DOCSLIB.ORG

London Economics – Case for Space 2015 – Full Report

Total Page：16

File Type：pdf, Size：1020Kb

Download full-text PDF Read full-text
London Economics – Case for Space 2015 – Full Report FINAL REPORT The Case for Space 2015 The impact of space on the UK economy FULL REPORT A study for the Satellite Applications Catapult, Innovate UK, UKspace and the UK Space Agency July 2015 About London Economics London Economics (LE) is a leading independent economic consultancy, headquartered in London, with a dedicated team of professional economists specialised in the application of best practice economic and financial analysis to the space sector. As a firm, our reputation for independent analysis and client‐driven, world‐class and academically robust economic research has been built up over 25 years. Drawing on our solid understanding of the economics of space, expertise in economic analysis and best practice industry knowledge, our space team has extensive experience of providing independent analysis and innovative solutions to advise clients in the public, private and third sectors on the economic fundamentals, commercial potential of existing, developing and speculative market opportunities to reduce uncertainty and guide decision‐makers in this most challenging of operating environments. All consultants of our space team are highly‐qualified economists with extensive experience in applying a wide variety of analytical techniques to the space sector, including: Insightful and accurate market analysis and demand forecasting; Analysis of industrial structure, strategy and competitive forces; New technology adoption modelling; Estimation of public utility benefits; Opportunity prioritisation and targeting to maximise exploitation of investment; Sophisticated statistical analysis (econometrics, regression); Economic and financial modelling, including: Cost‐Benefit Analysis (CBA), cost effectiveness analysis, Value for Money (VfM), impact assessment, policy evaluation, business case development, cash flow and sustainability modelling. Head Office: Somerset House, New Wing, Strand, London WC2R 1LA, United Kingdom. w: londoneconomics.co.uk/aerospace e: [email protected] t: +44 (0)20 3701 7700 : @LE_Aerospace Acknowledgements We would like to acknowledge the useful guidance and feedback provided by the Satellite Applications Catapult, Innovate UK, UKspace and the UK Space Agency throughout this research. We would also like to thank all of the stakeholders consulted for their time and informative response. Responsibility for the contents of this report remains with London Economics. Authors Greg Sadlier, Associate Director, +44 (0)20 3701 7707, [email protected] Rasmus Flytkjær, Senior Economic Consultant, +44 (0)20 3701 7717, [email protected] Maike Halterbeck, Economic Consultant, +44 (0)20 3701 7724, [email protected] Viktoriya Peycheva, Economic Consultant, +44 (0)20 3701 7719, [email protected] Laura Koch, Economic Analyst, +44 (0)20 3701 7718, [email protected] Wherever possible London Economics uses paper sourced from sustainably managed forests using production processes that meet the EU eco‐label requirements. Copyright © 2015 London Economics. Except for the quotation of short passages for the purposes of criticism or review, no part of this document may be reproduced without permission. London Economics Ltd is a Limited Company registered in England and Wales with registered number 04083204 and registered offices at Somerset House, New Wing, Strand, London WC2R 1LA. London Economics Ltd's registration number for Value Added Tax in the United Kingdom is GB769529863. Table of Contents Page 1 Introduction and context 1 1.1 Research objectives 1 1.2 Overall approach 2 1.3 Differences compared to the ‘Size and Health’ study 3 1.4 Caveats and limitations 3 1.5 Structure of the report 4 2 Defining the UK space economy 6 2.1 Defining ‘space economy’ 6 2.2 Challenges of measuring the space economy 7 2.3 Segmentation of the space economy 8 3 UK space economy in perspective 10 3.1 Turnover 10 3.2 Composition 20 3.3 Skills and qualifications 21 3.4 Customer mix 23 3.5 Export intensity and markets 24 3.6 R&D investment 27 4 Government engagement in the space economy 31 4.1 Rationale for government intervention in space 31 4.2 UK Government support to the space economy 35 5 Economic impact of the UK space economy: Direct, indirect and induced effects 41 5.1 Typology of impacts 41 5.2 Value‐Added 42 5.3 Employment 47 5.4 Productivity 55 5.5 Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) 57 5.6 Harwell Oxford campus 60 6 Economic impact of the UK space economy: Catalytic effects 63 6.1 Space applications as ‘General Purpose Technologies’ 63 6.2 Span of influence of space‐enabled applications 64 6.3 Typology of catalytic effects 67 7 Catalytic effects: End‐user benefits 70 7.1 Introduction 70 7.2 Security, safety & resilience 71 7.3 Game‐changing services 77 7.4 Climate and environmental services 79 7.5 More efficient public sector services 83 London Economics The Case for Space 2015 i Table of Contents Page 7.6 e‐connectivity 86 8 Catalytic effects: R&D and knowledge spillovers 92 8.1 R&D and knowledge spillovers 92 9 Catalytic effects: Education, exploration and space science 95 9.1 Science, Technology, Engineering and Maths (STEM) education and careers 95 9.2 Space exploration beyond earth orbit 96 9.3 Space science 99 10 Future prospects of the UK space economy 101 10.1 Introduction 101 10.2 Strengths of the UK space economy 101 10.3 Potential growth path 102 10.4 Game‐changers/catalysts/wild cards 104 10.5 Applications and end‐users: Space IGS high growth markets 109 10.6 Summary 110 Glossary 112 References 113 Index of Tables, Figures and Boxes 114 ANNEXES 118 Annex 1 Steering Committee 119 A1.1 Steering Committee membership 119 Annex 2 Methodology 119 A2.1 Defining the space economy 119 A2.2 UK space economy in perspective 126 A2.3 Economic impact of the UK space economy: Direct, indirect and induced effects 128 A2.4 Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) 132 London Economics ii The Case for Space 2015 1 | Introduction and context 1 Introduction and context Space technology is already woven into the fabric of modern daily life in the UK. From weather forecasts consulted before leaving home, location‐based services on smartphones, live events broadcast to television screens, to broadband connectivity in rural ‘not‐spots’, space‐enabled technologies are an integral part, and enhancement, of the everyday lives of UK citizens. Space technologies also enable an increasingly diverse range of business applications for professionals (e.g. aviation, surveying, agriculture, fisheries), commercial organisations (e.g. geological exploration, infrastructure monitoring, communication connectivity), critical infrastructures (e.g. transport, power, energy, telecoms, financial and civil infrastructures), public safety and security (e.g. defence forces, police, emergency services), and public agency users (e.g. environmental monitoring and disaster response, criminal justice). With such a span of influence, the availability and continuity of space services is of significant economic importance. Looking to the future, the considerable potential for the continued development of applications will drive innovation, providing important spillovers of knowledge and skills to the wider economy. On the supply side, the UK has a long and distinguished history of involvement in space.1 Indeed, in 2012 the UK celebrated 50 years of UK space science. Since Ariel‐1, the world’s first international satellite, carried UK experiments to solar orbit and made the UK the world’s 3rd space‐faring nation in 1962, the UK’s involvement in space has grown substantially, both institutionally and commercially. The path hasn’t always run smooth, but with ambitious long‐term objectives set out to 2030, the future is promising. Following on from a successful role in the Rosetta (Philae) mission, the UK Space Agency’s first CubeSat mission (UKube‐1), record industry performance, and recently announced government investment that will see the UK will playing the lead role in Europe's 2018 ExoMars mission, this report comes at an exciting time for the UK in space. The supply and consumption of space technologies in the UK contributes to GDP, provides employment, boosts productivity in space and non‐space sectors (knowledge spillovers), and offers utility benefits for consumers, producers, and society (environment, policy‐making, defence, etc.). The aggregate of these effects is the gross impact of space on the UK economy. 1.1 Research objectives This report aims to draw together existing evidence and conduct new analysis to assess this impact and provide answers to the questions: How significant is the contribution of space to the UK economy?; and how important is UK government support for the space economy? Whilst an accurate answer (i.e. net impact) would require a much larger piece of research consisting of a meta‐analysis of economic studies to rigorously assess the additionality of each investment and activity, this study endeavours to provide an assessment of gross impact. London Economics were commissioned to undertake this study on behalf of Innovate UK, the Satellite Applications Catapult, UKspace trade association and the UK Space Agency (represented by, and hereafter referred to as, ‘the Steering Committee’). This study complements and satisfies an Action (4.3) in the IGS Space Growth Action Plan 2014‐2030 for stakeholders to undertake a number of studies, including updating the economic impact study of the benefits of space for private business, UK citizens and government itself. 1 Please see Section 4.2 for a more detailed overview of the history of UK space involvement and government support. London Economics The Case for Space 2015 1 1 | Introduction and context This study, The Case for Space 2015, represents an update and extension of research originally undertaken in 2006, and updated in 2009, to assess the impact of space on the UK economy. This updated study has a base year of the 2012/13 financial year.2 This report is targeted towards a two‐part audience: 1) governmental economists and policymakers; and 2) industry, users and the general public.
Load more

Recommended publications
  • Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration
    1 ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY Burlington House, Piccadilly London W1J 0BQ, UK T: 020 7734 4582/ 3307 F: 020 7494 0166 [email protected] www.ras.org.uk Registered Charity 226545 Report of the Commission on the Scientific Case for Human Space Exploration Professor Frank Close, OBE Dr John Dudeney, OBE Professor Ken Pounds, CBE FRS 2 Contents (A) Executive Summary 3 (B) The Formation and Membership of the Commission 6 (C) The Terms of Reference 7 (D) Summary of the activities/meetings of the Commission 8 (E) The need for a wider context 8 (E1) The Wider Science Context (E2) Public inspiration, outreach and educational Context (E3) The Commercial/Industrial context (E4) The Political and International context. (F) Planetary Science on the Moon & Mars 13 (G) Astronomy from the Moon 15 (H) Human or Robotic Explorers 15 (I) Costs and Funding issues 19 (J) The Technological Challenge 20 (J1) Launcher Capabilities (J2) Radiation (K) Summary 23 (L) Acknowledgements 23 (M) Appendices: Appendix 1 Expert witnesses consulted & contributions received 24 Appendix 2 Poll of UK Astronomers 25 Appendix 3 Poll of Public Attitudes 26 Appendix 4 Selected Web Sites 27 3 (A) Executive Summary 1. Scientific missions to the Moon and Mars will address questions of profound interest to the human race. These include: the origins and history of the solar system; whether life is unique to Earth; and how life on Earth began. If our close neighbour, Mars, is found to be devoid of life, important lessons may be learned regarding the future of our own planet. 2. While the exploration of the Moon and Mars can and is being addressed by unmanned missions we have concluded that the capabilities of robotic spacecraft will fall well short of those of human explorers for the foreseeable future.
    [Show full text]
  • The Materials and Components for Missiles Innovation and Technology Partnership, MCM ITP Is a Dstl and DGA Sponsored Research Fu
    The Materials and Components for Missiles Innovation and Technology Partnership, MCM ITP is a dstl and DGA sponsored research fund open to all UK or French companies and academic institutions. Launched in 2007, the MCM ITP develops novel, exploitable technologies for generation-after-next missile systems. The MCM ITP aims to consolidate the UK-French Complex Weapons capability, strengthen the technological base and allow better understanding of common future needs. The programme manages a portfolio of over 100 cutting-edge technologies which hold the promise of major advances, but are still at the laboratory stage today. The MCM ITP is aligned into eight technical domains, each of which is led by one of the MCM ITP industrial consortium partners1. 1 The MCM ITP Industrial Consortium partners are: MBDA; THALES; Roxel; Selex ES; Safran Microturbo; QinetiQ; Nexter Munitions. Funding The programme is funded equally by the governments and the industrial partners and is composed of research projects on innovative and exploratory technologies and techniques for future missiles. There is strong participation from SMEs and academia with 76 participating in the programme to date, and a total of 121 organisations involved in the overall programme. With an annual budget of up to 12.5M€ and 30% of the budget targeted towards SMEs and Academia, the MCM has become the cornerstone of future collaborative research and technology demonstration programmes for UK-French missile systems. Conference On 21st and 22nd October 2015, DGA, dstl, MBDA and its partners will review the last two years of the MCM ITP programme, and present the technical advances that have been made possible thanks to this cooperative programme.
    [Show full text]
  • Eurofighter World Editorial 2016 • Eurofighter World 3
    PROGRAMME NEWS & FEATURES DECEMBER 2016 GROSSETO EXCLUSIVE BALTIC AIR POLICING A CHANGING AIR FORCE FIT FOR THE FUTURE 2 2016 • EUROFIGHTER WORLD EDITORIAL 2016 • EUROFIGHTER WORLD 3 CONTENTS EUROFIGHTER WORLD PROGRAMME NEWS & FEATURES DECEMBER 2016 05 Editorial 24 Baltic policing role 42 Dardo 03 Welcome from Volker Paltzo, Germany took over NATO’s Journalist David Cenciotti was lucky enough to CEO of Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH. Baltic Air Policing (BAP) mis - get a back seat ride during an Italian Air Force sion in September with five training mission. Read his eye-opening first hand Eurofighters from the Tactical account of what life onboard the Eurofighter Title: Eurofighter Typoon with 06 At the heart of the mix Air Wing 74 in Neuburg, Typhoon is really like. P3E weapons fit. With the UK RAF evolving to meet new demands we speak to Bavaria deployed to Estonia. Typhoon Force Commander Air Commodore Ian Duguid about the Picture: Jamie Hunter changing shape of the Air Force and what it means for Typhoon. 26 Meet Sina Hinteregger By day Austrian Sina Hinteregger is an aircraft mechanic working on Typhoon, outside work she is one of the country’s best Eurofighter World is published by triathletes. We spoke to her Eurofighter Jagdflugzeug GmbH about her twin passions. 46 Power base PR & Communications Am Söldnermoos 17, 85399 Hallbergmoos Find out how Eurofighter Typhoon wowed the Tel: +49 (0) 811-80 1587 crowds at AIRPOWER16, Austria’s biggest Air [email protected] 12 Master of QRA Show. Editorial Team Discover why Eurofighter Typhoon’s outstanding performance and 28 Flying visit: GROSSETO Theodor Benien ability make it the perfect aircraft for Quick Reaction Alert.
    [Show full text]
  • Relazione Finanziaria Semestrale Al 30 Giugno 2018
    RELAZIONE FINANZIARIA SEMESTRALE AL 30 GIUGNO 2018 Relazione finanziaria semestrale al 30 giugno 2018 INDICE ORGANI SOCIALI E COMITATI ................................................................................................. 4 RELAZIONE SULL’ANDAMENTO DELLA GESTIONE AL 30 GIUGNO 2018 ................... 5 Risultati del Gruppo e situazione finanziaria .......................................................................................... 5 Outlook .................................................................................................................................................. 14 Operazioni industriali e finanziarie ....................................................................................................... 15 Operazioni con parti correlate ............................................................................................................... 17 Indicatori di performance “non-GAAP” ............................................................................................... 18 BILANCIO CONSOLIDATO SEMESTRALE ABBREVIATO AL 30 GIUGNO 2018.......... 22 Conto economico abbreviato separato consolidato ............................................................................... 23 Conto economico complessivo consolidato .......................................................................................... 24 Situazione patrimoniale finanziaria abbreviata consolidata .................................................................. 25 Rendiconto finanziario consolidato ......................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • UK Space Agency Civil Space Strategy 2012-2016
    UK Space Agency Civil Space Strategy An executive agency of the Department of Business, Innovation UK SPACE AGENCY Polaris House, North Star Avenue, Swindon, Wiltshire, SN2 1SZ Tel +44(0)207 215 5000 Email [email protected] Web www.bis.gov.uk/ukspaceagency CIVIL SPACE STRATEGY 2012-2016 The UK Space Agency To lead and sustain the growth of the UK Space Sector Foreword A strategy is more than simply words. A strategy demonstrates that we are carefully considering the options available to us; that we have an eye on the long-term, and most importantly, that we are committed to action. We are currently celebrating the 50th anniversary of the UK’s first foray into space, recognizing the pioneers who first ventured into unknown scientific territory with the Ariel-1 satellite. In the intervening half-century, space has become part of our lives. We use its technology to navigate our streets, access the internet and communicate around the globe. And UK space expertise has cemented Britain at the forefront of the exploration of our Universe. We have landed the Huygens probe on Titan, flown by Halley’s comet with the Giotto mission, probed the mysteries of the Universe with Herschel and Planck, and advanced our understanding of planet Earth through the Envisat and Cryosat missions. Today, space continues to be a key sector for Britain’s future. Its economic contribution to the UK economy is impressive. Total space-related turnover was £9.1 billion in 2010/11 (compared to £7.5 billion in 2008/09). This represents a real growth of 15.6% since 2008/09.
    [Show full text]
  • The Economic Impact of Physics Research in the UK: Satellite Navigation Case Study
    The economic impact of physics research in the UK: Satellite Navigation Case Study A report for STFC November 2012 Contents Executive Summary................................................................................... 3 1 The science behind satellite navigation......................................... 4 1.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 4 1.2 The science................................................................................................ 4 1.3 STFC’s role in satellite navigation.............................................................. 6 1.4 Conclusions................................................................................................ 8 2 Economic impact of satellite navigation ........................................ 9 2.1 Introduction ................................................................................................ 9 2.2 Summary impact of GPS ........................................................................... 9 2.3 The need for Galileo................................................................................. 10 2.4 Definition of the satellite navigation industry............................................ 10 2.5 Methodological approach......................................................................... 11 2.6 Upstream direct impacts .......................................................................... 12 2.7 Downstream direct impacts.....................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009
    Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009 CAPITAL ANALYTICS UK REGISTRARS BENCHMARKING SURVEY 2009 September 2009 © Copyright, 2009 Capital Analytics Limited. All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means without permission from Capital Analytics Limited. No advertising or other promotional use can be made of the information in this report without the express prior written consent of Capital Analytics Limited. Capital Analytics UK Registrars Benchmarking Survey 2009 CONTENTS SURVEY PURPOSE AND METHODOLOGY ................................................................................... 4 Purpose ................................................................................................................................................ 4 Methodology ........................................................................................................................................ 4 COMPANY SATISFACTION INDEX 2009 ........................................................................................ 6 INDUSTRY ANNUAL OVERALL COMPARISON 2005 - 2009 ...................................................... 7 OVERALL SATISFACTION WITH SERVICES .............................................................................. 8 Comments on Overall Satisfaction with Services ................................................................................ 8 Overall Satisfaction with Registrar ..................................................................................................
    [Show full text]
  • Improving Gender Balance in FTSE Leadership
    Hampton-Alexander Review FTSE Women Leaders Improving gender balance in FTSE Leadership November 2017 Sponsored by Leading by Example When it comes to improving gender diversity, successful organisations recognise the need to implement only a few highly impactful initiatives - and do them well. Here we feature some of the recent innovations and different thinking seen across a variety of industries. Inclusion by Getting talented women design back into the workforce In 2016 BHP set an aspirational Vodafone is on a progressive goal of achieving gender balance journey to be the world’s best globally by 2025. To achieve this, employer of women by 2025. we actively redesigned the nature of the tasks and 28% of Vodafone’s management the qualifications required in specific jobs. and leadership roles are held by women and it has publicly-declared an ambition to get to 30% and At BHP’s Mooka Ore Car Repair Shop in Western beyond by 2020. Australia, the Mooka team redesigned their processes to reduce the need for specialist Vodafone was the first company to launch a global technical roles in the maintenance of ore cars. maternity programme in 2015, and built on this in This involved the introduction of automated 2017 by launching the world’s largest recruitment guided vehicles and a robotic gantry system which programme for women returning from career avoids the need for rigging licences, and the breaks. mechanisation of tasks that formerly required heavy lifting means physical force is no longer required to ReConnect is a global recruitment programme perform tasks safely. Separating tasks that required spanning 26 countries, aimed at recruiting female a trade-qualified operator from those that don’t managers back into the workplace from a potential has enabled participation from a much wider talent pool of 96 million skilled women on career breaks.
    [Show full text]
  • United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland
    SPACE DEBRIS MITIGATION STANDARDS UNITED KINGDOM OF GREAT BRITAIN AND NORTHERN IRELAND National mechanism: Outer Space Act 1986 (OSA) Description: The Outer Space Act is the legal basis for the regulation of activities in outer space (including the launch and operation of space objects) carried out by persons connected with the United Kingdom. The Act confers licensing and other powers on the Secretary of State acting through the UK Space Agency. The Act ensures compliance with UK obligations under the international conventions covering the use of outer space to which the UK is a signatory. Under the legislation of the OSA, the Secretary of State shall not grant a licence unless he is satisfied that the activities authorised by the licence will not jeopardise public health or the safety of persons or property, will be consistent with the international obligations of the United Kingdom, and will not impair the national security of the United Kingdom. Further the Secretary of State requires the licensee to conduct his operations in such a way as to prevent the contamination of outer space or adverse changes in the environment of the Earth, and to avoid interference with activities of others in the peaceful exploration and use of outer space. The Secretary of State requires the licensee to insure himself against liability incurred in respect of damage or loss suffered by third parties, in the United Kingdom or elsewhere, as a result of the activities authorised by the licence. Further the licensee shall indemnify Her Majesty’s government in the United Kingdom against any claims brought against the government in respect of damage or loss arising out of activities carried on by him to which this Act applies.
    [Show full text]
  • Symbol Code Description Exchange Description Rating New Rating FB:Xnas Facebook Inc
    Symbol Code Description Exchange Description Rating New Rating FB:xnas Facebook Inc. NASDAQ 4 3 GILD:xnas Gilead Sciences Inc. NASDAQ 3 2 VALE:xnys Vale SA New York Stock Exchange 3 4 BMW:xetr BMW AG Deutsche Börse (XETRA) 2 3 TWTR:xnys Twitter Inc. New York Stock Exchange 4 3 SAN:xmce Banco Santander SA BME Spanish Exchanges 2 3 RPTP:xnas Raptor Pharmaceutical Corp. NASDAQ 8 7 MTN:xjse MTN Group Ltd Johannesburg Stock Exchange 3 2 MAERSKb:xcse A.P. Møller - Mærsk B NASDAQ OMX Copenhagen 2 3 ICPT:xnas Intercept Pharmaceuticals Inc. NASDAQ 5 6 PRE:xtse Pacific Rubiales Energy Corp. Toronto Stock Exchange 6 7 BCP:xlis Banco Comercial Portugues SA Euronext Lisbon 5 4 GAM:xswx GAM Holding AG SIX Swiss Exchange 5 4 PAH3:xetr Porsche Automobil Holding SE Deutsche Börse (XETRA) 2 3 LHA:xetr Deutsche Lufthansa AG Deutsche Börse (XETRA) 4 3 BBVA:xmce Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA BME Spanish Exchanges 2 3 ESPR:xnas Esperion Therapeutics Inc. NASDAQ 6 7 SKY:xlon Sky Plc London Stock Exchange 3 2 ATVI:xnas Activision Inc. NASDAQ 4 3 GRPN:xnas Groupon Inc. NASDAQ 5 4 ADVS:xnas Advent Software Inc. NASDAQ 3 4 UHR:xvtx Swatch Group AG SIX Swiss Exchange (Blue-Chip) 2 3 GNFT:xpar Genfit Euronext Paris 5 6 PCYC:xnas Pharmacyclics Inc. NASDAQ (Small cap) 5 4 RIO:xlon Rio Tinto Plc London Stock Exchange 2 3 CABK:xmce CaixaBank SA BME Spanish Exchanges 2 3 AGL:xmil Autogrill SpA Borsa Italiana/Milan Stock Exchange 4 3 HLT:xnys Hilton Worldwide Holdings Inc.
    [Show full text]
  • Ew Test and Evaluation - Assuring Survivability and Operational Effectiveness
    EW TEST AND EVALUATION - ASSURING SURVIVABILITY AND OPERATIONAL EFFECTIVENESS Dr. Mike Pywell - EW Technologist & Project/Engineering Manager – Typhoon EW Rig Support Equipment Mitch Midgley-Davies – Technical Lead - Typhoon Avionics Sensors Future Capability (Radar/EW) Electromagnetic Engineering Department BAE SYSTEMS, Military Air & Information © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 1 Introduction Contents • Survival – man-made and unintentional threats • EW importance to survivability, mission success and affordability • Description of EW systems • Challenges facing the EW Test and Evaluation community • EW T&E process and capabilities • Description of significant developments to date • Moving EW T&E from flight towards modelling and simulation Security statement: Unclassified © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 2 Survival - Unintentional Threats • Lightning Strike • High intensity radiated fields (HiRF) • Electro-static discharge Bruce Fisher’s F-106B Typhoon undergoing full-threat Delta Dart was struck 714 lightning strike testing in BAE times during lightning Lightning strikes near taxying C-130 SYSTEMS EW Test Facility Hercules in Iraq research missions USAF Photo: Senior Airman James Croxon NASA Report SP-2003-4529 © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 3 Survival - Man-made Threats © Reproduced with the kind permission of Jane’s Information Group © BAE Systems 2013. All rights reserved. DEAL 5868 4 Typical Missile Engagement Ranges vs. Missile Volume SA-21 SA-20 SA-10 SA-12 • Patriot SA-11, SA-17 SA-6 SA-3 SA-15 SA-19 SA-8 SA-16 SA-13 Roland SA-9 •SA-18 SA-14 • Rapier • Javelin SA-7 (USAF Photo by Airman 1st Class Jonathan Snyder) © BAE Systems 2013.
    [Show full text]
  • Half-Year Financial Report at 30 June 2013 Finmeccanica
    HALF-YEAR FINANCIAL REPORT AT 30 JUNE 2013 FINMECCANICA Disclaimer This Half-Year Financial Report at 30 June 2013 has been translated into English solely for the convenience of the international reader. In the event of conflict or inconsistency between the terms used in the Italian version of the report and the English version, the Italian version shall prevail, as the Italian version constitutes the sole official document. CONTENTS BOARDS AND COMMITTEES ...................................................................................................... 4 REPORT ON OPERATIONS AT 30 JUNE 2013 .......................................................................... 5 Group results and financial position in the first half of 2013 .................................................................. 5 Outlook ................................................................................................................................................. 12 “Non-GAAP” alternative performance indicators ................................................................................. 22 Industrial and financial transactions ...................................................................................................... 26 Corporate Governance .......................................................................................................................... 29 CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED HALF-YEAR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AT 30 JUNE 2013 ..................................................................................................................................................
    [Show full text]