DOCSLIB.ORG

Danielle Keats Citron

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Danielle Keats Citron DANIELLE KEATS CITRON University of Virginia School of Law, 580 Massie Road, Charlottesville, VA 22903 [email protected]; [email protected]; (443) 957-5083 ACADEMIC APPOINTMENTS UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA SCHOOL OF LAW, Charlottesville, Virginia Inaugural Jefferson Scholars Foundation Schenck Distinguished Professor in Law (January 2021-present) BOSTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Boston, Massachusetts Austin B. Fletcher Distinguished Professor of Law (July 2019-December 2020) Courses: Information Privacy Law; Civil Procedure; Free Speech in a Digital Age Service: Chair, Workshops Committee (2019-20) UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND FRANCIS KING CAREY SCHOOL OF LAW, Baltimore, Maryland Morton & Sophia Macht Professor of Law (2016-19)· Lois K. Macht Research Professor of Law (with tenure) (2009-16)· Associate Professor of Law (2008-09)· Assistant Professor of Law (2006-07)· Visiting Assistant Professor (2004-06) Courses: Information Privacy Law; Introduction to Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure; Civil Procedure II; Legal Writing and Research I Honors: UMB Champion of Excellence (2018); Teacher of the Year (2005); Moot Court Board Recognition (Fall 2006) Service: Advisor, MARYLAND LAW REVIEW (2010-19); Clerkship Committee (2016-17); Adviser, American Constitution Society chapter; Curriculum Committee (2013-15); Technology Committee (Co-Chair, 2012-13), Appointments Committee (Co-Chair, 2010-2011, member, 2008); Dean’s Strategic Planning Committee (2009-10); Advisor, JOURNAL OF BUSINESS & TECHNOLOGY (2006-10); Professionalism and Diversity Committee (2006-08). UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO LAW SCHOOL, Chicago, IL Visiting Professor of Law (scheduled mini-visit, Spring 2021) FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, New York, N.Y. Visiting Professor of Law (Fall 2018) (Information Privacy Law course; Civil Rights and Civil Liberties in the Digital Age seminar). GEORGE WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, Washington, D.C. 1 Visiting Professor of Law (Spring 2017) (The New Discrimination: From Cyber Harassment to Scoring Systems seminar) WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, St. Louis, Missouri Dean’s Distinguished Visitor (April 20-22, 2016) UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS, AMHERST, Amherst, Massachusetts Interdisciplinary Studies Scholar in Residence (April 4-7, 2016) FORDHAM UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF LAW, New York, New York Adjunct Associate Professor of Legal Research and Writing (1997-2006) AWARDS AND GRANTS 2019 MacArthur Fellow Grant Recipient, Knight Foundation ($75,000 grant supporting project investigating sexual-privacy law’s role in empowering victims, co-led by Jonathon Penney) UMB 2018 Champion of Excellence 2018 Privacy for Policymakers Best Paper Award for “Sexual Privacy” 2016 Privacy for Policymakers Best Paper Award for “The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General” and “Risk and Anxiety: A Theory of Data Breach Harms” (coauthored with Daniel J. Solove) Best Paper of 2016, International Association of Privacy Practitioners for “The Privacy Policymaking of State Attorneys General” Best Paper of 2014, International Association of Privacy Practitioners for “The Scored Society” (coauthored with Frank Pasquale) Top 50 World Thinkers by PROSPECT UK MAGAZINE, http://www.prospectmagazine.co.uk/philosophy/world-thinkers-2015-danielle-keats-citron (naming 50 “leaders in their fields, engaging in original and profound ways with the central questions of the world today—whether in economics, science, philosophy, religion or feminism. We chose them based on recommendations from our wide pool of writers and editors”). Top 50 Most Influential Marylanders, 2015, Daily Record, http://thedailyrecord.com/influential- marylanders/ PUBLICATIONS BOOK 2 HATE CRIMES IN CYBERSPACE (Harvard University Press September 2014) Excerpted in Newsweek, http://www.newsweek.com/internet-and-golden-age-bully-271800, and Slate, http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/future_tense/2014/10/revenge_porn_laws_sample_text_for_ state_lawmakers.html Highlighted in the “20 Best Moments for Women in 2014” by the Editors of Cosmopolitan (“law professor Danielle Keats Citron published a book on Internet harassment that has the potential to totally shift the legal landscape”) Featured as the centerpiece of an online symposium held by the BOSTON UNIVERSITY LAW REVIEW (October-November 2015). Cited in academic casebooks, including THE FIRST AMENDMENT (edited by Geoffrey Stone et al.), Daniel J. Solove and Paul Schwartz, INFORMATION PRIVACY LAW (5th edition); WILLIAM MCGEVERAN, PRIVACY AND DATA PROTECTION LAW (2016). Reviewed by Erwin Chemerinsky in the Chronicle of Higher Education, Martha Nussbaum in The Nation, Robin West in Jotwell, and many others: “Vividly written and carefully argued, the book is a fine account of law in this area… We should, as Citron argues, reject the facile romanticization of the Internet as the last frontier of true freedom. We should acknowledge that the Internet both facilitates expression and silences, both allows speech and muzzles it… The major contribution of Citron’s book is its lucid summary of the vast network of laws, both state and federal, that are pertinent to cyberabuse. As she shows, we can do quite a lot for victims of cyberabuse without chilling expression… Citron confronts the perpetual free-speech/First Amendment problems attendant to her family of proposals head-on, and the case she makes is persuasive… Citron makes a number of useful proposals for legal reform while convincing readers of the seriousness of the problem.”—Martha C. Nussbaum, The Nation “Danielle Citron’s Hate Crimes in Cyberspace is a breakthrough book. It has been compared, and with good reason, to Catherine MacKinnon’s Sexual Harassment of Working Women. The book makes three major contributions. All are central to furthering the equality of women and men both in cyberspace and elsewhere. The book thus serves as a blueprint for what Citron insightfully calls a new civil rights movement. It gives legal representatives and victims a roadmap for charting out legal actions that can be taken to halt the abuse being currently suffered, and to compensate for past harms. It gives state and federal legislators a menu of options for strengthening the law in this area, so that cyberspace can be a safe as well as robust domain for the expression of views on all subjects. It responds to First Amendment worries about the possibility that her proposed reforms might chill valuable speech, and it suggests paths for interested private parties who want to affect the trajectory here outside the law. It’s a tour de force and I believe it will succeed. It will change the law, change the conversation, and change attitudes toward and regarding this extraordinarily abusive and harmful behavior. It will strengthen women’s civil rights, and thus strengthen women’s equality and at core, it will be a significant step toward ensuring women’s safety in the public space of employment and education, as well as in cyberspace and the home. This is a book to celebrate, to study, to argue over, and, mostly, to use.” —Robin West, Jotwell “Citron…focuses on how online hate speech ruins lives, most often women’s lives. She cites surveys that show that 60 to 70 percent of cyber stalking victims are women, and she details cases in which women have been targeted, defamed, and threatened with rape and murder…The very same things that make the Internet such a uniquely powerful medium for freedom of speech make it a uniquely powerful medium for hate crimes…The difficult question--as always in First Amendment and most constitutional litigation--is where to draw the line. In grappling with that and offering provisional answers, Citron [does] a great service.” — Erwin Chemerinsky Chronicle of Higher Education 3 “This book sets forth a compelling argument that the internet should not be allowed to maintain its ‘Wild West’ anarchic status, because its ability to facilitate cyber-bullying outweighs the virtues of maintaining that status… Hate Crimes in Cyberspace’s main strength lies in its sustained and detailed exploration of the bizarrely convoluted, sustained and extremely hurtful nature of online abuse of individuals… Its pioneering research could and should be used to support the case for introducing a criminal offence of gender-based hate speech in various countries.”—Helen Fenwick, Times Higher Education “To be sure, police and prosecutors regularly fail to enforce existing laws when it comes to online abuse, either because they don’t take the abuse seriously or because they lack the technological skills to find the perpetrators. But while better training and more resources are certainly necessary, Citron argues persuasively that the law itself needs to evolve as well.”—Michelle Goldberg, The Nation “An impassioned call for equal rights for women on the Internet. Citron offers well-considered and modest changes to communications law and judicial procedure that could go a long way toward opening the Internet to safer and wider use by currently victimized groups. Her suggestion that anonymity online should be treated as a privilege that can be lost by violations of a site’s terms of service is particularly constructive… Frightening and infuriating, this demand for legal accountability for Internet barbarism deserves widespread exposure and serious consideration.”—Kirkus Reviews (starred review) “Citron addresses a significant, timely topic in this impressively comprehensive, expertly researched book. An excellent analysis of the social impact of Internet hate crimes.”—Lynne Maxwell, Library Journal (starred review)
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Action. Power. Freedom. FY 2018 Annual Report Action
    Action. Power. Freedom. FY 2018 Annual Report Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Freedom. Action. Power. Freedom. Action. Power. This is our moment— “and I truly believe in us. Because we–NARAL, our members, our extended community–have all of the ingredients necessary to win this fight. This is the fight that NARAL, and all of you, were made for.” —Ilyse G. Hogue, President 2 FY 2018 Annual Report Contents A Message From Our President .............................................................................. 5 Action. Power. Freedom. .................................................................................................6 Financial Overview ...........................................................................................................14 A Message From Our Board Chairs...................................................................19 Boards of Directors & Executive Staff .........................................................20
    [Show full text]
  • Online Harassment: a Legislative Solution
    \\jciprod01\productn\H\HLL\54-2\HLL205.txt unknown Seq: 1 11-MAY-17 15:55 ONLINE HARASSMENT: A LEGISLATIVE SOLUTION EMMA MARSHAK* TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION .......................................... 501 II. WHY IS ONLINE HARASSMENT A PROBLEM?................ 504 R a. The Scope of the Problem ............................ 504 R b. Economic Impact .................................... 507 R i. Lost Business Opportunities ...................... 507 R ii. Swatting ........................................ 510 R iii. Doxxing ........................................ 511 R III. CURRENT LAW .......................................... 512 R a. Divergent State Law ................................. 512 R b. Elements of the Law ................................. 514 R IV. LAW ENFORCEMENT AND INVESTIGATIVE PROBLEMS ........ 515 R a. Police Training ...................................... 515 R b. Investigative Resources .............................. 519 R c. Prosecutorial Jurisdiction ............................ 520 R V. SOLUTION ............................................... 521 R a. Proposed Legislation ................................ 521 R b. National Evidence Laboratory ........................ 526 R c. Training Materials ................................... 526 R VI. CONCLUSION ............................................ 528 R VII. APPENDIX ............................................... 530 R I. INTRODUCTION A journalist publishes an article; rape threats follow in the comments.1 An art curator has a conversation with a visitor to her gallery;
    [Show full text]
  • Officials Say Flynn Discussed Sanctions
    Officials say Flynn discussed sanctions The Washington Post February 10, 2017 Friday, Met 2 Edition Copyright 2017 The Washington Post All Rights Reserved Distribution: Every Zone Section: A-SECTION; Pg. A08 Length: 1971 words Byline: Greg Miller;Adam Entous;Ellen Nakashima Body Talks with Russia envoy said to have occurred before Trump took office National security adviser Michael Flynn privately discussed U.S. sanctions against Russia with that country's ambassador to the United States during the month before President Trump took office, contrary to public assertions by Trump officials, current and former U.S. officials said. Flynn's communications with Russian Ambassador Sergey Kislyak were interpreted by some senior U.S. officials as an inappropriate and potentially illegal signal to the Kremlin that it could expect a reprieve from sanctions that were being imposed by the Obama administration in late December to punish Russia for its alleged interference in the 2016 election. Flynn on Wednesday denied that he had discussed sanctions with Kislyak. Asked in an interview whether he had ever done so, he twice said, "No." On Thursday, Flynn, through his spokesman, backed away from the denial. The spokesman said Flynn "indicated that while he had no recollection of discussing sanctions, he couldn't be certain that the topic never came up." Officials said this week that the FBI is continuing to examine Flynn's communications with Kislyak. Several officials emphasized that while sanctions were discussed, they did not see evidence that Flynn had an intent to convey an explicit promise to take action after the inauguration. Flynn's contacts with the ambassador attracted attention within the Obama administration because of the timing.
    [Show full text]
  • NARAL Ep5 V04 20200623.Mp3
    NARAL_Ep5_v04_20200623.mp3 Jess McIntosh [00:00:00] This limited series podcast is based on the book, "The Lie that Binds" by NARAL Pro-Choice America president Ilyse Hogue with Ellie Langford. Each episode builds on the history terminology and figureheads established in the last. So we strongly recommend that you start from episode one before jumping ahead. Brianna Wu [00:00:18] The truth is, GamerGate is less of an event and more of a playbook to use against someone you don't like. Jess McIntosh [00:00:26] This is Brianna Wu, co-founder of independent videogame studio Giant SpaceKat. Brianna Wu [00:00:32] This is the GamerGate playbook. Find someone you want to shut up. Go to their entire life. Go through all their social media posts. Investigate them and find something to attack them with. And then get an army of people online to scream from the hills about this fact which may or may not be true and destroyed their reputation. The idea is to make the cost of speaking out so high that it's easier to just remain silent. Jess McIntosh [00:00:59] The GamerGate controversy started in August 2014. Brianna Wu [00:01:01] All through 2014 my women colleagues were being basically bullied out of the industry. Jess McIntosh [00:01:09] It was set off after game developer Zoe Quinn was falsely accused by their ex-boyfriend of sleeping with a videogame journalist to garner positive reviews for their company's new game. This led to an avalanche of rape threats, doxing and death threats against Quinn, as well as women who criticized sexism in the game industry in general.
    [Show full text]
  • In the Service of Others: from Rose Hill to Lincoln Center
    Fordham Law Review Volume 82 Issue 4 Article 1 2014 In the Service of Others: From Rose Hill to Lincoln Center Constantine N. Katsoris Fordham University School of Law Follow this and additional works at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr Part of the Law Commons Recommended Citation Constantine N. Katsoris, In the Service of Others: From Rose Hill to Lincoln Center, 82 Fordham L. Rev. 1533 (2014). Available at: https://ir.lawnet.fordham.edu/flr/vol82/iss4/1 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. It has been accepted for inclusion in Fordham Law Review by an authorized editor of FLASH: The Fordham Law Archive of Scholarship and History. For more information, please contact [email protected]. DEDICATION IN THE SERVICE OF OTHERS: FROM ROSE HILL TO LINCOLN CENTER Constantine N. Katsoris* At the start of the 2014 to 2015 academic year, Fordham University School of Law will begin classes at a brand new, state-of-the-art building located adjacent to the Lincoln Center for the Performing Arts. This new building will be the eighth location for Fordham Law School in New York City. From its start at Rose Hill in the Bronx, New York, to its various locations in downtown Manhattan, and finally, to its two locations at Lincoln Center, the law school’s education and values have remained constant: legal excellence through public service. This Article examines the law school’s rich history in public service through the lives and work of its storied deans, demonstrating how each has lived up to the law school’s motto In the service of others and concludes with a look into Fordham Law School’s future.
    [Show full text]
  • February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison
    February 26, 2020 Chairman David Skaggs Co-Chairwoman Allison Hayward Office of Congressional Ethics 425 3rd Street, SW Suite 1110 Washington, DC 20024 Dear Chairman Skaggs and Co-Chairwoman Hayward: We write to request that the Office of Congressional Ethics (“OCE”) investigate whether Representative Devin Nunes is receiving free legal services in violation of the Rules of the House of Representatives (“House rules”). Specifically, Representative Nunes retained an attorney who represents him in several defamation lawsuits in various courts where he seeks a total of nearly $1 billion in damages. House rules prohibit a Member from receiving free legal services, unless the Member establishes a Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”). According to the House Legislative Resource Center, Representative Nunes has not filed any of the required reports to establish an LEF. The relevant facts detailed below establish that the OCE Board should authorize an investigation of Representative Nunes. Representative Nunes’s overt involvement with the highly-publicized lawsuits threatens to establish a precedent that the Legal Expense Fund (“LEF”) regulations no longer apply to Members. Although Representative Nunes is entitled to legal representation and he may pursue any legal action to protect and defend his interests, he must comply with House rules. An OCE investigation will preserve Representative Nunes’s legal right to counsel while upholding well-established House rules and precedent. House Rules Prohibit Members from Receiving Discounted or Free Legal Services A Member of the House of Representatives “may not knowingly accept a gift” with limited exceptions.1 A “gift” is defined to include “a gratuity, favor, discount, entertainment, hospitality, loan, forbearance, or other item having monetary value.
    [Show full text]
  • Civil Recourse Defended: a Reply to Posner, Calabresi, Rustard, Chamallas, and Robinette
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 88 Issue 2 Article 6 Spring 2013 Civil Recourse Defended: A Reply to Posner, Calabresi, Rustard, Chamallas, and Robinette John C. Goldberg Harvard Law School, [email protected] Benjamin Zipursky Fordham University School of Law, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Civil Law Commons, and the Torts Commons Recommended Citation Goldberg, John C. and Zipursky, Benjamin (2013) "Civil Recourse Defended: A Reply to Posner, Calabresi, Rustard, Chamallas, and Robinette," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 88 : Iss. 2 , Article 6. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol88/iss2/6 This Symposium is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. Civil Recourse Defended: A Reply to Posner, Calabresi, Rustad, Chamallas, and Robinette JOHN C. P. GOLDBERG* BENJAMIN C. ZIPURSKY** INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................... 569 I. CIVIL RECOURSE THEORY IN A NUTSHELL ......................................................... 570 II. CALABRESI AND POSNER .................................................................................. 575 A. POSNER ...................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • How to Fix Legal Scholarmush
    Indiana Law Journal Volume 95 Issue 4 Article 4 Fall 2020 How to Fix Legal Scholarmush Adam Kolber Brooklyn Law School, [email protected] Follow this and additional works at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj Part of the Jurisprudence Commons, Law and Society Commons, Legal Ethics and Professional Responsibility Commons, Legal Profession Commons, and the Public Law and Legal Theory Commons Recommended Citation Kolber, Adam (2020) "How to Fix Legal Scholarmush," Indiana Law Journal: Vol. 95 : Iss. 4 , Article 4. Available at: https://www.repository.law.indiana.edu/ilj/vol95/iss4/4 This Article is brought to you for free and open access by the Law School Journals at Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. It has been accepted for inclusion in Indiana Law Journal by an authorized editor of Digital Repository @ Maurer Law. For more information, please contact [email protected]. How to Fix Legal Scholarmush ADAM J. KOLBER Legal scholars often fail to distinguish descriptive claims about what the law is from normative claims about what it ought to be. The distinction couldn’t be more important, yet scholars frequently mix it up, leading them to mistake legal authority for moral authority, treat current law as a justification for itself, and generally use rhetorical strategies more appropriate for legal practice than scholarship. As a result, scholars sometimes talk past each other, generating not scholarship but “scholarmush.” In recent years, legal scholarship has been criticized as too theoretical. When it comes to normative scholarship, however, the criticism is off the mark. We need more careful attention to theory, otherwise we’re left with what we have too much of now: claims with no solid normative grounding that amount to little more than opinions.
    [Show full text]
  • The Lost Nuance of Big Data Policing
    THE LOST NUANCE OF BIG DATA POLICING 94 TEX. L. REV. __ (forthcoming 2015) Jane Bambauer* The third party doctrine permits the government to collect consumer records without implicating the Fourth Amendment. The doctrine strains the reasoning of all possible conceptions of the Fourth Amendment and is destined for reform. So far, scholars and jurists have advanced proposals using a cramped analytical model that attempts to balance privacy and security. They fail to account for the filterability of data. Filtering can simultaneously expand law enforcement access to relevant information while reducing access to irrelevant information. Thus, existing proposals will distort criminal justice by denying police a resource that can cabin discretion, increase distributional fairness, and exculpate the wrongly accused. This Article offers the first comprehensive analysis of third party data in police investigations by considering interests beyond privacy and security. First, it shows how existing proposals to require suspicion or a warrant will inadvertently conflict with other constitutional values, including equal protection, the First Amendment, and the due process rights of the innocent. Then it offers surgical reforms that address the most problematic applications of the doctrine: suspect-driven data collection, and bulk data collection. Well-designed reforms to the third party doctrine will shut down the data collection practices that most seriously offend civil liberties without impeding valuable, liberty-enhancing innovations in policing.
    [Show full text]
  • Updated: February 2021 Curriculum Vitae ARTHUR RIPSTEIN Faculty Of
    Updated: February 2021 Curriculum Vitae ARTHUR RIPSTEIN Faculty of Law Telephone: 416-978-0735 University of Toronto E-mail: [email protected] 78 Queen’s Park Crescent www.law.utoronto.ca/faculty/ripstein Toronto, ON, M5S 2C5 I. Biographical Information: a. Personal Information Born June 12, 1958, Winnipeg, Manitoba; Citizen of Canada and Germany b. Education: 1994 M.S.L., Yale Law School 1986 Ph.D., Philosophy, University of Pittsburgh, Dissertation title: Explanation and Empathy in Commonsense Psychology. Committee members: John Haugeland (director) Annette Baier (second reader) Peter King, Peter Machamer. 1984 M.A. University of Pittsburgh 1981 B.A. (Hons.) University of Manitoba II. Honours and Awards: 2021 Killam Prize for the Humanities, Canada Council for the Arts (Annual Award “awarded to active Canadian scholars who have distinguished themselves through sustained excellence, making a significant impact in their respective fields”) 2019 Keynote Lecturer, World Kant Congress, Oslo, Norway 2019 JJ Berry Smith Doctoral Supervision Award, University of Toronto (Annual University-wide Award. One award is given in natural Sciences and one in Social Sciences and Humanities. First person from humanities selected to win.) 2019 Tanner Lecturer, University of California, Berkeley. (Annual Lecture Series) 2016 Killam Fellowship, Canada Council for the Arts (Two-year leave fellowship, one of six awarded annually in Canada across all disciplines.) 2016 Society for Applied Philosophy (UK) Annual Lecturer. Arthur Ripstein /2 II. Honours and Awards (continued): 2016 University Professor, University of Toronto (special rank reserved for no more than 2% of tenured faculty. 2015 Kissel Lecturer, Edmund J. Safra Center for Ethics, Harvard University.
    [Show full text]
  • Platform Justice: Content Moderation at an Inflection Point 3
    A HOOVER INSTITUTION ESSAY ON Platform Justice C ONTENT MODERATION at an INFLECTION POINT DANIELLE CITRON & QUINTA JURECIC Aegis Series Paper No. 1811 In June 2016, Facebook Vice President Andrew Bosworth circulated an internal memorandum describing the company’s mission. “We connect people,” he wrote. “Maybe someone finds love. Maybe [Facebook] even saves the life of someone on the brink of suicide. Maybe it costs a life by exposing someone to bullies. Maybe someone dies in a terrorist attack coordinated on our tools.”1 Bosworth was not speaking metaphorically. The month after he distributed the memo, Facebook was sued by the parents of five victims of terrorist attacks conducted by Hamas, which had made extensive use of the company’s platform to recruit and organize. Days before, the social media platform had inadvertently broadcast a murder over the streaming app Facebook Live. National Security, Technology, and Law and Technology, Security, National Yet the outrage Facebook weathered in the aftermath of this violence was nothing compared to the scathing criticism it endured two years later after Buzzfeed News published Bosworth’s memo. When the memo leaked in March 2018, Facebook was neck-deep in controversies over its influence on the 2016 presidential election, including the use of the platform’s ad-targeting function by Russian trolls to sow political discord and the harvesting of user data under false pretenses by the Trump-affiliated political consultancy Cambridge Analytica.2 Meanwhile, Facebook’s competitors, Twitter and Google, faced mounting criticism over their failure to curb disinformation and abusive content.3 In 2016, Bosworth’s memo might have been an awkward attempt at self-reflection.
    [Show full text]
  • THE FIRST FORTY YEARS INTRODUCTION by Susan Stamberg
    THE FIRST FORTY YEARS INTRODUCTION by Susan Stamberg Shiny little platters. Not even five inches across. How could they possibly contain the soundtrack of four decades? How could the phone calls, the encounters, the danger, the desperation, the exhilaration and big, big laughs from two score years be compressed onto a handful of CDs? If you’ve lived with NPR, as so many of us have for so many years, you’ll be astonished at how many of these reports and conversations and reveries you remember—or how many come back to you (like familiar songs) after hearing just a few seconds of sound. And you’ll be amazed by how much you’ve missed—loyal as you are, you were too busy that day, or too distracted, or out of town, or giving birth (guess that falls under the “too distracted” category). Many of you have integrated NPR into your daily lives; you feel personally connected with it. NPR has gotten you through some fairly dramatic moments. Not just important historical events, but personal moments as well. I’ve been told that a woman’s terror during a CAT scan was tamed by the voice of Ira Flatow on Science Friday being piped into the dreaded scanner tube. So much of life is here. War, from the horrors of Vietnam to the brutalities that evanescent medium—they came to life, then disappeared. Now, of Iraq. Politics, from the intrigue of Watergate to the drama of the Anita on these CDs, all the extraordinary people and places and sounds Hill-Clarence Thomas controversy.
    [Show full text]