Golan Journal 146 January
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Load more
Recommended publications
-
Historical Records of the 79Th Cameron Highlanders
%. Z-. W ^ 1 "V X*"* t-' HISTORICAL RECORDS OF THE 79-m QUEEN'S OWN CAMERON HIGHLANDERS antr (Kiritsft 1m CAPTAIN T. A. MACKENZIE, LIEUTENANT AND ADJUTANT J. S. EWART, AND LIEUTENANT C. FINDLAY, FROM THE ORDERLY ROOM RECORDS. HAMILTON, ADAMS & Co., 32 PATERNOSTER Row. JDebonport \ A. H. 111 112 FOUE ,STRSET. SWISS, & ; 1887. Ms PRINTED AT THE " " BREMNER PRINTING WORKS, DEVOXPORT. HENRY MORSE STETHEMS ILLUSTRATIONS. THE PHOTOGRAVURES are by the London Typographic Etching Company, from Photographs and Engravings kindly lent by the Officers' and Sergeants' Messes and various Officers of the Regiment. The Photogravure of the Uniform Levee Dress, 1835, is from a Photograph of Lieutenant Lumsden, dressed in the uniform belonging to the late Major W. A. Riach. CONTENTS. PAGK PREFACE vii 1793 RAISING THE REGIMENT 1 1801 EGYPTIAN CAMPAIGN 16 1808 PENINSULAR CAMPAIGN .. 27 1815 WATERLOO CAMPAIGN .. 54 1840 GIBRALTAR 96 1848 CANADA 98 1854 CRIMEAN CAMPAIGN 103 1857 INDIAN MUTINY 128 1872 HOME 150 1879 GIBRALTAR ... ... .. ... 161 1882 EGYPTIAN CAMPAIGN 166 1884 NILE EXPEDITION ... .'. ... 181 1885 SOUDAN CAMPAIGN 183 SERVICES OF THE OFFICERS 203 SERVICES OF THE WARRANT OFFICERS ETC. .... 291 APPENDIX 307 LIST OF ILLUSTRATIONS, SIR JOHN DOUGLAS Frontispiece REGIMENTAL COLOUR To face SIR NEIL DOUGLAS To face 56 LA BELLE ALLIANCE : WHERE THE REGIMENT BIVOUACKED AFTER THE BATTLE OF WATERLOO .. ,, 58 SIR RONALD FERGUSON ,, 86 ILLUSTRATION OF LEVEE DRESS ,, 94 SIR RICHARD TAYLOR ,, 130 COLOURS PRESENTED BY THE QUEEN ,, 152 GENERAL MILLER ,, 154 COLONEL CUMING ,, 160 COLONEL LEITH , 172 KOSHEH FORT ,, 186 REPRESENTATIVE GROUP OF CAMERON HIGHLANDERS 196 PREFACE. WANT has long been felt in the Regiment for some complete history of the 79th Cameron Highlanders down to the present time, and, at the request of Lieutenant-Colonel Everett, D-S.O., and the officers of the Regiment a committee, con- Lieutenant and sisting of Captain T. -
1779 Soldiers, Sailors and Marines Kyllonen
1779 Soldiers, Sailors and Marines Kyllonen pation, farmer; inducted at Hillsboro on April 29, 1918; sent to Camp Dodge, Iowa; served in Company K, 350th Infantry, to May 16, 1918; Com- pany K, 358th Infantry, to discharge; overseas from June 20, 1918, to June 7, 1919. Engagements: Offensives: St. Mihiel; Meuse-Argonne. De- fensive Sectors: Puvenelle and Villers-en-Haye (Lorraine). Discharged at Camp Dodge, Idwa, on June 14, 1919, as a Private. KYLLONEN, CHARLEY. Army number 4,414,704; registrant, Nelson county; born, Brocket, N. Dak., July 5, 1894, of Finnish parents; occu- pation, farmer; inducted at La,kota on Sept. 3, 1918; sent to Camp Grant, Ill.; served in Machine Gun Training Center, Camp Hancock, Ga., to dis- charge. Discharged at Camp Hancock, Ga., on March 26, 1919, as a Private. KYLMALA, AUGUST. Army number 2,110,746; registrant, Dickey county; born, Oula, Finland, Aug. 9, 1887; naturalized citizen; occupation, laborer; inducted at Ellendale on Sept. 21, 1917; sent. to Camp Dodge, Iowa; served in Company I, 352nd Infantry, to Nov. 28, 1917; Company L, 348th Infantry, to May 18, 1918; 162nd Depot Brigade, to June 17, 1918; 21st Battalion, M. S. Gas Company, to Aug. 2, 1918; 165th Depot Brigade, to discharge. Discharged at Camp Travis, Texas, on Dec. 4, 1918, as a Private. KYNCL, JOHN. Army number 298,290; registrant, Cavalier county; born, Langdon, N. Dak., March 27, 1896, of Bohemian parents; occupation, farmer; inducted at Langdon on Dec. 30, 1917; sent to Fort Stevens, Ore.; served in Battery D, 65th Artillery, Coast Artillery Corps, to discharge; overseas from March 25, 1918, to Jan. -
Artillery Club's Newsletter 2 of 2020 ( 05 Jun
The Artillery Club – 05 Jun 20 TAKE POST - THE ARTILLERY CLUB’s NEWSLETTER 2/2020 INTRODUCTION Since the publication of Newsletter 1/2020 on 27 February, the Covid-19 pandemic has completely curtailed the Artillery Club’s activities. Stay Safe, Stay Well and Stay Connected. Accordingly, the main purpose of this Newsletter is to inform the Club’s membership of the situation regarding the 2020 activities. Following an assessment of the evolving Covid-19 situation, prevailing Government advice, the Club’s responsibilities for its members including serving personnel, and in partnership with the appropriate actors involved in the Field Trips, without hesitation, on 12 March, the Club’s Committee decided to cancel the Field Trip to the Ordnance School and the National Stud, and the Field Trip to Fort Shannon, Foynes Flying Boat Museum, and deferred the events to 2021. Likewise, for the same reasons, on 22 May, the Club’s Committee deferred until 2021, the Decades’ Reunion and the Foreign Field Trip to London. Currently, the 2020 Golf Outing remains under review. The Committee apologies for any inconvenience caused to those members who intended to participate in the cancelled events. Hopefully, those who accrued travel and accommodation costs will be refunded by the providers. Once a Gunner – Always a Gunner The Artillery Club – 05 Jun 20 Details of this Operational Pause are contained in the Activities Section of this Newsletter. On 22 May, the modified Diary of Events for 2020 was posted on the Club’s website, and is attached as Annex A. In addition to the Activities Section, Newsletter 2/2020 includes: Promotion of a Gunner Officer to the General rank, Joint Task Force for Covid-19, Governance, Activity Update, News from the Artillery Corps, and Looking into the Past. -
Irish Army, 1939-1945
The Irish Army 1939-45 The Irish Army - Part I 1939 The Army consisted of: 6000 regulars 6000 reservists 16,000 volunteers Outbreak of war on 2 September 1939 The army had a total of 19,783 men: 7494 Regular 5066 A and B Class Reservists 7223 Volunteers British Estimate on 3 September 1939: Regular Irish Army 5 infantry battalions 1 field battery artillery 1 armoured car squadron 1 field company engineers 3 construction and maintenance companies engineers 3 signal companies 4 motor transport companies 1 horsed squadron 1 cyclist squadron 1 light artillery battery 1 anti-aircraft battery 1 tank squadron 21 armoured vehicles included: 13 Rolls Royce Armoured Cars 2 Swedish Landsverk L60 Light Tanks at the Cavalry School July 1940 the army was 25,000 strong May-June 1940 placed on war footing with: 7 battalions an anti-aircraft brigade 2 companies engineers 12 rifle battalions were to be raised to bring strength to 40,000 Local Security Force was to be raised from Gardai 1st Armoured Squadron, Irish Cavalry Corps was at The Curragh October 1940 four more regular army brigades were to be raised in Ireland Armour consisted of: 13 Rolls Royce Light Armoured Cars 16 Medium Armoured Cars Some armoured vehicles based on Ford and Dodge chassis 1st Division was located in Cork 1 2nd Division faced north 4th Field Company, Irish Corps of Engineers existed 11th Infantry Battalion was at Gormanster, County Meath on maneuvers near Boyne in December 1940 By 1942 there were 250,000 men in the Irish Army: 1st, 3rd Brigades - Cork 2nd Brigade - Reserve 5th, 6th Brigades - Carlow 9th Battalion - Waterford two reserved brigades at Trim and Kells Outbreak of War 3 September 1939 1st, 2nd Reinforced Brigades - organized and mobilized but each 30% understrength Five garrison battalions were mobilized but at strength of 270 to 540 below establishment None of the war establishment eight battalions had been organized. -
1003 Soldiers, Sailors and Marines Furuseth
1003 Soldiers, Sailors and Marines Furuseth FURUSETH, OSCAR CARL. Army number 863,233; registrant, Moun- trail county; born, Halstad, Minn., March 7, 1891, of Norwegian parents; occupation, blacksmith; enlisted at Fort Snelling, Minn., on Dec. 15, 1917; sent to Vancouver Barracks, Wash.; served in 407th Aero Construction Squadron, Air Service, Signal Corps, to Feb. 1, 1918; 404th Aero Construc- tion Squadron, to July 4, 1918; 31st Provisional Squadron, to Jan. 21, 1919; 27th Spruce Squadron, 2nd Provisional Regiment, to discharge. Grade: Sergeant, Feb. 8, 1918. Discharged at Camp Dodge, Iowa, on Jan. 31, 1919, as a Sergeant. FUSKERUD. ALBERT. Navy number 1,518,819; registrant, LaMoure county; born, Nunda, S. Dak., March 29, 1890, of Norwegian-American parents; occupation, farmer; enlisted in the Navy at Aberdeen, S. Dak, on Dec. 4, 1917; served at Naval Training Station, Great Lakes, Ill., to April 18, 1918; USS Leviathan, to Nov. 11, 1918; Grades: Apprentice Sea- man, 59 days; Seaman 2nd Class, 120 days; Fireman 3rd Class, 137 days; Fireman 2nd Class, 26 days. Discharged at Hoboken, N. J., on Oct. 29, 1919, as a Fireman 1st Class. FUSSELL, EDWIN BRIGGS. Army number 467,712; registrant, Cass county; born, Washington, D. C., Oct. 4, 1886, of (nationality of parents not given); occupation, reporter; inducted at Fargo on March 6, 1918; served in Training School, Ordnance Field Service, University of Cali- fornia, to April 27, 1918; SuPply School, Ordnance Training Camp, Camp Hancock, Ga., to July 2, 1918; Ordnance Detachment, Ordnance Depot Company No. 123, to discharge. Grade: Private 1st Class, July 10, 1918. -
Minnesota National Guard
This document is made available electronically by the Minnesota Legislative Reference Library as part of an ongoing digital archiving project. http://www.leg.state.mn.us/lrl/lrl.asp MINNESOTA NATIONAL GUARD 2012 ANNUAL REPORT 2013 OBJECTIVES 2012 ANNUAL REPORT / 2013 OBJECTIVES TABLE OF CONTENTS To the Citizens of Minnesota: A Letter from the Adjutant General 2012 Deployments The Minnesota National Guard opened 2012 with the highest number of citizen-soldiers and -airmen deployed overseas at one time since 9/11. 01 19 We begin 2013 with the fewest deployed personnel in recent history. This organizational shift foreshadows some major changes for us and for the military community as a whole. As we approach this new reality, we cannot allow degradation of the operational experience, knowledge and capability that we have amassed over the past 12 years. Even in the face of budget pressures and changing war-fighting demands, we cannot forget the lessons we have learned about the Minnesota National Guard’s central role and relevance to the U.S. military in the 21st century, both at home and abroad. More than a decade of war Our Organizational Priorities 2012 Economic Impact has shaped the Minnesota Guard into an effective force, and it would be a tremendous mistake – in my view a catastrophic one – to put that 03 21 capability back on the shelf to accumulate dust. I can tell you it is not going to happen on my watch. We are in an era of a declining federal budget, and consequently will face emerging challenges to fund the programs, training and modernized equipment we have relied upon over the last 12 years. -
In This Regard, You May Wish to Consider Future Integrated Capability
1. Capabilities – In this regard, you may wish to consider future integrated capability development and the planning and delivery requirements to support a joint force approach in terms of new equipment, professional military education and training, maintenance and development of infrastructure, developments in military doctrine, and transformative concepts, including specialist capabilities, that prepare and support the Defence Forces for future operations. In regard to future integrated capability development and the planning, I have dealt with in the next section but to me this is all about putting the capabilities of the Defence Forces on a proper footing. Previous Governments have allowed the Defence Forces to decline due to problems with finances both nationally, European and world wide but this was most out of their hands. This is not a blame game this is now trying to do what’s best for the DF going forward. • New Equipment – In my opinion going forward the Artillery Corp should only keep Field Guns for Ceremonial occasions as we are never going to uses these in any major conflict. The Cavalry Corp also needs to lose the Scorpion Tanks and concentrate on their present personal Carriers, Signals Corp need to concentrate on hand held devices and a standard radio for the Gardai, Civil Defence, Coast Guard etc should be introduced and be able to work together in crises situations. • Maintenance and development of infrastructure – As laid out in the next section on the reserve there are so many buildings belonging to the State in many instances are listed building let’s take them over for the Reserves and with Monies for the Dept of Heritage & the EU let’s use these buildings and be proud of our country and the facilities we could have. -
Army Pensions) and Vote 36 (Defence)
Members, I welcome this opportunity to consider the 2020 Revised Estimates for the Defence Sector, comprising of Vote 35 (Army Pensions) and Vote 36 (Defence). As this is the first meeting of this Committee, I have prepared a short opening statement that will set out the overall position and update the members on some of the main developments within the Defence Sector over recent times. The Defence Sector is made up of two Votes – Vote 35, Army Pensions and Vote 36, Defence. The high-level goal of both Votes is to ‘provide for the military defence of the State, contribute to national and international peace and security and fulfil all other roles assigned by Government’. Accordingly, Defence sector outputs are delivered under a single programme in each Vote. The combined Estimates for Defence and Army Pensions for 2020 provides for Gross Expenditure in excess of €1 billion (one thousand and forty million), an increase of €33 million or 3.3% over 2019. The 2020 provision comprises €781 million for Vote 36 Defence, an increase of €23 million, and €259.2 million for Vote 35 Army Pensions, an increase of €10 million. The Army Pensions Vote has a single programme entitled, ‘Provision for Defence Forces’ Pensions Benefits’. It makes provision for retired pay, pensions, allowances and gratuities payable to, or in respect of, former members of the Defence Forces and certain dependants. The 2020 Estimate provides a gross sum of over €259 million for the Army Pensions Vote, of which some €250 million covers expenditure on superannuation benefits for former members of the Permanent Defence Force and certain dependants. -
Lytle O Fficial Roster, North Dakota 1972
Lytle O fficial Roster, North Dakota 1972 Engagements: Offensive: St. Mihiel. Defensive Sector: Villers-en-Haye (Lorraine). Discharged on Nov. 5, 1919, as a Private, Surgeon's Certifi- cate of Disability, 100%. LYTLE, JOHN WALTER. Army number 2,460; not a registrant, over age; born, Eldora, Iowa, Nov. 19, 1884, of American parents; occupation., garage manager; enlisted in Company I, 2nd Infantry, North Dakota Na- tional Guard, at Dawson, on July 14, 1917; called into federal service, World War, on July 15, 1917; served in Company I, 2nd Infantry, North Dakota National Guard (161st Ambulance Company, 116th Sanitary Train), to Jan. 10, 1918; Ambulance Company No. 3, 1st Sanitary Train, to dis- charge. Grades: Private let Class, Feb. 14, 1918; Wagoner, Nov. 28, 1918; overseas from Dec. 12, 1917, to Sept. 1, 1919; wounded, slightly, May 27, 1918. Engagements: Offensives: Aisne-Marne; St. Mihiel; Meuse-Argonne. Defensive Sectors: Ansauville and Saizerais (Lorraine); Cantigny (Pi- cardy). Discharged at Camp Dodge, Iowa, on Sept. 24, 1919, as a Wagoner. LYTLE, SAM T. Army number 2,524; registrant, Kidder county; born, New Providence, Iowa, Nov. 4, 1888, of American parents; occupation, mechanic; enlisted in Company I, 2nd Infantry, North Dakota National Guard, at Dawson, on July 14, 1917; called into federal service, World War, on July 15, 1917; served in Company I, 2nd Infantry, North Dakota National Guard (161st Ambulance Company, 116th Sanitary Train), to Jan. 10, 1918; Ambulance Company No. 3, 1st Sanitary Train, 1st Division, to discharge. Grades: Private 1st Class, Feb. 14, 1918; Wagoner, Nov. 28, 1918; overseas from Dec. -
Roinn Cosanta. Bijreaij of Military History, 1913-21
ROINN COSANTA. BIJREAIJ OF MILITARY HISTORY, 1913-21 STATEMENT BY WITNESS DOCUMENT NO. W.S. 492 Witness John McCoy, Greenhills, Kill, Co. Kildare. Identity Battalion Adjutant 1918-19; Brigade Adjutant 1919-21; Divisional" 1921-22; Member of Bureau of Military History, 1913-1921. Subject (a) Important national events in Northern Ireland, 1914-1923; (b) Military operations of I.R.A. in the North 1919-1921. Conditions, if any, stipulated by Witness Nil File No. S.1666 Form Statement by John McCoy, Greenhills, Kill, Co. Kildare. I was born on a farm of about 70 acres in a bowl shaped valley surrounded with mountains in South Armagh. My mother who died when I was 15 years of age was an O'Hanlon. Her family claimed direct descent from the Princes of Orior who before the plantation of Ulster were the traditional standard bearers to the O'Neills, Princes of Tyrone. The last chieftain of the O'Hanlon clan was Redmond 0'Hanlon who at the time of the plantation of Ulster in or about 1670 was serving as an officer in the French Army and had been awarded the title of Count by the French Government. My earliest recollection of my mother was her recounting to me the successes and adventures of her famous forebearer who returned to Ulster to drive the Sassanagh out and deal in particular with the undertakers who had murdered his Ulster kith and kin and taken possession of his family lands in the neighbourhood of Tanderagee, Co. Armagh. I was told how this same Redmond O'Hanlon gathered together a body of men who were prepared to take up the hazardous endeavour of an Irish Rapparee in order to harass and dispossess the planters who had taken over all the rich lands of the area. -
The Irish Army Reserve in the Single Force Concept
The Journal of Military History and Defence Studies Vol 1. Issue 1. (January 2020) Conceptually Ambitious, Hardly Novel, and Currently Failing: The Irish Army Reserve in the Single Force Concept. Jonathan Carroll In 2013 the Irish Defence Forces went under significant reorganisation. Part of this organisation entailed integrating the Irish Army Reserve into the Defence Forces, as part of the ‘Single Force Concept’. Ostensibly, the Single Force Concept sought to provide a more reliable, fit for purpose, reserve force. However, this article argues that the concept has failed and that the Army Reserve is almost unusable. The article evaluates each service corps and provides an analysis of Reserve capabilities. This shows that the training of the force is suboptimal for augmenting the regular army in an emergency, and that a gap exists between what government policy wants the Reserve to do, and what it is actually capable of doing. This has resulted in an unusable reserve force with questionable utility. This article also highlights the difficulty of establishing the qualitative strength of the Army Reserve in the absence of appropriate means of defining what is meant by an ‘effective’ reservist, and explores the detrimental consequences of paltry financial investment in sustaining, developing, or enabling the Reserve as an effective force. It argues that the Single Force Concept has failed because it did not remedy the fundamental pre-existing flaws that plagued the various iterations of the Irish reserve land component prior to 2013, nor did it attempt to bring the Army Reserve into line with international best practice regarding reserve forces. -
Dáil Éireann
Vol. 749 Tuesday, No. 4 13 December 2011 DÍOSPÓIREACHTAÍ PARLAIMINTE PARLIAMENTARY DEBATES DÁIL ÉIREANN TUAIRISC OIFIGIÚIL—Neamhcheartaithe (OFFICIAL REPORT—Unrevised) Dé Máirt, 13 Nollaig 2011. Ceisteanna — Questions Minister for Defence Priority Questions …………………………… 461 Other Questions …………………………… 468 Leaders’ Questions ……………………………… 477 Ceisteanna — Questions (resumed) The Taoiseach ……………………………… 485 Order of Business ……………………………… 508 Topical Issue Matters ……………………………… 516 Topical Issue Debate Medical Cards ……………………………… 517 Mental Health Services …………………………… 519 Departmental Properties …………………………… 523 Educational Disadvantage ………………………… 525 Local Government (Household Charge) Bill 2011 [Seanad]: Second Stage …………… 530 Private Members’ Business Rural Areas: Motion …………………………… 554 Local Government (Household Charge) Bill 2011 [Seanad]: Second Stage (resumed)……… 576 Questions: Written Answers …………………………… 589 DÁIL ÉIREANN ———— Dé Máirt, 13 Nollaig 2011. Tuesday, 13 December 2011. ———— Chuaigh an Leas-Ceann Comhairle i gceannas ar 2 p.m. ———— Paidir. Prayer. ———— Ceisteanna — Questions Priority Questions ———— Army Barracks 49. Deputy Dara Calleary asked the Minister for Defence the cost saving on a per barrack basis for his decision to close barracks at Mullingar, Clonmel, Cavan and Castlebar; the capital requirements on a per barrack basis for those barracks to which the affected soldiers will be reassigned; the projected costs of securing each of the four barracks when they are empty; the amount of travel allowances that are payable to those affected soldiers; if he will outline any other payments that are payable on foot of his decision to close these barracks; and if he will make a statement on the matter. [38808/11] 50. Deputy Jonathan O’Brien asked the Minister for Defence if he has conducted a cost analysis of the closure of Defence Force barracks across the State including the impact of the closure on local communities and additional costs of relocation of Defence Force members; and if he will make a statement on the matter.