Arxiv:2101.05318V2 [Gr-Qc]

Home , Ricci flow

arXiv:2101.05318v2 [gr-qc] 15 Mar 2021 osdragnrlsaeiewt h uvtr,trinadnon and torsion curvature, by the given with is spacetime connection general a Consider setup Geometric 10. 2 Sec. in provided are cons In remarks is and 6. theory conclusions torsion soliton Final curvature, Sec. the the 9. in with with Sec. obtained related relation theories is gravity The solution known power-law other derived. cosmological is The equation DeWitt 5. Sec. in h GVI ssuidi e.4 h pcfi model specific MG-VIII The the 4. on Sec. information in main studied a present is we MG-VIII 3, the Sec. In spacetime. GVI ihteaction the with MG-VIII rvt hoyi h ymti eeaallgaiywt h nonmet the with gravity teleparallel symmetric ization the is theory gravity rvt hois o xml,oeo h lentv rvt theo gravity alternative the scalar of torsion one the with example, gravity For theories. gravity mtisfo h imninoe o example, for one, Riemannian the from ometries rvt.G sdsrbdi em fteLv-iiacneto,which scalar connection, curvature Levi-Civita Ricci the the of terms with in accept geometry described best the is considered GR is gravity. (GR) Relativity General present, At Introduction 1 hsppri raie sflos nSc ,w reyrve h geo the review briefly we 2, Sec. In follows. as organized is paper This .Yesmakhanova K. eeaie rvt hoywt uvtr,trinand torsion curvature, with theory gravity Generalized rvttoa qain r band h atclrcase L particular the The particular, in obtained. case, are spacetime FRW equations the gravitational For studied. was band ial,sm rvt hoiswt h curvatur the correspondi with the theories case, gravity quantum some presented. In Finally, detail. obtained. in investigated is F nti ril,tegnrlzdgaiyter ihtecur the with theory gravity generalized the article, this In ( 2 Q abyMrauo uainItrainlCnr o Theor for Centre International Eurasian Myrzakulov Ratbay 1 .Myrzakulov K. rvt.I hsppr ewl osdrtemr eea rvt t gravity general more the consider will we paper, this In gravity. ) uainNtoa nvriy u-utn000,Kazakhs 010008, Nur-Sultan University, National Eurasian hsc,NrSla 109 Kazakhstan 010009, Nur-Sultan Physics, 1 , 2 .Myrzakulov N. , 1 S , 2 T .Yerzhanov K. , = Γ risgeneralization its or Z ρ µν √ nonmetricity = − ac 6 2021 16, March gd Γ ˘ R ρ 4 Abstract u Rcnb ecie ntrso ieetge- different of terms in described be can GR But . µν x [ F + 1 1 ( , F ,T Q, T, R, 2 K .Myrzakul S. , ( 1 R ρ , 2 µν rvt.Teeaesvrlohralternative other several are There gravity. ) n .Myrzakulov R. and , F F + ( ( ,T R, T T L rvt.Aohrpsil alternative possible Another gravity. ) + ) ρ µν F = ) aue oso n nonmetricity and torsion vature, ,trinadnnerct are nonmetricity and torsion e, gWelrDWt qainis equation Wheeler-DeWitt ng ( L , ,T R, n omtiiyaepeetdin presented are nonmetricity and m dfnaetlter describing theory fundamental ed gaga,Hmltna and Hamilatonian agrangian, αR ] . yi h ocle teleparallel so-called the is ry = ) erct.Tecorresponding The metricity. 1 iiyscalar ricity + , 2 rvt.FWcsooyof cosmology FRW gravity. .Yergaliyeva G. , βT stebsso Riemannian of basis the is αR er fteunderlying the of metry drdi e.8 Some 8. Sec. in idered + + e.7 h hee - Wheeler the 7, Sec. µQ βT er,teso-called the heory, + + Q etical tan ν 1 µQ risgeneral- its or T , 2 sanalyzed is + ν T 1 , 2 (2.1) (1.1) , ˘ρ ρ ρ where Γ µν is the Levi–Civita connection, K µν is the contorsion tensor and L µν is the disfor- mation tensor. These three tensors have the following forms

l 1 lr Γ˘ = g (∂kgrj + ∂j grk ∂rgjk) , (2.2) jk 2 − ρ 1 ρλ ρ K = g Tµλν + Tνλµ + Tλµν = K , (2.3) µν 2 − νµ ρ 1 ρλ ρ L = g Qµνλ Qνµλ + Qλµν = L . (2.4) µν 2 − − νµ Here α α T = 2Γ ,Qρµν = ρgµν (2.5) µν [µν] ∇ are the torsion tensor and the nonmetricity tensor, respectively. In this generalized spacetime with the curvature, torsion and nonmetricity, let us introduce three scalars as

µν R = g Rµν , (2.6) µν ρ T = Sρ T µν , (2.7) Q = gµν (Lα Lβ Lα Lβ ), (2.8) − βµ να − βα µν where R is the curvature scalar, T is the torsion scalar and Q is the nonmetricity scalar. Here

i i i p i p Rjk = ∂iΓ ∂j Γ +Γ Γ Γ Γ , (2.9) jk − ik ip jk − jp ik Spµν = Kµνp gpν T σµ + gpµT σν , (2.10) − σ σ 1 Kν = (T ν + T ν T ν ). (2.11) pµ 2 p µ µ p − pµ are the Ricci tensor, the potential and the contorsion tensor, respectively. The key moment of our construction is following: as in our previous paper [12], here we assume that these three scalars have the following forms

R = u + Rs, (2.12)

T = v + Ts, (2.13)

Q = w + Qs, (2.14)

ρ ρ ρ where u = u(Γ µν ; xi; gij , g˙ij , gïj , ...; fj), v = v(Γ µν ; xi; gij , g˙ij , gïj , ...; gj) and w = w(Γ µν ; xi; (LC) gij , g˙ij , gïj , ...; hj ) are some real functions. Here: i) Rs = R is the curvature scalar corresponding to the Levi-Civita connection with the vanishing torsion and nonmetricity (T = Q = 0); ii) (WC) Ts = T is the torsion scalar for the purely Weitzenböck connection with the vanishing curva- (NM) ture and nonmetricity (R = Q = 0); iii) Qs = Q is the nonmetricity scalar with the vanishing torsion and curvature (R = T = 0). Consider the Friedmann-Robertson-Walker (FRW) spacetime. The flat FRW spacetime is described by the metric ds2 = N 2(t)dt2 + a2(t)(dx2 + dy2 + dz2), (2.15) − where a = a(t) is the scale factor, N(t) is the lapse function. The orthonormal tetrad components µ ei(x ) are related to the metric through

i j gµν = ηij eµeν , (2.16) where the Latin indices i, j run over 0, ..., 3 for the tangent space of the manifold, while the Greek letters µ, ν are the coordinate indices on the manifold, also running over 0, ..., 3. With the FRW metric ansatz the three variables Rs,Ts,Qs look like (we assume that N = 1)

LC 2 Rs = R = 6(H˙ +2H ), (2.17) WC 2 Ts = T = 6H , (2.18) NM − 2 Qs = Q =6H , (2.19)

2 where H = (ln a)t is the Hubble parameter. Therefore, these three scalars (R,T,Q) of the metric - aﬃne spacetime (in the FRW case) take the following forms

R = u + 6(H˙ +2H2), (2.20) T = v 6H2, (2.21) − Q = w +6H2, (2.22)

ρ where u,v,w are some real functions of Γ µν ; t, a, a,˙ a,¨ Rs,Ts,Qs, ... and so on.

3 Myrzakulov F (R,T,Q, ) gravity T Let us consider the general spacetime with the curvature, torsion and nonmetricity. In this spacetime, the action of the Myrzakulov F (R,T,Q, ) gravity (or shortly the MG-VIII gravity) is given by [12] T

4 4 S = Sg + Sm = √ g d x [F (R,T,Q, )+ Lm]= √ g d xF (R,T,Q, )+ Sm, (3.1) Z − T Z − T where R stands for the Ricci scalar (curvature scalar), T is the torsion scalar, Q is the nonmetricity scalar and is trace of the energy-momentum tensor of matter Lagrangian Lm. These fourth scalars are givenT by

µν R = g Rµν (3.2) µν ρ T = Sρ T µν , (3.3) µν α β α β Q = g (LβµLνα LβαLµν ), (3.4) −µν − = g Tµν . (3.5) T Here

α Rµν = Rµνα, (3.6)

1 δ(√ gLm) δLm µν = − = Lmgµν (3.7) T −√ g δgµν − δgµν − β are Rµνα is the Riemann curvature tensor and µν is the energy-momentum tensor, respectively. Note that in the action (3.1), we have three independentT variables: the metric, the aﬃne connection and the matter ﬁelds contained in Sm. In this case, the energy-momentum tensor and the hypermomentum tensor are given by

2 δSm µν 1 δSm µν = , H = . (3.8) T −√ g δgµν λ −2 δΓλ − µν The variation of the action gives

µν 2k δ(√ gLm) µν 4 δS = [FRδR + FT δT + FQδQ + FT δ 0.5Fgµνδg + − δg ]√ gd x. (3.9) Z T − √ g ∂gµν − − Let us ﬁnd δ µν . We have T 2 ∂Lm αβ δ Lm αβ δ µν = Lmδgµν + gµν δg 2 δg = (3.10) T gαβ − ∂gµν ∂gαβ 2 αβ αβ δ Lm αβ = Lmgµαgνβδg +0.5gµν(gαβLm Tαβ)δg 2 δg . (3.11) − − − ∂gµν ∂gαβ This equation gives

2 δ µν δ Lm T = Lmgµαgνβ +0.5gµν(gαβLm Tαβ) 2 . (3.12) δgαβ − − − ∂gµν ∂gαβ

3 Note that the variation of with respect to the metric tensor gµν is given by T αβ δ δ(g αβ ) T = T = µν +Θµν . (3.13) δgµν δgµν T Hence we obtain 2 αβ δ αβ αβ δ Lm Θµν = g T = Lmgµν +2gµν Lm 2 µν 2g . (3.14) δgµν − − T − ∂gµν ∂gαβ We now ready to write the gravitational ﬁeld equation. We have

α FRRµν + α(FRgµν ) µ ν FR 0.5Fgµν + ... = (κ FT ) µν FT Θµν , (3.15) ∇ ∇ − ∇ ∇ − − T − where κ =0.5. Let us consider the perfect ﬂuid with

µν = (ρ + p)uµuν + pgµν , (3.16) T where ρ and p are the energy density and matter pressure of the fluid, respectively. The u = (0, 0, 0, 1) is the components of the four velocity vector (uµ) in the co-moving coordinate system µ µ which satisfies the conditions u uµ = 1 and u ν uµ = 0. We choose the perfect fluid matter as ∇ Lm = p in the action (3.1). Therefore we obtain

Θµν = 2 µν + pgµν . (3.17) − T Substituting the obtained expressions into the ﬁeld equations we ﬁnally get

α FRRµν + gµν αFR µ ν FR 0.5Fgµν + ... = (κ FT ) µν FT pgµν . (3.18) ∇ ∇ − ∇ ∇ − − T − Now we want rewrite the action of the MG-VIII with the lagrangian multipliers as

4 S = √ gd x[F λ1(R Rs u) λ2(T Ts v) λ3(Q Qs w) Z − − − − − − − − − − − λ ( s y)+ Lm]. (3.19) 4 T − T −

The variations with respect to R,T,Q, of the action give λ1 = FR, λ2 = FT , λ3 = FQ, λ4 = FT respectively. Thus the action of the MG-VIIIT takes the form

4 S = √ gd x[F FR(R Rs u) FT (T Ts v) Z − − − − − − − − FQ(Q Qs w) FT ( s y)+ Lm]. (3.20) − − − T − T − Let us ﬁnd the variation of the curvature scalar R. We obtain

µν µν µν λ λ δR = δ(g Rµν )= Rµν δg + g ( λδΓ ν Γ ). (3.21) ∇ µν − ∇ µλ Note that the variation of the aﬃne connection is given by

λ λα δΓ =0.5g ( µδgνα + ν δgαµ αδgµν ). (3.22) µν ∇ ∇ − ∇ Therefore, for the variation of the curvature scalar R we obtain

µν µν µν δR = Rµν δg + gµν δg µ ν δg . (3.23) − ∇ ∇ Using the Palatini formalism (see, for example, Refs [22], [23]) and varying the action with respect to the metric and the aﬃne connection, we obtain the following system of the two ﬁeld equations

α FRRµν + gµν αFR µ ν FR 0.5Fgµν + ... = (k FT ) µν FT pgµν , (3.24) ∇ ∇ −ρ ∇ ∇µν − µ ρν ν − µρ T − µν ρ √ g(δ FRg 0.5δ FRg 0.5δ FRg ) + ... = H . (3.25) ∇ − λ − λ − λ λ Let us also here present one important equation. The trace of the ﬁeld equation (3.15) of the MG-VIII becomes 1 FRR 2F +3FR + ... = + FT 4pFT . (3.26) − 2T T −

4 4 FRW cosmological equations

For a simplicity, we consider the ﬂat FLRW metric in the following form

2 2 2 i j ds = dt + a (t) δij dx dx , (4.1) − where a(t) stands for the scale factor. If we write down Lagrangian of F (R,T,Q, ) for this metric and if we assumed that the Universe is filled with matter fields with effective pressureT p and energy density ρ, we obtain s = 3p ρ. Therefore the trace of the field equation (3.24)-(3.25) of the MG-VIII becomes as inT (3.26).− In the FRW spacetime, the action of the MG-VIII reads as

S = dt, (4.2) Z L where the point like Lagrangian of the MG-VIII after an integration by part takes the form

3 = L + L¯m = a F RFR T FT QFQ FT (4.3) L − − − − T 2 2 3 6aa˙ FR + FT FQ) 6FRta a˙ + a [uFR + vFT + wFQ + ( s + y)FT + Lm]. − − − T

Here we suppose that Lm = ǫp(a), (ǫ = 1) and − ± 3 2 2 L = a F RFR T FT QFQ FT 6aa˙ FR + FT FQ) 6FRta a˙ = (4.4) − − − − T − − − 3 2 2 a (1) 6aa˙ (2) 6FRta a,˙ 3 − − L¯m = a [uFR + vFT + wFQ + ( s + y)FT + Lm], (4.5) T where

(1) = F RFR T FT QFQ FT , (4.6) − −− − − T (2) = FR + FT FQ. (4.7) − Here a¨ a˙ 2 R = 6( + )+ u, (4.8) a a2 a˙ 2 T = 6 + υ, (4.9) − a2 a˙ 2 Q = 6 + w, (4.10) a2 = 3p ρ + y, (4.11) T − where u,v,w,y are some real functions of a, a,˙ ... . The associated Euler-Lagrange equations are given by d ∂ ∂ ( L ) L =0, (4.12) dt ∂q˙ − ∂q

5 where q a, R, T, Q, . Let ﬁnd the following derivatives ≡{ T} ¯ ∂ 2 2 ∂Lm L = 3a (1) 6˙a (2) 12FRtaa˙ + , (4.13) ∂a − − ∂a ¯ ∂ 2 ∂Lm L = 12aa˙(2) 6FRta + , (4.14) ∂a˙ − − ∂a˙ ¯ ∂ 3 2 2 ∂Lm L = a (1)R 6aa˙ (2)R 6FRRta a˙ + , (4.15) ∂R − − ∂R ¯ ¯ ∂ 2 ∂Lm L = 6FRRa a˙ + , (4.16) ∂R˙ − ∂R˙ ¯ ∂ 3 2 2 ∂Lm L = a (1)T 6aa˙ (2)T 6FRT ta a˙ + , (4.17) ∂T − − ∂T ¯ ∂ 2 ∂Lm L = 6FRT a a˙ + , (4.18) ∂T˙ − ∂T˙ ¯ ∂ 3 2 2 ∂Lm L = a (1)Q 6aa˙ (2)Q 6FRQta a˙ + , (4.19) ∂Q − − ∂Q ¯ ∂ 2 ∂Lm L = 6FRQa a˙ + , (4.20) ∂Q˙ − ∂Q˙ ¯ ∂ 3 2 2 ∂Lm L = a (1)T 6aa˙ (2)T 6FRT ta a˙ + , (4.21) ∂ − − ∂ T ¯ T ∂ 2 ∂Lm L = 6FRT a a˙ + . (4.22) ∂ ˙ − ∂ ˙ T T Now we assume that ∂L¯ ∂L¯ ∂L¯ ∂L¯ m = m = m = m =0. (4.23) ∂R˙ ∂T˙ ∂Q˙ ∂ ˙ T Thus ﬁnally we obtain ¯ ∂ 2 2 ∂Lm L = 3a (1) 6˙a (2) 12FRtaa˙ + , (4.24) ∂a − − ∂a ¯ ∂ 2 ∂Lm L = 12aa˙(2) 6FRta + , (4.25) ∂a˙ − − ∂a˙ ¯ ∂ 3 2 2 ∂Lm L = a (1)R 6aa˙ (2)R 6FRRta a˙ + , (4.26) ∂R − − ∂R ¯ ∂ 2 L = 6FRRa a,˙ (4.27) ∂R˙ − ¯ ∂ 3 2 2 ∂Lm L = a (1)T 6aa˙ (2)T 6FRT ta a˙ + , (4.28) ∂T − − ∂T ∂ 2 L = 6FRT a a,˙ (4.29) ∂T˙ − ¯ ∂ 3 2 2 ∂Lm L = a (1)Q 6aa˙ (2)Q 6FRQta a˙ + , (4.30) ∂Q − − ∂Q

∂ 2 L = 6FRQa a,˙ (4.31) ∂Q˙ − ¯ ∂ 3 2 2 ∂Lm L = a (1)T 6aa˙ (2)T 6FRT ta a˙ + , (4.32) ∂ − − ∂ T T ∂ 2 L = 6FRT a a.˙ (4.33) ∂ ˙ − T

6 As result, we obtain the following ﬁve equations

¯ 2 ¯ 2 2 2 ∂Lm ∂ Lm 6 a˙ +2aa¨ (2)+3a (1) + 12aa˙(2) +6FRtta + = 0, (4.34) t ∂a − ∂t∂a˙ ¯ 3 2 2 ∂Lm a (1)R +6aa˙ [2FRR (2)R]+6FRRa a¨ + = 0, (4.35) − ∂R ¯ 3 2 2 ∂Lm a (1)T +6aa˙ [2FRT (2)T ]+6FRT a a¨ + = 0, (4.36) − ∂T ¯ 3 2 2 ∂Lm a (1)Q +6aa˙ [2FRQ (2)Q]+6FRQa a¨ + = 0, (4.37) − ∂Q ¯ 3 2 2 ∂Lm a (1)T +6aa˙ [2FRT (2)T ]+6FRT a a¨ + = 0. (4.38) − ∂ T One more equation we get from the following Hamiltonian constraint ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ ∂ =a ˙ L + R˙ L + T˙ L + Q˙ L + ˙ L =0. (4.39) H ∂a˙ ∂R˙ ∂T˙ ∂Q˙ T ∂ ˙ − L T This constraint gives ¯ 2 2 ∂Lm 6aa˙ (2)+6a a˙[FRRR˙ + FRT T˙ + FRQQ˙ + FRT ˙ ] a˙ + L¯m =0. (4.40) T − ∂a˙ Finally we have the following system of the 6 gravitational equations

¯ 2 ¯ 2 2 2 ∂Lm ∂ Lm 6 a˙ +2aa¨ (2)+3a (1)+ 12aa˙(2) +6FRtta + = 0, (4.41) t ∂a − ∂t∂a˙ ¯ 3 2 2 ∂Lm a (1)R +6aa˙ [2FRR (2)R]+6FRRa a¨ + = 0, (4.42) − ∂R ¯ 3 2 2 ∂Lm a (1)T +6aa˙ [2FRT (2)T ]+6FRT a a¨ + = 0, (4.43) − ∂T ¯ 3 2 2 ∂Lm a (1)Q +6aa˙ [2FRQ (2)Q]+6FRQa a¨ + = 0, (4.44) − ∂Q ¯ 3 2 2 ∂Lm a (1)T +6aa˙ [2FRT (2)T ]+6FRT a a¨ + = 0, (4.45) − ∂ ¯ T 2 2 ∂Lm 6aa˙ (2)+6a a˙[FRRR˙ + FRT T˙ + FRQQ˙ + FRT ˙ ] a˙ + L¯m = 0. (4.46) T − ∂a˙ 5 FRW cosmology of F = αR + βT + µQ + ν T To understand the physical and mathematical nature of the Myrzakulov F (R,T,Q, ) gravity (that is the MG-VIII), in this section, we consider the following particular model T

F (R,T,Q, )= αR + βT + µQ + ν , (5.1) T T where α,β,µ,ν are some real constants. Then

(1) = 0, (2) = α + β µ = σ. (5.2) − In this particular case, the Lagrangian (4.3) takes the form

2 3 2 3 = 6σaa˙ + a [αu + βv + µw + ν(y + s)+ Lm]= 6σaa˙ + a B, (5.3) L − T − where B = αu + βv + µw + ν(y + s)+ Lm. (5.4) T

7 Let us ﬁnd the following derivatives:

∂ 2 3 2 3 L = 6σa˙ + a [αu + βv + λw + γ(y + s)+ Lm] a = 6σa˙ + [a B]a, (5.5) ∂a − { T } − ∂ 3 3 L = 12σaa˙ + a [αua + βva + λwa + γ(ya + sa)+ Lma] = 12σaa˙ + a Ba,(5.6) ∂a˙ − { ˙ ˙ ˙ ˙ T ˙ ˙ } − ˙ ∂ 2 3 L = 12σ(˙a + aa¨) + [a Ba˙ ]t. (5.7) ∂a˙ t − Hence from the Euler-Lagrange equation ∂ ∂ L L =0, (5.8) ∂a − ∂a˙ t we obtain the following ﬁrst ﬁeld equation

2 3 3 6σ(˙a +2aa¨) + [a B]a [a Ba]t =0. (5.9) − ˙ From the Hamiltonian constraint ∂ =a ˙ L =0, (5.10) H ∂a − L we get the second ﬁeld equation

2 3 2 3 12σaa˙ + a aB˙ a +6σaa˙ a B = 0 (5.11) − ˙ − or

2 3 3 6σaa˙ a aB˙ a + a B =0. (5.12) − ˙ Finally we get the following system of the two ﬁeld equations

2 3 3 6σaa˙ a aB˙ a˙ + a B =0, (5.13) 2 −3 3 6σ(˙a +2aa¨) + [a B]a [a Ba]t =0. (5.14) − ˙ We can rewrite these two equations in the following standard forms

3H2 = ρ, (5.15) 2H˙ = (ρ + p), (5.16) − where the matter density ρ and the pressure p have the following forms 1 ρ = [˙aBa B], (5.17) 2σ ˙ − 1 3 3 p = [(a B)a (a Ba)t]. (5.18) 6σa2 − ˙ The EoS have the form p 1 (a3B) (a3B ) ω a a˙ t . = = 2 − (5.19) ρ 3a aB˙ a B ˙ − 6 Cosmological solutions

As example of the cosmological solutions, let us consider the power-law solution

n a = a0t , (6.1) where a0,n are some constants. Then 3n2 n(2 3n) ρ = , p = − . (6.2) t2 t2

8 On the other hand, from (5.17) we obtain 1 t ρ = [ Bt B] (6.3) 2σ n 1 − − where we used the following formulas t2−n t1−n B = B , B = B . (6.4) a˙ na (n 1) t a a n t 0 − 0 From (5.18) we get the following expression for the pressure 1 (3 + n)t t2 p = [3B Bt Btt]. (6.5) 6σ − n(n 1) − n(n 1) − − Now we assume that B has the form δ B = , (6.6) t2 where δ = const. Eqs. (6.2) and (6.3) for the density of energy give 6σn2(1 n) δ = − . (6.7) 1+ n At the same time, the expressions of the pressure (6.2) and (6.5) give 6σ(2 3n)n(n 1) δ = − − . (6.8) 3n 1 − The last two equations give that n = 0 that is a = a0 = const. Thus the power-law solution is the trivial at least for our assumptions.

7 Wheeler-DeWitt equation

In the Hamiltonian formulation of ordinary classical mechanics the key concept is the Poisson bracket (PB). In this formalism, the canonical coordinate system consists of canonical position qi and momentum pi variables which satisfy the following fundamental canonical PB relations

qi,pj = δij . (7.1) { } Here the PB reads as

N ∂f ∂g ∂f ∂g f,g = , (7.2) { } ∂qi ∂pi − ∂pi ∂qi Xi=1 where f,g are the phase space functions. Correspondingly, the Hamilton equations have the following forms

q˙i = qi,H , (7.3) { } p˙i = pi,H , (7.4) { } which can be interpreted as the ﬂow or orbit in phase space generated by H. In quantum case the q,p are promoted to quantum operatorsq, ˆ pˆ on a Hilbert space with the following canonical commutation

[ˆq, pˆ]= i~. (7.5)

These operators satisfy the following equations

qψˆ (q) = qψ(q), (7.6) d pψˆ (q) = i~ ψ(q). (7.7) − dq

9 Finally we get the following Schr¨odinger equation ∂ i~ ψ = Hψ,ˆ (7.8) ∂t where Hˆ is the operator form of the Hamiltonian with the usual replacements H d q q, p i~ . (7.9) 7→ 7→ − dq The momenta conjugate to variable a is given by

∂L 3 π = = 12σaa˙ + a Ba. (7.10) 1 ∂a˙ − ˙ Hence we get

3 π a Ba a˙ = 1 − ˙ . (7.11) − 12σa Therefore the Hamiltonian takes the form

∂ 2 3 3 Hˆ =a ˙ L =6σaa˙ a aB˙ a + a B (7.12) ∂a˙ − L − ˙ or

3 3 1 3 2 a Ba˙ (π1 a Ba˙ ) 3 1 2 6 2 4 Hˆ = [π a Ba] + − + a B = π a B + 24σa B . (7.13) 24σa 1 − ˙ 12σa 24σa 1 − a˙ The classical dynamics is governed by the following Hamiltonian equations

∂Hˆ a˙ = a, Hˆ = , (7.14) { } ∂π1 ∂Hˆ π˙ = π , Hˆ = . (7.15) 1 { 1 } − ∂a Therefore, we have π a˙ = 1 , (7.16) 12σa π2 a6B2 + 24σa4B a6B2 24σa4B π˙ = 1 − a˙ + a˙ − a . (7.17) 1 24σa2 24σa According to the Dirac quantization approach, the quantum states of the universe should be annihilated by the operator version of the Hamiltonian, that is

ˆ 1 Hˆ Ψ= π2 a6B2 + 24σa4B Ψ=0, (7.18) 24σa 1 − a˙ where Ψ = Ψ(a) is the wave function of the universe. We now use the standard representation π i∂a. Then we obtain the Wheeler - DeWitt equation ((WDWE) [18]-[19] 1 →− ˆ 1 ∂2 Hˆ Ψ= a6B2 + 24σa4B Ψ = 0 (7.19) 24σa −∂2a − a˙ or 1 ∂2 + a6B2 24σa4B Ψ=0. (7.20) 24σa ∂2a a˙ −

10 8 Relation with the soliton theory

Let us rewrite the WDWE as LΨ= ∂2 U Ψ= λΨ, (8.1) − a − where U = a6B2 + 24σa4B. (8.2) − a˙ Introduce the operator A as 3 A =4∂ 3[U∂a + ∂aU]. (8.3) a − Then the Lax equation

LΛ = [L, A] (8.4) gives the famous Korteweg-de Vries equation

UΛ +6UUa + Uaaa =0. (8.5)

9 Some other generalized and/or modiﬁed gravity theories

We consider some generalized metric - aﬃne spacetime with the curvature, torsion and nonmetricity. In the previous sections, we have considered the MG-VIII theory. In this section, we want to collect some other generalized and/or modiﬁed gravity theories.

9.1 F (R) gravity The action of the F (R) gravity is given by [26]

4 S = √ gd x[F (R)+ Lm], (9.1) Z − where R is the curvature scalar and Lm is the matter Lagrangian. Note that there are some other gravity theories of this kind. Let us we present some of them.

9.2 F (T ) gravity The action of the F (T ) gravity is given by ([7], [27])

4 S = √ gd x[F (T )+ Lm], (9.2) Z − where T is the torsion scalar and Lm is the matter Lagrangian.

9.3 F (Q) gravity The action of the F (Q) gravity is given by [20]

4 S = √ gd x[F (Q)+ Lm], (9.3) Z − where Q is the nonmetricity scalar and Lm is the matter Lagrangian.

9.4 MG-I The action of the Myrzakulov F (R,T ) gravity (or shortly the MG-I) has the following form [12]

4 S = √ gd x[F (R,T )+ Lm], (9.4) Z − where R is the curvature scalar, T is the torsion scalar and Lm is the matter Lagrangian. The MG-I is some kind generalizations of the well-known F (R) and F (T ) gravity theories. If exactly, the MG-I is the uniﬁcation of the F (R) and F (T ) theories.

11 9.5 MG-II The action of the Myrzakulov F (R,Q) gravity (or shortly the MG-II) reads as [12]

4 S = √ gd x[F (R,Q)+ Lm], (9.5) Z − where R is the curvature scalar and Q is the nonmetricity scalar.

9.6 F (R, ) gravity T The action of the F (R, ) gravity reads as [9] T 4 S = √ gd x[F (R, )+ Lm], (9.6) Z − T where R is the curvature scalar and is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. T 9.7 F (G, ) gravity T The action of the F (G, ) gravity reads as [17] T 4 S = √ gd x[F (G, )+ Lm], (9.7) Z − T where G is the Gauss-Bonnet term and is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. T 9.8 F (Q, ) gravity T The action of the F (Q, ) gravity reads as [5], [28] T 4 S = √ gd x[F (Q, )+ Lm], (9.8) Z − T where Q is the nonmetricity scalar and is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. T 9.9 F (T, ) gravity T The action of the F (T, ) gravity reads as [11] T 4 S = √ gd x[F (T, )+ Lm], (9.9) Z − T where T is the torsion scalar and is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. T 9.10 MG-III The action of the Myrzakulov F (T,Q) gravity (or shortly the MG-III) reads as [12]

4 S = √ gd x[F (T,Q)+ Lm], (9.10) Z − where T is the torsion scalar and Q is the nonmetricity scalar.

9.11 MG-IV The action of the Myrzakulov F (R,T, ) gravity (or shortly the MG-IV) has the following form [12] T

4 S = √ gd x[F (R,T, )+ Lm], (9.11) Z − T where R is the curvature scalar, T is the torsion scalar and is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor. T

12 9.12 MG-V The action of the Myrzakulov F (R,T,Q) gravity (or shortly the MG-V) is given by [12]

4 S = √ gd x[F (R,T,Q)+ Lm], (9.12) Z − where R is the curvature scalar, T is the torsion scalar and Q is the nonmetricity scalar.

9.13 MG-VI The action of the Myrzakulov F (R,Q, ) gravity (or shortly the MG-VII gravity) reads as [12] T

4 S = √ gd x[F (R,Q, )+ Lm], (9.13) Z − T where R is the curvature scalar, Q is the nonmetricity scalar and is the trace of the energy- momentum tensor. T

9.14 MG-VII The action of the Myrzakulov F (T,Q, ) gravity (or shortly the MG-VII) reads as [12] T

4 S = √ gd x[F (T,Q, )+ Lm], (9.14) Z − T where T is the torsion scalar, Q is the nonmetricity scalar and is the trace of the energy- momentum tensor. T

9.15 MG-VIII The action of the Myrzakulov F (R,T,Q, ) gravity (or the MG-VIII) reads as [12] T

4 S = √ gd x[F (R,T,Q, )+ Lm], (9.15) Z − T where R is the curvature scalar, T is the torsion scalar, Q is the nonmetricity scalar and is the trace of the energy-momentum tensor (the trace of the stress-energy tensor). T

9.16 Einstein-Ricci gravity The equations of motion of the Einstein-Ricci gravity are given by [24]-[25]

Rij 0.5Rgij κTij + φij = 0, (9.16) − − gijτ +2nRij + fij = 0. (9.17)

9.17 Einstein-Calabi gravity The equations of motion of the Einstein-Calabi gravity (ECG) read as [24]-[25]

Rij 0.5Rgij kTij + φij = 0, (9.18) − − ∂2R gijτ n + fij = 0. (9.19) − ∂zi∂zj

13 9.18 Einstein-Cartan gravity The action of the Einstein-Cartan gravity (ECG) reads as

4 1 4 S = L√ gd x = R(Γ,g)√ gd x + Sm. (9.20) Z − 16πG Z − The equations of motion of the ECG are given by [24]-[25]

[α β] βα βα β αλ αβγ Gij +4B B +2BβαµB BµβαB 0.5gij(4B B + BαβγB ) = κTij ,(9.21) βµ αν ν − ν − α [λ β] λ λ λ λ T + δ Tν δ Tµ = κS (9.22), − µν µ − ν µν ∂L ∂L + ( λ 2Tλ) = 0 (9.23) ∂φ ∇ − ∂ λφ ∇ λ where Tµ = Tµλ,

δ√ gLm λ δLm λ λ λ λ Gij = Rij 0.5Rgij,Tij = −ij , S µν = µν , Bµν = Tµν + δµTν δν Tµ. (9.24) − δg δT λ −

9.19 Einstein-Yamabe gravity The equations of motion of the Einstein-Yamabe gravity are given by [24]-[25]

Rij 0.5Rgij κTij + φij = 0, (9.25) − − gijτ +2nRgij + fij = 0. (9.26)

10 Conclusion

As we mentioned in the introduction, GR has several generalizations like F (R), F (T ) and so on. Among these generalizations of GR, the metric-aﬃne gravity theories have a nice feature by extending to admit not only curvature but both torsion and nonmetricity. This means the MAG is described by a pseudo - Riemannian geometry. The geometrical structure of the MAG can be studied once a metric tensor and a connection are given. In this way, we can calculate the aﬃne connection for the underlying theory. In this paper, we have considered the so-called generalized Myrzakulov gravity or MG-VIII which can be considered as the particular case of the MAG. To simplify the problem, we consider the FRW spacetime case in detail. For this case the point-like Lagrangian and Hamiltonian of the theory is derived. Using this Lagrangian and the Euler-Lagrangian equation, the gravitational equations of the MG-VIII is presented. For simplicity, the particular case of the MG-VIII when F = αR+βT +µQ+ν is investigated. For this particular case, the gravitational equations is considered in detail. For theT quantum case, the corresponding Wheeler - DeWitt equation is presented. The relation with the soliton theory is shortly discussed. These results show that altogether one can say that some ingredients of the MG-VIII are present and work as expected, but some other aspects remain to be properly understood. These aspects of the MG-VIII certainly worth further investigation (see e.i. refs. [4]-[8]).

Acknowledgments

The work was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan, Grant AP09058240.

References

[1] F. K. Anagnostopoulos, S. Basilakos, E. N. Saridakis. Observational constraints on Myrzakulov gravity, [arXiv:2012.06524]

14 [2] E. N. Saridakis, S. Myrzakul, K. Myrzakulov, K. Yerzhanov. Cosmological applications of Myrzakulov gravity, [arXiv:1912.03882] [3] Z. Sagidullayeva et al. Extended Myrzakulov gravity: Lagrangian, Hamiltonian and equations [4] Bajandi F., Vemieri D., Capozziello S. Bouncing cosmology in f(Q) symmetric teleparallel gravity, [arXiv:2011.012488] [5] Yixin Xu, Guangjie Li, Tiberiu Harko, Shi-Dong Liang. f(Q, ) gravity, [arXiv:1908.04760] T [6] Jose Beltrán Jiménez, Lavinia Heisenberg, Tomi Sebastian Koivisto, Simon Pekar. Cosmology in f(Q) geometry, [arXiv:1906.10027] [7] G. R. Bengochea and R. Ferraro. Dark torsion as the cosmic speed-up, Phys. Rev. D 79, 124019 (2009). [arXiv:0812.1205]. [8] S. Capozziello, M. De Laurentis and R. Myrzakulov, Noether Symmetry Approach for teleparallel-curvature cosmology, Int. J. Geom. Meth. Mod. Phys. 12, no. 09, 1550095 (2015). [arXiv:1412.1471]. [9] T. Harko, F. S. N. Lobo, S. Nojiri and S. D. Odintsov. f(R, T) gravity, Phys. Rev. D 84 (2011) 024020. [10] A. Karpelson. Matter as Curvature and Torsion of General Metric-Affine Space, [arXiv:gr-qc/0103039] [11] T. Mirzaei-Rezaei, Alireza Amani, E. Yusofi, S. Rouhani, M. A. Ramzanpour. Observational constraints and stability in viscous f(T, ) gravity, [arXiv:2012.09523] T [12] R. Myrzakulov. Dark Energy in F(R,T) Gravity, [arXiv:1205.5266] [13] R. Myrzakulov. FRW cosmology in F(R,T) Gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C72, 2203 (2012), [arXiv:1207.1039] [14] I. Damianos. Metric-affine gravity and cosmology/aspects of torsion and non-metricity in gravity theories, [arXiv:1902.09643] [15] M. Jamil, D. Momeni, M. Raza and R. Myrzakulov, Reconstruction of some cosmological models in f(R,T) gravity, Eur. Phys. J. C 72, 1999 (2012). [arXiv:1107.5807]. [16] M. Sharif, S. Rani and R. Myrzakulov, Analysis of F(R, T) gravity models through energy conditions, Eur. Phys. J. Plus 128, 123 (2013). [arXiv:1210.2714]. [17] M. Farasat Shamir, Mushtaq Ahmad. Some Exact Solutions in f(G,T) Gravity via Noether Symmetries, [arXiv:1707.03189] [18] A. V. Yurov, A. V. Astashenok, V. A. Yurov. The Big Trip and Wheeler-DeWitt equation , [arXiv:1208.3828] [19] A. E. Faraggi, M. Matone. The Geometrical Origin of Dark Energy, [arXiv:2006.11935] [20] Jose Beltran Jimenez, Lavinia Heisenberg, Tomi Koivisto. Coincident General Relativity, Phys. Rev. D, 98, 044048 (2018). [arXiv:1710.03116] [21] D. Momeni, E. Güdekli, R. Myrzakulov. Cosmological viable Mimetic f(R) and f(R, T) theories via Noether symmetry, [arXiv:1502.00977] [22] G. J. Olmo. Introduction to Palatini theories of gravity and nonsingular cosmologies, [arXiv:1212.6393] [23] G. J. Olmo. Palatini Approach to Modified Gravity: f(R) Theories and Beyond, [arXiv:1101.3864] [24] Wolfgang Graf. Ricci Flow Gravity, [arXiv:gr-qc/0602054]

15 [25] Ioannis Bakas, The algebraic structure of geometric ﬂows in two dimensions, [arXiv:hep-th/0507284] [26] Buchdahl H. A. Non-linear Lagrangians and cosmological theory. Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, 150, N1, 1–8 (1970) [27] Yi-Fu Cai, Salvatore Capozziello, Mariafelicia De Laurentis, Emmanuel N. Saridakis. f(T) teleparallel gravity and cosmology, Rept.Prog.Phys. 79 (2016) no.4, 106901. [arXiv:1511.07586] [28] S. Bhattacharjee. BBN Constraints on f(Q, T) Gravity, [arXiv:2102.12921]