DOCSLIB.ORG

Draft Tucannon Subbasin Summary

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
Draft Tucannon Subbasin Summary Draft Tucannon Subbasin Summary February 23, 2001 Prepared for the Northwest Power Planning Council Editors Laura Gephart, Columbia Conservation District Debra Nordheim, Columbia Conservation District Subbasin Team Leader Terry Bruegman, Columbia Conservation District Contributors (in alphabetical order): Paul Ashley, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Duane Bartels, Pomeroy Conservation District Michael Bireley, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Anne Davidson, Ecopacific Debbie Fortner, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Pat Fowler, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Monte Fujishin, USDA Forest Service, Umatilla National Forest Delbert Groat, USDA Forest Service, Umatilla National Forest David Johnson, Nez Perce Tribe Steve Martin, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Glen Mendel, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife William Neve, Washington State Department of Ecology Carl Scheeler, Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation Greg Schlenz, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Mark Schuck, Washington Department of Fish and Wildlife Rick Stauty, USDA Natural Resources Conservation Service Val Turner, Columbia County Weed Board Mimi Wainwright, Washington State Department of Ecology DRAFT: This document has not yet been reviewed or approved by the Northwest Power Planning Council Tucannon Subbasin Summary Table of Contents Background........................................................................................................................................ 1 Subbasin Description........................................................................................................................... 2 General Description..................................................................................................................... 2 Water Quality ........................................................................................................................... 14 Vegetation ................................................................................................................................ 31 Fish and Wildlife Resources .............................................................................................................. 40 Fish and Wildlife Status.............................................................................................................. 40 Habitat Areas and Quality.......................................................................................................... 58 Watershed Assessment ............................................................................................................. 70 Limiting Factors ........................................................................................................................ 73 Artificial Production................................................................................................................... 78 Existing and Past Efforts............................................................................................................ 84 Present Subbasin Management.......................................................................................................... 96 Existing Management ................................................................................................................ 96 Existing Goals, Objectives, and Strategies...................................................................................104 Research, Monitoring, and Evaluation Activities..........................................................................120 Statement of Fish and Wildlife Needs ........................................................................................124 References .....................................................................................................................................129 Appendix A: Washington State water quality standards .....................................................................142 Appendix B: WDOE’s Proposed Surface Water Quality Standards.....................................................143 Appendix C: Plant species in the Tucannon subbasin ..........................................................................144 Appendix D: Threatened and endangered wildlife, fish and plant species in Washington State ...............145 Appendix E: Rare plants found in Columbia County............................................................................147 Appendix F: Wildlife Species in the Tucannon Subbasin......................................................................148 Appendix G: The Tucannon River Model Watershed Plan..................................................................154 Appendix H: U.S. Forest Service Management Strategy Definitions....................................................163 Appendix I: PACFISH Guidelines.....................................................................................................166 Appendix J: U.S. Forest Service Prescribed Fire................................................................................174 Appendix K: Hatchery and Genetic Management Plan (HGMP).........................................................182 i Tucannon Subbasin Summary i Figures Figure 1. Location of Tucannon subbasin including towns, counties, major roads and streams (ICBEMP data source, Map by Ecopacific).................................................................................................. 3 Figure 2. Land ownership within the Tucannon subbasin, Washington. (Map by Ecopacific) .................... 3 Figure 3. Elevations within the Tucannon subbasin, Washington. (Map by Ecopacific)............................. 4 Figure 4. Precipitation trends of the Tucannon subbasin, Washington. (Map by Ecopacific) ..................... 5 Figure 5. Bridge and River Mile locations along the Tucannon River, Washington. (Map by Ecopacific) ... 6 Figure 6. Center for Environmental Education (CEEd), Washington State University, water quality monitoring stations in the Tucannon subbasin, Washington. (CEEd, 1998) ..................................... 17 Figure 7. Zone of Critical Temperature for the Tucannon River, Washington, July and August, 1988-1994 (WDFW & USFS). (Tucannon MWP, 1997).............................................................................. 19 Figure 8. Bi-weekly averages of daily maximum temperatures in adult holding areas (RM 25-37) prior to spawning in the Tucannon River (1992). (Tucannon MWP, 1997) ................................................ 20 Figure 9. Bi-weekly averages of daily maximum temperatures: Tucannon River (1990) ........................ 23 Figure 10. Average water temperatures of Pataha Creek, Washington, 1998-2000 (CEEd, 2000).......... 24 Figure 11. Fecal coliform concentrations (coliform counts only) at Pataha Creek CEEd stations, 1998- 2000 (CEEd 2000). ................................................................................................................... 28 Figure 12. Historic vegetation types in the Tucannon subbasin, Washington (WDFW). .......................... 32 Figure 13. Current vegetation types within the Tucannon subbasin. (Map by Ecopacific) ...................... 32 Figure 14. Assessment and inventory reaches on the Tucannon River, Washington. (Map by Ecopacific)33 Figure 15. Land use within the Tucannon subbasin, Washington. (Map by Ecopacific)........................... 39 Figure 16. Land uses in the Tucannon River watershed, Washington. (Tucannon MWP 1997) ............... 39 Figure 17. Spring Chinook Distribution within the Tucannon subbasin. ................................................. 42 Figure 18. Spring chinook redds in historic index (RM 42-45) (Bumgarner et al. 2000). ......................... 43 Figure 19. Lower Snake River dams and hatcheries (Mendel et al. 1995)............................................ 45 Figure 20. Fall Chinook distribution within the Tucannon subbasin. ...................................................... 47 Figure 21. Summer Steelhead distribution within the Tucannon subbasin. ............................................. 48 Figure 22. Bull trout distribution within the Tucannon subbasin, Washington (WDFW).......................... 52 Figure 23. Priority Habitat Species in the Tucannon subbasin, Washington (WDFW data, S. Martin per. com., 2001). ............................................................................................................................. 54 Figure 24. Hatchery Facilities within the Tucannon subbasin. .............................................................. 79 Figure 25. Tucannon River Spring Chinook escapement (Bumgarner et al. 1997)................................. 81 Figure 26. USFS Fire Behavior Prediction System. ...........................................................................176 Tables Table 1. Peak Flows: Tucannon River, near Starbuck, Washington (River Mile 7.9). ............................ 11 Table 2. Mean monthly flows: Tucannon River (River Mile 7.9).......................................................... 11 Table 3. Water rights: Tucannon subbasin, Washington. ..................................................................... 12 Table 4. Water claims to date: Tucannon subbasin, Washington. ......................................................... 13 Table 5. WDFW recommended minimum streamflows at USGS gauge number 13344500, Tucannon River, Washington. ..................................................................................................................
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Tucannon River Watershed Initial Assessment
    DRAFT INITIAL WATERSHED ASSESSMENT TUCANNON RIVER WATERSHED Part of Water Resources Inventory Area 35 Open file Report 95-04 Prepared by: John Covert, Jim Lyerla, and Mark Ader Washington Department of Ecology, Eastern Regional Office Water Resources Program N. 4601 Monroe Street, Suite 202 Spokane, Washington 99205-1295 and edited by: Montgomery Water Group, Inc. 620 Kirkland Way, Suite 202 Kirkland, Washington 98083-2517 Adolfson Associates, Inc. 5309 Shilshole Avenue NW Seattle, Washington 98107 Hong West & Associates, Inc. 19730 64th Avenue West Lynnwood, Washington 98036-0106 R2 Resource Consultants, Inc. 15250 NE 95th Redmond, Washington 98052 February 10, 1995 Table of Contents Tucannon River Watershed Assessment Initial Watershed Assessment Tucannon River Watershed ............................................................ 1 Introduction ................................................................................................................................. 1 Watershed Description ................................................................................................................ 1 Area Description ..................................................................................................................... 1 Land Use ................................................................................................................................. 2 Climate and Precipitation Trends............................................................................................ 2 Hydrogeology.............................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 4.0 Tucannon Subbasin Aquatic Assessment
    4.0 Tucannon Subbasin Aquatic Assessment 4.1 Selection of Focal Species Four aquatic species were chosen as focal for Tucannon Subbasin Planning: steelhead/rainbow trout Oncorhynchus mykiss; spring and fall Chinook Onchorynchus tshawytcha; bull trout Salvelinus confluentus. The criteria used to select focal species were the aspects of the Tucannon Subbasin ecosystem that the life histories represent; the Endangered Species Act (ESA) status; the cultural importance of the species and whether or not there was enough knowledge of the life history of the species to do an effective assessment. Those species of which too little was known to be included as focal at this time could be included as “species of interest” (see section 4.7). The WDFW suggested the above species as focal for the subbasin. These were then presented to the Nez Perce Tribe (NPT), the Confederated Tribes of the Umatilla Indian Reservation (CTUIR), The Columbia County Conservation District Board, the citizens advisory group, subbasin planning team and other interested agencies and entities. Consensus was achieved on their selection. Tucannon summer steelhead, spring/fall chinook and bull trout life histories intersect a broad range of the aquatic ecosystem. Spatially, the life histories of these four species cover the entire subbasin from the mouth to the headwaters. These species also occupy all levels of the water column including slack water, swift water and the hyporheic zone. Not only are they present but also the ability of these species to thrive is dependent on being able to successfully occupy these areas. Temporally, these species are present (or were assumed to be present in the past) at one lifestage or another throughout much of the watershed in all seasons.
    [Show full text]
  • Botany, Invasive Plants, Native Plants, Genetics
    United States Department of Agriculture Forest Service Pacific Northwest FY-16 Region Program Accomplishments Calochortus umpquaensis, Umpqua mariposa lily, is found only in the Umpqua River watershed of Botany southwestern OR. A big "anthophorid" bee is tucked into the flower. Invasive Plants Native Plants Genetics U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies In accordance with Federal civil rights law and U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) civil rights regulations and policies, the USDA, its Agencies, offices, and employees, and institutions participating in or administering USDA programs are prohibited from discriminating based on race, color, national origin, religion, sex, gender identity (including gender expression), sexual orientation, disability, age, marital status, family/parental status, income derived from a public assistance program, political beliefs, or reprisal or retaliation for prior civil rights activity, in any program or activity conducted or funded by USDA (not all bases apply to all programs). Remedies and complaint filing deadlines vary by program or incident. Persons with disabilities who require alternative means of communication for program information (e.g., Braille, large print, audiotape, American Sign Language, etc.) should contact the responsible Agency or USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TTY) or contact USDA through the Federal Relay Service at (800) 877-8339. To file a program discrimination complaint, complete the USDA Program Discrimination Complaint Form, AD-3027, found online at http://www.ascr.usda.gov/complaint_filing_cust.html and at any USDA office or write a letter addressed to USDA and provide in the letter all of the information requested in the form.
    [Show full text]
  • Backcountry Campsites at Waptus Lake, Alpine Lakes Wilderness
    BACKCOUNTRY CAMPSITES AT WAPTUS LAKE, ALPINE LAKES WILDERNESS, WASHINGTON: CHANGES IN SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, IMPACTED AREAS, AND USE OVER TIME ___________________________________________________ A Thesis Presented to The Graduate Faculty Central Washington University ___________________________________________________ In Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements for the Degree Master of Science Resource Management ___________________________________________________ by Darcy Lynn Batura May 2011 CENTRAL WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY Graduate Studies We hereby approve the thesis of Darcy Lynn Batura Candidate for the degree of Master of Science APPROVED FOR THE GRADUATE FACULTY ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Karl Lillquist, Committee Chair ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Anthony Gabriel ______________ _________________________________________ Dr. Thomas Cottrell ______________ _________________________________________ Resource Management Program Director ______________ _________________________________________ Dean of Graduate Studies ii ABSTRACT BACKCOUNTRY CAMPSITES AT WAPTUS LAKE, ALPINE LAKES WILDERNESS, WASHINGTON: CHANGES IN SPATIAL DISTRIBUTION, IMPACTED AREAS, AND USE OVER TIME by Darcy Lynn Batura May 2011 The Wilderness Act was created to protect backcountry resources, however; the cumulative effects of recreational impacts are adversely affecting the biophysical resource elements. Waptus Lake is located in the Alpine Lakes Wilderness, the most heavily used wilderness in Washington
    [Show full text]
  • Outline of Angiosperm Phylogeny
    Outline of angiosperm phylogeny: orders, families, and representative genera with emphasis on Oregon native plants Priscilla Spears December 2013 The following listing gives an introduction to the phylogenetic classification of the flowering plants that has emerged in recent decades, and which is based on nucleic acid sequences as well as morphological and developmental data. This listing emphasizes temperate families of the Northern Hemisphere and is meant as an overview with examples of Oregon native plants. It includes many exotic genera that are grown in Oregon as ornamentals plus other plants of interest worldwide. The genera that are Oregon natives are printed in a blue font. Genera that are exotics are shown in black, however genera in blue may also contain non-native species. Names separated by a slash are alternatives or else the nomenclature is in flux. When several genera have the same common name, the names are separated by commas. The order of the family names is from the linear listing of families in the APG III report. For further information, see the references on the last page. Basal Angiosperms (ANITA grade) Amborellales Amborellaceae, sole family, the earliest branch of flowering plants, a shrub native to New Caledonia – Amborella Nymphaeales Hydatellaceae – aquatics from Australasia, previously classified as a grass Cabombaceae (water shield – Brasenia, fanwort – Cabomba) Nymphaeaceae (water lilies – Nymphaea; pond lilies – Nuphar) Austrobaileyales Schisandraceae (wild sarsaparilla, star vine – Schisandra; Japanese
    [Show full text]
  • Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future
    Sea-Level Rise for the Coasts of California, Oregon, and Washington: Past, Present, and Future As more and more states are incorporating projections of sea-level rise into coastal planning efforts, the states of California, Oregon, and Washington asked the National Research Council to project sea-level rise along their coasts for the years 2030, 2050, and 2100, taking into account the many factors that affect sea-level rise on a local scale. The projections show a sharp distinction at Cape Mendocino in northern California. South of that point, sea-level rise is expected to be very close to global projections; north of that point, sea-level rise is projected to be less than global projections because seismic strain is pushing the land upward. ny significant sea-level In compliance with a rise will pose enor- 2008 executive order, mous risks to the California state agencies have A been incorporating projec- valuable infrastructure, devel- opment, and wetlands that line tions of sea-level rise into much of the 1,600 mile shore- their coastal planning. This line of California, Oregon, and study provides the first Washington. For example, in comprehensive regional San Francisco Bay, two inter- projections of the changes in national airports, the ports of sea level expected in San Francisco and Oakland, a California, Oregon, and naval air station, freeways, Washington. housing developments, and sports stadiums have been Global Sea-Level Rise built on fill that raised the land Following a few thousand level only a few feet above the years of relative stability, highest tides. The San Francisco International Airport (center) global sea level has been Sea-level change is linked and surrounding areas will begin to flood with as rising since the late 19th or to changes in the Earth’s little as 40 cm (16 inches) of sea-level rise, a early 20th century, when climate.
    [Show full text]
  • A Brief History of the Umatilla National Forest
    A BRIEFHISTORYOFTHE UMATILLA NATIONAL FOREST1 Compiled By David C. Powell June 2008 1804-1806 The Lewis and Clark Expedition ventured close to the north and west sides of the Umatilla National Forest as they traveled along the Snake and Columbia rivers. As the Lewis & Clark party drew closer to the Walla Walla River on their return trip in 1806, their journal entries note the absence of firewood, Indian use of shrubs for fuel, abundant roots for human consumption, and good availability of grass for horses. Writing some dis- tance up the Walla Walla River, William Clark noted that “great portions of these bottoms has been latterly burnt which has entirely destroyed the timbered growth” (Robbins 1997). 1810-1840 This 3-decade period was a period of exploration and use by trappers, missionaries, natu- ralists, and government scientists or explorers. William Price Hunt (fur trader), John Kirk Townsend (naturalist), Peter Skene Ogden (trap- per and guide), Thomas Nuttall (botanist), Reverend Samuel Parker (missionary), Marcus and Narcissa Whitman (missionaries), Henry and Eliza Spaulding (missionaries), Captain Benjamin Bonneville (military explorer), Captain John Charles Fremont (military scientist), Nathaniel J. Wyeth (fur trader), and Jason Lee (missionary) are just a few of the people who visited and described the Blue Mountains during this era. 1840-1859 During the 1840s and 1850s – the Oregon Trail era – much overland migration occurred as settlers passed through the Blue Mountains on their way to the Willamette Valley (the Oregon Trail continued to receive fairly heavy use until well into the late 1870s). The Ore- gon Trail traversed the Umatilla National Forest.
    [Show full text]
  • Umatilla National Forest 2019 Personal-Use Firewood Maps Attachment–Part 2 (Part 1 Is Your Permit Form)
    United States Department of Agriculture Umatilla National Forest 2019 Personal-Use Firewood Maps Attachment–Part 2 (Part 1 is your Permit Form) Is Today a Cut Day? INSIDE......... It's Your Responsibility to Important News for 2019.................................2 Find Out Before You Head Out! Heppner District Maps................................5-6 An updated recorded message will let you know if firewood North Fork John Day District Maps.…..............6-7 cutting is allowed, restricted to certain times of the day, or Walla Walla District Maps.............................8-10 closed completely due to hot, dry weather conditions. Pomeroy District Maps...……..….......…....11-12 21" Ruler for gauging diameter............................8-9 Call Toll-Free 2019 Firewood Season Calendar……...….….13 1-877-958-9663 Where to call for information .…......................16 Page 2 Umatilla National Forest's 2019 Program GENERAL INFORMATION: COMMERCIAL FIREWOOD: To purchase a firewood permit, you must be 18 years of age or older and All commercial activities on National Forest System Lands require a present a government-issued photo ID. commercial permit. If you wish to cut and sell firewood commercially, you must purchase a commercial firewood permit through the local The minimum cost for a personal-use firewood permit is $20, which buys Ranger District office for your area of interest. District contact four-cords. Anything over four cords will cost an additional $5 per cord. information is provided on the back page of this guide. Each household is allowed a maximum limit of 12 cords per year. HEPPNER DISTRICT OFFERS LIVE JUNIPER CUTTING: Firewood permits are available at all Umatilla National Forest Offices and at several local vendors.
    [Show full text]
  • Complete Chloroplast Genomes Shed Light on Phylogenetic
    www.nature.com/scientificreports OPEN Complete chloroplast genomes shed light on phylogenetic relationships, divergence time, and biogeography of Allioideae (Amaryllidaceae) Ju Namgung1,4, Hoang Dang Khoa Do1,2,4, Changkyun Kim1, Hyeok Jae Choi3 & Joo‑Hwan Kim1* Allioideae includes economically important bulb crops such as garlic, onion, leeks, and some ornamental plants in Amaryllidaceae. Here, we reported the complete chloroplast genome (cpDNA) sequences of 17 species of Allioideae, fve of Amaryllidoideae, and one of Agapanthoideae. These cpDNA sequences represent 80 protein‑coding, 30 tRNA, and four rRNA genes, and range from 151,808 to 159,998 bp in length. Loss and pseudogenization of multiple genes (i.e., rps2, infA, and rpl22) appear to have occurred multiple times during the evolution of Alloideae. Additionally, eight mutation hotspots, including rps15-ycf1, rps16-trnQ-UUG, petG-trnW-CCA , psbA upstream, rpl32- trnL-UAG , ycf1, rpl22, matK, and ndhF, were identifed in the studied Allium species. Additionally, we present the frst phylogenomic analysis among the four tribes of Allioideae based on 74 cpDNA coding regions of 21 species of Allioideae, fve species of Amaryllidoideae, one species of Agapanthoideae, and fve species representing selected members of Asparagales. Our molecular phylogenomic results strongly support the monophyly of Allioideae, which is sister to Amaryllioideae. Within Allioideae, Tulbaghieae was sister to Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae whereas Allieae was sister to the clade of Tulbaghieae‑ Gilliesieae‑Leucocoryneae. Molecular dating analyses revealed the crown age of Allioideae in the Eocene (40.1 mya) followed by diferentiation of Allieae in the early Miocene (21.3 mya). The split of Gilliesieae from Leucocoryneae was estimated at 16.5 mya.
    [Show full text]
  • Witd Attd Scettic "Ri()E1t Stadr "Repo1tt
    Ri.;-~, vev.:i A-':> l/1711at'U'"vr /J<.va AerJl../G.. /IS'iii·r. 1/1;([~~c":.b;f.. (i..C../J,~T!vt,~l.{·s NG~ oF r.Jv1,.,r I~ 1'?'7$ THE /2£;; 'te.t ~IU { 0 /~yu,,,/:--(,/tit,.J> J~<t 1L10 Witd attd Scettic "Ri()e1t Stadr "Repo1tt TABLE OF CONTENTS PART I - SUMMATION CHAPTER 1 - INTRODUCTION THE WILD AND SCENIC RIVERS ACT ............................................2 AGENCY INTERPRETATION ...................................................2 STUDY RIVERS ..............................................................2 STUDY APPROACH ..........................................................4 CHAPTER2-SUMMARYOF FINDINGS & RECOMMENDATIONS ......................... FINDINGS ..................................................................4 RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................5 PART II - THE STUDY CHAPTER 1 - INVENTORY .......................................................... -8 THE DRAINAGE BASIN .......................................................8 THE STUDY AREA .......................................................... · 10 CHAPTER2-EVALUATION OF RIVERS &ADJOINING LANDS CRITERIA USED ............................................................ 13 ANALYSIS ................................................................. 15 OUTSTANDING CHARACTERISTICS ........................................... 20 CHAPTER 3 -CLASSIFICATION ALTERNATIVES, ANALYSIS & SELECTION OF STUDY PROPOSAL BASIS OF ANALYSIS ........................................................ 23 THE PRESENT SITUATION ..................................................
    [Show full text]
  • 2017… Program of Work
    2017… PROGRAM OF WORK. Umatilla National Foresttt View from Oregon Butte - Pomeroy Ranger District United States Department of Agriculture FOREST SERVICE 1 The U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) prohibits discrimination in all its programs and activities on the basis of race, color, national origin, age, disability, and where applicable, sex, marital status, familial status, parental status, religion, sexual orientation, genetic information, political beliefs, reprisal, or because all or part of an individual’s income is derived from any public assistance program. (Not all prohibited bases apply to all programs.) Persons with disabilities who require alternative means for communication of program information (Braille, large print, audiotape, etc.) should contact USDA’s TARGET Center at (202) 720-2600 (voice and TDD). To file a complaint of discrimination, write USDA, Director, Office of Civil Rights, 1400 Independence Avenue, S.W., Washington, D.C. 20250-9410, or call (800) 795-3272 (voice) or (202) 720-6382 (TDD). USDA is an equal opportunity provider and employer. 2 TABLE OF CONTENTS Umatilla National Forest 2017 Program of Work 2016 Forest Staff and Accomplishments………………....…….. Page 5 South Zone Program of Work: Heppner Ranger District.………..…………………………..……….….. Page 7 North Fork John Day Ranger District………………………….…..….… Page 21 North Zone Program of Work: Pomeroy Ranger District …………………………..…………………… Page 33 Walla Walla Ranger District…………….……………………………..... Page 41 Forest-Wide Program of Work: Forest-wide projects…………………………………….…………….…
    [Show full text]
  • Page 1 of 2 Colville National Forest
    Colville National Forest - Salmo-Priest Wilderness Page 1 of 2 United States Department of Agriculture Colville National Forest Forest Service Forest Service Home About the Agency Contact the National Office Search Go Salmo-Priest Wilderness Site Map Area Status: Open Colville National Forest Home Tucked among the Selkirk Mountains in the extreme northeastern corner of Washington, the U-shaped 43,348 Special Places Low Fire Danger acre Salmo-Priest Wilderness extends its borders along those of Idaho and British Columbia. Its most prominent Recreation Quick Links features are two very long ridges, generally running Bicycling southwest to northeast, connected near their northern Salmo-Priest Wilderness Camping & Cabins ends by a ridge crowned by 6,828-foot Salmo Mountain. Winter Recreation in Washington State Climbing The eastern ridge stands lower, more wooded, more rounded off and more Upper Columbia Children's Forest Fishing accessible than the steep-sided, rocky-crested western ridge. Streams have cut Hiking deep drainages into both ridges. Water from the eastern side of the eastern ridge ends up in Idaho's Priest River. The remaining wilderness drains generally westerly Areas & Activities Horse Riding & Camping via Sullivan Creek and the Salmo River into the Pend Oreille River. Find An Area Hunting Below the ridge tops of this well-watered Wilderness (at 50+ inches of precipitation Highlights Nature Viewing annually) you'll find the largest growth of virgin forest left in eastern Washington: western red cedar, western hemlock, Douglas fir, grand fir, larch. The forest houses Recreation Passes OHV Riding & Camping mule deer and white-tailed deer, elk, black bears, cougars, bobcats, badgers, pine Recreation Passes martens, lynx, bighorn sheep, and moose.
    [Show full text]