Banton In its application to the study of race and ethnicity, the philosophy of critical rationalism expounded by Karl Popper has four prime characteristics. Firstly, it sees scholarly activity as a process leading to the growth of objective knowledge. Secondly, it maintains that this activity starts from the recognition of, and the attempt to solve, intellectual problems. Thirdly, it distinguishes two worlds of knowledge with their accompanying conceptual vocabularies. Fourthly, in its methodology critical rationalism is nominalist rather than essentialist. These four characteristics can be considered in turn. Objective knowledge We judge the work of our colleagues and students to decide whether it makes an original contribution to knowledge. That is the academic gold standard. To decide whether a book, article, or dissertation constitutes an original contribution to knowledge requires an assessment of the previously prevailing knowledge. Those who take the decision ask: to what field might this be a contribution? This can be problematical because important new contributions often do not fit easily into prevailing conceptions of fields and of the boundaries between them. These conceptions change, for both internal and external reasons. The internal reasons spring from the desire to make a body of knowledge coherent. The external ones stem from the availability of funds for research, the academic power structure and the social climate. Some contributions to knowledge extend existing understandings. Others subvert them. A research worker may find that existing theories, explanations or research results are in some respect unsatisfactory.
    [Show full text]
  • 5TH EUROPEAN GEOGRAPHIES of SEXUALITIES CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS (June 21 Update, This Is Not a Final Version)
    5TH EUROPEAN GEOGRAPHIES OF SEXUALITIES CONFERENCE PROCEEDINGS (June 21 update, this is not a final version) Title: 5th European Geographies of Sexualities conference proceedings Edited by: Michal Pitoňák Graphics: Lukáš Pitoňák Publisher: Queer Geography, zs. Márova 2806/10 Prague 5 155 00 Prague, Czechia Publication date: will be updated ISBN: will be updated ORGANIZATION Conference organizers: • Queer Geography, z. s. (responsible organizer) • Charles University, Faculty of Science, Department of Social Geography and Regional Development (host institution) Sponsors and supporters: • Gilead Sciences s.r.o. supported this even in form of donation grant • Czech Geographical Society • The Space, Sexualities and Queer Research Group (SSQRG) of the Royal Geographical Society (RGS) with Institute of British Geographers (IBG) • Primeros Prague a.s. Conference dates: 26-28th September, 2019 Website: https://2019.egsconference.com Emai: [email protected] Members of the local organizing committee: Michal Pitoňák (Queer Geography, Czech geographical society; independent researcher) Jana Kropáčková (Queer Geography) Lukáš Pitoňák (Queer Geography; IT, design; graphics; architecture) Lucie Pospíšilová (Charles University, Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Czech geographical society; researcher) Kamila Klingorová (Charles University, Department of Social Geography and Regional Development, Czech geographical society; researcher) Ondřej Šerý (Masaryk University, Department of Geography; assistant professor) Pavel Doboš
    [Show full text]
  • Studies European Journal of Cultural
    European Journal of Cultural Studies http://ecs.sagepub.com/ New hierarchies of belonging Les Back, Shamser Sinha and with Charlynne Bryan European Journal of Cultural Studies 2012 15: 139 DOI: 10.1177/1367549411432030 The online version of this article can be found at: http://ecs.sagepub.com/content/15/2/139 Published by: http://www.sagepublications.com Additional services and information for European Journal of Cultural Studies can be found at: Email Alerts: http://ecs.sagepub.com/cgi/alerts Subscriptions: http://ecs.sagepub.com/subscriptions Reprints: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsReprints.nav Permissions: http://www.sagepub.com/journalsPermissions.nav Citations: http://ecs.sagepub.com/content/15/2/139.refs.html >> Version of Record - Mar 29, 2012 What is This? Downloaded from ecs.sagepub.com at Universitet I Oslo on October 2, 2012 ECS15210.1177/1367549411432030Back et al.European Journal of Cultural Studies 4320302012 european journal of Article European Journal of Cultural Studies 15(2) 139 –154 New hierarchies © The Author(s) 2012 Reprints and permission: sagepub. of belonging co.uk/journalsPermissions.nav DOI: 10.1177/1367549411432030 ecs.sagepub.com Les Back Goldsmiths, University of London, UK Shamser Sinha with Charlynne Bryan University Campus Suffolk, UK Abstract The article discusses the effects that the debate about the ‘crisis of multiculturalism’ is having on the regulation, scrutiny and the surveillance of migrant communities. Through the story of a young migrant it explores the ways that old hierarchies of belonging are taking new forms within the social landscape of contemporary London. This biographical case study is drawn from a larger qualitative study of 30 young adult migrants.
    [Show full text]
  • Critical Race Theory and Racialisation in Post-7/7 Racist Britain Mike C
    ‘Shut the f*** up’, ‘you have no rights here’: Critical Race Theory and Racialisation in post-7/7 racist Britain Mike Cole Bishop Grosseteste University College, Lincoln, England, UK Alpesh Maisuria University of Wolverhampton, England, UK Abstract The London bombings of 7th July, 2007 (7/7) were a pivotal moment in British society, not only because of the loss of life and injury, but because it was the first time Britain had been attacked by non-white British citizens. This point was underscored by Chancellor Gordon Brown when he stressed that ‘the uncomfortable facts’ have to be faced that the bombers were ‘British citizens, British born, apparently integrated into our communities, who were prepared to maim and kill fellow British citizens’. Here we assess competing explanations for the role of ‘race’ in contemporary society: Critical Race Theory (CRT) and Racialisation. Two central tenets of CRT are critiqued from a Marxist perspective, and the Marxist concept of racialisation is put forward as having most purchase in explaining manifestations of intensified Islamophobia and xenoracism in post 7/7 Britain. Keywords: Critical Race Theory, Racialisation, Imperialism, Terrorism Critique Of Two Tenets Of Critical Race Theory (CRT) CRT is grounded in ‘the uncompromising insistence that “race” should occupy the central position in any legal, educational, or social policy analysis’ (Darder and Torres, 2004, p. 98). Given this centrality, ‘“racial” liberation [is] embraced as not ‘Shut the f*** up’, ‘you have no rights here’ only the primary but as the most significant objective of any emancipatory vision of education in the larger society’ (ibid.) Here we focus on two tenets of CRT: the first is that the concept of white supremacy better expresses oppression in contemporary societies based on ‘race’ than does the concept of racism; and the second tenet is the belief in the pre-eminence of ‘race’ rather than social class.
    [Show full text]
  • Aims of the Criminal Justice System by Kathleen Daly
    Aims of the Criminal Justice System by Kathleen Daly Professor Kathleen Daly School of Criminology and Criminal Justice Griffith University, Brisbane, Queensland AUSTRALIA of: +61 07 3735-5625 email: [email protected] Chapter 17 forthcoming in Marinella Marmo, Willem de Lint, and Darren Palmer (eds.) (2012) Crime and Justice: A Guide to Criminology (4th edition). Sydney: Lawbook Co. (Order of second and third editors is subject to change.) Note: there may be slight additions or emendations as the chapter moves through the editorial process. This chapter updates and revises Chapter 13, which was published in Crime and Justice: A Guide to Criminology (3rd edition, 2006) edited by Andrew Goldsmith, Mark Israel, and Kathleen Daly. 22 April 2011 1 CHAPTER 17 AIMS OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM Kathleen Daly, Griffith University KEY WORDS • discretion • retributive and utilitarian punishment • Crime Control and Due Process Models • processual and dispositive decisions • indeterminate sentencing • desert-based and individualised sentencing Key Words • Introduction THE PRACTICAL AND SYMBOLIC SIGNIFICANCE OF DOING JUSTICE THE CONTROVERSIAL CHARACTER OF THE CRIMINAL JUSTICE SYSTEM System or Collection of Agencies? Justice or Injustice? Criminal? THE FLOW OF THE CRIMINAL PROCESS THE ROLE OF ORDINARY CITIZENS MODELS OF THE CRIMINAL PROCESS Crime Control and Due Process Participant and Analytical Models Medical Model Bureaucratic Model Status Degradation and Status Passage Model Power Model CRIMINAL PROCESS AS FUNNEL PUNISHMENT: VALUES, THEORIES,
    [Show full text]
  • Judge for Yourself: a Guide to Sentencing in Australia
    Judge for yourself A Guide to Sentencing in Australia PUBLISHED BY THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF AUSTRALIA 2 Contents About this booklet Public perception of crime 3 The sentencing options 22 This booklet is published by the Judicial Conference of Australia as a free resource to members of the public who wish to gain a better Our brutal past 4 Appeals against sentencing 23 understanding of the system of sentencing offenders in Australia. The facts behind sentencing 5 Sentencing and news media 24 The JCA is the national representative body for Australian judicial Who’s who of sentencing 6 Criticisms of sentencing 25 officers. It has a membership of some 600 judges and magistrates, and is a non-profit organisation largely funded by its members. Crucial role of parliaments 7 The soft on crime perception 26 A number of courts, government departments and other organisations Australia’s court system 8 A case in point 27 in each state have very kindly provided photographs for use in this booklet. They are acknowledged in the captions below each image. The judiciary 9 Apparent inconsistencies 28 This publication was made possible by generous grants from the Executive branch of government 10 Picture: Defendant in the dock 29 Victoria Law Foundation, the Sentencing Advisory Council of Victoria, the Judicial Commission of NSW, the Law Foundation of South Australia How sentences are served 11 Prison rates / specialist courts 30 and the Law Society Public Purposes Trust of Western Australia. Parole Boards 12 Specialist courts (cont.) 31 The JCA is extremely grateful for the assistance provided by these How sentences happen 13 Qld drug court in session 32 organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Judge for Yourself a Guide to Sentencing in Australia
    Judge for yourself A Guide to Sentencing in Australia PUBLISHED BY THE JUDICIAL CONFERENCE OF AUSTRALIA 2 Contents About this booklet Public perception of crime 3 The sentencing options 22 This booklet is published by the Judicial Conference of Australia as a free resource to members of the public who wish to gain a better Our brutal past 4 Appeals against sentencing 23 understanding of the system of sentencing offenders in Australia. The facts behind sentencing 5 Sentencing and news media 24 The JCA is the national representative body for Australian judicial Who’s who of sentencing 6 Criticisms of sentencing 25 officers. It has a membership of some 600 judges and magistrates, and is a non-profit organisation largely funded by its members. Crucial role of parliaments 7 The soft on crime perception 26 A number of courts, government departments and other organisations Australia’s court system 8 A case in point 27 in each state have very kindly provided photographs for use in this booklet. They are acknowledged in the captions below each image. The judiciary 9 Apparent inconsistencies 28 This publication was made possible by generous grants from the Executive branch of government 10 Picture: Defendant in the dock 29 Victoria Law Foundation, the Sentencing Advisory Council of Victoria, the Judicial Commission of NSW, the Law Foundation of South Australia How sentences are served 11 Prison rates / specialist courts 30 and the Law Society Public Purposes Trust of Western Australia. Parole Boards 12 Specialist courts (cont.) 31 The JCA is extremely grateful for the assistance provided by these How sentences happen 13 Qld drug court in session 32 organisations.
    [Show full text]
  • Death Penalty: an Abolitionist Perspective
    DEATH PENALTY: AN ABOLITIONIST PERSPECTIVE Roland Rich 1. Introduction What do the following people have in common? Socrates, Spartacus, Jesus Christ, Joan of Arc, Danton, Robespierre, John Brown, Sacco and Vanzetti, Julius and Ethel Rosenberg, Ken Saro-Wiwa. 1 They were all executed. The first on the list, in the time of the Greeks and the last, a couple of years ago. The list is testimony to the enduring recourse to the death penalty over human history. There is some evidence that cavemen practised capital punishment 2 and its existence can certainly be found in the Bible and in the lex talionis of the Code of Hammurabi in 1750 BC.3 But the antiquity of an institution is not a justification for recourse to the death penalty in modern times. Otherwise we might still be practising other forms of community sanctioned murder such as ceremonial human sacrifice and cannibalism. This paper will argue in favour of the abolition of capital punishment and will attempt to do so from a legal and human rights perspective. Issues of ethics and natural justice will also arise. The superpower of capital punishment is undoubtedly China with a reported 1,876 executions in 1997. 4 But on a per capita basis, Iran (143) and Saudi Arabia (122) would match China.5 These countries are influenced by chari’a law, a subject I will touch on later. The United States comes next in line with 74 executions in 19976. By examining the Chinese and American situations we are able to look at the salient aspects of the problem.
    [Show full text]
  • Of Hard Copy Library At
    RESTORATIVE JUSTICE INDEX of MATERIALS BELONGING TO FWM MCELREA HELD AT VICTORIA UNIVERSITY OF WELLINGTON RESTORATIVE JUSTICE CENTRE JUDGE FWM MCELREA V O L U M E 1 1 Seminar notes - 1992, Advanced Criminal Law Class. 2 Typed transcript of that Seminar 3 Legal Research Foundation - Order Form : "The Youth Court in New Zealand" 1993 and copy of FWM McElrea paper therein. 4 1993 New Zealand Law Conference : Speech Notes 5 Transcript of New Zealand Law Conference Session 6 Article " The place of negotiated settlement with adult offenders" - from New Zealand Law Conference newspaper. 7 Notes for Advanced Criminal Law Session - 29 March 1993 8 Letter from Cambridge for Te Rangatahi 9 Notes for Guest Seminar 20 October 1993, Institute of Criminology, University of Cambridge 10 The Intent of the Children, Young Persons and Their Families Act 1989 - Restorative Justice? Paper for Youth Justice Conference, 25 February 1994 11 Restorative Justice - The New Zealand Youth Court: A Model for Development in other Courts? Paper for National Conference of District Court Judges, 6-9 April 1994. 12 "By Their Fruits - A future for Restorative Justice" - National District Court Judges' Conference, Rotorua - 6 April 1994 (Rev. Jim Consedine) 13 Comments at Restorative Justice Session, Rotorua 14 "The Role of the Judge" - Seminar in Criminal Law and Policy, 30 May 1994 15 Community Group Conference Report of Douglas Mansill, 3 June 1994. 16 Letter from Douglas Mansill - 30 June 1994, re Community Group Conference system. 17 "Stimulus" - May 1994 issue with Hakiaha article on decision making, and conference preview. 18 Material re Zehr/Justice Department meeting, Wellington 21 June 1994.
    [Show full text]