DOCSLIB.ORG

Cultural Heritage 12

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Cultural Heritage 12 CULTURAL HERITAGE 12 CONTENTS Introduction ............................................................................................................ 12-1 Methodology .......................................................................................................... 12-2 Scope and sources of baseline data ................................................................... 12-2 Sources .............................................................................................................. 12-3 Detailed assessment of indirect impacts ............................................................. 12-3 Legislation and planning policies ............................................................................ 12-7 Legislation .......................................................................................................... 12-7 Planning Policy ................................................................................................... 12-9 Baseline conditions .............................................................................................. 12-10 The application site........................................................................................... 12-10 Nature and date of designated heritage assets ................................................. 12-10 The nature and date of locally-listed (HER) sites .............................................. 12-10 Synthesis: the historic landscape ...................................................................... 12-12 Assessment of impacts ........................................................................................ 12-16 Description of the proposed scheme ................................................................ 12-16 Unmitigated impacts ......................................................................................... 12-17 Proposed mitigation .......................................................................................... 12-17 Residual impacts .............................................................................................. 12-17 Conclusions ......................................................................................................... 12-22 CULTURAL HERITAGE 12 INTRODUCTION 12.1 This section of the ES provides an assessment of the significance of the impact which the proposed development, which has been described in Section 3 above, would have on cultural heritage features. 12.2 The term ‘cultural heritage’ comprises many different elements of the historic environment. These are principally below-ground and above-ground archaeological remains, historic buildings and conservation areas, together with their settings, but can also include intangible aspects, such as associations with famous people or cultural perceptions; sacred sites and place-names: customs and craft industries; where appropriate to the scope of the study. Impacts on cultural heritage may be direct (for example, physical removal of archaeological remains during excavation) or indirect (for example visual impact of a scheme on the settings of nearby designated heritage assets). Impacts may be beneficial or detrimental, and short-term or long- term. 12.3 Amongst the complete range of cultural heritage elements, the term ‘designated heritage assets’ is used in this section to cover the following: world heritage sites; scheduled monuments; listed buildings; registered parks and gardens; registered battlefields; and conservation areas. 12.4 SLR is a registered organisation with the Institute for Archaeologists (IfA), and work has been carried out where relevant for the baseline study according to the IfA Standard and Guidance for Archaeological Desk-Based Assessments (2001). 12.5 The archaeology and cultural heritage assessment within this section is structured as follows: a brief description of the legislation, national guidance and planning policies applying to the cultural heritage elements addressed in this assessment; details of the methodology used in this assessment; description of the baseline data relating to the site and vicinity; description of the scheme and mitigation of impact; residual impact following mitigation; and conclusions. Kingswood ERF – Volume 3 12-1 SLR Consulting Limited CULTURAL HERITAGE 12 METHODOLOGY Scope and sources of baseline data 12.6 Legislation and national planning guidance, and regional and local planning policies require consideration of potential impacts on the historic environment from new development in two main categories: direct impacts through physical modification, and indirect impacts on settings of nationally- designated heritage assets and others of national importance which have no national designation. 12.7 The starting point of this part of the EIA has therefore been the mapping of designated heritage assets within 5km of the application site. 12.8 Almost all these assets proved to be of medieval or post-medieval date down to the 19th century (with two exceptions). Acquisition of further data has been focused on providing sufficient information to characterise their contemporary settings and assess the degree of change in their surroundings which has occurred since their construction. 12.9 In addition, data sources have therefore been acquired to assess whether there are any other locally-listed sites which are currently without such designation but still of national importance. 12.10 Analysis of the function and relationships between the assets has been carried out in order to identify any particular relationships between individual designated heritage assets (such as manor house and church in the same village), or designated heritage assets with a particular intended long distance outlook (such as prospect towers). 12.11 The designated heritage assets potentially subject to indirect impact have then been subjected to desk-based impact assessment including ZTV analysis, historic and modern mapping and satellite imagery showing surface features and relief 1. 12.12 Following detailed assessment of those within 2km, it was concluded that there would be a negligible level of impact from the proposed scheme, and that there were no other long-distance specific relationships between those assets and any other more distant from the application site. The level of impact indicated by the desk-based assessment has suggested that site inspection would be unnecessary and site inspection has therefore not been carried out. 12.13 The extensive extraction which has occurred throughout the application site will have removed all physical remains of historic assets which might have existed there. There could thus be no direct impact on any historic assets from the proposed scheme, and there has been no attempt to assess the potential for unknown sites to have existed within the application site. 1 Google earth, accessed on 10th January 2010. Kingswood ERF – Volume 3 12-2 SLR Consulting Limited CULTURAL HERITAGE 12 Sources 12.14 The baseline data gathered includes extracts from the Staffordshire Historic Environment Record (‘HER’), Ordnance Survey mapping and on-line satellite imagery, and earlier mapping held at the Staffordshire Record Office and elsewhere, and published historical works of synthesis. 12.15 Locations and descriptions of designated heritage assets have been obtained from a variety of sources2. 12.16 Details of conservation areas have been obtained from Cannock Chase District Council3: 12.17 For clarity in this section, the designation number of the following types of asset have been prefixed as follows: HER - HER sites; LB - listed buildings; and SM - scheduled monuments 12.18 Designated heritage assets within 5km of the application site and HER sites within 2km are described in summary in Appendix 12/1. Detailed assessment of indirect impacts 12.19 Impacts upon cultural heritage resources may be categorised in a number of ways. Direct impacts are those which involve physical removal or alteration of the fabric of the feature. Indirect impacts are those which affect the setting of the feature, i.e. those elements of its surroundings which contribute to its special historical or archaeological interest/importance. Positive / negative impacts enhance / detract from the special archaeological or historical importance of the feature. Impacts may be short term, long term or permanent. 12.20 Each impact is quantified in terms of the significance of the impact, a product of the magnitude of the impact of the development and the sensitivity of the feature. The magnitude is itself a product of the scale and the nature of the development, while the sensitivity is dependent upon the importance or heritage value of the feature. 12.21 Visual impact assessment for any particular designated heritage asset, or group of such assets, has been based on the identification of the key viewpoints from where the special qualities of the asset and its setting may best be seen and appreciated. 12.22 The likely scale of impact on the views to or from the proposed asset has been assessed initially using the ZTV (zone of theoretical visibility) analysis 2 Locations of assets at http://services.english-heritage.org.uk/NMRDataDownload; detailed descriptions at http://www.magic.gov.uk. and http://www.heritagegateway.org.uk/gateway. 3 Obtained from Cannock Chase Interactive mapping at http://mapping.cannockchasedc.com Kingswood ERF – Volume 3 12-3 SLR Consulting Limited CULTURAL HERITAGE 12 presented in detail in the Landscape and Visual Assessment section (Section 7 of
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Norton Aluminium Residents Liaison Committee- Meeting Minutes Norton Canes Community Centre, Brownhills Road, Norton Canes 16Th June 2016 1800-2030
    Norton Aluminium Residents Liaison Committee- Meeting Minutes Norton Canes Community Centre, Brownhills Road, Norton Canes 16th June 2016 1800-2030 List of Attendees Cllr John Bernard- Chairman of Liaison Committee & Norton Canes Parish Councilor. CCDC Mike Walker, Environmental Protection Manager Chris Richardson, Scientific Officer Norton Aluminium Trevor Bird Foundry Manager, Andrew Street, Environmental Manager, Wayne Harrison Production Manager Paul Clews, Maintenance Manager. Residents Rodney Brown- Vice Chairman Lenard Sharratt Robert Oddy Stephen Hawkins Paul Sanders Meeting opened Cllr Bernard opened the meeting and introduced himself as Chairman of the Norton Aluminum Liaison Committee. Confirmed Mr Rodney Brown was still Vice Chairman. Introductions All parties introduced themselves. Terms of reference- Purpose of meeting Cllr Bernard advised purpose of meeting was to continue to provide a forum at which issues relating to the operation of the site and any concerns of local residents, Councillors and Council Officers can be addressed. It was agreed by the committee that three meetings per year will continue to be held. Option to hold extraordinary meeting if required. Terms of reference agreed by all parties. Presentation by Norton Aluminium Presentation by Mr Wayne Harrison Foundry Manager providing overview of the process at Norton Aluminium. Detailed types of material the company melts (dross, engine blocks, pucks, coppers silicon, aluminium wheels etc) Provided an overview of the furnaces (rotaries & holding furnaces), extraction, launders and finished products. An example charge card passed around the group detailing how product information is required. Questions RO asked what happens as regards fumes & extraction within the plant. TB provided an overview of the DISA plant bag filtration system and how it operates.
    [Show full text]
  • 8. Cannock Project Area
    8. Cannock project area This product includes mapping licensed from Ordnance Survey with the permission of the Controller of Her Majesty’s Office © Crown copyright and/or database right 2009. All rights reserved. Licence number 100019422. Map 5: Cannock historic environment character zones (CHECZs) 21 8.1 CHECZ 1 – West of Pye Green 8.1.1 Summary on the historic environment The zone comprises a very large field, as depicted on map 6, which was created during the late 20th century through the removal of earlier internal boundaries. The field system was originally created as planned enclosure following an Act of Parliament to enclose (1868). Prior to this period the landscape had been dominated by heath land which had formed part of Cannock Chase. The nursery and its surrounding boundary also post date the Second World War. This product includes mapping data licensed from Ordnance Survey © Crown copyright and / or database right (2009). Licence no. 100019422 Map 6: The known heritage assets (sites referred to in the text are labelled). Of particular significance is the remains of a bank which follows the western boundary of the zone38. This feature is contiguous with the parish boundary between Huntington and Cannock. It is therefore possible that this bank was constructed in 38 Staffordshire HER: PRN 01039 22 the medieval or post medieval period to physically demarcate the parish bounds or the extent of the medieval manor of Cannock. 8.1.2 Heritage Assets Summary Table Survival The zone has seen moderate disturbance 2 from agricultural practices, although the earthwork bank was surviving in 2000.
    [Show full text]
  • Mineral Resources Report for Staffordshire
    BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY TECHNICAL REPORT WF/95/5/ Mineral Resources Series Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans Staffordshire: Resources and Constraints D E Highley and D G Cameron Contributors: D P Piper, D J Harrison and S Holloway Planning Consultant: J F Cowley Mineral & Resource Planning Associates This report accompanies the 1:100 000 scale maps: Staffordshire Mineral resources (other than sand and gravel) and Staffordshire Sand and Gravel Resources Cover Photograph Cauldon limestone quarry at Waterhouses, 1977.(Blue Circle Industries) British Geological Survey Photographs. No. L2006. This report is prepared for the Department of the Environment. (Contract PECD7/1/443) Bibliographic Reference Highley, D E, and Cameron, D G. 1995. Mineral Resource Information for Development Plans Staffordshire: Resources and Constraints. British Geological Survey Technical Report WF/95/5/ © Crown copyright Keyworth, Nottingham British Geological Survey 1995 BRITISH GEOLOGICAL SURVEY The full range of Survey publications is available from the BGS British Geological Survey Offices Sales Desk at the Survey headquarters, Keyworth, Nottingham. The more popular maps and books may be purchased from BGS- Keyworth, Nottingham NG12 5GG approved stockists and agents and over the counter at the 0115–936 3100 Fax 0115–936 3200 Bookshop, Gallery 37, Natural History Museum (Earth Galleries), e-mail: sales @bgs.ac.uk www.bgs.ac.uk Cromwell Road, London. Sales desks are also located at the BGS BGS Internet Shop: London Information Office, and at Murchison House, Edinburgh. www.british-geological-survey.co.uk The London Information Office maintains a reference collection of BGS publications including maps for consultation. Some BGS Murchison House, West Mains Road, books and reports may also be obtained from the Stationery Office Edinburgh EH9 3LA Publications Centre or from the Stationery Office bookshops and 0131–667 1000 Fax 0131–668 2683 agents.
    [Show full text]
  • Cannock Chase District Housing Development Capacity Study 2018–38 March 2021
    CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT HOUSING DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY STUDY 2018–38 MARCH 2021 Planning Policy Team Cannock Chase District Council V7 10/03/21 0 CANNOCK CHASE DISTRICT – DEVELOPMENT CAPACITY STUDY (HOUSING) CONTENTS 1. INTRODUCTION 2. NATIONAL POLICY CONTEXT 3. REQUIRED CAPACITY OF LAND FOR HOUSING DEVELOPMENT (2018-38) 3.1 Assessed Housing Need (2018-38) 3.2 Provision for the Needs of Neighbouring Areas under Duty to Co-operate 4. CONFIRMED HOUSING LAND SUPPLY CAPACITY (2018-38) 4.1 SHLAA Housing Completions (2018-20) 4.2 SHLAA Deliverable Sites 4.3 SHLAA Developable Sites (Adopted Local Plan Period to 2028) 4.4 Total Confirmed Housing Land Supply Capacity (2018-38) 5. POTENTIAL HOUSING LAND SUPPLY CAPACITY (2018-38) 5.1 SHLAA Developable Sites (Post Adopted Local Plan Period to 2028) 5.2 SHLAA ‘Restricted and Excluded’ Sites 5.3 Employment Land Availability Assessment ‘Restricted and Excluded’ Sites 5.4 Total Potential Housing Supply Capacity (2018-38) 6. OTHER POTENTIAL HOUSING LAND SUPPLY OPTIONS 6.1 SHLAA Green Belt and/or Green Space Network 6.2 ELAA Green Belt and Green Space Network 6.3 Restricted and Excluded Sites in Alternative Uses 6.4 Neighbourhood Plans 6.5 Cannock Chase Open Space Review 6.6 Housing Estates and Redevelopment 6.7 Public Sector Surplus Land 6.8 Reallocation of Existing Employment Land 6.9 Review of Brownfield Land Register and the National Land Use Database 6.10 Regeneration Sites Promoted for Residential Development 6.11 Sites where Planning Applications were Refused or Withdrawn (2018-20) 6.12 Contributions from Self Build Housing 6.13 Potential Contributions from new Permitted Development Rights 6.14 Contributions from Exception Sites 6.15 Reviewing Density Assumptions 6.16 Additional Potential Sites Identified During Study Process 7.
    [Show full text]
  • Baseline Report: Climate Change Mitigation & Adaptation Study
    Baseline Report Climate Change Adaptation & Mitigation Staffordshire County Council Project number: 60625972 16 October 2020 Revision 04 Baseline Report Project number: 60625972 Quality information Prepared by Checked by Verified by Approved by Harper Robertson Luke Aldred Luke Aldred Matthew Turner Senior Sustainability Associate Director Associate Director Regional Director Consultant Alice Purcell Graduate Sustainability Consultant Luke Mulvey Graduate Sustainability Consultant Revision History Revision Revision date Details Authorized Name Position 01 20 February 2020 Skeleton Report Y Luke Associate Aldred Director 02 31 March 2020 Draft for issue Y Luke Associate Aldred Director 03 11 September 2020 Final issue Y Luke Associate Aldred Director 04 16 October 2020 Updated fuel consumption Y Luke Associate and EV charging points Aldred Director Distribution List # Hard Copies PDF Required Association / Company Name Prepared for: Staffordshire County Council AECOM Baseline Report Project number: 60625972 Prepared for: Staffordshire County Council Prepared by: Harper Robertson Senior Sustainability Consultant E: [email protected] AECOM Limited Aldgate Tower 2 Leman Street London E1 8FA United Kingdom aecom.com © 2020 AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited. All Rights Reserved. This document has been prepared by AECOM Infrastructure & Environment UK Limited (“AECOM”) for sole use of our client (the “Client”) in accordance with generally accepted consultancy principles, the budget for fees and the terms of reference agreed between AECOM and the Client. Any information provided by third parties and referred to herein has not been checked or verified by AECOM, unless otherwise expressly stated in the document. No third party may rely upon this document without the prior and express written agreement of AECOM.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Canes 2014 Issue 7
    August Norton Canes 2014 Issue 7 Stone Me! Would you believe it? Eagle-eyed villagers may have noticed that a historic rock, which used to stand in Norton Green Lane, has been removed and there is a wooden seat in its place next to the bus stop. Recent scientific tests have revealed the rock dates back an incredible 300-400 MILLION years. According to Dr Peter Floyd of the North Staffordshire Archaeological Society, the boulder type is believed to be dolerite. It originated from the Ice Age when two ice flows from Scotland and Yorkshire are believed to have collided in South Staffordshire, bringing rocks to the surface. Local councillor Sheila Harding believes many of the smaller ones ended up in village garden rockeries – their owners unaware of their historic significance. The Norton Green Lane rock was originally found in Little Wyrley in a field owned by the late Hamish Wallace of Little Wyrley Hall. Mr Wallace gave permission for the rock to be transported by tractor to Norton Green Lane where it sat from 1999-2014. Local farmer, the late John Benton extracted samples from the rock, then parish councillor Sheila Harding and local historian Roger Knowles arranged for boulder samples to be analysed by the Open University. Local farmer John Bridgen and his nephew Jamie hauled the rock into its present position in the garden at the junction of Walsall Road/ Burntwood Road. An information plaque will be installed in the garden in the near future. ―It looks great,‖ Councillor Harding said. ―It sits against the back wall in a quiet area.‖ A full report about the rock can be viewed at the parish office or ring Sheila for more information on 01543 275013.
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Canes Staffordshire Case Study: Residential Sector
    Norton Canes Staffordshire Case Study: Residential Sector The Project In 2006 Richborough Estates negotiated an agreement to purchase a former greyhound racing track in Norton Canes, subject to securing residential planning permission. The derelict track and an existing garden centre was situated in the Green Belt, totalling approximately 21 acres. The Approach • The site was identified by Cannock Chase District Council as a preferred location for housing and was promoted through the Core Strategy process • A public consultation with the local community was held to address their concerns, centered around the impact of the development upon the Green Belt, local infrastructure and traffic congestion • Improvements to the local community centre and the provision of alternative grazing land was proposed following consultation with the Parish Council • The site had ecological issues which had to be addressed within the confines of the Cannock Chase Special Area of Conservation The Result • Unanimous approval for up to 130 residential units by Cannock Chase Council • An extensive Nature Conservation Area within the site, comprising 50% of the development • New public open spaces and an on-site children’s play area with links through to Chasewater Country Park • The preservation of existing wildlife around the site • The site was sold to Taylor Wimpey for development in 2014 www.richboroughestates.co.uk Richborough Estates Ltd, Waterloo House, 20 Waterloo Street, Birmingham, B2 5TB t +44 (0)121 633 4929 - f +44 (0)121 633 0718 Case Study: Residential Sector Norton Canes Staffordshire Key Benefits • 130 residential units including affordable housing • New nature conservation area • Improvements to the community centre • New off-site grazing land • New open spaces and children’s play area • New footpaths and cycleways T (+44) 0121 633 4929 www.richboroughestates.co.uk.
    [Show full text]
  • Document 1: Download
    CENSUS STREET INDEX 1851 FICHE 289 Whittington Fisherwick Tamhorn Elford FICHE 290 Weeford Swinfen Packington Shenstone FICHE 291 Shenstone Stonnal Shire Oaks Catshill Sandhill Little Aston Ogley Hay FICHE 292 Ogley Hay Eight Locks Farewell Chorley Elmhurst Curborough Lichfield FICHE 293-295 Lichfield FICHE 296 Lichfield Wall Pipe Hill FICHE 297 Pipe Hill Burntwood Woodhouses Curborough Edial Hammerwich FICHE 298 Acton Trussell Bednall Teddesley Hay Penkridge FICHE 299 Penkridge FICHE 300 Kinvaston Penkridge Dunston Coppenhall Dunston Church Eaton FICHE 301 Church Eaton FICHE 302 Lapley Stretton FICHE 303-305 Brewood FICHE 305-306 Bushbury FICHE 307 Shareshill Hilton Hatherton Saredon FICHE 307 cont. Cannock FICHE 308 Cannock Cannock Wood Hednesford FICHE 309 Leacroft, Cannock Huntington GREAT WYRLEY Address Page Address Page Walsall Road 523-524 Rail Road 537 Toll Gate 524 Gt. Wyrley Hall 538 Watling St. Road 524-525 Mount Pleasant 538 Brooks Lane 525-527 Brooks Lane 538 Cathill Lane 526 Cheslyn Hay Road 539 Walsall Road 527-530 Dunduck Lane 539-540 Bar House 527 Bartons Brook Lane 540-541 Bird in Hand Inn 527 Landywood 541-542 Swan Inn 528 Walsall Road 543-544 Star Beer House 528 Moat House 544 Toll Bar 528-529 Shaw's Lane 544-545 Wheat Sheaf Bar House 529 Warwell Lane 545 Jacobs Hall Lane 530 Stoney Lane 546-548 Jacobs Hall 530 Engine Cabin 549 Walsall Road 534-538 Mr. Yates' Stables 549 FICHE 310 Norton Canes Little Wyrley Wyrley Grove BROWNHILLS Address Page Address Page Wolverhampton Lane 572-573 Watling Street Road 582-583 Brownhills 573-581 (south of) FICHE 310 cont.
    [Show full text]
  • Unit 16 to Let A5, Cannock Staffordshire
    UNIT 16 A5, CANNOCK STAFFORDSHIRE TO LET WS11 9XG 48,632 SQ FT Industrial Warehouse Unit 48,632 sq ft (4,518 sq m) CANNOCK UNIT 22 WATLING STREET (A5) UNIT 21 UNIT 16A TAMWORTH UNIT 16 UNIT 9C OAK UNIT 9B HOUSE UNIT 9A UNIT 1 UNIT 8C UNIT UNIT 2 8B UNIT 8A UNIT 3 COMPOUND 5 UNIT 7 COMP 6 UNIT 10 COMP 7 UNIT 4 UNIT AVAILABILITY COMPOUND 4 COMPOUND 3 COMPOUND 2 COMPOUND 1 SUMMARY Unit 16 - 48,632 sq ft SPECIFICATION Ideally located with direct access to the - Approx 5.5m eaves A5, Watling Street Business Park is an established estate that has a variety - Multiple level access loading doors of industrial units and office buildings. - 2 Dock level loading doors These range in size from 50 sq m to 4,647 sq m (540 sq ft to 48,632 sq ft). - Small amenity block Several secure compound areas are also TENURE available to occupy. The unit is available on a term to be agreed between the parties on a full repairing and insuring basis. A commencing rent of £170,000 per annum exclusive(£3.50 per sq ft) CANNOCK DEVELOPMENT ACCOMMODATION UNIT 22 UNIT WATLING STREET (A5) LAYOUT Unit 1 3,270 sq ft 304 sq m Unit 2 8,465 sq ft 786 sq m UNIT 21 Unit 3 9,685 sq ft 899 sq m UNIT 16A Unit 4 7,063 sq ft 656 sq m Unit 7 540 sq ft 50 sq m UNIT 16 TAMWORTH Unit 8a 2,562 sq ft 238 sq m AVAILABLE NOW UNIT 16 UNIT 9C Unit 8b 2,121 sq ft 197 sq m OAK Unit 8c 3,229 sq ft 300 sq m UNIT 9B HOUSE Unit 9a 4,133 sq ft 384 sq m UNIT 9A UNIT 1 Unit 9b 2,766 sq ft 257 sq m UNIT Unit 9c 4,234 sq ft 393 sq m 8C UNIT UNIT 2 8B UNIT Unit 10 21,590 sq ft 2,006 sq m 8A Unit 16 48,632 sq ft 4,647 sq m UNIT 3 COMPOUND 5 UNIT 7 COMP 6 UNIT 10 Unit 16a 16,194 sq ft 1,506 sq m COMP 7 UNIT 4 Unit 21-22 12,150 sq ft 1,128 sq m Oak House 4,226 sq ft 343 sq m Compound 1 0.8 ac COMPOUND 4 COMPOUND 3 COMPOUND 2 COMPOUND 1 Compound 2 0.6 ac Compound 3 0.5 ac Compound 4 0.7 ac Compound 5 0.5 ac Compound 6 0.2 ac EPC RATING VAT SERVICES/UTILITIES Compound 7 0.1 ac D-79 The rent, price and service charge are all subject to VAT.
    [Show full text]
  • 66 Brownhills Road, Norton Canes, Ws11 9Se
    66 BROWNHILLS ROAD, NORTON CANES, WS11 9SE TO LET BY WAY OF ASSURED SHORTHOLD TENANCY £675.00 p.c.m. THREE BEDROOM DETACHED HOUSE CONVENIENT FOR LOCAL FACILITIES Lounge Landing Cloakroom with WC Three Bedrooms Dining Kitchen Bathroom Gas Central Heating Fully Double Glazed Off Road Parking & Garage To Rear Sorry No Smokers or Sharers THESE PARTICULARS SHOULD BE READ IN CONJUNCTION WITH THE FORMAL NOTICES BELOW 01543 50 54 54 19 Wolverhampton Road, Cannock, Staffordshire. WS11 1DG Facsimile: 01543 466913 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.bootandson.co.uk 66 Brownhills Road, Norton Canes All measurements given are approximate and for guidance purposes only All photographs have been taken with an extra wide angle lens. GROUND FLOOR LOUNGE - 17ft 8ins x 5ft 11ins to 10ft 1in (5.38 x 1.80 to 3.07) overall into stairwell but excluding door recess, with UPVC double glazed access door and side window, UPVC double glazed window, two radiators, television aerial point, telephone point and ceiling mounted smoke alarm. CLOAKROOM - with low flush WC, pedestal hand basin with tiled splash guard and radiator. DINING KITCHEN - 17ft 7ins x 7ft 0in (5.36 x 2.13) fitted with range of base units, drawers, laminate work surfaces, inset stainless steel sink with mixer taps, wall cupboards, electric built-in oven with gas hob and extractor fan over, ceramic tiled floor, UPVC double glazed window, double glazed sliding patio access door to rear garden and ‘Heatline’ gas fired combination condensing central heating boiler. 66 Brownhills Road, Norton Canes FIRST FLOOR LANDING - with ceiling mounted smoke alarm and giving access to: BEDROOM ONE - 9ft 9ins x 8ft 8ins (2.97 x 2.64) with UPVC double glazed window and radiator.
    [Show full text]
  • Census Street Index 1871
    CENSUS STREET INDEX 1871 FICHE 156 Address Page Lichfield 5 FICHE 157 Burntwood 65 FICHE 158 Burntwood FICHE 159 Woodhouses (Burntwood) 5 Elmhurst 17 Curborough 21 Elford 26 Farewell 39 Fisherwick 47 FICHE 160 Burntwood Not indexed Elmhurst Not indexed Elford Not indexed Farewell Not indexed Chorley Not indexed Fisherwick Not indexed Tamhorn Not indexed Hammerwich 53 Lichfield Not indexed Muckley Corner 93b Wall 95 Ogley Hay 99 FICHE 160 OGLEY HAY Address Page Address Page Ogley Hay 88-127 New Road 104 Bells Row 99 Brick Hill Farm, Chester Rd 104 Church Hill 99 Chester Road 104-117 Shoulder of Mutton Inn 99 Wheatsheaf 113 Hope Cottage 100 Miners Arms 114 School House 103 The Square 117 Vicarage 103 Burntwood Road 121 Wolverhampton Road 122-127 FICHE 162 Address Page Ogley Hay 4-17 Address Page Walsall Road 4 Spring Hill 11 Watling Street Road 4 Walsall Road 11 Ogley Road 4-6 Barrack Lane 11 Fox Row 6 Warren House Farm 12A Walsall Road 7-9 Lock House 12 Hilton Lane 9 Weeford 16 Rowleys Cottage 10 Thickbroom 22 Rowleys Farm 10 Packington 23 Cranbrook Farm 10 Swinfen 25 Walsall Road 10 Shenstone 30-49,59-68 Spring Hill Farm 11 FICHE 163 Address Page Address Page Wood End 50 Friezeland Lane 65 Footheley 53-59 The Anchor Inn, Chester Rd. 68 Cranebrook 59 Catshill 68 Pouk Lane 59 Chester Road 68 Whiteacres Lane 59 Shire Oak Cottages 68 Cartersfield Lane 59 The Royal Oak 68 Sandhills 60 Hodgkins Row 71 Shire Oak 62 Robinson’s Row 72 Gilpin’s Houses 62 Clark’s Row 73 Friezeland 64 Ogley Lane 73 Williams Row 73 FICHE 164 OGLEY HAY (cont) Address
    [Show full text]
  • Norton Canes Ward Notice Is Hereby Given That: 1
    NOTICE OF POLL AND SITUATION OF POLLING STATIONS Cannock Chase District Council Election of a District Councillor for Norton Canes Ward Notice is hereby given that: 1. A poll for the election of a District Councillor for Norton Canes will be held on Thursday 6 May 2021, between the hours of 7:00 am and 10:00 pm. 2. The number of District Councillors to be elected is one. 3. The names, home addresses and descriptions of the Candidates remaining validly nominated for election and the names of all persons signing the Candidates nomination paper are as follows: Names of Signatories Name of Candidate Home Address Description (if any) Proposers(+), Seconders(++) & Assentors ALLEN 77 Church Road, Reform UK Kerry L Bladen (+) Stewart P Bladen (++) Paul Gregory Norton Canes, Cannock, Staffordshire, WS11 9PF HOARE 10 Chapel Street, The Conservative Party Sheila J Harding (+) Alan Harding (++) Mike Norton Canes, Candidate Cannock, Staffordshire, WS11 9NT MAWLE 448 Rawnsley Road, Chase Community Christine J Holmes (+) Albert G Holmes (++) Linda Joy Hednesford, Independents People Staffordshire, WS12 Before Politics 1RB STRETTON MBE 49 Walsall Road, Labour Party John P T L Preece (+) Joshua A A Newbury Zaphne Phyllis Norton Canes, (++) Staffordshire, WS11 9QY TAPPER (Address in Cannock The Green Party Amy Tapper (+) Guy M Thursfield (++) Glen Gary Chase) 4. The situation of Polling Stations and the description of persons entitled to vote thereat are as follows: Station Ranges of electoral register numbers of Situation of Polling Station Number persons entitled to vote thereat Jerome C P School, Hussey Road, Norton Canes, Cannock 64 NC1-1 to NC1-1446 Norton Canes Methodist Church Hall, Poplar Street, Norton 65 NC2-1 to NC2-1147 Canes, Cannock Norton Canes Methodist Church Hall, Poplar Street, Norton 66 NC2-1148 to NC2-2187 Canes, Cannock Norton Canes Community Centre, Brownhills Road, Norton 67 NC3-1 to NC3-1323 Canes Norton Canes Community Centre, Brownhills Road, Norton 68 NC3-1324 to NC3-2531 Canes 5.
    [Show full text]