Annual Report 2020
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
										Recommended publications
									
								- 
												  Greensill Capital (UK) Limited-V-Reuters 2020 EWHC 1325Neutral Citation Number: [2020] EWHC 1325 (QB) Case No: QB-2019-002773 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MEDIA & COMMUNICATIONS LIST Date: 14 May 2020 Before: THE HONOURABLE MR JUSTICE NICKLIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Between: (1) GREENSILL CAPITAL (UK) LIMITED (2) ALEXANDER GREENSILL Claimants - and – REUTERS NEWS AND MEDIA LIMITED Defendant - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Adrienne Page QC and Jonathan Barnes (instructed by Schillings International LLP) appeared on behalf of the Claimants Catrin Evans QC (instructed by Pinsent Masons LLP) appeared on behalf of the Defendant Hearing date: 14 May 2020 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Approved Judgment This Transcript is Crown Copyright. It may not be reproduced in whole or in part other than in accordance with relevant licence or with the express consent of the Authority. All rights are reserved. Digital Transcription by Marten Walsh Cherer Ltd., 2nd Floor, Quality House, 6-9 Quality Court, Chancery Lane, London WC2A 1HP. Telephone No: 020 7067 2900. Fax No: 020 7831 6864 DX 410 LDE Email: [email protected] Web: www.martenwalshcherer.com The Honourable Mr Justice Nicklin Greensill Capital & Another -v- Reuters Approved Judgment 14.05.20 MR JUSTICE NICKLIN : 1. This is a claim for libel. As set out in the Particulars of Claim, the First Claimant is a financial services company that specialises in supply chain finance and securitising future guarantee cashflows. The Second Claimant founded the First Claimant in 2011 and he is its Chief Executive Officer. 2. The Defendant is a well-known international news publisher. The UK edition of its website can be found at uk.reuters.com (“the Website”). 3. From around midday on 7 July 2019, the Defendant published an article on the Website in the Business News section under the headline: “Exclusive: Greensill issued false statement on bonds sold by metals tycoon Gupta” (“the Article”).
- 
												  Treasury Committee Oral Evidence: Lessons from Greensill Capital, HC 151Treasury Committee Oral evidence: Lessons from Greensill Capital, HC 151 Tuesday 11 May 2021 Ordered by the House of Commons to be published on 11 May 2021. Watch the meeting Members present: Mel Stride (Chair); Rushanara Ali; Mr Steve Baker; Harriett Baldwin; Anthony Browne; Felicity Buchan; Dame Angela Eagle; Emma Hardy; Julie Marson; Siobhain McDonagh; Alison Thewliss. Questions 84-294 Witnesses I: Alexander Greensill CBE. Examination of witness Witness: Lex Greensill. Q84 Chair: Good afternoon and welcome to the Treasury Committee evidence session on the lessons from Greensill Capital. We are very pleased to be joined by one witness this afternoon, Lex Greensill. Lex, welcome to the Committee. For the public record, could I ask you very briefly to introduce yourself to the Committee? I believe that you have a short statement that you would like to make to the Committee, so can you make your brief introduction and statement, please? Lex Greensill: My name is Lex Greensill. Thank you for the opportunity to participate in this important hearing and to answer your questions, and I hope to provide clarity and greater understanding of the issues before us. Please understand that I bear complete responsibility for the collapse of Greensill Capital. I am desperately saddened that more than 1,000 very hard-working people have lost their jobs at Greensill. Likewise, I take full responsibility for any hardship being felt by our clients and their suppliers, and indeed by investors in our programmes. It is deeply regrettable that we were let down by our leading insurer, whose actions ensured Greensill’s collapse, and indeed by some of our biggest customers.
- 
												  Pulse of Fintech H2 2019Pulse of Fintech H2 2019 February 2020 Welcome message Welcome to the 2019 end-of-year edition of KPMG’s Pulse of Fintech — KPMG Fintech professionals a biannual report highlighting key trends and activities within the fintech include partners and staff in over market globally and in key jurisdictions around the world. 50 fintech hubs around theworld, working closely with financial After a massive year of investment in 2018, total global fintech institutions, digital banks and fintech investment remained high in 2019 with over $135.7 billion invested companies to help them understand globally across M&A, PE and VC deals. While the total number of fintech the signals of change, identify the deals declined, the fintech market saw median VC deal sizes grow in growth opportunities, and develop most jurisdictions around the world as maturing fintechs attracted larger and execute their strategicplans. funding rounds. Fintech-focused M&A activity was also very strong, propelled by a record-shattering quarterly high of $66.85 billion in M&A investment in Q3’19. The Americas and Europe both saw strong levels of fintech investment during 2019. In Asia, total annual fintech investment dropped compared to 2018’s massive peak high. However, on a quarterly basis it remained quite steady compared to all but the massive outlier quarter that was Q2’18. All jurisdictions saw a decline in their fintech deal volume during 2019 — a fact that reflects the growing maturity of fintech companies and the increasing focus of investors on late-stage and follow-on deals. Payments, including digital banking, remained the hottest area of fintech investment globally, with a significant amount of focus on mature startups working to expand geographically or to grow their product breadth.
- 
												  Northern Irish Society in the Wake of BrexitNorthern Irish Society in the Wake of Brexit By Agnès Maillot Since the 2016 referendum, Brexit has dominated the political conversation in Northern Ireland, launching a debate on the Irish reunification and exacerbating communitarian tensions within Northern Irish society. What are the social and economic roots of these conflicts, and what is at stake for Northern Ireland’s future? “No Irish sea border”, “EU out of Ulster”, “NI Protocol makes GFA null and void”. These are some of the graffiti that have appeared on the walls of some Northern Irish communities in recent weeks. They all express Loyalist1 frustration, and sometimes anger, towards the terms of the Withdrawal Agreement reached in 2019 between the UK and the EU, which includes a specific section on Northern Ireland.2 While the message behind these phrases might seem cryptic to the outsider, it is a language that most of the Irish, and more specifically Northern Irish, can speak fluently. For the last four years, Brexit has regularly been making the news headlines and has dominated political conversations. More importantly, it has introduced a new dimension in the way in which the future of the UK province is discussed, prompting a debate on the reunification of the island and exacerbating a crisis within Unionism. Brexit has destabilised the Unionist community, whose sense of identity had already been tested over the last twenty years by the Peace process, by the 1 In Northern Ireland, the two main political families are Unionism (those bent on maintaining the Union with the2 The UK) withdrawal and Nationalis agreementm, wh wasich reached strives into Octoberachieve 2019a United and subsequentlyIreland.
- 
												  Brexit Transition and Northern Ireland: a Reading ListResearch and Information Service Briefing Paper Paper 31/20 31 December 2020 NIAR 182-2020 Compiled by Seán McGeown Brexit Transition and Northern Ireland: A Reading List Research and Information Service briefings are compiled for the benefit of MLAs and their support staff. Authors are available to discuss the contents of these papers with Members and their staff but cannot advise members of the general public. We do, however, welcome written evidence that relates to our papers and this should be sent to the Research and Information Service, Northern Ireland Assembly, Room 139, Parliament Buildings, Belfast BT4 3XX or e-mailed to [email protected] Providing research and information services to the Northern Ireland Assembly NIAR 92-17 Briefing Paper Table of Contents 1. INTRODUCTION 2. GOVERNMENTS United Kingdom Government Government of Ireland Northern Ireland Executive Welsh Government Scottish Government 3. LEGISLATURES Westminster Parliament Houses of the Oireachtas/Tithe an Oireachtas Northern Ireland Assembly Senedd Cymru/Welsh Parliament Scottish Parliament 4. EU INSTITUTIONS European Council and Council of the European Union European Commission European Parliament 5. COMMENTARY AND ANALYSIS Brexit Institute (Dublin City University) Briefings for Britain (formerly Briefings for Brexit) British Irish Chamber of Commerce Brookings Institution Carnegie Europe Centre for Brexit Policy Centre for Brexit Studies (University of Birmingham) Centre for Cross Border Studies Centre for European Reform Centre on Constitutional Change Committee
- 
												  THE BORDER INTO BREXIT: Perspectives from Local Communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland/Northern Ireland Executive SummaryTHE BORDER INTO BREXIT: Perspectives from Local Communities in the Central Border Region of Ireland/Northern Ireland Executive Summary B 3 B 3 O 1 R 1 D 2 E 1 R 1 E 1 X 8 I 1 N 1 T 1 O 1 T 1 Contents Contents List of Figures ..................................................................................................... 5 Foreword ............................................................................................................. 6 Acknowledgements .......................................................................................... 8 Executive Summary ......................................................................................... 10 The project .................................................................................................................................................... 10 Impact of Brexit ............................................................................................................................................ 10 A hard border .................................................................................................................................................11 Leave supporters in the border region ................................................................................................ 12 A No Deal Brexit .......................................................................................................................................... 12 The Revised Protocol in the Withdrawal Agreement .....................................................................
- 
												  Introductory ReportHOUSE OF LORDS European Affairs Committee 2nd Report of Session 2021-22 Report from the Sub-Committee on the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland: Introductory report Ordered to be printed 21 July 2021 and published 29 July 2021 Published by the Authority of the House of Lords HL Paper 55 The European Affairs Committee and the Sub-Committee on the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland The European Affairs Committee was appointed to consider matters relating to the United Kingdom’s relationship with the European Union and the European Economic Area, including the implementation and governance structures of any agreements between the United Kingdom and the European Union; to consider European Union documents deposited in the House by a minister; and to support the House as appropriate in interparliamentary cooperation with the European Parliament and the Member States of the European Union. The Sub-Committee on the Protocol on Ireland/Northern Ireland was appointed by the European Affairs Committee to consider all matters related to the Protocol, including scrutiny of: EU legislation within the scope of the Protocol; relevant domestic UK legislation and policy; the Northern Ireland-related work of the governance bodies established under the UK-EU Withdrawal Agreement; the Protocol’s political and socio-economic impact on Northern Ireland; and its impact on UK-Irish bilateral relations; as well as conducting interparliamentary dialogue, including with the Northern Ireland Assembly and Irish Oireachtas. Membership The Members of the European
- 
												  Law+In+Society+2020+Crisis+Compressed.PdfACKNOWLEDGMENTS Many thanks to everyone who made the production and publication of the 2020 Sydney University Law Society Law in Society Journal possible. In particular, we would like to thank the Sydney Law School and the University of Sydney Union for their continued support of SULS and its publications. We acknowledge the traditional Aboriginal owners of the land that the University of Sydney is built upon, the Gadigal People of the Eora Nation. We acknowledge that this was and always will be Aboriginal Land and are proud to be on the lands of one of the oldest surviving cultures in existence. We respect the knowledge that traditional elders and Aboriginal people hold and pass on from generation to generation, and acknowledge the continuous fight for constitutional reform and treaty recognition to this day. We regret that white supremacy has been used to justify Indigenous dispossession, colonial rule and violence in the past, in particular, a legal and political system that still to this date doesn’t provide Aboriginal people with justice. EDITORS Editorial Team: Zachary O’Meara (Editor-in-Chief), Alexander Bird, Annie Chen, Alexander MacIntyre, Vanessa Li Publications Director: Alison Chen Design Director: Daniel Lee Aniceto Design Team: Justine Hu, Arasa Hardie, Gemma Wu, Michelle Chen and Shaily Shrestha SULS Office Monday to Thursday 10am-2pm Tuesday extended hours 10am-6pm Room 103 New Law Building Annex F10 University of Sydney Camperdown NSW 2006 Phone (02) 9352 0204 Website www.suls.org.au Facebook @SydneyUniversityLawSociety Instagram @suls_sydney All contents © Sydney University Law Society Incorporated 2020 All references to ‘Sydney University Law Society’ or ‘SULS’ refers to Sydney University Law Society Inc., an incorporated charitable association registered in the state of New South Wales.
- 
												  Public Hearing with Elke König, Chair of the Single Resolution Board ECON on 1 July 2021BRIEFING Public hearing with Elke König, Chair of the Single Resolution Board ECON on 1 July 2021 This note is prepared in view of an ordinary public hearing with the Chair of the Single Resolution Board (SRB), Elke König, which will take place on 1 July 2021. The Chair will present the SRB’s annual report for 2020. This briefing addresses (i) the review of the crisis management framework, and in particular the SRB’s input to the Commission’s public consultation; (ii) MREL policy and statistics; (iii) liquidity in resolution; (iv) the relationship with the United Kingdom: contractual recognition of bailinable liabilities issued under third country laws; (v) developments in respect of particular resolution cases; (vi) contributions to the Single Resolution Fund; and (vii) SRB and some other publications. 1. Review of the crisis management framework As part of its 2021 Work Programme, the Commission is reviewing the bank crisis management and deposit insurance (CMDI) frameworks, which covers in particular the Bank Recovery and Resolution Directive (BRRD) (see an earlier EGOV briefing on the review). The Commission launched a public consultation which closed on 20 May 2021, and has indicated that it expects to make a legislative proposal in the last quarter of 2021. The SRB published both its response to the consultation and separately a blueprint for the CMDI framework review. The ECB also published its response. Common and interlinked themes raised in the review and addressed by the SRB in its responses include: • Public interest assessment. If a bank under SRB’s remit is failing or likely to fail, the SRB needs to decide if there is public interest in resolving it.
- 
												  CONCERNING CONDUCT: QUARTERLY CASES Recent Cases Concerning Culture and Conduct ISSUE 7 • Q2 2021CONCERNING CONDUCT: QUARTERLY CASES Recent cases concerning culture and conduct ISSUE 7 • Q2 2021 Volkswagen’s April Fool’s joke sees ADRs up failings. Larry Fink said, “a high-performance Super League (ESL) with $6bn of debt funding. sixteen per cent. culture also requires diversity, empathy, equity, After the announcement of the new league Volkswagen was forced to apologise after its respect and inclusion”. involving a selected number of Europe’s April Fool’s joke that its US arm was to be re- biggest football teams, the founding clubs branded “Voltswagen” led to its US-listed ADRs faced universal backlash from fans and the rising sixteen per cent. Procurement civil servant held second role media that saw nine of the clubs withdrawing with Greensill Capital. their involvement within days. JPMorgan It was revealed that a senior UK Civil Servant subsequently owned up to its “misjudgement” Firms try to address burnout with bonuses and that had held the role of Chief Procurement stating that it will “learn from this”. luxury gifts for staff. Officer had worked at failed supply chain Firms including lawyers and banks are finance company Greensill Capital whilst still attempting to head off a staff retention crisis in Whitehall. Bill Crothers joined Greensill as a Barclays pulls out of underwriting the debt for amongst junior staff suffering burnout by part-time adviser two months before he left the Alabama prisons. handing out luxuries and generous bonuses. civil service. Barclays pulled out of underwriting an $840m Elite US law firms have announced that one-off debt deal for CoreCivic to fund the building payments between $12,000 and $64,000 will of two prisons in Alabama.
- 
												  Communications Between David Cameron and Senior Bank Officials About Greensill Capital and the Covid Corporate Financing FacilitRe: A question... From Date 05 March 2020 11:46 To D Cameron;Cunliffe, Jon Cc Journal Recipients DC and Sir Jon, and I have agreed that DC will call Jon this Saturday afternoon, 7th, on . If there is a specific time that’s best on Saturday, please let us know. Best wishes, On 05/03/2020, 11:40, "D Cameron" wrote: Great. Copied to to fix. Thanks Dc. > On 5 Mar 2020, at 10:55, Cunliffe, Jon wrote: > > David > > Of course. can I get my office to arrange a call? > > Jon > > -----Original Message----- > From: D Cameron > Sent: Thursday, March 5, 2020 9:44 AM > To: Cunliffe, Jon > Subject: A question... > > > Jon > > Hope all is well. I have a quick question for you, concerning what the Governor meant in his remarks about Supply Chain Finance. > > I do a lot of work with Greensill Capital, now the world leaders in this space. We would be keen to help... > > Do you have a moment for a quick word? I am on my old number or can call you whenever convenient. > > All good wishes. Dc. > > > > > > *********************************************************************************** > This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the addressee(s) named above. Its contents may be confidential. If you receive this e-mail in error, please immediately contact the sender and delete this e > > The Bank of England is located at Threadneedle Street, London EC2R 8AH. The Prudential Regulation Authority is located at 20 Moorgate, London EC2R 6DA. Please visit www.bankofengland.co.uk. > *********************************************************************************** > > > *********************************************************************************** > This e-mail (including any attachments) is intended only for the addressee(s) named above.
- 
												  Brexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern IrelandBrexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern Ireland March 24, 2021 Congressional Research Service https://crsreports.congress.gov R46730 SUMMARY R46730 Brexit: Overview, Trade, and Northern Ireland March 24, 2021 The United Kingdom (UK) withdrew from the European Union (EU) on January 31, 2020. Under the withdrawal agreement negotiated by the two sides, the UK continued to apply EU rules Derek E. Mix, Coordinator during a transition period lasting to the end of 2020. In December 2020, UK and EU negotiators Specialist in European concluded a Trade and Cooperation Agreement (TCA) that sets out terms of the future Affairs relationship, including on trade, economic relations, and cooperation on a range of other issues. The agreement left numerous questions and issues unresolved, however, meaning many aspects of the UK-EU relationship may evolve over time and through subsequent negotiations. Shayerah I. Akhtar Specialist in International Trade and Finance Trade and Economic Impacts After the transition period, the UK left the EU customs union and regained the ability to pursue Kristin Archick an independent national trade policy. The TCA avoids the severe disruption to UK-EU trade that Specialist in European many feared with a hard Brexit on World Trade Organization (WTO) terms but does not replicate Affairs the far more frictionless trading that occurs in the EU single market. Analysts predict the disruption resulting from Brexit and the adjustment to the new UK-EU trading relationship under the TCA may have a negative economic impact on the UK, at least in the near term; many businesses in the UK have been taking steps to mitigate potential economic losses.