20040107-BRC-Meeting Transcript

Total Page:16

File Type:pdf, Size:1020Kb

20040107-BRC-Meeting Transcript 1 STATE OF CALIFORNIA 2 GOVERNOR’S BLUE RIBBON FIRE COMMISSION 3 4 5 BEFORE THE GOVERNOR’S BLUE ) RIBBON FIRE COMMISSION, ) TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS 6 ) January 7, 2004 Senator William Campbell, Chair ) Ventura County, California 7 ) 8 9 CHAIR CAMPBELL: [mid-sentence] laryngitis. And for anybodyin politics, laryngitis is a 10 catastrophic illness. But we’ll try and see how long the voice holds up. We’d like to first of all welcome 11 you to Ventura County. It was the intent of the commission to hold one meeting in each county of the five 12 counties involved in the October/November fires here in Southern California. So, we’d like to ask you to 13 stand at this point and we’d ask the chairperson ofthe Ventura County Board of Supervisors, Judy Mikels, 14 to lead us in the pledge of our flag. 15 [Pledge of Allegiance is recited.] 16 CHAIR CAMPBELL: Thank you. If I might go over some details for the members of the 17 commission. The way in which you turn on your mike is you press the button, the green button, at the 18 bottom. And when you press it a second time, it will turn it off. 19 Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Mym nae is William Campbell and I’m Chair of the 20 Governor’s Blue Ribbon Commission on the fire. The commission members and I welcome you to this 21 third hearing in a review of the state’s efforts tocombat the destructive series of wildland and wildland 22 urban interface fires that scourged Southern California last October and November. The fires burned nearly 23 three-quarters of a million acres, destroyed over 3,600 homes and took the lives of 22 people. And now we 24 are witnessing the tragic aftermath of these fires. Fifteen people lost their lives when a church camp was 25 inundated by a mudslide, resulting from the loss of protective vegetation due to the fires. As the former 26 Chairman of the California State Legislature Select Committees on Fire Services, and as Joint Committee 27 on Fire, Police and Emergency Disaster Services, I have participated in several different reviews of federal, 28 state and local firefighting efforts. We oweto itour communities and the residents and the brave firefighters to take this opportunity to ascertain what government, the private sector, our communities, and Governor’s Blue Ribbon Fire Commission Page 1 of 118 January 7, 2004 1 our families, as well as individuals can do to not only prevent such fires from occurring, but how to better 2 combat them when they do erupt. 3 As you may know, the Blue Ribbon Fire Commission has already conducted two hearings. The 4 first hearing was on Thursday, November 11, 2003, in the Los Angeles area, and the second hearing was on 5 Thursday, December 4, 2003, in the San Bernardino area. Those hearings provided the commission 6 members with an overview and a chronological history of the fires that besieged Southern California during 7 late October and early November. We also nedlear about California’s ildlandw and wildland urban 8 interface firefighting capabilities, the number and types of federal, state, local, military and private sector 9 resources available to combat wildland and wildlandurban interface fires, and how these resources were 10 dispatched and coordinated during the firefighting response. 11 Today’s hearing will address fire prevention and e-firepr management efforts. We are all well 12 aware of the fact that California has a constant and growing population with an ever-increasing demand for 13 new housing. This exploding population has forcedan ever-relentless encroachment of housing and 14 developments into the state’s wildland and rural eas,ar which geometrically increased the difficulty and 15 demand for fire prevention and fire suppression programs and services. However, we cannot simply 16 depend upon an ever-increasing number of fire suppressionresources to solve our wildland fire problems. 17 We must also consider, and encourage, the use of sound, effective fire safety and fire prevention practices. 18 Fire safe building standards and codes, realisticand coordinated fuel reduction programs, and the 19 commitment of communities, families and individuals to fire safety and fire protection practices. These are 20 vital and critical and complimentary programs that support our fire suppression capabilities. We have long 21 known California’s a fire prone state. Our Mediterranean climate, our long, dry summers and Santa Ana 22 winds, chaparral brush and rangelands, and wooded foothills, and the forested mountains, make California 23 a prime target for wildland fires. When you addto this combination California’s burgeoning population, 24 the residential development of our wildland areas,the environmental and air quality regulations that 25 severely impede fuel reduction programs, budgetaryestrictions, r and the malicious acts of cowardly 26 persons, it is no wonder why California’s periodic fire disasters occur. 27 However, such impediments must not deter us in our effort to minimize the wildland fire threat. In 28 today’s hearing, the commission will benefit from the presentation of experts on the benefits and Governor’s Blue Ribbon Fire Commission Page 2 of 118 January 7, 2004 1 roadblocks to sound pre-fire management efforts. Please note, at the conclusion of our invited 2 presentations, anyone wishing to address the commission in regard to our review, will have the opportunity 3 to speak. Those who wish to address the commission oday,t please see Mr. Springer at the end of the dais 4 down there. If you wish to submit written testimony instead, Mr. Springer can inform you on where to 5 send the information. Again, thank you for your attendance. Do any of the commission members wish to 6 comment at this time? If not, we’ll begin first of allwith Dallas Jones. Dallas, we’ve asked Dallas, who’s 7 the Director of the Office of Emergency Services, to review the report of the, I think it’s officially titled the 8 East Bay Hills Fire of 1991, but most of us kind ofcall it the Oakland Hills Fire of 1991. There was a 9 major report done as a result after that, similar to the one we’re doing now, and what we’d like to do is find 10 out what information they garnered from that, howthat information was utilized, what recommendations 11 we adopted, and those that we didn’t adopt, that might have been beneficial. So, Dallas, you’re on. Thank 12 you. 13 DIRECTOR JONES: Mr. Chairman and honored commissioners, I have to say this is the first time 14 in many, many years that I’ve seen the chairman almost speechless. [Laughter.] 15 CHAIR CAMPBELL: Some people are grateful, by the way. 16 DIRECTOR JONES: It’s not really a good thing, because his humor always enlightens our 17 meetings and I always look forward to that, so we’ll try to save his voice as much as possible. 18 I’d like to review with you the lessons learned from the Oakland Hills Fire,or as we called it 19 officially, the 1991 East Bay Hill Fire. We will review some of the recommendations, many of which since 20 the time they were put together, have been implemented in California. The speakers to follow me will 21 review some of those, what they’re doing in their different agencies, but also I believe some of the newer 22 things that we’ve learned in that period of time, also. But first I’d like to overview, a little bit, the fire 23 itself. 24 CHAIR CAMPBELL: For those of you, if you’d like, the presentation will be on the chart at the 25 rear of this room. You might want to turn your chair around a little bit to help you. Otherwise we’ll have a 26 chiropractor on duty to provide services. 27 DIRECTOR JONES: This fire started in residentiala area near the Caldecott Tunnel in the 28 Oakland Hills. Thehomes were built on steep slopes, surrounded by abundant shrubbery and trees. Governor’s Blue Ribbon Fire Commission Page 3 of 118 January 7, 2004 1 Previous fires in the area included the 1970 fire that burned 200+ acres, and 37 homes, and the 1923 fire 2 that destroyed over 600 homes in one hour. It started near a three-acre fire that had burned the previous 3 day and at 0830 the following morning a spark within the burn area was blown into a fuel-rich area outside, 4 and the fire began. Within minutes the fire was out of control. East Bay Hills was a classic -canyon 5 influenced fire with winds rapidly moving it toward residential populations. A thermal inversion layer 6 developed and worked to put a lid on the bowl that trapped the fire. Pre-heated fuels within the bowl made 7 ignition most likely. The fire swept down slope, ivendr by fierce winds, and engulfed brush, trees and 8 homes. Within 15 minutes of the first house ignition,the fire gained such intensity that it looked and 9 behaved like a tornado, much like several of the fires in the recent firestorms. 10 Resources were immediately overtaxed. Communications were inadequate. Water pressurewas 11 insufficient. Narrow streets quickly became blocked. Untreated wood roosts contributed to the rapid 12 spread, and most homes had improper brush clearance. Incoming mutual aid units were unfamiliar with the 13 area. With the first hour had ignited 790 structures, nowthat’s within the first hour of that fire. In the 10 14 hours it burned through Oakland and Berkeley, it ignited homes at a rate of one every 11 seconds.
Recommended publications
  • Why Large Wildfires in Southern California? Refuting the Fire Suppression Paradigm
    5 Why Large Wildfires in Southern California? Refuting the Fire Suppression Paradigm Richard W. Halsey California Chaparral Institute Dylan Tweed California Chaparral Institute Abstract This paper examines the common belief that past fire suppression and “unnatural” fuel build-up are responsible for large, high-intensity fires in southern California. This has been characterized as the fire suppression paradigm or the southern/Baja California fire mosaic hypothesis. While the belief is frequently repeated by the popular media and has been cited in land/fire management documents, support in the scientific community for the hypothesis has been generally restricted to the original author (Minnich 1983) and his students. A significant number of scientists have raised serious questions about the hypothesis. These scientists offer substantial scientific evidence that the fire mosaic hypothesis should be rejected and that fire suppression has not had a significant impact on fire size, intensity, or frequency in shrubland- dominated wildland fires in southern California. The management implications of this research are important because past fire suppression impacts have been used to justify fuel treatment projects on federal, state, and private lands for the purposes of fire risk reduction and the enhancement of wildlife habitat. Keywords: mosaic, fire suppression, chaparral, southern California shrublands, Baja California, wildfire. Introduction Science reliably overturns our intuitions about how the natural world works. Although it is possible for intuitions to be correct, intuition alone is not sufficient evidence that a testable claim is true. If this were not the case, we would still accept the intuition that the sun revolves around the earth or that the earth itself is flat.
    [Show full text]
  • Governor's Blue Ribbon Fire Commission
    Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger State of California Governor’s Blue Ribbon Fire Commission Report to the Governor Senator William Campbell, (Retired) Chairman “Unless and until public policymakers at all levels of government muster the political will to put the protection of life and property ahead of competing political agendas, these tragedies are certain to repeat.” —Senator William Campbell (Ret.), Chairman Blue Ribbon Fire Commission FORWARD In October of 2003, Southern California experienced the most devastating wild land/urban interface fire disaster in its history. According to the California Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, a total of 739,597 acres were burned, 3,631 homes were destroyed and 24 lives were lost, including one firefighter. The aftermath of the fires saw even greater loss of life wherein 16 people perished in a flash flood/mudslide in an area of San Bernardino County due to the loss of vegetation impacted by the fire. The Governor’s Blue Ribbon Fire Commission was established to conduct a review of the efforts to fight the October 2003 wildfires and present recommendations to make California less vulnerable to disasters of such enormity in the future. The Governor’s Blue Ribbon Fire Commission includes the following federal, state, and local partners: Chair California State Senator William “Bill” Campbell (Ret.) Federal Partners U.S. Senate – Dianne Feinstein, Senator U.S. Congress – Susan Davis, Congresswoman U.S. Congress – Jerry Lewis, Congressman U.S. Department of Defense – Peter Verga, Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary U.S. Forest Service – Jerry Williams, Director, Office of Fire & Aviation U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Federal Emergency Management Agency – David Fukutomi, Federal Coordinating Officer U.S.
    [Show full text]
  • CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS 1780 Creekside Oaks Drive, Sacramento, CA 95833
    CALIFORNIA PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS 1780 Creekside Oaks Drive, Sacramento, CA 95833 Adin Fire Protection District Aerojet Fire Services Ken Richardson, Fire Chief Greg Granados, Fire Chief P.O. Box 16 P.O. Box 13222, BLD 02-028 Adin, CA 96006 Sacramento, CA 95813 Office: (530) 299-4700 Fax: Office: (916) 355-4251 Fax: (916) 355-4035 General Email: General Email: Chief Email: Chief Email: [email protected] Dept. Web: Dept. Web: City Web: City Web: MACS Designator: ADI Personnel: Mostly Volunteer MACS Designator: AFS Personnel: Paid County: Modoc Fire Dept. ID: 25005 County: Sacramento Fire Dept. ID: 34003 Agnews Developmental Center Air National Guard Fire Dept. Mike Horton, Fire Chief Christopher Diaz, Fire Chief 3500 Zanker Road 5323 E. McKinley Ave. San Jose, CA 95134 Fresno, CA 93727 Office: (408) 451-7403 Fax: (408) 451-7411 Office: (559) 454-5315 Fax: (559) 454-5329 General Email: General Email: Chief Email: [email protected] Chief Email: [email protected] Dept. Web: Dept. Web: City Web: City Web: MACS Designator: ASH Personnel: Paid MACS Designator: REE Personnel: Paid County: Santa Clara Fire Dept. ID: 43490 County: Fresno Fire Dept. ID: 10800 Alameda City Fire Dept. Alameda County Fire Dept. Doug Long, Fire Chief David Rocha, Fire Chief 1300 Park Street 6363 Clark Avenue Alameda, CA 94501 Dublin, CA 94568 Office: (510) 337-2100 Fax: (510) 521-7851 Office: (925) 833-3473 Fax: (925) 875-9387 General Email: [email protected] General Email: Chief Email: [email protected] Chief Email: [email protected] Dept. Web: www.cityofalamedaca.gov/City-Hall/Fire Dept.
    [Show full text]
  • Identification of Disaster Code Declaration
    State/Tribal Number Date Government Incident Description Declaration Type 1259 11/6/1998 Florida Tropical Storm Mitch Major Disaster Declaration 1258 11/5/1998 Kansas Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration Severe Storms, Flooding and 1257 10/21/1998 Texas Tornadoes Major Disaster Declaration 1256 10/19/1998 Missouri Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1255 10/16/1998 Washington Landslide In The City Of Kelso Major Disaster Declaration Severe Storms, Flooding, And 1254 10/14/1998 Kansas Tornadoes Major Disaster Declaration 1253 10/14/1998 Missouri Severe Storms and Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1252 10/5/1998 Washington Flooding Major Disaster Declaration 1251 10/1/1998 Mississippi Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1250 9/30/1998 Alabama Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1249 9/28/1998 Florida Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 3133 9/28/1998 Alabama Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 3132 9/28/1998 Mississippi Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 3131 9/25/1998 Florida Hurricane Georges Emergency Declaration 2248 9/25/1998 Washington Columbia County Fire Management Assistance Declaration 1247 9/24/1998 Puerto Rico Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1248 9/24/1998 Virgin Islands Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration 1245 9/23/1998 Texas Tropical Storm Frances Major Disaster Declaration Tropical Storm Frances and 1246 9/23/1998 Louisiana Hurricane Georges Major Disaster Declaration Hurricane Georges (Direct 3129 9/21/1998 Virgin Islands Federal
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Decision Support System for Prediction of Wildland Fire Weather, Fire Behavior, and Aircraft Hazards
    Colorado Decision Support System for Prediction of Wildland Fire Weather, Fire Behavior, and Aircraft Hazards Kick-off Briefing 3 December 2015 0 Fire Prediction Technology Description The CO-FPS will employ a sophisticated, coupled atmosphere - wildland fire model (e.g., CAWFE®), that generates a high-resolution 4D gridded weather simulation that allows for the production of reports (products) communicating fire behavior and aviation hazard forecasts. Research-to-Operations (R2O) Process Objective: To transition the CAWFE® research capability into a robust operational decision support system (e.g., CO-FPS) that can meet the needs of a broad group of Colorado decision makers. Testbed Definition A framework for conducting rigorous, transparent, and replicable testing of scientific theories and new technologies. The Technology “Valley of Death” The “Valley if Death” is where good research goes to die because of the complexity of the transition process and lack of funding opportunities. CAWFE® has been an R&D effort for 20 years. The CO Legislature and the State Operational Use recognized the potential value of this technology and is leading the effort to operationalize it. Source: ieeecomputingsociety.org Development Approach To reduce risk and ensure that end-user requirements are met throughout the course of the project, the system will be developed using an iterative approach. This approach is consistent with the overall concept that NCAR and the DFPC are in a partnership and will work cooperatively to develop and evolve the system capabilities
    [Show full text]
  • 2009 SAFE Landscapes Ventura County Calendar and Guidebook
    Ventura County Calendar and Guidebook Sustainable and Fire-Safe Landscapes In The Wildland Urban Interface SAFE LANDSCAPES PROJECT SAFE Landscapes (Sustainable And Fire SafE), has developed guidelines for creating and maintaining fire-safe, environmentally-friendly landscapes in the wildland-urban interface that minimize the use and spread of invasive plants. This project is a collaboration between University of California Cooperative Extension – Los Angeles and Ventura Counties, the Ventura County Fire Department, the Los Angeles and San Gabriel Rivers Watershed Council, and numerous governmental, non-profit, and business organizations (listed on the inside back cover) with support from the National Park Service and the Renewable Resources Extension Act. Fire safety in the wildland-urban interface starts in the home, with good practices to avoid starting fires in and around the home, a good fire response plan for your family, and the use of ignition-resistant building materials and architectural features. Beyond the home, develop a fire-resistant landscape, where plants and hardscape are maintained so that they do not easily transmit Ventura County Fire Department County Fire Ventura fire. Establish your defensible space so that the risk of fire transmission to your property is reduced, and fire fighters can safely protect your home. Fire is a part of the natural environment in Southern California. There is no way to completely ensure that your home will not be exposed to wildfire. If you live in a fire hazard severity zone in the wildland-urban interface, it is not a question of IF a fire will occur, but WHEN. Preparation for wildfire requires that YOU take responsibility for your safety, property, and pets in the event of a fire.
    [Show full text]
  • Large Outdoor Fire Modeling (LOFM) Workshop Summary Report
    NIST Special Publication 1245 Large Outdoor Fire Modeling (LOFM) Workshop Summary Report Randall J. McDermott Nelson P. Bryner Jon A. Heintz This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1245 NIST Special Publication 1245 Large Outdoor Fire Modeling (LOFM) Workshop Summary Report Randall J. McDermott Nelson P. Bryner Fire Research Division, Engineering Laboratory Gaithersburg, Maryland Jon A. Heintz Applied Technology Council Redwood City, California This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1245 October 2019 U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary National Institute of Standards and Technology Walter Copan, NIST Director and Undersecretary of Commerce for Standards and Technology Certain commercial entities, equipment, or materials may be identified in this document in order to describe an experimental procedure or concept adequately. Such identification is not intended to imply recommendation or endorsement by the National Institute of Standards and Technology, nor is it intended to imply that the entities, materials, or equipment are necessarily the best available for the purpose. National Institute of Standards and Technology Special Publication 1245 Natl. Inst. Stand. Technol. Spec. Publ. 1245, 118 pages (October 2019) CODEN: NSPUE2 This publication is available free of charge from: https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.SP.1245 ______________________________________________________________________________________________________ Abstract On March 18-19, 2019, NIST held a workshop on Large Outdoor Fire Modeling (LOFM) to assess the state of the art in computational fire modeling and to identify a set of research priorities for driving progress in the development of large outdoor fire models.
    [Show full text]
  • Community Wildfire Planning and Design: a Review and Evaluation of Current Policies and Practices in the Western United States
    Utah State University DigitalCommons@USU All Graduate Theses and Dissertations Graduate Studies 12-2017 Community Wildfire Planning and Design: A Review and Evaluation of Current Policies and Practices in the Western United States Carlene C. Klein Utah State University Follow this and additional works at: https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd Part of the Landscape Architecture Commons Recommended Citation Klein, Carlene C., "Community Wildfire Planning and Design: A Review and Evaluation of Current Policies and Practices in the Western United States" (2017). All Graduate Theses and Dissertations. 6921. https://digitalcommons.usu.edu/etd/6921 This Thesis is brought to you for free and open access by the Graduate Studies at DigitalCommons@USU. It has been accepted for inclusion in All Graduate Theses and Dissertations by an authorized administrator of DigitalCommons@USU. For more information, please contact [email protected]. COMMUNITY WILDFIRE PLANNING AND DESIGN: A REVIEW AND EVLAUATION OF CURRENT POLICIES AND PRACTICES IN THE WESTERN UNITED STATES by Carlene C. Klein A thesis submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of MASTER OF LANDSCAPE ARCHITECTURE Approved: ______________________ ____________________ Barty Warren-Kretzschmar, Ph.D. Richard E. Toth Major Professor Committee Member ______________________ ____________________ Carlos V. Licon, Ph.D. Mark R. McLellan, Ph.D. Committee Member Vice President for Research and Dean of the School of Graduate Studies UTAH STATE UNIVERSITY Logan, Utah 2017 ii Copyright © Carlene C. Klein 2017 All Rights Reserved iii ABSTRACT Community Wildfire Planning & Design: A Review and Evaluation of Current Policies and Practices in the Western United States by Carlene C. Klein, Master of Landscape Architecture Utah State University, 2017 Major Professor: Dr.
    [Show full text]
  • The California Fires Coordination Group a Report to the Secretary of Homeland Security
    The California Fires Coordination Group A Report to the Secretary of Homeland Security February 13, 2004 Office of the Under Secretary U.S. Department of Homeland Security 500 C Street, SW Washington, DC 20472 MEMORANDUM FOR THE SECRETARY From: Michael D. Brown Under Secretary Emergency Preparedness and Response Date: February 13, 2004 Re: California Fires Coordination Group Report I am pleased to present the following report from the interagency California Fires Coordination Group (CFCG). The CFCG successfully expedited disaster response and recovery operations among 13 Federal Agencies and the American Red Cross. In addition guidance was provided to member agencies’ field components as they worked with their partners in State and local governments, tribal authorities, first responders, and voluntary organizations to bring over $483 million in Federal assistance to the people of Southern California. Through the CFCG, the joint Disaster Field Office (DFO) and its Multi-Agency Support Group (MASG), Federal agencies successfully coordinated efforts in partnership with State and local authorities to deliver timely aid to communities in need. Also, post-fire hazards were mitigated through watershed remediation efforts designed to reduce the risk of flash flooding, mudslides, and debris flows. DHS-FEMA and its Federal, State, and local partners remain committed to actively facilitating dialogue among the diverse stakeholders in order to help Californians address their long-term recovery needs. www.fema.gov 2 CONTENTS Executive Summary……………………………………...4
    [Show full text]
  • San Fernando Is in the Process of Creating an Update to the 2014 COUNCILMEMBER CINDY MONTAÑEZ Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (Plan)
    CITY COUNCIL December 30, 2020 MAYOR SYLVIA BALLIN VICE MAYOR 2020 MULTI-HAZARD MITIGATION PLAN MARY MENDOZA The City of San Fernando is in the process of creating an update to the 2014 COUNCILMEMBER CINDY MONTAÑEZ Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan (Plan). The Plan identifies a range of natural hazards within our community. The Plan also provides a list of mitigation action COUNCILMEMBER items that will be used in the future to reduce impacts from the identified HECTOR A. PACHECO hazards. COUNCILMEMBER CELESTE T. RODRIGUEZ Part of the mandated approval process for the Plan requires the City to share the document with the general public as well as external agencies and to solicit input during the plan writing phase. I am asking you to please review this draft version of the Plan and share your comments with me by January 13, 2021. If you are not able to provide your comments by this date, I will move forward with the understanding that you do not have any concerns and you are comfortable with the Plan as it is written. As a colleague in the field of emergency management, I am sure you understand the importance of sharing this information and I hope you will be able to find the time to assist me with this task. Thank you in advance for your time and assistance with this project. I look forward to receiving your comments. Kenneth Jones Management Analyst [email protected] (818) 898-1240 PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT 117 MACNEIL STREET SAN FERNANDO CALIFORNIA 91340 (818) 898-1222 WWW.SFCITY.ORG October 9, 2020 | Multi-Hazard Mitigation Plan Credits Q&A | ELEMENT A: PLANNING PROCESS | A1c.
    [Show full text]
  • Stormwater Contaminant Loading Following Wildfires
    Stormwater contaminant loading following wildfires Eric D. Stein, Jeffrey S. Brown, Terri S. Hogue1, Megan P. Burke1 and Alicia Kinoshita1 southwestern United States, western South Africa, ABSTRACT Chile, northern Spain and Portugal, and southwestern Contaminant loading associated with stormwater Australia. However, the frequency and intensity of runoff from recently burned areas is poorly under- wildfires has increased in association with human stood, despite the fact that it has the potential to affect activities in and near natural forest and foothill areas downstream water quality. The goal of this study is (Syphard et al. 2007) and is expected to continue to assess regional patterns of runoff and contaminant increasing in association with changes in climate pat- loading from wildfires in urban fringe areas of terns (Westerling et al. 2006). In addition to habitat southern California. Post-fire stormwater runoff was destruction, wildfires have been shown to have the sampled from five wildfires that each burned between ability to mobilize contaminants. For example, 2 115 and 658 km of natural open space between 2003 combustion of plants and natural materials has been and 2009. Between two and five storm events were reported to release metals which are subsequently sampled per site over the first one to two years follow- mobilized (Caldwell et al. 2000, Yamasoe et al. ing the fires for basic constituents, metals, nutrients, 2000, Bitner et al. 2001, Amirbahman et al. 2004, TSS, and PAHs. Results were compared to data from Kelly et al. 2006, Burke et al. 2010), polycyclic 16 unburned natural areas and 6 developed sites. aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs; Jenkins et al.
    [Show full text]
  • Colorado Decision Support System for Prediction of Wildland Fire Weather, Fire Behavior, and Aircraft Hazards
    Colorado Decision Support System for Prediction of Wildland Fire Weather, Fire Behavior, and Aircraft Hazards Stakeholder Meeting #2 26 January 2016 CoE, Rifle, CO 0 Introduction of research comparing CAWFE® accuracy to current decision support systems Dr. Janice Coen, Project Scientist Presented by: Bill Mahoney, Deputy Director, Research Applications Laboratory Status of operational fire behavior models • Weather is the wildcard in a wildland fire event. • Current models (FARSITE, NTFB, FSPro) similarly: • Estimate how fast the leading edge of the fire will spread, based on effects of wind speed, terrain, & fuel properties or fire spread probability • Use station measurements, simple approximations, or coarse weather forecast grids (e.g., 5-km NDFD grids) • Frequently require calibrating inputs to capture observed fire behavior • Do not include how the fire creates its own weather • Current tools are weak in these (and other) events below: Others: - Fire whirls (Missionary Ridge) - Backfires (Spade Fire) - Splitting/fire- induced + wind- Plume-driven fires (fire- driven heads induced winds) Mountain airflows Cloud gust fronts - Chimney effect CAWFE® Testing and Verification Cases Simulated large wildfires in many fuel & weather conditions: • Little Bear Fire, NM • Simi Fire, CA • Big Elk Fire, CO • High Park Fire, CO • Troy Fire, CA • Hayman Fire, CO • Esperanza Fire, CA • Spade Fire, MT • Yarnell Hill Fire, AZ • Real-time simulation of CO fires during 2004 • King Fire, CA ESPERANZA WILDFIRE CAWFE SIMULATION INFRARED DATA FireMapper,
    [Show full text]