Modeling of the Electroacoustic Coupling of Electrostatic Microphones Including the Preamplifier Circuit
Total Page:16
File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb
Electroacoustics and Audio Engineering: Paper ICA2016-193 Modeling of the electroacoustic coupling of electrostatic microphones including the preamplifier circuit Bernardo Henrique Pereira Murta(a), Eric Brandão(b), Julio Cordioli(c), William D’A. Fonseca(d), Paulo H. Mareze(e) (a, b, d, e)Federal University of Santa Maria, Acoustical Engineering, Santa Maria, RS, Brazil, [email protected], [email protected] (c)Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil, [email protected] Abstract: This research aims to study tools to model and design electrostatic microphones coupled with its preamplifier circuits. The outcome is the access to their combined sensitivities curves, which allows the design of microphones with a wider and flat bandwidth. Analytical and numerical mod- eling techniques are explored and compared. On one hand, the lumped parameters approach is the basis of the analytical modeling of acoustic transducers. That is, this technique allows the engineer to design the transducer and its preamplifier circuit by predicting its sensitivity changes due to variations of model properties with low computational cost. On the other hand, numerical analysis is carried out using the Finite Element Method with a multiphysics approach, which is able to solve both the transducer model and the coupled electrical circuit. Two microphones with different complexities and constructive characteristics are studied. For validation of the proposed techniques, the behavior of a commercial measurement microphone model that has been well studied in the literature is considered. Once the validation of the modeling approach is satisfac- tory, one can use the same methodology to study a piezoelectric microphone for hearing aid applications, for instance. Its frequency response requires a designed preamplifier which should be able to make its sensitivity flatter over the audio bandwidth and to improve its output voltage level. The research also objectifies to analyze the whole chain of energy transducing and signal conditioning in order to prepare the fully coupled model for optimization procedures. The goal is to conceive efficient high-performance systems with low cost hardware. Keywords: electroacoustics, microphone modelling, finite element method Modeling of the electroacoustic coupling of electrostatic microphones including the preamplifier circuit 1 Introduction Computational modeling of microphones has been extensively used during design stages of transducers, mainly, in order to reduce unnecessarily prototyping costs. Thus, it is possible to select arbitrary geometries and material compositions to achieve microphones with specific characteristics as wide and flat bandwidth or particular sensitivities. Optimization methods, as the genetic algorithm, can be implemented to solve transducer models aiming to select the best fit for shapes and materials, searching for desired responses [1,2]. Robust numeric methods as the Finite Element Method (FEM) and the Boundary Element Method (BEM) are implemented in several commercial software, allowing the multiphysics modeling of complex geometry transducers with different materials [3]. However, as an outcome, a high computational cost is a common obstacle in the application of optimization techniques to such models. An alternative is the development of analytical methods to solve simplified situations. Generally, it is possible to achieve smaller solution time with a satisfactory representation of the designed transducer. A common approach to solve such devices is the equivalent circuit method, which was extensively used during the 60’s and 70’s, especially due to the advent of computers [4]. This approach consists of replacing the differential equations that represent each relevant characteristic of the transducer by analog electrical circuit elements, such as capacitors, inductors and resistors. For each of the physics that comprehend the transducer (acoustical, mechanical and electrical) a sub-circuit is derived and coupled by means of transformers to the adjacent physics. Therefore, a single circuit representing the whole acoustic-mechanic-electrical transducing chain of a microphone can be constructed and solved via the Kirchhoff Laws [5]. Many limitations and simplifications are required to apply correctly the analog circuit technique. On one hand, analyzed wavelengths must be larger than the transducer’s dimensions. Thus, the energy will be evenly (or with low variations) spatially distributed [6, 7], meaning that the microphone’s diaphragm moves as a rigid body. On the other hand, the complexity of the transducer’s elements as multi-material diaphragms or non-basic and asymmetric geometries cannot be well represented. To circumvent those limitations, new researches aim to develop higher complexity methods considering boundary conditions, geometries and materials [6, 8, 9]. Based on different models, it is possible to forge small details of microphones, for example, the influence of a perforated backplate facing the transducer’s diaphragm [10] in its frequency response [11]. All that brings an important role in computational models in the industry [12] may be a relevant tool to decrease design costs. There are still several limitations when considering the development of modern transducers such as microelectromechanical systems (MEMS). They may present multi-material non-usual geometries [7, 9] when compared to regular microphones as well when modeling anisotropic piezoelectric materials [13]. Thus, the development of new studies to include such conditions in equivalent circuit approach is desired Another step in the modeling process is considering integrated designed preamplifiers capable 2 of providing adequate signal conditioning for the studied transducer. Such circuits are required, for example, to couple the high output impedance of capacitive and piezoelectric microphones with the small input impedance of the following stages such as analog-to-digital converter (ADC) and digital signal processing devices. Furthermore, analog filters and gain stages to adjust the frequency response of the modeled transducer may be necessary when low-cost devices are the target of a study. 2 Equivalent circuit method The equivalent circuit of a transducer depends on its geometrical properties, composition of materials and the boundary conditions of its mounting. The analysis is subdivided into three domains, each one containing its own circuit and coupled by means of ideal transformers. There is the acoustic circuit, in which the incident sound pressure and the volume velocity of air around the diaphragm are modeled. Then, the mechanical domain models the diaphragm as a one degree of freedom system, computing its velocity and the associated forces. Finally, the electrical domain solves the electromechanical coupling and the voltage across the microphone’s terminal. 2.1 Acoustical domain (A.D.) The acoustical equivalent circuit is dependent of the transducer’s geometry, as shown in Figure1. Thus, to each element interacting with the sound pressure waves an impedance is attributed. The acoustical impedances are defined as the ratio between the incident pressure Pe and the produced volume velocity Qe˙, thus Zea = Pe=Qe˙ [kg=sm4]. Here the tilde notation represents the complex harmonic amplitude and the dot is the time derivative. Passive circuit elements are used to model those impedances. Thus, resistors are used to represent the damping elements while the reactive parts of the impedances are modeled by ca- pacitors (associated to acoustical compliance) and inductors (corresponding to acoustical mass). Specific properties and analytical equations describing some commonly found impedances in equivalent acoustical circuits of microphones are presented in the following. The incident pressure over the transducer’s diaphragm is modeled by an ideal AC voltage source, which magnitude is defined as the sound pressure in Pascal (Pa). Cavities delimiting air volumes V are represented by an acoustical compliance, as the capaci- 3 tance Ca m =Pa [6], given as: V Ca = 2 ; (1) r0c0 where r0 is the air density and c0 the speed of sound in the medium for the ambient conditions. Tube elements with radius at smaller than at < 0;4 mm are considered small ducts [14]. This impedance is commonly present in measurement microphones as the pressure equalization vent. Their acoustical impedance Zat is given by: 8h0l 4r0l Zat = 4 + jw 4 ; (2) pat 3pat 3 Rabp Mabp P Raslit Maslit ˙ e Zeraddia P2 Qe 1:Sd Xe˙ P1 Mateq Rateq Ca2 Ca1 ... M.D.,E.D. Zeradteq P0 A.D. Figure 1: Equivalent circuit of the capacitive B&K 4134 microphone (right) and its schematic (left). where w = 2p f is the angular frequency, h the air’s viscosity and l tube’s length. The small duct acoustical resistance Rat kg=m4s is obtained by 8h0l Rat = 4 ; (3) pat where h0 is air viscosity and l tube length. The reactive part, with inductive behavior, is modelled by the acoustical mass Mat kg=m4 calculated by 4r0l . Mat = 4 (4) 3pat The slits can be found between the microphone’s backplate andp its carcass, for example. A narrow slit is defined when its thickness tslit is smaller than 0,003/ f or tslit <0,6 mm. According to Beranek and Mellow [4], its acoustical resistance Rslit can be estimated by 12h0l Rslit = 3 ; (5) tslitwslit where wslit is the slit’s width and lslit its length. The acoustical mass Mslit is given by 6r0lslit Mslit = . (6) 5tslitwslit A rigid disk is considered micro-perforated when the diameter (2aholes) of its holes is sub-